Knowledge

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1441

Source 📝

162: 798:
December, Hans Blix reported before the United Nations and stated in regards to Iraq's 7 December report (unedited version): "During the period 1991–1998, Iraq submitted many declarations called full, final and complete. Regrettably, much in these declarations proved inaccurate or incomplete or was unsupported or contradicted by evidence. In such cases, no confidence can arise that proscribed programmes or items have been eliminated." By March, Blix declared that 7 December report had not brought any new documentary evidence to light.
201: 214: 53: 347: 308: 243: 269: 256: 882:). The US and Britain, while admitting that such a resolution was diplomatically desirable, insisted that Iraq had now been given enough time (noting also the time since the first disarmament resolutions of 1991) to disarm or provide evidence thereof, and that war was legitimized by 1441 and previous UN resolutions. Non-permanent Security Council member Spain declared itself with the US and Britain. Nevertheless, this position taken by the 295: 671: 334: 321: 282: 360: 826:
how many question marks they actually succeed in straightening out. This is not yet clear. Against this background, the question is now asked whether Iraq has cooperated "immediately, unconditionally and actively" with UNMOVIC, as required under paragraph 9 of resolution 1441 (2002). The answers can be seen from the factual descriptions I have provided. However, if more direct answers are desired, I would say the following:
498: 188: 175: 912:
While a small number of old, abandoned chemical munitions have been discovered, ISG judges that Iraq unilaterally destroyed its undeclared chemical weapons stockpile in 1991. There are no credible indications that Baghdad resumed production of chemical munitions thereafter, a policy ISG attributes to
838:
At this point, the US Administration asserted that Iraq remained in material breach of the UN Resolutions, and that, under 1441, this meant the Security Council had to convene immediately "in order to consider the situation and the need for full compliance with all of the relevant Council resolutions
825:
What are we to make of these activities? One can hardly avoid the impression that, after a period of somewhat reluctant cooperation, there has been an acceleration of initiatives from the Iraqi side since the end of January. This is welcome, but the value of these measures must be soberly judged by
793:
and Al-fatah missiles violated U.N. range restrictions, the former also being partially destroyed under UNMOVIC supervision. Debate about Resolution 1441 therefore turns on whether, despite the absence of WMDs and the acceptance of inspections, Iraq failed to comply with the terms of the Resolution,
589:
The resolution text was drafted jointly by the United States and the United Kingdom, the result of eight weeks of tumultuous negotiations, particularly with Russia and France. France questioned the phrase "serious consequences" and stated repeatedly that any "material breach" found by the inspectors
805:
Hans Blix and Mohamed ElBaradei presented several reports to the UN detailing Iraq's level of compliance with Resolution 1441. On 27 January 2003 Chief UN Weapons Inspector Blix addressed the UN Security Council and stated "Iraq appears not to have come to a genuine acceptance–not even today–of the
797:
On 7 December 2002, Iraq filed its 12,000-page weapons declaration with the UN in order to meet requirements for this resolution. The five permanent members of the Security Council received unedited versions of the report, while an edited version was made available for other UN Member States. On 19
646:
We heard loud and clear during the negotiations the concerns about "automaticity" and "hidden triggers" – the concern that on a decision so crucial we should not rush into military action; that on a decision so crucial any Iraqi violations should be discussed by the Council. Let me be equally clear
833:
It is obvious that, while the numerous initiatives, which are now taken by the Iraqi side with a view to resolving some long-standing open disarmament issues, can be seen as "active", or even "proactive", these initiatives 3–4 months into the new resolution cannot be said to constitute "immediate"
655:
Syria voted in favour of the resolution, having received reassurances from its sponsors, the United States of America and the United Kingdom, and from France and Russia through high-level contacts, that it would not be used as a pretext for striking against Iraq and does not constitute a basis for
489:. It also stated that "...false statements or omissions in the declarations submitted by Iraq pursuant to this resolution and failure by Iraq at any time to comply with, and cooperate fully in the implementation of, this resolution shall constitute a further material breach of Iraq's obligations." 817:
and long-range missiles remained unresolved. Blix's 7 March report stated "Iraq, with a highly developed administrative system, should be able to provide more documentary evidence about its proscribed weapons programmes. Only a few new such documents have come to light so far and been handed over
788:
Inspectors began visiting sites where WMD production was suspected, but found no evidence of such activities, except for 18 undeclared 122mm chemical rockets that were destroyed under UNMOVIC supervision. As was discovered after the invasion of Iraq, no production of WMDs was taking place, and no
801:
Iraq continued to fail to account for substantial chemical and biological stockpiles which UNMOVIC inspectors had confirmed as existing as late as 1998. Iraq claimed that it had disposed of its anthrax stockpiles at a specific site, but UNMOVIC found this impossible to confirm since Iraq had not
637:
or a Member State, the matter will return to the Council for discussions as required in paragraph 12. The resolution makes clear that any Iraqi failure to comply is unacceptable and that Iraq must be disarmed. And, one way or another, Iraq will be disarmed. If the Security Council fails to act
647:
in response... There is no "automaticity" in this resolution. If there is a further Iraqi breach of its disarmament obligations, the matter will return to the Council for discussion as required in paragraph 12. We would expect the Security Council then to meet its responsibilities.
