Knowledge

Reduced relative clause

Source 📝

783:—an effect whereby a reader begins a sentence with one interpretation, and later is forced to backtrack and re-analyze the sentence's structure. The diagram below illustrates the garden path effect in the sentence "the florist sent the flowers was pleased," where (1) represents the initial structure assigned to the sentence, (2) represents the garden path effect elicited when the reader encounters "was" and has nowhere to put it, and (3) represents the re-analysis of the sentence as containing a reduced relative clause. 779:) he or she can interpret it in two different ways: as a main verb, or the first verb of a reduced relative clause. Linguist David W. Carrol gives the example of "the florist sent...", which could either go on to form a sentence such as "the florist sent the flowers to the elderly widow" (in which "sent" is the main verb), or one such as "the florist sent the flowers was very pleased" (in which "sent" is the beginning of a reduced relative clause). Sentences like this often produce a 448: 868:
subject "defendant" is animate and could be the do-er of the action) and sentences in which the garden path effect was less likely (as in "the evidence examined...", where the subject "evidence" is not animate and thus could not be doing the examining). Reduced relative clauses have also been used in studies of
867:
can affect how a reader or listener initially parses a sentence. For example, one study compared sentences in which the garden path effect was more likely because the reduced relative verb was one that was likely to be used as a main verb for its subject (as in "the defendant examined...", where the
891:, non-reduced relative clauses may also cause temporary ambiguity because the relativizer does not precede the relative clause (and thus a person reading or hearing the relative clause has no "warning" that they are in a relative clause). 720:, the use of reduced relative clauses, particularly when nested, can give rise to sentences which, while theoretically correct grammatically, are not readily parsed by listeners. A well-known example put forward by linguists is " 855:
Across languages, reduced relative clauses often give rise to temporary ambiguity (garden path effects), since the first word of a reduced clause may initially be interpreted as part of the
625:
Reduced relative clauses have no such relative pronoun or complementizer introducing them. The example below contrasts an English non-reduced relative clause and reduced relative clause.
721: 787: 859:. Therefore, reduced relative clauses have been the subject of "an enormous number of experiments" in psycholinguistics, especially for investigating whether 813:, which assumes deep structures and surface structures in language. Frameworks that assume no underlying form label non-finite reduced relative clauses as 801:, or words that can have more than one meaning), they are the "classic" example of garden path sentences, and have been the subject of the most research. 619: 998:彭聃龄 (Peng Danling); 刘松林 (Liu Songlin) (1993). "汉语句子理解中语义分析与句法分析的关系 (Syntactic and semantic analysis in Chinese sentence comprehension)". 809:
Not all grammatical frameworks include reduced relative clauses. The term reduced relative clause comes from transformational
475: 365: 1090: 325: 1123:
Juffs, Alan (1998). "Main Verb Versus Reduced Relative Clause Ambiguity Resolution in L2 Sentence Processing".
385: 330: 103: 360: 51: 932: 305: 171: 767:
of the relative clause, and the relative clause is in passive voice), the most famous example of which is
1214: 869: 793:
While reduced relative clauses are not the only structures that create garden path sentences in English (
425: 131: 1209: 468: 415: 315: 141: 872:, to compare how native speakers handled reduced relatives and how non-native speakers handle them. 794: 1204: 539:
Another form of reduced relative clause is the "reduced object passive relative clause", a type of
320: 263: 78: 420: 258: 235: 864: 759:") can give rise to confusion concerning a special form of reduced relative clause, called the 370: 337: 290: 206: 186: 166: 68: 46: 41: 1019:"Meaning Through Syntax: Language Comprehension and the Reduced Relative Clause Construction" 146: 16:
Dependent clause without a connecting pronoun, such as "the man (that) I saw" without "that"
1023: 924: 461: 390: 300: 181: 126: 23: 1151:
Issues in head-final relative clauses in Chinese: Derivation, processing, and acquisition.
