139:
communicating their grasp of a valence issue during the election campaign. Yet unlike position issues politicians and parties have limited control over their command of a valence issue, especially when the valence issue concerns a politicians ascriptive characteristics. However, parties can try to overcome their poor reputation on a valence issue by steering the election campaign towards a battle over views on position issues and making a stance which is in line with the average voter’s attitude on that particular position issue. There are also other forms of electoral strategies concerning the interaction of valence issues and position issues beyond this specific example. For instance, some candidates may deliberately adopt a position issue that resembles the position issue of an opponent to accentuate their competence with a valence issue, thereby giving this candidate a valence issue advantage.
130:
voters often equivocate parties with a single politician’s issue valence. However, when a parties valence issue history is not clear, for instance, when there is an election with a new or challenger party, then the voter is likely to make a decision based on position issues. A major crisis or political event is another way voters formulate lasting impressions about valence issues. In this instance the way a party addresses the crisis gives voters concerned with a valence issue that represents the crisis an idea of how competent parties are at handling this particular spotlighted valence issue. Other scholars have asserted that valence issues only matter to a specific kind of voter, these voters are non-ideological and only make their vote choices based on valence issues.
116:
have a weak or insufficiently pronounced ideological alignment valence issues are likely to dominate an election rather than position issues. Highlighting a comparison between valence issues and positional issues also does not mean that issues can only belong In those two categories, as both issue types may sometimes lurk behind one another or overlap, or, the issue at question may even transform from a position issue into a valance issue. Another way of thinking about the position issue versus valence issue dichotomy is to see voters as taking into account both position and valence issues when voting, as Egan has.
79:
both parties would oppose corruption and it would be up to voters to decide which party would be best at bringing about an end to corruption. Therefore, valence issues are issues that are used by voters to evaluate a parties competence based on whether the party can most effectively bring about a goal or quality embodied by the valence issue, or, whether the party is to blame or should be credited with a past or present good or condition that is representative of the valence issue.
112:
way of dealing with the position issue at hand. Politicians and parties therefore have some maneuverability, policy wise they can arrange themselves more freely than when faced with a valence issue, as they can take a stance on a position issue according to a distinct voter bloc in order to collect voters who are mobilised by this politician's particular position issue perspective.
35:. The concept was developed by Donald Stokes’s critique of voting behavior theories which Stokes foresaw as being too confined to ideas about a voter’s rationality and ideological impulses, as with spatial models of party competition. Since Stokes noticed during an overview of historical U.S. elections that voters sometimes were not bound by self-interest or ideology.
75:
three competing parties may altogether each present to voters separate ideas about the degree of economic intervention, all with the aim to find and attract the most electoral support. However, valences issues offer minimal room for parties to form alternative stances on, as voters are all seemingly in agreement about a particular stance.
138:
In an election purely focused on valence issues the candidate that is able to adopt the valence issue and demonstrate their competence at handling the issue wins. in such an election parties try to indicate to voters that they are better at realising a valence issue when compared to other parties via
70:
elections in Stokes’s time, did not fit with Downs’s theoretical assumptions. Thus, Stokes's conceptualisation of valence issues emerged from his focused critique on one of Downs’s assumptions about voters making decisions on their vote based on a set of ordered alternative policy preferences. Stokes
38:
Valence issues can be contrasted and opposed to position issues, as position issues are organised by a voter’s ideology and their inclination for a selection of competing interests, rather than organised by the feelings of consensus found within valence issues. As valence issues can shape the outcome
129:
When voters assess parties and politicians based on issue valence they learn about how parties and politicians relate to the issue in question over time. Therefore, it is hard for parties and politicians to change a voter’s long-standing perception about their own valence issue history. Furthermore,
74:
In an election fought over position issues, an individual party can differentiate themselves from other competing parties by advocating different policy positions, so as to gain a greater amount of support from the voter than other rivaling parties and therefore win the election. For example,
142:
The valence issue reputation of a party is not static, as parties with competence on a particular valence issue can suffer once in power, since when these politicians in government there is a closer scrutiny of the governing party and there are opportunities for governing parties to make errors on
115:
This description of position issues does not mean that valence issues are only about a consensus among voters, instead for positional issues it is also a question of whether the voter decided to support a party based on their ideological position. Accordingly, in a scenario where voters or parties
111:
Position issues are an alternative to valence issues, as position issues create disagreement among voters because a broad consensus on the issue is lacking. Since position issues are divisive issues they consequently separate potential voters into distinct voting blocs that may support or oppose a
78:
The valence issue of corruption highlights Stokes’s belief in voters having a broad consensus of preferences on certain issues. In an election where corruption becomes an important issue there would not be one party which was pro-corruption and a rivaling party which was anti-corruption. Instead,
71:
believed this way of imagining the voter may work with position issues but not valence issues, since valence issues were political issues that competing parties could not take an alternative position on, as parties ordinarily would with position issues.
