Jury trial - Knowledge

1026:, which possessed an unlimited discretionary authority of fining, imprisoning, and inflicting corporal punishment, and whose jurisdiction extended to all sorts of offenses, contempts, and disorders, that lay not within reach of the common law. The members of this court consisted of the privy council and the judges; men who all of them enjoyed their offices during pleasure: And when the prince himself was present, he was the sole judge, and all the others could only interpose with their advice. There needed but this one court in any government, to put an end to all regular, legal, and exact plans of liberty. For who durst set himself in opposition to the crown and ministry, or aspire to the character of being a patron of freedom, while exposed to so arbitrary a jurisdiction? I much question, whether any of the absolute monarchies in Europe contain, at present, so illegal and despotic a tribunal. While so many terrors hung over the people, no jury durst have acquitted a man, when the court was resolved to have him condemned. The practice also, of not confronting witnesses to the prisoner, gave the crown lawyers all imaginable advantage against him. And, indeed, there scarcely occurs an instance, during all these reigns, that the sovereign, or the ministers, were ever disappointed in the issue of a prosecution. Timid juries, and judges who held their offices during pleasure, never failed to second all the views of the crown. And as the practice was anciently common of fining, imprisoning, or otherwise punishing the jurors, merely at the discretion of the court, for finding a verdict contrary to the direction of these dependent judges; it is obvious, that juries were then no manner of security to the liberty of the subject. 1010:) were forbidden to sit on the trial jury for that crime. 25 Edward III stat 5., c3 (1353). Medieval juries were self-informing, in that individuals were chosen as jurors because they either knew the parties and the facts, or they had the duty to discover them. This spared the government the cost of fact-finding. Over time, English juries became less self-informing and relied more on the trial itself for information on the case. Jurors remained free to investigate cases on their own until the 17th century. Magna Carta being forgotten after a succession of benevolent reigns (or, more probably, reigns limited by the jury and the barons, and only under the rule of laws that the juries and barons found acceptable), the kings, through the royal judges, began to extend their control over the jury and the kingdom. In 673:

plebeian tribune, quaestor, triumvir capitalis, military tribune in any of the first four legions, or triumvir for granting and assigning lands, or who is or has been in the Senate, or who has fought or shall fight as a gladiator for hire ... or who has been condemned by the judicial process and a public trial whereby he cannot be enrolled in the Senate, or who is less than thirty or more than sixty years of age, or who does not have his residence in the city of Rome or within one mile of it, or who is the father, brother, or son of any above-described magistrate, or who is the father, brother, or son of a person who is or has been a member of the Senate, or who is overseas.

2176:. Some judicial experts had argued that a system of whites-only juries (as was the system at that time) was inherently prejudicial to 'non-white' defendants (the introduction of nonracial juries would have been a political impossibility at that time). More recently it has been argued that, apart from being a racially divided country, South African society was, and still is, characterised by significant class differences and disparities of income and wealth that could make re-introducing the jury system problematic. Arguments for and against the re-introduction of a jury system have been discussed by South African constitutional expert Professor 2618:. Most states' constitutions also grant the right of trial by jury in lesser criminal matters, though most have abrogated that right in offenses punishable by fine only. The Supreme Court has ruled that if imprisonment is for six months or less, trial by jury is not required, meaning a state may choose whether or not to permit trial by jury in such cases. Under the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, if the defendant is entitled to a jury trial, they may waive their right to have a jury, but both the government (prosecution) and court must consent to the waiver. Several states require jury trials for all crimes, "petty" or not. 1740:

adjudicates in a panel which is composed of 1 professional judge as chair of the panel and 2 lay judges or 2 professional judges and 3 lay judges. Lay judges are elected by city councils and can be Hungarian citizens between the age of 30 and 70 years who have not been convicted. Non-professional judges have the same rights and responsibilities as professional judges, meaning that if they vote against the professional judge(s), their vote will decide the verdict. According to procedural laws, the youngest judge votes first and the chair of the panel votes last in case they reach a verdict through a vote.

1562:(1995 CarswellNB 313), there are limitations on the powers granted by Section 642. These powers are conferred specifically upon the judge, and the section does not confer a further discretion to delegate that power to others, such as the sheriff's officer, even with the consent of counsel. The Court said that to hold otherwise would nullify the rights of the accused and the prosecution to object to a person being excused inappropriately, and may also interfere with the rights of the parties to challenge for cause. The selection of an impartial jury is the basis of a fair trial. 1644:

trial. Justice Wright in the Court of First Instance held that there was no absolute right to a trial by jury and that the "decision as to whether an indictable offence be tried in the Court of First Instance by a judge and jury or in the District Court by a judge alone is the prerogative of the Secretary for Justice." Chiang issued a statement at the time saying "she was disappointed with the judgment because she has been deprived of a jury trial, an opportunity to be judged by her fellow citizens and the constitutional benefit protected by the Basic Law".

1221:, offences are classified as summary, indictable, or either way; jury trials are not available for summary offences (using instead a summary proceeding with a panel of three lay magistrates or a district judge sitting alone), unless they are tried alongside indictable or either way offences that are themselves tried by jury, but the defendant has a right to demand a jury trial for either way offences. The situation is similar in Scotland; whereas in Northern Ireland even summary offences carry a right to jury trial, with some exceptions. 2427:'s courts for more contentious inquests. All criminal juries consist of 12 jurors, those in a County Court having 8 jurors and Coroner's Court juries having between 7 and 11 members. Jurors must be between 18 and 75 years of age, and are selected at random from the register of voters. In the past a unanimous verdict was required. This has been changed so that, if the jury fails to agree after a given period, at the discretion of the judge they may reach a verdict by a 10–2 majority. This was designed to make it more difficult for 1595: 2771:

divorce litigation, Colorado, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Maine, Nevada, New York, North Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Wisconsin. Most of these limit the right to a jury to try issues regarding grounds or entitlement for divorce only. Texas provides jury trial rights most broadly, including even the right to a jury trial on questions regarding child custody. However, anyone who is charged with a criminal offense, breach of contract or federal offence has a Constitutional right to a trial by jury.

2703:, generally considered the pivotal case concerning the rights and powers of the jury, declared: "It is our deep and settled conviction, confirmed by a re-examination of the authorities that the jury, upon the general issue of guilty or not guilty in a criminal case, have the right, as well as the power, to decide, according to their own judgment and consciences, all questions, whether of law or of fact, involved in that issue." Jury determination of questions of law, sometimes called 2798:. Importantly, however, the Seventh Amendment does not guarantee a right to a civil jury trial in state courts (although most state constitutions guarantee such a right). The Seventh Amendment provides: "In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law." In 45: 415: 859: 1576:(1994 2 SCR 951), it was held that an accused only has to show that they were excluded from a part of the trial that affected their vital interests, they do not have to demonstrate actual prejudice, just the potential for prejudice. As well, a valid waiver of such a right must be clear, unequivocal and done with full knowledge of the rights that the procedure was enacted to protect, as well as the effect that the waiver will have on those rights. 607:. In such large juries, they rule by majority. Juries were appointed by lot. Jurists cast a ceramic disk with an axle in its middle: the axle was either hollow or solid. Thus the way they voted was kept secret because the jurists would hold their disk by the axle by thumb and forefinger, thus hiding whether its axle was hollow or solid. Since Periclean times, jurists were compensated for their sitting in court, with the amount of one day's wages. 897:, the truth-teller, were learned in folk custom and in its intricate judicial procedure. A Danish town in England often had, as its main officers, twelve hereditary 'law men.' The Danes introduced the habit of making committees among the free men in court, which perhaps made England favorable ground for the future growth of the jury system out of a Frankish custom later introduced by the Normans." The English king 980:, based on the customs and consent of John's subjects, and since they did not have Parliament in those times, this meant that neither the king nor the barons could make a law without the consent of the people. According to some sources, in the time of Edward III, "by the law of the land" had been substituted "by due process of law", which in those times was a trial by twelve peers. 2102:, for serious crimes the accused has the option of a jury trial consisting of 12 jurors. The number of jury trials remains small, at about 600 per year, out of about 1 million trials. A juror must be at least 25 years old, legally competent, and without a criminal record. The 12 jurors are selected by the prosecution and defense from a list of 30–40 eligible candidates. The 1519:, including those punishable by less than five years' imprisonment, though the right is only constitutionally enshrined for those offences punishable by five years' imprisonment or more. Generally, it is the accused person who is entitled to elect whether their trial will proceed by judge alone or by judge and jury; however, for the most severe criminal offences— 1640:, which can impose a sentence of up to seven years' imprisonment. This is despite the fact that all court rooms in the District Court have jury boxes. The lack of juries in the District Court has been severely criticized. Clive Grossman SC in a commentary in 2009 said conviction rates were "approaching those of North Korea". 2806:, he wrote, "t is a most important and valuable amendment; and places upon the high ground of constitutional right the inestimable privilege of a trial by jury in civil cases, a privilege scarcely inferior to that in criminal cases, which is conceded by all to be essential to political and civil liberty." 1911:

Juries only decide questions of fact; they have no role in criminal sentencing in criminal cases or awarding damages in libel cases. It is not necessary that a jury be unanimous in its verdict. In civil cases, a verdict may be reached by a majority of nine of the twelve members. In a criminal case, a

970:

No free man shall be captured, and or imprisoned, or disseised of his freehold, and or of his liberties, or of his free customs, or be outlawed, or exiled, or in any way destroyed, nor will we proceed against him by force or proceed against him by arms, but by the lawful judgment of his peers, and or

940:

The Church banned participation of clergy in trial by ordeal in 1215. Without the legitimacy of religion, trial by ordeal collapsed. The juries under the assizes began deciding guilt as well as providing accusations. The same year, trial by jury became an explicit right in one of the most influential

769:

The system whereby citizens were tried by their peers chosen from the entire community in open court was gradually superseded by a system of professional judges in Germany, in which the process of investigation was more or less confidential and judgements were issued by judges appointed by the state.

2865:

There is not a United States constitutional right under the Seventh Amendment to a jury trial in state courts, but in practice, almost every state except Louisiana, which has a civil law legal tradition, permits jury trials in civil cases in state courts on substantially the same basis that they are

2742:

A civil jury is typically made up of 6 to 12 persons. In a civil case, the role of the jury is to listen to the evidence presented at a trial, to decide whether the defendant injured the plaintiff or otherwise failed to fulfill a legal duty to the plaintiff, and to determine what the compensation or

2734:

There has been much debate about the advantages and disadvantages of the jury system, the competence or lack thereof of jurors as fact-finders, and the uniformity or capriciousness of the justice they administer. The jury has been described by one author as "an exciting and gallant experiment in the

1254:

Robert Burns argues that the jury trial provides the discipline and rigor needed to limit raw discretion of judges and other bureaucrats. In particular, he praises the adversarial nature of the American system as a more effective way to uncover truths than the judge-led process in Europe. He further

1124:

In most common law jurisdictions, the jury is responsible for finding the facts of the case, while the judge determines the law. These "peers of the accused" are responsible for listening to a dispute, evaluating the evidence presented, deciding on the facts, and making a decision in accordance with

663:

performing many of the duties of a judge. High government officials and their relatives were barred from acting as judices, due to conflicts of interest. Those previously found guilty of serious crimes (felonies) were also barred as were gladiators for hire, who likely were hired to resolve disputes

2968:

Only five of the 50 states require or permit jury trials for cases where the state is seeking to legally sever a parent-child relationship. Oklahoma, Texas, Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. In Virginia, the jury is called an "advisory jury". The remaining 46 jurisdictions have case law or statutes

2481:

director of policy Isabella Sankey said that "This is a dangerous precedent. The right to jury trial isn't just a hallowed principle but a practice that ensures that one class of people don't sit in judgement over another and the public have confidence in an open and representative justice system."

2021:

New Zealand previously required jury verdicts to be passed unanimously, but since the passing of the Criminal Procedure Bill in 2009 the Juries Act 1981 has permitted verdicts to be passed by a majority of one less than the full jury (that is an 11–1 or a 10–1 majority) under certain circumstances.

1643:

Many complex commercial cases are prosecuted in the District Court rather than before a jury in the High Court. In 2009, Lily Chiang, former chairwoman of the Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce, lost an application to have her case transferred from the District Court to the High Court for a jury

1547:

Criminal Code Section 642(1): If a full jury and alternate jurors cannot be provided, the court may order the sheriff or other proper officer, at the request of the prosecutor, to summon without delay as many people as the court directs for the purpose of providing a full jury and alternate jurors.

1224:

In the United States, because jury trials tend to be high profile, the general public tends to overestimate the frequency of jury trials. Approximately 150,000 jury trials are conducted in state courts annually, and an additional 5,000 jury trials are conducted in federal courts. Two-thirds of jury

1034:

WHEREAS by the great charter many times confirmed in parliament, it is enacted, That no freeman shall be taken or imprisoned, or disseised of his freehold or liberties, or free customs, or be outlawed or exiled or otherwise destroyed, and that the King will not pass upon him, or condemn him; but by

2943:

In the years since this 2004 article, this practice has become pervasive in the US and, especially in online agreements, it has become commonplace to include such waivers to trial by jury in everything from user agreements attached to software downloads to merely browsing a website. This practice,

2929:

For years, in an effort to avoid the slow-moving wheels of the U.S. judicial system, many American companies have forced their customers and employees to agree to settle disputes outside of the courts, through private arbitration ... but the rising cost of arbitration proceedings has led some

2809:

The Seventh Amendment does not guarantee or create any right to a jury trial; rather, it preserves the right to jury trial in the federal courts that existed in 1791 at common law. In this context, common law means the legal environment the United States inherited from England. In England in 1791,

2664:

that allowed sentencing enhancement based on "a preponderance of evidence", where enhancement could be based on the judge's findings alone. A jury must be unanimous for either a guilty or not guilty decision. A hung jury results in the defendants release; however, charges against the defendant are

1625:

Hong Kong, as a former British colony has a common law legal system. Article 86 of Hong Kong's Basic Law, which came into force on 1 July 1997 following the handover of Hong Kong from Britain to China provides: "The principle of trial by jury previously practised in Hong Kong shall be maintained."

1288:

provides that: "The trial on indictment of any offence against any law of the Commonwealth shall be by jury, and every such trial shall be held in the State where the offence was committed, and if the offence was not committed within any State the trial shall be held at such place or places as the

2017:

provides a defendant with the right to a jury trial if they are charged with a criminal offence punishable by two years' imprisonment or more. For most offences, the defendant can choose to forego a jury trial in favour of a judge-alone (bench) trial. Serious "category 4" offences such as murder,

1452:

Majority verdicts were introduced in New South Wales in 2006. In New South Wales, a majority verdict can only be returned if the jury consists of at least 11 jurors, and the deliberation has occurred for at least eight hours or for a period that the court considers reasonable having regard to the

1296:

were held in 1824, following a decision of the NSW Supreme Court on 14 October 1824. The NSW Constitution Act of 1828 effectively terminated trial by jury for criminal matters. Jury trials for criminal matters revived with the passing of the Jury Trials Amending Act of 1833 (NSW) (2 William IV No

1235:

Others contend that there never was a golden age of jury trials, but rather that juries in the early nineteenth century (before the rise of plea bargaining) were "unwitting and reflexive, generally wasteful of public resources and, because of the absence of trained professionals, little more than

997:

If we have deprived or dispossessed any Welshmen of lands, liberties, or anything else in England or in Wales, without the lawful judgement of their equals, these are at once to be returned to them. A dispute on this point shall be determined in the Marches by the judgement of equals. English law

2938:

The list includes residential leases, checking-account agreements, auto loans and mortgage contracts. Companies that believe juries are biased toward plaintiffs hope this approach will boost their chances of winning in court. Critics say that unfairly denies citizens' access to the full range of

2869:

The court determines the right to jury based on all claims by all parties involved. If the plaintiff brings only equitable claims but the defendant asserts counterclaims of law, the court grants a jury trial. In accordance with Beacon Theaters, the jury first determines the facts, then the judge

2770:

Not every case is eligible for a jury trial. For example, in the majority of U.S. states there is no right to a jury trial in family law actions not involving a termination of parental rights, such as divorce and custody modifications. As of 1978, eleven U.S. states allow juries in any aspect of

987:

For a trivial offence, a free man shall be fined only in proportion to the degree of his offence, and for a serious offence correspondingly, but not so heavily as to deprive him of his livelihood. In the same way, a merchant shall be spared his merchandise, and a husbandman the implements of his

920:

took a major step in developing the jury system. Henry II set up a system to resolve land disputes using juries. A jury of twelve free men were assigned to arbitrate in these disputes. As with the Saxon system, these men were charged with uncovering the facts of the case on their own rather than

2823:

39(c) allows a court to use one at its discretion. To determine whether the action would have been legal or equitable in 1791, one must first look at the type of action and whether such an action was considered "legal" or "equitable" at that time. Next, the relief being sought must be examined.

