1438:. Angry negotiators plan to use more competitive strategies and cooperate less, even before the negotiation starts. These competitive strategies are related to reduced joint outcomes. During negotiations, anger disrupts the process by reducing the level of trust, clouding parties' judgment, narrowing parties' focus of attention, and changing their central goal from reaching an agreement to retaliating against the other side. Angry negotiators pay less attention to the opponent's interests and are less accurate in judging their interests, thus achieving lower joint gains. Moreover, because anger makes negotiators more self-centered in their preferences, it increases the likelihood that they will reject profitable offers. Opponents who get angry (or cry, or otherwise lose control) are more likely to make errors. Anger does not help achieve negotiation goals either: it reduces joint gains and does not boost personal gains, as angry negotiators do not succeed. Moreover, negative emotions lead to acceptance of settlements that are not in a positive
29:
1694:
Negotiation is an area where faculties, chairs/heads, and their deans have little preparation; their doctoral degrees are typically in a highly specialized area according to their academic expertise. However, the academic environment frequently presents situations where negotiation takes place. For example, many faculties are hired with the expectation that they will conduct research and publish scholarly works. For these faculties, where their research requires equipment, space, and/or funding, negotiation of a "start-up" package is critical for their success and future promotion. Also, department chairs often find themselves in situations, typically involving resource redistribution where they must negotiate with their dean, on behalf of their unit. And deans oversee colleges where they must optimize limited resources, such as research space or operating funds while at the same time creating an environment that fosters student success, research accomplishments, and more.
1580:β In every negotiation, emotions will play a major role in determining what is said. It is possible to overreact and misinterpret what the other party says by projecting assumptions. To avoid miscommunication and build a collaborative environment, it is important to shift the focus to the other party and be fully present with them, listening without judgment instead of acting in self-interest and focusing on one's own needs and fears. To increase one's chances of reaching a deal that works for both parties, one needs to be focused on the other party, their emotions, their interests, and their worries in order to give them what they want. When the other party feels heard and acknowledged, barriers to communication fall, and reaching a consensus is much more likely to happen.
499:
1677:
approach is typically required. Many of the implications of these findings have strong financial impacts in addition to the social backlash faced by self-advocating women in negotiations, as compared to other advocating women, self-advocating men, and other advocating men. Research in this area has been studied across platforms, in addition to more specific areas like women as physician assistants. The backlash associated with this type of behavior is attributed to the fact that to be self-advocated is considered masculine, whereas the alternative, being accommodating, is considered more feminine. Males, however, do not appear to face any type of backlash for not being self-advocating.
719:
recognized that he would have to negotiate with the rail companies transporting his refined oil to market. Pittsburgh had just one major railroad, which would therefore be able to dictate prices in negotiations, while
Cleveland had three railroads that Rockefeller knew would compete for his business, potentially reducing his costs significantly. The leverage gained in these rail negotiations more than offset the additional operating costs of sending his oil to Cleveland for refining, helping establish Rockefeller's empire, while undermining his competitors who failed to integrate their core operating decisions with their negotiation strategies.
1636:
1042:
neglect the importance of relationships. Competing is an active, pro-self means of dealing with conflict that involves forcing others to accept one's view. Those who use this strategy tend to see conflict as a win-lose situation and so use competitive, powerful tactics to intimidate others. Fighting (forcing, dominating, or contending) can take many forms, including authoritative mandate, challenges, arguing, insults, accusations, complaining, vengeance, and even physical violence (Morrill, 1995). These conflict resolution methods are all contentious ones because they involve imposing one's solution on the other party.
1011:
places little emphasis on the relationship. Accommodation is a passive but prosocial approach to conflict. People solve both large and small conflicts by giving in to the demands of others. Sometimes, they yield because they realize that their position is in error, so they agree with the viewpoint adopted by others. In other cases, however, they may withdraw their demands without really being convinced that the other side is correct, but for the sake of group unity or in the interest of timeβthey withdraw all complaints. Thus, yielding can reflect either genuine conversion or superficial compliance.
1383:
factors. Negative emotions can cause intense and even irrational behavior and can cause conflicts to escalate and negotiations to break down, but may be instrumental in attaining concessions. On the other hand, positive emotions often facilitate reaching an agreement and help to maximize joint gains, but can also be instrumental in attaining concessions. Positive and negative discrete emotions can be strategically displayed to influence task and relational outcomes and may play out differently across cultural boundaries.
968:, is the most advantageous alternative course of action a negotiator can take should the current negotiation end without reaching an agreement. The quality of a BATNA has the potential to improve a party's negotiation outcome. Understanding one's BATNA can empower an individual and allow him or her to set higher goals when moving forward. Alternatives need to be actual and actionable to be of value. Negotiators may also consider the other party's BATNA and how it compares to what they are offering during the negotiation.
459:. The agreement can be beneficial for all or some of the parties involved. The negotiators should establish their own needs and wants while also seeking to understand the wants and needs of others involved to increase their chances of closing deals, avoiding conflicts, forming relationships with other parties, or maximizing mutual gains. Distributive negotiations, or compromises, are conducted by putting forward a position and making concessions to achieve an agreement. The degree to which the negotiating parties
838:. The process refers to how the parties negotiate: the context of the negotiations, the parties to the negotiations, the tactics used by the parties, and the sequence and stages in which all of these play out. Behavior refers to the relationships among these parties, the communication between them, and the styles they adopt. The substance refers to what the parties negotiate over: the agenda, the issues (positions and β more helpfully β interests), the options, and the agreement(s) reached at the end.
798:
is possible, assuming that both parties profit from the expansion of the pie. In practice, however, this maximization approach is oftentimes impeded by the so-called small pie bias, i.e. the psychological underestimation of the negotiation pie's size. Likewise, the possibility to increase the pie may be underestimated due to the so-called incompatibility bias. Contrary to enlarging the pie, the pie may also shrink during negotiations e.g. due to (excessive) negotiation costs.
1668:
team is more likely to discuss shared information and common interests, teams must make an active effort to foster and incorporate unique viewpoints from experts from different fields. Research by Daniel
Thiemann, which largely focused on computer-supported collaborative tasks, found that the Preference Awareness method is an effective tool for fostering knowledge about joint priorities and further helps the team judge which negotiation issues were of the highest importance.
49:
1681:
particular setup, men and women evaluated videos of men and women either accepting a compensation package or initiating negotiations. Men evaluated women more poorly for initiating negotiations, while women evaluated both men and women more poorly for initiating negotiations. In this particular experiment, women were less likely to initiate a negotiation with a male, citing nervousness, but there was no variation with the negotiation initiated with another female.
1232:
walks in saying they want to buy a car. You say that you can sell the car for 65,000 dollars. Their counteroffer would probably be 50,000β55,000 dollars. This also works and vice versa for buying something. The idea here is that we are narrowing the other parties' expectations down or up. To counter-anchoring, you should point out the fact that they are anchoring and say that they need to drive it down to an acceptable price.
1020:
avoid conflicts adopt a "wait and see" attitude, hoping that problems will solve themselves. Avoiders often tolerate conflicts, allowing them to simmer without doing anything to minimize them. Rather than openly discussing disagreements, people who rely on avoidance change the subject, skip meetings, or even leave the group altogether (Bayazit & Mannix, 2003). Sometimes they simply agree to disagree (a modus vivendi).
1420:, respect for others' perspectives, willingness to take risks, and higher confidence. The post-negotiation positive effect has beneficial consequences as well. It increases satisfaction with the achieved outcome and influences one's desire for future interactions. The PA aroused by reaching an agreement facilitates the dyadic relationship, which brings commitment that sets the stage for subsequent interactions.
1412:
aggressive tactics, and more cooperative strategies. This, in turn, increases the likelihood that parties will reach their instrumental goals, and enhance the ability to find integrative gains. Indeed, compared with negotiators with negative or natural affectivity, negotiators with positive affectivity reached more agreements and tended to honor those agreements more. Those favorable outcomes are due to better
5057:
1564:β It is possible that one party may feel angry or frustrated at some point during the negotiation. Rather than try to avoid discussing those feelings, allow the individual to talk it out. Sitting and listening, without providing too much feedback on the substance itself, can offer enough support for the person to feel better. Once the grievances are released, it may become easier to negotiate.
4618:
1181:
supports the conclusion of the contract and emphasizes positive aspects of the negotiation (mutual interests). The bad guy criticizes negative aspects (opposing interests). The division of the two roles allows for more consistent behavior and credibility of the individual negotiators. As the good guy promotes the contract, he/she can build trust with the other side.
857:. The Strategy comprises top-level goals. Which typically include the relationship and the outcome. Processes and tools include the steps to follow and roles to take in preparing for and negotiating with the other parties. Tactics include more detailed statements and actions and responses to others' statements and actions. Some add to this
1031:
Collaborating people identify the issues underlying the dispute and then work together to identify a solution that is satisfying to both sides. This orientation, which is also described as collaboration, problem solving, or a win-win orientation entreats both sides in the dispute to consider their opponent's outcomes as well as their own
1450:). In his work on negative affect arousal and white noise, Seidner found support for the existence of a negative affect arousal mechanism through observations regarding the devaluation of speakers from other ethnic origins. Negotiation may be negatively affected, in turn, by submerged hostility toward an ethnic or gender group.
891:β People tend to search for information that confirms their own beliefs and often ignore information that contradicts prior beliefs. To negotiate effectively, it is important to empathize with the other party's point of view. One should be open to other views and attempt to approach an issue from the perspective of the other.
1446:. However, the expression of negative emotions during negotiation can sometimes be beneficial: legitimately expressed anger can be an effective way to show one's commitment, sincerity, and needs. Moreover, although NA reduces gains in integrative tasks, it is a better strategy than PA in distributive tasks (such as
592:
While distributive negotiation assumes there is a fixed amount of value (a "fixed pie") to be divided between the parties, integrative negotiation attempts to create value in the course of the negotiation ("expand the pie") by either "compensating" the loss of one item with gains from another ("trade-offs" or
1083:
and reach results based on standards independent of personal will. They base their choices on objective criteria rather than power, pressure, self-interest, or an arbitrary decisional procedure. These criteria may be drawn from moral standards, principles of fairness, professional standards, and tradition.
1659:
However, unless a team can appropriately utilize the full capacity of its potential, effectiveness can suffer. One factor in the effectiveness of team negotiation is a problem that occurs through solidarity behavior. Solidarity behavior occurs when one team member reduces his or her utility (benefit)
1382:
play an important part in the negotiation process, although it is only in recent years that their effect is being studied. Emotions have the potential to play either a positive or negative role in negotiation. During negotiations, the decision as to whether or not to settle rests in part on emotional
1323:
Face and eyes: Receptive negotiators smile, and make plenty of eye contact. This conveys the idea that there is more interest in the person than in what is being said. On the other hand, non-receptive negotiators make little to no eye contact. Their eyes may be squinted, jaw muscles clenched and head
1309:
If possible, it may be helpful for negotiation partners to spend time together in a comfortable setting outside of the negotiation room. Knowing how each partner non-verbally communicates outside of the negotiation setting helps negotiation partners sense the incongruity between verbal and non-verbal
1224:
When people get on well, the outcome of a negotiation is likely to be more positive. To create trust and rapport, a negotiator may mimic or mirror the opponent's behavior and repeat what they say. Mirroring refers to a person repeating the core content of what another person just said, or repeating a
1050:
Individuals who are eager to close the deal by doing what is fair and equal for all parties involved in the negotiation. Compromisers can be useful when there is limited time to complete the deal; however, compromisers often unnecessarily rush the negotiation process and make concessions too
1019:
Individuals who do not like to negotiate and do not do it unless warranted. When negotiating, avoiders tend to defer and dodge the confrontational aspects of negotiating; however, they may be perceived as tactful and diplomatic. Inaction is a passive means of dealing with disputes. Those who
940:
A skilled negotiator may serve as an advocate for one party to the negotiation. The advocate attempts to obtain the most favorable outcomes possible for that party. In this process, the negotiator attempts to determine the minimum outcome(s) the other party is (or parties are) willing to accept, then
864:
Strategic approaches to concession-making include consideration of the optimum time to make a concession, making concessions in installments, not all at once, and ensuring that the opponent is aware that a concession has been made, rather than a re-expression of a position already outlined, and aware
814:
Due to different cultural lenses negotiation style differ worldwide. These differences comprise among others how the parties exchange information, the use of different strategies, conceptions of the nature of negotiation, the use of power, the use of options. Negotiations as they are often taught and
591:
Integrative negotiation is also called interest-based, merit-based, win-win or principled negotiation. It is a set of techniques that attempts to improve the quality and likelihood of negotiated agreement by taking advantage of the fact that different parties often value various outcomes differently.
560:
Distributive negotiation, compromise, positional negotiation, or hard-bargaining negotiation attempts to distribute a "fixed pie" of benefits. Distributive negotiation operates under zero-sum conditions, where it is assumed that any gain made by one party will be at the expense of the other. Haggling
1684:
Research also supports the notion that the way individuals respond in a negotiation varies depending on the gender of the opposite party. In all-male groups, the use of deception showed no variation in the level of trust between negotiating parties, however in mixed-sex groups, there was an increase
1663:
Intuitively, this may feel like a cooperative approach. However, though a team may aim to negotiate in a cooperative or collaborative nature, the outcome may be less successful than is possible, especially when integration is possible. The integrative potential is possible when different negotiation
1611:
Coding the emotions has a double catch: if done by a third side, some emotions might not be detected as the negotiator sublimates them for strategic reasons. Self-report measures might overcome this, but they are usually filled only before or after the process, and if filled during the process might
1483:
are known to affect processes both at the group and the personal levels. When it comes to negotiations, trust in the other party is a necessary condition for its emotion to effect, and visibility enhances the effect. Emotions contribute to negotiation processes by signaling what one feels and thinks
1470:
According to this model, emotions affect negotiations only when one is high and the other is low. When both ability and motivation are low, the effect is identified, and when both are high the effect is identified but discounted as irrelevant to judgment. A possible implication of this model is, for
1173:
Flinching is showing a strong negative physical reaction to a proposal. Common examples of flinching are gasping for air or a visible expression of surprise or shock. The flinch can be done consciously or unconsciously. The flinch signals to the opposite party that you think the offer or proposal is
1068:
These people see negotiation as too close to competition, so they choose a gentle style of bargaining. The offers they make are not in their best interests, they yield to others' demands, avoid confrontation, and they maintain good relations with fellow negotiators. Their perception of others is one
1030:
Individuals who enjoy negotiations that involve solving tough problems in creative ways. Collaborators are good at using negotiations to understand the concerns and interests of the other parties. Collaborating is an active, pro-social, and pro-self approach to conflict resolution.
