User talk:Ned Scott/archive2

1224:

to realize simple things? Look at your attitude towards official guidelines and WikiProjects. Of course they're not the final word, and no one is expected to live in "fear" of them. But rather than you looking at them and saying "hey, I bet there was a conversation behind that and I bet someone made a really good point that lead to that being a guideline." Rather, you ignore it all together, despite when other editors cite it as something helpful, directly to you. I forget where it says, but I believe there's another statement or guideline about guidelines themselves, and it says it's more important to follow them in spirit than word for word. You lack the collaborative spirit, you lack trust in your fellow Wikipedians. We take ideas from all of us and try to take the best parts and go forward. These things you think are my ideas, aren't my ideas. They're ideas I took from someone else, that they took from someone else, etc. It's been very hard to get you to think outside your editing style. I'm not telling you this to be rude, I'm telling this to you because I really want you to realize it. --

1381:. A is only popular enough to get a List of A episodes page, and no pages for each individual episodes. B is very popular, it has a List of B episodes page and a page for each individual episode. Everybody agrees that an individual episode page of the show B can use screenshots. Do some people contend that List of A episodes can't use screenshots? This would seem like a silly position to take, as List of A episodes is basically all of the individual episodes of A concatenated into one page. So if individual episode pages can use screenshots, why can't you use the screenshots if the individual episodes pages are all combined into one page? Further, if you can use screenshots on the List of A episodes page, how is that any different from using them on the List of B episodes page? Just because you can click a link on the List of B episodes page to bring you to more information, that changes what you can use on the list of episodes page? 1462:'s template over Cool Cat's template. This was pretty much reflected in discussion, but he didn't seem to go along with it unless it was "spelled out" in such a way. This debate has been going on for at least a week, and also covers other topics. Cool Cat continues to reject the input of others and even makes blatant statements that show he is opposed to considering Knowledge guidelines, consensus, and the input of his fellow editors. I reverted his edit then attempted to discuss it on the talk page, his response was that he was the only one editing the article and he should be the one who decides. This is not a simple content issue, but rather, an editor who is unwilling to work with others. Reverting him and directing him towards discussion doesn't help, yes, so I'm taking the matter to 1620:

GIVES READERS A UNDERSTANDING AT WHAT HE WOULD BE LIKE AND HIS DEMEANOR. IT ALSO IS APPLICABLE BECAUSE THE TRAITS ARE DIRECTLY FROM HIS APPEARANCES IN THE TV PROGRAM. I ALSO BELIEVE THAT JAPANESE ATTACKS AND NAMES SHOULD BE RESERVED FOR THE JAPANESE VERSION OF WIKIPEDIA, AS THE JAPANESE VERSION AND THE AMERICAN VERSION ARE NOT THE SAME. I AM SORRY IF MY CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE ARTICLE UPSETTED YOU, BUT I KNOW EVERYTHING ABOUT THESE DIGIMON AND THEY ARE ALSO MY FAVORITES. I WILL CONTINUE TO RESET THE ARTICLE UNTIL YOU REALIZE WHAT I PUT IN THEIR WASNT CRAP. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND PLEASE RESPOND WITH ANY FURTHER COMMENTS OR REPLIES.

997:

compromise and collaboration now, but is that only because you have been backed into a corner with no choice? I noticed on some of your archived talk pages that one editor reminded you to put fair use rational statements on images, and your response was something to the extent of "I don't have to do what anyone tells me to do". It was only until it was a requirement of the featured lists and it was brought up during the OMG candidacy that you complied, when you had no other choice. We will make some sort of peace with each other, surely, but not by sacrificing editing values. --

31: 64: 1134:

shown more patience than many other editors. However, based on the discussion above, I'd like to ask you (both of you, actually) to keep commenting on the edits, not so much on the editor. If you don't like his proposals, please tell him why and leave it at that. I hope you don't mind my 'intruding', I know from experience that an outsider's opinion can be either refreshing or frustrating, so please don't take this the wrong way. Kind regards, --

1250:, a WikiProject is a collection of pages (just a list of links) devoted to the management of a specific family of information within Knowledge. It is a resource to help coordinate and organize article writing. Nothing more, nothing less. Wikiprojects have no juristiction in any way nor are they in any way official. Wikiprojects do not set standards. 877:. I will continue that revert war as long as it takes. I will not be intimidated with you waging war against me on all air related articles, naruto episode list, fma episode list just because I made a damn suggestion at a list you worked at. Simply stunning, you have degraded me into a person revert waring. Congradulations. -- 418: 518:. There's no need to call out a specific individual: you could write something like "Reverters, please don't ignore the discussion here", for example. I think your point would be better made (and better listened to) if you could frame things more like that. Thanks for taking this into consideration. -- 1040:

posted a message on your talk page, I can't seem to find it right now, asking you to make a fair use rational argument, and you simply brushed it off, ignoring POLICY (as in, you don't get a choice, you have to do it). Why I don't trust you? You're rude, you ignore logical statements because you feel

1016:

Oh and btw, OMG achieved fac w/o the fair use rationales (see timestamp of the addition of the rationnale). I added that later on after someone bothered to expain me the reasonings behind fair-use rationales via IRC. I not only agreed with his reasonings, but became an advocate of the issue. I am not

1619:

HELLO THERE NED, I AM MATT DAVENPORT AND I AM THE ONE WHO ADDED INSIGHTFUL INFORMATION ABOUT ANGEMON ON THE SITE. I HAVE WATCHED AND DONE EXTENSIVE RESEARCH ON DIGIMON AND IN PARTICULAR THE ANGELS. THE INFORMATION I ADDED WAS USEFUL AS IT LISTED THE PERSONALITY AND THE BACKGROUND OF ANGEMON. IT ALSO

1253:

I do not ignore guidelines, I am just not obsessed about them. I edit in good faith developing a chain of articles. If a guideline or policy is making my life complicated, I forget about it until I have a working article. Then I consider weather or not applying the policy improves the articles value

1009:

View of many editors are met. That is why I comprimised by modifying my version of the template. I have taken into account their arguments especialy about "easy use". The template now is almost identical to the LOE template with a few minor differences. The point of a comprimise is to let go certain

1422:

discouraged on Knowledge, and he has some arguments to raise over your choice of page design. Instead of repeatedly reverting Cool Cat, please try to discuss with him why exactly you feel that the page design you choose is better. Cool Cat is interested in discussing the design with you, so a straw

1239:

I believe (without quoting a guideline or polcy) that it is imperative for wikipedia pages to be rendered correctly on all browsers. At the very least an effort should be made to make pages work on multiple browsers. My views on the necesity of thick borders have not changed. I pashionately support

1223:

Lets take the example of the Air nav templates. How many times did you revert me on that before taking it into consideration? Take the bold table lines, how long did it take for you to question that it might be a simple bug and not a requirement? Why is it that we must corner you in order for you

740:

I am sorry I forgot to complete the image licence information when uploading the images. I have followed the format from the images provided by the Planetes page as guidance. I will leave it to your expert hands to determine whether the image pages I have loaded are up to Knowledge standard or not.

1633:

YOU ARE REALLY JUMPING TO CONCLUSIONS, IF WANTED TO VANDALIZE THE ARTICLE I COULD HAVE ALL TOGETHER ERASED IT AND MADE YOU MORE FURIOUS, BUT I FIGURED SINCE THIS IS AN AREA OF EXPERTISE FOR ME, I'D CONTRIBUTE. AFTERALL, IT IS NOT YOUR ARTICLE, SO CONTRIBUTIONS ARE ALLOWED AND ACCEPTED. IF YOU CANT

1045:

issues, you undermine WikiProjects, you undermine common consensus, you try to use articles as a way to get fame for yourself, you try to make other editors not feel welcome, you take everything personally, the list can go on and on about why I don't trust you. Good faith? I have no faith in you,

1133:

Hi Ned, Cool Cat has asked me to look into this. I have tried to explain to him, among other things that the fact that his view differs from the consensus out of a poll does not mean that he has a 'right' to a consensus. And I understand how you have become frustrated with his actions, and you've

1345:

Am I correct in assuming that no one is contesting that screenshots be removed from the individual episode pages? Is there anyone arguing that screenshots should be removed from the list of episodes page for shows that do not have individual episode articles? If not, then it seems silly that the

666:

Wether or not the category stays it's it's own issue. I did not know of the CfD when I removed them, I removed them because I thought they shouldn't go on those articles. Such a category should go on an article of a character where being a flight attendant is a major identifying feature of that

1390:

Ah, I see. Yes, something similar to this has probably been brought up a few times, the basic response was a generic "no images on lists of episodes". I've asked a few times what the difference was between a list of episodes and a collection of episode stubs, also got no direct response. The

996:

Why would I compromise something that isn't just my view, but the view of many editors, and is backed by logic? I'm all for getting along with you, but I won't sacrifice these issues for the sake of appearing friendly. I don't have much reason to trust you, ether. Sure, you are speaking of

774:

Thanks for the example. However I feel that there should be a clear official endorsed format for listing licence information. Is that example from Kamisama an officially endorsed format? I notice a lot of existing images do not have a separate fair use section, just only a licensing section.

676:

It seems to me like it's a major feature of the characters from Infinite RYVIUS, as they're both described as being in the flight attendant program. I guess if you're going to keep removing them I can't stop you, but it seems like it's a major feature to me. (I agree with you on Catwoman,

332:

I have observed that with the new template in use, the table is so large that the horizontal scroll bar comes onto the window, and even though the full table is still displayed even without the use of moving the bar itself, it still is a minor inconvenience and it makes the page look less

1055:

But even ignoring all of that, your template and episode style is still losing in the straw poll, not because of your behavior, but because it's not what people want. I'm not trying to make you feel bad or "beat you", but I'm not going to hold back if you ask me why I don't trust you. --

1100:

I can undermine wikiprojects as they are a voluntery effort supposivley to better articles. They have no juristiction whatsoever. They can be summarised as a list of related articles and people who want to relate to these articles. And for common concensus, I see no evidence of

