User talk:Ned Scott/archive3

1903:

Sakura vetern. It is also common for people to mistake the fan-made Dojinshi pictures of her for the real thing made by Clamp, as there are many skilled artists in Japan and some of them can copy Clamp's style so well that it can be mistaken for the real thing, it was particulary common amongst her fans to call the dojinshi pictures "official". Again this was common knowledge 2-3 years to Cardcaptor Sakura veterans (eg: the people that saw every episode of the anime, read all tweleve volumes of the manga even the Omakes, owned all the artbooks, all the CDs, and had a lot dojinshis, had all the posters etc.). So when they said that the "manga-styled" picture of Mei-Ling came from the character Songbook and is the only one is existance, their word can be trusted. It should also be noted that Clamp doesn't usually draw "manga-style" pictures of their anime-only/ movie-only characters, as the group who does the anime is different from the group who does the manga their anime-only/ movie-only characters won't exist in the manga so therefore Clamp doesn't draw any pictures of them but the dojinshi pictures exist but can hardly be considered official see. Again mistaking the fan-made dojinshi pictures for the original is common as some of the popular Cardcaptor Sakura pictures espeically the SyaoranXSakura ones are actually dojinshi the proof is in the artbooks.

1336:

getting more unpleasant. If it helps, I can add scans from the series character guide - which was published by the manga authors who invented the character originally - to any page where it's necessary to verify the spelling of his name. It's "Fay D. Flourite." In English. If you read the TRC series Wiki, Fay's name is confirmed as it stands. This is a bit like someone continually insisting, on a public information forum, that the main character in the famous novel Crime & Punishment is actually named Bert, and being powerless to correct them. This is a single misinformed user misinforming hundreds of people by extension. I realize that it's not of ultimate importance, but it's still misinformation appearing under the sanctioned umbrella of the Knowledge. As I said, if scans of the source material could help, I can provide them.

1213:"?? Asking you to be a little bit more professional is a bit different than being able to handle curse words. If someone did not like curse words, are you saying it is an unreasonable request to ask that you not use them? What does that really have to do with anything? And for your information, I use curse words all the time, but I do so when around friends, and not around people I don't know. THAT is an example of being civil. That really has nothing to do with anything, I'm not sure why you even felt it important, but I couldn't resist pointing out the irony in your position on it. -- 2015:

time of the second movie, and yes I'm sure I re-watched the second movie, and the last 10 episodes of the anime before I corrected it. Bottom line only the Syaoran bear exists in the anime, the Sakura bear doesn't. As Sakura made the bear after she made the card, which in the manga had a name (The Love), and yes I'm sure its in Volume 12. Sakura was trying to tell Syaoran she loved him during the Second Movie and had no time to give him a bear, which in the manga was followed by Sakura telling Syaoran she loved him.

31: 2083:

issues and you added it back. This is a difference of opinion. The deciding factor here is apparently that you have too much time on your hands and you like to throw your weight around by using words like "vandalism" and threatening to block people. I don't know enough about how wikipedia is run to know whether you're just another self-appointed moderator or acting in some official capacity but resorting to the term "vandal" when you disagree with a change points to the former.

64: 1188:(yes, I know I've been uncivil at times, but you continuing to do that while I haven't is going to resolve something how?) by letting you know I'm not particularly fond of how you're conducting yourself where most anything I say is concerned, asking you to stop it, and asking you to focus on what we're supposed to be doing. 1719:. These entries are't "non facts" - they are there because someone has said the person has epilepsy and someone else has subsequently said they haven't and more to the point, there isn't any evidence for tbat statement. It is depressing how many of the people in this section appear time and again in other lists. 1941:

I made a couple of days ago some additions to the Meiling trivia. I just noted that her character design were very similar to other similar CLAMP originals. Kotoko of Chobits is the most closest when it comes to the hair style ( Bon Bons) and strong Chinese dress-code. her personality however nearly

1513:

While the titles are more likely to not over-lap, using the numbers makes for a smaller URL/wikilink. It might be easier to just suggest a standard numbering method for the EpisodeNumber parameter. I'm just pleased to see that the basic concept of it works, so it'd probably be a good idea to work out

1488:

to the Episode list template, I realized that won't work either because episode articles are linked to the title. Hmmm, maybe having the episode link and the episode title as separate fields, like what is done with some of the cite templates, may work. That will free up the episode name to be used as

1335:

Ah, sorry about the copying and pasting, I suppose I skipped the part in the FAQ where it says not to do that. I was just concerned about the fact that, as a result of someone who has apparently never even read any of the manga in which this character appears incorrectly editing his Wiki, my life was

1226:

I appreciate your promise to attempt to tone it down, and I will continue attempting to be what you deem civil, but I see nothing unprofessional or uncivil about being myself so long as I remain within the principles expected of me here. Cursing around strangers isn't being uncivil. It's simply using

1203:

attack, but it was still rather insulting, even if I wasn't one of those readers. I'll try to tone it down a bit, but for the most part there has been nothing wrong with what I've been saying to you. You've shown that you do not have faith in your fellow editors to understand guidelines, and simply

1170:

Drop it, okay? In previous discussion, there's been plenty of times that I felt I had little reason to assume good faith, and so I didn't, but if you'd try looking at the comments I've made to the people who haven't been insulting me at every turn, you'd see that I'm not trying to piss on your parade

738:

It's not that spoiler tags are just for fansites. What I've been saying is that by using them the way they're being used right now, Knowledge isn't an encyclopedia. Since it's not, it can only be a fansite. What problems would the compromise cause, by the way? It seemed to be the only thing that most

728:

No one wants Knowledge to be a fansite. But spoiler tags are not just for fansites, fansites do not own them. And I thought that compromise was a good idea at first, but I think it would lead to even more problems, even if I had your view. I see the off-by-default as acceptable if there was no other

589:

Do you think I am stalking you? Do you think I am watching your edits, waiting for the chance to make your life miserable? You have nothing to fear, I'm not going to follow you around Knowledge. That doesn't mean I'm going to go out of my way to avoid you on articles that I have a legitimate interest

502:

Just double-checking before I restore a line; did you mean to remove the redirect|Tsubasa tag from the Tsubasa article? I'd put it back since it seems necessary for the disambiguation page to be seen when Tsubasa redirects right to "Tsubasa: RESERVoir CHRoNiCLE". Maybe I'm looking too much into it.

