Knowledge

Friendly fire

Source πŸ“

336:
and poor weather conditions and combat stress may add to the confusion, especially if fire is exchanged. Accurate navigation and fire discipline are vital. In high-risk situations, leaders need to ensure units are properly informed of the location of friendly units and must issue clear, unambiguous orders, but they must also react correctly to responses from soldiers who are capable of using their own judgement. Miscommunication can be deadly. Radios, field telephones, and signalling systems can be used to address the problem, but when these systems are used to co-ordinate multiple forces such as ground troops and aircraft, their breakdown can dramatically increase the risk of friendly fire. When allied troops are operating, the situation is even more complex, especially with language barriers to overcome.
36: 357: 377:
actions has risen dramatically. In the 1991 Gulf War, most of the Americans killed by their own forces were crew members of armored vehicles hit by anti-tank rounds. The response in training includes recognition training for Apache helicopter crews to help them distinguish American tanks and armored vehicles at night and in bad weather from those of the enemy. In addition, tank gunners must watch for "friendly" robotic tanks that pop out on training courses in California's Mojave Desert. They also study video footage to help them recognize American forces in battle more quickly.
464:
people doing the shooting are American, then a high percentage of total casualties are bound to be the result of friendly fire, blunting the effectiveness of the shock and awe tactic. It is probably the fact that friendly fire has proven to be the only fundamental weakness of the tactics that has caused the American military to take significant steps to overturn a blasΓ© attitude to friendly fire and assess ways to eliminate it.
1647: 369:
soldiers must be trained to operate effectively in these conditions, as well as being trained to fight at night. Such simulated training is now commonplace for soldiers worldwide. Avoiding friendly fire can be as straightforward as ensuring fire discipline is instilled in troops, so that they fire and cease firing when they are told to. Firing ranges now also include
456:
dangerous that the attackers wanted them to be shelled, considering the shells far less deadly than the machine guns. Tactical adjustments include the use of "kill boxes", or zones that are placed off-limits to ground forces while allied aircraft attack targets, which goes back to the beginning of military aircraft in World War I.
239:" – the confusion inherent in warfare. Friendly fire that is the result of apparent recklessness or incompetence may be improperly lumped into this category. The concept of a fog of war has come under considerable criticism, as it can be used as an excuse for poor planning, weak or compromised intelligence and incompetent command. 75:
forces on friendly troops while attempting to attack enemy or hostile targets. Examples include misidentifying the target as hostile, cross-fire while engaging an enemy, long range ranging errors or inaccuracy. Accidental fire not intended to attack enemy or hostile targets, and deliberate firing on
463:
battle tactics adopted by the American military – overwhelming power, battlefield awareness, dominant maneuvers, and spectacular displays of force – are employed because they are believed to be the best way to win a war quickly and decisively, reducing casualties on both sides. However, if the only
344:
Some analyses dismiss the material impact of friendly fire, by concluding friendly-fire casualties are usually too few to affect the outcome of a battle. The effects of friendly fire, however, are not just material. Troops expect to be targeted by the enemy, but being hit by their own forces has a
335:
A number of situations can lead to or exacerbate the risk of friendly fire. Difficult terrain and visibility are major factors. Soldiers fighting on unfamiliar ground can become disoriented more easily than on familiar terrain. The direction from which enemy fire comes may not be easy to identify,
203:
is an untoward but inevitable aspect of warfare, so, too, is the tendency by military commanders to sweep such tragedies under the rug. It's part of a larger pattern: the temptation among generals and politicians to control how the press portrays their military campaigns, which all too often leads
376:
The increasing sophistication of weaponry, and the tactics employed against American forces to deliberately confuse them has meant that while overall casualties have fallen for American soldiers in the late 20th and 21st centuries, the overall percentage of deaths due to friendly fire in American
499:
has been used on Russian vehicles as a form of marking. There are various explanations as to its meaning, however, one is that both sides are using the same equipment. Ukrainian forces have responded by using visible Ukrainian flags on their vehicles. The picture has become more confused as both
247:
Errors of position occur when fire aimed at enemy forces may accidentally end up hitting one's own. Such incidents are exacerbated by close proximity of combatants and were relatively common during the First and Second World Wars, where troops fought in close combat and targeting was relatively
455:
posts in the final moments before capture. This practice continued throughout the 20th century since machine guns were first used in World War I. The high friendly fire risk has generally been accepted by troops since machine gun emplacements are tactically so valuable, and at the same time so
368:
Most militaries use extensive training to ensure troop safety as part of normal coordination and planning, but are not always exposed to possible friendly-fire situations to ensure they are aware of situations where the risk is high. Difficult terrain and bad weather cannot be controlled, but
154:
Paul R. Syms argues that friendly fire is an ancient phenomenon. He notes recorded events in Ancient Greece and other early accounts of battles. He and other historians also note that weapons such as guns, artillery, and aircraft dramatically increased friendly-fire casualties.
