Knowledge

Law enforcement agency powers

Source 📝

117:
Due to their nature, specifically allocated powers have a greater impact on subjects, whereas law exemptions have a lesser impact on subjects. For example, the use of deadly force is normally an explicitly granted power. This is distinct from the carrying of a firearm in a public place. The latter
522:
This power when provided to an LEA in a civil society or democratic society is typically counterbalanced by the subject not being able to be prosecuted as a result of them complying with the direction, but they can be prosecuted if they do not comply. They can be prosecuted if other law enforcement
155:
in order to get approval, each time the power is to be exercised. Typically, in line with the separation of authority, the judicial officer is external to the LEA. Judicial overview is typically required for the more intrusive powers. The judicial approval for the use of a power is usually called
71:
They depend on the social, legal, and technical maturity of the country, and on the resources available to LEAs generally in the country. Some countries may have no laws regarding a particular type of activity by its subjects at all, while other countries might have very stringent laws on the same
196:
Internal review involves formal reviews done by the LEA itself on the use of its powers and law exemptions. Often, as part of this process, every time a certain power is used an incident report detailing the circumstances requiring the use of the power and the outcomes of the use of the power must
113:
While a LEA's powers and law exemptions are not usually explicitly categorised in this way, they do fall into these two broad categories in this manner and can be identified by the types and level of overview applied to the use of the powers and law exemptions. The former group can have strong and
94:
The powers and law exemptions granted to an LEA allow the LEA to act in a way which would typically be regarded as violating the rights of law complying subjects. Accordingly, to minimise the risk that these powers and law exemptions might be misused or abused, many countries have in place strong
490:
Sometimes, a law enforcement agency will not normally have the jurisdictional authority to be involved in enforcing compliance of, or investigating the non compliance with, a law unless that law or the non complying subject crosses over multiple jurisdictions, or the non compliance is especially
395:
Controlled operations, an action by a law enforcement agency to allow a criminal act to occur, for example the importation of illicit substances, so that as many of the subjects involved in the act can be identified as possible during the process of importation. A controlled operation typically
95:
overview regimes to monitor the use and application of the LEA's powers and law exemptions. Overview regimes can involve judicial officers, be provided by internal audit services, by independent authorities, by the LEA's governing body, or some other civil mechanism.
168:
Civil overview can be applied to internally approved use of powers and also to judicial approval of powers. Civil overview is normally after the event reporting on the frequency and effectiveness of the use of the powers to open fora accessible to the public.
411:
Intrusive surveillance typically means entering or interfering with the private and confidential space and property of a subject. Intrusive surveillance typically requires the law enforcement agency to be enabled for a law enforcement agency, for example in
514:
The power of direction allows a LEA to direct a subject to either carry out some act or provide information with the subject having no right to refuse, even if the outcome is to incriminate the subject, that is, any explicit, implied, or de facto
114:
multiple levels of overview, typically for every exercising of the power or law exemption, and the latter group can have no overview other than an exceptional response for some extreme malutilisation of the power or law exemption.
131:
Typically personnel of an LEA cannot just exercise a power of their own volition. In order to exercise a power, an officer of an LEA must argue for and get approval, from either a senior officer of the LEA or a
122:
is normally subject to significant overview, whether or not person injury or property damage occurred, whereas the carrying of a firearm in compliance with the law exemption requires no reporting or overview.
213:, or perceived abuse, or lack of openness and reporting on the use, of powers and law exemptions by an LEA, can give rise to lack of confidence and respect by subjects in the LEA. Where there is 715: 252:
In a civil society or democratic society, governing bodies give their law enforcement agencies specific powers to intercept telecommunications via specific laws, for example, in
75:
Law enforcement agency powers are part of a broad range of techniques used for law enforcement, many of which require no specific legislative support or independent overview.
201:. These reports are then collated and analysed to determine if there are any patterns of misuse, overuse, or process change or LEA personnel training requirements required. 180:. The reports, or at least summaries of the reports, of these entities on the LEA's use of powers or law exemptions is typically available to the public. For example, the 396:
includes the substitution of all of the illicit substances, or the significant majority of them, by the law enforcement agency with similar looking but benign materials.
