User talk:Ned Scott/archive12

2563:

was vandalism, the other was a hoax article, which is generally not treated as severely as vandalism, I think, unless repeatedly done -- would have been a warning only, with block if repeated. A 24-hour block would have been justifiable. Beyond that, because of his history, it's possible to treat this as a second offense, so the block would escalate to the next step. Which has already expired, I think. So what I'd ask from the blocking admin is that he state that he will lift on request. He can make conditions for that, which might or might not be challenged. Mbstpo's position was that he did not wish to edit the encyclopedia if he was denied the normal facilities of editors. He'd actually been a very productive editor in article space, and had simply begun to apply that experience in the area of policy and process. With, shall we say, spectacular results. Sometimes very good ideas, when first introduced, do set off some fireworks.... --

5328:

nothing". If that's how we're approaching CfD and DRV, then we're doing something really wrong, and are missing the entire point behind having XfDs. I've seen this happen before, on XfDs that involved no less than three users. What ever happened to saying "I disagree with you, but I see your point and wouldn't mind giving something like this more discussion?" Is it that far fetched to see this as a pretty big decision, and where it would be wise to prod the community for more of a response? I don't bring uCfDs to DRV very often, and I'm an editor in good standing, and I'm asking that we simply give more attention to the issue (I'm not even asking that we undelete what's already been deleted). Is that really too troublesome? --

2554:

blocked at this point, it interrupts his ability to immediately dive in again. Mbstpo is a "time-sink" for other editors through disruption created in reaction to his ideas; actual disruption by him is minor at most, and done, twice now, when he has decided to burn a bridge. Voting canned comments in MfDs, for example, isn't disruption, it's actually common practice, the only difference was that instead of "Delete per nom," he wrote more explaining his generic reason for keep. I examined all these deletion debates and ended up concluding the same vote as him, I think. (There may have been one or two where I didn't think it worthwhile to make a comment, or I made a more specific recommendation.)

5841:(EC with above again. Damn, I am still behind...) Also, to respond to your last two posts... You may believe anything you want about admins (myself included) however, it may not always be prudent to say so in such blunt terms. You may have good reasons for believing what you do with Admins as an entire group (and all 1700 of us admins can't ALL be worthless, can we?). However, keep in mind that regardless of what you feel, making those feelings known is not always the most prudent way to get what you want done. Feel what you want to feel about us admins. Just don't type it and hit "save page"... -- 3746: 4329:. This is the only real point to the tag to begin with so I think it needs to be there. To the extent that it is correctly used on some indef blocked userpages it is an appropriate category (as much so as using the same cat in indef blocked tags). On the other hand, I think we should consider deleting the tag altogether or merging it to an indef blocked tag. Of course, whether or not such pages should be deleted is a related but different issue, which I encourage you to drive forward on. I am going through and looking for 4451:. However, I can see the rationale behind people not wanting to create red links simply to create red links, which is why I only delete(d) ones that had no incoming links. I don't foresee any deletions of orphaned redirects in the near future, however, I will say that under CSD, I would consider this part of the housekeeping criterion. That said, I will be doing talk page cleanout for quite some time and may even restart some article work(!). I wouldn't worry too much about the redirects, I really wouldn't. Cheers. -- 31: 436: 5807:(edit conflict with above 2 posts... This is a reply to 05:58 post) No, no, there's no need to get defensive. However, please tone down the rhetoric when doing so. As I said, when you say things like you did at User talk:CharlesFinnegan, it shows a lack of good faith in the abilities and motivations of administrators. Such attitudes are not in fostering a collaborative and conducive working environment. There's nothing wrong with advocating for blocked users; there is 5389:

issue. Even with that, for most situations uCfD is probably fine, and editors there are making decisions that most of the community would feel comfortable with. I'm talking about a specific situation, a specific discussion that I feel should have more attention. I'm not proposing any of those past ideas, nor am I saying that we shouldn't see normal uCfDs as something to worry about. However, this is one that is being challenged, and by a Wikipedian in good standing.

3731: 64: 6159:

suggesting either process in any shape applies to you, I merely wish to point out that all of us have the right to ask a user to modify their language, something I would hope you can agree with. As I have stated on a number of occasions, you may find it best simply to place very basic information in edit summaries. These are permanent and can never be revoked. Still, I'm sure you'll find a way to avoid such instances in the future. All the best,

6543:"Although I do think it is in all our interest that we resolve the debate, I still think there are some issues needed to be addressed. I am equally as grateful as Kransky for all your time and effort but do not agree with his revision especially since it still contains information which has been referenced by an invalid reference which has been the major issues I have had with him throughout the whole history of this article. My version 4427: 1350:

is not necessarily harmful for TTN who can have more time now to think about the way of editing instead of the content itself because afterall good editorialship requires good behavior and responsability. TTN could not do both of that at once. Knowledge receives routinely requests from restricted and/or banned users who seek another chance. In the case of TTN, he's clearly getting a chance now. I just consider it a fair deal. --

2998:

work, most of which was a clear improvement and not at issue, that particularly rankled me). You might also have brought on board someone like Geist as soon as possible to tease apart the issue, rather than letting it fester without apparent reason—that, as you can imagine, fuelled the impression that you were merely power-playing and seeing through ownership. I'm sorry that it happened this way.

5025: 5491:

abolishing/changing/merging UCfD, I think the way to go is to change the actual policy for what categories are permitted in user space. What you--and I--really want is a reversal of the guideline for them. That said, I can give it only a limited amount of time, as I am much more concerned with articles and at present maintaining NPOV for BLPs against those who want to follow Subject'sPOV.

3716: 1558:

dirty with. No one wants to go to bat for a raciest, but I believe in standing up for users regardless of their personal beliefs. I don't agree with EliasAlucard's racial views, and I don't dispute his block. The guy was an asshat who had it coming. However, he did some good work, and one flaw, no matter how angry it makes some people, should not be the sum of his existence. --

6273:

first place. Create an environment that supports other editors, and that does not encourage or support breaches of incivility. Editors can apply peer pressure by voicing displeasure each time rudeness or incivility happens. All contributors are expected to assume good faith towards each other (within reason), in order to try and uphold a reasonably civil atmosphere.

1339:

proposal that you are supporting now. I really believe this issue comes down to when situations where forced when challenged, and not the initial editorial actions. He would learn a lot from that kind of six month (or whatever) probation, and still be able to be constructive on Knowledge. I also believe it's something that both "sides" would be able to live with. --

4944:

There was none. At one point he chopped the Pauley Pavilion article in half. Still no edit summary oe explanation for these actions. If he had spoken up at some point to let someone know why here was doing this, this whole sorry mess could have been averted. But he didn't. That made it harder and harder to assume good faith as the behavior escalated.

597:. When I first started exporting Knowledge articles to there, everything broke. It drove me crazy for a week or so. Finally, after asking around, I was able to see how to write the wiki table code without it breaking. The reason we use HTML at all is because normal wikicode gets broken when used with #if functions, but the way around this is to use 6377:

conflict recently. You mentioned that you are having difficulties in your real life, as well. As a friend, I would encourage you to take a little break if you have not already. If you have feel free to ignore and/or delete this message as you see fit. Remember, in the end it is just an encyclopedia. I wish you the best, on and off wiki.

1901:). I explained that if they were to identify their previous account by email to a CU or similar and it was determined that it was not being used then the tariff on this account could be adjusted. They did not choose to do so. In the end another sysop looked at the facts, and decided to unblock. That is fine, it's how things work around here. 5119:. Be polite, apologies, and tell them you understand why we take the no-threats issue so seriously (I'm hopping that you actually do understand this, and would not just be saying it to just be unblocked). We're pretty good about giving users another chance, so as long as you mean it, you'll probably be given one. -- 2103:. Someone did tell me that a dev could probably change this, so maybe filing a bug report is the way to go. Recently the Wikia interwiki link broke and we changed a bunch of links to use normal ELs. It's since been fixed, but I'm holding off reverting back to the interwiki version until this can get fixed. -- 1237:, but I feel like the rest of the proposals (especially the enforcement by blocks) has the potential to draw a line with the other side's tendentious edit warring. I think this may be an excellent way to get back to work. Besides, if they close the case, the "problematic" injunction will be lifted. 6148:

More often than not I am civil and I don't make personal attacks. I apologies for not having the foresight to avoid the discussion while I was pissed off (about unrelated issues in real life), but it doesn't happen often. We're humans, we make mistakes, and the only person I need to answer to in this

5869:

Ned: How many of your unblock requests have been declined? I think you don't truly understand how these blocks work (like when you said "only if good hand/bad hand", which is not true). You should research the edits or reasoning more. You often come off as just attacking the blocking admins based on

5712:

Your tone sometimes borders on the adversarial. When you say things like "Seems some admins need to actually review WP:SOCK." which you posted at User talk:CharlesFinnegan, you are unlikely to gain sympathy from those same admins. We're all on the same team, and taking the stance that admins are to

5327:

Nothing personal, but parts of your deletion endorsement, and similar rationales that I've seen, really troubles me. It seems to be that we have it in our minds that if other users don't notice a deletion debate then their opinions don't matter. "If you don't get in by the deadline you comments means

3971:

Would it be possible to locate a reference that claims these attacks were perpetrated by the same group, that does not first cite Kevin Poulsen or Wired as its source? Reprints of the same source that cite that source are effectively just the same source, reprinted. As far as I can tell, the fountain

3538:

That might be how you feel, but it's far more than reasonable. Having a second category doesn't add any more maintenance, nor does it create any more of a burden on the servers. I'm inclined to make one to try it out, and you're free to CfD it, but don't be surprised when it's kept. Not only is there

3254:

Aside from the individual messages' appropriateness (or lack thereof), would you not agree that edit-warring to re-insert jokes is inappropriate? I don't condone any of the April Fools' Day pranks, but most of the users behind them had their fun and moved on. Viridae, conversely, continually fought

3113:

Understandable, but drama was never my intention. I even made my message even more direct and neutral from the previous time in an attempt to still give notice, but to minimize drama (that might result from my notices). And while I still strongly believe that a notice should be at the Village Pump, I

2899:

I'm divided about this block. Simply bringing up a thread elsewhere (albeit in an area I would not have) does not justify a block of a long-time user. On the other hand, Ned you do have a history of being less than a model Wikipedian in how you handle these sorts of things so I can somewhat see where

2641:

I hadn't picked up on that this would be a technical restriction for new users. I'm not so sure about that, but at the same time I can't say that it's a bad idea. There was a time when we wanted quantity over quality on Knowledge, but maybe we're stepping away from that stage (though we do have a lot

2562:

Given the history of this editor, which I've seen back to 2005, with no earned blocks at all, and no warnings that I've seen either, his suddenly having two indef blocks, also without specific warnings, is pretty abrupt. The proper warning for the "vandalism," -- I think that technically one of these

2453:

down to size for us. I copied the episode template over to it already. What I'd like is fields for "Name", "Page", and "Other Appearances", with a column spanning row called "Description" (instead of ShortSummary). If this is an easy thing for you and you want to, just go ahead and do it. I think

1964:. The gist of the suggestions is to institute a requirement for notifying those registered users whose identifying info is being sought by subpoenas in third-party lawsuits. These suggestions are motivated in large part by a discussion that took place in January 2008 at the Village Pump (Policy) page 1916:

No worries, and sorry if I seemed a bit harsh. I was just a bit frustrated with the situation, having thought about some past situations where sockpuppet accusations pushed others away and turned out to be false. I now see your note on her talk page, and I guess this would have been cleared up faster

1349:

I do respect and understand your point Ned Scott. However, please do understand that we are talking about a restriction and not a ban. In fact it may not be for the best of everyone but it clearly represents a consunsus between arbitrators and i personally believe it will benefit the project while it

6272:

More seriously, it makes people unhappy, and their discouragement could lead to departure from Knowledge. Because Knowledge is at heart an online community, to maintain the effectiveness of the community, all members must be civil to one another and remember why they have joined the community in the

4987:

But combine that with the stone wall when asked to explain, and it starts to become a problem. Language barrier or not, Kanabekobaton should have taken the hint that other editors were trying to communicate with him. To just blank the talk page and continue right ahead without a peep in any language

4173:

Hey! I'm sorry I've been MIA for so long... I want to at least fix poor Wikipe-tan's right foot before she's put up for FPC, and now that I got my tablet working again I'm going to get that done within the next couple of days. Sorry about the delay, but hopefully she'll look better when I'm done and

2790:

Procedure means noting in a debate like this. What you don't understand is this isn't something that you can actually delete. Even if there is no on-wiki copy, there is nothing stopping anyone from pasting the code onto a user's talk page, just as if it were subst'ed. You can't XfD the act of giving

2756:

I un-closed the deletion nomination because it has not still been 5 days since I put it up, and I want to make sure there are no complaints later about no consensus or about rushed deletions. If the barnstar gets re-created on a different form, I want to make sure we can point ot this debate without

2252:

Hi Ned. My notability merge drive of Stargate articles on single elements is nearing its end (there is still much to do afterwards). Since you have the SG wikiproject userbox on your userpage, and since you participated in some SG TfDs with keep, I ask you about your opinion on the following. I have

1632:

No problem; my question concerned your statement about the racist editor above, "he did some good work." Since you mentioned that as part of a justification for not blanking his page, I was wondering what "good work" you were referring to. And you're certainly not obligated to care about Jews, but I

1533:

make it true, nor does it mean anyone is "gathering friends." I have not, at any time, contacted Boodles (or anyone else) on or off-project, to blank that userpage. Perhaps the fact that you're the only one restoring it, and more than one other editor is deleting it, should let you know that perhaps

449:

Also, the characters on her puzzle pieces; I'd like to be sure they're correct, since I was merely tracing over Kasuga's hand-drawn characters - somewhere in there there's likely to be small mistakes or such. If I can have the actual text characters to copy I can put them in as text and then convert

6566:

If I have time I'll check it out, but for the most part I just occasionally check people who are requesting unblocks, and comment on the specifics of those blocks. Other than that, I'm not really involved in this. But like I said, if I have time I'll check it out and give an outside opinion. I wish

6269:

Incivility creates a hot, unfriendly space and a sense of threat; with civility, there's respect and a sense of safety and collegiality between all concerned, producing ample room for negotiation. Incivility puts people on the defensive, closing their minds to other ideas and preventing a consensus

5981:

Re: your question. Since you've aligned yourself with those who do not have an interest with having Knowledge fulfill the following quote of Jimbo's: "Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge. That's what we're doing." I could

5388:

Actually, CfD and uCfD specifically have a low participation rate. RfD even moreso. I'm far less worried about MfD, AfD, and DRV. I noted that this is likely a more global issue in my DRV nom, but I don't think that is a reason to ignore this situation simply because we haven't addressed the global

3940:

and thanks for signing up as interested in the 'NotTheWikipediaWeekly' conversation project - we haven't yet suggested a date and time, so I thought I'd pop round here and ask you if something along the lines of Monday 7th April, 22.30 UTC might work ok? - It's great to have more people interested,

2945:

I am glad to hear it. I was debating what to do (what I could do and what would be an appropriate response). I think we all would agree (including yourself) that you are a passionate editor and that you might get emotional from time to time. However, I felt this situation involved asking a valid

2728:

PHG to continue to contribute to the articles, simply not through direct editing, and not with incivility. Ironic, is it not, that PHG's error -- ArbComm did not impute bad faith as being involved -- was to cite sources when the sources contained contrary information (apparently in addition to what

2698:

I definitely agree that we need a way to help educate users before they just dive into editing. It might even be something we can fix with the interface of Knowledge itself. Some kind of thing where tips and parts of guidelines could come up, as they're editing, maybe. I remember being a new editor

2553:

The block was stated as being "indef" pending a resolution, I don't disagree with that, though it should not become an "indef" block as a permanent ban. I'd prefer to see a declaration that Mbstpo can get access again upon request, perhaps upon conditions. I think he would actually prefer to remain

2504:

I blocked him indef as a temporary measure purely to stop any more vandalism, and posted at ANI to see what the community thought. The general consensus there was that given all the problems with his SIX previous accounts, and now this, that his chances had run out. I can't say I disagree; he had

2054:

is prohibited for six months from making any edit to an article or project page related to a television episode or character that substantially amounts to a merge, redirect, deletion, or request for any of the preceding, to be interpreted broadly. However, he is free to contribute on the talk pages

1607:

No one contacted me, you are indeed demonstrating bad faith Ned. I'd be interested to know what "good work" you feel this user actually did. In addition to exerting great effort to put absurd amounts of lipstick on assorted Nazi pigs who are subjects of Knowledge entries, his other activity largely

1330:

If any of the arbs are reading these messages, I beg of you to accept a proposal that limits TTN's actions only when challenged. Like the others, I'm still not convinced TTN has even done something grossly wrong, but it's far better than the current proposal, allows TTN to preform non-controversial

6547:

provides references to the Embassy 2006 estimate and the ABS 2006 ancestory estimate. I respectfully ask you view my edit first as I asked first and tell me what problems you have with it before viewing Kransky's revision. (This was the terms I agreed to Kransky before promising I would not revert

6376:

Ned, speaking as a guy who really likes your style, I have to say it seems like you have had a rough couple of days. I love the way you are passionate you stand up for what you think is right, and always defend the little guy. Nonetheless, you seem to be increasingly snippy and easily drawn into

5446:

I've seen it done both ways. My worry was that some people will come in and say "it was decided, go away" to any further RfC. And I honestly do not believe that the uCfD represents a true consensus, and that we should be able to challenge those things in DRV so that the results can be clarified. I

4959:

I went back and looked at Kanabekobaton's contributions, This user has been here since 2005, and has almost never used an edit summary at all. From 2005-2007, I found only one example that wasn't automated, like a page creation or from editing a subsection of a larger article. Someone needs to get

2997:

Thank you for your belated communication. Neither of us handled the situation well, and it became extraordinarily destructive. In a re-run of that scenario, you might have been better to revert just the third point—the only one with which you took issue (it was the ham-fisted total reversion of my

2821:

Yeah, you rushed it a bit there. I know that it's frustrating having to wait a few days for a deision that you think is very clear, but on a collaborative project it's always important to be ultra-patient, wait for consensus, abide when the majority is against you (this is what annoys me more, but

2174:

In your eyes this was non-controversial and didn't change the meaning. I disagreed, and this is your response. It's a policy page, and no matter how sure you think you are, when someone questions your change you're supposed to discuss it like an adult and not throw a hissy fit. If you want to make

1505:

do point people to a "historical" parameter that can be used, but I fear many admins don't bother to use this when putting the template on the pages of established contributors that get blocked. One way to address this is to make the "historical" option the default, and to make "delete" the option

192:

Slow and steady wins the race? It's just something I haven't gotten around to. There's a lot of link cleanup for it, and I wanted to prevent articles from being recreated via redlinks that hadn't been removed. I also still need to import the history, but that's not really a big concern, since I've

6423:

page for full info, and a date and time convertor) - that's about 21 hours from now....... There could well be an additional conversation 24 hours later - so take your pick! - I will likely cover the topics which I nominated, and am aiming for a snappy 40minute conversation - do come along if you

6021:

These users are not trash. I find it shameful that you would crap on me, who's obviously an editor in good standing, because I have stood up for them. You've had your own difficulty with being civil, treating discussions like a battlefield, edit warring, and acting like a child, but I would still

1896:

Thanks for your message on my talkpage. I note that the editor has now been unblocked by another uninvolved admin. I would comment that I blocked the account because of the incivility, with a tariff of indefinite because I was aware that they had another account. Per AGF I don't suppose that they

1453:

Little good comes out of the way it is now. He has now instructed Ss how to be uncivil and given his seal of approval to do so. Today we saw the first example of an attack, more are sure to follow. Abd also speaks of restraining me. Did you actually read everything that he wrote? When, if not now

1232:

I, too, want a good solution. Many editors (including yourself) from disparate points of view have been diligently working at FICT and WAF to resolve this problem. One editor I have not seen there is TTN. I have no personal grudge against TTN, other than the fact that he has been rude to other

4943:

Take a look at the behavior as a whole. There was no explanation for the edits. Even when warned, the only reply was to blank his talk page. Then he apparently switched to an IP to continue along as if nothing ever happened. I was not the only editor who tried to get a response out of this user.

2960:

I also am glad to hear you were unblocked shortly after being blocked, though I don't think you should have been blocked in the first place. Posting neutral messages regarding a discussion on appropriate locations on the Wiki does not in any way violate any guidelines or policies here. It is not

2867:

You are absolutely wrong in every sentence of that message. There is nothing disruptive about letting others know about this with a neutral message on relevant and non-biased discussion pages. If you dare even think of blocking me for such then don't be surprised when you lose your admin bit. --

1557:

Friend was a bad choice of words then, and I should have simply said "like-minded user" or something. This user deserves a userpage because at one time he was an editor in good standing. I'm the only one restoring only because these are issues that most other people don't want to get their hands

6548:

your revision, as you did not respect my request and want your revision to be viewed first I do not see why I should respect your request and let the article remain in it's current revision especially since you have provided that invalid reference which you have been doing for months). Thankyou

6158:

Actually Ned, you need to answer to the community, it's the community which sets the standard and the community which upholds it, for example blocks can be issued to people for persistent blocks, and we have notice boards where we can ask for help regarding user's who breach etiquette. I am not