1010:
Individuals who enjoy solving the other party's problems and preserving personal relationships. Accommodators are sensitive to the emotional states, body language, and verbal signals of the other parties. They can, however, feel taken advantage of in situations when the other party
1000:
Based on this model, individuals balance their concern for personal needs and interests with the needs and interests of others. The following five styles can be used based on individuals' preferences, depending on their pro-self or pro-social goals. These styles can change over time, and individuals
873:
Negotiators do not need to sacrifice effective negotiation in favor of a positive relationship between parties. Rather than conceding, each side can appreciate that the other has emotions and motivations of their own and use this to their advantage in discussing the issue. Understanding perspectives
611:
Productive negotiation focuses on the underlying interests of both parties rather than their starting positions and approaches negotiation as a shared problem-solving exercise rather than an individualized battle. Adherence to objective and principled criteria is the basis for productive negotiation
1287:
Being able to read the non-verbal communication of another person can significantly aid in the communication process. By being aware of inconsistencies between a person's verbal and non-verbal communication and reconciling them, negotiators can come to better resolutions. Examples of incongruity in
1203:
Depending on whether selling or buying, sellers or buyers use a ridiculously high, or ridiculously low opening offer that is not achievable. The theory is that the extreme offer makes the other party reevaluate their opening offer and move close to the resistance point (as far as you are willing to
1111:
The bidding process is designed to create competition. When multiple parties want the same thing, pit them against one another. When people know that they may lose out on something, they want it even more. Not only do they want the thing that is being bid on, but they also want to win, just to win.
797:
The total of advantages and disadvantages to be distributed in a negotiation is illustrated with the term negotiation pie. The course of the negotiation can either lead to an increase, shrinking, or stagnation of these values. If the negotiating parties can expand the total pie, a win-win situation
1680:
This research has been supported by multiple studies, including one which evaluated candidates participating in a negotiation regarding compensation. This study showed that women who initiated negotiations were evaluated more poorly than men who initiated negotiations. In another variation of this
1667:
Thus, a team can perform more effectively if each member discloses his or her preferences before the negotiation. This step will allow the team to recognize and organize the team's joint priorities, which they can take into consideration when engaging with the opposing negotiation party. Because a
1498:
and more cooperation. In a study by Butt et al. (2005) that simulated real multi-phase negotiation, most people reacted to the partner's emotions in a reciprocal, rather than complementary, manner. Specific emotions were found to have different effects on the opponent's feelings and are strategies
1082:
Individuals who bargain this way seek integrative solutions and do so by sidestepping commitment to specific positions. They focus on the problem rather than the intentions, motives, and needs of the people involved. They separate the people from the problem, explore interests, avoid bottom lines,
924:
involves paying close attention to what is being said verbally and nonverbally. It involves periodically seeking further clarification from the person. By asking the person exactly what they mean, they may realize the negotiator takes them seriously and is not simply walking through a routine. The
1660:
to increase the benefits of other team members. This behavior is likely to occur when interest conflicts rise. When the utility/needs of the negotiation opponent do not align with every team member's interests, team members begin to make concessions and balance the benefits gained among the team.
1331:
Legs and Feet: Receptive negotiators sit with legs together or one leg slightly in front of the other. When standing, they distribute weight evenly and place their hands on their hips with their body tilted toward the speaker. Non-receptive negotiators stand with their legs crossed, pointing away
1247:
Communication is a key element of negotiation. Effective negotiation requires that participants effectively convey and interpret information. Participants in a negotiation communicate information not only verbally but non-verbally through body language and gestures. By understanding how nonverbal
1231:
Anchoring is the process of establishing a reference point first to guide the other person closer to your suggested price. It is often presented at the beginning of a negotiation to influence the rest of the negotiation. As an example, say you want to sell a car for 50,000 dollars. Now a customer
545:
Negotiation theorists generally distinguish between two primary types of negotiation: distributive negotiation and integrative negotiation. The type of negotiation that takes place is dependent on the mindset of the negotiators and the situation of the negotiation. For example, one-off encounters
1655:
Due to globalization and growing business trends, negotiation in the form of teams is becoming widely adopted. Teams can effectively collaborate to break down a complex negotiation. There is more knowledge and wisdom dispersed in a team than in a single mind. Writing, listening, and talking, are
1100:
Tactics are always an important part of the negotiating process. More often than not they are subtle, difficult to identify, and used for multiple purposes. Tactics are more frequently used in distributive negotiations and when the focus is on taking as much value off the table as possible. Many
1676:
Women often excel in collaborative and integrative negotiations, where they can leverage their strong communication skills and empathy to find mutually beneficial solutions. However, they may face challenges in competitive or distributive negotiations, where a more assertive and confrontational
1121:
One party aggressively pursues a set of terms to the point where the other negotiating party must either agree or walk away. Brinkmanship is a type of "hard nut" approach to bargaining in which one party pushes the other party to the "brink" or edge of what that party is willing to accommodate.
1041:
Individuals who enjoy negotiations because they present an opportunity to win something. Competitive negotiators have strong instincts for all aspects of negotiating and are often strategic. Because their style can dominate the bargaining process, competitive negotiators often
718:
One of the examples cited in
Johnston's book is that of J. D. Rockefeller deciding where to build his first major oil refinery. Instead of taking the easier, cheaper route from the oil fields to refine his petroleum in Pittsburgh, Rockefeller chose to build his refinery in Cleveland, because he
1626:
While negotiations involving more than two parties are less often researched, some results from two-party negotiations still apply to more than two parties. One such result is that in negotiations it is common to see language similarity arise between the two negotiating parties. In three-party
1180:
Within the tactic of good guy/bad guy (synonyms are good cop/bad cop or black hat/white hat) oftentimes positive and unpleasant tasks are divided between two negotiators on the same negotiation side or unpleasant tasks or decisions are allocated to a (real or fictitious) outsider. The good guy
1075:
These people use contentious strategies to influence, utilizing phrases such as "this is my final offer" and "take it or leave it". They make threats, are distrustful of others, insist on their position, and apply pressure to negotiate. They see others as adversaries and their ultimate goal is
607:
professor
Horacio Falcao has stated that, counter-intuitively, trust is a helpful aid to successful win-win negotiation but not a necessary requirement: he argues that promotion of interdependence is a more effective strategy that development of trust. Integrative negotiation can also involve
1411:
Even before the negotiation process starts, people in a positive mood have more confidence, and higher tendencies to plan to use a cooperative strategy. During the negotiation, negotiators who are in a positive mood tend to enjoy the interaction more, show less contentious behavior, use less
599:
However, even integrative negotiation is likely to have some distributive elements, especially when the different parties value some items to the same degree or when details are left to be allocated at the end of the negotiation. While concession by at least one party is always necessary for
568:
In a distributive negotiation, each side often adopts an extreme or fixed position that they know will not be accepted, and then seeks to cede as little as possible before reaching a deal. Distributive bargainers conceive of negotiation as a process of distributing a fixed amount of value. A
955:
Another negotiation tactic is the bad guy/good guy. Bad guy/good guy is when one negotiator acts as a bad guy by using anger and threats. The other negotiator acts as a good guy by being considerate and understanding. The good guy blames the bad guy for all the difficulties while soliciting
1693:
The academic world contains a unique management system, wherein faculty members, some of whom have tenure, reside in academic units (e.g. departments), and are overseen by chairs, or heads. These chairs/heads are in turn supervised by deans of the college where their academic unit resides.
1458:
Research indicates that a negotiator's emotions do not necessarily affect the negotiation process. AlbarracΔ±n et al. (2003) suggested that there are two conditions for emotional affect, both related to the ability (presence of environmental or cognitive disturbances) and the motivation:
620:
Text-based negotiation refers to the process of working up the text of an agreement that all parties are willing to accept and sign. Negotiating parties may begin with a draft text, consider new textual suggestions, and work to find the middle ground among various differing positions.
736:
A tech start-up looking to negotiate being bought out by a larger industry player in the future can improve its odds of that happening by ensuring, wherever possible, that its systems, technology, competencies, and culture are as compatible as possible with those of its most likely
1087:
Researchers from The
Harvard Negotiation Project recommend that negotiators explore several tactics to reach the best solution for their problems, but this is often not the case (as when you may be dealing with an individual using soft or hard-bargaining tactics) (Forsyth, 2010).
2169:
Richard Walton & Robert McKersie, A Behavioral Theory of Labor
Negotiations ; Leigh Thompson, The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator ; I William Zartman & Victor Kremenyuk, eds., Peace vs Justice: Negotiating Forward- vs Backward-Looking Outcomes. Rowman & Littlefield,
1157:
Several layers of decision-making authority is used to allow further concessions each time the agreement goes through a different level of authority. In other words, each time the offer goes to a decision-maker, that decision maker asks to add another concession to close the
1210:
Also known under the salami tactic or quivering quill, nibbling is the demand for proportionally small concessions that have not been discussed previously just before closing the deal. This method takes advantage of the other party's desire to close by adding "just one more
1762:"leisure". These terms mean "business, trade, traffic". By the late 1570s negotiation had the definition, "to communicate in search of mutual agreement". With this new introduction and this meaning, it showed a shift from "doing business" to "bargaining about" business.
732:
If purchases for similar goods or services are occurring independently of one another across different government departments, recognizing this and consolidating orders into one large volume purchase can help create buying leverage and cost savings in negotiations with
608:
creative problem-solving in the pursuit of mutual gains. It sees a good agreement as one that provides optimal gain for both parties, rather than maximum individual gain. Each party seeks to allow the other party sufficient benefit that both will hold to the agreement.
740:
A politician negotiating support for a presidential run may want to avoid bringing on board any high-profile supporters who risk alienating other important potential supporters while avoiding any unexpected new policies that could also limit the size of their growing
2001:
Adnan, Muhamad Hariz; Hassan, Mohd Fadzil; Aziz, Izzatdin Abdul; Rashid, Nuraini Abdul (2019), Saeed, Faisal; Gazem, Nadhmi; Mohammed, Fathey; Busalim, Abdelsalam (eds.), "A Survey and Future Vision of Double
Auctions-Based Autonomous Cloud Service Negotiations",
1204:
go to reach an agreement). Another advantage is that the party giving the extreme demand appears more flexible when they make concessions toward a more reasonable outcome. A danger of this tactic is that the opposite party may think negotiating is a waste of time.
785:' beliefs and his model of information processing. It is the most widely studied model of one's opponent: A state is presumed implacably hostile, and contra-indicators of this are ignored. They are dismissed as propaganda ploys or signs of weakness. Examples are
1327:
Arms and hands: To show receptivity, negotiators should spread their arms and open a hands-on table or relax on their lap. Negotiators show poor receptivity when their hands are clenched, crossed, positioned in front of their mouth, or rubbing the back of their
1217:
Negotiators overwhelm the other party with so much information that they have difficulty determining what information is important, and what is a diversion. Negotiators may also use technical language or jargon to mask a simple answer to a question asked by a
546:
where lasting relationships do not occur are more likely to produce distributive negotiations whereas lasting relationships are more likely to require integrative negotiating. Theorists vary in their labeling and definition of these two fundamental types.
697:
This approach in complex settings is executed by mapping out all potentially relevant negotiations, conflicts, and operating decisions to integrate helpful connections among them while minimizing any potentially harmful connections (see examples below).
1601:
Emotions in laboratory studies are usually manipulated and are therefore relatively 'cold' (not intense). Although those 'cold' emotions might be enough to show effects, they are qualitatively different from the 'hot' emotions often experienced during
1069:
of friendship, and their goal is agreement. They do not separate the people from the problem but are soft on both. They avoid contests of wills and insist on the agreement, offering solutions and easily trusting others and changing their opinions.
1278:: Begin the negotiation with positive gestures and enthusiasm. Look the person in the eye with sincerity. If you cannot maintain eye contact, the other person might think you are hiding something or that you are insincere. Give a solid handshake.
941:
adjusts their demands accordingly. A "successful" negotiation in the advocacy approach is when the negotiator can obtain all or most of the outcomes their party desires, but without driving the other party to permanently break off negotiations.
903:β The other party may have prior perceptions and expectations about the other side. The other side can act in a way that directly contradicts those preconceptions, effectively conveying that the party is interested in an integrative negotiation.
470:, and personal situations such as marriage, divorce, parenting, friendship, etc. Professional negotiators are often specialized. Examples of professional negotiators include union negotiators, leverage buyout negotiators, peace negotiators, and
1144:
Negotiators propose extreme measures often in the form of bluffs to force the other party to chicken out and give them what they want. This tactic can be dangerous when parties are unwilling to back down and go through with the extreme
1685:
in deceptive tactics when it was perceived that the opposite party was using an accommodating strategy. In all-female groups, there were many shifts in when individuals did and did not employ deception in their negotiation tactics.
533:
to establish international norms, meetings between combatants to end a military conflict, meetings between representatives of businesses to bring about a transaction, and conversations between parents about how to manage childcare.
569:
distributive negotiation often involves people who have never had a previous interactive relationship with each other and are unlikely to do so again shortly, although all negotiations usually have some distributive element. Since
909:β This approach justifies a stance based on one's previously expressed principles and values in a negotiation. This approach to an issue is less arbitrary, and thus, it is more understandable from the opposing party's perspective.
1394:
affect various stages of negotiation: which strategies to use, which strategies are chosen, the way the other party and their intentions are perceived, their willingness to reach an agreement, and the final negotiated outcomes.
