Liberum veto - Knowledge

246:, also witnessed an increased trend aiming at the reform of the Commonwealth's inefficient governance. Reforms of 1764–1766 improved the Sejm's proceedings. Majority voting for non-crucial items, including most economic and tax matters, was introduced, with binding instructions from sejmiks being outlawed. The road to reform was not easy, as conservatives, supported by foreign powers, opposed most of the changes and attempted to defend the 22: 203:, found it to be a useful tool to frustrate attempts at reforming and strengthening the Commonwealth. By bribing deputies to exercise their vetoes, Poland–Lithuania's neighbours could derail any measures not to their liking. The Commonwealth deteriorated from a European power into a state of anarchy. Only a few Sejms were able to meet during the reign of the 159:, in 1652. In reality, he vetoed only the continuation of the Sejm's deliberations beyond the statutory time limit. He had, however, set up a dangerous precedent. Over the proceedings of the next few sejms, the veto was still occasionally overruled, but it became gradually more accepted. Before 20 years had passed, in 1669 in 90:

was a major cause of the deterioration of the Commonwealth political system, particularly in the 18th century, when foreign powers bribed Sejm members to paralyze its proceedings, causing foreign occupation, dominance and manipulation of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth and its eventual destruction

143:

describes in the Sejm of 1611 context, some resolutions were struck down, but others passed. From the mid-17th century onward, however, an objection to any item of Sejm legislation from a deputy or senator automatically caused other, earlier adopted legislation to be rejected. That was because all

400:

had a decision-making process called "non-concur" in which any department head could veto a company-wide strategy if it did not fit in with their own department's outlook, the disagreements being then sent to the superiors in the hierarchy, often taking several months. This effectively turned IBM

332:

was a major cause of the deterioration of the Commonwealth political system and Commonwealth's eventual downfall. Deputies bribed by magnates or foreign powers, or simply content to believe they were living in some kind of "Golden Age", for over a century paralysed the Commonwealth's government,

207:

in Poland (1696–1763), the last one in 1736. Only 8 out of the 18 Sejm sessions during the reign of Augustus II (1697–1733) passed legislation. For a period of 30 years around the reign of Augustus III, only one session was able to pass legislation (1734–1763). The government was near collapse,

301:

The principle of the liberum veto preserved the feudal features of Poland's political system, weakened the role of the monarchy, led to anarchy in political life, and contributed to the economic and political decline of the Polish state. Such a situation made the country vulnerable to foreign

134:

of a region). He thus assumed responsibility to his sejmik for all decisions taken at the Sejm. Since all noblemen were considered equal, a decision taken by a majority against the will of a minority (even if only one sejmik) was considered a violation of the principle of political equality.

318:" and acted as a significant constraint on the powers of the monarch by making the "rule of law, religious tolerance and limited constitutional government... the norm in Poland in times when the rest of Europe was being devastated by religious hatred and despotism." 121:

The rule evolved from the principle of unanimous consent, which derived from the traditions of decision making in the Kingdom of Poland, and it developed under the federative character of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Each deputy represented a region in the

138:

At first, the dissenting deputies were often convinced or cowed back to withdraw their objections. Also, at first, the rule was used to strike down only individual laws, not to dissolve the chamber and throw out all measures passed. For example, as historian

191:(1674–1696), half of Sejm proceedings were scuttled by the veto. The practice also spread from the national Sejm to local sejmik proceedings. In the first half of the 18th century, it became increasingly common for Sejm sessions to be broken up by the 1595: 341:

had become the sinister symbol of old Polish anarchy." Wagner echoed him thus: "Certainly, there was no other institution of old Poland which has been more sharply criticized in more recent times than this one.".

1323:"Is he too cautious to save IBM? Lou Gerstner has stopped IBM's free fall. But Big Blue isn't competitive, and the CEO's deliberate style won't transform it into a winner for years. He may not have that long" 211:

Disruption of the Commonwealth governance caused by the liberum veto was highly significant. From 1573 to 1763, about 150 Sejms were held, of which 53 failed to pass any legislation. Historian

79:

was a key part of the political system of the Commonwealth, strengthening democratic elements and checking royal power and went against the European-wide trend of having a strong executive (

71:: "I do not allow!"). The rule was in place from the mid-17th century to the late 18th century in the Sejm's parliamentary deliberations. It was based on the premise that since all of the 103:

had become the sinister symbol of old Polish anarchy". In the period of 1573–1763, about 150 sejms were held, about a third failing to pass any legislation, mostly because of the

235:, unlike the national Sejm, which was being paralyzed by the veto. On some occasions, a confederated sejm was formed of the whole membership of the national Sejm so that the 1382: 442: 1617: 265:, adopted by a confederated sejm, which permanently established the principle of majority rule. The achievements of that constitution, however, which historian 59:(legislature) to force an immediate end to the current session and to nullify any legislation that had already been passed at the session by shouting either 503:

is originally a verb meaning "I forbid it" or "I protest"; this word was, in addition to its normal uses, in Roman times employed as an interjection by the

307: 1412: 172: 231:" evolve. It was a parliament session that operated under the rules of a confederation. Its primary purpose was to avoid disruption by the 427: 1268: 1464: 1590:

Roháč, Dalibor. "'It Is by Unrule That Poland Stands': Institutions and Political Thought in the Polish-Lithuanian Republic."

