Knowledge

Cabinet collective responsibility

Source 📝

452:. The cabinet members, along with the Prime Minister, schedule weekly closed door sessions to discuss the collective stance of the cabinet to avoid inconsistent responses from cabinet ministers. The solidarity of the cabinet is consistently challenged by the opposition in an attempt to create contradictions between cabinet ministers. It is therefore imperative for the cabinet members to have their responses as common and similar as possible. 32: 223:
The New South Wales Parliamentary Library Research Service in Australia explains that "one aspect of collective ministerial responsibility is that Ministers share responsibility for major government decisions, particularly those made by the cabinet and, even if they personally object to such decisions, Ministers must be prepared to accept and defend them or resign from the cabinet".
301:. Cabinet solidarity is not a legal requirement, but a political convention and practiced norm. There is no written law that upholds cabinet collective responsibility, but it is deeply ingrained in Australia's cabinets as a political norm and is therefore an important aspect of the collective strength and influence of the prime minister's administration. 289:, albeit informally. They lie at the core of ministerial governance. Cabinet solidarity is purely a political convention designed to maintain or protect the collective good as perceived by a partisan ministry. It rests on the notion that the executive ought to appear a collective entity, able to maintain cohesion and display political strength". 535:
responsibility to the people also benefits party and personal loyalty to the prime minister. Solidarity within the cabinet can strengthen the prime minister's party and accelerate policy decisions and interests of that party. Presidential democracies often lack the ability to pass legislation quickly in times of emergency or instances of
547:
Because cabinet collective responsibility forces the cabinet ministers to publicly agree with the prime minister's decisions, political debate and internal discourse is hindered. When disagreements occur within a cabinet dependent on collective responsibility, negotiating collective agreements can be
364:
and its ministers are collectively responsible for all its decisions. However, the constitution allows a minister to dissent by expressing an objection which is entered into the minutes. Nevertheless, while formally allowed, dissent is uncommon because it jeopardizes the stability of the government.
534:
A parliamentary system that uses cabinet collective responsibility is more likely to avoid contradictions and disagreements between cabinet members of the executive branch. Cabinet ministers are likely to feel there is a practical and collective benefit from being part of a team. Cabinet collective
271:
power over legislation passed by Congress. Cabinet unity and collective agreement between members are important to cabinet stability and party politics, but cabinet members do not have to publicly support legislation proposed or supported by the president. It is, however, in a cabinet member's best
222:
of the executive and legislative branches the prime minister relies on the cabinet to always support policy decisions. A breach of cabinet collective responsibility, such as when a cabinet member publicly disagrees with an executive decision, results in resignation or termination from the cabinet.
373:
retired in 1981. A new cabinet must be approved by a parliamentary majority, thus a government platform is agreed upon by the participating parties. It is distinct from party platforms and details the compromises that parties made in order to cooperate. If a party fails to follow the government
151:
must publicly support all governmental decisions made in Cabinet, even if they do not privately agree with them. This support includes voting for the government in the legislature. This convention formed in the 19th century in the United Kingdom. Some political parties, most commonly
258:
In non-parliamentary governments like that of the United States, cabinet collective responsibility is not formally practiced. This is due to a clearer separation of the executive and the legislature in policy-making. The United States president's
427:
In New Zealand, the principle of cabinet confidentiality is always observed. However, Cabinet solidarity can be weakened in coalition governments in which members from junior parties in the cabinet can openly dissent on specific policies through
280:
Parliamentary democracies such as Australia, the United Kingdom and Canada practice and adhere to cabinet collective responsibility. Rhodes, Wanna and Weller offer this description of the principle of cabinet solidarity in
594:. 15 November 2004. p. 7: "As with so much of the United Kingdom constitutional and political system, collective ministerial responsibility is not something created or explained in some statute or constitutional document." 409:
ruled in 1993 that such discussions could not be disclosed because Article 28.4.2° required absolute confidentiality of cabinet discussions (though not of decisions which were formally recorded). The
866: 178:, the government is responsible collectively, and thus the entire government resigns. The consequence will be that a new government will be formed or parliament will be dissolved and a 272:
interest to support and align with the president's policies because they serve at the pleasure of the president, who can at any time dismiss them or appoint them to another position.
405:
was investigating allegations of political corruption, and wanted to take evidence from a minister about cabinet meetings at which controversial proposals had been discussed. The
297:
In Australia, cabinet collective responsibility is fundamental to cabinet confidentiality, but also to protect private information from becoming public and possibly threatening
484: 239:
the members of the cabinet must publicly show a unified position, and must vote with the government even if they privately disagree with the decision that has been made.
233:
the members of the cabinet must not reveal the content of discussions which take place. This allows for cabinet members to privately debate and raise concerns.
410: 324:, the cabinet is on rare occasion allowed to freely vote its conscience and to oppose the government without consequence, as occurred with the vote on 49: 728: 312:
where any MP may vote as they wish, but these issues are rare and never tied to official party policy, and normally party discipline is very tight.
858: 548:
difficult. Cabinet collective responsibility is therefore dependent on the mutual agreement and collective unity of the cabinet and its members.
889: 96: 604: 448:. Once selected as cabinet ministers, each minister leads one of the government departments. Cabinet ministers respond to oral questions from 68: 285:
of parliamentary democracy: "Cabinet solidarity and collective responsibility are twin dimensions of responsible party government that enjoy
167:
If a member of the Cabinet wishes to openly object to a Cabinet decision then they are obliged to resign from their position in the Cabinet.
136: 938: 75: 567: 562: 687:
Petersen, Eric (19 May 2005). "Congress: A brief comparison of the British House of Commons and the U.S. House of Representatives".
422: 82: 440:
The United Kingdom practices cabinet collective responsibility. The prime minister selects a number of cabinet ministers from the
953: 348:
is much tighter than in other Westminster-system countries; it is very rare for any MP to vote counter to the party leadership.
441: 210:
faster and more effective. Unlike a presidential system, as used, for example, in the United States, a parliamentary system's
64: 711: 655: 183: 468: 305: 916: 834: 738: 464: 413:
was passed by referendum in 1997 to add Article 28.4.3°, which allows such disclosures in exceptional circumstances.
115: 460: 948: 89: 53: 202:
is responsible for appointing the cabinet ministers. The cabinet ministers are usually selected from the same
587: 394: 243:
Collective responsibility is not circumvented by appointing Ministers outside of Cabinet, as has occurred in
190:
are responsible for the running of their departments, and therefore culpable for the departments' mistakes.
260: 449: 958: 488: 336:. The most prominent Canadian cabinet minister to resign because he could not vote with the cabinet was 943: 374:
platform, other parties in the government can pull the plug and force the entire government to resign.
20: 255:
were Ministers outside of Cabinet, despite their parties not being considered part of a coalition.
406: 383: 341: 267:, and therefore cannot vote on legislation supported by the executive. The president instead has 42: 794: 754: 467:. On occasion, this principle has been suspended; most notably in the 1930s when in Britain the 360:, collective responsibility has been established both constitutionally and as a convention. The 629: 264: 211: 822: 588:
Research Paper 04/82: "The collective responsibility of Ministers – an outline of the issues"
459:, the doctrine applies to all members of the government, from members of the cabinet down to 390: 333: 187: 171: 157: 393:
shall meet and act as a collective authority, and shall be collectively responsible for the
366: 198:
Cabinet collective responsibility is a tradition in parliamentary governments in which the
148: 140: 8: 799: 759: 511: 472: 361: 325: 282: 215: 144: 912: 830: 734: 707: 651: 536: 429: 298: 286: 161: 345: 219: 179: 309: 203: 523: 456: 445: 329: 248: 199: 932: 648:
Minority governments in Australia 1989-2009: accords, charters and agreements
557: 515: 507: 500: 480: 476: 402: 370: 519: 496: 337: 252: 244: 207: 492: 175: 605:"MESSAGE FROM THE QUEEN—ARMY RESERVE FORCES. (Hansard, 8 April 1878)" 182:
will be called. Cabinet collective responsibility is not the same as
153: 31: 909:
British government in crisis : or the third English revolution
859:"Helen Clark and Jim Anderton with their coalition agreement, 1999" 727:
Strøm, Kaare; Müller, Wolfgang C.; Bergman, Torbjörn (2006-01-19).
170:
Cabinet collective responsibility is related to the fact that if a
510:
suspended the cabinet collective responsibility doctrine for the
423:
Cabinet of New Zealand § Collective responsibility after MMP
357: 226:
Cabinet collective responsibility consists of two main features:
890:"EU referendum to take place on 23 June, David Cameron confirms" 592:
Parliament and Constitution Centre, the House of Commons Library
321: 526:
opted to make use of the relaxation by campaigning to leave.
499:
to stay in the cabinet, despite her public opposition to the
483:
allowed Cabinet members to campaign both for and against the
206:
as the prime minister to make collective decision-making for
268: 730:
Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies
304:
Occasionally on highly controversial issues such as the
621: 900: 795:"Seventeenth Amendment of the Constitution Act, 1997" 702:
Rhodes, R.A.W.; Wanna, John; Weller, Patrick (2009).
332:. These events are rare and are never on matters of 56:. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. 726: 701: 682: 680: 641: 639: 930: 814: 650:. : NSW Parliamentary Library Research Service. 857:Holl, Maarten; Palmer, Matthew (20 June 2012). 630:"British and American Constitutional Democracy" 518:in 1975. Prominent cabinet ministers including 677: 636: 397:administered by the members of the Government. 887: 820: 16:Political concept in parliamentary politics 856: 568:Political Appointments System in Hong Kong 147:system of government, that members of the 563:Principal Officials Accountability System 411:Seventeenth Amendment of the Constitution 218:branches are intertwined. Because of the 116:Learn how and when to remove this message 686: 645: 463:. Its inner workings are set out in the 863:Te Ara: The Encyclopedia of New Zealand 821:Forde, Michael; Leonard, David (2013). 487:on whether the UK should remain in the 263:members cannot simultaneously serve in 931: 906: 475:members to oppose the introduction of 627: 184:individual ministerial responsibility 133:collective ministerial responsibility 54:adding citations to reliable sources 25: 829:. A&C Black. pp. 129–130. 65:"Cabinet collective responsibility" 13: 939:Constitution of the United Kingdom 869:from the original on 30 April 2014 782:Attorney General v Hamilton (No 1) 14: 970: 888:Rowena Mason (20 February 2016). 514:, following the precedent set by 461:Parliamentary Private Secretaries 435: 129:Cabinet collective responsibility 542: 369:became the norm after President 156:, apply a similar convention of 30: 881: 850: 787: 775: 503:; however, she later resigned. 41:needs additional citations for 954:Politics of the United Kingdom 823:"6.10 Cabinet confidentiality" 747: 720: 695: 689:Congressional Research Service 664: 597: 580: 416: 1: 827:Constitutional Law of Ireland 586:Gay, Oonagh; Powell, Thomas. 573: 529: 907:Foster, Christopher (2005). 674:(Wellington, 2008) para 3.20 292: 7: 551: 489:European Economic Community 275: 193: 10: 975: 420: 377: 351: 247:where, from 2005 to 2008, 18: 755:"Constitution of Ireland" 646:Griffith, Gareth (2010). 340:, who refused to support 315: 143:and a cornerstone of the 137:constitutional convention 21:Collective responsibility 306:1999 republic referendum 19:Not to be confused with 384:Constitution of Ireland 382:Article 28.4.2° of the 342:wage and price controls 230:Cabinet confidentiality 949:Political terminology 704:Comparing Westminster 421:Further information: 367:coalition governments 172:vote of no confidence 158:democratic centralism 141:parliamentary systems 706:. OUP. p. 127. 395:Departments of State 186:, which states that 50:improve this article 672:Cabinet Manual 2008 469:National Government 283:Westminster systems 959:Westminster system 800:Irish Statute Book 763:. pp. 28.4.2° 760:Irish Statute Book 512:2016 EU referendum 477:protective tariffs 362:Finnish Government 326:capital punishment 236:Cabinet solidarity 145:Westminster system 944:Political culture 713:978-0-19-956349-4 657:978-0-7313-1860-5 609:api.parliament.uk 537:national security 479:; and again when 430:agree to disagree 365:Namely, majority 308:, there may be a 299:national security 287:constitutionality 162:central committee 126: 125: 118: 100: 966: 923: 922: 911:. Oxford: Hart. 904: 898: 897: 885: 879: 878: 876: 874: 854: 848: 847: 845: 843: 818: 812: 811: 809: 807: 791: 785: 779: 773: 772: 770: 768: 751: 745: 744: 724: 718: 717: 699: 693: 692: 684: 675: 668: 662: 661: 643: 634: 633: 625: 619: 618: 616: 615: 601: 595: 584: 465:Ministerial Code 442:House of Commons 432:" arrangements. 346:party discipline 220:fusion of powers 180:general election 131:, also known as 121: 114: 110: 107: 101: 99: 58: 34: 26: 974: 973: 969: 968: 967: 965: 964: 963: 929: 928: 927: 926: 919: 905: 901: 886: 882: 872: 870: 855: 851: 841: 839: 837: 819: 815: 805: 803: 793: 792: 788: 780: 776: 766: 764: 753: 752: 748: 741: 725: 721: 714: 700: 696: 685: 678: 670:Cabinet Office 669: 665: 658: 644: 637: 626: 622: 613: 611: 603: 602: 598: 585: 581: 576: 554: 545: 532: 506:Prime Minister 485:1975 referendum 438: 425: 419: 380: 354: 318: 310:conscience vote 295: 278: 204:political party 196: 122: 111: 105: 102: 59: 57: 47: 35: 24: 17: 12: 11: 5: 972: 962: 961: 956: 951: 946: 941: 925: 924: 917: 899: 880: 849: 835: 813: 786: 774: 746: 739: 733:. OUP Oxford. 719: 712: 694: 676: 663: 656: 635: 620: 596: 578: 577: 575: 572: 571: 570: 565: 560: 553: 550: 544: 541: 531: 528: 524:Chris Grayling 457:United Kingdom 446:House of Lords 437: 436:United Kingdom 434: 418: 415: 399: 398: 391:The Government 379: 376: 353: 350: 330:Brian Mulroney 317: 314: 294: 291: 277: 274: 249:Winston Peters 241: 240: 237: 234: 231: 200:prime minister 195: 192: 124: 123: 38: 36: 29: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 971: 960: 957: 955: 952: 950: 947: 945: 942: 940: 937: 936: 934: 920: 918:1-84113-549-6 914: 910: 903: 895: 891: 884: 868: 864: 860: 853: 838: 836:9781847667380 832: 828: 824: 817: 802: 801: 796: 790: 783: 778: 762: 761: 756: 750: 742: 740:9780199291601 736: 732: 731: 723: 715: 709: 705: 698: 690: 683: 681: 673: 667: 659: 653: 649: 642: 640: 631: 624: 610: 606: 600: 593: 589: 583: 579: 569: 566: 564: 561: 559: 558:Ministerstyre 556: 555: 549: 543:Disadvantages 540: 538: 527: 525: 521: 517: 516:Harold Wilson 513: 509: 508:David Cameron 504: 502: 501:2003 Iraq War 498: 494: 490: 486: 482: 481:Harold Wilson 478: 474: 470: 466: 462: 458: 453: 451: 447: 443: 433: 431: 424: 414: 412: 408: 407:Supreme Court 404: 403:Beef Tribunal 401:In 1992, the 396: 392: 389: 388: 387: 385: 375: 372: 368: 363: 359: 349: 347: 344:. In Canada, 343: 339: 335: 331: 327: 323: 313: 311: 307: 302: 300: 290: 288: 284: 273: 270: 266: 262: 256: 254: 250: 246: 238: 235: 232: 229: 228: 227: 224: 221: 217: 213: 209: 205: 201: 191: 189: 185: 181: 177: 174:is passed in 173: 168: 165: 163: 159: 155: 150: 146: 142: 138: 134: 130: 120: 117: 109: 106:February 2015 98: 95: 91: 88: 84: 81: 77: 74: 70: 67: –  66: 62: 61:Find sources: 55: 51: 45: 44: 39:This article 37: 33: 28: 27: 22: 908: 902: 894:The Guardian 893: 883: 871:. Retrieved 862: 852: 840:. Retrieved 826: 816: 804:. Retrieved 798: 789: 781: 777: 765:. Retrieved 758: 749: 729: 722: 703: 697: 688: 671: 666: 647: 623: 612:. Retrieved 608: 599: 591: 582: 546: 533: 520:Michael Gove 505: 471:allowed its 454: 439: 426: 400: 381: 355: 319: 303: 296: 279: 257: 242: 225: 197: 169: 166: 132: 128: 127: 112: 103: 93: 86: 79: 72: 60: 48:Please help 43:verification 40: 873:2 September 628:Leroy Way. 497:Clare Short 491:. In 2003, 417:New Zealand 338:John Turner 253:Peter Dunne 245:New Zealand 216:legislative 208:legislation 933:Categories 614:2023-12-08 574:References 530:Advantages 493:Tony Blair 334:confidence 176:parliament 76:newspapers 293:Australia 212:executive 188:ministers 160:to their 154:communist 867:Archived 784:2 IR 250 552:See also 495:allowed 444:and the 386:states: 371:Kekkonen 276:Examples 265:Congress 194:Overview 691:: 3–15. 473:Liberal 455:In the 378:Ireland 358:Finland 352:Finland 261:cabinet 149:cabinet 135:, is a 90:scholar 915:  842:11 May 833:  806:11 May 767:11 May 737:  710:  654:  328:under 322:Canada 316:Canada 92:  85:  78:  71:  63:  97:JSTOR 83:books 913:ISBN 875:2019 844:2016 831:ISBN 808:2016 769:2016 735:ISBN 708:ISBN 652:ISBN 522:and 269:veto 251:and 214:and 69:news 450:MPs 356:In 320:In 139:in 52:by 935:: 892:. 865:. 861:. 825:. 797:. 757:. 679:^ 638:^ 607:. 590:, 539:. 164:. 921:. 896:. 877:. 846:. 810:. 771:. 743:. 716:. 660:. 632:. 617:. 428:" 119:) 113:( 108:) 104:( 94:· 87:· 80:· 73:· 46:. 23:.

Index

Collective responsibility

verification
improve this article
adding citations to reliable sources
"Cabinet collective responsibility"
news
newspapers
books
scholar
JSTOR
Learn how and when to remove this message
constitutional convention
parliamentary systems
Westminster system
cabinet
communist
democratic centralism
central committee
vote of no confidence
parliament
general election
individual ministerial responsibility
ministers
prime minister
political party
legislation
executive
legislative
fusion of powers

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.