4072:
1484:
and can thus prevent the other party from engaging in destructive behaviors and indicate what steps should be taken next: PA signals to keep in the same way, while NA points out that mental or behavioral adjustments are needed.
1664:
issues are of different importance to each team member. The integrative potential is often missed due to the lack of awareness of each member's interests and preferences. Ultimately, this leads to a poorer negotiation result.
1076:
victory. Additionally, they search for one single answer and insist you agree with it. They do not separate the people from the problem (as with soft bargainers), but they are hard on both the people involved and the problem.
897:β A more direct approach to understanding the other party is to explicitly discuss each other's perceptions. Each individual should openly and honestly share their perceptions without assigning blame or judgment to the other.
1558:β Taking a more proactive approach in discussing one's emotions can allow for a negotiation to focus on the problem itself, rather than any unexpressed feelings. It is important to allow both parties to share their emotions.
801:
In litigation, a negotiation pie is shared when parties settle outside the court. It is possible to quantify the conditions under which parties will agree to settle, and how legal expenses and the absolute coefficient of
600:
negotiations, research shows that people who concede more quickly are less likely to explore all integrative and mutually beneficial solutions. Therefore, early concession reduces the chance of an integrative negotiation.
931:β Too much information can be as harmful as too little. Before discussing an important point, determine exactly what to communicate to the other party. Determine the exact purpose that this shared information will serve.
2462:
1532:
expressed by the negotiator led to a better impression of him by the opponent, however, it also led the opponent to place higher demands. On the other hand, personal guilt was related to more satisfaction with what one
1422:
PA also has its drawbacks: it distorts the perception of self-performance, such that performance is judged to be relatively better than it is. Thus, studies involving self-reports on achieved outcomes might be biased.
1335:
Torso: Receptive negotiators sit on the edge of their chairs, unbuttoning their suit coats with their bodies tilted toward the speaker. Non-receptive negotiators may lean back in their chairs and keep their suit coats
1134:
To mitigate too far-reaching concessions, deescalate, or overcome a deadlock situation, one party makes the further negotiation process dependent on the decision of a decision maker, not present at the negotiation
925:
Australian Mosaic
Project Services business commends "proactive" rather than just "active" listening, in which more emphasis is placed on the asking of questions as well as listening actively to the answers given.
4378:
Amanatullah, Emily T.; Tinsley, Catherine H. (1 January 2013). "Punishing female negotiators for asserting too muchβ¦or not enough: Exploring why advocacy moderates backlash against assertive female negotiators".
1305:
Hands raised in a clenched position: The person raising his/her hands in this position reveals frustration even when he/she is smiling. This is a signal that the person doing it may be holding back a negative
1248:
communication works, a negotiator is better equipped to interpret the information other participants are leaking non-verbally while keeping secret those things that would inhibit his/her ability to negotiate.
976:
Kenneth W. Thomas identified five styles or responses to negotiation. These five strategies have been frequently described in the literature and are based on the dual-concern model. The dual-concern model of
1060:
Three basic kinds of negotiators have been identified by researchers involved in The
Harvard Negotiation Project. These types of negotiators are soft bargainers, hard bargainers, and principled bargainers.
1128:
Negotiators use the bogey tactic to pretend that an issue of little or no importance is very important. Then, later in the negotiation, the issue can be traded for a major concession of actual importance.
1700:
is the type predominately found in academic negotiation β where trust and long-term relationships between personnel are valued. Techniques found to be particularly useful in academic settings include:
1627:
negotiations, language similarity still arose, and results were particularly efficient when the party with the most to gain from the negotiation adopted language similarities from the other parties.
3851:
Butt, AN; Choi, JN; Jaeger, A (2005). "The effects of self-emotion, counterpart emotion, and counterpart behavior on negotiator behavior: a comparison of individual-level and dyad-level dynamics".
2129:
Chris
Honeyman & Andrea Kupfer Schneider, eds., The Negotiator's Handbook (Dispute Resolution Institute Press, 2017; Victor Kremenyuk, ed., International Negotiation. JosseyBass, 2nd ed. 2002)
4993:(United States Institute of Peace Press, 2010); 357 pages; identifies four mindsets in the negotiation behavior of policy makers and diplomats; draws on interviews with more than 50 practitioners
944:
Skilled negotiators may use a variety of tactics ranging from negotiation hypnosis to a straightforward presentation of demands or setting of preconditions, to more deceptive approaches such as
573:
indicates that people tend to prioritize the minimization of losses over the maximization of gains, this form of negotiation is likely to be more acrimonious and less productive in agreement.
1225:
certain expression. It indicates attention to the subject of negotiation and acknowledges the other party's point or statement. Mirroring can help create trust and establish a relationship.
538:
is a form of negotiation where a third party helps the conflicting parties negotiate, usually when they are unable to do so by themselves. Mediated negotiation can be contrasted with the
1295:: A laugh not matching the situation. This could be a sign of nervousness or discomfort. When this happens, it may be good to probe with questions to discover the person's true feelings.
1187:
Negotiators can choose avoiding giving concessions and hold out in the hope that the other side will concede before they do. This tough bargaining position can maximize the negotiators
466:
People negotiate daily, often without considering it a negotiation. Negotiations may occur in organizations, including businesses, non-profits, and governments, as well as in sales and
694:
is a strategic attempt to maximize value in any single negotiation through the astute linking and sequencing of other negotiations and decisions related to one's operating activities.
1272:: The person at the head of the table is the apparent symbol of power. Negotiators can negate this strategic advantage by positioning allies in the room to surround that individual.
1593:. Capturing all its complexity is a very difficult task, let alone isolating and controlling only certain aspects of it. For this reason, most negotiation studies are done under
729:
A union needs to negotiate and resolve any significant internal conflicts to maximize its collective clout before going to the table to negotiate a new contract with management.
1479:
Most studies on emotion in negotiations focus on the effect of the negotiator's own emotions on the process. However, what the other party feels might be just as important, as
4138:
1167:
Give the other party a deadline, forcing them to make a decision. This method uses time to apply pressure on the other party. Deadlines given can be actual or artificial.
1731:
keeping in mind the principle of a "wise agreement", with its associated emphasis on meeting the interests of both parties to the extent possible as a key working point.
1265:
one's position, one establishes the position from which the negotiation proceeds. Similarly, one can "anchor" and gain an advantage with nonverbal (body language) cues.
4002:
Barry, B.; Fulmer, I. S.; & Van Kleef, G. A. (2004) "I laughed, I cried, I settled: The role of emotion in negotiation". In M. J. Gelfand & J. M. Brett (Eds.),
3723:
Kopelman, S. and Rosette, A. S. (2008). "Cultural variation in response to strategic display of emotions in negotiations". Special Issue on Emotion and Negotiation in
1302:: If someone asks their negotiation partner if they are annoyed and the person pounds their fist and responds sharply, "what makes you think anything is bothering me?"
865:
of the cost incurred in making the concession, especially where the other party is generally less aware of the nature of the business or the product being negotiated.
28:
1918:
Adnan, Muhamad Hariz Muhamad; Hassan, Mohd Fadzil; Aziz, Izzatdin; Paputungan, Irving V (August 2016). "Protocols for agent-based autonomous negotiations: A review".
679:
negotiations, although some negotiations relax this requirement. The principle formed part of the British negotiating approach for the Brexit deal following the UK's
2436:
1434:
has detrimental effects on various stages in the negotiation process. Although various negative emotions affect negotiation outcomes, by far the most researched is
4321:
Thiemann, D., & Hesse, F. W. (2015). Learning about Team Members' Preferences: Computer-Supported Preference Awareness in the Negotiation Preparation of Teams.
680:
41:
2042:
Adnan, Muhamad Hariz; Hassan, Mohd Fadzil; Aziz, Izzatdin Abd (October 2018). "Business Level Objectives of Customer for Autonomous Cloud Service Negotiation".
1605:
In real life, people select which negotiations to enter, which affects emotional commitment, motivation, and interests, but this is not the case in lab studies.
2307:"Perspective taking as a means to overcome motivational barriers in negotiations: When putting oneself in the opponents shoes helps to walk towards agreements"
1122:
Successful brinkmanship convinces the other party they have no choice but to accept the offer and there is no acceptable alternative to the proposed agreement.
542:, where conflicting parties commit to accepting the decision of a third party. Negotiations in the workplace can impact the entire organization performance.
431:
3710:
Kopelman, S.; Rosette, A.; and Thompson, L. (2006). "The three faces of eve: Strategic displays of positive neutral and negative emotions in negotiations".
726:
In sports, athletes in the final year of their contracts will ideally hit peak performance so they can negotiate robust, long-term contracts in their favor.
456:
4351:
Gladstone, Eric; O'Connor, Kathleen M. (1 September 2014). "A counterpart's feminine face signals cooperativeness and encourages negotiators to compete".
815:
used by practicionners in "Western" countries may not be effective or may even be counterproductive in "non-Western" countries β such as Asian countries.
3504:
Vecchi, G. M.; Van Hasselt, V. B.; Romano, S. J. (2005). "Crisis (hostage) negotiation: Current strategies and issues in high-risk conflict resolution".
671:
Such negotiations are often founded on the principle that "nothing is agreed until everything is agreed". For example, this principle, also known as the
1319:
The way negotiation partners position their bodies relative to each other may influence how receptive each is to the other person's message and ideas.
1174:
absurd in hopes the other party will lower their aspirations. Seeing a physical reaction is more believable than hearing someone saying, "I'm shocked".
913:
Additionally, negotiators can use specific communication techniques to build stronger relationships and develop more meaningful negotiation solutions.
2958:
2077:
Hargreaves, Brendan; Hult, Henrik; Reda, Sherief (January 2008). "Within-die process variations: How accurately can they be statistically modeled?".
4295:. 17th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing. IEEE.
3927:. Eds. Guy Burgess and Heidi Burgess. Conflict Research Consortium, University of Colorado, Boulder. Posted: July 2005 downloaded: 30 August 2007
1656:
specific roles team members must satisfy. The capacity base of a team reduces the number of blunders and increases familiarity in a negotiation.
1292:
2971:
1466:
The determination that the effect is relevant and important for the judgment: requires that either the motivation, the ability, or both are low.
4737:
2948:
Fisher, Roger, Ury, William, & Patton, Bruce (1991). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Penguin: New York. Chapter 2
2479:
1812:
1597:
conditions and focus only on some aspects. Although such studies have their advantages, they do have major drawbacks when studying emotions:
1486:
Partner's emotions can have two basic effects on the negotiator's emotions and behavior: mimetic/ reciprocal or complementary. For example,
3169:
Sorenson, R; Morse, E; Savage, G (1999). "The Test of the Motivations Underlying Choice of Conflict Strategies in the Dual-Concern Model".
1471:
example, that the positive effects of PA have on negotiations (as described above) are seen only when either motivation or ability is low.
661:
33:
2837:"Getting to Yes in the cross-cultural-context: 'one size doesn't fit all' β a critical review of principled negotiations across borders"
2654:
2618:
32:
The ministers of foreign affairs of the United States, the United Kingdom, Russia, Germany, France, China, the European Union and Iran
2246:
John Nash, "The Bargaining problem", Econometrica XVIII 1:155β162, 1950; G C Homans, Social Behavior. Harcourt, Brace and world, 1961
1608:
Laboratory studies tend to focus on relatively few well-defined emotions. Real-life scenarios provoke a much wider scale of emotions.
1510:
negotiation, but also to evaluate the negotiation less favorably. It provoked both dominating and yielding behaviors of the opponent.
424:
4626:
4169:
4691:
3796:"Supplication and Appeasement in Conflict and Negotiation: The Interpersonal Effects of Disappointment, Worry, Guilt, and Regret"
2733:
3531:
1574:, or any other simple act, may be one of the most effective and low-cost means to reduce any negative emotions between parties.
596:), or by constructing or reframing the issues of the conflict in such a way that both parties benefit ("win-win" negotiation).
490:. In automated negotiation, the participants and process have to be modeled correctly. Recent negotiation embraces complexity.
343:
2734:"Merlone, U., & Lupano, M. (2021). Third-party funding: The minimum claim value. European Journal of Operational Research"
711:
Integrated negotiation was first identified and labeled by the international negotiator and author Peter Johnston in his book
4966:
4726:
4484:
3670:
3643:
3616:
3488:
3463:
3426:
3378:
3353:
3304:
3276:
3245:
3220:
2420:
2231:
2094:
2019:
1935:
4907:
981:
is a perspective that assumes individuals' preferred method of dealing with conflict is based on two themes or dimensions:
417:
770:
2120:, Erica J. Boothby, Gus Cooney, Maurice E. Schweitzer, Annual Review of Psychology, Volume 74, 2023, pp 299β332, 2023β01
3942:"The influence of positive affect and visual access on the discovery of integrative solutions in bilateral negotiation"
2602:
2577:
2534:
2507:
1985:
5038:
5008:
4984:
4942:
4917:
4898:
4880:
4868:
4850:
4842:
4834:
4817:
4805:
4788:
4778:
4753:
4709:
4654:
3695:
3591:
3063:
2911:
2193:
529:
Negotiation can take a variety of forms in different contexts. These may include conferences between members of the
4416:"Social incentives for gender diVerences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask"
4607:
3752:
Forgas, J. P. (1998). "On feeling good and getting your way: Mood effects on negotiator cognition and behavior".
664:(RCEP) in the Asia-Pacific Region, where the parties involved failed in 2019 to agree on a text which would suit
498:
4334:
Influence of negotiation and practice setting on salary disparities between male and female physician assistants
3795:
708:, a different concept (as outlined above) related to a non-zero-sum approach to creating value in negotiations.
463:
each other to implement the negotiated solution is a major factor in determining the success of a negotiation.
308:
3024:
750:
When a party pretends to negotiate but secretly has no intention of compromising, the party is negotiating in
603:
Integrative negotiation often involves a higher degree of trust and the formation of a relationship, although
1275:
861:, asserting that these have become integral to modern-day negotiation success, and so should not be omitted.
4052:
Davidson, M. N.; Greenhalgh, L. (1999). "The role of emotion in negotiation: The impact of anger and race".