1213: 1186: 1159: 1068: 1002: 965: 877: 829: 792: 756: 688: 655: 1390: 1348: 988: 1622: 175:. The practice spiraled out of control, and in 1688, the Sejm was dissolved even before the proceedings had begun or the 48: 1632: 1483: 1322: 1035: 617: 1100:

Roháč, Dalibor (June 2008). "The unanimity rule and religious fractionalisation in the Polish-Lithuanian Republic".

1627: 1560:

Grzegorz Ekiert, "Veto, Liberum", in Seymour Martin Lipset, ed. ‘'The Encyclopedia of Democracy'’ (1998) 4:1340-41

446: 1090:

Grzegorz Ekiert, "Veto, Liberum", in Seymour Martin Lipset, ed. ‘'The Encyclopedia of Democracy'’ (1998) 4:1341

109: 1295: 208:

giving rise to the term "Polish anarchy", and the country was managed by provincial assemblies and magnates.

1438: 1463:

Södersten, Anna; Kelemen, R. Daniel; van Middelaar, Luuk; Spaventa, Eleanor; Thies, Anne (December 2019).

559: 140: 1583:

Roháč, Dalibor. "The unanimity rule and religious fractionalisation in the Polish-Lithuanian Republic."

274: 262: 156: 470: 278: 1498: 364: 1573:

Lukowski, Jerzy. "Political Ideas among the Polish Nobility in the Eighteenth Century (to 1788)."

711: 1060: 957: 321:

It was seen as one of the key principles of the Commonwealth political system and culture, the

1176: 746: 645: 1203: 1149: 1027: 992: 356: 784: 334: 243: 96: 92: 26: 1413:"Professor Richard Butterwick-Pawlikowski debates the "liberum veto" on Polish television" 748:

The price of freedom: a history of East Central Europe from the Middle Ages to the present

8: 869:

Constitutions, elections, and legislatures of Poland, 1493–1977: a guide to their history

821:

Constitutions, elections, and legislatures of Poland, 1493–1977: a guide to their history

680:

Constitutions, elections, and legislatures of Poland, 1493–1977: a guide to their history

176: 705: 1477: 1238: 1117: 1053: 950: 413: 605: 75:

were equal, every measure that came before the Sejm had to be passed unanimously. The

1356: 1209: 1182: 1155: 1064: 1031: 998: 961: 873: 825: 788: 752: 684: 651: 613: 315: 228: 188: 80: 1255: 1121: 1020: 1109: 514: 380: 863: 815: 777: 731:

Barbara Markiewicz, "Liberum veto albo o granicach społeczeństwa obywatelskiego"

674: 212: 867: 819: 678: 517:, and eventually was also nominalized in reference to its use as an interjection. 480: 290: 204: 68: 250:

and other elements perpetuating the inefficient governance, most notably by the

505: 438: 406: 322: 196: 147:

It is commonly and erroneously believed that a Sejm was first disrupted by the

1113: 281:, the final dissolution of the Polish-Lithuanian state, just two years later. 269:

called "the first constitution of its kind in Europe", were undone by another

1612: 1606: 1360: 1229:

Wagner, W.J. (1992). "May 3, 1791, and the Polish constitutional tradition".

458: 266: 251: 566:(Władysław IV and His Times). PW "Wiedza Poweszechna". Warszawa 1976, pp. 29 1523: 510: 450: 368: 270: 1242: 1578: 1568: 475: 1462: 52: 314:

played an important role in emergence of the unique Polish form of

160: 994:

Democratic government in Poland: constitutional politics since 1989

647:

The new Cambridge modern history: The ascendancy of France, 1648–88

423: 215:

notes that out of the 53 disrupted Sejms, 32 were disrupted by the

163:, the entire Sejm was prematurely disrupted on the strength of the 113:

in many European languages originated from the apparent paralysis.

72: 21: 402: 375: 200: 1472:. Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies. pp. 58–59. 273:. That Sejm, under duress from Russia and Prussia, ratified the 1147: 454: 431: 152: 127: 1174: 1563:

Heinberg, John Gilbert. "History of the majority principle."

416:

requiring unanimity between states have been compared to the

144:

legislation that was adopted by a given Sejm formed a whole.

40: 1134: