300:, Berger was convicted of conspiracy to bribe a public official. The statute allowed electronic eavesdropping for up to two months upon a standard of "a reasonable ground to believe that evidence of a crime may be thus obtained." Further two-month extensions of the original order could be granted if investigators made a showing that such surveillance would be in the public interest. The statute required neither notice to the person surveilled nor any justification of such secrecy. The communications sought did not have to be described with any particularity; surveillance requests had to identify only the person targeted and the phone number to be tapped. Finally, the statute did not require a return on the warrant, so law enforcement officers did not have to account to a judge for their use of evidence gathered.
42:
323:, because it lacked "adequate judicial supervision protective procedures." Notably, the Court invalidated the law on its face rather than as applied to the petitioner. The Court likened such an indiscriminate grant of authority to search for any evidence of any crime to a
331:
was enacted to outlaw. The Court held that conversations are protected by the Fourth
Amendment, and that the use of electronic devices to capture conversations thus constituted a "search." This holding predates by several months the more famous case of
117:
The Court facially invalidated a New York statute (N.Y. Code of Crim. Proc. § 813-a) which allowed for electronic eavesdropping without the procedural safeguards required by the
479:
320:
418:
371:
83:
309:
17:
328:
316:
273:
255:
118:
484:
504:
474:
499:
494:
489:
391:
Agur, Colin (2013). "Negotiated Order: The Fourth
Amendment, Telephone Surveillance, and Social Interactions, 1878-1968".
269:
46:
509:
339:
164:
338:, which extended Fourth Amendment protection to a conversation in a public phone booth based on the speaker's
362:, specifically, limited police wiretapping when it struck down the New York statute for being overly broad.
447:
429:
276:, because the statute authorized electronic eavesdropping without required procedural safeguards.
289:
21:
168:
422:
334:
75:
8:
358:, were responses by the Court to police and government abuse of telephone surveillance.
152:
438:
324:
78:
315:, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that section 813-a violated the
176:
468:
312:
297:
156:
180:
136:
188:
144:
456:
284:
Under New York Code of
Criminal Procedure § 813-a, police obtained an
90:
285:
327:, a tool used by British authorities in colonial America that the
293:
41:
480:
United States
Supreme Court cases of the Warren Court
372:
List of United States
Supreme Court cases, volume 388
205:Clark, joined by Warren, Douglas, Brennan, Fortas
466:
296:Ralph Berger. Based on evidence obtained by the
272:decision invalidating a New York law under the
107:Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York
319:, made enforceable against the states by the
485:United States Fourth Amendment case law
303:
467:
29:1967 United States Supreme Court case
390:
13:
47:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
521:
505:Legal history of New York (state)
475:United States Supreme Court cases
407:
340:reasonable expectation of privacy
65:Ralph Berger v. State of New York
425:41 (1967) is available from:
350:Academic Colin Agur argues that
40:
500:1967 in United States case law
495:United States privacy case law
384:
1:
490:Privacy of telecommunications
377:
279:
268:, 388 U.S. 41 (1967), was a
7:
365:
270:United States Supreme Court
10:
526:
457:Oyez (oral argument audio)
15:
393:Information & Culture
345:
308:In an opinion written by
254:
249:
241:
233:
225:
217:
209:
201:
196:
130:
125:
116:
111:
103:
98:
70:
60:
53:
39:
34:
510:1967 in New York (state)
16:Not to be confused with
22:Berger v. United States
169:William J. Brennan Jr.
356:Katz v. United States
335:Katz v. United States
256:U.S. Const. amend. IV
56:Decided June 12, 1967
54:Argued April 13, 1967
321:Fourteenth Amendment
304:Opinion of the Court
448:Library of Congress
89:87 S. Ct. 1873; 18
415:Berger v. New York
265:Berger v. New York
153:William O. Douglas
141:Associate Justices
35:Berger v. New York
18:New York v. Burger
261:
260:
165:John M. Harlan II
517:
461:
455:
452:
446:
443:
437:
434:
428:
401:
400:
388:
329:Fourth Amendment
317:Fourth Amendment
274:Fourth Amendment
126:Court membership
119:Fourth Amendment
44:
43:
32:
31:
525:
524:
520:
519:
518:
516:
515:
514:
465:
464:
459:
453:
450:
444:
441:
435:
432:
426:
410:
405:
404:
389:
385:
380:
368:
348:
325:general warrant
306:
282:
179:
167:
155:
94:
55:
49:
30:
25:
12:
11:
5:
523:
513:
512:
507:
502:
497:
492:
487:
482:
477:
463:
462:
430:Google Scholar
409:
408:External links
406:
403:
402:
382:
381:
379:
376:
375:
374:
367:
364:
347:
344:
305:
302:
292:the office of
281:
278:
259:
258:
252:
251:
247:
246:
243:
239:
238:
235:
231:
230:
227:
223:
222:
219:
215:
214:
211:
207:
206:
203:
199:
198:
194:
193:
192:
191:
177:Potter Stewart
142:
139:
134:
128:
127:
123:
122:
114:
113:
109:
108:
105:
101:
100:
96:
95:
88:
72:
68:
67:
62:
61:Full case name
58:
57:
51:
50:
45:
37:
36:
28:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
522:
511:
508:
506:
503:
501:
498:
496:
493:
491:
488:
486:
483:
481:
478:
476:
473:
472:
470:
458:
449:
440:
431:
424:
420:
416:
412:
411:
399:(4): 419–447.
398:
394:
387:
383:
373:
370:
369:
363:
361:
357:
354:, along with
353:
343:
341:
337:
336:
330:
326:
322:
318:
314:
311:
301:
299:
295:
291:
287:
277:
275:
271:
267:
266:
257:
253:
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
197:Case opinions
195:
190:
186:
182:
178:
174:
170:
166:
162:
158:
154:
150:
146:
143:
140:
138:
135:
133:Chief Justice
132:
131:
129:
124:
120:
115:
110:
106:
102:
97:
92:
86:
85:
80:
77:
73:
69:
66:
63:
59:
52:
48:
38:
33:
27:
23:
19:
414:
396:
392:
386:
359:
355:
351:
349:
333:
313:Tom C. Clark
307:
298:surveillance
283:
264:
263:
262:
250:Laws applied
184:
172:
160:
157:Tom C. Clark
148:
99:Case history
82:
64:
26:
218:Concurrence
210:Concurrence
181:Byron White
137:Earl Warren
469:Categories
378:References
280:Background
189:Abe Fortas
145:Hugo Black
288:order to
91:L. Ed. 2d
71:Citations
413:Text of
366:See also
294:attorney
286:ex parte
202:Majority
310:Justice
242:Dissent
234:Dissent
226:Dissent
221:Stewart
213:Douglas
112:Holding
460:
454:
451:
445:
442:
439:Justia
436:
433:
427:
360:Berger
352:Berger
346:Legacy
237:Harlan
187:
185:·
183:
175:
173:·
171:
163:
161:·
159:
151:
149:·
147:
421:
245:White
229:Black
104:Prior
423:U.S.
93:1040
84:more
76:U.S.
74:388
419:388
290:bug
20:or
471::
417:,
397:48
395:.
342:.
79:41
121:.
87:)
81:(
24:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.