Knowledge talk:WikiProject Religion/Archive 9

881:

topic of new religious movements, as well as a few main topical articles such as, if I remember correctly, a set of articles relating to the broad topic of gender and religion. A few of the articles which were dropped from the second edition were some of the smaller historical religion articles, such as, although I can't swear to this one being among them, the article on the history of religion in Armenia. And, having gone through a few more focused works on a few specific religious groups, like Buddhism, Jainism, and some forms of Christianity, I now realize that the comparative amount of space given various topics, as well as whether there are named subsections of articles, are relevant to our considerations as well, and am once again going through the latest edition of the EoR to check for that information. In a few weeks at most, because it does take a while to do this, the revised listing with the additional information should be available, hopefully with information from both editions.

457:. Why is this? One need only to look at the oppression against Christians by the atheist Chinese government; and, not to single out China, many nations with atheistic governments or atheist rulers have committed acts of oppression and violence against Christians. But in the United States and throughout the world, Christians are victims of atheist violence and it is an ongoing conflict. Athiests have also expressed violence against Christianity on websites. In the "first world" nations, where one would think bigotry and anti-religious violence would be declining, people see more and more anti-religious violence. Websites, billboards, full-page ads in newspapers, the formation of atheist groups to perform violence against religion, etc all point to the rise in violence by atheists against Christians. It seems kind of surprising there isn't an article about such a thing. 1947:; quoting that policy, viewpoints are featured "in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in the published, reliable sources." A quick Google Scholar search on "Christianity" returns 1.1 million results; a search on "Raëlism" returns 55 results. For most topics, there's simply no comparison between the amount of weight reliable sources give to Raëlism relative to Christianity. For many topics, Knowledge will feature Christianity much more than Raëlism (if it mentions it at all), and this may be perceived as a bias for the "Christian POV", but that's entirely by design because the sources are biased in their coverage in exactly the same way. A Google Scholar search on "Christianity afterlife" returns 46,200 results, a search on "Raëlism afterlife" yields 26 results, so I'd expect 4303:

Jainism a "most dreadful religion" the founders and followers of which are "in dense ignorance". Their tirthankaras were ignorant. Dayanand condemned Christianity as a hollow religion. A barbourous religion and a false religion believed by fools and by people in state of barbarism. Jesus was the one who talked nonsense like savage. not a seer not even an enlightened man. For Dayananda, islam is a false religion that does nothing but harm and should be discarded. Muhammad (PBUH) was not a pious man but was immoral and lascivious. The militant Aryas followed the path of Dayananda and rejected any suggestion to soften Dayananda's criticism of other faiths or to change, in any way, the word of their rsi.

1608:, and to imposition of bias favoring scriptural faiths (oddly, since most scriptures have elements incompatible with others, at least most must logically be incorrect, and so any given scripture is probably incorrect; whereas systems without scripture ar more likely to be compatible, and so if they account for the existence of scripture, more likely correct). In fact why waste space having separate sections for differing Abrahamic faiths which have the same view on a particular point? Better that space be allotted in accordance with how much difference exists in less conventional faiths. And attention ought to be given to those beliefs which go beyond the theistic, such as 2622:

the comparatively concrete nature of texts. Christianity, with roughly 20 thousand different denominations, notwithstanding of course. Honestly, all six seem to me to be, basically, reasonable, well-intentioned, attempts to apply basic existing policies and guidelines, and I think that they all, to some degree, could reasonably serve as rough guides to how to apply existing policies and guidelines, and I would probably myself support them all more strongly if it weren't the case that there are a lot of reference books out there on the broad subject of religion. I went through JSTOR and other databanks some months ago, and still have, I think, several

4550:, in preparation for (hopefully) nominating it for Good Article status. I would be grateful for feedback — especially any pointers to reliable sources which might cast a more positive light on the attitudes and actions of the Georgian Orthodox Church (GOC) and its adherents towards followers of other faiths (or of no faith). Right now, the article feels heavily biased against the GOC, but given what the sources I've found so far are saying, I don't see any way to change this and still satisfy the NPOV policy requirement that an article must fairly and proportionately represent what the published reliable sources say. — 2945:, for example, threatens to conflate religious studies with anthropology, when religious studies has strong elements of philosophy and written culture. Obviously, though, this raises a bunch of other issues about questions like whether anthropological outsider descriptions are accurate, and whether the Western world's love of written knowledge is just cultural supremacism. Cultural anthropology almost fell apart as a discipline in the 1980s because of discussions like this. Obviously, the much smaller discipline of Knowledge is not equipped to handle such a discussion so we should just ignore the implications of rule 5. 2034:. Unsure, agnostic about the others, partly disagreeing with 5. I think the point in number 3, go by reliable sources, as always is a keypoint. We should in particular look at how text books in religion handle this. But as we often go by Western text books,I think Jeppiz may be right that this will sometimes tend to lead to an overemphasis on the Abrahamic religions. Many of the minor modern religions that are named in the opening questions (Wiccans etc.) also appears to be mainly Western phenomenas, so giving much weight to them will just reenforce undue weight to the Western religions. 4694: 670:, on the other hand, have much less broad significance to the topic of "religion" in general, and are covered much less in sources relating to that broad topic, and are on that basis pretty much going to be left in the hands of the more focused projects dealing with Christianity and Catholicism. And, yes, for what it might be worth, I am trying to go through good reference books on the other "religion" related projects as well and give them lists of articles that appear in good reference books dealing more specifically with their topics. 657:, both editions, the Eliade and the Jones ones, and tagged those subjects which have articles in that work as being of "Top" importance to the religion project, given that they each have substantial entries in those works. One of the difficulties this project has, which others don't, is that it doesn't really deal with a clearly defined single topic, like Japan and Death, for instance, but rather a rather universal human endeavor which has an almost infinite number of forms. The list of articles found in those books can be found at 2716:

probably existed in some way. So, basically, it wasn't on the basis that they are easier to classify, but that the existence of some sort of internal document, be it scriptural, liturgical, or whatever, makes it less likely for that specific group/denomination that there will be the sort of repeated arguments and discussions about how "I don't see this aspect in my own history of observing the group," which is a point that has been repeatedly made, by I'm fairly sure multiple different people, on the talk page of the

3688: 389: 31: 732:

my own guess is, basically, that if they thought it important enough to include in that work, it is probably important enough for us to call Top-importance for Religion. The fact that it was tagged as top-importance for Buddhism was based on the fact that if it was Top importance to the broad field of Religion, it's probably Top-importance to the narrower field of Buddhism as well. And, FWIW, particularly when recognizing the number of articles we can and will have about some

1870:? However, I do think there is a general tendency of a certain judeo-christian POV in many articles and I think more space need to be given to hinduim, buddhism, confucianism, taoism, shintoism etc. Those are all large religions, all of them easily above ten million followers. I am a bit confused by the "big 5". Why is Judaism in the big 5 despite being much smaller than Shintoism or Taoism? That seems to be a typical examples of the judeo-christian POV I just mentioned. 2668:

accurate, and would be less likely to face problems like "My branch of (name) doesn't do (whatever), so this broad article about a tangential topic shouldn't say that it does" problems. And, yeah, I guess I would think that, in at least a few cases, it might be better to use an example which isn't itself going to be the subject of protracted, possibly unresolvable, potential edit warring and disagreement on the talk page of the article on that basis. Articles like the

4702: 2501:

If the purpose is to limit attention given to groups within general articles on religion, then WP:UNDUE seems to already address that situation, though it would be OK to offer an essay on how to give weight to various religions when writing an article on the general subject of religion. Even so, we go with how religious traditions are treated in reliable sources. Clarification, please, because what is being proposed seems overly broad at first reading.

4453: 172: 1044: 1522:, etc. While this is very democratic, I see it as causing problems, because if every religion with a few hundred thousand adherents got similar preferential treatment, religion articles would turn into a huge, unmanageable jumbled list of religions. I have reverted the user's changes several times over the past few months, but we have been unable to reach a consensus between the two of us. 2788:

Christianity about as much as Christianity is distinguished from Judaism-- the latter now being eclipsed numerically by Mormonism, a trend certain to increase as Judaism continues to shrink and Mormonism continues to be the most aggressively growing religion. If Judaism is grouped in a big any-number group, I don't see how Mormonism, can't fairly have its own place in that group.

661:. One of the other reasons that this project does have, and I think will continue to have, probably a higher percentage of high-importance articles tagged than most others is because it is the purpose here to allow the rather large number of articles of other related projects to deal with the topics which more clearly relate exclusively to their own topics. So, for instance, 528:. It involves discriminating against the victims according to what beliefs they have. The definition doesn't involve discriminating the persecutors according to what beliefs the persecutors have, so it makes no difference to the definition what the persecutors believe or don't believe. So that article should be the place to cover what you are describing. 3395:. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. 2720:. Granted, good quality, hopefully somewhat lengthy, reference sources could still be used in such instances, but, in this particular case, the lack of any sort of real internal documentation has apparently made it harder for reference works to discuss their practices at length, resulting in fewer independent sources discussing them at length at all. 2845:

some high-profile deacons are saying the Book of Mormon is no longer divine scripture or a historical record). Judaism certainly has historical weight, both as the parent religion of Islam and Christianity, but also as a major player in historical events. (Obviously the Holocaust, but also expulsion from Spain, the original Italian Ghettos etc)

2697:, I must point out this is a very biased POV. It is based more in the history of one part of the world than fact. Limiting highlightable religions to those with membership at least in the millions produces a list of about 15. That is not a lot. In reality there are not many large religions. There no need to prune such a short list. 2672:, for instance, have long been argued about on their talk pages because there are no readily available internal sources on their practices, teachings, etc. Those which have books of some sort, be they scriptural, liturgical, or otherwise, won't generally face the same degree of regular disagreement and dispute. 2952:

Weight should be given to groups based on their level of historical influence on the article's subject. Examples of historical influence in religion include age, number of adherents, and geographical extent. Groups limited to a local area or single, small community should get only short mentions that

2626:

reviews of reference books relating to religion, covering, I think, somewhere around or over a thousand different works. Most of them are also comparatively recent. With that glut of generally highly regarded reference sources out there, these rough guidelines for how to apply policies and guidelines

1817:

And in any event, Judaism does not concede such "parentage". In contrast, Christianity and Islam do acknowledge Judaism as parent, and everyone pretty transparently understands why. (Frankly, the identification of Judaism as one of the "Big 5" would probably need a source if this were an article ...

880:

This is certainly reasonable. FWIW, there only have been two editions of the EoR published to date, one in 1985, the other in 2005. The editors of the second edition did indicate that they dropped a few articles from the first edition, and added a rather large number of articles relating to the broad

3865:

Since you identify yourself as working on behalf of the school, and since the only article you have contributed to is the school's, I would like to offer some friendly advice. It is generally frowned upon for people directly associated with an organization to work on articles about the organization:

3658:

which lists those reference sources in the broad field of religion, including some on philosophy and mythology, which closely relate to religion, which have received either recognition from the American Library Associations as outstanding reference sources, or been listed in the article on reference

3497:

pages. Would anyone have any interest in perhaps helping get such pages together? And, yes, I have also asked the same thing at the Christianity WikiProject noticebard, because, honestly, given the roughly 20,000 or so denominations of Christianity that are apparently out there, that is probably the

3182:

Go ahead, it would be right to remove it for that reason you gave. The Freedom OF Religion has been recognized as a human right by almost all governments of the world and the United Nations. Freedom FROM Religion means the exact opposite of this, and was recognized in very few countries like North

2979:

By the way, although it wasn't part of the discussion, I am concerned about the recent uptick in Wikipedians trying to debate theology on article talk pages. I recently dropped in on two discussions where people were trying to puzzle out if a group was "really Baptist" or "really Muslim". We need to

2903:

As a general rule for both situations, there was a sizable support in this RFC for giving more weight to the most influential groups, less weight to smaller and newer groups, and no weight to groups that lack significant documentation. Furthermore, there was no significant objection raised to such a

2768:

states. I completely agree that describing established religions are easier than describing new ones, but there is strong resistance against favouring religions do to their age or political stability. That is why I consider adherence the most neutral metric. The more people follow a belief, the more

2105:

Treatment by reliable sources is how we should be giving weight to different religions. It will be different for some subjects, as well it should be. I see the occasional argument that there is systemic bias in reliable sources, because most of them are written by adherents of the main religions. To

2053:

roughly in that order (ordered from "yes, this is a good idea" to "meh, whatever"). Appreciate the qualitative comments above. By the way, a number of the proposals are actually extensions of number 3: I got many of the ideas from reading sources about world religions, and those were ways they chose

1918:

degree of recent proliferation of reference sources of all kinds, I can honestly think of only a very few, generally very recent or very minor, topics which are not discussed at some length in at least a few of them. So, personally, in these instances, I would myself favor that any examples or other

1539:

When choosing between "traditional" or "new" religions for inclusion in religion-related articles, preference should be given to the historic, traditional, stable religions with significant influence in society, politics, and economic affairs, over the short-lived, novel, charismatic popular faiths.

