Knowledge

Bartkus v. Illinois

Source 📝

1129: 31: 259:. It also held that a defendant may be acquitted of a federal crime and convicted of a state crime, even if those crimes share the same evidence, without violating the Due Process Clause of the 120:. It also held that a defendant may be acquitted of a federal crime and convicted of a state crime, even if those crimes share the same evidence, without violating the Due Process Clause of the 102:
Affirmed by an equally divided Court January 6, 1958, 355 U.S. 281. Rehearing granted, judgment vacated and case restored to calendar for reargument May 26, 1958, 356 U. S. 969.
1204: 798: 1038: 894: 734: 530: 1194: 958: 260: 121: 1209: 284: 74: 934: 918: 361: 234: 352: 364: 248: 1214: 1189: 256: 117: 1199: 1170: 833: 345: 1136: 35: 295: 378: 982: 578: 270:
exception to the Double Jeopardy Clause, enabling state and federal prosecutions for substantially similar events.
171: 758: 338: 645: 330: 782: 715: 479: 322: 522: 1070: 998: 407: 251:. The decision held that coordination of federal officials with state officials did not implicate the 1163: 882: 546: 423: 267: 990: 849: 304: 1030: 790: 680: 613: 605: 538: 439: 183: 1014: 664: 637: 629: 562: 503: 495: 460: 179: 1144: 1062: 902: 774: 672: 391: 288: 66: 1156: 825: 696: 1128: 8: 1054: 1022: 974: 966: 926: 586: 1006: 942: 910: 857: 841: 431: 159: 1046: 750: 688: 570: 155: 1094: 950: 817: 766: 69: 1086: 621: 554: 487: 313: 252: 113: 1140: 1078: 415: 191: 1183: 1102: 399: 360: 112:
Coordination of federal officials with state officials did not implicate the
167: 139: 147: 85: 81: 30: 208:
Frankfurter, joined by Clark, Harlan, Whittaker, Stewart
1205:
United States Supreme Court cases of the Warren Court
1181: 1195:United States Double Jeopardy Clause case law 1164: 881: 346: 1210:Tie votes of the United States Supreme Court 247:, 359 U.S. 121 (1959), is a decision of the 1171: 1157: 459: 353: 339: 257:Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution 118:Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution 1182: 880: 834:Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. Resweber 458: 377: 376: 334: 18:1959 United States Supreme Court case 1123: 13: 1137:Supreme Court of the United States 224:Brennan, joined by Warren, Douglas 36:Supreme Court of the United States 14: 1226: 1215:United States Supreme Court stubs 1190:United States Supreme Court cases 291:121 (1959) is available from: 273: 1127: 579:Bravo-Fernandez v. United States 216:Black, joined by Warren, Douglas 29: 1200:1959 in United States case law 1: 362:United States Fifth Amendment 1143:. You can help Knowledge by 1135:This article related to the 783:Puerto Rico v. Sanchez Valle 716:Blockburger v. United States 480:Blockburger v. United States 45:Reargued October 21–22, 1958 7: 523:United States v. Randenbush 10: 1231: 1122: 1071:J. D. B. v. North Carolina 999:Dickerson v. United States 408:Wong Wing v. United States 983:Mitchell v. United States 889: 883:Self-Incrimination Clause 876: 809: 727:Dual sovereignty doctrine 726: 707: 656: 597: 547:Fong Foo v. United States 514: 472:Meaning of "same offense" 471: 467: 454: 424:United States v. Moreland 386: 372: 266:The case established the 233: 228: 220: 212: 204: 199: 133: 128: 111: 106: 98: 93: 61: 51: 42: 28: 23: 991:United States v. Hubbell 850:North Carolina v. Pearce 799:Denezpi v. United States 759:United States v. Wheeler 43:Argued November 19, 1957 1039:Corley v. United States 1031:United States v. Patane 895:Curcio v. United States 791:Gamble v. United States 681:United States v. Dinitz 614:Ludwig v. Massachusetts 606:United States v. Wilson 539:Burton v. United States 440:United States v. Cotton 1015:Yarborough v. Alvarado 735:United States v. Lanza 665:United States v. Perez 646:Smith v. United States 638:United States v. Dixon 630:United States v. Felix 563:Burks v. United States 504:United States v. Dixon 496:United States v. Felix 461:Double Jeopardy Clause 180:William J. Brennan Jr. 47:Decided March 30, 1959 1063:Berghuis v. Thompkins 903:Griffin v. California 775:United States v. Lara 673:United States v. Jorn 531:Ball v. United States 392:Hurtado v. California 959:Doe v. United States 826:Palko v. Connecticut 697:Blueford v. Arkansas 261:Fourteenth Amendment 235:U.S. Const. amend. V 184:Charles E. Whittaker 122:Fourteenth Amendment 1055:Maryland v. Shatzer 1023:Missouri v. Seibert 975:McNeil v. Wisconsin 967:Illinois v. Perkins 927:Williams v. Florida 743:Bartkus v. Illinois 708:Multiple punishment 587:McElrath v. Georgia 323:Library of Congress 281:Bartkus v. Illinois 244:Bartkus v. Illinois 56:Bartkus v. Illinois 24:Bartkus v. Illinois 1007:Chavez v. Martinez 943:Edwards v. Arizona 935:Michigan v. Tucker 911:Miranda v. Arizona 858:Benton v. Maryland 842:Baxstrom v. Herold 432:Beck v. Washington 365:criminal procedure 249:U.S. Supreme Court 160:William O. Douglas 144:Associate Justices 1152: 1151: 1117: 1116: 1113: 1112: 1047:Florida v. Powell 919:Boulden v. Holman 872: 871: 868: 867: 751:Waller v. Florida 689:Oregon v. Kennedy 571:Evans v. Michigan 450: 449: 240: 239: 172:John M. Harlan II 156:Felix Frankfurter 80:79 S. Ct. 676; 3 1222: 1173: 1166: 1159: 1131: 1124: 1095:Salinas v. Texas 951:Oregon v. Elstad 878: 877: 818:Ex parte Bigelow 767:Heath v. Alabama 598:After conviction 469: 468: 456: 455: 374: 373: 355: 348: 341: 332: 331: 327: 321: 318: 312: 309: 303: 300: 294: 129:Court membership 33: 32: 21: 20: 1230: 1229: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1120: 1118: 1109: 1087:Howes v. Fields 885: 864: 805: 722: 703: 652: 622:Grady v. Corbin 593: 555:Ashe v. Swenson 515:After acquittal 510: 488:Grady v. Corbin 463: 446: 382: 368: 359: 325: 319: 316: 310: 307: 301: 298: 292: 276: 253:double jeopardy 182: 170: 158: 114:double jeopardy 89: 46: 44: 38: 19: 12: 11: 5: 1228: 1218: 1217: 1212: 1207: 1202: 1197: 1192: 1176: 1175: 1168: 1161: 1153: 1150: 1149: 1132: 1115: 1114: 1111: 1110: 1108: 1107: 1099: 1091: 1083: 1079:Bobby v. Dixon 1075: 1067: 1059: 1051: 1043: 1035: 1027: 1019: 1011: 1003: 995: 987: 979: 971: 963: 955: 947: 939: 931: 923: 915: 907: 899: 890: 887: 886: 874: 873: 870: 869: 866: 865: 863: 862: 854: 846: 838: 830: 822: 813: 811: 807: 806: 804: 803: 795: 787: 779: 771: 763: 755: 747: 739: 730: 728: 724: 723: 721: 720: 711: 709: 705: 704: 702: 701: 693: 685: 677: 669: 660: 658: 657:After mistrial 654: 653: 651: 650: 642: 634: 626: 618: 610: 601: 599: 595: 594: 592: 591: 583: 575: 567: 559: 551: 543: 535: 527: 518: 516: 512: 511: 509: 508: 500: 492: 484: 475: 473: 465: 464: 452: 451: 448: 447: 445: 444: 436: 428: 420: 416:Maxwell v. Dow 412: 404: 396: 387: 384: 383: 370: 369: 358: 357: 350: 343: 335: 329: 328: 305:Google Scholar 275: 274:External links 272: 268:dual sovereign 255:Clause of the 238: 237: 231: 230: 226: 225: 222: 218: 217: 214: 210: 209: 206: 202: 201: 197: 196: 195: 194: 192:Potter Stewart 145: 142: 137: 131: 130: 126: 125: 116:Clause of the 109: 108: 104: 103: 100: 96: 95: 91: 90: 79: 63: 59: 58: 53: 52:Full case name 49: 48: 40: 39: 34: 26: 25: 17: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1227: 1216: 1213: 1211: 1208: 1206: 1203: 1201: 1198: 1196: 1193: 1191: 1188: 1187: 1185: 1174: 1169: 1167: 1162: 1160: 1155: 1154: 1148: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1133: 1130: 1126: 1125: 1121: 1105: 1104: 1103:Vega v. Tekoh 1100: 1097: 1096: 1092: 1089: 1088: 1084: 1081: 1080: 1076: 1073: 1072: 1068: 1065: 1064: 1060: 1057: 1056: 1052: 1049: 1048: 1044: 1041: 1040: 1036: 1033: 1032: 1028: 1025: 1024: 1020: 1017: 1016: 1012: 1009: 1008: 1004: 1001: 1000: 996: 993: 992: 988: 985: 984: 980: 977: 976: 972: 969: 968: 964: 961: 960: 956: 953: 952: 948: 945: 944: 940: 937: 936: 932: 929: 928: 924: 921: 920: 916: 913: 912: 908: 905: 904: 900: 897: 896: 892: 891: 888: 884: 879: 875: 860: 859: 855: 852: 851: 847: 844: 843: 839: 836: 835: 831: 828: 827: 823: 820: 819: 815: 814: 812: 808: 801: 800: 796: 793: 792: 788: 785: 784: 780: 777: 776: 772: 769: 768: 764: 761: 760: 756: 753: 752: 748: 745: 744: 740: 737: 736: 732: 731: 729: 725: 718: 717: 713: 712: 710: 706: 699: 698: 694: 691: 690: 686: 683: 682: 678: 675: 674: 670: 667: 666: 662: 661: 659: 655: 648: 647: 643: 640: 639: 635: 632: 631: 627: 624: 623: 619: 616: 615: 611: 608: 607: 603: 602: 600: 596: 589: 588: 584: 581: 580: 576: 573: 572: 568: 565: 564: 560: 557: 556: 552: 549: 548: 544: 541: 540: 536: 533: 532: 528: 525: 524: 520: 519: 517: 513: 506: 505: 501: 498: 497: 493: 490: 489: 485: 482: 481: 477: 476: 474: 470: 466: 462: 457: 453: 442: 441: 437: 434: 433: 429: 426: 425: 421: 418: 417: 413: 410: 409: 405: 402: 401: 400:Ex parte Bain 397: 394: 393: 389: 388: 385: 380: 375: 371: 366: 363: 356: 351: 349: 344: 342: 337: 336: 333: 324: 315: 306: 297: 290: 286: 282: 278: 277: 271: 269: 264: 262: 258: 254: 250: 246: 245: 236: 232: 227: 223: 219: 215: 211: 207: 203: 200:Case opinions 198: 193: 189: 185: 181: 177: 173: 169: 165: 161: 157: 153: 149: 146: 143: 141: 138: 136:Chief Justice 135: 134: 132: 127: 123: 119: 115: 110: 105: 101: 97: 92: 87: 83: 77: 76: 71: 68: 64: 60: 57: 54: 50: 41: 37: 27: 22: 16: 1145:expanding it 1134: 1119: 1101: 1093: 1085: 1077: 1069: 1061: 1053: 1045: 1037: 1029: 1021: 1013: 1005: 997: 989: 981: 973: 965: 957: 949: 941: 933: 925: 917: 909: 901: 893: 856: 848: 840: 832: 824: 816: 797: 789: 781: 773: 765: 757: 749: 742: 741: 733: 714: 695: 687: 679: 671: 663: 644: 636: 628: 620: 612: 604: 585: 577: 569: 561: 553: 545: 537: 529: 521: 502: 494: 486: 478: 438: 430: 422: 414: 406: 398: 390: 280: 265: 243: 242: 241: 229:Laws applied 187: 175: 168:Tom C. Clark 163: 151: 94:Case history 73: 55: 15: 140:Earl Warren 1184:Categories 379:Grand Jury 148:Hugo Black 86:U.S. LEXIS 84:684; 1959 82:L. Ed. 2d 62:Citations 367:case law 279:Text of 205:Majority 296:Findlaw 221:Dissent 213:Dissent 107:Holding 1106:(2022) 1098:(2013) 1090:(2012) 1082:(2011) 1074:(2011) 1066:(2010) 1058:(2010) 1050:(2010) 1042:(2009) 1034:(2004) 1026:(2004) 1018:(2004) 1010:(2003) 1002:(2000) 994:(2000) 986:(1999) 978:(1991) 970:(1990) 962:(1988) 954:(1985) 946:(1981) 938:(1974) 930:(1970) 922:(1969) 914:(1966) 906:(1965) 898:(1957) 861:(1969) 853:(1969) 845:(1966) 837:(1947) 829:(1937) 821:(1885) 802:(2022) 794:(2019) 786:(2016) 778:(2004) 770:(1985) 762:(1978) 754:(1970) 746:(1959) 738:(1922) 719:(1932) 700:(2012) 692:(1982) 684:(1976) 676:(1971) 668:(1824) 649:(2023) 641:(1993) 633:(1992) 625:(1990) 617:(1976) 609:(1833) 590:(2024) 582:(2016) 574:(2013) 566:(1978) 558:(1970) 550:(1962) 542:(1906) 534:(1896) 526:(1834) 507:(1993) 499:(1992) 491:(1990) 483:(1932) 443:(2002) 435:(1962) 427:(1922) 419:(1900) 411:(1896) 403:(1887) 395:(1884) 381:Clause 326:  320:  317:  314:Justia 311:  308:  302:  299:  293:  190: 188:· 186:  178: 176:· 174:  166: 164:· 162:  154: 152:· 150:  1139:is a 810:Other 287: 99:Prior 1141:stub 289:U.S. 88:1824 75:more 67:U.S. 65:359 285:359 70:121 1186:: 283:, 263:. 1172:e 1165:t 1158:v 1147:. 354:e 347:t 340:v 124:. 78:) 72:(

Index

Supreme Court of the United States
U.S.
121
more
L. Ed. 2d
U.S. LEXIS
double jeopardy
Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
Fourteenth Amendment
Earl Warren
Hugo Black
Felix Frankfurter
William O. Douglas
Tom C. Clark
John M. Harlan II
William J. Brennan Jr.
Charles E. Whittaker
Potter Stewart
U.S. Const. amend. V
U.S. Supreme Court
double jeopardy
Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
Fourteenth Amendment
dual sovereign
359
U.S.
Findlaw
Google Scholar
Justia
Library of Congress

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.