2873:

Following the English tradition, U.S. juries have usually been composed of 12 jurors, and the jury's verdict has usually been required to be unanimous. However, in many jurisdictions, the number of jurors is often reduced to a lesser number (such as five or six) by legislative enactment, or by

2754:

Prior to 2020, under most states' laws, verdicts in criminal cases had to be unanimous, with the exception of Oregon and Louisiana. In Oregon, a 10–2 majority was enough to reach a verdict, except for guilty verdicts for capital crimes, which required unanimity. Louisiana also did not require

2668:

Jurors in some states are selected through voter registration and drivers' license lists. A form is sent to prospective jurors to pre-qualify them by asking the recipient to answer questions about citizenship, disabilities, ability to understand the English language, and whether they have any

2659:

held that a criminal defendant has a right to a jury trial not only on the question of guilt or innocence, but on any fact used to increase the defendant's sentence beyond the maximum otherwise allowed by statutes or sentencing guidelines. This invalidated the procedure in many states and the

672:

The peregrine praetor (literally, traveling judge) within the next ten days after this law is passed by the people or plebs shall provide for the selection of 450 persons in this State who have or have had a knight's census ... provided that he does not select a person who is or has been

658:

From the beginning of the republic and in the majority of civil cases towards the end of the empire, there were tribunals with the characteristics of the jury in the sense that Roman judges were civilian, lay and not professionals. Capital trials were held in front of hundreds or thousands of

951:

Nullus liber homo capiatur, vel imprisonetur, aut desseisetur de libero tenemento, vel libertatibus, vel liberis consuetudinibus suis, aut utlagetur, aut exuletur, aut aliquo modo destruatur, nec super eum ibimus, nec super eum mittemus, nisi per legale judicium parium suorum, vel per legem

2722:

can be given, but in criminal cases a general verdict is rendered, because requiring a special verdict could apply pressure to the jury, and because of the jury's historic function of tempering rules of law by common sense brought to bear upon the facts of a specific case. For this reason,

1739:

Hungary used a jury system from 1897 to 1919. Since 1949, Hungary uses the mixed court system. According to the Fundamental Law of Hungary, "non-professional judges shall also participate in the administration of justice in the cases and ways specified in an Act." In these cases, the court

1827:, they were optional and rarely utilized. In cases where the defendants were either European or American, at least half of the jury was required to be European or American men, with the justification given that juries in these cases had to be "acquainted with feelings and dispositions." 2256:, only professional judges decide, and may impose a sentence or re-impose a sentence imposed by the district court but quashed by the Court of Appeals.) In such a case, the jury provides a unique lock on the ability of the professional judges, upon appeal, outvoting the layman judges. 2548:

internments, and because of the argument that juries were intimidated, though this is disputed. The Diplock courts were shut in 2007, but between 1 August 2008 and 31 July 2009, 13 non-jury trials were held, down from 29 in the previous year, and 300 trials per year at their peak.

2818:

Rule 2 says "here is one form of action—the civil action", which abolishes the legal/equity distinction. Today, in actions that would have been "at law" in 1791, there is a right to a jury; in actions that would have been "in equity" in 1791, there is no right to a jury. However,

566:

rules, even if a bench trial is actually contemplated in a particular case. In general, the availability of a jury trial if properly demanded has given rise to a system in which fact finding is concentrated in a single trial rather than multiple hearings, and appellate review of

2920:

23(a), only if the prosecution and the court consent may a defendant waive a jury trial for criminal cases. However, most states give the defendant the absolute right to waive a jury trial, and it has become commonplace to find such a waiver in routine contracts as a 2004

913:(a small district) were required to swear that they would investigate crimes without a bias. These juries differed from the modern sort by being self-informing; instead of getting information through a trial, the jurors were required to investigate the case themselves. 2331:

are to be randomly selected as citizen judges who would participate in trial proceedings and adjudicate cases alongside professional judges in certain felony cases. The citizen judge system is based on Japan’s saiban-in system, which also resembles a lay judge system.

1931:, which scrapped the upper age limit of 70. Juries are not paid, nor do they receive travel expenses. They do receive lunch for the days that they are serving; however, for jurors in employment, their employer is required to pay them as if they were present at work. 2445:, which sought to remove the right to trial by jury for cases involving jury tampering or complex fraud. The provision for trial without jury to circumvent jury tampering succeeded and came into force in 2007; the provision for complex fraud cases was defeated. 2584:" that tried civil cases seeking an injunction or another form of non-monetary relief did not. As a result, this practice continues in American civil laws, but in modern English law, only criminal proceedings and some inquests are likely to be heard by a jury. 690:

statements from between three and twelve witnesses. When the statements of all witnesses are consistent, the notaries will certify their unanimous testimony in a legal document, which may be used to support the litigant's claim. The notaries serve to free the

2236:. If such a majority of the jurors hold that said crime has in fact been committed, this finding is not legally binding for the court; thus, the court (three judges out of five) can still acquit the defendant or find him/her not liable. A jury acquittal may 2129:

Juries have granted acquittals in 15–20% of cases, compared with less than 1% in cases decided by judges. Juries may be dismissed and skeptical juries have been dismissed on the verge of verdicts, and acquittals are frequently overturned by higher courts.

1554:

Section 642(3): The names of the people who are summoned under this Section shall be added to the general panel for the purposes of the trial, and the same proceedings with respect to calling, challenging, excusing and directing them shall apply to them.

2944:

however, means that while such waivers may have legal force in one jurisdiction—in this case the United States—in the jurisdiction where a verdict is sought in the absence of jury trial (or indeed the presence of a defendant, or any legal representation

2350:

for criminal cases where the sentence can reach life imprisonment if the accused so wishes. But this seldom happens. A jury is not formed from random citizens, but only from those who have previously applied for this role who do meet certain criteria.

2959:

states (in part, in Item 55) "the issue has to be determined by looking at the way in which the courts handled the problem under English criminal procedure and by deciding whether, in the result, the appellant can be said to have had a fair hearing."

2866:

allowed under the Seventh Amendment in federal court. The right to a jury trial in civil cases does not extend to the states, except when a state court is enforcing a federally created right, of which the right to trial by jury is a substantial part.

2034:) is set with a judge and two lay judges, or in bigger cases two judges and three lay judges. All of these judges convict or acquit, and set sentences. Simple majority is required in all cases, which means that the lay-judges are always in control. 2160:, a former trial lawyer, explained why he supported the policy to the BBC and in his memoirs, saying, "I had no faith in a system that allowed the superstition, ignorance, biases, and prejudices of seven jurymen to determine guilt or innocence." 2106:

stipulates that, until the abolition of the death penalty, all defendants in a case that may result in a death sentence are entitled to a jury trial. Lawmakers are continuously chipping away at what types of criminal offenses merit a jury trial.

1417:

Since 1927 South Australia has permitted majority verdicts of 11-1 (or 10-1 or 9-1 in cases where the jury has been reduced) in criminal trials if a unanimous verdict cannot be reached in four hours. These are accepted in all cases except for

2423:) offences, however, must be tried before a jury in the Crown Court. Juries sit in few civil cases, being restricted to false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, and civil fraud (unless ordered otherwise by a judge). Juries also sit in 1217:, an individual charged with an indictable offence may elect to be tried by a judge alone in a provincial court, by judge alone in a superior court, or by judge and jury in a superior court; summary offences cannot be tried by jury. In 2861:

discussed the right to a jury, holding that when both equitable and legal claims are brought, the right to a jury trial still exists for the legal claim, which would be decided by a jury before the judge ruled on the equitable claim.

699:

school of Islamic jurisprudence requires two notaries to collect a minimum of twelve eyewitness statements in certain legal cases, including those involving unregistered marriages and land disputes. John Makdisi has compared this to

1647:

In civil cases in the Court of First Instance jury trials are available for defamation, false imprisonment, malicious prosecution or seduction unless the court orders otherwise. A jury can return a majority verdict in a civil case.

1190:, jury trials are reserved, and compulsory, for the most severe crimes and are not available for civil cases. In Brazil, trials by jury are applied in cases of voluntary crimes against life, such as first and second degree murder, 2126:. They must return unanimous verdicts during the first 3 hours of deliberation, but may return majority verdicts after that, with 6 jurors being enough to acquit. They may also request that the judge show leniency in sentencing. 975:

Although it says "and or by the law of the land", this in no manner can be interpreted as if it were enough to have a positive law, made by the king, to be able to proceed legally against a citizen. The law of the land was the

2969:

or local court rules or common practice that specifically prohibits a jury trial in termination of parental rights cases. The fate of a family is exclusively placed in the hands of a single judge when there is no jury trial.

2477:, cited cost and the additional burden on the jurors as reasons to proceed without a jury. Previously in cases where jury tampering was a concern the jurors were sometimes closeted in a hotel for the duration of the trial. 2232:) cases under the fundamental laws. A majority of at least six jurors (out of nine) must find that the defendant has committed the alleged crime. If it does not, the defendant is acquitted or, in a civil case, held not 1984:

enacted a law requiring selected citizens to take part in criminal court trials of certain severe crimes to make decisions together with professional judges, both on guilt and on the sentence. These citizens are called

1453:

nature and complexity of the case. Additionally, the court must be satisfied through examination of one or more of the jurors on oath that a unanimous verdict will not be reached if further deliberation were to occur.

1359:

allows three peremptory challenges per side unless there is more than one accused in which case the prosecution can peremptorily challenge 3 times the number of accused and each accused has 3 peremptory challenges.

2930:

companies to decide they might be better off in the court system after all they don't have to tangle with juries. The new tactic let disputes go to court, but on the condition that they be heard only by a judge.

2746:

A criminal jury is usually made up of 12 members, though fewer may sit on cases involving lesser offenses. Criminal juries decide whether the defendant committed the crime as charged. In several southern states,

2411:(which have the same legal system), everyone accused of an offence which carries more than six months' imprisonment has a right to trial by jury. Minor ("summary") criminal cases are heard without a jury in the 1059:

for returning a verdict contrary to their own findings of fact and removed them to prison until the fine was paid. Edward Bushel, a member of the jury, nonetheless refused to pay the fine. Bushel petitioned the

1928: 659:'juries' in the commitias or centuries, the same as in Athenian trials. Roman law provided for the yearly selection of judices, who would be responsible for resolving disputes by acting as jurors, with a 5177: 2468:

The trial for the first serious offence to be tried without a jury for 350 years was allowed to go ahead in 2009. Three previous trials of the defendants had been halted because of jury tampering and the

2761:, decided in April 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that convictions for serious offenses require unanimity, overturning Oregon's and Louisiana's prior allowances for split decisions. 1335:

had twenty peremptory challenges for each side where the offence was murder, and eight for all other cases. In 1987 this was lowered to three peremptory challenges per side, the same amount allowed in

1277:

Argentina is one of the first countries in Latin America that has implemented trial by jury. Although it has a civil law process, since November 2015, it has a jury system for serious criminal cases.

2319:). Because the unified Swiss Code of Criminal Procedure (set to enter into force in 2011) does not provide for jury trials or lay judges, however, they are likely to be abolished in the near future. 1655:, in cases which contain "involvement of foreign elements", "personal safety of jurors and their family members" or "risk of perverting the course of justice if the trial is conducted with a jury". 1174:

and some countries organized in the same fashion, the jury and several professional judges sit together to determine guilt first. Then, if guilt is determined, they decide the appropriate penalty.

5996: 2188:

that assist the judge on questions of fact (rather than law), in place of the jury, to reach a verdict. The legal system in the UK sees no reason to block extradition on this, as witnessed in the

1506: 1018:, he tells something of the powers that the kings had accumulated in the times after Magna Carta, the prerogatives of the crown and the sources of great power with which these monarchs counted: 1435:

Majority verdicts of 10-2 have been allowed in Tasmania since 1936 for all cases, except murder and treason, if a unanimous decision has not been made within two hours. Since 1943, verdicts of

2228:, in a medium covered by the fundamental laws (e.g. a printed paper or a radio programme), she has the right to have the accusation tried by a jury of nine jurors. This applies also in civil ( 2075:

The three-judge panel can set aside a jury conviction or acquittal if there has been an obvious miscarriage of justice. In that event, the case is settled by three judges and four lay-judges.

2001:

Malaysia abolished trials by jury on 1 January 1995. The impartiality of jury trials had been brought into question for several years prior, but their abolition was expedited by the notorious

1236:

slow guilty pleas themselves", and that the guilty-plea system that emerged in the latter half of the nineteenth century was a superior, more cost-effective method of achieving fair outcomes.

1873: 2515:

In Scots law the jury system has some similarities with England but some important differences; in particular, there are juries of 15 in criminal trials, with verdicts by simple majority.

4442: 1442:

The Northern Territory has allowed majority verdicts of 10-2, 10-1 and 9-1 since 1963 for all charges. Deliberation must go for at least six hours before delivering a majority verdict.

601:

of up to 500 citizens. For capital cases—those that involved death, loss of liberty, exile, loss of civil rights, or seizure of property—the trial was before a jury of 1,001 to 1,501

2252:

guilty, the not guilty verdict may still be appealed to the Court of Appeals where, conversely, the professional judges outvotes the layman judges. (Should a case be appealed to the

2018:

manslaughter and treason are always tried by jury, with some exceptions. Civil jury trials are restricted to cases involving defamation, false imprisonment or malicious prosecution.

4827: 3518:... roughly ninety percent of the criminal defendants convicted in state and federal courts plead guilty rather than exercise their right to stand trial before a court or jury. 1860:

as "delegates") from the local Parsi community are used to decide the outcome of the matrimonial disputes in question during civil trials. This jury system consists of a mixture of

2327:

The Citizen Judges Act (國民法官法) was passed by the Legislative Yuan on July 22, 2022, promulgated by the president on Aug.12th and was implemented on Jan.1st of 2023. Under the act,

4203: 2045:) of 10 members, which need a minimum of seven votes to be able to convict. The judges have no say in the jury deliberations, but jury instructions are given by the chief judge ( 1225:

trials are criminal trials, while one-third are civil and "other" (e.g., family, municipal ordinance, traffic). Nevertheless, the vast majority of criminal cases are settled by

2072:) and three other members of the jury chosen by ballot. This way the laymen are in control of both the conviction and sentencing, as simple majority is required in sentencing. 1432:

Western Australia accepted majority verdicts in 1957 for all trials except where the crime is murder or has a maximum penalty of life imprisonment: a 10-2 verdict is accepted.

1429:

Victoria has accepted majority verdicts with the same conditions since 1994, though deliberations must have gone for at least six hours before a majority verdict can be made.

