261:
That in all criminal prosecutions, every man hath a right to be informed of the accusation against him; to have a copy of the
Indictment, or charge, in due time (if required) to prepare for his defence; to be allowed counsel; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have process for his
135:
The legitimacy supposedly established by unanimity has been used by dictatorial regimes in an attempt to gain support for their position. Participants in a legislature may be coerced or intimidated into supporting the position of a dictator, with the legislature becoming little more than a
98:
introduced the concept of "constructive abstention", where a member can abstain in a vote where unanimity is required without thereby blocking the success of the vote. This is intended to allow states to symbolically withhold support while not paralysing decision-making.
386:
Note 7: The result of the voting on the second and sixth preambular paragraphs of the draft resolution S/1994/280 was as follows: 14 in favour, none against and 1 abstention (United States of
America); all the other paragraphs were approved
366:
399:
Philippart, E.; Monika Sie Dhian Ho (2003). "Flexibility and the new constitutional treaty of the
European Union". In Jacques Pelkmans; Monika Sie; Dhian Ho; Bas Limonard (eds.).
75:, a "unanimous vote" is not specifically defined, although an abstention is not counted as a vote regardless of the voting threshold. Also in this book, action could be taken by "
262:
witnesses; to examine the witnesses for and against him on oath; and to a speedy trial by an impartial jury, without whose unanimous consent he ought not to be found guilty.
234:
504:
468:
253:
jury trial. Many U.S. state constitutions have their own provisions requiring jury unanimity for a finding of guilty; for example, article 21 of the
246:
224:
374:
79:", or "general consent", if there are no objections raised. However, unanimous consent may not necessarily be the same as a unanimous vote (see
87:
155:
350:
553:
451:
412:
545:
80:
53:
or implicitly by a lack of objections. It does not necessarily mean uniformity and can sometimes be the opposite of
589:
434:
478:
524:
250:
238:
213:
175:
163:
120:
71:
20:
278:
30:
269:, since the Juries Act 1974, a guilty verdict may be returned where not more than 2 jurors dissent.
266:
108:
137:
116:
206:
167:
443:
508:
254:
404:
205:, many jurisdictions require a guilty verdict by a jury to be unanimous. This is not so in
112:
8:
95:
33:
by all people in a given situation. Groups may consider unanimous decisions as a sign of
179:
579:
511:
293:
242:
217:
499:
447:
408:
346:
288:
229:
147:
76:
429:
83:). In either case, it does not take into account the members who were not present.
227:
mandates unanimity in all federal and state criminal jury trials. This overturned
584:
473:
151:
143:
124:
42:
370:
183:
91:
65:
Practice varies as to whether a vote can be considered unanimous if some voter
573:
159:
54:
439:
283:
199:
313:
202:
66:
46:
38:
119:. Unanimity is often a political endeavor. Although governments and
469:"Claiming 100 Percent Vote for Hussein, Iraq Hails Its 'Democracy'"
49:, and unity. Unanimity may be assumed explicitly after a unanimous
345:(11th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Da Capo Press. pp. 54–56.
127:
is most often a more achievable aspiration for elected officials.
171:
50:
34:
398:
187:
146:
can restrict nominees to one per seat in elections and use
90:
is not considered "unanimous" if a member abstains. In the
427:
314:"Frequently Asked Questions about RONR (Question 6)"
154:to create an impression of popular unanimity. The
571:
546:"Juries Act 1974 (c.23), §17: Majority verdicts"
233:, which held that the Due Process Clause of the
19:"Unanimous" redirects here. For other uses, see
525:"Maryland Constitution - Declaration of Rights"
466:
123:may occasionally achieve unanimous decisions,
318:The Official Robert's Rules of Order Web Site
249:mandates unanimity for a guilty verdict in a
88:United Nations Security Council resolution
156:1962 North Korean parliamentary election
166:. 100% votes have also been claimed by
572:
527:. Maryland Government. 4 November 2008
341:Robert, Henry M.; et al. (2011).
340:
16:Agreement by all people in a situation
343:Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised
467:Chandrasekaran, Rajiv (2002-10-17).
432:(1990). "Most One-Sided Elections".
336:
334:
554:Office of Public Sector Information
247:Sixth Amendment to the Constitution
225:Sixth Amendment to the Constitution
13:
237:did not require jury unanimity in
14:
601:
401:Nederland en de Europese grondwet
331:
107:The occurrence of unanimity in a
320:. The Robert's Rules Association
257:'s Declaration of Rights states:
130:
373:. 18 March 1994. Archived from
140:for a more powerful authority.
538:
517:
492:
460:
435:Guinness Book of World Records
421:
392:
359:
306:
102:
81:Not the same as unanimous vote
1:
477:. p. A14. Archived from
299:
115:and variety of opinions in a
7:
272:
214:United States Supreme Court
121:international organizations
10:
606:
21:Unanimous (disambiguation)
18:
407:Press. pp. 128–136.