846:
declared on 10 March that France would veto any resolution which would automatically lead to war. This caused open displays of dismay by the U.S. and British governments. The drive by Britain for unanimity and a "second resolution" was effectively abandoned at that point.
806:
disarmament, which was demanded of it and which it needs to carry out to win the confidence of the world and to live in peace." Blix went on to state that the Iraqi regime had allegedly misplaced "1,000 tonnes" of VX nerve agent—one of the most toxic ever developed.
829:
The Iraqi side has tried on occasion to attach conditions, as it did regarding helicopters and U-2 planes. Iraq has not, however, so far persisted in these or other conditions for the exercise of any of our inspection rights. If it did, we would report it.
638:
decisively in the event of further Iraqi violations, this resolution does not constrain any Member State from acting to defend itself against the threat posed by Iraq or to enforce relevant United Nations resolutions and protect world peace and security.
585:
Following the speech, intensive negotiations began with other members of the Security Council. In particular, three permanent members (with veto power) of the council were known to have misgivings about an invasion of Iraq: Russia, China, and France.
877:
explicitly declared the period of diplomacy to be over, as declared by Resolution 1441's prohibition on giving Iraq new opportunities for compliance, and that no further authorization from the UN would be sought before an invasion of Iraq (see
656:
any automatic strikes against Iraq. The resolution should not be interpreted, through certain paragraphs, as authorizing any State to use force. It reaffirms the central role of the Security Council in addressing all phases of the Iraqi issue.
869:
who hosted the meeting, announced the imminent deadline of 17 March for complete Iraqi compliance, with statements such as "Tomorrow is a moment of truth for the world". On the 17th, speeches by Bush and
921:
and the Iraq Survey Group. In October 2004, Bush said of Duelfer's analysis: "The chief weapons inspector, Charles Duelfer, has now issued a comprehensive report that confirms the earlier conclusion of
590:
should not automatically lead to war; instead the UN should pass another resolution deciding on the course of action. In favour of this view is the fact that previous resolutions legitimizing war under
1285:
Thirteenth quarterly report of the Executive Chairman of the United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission in accordance with paragraph 12 of Security Council resolution 1284 (1999)
1084: 834:
cooperation. Nor do they necessarily cover all areas of relevance. They are nevertheless welcome and UNMOVIC is responding to them in the hope of solving presently unresolved disarmament issues.
802:
allowed the destruction to be witnessed by inspectors as required by the pertinent Resolutions. Chemical testing done at the site was unable to show that any anthrax had been destroyed there.
1946: 1558: 617:
While some politicians have argued that the resolution could authorize war under certain circumstances, the representatives in the meeting were clear that this was not the case. The
850:
In the leadup to the meeting, it became apparent that a majority of UNSC members would oppose any resolution leading to war. As a result, no such resolution was put to the council.