293:

I also fail to see how what I've said is a personal attack. I've indeed commented on you personally, but because you've become a problematic editor, and I wish to resolve a dispute. As such, certain things of a personal nature must be addressed. A fine line, but not much different from the comments

2141:

that are often ignored. This creates legal complications for Knowledge and credibility issues for our articles. These images are owned by someone else, and we cannot just use them as we please. I doubt this is the worst example, but it doesn't make it "right". All these images are being used under

2014:

Sakura never gave Syaoran a bear in the anime, but Syaoran gave Sakura a bear in episode 70. Watch the second movie again it ends with Sakura jumping off a cliff shouting "I Love You!!", not with her giving him a bear. Remember the anime ended before the manga(anime 1999, manga 2000) around the same

1180:

suggested I do, might I add(!) -- that's all you're doing, with everything I say. Half the time you don't even address what I've actually said because you build a strawman to tear down. Give it a rest, okay? Can we please just focus on the subject at hand? This is like the third time you've derailed

1147:

Ned, I don't think either of us have any illusions about becoming best friends, but I even acknowledged some prudish requests in the RfC that I not express myself in a normal capacity because certain people take as much offense at cursing as they do at untagged plot details. Despite this, you're the

1886:

There's an entire category of hundreds of Digimon images that don't have proper source information or fair use rational statements. Some that are uploaded before a certain date are given more leeway, for whatever reason. Even without that, I would at least like to not add anymore images to the huge

1386:

That said, as I mentioned a week or so ago on the article's talk page, I've always had misgivings about the list of tracks because it can be seen as somewhat trivia-ish outside an article specifically for the soundtrack itself, and — as you've said — if something is considered unimportant enough to

1151:

Yet, what do we have? We have you on one occasion trying to tell me to get the hell out apparently without even bothering to read all I was saying (and just to be fair, we won't ignore how often you've told me that I don't control debates just because I have an opinion that disagrees with even what

717:

The point isn't to discourage editors from using it by turning it into an essay. It's completely about not turning Knowledge into a hypocritical fansite. That's my objective here. Principles are very important to me. Randall's issue with this matter has been mainly the professional aspect, which is

1175:

you are doing to everything I say. You've snuck insults in at me constantly for the last month, despite your claims of being civil yourself, and now -- even after I've suppressed my individuality for the sake of your inability to handle curse words in your presence, and also agreed to take part in

602:

For the record, I haven't accused you of stalking and cannot understand the reason of your deffensive stance. If I felt that you were stalking me, we would not be talking. I however am still curious on how did you notice and prepare a response to a change just after ten minutes. I can't think of a

1902:

Mei-Ling doesn't exist at all in the manga and was only created for the the anime, so the picture was from the booklet that came with the Cardcaptor Sakura Songbook you can buy it on Amazon. The fact that this is the only "manga-styled" image of her is common and basic knowledge to any Cardcaptor

2082:

I suggest you consider your word choice and do not throw around words like vandalism unless you know what you're talking about. I've not vandalised the sock puppet page and I do not appreciate the suggestion. The illustration does not improve the article and it was removed. You seem to have some

853:

In that case... find out what other Case Closeds there are and maybe turn this into "Case Closed (manga and anime series)" or "Case Closed (manga)" - I did a Knowledge search and could not find any other series with the title "Case Closed" - As for the phrase, you could put that at "Case closed"

1267:

True, she hasn't been animated yet, but I still think she's a good example (and our only free one) of what anime looks like. Maybe having her farther down on the article, instead of as the first picture might be better? Maybe less "misleading" since she is indeed not an animated character. It

662:

This seems to be a misunderstanding. I had no intention of my signature being a recreation of the deleted page in CAUBXD, just to be something I could use to sign. Now if you have an idea of how to put a signature template in your signature box without it automatically subst'ing, that would be

1378:

Thanks for your support. While your concerns have already been addressed, I'd like to point out that you misunderstood the argument involving space. It wasn't that it saves space for the sake of saving space (an article will be as long as it needs to be, after all), but rather, that it's less

963:

for deletion on the grounds that it's not notable. I do have a slight bias against the article's content, but it's still just an article based on a shipping fandom that is not necessarily widely accepted in the CCS community. Would you agree to AfDing this? Or should the terms be a little

1439:. It seems tat you're better than me at debatig and you convinced them quickly. But I see many other pages that use the scroll box. Would you consider creating a guideline that prevents the use of restrictive techniques (I don't know how to name them) like scroll boxes or hide/show feature? 1416:

Hi. Do you own any magazines with information on sales numbers, viewer numbers, and popularity (polls and surveys) of anime and manga? Many articles desperately need some information on reception (aside from reviews, which can be found all over the place). I stared asking this on

1198:

Disagreeing with you is not the same as being uncivil with you. And also, I am not using strawman arguments, even by your own examples you've yet to show me doing so. When I asked you to stop assuming that people who want tags are stupid, I knew you weren't trying to mount a

636:

Hi there, Ned Scott. I noticed your dispute with Cool Cat over styling and formatting on lists of TV show episodes, and I think it is unfortunate that such a dispute should go on without resolution. Would you be interested in informal mediation with myself as the mediator?

562:

I try to avid personal reverances unless it is absolutely necesary (such as in arbitration cases or ANB/I posts). This is something not covered in policy, just my personal preference. Personal referances often make people act over defensively as it is apperant in this very

1148:

only one going out of your way now to toss out personal attacks or "assume bad faith" as you put it. Try taking a look at what I've said in the guidelines discussion, will you? I'd say I've been damn nice about the whole thing, despite my disdain for the subject matter.

904:

I WILL DEFEND THE PAGES. A warrior needs not sleep nor food. I shall triumph over these puppets. Their strings shall be cut even in the dead of night... No I'm kidding, I'm going to bed, you should sleep too, what could they possibly due in the next 4 hours anyway?

2106:

There have been several troll vandals who've removed images such as this just to get a reaction out of people. If you are not one of them, then I apologies. However, saying things like I have too much time on my hands and I just like to throw my weight around are

1453:

Basically I figured one would use one or the other, but not both. I've seen lists where the ep number resets for each season, so I figured another alternative might be good for those lists. But yeah, there's probably a better way of doing that.. Any ideas? --

2188:

User:Ned Scott, I'm GrievousAlpha95. I recently looked at the discussion page of the Megadeus article, and I recently added Big Venus to the Megadeus article. Please read it, and if there are any additions that you consider necessary, I'll see what I can do.

