User talk:Slrubenstein/archive 1

805:

control over their own production-mix, some flexibility over wages, and allowed them to put a proportion of profit into their own funds. But these reforms suggested a move away from detailed central planning and control from above, prompting the planning ministries, whose numbers were proliferating rapidly, to fight back and protect their old powers. This was not a difficult task since the Brezhnev/Kosygin collective leadership lacked the strength to counter their influence (the ministries, after all, controlled supplies and rewarded performance) in order to implement the reforms. The ministries fought back by just issuing more detailed instructions that retarded the reforms, curtailing the freedom of action of the enterprises. Nor did these economic reforms, aimed at increasing productivity by pushing aside surplus labor, necessarily appeal to workers. The constituency that stood to gain the most from the reforms was the enterprise management, but they weren’t enthusiastic either since they weren’t convinced that these reforms might last. Finally, by 1968 there was the unfortunate example of Czechoslovakia, which put the breaks on the momentum for economic and political reform. In contrast, the military sector continued to be the success story.

452:, as well: "Christian" advocates only go so far as to quote scripture, and say that Jews be restored to Israel. They stop cold at claiming that Jews not accepting Christ be saved. Of course, Jews dont care. They're happy to have a land of thier own, ( rent--paid, the US has the check.) where they dont have to act like anyone but themselves, like they feel they have to do in "Christian America". That this all creates a further divide and injustice in the world (that leads to wake-up calls like September 11) is of no consequence to Jews, who are keeping their eye on the ball - Israel. Too bad, I say, that they never learn the sins of attachment to earthly things, as the state of Israel is now nothing more than an idol: 3. Thou shalt have no other gods before me. 4. Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: 506:

with large paragraphs of fabrication (Danny had made clear that SV did not research on his early versions of the Semitism article; he simply made it up.) This is really no surprise to me; the Internet is well-documented as the new home of anti-Semitism. A newsgroup I used to frequent was totally taken over by dozens of obsesssive anti-Semites, who literally forced all the Jews out. (The Jews who uses to frequent Soc.Culture.Jewish were forced to set up a moderated newsgroup to have a safe haven.) I just call a spade, a spade. There are literally thousands of decent contribuotrs to Knowledge that we all work with, and who are not anti-Semitic. I just see no need to treat these four specific people as academic equals to the thousands of actual decent people here! As such, I have just reversed a large number of egregious edits today by Martha. But you beat me to the revert of her anti-Semitic that "the Jews" are really all Khazars!

670:. She then deleted them, and I had to override her. She just won't let any fact get in her way; she seems to have a neo-pagan theological agenda, which pushes all monotheistic faiths into one basket. This furthers their us-versus-them polemic against monotheists. Its much easier to view us all as wrong if we are all viewed as the same. In the Talk pages, she has explicitly stated that she views all three of these religions as being basically the same, which is like saying that "Health food, junk food, and Oak trees are really all the same". Its only the same to someone who hasn't the slighest idea! Please don't get me wrong. Its not her faith that I have a problem with, and I certainly don't mind when a non-expert contributes to an article. I just mind when the person in question seems totally ignorant, and is forcefully pushing myths as facts without any regard for any sources or scholarship. 576:. The original version seemed very biased and anti-Jewish to me. It clearly implied that the statements of a few were the beliefs of most Israelis (and hence, Jews, of course). I entered these quotes (some of which I had read before) into Google, and found them on hundreds of anti-Semitic Islamist and Neo-Nazis sites. Most of these sites portrayed them the same way: If one Jew says it, all Jews must secretly believe this. These quotes seem to be most popular on "Exposing the Talmud! Exposing the Jews!" type sites. I have done my best to try and put this material into a more accurate context, and to show the efforts that people are making to fight prejudice. ~~ 776:

rather than under his "leadership" since he may or may not have taken any great role in some of the developments seen under his “tutelage”. Go through the section that on the nature of economic planning and you'd get a sense why. A Soviet party chief/ceremonial state president (like Brezhnev, Andropov, Chernenko, or Gorbachev” is a bit more like the “chairman of the board” than someone like Bush or Chirac (other strong heads of state). Also, it’s too simplistic to go through some of the conditions liked to the Bolshevik Revolution and list them together as “causes”. There is simply to much debate about the subject.

