Knowledge

Reid v. Covert

Source đź“ť

71: 899: 24: 445:
and its progeny unequivocally strike down military jurisdiction over civilian crimes of the United States. From this point on, the Constitution was to be interpreted and ensuring that the Bill of Rights would protect all U.S. citizens accused of crimes no matter where those crimes occurred."
400:
declared: "The concept that the Bill of Rights and other constitutional protections against arbitrary government are inoperative when they become inconvenient or when expediency dictates otherwise is a very dangerous doctrine and if allowed to flourish would destroy the benefit of a written
838: 432:
and its progeny cases made clear that civilians can't be tried by military courts, but instead must be tried in civil courts regardless where the crime was committed. "The Constitution does not allow Congress to pass regulations that allow the military to
384:
The Court agreed with the petitioners, concluding that as United States citizens they were entitled to the protections of the Bill of Rights, notwithstanding that they committed crimes on foreign soil. The Court distinguished
393:" can be distinguished from the present cases in that they involved the power of Congress to provide rules and regulations to govern temporarily territories with wholly dissimilar traditions and institutions. 354:, famously made a successful petition for rehearing. This is the only time the Supreme Court, without a relevant change in its membership, has changed its mind as the result of a petition for rehearing. 730: 696: 366:, or on any other branch of Government, which is free from the restraints of the Constitution." The Court's core holding of the case is that U.S. citizen civilians abroad have the right to 980: 914: 675: 652: 629: 603: 580: 557: 511: 276: 114: 865: 985: 371: 367: 413: 404:
Justice Harlan's concurred with the judgment of the Court but disagreed with much of Justice Black's reasoning. He held that the court-martial
262: 786: 424:
The significance of the case lies in the protection that the United States Constitution grants to civilians who are associated with the
975: 732:
Landmark Supreme Court Cases: The Most Influential Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States (2004) - Chapter Jurisdiction
698:
Landmark Supreme Court Cases: The Most Influential Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States (2004) - Chapter Jurisdiction
970: 740: 706: 504: 350:
The court initially ruled against Mrs. Covert, but changed its mind and issued a new decision in her favor after her lawyer,
139:
The military may not deprive American civilians of their Bill of Rights protections by trying them in a military tribunal.
75: 378: 194: 335:, at an airbase in England. At the time of her alleged offense, an executive agreement was in effect between the 304: 787:"The Case of the Murdering Wives: Reid v. Covert and the Complicated Question of Civilians and Courts-Martial" 943: 438: 409: 280: 463: 425: 296: 816: 377:
The Court found it unconstitutional to adjudge U.S. citizen civilians in military courts, under the
351: 206: 437:
a civilian. To do so would deprive an individual of all the safeguards of the Constitution and
363: 198: 903: 918: 679: 656: 633: 607: 584: 561: 480: 284: 106: 701:. New York City, New York, United States of America: Facts onf File, Inc. pp. 464–466. 878: 8: 496: 308: 38: 682: 659: 636: 610: 37:
Please expand the article to include this information. Further details may exist on the
735:. New York City, New York, United States of America: Facts onf File, Inc. p. 465. 587: 564: 455: 312: 182: 174: 925: 934: 736: 702: 324: 292: 170: 488: 728: 694: 109: 340: 866:"The Treaty Making Power and the Extraterritorial Effect of the Constitution: 964: 763: 434: 390: 362:
The Court found: "No agreement with a foreign nation can confer power on the
336: 300: 288: 344: 186: 412:. Harlan also explicitly stated that this power was not limited by either 154: 397: 162: 125: 952: 531: 121: 252:
Whittaker took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
898: 408:
was not unconstitutional, being an appropriate application of the
729:
Gary R. Hartman, Roy M. Mersky and Cindy L. Tate (May 14, 2014).
695:
Gary R. Hartman, Roy M. Mersky and Cindy L. Tate (May 14, 2014).
467: 323:
The case involved Clarice B. Covert, who had been convicted by a
96:
Reid, Superintendent, District of Columbia Jail v. Clarice Covert
23: 328: 70: 454:
Clarice Covert could not be retried. She eventually moved to
441:, as well as the protections of civil laws and protections. 303:. Additionally, a plurality of the Court also reaffirmed the 343:, which permitted US military courts to exercise exclusive 332: 401:
Constitution and undermine the basis of our government."
287:
civilians outside of the territorial jurisdiction of the
311:, though it held that such agreements cannot contradict 295:, but instead retain the protections guaranteed by the 347:
over offenses by U.S. servicemen or their dependents.
981:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Warren Court
536:, The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law 512:
List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 354
458:, where she worked in the advertising department of 962: 784: 841:. Arizona Republic. May 14, 1992. p. 56 766:. Arizona Sun. February 29, 1960. p. 7 685: (1957) (Harlan, J., concurring) 662: (1957) (Harlan, J., concurring) 621: 619: 466:. She died on May 9, 1992, in Flagstaff, 462:newspaper and as an archaeologist at the 223:Black, joined by Warren, Douglas, Brennan 986:United States foreign relations case law 357: 963: 616: 863: 505:United States ex rel. Toth v. Quarles 58:1957 United States Supreme Court case 524: 307:ability to enter into international 17: 416:or the Fifth and Sixth amendments. 291:cannot be tried by a United States 13: 857: 819:. Museum of Northern Arizona. 1967 76:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 997: 976:United States Supreme Court cases 891: 897: 379:Uniform Code of Military Justice 69: 22: 921:1 (1957) is available from: 831: 809: 778: 756: 419: 331:her husband, a sergeant in the 275:, 354 U.S. 1 (1957), was a 6–2 971:1957 in United States case law 839:"Clarice B. Covert (obituary)" 722: 688: 665: 642: 593: 570: 547: 1: 517: 389:from the Insular Cases: The " 318: 35:about the dissenting opinion. 449: 374:constitutional protections. 7: 864:Green, Sedgwick W. (1958). 473: 428:and are accused of crimes. 410:Necessary and Proper Clause 281:United States Supreme Court 10: 1002: 953:Oyez (oral argument audio) 464:Museum of Northern Arizona 426:United States Armed Forces 297:United States Constitution 85:Reargued February 27, 1957 261: 256: 251: 243: 235: 227: 219: 214: 148: 143: 138: 133: 101: 91: 82: 68: 63: 785:Brittany Warren (2012). 352:Frederick Bernays Wiener 247:Clark, joined by Burton 817:"Photo Print Archives" 199:William J. Brennan Jr. 33:is missing information 481:Botiller v. Dominguez 315:or the Constitution. 285:United States citizen 87:Decided June 10, 1957 879:Minnesota Law Review 358:Opinion of the Court 309:executive agreements 207:Charles E. Whittaker 944:Library of Congress 791:Military Law Review 497:Kinsella v. Krueger 263:U.S. Const. Art. VI 456:Flagstaff, Arizona 175:William O. Douglas 159:Associate Justices 120:77 S. Ct. 1222; 1 83:Argued May 3, 1956 902:Works related to 764:"Purely Personal" 742:978-0-8160-2452-0 708:978-0-8160-2452-0 325:military tribunal 293:military tribunal 277:landmark decision 268: 267: 195:John M. Harlan II 171:Felix Frankfurter 56: 55: 993: 957: 951: 948: 942: 939: 933: 930: 924: 901: 887: 851: 850: 848: 846: 835: 829: 828: 826: 824: 813: 807: 806: 804: 802: 782: 776: 775: 773: 771: 760: 754: 753: 751: 749: 726: 720: 719: 717: 715: 692: 686: 669: 663: 646: 640: 623: 614: 597: 591: 574: 568: 551: 545: 544: 543: 541: 528: 489:Wilson v. Girard 299:, in this case, 183:Harold H. Burton 144:Court membership 73: 72: 61: 60: 51: 48: 42: 26: 18: 1001: 1000: 996: 995: 994: 992: 991: 990: 961: 960: 955: 949: 946: 940: 937: 931: 928: 922: 894: 860: 858:Further reading 855: 854: 844: 842: 837: 836: 832: 822: 820: 815: 814: 810: 800: 798: 783: 779: 769: 767: 762: 761: 757: 747: 745: 743: 727: 723: 713: 711: 709: 693: 689: 670: 666: 647: 643: 624: 617: 598: 594: 575: 571: 552: 548: 539: 537: 530: 529: 525: 520: 476: 452: 422: 372:Sixth Amendment 368:Fifth Amendment 360: 321: 197: 185: 173: 129: 86: 84: 78: 59: 52: 46: 43: 36: 27: 12: 11: 5: 999: 989: 988: 983: 978: 973: 959: 958: 911:Reid v. Covert 907: 904:Reid v. Covert 893: 892:External links 890: 889: 888: 868:Reid v. Covert 859: 856: 