1227:

my own form of expression. Someone else might call a meteor crater "a very large recess in the Earth's surface" while I might call it "a ****ing big hole in the ground". Presenting myself as something I'm not in the company of strangers is inappropriate in

829:

You see, if the U.S. release of the original manga had used "Detective Conan", the Knowledge article would NEVER have been moved. But, not only did it use the dub title, the character names are also changed. And the same release is on U.K. shelves.

1858:

What is the "Fair use rationale" you are looking for for Tsukiamon that exists on any of the other digimon article pictures. Your only trying to get three deleted Tsukaimon, Goldveedramon, and redveedramon, because you don't like the user(

824:

There's a few problems with the idea to move back the article to Detective Conan - 1. The British Manga release is Case Closed. 2. The American Manga release is Case Closed. 3. Case Closed still airs on the FUNimation Channel in the

1252:

page...because she's not in any anime, or even animated in any way. Although she does follow the "anime style" (might I add there is no such concept in Japan), that's not what the article is about. She might be better off in the

545:. Also, what you said isn't untrue, except I wouldn't call it complaining, since that's just rude. Rather, it's called discussion. Feel free to change it back to my name, I won't go screaming "NPA!", since that's just silly. -- 1112:

I didnt upload a new one, the user prior to me did, i uploaded that soemtime before him. he however changed the image. i reinstated mine as it is of the keymoment the ascended woman. Showing the cast isnt key.

2126:

Would you please stop trying to delete pictures of GoldVeedramon? He is an OFFICIAL DIGIMON! There are many official Digimon who are recolorings of existing ones, but that doesn't make them fan drawings!

1621:

Hello again. I see you've reverted my changes, with the explanation that "exception is made for sandbox pages". Can you show me where this exception is stated? I didn't know such an exception existed. —

1391:

utilized it, however, was enough to convince me to give it a chance, though I honestly can't say I'm surprised to see this concern over relevance brought up. Thanks again for your input and support.

1754:

Thank-you for taking the time to review and consider this article. I'm still making big changes to improve it. I do appreciate your time and if I can return the favour, please let me know. Cheers,

1598:, as they are copyrighted images that are being used under claims of fair use. Unfortunately, by Knowledge policies, no fair-use images can be used on user pages; please see the ninth item of the 369:

Labramon does NOT digivolve to Dobermon. Gabumon and Bakumon do. You check your sources and don't edit pages with incorrect crap. It's called Shining Evolution's Digimon Encyclopedia. Use it. --

569:

I also am curious on why are you going through my individual diffs. You noticed and responded to that particular diff 10 minutes after the change. Just how frequently are you loading my diffs?

1976:

Someone keeps deleting the notes to the Cardcaptor Sakura Characters, and adding false ones, so I was trying to find the culprit while correcting the mistakes that they keep messing up.

1697:

Featured lists do have a lower bar than featured articles. I've no idea how many lists you've reviewed. Some folk are anti-list by inclination and don't feel that any should be featured.

528: 1464:

Including the season number may be a way to go about it, but that means adding an extra field to the templates. But perhaps the best way would be to use the episode title instead. --

1887:

pile of "to be fixed". The image policy on Knowledge is pretty clear on this, there's a half dozen notices and warnings when you click to upload a file, please read those pages. --

1682:

Thanks very much for your more constructive reply. The comments you've made are helpful regardless of how this review goes. If you have any more to give, I'd be most appreciative.

1942:

mimicks thats of Lady Aska of Fahren. It was just a note that I wanted to emphasized since Clamp is fond of co-relating a lot of thier other charaters to the new ones they made

1089:

Man, you need to show me how to modify the fair use thing with the image I showed of something. Please, I really want the list to be featured. Mentor me in the fair use ways!!--

690: 2150:

that we have to follow in order to use any image that is owned by someone else. This isn't about him being official or not, or about what all the other articles do or not. --

1418: 670: 882:

Hey Ned, I saw the link to the category you created for Father's Wish's suspected puppets; is this standard procedure? As I was just making a suspected sock puppet page at

477:

the reason it was taken off, was because I didn't want to deal with him anymore, he was getting ridiculously annoying. Not seeing his name made it easier... is this wrong?

1436: 1694:

I've suggested a section/article on the social implications of epilepsy. Regardless, giving examples of successful people is more accessible that prose with statistics.

549: 212:

first. That is because I think we are very close to a consensus already, with Cool Cat being the only real obstacle, and we probably don't need to go through an RfC (

1120: 1049: 1010: 609:

P.S. feel free to post your response on my talk page if you want a more prompt response. Keeping the thread on both talk pages while not required is common practice.

178:

Thanks for explaining to me, i didnt mean it how it probably looks i was just curios. Ive not fully got to grips with wikipedia yet, thanks for letting me know :-)(

1401:

Thanks for your defense of the images. I can't believe that after we cut the image use in half, someone would suggest that the article violates fair use criteria.

1278:

Hey, this is about Wikipe-tan again...can you be more careful where you put her? Already some people are getting the wrong ideas about her in the FPC. Thank you.

2160:

It has all the information it needs though! It tells that's its a card scan and that its owned by Bandai and you can use it as much as any other Bandai image!

2090: 1569:. There are probably more, but I don'thave every single digimon article on my watchlist. At least attack aditions have reduced considerably these last months. 1440: 1086: 617: 577: 462: 355: 312: 274: 542: 2026: 1987: 1914: 1589: 1847: 1066: 1615: 1365: 1358: 960: 761: 266: 1656:

I probably would have left the page alone if it looked like you were actively working on it, but you hadn't touched it since the middle of June. —

1443: 1268:

wouldn't bother me if you wish to take out the image, I'm just looking for more articles that can benefit from her anime-ness and free-ness :) --

1037: 706: 590:

in editing and contributing to, such as the Air articles. I do not edit, suggest, list for AfD, or anything like that just to cause you grief. --

2111:

and are not tolerated here on Knowledge. I suggest you learn a little bit more about editing on our encyclopedia before making such comments. --

1538: 1337: 883: 614: 574: 459: 399:

Whilst I appreciate this appears to be a subject you are passionate about, note it's polite to remain neutral when pointing people to a debate.

