425:
93:
24:
273:(AFDC) could not be withheld because of the presence of a "substitute father" who visited a family on weekends. The issue before the US Supreme Court involved how the states could determine how to implement a federal program. The court used the term "co-operative federalism."
293:
resident who had four children, without a biological father providing support. The father of three of her children had died and the father of her fourth child was not in the picture. Thus, she qualified for AFDC. She was, however, having an
298:
with a Mr. Williams. Mr. Williams had nine children of his own. Williams, who visited on weekends, was counted as a "substitute father", thus disqualifying the family for aid according to
Alabama Law.
525:
307:
In a unanimous decision, the Court held that the term "father" did not include substitute fathers because
Williams was under no obligation to support Smith's children.
351:
134:
495:
515:
505:
530:
485:
490:
281:
were a set of successful
Supreme Court cases that dealt with Welfare, specifically referred to as a part of 'The Welfare Cases'.
270:
159:
466:
432:
266:
97:
510:
67:
45:
38:
197:
520:
459:
380:
32:
389:
290:
205:
49:
362:
355:
126:
371:
452:
424:
8:
500:
274:
440:
193:
278:
229:
129:
162:
cannot be denied to families of qualifying children based on a substitute father.
436:
209:
116:
King, Commissioner, Department of
Pensions and Security, et al. v. Smith et al.
479:
308:
330:
The
National Welfare Rights Movement : The Social Protest of Poor Women
246:
Warren, joined by Black, Harlan, Brennan, Stewart, White, Fortas, Marshall
217:
177:
221:
185:
145:
407:
141:
398:
295:
92:
265:, 392 U.S. 309 (1968), was a unanimous decision in which the
526:
United States
Supreme Court cases of the Warren Court
477:
460:
332:. New York, N.Y: Praeger. pp. 328–345.
467:
453:
496:American Civil Liberties Union litigation
68:Learn how and when to remove this message
31:This article includes a list of general
516:United States equal protection case law
506:Federal assistance in the United States
271:Aid to Families with Dependent Children
160:Aid to Families with Dependent Children
478:
311:spoke for the appellees of the case.
80:1968 United States Supreme Court case
419:
327:
17:
13:
433:Supreme Court of the United States
321:
267:Supreme Court of the United States
98:Supreme Court of the United States
37:it lacks sufficient corresponding
14:
542:
531:United States Supreme Court stubs
486:United States Supreme Court cases
358:309 (1968) is available from:
340:
423:
91:
22:
491:1968 in United States case law
1:
314:
284:
439:. You can help Knowledge by
431:This article related to the
7:
302:
289:Mrs. Sylvester Smith was a
10:
547:
418:
408:Oyez (oral argument audio)
250:
242:
237:
171:
166:
158:
153:
121:
111:
104:
90:
85:
511:Legal history of Alabama
52:more precise citations.
521:Dallas County, Alabama
291:Dallas County, Alabama
206:William J. Brennan Jr.
107:Decided June 17, 1968
105:Argued April 23, 1968
328:West, Guida (1981).
277:, King v. Smith and
275:Shapiro v. Thompson
140:88 S. Ct. 2128; 20
194:William O. Douglas
182:Associate Justices
448:
447:
279:Goldberg v. Kelly
258:
257:
230:Thurgood Marshall
198:John M. Harlan II
78:
77:
70:
538:
469:
462:
455:
427:
420:
412:
406:
403:
397:
394:
388:
385:
379:
376:
370:
367:
361:
334:
333:
325:
167:Court membership
95:
94:
83:
82:
73:
66:
62:
59:
53:
48:this article by
39:inline citations
26:
25:
18:
546:
545:
541:
540:
539:
537:
536:
535:
476:
475:
474:
473:
416:
410:
404:
401:
395:
392:
386:
383:
377:
374:
368:
365:
359:
343:
338:
337:
326:
322:
317:
305:
287:
220:
208:
196:
149:
106:
100:
81:
74:
63:
57:
54:
44:Please help to
43:
27:
23:
12:
11:
5:
544:
534:
533:
528:
523:
518:
513:
508:
503:
498:
493:
488:
472:
471:
464:
457:
449:
446:
445:
428:
414:
413:
381:Google Scholar
342:
341:External links
339:
336:
335:
319:
318:
316:
313:
304:
301:
286:
283:
256:
255:
252:
248:
247:
244:
240:
239:
235:
234:
233:
232:
210:Potter Stewart
183:
180:
175:
169:
168:
164:
163:
156:
155:
151:
150:
139:
123:
119:
118:
113:
112:Full case name
109:
108:
102:
101:
96:
88:
87:
79:
76:
75:
30:
28:
21:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
543:
532:
529:
527:
524:
522:
519:
517:
514:
512:
509:
507:
504:
502:
499:
497:
494:
492:
489:
487:
484:
483:
481:
470:
465:
463:
458:
456:
451:
450:
444:
442:
438:
434:
429:
426:
422:
421:
417:
409:
400:
391:
382:
373:
364:
363:CourtListener
357:
353:
349:
348:King v. Smith
345:
344:
331:
324:
320:
312:
310:
309:Martin Garbus
300:
297:
292:
282:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
263:
262:King v. Smith
253:
249:
245:
241:
238:Case opinions
236:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
211:
207:
203:
199:
195:
191:
187:
184:
181:
179:
176:
174:Chief Justice
173:
172:
170:
165:
161:
157:
152:
147:
143:
137:
136:
131:
128:
124:
120:
117:
114:
110:
103:
99:
89:
86:King v. Smith
84:
72:
69:
61:
58:November 2013
51:
47:
41:
40:
34:
29:
20:
19:
16:
441:expanding it
430:
415:
347:
329:
323:
306:
288:
261:
260:
259:
225:
213:
201:
189:
133:
115:
64:
55:
36:
15:
251:Concurrence
218:Byron White
178:Earl Warren
144:1118; 1968
50:introducing
501:Fatherhood
480:Categories
399:OpenJurist
315:References
285:Background
269:held that
222:Abe Fortas
186:Hugo Black
146:U.S. LEXIS
33:references
142:L. Ed. 2d
122:Citations
346:Text of
303:Decision
243:Majority
372:Findlaw
254:Douglas
154:Holding
46:improve
411:
405:
402:
396:
393:
390:Justia
387:
384:
378:
375:
369:
366:
360:
296:affair
228:
226:·
224:
216:
214:·
212:
204:
202:·
200:
192:
190:·
188:
35:, but
435:is a
354:
437:stub
356:U.S.
148:1139
135:more
127:U.S.
125:392
352:392
130:309
482::
350:,
468:e
461:t
454:v
443:.
138:)
132:(
71:)
65:(
60:)
56:(
42:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.