2117:
5061:
3080:
22:
5087:
2357:
1772:
769:
to refer to negotiating strategies in which there is no real intention to reach compromise or a model of
4718:
Nonviolent Communication: A Language of Life, 3rd Edition: Life-Changing Tools for Healthy Relationships
3941:
2466:
375:
282:
5092:
4636:
1797:
2326:
1635:
451:
between two or more parties to resolve points of difference, gain an advantage for an individual or
4534:
McKersie, R.B. (2012). "The Day-to-Day Life of a Dean: Engaging in Negotiations and negotiations".
945:
774:
676:
370:
328:
132:
125:
2405:
Previewing work ahead, UN Assembly President says Member States must agree a bold post-2015 agenda
3333:
2550:
2391:
2140:
1857:
1697:
1242:
657:
637:
217:
147:
2902:
Duening, Thomas N.; Hisrich, Robert D.; Lechter, Michael A. (2010). "Negotiating Fundamentals".
2773:"Lacking pluralism? A critical review of the use of cultural dimensions in negotiation research"
2632:
1640:
1340:
Receptive negotiators tend to appear relaxed with their hands open and palms visibly displayed.
3268:
3262:
2691:"... the most widely studied is the inherent bad faith model of one's opponent ...",
2480:
Theresa May to tell Ireland 'nothing is agreed' on terms of Brexit as row over deal intensifies
2449:
2321:
2276:"Holding Out for Concession: The Quest for Gain in the Negotiation of International Agreements"
1887:
1877:
1782:
460:
4859:, and criticized conflict-resolution methods that give too much weight to the former. See his
4759:
1261:
In a negotiation, a person can gain the advantage by verbally expressing a position first. By
514:
3395:
3055:
1882:
1644:
487:
452:
353:
292:
777:" of information processing is a theory in political psychology that was first put forth by
455:, or craft outcomes to satisfy various interests. The parties aspire to agree on matters of
5082:
4461:
Callahan, J; Besterfield-Sacre, M.E.; Carpenter, J.P.; Needy, K.L.; Schrader, C.B. (2016).
1837:
1400:
1396:
1391:
766:
506:
358:
2392:
WTO members search for compromise as text-based negotiations on fishing subsidies continue
1545:
left a bad impression on the opponent but led to relatively lower demands by the opponent.
8:
3334:"Towards a Quantitative Concession-Based Classification Method of Negotiation Strategies"
2222:
McDermott, Rose (2009). "Negotiated Risks". In Avenhaus, Rudolf; SjΓΆsted, Gunnar (eds.).
978:
758:
to negotiate without having any intention of making the compromises necessary to settle.
653:
287:
186:
163:
67:
4956:
4935:
Enabling Collaboration β Achieving Success Through Strategic Alliances and Partnerships
4903:
4438:
4396:
4304:
4114:
4090:"Affect as Information in Persuasion: A Model of Affect Identification and Discounting"
4089:
3826:
3111:
2753:
2182:
2100:
2059:
2025:
1941:
1832:
1590:
786:
782:
471:
405:
323:
318:
103:
1959:
de Felice, Fortune BarthΓ©lΓ©my (1976). "The 50%Solution". In Zartman, I William (ed.).
1647:
during the 5th International Negotiation Tournament β Warsaw Negotiation Round in the
884:, and through the following, negotiators can separate people from the problem itself:
522:
5034:
5004:
4980:
4962:
4952:
4938:
4922:
4913:
4894:
4876:
4864:
4846:
4838:
4830:
4813:
4801:
4784:
4774:
4749:
4722:
4705:
4547:
4480:
4260:
4252:
4211:
4161:
4119:
3960:
3921:
3818:
3769:
3691:
3666:
3660:
3639:
3633:
3612:
3587:
3484:
3459:
3422:
3374:
3349:
3300:
3272:
3241:
3216:
3115:
3059:
2907:
2856:
2792:
2757:
2598:
2573:
2530:
2503:
2339:
2227:
2189:
2090:
2063:
2029:
2015:
1981:
1975:
1931:
1822:
1787:
762:
582:
313:
277:
251:
181:
113:
53:
5067:
4991:
American Negotiating Behavior: Wheeler-Dealers, Legal Eagles, Bullies, and Preachers
4505:
Amekudzi-Kennedy, A.A.; Hall, K.D.; Harding, T.S.; Moll, A.J.; Callahan, J. (2017).
4442:
4400:
4308:
3830:
2874:
2810:
2104:
1945:
878:
illustrate a few techniques that effectively improve perspective-taking in the book
4543:
4514:
4470:
4430:
4388:
4360:
4296:
4242:
4207:
4203:
4194:
Bazerman, M. H.; Curhan, J. R.; Moore, D. A.; Valley, K. L. (2000). "Negotiation".
4153:
4109:
4101:
4032:
3964:
3956:
3894:
3860:
3810:
3761:
3513:
3341:
3178:
3151:
3103:
3095:
2848:
2784:
2745:
2432:
2416:
2331:
2287:
2152:
2082:
2051:
2007:
1923:
1872:
1528:
921:
823:
There are many different ways to categorize the essential elements of negotiation.
486:. Negotiations may also be conducted by algorithms or machines in what is known as
467:
4958:
The Art of Negotiating: Psychological Strategies for Gaining Advantageous Bargains
4855:
The political philosopher Charles Blattberg distinguished between negotiation and
3883:"Self-enhancement biases and negotiator judgment: Effects of self-esteem and mood"
1827:
1403:(NA) of one or more of the negotiating sides can lead to very different outcomes.
1151:
One party offers up something with hope reaching or coming closer to an agreement.
565:, as in the purchase of a car or home, is an example of distributive negotiation.
4795:
4716:
3577:
3345:
2463:
Critical Mass Agreements: The Proven Template for Trade Liberalization in the WTO
2011:
1927:
1867:
1817:
1522:
1439:
1431:
1417:
1413:
570:
502:
365:
272:
256:
196:
48:
4434:
4415:
4392:
4364:
4293:
Team negotiation based on solidarity behavior: A concession strategy in the team
2421:
15 nations complete 'text-based' negotiations for RCEP, signing expected in 2020
2086:
1920:
2016 3rd International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences (ICCOINS)
806:
affect the size of the pie as well as the decision to settle outside the court.
5003:
John McMillan "Games, Strategies, and Managers" Oxford University Press. 1992.
4824:
4105:
3814:
3765:
3142:
Marks, M; Harold, C (2011). "Who Asks and Who Receives in Salary Negotiation".
2852:
2788:
2749:
2156:
1807:
1487:
1269:
949:
880:
649:
633:
530:
338:
57:
4783:
David Churchman, "Negotiation Tactics" University Press of America, Inc. 1993
4579:
4300:
4157:
3517:
2404:
2306:
2291:
1463:
Identification of the effect: requires high motivation, high ability, or both.
5076:
4332:
4256:
2860:
2836:
2796:
2772:
2671:"The 'Inherent Bad Faith Model' Reconsidered: Dulles, Kennedy, and Kissinger"
1648:
1571:
1507:
1480:
1299:
1116:
1024:
986:
803:
555:
390:
380:
191:
4998:
Liberalism and the Problem of Knowledge: A New Rhetoric for Modern Democracy
4893:
Nicolas Iynedjian, NΓ©gociation β Guide pratique, CEDIDAC 62, Lausanne 2005,
2722:, The Essentials of Contract Negotiation, p. 126 (keyword: Negotiation Pie).
2707:, The Essentials of Contract Negotiation, p. 125 (keyword: Negotiation Pie).
2524:
2275:
4856:
4264:
4215:
4165:
4123:
4074:
Negative Affect Arousal Reactions from Mexican and Puerto Rican Respondents
4037:
4020:
3899:
3882:
3822:
3773:
3099:
2695:, Volumes 1β2, edited by Daniel T. Gilbert, Susan T. Fiske, Gardner Lindzey
2375:"Against Gridlock: The Viability of Interest-Based Legislative Negotiation"
2343:
2055:
1892:
1792:
1139:
625:
586:
518:
385:
236:
93:
3421:. United Kingdom: A John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Publication. p. 245.
3373:. United Kingdom: A John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Publication. p. 246.
3240:. United Kingdom: A John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Publication. p. 240.
3014:
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83 (5) (2002), pp. 1131β1140
3969:
3215:. United Kingdom: A John Wiley and Sons, LTD., Publication. p. 232.
1847:
1777:
1035:
641:
562:
539:
479:
400:
395:
348:
226:
206:
108:
83:
74:
5031:
Negotiation: Closing deals, settling disputes, and making team decisions
4744:
Douglas Stone, Bruce Patton, and Sheila Heen, foreword by Roger Fisher,
4519:
2139:
Swann Jr., William B.; Johnson, Russell E.; Bosson, Jennifer K. (2009).
1112:
Taking advantage of someone's competitive nature can drive up the price.
4460:
4247:
4230:
3704:
3340:. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 7047. pp. 143β158.
3107:
2927:
1862:
1741:
1594:
1495:
1162:
778:
593:
483:
4702:
The Power of Nice: How to Negotiate So Everyone Wins β Especially You!
4685:
Secrets of Power Negotiating β Inside Secrets from a Master Negotiator
3690:. Harvard Business Essentials. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
2006:, vol. 843, Springer International Publishing, pp. 488β498,
4475:
3182:
2335:
1740:
The word "negotiation" originated in the early 15th century from the
1506:
caused the opponents to place lower demands and to concede more in a
1262:
751:
624:
Common examples of text-based negotiation include the redaction of a
535:
333:
246:
241:
231:
120:
4467:
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana
3864:
3155:
2670:
2374:
4845:. The first edition, unrevised, Houghton Mifflin, 1981, hardcover,
4764:
Conflict Transformation and Peacebuilding: A Selected Bibliography.
3583:
3557:
Hui, Zhou; Tingqin Zhang. "Body Language in Business Negotiation".
2497:
2437:
India will not join RCEP trade deal in blow to sprawling Asian pact
2304:
1802:
1447:
1195:
475:
448:
172:
137:
37:
4139:"The interpersonal effects of anger and happiness in negotiations"
4021:"The influence of anger and compassion on negotiation performance"
3264:
Settling For More: Mastering Negotiating Strategies and Techniques
2529:. United States: Penguin Random House. pp. Pages 111 to 112.
1101:
negotiation tactics exist. Below are a few commonly used tactics.
4231:"Language Use and Coalition Formation in Multiparty Negotiations"
3478:
3294:
3267:. Washington, D.C.: The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. p.
1852:
1842:
1724:
1518:
led to more integrative and compromise strategies by the partner.
1491:
1443:
1379:
1188:
1106:
993:
874:
can help move parties toward a more integrative solution. Fisher
88:
4875:, Montreal and Kingston: McGill Queen's University Press, 2003,
4137:
Van Kleef, G. A.; De Dreu, C. K. W.; Manstead, A. S. R. (2004).
4019:
Allred, K. G.; Mallozzi, J. S.; Matsui, F.; Raia, C. P. (1997).
920:β Listening is more than just hearing what the other side says.
754:; for example, when a political party sees political benefit in
722:
Other examples of integrated negotiation include the following:
5056:
4504:
3453:
2687:
2685:
604:
510:
4506:
4462:
2305:
Trotschel; Hufmeier; Loschelder; Schwartz; Collwitzer (2011).
4678:
Built to Win: Creating a World Class Negotiating Organization
3611:. Indianapolis, Indiana: Wiley Publishing, Inc. p. 125.
1977:
Getting to yes : negotiating agreement without giving in
1748:
1537:
1514:
1435:
965:
952:
may also play a part in swaying the outcome of negotiations.
665:
645:
4861:
From Pluralist to Patriotic Politics: Putting Practice First
4511:
2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio
2682:
4829:, Revised 2nd edition, Penguin USA, 1991, trade paperback,
3794:
Van Kleef, G.A.; De Dreu, C.K.W.; Manstead, A.S.R. (2006).
3717:
2653:
example of use β "the Republicans accused the Democrats of
2502:. United States: Negotiation Press. pp. Pages 4 to 5.
4500:
4498:
4496:
3081:"Conflict and conflict management: Reflections and update"
3050:
Lewicki, Roy J.; Barry, Bruce; Saunders, David M. (2014).
4800:, revised second edition, Bantam, 1993, trade paperback,
4746:
Difficult Conversations: How to Discuss What Matters Most
4671:
No, The Only Negotiating System You Need For Work Or Home
4193:
4006:(pp. 71β94). Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
3332:
Baarslag, Tim; Hindriks, Koen; Jonker, Catholijn (2011).
2551:"Athletes' performance declines following contract years"
2274:
Langlois, Jean-Pierre P.; Langlois, Catherine C. (2006).
2212:, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 2000 (p. 40)
1974:
Fisher, Roger; Ury, William (1984). Patton, Bruce (ed.).
1917:
901:
Find opportunities to act inconsistently with their views
629:
201:
98:
4798:: Negotiating Your Way from Confrontation to Cooperation
4136:
4018:
3793:
3658:
2079:
2008 Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference
42:
Comprehensive agreement on the Iranian nuclear programme
4563:
Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in
4493:
3503:
1711:
listening actively and acknowledging what is being said
826:
One view of negotiation involves three basic elements:
4863:, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2000,
3880:
3483:. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education. p. 86.
3458:. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education. p. 81.
3331:
3299:. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education. p. 82.
2486:, published 11 December 2017, accessed 29 January 2024
2138:
2118:
Embracing Complexity: A Review of Negotiation Research
4883:, which applies that philosophy to the Canadian case.
4350:
3881:
Kramer, R. M.; Newton, E.; Pommerenke, P. L. (1993).
3479:
Lewicki, R. J.; D. M. Saunders; J. W. Minton (2001).
3295:
Lewicki, R. J.; D. M. Saunders; J. W. Minton (2001).
2901:
2572:. United States: Negotiation Press. pp. Page 4.
2439:, published 4 November 2019, accessed 16 October 2020
2407:, published 15 January 2015, accessed 16 October 2020
2000:
1705:
doing your homework β grounding your request in facts
1001:
can have strong dispositions toward numerous styles.