352: 309: 294:

made in your RfAs or in a typical RfC. Considering this is all building up to a RfC on you, I don't see anything I've said as inappropriate. --

271: 858: 848: 491: 418: 2154: 1345:

In the anime series i think you can get a screenshot of Fai/ fay's name in one of thier backgrounds. Go to youtube to get some of the episodes

1305: 1292: 1272: 193: 1963: 1248:

Hey Ned, I thought I might talk to you about it rather than just revert you outright. I personally don't think Wikipe-tan is suitable for the

431: 298: 2071: 1522: 1475: 1235: 1217: 747: 733: 621: 594: 581: 466: 316: 288: 237: 1814: 1795:

You made a loop redirect. It pointed back to the article. So I reverted it. Please correct it to the correct destination again :) Chears! --

1583: 1500: 1405: 2222: 606:

Since you are interested air articles, why not help out aside from participating in discussion. How about expanding the character articles?

1748: 1665: 1643: 990: 981: 810: 795: 522: 2174:

Just returning the comment you left on my talk page. It's been no trouble at all, Wiki-editing is practically an obession of mine now. :D

1348: 1163: 1160: 1153: 1076: 603:

way aside from loading individual diffs or reloading the afd page every 10 minues and reading it carefull enogh to notice such a change.

445: 388: 1630: 1322: 1430: 1395: 771: 1761: 1738: 1166: 359: 278: 1387:

be stuck in its own scroll box box like that in the first place, it might not be important enough to include anyway. The fact that

1102: 1093: 227: 1833: 718:

why he was fine with the compromise from the start (I thought you liked it too?), but my issue has been entirely about integrity.

261:, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to 182: 2086: 2018: 1979: 1906: 1866: 1776: 1458: 1318:

Strange how similar "above this line" and "below this line" look... this is why I'm not a doctor! Well, it's one reason, anyway.

909: 877: 424: 1783: 408: 2212: 2098: 1185: 942: 481: 1027: 2115: 1934: 1675: 1603: 899: 785: 451: 2164: 2131: 1891: 1863:) who uploaded them. I looked at over twenty digimon images, all they say is this is a card scan, or this is offical art. 1485: 1340: 931: 1313: 1137: 1126: 1055: 1016: 836: 696: 680: 2057: 652: 2178: 1573: 1370: 1282: 1261: 1033:

Yeah, but they've pretty much lost the "battle" on the NPOV and censorship arguments, so eh, doesn't really matter. --

968: 1826: 1425: 949: 722: 886:(and the evidence isn't really there yet, I just had to list the accounts, and threw some IPs in for good measure). – 246: 507: 2205:

has been opened for the Anime entry. Please feel free to discuss on the Anime talk page and/or the mediation page

2042: 1799: 1772: 1562: 199: 1806: 2003: 1211:

even after I've suppressed my individuality for the sake of your inability to handle curse words in your presence

895: 685: 339: 974: 804: 514: 1878: 1548: 1099: 1090: 1073: 164: 159: 154: 149: 144: 1639:

I can't seem to find where I've read that, so I've blanked the sandbox page for now incase I was mistaken. --

1192: 755: 2030: 1991: 1918: 1448: 1155:

on another we've got you somehow assuming that I'm insulting you (nevermind that I wasn't even responding to

380: 373: 327: 254: 173: 139: 134: 129: 921:

I've decreaed the protection on this from protected to semiprotected, and will remove that in a few days. —

2196: 1676: 1257:

page, I think. But for the purpose of her FP, I'm not gonna revert you...just yet :) Just to let you know.

347: 124: 116: 111: 106: 101: 96: 86: 81: 2147: 776: 68: 1843:

to get a consensus version, though. Still, I think it's getting better slowly. Thanks for your input. --

1606:. These images have not been deleted from any articles. If you have any questions, please let me know. — 2138: 1820: 72: 38: 1839:

I agree that the Talk page should be used first. You'd have to go back to an 8 August 2006 version of

444:

Well I'll be a thing that does stuff, I thought he was talking about my comments on the lost dispute,

2094: 1771:

Hey Ned, I'm having a problem with the LOE template and empty cells, can you help me? I describe it

331: 262: 247: 209: 457:

You should be civil at all times avoiding personal remarks. I am glad the issue has been cleared. --

2063:

You're editing against consensus and established guidelines and policies for article creation. See

394: 335: 1171:

just for the sake of doing it. For all the times you've accused me of assuming bad faith, that is

2077: 1897: 1715:". This isn't simply a section where I (as an editor) couldn't find any evidence - that would be 1330: 954: 914: 868: 675: 472: 439: 2038:

D'oh, yeah, you're right. We see the bear, but she never gives it to him. Sorry about that. --

1853: 1595: 1371: 645: 536:(just to note, the initial comment was originally on Cool Cat's talk page, then copied to here) 1599: 1042:

Okay then, i will leave it as it is. Could they ever win anyway? i have quantum torpedoes ;-)

2121: 2048: 1707:

Each entry in the "No evidence" section is sourced. I can quote a reliable source as saying "

1532: 404: 2190: 1780: 1766: 1556: 998: 906: 874: 768: 497: 205: 2206: 8: 1181:

the discussion for the sake of coming after me specifically, and I'm rather tired of it.

1003:

Ned, in the way it is worded it does not sound like an argument, more like a conclusion.

946: 891: 818: 712: 47: 17: 2175: 1874: 1844: 1830: 1542: 1515: 1496: 1471: 1362: 1243: 665: 223: 213: 1744:

Indeed, I've retracted the oppose. Sorry I jumped the gun, or something like that. --

1204:

display fears of a worst case scenario over new guidelines that have yet to be formed.

1072:

What is exatly that you do (mostly) around? You seem to be very involved in TV lists--

1788: 1411: 1107: 781:

Hi, please stop replacing prod tags as the policy against it is quite clear. Thanks.

657: 638: 631: 566:

Declaring someting "going too far" is complaining, more so 5 days after its creation.

63: 326:

Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Knowledge has a policy against

855: 833: 556: 478: 400: 364: 1419:

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Anime_and_manga#Magazines_and_other_information_sources

586:

There's no relevance to Gustav at all, but he's sure one hell of a harpsichordist.