82:
Since Stokes established the valence issue concept it has been applied to polities beyond the U.S. Whereas the original interpretation of the concept was founded on observations Stokes made when reviewing
American elections in the
143:
valence issues. Additionally, once in government voters have an opportunity to reevaluate their ideas about a parties competence on valence issues based on real performance and therefore vote retrospectively.
20:
is a political issue where there is a broad amount of consensus among voters. As valence issues are representative of a goal or quality, voters use valence issues to evaluate a
55:
market logic. Downs concluded that voters, when determining their voting preferences, and political parties, when determining which policies to supply, made
200:
160:
1776:
Pardos-Prado, Sergi (June 2012). "Valence beyond consensus: Party competence and policy dispersion from a comparative perspective".
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
1416:
Egan, Patrick J. (2008). "Issue
Ownership and Representation: A Theory of Legislative Responsiveness to Constituency Opinion": 3.
39:
of an election and therefore a future government, voters and politicians both adjust their behavior according to valence issues.
1873:
Nezi, Roula; Katsanidou, Alexia (6 November 2014). "From valence to position: Economic voting in extraordinary conditions".
1499:
1457:
1306:
1239:
1197:
1155:
312:
1949:
1921:
1864:
1812:
1760:
1735:
1717:
1692:
1667:
1642:
1617:
1592:
1567:
1542:
1356:
1289:
1009:
583:
514:
489:
464:
66:
Stokes’s main problem with Downs’s model of voting behavior was that empirical reality, specifically the most recent
1970:
1941:
1913:
1442:
56:
1429:
228:
1828:
Clark, Michael (March 2009). "Valence and electoral outcomes in
Western Europe, 1976–1998".
1076:
Clark, Michael (March 2009). "Valence and electoral outcomes in
Western Europe, 1976–1998".
8:
216:
164:
91:; in which Stokes identified economic recovery as a valences issue, the US elections of
1890:
1522:
1480:
1398:
1390:
1329:
1262:
1220:
1178:
1136:
1128:
1058:
1050:
989:
981:
938:
930:
887:
879:
836:
828:
785:
777:
734:
726:
683:
675:
632:
624:
556:
548:
437:
429:
386:
378:
335:
293:
285:
103:
election; which Stokes’s sees as dominated by the valence issue of U.S foreign policy.
95:; where Stokes recognized the Korean war and corruption as two valence issues, and the
60:
1945:
1917:
1894:
1860:
1808:
1756:
1731:
1713:
1688:
1663:
1638:
1613:
1588:
1563:
1538:
1518:
1476:
1402:
1382:
1352:
1325:
1285:
1258:
1216:
1174:
1140:
1120:
1062:
1042:
1005:
993:
973:
942:
922:
891:
871:
840:
820:
789:
769:
738:
718:
687:
667:
636:
616:
579:
560:
540:
510:
485:
460:
441:
421:
390:
370:
331:
297:
277:
52:
1841:
1789:
1089:
1882:
1837:
1785:
1526:
1514:
1484:
1472:
1417:
1374:
1333:
1321:
1266:
1254:
1224:
1212:
1182:
1170:
1112:
1085:
1034:
965:
914:
863:
812:
761:
710:
659:
608:
532:
413:
362:
339:
327:
269:
21:
1964:
1386:
1124:
1046:
1002:
Corruption, ideology, and populism: the rise of valence political campaigning
977:
926:
875:
824:
773:
722:
671:
620:
544:
425:
374:
281:
232:
204:
156:
155:, candidates focused upon valence issues in 77% of their advertising. In the
67:
48:
47:
The valence issue concept originates from Donald Stokes’s critical review of
1935:
1907:
196:
1421:
240:
220:
212:
1886:
1751:
Congleton, Roger D.; Grofman, Bernard; Voigt, Stefan (8 January 2019).