279:Consensus decision-making
193:
60:
162:and a 100% vote for the
111:can be elusive with the
109:representative democracy
550:UK Statute Law Database
164:Workers' Party of Korea
117:participatory democracy
72:Robert's Rules of Order
264:
176:Félix Houphouët-Boigny
57:in terms of outcomes.
590:Group decision-making
259:
255:Maryland Constitution
405:Amsterdam University
377:on February 10, 2008
267:In England and Wales
235:Fourteenth Amendment
96:Treaty of Amsterdam
428:McFarlan, Donald;
294:Unanimous fairness
243:concurring opinion
219:Ramos v. Louisiana
174:in 1975 and 1982,
500:Apodaca v. Oregon
352:978-0-306-82020-5
289:Unanimous consent
230:Apodaca v. Oregon
168:Ahmed Sékou Touré
148:compulsory voting
77:unanimous consent
597:
564:
563:
561:
560:
542:
536:
535:
533:
532:
521:
515:
496:
490:
489:
487:
486:
464:
458:
457:
430:Norris McWhirter
425:
419:
418:
396:
390:
389:
383:
382:
367:"Resolution 904"
363:
357:
356:
338:
329:
328:
326:
325:
310:
158:reported a 100%
144:One-party states
605:
604:
600:
599:
598:
596:
595:
594:
570:
569:
568:
567:
558:
556:
544:
543:
539:
530:
528:
523:
522:
518:
497:
493:
484:
482:
474:Washington Post
465:
461:
454:
426:
422:
415:
397:
393:
380:
378:
365:
364:
360:
353:
339:
332:
323:
321:
312:
311:
307:
302:
275:
196:
152:electoral fraud
133:
125:popular consent
105:
86:In contrast, a
63:
24:
17:
12:
11:
5:
603:
593:
592:
587:
582:
566:
565:
537:
516:
491:
459:
452:
420:
413:
391:
371:United Nations
358:
351:
330:
304:
303:
301:
298:
297:
296:
291:
286:
281:
274:
271:
195:
192:
184:Saddam Hussein
132:
129:
104:
101:
92:European Union
62:
59:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
602:
591:
588:
586:
583:
581:
578:
577:
575:
555:
551:
547:
541:
526:
520:
513:
510:
506:
502:
501:
495:
481:on 2020-04-13
480:
476:
475:
470:
463:
455:
453:0-553-28452-5
449:
445:
441:
437:
436:
431:
424:
416:
414:90-5356-656-2
410:
406:
403:. Amsterdam:
402:
395:
388:
376:
372:
368:
362:
354:
348:
344:
337:
335:
319:
315:
309:
305:
295:
292:
290:
287:
285:
282:
280:
277:
276:
270:
268:
263:
258:
256:
252:
251:federal court
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
231:
226:
222:
220:
215:
210:
209:jury trials.
208:
204:
201:
191:
189:
185:
182:in 1985, and
181:
180:CĂ´te d'Ivoire
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
157:
153:
149:
145:
141:
139:
131:Dictatorships
128:
126:
122:
118:
114:
110:
100:
97:
93:
89:
84:
82:
78:
74:
73:
68:
58:
56:
52:
48:
44:
40:
36:
32:
28:
22:
557:. Retrieved
549:
540:
529:. Retrieved
519:
498:
494:
483:. Retrieved
479:the original
472:
462:
440:Bantam Books
433:
423:
400:
394:
387:unanimously.
385:
379:. Retrieved
375:the original
361:
342:
322:. Retrieved
317:
308:
284:Liberum veto
265:
260:
239:state courts
228:
218:
211:
200:criminal law
197:
142:
138:rubber stamp
134:
106:
85:
70:
64:
26:
25:
514: (1972)
203:jury trials
103:Democracies
45:agreement,
574:Categories
559:2009-01-30
531:2009-01-30
485:2009-01-30
442:. p.
381:2009-01-30
324:2015-12-27
300:References
47:solidarity
43:procedural
580:Unanimity
245:that the
241:, with a
223:that the
216:ruled in
207:civil law
190:in 2002.
113:diversity
39:political
31:agreement
27:Unanimity
273:See also
67:abstains
55:majority
160:turnout
585:Voting
450:
411:
349:
221:(2020)
194:Juries
172:Guinea
94:, the
61:Voting
35:social
507:
69:. In
509:U.S.
448:ISBN
409:ISBN
347:ISBN
212:The
188:Iraq
51:vote
512:404
505:406
444:361
198:In
186:in
178:in
170:in
150:or
41:or
29:is
576::
552:.
548:.
503:,
471:.
446:.
438:.
384:.
369:.
333:^
316:.
37:,
562:.
534:.
488:.
456:.
417:.
355:.
327:.
23:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.