2169: 2161: 2128: 2009: 1759: 1736: 1701: 1661: 1626: 1611: 1552: 1422: 1302: 1279: 1258: 1081: 915: 873:

Hot damn you're quick. That change didn't even move into another minute. Thanks.

801: 179: 1690:

page gives any clue as to how people with epilepsy fare in society, although in

1288:

Heh, for the sake of the FPC I will try to avoid the controversial articles. --

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2219: 2151: 2112: 2068: 2064: 2039: 2000: 1960: 1931: 1888: 1840: 1811: 1745: 1640: 1580: 1519: 1455: 1350: 1289: 1269: 1214: 1034: 978: 887: 845: 792: 730: 703: 591: 546: 519: 488: 448: 428: 415: 385: 295: 285: 234: 190: 2108: 2054: 1971: 1870: 1860: 1716: 1691: 1491: 1466: 1402: 1392: 1319: 1232: 1189: 936: 922: 744: 719: 233:

Actually, I wanted to do the RfC on Cool Cat himself, but I'm in no rush. --

218: 2022: 1983: 1956: 1946: 1910: 1796: 1570: 1098:

the DC animation template isn't external links. Why did you move it back?--

2209: 1537:

I reverted a bunch of additions of lines and left warnings to two users:

1388: 1142: 2201:

Hi, this is just to let you know that a mediation case as requested by

2053:

What do oyu mean by "keep this up and you'll get blocked from editing"?

1927: 1755: 1732: 1657: 1622: 1607: 987: 965: 807: 782: 504: 427:. Agreed, I should have been more neutral when posting that, sorry. -- 1789: 1162:

later we've got you accusing me of things that I haven't said again,

2143: 1687: 1566: 1700:

I can't spot the self reference myself. There was one deleted by

1298: 414:

I'm not sure I follow you. Which message are you speaking of? --

370: 543:

It's not a personal attack just because you addressed me by name

1926:

Why are you telling me this? I did not delete those notes from

1254: 1999:

Ah, I see, no problem then. I'll keep an eye out as well. --

1249: 330:. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be 2183: 1437:

Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Shadow of the Colossus

2202: 765: 529:

Gustav Leonhardt is a highly acclaimed Dutch harpsichordist

1565:). The latter seems to be a bit confrontational over at 663:

appreciated. For now, excuse the long signature please.

844:

Confusion is still an issue with the generic title. --

487:

Oh, no, I thought maybe you had done it by mistake. --

344:

Comment on content, not on other contributors or people

1713:

but people continue to claim he/she does have epilepsy

269:

and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --

204:I know that you are currently pursuing an RfC for 1594:Hello, Ned Scott. I've removed some images from 986:Article is tagged. Thanks for your input..! -- 762:Knowledge talk:Fair use/Fair use images in lists 924: 1955:It's not that it's "bad", but it's considered 1731:if you aren't enthusiastic about it. Regards, 1383:the page. That was the issue involving space. 884:Knowledge:Suspected_sock_puppets/Father's_Wish 1727:. However, I'm not asking you to change to a 1723:I hope you "sleep on it" and reconsider your 447:. I guess I learn something new everyday. -- 208:, however, may I suggest that you request an 1590:Fair-use images removed from your user page 1184:So, please, I am following a suggestion of 739:of us could agree on, which is generally a 305:Comment on content, not on the contributor 61: 14: 1827:Wikipedia_talk:List_guideline#Criteria 1435:First, thank you for your comments in 1152:the majority might think is sensible), 1114: 1043: 1004: 760:I'm so glad you are patrticipating in 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 941:Hi Ned. I left a reply to your post 1604:Knowledge:Removal of fair use images 791:Hi, please stop wasting my time. -- 284:You really don't get it, do you. -- 25: 1379:imposing and doesn't unnecessarily 23: 1361:, and am seeking feedback. Best,-- 24: 2234: 1486:List of Ōban Star-Racers episodes 1431:Scroll boxes and other techniques 62: 58: 29: 1159:there; assume bad faith much?), 1131: 1119: 1115: 1060: 1048: 1044: 1021: 1009: 1005: 691: 686: 681: 676: 666: 599:Then please lets stay on topic. 555:I have never met or heard of a 1297:Yeah, imagine if she's on the 1165:oh, and then we have it again! 13: 1: 1176:this discussion... something 671: 350:appropriately. Thank you. -- 1677:List of people with epilepsy 1301:page, there'll be a riot XD 646: 639: 7: 2223:23:26, 26 August 2006 (UTC) 2213:21:26, 26 August 2006 (UTC) 2179:20:49, 25 August 2006 (UTC) 2165:23:37, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 2155:23:27, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 2146:. Knowledge has additional 2132:16:45, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 2116:23:13, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 2072:09:11, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 2058:09:06, 21 August 2006 (UTC) 2043:23:25, 17 August 2006 (UTC) 2004:14:32, 16 August 2006 (UTC) 1964:21:23, 16 August 2006 (UTC) 1935:14:25, 16 August 2006 (UTC) 1892:14:28, 16 August 2006 (UTC) 1848:13:12, 18 August 2006 (UTC) 1834:00:01, 15 August 2006 (UTC) 1815:07:14, 14 August 2006 (UTC) 1800:07:12, 14 August 2006 (UTC) 1784:04:56, 12 August 2006 (UTC) 1762:21:52, 14 August 2006 (UTC) 1749:05:21, 12 August 2006 (UTC) 1739:10:49, 11 August 2006 (UTC) 1709:there is no evidence at all 1666:10:15, 10 August 2006 (UTC) 1644:06:10, 10 August 2006 (UTC) 1631:05:57, 10 August 2006 (UTC) 1616:05:42, 10 August 2006 (UTC) 1584:04:12, 10 August 2006 (UTC) 1579:It makes my head hurt.. -- 559:, nor do I see a relevance. 303:Pay close attention to the 10: 2239: 2193:5:24 PM, 25, August 2006. 1574:21:57, 9 August 2006 (UTC) 1523:02:35, 9 August 2006 (UTC) 1501:01:42, 9 August 2006 (UTC) 1484:Actually, after switching 1476:22:42, 8 August 2006 (UTC) 1459:22:35, 8 August 2006 (UTC) 1444:13:21, 8 August 2006 (UTC) 1426:04:17, 8 August 2006 (UTC) 1406:13:42, 8 August 2006 (UTC) 1396:12:07, 7 August 2006 (UTC) 1366:13:59, 6 August 2006 (UTC) 1341:09:06, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 1323:23:47, 3 August 2006 (UTC) 1306:06:29, 7 August 2006 (UTC) 1293:05:20, 7 August 2006 (UTC) 1283:01:24, 7 August 2006 (UTC) 1273:00:19, 3 August 2006 (UTC) 1262:00:10, 3 August 2006 (UTC) 1236:23:39, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 1218:22:56, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 1193:21:45, 2 August 2006 (UTC) 1138:17:07, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 800:Also I will remind you of 334:from editing by admins or 1600:Knowledge fair-use policy 1103:04:15, 31 July 2006 (UTC) 1094:03:49, 31 July 2006 (UTC) 1077:04:01, 30 July 2006 (UTC) 1067:13:04, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 1038:13:02, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 1028:13:00, 29 July 2006 (UTC) 991:12:53, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 982:05:57, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 969:05:08, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 950:02:54, 26 July 2006 (UTC) 932:01:04, 25 July 2006 (UTC) 910:08:22, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 900:06:21, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 878:04:22, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 859:03:21, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 849:03:18, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 837:03:17, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 811:03:01, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 796:02:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 786:02:58, 24 July 2006 (UTC) 772:08:30, 20 July 2006 (UTC) 748:13:46, 17 July 2006 (UTC) 734:13:40, 17 July 2006 (UTC) 723:13:35, 17 July 2006 (UTC) 707:12:34, 15 July 2006 (UTC) 697:12:33, 15 July 2006 (UTC) 653:20:38, 14 July 2006 (UTC) 622:11:10, 13 July 2006 (UTC) 595:09:36, 13 July 2006 (UTC) 582:09:20, 13 July 2006 (UTC) 550:09:08, 13 July 2006 (UTC) 523:20:15, 12 July 2006 (UTC) 508:14:13, 12 July 2006 (UTC) 492:05:07, 12 July 2006 (UTC) 482:20:04, 11 July 2006 (UTC) 467:12:03, 10 July 2006 (UTC) 452:11:57, 10 July 2006 (UTC) 432:09:08, 10 July 2006 (UTC) 419:04:24, 10 July 2006 (UTC) 248:Talk:List of Air episodes 767:needs your arguments. - 423:Oh, never-mind, I found 409:22:55, 9 July 2006 (UTC) 389:23:02, 8 July 2006 (UTC) 374:18:25, 8 July 2006 (UTC) 360:21:14, 9 July 2006 (UTC) 317:13:49, 9 July 2006 (UTC) 299:22:46, 8 July 2006 (UTC) 289:21:41, 8 July 2006 (UTC) 279:21:05, 8 July 2006 (UTC) 238:00:23, 3 July 2006 (UTC) 228:22:35, 2 July 2006 (UTC) 200:Re: List of Air episodes 194:11:00, 1 July 2006 (UTC) 183:10:48, 1 July 2006 (UTC) 1349:your opinion sought at 964:different? Thanks. -- 265:for disruption. Please 253:Please see Knowledge's 2137:Knowledge has several 1775:. My problem page is 1711:" and also as saying " 1596:User:Ned Scott/sandbox 1372:Shadow of the Colossus 2089:comment was added by 2021:comment was added by 1982:comment was added by 1909:comment was added by 1869:comment was added by 1514:the finer details on 1449:prod and ep number id 1357:I've made a proposal 764:. The pro image side 340:arbitration committee 174:Kirsten Prout Tagging 145:mid 05/08 - mid 07/08 140:mid 02/08 - mid 05/08 42:of past discussions. 