853: 852: 830: 808: 777: 755: 741: 721: 707: 687: 672:Reid v. Covert 664: 649:Reid v. Covert 641: 626:Reid v. Covert 615: 600:Reid v. Covert 592: 577:Reid v. Covert 569: 554:Reid v. Covert 546: 533:Reid v. Covert 522: 521: 519: 516: 515: 514: 509: 501: 493: 485: 475: 472: 451: 448: 439:Bill of Rights 421: 418: 359: 356: 341:United Kingdom 320: 317: 272:Reid v. Covert 266: 265: 259: 258: 254: 253: 249: 248: 245: 241: 240: 237: 233: 232: 229: 225: 224: 221: 217: 216: 212: 211: 210: 209: 160: 157: 152: 146: 145: 141: 140: 136: 135: 131: 130: 119: 103: 99: 98: 93: 92:Full case name 89: 88: 80: 79: 74: 66: 65: 64:Reid v. Covert 57: 54: 53: 30: 28: 21: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 998: 987: 984: 982: 979: 977: 974: 972: 969: 968: 966: 954: 945: 936: 927: 926:CourtListener 920: 916: 912: 908: 906:at Wikisource 905: 900: 896: 895: 885: 881: 880: 875: 873: 869: 862: 861: 840: 834: 818: 812: 796: 792: 788: 781: 765: 759: 744: 738: 734: 733: 725: 710: 704: 700: 699: 691: 684: 681: 677: 673: 668: 661: 658: 654: 650: 645: 638: 635: 631: 627: 622: 620: 612: 609: 605: 601: 596: 589: 586: 582: 578: 573: 566: 563: 559: 555: 550: 535: 534: 527: 523: 513: 510: 507: 506: 502: 499: 498: 494: 491: 490: 486: 483: 482: 478: 477: 471: 469: 465: 461: 457: 447: 444: 440: 436: 435:court-martial 431: 427: 417: 415: 411: 407: 402: 399: 394: 392: 391:Insular Cases 388: 382: 380: 375: 373: 369: 365: 355: 353: 348: 346: 342: 338: 337:United States 334: 330: 326: 316: 314: 310: 306: 302: 301:trial by jury 298: 294: 290: 289:United States 286: 283:holding that 282: 278: 274: 273: 264: 260: 255: 250: 246: 242: 238: 234: 230: 226: 222: 218: 215:Case opinions 213: 208: 204: 200: 196: 192: 188: 184: 180: 176: 172: 168: 164: 161: 158: 156: 153: 151:Chief Justice 150: 149: 147: 142: 137: 132: 127: 123: 117: 116: 111: 108: 104: 100: 97: 94: 90: 81: 77: 67: 62: 50: 47:December 2022 40: 34: 31:This article 29: 25: 20: 19: 16: 910: 883: 877: 871: 867: 843:. Retrieved 833: 821:. Retrieved 811: 799:. Retrieved 794: 790: 780: 768:. Retrieved 758: 748:December 31, 746:. Retrieved 731: 724: 714:December 31, 712:. Retrieved 697: 690: 671: 667: 648: 644: 639: (1957). 625: 599: 595: 576: 572: 553: 549: 538:, retrieved 532: 526: 503: 495: 487: 479: 459: 453: 442: 429: 423: 420:Significance 405: 403: 395: 386: 383: 376: 361: 349: 345:jurisdiction 322: 271: 270: 269: 257:Laws applied 202: 190: 187:Tom C. Clark 178: 166: 113: 95: 44: 32: 15: 845:October 30, 823:October 30, 801:October 30, 770:October 30, 613: (1957) 590: (1957) 567: (1957) 460:Arizona Sun 414:Article III 313:federal law 305:president’s 236:Concurrence 231:Frankfurter 228:Concurrence 155:Earl Warren 124:1148; 1957 965:Categories 540:October 3, 518:References 319:Background 163:Hugo Black 126:U.S. LEXIS 797:: 133–193 450:Aftermath 329:murdering 220:Plurality 122:L. Ed. 2d 102:Citations 39:talk page 909:Text of 870:and the 474:See also 396:Justice 364:Congress 468:Arizona 279:of the 244:Dissent 134:Holding 956:  950:  947:  941:  938:  935:Justia 932:  929:  923:  886:: 825. 872:Girard 739:  705:  674:, 651:, 628:, 602:, 579:, 556:, 508:(1955) 500:(1957) 492:(1957) 484:(1889) 443:Covert 430:Covert 406:per se 239:Harlan 205: 203:· 201:  193: 191:· 189:  181: 179:· 177:  169: 167:· 165:  917: 683:1, 76 678: 660:1, 73 655: 637:1, 14 632: 611:1, 23 606: 583: 560: 398:Black 919:U.S. 847:2021 825:2021 803:2021 772:2021 750:2020 737:ISBN 716:2020 703:ISBN 680:U.S. 657:U.S. 634:U.S. 608:U.S. 588:1, 8 585:U.S. 565:1, 2 562:U.S. 542:2018 387:Reid 370:and 339:and 333:USAF 115:more 107:U.S. 105:354 915:354 795:212 676:354 653:354 630:354 604:354 581:354 558:354 327:of 128:729 967:: 913:, 884:42 882:. 876:. 793:. 789:. 618:^ 470:. 381:. 874:" 849:. 827:. 805:. 774:. 752:. 718:. 118:) 112:( 110:1 49:) 45:( 41:.

Index


talk page
Supreme Court of the United States
U.S.
1
more
L. Ed. 2d
U.S. LEXIS
Earl Warren
Hugo Black
Felix Frankfurter
William O. Douglas
Harold H. Burton
Tom C. Clark
John M. Harlan II
William J. Brennan Jr.
Charles E. Whittaker
U.S. Const. Art. VI
landmark decision
United States Supreme Court
United States citizen
United States
military tribunal
United States Constitution
trial by jury
president’s
executive agreements
federal law
military tribunal
murdering

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