998:

shall apply to holdings of land in England, Welsh law to those in Wales, and the law of the Marches to those in the Marches. The Welsh shall treat us and ours in the same way.

3990: 3821: 1150:, unlike in modern jury trials, jurors decided not only whether the defendant was guilty or not guilty, but they had a third choice: "Guilty, but not to be punished", since 2248:

the layman majority and the jury must convict to sentence a culprit; however, if the deciding two-thirds jury majority approves and the district court finds the defendant

1232:

Some commentators contend that the guilty-plea system (and the high costs incurred in trials) unfairly coerces defendants into relinquishing their right to a jury trial.

2145:

in 1917. They were reintroduced in the Russian Federation in 1993, and extended to another 69 regions in 2003. Its reintroduction was opposed by the Prosecutor General.

1966:

is composed of 2 judges and 6 laypersons chosen at random among Italian citizens 30 to 65 years old. Only serious crimes like murder can be tried by the Corte d'Assise.

5181: 1255:

argues that being face-to-face in open court can help to bring humanity into the courtroom, by reminding decision-makers that everyone involved are humans with souls.

4908: 988:

husbandry, if they fall upon the mercy of a royal court. None of these fines shall be imposed except by the assessment on oath of reputable men of the neighbourhood.

994:

To any man whom we have deprived or dispossessed of lands, castles, liberties, or rights, without the lawful judgement of his equals, we will at once restore these.

2711:. Although a judge can throw out a guilty verdict if it was not supported by the evidence, a jurist has no authority to override a verdict that favors a defendant. 1449:(s 59F) allows majority verdicts for all crimes except for murder and other offences that carry a life sentence, although only 11-1 or 10-1 majorities are allowed. 2564:

The availability of a trial by jury in U.S. jurisdictions varies. Because the United States legal system separated from that of the English one at the time of the

1311:

system of examining the jury pool before selection is not permitted in Australia as it violates the privacy of jurors. Therefore, though it exists, the right to

4490: 2755:

unanimous juries in serious felony cases until passage of a state constitutional amendment that required unanimity for crimes committed after 2018. However, in

1731:, are exempt, due to their nature, from the jurisdiction of the "mixed courts" and are tried instead by the Court of Appeals both in first and second instance. 2611: 1912:

verdict need not be unanimous where there are not fewer than eleven jurors if ten of them agree on a verdict after considering the case for a reasonable time.

4849: 4832: 3477: 2847: 2645: 2628: 695:

from the time-consuming task of hearing the testimony of each eyewitness himself, and their documents serve to legally authenticate each oral testimony. The

4252: 499: 2795: 2068:), and if seven or more jury members want to convict, the sentence is set in a separate proceeding, consisting of the three judges and the jury foreman ( 1727:, including the President of the Court, and four lay judges who decide the facts, and the appropriate penalty if they convict. Certain felonies, such as 1107: 4882: 5287: 4030: 2267:. Earlier, a court disagreeing with a jury acquittal could, when deciding on the matter of such costs, set aside the English rule, and instead use the 1497:

Brazil instated jury trial since 1822, surviving seven constitutions. It is limited to criminal law, specifically to intentional crimes against life.

2599: 1924: 1103: 1099: 1003: 4998: 4460: 1703:

in which three professional judges sit together with six or nine jurors (on appeal). Conviction requires a two-thirds majority (four or six votes).

4085: 558:

The use of jury trials, which evolved within common law systems rather than civil law systems, has had a profound impact on the nature of American

2457:

in Parliament, which sought to abolish jury trials in major criminal fraud trials. The Bill was subject to sharp criticism from both sides of the

2053:

is usually set with 16 prospective jurors, which the prosecution and defence may dismiss the six persons they do not desire to serve on the jury.

3567: 2595: 2156:

fully abolished the jury system in 1969, though jury trials for non-capital offenses had already been abolished a decade earlier. Prime Minister

1194:

and instigation of suicide, even if only attempted. In others, jury trials are only available for criminal cases and very specific civil cases (

983:

In 1215, Magna Carta further secured defendants the right to a judgement of "reputable men of the neighbourhood"/"their equals" by stating that

4439: 3555:

Those few cases being tried set the standard for everybody in determining what to do with the 95 percent, 96 percent of the plea bargain cases.

1511:

Under Canadian law, a person has the constitutional right to a jury trial for all crimes punishable by five years of imprisonment or more. The

571:

decisions is greatly limited. Jury trials are of far less importance (or of no importance) in countries that do not have a common law system.

4402: 5022: 2767:

A jury's deliberations are conducted in private, out of sight and hearing of the judge, litigants, witnesses, and others in the courtroom.

824:

returned to the jury trial as it had existed before the 1933 emergency decrees, but they were again abolished by the 1950 Unification Act (

4762: 1781: 1285: 4149: 2005:

case in 1993. The sensational nature of the crime heightened concerns that jury verdicts could be coloured by emotions and media bias.

1030:

The first paragraph of the Act that abolished the Star Chamber repeats the clause on the right of a citizen to be judged by his peers:

3481: 1569:(1982 SCR 730) that the right of an accused to be present in court during the whole of his trial includes the jury selection process. 801:

Ministry of Justice proposed to abolish the jury and replace it with the mixed system, causing a significant political debate. In the

2527:, the role of the jury trial is roughly similar to England and Wales, except that jury trials have been replaced in cases of alleged 2412: 1935: 4947: 5131: 2956: 2874:

agreement of both sides. Some jurisdictions also permit a verdict to be returned despite the dissent of one, two, or three jurors.

1461:

Austria, in common with a number of European civil law jurisdictions, retains elements of trial by jury in serious criminal cases.

833: 492: 2572:

at that time rather than the methods used in English courts now. For example, at the time, English "courts of law" tried cases of

1110:

of the U.S. Constitution extend the right to a jury trial for both criminal and civil matters and a grand jury for serious cases.

6041: 5955: 5540: 4964: 2470: 4783: 4266: 2735:

conduct of serious human affairs". Because they are fact-finders, juries are sometimes expected to perform a role similar to a

2458: 2450: 311: 305: 5736: 5662: 5641: 5620: 5490: 5469: 5426: 5401: 5376: 5362: 3905: 3793: 3760: 3725: 3690: 3628: 3145: 2996: 2415:. Middle-ranking ("triable either way") offences may be tried by magistrates or the defendant may elect trial by jury in the 2225: 4914: 4795:

They were tried in a 'diplock court' by a judge with no jury; common in Northern Ireland for crimes connected to terrorism.

1652: 1856:

in India are legally permitted to use jury trials to decide divorces wherein randomly selected jurors (referred to in the

6036: 5233: 2948:) may well run directly counter to law in the jurisdiction—such as the United Kingdom—where the defendant resides, thus: 2917: 2615: 2402: 2276: 2014: 1094:

system in which trial by jury is an important part. Jury trials in criminal cases were a protected right in the original

887:

occupation: "The Scandinavians, when not on the Viking warpath, were a litigious people and loved to get together in the

485: 5050: 3238: 2858: 2656: 2454: 1847: 1816: 5762: 3607:

The overwhelming majority of individuals who are accused of crime forgo their constitutional rights and plead guilty.

3450: 3384: 3118: 3089: 3064: 3039: 2842: 2260: 933:

to a "justice in eyre", a judge who moved between hundreds on a circuit. A criminal accused by this jury was given a

786:

called for jury trials for "the more serious crimes and all political offenses", but was never implemented after the

783: 4031:

https://web.archive.org/web/20150615052822/http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?art_id=78017&con_type=1

1331:

selection; however, the number of challenges granted to the counsels in each state are not all the same. Until 1987

2910: 2815: 2446: 1673: 1633:

are by jury. The juries are generally made of seven members, who can return a verdict based on a majority of five.

1249: 3137:

The Role of the Arab-Islamic World in the Rise of the West: Implications for Contemporary Trans-Cultural Relations

6064: 5584: 5436:

Wolfe, Nancy Travis (December 1994). "Lay Judges in German Criminal Courts: The Modification of an Institution".

3786:

The missing American jury: restoring the fundamental constitutional role of the criminal, civil, and grand juries

2820: 2138: 1143: 1129:. Typically, the jury only judges a verdict of guilty or not guilty, but the actual penalty is set by the judge. 1061: 3533: 1830:

During the 20th century, the jury system in British India came under criticism from both colonial officials and

1182:

Some jurisdictions with jury trials allow the defendant to waive their right to a jury trial, thus leading to a

5794: 5274: 2718:

that a judge cannot order the jury to convict, no matter how strong the evidence is. In civil cases, a special

2374: 1186:. Jury trials tend to occur only when a crime is considered serious. In some jurisdictions, such as France and 837: 551:

judicial systems, but not all. Juries or lay judges have also been incorporated into the legal systems of many

361: 38: 2824:

Monetary damages alone were purely a legal remedy, and thus entitled to a jury. Non-monetary remedies such as

1838:

and frequently went unimplemented in many Indian legal jurisdictions after independence in 1947. In 1958, the

597:, to assure that no one could select jurors for their own trial. For normal cases, the courts were made up of 6046: 4886: 4514: 4323: 4156: 3867: 56: 31: 17: 4034: 1872:, and was first implemented during the period of British rule, with the colonial administration passing the 1469:

Belgium, in common with a number of European civil law jurisdictions, retains the trial by jury through the

4373: 2661: 2364: 1831: 1473:

for serious criminal cases and for political crimes and for press delicts (except those based on racism or

1407: 471: 254: 4468: 2377:, but there are some features common to all of them. In particular there is seldom anything like the U.S. 1901: 6090: 6031: 6026: 6001: 3893: 2691:

In the United States, it is understood that juries usually weigh the evidence and testimony to determine

2669:

conditions that would excuse them from being a juror. If they are deemed qualified, a summons is issued.

2558: 2398: 2347: 2271:, that each party bears its own expense of litigation. This practice was declared to violate the rule of 1327:

of counsel and no reason is needed to use them. All Australian states allow for peremptory challenges in

1084: 991:

Earls and barons shall be fined only by their equals, and in proportion to the gravity of their offence.

853: 442: 434: 4238: 4224: 4062: 4008: 929:. Under the assize, a jury of free men was charged with reporting any crimes that they knew of in their 5418: 5393: 3956: 3538: 2685: 2677: 1688:

in French). Crimes encompass all offenses that carry a penalty of at least 10 years' imprisonment (for

1637: 1095: 841: 752:

the jury was composed of 30 citizens and councilors. The modern jury trial was first introduced in the

384: 2598:, which states in part, "The Trial of all Crimes...shall be by Jury". The right was expanded with the 1819:

was adopted in 1861. These new regulations stipulated that criminal juries were only mandatory in the

6016: 5965: 2829: 2587:

A distinctive feature of jury trials in the United States is that verdicts in criminal cases must be

2510: 2442: 1470: 930: 910: 346: 5633:

The Creation of the Modern German Army: General Walther Reinhardt and the Weimar Republic, 1914-1930

4145: 2201: 6085: 6006: 5579: 5324: 5051:"Supreme Court says unanimous jury verdicts required in state criminal trials for serious offenses" 4981: 3644:

McConville, Mike; Chester Mirsky (December 1995). "The Rise of Guilty Pleas: New York, 1800–1865".

2788: 2497:

Being a Common Law jurisdiction, Gibraltar retains jury trial in a similar manner to that found in

2478: 2272: 2173: 1943: 552: 110: 5705: 4807: 4390: 2787:

is the branch of common law dealing with non-criminal actions. It should not be confused with the

2568:, the types of proceedings that use juries depends on whether such cases were tried by jury under 1776:, jury trials within a dual-court system territories were implemented in Indian territories under 893:

to hear legal argument. They had no professional lawyers, but many of their farmer-warriors, like

5612: 4563: 2474: 2280: 2253: 1947: 1897: 1839: 1486: 1052: 813: 272: 30:"Jury court" redirects here. For the former division of the supreme civil court of Scotland, see 5098:

Matsumoto, John K. (October 1999). "Why No Right to Jury Trial in Marital Dissolution Actions".

4491:"The "Citizen Judge Act" and Its Implications for Major Criminal Cases in Taiwan's Legal System" 1800:. Outside of Presidency towns, Company Courts staffed by EIC officials judged both criminal and 898: 5438: 5156: 4009:"CHIANG LILY v. SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE [2009] HKCFI 100; HCAL 42/2008 (9 February 2009)" 2784: 2623: 2103: 1939: 1716: 1630: 1512: 1151: 894: 779: 331: 5722: 5631: 5480: 5459: 5412: 5387: 2764:

In civil cases, the law (or the agreement of the parties) may permit a non-unanimous verdict.

2602:, which states in part, "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a 5823: 5652: 5606: 5366: 4853: 4836: 4160: 3928: 3596: 3579: 2986: 2851: 2649: 2640: 2632: 2189: 1835: 1773: 1324: 1195: 356: 215: 85: 5679: 1551:

Section 642(2): Jurors may be summoned under subsection (1) by word of mouth, if necessary.

6021: 5950: 5940: 5695: 3571: 3427: 2833: 2360: 2341: 2328: 2217: 2209: 2079: 1951: 1923:. The principal statute regulating the selection, obligations and conduct of juries is the 1846:. Jury trials in India were gradually abolished during the 1960's, culminating in the 1973 1820: 1507:

Section Eleven of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms § Right to trial by jury

1383: 1344: 1320: 787: 749: 547:

Jury trials are increasingly used in a significant share of serious criminal cases in many

210: 190: 52: 4933: 748:'s charter of 1442 secured the right to be tried in all cases by 24 fellow equals, and in 8: 6011: 5549: 5077: 4844: 4358: 3486: 2565: 2545: 2172:

in 1969 by the Abolition of Juries Act, 1969. The last jury trial to be heard was in the

2099: 1975: 1885: 1843: 926: 917: 705: 351: 5699: 5135: 4546: 3371: 2304: 2082:

asked the government to bring an end to jury trials, replacing them with a bench trial (

1842:

recommended its abolition in the fourteenth report that the commission submitted to the

1608:

Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.

5945: 5917: 5902: 5880: 5787: 5566: 5528: 5523: 5504: 5446: 5349: 5341: 4999:"Louisiana voters scrap Jim Crow-era split jury law; unanimous verdicts to be required" 4839: 4415: 4328: 3661: 3503: 2916:

In United States Federal courts, there is no absolute right to waive a jury trial. Per

2854: 2757: 2728: 2704: 2652: 2635: 2386: 2142: 1893: 1777: 1516: 1439:

for murder and treason have also been included, but must be deliberated for six hours.

1395: 1352: 1264: 1203: 701: 563: 450: 241: 233: 228: 205: 200: 195: 120: 65: 5234:

Civil Procedure - White v. McGinnis: The Ninth Circuit Expands Civil Jury Trial Waiver

4856: 2707:, cannot be overturned by a judge if doing so would violate legal protections against 2485:

The trial started in 2010, with the four defendants convicted on the 31 March 2010 by

2204:(nämndemän). However, the defendant has the right to a jury trial in the lower court ( 1684:

In France, a defendant is entitled to a jury trial only when prosecuted for a felony (

840:

in West Berlin, which declared the defendants had the right to a jury trial under the

5860: 5828: 5758: 5732: 5709: 5683: 5658: 5637: 5616: 5509: 5486: 5465: 5422: 5397: 5372: 5353: 5215: 4683: 4658: 4633: 4608: 4550: 4049: 3800:

The presence and growth of juries world-wide affirms some value for lay participation

3789: 3766: 3756: 3731: 3721: 3696: 3686: 3624: 3592: 3446: 3234: 3169: 3141: 3114: 3085: 3060: 3035: 3018: 2992: 2498: 2441:

introduced a controversial bill to limit the right to trial by jury. This became the

2408: 2213: 1963: 1812: 1765: 1698: 1539:—trial by jury is mandatory unless the prosecution consents to trial by judge alone. 1478: 1387: 1356: 1218: 1126: 1056: 1044: 775: 741: 709: 590: 326: 277: 267: 246: 115: 5544: 5254: 4583: 3400:

Vouin, Robert (1956). "The Protection of the Accused in French Criminal Procedure".