1708:
Congleton, Roger D.; Grofman, Bernard; Voigt, Stefan (8 January 2019).
1683:
Congleton, Roger D.; Grofman, Bernard; Voigt, Stefan (8 January 2019).
1558:
Congleton, Roger D.; Grofman, Bernard; Voigt, Stefan (8 January 2019).
1533:
Congleton, Roger D.; Grofman, Bernard; Voigt, Stefan (8 January 2019).
1394:
1132:
1054:
985:
934:
883:
832:
781:
730:
679:
628:
552:
480:
Congleton, Roger D.; Grofman, Bernard; Voigt, Stefan (8 January 2019).
455:
Congleton, Roger D.; Grofman, Bernard; Voigt, Stefan (8 January 2019).
433:
382:
289:
224:
188:
1855:
Arzheimer, Kai; Evans, Jocelyn; Lewis-Beck, Michael S. (5 May 2017).
1803:
Arzheimer, Kai; Evans, Jocelyn; Lewis-Beck, Michael S. (5 May 2017).
1658:
Arzheimer, Kai; Evans, Jocelyn; Lewis-Beck, Michael S. (5 May 2017).
1633:
Arzheimer, Kai; Evans, Jocelyn; Lewis-Beck, Michael S. (5 May 2017).
1608:
Arzheimer, Kai; Evans, Jocelyn; Lewis-Beck, Michael S. (5 May 2017).
1583:
Arzheimer, Kai; Evans, Jocelyn; Lewis-Beck, Michael S. (5 May 2017).
1500:"When Voters and Parties Agree: Valence Issues and Party Competition"
1458:"When Voters and Parties Agree: Valence Issues and Party Competition"
1347:
Arzheimer, Kai; Evans, Jocelyn; Lewis-Beck, Michael S. (5 May 2017).
1307:"When Voters and Parties Agree: Valence Issues and Party Competition"
1280:
Arzheimer, Kai; Evans, Jocelyn; Lewis-Beck, Michael S. (5 May 2017).
1240:"When Voters and Parties Agree: Valence Issues and Party Competition"
1198:"When Voters and Parties Agree: Valence Issues and Party Competition"
1156:"When Voters and Parties Agree: Valence Issues and Party Competition"
313:"When Voters and Parties Agree: Valence Issues and Party Competition"
184:
180:
152:
119:
1378:
1116:
1038:
969:
918:
867:
816:
765:
714:
663:
612:
536:
417:
366:
273:
192:
32:
1365:
Stokes, Donald E. (1963). "Spatial Models of Party
Competition".
1103:
Stokes, Donald E. (1963). "Spatial Models of Party
Competition".
1025:
Stokes, Donald E. (1963). "Spatial Models of Party
Competition".
956:
Stokes, Donald E. (1963). "Spatial Models of Party
Competition".
905:
Stokes, Donald E. (1963). "Spatial Models of Party
Competition".
854:
Stokes, Donald E. (1963). "Spatial Models of Party
Competition".
803:
Stokes, Donald E. (1963). "Spatial Models of Party Competition".
752:
Stokes, Donald E. (1963). "Spatial Models of Party Competition".
701:
Stokes, Donald E. (1963). "Spatial Models of Party Competition".
650:
Stokes, Donald E. (1963). "Spatial Models of Party Competition".
599:
Stokes, Donald E. (1963). "Spatial Models of Party Competition".
523:
Stokes, Donald E. (1963). "Spatial Models of Party Competition".
404:
Stokes, Donald E. (1963). "Spatial Models of Party Competition".
353:
Stokes, Donald E. (1963). "Spatial Models of Party Competition".
260:
Stokes, Donald E. (1963). "Spatial Models of Party Competition".
176:
172:
28:
236:
208:
168:
24:
effectiveness in producing this particular goal or quality.