731:

section. That work does have some 3,000 articles, but for whatever reason, probably because he was, as you say, the founder of a significant branch of Buddhism, he was included in that source. Yeah, that is around 3,000 articles, and some of them might seem tangential to the subject of religion, but

3663:

I may have removed some entries from this list which have already been, basically, added to the various extant lists of articles from religion sources I have recently created. In any event, I think it is probably in our best interests as a whole to maybe see what content these sources have, because

2844:

IMO most Mormons consider themselves Christian, but non-Mormons generally do not accept Mormons as Christians, due to some major doctrinal schisms. However, over time Mormonism is actively backing away from many of the schisms that differentiate it from mainstream Christianity. (To the point where

2810:

the numbers that count. As others have mentioned above, Judaism is given more weight because of its historical importance and being kind of the grandfather of Abrahamic religions. I personally see Mormonism as being more akin to Baha'i. They have similar numbers of adherents (14 and 6 million), and

2621:

FWIW, I can see a not unreasonable case for 5, which even the proposer didn't indicate particularly strong support for, which is basically that religions which have a clear text are also probably a bit less likely to have radical disagreements among their adherents regarding matters of faith, given

2591:

That is correct. I certainly wasn't trying to rewrite any policy or guidelines...just trying to achieve a consensus on how the policy and guidelines should be applied in a specific circumstance. By the way, thank you all for the thoughtful comments you've left here and in the survey section. I feel

2500:

does already dictate that the attention given inside articles to subjects should reflect the same weight as given in reliable sources. I am unclear as to the scope of this RfC. We should not (and cannot) limit the creation or content of articles that are backed by secondary and tertiary references.

1571:

in topics related to the religion. (For example: the Monotheism article will have more on Christianity and Islam, while the Polytheism article will have more on Hinduism; articles about reincarnation will have more on religions that have doctrines about reincarnation; articles about witchcraft will

4881:

Would you be interested in participating in a user study? We are a team at University of Washington studying methods for finding collaborators within a Knowledge community. We are looking for volunteers to evaluate a new visualization tool. All you need to do is to prepare for your laptop/desktop,

4741:, the article says that they are over 90%, 50%, 90% and 90% respectively. The authors of this type of edits also use unreliable sources (tourist and travel websites, for example). The same hyper-inflated fake numbers (over 1 billion Buddhists in the world) have been cited also in the main article, 4716:

statistics of Buddhism have been mixed with those of other religions of East Asia (Chinese folk religion, Taoism, Shinto, Dao Mau), that have more followers than Buddhism in the respective countries, claiming that they are "related" to Buddhism, when this is utterly false. In the case of China and

2495:

While I can see these guidelines would be useful in rating article importance, I cannot see how they could/should be applied to writing articles. If there is information available backed by verifiable citations, then there is no reason that Knowledge should not report it. regardless of the size or

884:

My own, admittedly individual, opinion here might be to take the articles or groups of articles, in some cases, which have the most weight in these works as being not of "top" importance, but maybe as "core" importance, and allowing the rest to remain at the old "top" level. But any other opinions

736:

minor topics about religion we have, like small-town pastors, local churches or temples, and the like, I think it not unreasonable to maybe err on the side of generosity for those topics which receive such mention. Also, I am in the process of trying to make a more specific list of articles from a

222:

I have proposed renaming Category:Legislatures of non-governmental organizations to Category:Legislatures of religious organizations I am making this proposal because all the articles placed in this category are related to the legislative bodies of religious groups. I think members of this project

4767:

has been created using the same type of unreliable sources mentioned above to sustain the high statistics, claiming that East Asians practice "mixed religions" ultimately resulting in this "East Asian Buddhism". Also, many charts have been created by the same authors: I have inserted some of them

4616:

is clearly a much more general subject than simply what is going on in ex-Soviet Georgia, it seems to me that the question of exactly what freedom of religion should mean might be a valid topic of broader discussion. Without trying to slant the discussion either way, I'd like to encourage people

3242:

I'll let others give their opinion here, since there doesn't seem to be much interest in this yet. Mine is that any article directly related to religion should have the project tag. But then, I tend to have an open mind about project tags and how liberally they should be used. I don't see them as

2748:

You raise a good point, but I feel this really only works for religions like Judaism and Islam, those with with single authoritative versions of scripture. Christian denominational interpenetration of scripture varies to extremes of complete contradiction, before even considering the multitude of

2692:

If the argument for preferring religions with "books" is that they are easer to classify, I must disagree. In all cases, complete descriptions of religions require coverage of contradictory/competing ideologies. If the argument for preferring religions with "books" is that it limits the number of

2471:

in the Lead sections of main topic articles has anything to do with Christianity. I'm just trying to improve the encyclopedia, and I have stated my reasons above. We aren't doing any service to our readers by turning main topic articles into long and arbitrary lists of small and obscure religions

2414:

Adjwilley, i would have thought that your above sentiment is genuine if i did not see you frequently try to remove or argue for removal of coverage of islam from various articles. Is Islam a small religion? Why leave out Sikhism and Baha'i faith which you previously described as insigificant too?

2147:

Thanks for proposing npov reasonable guidelines. The flip side of this is that religions are sometimes founded to "push" a pov and get publicity in the media. Which should have nothing to do with influence on society in general. "Church for Better Health Care" or "Church to Help Haiti." With real

1525:

In an attempt to find out what the larger community thinks on the matter, I propose the following guidelines for the weight given to individual religions in religion-related articles. I'm not asking that these be accepted as official or added to any Knowledge-space policy page; I just want to see

2715:

True, and freely acknowledged, like I said before about Christianity. In the above comment I was referring specifically to individual groupings within those traditions. Like I said before, I kinda doubt all 20 thousand Christian denominations necessarily agree on anything, other than that Christ

4302:

The views of Dayanand Saraswati towards other religions as expressed in Satyarth Prakash was strongly condemnatory, predominantly negative and positively intolerant and negative. Jorden observes, "there is quite a lot of sarcastic bitterness" in the criticism of other religions. Dayanand called

3849:

you will find more information about what I suggest changing and why. You will also find a link to what I have written. Though I have written this on behalf of the school, I am not personally a member, however because of my "conflict of interest" I will not edit the entry myself. If what I have

3142:

The comparison with Venus and Aphrodite seems apt. The attempt to disentangle the figures is informative and useful, even when ultimately doomed because of cultural interaction and influence. "Two names for the same goddess" implies that there is an actual, knowable goddess to whom two cultures

2967:

we should be making sure that an unbalanced load of reliable sources does not prevent us from presenting an accurate, globally balanced summary. Articles with international scope should reflect groups that have had an international impact on the subject, as opposed to groups merely known to the

4607:

A discussion has started at the Eastern Orthodoxy wikiproject talk page, and the main point being dealt with over there right now is exactly what "freedom of religion" is — more specifically, whether "freedom of religion" validly takes in religion-vs.-society issues that might more properly be

2208:

should be featured more prominently than others of more modest international stature in any article they are relevant to, not just articles with an international scope. International religions are more notable. (This does not include some — what I hope to be hypothetical — religion that has 10

684:

Ok, a fair answer. Yes, I can understand Jesus and Buddha, and all the major prophets and gods and various supernatural beings and concepts of that span or have had an impact on multiple faiths, countries, ethnicity, or have shaped our present conceptualization of religion. I was confused with

3257:

Ya, I'm with First Light. The scope of this project is "articles on religion" not religious only articles. Critiques fit that bill. There are lots of critique pages that are part of projects which organize the subject they are critiquing. In addition, not all atheists are non-religious (e.g.,

2787:

I am given to understanding that for a century and a half Mormonism denied being part of Christianity, and that it is only in recent decades that political considerations have overwhelmed doctrine on this point. I'm any event, Mormonism having an additional 'revelation' distinguishes it from

2667:

I guess I should clarify - I wasn't thinking that they were "preferable" because of being fairly standard, but that one could, somewhat reasonably, with exceptions like Christianity like I already mentioned, be fairly sure in several of those cases that any article material would actually be

4402:. So it is clear that User Rahul has put his opinion citing above source (pl. see my edit summary wherein I have explained same)- which does not say anything about the lines removed. I am bit busy in real life and may not be able to follow up on day to day basis - so excuse me for that 2744:

the existence of some sort of internal document, be it scriptural, liturgical, or whatever, makes it less likely for that specific group/denomination that there will be the sort of repeated arguments and discussions about how "I don't see this aspect in my own history of observing the

1893:

one of the "Big eight" it covers, as it is both the religion of a major African group and a religion which has had very significant impact on any number of religions of people of African descent in the New World. In general, I tend to think that the best way to determine weight as per

2940:

The only proposal actively disliked was 5. Good points were made in favor of it. We can say more about religions with texts, and it's hard to come to firm conclusions about witnessing practices without texts. Conflating Christian self-descriptions with anthropological discussions of

3842:

On behalf of the school, which is aware that the current version is not in very good shape, I have been working on improving the entry. After carefully looking over the page, and researching the school, I've written a new version that I would like other editors to consider.

217: 1736:

I would love to see a source which indicates that Zoroastrianism is a "partial parent" of Judaism. I know Judaism is considered by several academics to be at least partially derived/descended from the other early Mesopotamian religions, and I know that Zoroastrianism shares

2576:

policy, not rewrite it, in a circumstance that is specific to this WikiProject. I've seen such discussions be quite helpful in other healthy Projects. Discussion=Healthy, Even when it's just to berate every editor here for wasting their time—your opinion has been noted.

2763:

Ultimately, every religion is defined by tradition and each forms its own sense orthodoxy. The way I see it, the substantive differences you see are those of established religions no longer coping with competing orthodoxies as compared to new movements still in their

1069: 1951:

to talk about Christianity a lot and Raëlism not at all. There might be some specific topics for which sources relatively feature Raëlism much more prominently, for example, cloning is a topic that's important to Raëlism and not so much Christianity; look at

4763:, the same author uses reliable survey statistics (those reorting lower numbers) claiming that thair count is only of "practicing Buddhists", while uses the hyper inflated numbers claiming that they represent both practicing and non-practicing Buddhists. 1849:

I think that smaller religions with few followers are not always notable in all religion-related articles. We should of course have articles on those religions, and link to them were appropriate, but it really becomes impossible if we should discuss what

4237:

On the Ramtha's discussion page I've shared my concerns with the current section and some detailed notes that explain the changes I would like to make with my revision. If you can help you can see the message on the Ramtha's discussion page about this

3498:

other religion based project which might most benefit from having such pages, so as to help ensure that all those groups which have received attention from reliable sources have their beliefs and practices given attention as per weight requirements.

3912:

Calstarry, I would like to thank you for announcing your conflict of interest and taking the appropriate steps of suggesting your edits on the talk page instead of doing them yourself. I will take the rest of my comments to the article's talk page.

1919:

references to individual faiths in articles about topics other than the faiths themselves be cited to some such reference source, which to my eyes would be the best way to ensure that the best examples for any particular topic be the ones chosen.

4725:), mixing this statistics with that of indigenous religions, the article says that these countries are 50% to 80% Buddhist. In the case of Taiwan, Korea, Japan and Mongolia, where according to censuses or surveys the Buddhists are, respectively, 1535:

Larger religions should receive more weight than smaller religions in articles about general religious subjects. (This means having sections on Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, etc., but probably not sections on Raelism, Druidism, Church of Satan,

4479:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

198:

3813: 2984:

say about theology -- and that means theologians, within their sectarian disciplines, and academics when summarizing general opinions or popular language. If we are drawing up a guideline for religion I request someone include that as well.

3092:

are two names for the same person. Should these articles be merged together? Articles for other figures in ancient Mesopotamian religion already seem to be merged (Enki and Ea, two names for the same god, are included in the same article).

3790: 3243:

some sort of black mark that ties them unwillingly to a particular wikiproject, or some sort of ownership by a project. To me, those tags only say, "this is a subject that relates in some way to the subject of religion," in this case.

665:

is going to be tagged by the WikiProject Religion, given that topic's broad importance to multiple faiths and the amount of discussion of it in sources dealing with the broad topic of "religion" in general. Other articles, like maybe

328:

page? I'm working in my sandbox to differentiate both approaches within the page, but it might be easier to understand if they are separated. There is a huge difference between both approaches. Also, could we create a page for the

2627:

on content related to this subject might prove in at least some cases superfluous, those cases being one where the existing reference sources covering the topic themselves display some consistency in their material. But, for the

4882:

web camera, and speaker for video communication with Google Hangout. We will provide you with a Amazon gift card in appreciation of your time and participation. For more information about this study, please visit our wiki page (

3767:. A question has been raised as to whether Landmark Worldwide (previously known as, Landmark Education, The Forum, est, etc.), which is discussed in the scholarship on new religous movements, is ineligible for inclusion in the 3209:

is part of this WikiProject because it also deals with the issue of Religion in society and politics. Surely any articles that directly address religion in society and politics should be included in this project, among others.

741:

by Robert E. Buswell, Thomson Gale 2004, which only has about 400 articles, and I see Ippen is one of the articles included there as well. so I'm guessing he even qualifies as extremely significant within Buddhism as well.

4503:

I'm wondering what participants here think of the series of articles on Criticism of… particular religions. I know that some are quite developed, others certainly are not. As you can see from the previous thread, the new

224: 3492:

I am wondering whether it might be useful for this project, and/or possibly other religion based projects to have some sort of group of helpful pages for editors in dealing with this material, maybe something like the

2811:

were both founded in the 1800s. One of the differences is that Baha'i is probably further from Islam than Mormonism is from Christianity, which is probably why Baha'i is more often referred to as a separate religion.

4350:

Hopefully, since that page isn't about Dayanand Saraswati, only the criticism of Jainism must be noted. Anyone can know by the numerous links of wikipedia that what actually dayanand felt about every other religion.

202:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

4070:, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the 1987:

it is the historical and sociological influence of the older religions, not their age, that is the factor. I'm a little worried about using age as a proxy, and I think the other guidelines cover the issue better.