1360:

type articles. Some of these articles feature links to full episode articles, there are also some who combine both (rather bloated, though). But for the most part, it is about the Lists and not individual articles. Feel free to share your thoughts, both pro and con. --

844:

I don't. You should try and keep calm at all times, getting stressed and appearing as angry is not going to help your case, and will only make other users disrespect you. Remember that incivility can turn into personal attacks soon enough, which can warrant a block. —

1092:

If I were ignorant of logical statements I would not have bothered modifying my template. Last time I checked, during the course of my Air list edit war, the only logical argument you threw at my general direction is that LOE templates was the standard, which it is

1069:

When debates get heated we often say things in a manner which we breech civility. Some people have better control over their anger, I admire them. I apologise for any inaproporate comment I had made so far. Complaining for a featured list candidacy passing

1065:

I do regret my behaviour with the fair use rationales and I am not going to make excuses. If you are going to hold grudge against me because of a comment I directed at a third party (probably before even you registered your username), you are welcome to do

695:

Oh, I just assumed you removed that. She was in my initial grouping of fictional flight attendants (she was one before she turned to crime), but I thought better about it since it's such a trivial aspect of the character. But somebody removed it before I

1235:

Lets take example of air templates. You revert warred against me. Have you not? Have you attempted explaining yourself? Have you attempted a comprimise? I had to get a 3rd person to come up with a 3rd version in between. Have you taken my version into

977:

Since you have responded to a comment I make on the talk page of the List of air episodes I believe you have noticed this post. While you have the liberty to reply at your conviniance, please respond confirming you are considering the suggestion.

1265:

I think it was you not trusting me (for whatever the reason). I do however trust you. I know for certain you don't vandalise articles. Nor do I consider you to be a threat to wikipedia. I monitor every edit of people I do not "trust" such as

1399:. It's a lot of people repeating themselves and such.. They have said that individual articles for episodes are ok to use the images, but not Lists, and have cited policy as their backing. Which.. I think is a load of.. stuff.. -- 1104:

You see, I am trying to coexist here while you are the one with an attitude one might view hostile. Think it this way, you are the one accusing me. I do not expect you to trust me, but your arguments apply to yourself as

1240:

the think borders. While being slightly ugly, thick boreds work well on firefox. But I comprimised something I pashionately believe in to cool of the heat of the debate. Somebody has to pull his hand off the triger...

1346:

images meet criteria number 9 on the list of episodes page when there are not individual episode pages, but if there are individual episode pages then the images do not meet criteria 8 on the list of episodes page.

1273:

I colaborate just fine, assuming I am beeing talked to. I prefer to resolve disputes with diplomacy and discussion. I prefer to discuss matters with other editors rather than forcing it as a standard or via a straw

1508:

Even if the article follows a layout guideline, the amount of content it has is very low. Even though it has an infobox, a list of evolutions, and such, there's really only five sentences actually written about

1096:

You are accusing me of seeking fame, which rather ridiclous but anyways there are better ways to seek fame on wikipedia. Revert waring on a discrete anime episode list no one cares about is no way to gain

614:

I think it's fair to ask in the case of controversial nominations, for transparency and all that. It also helps to remember that promotions are not set in stone and can be removed at the heavily underused

924:

So far you have not comprimised at all. Now I request to be able to use whats left of my tables. The only difference currently is where kanji, romaji, and episode numbers appear. I prefer my syntax.

399:

According to my computer, the images only come out to be 72 dpi. Anything under 100 dpi is considered to be low res enough. Basically, if it's not good enough to use as a background image it's fine.--

1591:

Actually, I discovered that the problem was that with the really really short summaries and my really really large screen resolution, there was a nice sized blank space to the right of each picture.

207:

I am using for the Bob Saget page was taken with my own camera. Therefore we can use it. The reason it is everywhere is that a friend of mine used the image, and in turn it got passed arround.--

719:

This is a friendly warning. Please allow articles to grow. You objected their creation hours later I created them and we have discussed this and I thought it was settled. So what is the issue? --

1282: 1391:

anti-image group has also claimed that the episode descriptions are too short and also don't talk about the subject matter of the screenshot. The first part of the debate got archived to

1081:

polite? Also, revert wars are hardly polite and are a breech of policy. If I am violating policy (which I am) so are you. You say you cannot assume good faith, well that is a policy (See

576:

Also, I tend to mark promotions as minor edits (see my edit history). In any case, I always mention which lists are being promoted in the edit summary, so no conspiracy here. Regards, --

561:(which is what people were really claiming for) does break the table display on Firefox. In any case table looks are not as crucial as the content of the list when it comes to promotion. 816:

Hi. Just a quick message to remind you to try and stay civil at all times. I appreciate that anger and stress can run high during disputes, but please try and keep your cool. Thanks, —

490:

head. It's one thing for you to write to me, "What the hell is your problem?"; it's an entirely different and very inappropriate to write "bullshit" in an edit summary. Please review

1243:

Who is we? Who do you talk behalf of? Who is cornering me? What kind of an attitude is "cornerring"? I do not believe I have been cornered. I can just as easly continue the revert war.