630: 513: 965: 688: 1513: 477:(WMD), but also the known construction of prohibited types of missiles, the purchase and import of prohibited armaments, and the continuing refusal of Iraq to compensate 1941: 629:
his resolution contains no "hidden triggers" and no "automaticity" with respect to the use of force. If there is a further Iraqi breach, reported to the Council by
871: 1518: 473:
Resolution 1441 stated that Iraq was in material breach of the ceasefire terms presented under the terms of Resolution 687. Iraq's breaches related not only to
735: 707: 1070: 385: 17: 714: 781:
of the International Atomic Energy Agency. The inspectors had been absent from Iraq since December 1998 when they were withdrawn immediately prior to
1457: 1910: 1907: 1902: 1897: 1892: 1887: 1882: 1877: 1872: 1867: 1862: 1857: 1852: 1847: 1837: 1832: 1827: 1822: 1817: 1812: 1807: 1802: 1797: 1792: 1787: 1782: 1777: 1772: 1767: 1762: 1757: 1752: 1747: 1742: 1737: 1732: 1727: 1722: 1717: 1712: 1707: 1702: 1697: 1692: 1687: 1682: 1677: 1672: 1667: 1662: 1657: 1652: 1647: 1642: 1637: 1632: 1627: 1622: 1617: 1612: 1607: 1602: 1597: 1592: 1587: 1582: 1577: 1572: 1569: 1044: 721: 542: 463: 390: 380: 618: 611: 595: 459: 455: 451: 447: 443: 439: 435: 431: 427: 1936: 908:
to determine whether in fact any WMD existed in Iraq. After a year and half of meticulously searching the country, the inspectors reported:
703: 1931: 1554: 407: 43: 606:
On 8 November 2002, the Security Council passed Resolution 1441 by a unanimous 15–0 vote; Russia, China, France, and Syria, the only
591: 559: 991: 563: 1408: 894: 728: 913:
Baghdad's desire to see sanctions lifted, or rendered ineffectual, or its fear of force against it should WMD be discovered.
1545: 568: 890:, it is up to the council itself, and not individual members, to determine how the body's resolutions are to be enforced. 1264:
Letter dated 13 November 2002 from the Secretary-General addressed to the President of the Security Council, S/2002/1242
634: 517: 886:
and its supporters, has been and still is being disputed by numerous legal experts. According to most members of the
754: 545:, Iraq supports terrorist organizations that direct violence against Iran, Israel, and Western governments....And 1275: 1228: 1194: 1160: 1130: 539: 531: 505: 411: 143: 39: 692: 524: 1523: 1956: 883: 794:
and whether an invasion was justified in the absence of any further UN Security resolutions on the subject.
474: 581:
Iraq flagrantly violated the terms of the weapons inspection program before discontinuing it altogether.
598:
in 1990 and that Resolution 1441 stated that the Security Council shall "remain seized of the matter."
1482: 571:(biological weapons, chemical weapons, and long-range missiles), all in violation of U.N. resolutions. 945: 1106:"Resolution 1441 (2002) - Adopted by the Security Council at its 4644th meeting, on 8 November 2002" 1538: 1519:
CHIEF PROSECUTOR OF THE KUALA LUMPUR WAR CRIMES COMMISSION v. GEORGE W BUSH & ANTHONY L. BLAIR
1263: 773:
Iraq agreed to the Resolution on 13 November. Weapons inspectors returned on 27 November, led by
768: 681: 508:
on 12 September 2002 to outline the complaints of the United States against the Iraqi government.
866: 1951: 1210: 935: 879: 862: 512:
The resolution itself never mentioned a war and only required Iraq to support inspections by
467: 1304: 1508: 1382: 1356: 1330: 782: 8: 1531: 999: 971: 300: 1283: 1240: 1206: 1172: 1142: 950: 918: 486: 1064: 955: 940: 905: 778: 534:
and outlined a catalogue of complaints against the Iraqi government. These included:
415: 1509:
BBC report on the initial controversy over the access to the 12,000 page declaration
887: 814: 1416: 1176: 1021: 810: 622: 426:
obligations" that had been set out in several previous resolutions (Resolutions
1553: 1215: 926:
that Iraq did not have the weapons that our intelligence believed were there."