1481:

given to small religions (with thousands to millions of adherents) compared to large religions (with millions to billions of adherents). An editor has recently been adding sections and links to small religions like

4483:

3890:: Knowledge is a collaborative venture, and negative or unflattering information that meets inclusion standards cannot be removed just because someone with the organization doesn't like the material being added. 2082:. 5 is codified systemic bias. Most others look like good general guidelines for what I'd expect WP:WEIGHT to amount to, but if in doubt, we should follow the sources, not some general rules. Basically I'm with 4645: 2739:

In the above comment I was referring specifically to individual groupings within those traditions. Like I said before, I kinda doubt all 20 thousand Christian denominations necessarily agree on anything...

2451:@Pass a Method: That's where you've gone wrong. Just because I oppose some of your edits doesn't mean that I'm pushing a "christcentric" view (whatever that means). In fact, at our most recent dispute at 236: 4386:- again this statement is false as Arya Samaj was founded as it Dayananda believed that there were faults in Hindu religion and Arya Samaj is not a militant organization. The above source mentions about 4222:

article. Over the past few weeks the conversation has gotten very long and complicated so now, at the suggestion of several other editors, I would like to try and look at the article section by section.

3041:. The dispute over the lead section is one of the oldest on Knowledge, dating back to 2003, and focuses on whether or not it is neutral to say that Jerusalem is the capital of Israel. The discussion was 2879:

exclusively. The study of religion in the West began with the study of Christianity and we should be on the lookout for systemic bias. If an article deals with all religions it needs to be talking about

4658:

have been constructed through misuse of sources and original research (for example combining statistics of different religions), in order to enormously inflate the number of Buddhists in the world.--

4754: 4667: 3143:

applied a different name. But from an encyclopedic perspective, we can only know a deity through its representation, and in antiquity naming (invocation) was a crucial aspect of knowing the divine.

4673:

Could you perhaps give a specific example of how this is being done? (How many Buddhists are there? What does the article say? Where is the original research, or where are the calculations wrong?)

1214: 1372:

If others add their opinion, then it's possible to form a consensus to decide if it should be added or not - at which point, the person who disagrees should hopefully go along with the consensus.

4371:

I am also of opinion that since the page is not about any other religion and nor about Dayanand Saraswati - it Undue - to put weight of what Dayanand said about other religion. Again see as per

4618: 3458:

Thank you for doing that. I would be grateful if an experienced editor could watchlist this problematic page regarding a highly controversial cultural figure. FYI, I have tried to provide a

1898:

in matters like which religions to refer to as examples is to consult the relevant reference sources on the topic at hand and see which examples they use. In some cases, it may well be that

4108: 1956:, and quite appropriately Christianity has a small sub-section there and Raëlism has a larger one. It's all about what's in the sources, the numbers of adherents is entirely irrelevant. 697:-importance, neither he nor his sect have been influential outside of his own time period, and even that was of nominal influence, as far as I can tell. (By the by, I changed them both to 283: 3227:

But, First Light, the FFRF is not within the stated scope of the WPReligion. And while I haven't been to every page related to atheism, none before this one had the WPReligion tag on it.

2314:

Who decides what theology is included in sacred writings? We all have a different method in theology, and to specify this as criteria would open a Pandora's box and exclude other editors.

728: 658: 2690:

Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, and Buddhism all have major sects with substantially different beliefs. Some don't even agree on what texts are canonical; some even war with each other.

4532: 1113: 1108: 3724: 3632: 3391: 3167:

I'm not sure why the FFRF is in this WikiProject as it is not a religion, and is not within the stated parameters of the project. Could someone go remove it? Or is it okay if I do?

2649:

That case for 5 sounds like wishful thinking to me, and I'd happily argue the opposite - but even if the case were true, why should more "monolithic" religions be given preference?

1129: 4048:. Someone asked me to weigh in on it, but since I do not have the expertise, hopefully some experienced editors from the Religion Project may be able to help sort things out. -- 2054:

the religions that were important/useful to talk about. That's where #2 and #5 came from, although upon further reflection some may have used that criteria because it was easier.

1369:

two people, with two differing opinions - one says something should be added, the other says it shouldn't. Arguments like that go on forever, because there cannot be 'consensus'.

789:

importance to this project. Certainly that was a reasonable place to start. In our discussion, though, he offered, and I agreed, that anything included there is probably either

334: 126:

Sounds like a good idea to me. God (the creator) and gods (important supernatural beings) are really not the same thing at all. You can have one or the other without the other.

4564: 4493: 3363:

infobox. But I feel it still needs some work. It would be good if others could have a look and see what they can add to it in the way of links, formatting and categorization. --

3102: 1419: 373: 261: 3389:

article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so,

144:

Then you would also have to define "existence." I'm sure everyone agrees they exist as ideas. Probably few people now days think they exist as physically substantial beings.

358: 4538: 3839:

that this Wikiproject has marked the entry as "Mid-importance" so I wanted to leave a message here for anyone who might be interested in the work I've been doing recently.

3786: 3072: 774:. First of all, tremendous credit to John for all the work he does on this, and for continuing to find appropriate outside sources against which we can calibrate ourselves. 1741:

similar beliefs with Judaism, but I don't know that I've ever seen an academic source explicitly state that Zoroastrianism was in any way a "parent" of Judaism in any way.

4005: 2753:

Bible. Some groups even hold other scriptures above the Christian bible. (Mormons are the largest example.) Buddhism doesn't have a single canon and — in theory — another

212: 4344: 4251: 3716:

in the "Today's articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing!

701:-importance. Apologies. I'm not given to changing the evaluations on other projects, it was an impulse. You can change them back.)So I wasn't sure, how did he qualify as 3337: 421:

in the "Today's Article for Improvement" section for one week. Everyone is invited to participate in the discussion and encouraged to collaborate to improve the article.

3678: 3219: 2277:

and the fact that Christianity emerged from Judaism itself. I doubt if there are very many practising Jews who would agree that Zoroastrianism is its parent religion.

1437: 1275: 1122: 537: 4360: 3192: 4309:

I do not think that the wordings of the article correctly represents the reference provided. I tried removing or rewording the statement, all of which were reverted.

931: 454: 4103:(a Korean religious leader). This article has been the subject of edit-warring and both full and semi-protection for over a year. I listed it several days ago at 4826: 2586: 2567: 2545: 2402: 330: 243: 135: 4213: 3802: 1059: 894: 765: 751: 718: 679: 4750: 4687: 4663: 4512:

also looks in a pretty bad way. Is it a general policy of this WikiProject to see those articles merged? To my mind, they are all incoherent conceptual ragbags.

4442: 3477: 3447: 3252: 2825: 2606: 2563: 2523: 1827: 1750: 1247: 410: 4411: 3541: 3290: 867: 519: 497: 4830: 4635: 4602: 4583: 4057: 3846: 2486: 2347:- But in practice? I get the feeling that most of this stuff really has to be decided on a case-by-case basis. I'd absolutely agree that giving something like 1792: 1694: 1676:

Lisa, It's not my idea, that's what the sources do, and likely for some of the reasons StevenJ81 was saying. There's actually a fairly good discussion of this

161: 153: 3906: 3775: 3043: 2797: 2778: 2729: 2706: 1359: 4485: 4391: 4336: 4239: 3984: 3859: 3319: 3236: 3176: 1593: 255: 4526: 3937: 3764: 2681: 2658: 2384: 1992:

might represent an actual bias violating NPOV. The others are entirely in accord with the historical and current significance of religions as described in

1203: 4476: 274:. It seems to me that, according to the terms of these two articles, they could be addressed in a single article, and that this fork does not aid readers. 3586: 1731: 1671: 593: 3709: 3673: 3602:

though personally one might consider the intersections between Sephiroth and Christianity fringey, theres no shortage of attempts to link or compare them

3206: 3152: 3133: 414: 305: 195: 4809: 4208: 3327: 1561:

Religions with a significant international following (geographical distribution) are more notable for inclusion in articles with an international scope.

1460: 3597: 3404: 3349: 2559: 2519: 2308:

Consider. How do you treat Baha'i's who have a considerable international following in the media? Do you treat them as a new religious movement or not?

2182:, my personal requirement is adherence of at least a few million. This is a very manageable group of religions. Few even achieve more than one million. 1335:

There's some discussions going on, and a couple of editors have strong views. It would help if others could contribute to improve the article. Thanks,

474: 3417: 3067: 2375:. At the end of the day, the amount of weight you provide to any particular religion is sorta dependent on the context in which you are providing it. 1564:

A very slight preference should be made toward religions that have a sacred text containing their theology vs. those that rely on unorganized customs.

985:

The PROD tag was removed. Therefore, the proposal for deletion failed. You may want to participate in a discussion of what to do as an alternative.

3613: 3507: 900: 4895: 3664:

in most cases the articles in these works are probably the topics of most importance to whatever the individual topics of those reference works is.

2426: 1148: 502:

I'm talking about non-religious people attacking religion, not the other way around. How is it religious persecution if the people arn't religious?

4256: 1159: 1096: 1037: 288: 4437: 2640: 2527: 2455:, I favored not having references to Christian, Muslim, or Baha'i' scripture in the 1st sentence of the Lead, but just a link to the Hebrew Bible 4821:

I have created a new article, perhaps someone would like to help me develop it into a DYK? I am also not sure if this is the best name, or maybe

3993: 3514: 3372: 1163: 120: 4378:- now this is a affirmative statement but it does not mention who says so. (Even above source does not says so) Also other section removed was 3825: 2446: 4196: 3753: 3568:. There you can give ideas or thoughts about what to do with this guideline. Note this discussion is not to modify any aspect of NCCL. Thanks. 3494: 1404: 94: 89: 84: 4845: 4521: 3644: 3429: 2864:

The weight given to individual religions should be proportional to the weight given to those religions in reliable sources on the given topic.

2505: 1662:

Ba'hai). And we continue to have an influence on the world that is higher than our numbers would indicate. So, yes, it's one of the big 5.

4705:

Inflated numbers: according to surveys China and Vietnam should be in the 10-20 tonality, Taiwan and Japan in the 30-40, Mongolia in the 50%.

3565: 2892:

where it appears to cover an insufficient percentage of the world's population. Also, we should keep in mind that for some big subjects like

109:

The above title does not cover polytheistic religions. Should there be a seperate article titled "Existence of gods"/"Existence of deities"?

72: 67: 59: 4185: 4167: 4125: 1381: 4571: 3741: 2904:

guideline, although NickCT helpfully pointed out that "influence" is not a strict, single rule, but always depends on the article's topic:

2286:

Larger religions generally have more developed philosophy-doctrine-dogma which has more effect and influence over larger numbers of people.

3037:

article, and all editors are welcome to give their opinions. I'm posting this here because the WikiProject Religion banner is included at

2408: 1344: 647: 634:

combined. This is contrary to my experience in other projects, which follows a more pyramidal distribution. So, I am curious: Why all the

3979: 3780: 3758: 3704: 3655: 994: 980: 958: 566: 4032: 3962: 3830: 2024: 1191: 853:

it's hard for me to see why we should disagree here. (Alternatively, we can always ask the other Project for a reassessment if we do.)

433: 405: 3023: 2872:, which should guide us for religion articles as much as any other article. A few editors complained that this is all that is needed. 2769:

notable it is. Best of all, 15 groups is a manageable number and clearly indicates we're attempting to provide well rounded coverage.

4793:

is correct, but I am not an expert on English religious terminology. Can someone look into that? Is this a generic term for a Jewish

4465: 4231: 3949:

To my possibly untutored eye, this article appears to be full of original research, conflation of other concepts with misotheism, eg

2115: 1928: 1629: 1177: 184: 3601: 4870: 3160: 3053: 2338: 2068: 2005: 1636:

I don't get it. I mean, you list Judaism among the big 5, which I like, but in terms of numbers, we aren't anywhere near that. -

1445: 4697:

Chart created mixing the statistics of Buddhism with those of other religions (Shinto, Chinese religion, Dao Mau, Tengrism, etc.).

4083: 2157: 2139: 2043: 1032: 3547: 2992: 1226: 218:

Proposal for renaming Category:Legislatures of non-governmental organizations to Category:Legislatures of religious organizations

2252: 1879: 1081: 3315: 1973: 667: 4227: 2095: 1649: 914: 4774: 1263: 1187: 2900:

there may be a huge number of sources about countless religions, and calculating relative weights would be a waste of time.

4037: 3469: 3421: 1472:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

2851:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

1350:

The disputing parties have been quite for two days. Perhaps it is better to say nothing rather than rekindle that battle.

3377: 1373: 1271: 1257: 1195: 1182: 1086: 946: 585: 47: 17: 1231: 4760: 4190: 3649: 1139:. This all seems rather ill-defined and not source based. Please consider participating in this discussion. Thank you. 4428:

This is bleeping on Watchlist... anybody feel able to pass by and look :( I don't have the energy at the moment sorry

2855: 4746: 4659: 4372: 4331:, but its been six days and no one commented. Can anyone provide their comments in this (preferably at the talk page 4312: 4286: 4219: 4176:. which seems appropriate in each case. We now have two redundant categories: I'll make these category redirects. -- 3836: 3553: 3332: 3007: 2415:

Therefore your sentiment above is imo dishonest and is merely an attempt to push a Christcentric view on wikipedia.

1336: 571: 444: 3463: 2631:

cases when those sources can't be found or aren't available, I kind of like them all as "rule-of-thumb" guidelines.