191:. To contrast, position issues in the United States include
27:
The valence issue concept is a way of theorizing about how
1936:
Kim Fridkin; Kim Fridkin Kahn; Patrick J. Kenney (1999),
1908:
Kim Fridkin; Kim Fridkin Kahn; Patrick J. Kenney (1999),
1854:
1802:
1657:
1632:
1607:
1582:
1346:
1279:
1750:
1707:
1682:
1557:
1532:
479:
454:
1857:The SAGE handbook of electoral behaviour. Volume 2
1805:The SAGE handbook of electoral behaviour. Volume 2
1660:The SAGE handbook of electoral behaviour. Volume 2
1635:The SAGE handbook of electoral behaviour. Volume 2
1610:The SAGE handbook of electoral behaviour. Volume 2
1585:The SAGE handbook of electoral behaviour. Volume 2
1349:The SAGE handbook of electoral behaviour. Volume 2
1282:The SAGE handbook of electoral behaviour. Volume 2
120:Impact of valence issues on voters and politicians
31:are motivated to vote for competing parties in an
1962:
578:. Amsterdam University Press. pp. 149–150.
1872:
1730:. Oxford University Press. pp. 622–623.
1562:. Oxford University Press. pp. 269–270.
1537:. Oxford University Press. pp. 269–270.
146:
1775:
1938:Spectacle of United States Senate Campaigns
1910:Spectacle of United States Senate Campaigns
1807:. SAGE Publications Ltd. pp. 545–546.
1351:. SAGE Publications Ltd. pp. 539–540.
1284:. SAGE Publications Ltd. pp. 539–540.
509:. Amsterdam University Press. p. 149.
133:
51:theory of voting behavior which analogues
573:
504:
57:economical and rational strategic choices
42:
1755:. Oxford University Press. p. 269.
1728:The Oxford handbook of political science
1712:. Oxford University Press. p. 269.
1687:. Oxford University Press. p. 267.
484:. Oxford University Press. p. 269.
459:. Oxford University Press. p. 269.
576:Political science and changing politics
507:Political science and changing politics
1963:
1859:. SAGE Publications Ltd. p. 548.
1725:
1662:. SAGE Publications Ltd. p. 538.
1637:. SAGE Publications Ltd. p. 548.
1612:. SAGE Publications Ltd. p. 548.
1587:. SAGE Publications Ltd. p. 544.
1364:
1102:
1024:
999:
955:
904:
853:
802:
751:
700:
649:
598:
522:
403:
352:
259:
1827:
1497:
1455:
1367:The American Political Science Review
1304:
1237:
1195:
1153:
1105:The American Political Science Review
1075:
1027:The American Political Science Review
958:The American Political Science Review
907:The American Political Science Review
856:The American Political Science Review
805:The American Political Science Review
754:The American Political Science Review
703:The American Political Science Review
652:The American Political Science Review
601:The American Political Science Review
574:van Praag, Philip (31 October 2017).
525:The American Political Science Review
505:van Praag, Philip (31 October 2017).
406:The American Political Science Review
355:The American Political Science Review
310:
262:The American Political Science Review
1753:The Oxford handbook of public choice
1710:The Oxford handbook of public choice
1685:The Oxford handbook of public choice
1560:The Oxford handbook of public choice
1535:The Oxford handbook of public choice
1415:
482:The Oxford handbook of public choice
457:The Oxford handbook of public choice
13:
1004:. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 15.
106:
14:
1982:
1726:Goodin, Robert E. (7 July 2011).
1519:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00671.x
1477:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00671.x
1326:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00671.x
1259:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00671.x
1217:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00671.x
1175:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00671.x
332:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00671.x
151:In a study of campaigns for the
1929:
1901:
1848:
1842:10.1016/j.electstud.2008.07.009
1821:
1796:
1790:10.1016/j.electstud.2012.01.004
1769:
1744:
1701:
1676:
1651:
1626:
1601:
1576:
1551:
1491:
1449:
1409:
1340:
1298:
1273:
1231:
1189:
1147:
1096:
1090:10.1016/j.electstud.2008.07.009
1069:
1018:
949:
898:
847:
796:
745:
694:
643:
592:
567:
498:
473:
448:
397:
346:
304:
253:
1:
1000:Curini, Luigi (August 2017).