843: 642:
The ambassador for the United Kingdom, the co-sponsor of the resolution, said:
527: 501: 419: 206: 1409:"JURIST - O'Connell: UN Resolution 1441 - Compelling Saddam, Restraining Bush" 1925: 1244: 1181: 1147: 960: 854: 219: 1439: 575: 790: 423: 874: 858: 695: in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 607: 1503: 1105: 610:, voted in favour, giving Resolution 1441 wider support than even the 83: 52: 923: 774: 352: 313: 670: 578:" U.N. program to purchase weapons rather than food for its people. 555:] terrorists escaped from Afghanistan are known to be in Iraq." 546: 274: 261: 248: 1151: 12 September 2002 at 10:00. Retrieved 7 July 2015. 497: 482: 966:
List of United Nations Security Council Resolutions 1401 to 1500
1219: 8 November 2002 at 10:00. Retrieved 7 July 2015. 1185: 8 November 2002 at 10:00. Retrieved 7 July 2015. 651:
The message was further confirmed by the ambassador for Syria:
478: 339: 326: 287: 193: 180: 27:
2002 UN Security Council resolution regarding Iraqi disarmament
594:
used much stronger terms, like "...all necessary means..." in
1249: 904:
After the invasion, the Bush administration commissioned the
365: 167: 1440:"The United Nations, International Law, and the war in Iraq" 1289: page 30. 30 May 2003. Retrieved 7 July 2015. 1947:
United Nations Security Council resolutions concerning Iraq
551: 789:
stockpiles existed. U.N. inspectors also found that the
466:). It provided a legal justification for the subsequent 569:
Iraqi production and use of weapons of mass destruction
839:
in order to secure international peace and security".
1049:
Head of Legal: Independent Legal Comment and Analysis
1253: 8 November 2002. Retrieved 7 July 2015. 1145: page 6. President George W. Bush 704:"United Nations Security Council Resolution 1441" 1942:2002 United Nations Security Council resolutions 1923: 1069:: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown ( 1051:. Archived from the original on 18 November 2011 992:"Text of U.N. resolution on Iraq - Nov. 8, 2002" 842:Before the meeting took place, French president 404:United Nations Security Council Resolution 1441 1514:Examination of if the resolution justified war 619:United States Ambassador to the United Nations 1539: 1555:United Nations Security Council resolutions 1546: 1532: 408:United Nations Security Council resolution 1483:"Transcript: Bush Responds to WMD Report" 1262:United Nations Security Council Document 861:, George W. Bush, Spanish prime minister 755:Learn how and when to remove this message 560:United Nations Commission on Human Rights 32:United Nations resolution adopted in 2002 601: 496: 492: 422:"a final opportunity to comply with its 57:Map of Iraq (green) and Kuwait (orange). 1042: 14: 1924: 1299: 1297: 1295: 1527: 1022:"Gulf war - PBS Frontline Interviews" 895:United Nations actions regarding Iraq 865:as well as Portuguese prime minister 95:The situation between Iraq and Kuwait 1937:Iraq and weapons of mass destruction 1504:Text of the Resolution at undocs.org 693:adding citations to reliable sources 664: 1292: 485:conducted by its troops during the 24: 18:UN Security Council Resolution 1441 1932:Causes and prelude of the Iraq War 1437: 