4876: 4074:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. 3341: 3161: 1854:

religion has to say about every religious subject. To make a comparison, should we always give the same weight to

3768: 1306: 1301: 1018: 4314: 4310: 4289: 1598: 816:

for this project. (Included in an earlier edition, then dropped, would not only not qualify an article here as

413:, where comments are welcome about ideas to improve it. After the article is moved from the holding area to the 4547: 4539: 3903: 3487: 3298: 2292:

However, we need to define new religious movements. This may set a definable marker for inclusion or exclusion.

2131: 1310: 1267: 923: 581: 4199:

is part of this wikiproject -- it's a bit bizarre, if anyone is interested in cleaning up that sort of thing.

3604:. Given that some of this project's editors may wish to be informed even though the subject is wholly Jewish. 2273:

in its iterations includes Judaism. Judaism has always had disproportionate weight, and is due popular use of

4655: 3354: 2960:

we should ideally be summarizing what other people are saying and in what quantity, if it is at all possible.

2917: 2356: 4045: 4038: 3633:

Talk:Landmark Worldwide#Merging Erhard Seminar Traiining and Landmark Education articles/Article Neutrality

3591: 1415: 1400: 1293: 618:

for WP:Religion. A quick look at this projects front page shows that out of ~8,000 articles, about 1/4 are

369: 354: 3850:

written is an improvement I hope that other editors will be able to make the changes to the entry for me.

1889:

with these proposals. First, as I think I said elsewhere, at least one recent academic source has counted

1576:

Please indicate your agreement or disagreement with the above six guidelines. Answers may be of the form:

1543:

The weight given to individual religions should be proportional to the weight given to those religions in

1070:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Molko v. Holy Spirit Association for the Unification of World Christianity

4814: 3735: 3011: 2434: 1315: 611: 279: 801:

So I would like to make the following interim proposal, subject to John's finding additional resources:

4140: 3188: 3028: 1645: 1104: 906: 533: 364:

Actually, ignore the part about splitting. It would be easier to differentiate inside the page. Sorry.

38: 2948:

A guideline should be written up for religion-related articles that reflects the following consensus:

4469: 4421: 4398:. The above source does not say Dayananda did not criticise Hinduism. Rahul put his own words to say 4332: 4320: 4173: 4155: 4144: 4049: 2997: 2757:

could emerge tomorrow, throwing everything we knew into question (just like any religion without the

2532:

It's still worth discussing, even if there are no proposed changes to the main policy covering this (

1953: 577: 429: 325: 297: 188: 1327: 4489: 4340: 3875: 3807: 3624: 3473: 3425: 3323: 2972: 2933: 2514: 2372: 1241: 1233: 309: 102: 2518:

large discussion in small pond. Will not go anywhere, for it can not over-rider wider guidelines.

4730: 4498: 4433: 4151: 4136: 4130: 4088: 4027: 3720: 3618: 3609: 2885: 2421: 2398: 2019: 1710: 1704:

is partially a parent of Judaism. Does that make Zoroastrianism part of the big 6 by that logic?

1677: 1554: 1453:

Closed after a month and a half. Discussion of the decision should be made in the section below.

1424:

This went GA in May. I don't disagree on net, but I do still have issues with the article. See

1411: 1396: 1377: 1199: 1172: 964: 942: 771: 589: 561: 365: 350: 301: 289: 115: 4612:

religion", or "incidents involving society vs. leaders/members of a religious majority". Since

4218:

I posted on this page about six weeks ago looking for editors to help review a new draft of the

3517:

last year, but never got around to finishing it. Perhaps it could serve as a starting point. --

834:

We should probably defer to more specialized WikiProjects' opinions in deciding that a topic is

3821: 3116:; the Ishtar and Inanna situation seems similar. I don't think any mergers are necessary here. 1495: 317: 300:(e.g. scholars Pierre Daniël Chantepie de la Saussaye, Geo Widengren, and Åke Hultkrantz) from 275: 614:. In my editing experience, I have noticed what appears to be a vast number of articles rated 4517: 4356: 4079: 3975: 3798: 3791:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Philotheos: International Journal for Philosophy and Theology

3669: 3640: 3503: 3360: 3248: 3215: 3184: 3060: 2793: 2725: 2677: 2636: 2582: 2541: 2452: 2274: 2216: 2111: 1924: 1746: 1625: 1340: 910: 890: 747: 675: 529: 525: 480: 693:, itself a geographical and ideological branch of the larger Buddhist faith. Although rated 4738: 4509: 4505: 4460: 4444: 4278: 4258: 4204: 4001: 3958: 3883: 3409: 3345: 2897: 2188:

Greater age ≠ greater notability. We should depend on objective figures, such as adherence.

1943:

is actually the application of guideline 3. This is a very straightforward application of

990: 976: 954: 761: 714: 643: 598: 511: 466: 425: 346: 1323: 770:

John and I have been having a similar discussion with respect to Judaism articles over on

296:

Hi! I'm new to Knowledge and I don't know if this is the place to ask, but could we split

8: 4815: 4764: 4722: 4713: 4681: 4651: 4627: 4613: 4594: 4579: 4556: 4247: 4181: 4163: 4117: 3855: 3713: 3232: 3172: 2819: 2600: 2480: 2442: 2334: 2062: 2001: 1823: 1818:

but the statement that Judaism is parent to Christianity and Islam might very well not.)

1725: 1688: 1667: 1605: 1587: 1433: 1280: 1077: 1025: 936: 863: 491: 418: 208: 179: 163: 149: 131: 2975:

editors are free to propose exceptions on a talk page if they have a good reason for it.

4891: 4726: 4429: 4407: 4288:

It used a primary source which I hence removed. It was re-added with another reference.

4270: 4096: 4071: 4022: 3942: 3930: 3899: 3749: 3628: 3605: 3534: 3400: 3368: 3283: 3148: 3098: 2929: 2913: 2416: 2394: 2368: 2352: 2153: 2135: 2039: 2014: 1778: 1705: 1553:

which adds Confucianism, Taoism, Jainism, Shinto, Sikhism, Baha'i, and Zoroastrianism.

1222: 1167: 1048: 927: 556: 450: 251: 232: 110: 4380:

He uses same bitterness towards every other religion except Hinduism and the militant

2227:

religions' relevant details are always outside of cannon. Academic coverage is enough.

1910:, for instance, is the best example of some particular belief, like maybe belief in a 1319: 4850: 4839: 4822: 4803: 4734: 4718: 4422: 3817: 3466: 3109: 2921: 2558:

You can discuss all you want, and I can say "save your breath"... as simple as that.

2360: 2171: 1788: 1395:

article has been nominated at GAN. Would anyone here be interested in reviewing it?--

1386: 1251:. any input on how to improve the article would be very much appreciated. Thanks! -- 1118: 690: 399: 3124:

with little loss; that article already mentions Utnapishtim as an alternative name.

1939:, I saw this RFC linked from an ANI discussion. Disagree with the others, although 845:

then we do, too. If the other project goes lower than that, we continue to hold at

727:

of them were included as an entry in that work, and I do see it listed there in the

705:

importance to both WP:Buddhism and WP:Religion? Was it because he was listed in the

4886:). If you would like to participate in our user study, please send me a message at 4866: 4717:

Vietnam, where Buddhism is followed by little more than 10% of the population (see

4693: 4513: 4352: 4282: 4075: 3971: 3794: 3665: 3636: 3631:

for some time now, and I would very much welcome any input regarding the matter at

3499: 3263: 3244: 3211: 3048: 2957: 2889: 2876: 2869: 2789: 2721: 2673: 2632: 2578: 2537: 2380: 2299: 2266: 2195: 2175: 2107: 2083: 2079: 1944: 1920: 1895: 1875: 1742: 1658:

But Judaism is the parent of Christianity, Islam, and to some extent other things (

1621: 1478: 1297: 1136: 1100: 1092: 886: 743: 671: 547: 103: 4266: 4200: 4100: 4089: 4010: 3997: 3954: 3581: 3311: 3019: 2942: 2533: 2497: 2321: 2234: 1965: 1890: 1846: 1491: 1144: 986: 972: 950: 757: 710: 639: 607: 504: 459: 271: 267: 4376:

The comments of Dayanand Saraswati is generally seen as intolerant and negative.

3687: 388: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

4861:. Does anyone here at WP Religion focus on shamanism and care to take a look? - 4676: 4622: 4589: 4575: 4551: 4546:

Hi. I've done a major revision (essentially a total rewrite) of the article on

4243: 4177: 4159: 4112: 3871: 3851: 3557: 3228: 3168: 3129: 3051:, and its result will be binding for three years. The discussion is located at 3038: 3003: 2989: 2964: 2814: 2654: 2595: 2475: 2438: 2330: 2091: 2057: 1997: 1819: 1720: 1701: 1683: 1663: 1641: 1582: 1457: 1429: 1073: 1009: 968: 859: 486: 204: 145: 127: 4883: 1547:

on the given topic. (In general, this will give more weight to the "Big Five"

831:

it is up to the interested editors/WikiProject members to decide by consensus.

4887: 4403: 4324: 4104: 3994:

Talk:Islamophobia#Talk:RFC:Should this article be included in Category:Racism

3915: 3891: 3887: 3867: 3745: 3519: 3459: 3396: 3364: 3268: 3144: 3094: 3033:

There is currently a request for comments open about the lead section of the

2149: 2126: 2035: 1218: 1208: 999: 918: 247: 228: 553: 338: 4835: 4799: 4790: 4786: 4779: 4775: 4328: 4172:

OK, I've now changed the relevant categories for each of those articles to

3986: 3879: 3772: 3569: 3410: 2981: 2925: 2909: 2502: 2364: 2348: 1993: 1784: 1544: 1153: 777:

That said, John's initial thesis has been that anything with an article in

379: 342: 333:

approach in religious studies(the idea that religion evolved socially e.g.

321: 689:, a 13th century Japanese Buddhist monk who founded a sect of a branch of 4862: 4794: 4062: 3561: 3441: 3385:

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Religion for a

3117: 3085: 2772: 2717: 2700: 2669: 2376: 2246: 1899: 1871: 1777:

article should contain some of the information to which the statement by

1568: 1353: 1289: 1281: 1215:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Neo-fascism and religion (2nd nomination)

1064: 1054: 313: 4701: 4646:

Original research in various articles regarding the number of Buddhists

4395: 4387: 4381: 3943: 3015: 1958: 1907: 1859: 1425: 1140: 3438:

The article's subject is not one of the "core topics about religion".

804:

If the subject is contained in the current (last one-two editions of)

403:, which is within this project's scope, has been selected to become a 4858: 4851: 4067: 3950: 3596:

This has already been notified at WP Judaism and WP Video Games, but

3259: 3125: 3121: 3113: 3089: 3034: 2986: 2650: 2087: 1948: 1637: 1617: 1519: 1477:

There has recently been some controversy over the amount of space or

1454: 3702:, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of 3564:

affects articles in this WikiProject, some examples can be found at

3201:

e/c Inclusion in this WikiProject doesn't meat that an organization

1717:

Zoroastrianism is actually one of the so-called "Classical Twelve".

4742: 4230:

section and compare it to my suggested revision which I have named

3600:, but belated it seems worth notifying here too. Why notify? since 2893: 2464: 2460: 2179: 1911: 1613: 1515: 1503: 1487: 2393:- Noting the initial proviso 'When all other things are equal...' 3307: 3300: 2468: 2178:. In terms of what should be included in a main article, such as 1483: 941:

A merge discussion has been going on for some time regarding the

4226:

I am looking for editors who can help review the page's current

3870:. In your edits, please keep in mind Knowledge's policies about 2953:

reflect their relative importance in reliable secondary sources.

2742:

So was I. I just wanted to point out it's not only Christianity.

1540:(This means giving Zoroastrianism more weight than Scientology.) 820:

but would probably be a red flag that suggests it shouldn't be.)

4531:

FYI re discussion re categorization of cult-related books: See

3967: 3081: 3077: 2912:(a "highly" notable religion) equal weight with something like 2351:(a "highly" notable religion) equal weight with something like 2106:

the extent that's true, it's still the best we've got for now.

1903: 1774: 1507: 3814:

List of publications critical of the Latter Day Saint movement

2459:. I challenge you to demonstrate how not having a links to to 4291:. Here is the precise quote from the reference now provided: 3787:

Philotheos: International Journal for Philosophy and Theology

3698: 1867: 1855: 1609: 1499: 1392: 1005: 686: 662: 4621:

and consider contributing your views as you may see fit. —

3598:

Talk:Sephiroth (Final Fantasy)/Archive 2#Requested Move 2013

3416:

I was surprised to see that this page is marked as being of

2860:

The most widely supported and uncontroversial option was 3:

1843:

Agree with 1, 2, 4 and 6, some agreement with 3 and oppose 5

723:

At least regarding the articles I tagged as Top-importance,

4150:

Would anyone have an objection if I moved all the pages in

1981:

Agree with 1, 3, 4, 6; weak agree with 2; weak oppose to 5.

3318:. Please help me in making it a Featured Article. Thanks, 2875:

However, two important issues were raised about following

2223:

they define themselves. Also, much (perhaps most) of even

1914:. If anyone wanted to check, they would see that with the 606:

Hi, I usually edit articles in other projects, especially

4884:

http://meta.wikimedia.org/Research:Finding_a_Collaborator

4527:

FYI re discussion re categorization of cult-related books

4011: 1863: 1511: 1004:

These are not my usual stomping grounds, but I think the

945:

article. It's time to wrap this up. Please weigh in at

4533:

Category talk:Cult-related books#Description of category

3771:

and should be removed. Input by editors is appreciated.