2197:Anime page mediation 641:this is messedrocker 206:List of Air episodes 2142:a process known as 1087:Image:LOGO-BTAS.jpg 777:Replacing prod tags 756:Ed, You're the Man. 257:policy. Comment on 255:no personal attacks 125:05/07 - early 08/07 18:User talk:Ned Scott 2139:image use policies 1821:Feedback requested 1704:on the 8th August. 1686:I don't think the 2148:fair use criteria 2102: 2034: 1995: 1957:original research 1922: 1882: 1717:original research 1314:"above this line" 1209:And what's with " 620: 580: 537: 465: 407: 358: 315: 277: 210:informal mediator 171: 170: 150:mid 07/08 - 11/08 135:11/07 - mid 02/08 54: 53: 48:current talk page 2230: 2109:personal attacks 2084: 2016: 1977: 1904: 1864: 1136: 1135: 1129: 1124: 1117: 1065: 1064: 1058: 1053: 1046: 1026: 1025: 1019: 1014: 1007: 928: 729:alternative. -- 693: 688: 683: 678: 673: 668: 650: 649: 643: 642: 613: 573: 557:Gustav Leonhardt 535: 458: 403: 395:Spoiler warnings 351: 348:resolve disputes 328:personal attacks 308: 307:part. Thanks. -- 270: 189:No problemo. -- 66: 59: 33: 32: 26: 2238: 2237: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2199: 2191:GrievousAlpha95 2186: 2172: 2124: 2091:150.182.153.229 2085:—The preceding 2080: 2051: 2017:—The preceding 2012: 1978:—The preceding 1974: 1949:8:31 AM Aug 16 1905:—The preceding 1900: 1898:Mei-Ling Trivia 1865:—The preceding 1856: 1823: 1793: 1781:Peregrinefisher 1769: 1702:User:Rune.welsh 1680: 1592: 1535: 1451: 1433: 1414: 1376: 1355: 1333: 1331:Fay D. Flourite 1316: 1246: 1145: 1127: 1110: 1100:T-man, the wise 1091:T-man, the wise 1084: 1074:T-man, the wise 1056: 1017: 1001: 961:E&T Pairing 959:I want to list 957: 955:E&T Pairing 939: 927: 919: 916:Template:Avatar 871: 869:Avatar Episodes 821: 779: 769:Peregrinefisher 758: 715: 660: 647: 640: 634: 531: 500: 475: 473:blanked comment 442: 440:FireFox warning 397: 367: 251: 202: 176: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2236: 2226: 2225: 2198: 2195: 2185: 2182: 2171: 2168: 2158: 2157: 2123: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2079: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2065:Talk:Wikiality 2050: 2047: 2046: 2045: 2011: 2008: 2007: 2006: 1973: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1966: 1944: 1943: 1938: 1937: 1899: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1855: 1854:Digimon images 1852: 1851: 1850: 1822: 1819: 1818: 1817: 1792: 1787: 1768: 1765: 1752: 1751: 1721: 1720: 1705: 1698: 1695: 1679: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1634: 1633: 1591: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1534: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1479: 1478: 1450: 1447: 1432: 1429: 1413: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1375: 1369: 1354: 1347: 1332: 1329: 1327: 1315: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1276: 1275: 1245: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1238: 1221: 1220: 1206: 1205: 1186:Wiki etiquette 1144: 1141: 1109: 1106: 1083: 1080: 1070: 1069: 1040: 1000: 997: 996: 995: 994: 993: 956: 953: 947:AdamBiswanger1 938: 935: 925: 918: 913: 870: 867: 866: 865: 864: 863: 862: 861: 827: 826: 820: 817: 816: 815: 814: 813: 778: 775: 757: 754: 753: 752: 751: 750: 714: 711: 710: 709: 702:Ah, I see. -- 659: 656: 633: 630: 629: 628: 627: 626: 625: 624: 610: 607: 604: 600: 587: 570: 567: 564: 560: 540: 539: 530: 527: 526: 525: 499: 496: 495: 494: 474: 471: 470: 469: 441: 438: 437: 436: 435: 434: 396: 393: 392: 391: 366: 363: 324: 323: 322: 321: 320: 319: 250: 245: 243: 241: 240: 201: 198: 197: 196: 175: 172: 169: 168: 162: 157: 152: 147: 142: 137: 132: 127: 120: 114: 109: 104: 99: 94: 89: 84: 76: 75: 67: 56: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2235: 2224: 2221: 2217: 2216: 2215: 2214: 2211: 2207: 2204: 2194: 2192: 2181: 2180: 2177: 2176:Indiawilliams 2167: 2166: 2163: 2156: 2153: 2149: 2145: 2140: 2136: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2130: 2122:GoldVeedramon 2117: 2114: 2110: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2100: 2096: 2092: 2088: 2073: 2070: 2066: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2056: 2049:Keep what up? 2044: 2041: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2032: 2028: 2024: 2020: 2005: 2002: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1993: 1989: 1985: 1981: 1965: 1962: 1958: 1954: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1948: 1940: 1939: 1936: 1933: 1929: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1920: 1916: 1912: 1908: 1893: 1890: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1862: 1861:User:Chijimon 1849: 1846: 1845:Anthony Krupp 1842: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1832: 1831:Anthony Krupp 1828: 1816: 1813: 1809: 1808: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1801: 1798: 1791: 1786: 1785: 1782: 1778: 1774: 1764: 1763: 1760: 1757: 1750: 1747: 1743: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1737: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1718: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1703: 1699: 1696: 1693: 1692:Talk:Epilepsy 1689: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1678: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1645: 1642: 1638: 1637: 1636: 1635: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1613: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1597: 1585: 1582: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1561: 1558: 1554: 1550: 1547: 1544: 1540: 1533:Digimon lines 1524: 1521: 1517: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1502: 1498: 1494: 1493: 1487: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1468: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1457: 1446: 1445: 1442: 1438: 1428: 1427: 1424: 1420: 1407: 1404: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1394: 