1176:

The 98% isn't important. It was a minor adjustment so some browsers wouldn't show a horizontal scroll bar when rendering the Wikitable. It's not really apart of any guideline. --

750:

Actually I did put in the info, but the system automatically taged the no licence tag for all the uploaded images regardless. It needs to be removed manually by hand. Now I know.--

285:

Actually, I did provide links on the image's talk page, but during the time when the image was re-deleted by an admin. The talk page is actually still there if you wish to look.

761: 188:

You don't need a bot flag per say but if you're going to do multiple non contoversial edits in a short timeframe its a good thing as the RC feed gets a little clogged up :) --

1435: 1013:

I am making an effort to settle this in a civil and cooperative enviorment. Both sides made mistakes such as revert warring. In a cooperative enviorment, no one is cornered.

921:

Lets settle this with a comprimise. So far I have comprimised the thick borders (with delight might I add). I also converted the template to folow the "LOE" table markup.

1655:. Megchan released her original encyclopedia in the public domain afew years ago. Any data not from the original version is (C) the updater though, just to let you know. 1572:

Are you getting a strange error with the first season's picture column formatting? It's appearing on my computer as there's a little space to the right of each picture.

1482: 656:. You can make your vote known there, and if the category is deleted, then the anime characters won't have those categories any more. Otherwise, the tags should stay.-- 544:

Use of DVD covers instead of individual screenshots has been deemed as an acceptable and even less controversial solution in terms of Fair Use claims (see for instance

272:

provide links in talk pages to what you are talking about. To prove it, Alabama Man is easy: re-upload the image at the original resolution - at least 800px wide. --

1551: 1496: 286: 1521: 780: 1547: 1492: 1327: 1301: 1214: 1191: 1152: 1113: 1028: 983: 966: 950: 935: 882: 724: 204: 653: 784: 776: 751: 742: 1293:

It was very late when I was posting this. If something doesnt make any sense its probably because I am sleepy. :) I'll correct any such error later on.

1288:

If you want me to consider something, you should talk to me and tell me precisely what I should consder. I was unaware that I had an editing pattern...

1006:

In war there are only two ways to peace. Either through one sides surrender, or both sides comprimise. What you ask of me is unconditional surrender.

514:

Your latest summary says things like "Ed as well as others need to stop ignoring discussion". Please attempt to see that that constitutes a bit of a

441: 327: 1624: 1458:? Discussion was attempted many times, and other editors agreed that for a speedy resolution that a straw poll was necessary. And so it was, 8-2, 360: 700: 690: 681: 671: 306: 1470: 1324: 1298: 1211: 1188: 1149: 1110: 1025: 980: 963: 947: 932: 879: 803: 768: 721: 319: 241: 221: 635: 605: 276: 1060: 910: 250: 1403: 1385: 1365: 1331: 1305: 1228: 1218: 1204: 1195: 1117: 1050: 1032: 1001: 293: 1669: 1595: 1586: 1165: 987: 970: 954: 386: 373: 1576: 1156: 660: 461: 1604: 787: 754: 745: 532: 508: 1186:

Editing wikipedia is quite possible w/o a guideline or a straw poll. With little care, pages can look perfectly on multiple browsers. --

192: 1627: 796: 555:

Full description of each episode belongs to its own article, so it is reasonable to keep summaries in the list as concise as possible.

1565: 598: 1423:

poll is not necessary just yet. Try talking to him about the design first, then a straw poll if an absolute must. Have a nice day! —

1392: 945:

As a gesture of good faith I have removed thick borders on every page I used my syntax on with the exeption of locked air list. --

1543: 1488: 522: 498: 472:

Gee, thanks for your message. I'm not really sure how much I'll be able to do, but it certainly couldn't hurt to check it out. -

886: 839: 476: 448: 1614: 1531: 1448: 1180: 649: 569: 1555: 1500: 1485:? Maybe I think we should put (Digi-Expand) in this article but I think its not true to say that this article is a stub. 733: 643: 1350: 403: 728: 481: 444:

was pretty much dead. Thanks for your hard work into making this a reality! Here's a barnstar to show my appreciation.

262: 231: 211: 900: 1582:

Probably because the images are currently resizing to 125px and the column was set at 150px. Should be fixed now. --

1566: 1071: 939: 1639: 1141: 1074: 1659: 592: 1634:

MAKE A COMPROMISE I GUESS I WILL GO TO THE DIGIMON UPDATE PROJECT AND REPORT YOU AS BEING UNNEGOTIABLE. THANK YOU

1200:

Actually, no, you prove that wrong. Normally people accept progress, instead of hanging on to "their things". --

366: 182: 1078: 549: 164: 159: 154: 149: 144: 545: 408: 139: 134: 129: 866: 124: 116: 111: 106: 101: 96: 91: 81: 811: 734: 572:; while I recognize that standards do get tougher in FLC, in my experience it does not happen so quickly. 437: 349: 68: 1600:

For some reason, the LineColor parameters do not work in Internet Explorer. Is there a way to fix this?