3326: 3017:

Acilian Law on the Right to Recovery of Property Officially Extorted, 122 B.C.

2200:

In Sweden, juries are uncommon; the public is represented in the courts by means of

1076:

was that a jury could not be punished simply on account of the verdict it returned.

921:

listening to arguments in court. Henry II also introduced what is now known as the "

5960: 5912: 5865: 5558: 5518: 5500: 5333: 4788: 3653: 3495: 3409: 2909:

For civil cases, a jury trial must be demanded within a certain period of time per

2837: 2715: 2537:. Diplock courts are common in Northern Ireland for crimes connected to terrorism. 2524: 2308: 2292: 1916: 1869: 1769: 1676:, developed trial by jury independently prior to the arrival of Europeans in 1884. 1312: 1072: 1022:

One of the most ancient and most established instruments of power was the court of

959: 889: 760: 463: 316: 170: 105: 5673: 5023:"Louisiana Amendment 2, Unanimous Jury Verdict for Felony Trials Amendment (2018)" 2501:, the exception being that juries consist of nine lay people, rather than twelve. 6095: 5935: 4446: 3440: 3135: 2708: 2696: 2692: 2681: 2233: 2181: 2123: 2119: 1399: 1379: 1336: 1332: 1293: 1191: 934: 876: 806: 802: 665: 559: 529: 379: 125: 2794:

The right to trial by jury in a civil case in federal court is addressed by the

1339:. Eight peremptory challenges are allowed for both counsels for all offences in 5927: 5885: 5461:

Democracy in the Courts: Lay Participation in European Criminal Justice Systems

5319: 5315: 4883:"Jury Nullification: History, questions and answers about nullification, links" 3588: 2533: 2462: 2461:

before passing its second Commons reading in November 2006 but was defeated in

2435: 2428: 2381:

system; jurors are usually just accepted without question. Controversially, in

2370: 2296: 2205: 2185: 2134: 1920: 1865: 1768:

jurors acquitted a Mrs. Ascentia Dawes, who was on trial for the murder of her

1761: 1749: 1720: 1689: 1316: 1147: 1080: 541: 394: 180: 1245: 791: 6079: 5980: 5897: 5780: 5687: 5219: 4111: 3770: 3735: 3700: 3413: 2486: 2177: 1981: 1876:

in 1936. Post-independence, it was amended by the Indian government in 1988.

1210: 1066: 863: 832:) for the Federal Republic. In 1979, the United States tried the East German 616: 5713: 5203: 4711: 3842: 2731:

indicated their disapproval of special interrogatories even in civil cases.

2688:

that allows the accused to choose whether to be judged by judges or a jury.

1723:: Κακουργήματα) are tried by a "mixed court" composed of three professional 580: 5975: 5870: 5120:. Vol. 56. Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Company. 1987. p. 955. 4403:

G+M: "Pistorius murder trial adjourned until April 7" (Reuters) 28 Mar 2014

4112:"BBC Inside Science Clean Air Strategy, Fast Radio Bursts and Kuba Kingdom" 4090: 3750: 3715: 3680: 2887: 2883: 2811: 2799: 2748: 2607: 2603: 2581: 2541: 2169: 2157: 1857: 1797: 1693: 1669: 1226: 1048: 1023: 977: 902: 817: 643: 389: 262: 95: 5288:"Is a Jury Trial Ever Available in a Termination of Parental Rights Case?" 4086:"Hong Kong tycoon Jimmy Lai to plead not guilty in national security case" 2300: 708:, surmising a link between the king’s reforms and the legal system of the 44: 5970: 5907: 5027: 4736: 3283: 2903: 2899: 2751:, while in most states and at the federal level, it is set by the judge. 2569: 2416: 2264: 2002: 1824: 1793: 1419: 1183: 942: 868: 733: 568: 533: 321: 220: 5772: 4185: 1915:

Juries are selected from a jury panel, which is picked at random by the

5845: 5838: 5833: 5570: 5532: 4547:

A jury trial begins in Sheremet's case. We tell how he works in Ukraine

3665: 3530: 3507: 3347: 2891: 2825: 2724: 2673: 2438: 2420: 1905: 1889: 1861: 1753: 1474: 1403: 1340: 1091: 1011: 1007: 922: 745: 650:, Athena dictates that the verdict should henceforth be for acquittal. 548: 419: 341: 165: 155: 5485:. International and Comparative Criminal Justice. Ashgate Publishing. 5450: 5345: 858: 5890: 5875: 5855: 5850: 2902:

resulting in a plea bargain. If the defendant waives a jury trial, a

2895: 2736: 2588: 2528: 2378: 2311:—provide for courts composed of both professional judges and laymen ( 2153: 2115: 1808: 1728: 1436: 1411: 1369: 1363: 1307: 1055:, were found not guilty by a jury. The judge then fined the jury for 753: 687: 647: 626:

trilogy. In the play, the innovation is brought about by the goddess

611: 300: 160: 90: 5562: 3957:"JURY ACT 1977 - SECT 55F Majority verdicts in criminal proceedings" 3657: 3652:(4). Blackwell Publishing on behalf of Cardiff University: 443–474. 3499: 3386:

Juries and Technology: Equipping Jurors for the Twenty-First Century

414: 5728: 5337: 4812: 4464: 4416:"Honeymoon murder: Timeline of events for Shrien Dewani - BBC News" 3473:

Conviction: The Determination of Guilt or Innocence without Trial 3

2814:. Actions at law had a right to a jury, actions in equity did not. 2577: 2385:

there has been some screening in sensitive security cases, but the

1532: 1482: 1391: 1375: 1348: 1159: 905:

of Ethelred, one provision of which stated that the twelve leading

771: 622: 603: 3543: 2780: 2719: 2424: 2382: 2344: 2180:

in the article "Do we need a jury system?" On 28 March 2014, the

1801: 1785: 1757: 1524: 1423: 1213:, jury trials are available in both civil and criminal cases. In 1155: 1088: 1040: 884: 821: 798: 794: 737: 660: 639: 635: 145: 2665:

not dropped and can be reinstated if the government so chooses.

1748:

The history of jury trials in India dates back to the period of

1119: 1035:

lawful judgment of his peers, or by the law of the land ...

5654:

The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich: A History of Nazi Germany

4391:

http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/do-we-need-a-jury-system/

2898:

often have a strong interest in resolving the criminal case by

1853: 1789: 1536: 1528: 1520: 1214: 1187: 1171: 756:

in 1798, with a court consisting most commonly of 12 citizens (

721: 696: 631: 627: 336: 295: 135: 5636:. Monographs in German History. Vol. 12. Berghahn Books. 3788:. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. pp. 232–234. 3643: 2810:

civil actions were divided into actions at law and actions in

4341: 4339: 3107:

Property, Social Structure, and Law in the Modern Middle East

2699:, although the dissenting justices in the Supreme Court case 2389:

have firmly set themselves against any form of jury vetting.

2221: 1724: 1199: 906: 537: 521: 5322:(January 1972). "Lay Judges in the German Criminal Courts". 2086:) consisting of two law-trained judges and five lay judges ( 1651:

The government can issue a judge-only trial order under the

5803: 4784:"Two jailed for life for killing policeman Stephen Carroll" 3295: 3271: 3259: 3110: 2963: 2886:

cases are not concluded with a jury verdict, but rather by

2739:, especially when presented with testimony from witnesses. 2573: 2229: 2111: 1796:

employed juries to judge European and Indian defendants in

1712: 1328: 1292:

The first trials by civilian juries of 12 in the colony of

692: 683: 525: 130: 4539: 4537: 4535: 4336: 3991:"The Hong Kong legal system takes China's road to justice" 3755:. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 121–123. 3720:. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 115–116. 3623:. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 120–121. 2090:). This has now been fully implemented as of March 2021. 634:

takes part in the trial as the advocate for the defendant

610:

The institution of trial by jury was ritually depicted by

5055: 4298: 4296: 4294: 4292: 4290: 4288: 4286: 3212: 3210: 2184:

trial was adjourned due to the illness of one of the two

2118:, in that they sit separately from the judges and decide 1942:

composed of three judges instead of a jury, one from the

1938:

may issue a certificate that the accused be tried by the

1811:

assumed control over the EIC's possessions in India, the

3197: 3195: 2840:, and thus up to the judge's discretion, not a jury. In 2680:

recognize the right to a jury trial to be a fundamental

2531:

offences by courts where the judge sits alone, known as

2295:

provides for genuine jury trials. Several other cantons—

1002:

During the mid-14th century, persons who had sat on the

4532: 3921: 3843:"21 Oct 1824 - TRIAL BY JURY IN THE COURTS OF SESSIONS" 3348:"Trial by ordeal: When fire and water determined guilt" 2291:

As of 2008, only the code of criminal procedure of the

1934:

For certain terrorist and organised crime offences the

715: 4283: 4267:"Stortinget fjerner juryen fra rettssalen (Norwegian)" 3247: 3207: 2060:) is administered by a three-judge panel (usually one 1719:

and Code of criminal procedure provide that felonies (

797:. An 1873 draft on criminal procedure produced by the 630:, who summons twelve citizens to sit as jury. The god 3685:. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p. 130. 3529: 3442:

Fundamentals of Criminal Justice: A Sociological View

3307: 3192: 2804:

Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States

2049:) in each case to the jury before deliberations. The 1515:

also provides for the right to a jury trial for most

724:

ordinance of 1562 called for the summons of jurymen (

5598:

The Hitler Trial Before the People's Court in Munich

4140: 4138: 4136: 4134: 4132: 4130: 4128: 3438: 1422:

verdicts if the defendant is on trial for murder or

5255:"Companies Ask People To Waive Right to Jury Trial" 4997:SIMERMAN, JOHN; RUSSELL, GORDON (6 November 2018). 4515:"Citizen judge system revolutionary - Taipei Times" 4225:"sections 73-74, Criminal Procedure Act 2011 No 81" 4144: 3426:Magistrates' Courts (Northern Ireland) Order 1981, 3104: 1658: 5755:The Trial: A History from Socrates to O.J. Simpson 5157:"CRS/LII Annotated Constitution Seventh Amendment" 5132:"The Constitution of the United States of America" 4945: 3019:http://avalon.law.yale.edu/ancient/acilian_law.asp 2580:for monetary damages using juries, but "courts of 1364:Majority and unanimous verdicts in criminal trials 5594:Der Hitler-Prozeß vor dem Volksgericht in München 4962: 4125: 3951: 3949: 2991:. Cambridge University Press. pp. 244, 246. 2600:Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution 1850:, which remains in effect into the 21st century. 1269:Overall, jury use has been increasing worldwide. 32:Court of Session § Court of Session Act 1810 6077: 4808:"Non-jury trial option 'essential' says Goggins" 3084:. Cambridge University Press. pp. 205–210. 2614:, these rights also apply to the states through 2540:Diplock courts were created in the 1970s during 5414:Judiciaries Within Europe: A Comparative Review 5248: 5246: 4996: 4763:"Armed raiders jailed after trial without jury" 4317: 4315: 4313: 4311: 3079: 2596:Article Three of the United States Constitution 1711:The country that originated the concept of the 1300: 774:the jury trial was suppressed by decree of the 5202:Allan, Arbman; James, McConnell (2016-01-01). 5178:"Amoco Oil Co. V. Torcomian | Casebriefs" 4204:"The Abolition of the Jury System in Malaysia" 3946: 3029: 2988:The Cambridge companion to the Age of Pericles 1834:. The system received no mentions in the 1950 844:, and hence were tried by a West German jury. 5788: 4979: 4949:Sense and Non-Sense: Jury Trial Communication 4324:"In Russia, Jury Is Something to Work Around" 3847:Sydney Gazette and New South Wales Advertiser 3059:. University of Chicago Press. pp. 4–8. 2939:legal options guaranteed by the Constitution. 2594:The right to a trial by jury is contained in 1929:Civil Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 2008 493: 5592: 5385: 5314: 5243: 4906: 4374:"Lee Kuan Yew's Opposition to Trial by Jury" 4371: 4308: 4190:Facebook, RIGHT TO RECALL AGAINST CORRUPTION 3822:"Democracy - Faculty Projects :: SETIS" 3382: 3301: 3277: 3265: 2365:Privilege of peerage § Trial by peers 2030:Norway has a system where the lower courts ( 1892:jurisdiction, jury trials are available for 1696:). The only court that tries by jury is the 1250:Juries in the United States § Reception 826: 758: 726: 653: 5499: 4910:Justices Say Jurors May Not Vote Conscience 4186:"Jury system in Parsi Matrimonial Disputes" 4078: 4022: 3811:au/senate/general/constitution/chapter3.htm 3402:International and Comparative Law Quarterly 3289: 1823:of Presidency towns; in all other parts of 949: 5795: 5781: 5201: 4359:"'Judiciary', Singapore - A Country Study" 4239:"section 16, Senior Courts Act 2016 No 48" 3929:"Jury Amendment (Verdicts) Act 2006 No 19" 3054: 2779:In the United States, a civil action is a 2133:Trial by jury was first introduced in the 500: 486: 5802: 5608:Press and politics in the Weimar Republic 5522: 5204:"Trial by Jury: The New Irrelevant Right" 5097: 4969:, vol. 50, Va. L. Rev., p. 1055 4952:, vol. 1975, BYU L.Rev., p. 601 4488: 3906:"Smith v The Queen [2015] HCA 27" 3476: 3133: 3034:. Oxford University Press. pp. 7–9. 2208:) when accused of an offence against the 1715:trial retains it in an unusual form. The 1565:The Supreme Court of Canada also held in 1286:Section 80 of the Australian Constitution 901:set up an early legal system through the 37:For other uses and related subjects, see 5724:World Criminal Justice Systems: A Survey 5629: 5505:"On Uses and Misuses of Comparative Law" 5360: 5048: 2964:Jury trials: terminating parental rights 2870:enter judgment on the equitable claims. 2774: 1542: 857: 43: 5956:Racial discrimination in jury selection 5720: 5694: 5252: 4880: 4706: 4704: 4489:Institute, Global Taiwan (2023-04-05). 4458: 4345: 4302: 3253: 3228: 3216: 3201: 3170:"The Islamic Origins of the Common Law" 3167: 2877: 2701:Sparf et al. v. U.S. 156 U.S. 51 (1895) 1527:, intimidating Parliament, inciting to 1265:Jury § Trial procedures by country 1258: 14: 6078: 5650: 5478: 5457: 4760: 3783: 3432: 3313: 3161: 2984: 2955:UKHL 5 issued by the United Kingdom's 2392: 2244:verdict in the district court. Hence, 732:), and various methods were in use in 5776: 5604: 5577: 5539: 5435: 4321: 4001: 3748: 3713: 3678: 3618: 3566: 3465: 3399: 3127: 2226:incitement to ethnic or racial hatred 2037:In the higher court/appellate court ( 5671: 5578:Bauer, Franz J. (23 December 2009). 5410: 5295:National Center for Juvenile Justice 5100:Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues 4874: 4729: 4701: 4676: 4576: 4075:.Ss 24 and 33A, High Court Ordinance 3814: 3534:"Interview: Judge Michael McSpadden" 3057:The Expert Witness in Islamic Courts 2610:, by an impartial jury". Due to the 2240:be overruled after appeal, unlike a 1993:system was implemented in May 2009. 1908:cases, consisting of twelve jurors. 1588: 1560:R v Mid-Valley Tractor Sales Limited 847: 716:Holy Roman Empire and modern Germany 5049:de Vogue, Ariana (April 20, 2020). 4712:"First trial without jury approved" 4459:Mansour, Fati (29 September 2008). 4408: 3777: 2918:Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 2518: 2403:History of trial by jury in England 2277:European Convention on Human Rights 2015:New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 1132: 24: 5747: 5524:10.1111/j.1468-2230.1974.tb02366.x 5363:German Federal Ministry of Justice 4936: (1st Cir. July 11, 1969). 4871:, 818 F.2d 1169 (1989), dissenting 4737:"First no-jury crime trial begins" 4684:"Lords defeat no-jury trials plan" 4322:Barry, Ellen (November 15, 2010). 4178: 3572:"The Case Against Plea Bargaining" 3140:. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 73. 3082:Positive Law from the Muslim World 2657:Supreme Court of the United States 2455:Fraud (Trials Without a Jury) Bill 945:. Article 39 of Magna Carta read: 620:, the third and final play of his 25: 6107: 5768: 5253:Spencer, Jane (August 17, 2004). 5238:Golden Gate University Law Review 4986:, vol. 107, Yale Law Journal 4659:"Commons passes jury-less trials" 4634:"Non-jury trial plans under fire" 4609:"No-jury trial plan 'presses on'" 4584:"Straw on trial over jury reform" 3482:"Plea Bargaining And Its History" 3445:. Jones & Bartlett Learning. 3105:Ann Elizabeth Mayer, ed. (1985). 2843:Beacon Theaters, Inc. v. Westover 2354: 2275:according to article 6.2. of the 2220:. If a person is accused of e.g. 2168:The jury system was abolished in 2141:in 1864, and abolished after the 2122:alone while the judge determines 1229:, which bypasses the jury trial. 5557:(6). footnote 7, pp. 1069–1070. 5482:A World View of Criminal Justice 5280: 5265: 2911:Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 2816:Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 2552: 2453:, then pressed forward with the 1674:Democratic Republic of the Congo 1659:Democratic Republic of the Congo 1636:There are no jury trials in the 1593: 686:, litigants in court may obtain 413: 6065:Fully Informed Jury Association 5675:European Constitutional History 5386:Delmas-Marty, Mireille (2002). 5226: 5195: 5170: 5149: 5134:. Gpoaccess.gov. Archived from 5124: 5110: 5091: 5070: 5042: 5015: 4990: 4983:The Jury's Rise as Lie Detector 4973: 4956: 4939: 4921: 4900: 4862: 4828:District of Columbia v. Clawans 4820: 4800: 4776: 4754: 4651: 4626: 4601: 4556: 4507: 4482: 4452: 4433: 4396: 4380: 4365: 4351: 4259: 4245: 4241:. Parliamentary Counsel Office. 4231: 4227:. Parliamentary Counsel Office. 4217: 4196: 4104: 4069: 3983: 3974: 3898: 3883: 3860: 3835: 3805: 3752:The death of the American trial 3742: 3717:The death of the American trial 3707: 3682:The death of the American trial 3672: 3637: 3621:The death of the American trial 3612: 3560: 3523: 3439:Barkan, S.; Bryjak, G. (2011). 3420: 3393: 3376: 3365: 3340: 3319: 3222: 3134:Al-Rodhan, Nayef R. F. (2012). 2821:Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 2695:, while judges usually rule on 2259:In Swedish civil process, the " 2163: 2139:Judicial reform of Alexander II 2110:They are similar to common law 1936:Director of Public Prosecutions 1815:was adopted. A year later, the 1663: 1653:Hong Kong national security law 1177: 1144:judicial reform of Alexander II 1006:(i.e., in modern parlance, the 862:Drawing from a 1920 edition of 72:Criminal trials and convictions 5678:. Jennings & Pye. p. 4966:Dignity of the Civil Jury, The 4885:. law.umkc.edu. Archived from 4765:. London: The Independent (UK) 4461:"Le jury populaire à l'agonie" 3327:"Narrative History of England" 3098: 3073: 3048: 3023: 3011: 2978: 2934:The article goes on to claim: 2286: 2008: 1874:Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act 1567:Basarabas and Spek v The Queen 1246:Jury § Jury effectiveness 881:A Shortened History of England 838:United States Court for Berlin 805:the jury was abolished by the 677: 555:countries for criminal cases. 362:Sexually violent predator laws 39:Trial by Jury (disambiguation) 13: 1: 5545:"Criminal Justice in Germany" 3168:Makdisi, John (1 June 1999). 2972: 1239: 642:as prosecutors for the slain 532:. It is distinguished from a 57:Buckinghamshire County Museum 5721:Terrill, Richard J. (2009). 5585:Historisches Lexikon Bayerns 5389:European Criminal Procedures 4907:Dolan, Maura (May 8, 2001), 2492: 2148: 1692:) or a fine of €75,000 (for 1584: 1301:Challenging potential jurors 1280: 1272: 581:Jury § Historical roots 255:Cruel and unusual punishment 7: 5651:Shirer, William L. (1990). 5368:Criminal Justice in Germany 4946:Forston, Robert F. (1975), 4761:Hughes, Mark (2010-03-31). 4564:"Criminal Justice Act 1967" 3980:Ss. 3 and 24 Jury Oridnance 3890:Criminal Procedure Act 2004 3824:. setis.library.usyd.edu.au 2559:Juries in the United States 2504: 2399:Juries in England and Wales 2373:consists of three separate 2093: 1996: 1804:without the use of a jury. 1706: 1679: 1125:the rules of law and their 854:Juries in England and Wales 818:Federal Republic of Germany 646:. In the event the jury is 10: 6112: 5630:Mulligan, William (2005). 5580:"Volksgerichte, 1918-1924" 5419:Cambridge University Press 5394:Cambridge University Press 4963:Kalven, Harry Jr. (1964), 3646:Journal of Law and Society 2882:The vast majority of U.S. 2778: 2678:United States Constitution 2556: 2508: 2396: 2358: 2335: 1973: 1879: 1817:Code of Criminal Procedure 1734: 1504: 1464: 1456: 1367: 1262: 1243: 1117: 1096:United States Constitution 964:Essay on the Trial by Jury 851: 842:United States Constitution 668:. The law was as follows: 578: 574: 457: English/Welsh courts 36: 29: 6057: 5989: 5966:Scientific jury selection 5926: 5811: 4387:Constitutionally Speaking 3749:Burns, Robert P. (2009). 3714:Burns, Robert P. (2009). 3679:Burns, Robert P. (2009). 3619:Burns, Robert P. (2009). 3542:. Boston, Massachusetts: 3229:Forsyth, William (2010). 3174:North Carolina Law Review 2985:Samons, Loren J. (2007). 2789:legal system of civil law 2511:Trial by jury in Scotland 2443:Criminal Justice Act 2003 2322: 2195: 2025: 1602:This section needs to be 1558:According to the case of 1500: 1492: 1323:are usually based on the 1319:cannot be employed much. 1165: 1137: 958:It is translated thus by 877:George Macaulay Trevelyan 814:American-occupied Germany 812:Between 1948 and 1950 in 654:Roman Republic and Empire 585: 5704:. J. W. Parker. p. 5701:History of Trial by Jury 5605:Fulda, Bernhard (2009). 5479:Vogler, Richard (2005). 5458:Malsch, Marijke (2009). 5325:Journal of Legal Studies 4405:(in print one day later) 4157:École Normale Supérieure 3784:Thomas, Suja A. (2016). 3302:Casper & Zeisel 1972 3278:Casper & Zeisel 1972 3266:Casper & Zeisel 1972 3231:History of Trial by Jury 3080:Baudouin Dupret (2021). 2749:the jury sets punishment 2273:presumption of innocence 1969: 1957: 1743: 1579: 1378:verdicts are allowed in 1083:colonies, including the 834:LOT Flight 165 hijacking 828:Vereinheitlichungsgesetz 593:had a mechanism, called 111:Presumption of innocence 5613:Oxford University Press 5259:The Wall Street Journal 4495:Global Taiwan Institute 3587:(3). Washington, D.C.: 3113:Press. pp. 54–64. 3030:Lawrence Rosen (2000). 2281:Supreme Court of Sweden 2254:Supreme Court of Sweden 1989:(裁判員 "lay judge"). The 1848:Criminal Procedure Code 1840:Law Commission of India 1772:. During the period of 1629:Criminal trials in the 1289:Parliament prescribes. 