492:

Christianity? Very nice, but lets not slander an entire religion simply on the basis of an estimated 90 precent of its population. Christocentrism is no doubt, neologic, perhaps wordy. Your right there. My simple point is that only those who find that the ratio of faithful and unfaithful is equal among all "faiths" are bona fide NPOV, and perfectly rare. We can easily pick out stereotypes of exageration, while failing to notice those of moderation. In the IPF context - it was simple for you - you stake no claim on the minor or even major changes in the article. Your attachments are elsewhere.

433:! I feel like Jesus, when he went to the temple to find the money changers in it! You know what I mean. Its the same feeling no doubt he would get if he went paid a visit to the Senate today. So much for separating Church and State... this principle is so vital to the survival of this country, and yet we see now, a recent phenomenon of the Christian support for Israel, (sponsoring Jewish immigration!?) at the expense of Palestinian muslims. 809:

population of the hardships of the past twenty years. By Gorbachev, in contrast, a decade of stagnation, declining productivity, and systemic problems like the ones I chronicled in the article might have been insurmountable. Perhaps the problem with Kosygin/Brezhnev was not too much power concentrated in their hands, but not enough. Forces like the ministries and the military won out, pushing the Soviet Union in a less prudent direction.

437:

have paid a price in the stereotype of the unyielding, "unfaithful", living on the charity of Christians. Little does either realise that this relationship is more than just one way, and adding Muslims to the equasion, barring genocide of Muslims, must be more than two-way as well. Consider, for a moment, how many unreasonable Christians and Jews, think that killing muslims, perhaps millons, would be

136:

deleted, but I will make changes when I think something is wrong or dumb. This has been hapenning a lot lately with the Ezra Wax articles, and I fully support the changes and comments made by RK, Danny, and a few numbers. But I am not a sysop (nor do I want to be). I left a message on Ed's page, and if anyone thinks I can help by leaving a message on another sysop's page, tell me and I will do so.

116:

NPOV. He is now emarking on what I can only term vandalism by inserting a large number of deliberately non-NPOV entries based on his own person view of what Judaism should be. He needs to be banned, and immediately so. He simply is writing factually false material, errors, and non-NPOV polemics faster than we can correct them. We need to ask the moderators to ban his address.

459:

it as a surviving relic of an ancient tradition, of a time when man was beginning to escape his primitive, selfish natures. To say, "I have this faith, and in it stipulates that we are not to worship idols" - is countered in two ways; one, faith is not something that you possess, like material, or an identity. And two, despite what the faith says, it countered by what you

559:! Interesting new content... I think Eloquence made a good edit to the bit about the Grand Cross, since I'm not exactly sure that it was for management techniques, given the glowing treatment Hitler gives him for his ideology, and would need to see some evidence for that, but that wasn't your text anyway... but I am ranting again. 624:

relationship history, up to that point - Judaism being paternal to Chistianity, the sense of the child culture that the past is irrelevant, etc... "freaks of nature" etc. all under these generalized pseudo-scientific ideas of race, etc. The point is, is that Wagners music not be reduced to hate speech.

656:

SLR, you that Susan "hasn't been making many real substantive contributions to those pages either. It is possible that she is using these talk pages to educate herself. I do think you are raising a very valid point about not promoting our own views through the contents of articles, all I am saying is

409:

page, and once again RK finds it his duty to revert it. I have no respect at all for people like him. Im sorry to say, that these are not uncommon, and they exist among pig-heads everywhere, regardless of what their faith. I sense a natural tendency of you and Dan, generally, to take his side on this

372:

Sorry to be so slow, SLR. I guess my (far too long) post on the talk page explains things, but in brief, my feeling is that (a) the original article was vapid and slightly offensive, and (b) that the issues it raises (or more to the point, hints at) are really interesting but very difficult ones. I'm

115:

Slr and Danny: It is now clear that Ezra Wax is vandalizing Knowledge. He is totally out of control, writing pro-Ultra-Orthodox Jewish polemics and proselytization. We have attempted to work with him, but he continues to override the Knowledge project, and refuses all attempts to maintain any type of

796:

I wasn’t suggesting that Bush and Chirac have more or less power than Brezhnev did, but just stressing the fact that the systems are very different. One system is based on delegated powers, the other is sort of based on informal personal influence that some top cadre accumulated over some particular

767:

or something similar - i.e., leave the content more or less intact but make it clear that this is a discussion of a particular aspect of 19th century proto-science - quite interesting as a sociology of science/history of public opinion topic - or (c) just take out the hopelessy non-scientific stuff.