244:

Category:Governing assemblies of religious organizations

4458:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

2888:

are most familiar with. This would mean going against

2761:

of scripture). Hinduism has a similarly nuanced system.

2269:, the interfaith movement and inter-religious dialogue 1604:

Utterly disagree, especially as to any codification of

1248:

Knowledge:Peer review/Flying Spaghetti Monster/archive1

262:

Possible merger of Religious abuse and Spiritual abuse?

177:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

4019: 2806:

Regarding Mormonism, I should emphasize that it's not

905:

For your information, there is a new proposal to move

242:

This category has been redirected to the new category

4477:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Jainism

3073:

Mergers of Ishtar/Inanna & Utnapishtim/Atrahasis?

2496:

scope of the religious tradition. On the other hand,

1549:

Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, and Buddhism

4464:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

3970:

seems to need this sort of help as well. Blessings!

2206:

religions with a significant international following

756:

Understood. Thank you for the answer and your time.

324:, etc.) Or should they just be separated within the 196:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Religious terrorism

183:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge according to

4588:Good point. I've asked there as well. Thanks. — 3207:

Separation of church and state in the United States

1008:

page could be improved if it had fewer headlines.--

841:So if WikiProject Judaism, says "Such-and-such" is 2265:With regard to Judaism and its numbers, vis a vis 858:Any thoughts others might have would be welcome. 4111:), but no one has responded so far. Thanks. — 3679:One of your project's articles has been featured 3556:about partially disambiguated titles, known as " 3183:Korea and Communist Albania as the role models. 2908:I'd absolutely agree that giving something like 4327:) hasn't even participated. I tried asking for 4158:, and deleted the two redundant categories? -- 3515:Knowledge:WikiProject Religion/Notability guide 3310:for peer review. Jainism is one of the ancient 3057:, and will be open until 22 June 2013 (UTC). — 1287:Can some experienced editors please check over 1262:Would this project like to absorb the inactive 1160:Pope Benedict XVI's visit to the United Kingdom 4745:(which even reports 1.6 billion Buddhists!).-- 4265:Note:This comment is left at the talk page of 4143:. Surely both of these are unnecessary, since 3866:it is very easy for that to be perceived as a 3793:. Recommendations would be welcome. Thanks, -- 3495:Knowledge:WikiProject Military history/Academy 3084:are two names for the same goddess. Likewise, 1164:Pope Benedict XVI's visit to the United States 4857:A flood of uncited edits are taking place at 4214:Fresh start: Ramtha's School of Enlightenment 3835:Hi there! I see from the discussion page for 3763:There is currently a request for comments on 849:But if the specialized Project says it's not 4572:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy 2932:might be reasonably balanced on a page like 2572:Most of the discussion here is about how to 2457:because that's where Joseph is most relevant 2371:might be reasonably balanced on a page like 2345:Agree with all proposed guidelines in theory 2148:small membership, but very large headlines. 915:Talk:Genesis creation narrative#New proposal 4574:, and this article might be tagged for it. 3656:User:John Carter/Religion reference sources 1502:, etc., to big primary-topic articles like 729:User:John Carter/Religion articles#Buddhism 4323:is not helping. One of the user involved ( 4044:There is apparently a dispute going on at 3886:. Also, be careful that you do not assert 3554:there is a discussion at WT:Disambiguation 2916:(a "low" notability religion) on the page 2355:(a "low" notability religion) on the page 2219:" are no more notable than others because 2076:Agree with 3, oppose 5, "meh" on the rest. 1117:about the final remnant category of these 1047:You are invited to join the discussion at 947:Talk:Hebrew Gospel hypothesis#AfD or stub 901:Proposed move: Genesis creation narrative 4700: 4692: 4295: 3465:to a user editing from a problematic IP 3392:here are the questions for the interview 3054:Knowledge:Requests for comment/Jerusalem 2884:religions and not just about those that 1578:"Agree with 1,3,5. Disagree with 2,4,6." 1125:. Attention may also need to be paid to 1038:Discussion at Talk:Wicca#GA Reassessment 737:Buddhist encyclopedia, specifically the 4761:List of religious populations#Buddhists 4285:regarding dayananda's views on Jainism. 14: 4139:, which in turn is the sole member of 4099:to take a good look at the article on 3316:Knowledge:Peer_review/Jainism/archive4 2320:Of course; that is a simple matter of 2233:Of course; that is a simple matter of 1365:The main problem is - as usual - it's 1190:has been requested to be renamed, see 797:here, but not necessary automatically 668:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of New York 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 4836:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 4800:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 3765:Talk: List of new religious movements 3420:to this project (see talk). Regards, 266:Is there any support for a merger of 3623:There has been a proposed merger of 2693:religions to highlight to something 1526:where the community consensus lies. 1468:The following discussion is closed. 1135:, which contains such occultists as 25: 4785:I don't think that the redirect of 4466:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 4298:Gandhi on Pluralism and Communalism 3781:Philotheos at Articles for deletion 3759:List of new religious movements Rfc 3340:has been nominated for deletion -- 3120:could indeed be easily merged into 3012:Talk:Deconstruction#Merger proposal 185:Knowledge's policies and guidelines 23: 18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Religion 3686: 2924:; however, giving equal weight to 2363:; however, giving equal weight to 1530:When all other things are equal... 1091:Some time ago (2007), the article 659:User:John Carter/Religion articles 653:In a word, me. I went through the 409:. The article is currently in the 387: 24: 4907: 4475:The article will be discussed at 3985:RfC on a category in the article 3306:Hello, I have listed the article 3008:Jacques Derrida on deconstruction 1954:Ethics_of_cloning#Religious_views 552:I would appreciate some feedback 453:but there isn't an article about 194:The article will be discussed at 4451: 4220:Ramtha's School of Enlightenment 3837:Ramtha's School of Enlightenment 3831:Ramtha's School of Enlightenment 3705:Today's articles for improvement 3359:I have attempted to cleanup the 3162:Freedom from Religion Foundation 2847:The discussion above is closed. 1446:RfC on weight given to religions 1410:A second opinion is requested.-- 1042: 971:as an uncontroversial deletion. 417:, it will appear on Knowledge's 170: 29: 4277:There is a dispute at the page 3769:List of new religious movements 3548:Invitation to join a discussion 2886:ex-Protestant American atheists 2215:This is very much POV-tinted. " 2209:members each in 100 countries.) 967:article has been tagged with a 406:Today's Article for Improvement 349:)? Please let me know! Thanks! 223:may wish to way in over on its 4797:, or is it more widespread? -- 4548:Freedom of religion in Georgia 4540:Freedom of religion in Georgia 4535:. 17:25, 7 January 2014 (UTC) 3826:00:02, 20 September 2013 (UTC) 3803:12:09, 10 September 2013 (UTC) 3742:Missing topics about Religions 3205:a religion. In a similar way, 1254:21:58, 24 November 2012 (UTC) 1192:WT:Naming conventions (clergy) 1188:WP:Naming conventions (clergy) 582:talk:Shinto in popular culture 13: 1: 4896:13:07, 18 February 2014 (UTC) 4871:06:22, 11 February 2014 (UTC) 4656:List of religious populations 4522:18:58, 14 December 2013 (UTC) 4494:06:30, 14 December 2013 (UTC) 4412:15:02, 30 November 2013 (UTC) 4361:06:42, 30 November 2013 (UTC) 4345:06:39, 30 November 2013 (UTC) 4296:Panicker, P. L. John (2006). 4252:21:42, 19 November 2013 (UTC) 4209:21:33, 18 November 2013 (UTC) 4046:Hinduism and other religions‎ 4039:Hinduism and other religions‎ 3776:03:31, 6 September 2013 (UTC) 3314:. I request your opinions at 2918:Religion in the United States 2749:translations and versions of 2357:Religion in the United States 1060:06:54, 28 February 2013 (UTC) 1033:17:04, 16 February 2013 (UTC) 995:17:48, 11 February 2013 (UTC) 622:-importance, a bit more than 335:Comte Eugene Goblet d'Aviella 237:21:06, 24 December 2012 (UTC) 121:17:57, 24 December 2012 (UTC) 4846:17:28, 2 February 2014 (UTC) 4810:16:58, 2 February 2014 (UTC) 4755:12:43, 25 January 2014 (UTC) 4712:For example, in the article 4688:03:35, 25 January 2014 (UTC) 4668:22:19, 24 January 2014 (UTC) 4438:13:50, 5 December 2013 (UTC) 4186:23:27, 28 October 2013 (UTC) 4168:11:44, 28 October 2013 (UTC) 4126:19:15, 23 October 2013 (UTC) 4084:17:06, 16 October 2013 (UTC) 4058:12:41, 15 October 2013 (UTC) 4033:00:48, 15 October 2013 (UTC) 4006:09:03, 14 October 2013 (UTC) 3876:not promoting or advertising 2592:this has been very helpful. 981:18:39, 2 February 2013 (UTC) 959:18:01, 30 January 2013 (UTC) 932:21:22, 5 February 2013 (UTC) 895:16:01, 3 February 2013 (UTC) 868:16:47, 31 January 2013 (UTC) 594:04:52, 1 February 2013 (UTC) 576:The coverage of the article 567:21:45, 29 January 2013 (UTC) 538:14:31, 31 January 2013 (UTC) 520:12:19, 31 January 2013 (UTC) 498:16:17, 26 January 2013 (UTC) 475:14:23, 26 January 2013 (UTC) 434:07:28, 27 January 2013 (UTC) 374:00:53, 20 January 2013 (UTC) 359:05:27, 16 January 2013 (UTC) 284:18:57, 11 January 2013 (UTC) 7: 4636:21:52, 8 January 2014 (UTC) 4603:03:51, 2 January 2014 (UTC) 4584:00:49, 2 January 2014 (UTC) 4565:23:42, 1 January 2014 (UTC) 3980:18:25, 7 October 2013 (UTC) 3963:10:48, 7 October 2013 (UTC) 3938:20:07, 4 October 2013 (UTC) 3907:16:04, 4 October 2013 (UTC) 3860:15:35, 4 October 2013 (UTC) 3785:The article on the journal 3754:11:33, 29 August 2013 (UTC) 3725:00:08, 12 August 2013 (UTC) 3674:00:18, 11 August 2013 (UTC) 3659:works in the Lindsay Jones 3577:. Grammatically incorrect? 3552:Through this way, I inform 2920:would seem to grossly lack 2472:like Raelism and Eckankar. 