1113: 971:by the law of the land. 909:(minor nobles) of each 704:jury trials under King 273:Indefinite imprisonment 5990:Specific jurisdictions 5753:Sadakat Kadri (2005). 5657:. Simon and Schuster. 5464:. Ashgate Publishing. 5439:Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 5080:. United States Courts 4980:George Fisher (1997), 4253:"s46C Juries Act 1981" 4150:"Lay Justice in India" 3546:Educational Foundation 3414:10.1093/iclqaj/5.2.157 2941: 2932: 2714:It was established in 2624:Apprendi v. New Jersey 2104:Constitution of Russia 1940:Special Criminal Court 1902:Central Criminal Court 1832:independence activists 1717:Constitution of Greece 1487:crime against humanity 1037: 1028: 1000: 973: 956: 950: 872: 827: 780:Frankfurt Constitution 759: 727: 675: 332:Miscarriage of justice 59: 5672:Case, Nelson (1902). 5275:[2002] UKHL 5 4393:Retrieved 2013-01-08. 4389:, 9 September 2009 — 4029:. thestandard.com.hk 3389:, Brooklyn Law Review 3383:N. S. Marder (2000), 3292:, footnote 73, p. 18. 2936: 2927: 2775:Civil trial procedure 2641:Blakely v. Washington 2214:freedom of expression 2174:District of Kimberley 1980:On May 28, 2004, the 1774:Company rule in India 1750:European colonization 1672:, in what is now the 1543:Jury panel exhaustion 1477:), and for crimes of 1321:Peremptory challenges 1196:malicious prosecution 1062:Court of Common Pleas 1032: 1020: 985: 968: 947: 916:In the 12th century, 861: 684:Islamic jurisprudence 670: 544:makes all decisions. 357:Sex offender registry 77:Rights of the accused 47: 5951:Peremptory challenge 5941:Death-qualified jury 5361:Jehle, Jörg-Martin; 4934:416 F.2d 165 4665:. London. 2006-11-29 4640:. London. 2005-11-21 4615:. London. 2005-11-26 4471:on 29 September 2008 3478:Alschuler, Albert W. 3032:The Justice of Islam 2878:Waiver of jury trial 2834:specific performance 2612:Fourteenth Amendment 2361:Rights of Englishmen 2329:Lay judges in Taiwan 2317:tribunaux d'échevins 2218:freedom of the press 2080:Norwegian Parliament 1259:In various countries 1070:. The ruling in the 899:Æthelred the Unready 788:Frankfurt Parliament 528:makes a decision or 443:English/Welsh courts 371:Related areas of law 5550:Michigan Law Review 5411:Bell, John (2006). 4917:on December 2, 2006 4845:Baldwin v. New York 4553:(10 September 2020) 4519:www.taipeitimes.com 4348:, pp. 438–439. 4146:Jean-Louis Halpérin 3487:Columbia Law Review 3372:Magna Carta of 1215 3055:Ron Shaham (2010). 2923:Wall Street Journal 2743:penalty should be. 2566:American Revolution 2546:Operation Demetrius 2489:at the Old Bailey. 2413:Magistrates' Courts 2375:legal jurisdictions 2137:as a result of the 2100:judiciary of Russia 2070:lagrettens ordfører 2041:) there is a jury ( 1976:Lay judges in Japan 1886:Republic of Ireland 1858:Indian legal system 1836:Indian Constitution 1807:In 1860, after the 1760:composed of twelve 1517:indictable offences 1313:challenge for cause 927:Assize of Clarendon 809:of 4 January 1924. 784:Revolutions of 1848 352:Restorative justice 27:Type of legal trial 6091:Criminal procedure 5946:Jury questionnaire 5918:Summary jury trial 5903:Jury sequestration 5881:Jury nullification 5824:Citizens' assembly 5541:Wolff, Hans Julius 5232:Leney HC. (1991). 4869:Landry v. Hoepfner 4445:2013-12-27 at the 4372:George P. Landow. 4329:The New York Times 4192:. August 30, 2016. 3961:www.austlii.edu.au 3471:Newman, D. (1966) 2838:equitable remedies 2758:Ramos v. Louisiana 2705:jury nullification 2570:English common law 2471:Lord Chief Justice 2348:allows jury trials 2143:October Revolution 1927:as amended by the 1921:electoral register 1780:(EIC) control. In 1778:East India Company 1396:Northern Territory 1353:Northern Territory 1204:false imprisonment 1108:Seventh Amendments 1016:History of England 978:consuetudinary law 873: 702:English Common Law 564:criminal procedure 242:Capital punishment 234:Dangerous offender 121:Self-incrimination 66:Criminal procedure 60: 6073: 6072: 6002:England and Wales 5861:Jury instructions 5806:-related articles 5757:. HarperCollins. 5738:978-1-59345-612-2 5664:978-0-671-72868-7 5643:978-1-57181-908-6 5622:978-0-19-954778-4 5510:Modern Law Review 5501:Kahn-Freund, Otto 5492:978-0-7546-2467-7 5471:978-0-7546-7405-4 5428:978-0-521-86072-7 5403:978-0-521-59110-2 5378:978-3-936999-51-8 5159:. Law.cornell.edu 4793:. 30 March 2012. 4551:Ukrayinska Pravda 4148:(25 March 2011). 4057:Missing or empty 3868:"Jury Trials XII" 3849:. 21 October 1824 3795:978-1-107-05565-0 3762:978-0-226-08126-7 3727:978-0-226-08126-7 3692:978-0-226-08126-7 3630:978-0-226-08126-7 3532:(June 17, 2004). 3147:978-0-230-39320-2 2998:978-0-521-80793-7 2857: (1959), the 2802:'s 1833 treatise 2796:Seventh Amendment 2693:questions of fact 2655: (2004), the 2638: (2000), and 2499:England and Wales 2487:Mr Justice Treacy 2421:"indictable-only" 2409:England and Wales 2393:England and Wales 2120:questions of fact 2078:In May 2015, the 1896:cases before the 1844:Indian government 1813:Indian Penal Code 1623: 1622: 1479:international law 1388:Western Australia 1357:Western Australia 1219:England and Wales 1127:jury instructions 1057:contempt of court 1045:unlawful assembly 895:Njáll Þorgeirsson 848:England and Wales 790:was dissolved by 776:Habsburg monarchy 754:Rhenish provinces 710:Kingdom of Sicily 510: 509: 385:Criminal defenses 327:Habitual offender 278:Three-strikes law 268:Life imprisonment 247:Execution warrant 116:Exclusionary rule 16:(Redirected from 6103: 5961:Strike for cause 5913:Juror misconduct 5866:Specific finding 5812:Primary articles 5797: 5790: 5783: 5774: 5773: 5742: 5717: 5696:Forsyth, William 5691: 5668: 5647: 5626: 5601: 5589: 5574: 5536: 5526: 5503:(January 1974). 5496: 5475: 5454: 5432: 5407: 5382: 5357: 5307: 5306: 5304: 5302: 5292: 5284: 5278: 5269: 5263: 5262: 5250: 5241: 5230: 5224: 5223: 5199: 5193: 5192: 5190: 5189: 5180:. Archived from 5174: 5168: 5167: 5165: 5164: 5153: 5147: 5146: 5144: 5143: 5128: 5122: 5121: 5114: 5108: 5107: 5095: 5089: 5088: 5086: 5085: 5074: 5068: 5067: 5065: 5063: 5046: 5040: 5039: 5037: 5035: 5019: 5013: 5012: 5010: 5009: 4994: 4988: 4987: 4977: 4971: 4970: 4960: 4954: 4953: 4943: 4937: 4931: 4925: 4919: 4918: 4913:, archived from 4904: 4898: 4897: 4895: 4894: 4878: 4872: 4866: 4860: 4842: (1937) and 4824: 4818: 4817: 4804: 4798: 4797: 4780: 4774: 4773: 4771: 4770: 4758: 4752: 4751: 4749: 4748: 4733: 4727: 4726: 4724: 4723: 4708: 4699: 4698: 4696: 4695: 4680: 4674: 4673: 4671: 4670: 4655: 4649: 4648: 4646: 4645: 4630: 4624: 4623: 4621: 4620: 4605: 4599: 4598: 4596: 4595: 4580: 4574: 4573: 4571: 4570: 4560: 4554: 4545: 4541: 4530: 4529: 4527: 4526: 4511: 4505: 4504: 4502: 4501: 4486: 4480: 4479: 4477: 4476: 4467:. Archived from 4456: 4450: 4437: 4431: 4430: 4428: 4427: 4412: 4406: 4400: 4394: 4384: 4378: 4377: 4369: 4363: 4362: 4355: 4349: 4343: 4334: 4333: 4319: 4306: 4300: 4281: 4280: 4278: 4277: 4263: 4257: 4256: 4249: 4243: 4242: 4235: 4229: 4228: 4221: 4215: 4214: 4212: 4210: 4200: 4194: 4193: 4182: 4176: 4175: 4173: 4171: 4165: 4159:. Archived from 4154: 4142: 4123: 4122: 4120: 4118: 4108: 4102: 4101: 4099: 4098: 4082: 4076: 4073: 4067: 4066: 4060: 4055: 4053: 4045: 4043: 4042: 4033:. Archived from 4026: 4020: 4019: 4017: 4016: 4005: 3999: 3998: 3987: 3981: 3978: 3972: 3971: 3969: 3967: 3953: 3944: 3943: 3941: 3939: 3925: 3919: 3918: 3916: 3915: 3910: 3902: 3896: 3887: 3881: 3880: 3878: 3877: 3872: 3864: 3858: 3857: 3855: 3854: 3839: 3833: 3832: 3830: 3829: 3818: 3812: 3809: 3803: 3802: 3781: 3775: 3774: 3746: 3740: 3739: 3711: 3705: 3704: 3676: 3670: 3669: 3641: 3635: 3634: 3616: 3610: 3609: 3604: 3603: 3576: 3564: 3558: 3557: 3552: 3551: 3527: 3521: 3520: 3515: 3514: 3480:(January 1979). 3469: 3463: 3462: 3460: 3459: 3436: 3430: 3424: 3418: 3417: 3397: 3391: 3390: 3380: 3374: 3369: 3363: 3362: 3360: 3359: 3344: 3338: 3337: 3335: 3334: 3323: 3317: 3311: 3305: 3299: 3293: 3290:Kahn-Freund 1974 3287: 3281: 3275: 3269: 3263: 3257: 3251: 3245: 3244: 3226: 3220: 3214: 3205: 3199: 3190: 3189: 3187: 3185: 3165: 3159: 3158: 3156: 3154: 3131: 3125: 3124: 3102: 3096: 3095: 3077: 3071: 3070: 3052: 3046: 3045: 3027: 3021: 3015: 3009: 3008: 3006: 3005: 2982: 2951:The judgment on 2925:article states: 2859:US Supreme Court 2697:questions of law 2525:Northern Ireland 2519:Northern Ireland 2459:House of Commons 2451:Attorney General 2313:Schöffengerichte 2293:Canton of Geneva 2210:fundamental laws 2124:questions of law 1917:county registrar 1870:local government 1782:Presidency towns 1770:enslaved servant 1618: 1615: 1609: 1597: 1596: 1589: 1574:Tran v The Queen 1133:Various verdicts 1120:Jury § Role 960:Lysander Spooner 954: 836:suspects in the 830: 764: 730: 648:split six to six 530:findings of fact 522:legal proceeding 502: 495: 488: 474: 466: 458: 453: 445: 437: 418: 417: 317:Criminal justice 171:Directed verdict 62: 61: 21: 6111: 6110: 6106: 6105: 6104: 6102: 6101: 6100: 6086:Types of trials 6076: 6075: 6074: 6069: 6053: 5985: 5936:Change of venue 5922: 5807: 5801: 5771: 5750: 5748:Further reading 5745: 5739: 5665: 5644: 5623: 5563:10.2307/1283584 5493: 5472: 5429: 5404: 5379: 5316:Casper, Gerhard 5310: 5300: 5298: 5290: 5286: 5285: 5281: 5270: 5266: 5251: 5244: 5231: 5227: 5200: 5196: 5187: 5185: 5176: 5175: 5171: 5162: 5160: 5155: 5154: 5150: 5141: 5139: 5130: 5129: 5125: 5116: 5115: 5111: 5096: 5092: 5083: 5081: 5076: 5075: 5071: 5061: 5059: 5047: 5043: 5033: 5031: 5021: 5020: 5016: 5007: 5005: 4995: 4991: 4978: 4974: 4961: 4957: 4944: 4940: 4927: 4926: 4922: 4905: 4901: 4892: 4890: 4879: 4875: 4867: 4863: 4825: 4821: 4816:. 3 March 2010. 4806: 4805: 4801: 4782: 4781: 4777: 4768: 4766: 4759: 4755: 4746: 4744: 4735: 4734: 4730: 4721: 4719: 4710: 4709: 4702: 4693: 4691: 4682: 4681: 4677: 4668: 4666: 4657: 4656: 4652: 4643: 4641: 4632: 4631: 4627: 4618: 4616: 4607: 4606: 4602: 4593: 4591: 4582: 4581: 4577: 4568: 4566: 4562: 4561: 4557: 4543: 4542: 4533: 4524: 4522: 4513: 4512: 4508: 4499: 4497: 4487: 4483: 4474: 4472: 4457: 4453: 4447:Wayback Machine 4440:NJA 2012 s. 940 4438: 4434: 4425: 4423: 4414: 4413: 4409: 4401: 4397: 4385: 4381: 4370: 4366: 4357: 4356: 4352: 4344: 4337: 4320: 4309: 4301: 4284: 4275: 4273: 4265: 4264: 4260: 4251: 4250: 4246: 4237: 4236: 4232: 4223: 4222: 4218: 4208: 4206: 4202: 4201: 4197: 4184: 4183: 4179: 4169: 4167: 4163: 4152: 4143: 4126: 4116: 4114: 4110: 4109: 4105: 4096: 4094: 4084: 4083: 4079: 4074: 4070: 4058: 4056: 4047: 4046: 4040: 4038: 4028: 4027: 4023: 4014: 4012: 4007: 4006: 4002: 3989: 3988: 3984: 3979: 3975: 3965: 3963: 3955: 3954: 3947: 3937: 3935: 3927: 3926: 3922: 3913: 3911: 3908: 3904: 3903: 3899: 3888: 3884: 3875: 3873: 3870: 3866: 3865: 3861: 3852: 3850: 3841: 3840: 3836: 3827: 3825: 3820: 3819: 3815: 3810: 3806: 3796: 3782: 3778: 3763: 3747: 3743: 3728: 3712: 3708: 3693: 3677: 3673: 3658:10.2307/1410610 3642: 3638: 3631: 3617: 3613: 3601: 3599: 3574: 3565: 3561: 3549: 3547: 3528: 3524: 3512: 3510: 3500:10.2307/1122051 3470: 3466: 3457: 3455: 3453: 3437: 3433: 3425: 3421: 3398: 3394: 3381: 3377: 3370: 3366: 3357: 3355: 3346: 3345: 3341: 3332: 3330: 3329:. Britannia.com 3325: 3324: 3320: 3312: 3308: 3300: 3296: 3288: 3284: 3276: 3272: 3264: 3260: 3252: 3248: 3241: 3227: 3223: 3215: 3208: 3200: 3193: 3183: 3181: 3166: 3162: 3152: 3150: 3148: 3132: 3128: 3121: 3103: 3099: 3092: 3078: 3074: 3067: 3053: 3049: 3042: 3028: 3024: 3016: 3012: 3003: 3001: 2999: 2983: 2979: 2975: 2966: 2880: 2792: 2777: 2729:Justice Douglas 2709:double jeopardy 2563: 2561: 2555: 2544:, to phase out 2521: 2513: 2507: 2495: 2465:in March 2007. 2405: 2397:Main articles: 2395: 2387:Scottish courts 2367: 2357: 2338: 2325: 2289: 2198: 2182:Oscar Pistorius 2166: 2151: 2096: 2028: 2011: 1999: 1978: 1972: 1960: 1925:Juries Act 1976 1882: 1864:juries and the 1746: 1737: 1709: 1690:natural persons 1682: 1666: 1661: 1619: 1613: 1610: 1607: 1598: 1594: 1587: 1582: 1545: 1509: 1503: 1495: 1471:Court of Assize 1467: 1459: 1445:The Queensland 1400:New South Wales 1380:South Australia 1372: 1366: 1355:allow for six. 1337:South Australia 1333:New South Wales 1303: 1294:New South Wales 1283: 1275: 1267: 1261: 1252: 1242: 1192:forced abortion 1180: 1168: 1140: 1135: 1122: 1116: 1004:Presenting Jury 935:trial by ordeal 856: 850: 807:Emminger Reform 803:Weimar Republic 718: 680: 666:trial by combat 656: 588: 583: 577: 560:civil procedure 542:panel of judges 506: 477: 469: 464:Canadian courts 461: 456: 451:Scottish courts 448: 440: 432: 424: 412: 399: 380:Civil procedure 366: 287:Post-sentencing 282: 251: 225: 175: 140: 126:Double jeopardy 42: 35: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 6109: 6099: 6098: 6093: 6088: 6071: 6070: 6068: 6067: 6061: 6059: 6055: 6054: 6052: 6051: 6050: 6049: 6044: 6039: 6037:Jury selection 6034: 6024: 6019: 6014: 6009: 6004: 5999: 5993: 5991: 5987: 5986: 5984: 5983: 5978: 5973: 5968: 5963: 5958: 5953: 5948: 5943: 5938: 5932: 5930: 5928:Jury selection 5924: 5923: 5921: 5920: 5915: 5910: 5905: 5900: 5895: 5894: 5893: 5886:Jury tampering 5883: 5878: 5873: 5868: 5863: 5858: 5853: 5848: 5843: 5842: 5841: 5831: 5829:Coroner's jury 5826: 5821: 5815: 5813: 5809: 5808: 5800: 5799: 5792: 5785: 5777: 5770: 5769:External links 5767: 5766: 5765: 5749: 5746: 5744: 5743: 5737: 5727:(7 ed.). 