538:

Hi SLR. Yup, I don't think we are disagreeing about anything of substance here. I could probably put my entire view on race and intelligence in a couple of sentences. Neither concept is well-defined. A great deal of effort has been expended on researching the question, with a conspicuous lack of any

458:

Once again, trading of something holy; faith, for an attached value to a symbol. This is what I refer to when I called Judaism an unadvanced religion - as all religions are, when they do not stipulate the value of faith over the symbols. Judaism does, but the orthodox, literal interpretation renders

817:

by executive decree and unconstitutional actions like his disillusion of the duma in 1993. Kosygin, then the Soviet Premier, however, could not get the Byzantine labyrinth of the Soviet Administrative Command System to carry out the reforms that he attempted to institute. Stalin's successors simply

812:

When I was describing the role of the Soviet Party chief/state president, I should’ve given Putin and Yeltsin as examples just to avoid confusion. Yes, Yelstin was more powerful within Russia than Brezhnev. Since Yelstin was a strong executive with strong formal delegated powers, he could implement

530:

I learned a long time ago that arguments based on passion cannot be won with logic. It's two different lagguages, and it just leaves people speaking at each other, instead of to each other. Meanwhile, the only people who are convinced on either side are the people who tend to sympathize toward that

804:

I’m partial to the bureaucratic pluralist and interest groups approaches taken by Sovietologists in years past. To get a sense of where these model’s are coming from, I suggest that you take into consideration the aborted Kosygin Reforms of 1965, which called for giving industrial enterprises more

436:

Christians maintian a second motive as well, because of the culturally engrained mistrust of Jews. This comes from the scriptural metaphors about a famous Jew who spoke some truthful things - all to deaf ears. They even solicit the Romans to kill him. This is such a recurrent theme, and sadly Jews

276:

and seems very ambitious in a devious sort of way. I offered to stop revising that article permanently if he stops permanently. That would leave it to you, Ortolan88, and Tannin. Try to get him to agree to that. First though, we need to stop him from deleting Ortolan88's paragraph explaining what

119:

Slr and RK. I am going to go ot on a limb here and say that Ezra is so far off that he is not serious, nor do I even think he is a so-called Torah Jew. His work is reading more and more like a parody that I would do with certain friends when discussing the Orthodox community. It is not genuine. As

808:

In the article I pointed out that the ACS system had not yet exhausted its capacity for growth by the late 1960s since it was still sustaining higher rates of growth than the Western powers, so these reforms could have been implemented at just the right time to save the Soviet Union and spare the

505:

I see other way to say it: Quasar, Clutch, Martha and Stevertigo are anti-Semites who are clearly obsessed with Jews. Nothing factual means anything to them; all that they seem to love for is finding a way to stick it to the "the Jews". Stevertigo uses obscure quotes totally out of context, along

495:

Im sure you agree with me that its unfortunate that active Muslim representation here is low. And that humans, being what they are, each pov can be represented by the most polar, pig-headed people possible. These people are equal in value to me; as are their opinions, despite their resemblance to

616:

No, It really is an interesting theory - but youll have to admit that it would belong under a subheading of "interesting research" if you will. Im far more interested in the continuation of that - how does this theory apply to Rap or heavy metal music etc... Its funny, Ive been a musician all my

135:

Hey Everybody! I haven't gotten this many notes since high-school. And although it almost makes me feel popular, what can I say? I think everyone who knows me knows that I have never called for a person to be banned or an article to be blocked, and very seldom have called for an article to be

775:

I’m looking through some of your edits. While they make for better “readability”, this is often at the cost of over-simplifying the content and at the expense of more precise wording. For instance, it’s more precise to state that under Brezhnev’s “tutelage” certain growth rates were experienced