2359:would seem to grossly lack 2174:. It is a simple matter of 2051:Agree with 6, 4, 3, 1, 2, 5 1551:and the "Classical Twelve" 1264:WikiProject Religious texts 1258:WikiProject Religious texts 1183:Naming conventions (clergy) 766:21:43, 9 January 2013 (UTC) 752:20:43, 9 January 2013 (UTC) 719:20:22, 9 January 2013 (UTC) 680:16:23, 9 January 2013 (UTC) 648:13:31, 9 January 2013 (UTC) 256:19:11, 9 January 2013 (UTC) 213:07:36, 7 January 2013 (UTC) 154:07:39, 7 January 2013 (UTC) 136:07:37, 7 January 2013 (UTC) 10: 4912: 4833:is too limited, I feel. -- 4619:that discussion over there 4617:here to go take a look at 4191:Strange article needs eyes 4141:Category:Protector deities 3727:on behalf of the TAFI team 3650:Religion reference sources 3645:15:19, 8 August 2013 (UTC) 2798:18:57, 30 March 2013 (UTC) 2779:06:28, 22 March 2013 (UTC) 2730:00:42, 22 March 2013 (UTC) 2707:00:33, 22 March 2013 (UTC) 2682:23:25, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 2659:22:54, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 2641:21:02, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 2607:02:25, 27 March 2013 (UTC) 2587:19:29, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 2568:19:01, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 2546:18:44, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 2528:18:04, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 2506:17:54, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 2487:14:13, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 2447:13:35, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 2427:11:27, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 2403:08:58, 10 April 2013 (UTC) 2339:22:20, 27 March 2013 (UTC) 2253:20:19, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 2170:Larger religions are more 2158:22:14, 28 March 2013 (UTC) 2140:19:40, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 2116:18:23, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 2096:17:35, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 2069:17:27, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 2044:16:58, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 2025:16:30, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 2013:per Zad. Oppose 2 and 5. 2006:16:28, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 1974:16:19, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 1929:15:59, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 1880:15:44, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 1828:16:14, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 1793:19:39, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 1751:15:59, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 1732:15:07, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 1695:15:05, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 1672:13:34, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 1650:02:22, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 1630:01:37, 21 March 2013 (UTC) 1594:20:40, 20 March 2013 (UTC) 1420:20:27, 22 April 2013 (UTC) 1405:03:05, 21 April 2013 (UTC) 1360:17:57, 24 March 2013 (UTC) 1345:14:07, 24 March 2013 (UTC) 1227:03:17, 23 March 2013 (UTC) 1204:11:21, 22 March 2013 (UTC) 1178:22:33, 14 March 2013 (UTC) 1149:17:09, 10 March 2013 (UTC) 1107:was deleted in 2008 after 1105:Category:Dharmic religions 1049:Talk:Wicca#GA Reassessment 907:Genesis creation narrative 449:There is an article about 4333:Talk:Criticism_of_Jainism 4174:Category:Tutelary deities 4156:Category:Tutelary deities 4145:Category:Tutelary deities 3712:to appear on Knowledge's 3661:Encyclopedia of Religion. 3654:I have started a page at 3614:10:44, 27 July 2013 (UTC) 3587:00:57, 25 July 2013 (UTC) 3583:See terms and conditions. 3542:18:32, 21 July 2013 (UTC) 3508:15:46, 21 July 2013 (UTC) 3478:08:49, 18 July 2013 (UTC) 3448:11:37, 17 July 2013 (UTC) 3430:09:24, 17 July 2013 (UTC) 3405:16:02, 13 July 2013 (UTC) 3350:01:37, 30 June 2013 (UTC) 3338:File:P religion world.png 3333:File:P religion world.png 3328:16:56, 29 June 2013 (UTC) 3291:16:18, 27 June 2013 (UTC) 3253:15:20, 27 June 2013 (UTC) 3237:12:38, 27 June 2013 (UTC) 3220:19:43, 26 June 2013 (UTC) 3193:19:40, 26 June 2013 (UTC) 3177:19:14, 26 June 2013 (UTC) 3153:17:12, 11 June 2013 (UTC) 3134:16:43, 11 June 2013 (UTC) 3108:For the godesses compare 3103:00:58, 11 June 2013 (UTC) 2826:16:43, 1 April 2013 (UTC) 2385:12:21, 4 April 2013 (UTC) 1382:14:16, 4 April 2013 (UTC) 1276:20:17, 1 April 2013 (UTC) 1268:Emmette Hernandez Coleman 1082:15:22, 2 March 2013 (UTC) 806:Encyclopedia of Religion, 638:-rated articles? Thanks. 578:Shinto in popular culture 572:Shinto in popular culture 445:Violence against religion 326:phenomenology of religion 298:phenomenology of religion 4877:Invitation to User Study 4468:or whether it should be 4018:I invite you to comment 3888:ownership of the article 3625:Erhard Seminars Training 3373:18:39, 8 July 2013 (UTC) 3068:13:52, 23 May 2013 (UTC) 3024:13:37, 19 May 2013 (UTC) 2993:04:17, 15 May 2013 (UTC) 2963:Countering point 2, per 2934:Native American religion 2849:Please do not modify it. 2373:Native American religion 1470:Please do not modify it. 1461:04:17, 15 May 2013 (UTC) 1438:21:45, 13 May 2013 (UTC) 1242:Flying Spaghetti Monster 1234:Flying Spaghetti Monster 1123:Category:Dharmic writers 1109:this deletion discussion 1097:this deletion discussion 779:Encyclopedia of Religion 739:Encyclopedia of Buddhism 707:Encyclopedia of Religion 655:Encyclopedia of Religion 310:William Brede Kristensen 187:or whether it should be 4608:classified as "freedom 4384:continue to do the same 4374:the lines removed were 4281:. A claim was added by 4152:Category:Protector gods 4137:Category:Protector gods 4053:aka The Red Pen of Doom 2387:(called by the RfC bot) 1572:talk more about Wicca.) 1111:. There is currently a 965:Hebrew Gospel (Aramaic) 943:Hebrew Gospel (Aramaic) 626:, and twice as many as 580:is under discussion at 524:Read the definition at 455:anti-religious violence 302:religious phenomenology 290:Religious phenomenology 4827:Devotional merchandise 4706: 4698: 4632:(no relation to Jimbo) 4599:(no relation to Jimbo) 4561:(no relation to Jimbo) 4542:— looking for comments 4319:The discussion at the 4122:(no relation to Jimbo) 3953:without sources, etc. 3847:On the discussion page 3789:is up for deletion at 3691: 3488:Project academy pages? 1680:if you're interested. 1567:Religions become more 1496:Unitarian Universalism 1130:Modern Dharmic writers 392: 331:religious evolutionism 318:Gerardus van der Leeuw 4831:devotional souvernirs 4704: 4696: 3872:neutral point of view 3690: 3361:Template:Universalism 3355:Template:Universalism 3049:Arbitration Committee 2980:stick solely to what 2868:This merely restates 2453:Joseph (son of Jacob) 2275:Religions of the Book 2217:Religions of the Book 2123:Agree with 1, 3 and 6 2032:Agree with 1, 3 and 6 1783:would be referring.-- 969:Proposal for Deletion 911:Genesis creation myth 885:are welcome as well. 526:religious persecution 481:Religious persecution 437:(From the TAFI team) 391: 42:of past discussions. 4510:Criticism of Sikhism 4506:Criticism of Jainism 4461:Criticism of Jainism 4445:Criticism of Jainism 4279:Criticism of Jainism 4259:Criticism of Jainism 4257:Dispute at the page 4232:Research into Ramtha 4135:We currently have a 3868:conflict of interest 3592:Slightly off project 3560:". This subguide of 2898:Religion and science 2435:WP:Assume Good Faith 2213:Disagreed, strongly. 347:Edward Burnett Tylor 4816:Devotional articles 4765:East Asian Buddhism 4723:religion in Vietnam 4714:Buddhism by country 4652:Buddhism by country 4614:freedom of religion 4570:You might also try 4508:article is at AfD. 3736:Missing topics page 3513:I started creating 3462:talk-page response 3378:WP Religion in the 2409:Threaded discussion 1887:Qualified agreement 1773:I believe that the 1245:for peer review at 1114:deletion discussion 180:Religious terrorism 164:Religious terrorism 4823:devotional objects 4707: 4699: 3708:. The article was 3692: 3629:Landmark Education 3029:Jerusalem lead RfC 2930:Longhouse Religion 2914:Longhouse Religion 2369:Longhouse Religion 2353:Longhouse Religion 2298:This goes back to 2194:This goes back to 2011:Agree with 3 and 4 1471: 1412:FutureTrillionaire 1397:FutureTrillionaire 1099:and redirected to 1095:was deleted after 451:religious violence 393: 366:Zolotoi kryzhovnik 351:Zolotoi kryzhovnik 4768:here on the left. 4719:religion in China 4685: 4650:Articles such as 4634: 4601: 4563: 4423:Nontrinitarianism 4394:twisted words to 4124: 4097:uninvolved admins 4072:reassessment page 4054: 3924: 3878:and the need for 3733: 3732: 3721:Theo's Little Bot 3696:Please note that 3528: 3277: 3110:Venus (mythology) 2998:Suggested merge … 2973:WP:LOCALCONSENSUS 2823: 2604: 2515:WP:LOCALCONSENSUS 2484: 2066: 1729: 1692: 1591: 1557: 1550: 1469: 1266:as a work group? 1087:"Dharmic writers" 1058: 691:Japanese Buddhism 495: 442: 441: 411:TAFI Holding Area 400:Church (building) 397:Please note that 306:Cornelis P. Tiele 276:Shawn in Montreal 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 4903: 4842: 4825:would be best ? 4806: 4759:In other cases, 4686: 4679: 4630: 4597: 4559: 4455: 4454: 4305: 4300:. ISPCK. p. 39. 4283:User:Bladesmulti 4120: 4055: 4052: 4030: 4025: 3936: 3933: 3927: 3925: 3922: 3896: 3880:reliable sources 3808:AfD notification 3683: 3682: 3575: 3572: 3540: 3537: 3531: 3529: 3526: 3446: 3444: 3312:Indian religions 3289: 3286: 3280: 3278: 3275: 3264:Hiroshi Motoyama 3185:Til Eulenspiegel 3063: 3062:Mr. Stradivarius 3046: 3014:. Kind regards, 2982:reliable sources 2824: 2817: 2777: 2775: 2705: 2703: 2605: 2598: 2485: 2478: 2424: 2419: 2251: 2249: 2067: 2060: 2022: 2017: 1994:reliable sources 1983:With respect to 1972: 1970: 1963: 1937:guideline 3 only 1906:or some form of 1862:as we do to the 1781: 1730: 1723: 1713: 1708: 1693: 1686: 1592: 1585: 1552: 1548: 1545:reliable sources 1358: 1356: 1331: 1313: 1175: 1170: 1137:Helena Blavatsky 1134: 1128: 1101:Indian religions 1093:Dharmic religion 1052: 1046: 1045: 1030: 1023: 1016: 843:Importance:High, 808:we assume it is 564: 559: 530:Til Eulenspiegel 516: 509: 496: 489: 471: 464: 384: 383: 292:needs major help 174: 173: 118: 113: 104:Existence of God 81: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 4911: 4910: 4906: 4905: 4904: 4902: 4901: 4900: 4879: 4855: 4844: 4840: 4819: 4808: 4804: 4783: 4674: 4648: 4544: 4529: 4501: 4499:Criticism of... 4456: 4452: 4449: 4426: 4400:except Hinduism 4262: 4216: 4193: 4133: 4131:Category merge? 4101:Jung Myung Seok 4093: 4090:Jung Myung Seok 4065: 4050: 4042: 4028: 4023: 4016: 3990: 3947: 3931: 3928: 3921: 3916: 3914: 3892: 3833: 3810: 3783: 3761: 3740:I have updated 3738: 3728: 3681: 3652: 3621: 3619:Proposed merger 3594: 3573: 3570: 3550: 3535: 3532: 3525: 3520: 3518: 3490: 3442: 3439: 3414: 3383: 3357: 3335: 3304: 3299:Peer Review of 3284: 3281: 3274: 3269: 3267: 3165: 3075: 3061: 3042: 3031: 3000: 2943:Yoruba religion 2858: 2853: 2852: 2812: 2773: 2770: 2701: 2698: 2593: 2473: 2422: 2417: 2411: 2247: 2244: 2145:Agree with 1-6. 