1092:webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk 1014: 25: 1968: 1497: 1045:"The invasion of Iraq was lawful" 660: 487:1990–1991 invasion and occupation 1458:"Iraq Survey Group Final Report" 669: 562:in 2001 found "extremely grave" 358: 345: 332: 319: 306: 293: 280: 267: 254: 241: 212: 199: 186: 173: 160: 51: 1475: 1450: 1431: 1401: 1375: 1349: 1323: 1276:United Nations Security Council 1269: 1256: 1229:United Nations Security Council 1195:United Nations Security Council 1161:United Nations Security Council 1131:United Nations General Assembly 680:needs additional citations for 412:United Nations Security Council 1383:"Iraq war illegal, says Annan" 1305:"Transcript of Blix's remarks" 1222: 1188: 1154: 1124: 1098: 1077: 1036: 984: 809:By mid-February the issues of 13: 1: 1357:"Full text: ElBaradei report" 977: 818:since we began inspections." 574:Iraq used proceeds from the " 414:on 8 November 2002, offering 917:The review was conducted by 899: 7: 1085:"UK Government Web Archive" 929: 821:Blix's report also stated: 475:weapons of mass destruction 410:adopted unanimously by the 10: 1973: 892: 766: 1565: 1444:World Press Review Online 1413:JURIST Legal Intelligence 1331:"Full text: Blix address" 946:Criticism of the Iraq War 374: 228: 150: 142: 134: 100: 90: 78: 70: 62: 50: 37: 612:1990 Gulf War resolution 769:Iraq disarmament crisis 564:human rights violations 468:US-led invasion of Iraq 1266:, Retrieved 2017-02-22 1043:Gardner, Carl (2010). 915: 836: 658: 649: 640: 523:On 12 September 2002, 509: 1211:Sir Jeremy Greenstock 1133: Session 57 936:2003 invasion of Iraq 910: 893:Further information: 880:2003 invasion of Iraq 823: 653: 644: 627: 602:Security Council vote 500: 493:Passage of resolution 1957:November 2002 events 1243: page 10. 872:UK Foreign Secretary 783:Operation Desert Fox 689:improve this article 386:Lists of resolutions 1389:. 16 September 2004 1209: page 4. 1175: page 3. 1002:on 22 November 2007 972:Mass graves in Iraq 884:Bush administration 867:José Manuel Barroso 481:for the widespread 1487:washingtonpost.com 1462:GlobalSecurity.org 1438:Taylor, Rachel S. 1363:. 14 February 2003 951:Invasion of Kuwait 919:Charles A. Duelfer 813:, the nerve agent 510: 118:None voted against 1919: 1918: 1489:. 7 October 2004. 1337:. 27 January 2003 1311:. 27 January 2003 941:Al-Anfal Campaign 906:Iraq Survey Group 779:Mohamed ElBaradei 765: 764: 757: 739: 538:"In violation of 401: 400: 397: 396: 152:Permanent members 16:(Redirected from 1964: 1548: 1541: 1534: 1525: 1524: 1491: 1490: 1479: 1473: 1472: 1470: 1468: 1454: 1448: 1447: 1435: 1429: 1428: 1426: 1424: 1415:. Archived from 1405: 1399: 1398: 1396: 1394: 1379: 1373: 1372: 1370: 1368: 1353: 1347: 1346: 1344: 1342: 1327: 1321: 1320: 1318: 1316: 1301: 1290: 1273: 1267: 1260: 1254: 1226: 1220: 1192: 1186: 1158: 1152: 1128: 1122: 1121: 1119: 1117: 1112:. United Nations 1102: 1096: 1095: 1089: 1081: 1075: 1074: 1068: 1060: 1058: 1056: 1040: 1034: 1033: 1031: 1029: 1018: 1012: 1011: 1009: 1007: 998:. Archived from 988: 888:Security Council 863:José María Aznar 760: 753: 749: 746: 740: 738: 697: 673: 665: 540:Security Council 532:General Assembly 506:General Assembly 376: 375: 364: 362: 361: 351: 349: 348: 338: 336: 335: 325: 323: 