5718: 5692: 5669: 5663: 5648: 5642: 5627: 5621: 5602: 5590: 5575: 5537: 5497: 5491: 5476: 5470: 5455: 5445:(4): 495–515. 5433: 5427: 5408: 5402: 5383: 5377: 5371:. Forum-Verl. 5358: 5338:10.1086/467481 5332:(1): 135–191. 5311: 5309: 5308: 5279: 5264: 5242: 5225: 5208:SMU Law Review 5194: 5169: 5148: 5123: 5109: 5090: 5078:"Jury Service" 5069: 5041: 5014: 4989: 4972: 4955: 4938: 4920: 4899: 4873: 4861: 4819: 4799: 4775: 4753: 4728: 4700: 4675: 4650: 4625: 4600: 4575: 4555: 4544:(in Ukrainian) 4531: 4506: 4481: 4451: 4432: 4407: 4395: 4379: 4364: 4350: 4335: 4307: 4305:, p. 439. 4282: 4258: 4244: 4230: 4216: 4195: 4177: 4124: 4103: 4077: 4068: 4021: 4000: 3995:The Australian 3982: 3973: 3945: 3933:NSW Government 3920: 3897: 3882: 3859: 3834: 3813: 3804: 3794: 3776: 3761: 3741: 3726: 3706: 3691: 3671: 3636: 3629: 3611: 3589:Cato Institute 3568:Lynch, Timothy 3559: 3522: 3464: 3451: 3431: 3419: 3408:(2): 157–173. 3392: 3375: 3364: 3339: 3318: 3316:, p. 245. 3306: 3304:, p. 141. 3294: 3282: 3280:, p. 139. 3270: 3268:, p. 137. 3258: 3256:, p. 371. 3246: 3240:978-1141968268 3239: 3233:. Nabu Press. 3221: 3219:, p. 370. 3206: 3204:, p. 369. 3191: 3160: 3146: 3126: 3119: 3097: 3090: 3072: 3065: 3047: 3040: 3022: 3010: 2997: 2976: 2974: 2971: 2965: 2962: 2957:House of Lords 2879: 2876: 2776: 2773: 2662:federal courts 2557:Main article: 2554: 2551: 2534:Diplock courts 2520: 2517: 2509:Main article: 2506: 2503: 2494: 2491: 2447:Lord Goldsmith 2436:Home Secretary 2429:jury tampering 2394: 2391: 2371:United Kingdom 2356: 2355:United Kingdom 2353: 2337: 2334: 2324: 2321: 2288: 2285: 2197: 2194: 2165: 2162: 2150: 2147: 2135:Russian Empire 2095: 2092: 2058:lagmannsretten 2027: 2024: 2010: 2007: 1998: 1995: 1974:Main article: 1971: 1968: 1964:Corte d'Assise 1959: 1956: 1944:District Court 1881: 1878: 1866:Panchayati raj 1798:criminal cases 1745: 1742: 1736: 1733: 1708: 1705: 1699:cour d'assises 1681: 1678: 1665: 1662: 1660: 1657: 1638:District Court 1621: 1620: 1601: 1599: 1592: 1586: 1583: 1581: 1578: 1544: 1541: 1502: 1499: 1494: 1491: 1466: 1463: 1458: 1455: 1374:In Australia, 1365: 1362: 1317:jury selection 1302: 1299: 1282: 1279: 1274: 1271: 1260: 1257: 1241: 1238: 1179: 1176: 1167: 1164: 1154:believed that 1142:Following the 1139: 1136: 1134: 1131: 1118:Main article: 1115: 1112: 1087:, adopted the 1064:for a writ of 925:" through his 852:Main article: 849: 846: 782:of the failed 717: 714: 679: 676: 655: 652: 591:Ancient Athens 587: 584: 576: 573: 508: 507: 505: 504: 497: 490: 482: 479: 478: 476: 475: 467: 459: 454: 446: 438: 429: 426: 425: 423: 422: 420:Law portal 409: 406: 405: 401: 400: 398: 397: 392: 387: 382: 376: 373: 372: 368: 367: 365: 364: 359: 354: 349: 347:Rehabilitation 344: 339: 334: 329: 324: 319: 314: 309: 303: 298: 292: 289: 288: 284: 283: 281: 280: 275: 270: 265: 259: 258: 257: 250: 249: 244: 238: 237: 236: 231: 224: 223: 218: 213: 208: 203: 198: 193: 187: 184: 183: 177: 176: 174: 173: 168: 163: 158: 152: 149: 148: 142: 141: 139: 138: 133: 128: 123: 118: 113: 108: 103: 98: 93: 88: 82: 79: 78: 74: 73: 69: 68: 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 6108: 6097: 6094: 6092: 6089: 6087: 6084: 6083: 6081: 6066: 6063: 6062: 6060: 6056: 6048: 6045: 6043: 6042:Nullification 6040: 6038: 6035: 6033: 6032:U.S. military 6030: 6029: 6028: 6027:United States 6025: 6023: 6020: 6018: 6015: 6013: 6010: 6008: 6005: 6003: 6000: 5998: 5995: 5994: 5992: 5988: 5982: 5981:Stealth juror 5979: 5977: 5974: 5972: 5969: 5967: 5964: 5962: 5959: 5957: 5954: 5952: 5949: 5947: 5944: 5942: 5939: 5937: 5934: 5933: 5931: 5929: 5925: 5919: 5916: 5914: 5911: 5909: 5906: 5904: 5901: 5899: 5898:Jury research 5896: 5892: 5889: 5888: 5887: 5884: 5882: 5879: 5877: 5874: 5872: 5869: 5867: 5864: 5862: 5859: 5857: 5854: 5852: 5849: 5847: 5844: 5840: 5837: 5836: 5835: 5832: 5830: 5827: 5825: 5822: 5820: 5817: 5816: 5814: 5810: 5805: 5798: 5793: 5791: 5786: 5784: 5779: 5778: 5775: 5764: 5763:0-00-711121-5 5760: 5756: 5752: 5751: 5740: 5734: 5730: 5726: 5725: 5719: 5715: 5711: 5707: 5703: 5702: 5697: 5693: 5689: 5685: 5681: 5677: 5676: 5670: 5666: 5660: 5656: 5655: 5649: 5645: 5639: 5635: 5634: 5628: 5624: 5618: 5614: 5610: 5609: 5603: 5599: 5595: 5591: 5587: 5586: 5581: 5576: 5572: 5568: 5564: 5560: 5556: 5552: 5551: 5546: 5543:(June 1944). 5542: 5538: 5534: 5530: 5525: 5520: 5516: 5512: 5511: 5506: 5502: 5498: 5494: 5488: 5484: 5483: 5477: 5473: 5467: 5463: 5462: 5456: 5452: 5448: 5444: 5441: 5440: 5434: 5430: 5424: 5420: 5416: 5415: 5409: 5405: 5399: 5395: 5391: 5390: 5384: 5380: 5374: 5370: 5369: 5364: 5359: 5355: 5351: 5347: 5343: 5339: 5335: 5331: 5327: 5326: 5321: 5317: 5313: 5312: 5296: 5289: 5283: 5276: 5273: 5268: 5260: 5256: 5249: 5247: 5239: 5235: 5229: 5221: 5217: 5213: 5209: 5205: 5198: 5184:on 2013-01-21 5183: 5179: 5173: 5158: 5152: 5138:on 2008-09-19 5137: 5133: 5127: 5119: 5113: 5105: 5101: 5094: 5079: 5073: 5058: 5057: 5052: 5045: 5030: 5029: 5024: 5018: 5004: 5000: 4993: 4985: 4984: 4976: 4968: 4967: 4959: 4951: 4950: 4942: 4935: 4930: 4929:U.S. v. Spock 4924: 4916: 4912: 4911: 4903: 4889:on 2011-01-23 4888: 4884: 4881:Doug Linder. 4877: 4870: 4865: 4858: 4855: 4851: 4847: 4846: 4841: 4838: 4834: 4830: 4829: 4823: 4815: 4814: 4809: 4803: 4796: 4792: 4790: 4785: 4779: 4764: 4757: 4742: 4738: 4732: 4717: 4713: 4707: 4705: 4689: 4685: 4679: 4664: 4660: 4654: 4639: 4635: 4629: 4614: 4610: 4604: 4589: 4585: 4579: 4565: 4559: 4552: 4548: 4540: 4538: 4536: 4520: 4516: 4510: 4496: 4492: 4485: 4470: 4466: 4463:(in French). 4462: 4455: 4448: 4444: 4441: 4436: 4421: 4417: 4411: 4404: 4399: 4392: 4388: 4383: 4375: 4368: 4360: 4354: 4347: 4342: 4340: 4331: 4330: 4325: 4318: 4316: 4314: 4312: 4304: 4299: 4297: 4295: 4293: 4291: 4289: 4287: 4272: 4268: 4262: 4254: 4248: 4240: 4234: 4226: 4220: 4205: 4199: 4191: 4187: 4181: 4166:on 3 May 2014 4162: 4158: 4151: 4147: 4141: 4139: 4137: 4135: 4133: 4131: 4129: 4113: 4107: 4093: 4092: 4087: 4081: 4072: 4064: 4051: 4037:on 2015-06-15 4036: 4032: 4025: 4010: 4004: 3997:. 2009-11-26. 3996: 3992: 3986: 3977: 3962: 3958: 3952: 3950: 3934: 3930: 3924: 3907: 3901: 3895: 3891: 3886: 3869: 3863: 3848: 3844: 3838: 3823: 3817: 3808: 3801: 3797: 3791: 3787: 3780: 3772: 3768: 3764: 3758: 3754: 3753: 3745: 3737: 3733: 3729: 3723: 3719: 3718: 3710: 3702: 3698: 3694: 3688: 3684: 3683: 3675: 3667: 3663: 3659: 3655: 3651: 3647: 3640: 3632: 3626: 3622: 3615: 3608: 3598: 3594: 3590: 3586: 3582: 3581: 3573: 3570:(Fall 2003). 3569: 3563: 3556: 3545: 3541: 3540: 3535: 3531: 3526: 3519: 3509: 3505: 3501: 3497: 3493: 3489: 3488: 3483: 3479: 3474: 3468: 3454: 3452:9780763754242 3448: 3444: 3443: 3435: 3429: 3423: 3415: 3411: 3407: 3403: 3396: 3388: 3387: 3379: 3373: 3368: 3353: 3349: 3343: 3328: 3322: 3315: 3310: 3303: 3298: 3291: 3286: 3279: 3274: 3267: 3262: 3255: 3250: 3242: 3236: 3232: 3225: 3218: 3213: 3211: 3203: 3198: 3196: 3179: 3175: 3171: 3164: 3149: 3143: 3139: 3138: 3130: 3122: 3120:9780873959889 3116: 3112: 3108: 3101: 3093: 3091:9781108960137 3087: 3083: 3076: 3068: 3066:9780226749358 3062: 3058: 3051: 3043: 3041:9780198298847 3037: 3033: 3026: 3020: 3014: 3000: 2994: 2990: 2989: 2981: 2977: 2970: 2961: 2958: 2954: 2949: 2947: 2940: 2935: 2931: 2926: 2924: 2919: 2914: 2912: 2907: 2905: 2901: 2897: 2893: 2889: 2885: 2875: 2871: 2867: 2863: 2860: 2856: 2853: 2849: 2845: 2844: 2839: 2835: 2831: 2827: 2822: 2817: 2813: 2807: 2805: 2801: 2797: 2790: 2786: 2782: 2772: 2768: 2765: 2762: 2760: 2759: 2752: 2750: 2744: 2740: 2738: 2732: 2730: 2726: 2725:Justice Black 2721: 2717: 2716:Bushel's Case 2712: 2710: 2706: 2702: 2698: 2694: 2689: 2687: 2683: 2682:civil liberty 2679: 2675: 2670: 2666: 2663: 2658: 2654: 2651: 2647: 2643: 2642: 2637: 2634: 2630: 2626: 2625: 2621:In the cases 2619: 2617: 2616:incorporation 2613: 2609: 2605: 2601: 2597: 2592: 2590: 2585: 2583: 2579: 2575: 2571: 2567: 2560: 2553:United States 2550: 2547: 2543: 2538: 2536: 2535: 2530: 2526: 2516: 2512: 2502: 2500: 2490: 2488: 2483: 2480: 2476: 2472: 2466: 2464: 2460: 2456: 2452: 2448: 2444: 2440: 2437: 2432: 2430: 2426: 2422: 2418: 2414: 2410: 2404: 2400: 2390: 2388: 2384: 2380: 2376: 2372: 2366: 2362: 2352: 2349: 2346: 2343: 2333: 2330: 2320: 2318: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2302: 2298: 2294: 2284: 2282: 2278: 2274: 2270: 2269:American rule 2266: 2263:" applies to 2262: 2257: 2255: 2251: 2247: 2243: 2239: 2235: 2231: 2227: 2223: 2219: 2215: 2211: 2207: 2203: 2193: 2191: 2190:Shrien Dewani 2187: 2183: 2179: 2178:Pierre de Vos 2175: 2171: 2161: 2159: 2155: 2146: 2144: 2140: 2136: 2131: 2127: 2125: 2121: 2117: 2114:, and unlike 2113: 2108: 2105: 2101: 2091: 2089: 2085: 2081: 2076: 2073: 2071: 2067: 2063: 2059: 2054: 2052: 2048: 2044: 2040: 2035: 2033: 2023: 2019: 2016: 2006: 2004: 1994: 1992: 1988: 1983: 1982:Diet of Japan 1977: 1967: 1965: 1955: 1953: 1949: 1948:Circuit Court 1945: 1941: 1937: 1932: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1918: 1913: 1909: 1907: 1903: 1899: 1898:Circuit Court 1895: 1891: 1887: 1877: 1875: 1871: 1867: 1863: 1859: 1855: 1851: 1849: 1845: 1841: 1837: 1833: 1828: 1826: 1825:British India 1822: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1809:British Crown 1805: 1803: 1799: 1795: 1792:and Madras), 1791: 1787: 1783: 1779: 1775: 1771: 1767: 1763: 1759: 1755: 1752:. In 1665, a 1751: 1741: 1732: 1730: 1726: 1722: 1718: 1714: 1704: 1702: 1700: 1695: 1694:legal persons 1691: 1687: 1677: 1675: 1671: 1656: 1654: 1649: 1645: 1641: 1639: 1634: 1632: 1627: 1617: 1605: 1600: 1591: 1590: 1577: 1575: 1570: 1568: 1563: 1561: 1556: 1552: 1549: 1540: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1514: 1513:Criminal Code 1508: 1498: 1490: 1488: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1462: 1454: 1450: 1448: 1447:Jury Act 1995 1443: 1440: 1438: 1433: 1430: 1427: 1425: 1421: 1415: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1385: 1381: 1377: 1371: 1361: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1326: 1322: 1318: 1314: 1310: 1309: 1298: 1295: 1290: 1287: 1278: 1270: 1266: 1256: 1251: 1247: 1237: 1233: 1230: 1228: 1222: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1211:United States 1207: 1205: 1201: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1175: 1173: 1163: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1145: 1130: 1128: 1121: 1111: 1109: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1090: 1086: 1085:United States 1082: 1077: 1075: 1074: 1073:Bushel's Case 1069: 1068: 1067:habeas corpus 1063: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1046: 1043:charged with 1042: 1036: 1031: 1027: 1025: 1019: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1005: 999: 995: 992: 989: 984: 981: 979: 972: 967: 965: 961: 955: 953: 946: 944: 938: 936: 932: 928: 924: 919: 914: 912: 908: 904: 900: 896: 892: 891: 886: 883:, during the 882: 878: 875:According to 871: 870: 865: 864:W. S. Gilbert 860: 855: 845: 843: 839: 835: 831: 829: 823: 819: 815: 810: 808: 804: 800: 796: 793: 789: 785: 781: 778:in 1786. The 777: 773: 767: 765: 763: 762: 755: 751: 747: 743: 739: 735: 731: 729: 723: 713: 711: 707: 703: 698: 694: 689: 685: 682:In classical 674: 669: 667: 662: 651: 649: 645: 641: 637: 633: 629: 625: 624: 619: 618: 617:The Eumenides 613: 608: 606: 605: 600: 596: 592: 582: 572: 570: 565: 561: 556: 554: 550: 545: 543: 539: 535: 531: 527: 523: 519: 518:trial by jury 515: 503: 498: 496: 491: 489: 484: 483: 481: 480: 473: 468: 465: 460: 455: 452: 447: 444: 441: Not in 439: 436: 431: 430: 428: 427: 421: 416: 411: 410: 408: 407: 403: 402: 396: 393: 391: 388: 386: 383: 381: 378: 377: 375: 374: 370: 369: 363: 360: 358: 355: 353: 350: 348: 345: 343: 340: 338: 335: 333: 330: 328: 325: 323: 320: 318: 315: 313: 310: 307: 304: 302: 299: 297: 294: 293: 291: 290: 286: 285: 279: 276: 274: 271: 269: 266: 264: 261: 260: 256: 253: 252: 248: 245: 243: 240: 239: 235: 232: 230: 227: 226: 222: 219: 217: 214: 212: 209: 207: 204: 202: 199: 197: 194: 192: 189: 188: 186: 185: 182: 179: 178: 172: 169: 167: 164: 162: 159: 157: 154: 153: 151: 150: 147: 144: 143: 137: 134: 132: 129: 127: 124: 122: 119: 117: 114: 112: 109: 107: 104: 102: 99: 97: 94: 92: 89: 87: 84: 83: 81: 80: 76: 75: 71: 70: 67: 64: 63: 58: 54: 50: 46: 40: 33: 19: 18:Trial by jury 5976:Special jury 5871:Deliberation 5818: 5754: 5723: 5700: 5674: 5653: 5632: 5607: 5600:]. 