8: 571: 231: 161: 136: 108: 775:
In sentences such as this, when the reader or hearer encounters the verb (in this case,
1045: 1018: 810: 780: 563: 451: 430: 400: 355: 310: 278: 268: 156: 151: 1050: 884: 798: 567: 447: 295: 273: 216: 1132: 1040: 1032: 888: 880: 737: 583: 540: 501: 395: 226: 221: 196: 191: 176: 544: 493: 1036: 505: 240: 1198: 900: 856: 764: 752: 717: 1136: 1054: 741: 283: 73: 615: 435: 410: 31: 876: 814: 744: 405: 88: 860: 559: 528:." Unreduced forms of this relative clause would be "This is the man 380: 375: 211: 201: 93: 83: 997: 786: 590:. They are typically introduced by one of the relative pronouns 722:
Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo
98: 614:, which may be analyzed either as a relative pronoun or as a 1187:
Sentence Comprehension: The Integration of Habits and Rules
587: 839:
must be left in the bicycle racks. (full relative clause)
846:
must be left in the bicycle racks. (participial phrase)
1184: 728:(meaning "which buffalo from Buffalo (do) buffalo"). 1016: 586:(or "subordinate clause") that usually modifies a 1175: 850: 1075: 1073: 984: 982: 980: 763:(so called because the noun being modified is the 1149:See, e.g., Peng (1993), and Hsu, Natalie (2006). 1196: 1178:Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar 1171:(5 ed.). Belmont: Thomson & Wadsworth. 1070: 977: 1180:. Los Angeles: University of California Press. 724:", which contains the reduced relative clause 825:will receive a refund. (full relative clause) 469: 947: 1153:Ph.D. dissertation, University of Delaware. 970: 968: 832:will receive a refund. (participial phrase) 1185:Townsend, David J; Thomas G Bever (2001). 476: 462: 1176:Li, Charles N; Sandra A Thompson (1981). 1107: 1044: 524:in the English sentence "This is the man 965: 956: 627: 582:Regular relative clauses are a class of 1088: 1197: 1166: 1061: 761:reduced object relative passive clause 558:Reduced relative clauses are given to 1122: 1017:McKoon, Gail; Roger Ratcliff (2003). 953:Li & Thompson 1981:579–580. 919: 917: 915: 1095:. American Book Company. p. 232 863:information or information from the 795:other forms of garden path sentences 366:Conservative and innovative language 991: 771:The horse raced past the barn fell. 731: 13: 1089:Kimball, Lillian Gertrude (1912). 912: 785: 570:study, especially in the field of 566:, and have been a common topic of 14: 1226: 851:Use in psycholinguistic research 755:past tense (i.e., "the ball was 446: 1159: 1143: 1116: 1082: 1000:心理学报 (Acta Psychologica Sinica) 929:The Internet Grammar of English 577: 1079:Townsend & Bever 2001:248. 1010: 610:—and, in English, by the word 1: 988:Townsend & Bever 2001:247 740:, the similarity between the 933:University College of London 804: 306:Functional discourse grammar 172:Ethnography of communication 7: 1037:10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.490 894: 870:second-language acquisition 747:form of verbs (i.e., "John 716:Because of the omission of 520:. An example is the clause 426:Second-language acquisition 10: 1231: 879:relative clauses, such as 104:Syntax–semantics interface 837:that are ridden to school 416:Philosophy of linguistics 316:Interactional linguistics 1167:Carrol, David W (2008). 906: 823:who are living on campus 797:include those caused by 1189:. Cambridge: MIT Press. 1137:10.1111/1467-9922.00034 726:Buffalo buffalo buffalo 702:Reduced relative clause 674:Reduced relative clause 490:reduced relative clause 1169:Psychology of Language 790: 773: 618:(complementizer); see 500:marked by an explicit 253:Theoretical frameworks 207:Philosophy of language 187:History of linguistics 925:"Subordinate Clauses" 789: 769: 547:, such as the clause 147:Conversation analysis 1024:Psychological Review 391:Internet linguistics 301:Construction grammar 815:participial phrases 751:the ball") and the 620:That as relativizer 572:sentence processing 564:garden path effects 555:can be dangerous." 