927:

Perhaps that could be applied to the LOE template? Or a new LOE template for articles using dvd covers?

1418:

Hello there Ned Scott, I noticed your disputes over Cool Cat's change over the design. Edit warring is

1396: 1255: 72: 38: 1652: 1455: 565: 1089:

issues, while you commit identical behaviour. I do not believe either one if us is the policy saint.

178:

I've approved your bot for operation, please feel free to request a bot flag when you are ready --

1513:. One thing to help us define what is a stub and what is not is Wikipeida's official guidelines, 1476: 1281:? Whoes input are we talking about? Certinly not my input... that has been actively dismissed at 1171: 467: 1444: 1337: 1247: 433: 1413: 867: 712: 632: 589: 1646: 8: 623: 580: 394: 47: 17: 1077:) while impliying a conspircacy is hardly nice. Would you consider your contribution on 486:

Please refrain from uncivil remarks/profanity in your edit summaries, and try to keep a

916: 891: 697: 678: 657: 1438: 1424: 1138: 853: 824: 473: 198: 63: 1020:

What is it that you do not trust about me? I havent decieved you or anything have I?

1147:

I agree. There is so much for us to gain and so little to loose if we cooperate. --

1037: 504:

I thought it was rather descriptive and summarized my message. But I understand.--

303: 259: 228: 208: 173: 628: 620: 585: 577: 491: 400: 237:

That's not how it works here. The burden of proof is on you, the contributer. --

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

1666: 1583: 1528: 1514: 1467: 1400: 1362: 1225: 1209:

Sorry what progress are we talking about? What is the point of that comment? --

1201: 1177: 1162: 1057: 1047: 998: 907: 897: 836: 800: 765: 687: 668: 616: 602: 538: 529: 505: 487: 458: 370: 316: 290: 247: 238: 218: 1285:. I am not sure which ideas are we discussing, but the origin does not matter. 1463: 1459: 1382: 1347: 1259: 1086: 1082: 1042: 874: 515: 273: 1656: 1601: 1592: 1573: 1135: 848: 819: 713: 383: 357: 896:

Sorry to bother you but how do you add a reference, I'm still new to it.--

227:

Actually, I did take the picture. Can you prove that I didn't take it? --

1267: 445: 189: 179: 1356:

I'm not sure I follow you, but basically the current debate is just for

1046:

because of your behavior, and you have no one to blame but yourself. --

835:

I think a certain level of outrage is appropriate in this situation. --

417: 654:

Knowledge:Categories for deletion#Category:Fictional flight attendants

519: 495: 760:

They also need a fair use rational written up for them, you can use

333:

professional, at least to me. I have figured out that a setting of:

1481:

Don't you think that this article is enough in terms of our policy

353: 1527:, since some might not be able to find much more to add to it. -- 1510: 1434: 1262:

a burocracy. Also which guideline am I allegedly not following?

1161:

I agree as well, but he did ask me why I didn't trust him. --

1342:

I'm not familiar with the debate, so let me run this by you.

1041:

that someone is just trying to tell you what to do, you have

1483:

Knowledge:WikiProject Digimon Systems Update/Digimon layout

1278: 795:

Perfect. As for an official example, you can find that at

258:

How am I suppose to prove that it came from my camera? --

1319: 382:

I'm using the latest MSN browser; version 10 I believe.--

1246:

My attitude towards wikiprojects is in accordance with

1466:. And, really, did you not look at the talk page? -- 1395:, then it spilled back over to the main talk page of 302:Great! So I put it up and you take it down again? 1010:

things you disagree with as should the other party.

797:

Knowledge:Image description page#Fair use rationale

315:I did not delete the image, I am not an admin. -- 873:The only reason I am not reverting is because of 1370:It was rather poorly worded, let me try again. 779:11:23, 20 June 2006 (UTC) I've done one here. 1322:where we can discuss our problems better. -- 528:Very true, I shall do that from now on. -- 1517:. If you wish, you can change the tag to 961:Well, I await your response anxiously. -- 568:with exactly the same characteristics as 564:Moreover, about two weeks ago I promoted 328:Re: The new Japanese episode template.... 1393:Talk:List of Lost episodes/Use of images 440:page. Before the template was made, the 61: 14: 415: 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 650:Category:Fictional flight attendants 570:List of Fullmetal Alchemist episodes 246:Oh, and it got deleted anyways.. -- 25: 1283:Template talk:Japanese episode list 23: 1017:as close minded as you portray me. 457:My first Barnstar! Thanks man! -- 342:{| class="wikitable" width="100%" 24: 1681: 1567:List of Xiaolin Showdown episodes 336:{| class="wikitable" width="98%" 1665:Ah, thanks for the heads up. -- 1433: 416: 62: 58: 29: 624: 581: 1373:Suppose we have two tv shows, 1079:Talk:List of Planetes episodes 762:Image:Kamisama Kazoku ep04.jpg 550:List of Oh My Goddess episodes 13: 1: 546:List of The Simpsons episodes 7: 735:List of Ergo Proxy episodes 644:fictional flight attendants 438:List of South Park episodes 350:Ouran High School Host Club 10: 1686: 1615:I'M SORRY YOU DONT LIKE IT 1397:Talk:List of Lost episodes 1256:Knowledge:Ignore all rules 482:Civility in edit summaries 432:I've begun to include the 1670:22:04, 30 June 2006 (UTC) 1660:22:02, 30 June 2006 (UTC) 1628:20:41, 30 June 2006 (UTC) 1596:08:30, 30 June 2006 (UTC) 1587:07:59, 30 June 2006 (UTC) 1577:07:56, 30 June 2006 (UTC) 1532:19:22, 29 June 2006 (UTC) 1471:08:40, 27 June 2006 (UTC) 1456:Talk:List of Air episodes 1454:Wow, did you not look at 1449:07:59, 27 June 2006 (UTC) 1404:08:57, 26 June 2006 (UTC) 1386:08:46, 26 June 2006 (UTC) 1366:08:35, 26 June 2006 (UTC) 1351:08:31, 26 June 2006 (UTC) 1332:04:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC) 1306:04:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC) 1229:03:32, 26 June 2006 (UTC) 1219:03:18, 26 June 2006 (UTC) 1205:03:12, 26 June 2006 (UTC) 1196:01:44, 26 June 2006 (UTC) 1181:22:58, 25 June 2006 (UTC) 1166:01:03, 25 June 2006 (UTC) 1157:20:27, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 1142:18:55, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 1118:17:20, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 1061:12:35, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 1051:12:31, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 1033:11:59, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 1002:06:17, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 988:03:47, 24 June 2006 (UTC) 971:07:29, 23 June 2006 (UTC) 955:06:54, 23 June 2006 (UTC) 940:06:47, 23 June 2006 (UTC) 911:06:36, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 901:05:41, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 887:04:01, 21 June 2006 (UTC) 840:21:19, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 804:20:38, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 788:17:25, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 769:23:25, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 755:23:07, 19 June 2006 (UTC) 746:21:01, 17 June 2006 (UTC) 729:20:34, 17 June 2006 (UTC) 701:21:12, 14 June 2006 (UTC) 691:20:43, 14 June 2006 (UTC) 682:20:33, 14 June 2006 (UTC) 672:19:59, 14 June 2006 (UTC) 661:18:24, 14 June 2006 (UTC) 636:12:32, 15 June 2006 (UTC) 606:20:03, 14 June 2006 (UTC) 593:11:36, 14 June 2006 (UTC) 566:List of Planetes episodes 533:02:23, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 523:02:21, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 509:06:03, 14 June 2006 (UTC) 499:05:55, 14 June 2006 (UTC) 477:02:10, 13 June 2006 (UTC) 462:01:18, 13 June 2006 (UTC) 449:03:22, 12 June 2006 (UTC) 422: 404:07:54, 11 June 2006 (UTC) 352:has the 100% setting and 1651:Just a quick comment re: 1605:00:38, 1 July 2006 (UTC) 652:is up for discussion on 387:06:10, 9 June 2006 (UTC) 374:06:02, 9 June 2006 (UTC) 361:03:57, 9 June 2006 (UTC) 320:00:56, 8 June 2006 (UTC) 307:14:01, 7 June 2006 (UTC) 294:23:03, 5 June 2006 (UTC) 277:19:45, 5 June 2006 (UTC) 263:14:26, 5 June 2006 (UTC) 251:11:19, 5 June 2006 (UTC) 242:11:18, 5 June 2006 (UTC) 232:09:19, 5 June 2006 (UTC) 222:08:35, 5 June 2006 (UTC) 212:07:48, 5 June 2006 (UTC) 193:19:21, 2 June 2006 (UTC) 183:07:02, 2 June 2006 (UTC) 1540:OK I Understood thanks! 