841:
Another view of negotiation comprises four elements:
4423:
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
4381:
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
4353:
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
4025:
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
3949:
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
3887:
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
3712:
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
3049:
2394:, published 9 October 2020, accessed 15 October 2020
868:
4975:Andrea Schneider & Christopher Honeyman, eds.,
4696:
Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law
3454:Lewicki, R. J.; D.M. Saunders; J.W. Minton (2001).
3168:
1584:
1282:
1256:
964:The best alternative to a negotiated agreement, or
4810:Getting Past No: Negotiating with Difficult People
4714:
4554:
4456:
4454:
4452:
4377:
4346:
4344:
4051:
3536:PON β Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School
3029:PON - Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School
2961:, archived 18 March 2012, accessed 12 January 2024
2367:
2181:
2076:
1922:. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: IEEE. pp. 622β626.
5023:Argumentation and the Social Grounds of Knowledge
4527:
4414:Bowles, Hannah; Babcock, Linda; Lai, Lei (2006).
4229:Sagi, Eyal; Diermeier, Daniel (1 December 2015).
4087:
3935:
3933:
3789:
3787:
3785:
3783:
2997:
2995:
2617:"negotiating in bad faith", an example of use of
2597:. United States: Negotiation Press. p. 168.
474:. They may also work under other titles, such as
5074:
4837:; Houghton Mifflin, 1992, hardcover, 200 pages,
4413:
4331:Brianne, Hall; Tracy, Hoelting (24 April 2015).
3559:International Journal of Business and Management
3171:The International Journal of Conflict Management
2732:Merlone, Ugo; Lupano, Matteo (16 January 2022).
2630:
2273:
2004:Recent Trends in Data Science and Soft Computing
1453:
4873:Shall We Dance? A Patriotic Politics for Canada
4560:
4449:
4341:
4081:
3659:Donaldson, Michael C.; Donaldson, Mimi (1996).
3396:"Neutralising Manipulative Negotiation Tactics"
3290:
3288:
3005:. Maryland: University Press of America. p. 13.
2715:
2713:
2041:
1963:. United States: Doubleday Anchor. p. 549.
1913:
1911:
1909:
1474:
1416:processes, such as flexible thinking, creative
648:respectively. Other more specific examples are
4738:Beyond Reason: Using Emotions as You Negotiate
4281:(second edition). Houston: Gulf Publishing Co.
4130:
4014:
4012:
3930:
3876:
3874:
3850:
3780:
3747:
3745:
3743:
3741:
3739:
3737:
2992:
2934:, published 6 March 2006, accesses 2 June 2021
1355:Informational vacuums and negotiator's dilemma
4228:
4187:
4045:
3998:
3996:
3994:
3992:
3990:
3988:
3986:
3984:
3982:
3980:
3939:
2731:
1980:(Reprint ed.). New York: Penguin Books.
1813:Cross-cultural differences in decision-making
956:concessions and agreement from the opponent.
425:
4822:William Ury, Roger Fisher and Bruce Patton,
4330:
4146:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
4094:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
3846:
3844:
3842:
3840:
3803:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
3754:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
3556:
3447:
3285:
3025:"best alternative to a negotiated agreement"
2841:International Journal of Conflict Management
2710:
2314:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
1906:
809:
505:, Finnish Counselor of State and the future
4009:
3871:
3734:
3141:
2269:
2267:
662:Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership
549:
4951:
4932:
4871:, a work of political philosophy; and his
3977:
3052:Negotiation: Readings, Exercises and Cases
2526:Titan, The Life of John D. Rockefeller, Sr
1236:
576:
432:
418:
4827:: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving in
4700:Ronald M. Shapiro and Mark A. Jankowski,
4655:Learn how and when to remove this message
4518:
4474:
4246:
4113:
4036:
3968:
3940:Carnevale, P. J. D.; Isen, A. M. (1986).
3916:
3914:
3912:
3910:
3898:
3837:
3606:
2325:
2221:
1973:
1958:
761:Bad faith negotiations are often used in
686:
615:
513:on October 16, 1939. From left to right:
4680:. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
4561:Fisher, R.; Ury, W.; Patton, B. (2012).
4533:
4290:
4064:
4054:Research on Negotiation in Organizations
2738:European Journal of Operational Research
2592:
2567:
2495:
2469:, 20 July 2017, accessed 29 January 2024
2264:
1634:
1549:
1314:
935:
652:negotiation regarding the reform of the
497:
47:
27:
4070:
4004:The handbook of negotiation and culture
3607:Donaldson, Michael C. (18 April 2011).
3338:Agents in Principle, Agents in Practice
3260:
3195:
2522:
2358:The Seven Myths of Win-Win Negotiations
2255:
1717:asking β negotiation begins with an ask
1688:
1055:
789:' position regarding the Soviet Union.
16:Dialogue intended to reach an agreement
5075:
4989:Richard H. Solomon and Nigel Quinney.
4812:, Bantam, 1991, hardcover, 161 pages,
4676:Movius, H. and Susskind, L. E. (2009)
4574:
4572:
4088:Albarracin, D.; Kumkale, G.T. (2003).
3907:
3751:
3685:
3638:. New York: Bantam Dell. p. 131.
3079:Thomas, Kenneth W (21 November 2006).
3078:
2928:Four Strategies for Making Concessions
2834:
2770:
2633:""Bad Faith Negotiation", Union Voice"
2621:definition in Oxford Online Dictionary
1961:Negotiation, or the art of Negotiating
344:Forum (alternative dispute resolution)
5028:
4704:, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1998,
4279:The Dynamics of Effective Negotiation
3631:
3575:
3416:
3368:
3235:
3210:
3200:. Wadsworth Pub Co. pp. 379β409.
2944:
2942:
2940:
2897:
2895:
2179:
1324:turned slightly away from the speaker
5025:. University of Alabama Press. 1982.
5018:. University of Alabama Press. 1989.
5000:. University of Chicago Press. 1996.
4888:The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator
4766:Victoria, Canada: Peacemakers Trust.
4611:
3635:The Definitive Book of Body Language
2631:IBHS Union Voice (3 December 2008).
1616:
781:to explain the relationship between
4979:, American Bar Association (2006).
4909:Handbook of negotiation and culture
4569:
3532:"What is Anchoring in Negotiation?"
2145:Research in Organizational Behavior
1556:Make emotions explicit and validate
13:
4771:The Art and Science of Negotiation
4601:
4291:Wang, Jian; Gong, Jingqiu (2016).
3853:Journal of Organizational Behavior
3393:
3144:Journal of Organizational Behavior
3088:Journal of Organizational Behavior
2957:Mosaic Project Services Pty Ltd.,
2937:
2892:
2835:Schoen, Raphael (1 January 2021).
2450:How the negotiations are organized
2226:. Germany: Springer. p. 372.
2202:
1426:
1406:
971:
792:
681:withdrawal from the European Union
14:
5104:
5049:
4890:3rd Ed., Prentice Hall Oct. 2005.
4735:Roger Fisher and Daniel Shapiro,
2693:The handbook of social psychology
2669:Douglas Stuart and Harvey Starr,
869:Stages in the negotiation process
5055:
4616:
4548:10.1111/j.1571-9979.2012.00352.x
4407:
3632:Pease, Barbara and Alan (2006).
3398:. Negotiation Training Solutions
2906:(1st ed.). Academic Press.
2771:Schoen, Raphael (1 April 2021).
1585:Problems with laboratory studies
1386:
1283:Reading non-verbal communication
1022:
1004:
895:Discuss each other's perceptions
509:, arriving from negotiations in
4808:; 1st edition under the title,
4608:List of books about negotiation
4371:
4324:
4315:
4284:
4271:
4222:
3679:
3652:
3625:
3600:
3569:
3550:
3524:
3506:Aggression and Violent Behavior
3497:
3472:
3435:
3410:
3387:
3362:
3325:
3313:
3254:
3229:
3204:
3189:
3162:
3135:
3122:
3072:
3043:
3017:
3008:
2964:
2951:
2920:
2867:
2828:
2803:
2764:
2725:
2698:
2663:
2647:
2624:
2611:
2586:
2561:
2543:
2516:
2489:
2472:
2455:
2442:
2426:
2410:
2397:
2384:
2379:Harvard Law & Policy Review
2350:
2298:
2249:
2240:
2224:Prospect Theory and Negotiation
2215:
2173:
2163:
1714:putting yourself in their shoes
1364:Cultural and gender differences
1044:
4507:"Listening and Negotiation II"
4208:10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.279
3725:Group Decision and Negotiation
2381:(Online), vol. 3, p. 1 (2009).
2141:"Identity negotiation at work"
2132:
2123:
2111:
2070:
2035:
1994:
1967:
1952:
1621:
309:Alternative dispute resolution
1:
4639:and help improve the section.
1899:
1454:Conditions for emotion affect
818:
4071:Seidner, Stanley S. (1991).
3961:10.1016/0749-5978(86)90041-5
3346:10.1007/978-3-642-25044-6_13
2012:10.1007/978-3-319-99007-1_46
1928:10.1109/ICCOINS.2016.7783287
1735:
1475:Effect of partner's emotions
1298:Positive words but negative
1033:
992:A concern for others (i.e.,
745:
23:Negotiation (disambiguation)
7:
4933:Echavarria, Martin (2015).
4715:Marshall Rosenberg (2015).
4673:. Crown Business. New York.
4584:Online Etymology Dictionary
4536:Negotiation Journal 475β488
4463:"Listening and Negotiation"
4435:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.001
4393:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.03.006
4365:10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.05.001
4196:Annual Review of Psychology
2930:, Harvard Business School,
2904:Technology Entrepreneurship
2777:Management Review Quarterly
2593:Johnston, Peter D. (2008).
2568:Johnston, Peter D. (2008).
2087:10.1109/aspdac.2008.4484007
1773:Alternating offers protocol
1765:
1562:Allow time to let off steam
1442:but rather have a negative
1343:
1251:
1185:Holding out for concession:
1132:Calling a higher authority:
1013:
889:Put yourself in their shoes
704:is not to be confused with
673:single undertaking approach
10:
5109:
4977:The Negotiator's Fieldbook
4605:
4106:10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.453
3815:10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.124
3766:10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.565
3665:. New York: Hungry Minds.
3132:. New York: Penguin Books.
2879:www.schoen-negotiation.com
2853:10.1108/IJCMA-12-2020-0216
2815:www.schoen-negotiation.com
2789:10.1007/s11301-020-00187-5
2750:10.1016/j.ejor.2021.04.059
2655:"negotiating in bad faith"
2496:Johnston, Peter D (2008).
2467:Cambridge University Press
2452:, accessed 29 January 2024
2448:World Trade Organization,
2423:, accessed 15 October 2020
2390:World Trade Organization,
2364:, accessed 3 December 2023
2280:International Interactions
2188:. United States: Penguin.
2157:10.1016/j.riob.2009.06.005
2081:. IEEE. pp. 524β530.
1720:not committing immediately
1374:
1240:
1091:
985:A concern for self (i.e.,
580:
553:
376:Peace and conflict studies
283:Mutual assured destruction
20:
5068:International Negotiation
5016:A Theory of Argumentation
4906:and Jeanne M. Brett, ed.
4301:10.1109/snpd.2016.7515883
4158:10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.57
4077:. Washington, D.C.: ERIC.
3518:10.1016/j.avb.2004.10.001
3481:Essentials of Negotiation
3456:Essentials of Negotiation
3297:Essentials of Negotiation
2292:10.1080/03050620600837866
2260:. United States: P Smith.
2180:Shell, G Richard (1999).
1798:Consistency (negotiation)
1645:the University of Toronto
1589:Negotiation is a complex
810:International negotiation
656:and the formation of the
5029:Hames, David S. (2011).
5021:Charles Arthur Willard.
5014:Charles Arthur Willard.
4996:Charles Arthur Willard.
3714:(OBHDP), 99 (1), 81β101.
3686:Luecke, Richard (2003).
3130:Bargaining for advantage
3001:Churchman, David. 1993.
2875:"Schoen-Negotiation.com"
2811:"Schoen-Negotiation.com"
2659:Oxford Online Dictionary
2184:Bargaining for Advantage
2044:Advanced Science Letters
1671:
1641:the University of TromsΓΈ
1392:Dispositions for effects
959:
859:persuasion and influence
775:inherent bad faith model
677:World Trade Organization
550:Distributive negotiation
493:
371:Non-aggression principle
329:Conflict style inventory
133:Nonviolent Communication
4741:, Viking/Penguin, 2005.
3662:Negotiating for dummies
3609:Negotiating For Dummies
3261:Goldman, Alvin (1991).
3196:Forsyth, David (2009).
2678:(subscription required)
2595:Negotiating with Giants
2570:Negotiating with Giants
2499:Negotiating with Giants
1858:International relations
1698:Integrative negotiation
1630:
1288:body language include:
1243:Nonverbal communication
1237:Nonverbal communication
713:Negotiating with Giants
706:integrative negotiation
658:international agreement
638:constitutional assembly
577:Integrative negotiation
218:International relations
148:Speaking truth to power
60:standing in the middle.
4937:. LID Publishing Inc.
4923:"Emotion and conflict"
4773:, Belknap Press 1982,
4758:Catherine Morris, ed.
4692:"Negotiations, Secret"
4277:Sparks, D. B. (1993).
4038:10.1006/obhd.1997.2705
3900:10.1006/obhd.1993.1047
3100:10.1002/job.4030130307
2635:. Unitas.wordpress.com
2465:, published online by
2256:Follett, Mary (1951).
2056:10.1166/asl.2018.12971
1888:Program on Negotiation
1878:Principled negotiation
1783:Collaborative software
1652:
1367:Communication problems
1358:Structural impediments
1257:Non-verbal "anchoring"
771:information processing
702:Integrated negotiation
692:Integrated negotiation
687:Integrated negotiation
616:Text-based negotiation
526:
61:
45:
5033:. SAGE Publications.
4953:Nierenberg, Gerard I.
4927:Beyond Intractability
4690:Davérède, Alberto L.