246:
159:, valence issues may include
1498:Green, Jane (24 June 2016).
1456:Green, Jane (24 June 2016).
1305:Green, Jane (24 June 2016).
1238:Green, Jane (24 June 2016).
1196:Green, Jane (24 June 2016).
1154:Green, Jane (24 June 2016).
311:Green, Jane (24 June 2016).
7:
10:
1987:
1942:Princeton University Press
1914:Princeton University Press
147:Examples of valence issues
124:
161:campaign finance reform
134:Parties and politicians
1437:Cite journal requires
43:History of the concept
229:nuclear proliferation
1422:10.2139/ssrn.1239464
165:care of the elderly
1944:, pp. 67–70,
1916:, pp. 67–70,
1887:10.1057/ap.2014.14
1971:Political science
1830:Electoral Studies
1778:Electoral Studies
1507:Political Studies
1465:Political Studies
1314:Political Studies
1247:Political Studies
1205:Political Studies
1163:Political Studies
1078:Electoral Studies
320:Political Studies
201:congressional pay
61:ideological space
53:supply and demand
22:political party’s
1978:
1955:
1954:
1933:
1927:
1926:
1905:
1899:
1898:
1870:
1852:
1846:
1845:
1825:
1819:
1818:
1800:
1794:
1793:
1773:
1767:
1766:
1748:
1742:
1741:
1723:
1705:
1699:
1698:
1680:
1674:
1673:
1655:
1649:
1648:
1630:
1624:
1623:
1605:
1599:
1598:
1580:
1574:
1573:
1555:
1549:
1548:
1530:
1504:
1495:
1489:
1488:
1462:
1453:
1447:
1446:
1440:
1435:
1433:
1425:
1413:
1407:
1406:
1362:
1344:
1338:
1337:
1311:
1302:
1296:
1295:
1277:
1271:
1270:
1244:
1235:
1229:
1228:
1202:
1193:
1187:
1186:
1160:
1151:
1145:
1144:
1100:
1094:
1093:
1073:
1067:
1066:
1022:
1016:
1015:
997:
953:
947:
946:
902:
896:
895:
851:
845:
844:
800:
794:
793:
749:
743:
742:
698:
692:
691:
647:
641:
640:
596:
590:
589:
571:
565:
564:
520:
502:
496:
495:
477:
471:
470:
452:
446:
445:
401:
395:
394:
350:
344:
343:
317:
308:
302:
301:
257:
1986:
1985:
1981:
1980:
1979:
1977:
1976:
1975:
1961:
1960:
1959:
1958:
1952:
1934:
1930:
1924:
1906:
1902:
1867:
1853:
1849:
1826:
1822:
1815:
1801:
1797:
1774:
1770:
1763:
1749:
1745:
1738:
1720:
1706:
1702:
1695:
1681:
1677:
1670:
1656:
1652:
1645:
1631:
1627:
1620:
1606:
1602:
1595:
1581:
1577:
1570:
1556:
1552:
1545:
1502:
1496:
1492:
1460:
1454:
1450:
1438:
1436:
1427:
1426:
1414:
1410:
1379:10.2307/1952828
1359:
1345:
1341:
1309:
1303:
1299:
1292:
1278:
1274:
1242:
1236:
1232:
1200:
1194:
1190:
1158:
1152:
1148:
1117:10.2307/1952828
1101:
1097:
1074:
1070:
1039:10.2307/1952828
1023:
1019:
1012:
970:10.2307/1952828
954:
950:
919:10.2307/1952828
903:
899:
868:10.2307/1952828
852:
848:
817:10.2307/1952828
801:
797:
766:10.2307/1952828
750:
746:
715:10.2307/1952828
699:
695:
664:10.2307/1952828
648:
644:
613:10.2307/1952828
597:
593:
586:
572:
568:
537:10.2307/1952828
517:
503:
499:
492:
478:
474:
467:
453:
449:
418:10.2307/1952828
402:
398:
367:10.2307/1952828
351:
347:
315:
309:
305:
274:10.2307/1952828
258:
254:
249:
149:
136:
127:
122:
109:
107:Position issues
49:Anthony Downs’s
45:
12:
11:
5:
1984:
1974:
1973:
1957:
1956:
1950:
1928:
1922:
1900:
1865:
1847:
1820:
1813:
1795:
1768:
1761:
1743:
1736:
1718:
1700:
1693:
1675:
1668:
1650:
1643:
1625:
1618:
1600:
1593:
1575:
1568:
1550:
1543:
1513:(3): 629–655.