287:Image talk:BobSaget.JPG 356:has the 98% setting.-- 1546:comment was added by 1491:comment was added by 1277:Again who is we? The 1248:Knowledge:Wikiproject 781:Image:ErgoProxyE1.png 426:The Template Barnstar 409:Episode list template 145:mid 05/08 - mid 07/08 140:mid 02/08 - mid 05/08 42:of past discussions. 1085:). You accuse me of 868:List of Air episodes 831:21:16, 20 June '06 812:Please remain civil 348:Here's an example: 345:fixes the problem. 205:Image:Bob Saget.JPG 125:05/07 - early 08/07 18:User talk:Ned Scott 860:21:24, 20 June '06 764:as an example. -- 436:template into the 268:If I may butt in. 1653:this edit summary 1559: 1504: 1447: 1441: 1431: 1427: 1330: 1304: 1217: 1194: 1155: 1116: 1031: 986: 969: 953: 938: 885: 727: 454: 453: 171: 170: 150:mid 07/08 - 11/08 135:11/07 - mid 02/08 54: 53: 48:current talk page 1677: 1541: 1526: 1520: 1486: 1443: 1439: 1437: 1429: 1425: 1358:List of episodes 1323: 1318:I invite you to 1297: 1258:). Knowledge is 1210: 1187: 1148: 1109: 1038:User:Discordance 1024: 979: 962: 946: 931: 878: 856: 851: 827: 822: 720: 626: 583: 420: 413: 412: 66: 59: 33: 32: 26: 1685: 1684: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1649: 1617: 1570: 1542:—The preceding 1524: 1518: 1487:—The preceding 1479: 1477:Article:Bukamon 1416: 1340: 1174: 1172:98% width issue 919: 894: 871: 854: 849: 825: 820: 814: 738: 717: 646: 559:class=wikitable 541: 516:personal attack 484: 470: 468:Digimon message 411: 397: 343: 337: 330: 201: 176: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1683: 1673: 1672: 1648: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1616: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1569: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1535: 1534: 1515:Knowledge:Stub 1478: 1475: 1474: 1473: 1415: 1412: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1407: 1406: 1371: 1339: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1294: 1291: 1290: 1289: 1286: 1275: 1271: 1263: 1251: 1244: 1241: 1237: 1236:consideration? 1173: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1159: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1106: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1067: 1021: 1018: 1014: 1011: 1007: 991: 990: 974: 973: 958: 957: 918: 915: 914: 913: 893: 890: 870: 865: 864: 863: 862: 861: 813: 810: 809: 808: 807: 806: 783:. Any good? -- 772: 771: 737: 732: 716: 711: 710: 709: 708: 707: 706: 705: 704: 703: 686:Catwoman?? -- 667:character. -- 645: 642: 641: 640: 639: 638: 609: 608: 574: 573: 562: 556: 553: 540: 537: 536: 535: 512: 511: 483: 480: 469: 466: 465: 464: 452: 451: 429: 428: 423: 421: 410: 407: 396: 393: 392: 391: 390: 389: 377: 376: 341: 335: 329: 326: 325: 324: 323: 322: 310: 309: 299: 298: 297: 296: 280: 279: 256: 255: 254: 253: 225: 224: 200: 197: 196: 195: 175: 172: 169: 168: 162: 157: 152: 147: 142: 137: 132: 127: 120: 114: 109: 104: 99: 94: 89: 84: 76: 75: 67: 56: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1682: 1671: 1668: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1658: 1654: 1641: 1637: 1636: 1635: 1631: 1629: 1626: 1621: 1606: 1603: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1594: 1590: 1589: 1588: 1585: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1578: 1575: 1568: 1557: 1553: 1549: 1548:Onurkaryagmaz 1545: 1539: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1533: 1530: 1523: 1516: 1512: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1502: 1498: 1494: 1493:Onurkaryagmaz 1490: 1484: 1472: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1436: 1432: 1421: 1405: 1402: 1398: 1394: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1384: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1364: 1359: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1349: 1343: 1333: 1329: 1326: 1321: 1317: 1307: 1303: 1300: 1295: 1292: 1287: 1284: 1280: 1276: 1272: 1269: 1264: 1261: 1257: 1252: 1249: 1245: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1231: 1230: 1227: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1216: 1213: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1203: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1193: 1190: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1179: 1167: 1164: 1160: 1158: 1154: 1151: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1143: 1140: 1137: 1119: 1115: 1112: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1095: 