4687:. Career Press, 1999.
3925:Beyond Intractability
3417:Gates, Steve (2011).
3369:Gates, Steve (2011).
3236:Gates, Steve (2011).
3211:Gates, Steve (2011).
3128:Shell, R. G. (2006).
3056:McGraw Hill Education
2523:Chernow, Ron (2004).
2210:The Expert Negotiator
1638:
1550:Dealing with emotions
1370:The power of dialogue
1315:Conveying receptivity
936:Employing an advocate
501:
488:automated negotiation
293:Nuclear proliferation
51:
31:
5064:at Wikimedia Commons
4961:. Barnes and Noble.
4565:. Penguin: New York.
4175:on 26 September 2007
3576:Human, Hanz (2017).
3419:The Negotiation Book
3371:The Negotiation Book
3238:The Negotiation Book
3213:The Negotiation Book
2959:Win-Win Negotiations
2675:Political Psychology
1838:Expert determination
1689:Academic negotiation
1401:negative affectivity
1397:Positive affectivity
1056:Types of negotiators
767:political psychology
507:President of Finland
359:Paradox of tolerance
21:For other uses, see
4886:Leigh L. Thompson,
4669:Camp, Jim. (2007).
4520:10.18260/1-2--28631
3579:Body Language Magic
3003:Negotiation Tactics
2258:Creative Experience
1570:β Consider that an
1349:Die-hard bargainers
979:conflict resolution
948:. Intimidation and
929:Speak for a purpose
675:, is often used in
654:UN Security Council
515:Aarno YrjΓΆ-Koskinen
472:hostage negotiators
288:Nuclear disarmament
187:Conflict escalation
164:Conflict management
68:Conflict resolution
5088:Dispute resolution
4904:Michele J. Gelfand
4248:10.1111/cogs.12325
3538:. 20 December 2021
2557:. 22 January 2014.
1883:Prisoner's dilemma
1833:Dispute resolution
1708:knowing your value
1653:
1612:interfere with it.
787:John Foster Dulles
783:John Foster Dulles
561:over prices on an
527:
406:Track II diplomacy
354:Prisoner's dilemma
324:Conflict continuum
319:Conflict avoidance
104:Dispute resolution
62:
46:
5060:Media related to
4968:978-1-56619-816-5
4748:, Penguin, 1999,
4728:978-1-892005-54-0
4665:
4664:
4657:
4486:978-0-692-68565-5
4235:Cognitive Science
3920:Maiese, Michelle
3672:978-1-56884-867-9
3645:978-0-553-80472-0
3618:978-1-118-06808-3
3490:978-0-07-231285-0
3465:978-0-07-231285-0
3428:978-0-470-66491-9
3380:978-0-470-66491-9
3355:978-3-642-25043-9
3306:978-0-07-231285-0
3278:978-0-87179-651-6
3247:978-0-470-66491-9
3222:978-0-470-66491-9
2932:Working Knowledge
2373:Gregory Brazeal,
2233:978-3-540-92992-5
2096:978-1-4244-1921-0
2050:(10): 7524β7528.
2021:978-3-319-99006-4
1937:978-1-5090-2549-7
1788:Collective action
1617:Group composition
1568:Symbolic gestures
1332:from the speaker.
1196:Highball/Low-ball
1191:(actual) outcome.
1178:Good Guy/Bad Guy:
1155:Defense in Depth:
763:political science
660:underpinning the
583:Non-zero-sum game
468:legal proceedings
442:
441:
314:Anti-war movement
278:Nuclear blackmail
182:Communal violence
54:Treaty of Trianon
5100:
5093:Personal selling
5059:
5044:
4972:
4948:
4732:
4660:
4653:
4649:
4646:
4640:
4635:Please read the
4631:may need cleanup
4620:
4619:
4612:
4595:
4594:
4592:
4590:
4576:
4567:
4566:
4558:
4552:
4551:
4531:
4525:
4524:
4522:
4502:
4491:
4490:
4478:
4476:10.18260/p.25571
4458:
4447:
4446:
4420:
4411:
4405:
4404:
4375:
4369:
4368:
4348:
4339:
4338:
4328:
4322:
4319:
4313:
4312:
4288:
4282:
4275:
4269:
4268:
4250:
4226:
4220:
4219:
4191:
4185:
4184:
4182:
4180:
4174:
4168:. Archived from
4143:
4134:
4128:
4127:
4117:
4085:
4079:
4078:
4068:
4062:
4061:
4049:
4043:
4042:
4040:
4016:
4007:
4000:
3975:
3974:
3972:
3946:
3937:
3928:
3918:
3905:
3904:
3902:
3878:
3869:
3868:
3848:
3835:
3834:
3800:
3791:
3778:
3777:
3749:
3732:
3731:), 17 (1) 65β77.
3721:
3715:
3708:
3702:
3701:
3683:
3677:
3676:
3656:
3650:
3649:
3629:
3623:
3622:
3604:
3598:
3597:
3573:
3567:
3566:
3554:
3548:
3547:
3545:
3543:
3528:
3522:
3521:
3501:
3495:
3494:
3476:
3470:
3469:
3451:
3445:
3439:
3433:
3432:
3414:
3408:
3407:
3405:
3403:
3391:
3385:
3384:
3366:
3360:
3359:
3329:
3323:
3317:
3311:
3310:
3292:
3283:
3282:
3258:
3252:
3251:
3233:
3227:
3226:
3208:
3202:
3201:
3193:
3187:
3186:
3183:10.1108/eb022817
3166:
3160:
3159:
3139:
3133:
3126:
3120:
3119:
3085:
3076:
3070:
3069:
3054:(7th ed.).
3047:
3041:
3040:
3038:
3036:
3031:. 13 August 2024
3021:
3015:
3012:
3006:
2999:
2990:
2989:
2987:
2985:
2976:
2968:
2962:
2955:
2949:
2946:
2935:
2924:
2918:
2917:
2899:
2890:
2889:
2887:
2885:
2871:
2865:
2864:
2832:
2826:
2825:
2823:
2821:
2807:
2801:
2800:
2768:
2762:
2761:
2729:
2723:
2717:
2708:
2702:
2696:
2689:
2680:
2679:
2667:
2661:
2651:
2645:
2644:
2642:
2640:
2628:
2622:
2615:
2609:
2608:
2590:
2584:
2583:
2565:
2559:
2558:
2547:
2541:
2540:
2520:
2514:
2513:
2493:
2487:
2476:
2470:
2459:
2453:
2446:
2440:
2430:
2424:
2414:
2408:
2403:United Nations,
2401:
2395:
2388:
2382:
2371:
2365:
2362:INSEAD Knowledge
2354:
2348:
2347:
2336:10.1037/a0023801
2329:
2311:
2302:
2296:
2295:
2271:
2262:
2261:
2253:
2247:
2244:
2238:
2237:
2219:
2213:
2208:Saner, Raymond.
2206:
2200:
2199:
2187:
2177:
2171:
2167:
2161:
2160:
2136:
2130:
2127:
2121:
2115:
2109:
2108:
2074:
2068:
2067:
2039:
2033:
2032:
1998:
1992:
1991:
1971:
1965:
1964:
1956:
1950:
1949:
1915:
1873:Nash equilibrium
1440:utility function
1276:First impression
1096:
1095:
922:Active listening
918:Active listening
434:
427:
420:
64:
63:
56:on 4 June 1920.
5108:
5107:
5103:
5102:
5101:
5099:
5098:
5097:
5073:
5072:
5052:
5047:
5041:
4969:
4945:
4796:Getting Past No
4769:Howard Raiffa,
4729:
4661:
4650:
4644:
4641:
4634:
4627:Further reading
4621:
4617:
4610:
4604:
4602:Further reading
4599:
4598:
4588:
4586:
4578:
4577:
4570:
4559:
4555:
4532:
4528:
4503:
4494:
4487:
4459:
4450:
4418:
4412:
4408:
4376:
4372:
4349:
4342:
4329:
4325:
4320:
4316:
4289:
4285:
4276:
4272:
4227:
4223:
4192:
4188:
4178:
4176:
4172:
4141:
4135:
4131:
4086:
4082:
4069:
4065:
4050:
4046:
4017:
4010:
4001:
3978:
3944:
3938:
3931:
3919:
3908:
3879:
3872:
3865:10.1002/job.328
3849:
3838:
3798:
3792:
3781:
3750:
3735:
3722:
3718:
3709:
3705:
3698:
3684:
3680:
3673:
3657:
3653:
3646:
3630:
3626:
3619:
3605:
3601:
3594:
3574:
3570:
3555:
3551:
3541:
3539:
3530:
3529:
3525:
3502:
3498:
3491:
3477:
3473:
3466:
3452:
3448:
3440:
3436:
3429:
3415:
3411:
3401:
3399:
3394:Coburn, Calum.
3392:
3388:
3381:
3367:
3363:
3356:
3330:
3326:
3318:
3314:
3307:
3293:
3286:
3279:
3259:
3255:
3248:
3234:
3230:
3223:
3209:
3205:
3194:
3190:
3167:
3163:
3156:10.1002/job.671
3140:
3136:
3127:
3123:
3083:
3077:
3073:
3066:
3058:. p. 467.
3048:
3044:
3034:
3032:
3023:
3022:
3018:
3013:
3009:
3000:
2993:
2983:
2981:
2974:
2970:
2969:
2965:
2956:
2952:
2947:
2938:
2925:
2921:
2914:
2900:
2893:
2883:
2881:
2873:
2872:
2868:
2833:
2829:
2819:
2817:
2809:
2808:
2804:
2769:
2765:
2730:
2726:
2718:
2711:
2703:
2699:
2690:
2683:
2677:
2668:
2664:
2652:
2648:
2638:
2636:
2629:
2625:
2616:
2612:
2605:
2591:
2587:
2580:
2566:
2562:
2549:
2548:
2544:
2537:
2521:
2517:
2510:
2494:
2490:
2477:
2473:
2460:
2456:
2447:
2443:
2431:
2427:
2415:
2411:
2402:
2398:
2389:
2385:
2372:
2368:
2355:
2351:
2327:10.1.1.728.9853
2309:
2303:
2299:
2272:
2265:
2254:
2250:
2245:
2241:
2234:
2220:
2216:
2207:
2203:
2196:
2178:
2174:
2168:
2164:
2137:
2133:
2128:
2124:
2116:
2112:
2097:
2075:
2071:
2040:
2036:
2022:
1999:
1995:
1988:
1972:
1968:
1957:
1953:
1938:
1916:
1907:
1902:
1897:
1868:Multilateralism
1818:Delaying tactic
1768:
1738:
1691:
1674:
1633:
1624:
1619:
1587:
1552:
1485:
1477:
1456:
1432:Negative affect
1429:
1427:Negative affect
1421:
1418:problem-solving
1414:decision-making
1409:
1407:Positive affect
1389:
1377:
1346:
1317:
1285:
1259:
1254:
1245:
1239:
1098:
1093:
1092:
1058:
1047:
1038:
1027:
1016:
1007:
974:
972:Conflict styles
962:
938:
871:
821:
812:
795:
793:Negotiation pie
748:
689:
650:United Nations'
618:
612:and agreement.
589:
579:
571:prospect theory
558:
552:
523:AladΓ‘r Paasonen
503:J. K. Paasikivi
496:
457:mutual interest
438:
366:Liaison officer
273:Nuclear warfare
257:Multilateralism
197:Just war theory
44:(30 March 2015)
26:
17:
12:
11:
5:
5106:
5096:
5095:
5090:
5085:
5071:
5070:
5065:
5051:
5050:External links
5048:
5046:
5045:
5039:
5026:
5019:
5012:
5001:
4994:
4987:
4973:
4967:
4949:
4943:
4930:
4920:
4901:
4891:
4884:
4853:
4825:Getting to Yes
4820:
4791:
4781:
4767:
4756:
4742:
4733:
4727:
4712:
4698:
4688:
4683:Roger Dawson,
4681:
4674:
4666:
4663:
4662:
4645:September 2022
4624:
4622:
4615:
4603:
4600:
4597:
4596:
4568:
4553:
4542:(4): 475β488.
4526:
4492:
4485:
4448:
4406:
4387:(1): 110β122.
4370:
4340:
4323:
4314:
4283:
4270:
4241:(1): 259β271.
4221:
4186:
4129:
4100:(3): 453β469.
4080:
4063:
4044:
4031:(3): 175β187.
4008:
3976:
3929:
3906:
3870:
3859:(6): 681β704.
3836:
3809:(1): 124β142.
3779:
3760:(3): 565β577.
3733:
3716:
3703:
3696:
3678:
3671:
3651:
3644:
3624:
3617:
3599:
3592:
3568:
3549:
3523:
3512:(5): 533β551.
3496:
3489:
3471:
3464:
3446:
3434:
3427:
3409:
3386:
3379:
3361:
3354:
3324:
3312:
3305:
3284:
3277:
3253:
3246:
3228:
3221:
3203:
3198:Group dynamics
3188:
3161:
3150:(3): 371β394.
3134:
3121:
3094:(3): 265β274.
3071:
3064:
3042:
3016:
3007:
2991:
2979:Saylor Academy
2963:
2950:
2936:
2926:Malhotra, D.,
2919:
2912:
2891:
2866:
2827:
2802:
2783:(2): 393β432.
2763:
2744:(2): 738β747.
2724:
2709:
2697:
2681:
2662:
2646:
2623:
2610:
2604:978-0980942101
2603:
2585:
2579:978-0980942101
2578:
2560:
2542:
2536:978-1400077304
2535:
2515:
2509:978-0980942101
2508:
2488:
2471:
2461:Winslett, G.,
2454:
2441:
2425:
2409:
2396:
2383:
2366:
2349:
2320:(4): 771β790.
2297:
2286:(3): 261β293.