322: 312: 310: 309: 299: 297: 296: 286: 284: 283: 273: 271: 270: 260: 258: 257: 247: 245: 244: 232: 218: 216: 215: 205: 203: 202: 192: 190: 189: 179: 177: 176: 166: 164: 163: 144:Security Council 126: 119: 112: 71:Meeting no. 55: 40:Security Council 35: 34: 21: 1972: 1971: 1967: 1966: 1965: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1915: 1561: 1552: 1500: 1495: 1494: 1481: 1480: 1476: 1466: 1464: 1456: 1455: 1451: 1436: 1432: 1422: 1420: 1407: 1406: 1402: 1392: 1390: 1381: 1380: 1376: 1366: 1364: 1355: 1354: 1350: 1340: 1338: 1329: 1328: 1324: 1314: 1312: 1303: 1302: 1293: 1287: S/2003/580 1274: 1270: 1261: 1257: 1233:Verbatim record 1227: 1223: 1199:Verbatim record 1193: 1189: 1177:John Negroponte 1165:Verbatim record 1159: 1155: 1135:Verbatim record 1129: 1125: 1115: 1113: 1104: 1103: 1099: 1087: 1083: 1082: 1078: 1062: 1061: 1054: 1052: 1041: 1037: 1027: 1025: 1024:. PBS Frontline 1020: 1019: 1015: 1005: 1003: 990: 989: 985: 980: 932: 902: 897: 777:of UNMOVIC and 771: 761: 750: 744: 741: 698: 696: 686: 674: 663: 623:John Negroponte 604: 543:resolution 1373 495: 370: 359: 357: 346: 344: 333: 331: 320: 318: 307: 305: 294: 292: 281: 279: 268: 266: 255: 253: 242: 240: 234: 230: 224: 213: 211: 200: 198: 187: 185: 174: 172: 161: 159: 153: 130: 124: 117: 110: 103: 66:8 November 2002 58: 42: 33: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1970: 1960: 1959: 1954: 1949: 1944: 1939: 1934: 1917: 1916: 1914: 1913: 1905: 1900: 1895: 1890: 1885: 1880: 1875: 1870: 1865: 1860: 1855: 1850: 1845: 1840: 1835: 1830: 1825: 1820: 1815: 1810: 1805: 1800: 1795: 1790: 1785: 1780: 1775: 1770: 1765: 1760: 1755: 1750: 1745: 1740: 1735: 1730: 1725: 1720: 1715: 1710: 1705: 1700: 1695: 1690: 1685: 1680: 1675: 1670: 1665: 1660: 1655: 1650: 1645: 1640: 1635: 1630: 1625: 1620: 1615: 1610: 1605: 1600: 1595: 1590: 1585: 1580: 1575: 1566: 1563: 1562: 1551: 1550: 1543: 1536: 1528: 1522: 1521: 1516: 1511: 1506: 1499: 1498:External links 1496: 1493: 1492: 1474: 1449: 1430: 1419:on 16 May 2006 1400: 1374: 1348: 1322: 1291: 1268: 1255: 1221: 1216:United Kingdom 1187: 1153: 1123: 1097: 1076: 1035: 1013: 982: 981: 979: 976: 975: 974: 969: 963: 958: 953: 948: 943: 938: 931: 928: 901: 898: 844:Jacques Chirac 767:Main article: 763: 762: 677: 675: 668: 662: 661:Implementation 659: 603: 600: 596:Resolution 678 583: 582: 579: 572: 566: 556: 530:addressed the 528:George W. Bush 525:U.S. President 504:addressed the 502:George W. Bush 494: 491: 420:Saddam Hussein 399: 398: 395: 394: 388: 383: 372: 371: 369: 368: 355: 342: 329: 316: 303: 290: 277: 264: 251: 237: 235: 229: 226: 225: 223: 222: 209: 207:United Kingdom 196: 183: 170: 156: 154: 151: 148: 147: 140: 139: 136: 132: 131: 129: 128: 125:None abstained 121: 114: 106: 104: 102:Voting summary 101: 98: 97: 92: 88: 87: 80: 76: 75: 72: 68: 67: 64: 60: 59: 56: 48: 47: 31: 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1969: 1958: 1955: 1953: 1950: 1948: 1945: 1943: 1940: 1938: 1935: 1933: 1930: 1929: 1927: 1912: 1909: 1906: 1904: 1901: 1899: 1896: 1894: 1891: 1889: 1886: 1884: 1881: 1879: 1876: 1874: 1871: 1869: 1866: 1864: 1861: 1859: 1856: 1854: 1851: 1849: 1846: 1844: 1841: 1839: 1836: 1834: 1831: 1829: 1826: 1824: 1821: 1819: 1816: 1814: 