326:Systemic functional 121:Applied linguistics 63:General linguistics 1215:Syntactic entities 875:In languages with 811:generative grammar 791: 781:garden path effect 431:Theory of language 401:Origin of language 356:Autonomy of syntax 311:Grammaticalization 157:Discourse analysis 152:Corpus linguistics 1210:Psycholinguistics 1125:Language Learning 799:lexical ambiguity 714: 713: 710: 703: 698: 668: 661: 656: 551:in: "The animals 486: 485: 274:Distributionalism 217:Psycholinguistics 1222: 1190: 1181: 1172: 1154: 1147: 1141: 1140: 1120: 1114: 1113:Carrol 2008:137. 1111: 1105: 1104: 1102: 1100: 1086: 1080: 1077: 1068: 1065: 1059: 1058: 1048: 1014: 1008: 1007: 995: 989: 986: 975: 974:Carrol 2008:136. 972: 963: 962:Carrol 2008:294. 960: 954: 951: 945: 944: 942: 940: 921: 844:ridden to school 830:living on campus 732:Non-finite types 706: 701: 694: 664: 659: 652: 628: 584:dependent clause 568:psycholinguistic 541:nonfinite clause 502:relative pronoun 478: 471: 464: 450: 396:LGBT linguistics 386:Internationalism 361:Compositionality 222:Sociolinguistics 197:Neurolinguistics 192:Interlinguistics 177:Ethnomethodology 19: 18: 1230: 1229: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1205:English grammar 1195: 1194: 1193: 1162: 1157: 1148: 1144: 1121: 1117: 1112: 1108: 1098: 1096: 1092:English Grammar 1087: 1083: 1078: 1071: 1066: 1062: 1015: 1011: 996: 992: 987: 978: 973: 966: 961: 957: 952: 948: 938: 936: 923: 922: 913: 909: 897: 853: 807: 734: 708: 696: 687:was humongous. 666: 660:Relative clause 654: 645:was humongous. 632:Relative clause 580: 545:past participle 494:relative clause 482: 441: 440: 351: 343: 342: 254: 246: 245: 241:Writing systems 132:Anthropological 122: 114: 113: 64: 56: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1228: 1218: 1217: 1212: 1207: 1192: 1191: 1182: 1173: 1163: 1161: 1158: 1156: 1155: 1142: 1131:(1): 107–147. 1115: 1106: 1081: 1069: 1067:Carrol 2008:5. 1060: 1031:(3): 490–525. 1009: 990: 976: 964: 955: 946: 910: 908: 905: 904: 903: 896: 893: 852: 849: 848: 847: 840: 833: 826: 806: 803: 733: 730: 718:function words 712: 711: 704: 699: 692: 689: 688: 685: 680: 677: 670: 669: 662: 657: 650: 647: 646: 643: 638: 635: 579: 576: 506:complementizer 484: 483: 481: 480: 473: 466: 458: 455: 454: 443: 442: 439: 438: 433: 428: 423: 421:Prescriptivism 418: 413: 408: 403: 398: 393: 388: 383: 378: 373: 368: 363: 358: 352: 349: 348: 345: 344: 341: 340: 335: 334: 333: 328: 323: 318: 313: 308: 303: 298: 288: 287: 286: 281: 276: 271: 266: 255: 252: 251: 248: 247: 244: 243: 238: 229: 224: 219: 214: 209: 204: 199: 194: 189: 184: 179: 174: 169: 164: 159: 154: 149: 144: 139: 134: 129: 123: 120: 119: 116: 115: 112: 111: 106: 101: 96: 91: 86: 81: 76: 71: 65: 62: 61: 58: 57: 55: 54: 49: 44: 38: 35: 34: 28: 27: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1227: 1216: 1213: 1211: 1208: 1206: 1203: 1202: 1200: 1188: 1183: 1179: 1174: 1170: 1165: 1164: 1152: 1146: 1138: 1134: 1130: 1126: 1119: 1110: 1094: 1093: 1085: 1076: 1074: 1064: 1056: 1052: 1047: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1026: 1025: 1020: 1013: 1005: 1001: 994: 985: 983: 981: 971: 969: 959: 950: 934: 930: 926: 920: 918: 916: 911: 902: 901:Dummy pronoun 899: 898: 892: 890: 886: 882: 878: 873: 871: 866: 862: 858: 845: 841: 838: 834: 831: 827: 824: 820: 819: 818: 816: 812: 802: 800: 796: 788: 784: 782: 778: 772: 768: 766: 765:direct object 762: 758: 754: 750: 746: 743: 739: 729: 727: 723: 719: 705: 700: 693: 691: 690: 686: 684: 681: 678: 675: 672: 671: 663: 658: 651: 