388:

terms, here. First of all, Im not a conventional Christian, at all... I'm one of those who believe most, perhaps 90 percent of Christians are completely ignorant of the meaning of their faith. The same goes for everyone, really, but I was more of a militant agnostic, before coming to terms with

159:

Hey, Slr! It's been quite a week. Like I said above, I thought he was parodying the style, though I was a bit taken aback about him doing it to offend me. I will be writing two new articles over the weekend: Mussar and Luzzato. It'll be interesting to see his response. If you want to discuss it

627:

If it were that his anti-Semitism were related at all to his music, it would be in inspiration - telling a story; about his own clan's grandeur, and the other clan's outlandishness, and the nuanced conflicts their very different, yet related cultures engage in; Some of it discourse, some of it

145:

use in a debate in which I am personally involved. The problem is that Ezra's writing is teetering on the bizarre--yingl, yidden, toireh, yeshiva bochrim drive a jalopy ... Reb Aharon Kotler founded Lakewood?Sorry, I know that world too well and I don't buy it. He is parodying that world, not

491:

The Muslim equasion is no doubt similar - according to NPOV. People are people after all. Any deviation of this, say... Christians who think there are more unfaithful Jews than there are unfaithful Christians... are obviously, ethnocentric. But ethnocentrism doesnt do it. Lets be specific -

623:

Well, all I'd have to say at this point before researching that is that its not useful to focus on the "anti-Semitsm" aspect. what I mean, is that its a relationship between what he saw as German Christendom and the prominent xenoculture. Within this relationships are the specifics of the

531:

side anyways. Maybe I'm pessimistic tonight, but I don't think that a consensus can be reached, at least not tonight, in the heat of the passion. Let it ride for a few days. (as for Khazars, it was a horrible misrepresentation of Koestler's arguments, but that ain't no surprise, is it?)

184:

Also, you are needlessly antagonizing Lir with your cold-hearted and insulting remarks. Think of her as your best friend's daughter. If you spoke to your best friend's daughter like that, would he smile at you -- or tell you never to visit his house again? I am considering locking the

428:

I am not alone at all in saying that there exists a bias, - a pro-Jew bias, and that this is excused to a large degree by other Jews for natural reasons. This is Judeocentrism. As for tokers claim that there be no such articles that single out specific groups? - B*!!$ #!^! - look at

120:

for you Ezra, I don't know what your kavanos are and I'm not going to pasken that it's a chillul hashem mamesh, but writing narishkeit like that really is pass nisht. I refuse to be misya'esh (a major Yinglish construction you totally ignore) and will keep on editing your stuff out.

40:

Thanks! In general, I have a big problem with all the Bible articles, especially those taken from old, agenda-ridden encyclopedias. If you think it does what you say though, I guess it should stay. My big worry is that it is both too detailed and not sufficiently detailed. Oh, well.

289:

tracked Lir and Vera Cruz to the same IP address (or some similar indicator). Also, there are several items on VC list of things worked on that do not have VC in the history but do have Lir. I hate these feuds and all that. It's hard enough dealing with people who are sincere.

732:, and, although its all right to show the true colors in a talk page, it still makes me wonder if he would be able to write an article about Iraq without taking sides. I myself tried not to, but only report on a group of people the American government accuses of doing so or that. 333:

Thanks. It's funny, but I had a long tedious argument about "new" with 172 before he became an advocate for my paragraph, and in fact elevated it to the top of the article. I do try as best I can to be patient and polite, and sometimes it works (for me, or for the other guy).

617:

life, and have never bothered to deal with musicology as a kind of mass-psychology - perhaps because Ive seen some smelly theorizing about it, that makes some leaps and assumptions... Im not too interested either, and that might make me useful here as a moderator. :) B'well. -

768:(Fast runners & slow runners - ha! Seen a list of Olympic champions lately? All races are well-represented.) I took the quick and easy method, just deleted the silly stuff. Something could be done with it, but my main current focus is birds. Maybe some other week. 539:

result that is not fraught with methodolical error. It might be possible to comb through the research looking for studies that have the "best methodology" - but rather pointless, as so far as I know, no-one has yet managed to define "intelligence" in a way that is

743:

writer's staff, was controversial. This one has, in only hours, overpassed that one in controversy....by far..LOL! I dont like some of the comments said about the page, but what the heck you gotta find things in life funny and take it all in good stride.

324:

Thanks for the kind note. You are right, of course. I got carried away in the heat of the moment. I will try to rise above it, perhaps by staying away from any of the Jewish history pages for a while. Now, what's this about you not thinking your wise?

821:

Perhaps what I just described to you should be in the article. Rather than squabbling over whether or not “tutelage” is a common enough word to belong in the article, maybe the above content could give readers a better sense of Soviet politics.

665:

article and its Talk page. My complaint was about her Knowledge contributions that she wrote in the Idolatry entry; I deleted her misinformed comments, and replaced them with content from the fine article that we already have on the

522:

Hi, Slr. I just walked in and see you've been having a fun weekend. I'm staying out of it this time, at least for a while. The unresearched soundbytes and fanciful claims are too upsetting. I'm not going to lose my cool over this.

479:

We know by our experienced knowlege of human nature that man is a hypocrite. Thus, for people who say: "I am not a hypocrite," is supicious - despite their insistence, they still are. Perhaps moreso, because of their denials.

228:

Looks like the copyright thing's not really an issue after all; I half-wondered at the time if I wasn't jumping the gun. Not sure about the redundancy between articles; anthropology's not really anything I know a lot about.

628:

violence. Some is is warm, and the other is cold and disengaging... In other words, the 'body that writes that part of the article ought know damn well what theyre talking about - they'd have to be channeling Richard Wagner

26:

Slrubenstein, thanks for the feedback regarding my changes to Evolution. The changes were big and I thought that they'd either be loved or hated. I guess that since they have survived this long, no-one seriously objected!

696:

a "nod" to Irving Berlin. When you posted the verse about "No Trespassing", which I remembered having seen before, I realized that TYIYL was much more of a protest song than a hymn of national praise. In short, good catch.

800:

Here’s a story that will illustrate why Brezhnev and his successors were conciliatory chairmen of the board, and not dictators in the mold of Stalin or executives with strong delegated powers like Yeltsin or Putin.

410:

issue. Yes, you chastise him for cockadooing and chuckling all the time, but its like the child who keeps acting up, while his mother simply says "Now, thats a nono." The rod is spared, and the child never learns.

68:, not to mention general criticism of Western Civilization and its values. Maybe we can show some of the mental connections people make between Columbus and various issues which have their own articles. -- 484:

My contention is this; how many Jews might you estimate to be of this type- the unfaithful, "Orthodox" Jews... unfaithful, because theyve stopped asking God to provide, and let America take God's place.

262: 413:

I understand preferentiality. In fact you were keen to point out to me, on the IPF article, that I may be swayed by my own biases as someone who's ancestors hadd to come over here on a boat, (

573: 709:, I'm sorry, I had a browser timeout and did not intentionally revert your changes. I have reverted to your previous version and will hold off further edits for the time being, okay? -- 476:

which was Jesus's way of answering the pork question, quite eloquently. He takes a meager, insignificant rule and turns it into something far more meaningful - to humans, anyway...

75:

That's fine. I was just pointing out that since there is more than one proponent of method acting, it's not especially fair to list just one of them as "owning" it. :-)

764: 547:

was a matter of seeing a series of fairly gross errors of fact and correcting them sentence by sentence - weeding the trees, so to speak, without looking at the forest.

488:

It may be similar to my estimate of faithless Christians - The ones who have abandoned God, for America as well, espousing America's greatness, at the cost of faith.

855:

are where people discuss how to make content on Knowledge the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "

863: 588:

shows no attempt being made to define it there. To ask a specific question, is it, in your view, correct to say that the majority scientific opinion captured in

643:-- that's why I put my bit it, to inspire someone to explain what a second-cousin is. The stuff about how it works in other cultures is interesting, thanks. 831:

SR, thanks for the sentiment, though our Easter or Pascha isn't until April 27 this year. Just one more week of this fast. :-) If the dates listed at

235:---Unless you have some reason to think my version is so bad-why not edit that instead of bothering with 172? You can edit mine-thats fine. vera cruz 365:

Wow! Where did this come from. My read is that it stems from an overuse (and misuse) of the term anti-Semitism here. Still, this is outta hand.

205:

I agree. Not worth getting into a spam war over it. Lets keep an eye on anti-defamation league as well. He commented there too. Happy Hanukkah

818:

did not enjoy his apparatus of state terror to get things done, made possible by Stalin subverting the party's power with the secret police.

580:

Hello SLR, If you feel like a change from talk on Israel/Palestine, I would value your thoughts on the coverage in Knowledge of the word

178:

disputed text to the talk page before deleting it. This also will set a good example for her (and others) who need help learning NPOV. --

160:

directly, if you have suggestions, or if you think I will only be adding fuel to the fire, you can email me at my new temporary address

441:? I might ask you, on the side, considering the deep wounds of the holocaust, how many Jews might think that Arabs and Christians " 127: 106: 763:

was ... er ... like you said. There seemed to be three possible things to do: (a) just delete it - I was tempted - (b) move it to

258:

article, since those roles have continued post the feminist revolution (there are still tomboys etc) shouldn't that be mentioned?

161: 852: 265:

just sort of throws you into the article without any preparation. It really needs some background explanation. --

584:. A search shows that it is widely used in articles relating to particular animals, but a search on the article 373:

going to take a break with some lighter stuff for a time, but will be interested to see what comes of it. Best -

856: 297:

Hey, Slr. If you get a chance, please take a look at timeline of Jewish history--incl. Talk pages, etc.

870: 760: 199:

Hey, Slr. I just noticed a bunch of comments by 203.79. etc. Not very friendly, if you ask me.

17: 592:, that human races have no objective existence, is equivalent to a statement that the species 835:

are right, east and west will coincide next year though on April 11. I'll take a look at the

604:

Thanks for the feedback. I have placed the above, your response, and my further thoughts on

544: 474:

your mouth that makes you unclean, rather, its what comes out of it, that makes you unclean.

786: 728:

Dear Sil: Good point. As I said, my only problem is with Hussein who deemed the article as

406: 244: 221: 49: 8: 721: 76: 753: 430: 28: 609: 597: 353: 314: 286: 667: 399:"Its easier to see the straw in another's eye and fail to see the log in your own." 790: 633: 618: 567: 517: 497: 360: 346: 273: 240: 230: 217: 543:

measurable and free from cultural baggage. My brief and ill-advided sortie into

141:

Hey, Slr! I am a sysop, but it is a tool that I really hesitate to use and will

717: 496:

community ones, and Im sure you know what I mean by all that. Take your time. -

335: 291: 248: 154: 736: 689: 415:

and become destitute, depressed, drunkard, abusive, and miserable bastards...

661:

That's only what it looks like on the surface, but check the history of the

710: 698: 644: 605: 593: 359:

I just got your message. Im sorry, I dont have time right now to respond. -

255: 194: 179: 69: 649:--- If you thought Christo-Islamic-Judaic was off, wait till you see the 840: 769: 706: 566:

Hi, I left a rather long-winded reply toward the bottom of my talk page.

548: 374: 309:

page. I'll wait till it seems like the elephants have all gone past (see

130:.... I just can't see how certain other people can't see this... -- Mon. 65: 320:

Actually, I've got paying work to do now, but I'll get to it :-) -- Marj

848:

Start a discussion about improving the User:Slrubenstein/archive 1 page

681: 560: 556: 532: 524: 385: 366: 326: 298: 206: 200: 164: 147: 121: 110: 42: 740: 186: 171: 82: 836: 825: 779: 662: 650: 572:

When you get some free time (Ha!) you might want to take a look at

280: 266: 102: 53: 35: 48:

As I think I said somewhere (here or elsewhere) recently, I think

671: 585: 507: 422: 213: 98: 94: 86: 61: 832: 640: 310: 126:

I agree that Ezra Wax is a vandal. Look at the edit history of

90: 57: 52:

has become a proxy for one or more of the following issues:

589: 306: 632:... otherwise it's just material for a historical novel. - 748: 797:

institutions and compromise between committee members.

193:

edits -- if you don't start treating Lir like a lady. --

345:. Not that it was of much value but that's not nice. -- 692:. I was wrong to rely on a single source which called 657:

that in this instance Susan is not the main culprit."

109:, is in store for us too. I am really at a loss here. 813:radical (and unpopular) economic reforms under his 448:This unholy alliance, for Jews, is a deal with the 680:hi. I'm afraid I know nothing about the topic of 754:Antonio Wild Boys Never Chose this way!! Martin 381:I appreciate your response. I'll not be brief: 81:Hey, Slr. Please take a look at the following: 341:You deleted my comment in the talk page of 502:(my responses are on Sv's user:talk page) 421:it would be for Israelis, if Palestinian 128:Relationship between segments of Judaism 739:, done about 3 days after I joined the 14: 263:Sinitic Western comparative philosophy 105:, etc. Also note that a new article, 720:need more words, flows; it-does.not 574:Israelis and anti-Palestinian racism 23: 343:The crusade of the Catholic....etc 24: 879: 254:With regard to yourk work on the 630:like The Psychic Friends Network 239:Pleasant travelling with you in 174:, please do Lir the courtesy of 653:piece and accompanying talk. ] 405:I recenly made a change to the 384:Im wondering if we can talk in 313:) before cleaning up again. -- 305:Hi, thanks for the note on the 189:page, or simply reverting all 13: 1: 352:It was an accident -- sorry! 751:bless you. Sincerely yours, 7: 857:User:Slrubenstein/archive 1 555:Hey SLR... nice changes on 10: 884: 765:19th Century views on race 759:I see what you mean, SLR. 425:sank into alcoholism... ) 843:13:15 Apr 21, 2003 (UTC) 724:21:58 Mar 28, 2003 (UTC) 713:21:49 Mar 20, 2003 (UTC) 701:20:21 Mar 20, 2003 (UTC) 600:13:10 Feb 18, 2003 (UTC) 329:23:19 Jan 20, 2003 (UTC) 301:17:07 Jan 20, 2003 (UTC) 612:18:57 Feb 19, 2003 (UTC) 551:02:30 Feb 9, 2003 (UTC) 535:00:54 Feb 9, 2003 (UTC) 527:00:39 Feb 9, 2003 (UTC) 377:15:23 Feb 7, 2003 (UTC) 369:00:05 Feb 6, 2003 (UTC) 224:10:56 Dec 6, 2002 (UTC) 761:Racial characteristics 694:This Land is Your Land 688:Thanks for correcting 596:has no subspecies? -- 470:It's not what you put 153:Thanks, and no prob. 18:User talk:Slrubenstein 735:I thought my page on 545:race and intelligence 277:New Imperialism is. 272:Vera Cruz is back on 216:be sure to check out 785:Sure thing; more in 747:Well, thank you and 514:team-sport mentality 407:Middle East conflict 245:Talk:New Imperialism 50:Christopher Columbus 730:American propaganda 722:user_talk:hfastedge 865:Start a discussion 445:" a similar fate. 431:Arab Anti-Semitism 516:reigns! Woohoo! - 393:and their value. 212:Hey, if you like 875: 868: 866: 684:. Sorry. Arthur 668:Ten Commandments 883: 882: 878: 877: 876: 874: 873: 872: 871: 869: 864: 862: 861: 274:New Imperialism 241:New Imperialism 222:Dante Alighieri 218:Talk:Common Era 146:describing it. 