1811: 1809: 1806: 1804: 1801: 1799: 1796: 1794: 1791: 1789: 1786: 1784: 1781: 1779: 1776: 1774: 1771: 1769: 1766: 1764: 1761: 1759: 1756: 1754: 1751: 1749: 1746: 1744: 1741: 1739: 1736: 1734: 1731: 1729: 1726: 1724: 1721: 1719: 1716: 1714: 1711: 1709: 1706: 1704: 1701: 1699: 1696: 1694: 1691: 1689: 1686: 1684: 1681: 1679: 1676: 1674: 1671: 1669: 1666: 1664: 1661: 1659: 1656: 1654: 1651: 1649: 1646: 1644: 1641: 1639: 1636: 1634: 1631: 1629: 1626: 1624: 1621: 1619: 1616: 1614: 1611: 1609: 1606: 1604: 1601: 1599: 1596: 1594: 1591: 1589: 1586: 1584: 1581: 1579: 1576: 1574: 1571: 1568: 1567: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1549: 1544: 1542: 1537: 1535: 1530: 1529: 1526: 1520: 1517: 1515: 1512: 1510: 1507: 1505: 1502: 1501: 1488: 1484: 1478: 1463: 1459: 1453: 1445: 1441: 1434: 1418: 1414: 1410: 1404: 1388: 1384: 1378: 1362: 1358: 1352: 1336: 1332: 1326: 1310: 1306: 1300: 1298: 1296: 1288: 1286: 1281: 1277: 1272: 1265: 1259: 1252: 1251: 1246: 1245:Faisal Mekdad 1242: 1238: 1234: 1230: 1225: 1218: 1217: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1191: 1184: 1183: 1182:United States 1178: 1174: 1170: 1166: 1162: 1157: 1150: 1149: 1148:United States 1144: 1140: 1136: 1132: 1127: 1111: 1107: 1101: 1093: 1086: 1080: 1072: 1066: 1050: 1046: 1039: 1023: 1017: 1001: 997: 993: 987: 983: 973: 970: 967: 964: 962: 961:Jus ad bellum 959: 957: 956:Iran–Iraq War 954: 952: 949: 947: 944: 942: 939: 937: 934: 933: 927: 925: 920: 914: 909: 907: 896: 891: 889: 885: 881: 876: 873: 868: 864: 860: 857:of 16 March, 856: 855:Azores Summit 851: 848: 845: 840: 835: 831: 827: 822: 819: 816: 812: 807: 803: 799: 795: 792: 786: 784: 780: 776: 770: 759: 756: 748: 745:November 2015 737: 734: 730: 727: 723: 720: 716: 713: 709: 706: –  705: 701: 700:Find sources: 694: 690: 684: 683: 678:This section 676: 672: 667: 666: 657: 652: 648: 643: 639: 636: 632: 626: 624: 620: 615: 613: 609: 599: 597: 593: 587: 580: 577: 573: 570: 567: 565: 561: 557: 554: 553: 548: 544: 541: 537: 536: 535: 533: 529: 526: 521: 519: 515: 507: 503: 499: 490: 488: 484: 480: 476: 471: 469: 465: 461: 457: 453: 449: 445: 441: 437: 433: 429: 425: 421: 417: 413: 409: 405: 393: → 392: 389: 387: 384: 382: 379:←  378: 377: 373: 367: 356: 354: 343: 341: 330: 328: 317: 315: 304: 302: 291: 289: 278: 276: 265: 263: 252: 250: 239: 238: 236: 231:Non-permanent 227: 221: 220:United States 210: 208: 197: 195: 184: 182: 171: 169: 158: 157: 155: 149: 145: 141: 137: 133: 127: 122: 120: 115: 113: 108: 107: 105: 99: 96: 93: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 69: 65: 61: 54: 49: 45: 41: 36: 30: 19: 1952:2002 in Iraq 1842: 1486: 1477: 1465:. Retrieved 1461: 1452: 1443: 1433: 1421:. Retrieved 1417:the original 1412: 1403: 1391:. Retrieved 1386: 1377: 1365:. Retrieved 1360: 1351: 1339:. Retrieved 1334: 1325: 1313:. Retrieved 1308: 1284: 1279: 1271: 1258: 1248: 1236: 1232: 1224: 1214: 1202: 1198: 1190: 1180: 1168: 1164: 1156: 1146: 1138: 1134: 1126: 1114:. Retrieved 1109: 1100: 1091: 1079: 1053:. Retrieved 1048: 1038: 1026:. Retrieved 1016: 1004:. Retrieved 1000:the original 995: 986: 916: 911: 903: 852: 849: 841: 837: 832: 828: 824: 820: 808: 804: 800: 796: 787: 772: 751: 742: 732: 725: 718: 711: 699: 687:Please help 