2263:
2248:
2239:
2232:
2214:
2201:
2194:
2172:
2162:
2131:
2122:
2110:
2095:
2069:
2034:
2020:
1993:
1987:978-0140065343
1986:
1966:
1951:
1936:
1904:
1903:
1901:
1898:
1896:
1895:
1890:
1885:
1880:
1875:
1870:
1865:
1860:
1855:
1850:
1845:
1840:
1835:
1830:
1825:
1820:
1815:
1810:
1808:Cross-cultural
1805:
1800:
1795:
1790:
1785:
1780:
1775:
1769:
1767:
1764:
1737:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1728:
1727:
1721:
1718:
1715:
1712:
1709:
1706:
1690:
1687:
1673:
1670:
1639:Students from
1632:
1629:
1623:
1620:
1618:
1615:
1614:
1613:
1609:
1606:
1603:
1586:
1583:
1582:
1581:
1575:
1565:
1559:
1551:
1548:
1547:
1546:
1543:disappointment
1534:
1519:
1511:
1494:might lead to
1488:disappointment
1481:group emotions
1476:
1473:
1468:
1467:
1464:
1455:
1452:
1428:
1425:
1408:
1405:
1388:
1385:
1376:
1373:
1372:
1371:
1368:
1365:
1362:
1359:
1356:
1353:
1350:
1345:
1342:
1338:
1337:
1333:
1329:
1325:
1316:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1310:communication.
1307:
1303:
1296:
1284:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1273:
1270:Personal space
1258:
1255:
1253:
1250:
1241:Main article:
1238:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1226:
1219:
1212:
1205:
1192:
1182:
1175:
1168:
1159:
1152:
1146:
1136:
1129:
1123:
1113:
1097:
1090:
1085:
1084:
1080:
1077:
1073:
1070:
1066:
1057:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1048:
1045:
1043:
1039:
1034:
1032:
1028:
1023:
1021:
1017:
1014:
1012:
1008:
1005:
998:
997:
990:
973:
970:
961:
958:
950:salami tactics
946:cherry picking
937:
934:
933:
932:
926:
911:
910:
904:
898:
892:
881:Getting to Yes
870:
867:
820:
817:
811:
808:
794:
791:
747:
744:
743:
742:
738:
734:
730:
727:
688:
685:
617:
614:
578:
575:
551:
548:
531:United Nations
495:
492:
440:
439:
437:
436:
429:
422:
414:
411:
410:
409:
408:
403:
398:
393:
388:
383:
378:
373:
368:
363:
362:
361:
356:
346:
341:
339:Family therapy
336:
331:
326:
321:
316:
311:
303:
302:
298:
297:
296:
295:
290:
285:
280:
275:
267:
266:
262:
261:
260:
259:
254:
249:
244:
239:
234:
229:
221:
220:
214:
213:
212:
211:
210:
209:
199:
194:
189:
184:
176:
175:
169:
168:
167:
166:
158:
157:
153:
152:
151:
150:
145:
140:
135:
130:
129:
128:
126:Party-directed
118:
117:
116:
111:
106:
96:
91:
86:
78:
77:
71:
70:
58:Albert Apponyi
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
5105:
5094:
5091:
5089:
5086:
5084:
5081:
5080:
5078:
5069:
5066:
5063:
5058:
5054:
5053:
5042:
5040:9781483332727
5036:
5032:
5027:
5024:
5020:
5017:
5013:
5010:
5009:0-19-507403-3
5006:
5002:
4999:
4995:
4992:
4988:
4986:
4985:1-59031-545-6
4982:
4978:
4974:
4970:
4964:
4960:
4959:
4954:
4950:
4946:
4944:9780986079337
4940:
4936:
4931:
4928:
4924:
4921:
4919:
4918:0-8047-4586-2
4915:
4911:
4910:
4905:
4902:
4900:
4899:2-88197-061-3
4896:
4892:
4889:
4885:
4882:
4881:0-7735-2596-3
4878:
4874:
4870:
4869:0-19-829688-6
4866:
4862:
4858:
4854:
4852:
4851:0-395-31757-6
4848:
4844:
4843:0-395-63124-6
4840:
4836:
4835:0-14-015735-2
4832:
4828:
4826:
4821:
4819:
4818:0-553-07274-9
4815:
4811:
4807:
4806:0-553-37131-2
4803:
4799:
4797:
4793:William Ury,
4792:
4790:
4789:0-8191-9164-7
4786:
4782:
4780:
4779:0-674-04812-1
4776:
4772:
4768:
4765:
4761:
4757:
4755:
4754:0-14-028852-X
4751:
4747:
4743:
4740:
4739:
4734:
4730:
4724:
4720:
4719:
4713:
4711:
4710:0-471-08072-1
4707:
4703:
4699:
4697:
4693:
4689:
4686:
4682:
4679:
4675:
4672:
4668:
4667:
4659:
4656:
4648:
4638:
4637:editing guide
4632:
4628:
4623:
4614:
4613:
4609:
4585:
4581:
4580:"negotiation"
4575:
4573:
4564:
4557:
4549:
4545:
4541:
4537:
4530:
4521:
4516:
4512:
4508:
4501:
4499:
4497:
4488:
4482:
4477:
4472:
4468:
4464:
4457:
4455:
4453:
4444:
4440:
4436:
4432:
4428:
4424:
4417:
4410:
4402:
4398:
4394:
4390:
4386:
4382:
4374:
4366:
4362:
4358:
4354:
4347:
4345:
4336:
4335:
4327:
4318:
4310:
4306:
4302:
4298:
4294:
4287:
4280:
4274:
4266:
4262:
4258:
4254:
4249:
4244:
4240:
4236:
4232:
4225:
4217:
4213:
4209:
4205:
4201:
4197:
4190:
4171:
4167:
4163:
4159:
4155:
4151:
4147:
4140:
4133:
4125:
4121:
4116:
4111:
4107:
4103:
4099:
4095:
4091:
4084:
4076:
4075:
4067:
4059:
4055:
4048:
4039:
4034:
4030:
4026:
4022:
4015:
4013:
4005:
3999:
3997:
3995:
3993:
3991:
3989:
3987:
3985:
3983:
3981:
3971:
3970:2027.42/26263
3966:
3962:
3958:
3954:
3950:
3943:
3936:
3934:
3926:
3923:
3917:
3915:
3913:
3911:
3901:
3896:
3892:
3888:
3884:
3877:
3875:
3866:
3862:
3858:
3854:
3847:
3845:
3843:
3841:
3832:
3828:
3824:
3820:
3816:
3812:
3808:
3804:
3797:
3790:
3788:
3786:
3784:
3775:
3771:
3767:
3763:
3759:
3755:
3748:
3746:
3744:
3742:
3740:
3738:
3730:
3726:
3720:
3713:
3707:
3699:
3697:9781591391111
3693:
3689:
3682:
3674:
3668:
3664:
3663:
3655:
3647:
3641:
3637:
3636:
3628:
3620:
3614:
3610:
3603:
3595:
3593:9781387060191
3589:
3585:
3581:
3580:
3572:
3564:
3560:
3553:
3537:
3533:
3527:
3519:
3515:
3511:
3507:
3500:
3492:
3486:
3482:
3475:
3467:
3461:
3457:
3450:
3443:
3438:
3430:
3424:
3420:
3413:
3397:
3390:
3382:
3376:
3372:
3365:
3357:
3351:
3347:
3343:
3339:
3335:
3328:
3321:
3316:
3308:
3302:
3298:
3291:
3289:
3280:
3274:
3270:
3266:
3265:
3257:
3249:
3243:
3239:
3232:
3224:
3218:
3214:
3207:
3199:
3192:
3184:
3180:
3176:
3172:
3165:
3157:
3153:
3149:
3145:
3138:
3131:
3125:
3117:
3113:
3109:
3105:
3101:
3097:
3093:
3089:
3082:
3075:
3067:
3065:9780077862428
3061:
3057:
3053:
3046:
3030:
3026:
3020:
3011:
3004:
2998:
2996:
2980:
2973:
2972:"Negotiation"
2967:
2960:
2954:
2945:
2943:
2941:
2933:
2929:
2923:
2915:
2913:9780123745026
2909:
2905:
2898:
2896:
2880:
2876:
2870:
2862:
2858:
2854:
2850:
2846:
2842:
2838:
2831:
2816:
2812:
2806:
2798:
2794:
2790:
2786:
2782:
2778:
2774:
2767:
2759:
2755:
2751:
2747:
2743:
2739:
2735:
2728:
2721:
2716:
2714:
2706:
2701:
2694:
2688:
2686:
2676:
2672:
2666:
2660:
2656:
2650:
2634:
2627:
2620:
2614:
2606:
2600:
2596:
2589:
2581:
2575:
2571:
2564:
2556:
2552:
2546:
2538:
2532:
2528:
2527:
2519:
2511:
2505:
2501:
2500:
2492:
2485:
2484:The Telegraph
2481:
2475:
2468:
2464:
2458:
2451:
2445:
2438:
2434:
2429:
2422:
2418:
2413:
2406:
2400:
2393:
2387:
2380:
2376:
2370:
2363:
2359:
2353:
2345:
2341:
2337:
2333:
2328:
2323:
2319:
2315:
2308:
2301:
2293:
2289:
2285:
2281:
2277:
2270:
2268:
2259:
2252:
2243:
2235:
2229:
2225:
2218:
2211:
2205:
2197:
2195:9780670881338
2191:
2186:
2185:
2176:
2166:
2158:
2154:
2150:
2146:
2142:
2135:
2126:
2119:
2114:
2106:
2102:
2098:
2092:
2088:
2084:
2080:
2073:
2065:
2061:
2057:
2053:
2049:
2045:
2038:
2031:
2027:
2023:
2017:
2013:
2009:
2005:
1997:
1989:
1983:
1979:
1978:
1970:
1962:
1955:
1947:
1943:
1939:
1933:
1929:
1925:
1921:
1914:
1912:
1910:
1905:
1894:
1891:
1889:
1886:
1884:
1881:
1879:
1876:
1874:
1871:
1869:
1866:
1864:
1861:
1859:
1856:
1854:
1851:
1849:
1846:
1844:
1841:
1839:
1836:
1834:
1831:
1829:
1826:
1824:
1821:
1819:
1816:
1814:
1811:
1809:
1806:
1804:
1801:
1799:
1796:
1794:
1791:
1789:
1786:
1784:
1781:
1779:
1776:
1774:
1771:
1770:
1763:
1761:
1757:
1753:
1750:
1746:
1743:
1730:
1729:
1726:
1722:
1719:
1716:
1713:
1710:
1707:
1704:
1703:
1702:
1699:
1695:
1686:
1682:
1678:
1669:
1665:
1661:
1657:
1650:
1649:Polish Senate
1646:
1642:
1637:
1628:
1610:
1607:
1604:
1602:negotiations.
1600:
1599:
1598:
1596:
1592:
1579:
1576:
1573:
1569:
1566:
1563:
1560:
1557:
1554:
1553:
1544:
1540:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1530:
1525:
1524:
1520:
1517:
1516:
1512:
1509:
1505:
1502:
1501:
1500:
1497:
1493:
1489:
1482:
1472:
1465:
1462:
1461:
1460:
1451:
1449:
1445:
1441:
1437:
1433:
1424:
1419:
1415:
1404:
1402:
1398:
1393:
1387:Affect effect
1384:
1381:
1369:
1366:
1363:
1360:
1357:
1354:
1352:Lack of trust
1351:
1348:
1347:
1341:
1334:
1330:
1326:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1308:
1304:
1301:
1300:body language
1297:
1294:
1293:Nervous Laugh
1291:
1290:
1289:
1277:
1274:
1271:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1264:
1249:
1244:
1230:
1227:
1223:
1220:
1216:
1213:
1209:
1206:
1202:
1198:
1197:
1193:
1190:
1186:
1183:
1179:
1176:
1172:
1169:
1166:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1153:
1150:
1147:
1143:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1130:
1127:
1124:
1120:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1108:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1089:
1081:
1078:
1074:
1071:
1067:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1049:
1040:
1037:
1029:
1026:
1025:Collaborating
1018:
1009:
1006:Accommodating
1003:
1002:
995:
991:
988:
987:assertiveness
984:
983:
982:
980:
969:
967:
957:
953:
951:
947:
942:
930:
927:
923:
919:
916:
915:
914:
908:
905:
902:
899:
896:
893:
890:
887:
886:
885:
883:
882:
877:
866:
862:
860:
856:
852:
848:
844:
839:
837:
833:
829:
824:
816:
807:
805:
804:risk aversion
799:
790:
788:
784:
780:
776:
772:
768:
764:
759:
757:
753:
739:
735:
731:
728:
725:
724:
723:
720:
716:
714:
709:
707:
703:
699:
695:
693:
684:
682:
678:
674:
669:
667:
663:
659:
655:
651:
647:
643:
639:
635:
631:
627:
622:
613:
609:
606:
601:
597:
595:
588:
584:
574:
572:
566:
564:
557:
556:Zero-sum game
547:
543:
541:
537:
532:
524:
520:
517:, Paasikivi,
516:
512:
508:
504:
500:
491:
489:
485:
481:
477:
473:
469:
464:
462:
458:
454:
450:
446:
435:
430:
428:
423:
421:
416:
415:
413:
412:
407:
404:
402:
399:
397:
394:
392:
391:Peacebuilding
389:
387:
384:
382:
381:Peace process
379:
377:
374:
372:
369:
367:
364:
360:
357:
355:
352:
351:
350:
347:
345:
342:
340:
337:
335:
332:
330:
327:
325:
322:
320:
317:
315:
312:
310:
307:
306:
305:
304:
300:
299:
294:
291:
289:
286:
284:
281:
279:
276:
274:
271:
270:
269:
268:
264:
263:
258:
255:
253:
250:
248:
245:
243:
240:
238:
235:
233:
230:
228:
225:
224:
223:
222:
219:
216:
215:
208:
205:
204:
203:
200:
198:
195:
193:
192:De-escalation
190:
188:
185:
183:
180:
179:
178:
177:
174:
171:
170:
165:
162:
161:
160:
159:
155:
154:
149:
146:
144:
141:
139:
136:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:
122:
119:
115:
114:Collaborative
112:
110:
107:
105:
102:
101:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
81:
80:
79:
76:
73:
72:
69:
66:
65:
59:
55:
50:
43:
39:
35:
30:
24:
19:
5030:
5022:
5015:
4997:
4990:
4976:
4957:
4934:
4926:
4908:
4887:
4872:
4860:
4857:conversation
4823:
4809:
4794:
4770:
4763:
4745:
4736:
4721:. PD Press.