1390: 1384: 1382: 1373: 1368: 1367: 1364: 1363:Anthony Krupp 1360: 1352: 1346: 1343: 1342: 1339: 1328: 1325: 1324: 1321: 1307: 1304: 1300: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1291: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1281: 1274: 1271: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1263: 1260: 1256: 1251: 1237: 1234: 1230: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1219: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1207: 1202: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1191: 1187: 1182: 1179: 1174: 1168: 1167: 1164: 1161: 1158: 1154: 1149: 1140: 1139: 1134: 1130: 1125: 1122: 1105: 1104: 1101: 1096: 1095: 1092: 1088: 1079: 1078: 1075: 1068: 1063: 1059: 1054: 1051: 1041: 1039: 1036: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1024: 1020: 1015: 1012: 992: 989: 985: 984: 983: 980: 976: 973: 972: 971: 970: 967: 962: 952: 951: 948: 944: 934: 933: 930: 929: 917: 912: 911: 908: 902: 901: 897: 893: 889: 885: 880: 879: 876: 860: 857: 852: 851: 850: 847: 843: 842: 841: 840: 839: 838: 835: 831: 823: 822: 812: 809: 805: 803: 799: 798: 797: 794: 790: 789: 788: 787: 784: 774: 773: 770: 766: 763: 749: 746: 742: 737: 736: 735: 732: 727: 726: 725: 724: 721: 708: 705: 701: 700: 699: 698: 695: 694: 689: 684: 679: 674: 669: 655: 654: 651: 644: 623: 619: 616: 611: 608: 605: 601: 598: 597: 596: 593: 588: 585: 584: 583: 579: 576: 571: 568: 565: 561: 558: 554: 553: 552: 551: 548: 544: 538: 533: 532: 524: 521: 517: 516: 512: 511: 510: 509: 506: 493: 490: 486: 485: 484: 483: 480: 468: 464: 461: 456: 455: 454: 453: 450: 446: 433: 430: 426: 422: 421: 420: 417: 413: 412: 411: 410: 406: 402: 390: 387: 383: 382: 378: 377: 376: 375: 372: 371:68.43.128.186 362: 361: 357: 354: 349: 345: 341: 337: 333: 329: 318: 314: 311: 306: 302: 301: 300: 297: 292: 291: 290: 287: 283: 282: 281: 280: 276: 273: 268: 264: 260: 256: 249: 244: 239: 236: 232: 231: 230: 229: 225: 221: 220: 215: 211: 207: 195: 192: 188: 187: 186: 184: 181: 167: 166: 165:05/11 - 06/18 161: 160:06/09 - 04/11 156: 155:12/08 - 05/09 151: 146: 141: 136: 131: 130:08/07 - 10/07 126: 121: 119: 118: 117:04/07 - 05/07 113: 112:02/07 - 03/07 108: 107:11/06 - 01/07 103: 102:10/06 - 11/06 98: 97:08/06 - 09/06 93: 92:07/06 - 08/06 88: 83: 82:02/06 - 05/06 78: 77: 74: 70: 65: 60: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2200: 2187: 2173: 2159: 2125: 2081: 2052: 2013: 1975: 1947:user:layamin 1945: 1901: 1857: 1824: 1805: 1794: 1770: 1767:LOE Template 1753: 1728: 1724: 1722: 1712: 1708: 1681: 1593: 1559: 1545: 1536: 1490: 1465: 1452: 1434: 1415: 1385: 1380: 1377: 1356: 1344: 1334: 1326: 1317: 1277: 1247: 1228: 1210: 1200: 1183: 1177: 1172: 1169: 1156: 1150: 1146: 1132: 1118: 1111: 1097: 1085: 1071: 1061: 1047: 1022: 1008: 1002: 999:Spoilers RfC 958: 940: 923: 920: 903: 881: 872: 832: 828: 780: 759: 740: 716: 664: 661: 635: 541: 534: 513: 501: 498:Tsubasa edit 476: 443: 398: 379: 368: 343: 325: 304: 258: 252: 242: 217: 203: 177: 122: 91: 79: 55: 43: 37: 2208:; thanks! 1389:Half-Life 2 945:. Regards, 856:WhisperToMe 834:WhisperToMe 819:Case Closed 713:Essay thing 563:discussion. 479:Somerset219 401:Steve block 214:WP:SNOWBALL 36:This is an 2162:Pokemega32 2129:Pokemega32 2078:"vandalism 1928:Meiling Li 1829:Thanks! -- 1553:Pokemega32 1423:GunnarRene 1244:Wikipe-tan 180:Neostinker 2220:Ned Scott 2218:..... -- 2189:Thanks. : 2184:Big Venus 2152:Ned Scott 2113:Ned Scott 2069:Ned Scott 2040:Ned Scott 2001:Ned Scott 1961:Ned Scott 1932:Ned Scott 1889:Ned Scott 1812:Ned Scott 1790:Snatchmon 1746:Ned Scott 1641:Ned Scott 1581:Ned Scott 1520:Ned Scott 1489:an ID. -- 1456:Ned Scott 1412:Magazines 1290:Ned Scott 1270:Ned Scott 1231:opinion. 1215:Ned Scott 1108:Re: image 1035:Ned Scott 979:Ned Scott 888:Prototime 846:Ned Scott 793:Ned Scott 731:Ned Scott 704:Ned Scott 658:Signature 632:Mediation 592:Ned Scott 547:Ned Scott 520:Ned Scott 489:Ned Scott 449:Ned Scott 429:Ned Scott 416:Ned Scott 386:Ned Scott 346:. Please 296:Ned Scott 286:Ned Scott 267:stay cool 235:Ned Scott 191:Ned Scott 2144:fair use 2099:contribs 2087:unsigned 2055:aido2002 2031:contribs 2019:unsigned 1992:contribs 1980:unsigned 1919:contribs 1907:unsigned 1879:contribs 1871:Qilinmon 1867:unsigned 1807:my reply 1688:epilepsy 1567:Stingmon 1563:contribs 1549:contribs 1539:Pjpatron 1492:TheFarix 1467:TheFarix 1403:Ryu Kaze 1393:Ryu Kaze 1338:Oryssein 1320:Melchoir 1233:Ryu Kaze 1201:personal 1190:Ryu Kaze 1128:contribs 1057:contribs 1018:contribs 975:my reply 926:xaosflux 896:contribs 802:WP:CIVIL 745:Ryu Kaze 720:Ryu Kaze 515:my reply 503:^^; -- 381:my reply 365:Dobermon 219:TheFarix 69:Archives 2170:Thanks! 2023:Jazz189 2010:Syaoran 1984:Jazz189 1911:Jazz189 1841:WP:LIST 1797:syvanen 1729:support 1571:Circeus 1381:stretch 1351:WP:LIST 1299:lolicon 1116:Matthew 1082:Show me 1045:Matthew 1006:Matthew 338:by the 332:blocked 259:content 39:archive 2210:Jsw663 1725:oppose 1551:) and 1516:WT:LOE 1121:Fenton 1050:Fenton 1011:Fenton 743:sign. 648:(talk) 336:banned 263:blocks 2203:Selmo 2067:. -- 1972:Sorry 1959:. -- 1930:. -- 1756:Colin 1733:Colin 1658:Bkell 1623:Bkell 1608:Bkell 1518:. -- 1250:anime 988:Crisu 966:Crisu 937:Reply 808:Kappa 783:Kappa 505:Crisu 216:). -- 87:06/06 16:< 2095:talk 2027:talk 1988:talk 1915:talk 1875:talk 1779:. - 1777:here 1773:here 1662:talk 1627:talk 1612:talk 1602:and 1557:talk 1543:talk 1497:Talk 1472:Talk 1359:here 1353:talk 943:here 892:talk 741:good 405:Talk 224:Talk 163:17. 158:16. 153:15. 148:14. 143:13. 138:12. 133:11. 128:10. 2101:) . 2033:) . 1994:) . 1921:) . 1881:) . 1825:At 1810:-- 1374:FAC 1303:_dk 1280:_dk 1259:_dk 1255:moé 1178:you 1173:all 1157:you 1143:Hey 977:-- 907:H2P 875:H2P 825:USA 677:dil 618:out 615:Cat 578:out 575:Cat 518:-- 463:out 460:Cat 384:-- 356:out 353:Cat 313:out 310:Cat 275:out 272:Cat 123:9. 115:8. 110:7. 105:6. 100:5. 95:4. 90:3. 85:2. 80:1. 2097:• 2029:• 1990:• 1917:• 1877:• 1664:) 1629:) 1614:) 1499:) 1474:) 1441:CG 1421:-- 1229:my 898:) 894:• 806:. 692:go 687:pi 682:Yu 667:Fr 612:-- 572:-- 425:it 342:. 226:) 185:) 71:• 2093:( 2025:( 1986:( 1913:( 1873:( 1758:° 1735:° 1660:( 1625:( 1610:( 1560:· 1555:( 1546:· 1541:( 1495:( 1470:( 1133:) 1123:( 1062:) 1052:( 1023:) 1013:( 890:( 672:e 637:— 222:( 73:ℹ 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index