2078:3 is basically 2055: 2020: 2015: 1966: 1959: 1957: 1891:Yoruba religion 1779: 1718: 1711: 1706: 1681: 1601: 1580: 1492:Church of Satan 1474: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1448: 1389: 1354: 1351: 1304: 1288: 1285: 1260: 1237: 1232:Peer Review of 1211: 1185: 1173: 1168: 1156: 1132: 1126: 1089: 1067: 1043: 1040: 1026: 1019: 1010: 1002: 939: 903: 604: 574: 562: 557: 550: 512: 505: 484: 467: 460: 447: 426:TheOriginalSoni 382: 304:(e.g. scholars 294: 272:Spiritual abuse 268:Religious abuse 264: 220: 175: 171: 168: 116: 111: 107: 77: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 4909: 4878: 4875: 4854: 4849: 4834: 4818: 4813: 4798: 4782: 4773: 4772: 4771: 4770: 4769: 4757: 4691: 4690: 4647: 4644: 4643: 4642: 4641: 4640: 4639: 4638: 4543: 4537: 4528: 4525: 4500: 4497: 4450: 4448: 4443:Nomination of 4441: 4425: 4420: 4419: 4418: 4417: 4416: 4415: 4414: 4364: 4363: 4307: 4306: 4261: 4255: 4215: 4212: 4192: 4189: 4132: 4129: 4092: 4087: 4064: 4061: 4041: 4036: 4015: 4009: 3989: 3983: 3946: 3941: 3917: 3910: 3909: 3832: 3829: 3809: 3806: 3782: 3779: 3760: 3757: 3737: 3734: 3731: 3730: 3718: 3717: 3695: 3680: 3677: 3651: 3648: 3620: 3617: 3593: 3590: 3549: 3546: 3545: 3544: 3521: 3489: 3486: 3485: 3484: 3483: 3482: 3481: 3480: 3470:86.161.251.139 3451: 3450: 3422:86.161.251.139 3418:Top importance 3413: 3408: 3382: 3376: 3356: 3353: 3334: 3331: 3303: 3297: 3296: 3295: 3294: 3293: 3270: 3225: 3224: 3223: 3222: 3196: 3195: 3164: 3159: 3158: 3157: 3156: 3155: 3137: 3136: 3074: 3071: 3039:Talk:Jerusalem 3030: 3027: 3004:Deconstruction 2999: 2996: 2977: 2976: 2969: 2961: 2954: 2938: 2937: 2866: 2865: 2857: 2854: 2846: 2843: 2842: 2841: 2840: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2801: 2800: 2782: 2781: 2762: 2747: 2741: 2733: 2732: 2710: 2709: 2691: 2685: 2684: 2662: 2661: 2644: 2643: 2618: 2617: 2616: 2615: 2614: 2613: 2612: 2611: 2610: 2609: 2551: 2550: 2549: 2548: 2509: 2508: 2492: 2491: 2490: 2489: 2430: 2429: 2410: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2388: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2315: 2309: 2303: 2293: 2287: 2263: 2262: 2256: 2255: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2228: 2210: 2199: 2189: 2183: 2161: 2160: 2142: 2119: 2118: 2099: 2098: 2072: 2071: 2047: 2046: 2028: 2027: 2008: 1977: 1976: 1932: 1931: 1883: 1882: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1702:Zoroastrianism 1699: 1698: 1697: 1653: 1652: 1633: 1632: 1600: 1597: 1574: 1573: 1565: 1562: 1559: 1541: 1537: 1532: 1531: 1475: 1466: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1447: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1388: 1385: 1363: 1362: 1284: 1279: 1259: 1256: 1239:I have listed 1236: 1230: 1210: 1207: 1184: 1181: 1155: 1152: 1088: 1085: 1066: 1063: 1039: 1036: 1013:Jim in Georgia 1001: 998: 938: 935: 902: 899: 898: 897: 882: 878: 877: 876: 875: 874: 873: 872: 871: 870: 856: 855: 854: 832: 821: 775: 685:articles like 624:Low-importance 616:Top-importance 603: 597: 573: 570: 549: 546: 545: 544: 543: 542: 541: 540: 446: 443: 440: 439: 436: 424: 422: 396: 381: 378: 377: 376: 293: 287: 263: 260: 259: 258: 219: 216: 169: 167: 162:Nomination of 160: 159: 158: 157: 156: 139: 138: 106: 101: 98: 97: 92: 87: 82: 75: 70: 65: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 4908: 4899: 4897: 4893: 4889: 4885: 4874: 4872: 4868: 4864: 4860: 4853: 4848: 4847: 4843: 4837: 4832: 4828: 4824: 4817: 4812: 4811: 4807: 4801: 4796: 4792: 4788: 4781: 4777: 4766: 4762: 4758: 4756: 4752: 4748: 4744: 4740: 4736: 4732: 4728: 4724: 4720: 4715: 4711: 4710: 4709: 4708: 4703: 4695: 4689: 4683: 4678: 4672: 4671: 4670: 4669: 4665: 4661: 4657: 4653: 4637: 4633: 4629: 4626: 4625: 4620: 4615: 4611: 4606: 4605: 4604: 4600: 4596: 4593: 4592: 4587: 4586: 4585: 4581: 4577: 4573: 4569: 4568: 4567: 4566: 4562: 4558: 4555: 4554: 4549: 4541: 4536: 4534: 4524: 4523: 4519: 4515: 4511: 4507: 4496: 4495: 4491: 4487: 4481: 4478: 4473: 4471: 4467: 4463: 4462: 4446: 4440: 4439: 4435: 4431: 4430:In ictu oculi 4424: 4413: 4409: 4405: 4401: 4397: 4393: 4389: 4385: 4383: 4377: 4373: 4370: 4369: 4368: 4367: 4366: 4365: 4362: 4358: 4354: 4349: 4348: 4347: 4346: 4342: 4338: 4334: 4330: 4329:third opinion 4326: 4325:User:Jethwarp 4322: 4317: 4315: 4313: 4311: 4304: 4299: 4294: 4293: 4292: 4290: 4287: 4284: 4280: 4275: 4274: 4272: 4268: 4260: 4254: 4253: 4249: 4245: 4241: 4235: 4233: 4229: 4224: 4221: 4211: 4210: 4206: 4202: 4198: 4188: 4187: 4183: 4179: 4175: 4170: 4169: 4165: 4161: 4157: 4153: 4148: 4146: 4142: 4138: 4128: 4127: 4123: 4119: 4116: 4115: 4110: 4106: 4102: 4098: 4091: 4086: 4085: 4081: 4077: 4073: 4069: 4060: 4059: 4056: 4047: 4040: 4035: 4034: 4031: 4026: 4024:Pass a Method 4021: 4013: 4008: 4007: 4003: 3999: 3995: 3988: 3982: 3981: 3977: 3973: 3969: 3965: 3964: 3960: 3956: 3952: 3945: 3940: 3939: 3934: 3926: 3920: 3908: 3905: 3904:Contributions 3901: 3897: 3895: 3889: 3885: 3884:third-parties 3881: 3877: 3873: 3869: 3864: 3863: 3862: 3861: 3857: 3853: 3848: 3844: 3840: 3838: 3828: 3827: 3823: 3819: 3815: 3805: 3804: 3800: 3796: 3792: 3788: 3778: 3777: 3774: 3770: 3766: 3756: 3755: 3751: 3747: 3743: 3729: 3726: 3722: 3719:Delivered by 3715: 3711: 3707: 3706: 3701: 3700: 3689: 3685: 3684: 3676: 3675: 3671: 3667: 3662: 3657: 3647: 3646: 3642: 3638: 3635:. Thank you. 3634: 3630: 3626: 3616: 3615: 3611: 3607: 3606:In ictu oculi 3603: 3599: 3589: 3588: 3585: 3584: 3580: 3576: 3567: 3563: 3559: 3555: 3543: 3538: 3530: 3524: 3516: 3512: 3511: 3510: 3509: 3505: 3501: 3496: 3479: 3475: 3471: 3467: 3464: 3461: 3457: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3453: 3452: 3449: 3445: 3437: 3434: 3433: 3432: 3431: 3427: 3423: 3419: 3412: 3407: 3406: 3402: 3398: 3394: 3393: 3388: 3381: 3375: 3374: 3370: 3366: 3362: 3352: 3351: 3347: 3343: 3339: 3330: 3329: 3325: 3321: 3317: 3313: 3309: 3302: 3292: 3287: 3279: 3273: 3265: 3261: 3256: 3255: 3254: 3250: 3246: 3241: 3240: 3239: 3238: 3234: 3230: 3221: 3217: 3213: 3208: 3204: 3200: 3199: 3198: 3197: 3194: 3190: 3186: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3174: 3170: 3163: 3154: 3150: 3146: 3141: 3140: 3139: 3138: 3135: 3131: 3127: 3123: 3119: 3115: 3111: 3107: 3106: 3105: 3104: 3100: 3096: 3091: 3087: 3083: 3079: 3070: 3069: 3066: 3065: 3064: 3056: 3055: 3050: 3045: 3040: 3036: 3026: 3025: 3021: 3017: 3013: 3009: 3005: 2995: 2994: 2991: 2988: 2983: 2974: 2971:Finally, per 2970: 2966: 2962: 2959: 2955: 2951: 2950: 2949: 2946: 2944: 2935: 2931: 2927: 2923: 2919: 2915: 2911: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2901: 2899: 2895: 2891: 2887: 2883: 2878: 2873: 2871: 2863: 2862: 2861: 2850: 2827: 2821: 2816: 2809: 2805: 2804: 2803: 2802: 2799: 2795: 2791: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2783: 2780: 2776: 2767: 2760: 2756: 2752: 2746: 2740: 2737: 2736: 2735: 2734: 2731: 2727: 2723: 2719: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2708: 2704: 2696: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2686: 2683: 2679: 2675: 2671: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2660: 2656: 2652: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2642: 2638: 2634: 2630: 2625: 2620: 2619: 2608: 2602: 2597: 2590: 2589: 2588: 2584: 2580: 2575: 2571: 2570: 2569: 2565: 2561: 2557: 2556: 2555: 2554: 2553: 2552: 2547: 2543: 2539: 2535: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2525: 2521: 2517: 2516: 2511: 2510: 2507: 2504: 2499: 2494: 2493: 2488: 2482: 2477: 2470: 2466: 2462: 2458: 2454: 2450: 2449: 2448: 2444: 2440: 2436: 2432: 2431: 2428: 2425: 2420: 2418:Pass a Method 2413: 2412: 2404: 2400: 2396: 2395:William Avery 2392: 2389: 2386: 2382: 2378: 2374: 2370: 2366: 2362: 2358: 2354: 2350: 2346: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2336: 2332: 2323: 2319: 2316: 2313: 2310: 2307: 2304: 2301: 2297: 2294: 2291: 2288: 2285: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2278: 2276: 2272: 2268: 2261: 2258: 2257: 2254: 2250: 2243: 2242: 2236: 2232: 2229: 2226: 2222: 2218: 2214: 2211: 2207: 2203: 2200: 2197: 2193: 2190: 2187: 2184: 2181: 2177: 2173: 2169: 2166: 2165: 2163: 2162: 2159: 2155: 2151: 2146: 2143: 2141: 2137: 2133: 2130: 2129: 2124: 2121: 2120: 2117: 2113: 2109: 2104: 2101: 2100: 2097: 2093: 2089: 2085: 2081: 2077: 2074: 2073: 2070: 2064: 2059: 2052: 2049: 2048: 2045: 2041: 2037: 2033: 2030: 2029: 2026: 2023: 2018: 2016:Pass a Method 2012: 2009: 2007: 2003: 1999: 1995: 1991: 1986: 1982: 1979: 1978: 1975: 1971: 1969: 1964: 1962: 1955: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1934: 1933: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1917: 1913: 1909: 1905: 1901: 1897: 1892: 1888: 1885: 1884: 1881: 1877: 1873: 1869: 1865: 1861: 1857: 1853: 1848: 1844: 1841: 1840: 1829: 1825: 1821: 1816: 1815: 1814: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1794: 1790: 1786: 1782: 1780:Pass a Method 1776: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1752: 1748: 1744: 1740: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1727: 1722: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1709: 1707:Pass a Method 1703: 1700: 1696: 1690: 1685: 1679: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1669: 1665: 1661: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1651: 1647: 1643: 1639: 1635: 1634: 1631: 1627: 1623: 1619: 1615: 1611: 1607: 1603: 1602: 1596: 1595: 1589: 1584: 1579: 1570: 1566: 1563: 1560: 1556: 1546: 1542: 1538: 1534: 1533: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1523: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1497: 1493: 1489: 1485: 1480: 1473: 1462: 1459: 1456: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1417: 1413: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1402: 1398: 1394: 1384: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1374:88.104.28.176 1370: 1368: 1361: 1357: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1312: 1308: 1303: 1299: 1295: 1291: 1283: 1278: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1265: 1255: 1252: 1250: 1249: 1244: 1243: 1235: 1229: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1206: 1205: 1201: 1197: 1196:65.92.180.137 1193: 1189: 1180: 1179: 1176: 1171: 1169:Pass a Method 1166:to wikinews. 