781: 587: 72:
type of activity. This will impact significantly on the legal structures, if any, that govern how an LEA can operate, and on how the LEA's use of powers is overviewed.
249:(TI). In some countries TI is called wire tapping. Other forms of communications interception can be intercepting radio transmissions and opening physical mail items. 728: 655: 257: 551: 399:
In open societies, controlled operations are specifically legislated for to be used by law enforcement agencies and are subject to overview, for example in
160:
for the intrusive search and seizure of a subject's property, or a telecommunications interception warrant to listen to and copy subjects' communications:)
136:. The senior officer or the judicial officer have a responsibility to ensure that use of a power is necessary and does not unnecessarily violate the 269: 615: 31:, which other government subjects do not, to enable the LEA to undertake its responsibilities. These powers are generally in one of six forms: 796: 384: 261: 645:
United States Code Title 18 Part I Chapter 119 Section 2516 - Authorization for interception of wire, oral, or electronic communications
523:
outcomes have the otherwise same effect. A subject can be prosecuted using information obtained from another subject under direction.
506:
is allowed to take responsibility when the matter crosses state boundaries by virtue of the act(s) then becoming a federal matter.
371:
officers. The use of such methods in open societies are typically explicitly authorised and is subject to overview, for example in
656:
United States Code Title 18 Part II Chapter 205 Section 3107 - Service of warrants and seizures by Federal Bureau of Investigation
245:
The interception of communications is usually the interception of electronic voice or data connections, and is typically called
811: 591: 304:
Taking from a subject finger prints, palm prints, sole prints, teeth impressions, lip prints, blood samples, DNA samples, etc.
791: 151:
overview of LEA powers is typically in the form of the LEA having to provide grounds for the exercising of the power to a
81: 217:
and law exemptions by an LEA, and no or ineffective overview of its activities, the LEA can come to be referred to as a
420:. Recent advances in technology have made surveillance easier to achieve and, in some instance, even commonplace. 503: 323: 562: 275:
The use of TI powers by a LEA is typically subject to strong overview from outside of the LEA. For example, in
761: 750: 527: 729:
United States Code Title 18 PArt II Chapter 203 Section 3052 - Powers of Federal Bureau of Investigation
681:
Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 Part II - Survaillance and Covert Human Intelligence Sources
776: 326:
The power to search and seize property is typically granted in an instance via an instrument called a
751:
Australian Crime Commission Act 2002 - Section 30 Failure of witnesses to attend and answer questions
612: 558: 531: 322:
Law enforcement agencies are specifically given the authority to seize property, for the example the
181: 479: 464:. The power to arrest is also typically granted to a member of an LEA for whenever the member has 692:
Crimes Act 1914 Part IAB - Controlled Operation for Obtaining Evidence about Commonwealth Offences
633: 185: 702: 680: 472:
publicly give their law enforcement agencies the power to arrest subjects, for example, in the
363:
Law enforcement agency personnel when they take on assumed identities are often referred to as
24: 691: 109:
those that are relatively unintrusive and do not significantly impact the rights of a subject.
666: 534:(AFP) also has a power of direction, but this is limited to being applied to AFP appointees. 8: 292: 240: 786: 716:""It wasn't on. I wasn't using it." Google Glass, Public Surveillance, and Entitlement" 433: 317: 39: 460:. The power to arrest is typically granted in an instance via an instrument called an 236: 184:'s controlled operations are subject to open civil review by its governing body, the 644: 516: 152: 133: 739: 619: 376: 65: 98:
Generally, the use of powers and law exemptions fall into two loose categories:
465: 461: 417: 380: 327: 214: 157: 805: 499: 495: 473: 265: 225: 762:
Austral Federal Police Act 1979 - Section 40VE - Directions to AFP appointee
498:
while kidnapping is typically initially a state jurisdictional matter, the
439: 51: 102:
those that are deemed to be intrusive and might significantly impact the
469: 368: 358: 782:
Police stop, search, detention and arrest powers in the United Kingdom
613:
ACT Policing media release Police weapon discharge report 1 June 2005
413: 400: 372: 280: 276: 253: 177: 46: 176:, or specifically created general overview authorities, for example 64:
The types of powers and law exemptions available to a LEA vary from
283:
has strong intrusive powers to monitor and review an LEA using TI.