1924. 5597: 5593: 5583: 5554: 5548: 5514: 5508: 5481: 5460: 5442: 5437: 5413: 5388: 5367: 5329: 5323: 5320:Zeisel, Hans 5301:December 12, 5299:. Retrieved 5297:. March 2011 5294: 5282: 5271: 5267: 5258: 5237: 5228: 5211: 5207: 5197: 5186:. Retrieved 5182:the original 5172: 5161:. Retrieved 5151: 5140:. Retrieved 5136:the original 5126: 5117: 5112: 5103: 5099: 5093: 5082:. Retrieved 5072: 5060:. Retrieved 5054: 5044: 5032:. Retrieved 5026: 5017: 5006:. Retrieved 5003:The Advocate 5002: 4992: 4982: 4975: 4965: 4958: 4948: 4941: 4928: 4923: 4915:the original 4909: 4902: 4891:. Retrieved 4887:the original 4876: 4868: 4864: 4843: 4826: 4822: 4811: 4802: 4794: 4787: 4778: 4767:. Retrieved 4756: 4745:. Retrieved 4743:. 2010-01-12 4740: 4731: 4720:. Retrieved 4718:. 2009-06-18 4715: 4692:. Retrieved 4690:. 2007-03-20 4687: 4678: 4667:. Retrieved 4662: 4653: 4642:. Retrieved 4637: 4628: 4617:. Retrieved 4612: 4603: 4592:. Retrieved 4590:. 1999-11-19 4587: 4578: 4567:. Retrieved 4558: 4523:. Retrieved 4521:. 2022-12-04 4518: 4509: 4498:. Retrieved 4494: 4484: 4473:. Retrieved 4469:the original 4454: 4435: 4424:. Retrieved 4422:. 3 May 2011 4419: 4410: 4398: 4386: 4382: 4367: 4353: 4346:Terrill 2009 4327: 4303:Terrill 2009 4274:. Retrieved 4270: 4261: 4247: 4233: 4219: 4207:. Retrieved 4198: 4189: 4180: 4168:. Retrieved 4161:the original 4115:. Retrieved 4106: 4095:. Retrieved 4091:The Guardian 4089: 4080: 4071: 4059:|title= 4039:. Retrieved 4035:the original 4024: 4013:. Retrieved 4003: 3994: 3985: 3976: 3964:. Retrieved 3960: 3936:. Retrieved 3932: 3923: 3912:. Retrieved 3900: 3889: 3885: 3874:. Retrieved 3862: 3851:. Retrieved 3846: 3837: 3826:. Retrieved 3816: 3807: 3799: 3785: 3779: 3751: 3744: 3716: 3709: 3681: 3674: 3649: 3645: 3639: 3620: 3614: 3606: 3600:. Retrieved 3584: 3578: 3562: 3554: 3548:. Retrieved 3537: 3525: 3517: 3511:. Retrieved 3491: 3485: 3472: 3467: 3456:. Retrieved 3441: 3434: 3422: 3405: 3401: 3395: 3385: 3378: 3367: 3356:. Retrieved 3354:. 2019-02-09 3351: 3342: 3331:. Retrieved 3321: 3309: 3297: 3285: 3273: 3261: 3254:Forsyth 1852 3249: 3230: 3224: 3217:Forsyth 1852 3202:Forsyth 1852 3182:. Retrieved 3177: 3173: 3163: 3151:. Retrieved 3136: 3129: 3106: 3100: 3081: 3075: 3056: 3050: 3031: 3025: 3013: 3002:. Retrieved 2987: 2980: 2967: 2952: 2950: 2945: 2942: 2937: 2933: 2928: 2922: 2915: 2908: 2888:plea bargain 2881: 2872: 2868: 2864: 2841: 2808: 2803: 2800:Joseph Story 2793: 2769: 2766: 2763: 2756: 2753: 2745: 2741: 2737:lie detector 2733: 2713: 2700: 2690: 2671: 2667: 2639: 2622: 2620: 2608:public trial 2593: 2586: 2562: 2542:The Troubles 2539: 2532: 2522: 2514: 2496: 2484: 2467: 2434:In 1999 the 2433: 2431:to succeed. 2406: 2368: 2342:judiciary of 2339: 2326: 2316: 2312: 2290: 2268: 2261:English rule 2258: 2249: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2199: 2170:South Africa 2167: 2164:South Africa 2158:Lee Kuan Yew 2152: 2132: 2128: 2109: 2097: 2087: 2083: 2077: 2074: 2069: 2065: 2061: 2057: 2056:This court ( 2055: 2050: 2046: 2042: 2039:lagmannsrett 2038: 2036: 2031: 2029: 2020: 2012: 2000: 1990: 1986: 1979: 1961: 1933: 1914: 1910: 1883: 1852: 1829: 1806: 1794:Crown Courts 1747: 1738: 1710: 1697: 1685: 1683: 1670:Kuba Kingdom 1667: 1664:Kuba Kingdom 1650: 1646: 1642: 1635: 1628: 1624: 1611: 1603: 1573: 1571: 1566: 1564: 1559: 1557: 1553: 1550: 1546: 1510: 1496: 1468: 1460: 1451: 1446: 1444: 1441: 1434: 1431: 1428: 1416: 1406:, while the 1373: 1306: 1304: 1291: 1284: 1276: 1268: 1253: 1234: 1231: 1227:plea bargain 1223: 1208: 1181: 1178:Bench trials 1169: 1152:Alexander II 1141: 1123: 1078: 1071: 1065: 1053:William Mead 1049:William Penn 1039:In 1670 two 1038: 1033: 1029: 1024:Star Chamber 1021: 1015: 1001: 996: 993: 990: 986: 982: 974: 969: 963: 957: 948: 939: 915: 903:Wantage Code 888: 880: 874: 867: 825: 811: 768: 757: 725: 719: 681: 671: 657: 644:Clytemnestra 621: 615: 609: 602: 598: 594: 589: 557: 546: 517: 513: 511: 390:Criminal law 312:Life licence 263:Imprisonment 100: 96:Speedy trial 48: 5971:Struck jury 5908:Jury stress 5517:(1): 1–27. 5028:Ballotpedia 4859: (1970) 4271:Aftenposten 3494:(1): 1–43. 3314:Vogler 2005 2946:in absentia 2904:bench trial 2900:negotiation 2892:prosecutors 2826:injunctions 2686:civil right 2578:private law 2449:, the then 2419:. Serious ( 2417:Crown Court 2287:Switzerland 2283:, in 2012. 2265:court costs 2084:meddomsrett 2009:New Zealand 2003:Mona Fandey 1821:High courts 1802:civil cases 1184:bench trial 1162:was wrong. 943:Magna Carta 941:clauses of 869:Bab Ballads 792:Württemberg 734:Emmendingen 678:Islamic law 569:trial court 536:in which a 534:bench trial 524:in which a 322:Exoneration 53:John Morgan 6080:Categories 5846:Petit jury 5839:Indictment 5834:Grand jury 5819:Jury trial 5188:2011-04-23 5163:2008-09-06 5142:2008-09-06 5084:2012-12-16 5008:2019-04-03 4893:2015-06-13 4769:2010-03-31 4747:2010-05-07 4722:2010-05-07 4694:2010-05-07 4669:2010-03-24 4644:2010-03-24 4619:2010-03-24 4594:2010-05-07 4569:2013-01-07 4525:2023-09-03 4500:2023-09-03 4475:2008-09-29 4426:2015-06-13 4276:2016-02-20 4117:20 January 4097:2022-08-23 4041:2015-06-13 4015:2015-06-13 4011:. hklii.hk 3914:2015-08-09 3894:s 104 3876:2012-07-25 3853:2012-07-25 3828:2015-06-13 3602:2012-01-10 3580:Regulation 3550:2012-01-10 3513:2012-01-10 3475:. Ref. in 3458:2015-06-13 3358:2022-06-07 3333:2008-09-06 3004:2010-12-08 2973:References 2896:defendants 2830:rescission 2674:common law 2475:Lord Judge 2439:Jack Straw 2359:See also: 2242:not guilty 2202:lay judges 2116:lay judges 2088:lekdommere 2066:lagdommere 1952:High Court 1906:defamation 1890:common law 1862:common law 1766:Portuguese 1754:petit jury 1631:High Court 1505:See also: 1481:, such as 1475:xenophobia 1437:not guilty 1414:verdicts. 1404:Queensland 1368:See also: 1341:Queensland 1263:See also: 1244:See also: 1240:Discussion 1092:common law 1012:David Hume 1008:grand jury 923:grand jury 746:Hauenstein 579:See also: 549:common law 514:jury trial 342:Recidivism 216:Guidelines 181:Sentencing 166:Not proven 156:Conviction 101:Jury trial 86:Fair trial 51:(1861) by 6007:Hong Kong 5891:Embracery 5876:Hung jury 5856:Jury fees 5851:Jury duty 5688:608806061 5354:144941508 5272:R v Jones 5220:1066-1271 5062:April 20, 5034:August 8, 3771:243845474 3736:243845474 3701:243845474 3591:: 23–27. 3539:FRONTLINE 3180:(5): 1635 2953:R v Jones 2906:is held. 2836:were all 2785:civil law 2589:unanimous 2529:terrorist 2493:Gibraltar 2463:the Lords 2379:voir dire 2301:Neuchâtel 2279:, by the 2206:tingsrätt 2186:assessors 2154:Singapore 2149:Singapore 2051:voir-dire 1991:saiban-in 1987:saiban-in 1919:from the 1784:(such as 1729:terrorism 1614:June 2024 1585:Hong Kong 1412:unanimous 1410:requires 1370:Hung jury 1308:voir dire 1281:Australia 1273:Argentina 911:wapentake 772:Constance 742:Oberkirch 728:urtheiler 688:notarized 612:Aeschylus 553:civil law 472:UK courts 435:US courts 301:Probation 211:Discharge 201:Custodial 196:Suspended 191:Mandatory 161:Acquittal 91:Pre-trial 6017:Scotland 5729:Elsevier 5714:29739821 5698:(1852). 5365:(2009). 4813:BBC News 4741:BBC News 4716:BBC News 4688:BBC News 4663:BBC News 4638:BBC News 4613:BBC News 4588:BBC News 4465:Le Temps 4443:Archived 4420:BBC News 4209:16 April 4050:cite web 3966:15 March 3938:19 March 3352:BBC News 2884:criminal 2676:and the 2672:English 2505:Scotland 2064:and two 2043:lagrette 2032:tingrett 1997:Malaysia 1894:criminal 1868:form of 1786:Calcutta 1533:sedition 1483:genocide 1392:Tasmania 1384:Victoria 1376:majority 1351:and the 1349:Tasmania 1345:Victoria 1198:, civil 1160:morality 1158:without 1098:and the 918:Henry II 816:and the 799:Prussian 795:dragoons 750:Freiburg 706:Henry II 664:through 638:and the 623:Oresteia 604:dikastai 599:dikastai 595:dikastaí 395:Evidence 229:Totality 206:Periodic 49:The Jury 5571:1283584 5533:1094713 5118:ALR 4th 4449:, p. 13 3666:1410610 3508:1122051 3428:art. 29 2890:. Both 2781:lawsuit 2720:verdict 2479:Liberty 2425:coroner 2383:England 2345:Ukraine 2336:Ukraine 2098:In the 2062:lagmann 2047:lagmann 1884:In the 1880:Ireland 1762:English 1735:Hungary 1604:updated 1525:treason 1465:Belgium 1457:Austria 1424:treason 1325:hunches 1315:during 1209:In the 1156:justice 1089:English 1081:British 1041:Quakers 962:in his 952:terrae. 931:hundred 822:Bavaria 738:Oppenau 722:Swabian 661:praetor 636:Orestes 575:History 520:, is a 404:Portals 146:Verdict 106:Counsel 6096:Juries 6058:Groups 6022:Taiwan 5997:Canada 5761: 5735: 5712: 5686: 5661: 5640: 5619: 5569: 5531: 5489: 5468: 5451:986849 5449: 5425: 5400: 5375: 5352: 5346:724014 5344: 5218: 5106:: 202. 4932:, 3792: 3769: 3759: 3734: 3724: 3699: 3689: 3664: 3627: 3597:511222 3595: 3506: 3449: 3237: 3184:25 May 3153:25 May 3144: 3117: 3088: 3063: 3038: 2995: 2832:, and 2812:equity 2604:speedy 2582:equity 2323:Taiwan 2309:Ticino 2305:Zürich 2234:liable 2196:Sweden 2192:case. 2112:juries 2094:Russia 2026:Norway 1854:Parsis 1790:Bombai 1758:Madras 1725:judges 1707:Greece 1680:France 1537:piracy 1535:, and 1529:mutiny 1521:murder 1501:Canada 1493:Brazil 1420:guilty 1394:, the 1248:, and 1215:Canada 1188:Brazil 1172:France 1166:France 1148:Russia 1138:Russia 1106:, and 907:thegns 885:Viking 761:Bürger 740:, and 697:Maliki 640:Furies 632:Apollo 628:Athena 586:Greece 470: 462: 449: 433: 337:Pardon 308: 306:Tariff 296:Parole 136:Appeal 6047:Women 6012:Japan 5596:[ 5567:JSTOR 5529:JSTOR 5447:JSTOR 5350:S2CID 5342:JSTOR 5291:(PDF) 5214:(3). 4852: 4835: 4170:3 May 4164:(PDF) 4153:(PDF) 3909:(PDF) 3892:(WA) 3871:(PDF) 3662:JSTOR 3575:(PDF) 3504:JSTOR 2850: 2648: 2631: 2574:torts 2222:libel 1970:Japan 1958:Italy 1744:India 1721:Greek 1686:crime 1580:China 1297:12). 1200:fraud 1104:Sixth 1100:Fifth 1079:Many 890:thing 693:judge 538:judge 516:, or 221:Guilt 5804:Jury 5759:ISBN 5733:ISBN 5710:OCLC 5684:OCLC 5659:ISBN 5638:ISBN 5617:ISBN 5487:ISBN 5466:ISBN 5423:ISBN 5398:ISBN 5373:ISBN 5303:2020 5216:ISSN 5064:2020 5036:2023 4854:U.S. 4837:U.S. 4791:News 4211:2022 4172:2014 4119:2019 4063:help 3968:2018 3940:2024 3790:ISBN 3767:OCLC 3757:ISBN 3732:OCLC 3722:ISBN 3697:OCLC 3687:ISBN 3625:ISBN 3593:SSRN 3544:WGBH 3447:ISBN 3235:ISBN 3186:2020 3155:2020 3142:ISBN 3115:ISBN 3111:SUNY 3086:ISBN 3061:ISBN 3036:ISBN 2993:ISBN 2913:38. 2894:and 2852:U.S. 2727:and 2650:U.S. 2633:U.S. 2606:and 2401:and 2369:The 2363:and 2340:The 2307:and 2297:Vaud 2246:both 2230:tort 2216:and 2013:The 1962:The 1950:and 1904:and 1888:, a 1764:and 1713:jury 1668:The 1485:and 1402:and 1329:jury 1305:The 1202:and 1114:Role 1051:and 562:and 526:jury 131:Bail 5706:369 5680:139 5559:doi 5519:doi 5443:138 5334:doi 5056:CNN 4850:399 4840:617 4833:300 4789:ITV 3654:doi 3496:doi 3410:doi 2855:500 2848:359 2684:or 2653:296 2646:542 2636:466 2629:530 2576:or 2523:In 2407:In 2250:not 2238:not 2224:or 2212:on 1756:in 1572:In 1408:ACT 1206:). 1170:In 1146:in 1014:'s 879:in 866:'s 770:In 766:). 614:in 540:or 6082:: 5731:. 5708:. 5682:. 5615:. 5611:. 5582:. 5565:. 5555:42 5553:. 5547:. 5527:. 5515:37 5513:. 5507:. 5421:. 5417:. 5396:. 5392:. 5348:. 5340:. 5328:. 5318:; 5293:. 5257:. 5245:^ 5236:. 5212:27 5210:. 5206:. 5104:11 5102:. 5053:. 5025:. 5001:. 4857:66 4848:, 4831:, 4810:. 4786:. 4739:. 4714:. 4703:^ 4686:. 4661:. 4636:. 4611:. 4586:. 4549:, 4534:^ 4517:. 4493:. 4418:. 4338:^ 4326:. 4310:^ 4285:^ 4269:. 4188:. 4155:. 4127:^ 4088:. 4054:: 4052:}} 4048:{{ 3993:. 3959:. 3948:^ 3931:. 3845:. 3798:. 3765:. 3730:. 3695:. 3660:. 3650:22 3648:. 3605:. 3585:23 3583:. 3577:. 3553:. 3536:. 3516:. 3502:. 3492:79 3490:. 3484:. 3404:. 3350:. 3209:^ 3194:^ 3178:77 3176:. 3172:. 3109:. 2846:, 2828:, 2783:; 2644:, 2627:, 2591:. 2473:, 2315:/ 2303:, 2299:, 1954:. 1946:, 1900:, 1788:, 1531:, 1523:, 1489:. 1426:. 1398:, 1390:, 1386:, 1382:, 1347:, 1343:. 1102:, 1047:, 966:: 937:. 820:, 744:. 736:, 720:A 712:. 512:A 55:, 5796:e 5789:t 5782:v 5741:. 5716:. 5690:. 5667:. 5646:. 5625:. 5588:. 5573:. 5561:: 5535:. 5521:: 5495:. 5474:. 5453:. 5431:. 5406:. 5381:. 5356:. 5336:: 5330:1 5305:. 5277:. 5261:. 5240:. 5222:. 5191:. 5166:. 5145:. 5087:. 5066:. 5038:. 5011:. 4896:. 4772:. 4750:. 4725:. 4697:. 4672:. 4647:. 4622:. 4597:. 4572:. 4528:. 4503:. 4478:. 4429:. 4376:. 4361:. 4332:. 4279:. 4255:. 4213:. 4174:. 4121:. 4100:. 4065:) 4061:( 4044:. 4018:. 3970:. 3942:. 3917:. 3879:. 3856:. 3831:. 3773:. 3738:. 3703:. 3668:. 3656:: 3633:. 3498:: 3461:. 3416:. 3412:: 3406:5 3361:. 3336:. 3243:. 3188:. 3157:. 3123:. 3094:. 3069:. 3044:. 3007:. 2791:. 1701:, 1616:) 1612:( 1606:. 501:e 494:t 487:v 41:. 34:. 20:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index