256:
Errors of identification happen when friendly troops are mistakenly attacked in the belief that they are the enemy. Highly mobile battles, and battles involving troops from many nations are more likely to cause this kind of incident as evidenced by incidents in the 1991
331:
Errors of response inhibition have recently been proposed as another potential cause of some friendly fire accidents. These types of errors are different from visual misidentification, and instead appear to be caused by a failure to inhibit a shooting response.
385:
Improved technology to assist in identifying friendly forces is also an ongoing response to friendly fire problems. From the earliest days of warfare, identification systems were visual and developed into extremely elaborate suits of armour with distinctive
1280: 951:
Wilson, K. M., Head, J., de Joux, N. R., Finkbeiner, K. M., & Helton, W. S. (2015). Friendly fire and the sustained attention to response task. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society,
1247: 364:
Joint Maneuver Training Center during Bold Quest 2011, a combat assessment exercise to test the interoperability of target identification systems of different allied nations to reduce friendly fire incidents.
417:
is vital to ensuring units know where they are in relation to their own force and the enemy. Efforts to provide accurate compasses inside metal boxes in tanks and trucks has proven difficult, with
432:
that are invisible to observers without night-goggles, or fibres and dyes that reflect only specific wavelengths are developing into key identifiers for friendly infantry units at night.
935:
Biggs, A. T., Cain, M. S., & Mitroff, S. R. (2015). Cognitive training can reduce civilian casualties in a simulated shooting environment. Psychological science, 26(8), 1164–1176.
1172: 348:
Attempts to reduce this effect by military leaders involve identifying the causes of friendly fire and overcoming repetition of the incident through training, tactics and technology.
484:
were mistakenly fired upon by American ground and naval forces and 23 planes were shot down and 37 damaged, resulting in 318 casualties, with 60 airmen and 81 paratroopers killed.
1270: 370: 191:
are important, especially in modern warfare, the military may be inclined to under-report incidents of friendly-fire, especially when in charge of both investigations and
622:
when US Air National Guard pilots in 2002 bombed 12 Canadian soldiers, four of whom were killed; these were the first Canadian casualties of the war in Afghanistan.
714: 1449: 183:
In the annals of warfare, deaths at the hand of the enemy are often valorized, while those at the hand of friendly forces may be cast in shame. Moreover, because
170:
While acknowledging that the "statistical dimensions of the friendly fire problem have yet to be defined; reliable data are simply not available in most cases,"
1078: 435:
There is also some development of remote sensors to detect enemy vehicles – the Remotely Monitored Battlefield Sensor System (REMBASS) uses a combination of
830:
Claire Outteridge, Simon Henderson, Raphael Pascual, Paul Shanahan, "How can Human Factors be Exploited to Reduce the Risk of Fratricide?" in Kirke, p. 115
319:
was first introduced into use as it was otherwise very similar in profile to a German aircraft. Late in the war the "protection squadron" that covered the
394:, Admiral Nelson ordered that ships under his command adopt a common paint scheme to reduce friendly fire incidents; this pattern became known as the 515: 591: 914: 282: 345:
huge negative impact on morale. Forces doubt the competence of their command, and its prevalence makes commanders more cautious in the field.
1147: 894: 1412: 158:
By the 20th and 21st centuries, friendly-fire casualties have likely become a significant percentage of combat injuries and fatalities.
747: 978: 1622: 218:
Although there may well be a longstanding history of such bias, Krakauer claims "the scale and sophistication of these recent
1173:"The Ukrainian Army Has More Tanks Now Than When The War Began – Because It Keeps Capturing Them From Russia" 1698: 741:"Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms, 20 November 2010 (As amended through 31 January 2011)" 571: 579: 1435: 1471:
Yaniszewski, Mark (2007). "Reporting on Fratricide: Canadian Newspapers and the Incident at Tarnak Farm, Afghanistan".
1369: 615: 599: 285:
regiment which was conducting a night firing exercise near Kandahar. Another case of such an accident was the death of
174:
estimates that between 2 percent and 25 percent of the casualties in America's wars are attributable to friendly fire.
135:
dominated, death from a "friendly" was rare, but in industrialized warfare, deaths from friendly fire are more common.
116: 428:
signals, giving ground forces the exact location of enemy forces as well as their own. The use of infrared lights and
1658: 1611: 1566: 1406: 1339: 1241: 1070: 1043: 975: 44: 1683: 1445: 84:. Training accidents and bloodless incidents also do not qualify as friendly fire in terms of casualty reporting. 1148:"Russia Starts Erasing 'Z' – The Infamous Ukraine Invasion Symbol From Their Tanks & Armored Vehicles – Kiev" 1125: 585: 509: 248:
inaccurate. As the accuracy of weapons improved, this class of incident has become less common but still occurs.
35: 1651: 1634: 1597: 1552: 1538: 27: 19:
This article is about unintentional incidents. For institutionalised, intentional instances of fratricide, see
610:, the Italian governor of Libya over Tobruk by Italian anti aircraft fire in 1940; the accidental shooting of 1688: 76:
one's own troops for disciplinary reasons is not called friendly fire, and neither is unintentional harm to
43:"Miss Donna Mae II" is damaged by bombs after drifting under the American bomber flying above it during the 1100: 647: 407: 542: 492: 429: 289:
in Afghanistan, although the exact circumstances of that incident are yet to be definitively determined.
40: 614:
during the American Civil War; the killing of a Royal Military Policeman by a British sniper during the
1703: 632: 574:, killing 117 sailors and wounding 153 more; the eight-hour firefight between British units during the 451:
make friendly fire virtually inevitable, such as the practice of dropping barrages of mortars on enemy
104: 910: 879:
Friendly Fire: The Untold Story of the U.S. Bombing that Killed Four Canadian Soldiers in Afghanistan.
1708: 640: 477: 473: 771:
Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd ed. cites a 1925 reference to a term used in trenches during the war
312: 1693: 323:
as it landed or took off were brightly painted to distinguish them from raiding Allied fighters.
274: 1302: 708:"The Wrong Target – The Problem of Mistargeting Resulting in Fratricide and Civilian Casualties" 301: 1325: 891: 644:, 1979 television docudrama about a high-profile friendly fire incident during the Vietnam War 356: 1482: 1473: 1392: 1227: 481: 266: 48: 1033: 740: 204:
them to misrepresent the truth in order to bolster public support for the war of the moment.
1629:, US Command & Staff College, Fort Leavenworth: University Press of the Pacific, 2005; 619: 554: 550: 500:
sides are using captured or abandoned equipment with Ukraine using captured Russian tanks.
308: 270: 56: 51:
caused the plane to go into an uncontrollable spin and crash, killing all 11 crew members.
8: 1678: 1275: 874: 558: 496: 132: 1617: 402:
served a similar function during the Allied invasion of Normandy in World War II. When
1502: 1494: 603: 96: 1630: 1607: 1593: 1579: 1562: 1548: 1534: 1531:
Friendly Fire in the Civil War: More than 100 True Stories of Comrade Killing Comrade
1506: 1402: 1335: 1271:"The little known D-Day operation that accidentally killed more than 100 U.S. troops" 1237: 1200: 1039: 611: 519: 124: 81: 1486: 953: 936: 575: 565: 523: 488: 448: 399: 297: 222:
efforts, and the unabashedness of their executors" in Iraq and Afghanistan is new.
184: 163: 146:(or attempted) killing of servicemen by fellow personnel serving on the same side. 491:
that were used during D-Day as a visible way to prevent friendly fire. During the
1626: 898: 530: 391: 262: 108: 92: 72: 1490: 1360: 707: 395: 361: 320: 316: 192: 20: 1663: 1672: 1331: 957: 940: 595: 460: 439:, seismic vibration, and infrared to not just detect, but identify vehicles. 410:") systems to identify aircraft developed into a multitude of radio beacons. 1355: 694:
Backfire: a history of friendly fire from ancient warfare to the present day
424:
Other technological changes include hand-held navigational devices that use
1440: 534: 293: 159: 1583: 127:
where NATO forces were identified by blue pennants and units representing
1233: 607: 452: 286: 128: 68: 1498: 600:
downing of two U.S. Army Black Hawk helicopters by USAF fighters in 1994
1201:"Russia restoring captured, damaged Ukrainian tanks, vehicles – report" 982: 668: 538: 414: 236: 219: 200: 1664:
The American War Library's best estimates on friendly fire casualties
1398: 436: 425: 273:, four Canadian soldiers were killed and eight others injured when a 546: 387: 304: 258: 139: 77: 839:
Krakauer, Jon. 2009. Where Men Win Glory. NY: Bloomsbury, p. 204.
592:
downing of a British Army Gazelle helicopter by a British warship
526: 162:
provides an overview of American casualties during and since the
1646: 1177: 1031: 188: 1394:
No Fly Zones and International Security: Politics and Strategy
705: 91:
in a military context for allied personnel started during the
403: 131:
forces by red pennants. In classical forms of warfare where
590:
by the Luftwaffe in the North Sea during World War II; the
278: 1303:"Sinking of HMS Britomart and HMS Hussar by friendly fire" 514:
Incidents include: the killing of Royalist commander, the
1365: 418: 277:
major dropped a 500 lb (230 kg) bomb from his
261:, or the shooting down of a British aircraft by a U.S. 80:
or neutral targets, which is sometimes referred to as
1619:
Amicicide: The Problem of Friendly Fire in Modern War
1436:"Sniper escapes prosecution over friendly fire death" 1356:"London Calling the Falklands Islands, Friendly Fire" 1013:, US Command & General Staff College Survey No. 1 1011:
Amicicide: The Problem of Friendly Fire in Modern War
1327:The Cyprus Emergency: The Divided Island 1955–1974 1064: 1062: 172:The Oxford Companion to American Military History 1670: 1152:Latest Asian, Middle-East, Eurasian, Indian News 326: 307:to assist identification in preparation for the 1027: 1025: 1023: 1021: 1019: 819:Where Men Win Glory: The Odyssey of Pat Tillman 1059: 119:(NATO) militaries refer to these incidents as 1323: 1268: 1016: 785:. University of Oklahoma Press. p. 193. 1545:Friend or Foe: Friendly Fire at Sea 1939–45 1470: 1390: 283:Princess Patricia's Canadian Light Infantry 251: 99:fell short of the targeted enemy. The term 1071:"U.S. Striving to Prevent 'Friendly Fire'" 138:Friendly fire should not be confused with 1576:Le Massacre de Notre Infanterie 1914–1918 998:Le Massacre de Notre Infanterie 1914–1918 480:, on the night of 11 July 1943, American 406:was developed during World War II, IFF (" 1659:Friendly fire during the Napoleonic Wars 1590:Blue on Blue: A History of Friendly Fire 1032:Office of Technology Assessment (1993). 967: 965: 780: 355: 34: 1559:Fratricide in Battle: (Un)Friendly Fire 1068: 973:Fratricide in Battle: (Un)Friendly Fire 806:Fratricide in Battle: (Un)Friendly Fire 688: 686: 578:; the sinking of the German destroyers 1671: 1533:, Rutledge Hill Press, Nashville, TN; 1524:Friendly Fire in the Literature of War 1433: 1391:Wrage, Stephen; Cooper, Scott (2019). 1145: 911:"U.S. military probes soldier's death" 380: 1225: 962: 518:, by Royalist cannon fire during the 242: 1415:from the original on 25 January 2022 1269:Gibbons-Neff, Thomas (6 June 2016). 1250:from the original on 25 January 2022 1229:Seriously Funny, and Other Oxymorons 1081:from the original on 25 January 2022 1035:Who goes there : friend or foe? 720:from the original on 31 October 2012 683: 522:; the bombing of American troops by 360:Soldiers perform a night assault at 16:Accidental attack on friendly forces 753:from the original on 6 October 2016 606:; the shooting down and killing of 339: 13: 1516: 1434:Doward, Jamie (14 November 2010). 235:Friendly fire can arise from the " 178: 117:North Atlantic Treaty Organization 14: 1720: 1640: 1452:from the original on 31 July 2020 1446:Guardian News & Media Limited 1372:from the original on 25 June 2020 1283:from the original on 24 June 2020 1126:"The History of Invasion Stripes" 1069:Schmitt, Eric (9 December 1991). 917:from the original on 14 June 2010 321:elite German jet fighter squadron 1645: 1146:Tiwari, Sakshi (19 April 2022). 1464: 1427: 1384: 1348: 1324:van der Bijl, Nicholas (2014). 1317: 1295: 1262: 1219: 1193: 1165: 1139: 1118: 1093: 1003: 987: 945: 929: 903: 890:CBC News Online (6 July 2004). 884: 868: 855: 842: 833: 824: 557:RAF on 27 August 1944, sinking 510:List of friendly fire incidents 1574:Percin, Gen. Alexandre (1921) 1557:Kirke, Charles M. (ed., 2012) 996:Percin, Gen. Alexandre (1921) 971:Kirke, Charles M. (ed., 2012) 811: 798: 789: 774: 765: 732: 699: 661: 541:1st Minesweeping Flotilla off 313:Similar markings had been used 103:was originally adopted by the 28:Friendly Fire (disambiguation) 1: 677: 327:Errors of response inhibition 230: 1526:, Jefferson NC: McFairland 804:Kirke, Charles (ed.). 2010. 738: 648:Identification friend or foe 408:Identification friend or foe 7: 1699:Military operations by type 1616:Shrader, Charles R. (1982) 1009:Shrader, Charles R. (1982) 821:, NY: Anchor Books, p. 405. 808:. London: Bloomsbury, p. 7. 625: 570:, and irreparably damaging 503: 493:Russian invasion of Ukraine 467: 351: 47:in 1944. The damage to the 10: 1725: 1491:10.1177/002070200706200210 650:(IFF), aviation technology 633:A Second Knock at the Door 507: 442: 149: 142:, which is the uncondoned 25: 18: 1529:Garrison, Webb B. (1999) 1522:Anderson, Earl R. (2017) 892:"U.S. Air Force Verdict." 852:. NY: Bloomsbury, p. 205. 781:Marshall, S.L.A. (1947). 478:Allied invasion of Sicily 225: 213:. NY: Bloomsbury, p. 205. 1101:"Airborne Reinforcement" 958:10.1177/0018720815605703 941:10.1177/0956797615579274 654: 252:Errors of identification 1684:Friendly fire incidents 1602:Regan, Geoffrey (2004) 1588:Regan, Geoffrey (1995) 1578:, Michel Albin, Paris; 1483:Sage Publications, Ltd. 1105:US Army in World War II 739:Joint Chiefs of Staff. 692:Regan, Geoffrey (2002) 636:(2011 documentary film) 487:This led to the use of 275:U.S. Air National Guard 1604:More Military Blunders 1547:, Leo Cooper, London; 1000:, Michel Albin, Paris; 421:a major breakthrough. 365: 216: 176: 105:United States military 52: 1654:at Wikimedia Commons 1625:20 April 2021 at the 1474:International Journal 1226:Brett, Simon (2017). 897:4 August 2004 at the 863:Closing in on Baghdad 848:Krakauer, Jon. 2009. 817:Krakauer, Jon. 2010. 706:Rasmussen, Robert E. 669:killing one's brother 482:C-47 transport planes 390:patterns. During the 359: 267:2003 invasion of Iraq 197: 168: 123:, which derives from 49:horizontal stabilizer 38: 1689:Military terminology 1038:. Diane Publishing. 913:. CNN. 1 July 2006. 875:Friscolanti, Michael 620:Tarnak Farm incident 537:; the attack on the 371:"don't fire" targets 309:invasion of Normandy 271:Tarnak Farm incident 57:military terminology 41:B-17 Flying Fortress 26:For other uses, see 1561:, Continuum Books; 1543:Kemp, Paul. (1995) 1276:The Washington Post 981:11 October 2017 at 850:Where Men Win Glory 497:Z (military symbol) 476:, codename for the 381:Technological fixes 211:Where Men Win Glory 133:hand-to-hand combat 1592:, Avon Books, NY; 1401:. pp. 34–36. 1368:. 7 January 2003. 1205:The Jerusalem Post 1075:The New York Times 667:From the term for 616:war in Afghanistan 604:Iraqi no-fly zones 366: 300:" were painted on 243:Errors of position 125:military exercises 53: 1704:Military scandals 1650:Media related to 795:Shrader 1982, vii 612:Stonewall Jackson 520:English Civil War 111:used the term in 82:collateral damage 45:bombing of Berlin 1716: 1709:Killings by type 1649: 1606:, Carlton Books 1573: 1511: 1510: 1468: 1462: 1461: 1459: 1457: 1431: 1425: 1424: 1422: 1420: 1388: 1382: 1381: 1379: 1377: 1352: 1346: 1345: 1321: 1315: 1314: 1312: 1310: 1299: 1293: 1292: 1290: 1288: 1266: 1260: 1259: 1257: 1255: 1223: 1217: 1216: 1214: 1212: 1197: 1191: 1190: 1188: 1186: 1169: 1163: 1162: 1160: 1158: 1143: 1137: 1136: 1134: 1132: 1122: 1116: 1115: 1113: 1111: 1097: 1091: 1090: 1088: 1086: 1066: 1057: 1056: 1054: 1052: 1029: 1014: 1007: 1001: 995: 991: 985: 969: 960: 949: 943: 933: 927: 926: 924: 922: 907: 901: 888: 882: 872: 866: 859: 853: 846: 840: 837: 831: 828: 822: 815: 809: 802: 796: 793: 787: 786: 783:Men Against Fire 778: 772: 769: 763: 762: 760: 758: 752: 745: 736: 730: 729: 727: 725: 719: 712: 703: 697: 690: 671: 665: 576:Cyprus Emergency 524:Eighth Air Force 516:Earl of Kingston 489:Invasion stripes 400:Invasion stripes 340:Impact reduction 298:invasion stripes 214: 185:public relations 164:Second World War 113:Men Against Fire 87:Use of the term 67:is an attack by 1724: 1723: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1669: 1668: 1643: 1627:Wayback Machine 1571: 1519: 1517:Further reading 1514: 1469: 1465: 1455: 1453: 1432: 1428: 1418: 1416: 1409: 1389: 1385: 1375: 1373: 1354: 1353: 1349: 1342: 1334:. p. 109. 1322: 1318: 1308: 1306: 1305:. Halcyon Class 1301: 1300: 1296: 1286: 1284: 1267: 1263: 1253: 1251: 1244: 1224: 1220: 1210: 1208: 1207:. 17 April 2022 1199: 1198: 1194: 1184: 1182: 1181:. 24 March 2022 1171: 1170: 1166: 1156: 1154: 1144: 1140: 1130: 1128: 1124: 1123: 1119: 1109: 1107: 1099: 1098: 1094: 1084: 1082: 1077:. Middle East. 1067: 1060: 1050: 1048: 1046: 1030: 1017: 1008: 1004: 993: 992: 988: 976:Continuum Books 970: 963: 950: 946: 934: 930: 920: 918: 909: 908: 904: 899:Wayback Machine 889: 885: 873: 869: 860: 856: 847: 843: 838: 834: 829: 825: 816: 812: 803: 799: 794: 790: 779: 775: 770: 766: 756: 754: 750: 746:. p. 149. 743: 737: 733: 723: 721: 717: 710: 704: 700: 691: 684: 680: 675: 674: 666: 662: 657: 628: 581:Leberecht Maass 531:Operation Cobra 512: 506: 474:Operation Husky 470: 445: 392:Napoleonic Wars 383: 354: 342: 329: 263:Patriot battery 254: 245: 233: 228: 215: 208: 181: 179:Under-reporting 152: 109:S.L.A. Marshall 93:First World War 31: 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1722: 1712: 1711: 1706: 1701: 1696: 1694:War casualties 1691: 1686: 1681: 1667: 1666: 1661: 1642: 1641:External links 1639: 1638: 1637: 1614: 1600: 1586: 1569: 1555: 1541: 1527: 1518: 1515: 1513: 1512: 1463: 1426: 1407: 1383: 1361:BBC Programmes 1347: 1340: 1316: 1294: 1261: 1242: 1236:. p. 43. 1218: 1192: 1164: 1138: 1117: 1092: 1058: 1044: 1015: 1002: 986: 961: 944: 928: 902: 883: 867: 861:The Economist 854: 841: 832: 823: 810: 797: 788: 773: 764: 731: 698: 696:, Robson Books 681: 679: 676: 673: 672: 659: 658: 656: 653: 652: 651: 645: 637: 627: 624: 572:HMS Salamander 508:Main article: 505: 502: 469: 466: 444: 441: 396:Nelson Chequer 382: 379: 362:Camp Atterbury 353: 350: 341: 338: 328: 325: 317:Hawker Typhoon 253: 250: 244: 241: 232: 229: 227: 224: 209:Jon Krakauer, 206: 193:press releases 180: 177: 151: 148: 115:in 1947. Many 21:barrier troops 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1721: 1710: 1707: 1705: 1702: 1700: 1697: 1695: 1692: 1690: 1687: 1685: 1682: 1680: 1677: 1676: 1674: 1665: 1662: 1660: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1653: 1652:Friendly fire 1648: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1621: 1620: 1615: 1613: 1612:9781844427109 1609: 1605: 1601: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1570: 1568: 1567:9781441157003 1564: 1560: 1556: 1554: 1550: 1546: 1542: 1540: 1536: 1532: 1528: 1525: 1521: 1520: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1492: 1488: 1484: 1480: 1476: 1475: 1467: 1451: 1447: 1443: 1442: 1437: 1430: 1414: 1410: 1408:9781317087182 1404: 1400: 1396: 1395: 1387: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1362: 1357: 1351: 1343: 1341:9781844682508 1337: 1333: 1332:Pen and Sword 1329: 1328: 1320: 1304: 1298: 1282: 1278: 1277: 1272: 1265: 1249: 1245: 1243:9781472139443 1239: 1235: 1231: 1230: 1222: 1206: 1202: 1196: 1180: 1179: 1174: 1168: 1153: 1149: 1142: 1127: 1121: 1106: 1102: 1096: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1065: 1063: 1047: 1045:9781428921139 1041: 1037: 1036: 1028: 1026: 1024: 1022: 1020: 1012: 1006: 999: 990: 984: 980: 977: 974: 968: 966: 959: 955: 948: 942: 938: 932: 916: 912: 906: 900: 896: 893: 887: 880: 876: 871: 865:25 March 2003 864: 858: 851: 845: 836: 827: 820: 814: 807: 801: 792: 784: 777: 768: 749: 742: 735: 716: 709: 702: 695: 689: 687: 682: 670: 664: 660: 649: 646: 643: 642: 641:Friendly Fire 638: 635: 634: 630: 629: 623: 621: 617: 613: 609: 605: 601: 597: 596:Falklands War 593: 589: 588: 583: 582: 577: 573: 569: 568: 563: 562: 556: 552: 548: 544: 543:Cap d'Antifer 540: 536: 532: 528: 525: 521: 517: 511: 501: 498: 494: 490: 485: 483: 479: 475: 465: 462: 461:shock and awe 457: 454: 450: 440: 438: 433: 431: 427: 422: 420: 416: 411: 409: 405: 401: 397: 393: 389: 378: 374: 372: 363: 358: 349: 346: 337: 333: 324: 322: 318: 314: 310: 306: 303: 299: 295: 290: 288: 284: 280: 276: 272: 268: 264: 260: 249: 240: 238: 223: 221: 212: 205: 202: 196: 194: 190: 186: 175: 173: 167: 165: 161: 156: 147: 145: 141: 136: 134: 130: 126: 122: 118: 114: 110: 106: 102: 101:friendly fire 98: 95:, often when 94: 90: 85: 83: 79: 74: 70: 66: 62: 61:friendly fire 58: 50: 46: 42: 37: 33: 29: 22: 1644: 1618: 1603: 1589: 1575: 1558: 1544: 1530: 1523: 1478: 1472: 1466: 1454:. Retrieved 1441:The Guardian 1439: 1429: 1419:13 September 1417:. Retrieved 1393: 1386: 1374:. Retrieved 1359: 1350: 1326: 1319: 1307:. Retrieved 1297: 1285:. Retrieved 1274: 1264: 1254:13 September 1252:. Retrieved 1228: 1221: 1209:. Retrieved 1204: 1195: 1183:. Retrieved 1176: 1167: 1155:. Retrieved 1151: 1141: 1129:. Retrieved 1120: 1108:. Retrieved 1104: 1095: 1083:. Retrieved 1074: 1049:. Retrieved 1034: 1010: 1005: 997: 989: 972: 947: 931: 919:. Retrieved 905: 886: 878: 870: 862: 857: 849: 844: 835: 826: 818: 813: 805: 800: 791: 782: 776: 767: 755:. Retrieved 734: 722:. Retrieved 701: 693: 663: 639: 631: 586: 580: 566: 560: 555:266 Squadron 551:263 Squadron 535:World War II 513: 486: 471: 458: 446: 434: 430:thermal tape 423: 412: 384: 375: 367: 347: 343: 334: 330: 294:World War II 291: 255: 246: 234: 217: 210: 198: 182: 171: 169: 160:Jon Krakauer 157: 153: 143: 137: 121:blue on blue 120: 112: 100: 88: 86: 64: 60: 54: 39:An American 32: 1572:(in French) 1485:: 362–380. 1234:Hachette UK 994:(in French) 881:pp. 420–421 877:. (2005). 608:Italo Balbo 602:during the 594:during the 587:Max Schultz 453:machine gun 287:Pat Tillman 265:during the 144:intentional 129:Warsaw Pact 69:belligerent 1679:Euphemisms 1673:Categories 1635:1410219917 1598:0380776553 1553:0850523850 1539:1558537147 1309:27 January 983:Archive-It 678:References 618:; and the 539:Royal Navy 415:navigation 237:fog of war 231:Fog of war 220:propaganda 201:fratricide 65:fratricide 1584:924214914 1507:141837377 1399:Routledge 1085:4 January 1051:4 January 921:4 January 757:18 August 724:4 January 561:Britomart 559:HMS  426:satellite 315:when the 281:onto the 269:. In the 1623:Archived 1499:40204274 1450:Archived 1413:Archived 1370:Archived 1281:Archived 1248:Archived 1211:19 April 1185:19 April 1157:19 April 1131:19 April 1110:10 March 1079:Archived 979:Archived 915:Archived 895:Archived 748:Archived 715:Archived 626:See also 547:Le Havre 504:Examples 468:Markings 437:acoustic 413:Correct 388:heraldic 352:Training 305:aircraft 259:Gulf War 207:β€”  140:fragging 89:friendly 78:civilian 1456:22 June 1376:22 June 1287:22 June 529:during 527:bombers 472:During 449:tactics 443:Tactics 292:During 150:History 73:neutral 1633:  1610:  1596:  1582:  1565:  1551:  1537:  1505:  1497:  1405:  1338:  1240:  1178:Forbes 1042:  598:; the 567:Hussar 302:Allied 226:Causes 189:morale 97:shells 1503:S2CID 1495:JSTOR 1481:(2). 751:(PDF) 744:(PDF) 718:(PDF) 711:(PDF) 655:Notes 447:Some 404:radar 1631:ISBN 1608:ISBN 1594:ISBN 1580:OCLC 1563:ISBN 1549:ISBN 1535:ISBN 1458:2020 1421:2020 1403:ISBN 1378:2020 1336:ISBN 1311:2014 1289:2020 1256:2020 1238:ISBN 1213:2022 1187:2022 1159:2022 1133:2022 1112:2009 1087:2011 1053:2011 1040:ISBN 923:2011 759:2016 726:2011 584:and 564:and 553:and 495:the 459:The 279:F-16 187:and 1487:doi 1366:BBC 954:doi 937:doi 549:by 533:in 419:GPS 296:, " 199:If 71:or 63:or 55:In 1675:: 1501:. 1493:. 1479:62 1477:. 1448:. 1444:. 1438:. 1411:. 1397:. 1364:. 1358:. 1330:. 1279:. 1273:. 1246:. 1232:. 1203:. 1175:. 1150:. 1103:. 1073:. 1061:^ 1018:^ 964:^ 713:. 685:^ 545:, 398:. 373:. 311:. 195:: 166:: 107:; 59:, 1509:. 1489:: 1460:. 1423:. 1380:. 1344:. 1313:. 1291:. 1258:. 1215:. 1189:. 1161:. 1135:. 1114:. 1089:. 1055:. 956:: 939:: 925:. 761:. 728:. 30:. 23:.

Index

barrier troops
Friendly Fire (disambiguation)

B-17 Flying Fortress
bombing of Berlin
horizontal stabilizer
military terminology
belligerent
neutral
civilian
collateral damage
First World War
shells
United States military
S.L.A. Marshall
North Atlantic Treaty Organization
military exercises
Warsaw Pact
hand-to-hand combat
fragging
Jon Krakauer
Second World War
public relations
morale
press releases
fratricide
propaganda
fog of war
Gulf War
Patriot battery

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