682:verification 679: 654: 650: 645: 641: 628: 616: 605: 588: 584: 576:oil for food 550: 522: 511: 472: 403: 402: 123: 116: 111:15 voted for 109: 94: 82:S/RES/1441 ( 29: 1557:adopted in 1110:undocs.org/ 968:(2002–2003) 791:Al-Samoud 2 592:Chapter VII 424:disarmament 146:composition 1926:Categories 1055:19 January 1006:8 December 978:References 875:Jack Straw 859:Tony Blair 715:newspapers 608:Arab state 549: [ 44:Resolution 1387:bbc.co.uk 1361:bbc.co.uk 1335:bbc.co.uk 1241:S/PV.4644 1207:S/PV.4644 1173:S/PV.4644 1143:A/57/PV.2 924:David Kay 900:Aftermath 775:Hans Blix 353:Singapore 314:Mauritius 1280:Document 1116:28 March 1065:cite web 1028:28 March 930:See also 625:, said: 547:al-Qaida 275:Colombia 262:Cameroon 249:Bulgaria 84:Document 1309:cnn.com 1239:. 1205:. 1171:. 1141:. 1094:. 2003. 996:CNN.com 853:At the 811:anthrax 729:scholar 631:UNMOVIC 514:UNMOVIC 483:looting 301:Ireland 233:members 138:Adopted 91:Subject 1467:7 July 1423:25 May 1393:7 July 1367:7 July 1341:7 July 1315:7 July 1282: 1247: 1235: 1213: 1201: 1179: 1167: 1137: 731:  724:  717:  710:  702:  633:, the 479:Kuwait 462:, and 418:under 363:  350:  340:Norway 337:  327:Mexico 324:  311:  298:  288:Guinea 285:  272:  259:  246:  217:  204:  194:Russia 191:  181:France 178:  165:  135:Result 1278: 1250:Syria 1231: 1197: 1163: 1088:(PDF) 736:JSTOR 722:books 406:is a 366:Syria 168:China 74:4,644 1908:1454 1903:1453 1898:1452 1893:1451 1888:1450 1883:1449 1878:1448 1873:1447 1868:1446 1863:1445 1858:1444 1853:1443 1848:1442 1843:1441 1838:1440 1833:1439 1828:1438 1823:1437 1818:1436 1813:1435 1808:1434 1803:1433 1798:1432 1793:1431 1788:1430 1783:1429 1778:1428 1773:1427 1768:1426 1763:1425 1758:1424 1753:1423 1748:1422 1743:1421 1738:1420 1733:1419 1728:1418 1723:1417 1718:1416 1713:1415 1708:1414 1703:1413 1698:1412 1693:1411 1688:1410 1683:1409 1678:1408 1673:1407 1668:1406 1663:1405 1658:1404 1653:1403 1648:1402 1643:1401 1638:1400 1633:1399 1628:1398 1623:1397 1618:1396 1613:1395 1608:1394 1603:1393 1598:1392 1593:1391 1588:1390 1583:1389 1578:1388 1573:1387 1559:2002 1469:2015 1425:2006 1395:2015 1369:2015 1343:2015 1317:2015 1237:4644 1203:4644 1169:4644 1118:2019 1071:link 1057:2024 1030:2019 1008:2007 708:news 635:IAEA 558:The 518:IAEA 516:and 464:1284 416:Iraq 391:1442 381:1440 79:Code 63:Date 46:1441 691:by 552:sic 460:986 456:715 452:707 448:688 444:687 440:686 436:678 432:661 428:660 38:UN 1928:: 1485:. 1460:. 1442:. 1411:. 1385:. 1359:. 1333:. 1307:. 1294:^ 1108:. 1090:. 1067:}} 1063:{{ 1047:. 994:. 815:VX 785:. 621:, 614:. 520:. 470:. 458:, 454:, 450:, 446:, 442:, 438:, 434:, 430:, 1911:→ 1570:← 1547:e 1540:t 1533:v 1471:. 1446:. 1427:. 1397:. 1371:. 1345:. 1319:. 1139:2 1120:. 1073:) 1059:. 1032:. 1010:. 758:) 752:( 747:) 743:( 733:· 726:· 719:· 712:· 685:. 86:) 20:)

Index

UN Security Council Resolution 1441
Security Council
Resolution

Document
Security Council
China
France
Russia
United Kingdom
United States
Bulgaria
Cameroon
Colombia
Guinea
Ireland
Mauritius
Mexico
Norway
Singapore
Syria
1440
Lists of resolutions
1442
United Nations Security Council resolution
United Nations Security Council
Iraq
Saddam Hussein
disarmament
660

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.