649: 648: 644: 642: 639: 636: 633: 630: 629: 626: 623: 621: 617: 613: 609: 605: 601: 597: 593: 589: 585: 575: 573: 569: 565: 561: 556: 554: 550: 546: 542: 537: 535: 531: 527: 523: 519: 515: 511: 507: 503: 499: 495: 491: 479: 474: 472: 467: 465: 460: 459: 457: 456: 453: 449: 445: 444: 437: 434: 432: 429: 427: 424: 422: 419: 417: 414: 412: 409: 407: 404: 402: 399: 397: 394: 392: 389: 387: 384: 382: 379: 377: 374: 372: 371:Descriptivism 369: 367: 364: 362: 359: 357: 354: 353: 347: 346: 339: 338:Structuralism 336: 332: 329: 327: 324: 322: 321:Prague circle 319: 317: 314: 312: 309: 307: 304: 302: 299: 297: 294: 293: 292: 289: 285: 282: 280: 277: 275: 272: 270: 267: 265: 262: 261: 260: 257: 256: 250: 249: 242: 239: 237: 233: 230: 228: 225: 223: 220: 218: 215: 213: 210: 208: 205: 203: 200: 198: 195: 193: 190: 188: 185: 183: 180: 178: 175: 173: 170: 168: 167:Documentation 165: 163: 160: 158: 155: 153: 150: 148: 145: 143: 142:Computational 140: 138: 135: 133: 130: 128: 125: 124: 118: 117: 110: 107: 105: 102: 100: 97: 95: 92: 90: 87: 85: 82: 80: 77: 75: 72: 70: 67: 66: 60: 59: 53: 50: 48: 45: 43: 40: 39: 37: 36: 33: 30: 29: 25: 21: 20: 1186: 1177: 1168: 1160:Bibliography 1150: 1145: 1128: 1124: 1118: 1109: 1097:. Retrieved 1091: 1084: 1063: 1028: 1022: 1012: 1003: 999: 993: 958: 949: 937:. Retrieved 928: 874: 854: 843: 836: 829: 822: 808: 792: 776: 774: 770: 760: 756: 748: 735: 725: 715: 707:Predicate of 682: 673: 665:Predicate of 641:who(m) I saw 640: 631: 624: 611: 607: 603: 599: 595: 591: 581: 578:Finite types 557: 552: 548: 543:headed by a 538: 533: 529: 525: 521: 517: 513: 509: 497: 489: 487: 284:Glossematics 264:Constituency 236:interpreting 74:Lexicography 1099:29 December 857:main clause 709:main clause 697:main clause 667:main clause 655:main clause 616:relativizer 436:Terminology 411:Orthography 331:Usage-based 232:Translating 127:Acquisition 32:Linguistics 1199:Categories 1006:: 132–139. 877:head-final 745:past tense 695:Subject of 679:The Viking 653:Subject of 637:The Viking 553:found here 549:found here 534:whom I saw 532:." or "... 530:that I saw 406:Orismology 291:Functional 279:Generative 269:Dependency 89:Pragmatics 79:Morphology 69:Diachronic 828:Students 821:Students 805:Criticism 560:ambiguity 381:Iconicity 376:Etymology 296:Cognitive 259:Formalist 212:Phonetics 202:Philology 94:Semantics 84:Phonology 1055:12885112 939:15 March 895:See also 885:Japanese 861:semantic 508:such as 496:that is 182:Forensic 162:Distance 109:Typology 24:a series 22:Part of 1046:1403829 889:Turkish 881:Chinese 865:context 753:passive 738:English 137:Applied 47:History 42:Outline 1053:  1043:  935:. 1998 887:, and 842:Bikes 835:Bikes 757:kicked 749:kicked 742:active 452:Portal 350:Topics 99:Syntax 907:Notes 777:raced 683:I saw 608:which 606:, or 600:whose 526:I saw 522:I saw 514:which 492:is a 52:Index 1101:2020 1051:PMID 941:2009 612:that 604:what 596:whom 588:noun 518:that 234:and 227:Text 1133:doi 1041:PMC 1033:doi 1029:110 736:In 592:who 562:or 536:." 516:or 510:who 504:or 498:not 1201:: 1129:48 1127:. 1072:^ 1049:. 1039:. 1027:. 1021:. 1002:. 979:^ 967:^ 931:. 927:. 914:^ 883:, 817:. 622:. 602:, 598:, 594:, 574:. 512:, 488:A 26:on 1139:. 1135:: 1103:. 1057:. 1035:: 1004:2 943:. 676:: 634:: 477:e 470:t 463:v

Index

a series
Linguistics
Outline
History
Index
Diachronic
Lexicography
Morphology
Phonology
Pragmatics
Semantics
Syntax
Syntax–semantics interface
Typology
Acquisition
Anthropological
Applied
Computational
Conversation analysis
Corpus linguistics
Discourse analysis
Distance
Documentation
Ethnography of communication
Ethnomethodology
Forensic
History of linguistics
Interlinguistics
Neurolinguistics
Philology

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.