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 881: 850: 849: 846: 845: 829: 794: 783: 773: 726: 718:chess problems 715: 703: 686: 675: 674: 639:Great work at 637: 614: 613: 578: 564: 553: 483: 468:Paraphrasing: 466: 465: 464: 463: 403: 402: 401: 400: 379: 357: 356: 339: 331: 322: 321: 303: 295: 284: 270: 260: 252: 237: 226: 210: 168: 151: 139: 138: 73: 46: 32: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 880: 867: 860: 858: 854: 847: 844: 842: 838: 834: 828: 827: 823: 819: 816: 810: 806: 802: 798: 793: 792: 788: 782: 781: 777: 772: 771: 766: 762: 757: 756: 755: 750: 745: 742: 738: 737:Carlos Monzon 733: 731: 725: 723: 719: 714: 712: 708: 702: 700: 695: 691: 690:Woody Guthrie 685: 683: 678: 673: 669: 664: 660: 659: 658: 654: 652: 647: 646: 642: 636: 635: 631: 625: 621: 620: 611: 607: 603: 602: 601: 599: 595: 591: 587: 583: 577: 575: 570: 569: 563: 562: 558: 552: 550: 546: 542: 536: 534: 528: 526: 520: 519: 515: 510: 509: 503: 500: 499: 493: 489: 486: 481: 477: 475: 473: 462: 457: 456: 455: 454: 453: 451: 446: 444: 440: 434: 432: 426: 424: 420: 416: 411: 408: 398: 397: 396: 395: 394: 392: 387: 382: 378: 376: 370: 368: 363: 362: 355: 351: 350: 349: 348: 344: 338: 337: 330: 328: 319: 318: 317: 316: 312: 308: 302: 300: 294: 293: 288: 283: 282: 278: 275: 269: 268: 264: 259: 257: 251: 250: 246: 242: 236: 233: 232: 225: 223: 219: 215: 209: 208: 203: 202: 197: 196: 192: 188: 182: 181: 177: 173: 167: 166: 162: 157: 156: 150: 149: 144: 137: 133: 132: 131: 129: 124: 123: 117: 113: 112: 108: 104: 100: 96: 92: 88: 84: 79: 78: 72: 71: 67: 63: 59: 55: 51: 45: 44: 38: 37: 31: 30: 19: 851: 830: 824: 820: 814: 811: 807: 803: 799: 795: 784: 778: 774: 758: 752: 746: 734: 729: 727: 716: 704: 693: 687: 679: 676: 655: 648: 638: 629: 626: 622: 615: 610:Alan Peakall 606:Talk:species 598:Alan Peakall 594:homo sapiens 581: 579: 571: 565: 554: 540: 537: 529: 521: 513: 511: 504: 501: 494: 490: 487: 482: 478: 471: 469: 467: 460: 449: 447: 442: 438: 435: 427: 418: 414: 412: 404: 390: 383: 380: 371: 364: 358: 354:Slrubenstein 342: 340: 332: 323: 304: 296: 287:Brion Vibber 285: 279: 271: 261: 256:Gender roles 253: 238: 234: 227: 211: 204: 198: 190: 183: 175: 169: 158: 152: 142: 140: 134: 125: 118: 114: 80: 74: 47: 39: 34:Thanks! ;-) 33: 25: 707:hate speech 417:- How much 66:imperialism 853:Talk pages 815:leadership 791:Hephaestos 682:attachment 582:subspecies 568:Hephaestos 557:Henry Ford 439:reasonable 386:scriptural 231:Hephaestos 170:Regarding 839:article. 741:Knowledge 512:I.e: The 336:Ortolan88 292:Ortolan88 249:Ortolan88 220:!!! ;) -- 187:vampirism 172:vampirism 155:Ortolan88 83:Yeshivish 859:" page. 837:Abortion 711:Uncle Ed 699:Uncle Ed 663:idolatry 651:idolatry 389:religion 103:Yinglish 54:genocide 705:As for 645:Tuf-Kat 586:species 518:Stevert 498:Stevert 443:deserve 423:Muslims 361:Stevert 214:Talk:CE 195:Ed Poor 180:Ed Poor 176:copying 99:Rabbenu 95:Shabbos 87:Yeshiva 70:Ed Poor 62:slavery 841:Wesley 833:Easter 770:Tannin 641:family 549:Tannin 419:easier 375:Tannin 311:editor 107:Yidden 91:Kollel 58:racism 677:SLR, 634:'Vert 619:'Vert 608:. -- 561:Graft 533:Danny 525:Danny 450:golem 367:Danny 327:Danny 299:Danny 207:Danny 201:Danny 165:Danny 148:Danny 122:Danny 111:Danny 43:Danny 16:< 789:. - 787:talk 590:race 541:both 315:Marj 307:gene 243:and 191:your 77:--KQ 29:adam 826:172 780:172 749:God 461:do. 281:172 267:Zoe 247:. 143:not 36:JHK 697:-- 672:RK 508:RK 472:in 347:AN 163:. 101:, 97:, 93:, 89:, 85:, 64:, 60:, 56:, 391:s

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index