148: 173: 119: 457: 364: 137: 103: 436:
or temporary physical holds and contact to immobilize subjects
210: 740:
United States Code Title 18 Part I Chapter 55 Section 1201
311: 634:
Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979
526:
An example of this power of direction is held by the
476:, the FBI has the power of arrest under 18 USC §3052. 258:
Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979
204: 667:
Part IAC of the Crimes Act 1914 - Assumed Identities
307:
Information seizure by accessing information systems
118:is normally a law exemption. The discharging of a 588:"Controlled Operations Inspections Report 2005-06" 126: 803: 84:for a list of other law enforcement techniques. 230: 163: 552:"Controlled Operations Annual Report 2006-07" 797:Federal law enforcement in the United States 89: 385:Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 262:Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 485: 453:Constraint of liberty powers can include: 406: 590:. Commonwealth Ombudsman. Archived from 448: 390: 676: 674: 804: 722: 685: 660: 629: 627: 352: 312:Property seizure by entering premises 301:Property seizure by entering premises 792:Law enforcement in the United States 713: 671: 338:Legal deception powers can include: 286: 143: 624: 432:Non-lethal force, including either 13: 333: 205:Abuse of powers and law exemptions 191: 14: 823: 428:Use of force powers can include: 172:External overview can be done by 260:, in the United Kingdom via the 755: 744: 733: 707: 696: 504:Federal Bureau of Investigation 423: 324:Federal Bureau of Investigation 297:Intrusive seizure can include: 247:telecommunications interception 649: 638: 606: 580: 544: 197:be completed. For example, a 127:Approval and internal overview 1: 812:Law enforcement agency powers 703:Surveillance Devices Act 2004 537: 509: 444:Immobilisation and restraint 7: 770: 528:Australian Crime Commission 231:Communications interception 164:Civil and external overview 10: 828: 777:Photography is Not a Crime 356: 315: 290: 234: 223: 156:a warrant, for example, a 82:law enforcement techniques 559:Australian Federal Police 532:Australian Federal Police 182:Australian Federal Police 90:Overview of use of powers 54:and constraint of liberty 486:Jurisdictional override 186:Parliament of Australia 57:Jurisdictional override 18:Powers of police forces 407:Intrusive surveillance 348:Intrusive surveillance 38:Intrusive powers, for 25:law enforcement agency 714:Vysotsky, Stanislav. 449:Constraint of liberty 391:Controlled operations 345:Controlled operations 618:23 July 2008 at the 494:For example, in the 35:Exemptions from laws 293:Evidence management 241:Lawful interception 215:abuse of its powers 199:use of force report 787:Proactive policing 594:on August 29, 2007 434:non-lethal weapons 353:Assumed identities 342:Assumed identities 318:Search and seizure 42:, and interception 287:Intrusive seizure 237:Telephone tapping 144:Judicial overview 819: 764: 759: 753: 748: 742: 737: 731: 726: 720: 719: 711: 705: 700: 694: 689: 683: 678: 669: 664: 658: 653: 647: 642: 636: 631: 622: 610: 604: 603: 601: 599: 584: 578: 577: 575: 573: 567: 561:. Archived from 556: 548: 517:right to silence 153:judicial officer 134:judicial officer 827: 826: 822: 821: 820: 818: 817: 816: 802: 801: 773: 768: 767: 760: 756: 749: 745: 738: 734: 727: 723: 712: 708: 701: 697: 690: 686: 679: 672: 665: 661: 654: 650: 643: 639: 632: 625: 620:Wayback Machine 611: 607: 597: 595: 586: 585: 581: 571: 569: 568:on May 19, 2009 565: 554: 550: 549: 545: 540: 519:is overridden. 