1490:
1471:(3): 629–655.
1448:
1439:|journal=
1408:
1373:(2): 373–374.
1357:
1339:
1320:(3): 629–630.
1297:
1290:
1272:
1230:
1211:(3): 539–540.
1188:
1169:(3): 539–540.
1146:
1111:(2): 372–373.
1095:
1068:
1017:
1010:
964:(2): 372–373.
948:
897:
862:(2): 372–373.
846:
795:
744:
709:(2): 373–374.
693:
658:(2): 372–373.
642:
607:(2): 369–370.
591:
584:
566:
515:
497:
490:
472:
465:
447:
412:(2): 372–373.
396:
345:
326:(3): 629–655.
303:
268:(2): 372–373.
251:
250:
248:
245:
148:
145:
135:
132:
126:
123:
121:
118:
108:
105:
44:
41:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1983:
1972:
1969:
1968:
1966:
1953:
1951:9780691005058
1947:
1943:
1939:
1932:
1925:
1923:9780691005058
1919:
1915:
1911:
1904:
1896:
1892:
1888:
1884:
1880:
1876:
1875:Acta Politica
1868:
1866:9781473913158
1862:
1858:
1851:
1843:
1839:
1835:
1831:
1824:
1816:
1814:9781473913158
1810:
1806:
1799:
1791:
1787:
1783:
1779:
1772:
1764:
1762:9780190469733
1758:
1754:
1747:
1739:
1737:9780199604456
1733:
1729:
1721:
1719:9780190469733
1715:
1711:
1704:
1696:
1694:9780190469733
1690:
1686:
1679:
1671:
1669:9781473913158
1665:
1661:
1654:
1646:
1644:9781473913158
1640:
1636:
1629:
1621:
1619:9781473913158
1615:
1611:
1604:
1596:
1594:9781473913158
1590:
1586:
1579:
1571:
1569:9780190469733
1565:
1561:
1554:
1546:
1544:9780190469733
1540:
1536:
1528:
1524:
1520:
1516:
1512:
1508:
1501:
1494:
1486:
1482:
1478:
1474:
1470:
1466:
1459:
1452:
1444:
1431:
1423:
1419:
1412:
1404:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1384:
1380:
1376:
1372:
1368:
1360:
1358:9781473913158
1354:
1350:
1343:
1335:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1308:
1301:
1293:
1291:9781473913158
1287:
1283:
1276:
1268:
1264:
1260:
1256:
1252:
1248:
1241:
1234:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1199:
1192:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1164:
1157:
1150:
1142:
1138:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1122:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1099:
1091:
1087:
1083:
1079:
1072:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1032:
1028:
1021:
1013:
1011:9783319567341
1007:
1003:
995:
991:
987:
983:
979:
975:
971:
967:
963:
959:
952:
944:
940:
936:
932:
928:
924:
920:
916:
912:
908:
901:
893:
889:
885:
881:
877:
873:
869:
865:
861:
857:
850:
842:
838:
834:
830:
826:
822:
818:
814:
810:
806:
799:
791:
787:
783:
779:
775:
771:
767:
763:
759:
755:
748:
740:
736:
732:
728:
724:
720:
716:
712:
708:
704:
697:
689:
685:
681:
677:
673:
669:
665:
661:
657:
653:
646:
638:
634:
630:
626:
622:
618:
614:
610:
606:
602:
595:
587:
585:9789462987487
581:
577:
570:
562:
558:
554:
550:
546:
542:
538:
534:
530:
526:
518:
516:9789462987487
512:
508:
501:
493:
491:9780190469733
487:
483:
476:
468:
466:9780190469733