1091: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1073: 1068: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1059: 1054: 1053: 1052: 1049: 1044: 1039: 1036: 1035: 1034: 1030: 1027: 1022: 1019: 1015: 1012: 1008: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1000: 995: 994: 993: 992: 989: 985: 982: 976: 975: 972: 968: 965: 960: 959: 956: 952: 949: 944: 943: 942: 941: 937: 934: 928: 925: 922: 912: 909: 905: 904: 903: 902: 899: 889: 888: 884: 881: 876: 869: 859: 858: 857: 852: 843: 842: 841: 838: 834: 833: 832: 830: 829: 828: 823: 805: 802: 798: 794: 793: 792: 791: 790: 789: 786: 782: 778: 770: 767: 763: 759: 758: 757: 756: 753: 748: 747: 744: 736: 731: 730: 726: 723: 715: 702: 699: 698:Mike Selinker 694: 693: 692: 689: 685: 684: 683: 680: 679:Mike Selinker 675: 674: 673: 670: 665: 664: 663: 662: 659: 658:Mike Selinker 655: 651: 637: 634: 630: 627: 622: 618: 613: 612: 611: 610: 607: 604: 600: 597: 596: 595: 594: 591: 587: 584: 579: 571: 567: 563: 560: 557: 554: 551: 547: 543: 542: 534: 531: 527: 526: 525: 524: 521: 517: 510: 507: 503: 502: 501: 500: 497: 493: 489: 479: 478: 475: 463: 460: 456: 455: 450: 447: 443: 439: 435: 431: 430: 427: 424: 419: 414: 406: 405: 402: 388: 385: 381: 380: 379: 378: 375: 372: 368: 365: 364: 363: 362: 359: 355: 351: 346: 340: 334: 321: 318: 314: 313: 312: 311: 308: 305: 301: 300: 295: 292: 288: 284: 283: 282: 281: 278: 275: 271: 267: 266: 265: 264: 261: 252: 249: 245: 244: 243: 240: 236: 235: 234: 233: 230: 223: 220: 216: 215: 214: 213: 210: 206: 194: 191: 187: 186: 185: 184: 181: 167: 166: 165:05/11 - 06/18 161: 160:06/09 - 04/11 156: 155:12/08 - 05/09 151: 146: 141: 136: 131: 130:08/07 - 10/07 126: 121: 119: 118: 117:04/07 - 05/07 113: 112:02/07 - 03/07 108: 107:11/06 - 01/07 103: 102:10/06 - 11/06 98: 97:08/06 - 09/06 93: 92:07/06 - 08/06 88: 83: 82:02/06 - 05/06 78: 77: 74: 70: 65: 60: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 1650: 1632: 1622: 1618: 1571: 1480: 1419: 1417: 1414:Edit warring 1378: 1374: 1357: 1344: 1341: 1175: 1132: 1075:his response 1072:your comment 929: 926: 923: 920: 906:Thank you.-- 895: 872: 847: 846: 818: 817: 815: 785:GoogleMonkey 777:GoogleMonkey 773: 752:GoogleMonkey 749: 743:GoogleMonkey 739: 718: 714:Air (series) 647: 619:. Cheers -- 575: 558: 513: 485: 474:TPIRFanSteve 471: 434:Episode list 425: 398: 347: 344: 338: 331: 269: 257: 226: 202: 177: 122: 86: 79: 55: 43: 37: 1625:DopplerMatt 1522:digi-expand 1338:Screenshots 1268:User:MARMOT 494:. Thanks, 442:WikiProject 395:screenshots 339:intead of: 304:Alabama Man 260:Alabama Man 229:Alabama Man 217:right.. -- 209:Alabama Man 36:This is an 917:Comprimise 892:References 677:though.)-- 401:SeizureDog 1667:Ned Scott 1647:Megchan's 1584:Ned Scott 1529:Ned Scott 1468:Ned Scott 1401:Ned Scott 1363:Ned Scott 1226:Ned Scott 1202:Ned Scott 1178:Ned Scott 1163:Ned Scott 1058:Ned Scott 1048:Ned Scott 1043:ownership 999:Ned Scott 908:Amigobro2 898:Amigobro2 837:Ned Scott 801:Ned Scott 766:Ned Scott 688:Ned Scott 669:Ned Scott 603:Ned Scott 530:Ned Scott 506:Ned Scott 459:Ned Scott 371:Ned Scott 317:Ned Scott 291:Ned Scott 248:Ned Scott 239:Ned Scott 219:Ned Scott 199:Bob Saget 1556:contribs 1544:unsigned 1501:contribs 1489:unsigned 1383:Qutezuce 1348:Qutezuce 696:could.-- 492:WP:Civil 354:Kasimasi 274:RHaworth 174:Your bot 69:Archives 1657:Circeus 1602:Ryulong 1593:Ryulong 1574:Ryulong 1511:Bukamon 1426:THIS IS 617:WP:FLRC 384:Juhachi 358:Juhachi 39:archive 1464:WP:RFC 1460:WP:LOE 1445:(TALK) 1420:highly 1136:Joanne 1087:WP:OWN 1083:WP:AGF 875:WP:3rr 539:On FLC 446:Will2k 270:Please 190:Tawker 180:Tawker 1640:reply 1440:OCKER 1430:ESSED 1274:poll. 1105:well. 1097:fame. 799:. -- 629:Welsh 599:reply 586:Welsh 367:reply 87:06/06 16:< 1552:talk 1497:talk 1377:and 1279:Borg 1093:not. 850:Fire 821:Fire 648:The 633:ταλκ 590:ταλκ 520:PKtm 496:PKtm 488:cool 203:The 163:17. 158:16. 153:15. 148:14. 143:13. 138:12. 133:11. 128:10. 1558:) . 1503:) . 1328:out 1325:Cat 1320:IRC 1302:out 1299:Cat 1260:NOT 1215:out 1212:Cat 1192:out 1189:Cat 1153:out 1150:Cat 1114:out 1111:Cat 1101:it. 1066:so. 1029:out 1026:Cat 984:out 981:Cat 967:out 964:Cat 951:out 948:Cat 936:out 933:Cat 883:out 880:Cat 855:Fox 826:Fox 725:out 722:Cat 621:Run 601:-- 578:Run 369:-- 289:-- 123:9. 115:8. 110:7. 105:6. 100:5. 95:4. 90:3. 85:2. 80:1. 1630:) 1554:• 1525:}} 1519:{{ 1499:• 1296:-- 1108:-- 1023:-- 978:-- 930:-- 775:-- 741:-- 631:| 588:| 552:). 548:, 71:• 1642:) 1638:( 1623:( 1550:( 1495:( 1428:M 1379:B 1375:A 1270:. 1254:( 1139:B 1070:( 625:e 582:e 73:ℹ 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index