512: 488: 468:to do so. Open 451: 426: 409: 393: 377:Crimes Act 1914 361: 355: 336: 334:Legal deception 320: 314: 295: 289: 243: 235:Main articles: 233: 228: 207: 194: 192:Internal review 166: 146: 129: 92: 40:search, seizure 19: 12: 11: 5: 825: 815: 814: 800: 799: 794: 789: 784: 779: 772: 769: 766: 765: 754: 743: 732: 721: 706: 695: 684: 670: 659: 648: 637: 623: 605: 579: 542: 541: 539: 536: 511: 508: 487: 484: 483: 482: 477: 466:probable cause 462:arrest warrant 450: 447: 446: 445: 442: 437: 425: 422: 418:United Kingdom 408: 405: 392: 389: 381:United Kingdom 357:Main article: 354: 351: 350: 349: 346: 343: 335: 332: 328:search warrant 316:Main article: 313: 310: 309: 308: 305: 302: 288: 285: 232: 229: 224:Main article: 206: 203: 193: 190: 165: 162: 158:search warrant 145: 142: 128: 125: 111: 110: 107: 91: 88: 87: 86: 62: 61: 58: 55: 49: 43: 36: 17: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 824: 813: 810: 809: 807: 798: 795: 793: 790: 788: 785: 783: 780: 778: 775: 774: 763: 758: 752: 747: 741: 736: 730: 725: 717: 710: 704: 699: 693: 688: 682: 677: 675: 668: 663: 657: 652: 646: 641: 635: 630: 628: 621: 617: 614: 609: 593: 589: 583: 564: 560: 553: 547: 543: 535: 533: 529: 524: 520: 518: 507: 505: 501: 500:United States 497: 496:United States 492: 481: 478: 475: 474:United States 471: 467: 463: 459: 456: 455: 454: 443: 441: 438: 435: 431: 430: 429: 421: 419: 416:, and in the 415: 404: 402: 397: 388: 386: 382: 379:, and in the 378: 374: 370: 366: 360: 347: 344: 341: 340: 339: 331: 329: 325: 319: 306: 303: 300: 299: 298: 294: 284: 282: 278: 273: 271: 267: 266:United States 264:, and in the 263: 259: 255: 250: 248: 242: 238: 227: 226:Secret police 222: 220: 219:secret police 216: 212: 202: 200: 189: 187: 183: 179: 175: 170: 161: 159: 154: 150: 141: 140:of subjects. 139: 135: 124: 121: 115: 108: 105: 101: 100: 99: 96: 85: 83: 78: 77: 76: 73: 69: 67: 59: 56: 53: 50: 48: 44: 41: 37: 34: 33: 32: 30: 26: 21: 16: 757: 746: 735: 724: 709: 698: 687: 662: 651: 640: 608: 596:. Retrieved 592:the original 582: 570:. Retrieved 563:the original 546: 525: 521: 513: 493: 489: 452: 440:Lethal force 427: 424:Use of force 410: 398: 394: 367:officers or 362: 337: 321: 296: 274: 270:18 USC §2516 251: 246: 244: 218: 208: 198: 195: 171: 167: 147: 130: 116: 112: 106:of a subject 97: 93: 79: 74: 70: 68:to country. 63: 52:Use of force 28: 22: 20: 15: 598:February 5, 572:February 4, 470:governments 538:References 383:under the 375:under the 369:undercover 359:Undercover 291:See also: 27:(LEA) has 510:Direction 480:Detention 414:Australia 401:Australia 373:Australia 281:ombudsman 277:Australia 256:with the 254:Australia 178:ombudsmen 60:Direction 47:deception 806:Category 771:See also 616:Archived 491:severe. 221:agency. 174:auditors 149:Judicial 530:. The 120:firearm 66:country 458:Arrest 365:covert 138:rights 104:rights 45:Legal 29:powers 566:(PDF) 555:(PDF) 268:with 211:abuse 600:2008 574:2008 239:and 209:The 80:See 279:an 808:: 673:^ 626:^ 557:. 502:' 403:. 387:. 330:. 272:. 188:. 23:A 718:. 602:. 576:.

Index

law enforcement agency
search, seizure
deception
Use of force
country
law enforcement techniques
rights
firearm
judicial officer
rights
Judicial
judicial officer
search warrant
auditors
ombudsmen
Australian Federal Police
Parliament of Australia
abuse
abuse of its powers
Secret police
Telephone tapping
Lawful interception
Australia
Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979
Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000
United States
18 USC §2516
Australia
ombudsman
Evidence management

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.