1165: 1161: 1151: 1150: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1131: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1115: 1110: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1084: 1083: 1079: 1075: 1071: 1062: 1061: 1057: 1056: 1050: 1035: 1034: 1031: 1029: 1024: 1022: 1017: 1015: 1014: 1007: 997: 996: 992: 988: 983: 982: 978: 974: 970: 966: 961: 960: 956: 952: 948: 944: 934: 933: 929: 925: 922: 921: 916: 912: 908: 896: 892: 888: 883: 879: 869: 865: 861: 857: 852: 848: 844: 840: 837: 833: 830: 826: 822: 819: 815: 811: 807: 803: 802: 800: 796: 792: 788: 784: 780: 776: 773: 769: 768: 767: 763: 759: 755: 754: 753: 749: 745: 740: 735: 730: 726: 722: 721: 720: 716: 712: 708: 704: 700: 696: 692: 688: 683: 682: 681: 677: 673: 669: 664: 660: 656: 652: 651: 650: 649: 645: 641: 637: 633: 629: 625: 621: 617: 613: 609: 601: 596: 595: 591: 587: 586:65.92.180.137 583: 579: 569: 568: 565: 560: 558:Pass a Method 555: 539: 535: 531: 527: 523: 522: 521: 518: 517: 515: 510: 508: 501: 500: 499: 493: 488: 482: 479: 478: 477: 476: 473: 472: 470: 465: 463: 456: 452: 438: 435: 431: 427: 420: 416: 415:TAFI schedule 412: 408: 407: 402: 401: 390: 386: 385: 375: 371: 367: 363: 362: 361: 360: 356: 352: 348: 344: 340: 336: 332: 327: 323: 319: 315: 311: 307: 303: 299: 291: 286: 285: 281: 277: 273: 269: 257: 253: 249: 245: 241: 240: 239: 238: 234: 230: 226: 215: 214: 210: 206: 200: 197: 192: 190: 186: 182: 181: 165: 155: 151: 147: 143: 142: 141: 140: 137: 133: 129: 125: 124: 123: 122: 119: 114: 112:Pass a Method 105: 96: 93: 91: 88: 86: 83: 80: 76: 74: 71: 69: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 4880: 4856: 4820: 4791:Service Book 4787:Service book 4784: 4780:Service Book 4776:Service book 4649: 4631: 4623: 4609: 4598: 4590: 4560: 4552: 4545: 4530: 4502: 4482: 4474: 4459: 4457: 4447:for deletion 4427: 4399: 4379: 4375: 4318: 4308: 4301: 4297: 4276: 4264: 4263: 4236: 4225: 4217: 4197:Sanat Kumara 4194: 4171: 4149: 4134: 4121: 4113: 4094: 4066: 4043: 4017: 3991: 3987:Islamophobia 3966: 3948: 3918: 3911: 3893: 3845: 3841: 3834: 3818:AndyTheGrump 3811: 3784: 3762: 3739: 3703: 3697: 3693: 3660: 3653: 3622: 3595: 3582: 3578: 3551: 3522: 3491: 3435: 3415: 3411:Julius Evola 3390: 3386: 3384: 3379: 3365:Devin Murphy 3358: 3336: 3305: 3271: 3226: 3202: 3166: 3076: 3059: 3058: 3052: 3032: 3001: 2978: 2947: 2939: 2926:Christianity 2910:Christianity 2902: 2881: 2874: 2867: 2859: 2848: 2807: 2765: 2758: 2754: 2750: 2743: 2738: 2694: 2628: 2623: 2573: 2512: 2456: 2390: 2365:Christianity 2349:Christianity 2344: 2329: 2317: 2311: 2305: 2295: 2289: 2283: 2270: 2264: 2259: 2230: 2224: 2220: 2212: 2205: 2204:But I'd say 2201: 2191: 2185: 2167: 2144: 2127: 2122: 2103:Agree with 3 2102: 2075: 2050: 2031: 2010: 1989: 1985:guideline 2, 1984: 1980: 1967: 1960: 1940: 1936: 1915: 1886: 1851: 1842: 1738: 1659: 1577: 1575: 1524: 1476: 1467: 1390: 1371: 1366: 1364: 1334: 1286: 1261: 1253: 1246: 1240: 1238: 1213:Please see: 1212: 1186: 1157: 1112: 1090: 1068: 1053: 1041: 1027: 1020: 1012: 1011: 1003: 984: 962: 940: 919: 904: 850: 846: 842: 838: 835: 828: 824: 817: 813: 809: 805: 798: 794: 790: 786: 782: 778: 772:my talk page 738: 733: 724: 706: 702: 698: 694: 654: 635: 631: 627: 623: 619: 615: 605: 599: 575: 551: 513: 506: 503: 468: 461: 458: 448: 404: 398: 394: 343:James Frazer 322:Ninian Smart 295: 265: 248:Devin Murphy 229:Devin Murphy 221: 201: 193: 178: 176: 166:for deletion 108: 78: 43: 37: 4795:prayer book 4747:79.50.85.69 4660:79.6.90.105 4514:Itsmejudith 4353:Bladesmulti 4271:WP:RELIGION 4195:I see that 4147:suffices? 4076:Dana boomer 3972:DeistCosmos 3932:talk to me! 3795:Mark viking 3666:John Carter 3637:John Carter 3579:Correct it! 3536:talk to me! 3500:John Carter 3285:talk to me! 3245:First Light 3212:First Light 3118:Utnapishtim 3086:Utnapishtim 2790:DeistCosmos 2722:John Carter 2718:Two by Twos 2674:John Carter 2670:Two by Twos 2633:John Carter 2579:First Light 2560:History2007 2538:First Light 2520:History2007 2108:First Light 2084:John Carter 1990:Guideline 5 1941:guideline 6 1935:Agree with 1921:John Carter 1900:Mandaeanism 1743:John Carter 1622:DeistCosmos 1337:88.104.27.2 1290:Soka Gakkai 1282:Soka Gakkai 937:AfD or stub 887:John Carter 781:is assumed 744:John Carter 672:John Carter 314:Rudolf Otto 36:This is an 4841:reply here 4805:reply here 4735:around 30% 4396:Arya Samaj 4382:Arya Samaj 4201:Dougweller 3998:Dougweller 3955:Dougweller 3944:Misotheism 3342:65.94.79.6 3320:Rahul Jain 2695:manageable 2186:Disagreed. 1908:Gnosticism 1860:San Marino 1426:Talk:Jesus 987:Ignocrates 973:Ignocrates 951:Ignocrates 758:Boneyard90 711:Boneyard90 640:Boneyard90 423:Thank you, 339:Max Müller 95:Archive 12 90:Archive 11 85:Archive 10 4859:Shamanism 4852:Shamanism 4677:Adjwilley 4576:Elizium23 4321:talk page 4244:Calstarry 4178:The Anome 4160:The Anome 4068:Akhenaten 3951:Dystheism 3852:Calstarry 3773:• Astynax 3714:Main Page 3710:scheduled 3397:–Mabeenot 3260:Confucius 3229:Cap020570 3169:Cap020570 3122:Atrahasis 3114:Aphrodite 3090:Atrahasis 3035:Jerusalem 2958:WP:WEIGHT 2890:WP:WEIGHT 2877:WP:WEIGHT 2870:WP:WEIGHT 2856:Consensus 2815:Adjwilley 2759:stability 2596:Adjwilley 2503:• Astynax 2476:Adjwilley 2439:StevenJ81 2331:Whiteguru 2312:Disagreed 2300:WP:WEIGHT 2271:worldwide 2267:WP:WEIGHT 2196:WP:WEIGHT 2176:WP:WEIGHT 2080:WP:WEIGHT 2058:Adjwilley 1998:StevenJ81 1949:Afterlife 1945:WP:WEIGHT 1896:WP:WEIGHT 1820:StevenJ81 1721:Adjwilley 1684:Adjwilley 1664:StevenJ81 1618:Pantheism 1606:recentism 1583:Adjwilley 1520:Afterlife 1430:StevenJ81 1387:Jesus GAN 1119:POV forks 1074:BigJim707 860:StevenJ81 785:to be of 602:-Question 487:Adjwilley 483:perhaps? 419:Main Page 205:BigJim707 146:BigJim707 128:BigJim707 79:Archive 9 73:Archive 8 68:Archive 7 60:Archive 5 4888:Wkmaster 4743:Buddhism 4404:Jethwarp 4267:WP:INDIA 4228:Research 4095:Seeking 3894:TechBear 3746:Skysmith 3460:measured 3436:Changed. 3387:Signpost 3380:Signpost 3145:Cynwolfe 3095:ComfyKem 3044:mandated 2968:editors. 2894:Religion 2766:juvenile 2624:thousand 2534:WP:UNDUE 2498:WP:UNDUE 2465:Druidism 2461:Eckankar 2322:WP:SCOPE 2260:Comments 2235:WP:SCOPE 2180:Religion 2164:Varied: 2150:Student7 2036:Iselilja 1912:demiurge 1847:WP:UNDUE 1646:contribs 1614:Pandeism 1516:Marriage 1504:Religion 1488:Druidism 1219:Kitfoxxe 1021:Contribs 823:Between 783:a priori 612:WP:Death 608:WP:Japan 548:Feedback 4873:Uyvsdi 4470:deleted 3923:kriegls 3527:kriegls 3308:Jainism 3301:Jainism 3276:kriegls 3047:by the 2965:WP:BIAS 2922:balance 2745:group," 2469:Raelism 2433:Please 2361:balance 2318:Agreed. 2306:Agreed. 2296:Agreed. 2290:Agreed. 2284:Agreed. 2231:Agreed. 2202:Agreed. 2192:Agreed. 2172:notable 2168:Agreed. 1845:As per 1785:Ubikwit 1569:notable 1484:Raelism 1307:protect 1302:history 507:Volcano 462:Volcano 189:deleted 39:archive 4863:Uyvsdi 4105:WP:ANI 4051:TRPoD 3968:Omnism 3694:Hello, 3443:Sowlos 3082:Inanna 3078:Ishtar 3010:. See 2990:(tock) 2774:Sowlos 2755:Buddha 2702:Sowlos 2467:, and 2377:NickCT 2248:Sowlos 2225:booked 2132:Anselm 2086:here. 1904:Yazidi 1872:Jeppiz 1775:Mithra 1616:, and 1599:Survey 1555:source 1508:Church 1479:weight 1458:(tock) 1355:Sowlos 1311:delete 1055:Sowlos 924:Anselm 913:. See 734:really 395:Hello, 345:, and 4628:wales 4595:wales 4557:wales 4486:Rahul 4392:Rahul 4388:Aryas 4337:Rahul 4118:wales 4107:(see 3882:from 3699:Child 3627:into 3574:hotch 3558:PDABs 3266:). -- 2574:apply 2391:Agree 1868:China 1856:Nauru 1852:every 1660:e.g., 1610:Deism 1536:etc.) 1500:Wicca 1393:Jesus 1328:views 1320:watch 1316:links 1158:Move 1141:Yworo 1006:Demon 1000:Demon 847:High. 829:High, 687:Ippen 663:Jesus 225:entry 16:< 4892:talk 4867:talk 4829:and 4778:and 4751:talk 4737:and 4682:talk 4664:talk 4624:Rich 4610:from 4591:Rich 4580:talk 4553:Rich 4518:talk 4490:talk 4434:talk 4408:talk 4357:talk 4341:talk 4269:and 4248:talk 4240:here 4205:talk 4182:talk 4164:talk 4114:Rich 4109:here 4080:talk 4029:talk 4020:here 4002:talk 3992:See 3976:talk 3959:talk 3900:Talk 3856:talk 3822:talk 3812:See 3799:talk 3750:talk 3670:talk 3641:talk 3610:talk 3566:NCCL 3562:WP:D 3504:talk 3474:talk 3426:talk 3401:talk 3369:talk 3346:talk 3324:talk 3249:talk 3233:talk 3216:talk 3189:talk 3173:talk 3149:talk 3130:talk 3126:Huon 3112:and 3099:talk 3088:and 3080:and 3020:talk 3006:and 2987:Shii 2956:Per 2928:and 2820:talk 2808:just 2794:talk 2726:talk 2678:talk 2655:talk 2651:Huon 2637:talk 2629:rare 2601:talk 2583:talk 2564:talk 2542:talk 2524:talk 2513:Per 2481:talk 2443:talk 2423:talk 2399:talk 2381:talk 2367:and 2335:talk 2154:talk 2136:talk 2112:talk 2092:talk 2088:Huon 2063:talk 2040:talk 2021:talk 2002:talk 1925:talk 1916:huge 1876:talk 1858:and 1824:talk 1789:talk 1747:talk 1739:some 1726:talk 1712:talk 1689:talk 1678:here 1668:talk 1642:talk 1638:Lisa 1626:talk 1588:talk 1455:Shii 1434:talk 1416:talk 1401:talk 1391:The 1378:talk 1367:just 1341:talk 1324:logs 1298:talk 1294:edit 1272:talk 1223:talk 1200:talk 1174:talk 1162:and 1154:news 1145:talk 1078:talk 1051:. — 1028:Talk 991:talk 977:talk 963:The 955:talk 928:talk 891:talk 864:talk 851:Top, 839:Top. 827:and 818:Top, 814:High 799:Top. 795:High 762:talk 748:talk 715:talk 676:talk 644:talk 632:High 630:and 610:and 590:talk 563:talk 554:here 534:talk 492:talk 430:talk 380:TAFI 370:talk 355:talk 280:talk 270:and 252:talk 246:. -- 233:talk 227:. -- 209:talk 150:talk 132:talk 117:talk 4789:to 4739:53% 4731:22% 4727:35% 4654:or 4335:)? 4234:. 4154:to 4063:GAR 4014:rfc 4012:God 3723:at 3262:or 3002:of 2896:or 2882:all 2751:the 2536:). 2437:. 2221:how 1996:. 1961:Zad 1902:or 1866:or 1864:USA 1512:God 1428:. 1209:AfD 1194:-- 1065:AfD 909:to 836:not 825:Top 812:or 810:Top 793:or 791:Top 787:Top 725:all 703:Top 699:Mid 695:Top 636:Top 628:Mid 620:Top 600:Top 584:-- 514:guy 469:guy 4898:. 4894:) 4869:) 4753:) 4733:, 4729:, 4721:, 4666:) 4582:) 4520:) 4492:) 4484:-- 4472:. 4436:) 4410:) 4390:- 4359:) 4343:) 4316:. 4250:) 4242:. 4207:) 4184:) 4166:) 4082:) 4004:) 3996:. 3978:) 3961:) 3902:| 3898:| 3874:, 3858:) 3824:) 3816:. 3801:) 3752:) 3744:- 3672:) 3643:) 3612:) 3571:Tb 3506:) 3476:) 3468:. 3428:) 3403:) 3371:) 3348:) 3326:) 3251:) 3235:) 3218:) 3203:is 3191:/ 3175:) 3151:) 3132:) 3101:) 3022:) 2796:) 2728:) 2680:) 2657:) 2639:) 2585:) 2566:) 2544:) 2526:) 2463:, 2445:) 2401:) 2383:) 2337:) 2156:) 2138:) 2128:St 2125:. 2114:) 2094:) 2042:) 2004:) 1968:68 1927:) 1878:) 1826:) 1791:) 1749:) 1670:) 1648:) 1644:- 1628:) 1620:. 1612:, 1518:, 1514:, 1510:, 1506:, 1498:, 1494:, 1490:, 1486:, 1436:) 1418:) 1403:) 1380:) 1343:) 1332:. 1326:| 1322:| 1318:| 1314:| 1309:| 1305:| 1300:| 1296:| 1274:) 1225:) 1202:) 1147:) 1133:}} 1127:{{ 1121:, 1103:. 1080:) 1072:. 993:) 979:) 957:) 949:. 930:) 920:St 917:. 893:) 866:) 764:) 750:) 717:) 709:? 678:) 646:) 592:) 536:/ 432:) 372:) 357:) 341:, 337:, 320:, 316:, 312:, 308:, 282:) 254:) 235:) 211:) 191:. 152:) 134:) 64:← 4890:( 4865:( 4838:| 4802:| 4749:( 4684:) 4680:( 4675:~ 4662:( 4578:( 4516:( 4488:( 4432:( 4406:( 4355:( 4339:( 4273:. 4246:( 4203:( 4180:( 4162:( 4078:( 4000:( 3974:( 3957:( 3935:) 3929:( 3919:D 3854:( 3820:( 3797:( 3748:( 3668:( 3639:( 3608:( 3539:) 3533:( 3523:D 3502:( 3472:( 3440:— 3424:( 3399:( 3367:( 3344:( 3322:( 3288:) 3282:( 3272:D 3247:( 3231:( 3214:( 3187:/ 3171:( 3147:( 3128:( 3097:( 3018:( 3016:㓟 2936:. 2822:) 2818:( 2813:~ 2792:( 2771:— 2724:( 2699:— 2676:( 2653:( 2635:( 2603:) 2599:( 2594:~ 2581:( 2562:( 2540:( 2522:( 2483:) 2479:( 2474:~ 2441:( 2397:( 2379:( 2333:( 2324:. 2302:. 2245:— 2237:. 2198:. 2152:( 2134:( 2110:( 2090:( 2065:) 2061:( 2056:~ 2038:( 2000:( 1923:( 1874:( 1822:( 1787:( 1745:( 1728:) 1724:( 1719:~ 1691:) 1687:( 1682:~ 1666:( 1640:( 1624:( 1590:) 1586:( 1581:~ 1558:) 1432:( 1414:( 1399:( 1376:( 1352:— 1339:( 1330:) 1292:( 1270:( 1221:( 1217:- 1198:( 1143:( 1076:( 989:( 975:( 953:( 926:( 889:( 862:( 760:( 746:( 713:( 674:( 642:( 588:( 532:/ 494:) 490:( 485:~ 428:( 368:( 353:( 278:( 250:( 231:( 207:( 148:( 130:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

talk:WikiProject Religion/Archive 9 - Knowledge

Index