462:
458:
451:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
407:
400:
392:
388:
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
364:
360:
356:
349:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
314:
307:
299:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
256:
252:
244:
242:
238:
234:
233:school prayer
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
206:
205:death penalty
202:
198:
194:
190:
186:
182:
178:
174:
170:
166:
162:
158:
157:United States
154:
144:
140:
131:
117:
113:
104:
102:
98:
94:
90:
86:
80:
76:
72:
69:
64:
62:
58:
54:
50:
40:
36:
34:
30:
25:
23:
19:
18:valence issue
1937:
1931:
1909:
1903:
1878:
1874:
1856:
1850:
1833:
1829:
1823:
1804:
1798:
1781:
1777:
1771:
1752:
1746:
1727:
1709:
1703:
1684:
1678:
1659:
1653:
1634:
1628:
1609:
1603:
1584:
1578:
1559:
1553:
1534:
1510:
1506:
1493:
1468:
1464:
1451:
1430:cite journal
1411:
1370:
1366:
1348:
1342:
1317:
1313:
1300:
1281:
1275:
1250:
1246:
1233:
1208:
1204:
1191:
1166:
1162:
1149:
1108:
1104:
1098:
1081:
1077:
1071:
1030:
1026:
1020:
1001:
961:
957:
951:
910:
906:
900:
859:
855:
849:
808:
804:
798:
757:
753:
747:
706:
702:
696:
655:
651:
645:
604:
600:
594:
575:
569:
528:
524:
506:
500:
481:
475:
456:
450:
409:
405:
399:
358:
354:
348:
323:
319:
306:
265:
261:
255:
197:civil rights
150:
141:
137:
128:
114:
110:
81:
77:
73:
65:
46:
37:
26:
17:
15:
241:term limits
221:gun control
217:environment
213:foreign aid
1881:(4): 425.
1836:(1): 121.
1784:(2): 344.
1253:(3): 638.
1084:(1): 114.
1033:(2): 373.
913:(2): 372.
811:(2): 372.
760:(2): 374.
531:(2): 369.
361:(2): 374.
247:References
225:healthcare
59:within an
1895:144265318
1403:143960993
1387:0003-0554
1141:143960993
1125:0003-0554
1063:143960993
1047:0003-0554
994:143960993
978:0003-0554
943:143960993
927:0003-0554
892:143960993
876:0003-0554
841:143960993
825:0003-0554
790:143960993
774:0003-0554
739:143960993
723:0003-0554
688:143960993
672:0003-0554
637:143960993
621:0003-0554
561:143960993
545:0003-0554
442:143960993
426:0003-0554
391:143960993
375:0003-0554
298:143960993
282:0003-0554
185:inflation
181:education
153:US Senate
1965:Category
193:abortion
85:thirties
33:election
1527:4794102
1485:4794102
1395:1952828
1334:4794102
1267:4794102
1225:4794102
1183:4794102
1133:1952828
1055:1952828
986:1952828
935:1952828
884:1952828
833:1952828
782:1952828
731:1952828
680:1952828
629:1952828
553:1952828
434:1952828
383:1952828
340:4794102
290:1952828
177:economy
173:daycare
89:forties
1948:
1920:
1893:
1863:
1811:
1759:
1734:
1716:
1691:
1666:
1641:
1616:
1591:
1566:
1541:
1525:
1483:
1401:
1393:
1385:
1355:
1332:
1288:
1265:
1223:
1181:
1139:
1131:
1123:
1061:
1053:
1045:
1008:
992:
984:
976:
941:
933:
925:
890:
882:
874:
839:
831:
823:
788:
780:
772:
737:
729:
721:
686:
678:
670:
635:
627:
619:
582:
559:
551:
543:
513:
488:
463:
440:
432:
424:
389:
381:
373:
338:
296:
288:
280:
239:, and
215:, the
187:, and
125:Voters
29:voters
1891:S2CID
1523:S2CID
1503:(PDF)
1481:S2CID
1461:(PDF)
1399:S2CID
1391:JSTOR
1330:S2CID
1310:(PDF)
1263:S2CID
1243:(PDF)
1221:S2CID
1201:(PDF)
1179:S2CID
1159:(PDF)
1137:S2CID
1129:JSTOR
1059:S2CID
1051:JSTOR
990:S2CID
982:JSTOR
939:S2CID
931:JSTOR
888:S2CID
880:JSTOR
837:S2CID
829:JSTOR
786:S2CID
778:JSTOR
735:S2CID
727:JSTOR
684:S2CID
676:JSTOR
633:S2CID
625:JSTOR
557:S2CID
549:JSTOR
438:S2CID
430:JSTOR
387:S2CID
379:JSTOR
336:S2CID
316:(PDF)
294:S2CID
286:JSTOR
237:taxes
209:drugs
169:crime
1946:ISBN
1918:ISBN
1861:ISBN
1809:ISBN
1757:ISBN
1732:ISBN
1714:ISBN
1689:ISBN
1664:ISBN
1639:ISBN
1614:ISBN
1589:ISBN
1564:ISBN
1539:ISBN
1443:help
1383:ISSN
1353:ISBN
1286:ISBN
1121:ISSN
1043:ISSN
1006:ISBN
974:ISSN
923:ISSN
872:ISSN
821:ISSN
770:ISSN
719:ISSN
668:ISSN
617:ISSN
580:ISBN
541:ISSN
511:ISBN
486:ISBN
461:ISBN
422:ISSN
371:ISSN
278:ISSN
189:jobs
101:1960
99:and
97:1956
93:1952
87:and
1883:doi
1838:doi
1786:doi
1515:doi
1473:doi
1418:doi
1375:doi
1322:doi
1255:doi
1213:doi
1171:doi
1113:doi
1086:doi
1035:doi
966:doi
915:doi
864:doi
813:doi
762:doi
711:doi
660:doi
609:doi
533:doi
414:doi
363:doi
328:doi
270:doi
68:U.S
1967::
1940:,
1912:,
1889:.
1879:49
1877:.
1871:;
1834:28
1832:.
1782:31
1780:.
1724:;
1531:;
1521:.
1511:55
1509:.
1505:.
1479:.
1469:55
1467:.
1463:.
1434::
1432:}}
1428:{{
1397:.
1389:.
1381:.
1371:57
1369:.
1363:;
1328:.
1318:55
1316:.
1312:.
1261:.
1251:55
1249:.
1245:.
1219:.
1209:55
1207:.
1203:.
1177:.
1167:55
1165:.
1161:.
1135:.
1127:.
1119:.
1109:57
1107:.
1082:28
1080:.
1057:.
1049:.
1041:.
1031:57
1029:.
998:;
988:.
980:.
972:.
962:57
960:.
937:.
929:.
921:.
911:57
909:.
886:.
878:.
870:.
860:57
858:.
835:.
827:.
819:.
809:57
807:.
784:.
776:.
768:.
758:57
756:.
733:.
725:.
717:.
707:57
705:.
682:.
674:.
666:.
656:57
654:.
631:.
623:.
615:.
605:57
603:.
555:.
547:.
539:.
529:57
527:.
521:;
436:.
428:.
420:.
410:57
408:.
385:.
377:.
369:.
359:57
357:.
334:.
324:55
322:.
318:.
292:.
284:.
276:.
266:57
264:.
243:.
235:,
231:,
227:,
223:,
219:,
211:,
207:,
203:,
199:,
195:,
183:,
179:,
175:,
171:,
167:,
163:,
63:.
16:A
1897:.
1885::
1869:.
1844:.
1840::
1817:.
1792:.
1788::
1765:.
1740:.
1722:.
1697:.
1672:.
1647:.
1622:.
1597:.
1572:.
1547:.
1529:.
1517::
1487:.
1475::
1445:)
1441:(
1424:.
1420::
1405:.
1377::
1361:.
1336:.
1324::
1294:.
1269:.
1257::
1227:.
1215::
1185:.
1173::
1143:.
1115::
1092:.
1088::
1065:.
1037::
1014:.
996:.
968::
945:.
917::
894:.
866::
843:.
815::
792:.
764::
741:.
713::
690:.
662::
639:.
611::
588:.
563:.
535::
519:.
494:.
469:.
444:.
416::
393:.
365::
342:.
330::
300:.
272::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.