4717:
4701:
4695:
4684:
4677:
4670:
4651:
4642:
4630:
4587:. Retrieved
4583:
4562:
4556:
4539:
4535:
4529:
4510:
4466:
4426:
4422:
4409:
4384:
4380:
4373:
4359:(1): 18β25.
4356:
4352:
4333:
4326:
4317:
4292:
4286:
4278:
4273:
4238:
4234:
4224:
4199:
4195:
4189:
4177:. Retrieved
4170:the original
4152:(1): 57β76.
4149:
4145:
4132:
4097:
4093:
4083:
4073:
4066:
4057:
4053:
4047:
4028:
4024:
4003:
3952:
3948:
3924:
3890:
3886:
3856:
3852:
3806:
3802:
3757:
3753:
3728:
3724:
3719:
3711:
3706:
3687:
3681:
3661:
3654:
3634:
3627:
3608:
3602:
3578:
3571:
3562:
3558:
3552:
3540:. Retrieved
3535:
3526:
3509:
3505:
3499:
3480:
3474:
3455:
3449:
3441:
3437:
3418:
3412:
3400:. Retrieved
3389:
3370:
3364:
3337:
3327:
3319:
3315:
3296:
3263:
3256:
3237:
3231:
3212:
3206:
3197:
3191:
3174:
3170:
3164:
3147:
3143:
3137:
3129:
3124:
3091:
3087:
3074:
3051:
3045:
3033:. Retrieved
3028:
3019:
3010:
3002:
2982:. Retrieved
2978:
2966:
2953:
2931:
2922:
2903:
2882:. Retrieved
2878:
2869:
2847:(1): 22β46.
2844:
2840:
2830:
2818:. Retrieved
2814:
2805:
2780:
2776:
2766:
2741:
2737:
2727:
2719:
2704:
2700:
2692:
2674:
2665:
2658:
2649:
2637:. Retrieved
2626:
2613:
2594:
2588:
2569:
2563:
2555:ScienceDaily
2554:
2545:
2525:
2518:
2498:
2491:
2483:
2474:
2457:
2444:
2428:
2412:
2399:
2386:
2378:
2369:
2361:
2356:Falcao, H.,
2352:
2317:
2313:
2300:
2283:
2279:
2257:
2251:
2242:
2223:
2217:
2209:
2204:
2183:
2175:
2165:
2148:
2144:
2134:
2125:
2113:
2078:
2072:
2047:
2043:
2037:
2003:
1996:
1976:
1969:
1960:
1954:
1919:
1893:Trust metric
1793:Conciliation
1759:
1755:
1751:
1744:
1739:
1696:
1692:
1683:
1679:
1675:
1666:
1662:
1658:
1654:
1625:
1588:
1577:
1567:
1561:
1555:
1542:
1536:
1527:
1521:
1513:
1503:
1478:
1469:
1457:
1430:
1410:
1390:
1378:
1339:
1318:
1286:
1260:
1246:
1228:
1221:
1214:
1207:
1201:Ambit claim:
1200:
1194:
1184:
1177:
1170:
1161:
1154:
1148:
1138:
1131:
1125:
1117:Brinkmanship
1115:
1105:
1099:
1086:
1059:
1046:Compromising
999:
975:
963:
954:
943:
939:
928:
917:
912:
906:
900:
894:
888:
879:
875:
872:
863:
858:
854:
850:
846:
842:
840:
835:
831:
827:
825:
822:
813:
800:
796:
760:
755:
749:
721:
717:
712:
710:
705:
701:
700:
696:
691:
690:
672:
670:
626:constitution
623:
619:
610:
602:
598:
590:
587:Win-win game
567:
559:
544:
528:
519:Johan Nykopp
465:
444:
443:
386:Peace treaty
237:Brinkmanship
142:
94:Conciliation
52:Signing the
18:
5083:Negotiation
5062:Negotiation
4760:Negotiation
4202:: 279β314.
4179:2 September
3893:: 110β133.
3688:Negotiation
3108:10945/40295
2619:"bad faith"
1848:Game theory
1778:Appeasement
1758:- "no" and
1745:negociacion
1622:Multi-party
1591:interaction
1218:non-expert.
1208:The Nibble:
1149:Concession:
907:Face-saving
642:legislature
563:open market
540:arbitration
484:arbitrators
480:legislators
445:Negotiation
401:Rule of man
396:Peacemaking
349:Game theory
227:Appeasement
143:Negotiation
109:Rule of law
84:Arbitration
75:Nonviolence
34:negotiating
5077:Categories
4629:" section
4606:See also:
4429:: 84β103.
3922:"Emotions"
3542:24 January
3442:Jung/Krebs
3320:Jung/Krebs
2884:12 October
2820:12 October
2720:Jung/Krebs
2705:Jung/Krebs
2478:Hope, C.,
2151:: 81β109.
1900:References
1863:Leadership
1823:Deterrence
1752:negotiatio
1742:Old French
1595:laboratory
1496:compassion
1229:Anchoring:
1222:Mirroring:
1079:Principled
819:Strategies
779:Ole Holsti
741:coalition.
733:suppliers.
594:logrolling
581:See also:
554:See also:
453:collective
252:Deterrence
4925:from the
4589:19 August
4257:1551-6709
3444:, p. 102.
3402:1 October
3177:: 25β44.
3116:145635552
3035:16 August
2861:1044-4068
2797:2198-1639
2758:236586390
2639:24 August
2322:CiteSeerX
2064:116247733
2030:169093081
1828:Diplomacy
1736:Etymology
1723:managing
1533:achieved.
1399:(PA) and
1336:buttoned.
1306:attitude.
1263:anchoring
1215:Snow Job:
1163:Deadlines
1036:Competing
836:substance
832:behavior,
756:appearing
752:bad faith
746:Bad faith
536:Mediation
476:diplomats
334:Democracy
247:Diplomacy
242:Ceasefire
232:Armistice
156:Workplace
121:Mediation
4955:(1995).
4929:Database
4912:, 2004.
4443:18202551
4401:14837583
4309:14385529
4265:26671166
4216:10751973
4166:14717628
4124:12635909
3955:: 1β13.
3831:11970038
3823:16834484
3774:11407408
3584:Lulu.com
3322:, p. 73.
2984:10 April
2344:21728447
2105:12874929
1946:11379608
1803:Contract
1766:See also
1508:zero-sum
1499:chosen:
1448:zero-sum
1380:Emotions
1361:Spoilers
1344:Barriers
1252:Examples
1145:measure.
1051:quickly.
1015:Avoiding
843:strategy
634:sentence
449:dialogue
173:Violence
138:Pacifism
38:Lausanne
4115:4797933
4060:: 3β26.
1853:Impasse
1843:Flipism
1725:emotion
1578:Empathy
1572:apology
1492:sadness
1444:utility
1375:Emotion
1211:thing".
1189:ex-post
1171:Flinch:
1140:Chicken
1107:Auction
1094:Tactics
994:empathy
855:tactics
847:process
828:process
773:. The "
265:Nuclear
207:studies
89:Auction
5037:
5007:
4983:
4965:
4941:
4916:
4897:
4879:
4867:
4849:
4841:
4833:
4816:
4804:
4787:
4777:
4752:
4725:
4708:
4625:This "
4483:
4441:
4399:
4307:
4263:
4255:
4214:
4164:
4122:
4112:
3829:
3821:
3772:
3694:
3669:
3642:
3615:
3590:
3487:
3462:
3425:
3377:
3352:
3303:
3275:
3244:
3219:
3114:
3062:
2910:
2859:
2795:
2756:
2601:
2576:
2533:
2506:
2342:
2324:
2230:
2192:
2103:
2093:
2062:
2028:
2018:
1984:
1944:
1934:
1651:(2014)
1529:regret
1135:table.
1126:Bogey:
989:), and
876:et al.
853:, and
737:buyer.
605:INSEAD
511:Moscow
40:for a
4439:S2CID
4419:(PDF)
4397:S2CID
4305:S2CID
4173:(PDF)
4142:(PDF)
3945:(PDF)
3827:S2CID
3799:(PDF)
3112:S2CID
3084:(PDF)
2975:(PDF)
2754:S2CID
2310:(PDF)
2170:2005]
2101:S2CID
2060:S2CID
2026:S2CID
1942:S2CID
1760:otium
1754:from
1749:Latin
1747:from
1672:Women
1538:Worry
1523:Guilt
1515:Pride
1504:Anger
1436:anger
1328:neck.
1158:deal.
966:BATNA
960:BATNA
851:tools
666:India
646:court
636:by a
494:Types
482:, or
461:trust
447:is a
301:Other
5035:ISBN
5005:ISBN
4981:ISBN
4963:ISBN
4939:ISBN
4914:ISBN
4895:ISBN
4877:ISBN
4865:ISBN
4847:ISBN
4839:ISBN
4831:ISBN
4814:ISBN
4802:ISBN
4785:ISBN
4775:ISBN
4750:ISBN
4723:ISBN
4706:ISBN
4591:2019
4481:ISBN
4261:PMID
4253:ISSN
4212:PMID
4181:2007
4162:PMID
4120:PMID
3819:PMID
3770:PMID
3692:ISBN
3667:ISBN
3640:ISBN
3613:ISBN
3588:ISBN
3565:(2).
3544:2022
3485:ISBN
3460:ISBN
3423:ISBN
3404:2012
3375:ISBN
3350:ISBN
3301:ISBN
3273:ISBN
3242:ISBN
3217:ISBN
3060:ISBN
3037:2024
2986:2022
2908:ISBN
2886:2023
2857:ISSN
2822:2023
2793:ISSN
2641:2014
2599:ISBN
2574:ISBN
2531:ISBN
2504:ISBN
2340:PMID
2228:ISBN
2190:ISBN
2091:ISBN
2016:ISBN
1982:ISBN
1932:ISBN
1643:and
1631:Team
1072:Hard
1065:Soft
834:and
765:and
585:and
521:and
4762:in
4544:doi
4515:doi
4471:doi
4431:doi
4427:103
4389:doi
4385:120
4361:doi
4357:125
4297:doi
4243:doi
4204:doi
4154:doi
4110:PMC
4102:doi
4033:doi
3965:hdl
3957:doi
3895:doi
3861:doi
3811:doi
3762:doi
3729:GDN
3514:doi
3342:doi
3179:doi
3152:doi
3104:hdl
3096:doi
2849:doi
2785:doi
2746:doi
2742:296
2433:CNA
2417:CNA
2332:doi
2318:101
2288:doi
2153:doi
2083:doi
2052:doi
2008:doi
1924:doi
1756:neg
1541:or
1526:or
1490:or
1199:or
644:or
632:or
630:law
202:War
99:Law
36:in
5079::
4694:,
4582:.
4571:^
4540:28
4538:.
4513:.
4509:.
4495:^
4479:.
4469:.
4465:.
4451:^
4437:.
4425:.
4421:.
4395:.
4383:.
4355:.
4343:^
4303:.
4259:.
4251:.
4239:41
4237:.
4233:.
4210:.
4200:51
4198:.
4160:.
4150:86
4148:.
4144:.
4118:.
4108:.
4098:84
4096:.
4092:.
4056:.
4029:70
4027:.
4023:.
4011:^
3979:^
3963:.
3953:37
3951:.
3947:.
3932:^
3909:^
3891:56
3889:.
3885:.
3873:^
3857:26
3855:.
3839:^
3825:.
3817:.
3807:91
3805:.
3801:.
3782:^
3768:.
3758:74
3756:.
3736:^
3586:.
3582:.
3561:.
3534:.
3510:10
3508:.
3348:.
3336:.
3287:^
3271:.
3269:83
3175:10
3173:.
3148:32
3146:.
3110:.
3102:.
3092:13
3090:.
3086:.
3027:.
2994:^
2977:.
2939:^
2894:^
2877:.
2855:.
2845:33
2843:.
2839:.
2813:.
2791:.
2781:71
2779:.
2775:.
2752:.
2740:.
2736:.
2712:^
2684:^
2673:,
2657:,
2553:.
2482:,
2435:,
2419:,
2377:,
2360:,
2338:.
2330:.
2316:.
2312:.
2284:32
2282:.
2278:.
2266:^
2149:29
2147:.
2143:.
2099:.
2089:.
2058:.
2048:24
2046:.
2024:,
2014:,
1940:.
1930:.
1908:^
996:).
849:,
845:,
830:,
715:.
683:.
668:.
640:,
628:,
478:,
5043:.
5011:.
4971:.
4947:.
4731:.
4658:)
4652:(
4647:)
4643:(
4633:.
4593:.
4550:.
4546::
4523:.
4517::
4489:.
4473::
4445:.
4433::
4403:.
4391::
4367:.
4363::
4337:.
4311:.
4299::
4267:.
4245::
4218:.
4206::
4183:.
4156::
4126:.
4104::
4058:7
4041:.
4035::
3973:.
3967::
3959::
3903:.
3897::
3867:.
3863::
3833:.
3813::
3776:.
3764::
3727:(
3700:.
3675:.
3648:.
3621:.
3596:.
3563:3
3546:.
3520:.
3516::
3493:.
3468:.
3431:.
3406:.
3383:.
3358:.
3344::
3309:.
3281:.
3250:.
3225:.
3185:.
3181::
3158:.
3154::
3118:.
3106::
3098::
3068:.
3039:.
2988:.
2916:.
2888:.
2863:.
2851::
2824:.
2799:.
2787::
2760:.
2748::
2643:.
2607:.
2582:.
2539:.
2512:.
2346:.
2334::
2294:.
2290::
2236:.
2198:.
2159:.
2155::
2107:.
2085::
2066:.
2054::
2010::
1990:.
1948:.
1926::
1165::
1142::
1119::
1109::
525:.
433:e
426:t
419:v
25:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.