6006:

No, I don't go out of my way to keep trash around when we're better off without them. The users you have stood up for have a bad habit of being less than civil, of treating the encyclopedia as a battlefield and have serious problems with playing well with others. I like anal retentiveness in my

5102:

The best thing to do is to simply apologies and make it clear that you'll try your best at not making any comment that could be considered a physical threat. You and I know you weren't serious, but not everyone knows that, and it really bothers some people. It's basically a no-tolerance kind of

4221:

to better organise and plan conversations - and I'd also like to encourage all interested folks to watchlist that page for updates / changes etc. which will probably be a smoother way of staying in touch than many talk page messages (though it's great that more people are expressing interest in

2062:

Furthermore, the parties are instructed to cease engaging in editorial conflict and to work collaboratively to develop a generally accepted and applicable approach to the articles in question, and are warned that the Committee will look very unfavorably on anyone attempting to further spread or

1338:

TTN might have had a liberal interpretation of ArbCom's instructions from the last case, but something like this would be a lot more clear cut, and I have no doubt he would follow it. Perhaps this could be given a trial time of a week or two, and if not effective then simply default to the 1.1

5965:

Well, everything is available in my archives. I try to keep the number of revisions below the bigdelete threshold, and I prefer not to have all the vandalism and suchlike in the history. If you want me to selectively restore some, I can, it's just that I find it easier to just restore 1. It's

6288:

As you can see, it is possible your behaviour is driving people from Knowledge, and also that editors are encouraged to discourage incivility. If you do not have the self control in order to prevent yourself from posting comments in which you accuse people of being a Nazi, the onus is on the

5490:

I will certainly support you in more general discussions. (and I far you made a mistake withdrawing the Deletion ?Review--in my view, it's a good visible place for a general discussion) But I think you should then start a new centralised discussion about such categories in general. Besides

6355:

I just meant the quoting of policy. It's all in my head, though, just some personal stuff happing in real life that I've obviously let spill over on the wiki. I have to head off back to work right now, and will be home later tonight, so I'll be able to do a full and proper apology then. --

5184:

As a side note, I was wondering if maybe a generic form of this hack might be something we could make that could be passed params for the episode list name so we wouldn't have to make a new one for each show that is basically the same except for the name of the list to hide summaries from?

592:

Tidy basically fixes when formatting gets mixed. For example (wikitag) (html) (/html) (wikitag) would work, but (wikitag) (html) (wikitag) (/html) will break. At least I think that's how it works.. it's been a while since I explored the issue. I've converted a bunch of templates for use on

4847:(where some experience is shown and hinted) and in combination with the recent activity regarding ElisaEXPLOSION, I felt a block had been warranted–but in the absence of any further evidence to conclude the account could be under the control of Elisa, an unblock was necessary. Regards, 4216:

I've confirmed a time for the next conversation on Tuesday night, US time, (Wednesday, 02.30 UTC). Huge apologies that this isn't going to be good for Euro folk, and I know Anthony and Peter will likely be unable to attend therefore. It's possible we need a bit of a wiki effort at the

442:

It's 5:18am here and I finally finished her. I've gone over the image a few times and tried to ensure all mistakes were fixed, and I've cleaned it up a little more several dozen times over, so it should be almost-perfect! You can view a larger version than the previews in the sandbox

1622:

I didn't say anyone contacted you either. If you want to assume that I'm assuming bad faith (zomg), go ahead. My point still stands, there is no consensus to blank. I'm being objective here. I don't care about nazis or jews or any of that, and I'm not here to debate those topics. --

4470:

Evening. I recently noticed Jack Merridew's indefinite ban. I gather that the two of you were compatriots of a sort, and I had defended him from vandals despite our directly opposing views; I wanted to discuss editing philosophies once I could muster that sort of coherence again.

6289:

community to help you achieve such self control, or otherwise ensure such behaviour does not happen. I don;t really wish to see this issue escalate, but I'm not sure how else to solve the problems your incivility presents. Would avoiding debates which make you frustrated help?

5550:

article and found out that this person was never sent a warning for his work despite the weeks that his information. Since I know you are involved with the Digimon project I should let you know especially since in most cases the material lasted weeks before someone noticed.

2351:. If you think the situation needs clarifying, you could add a further comment. Alternatively, if you think I should remove my note, you are welcome to discuss the matter with me on my talkpage (as I would rather have hoped you might have done in the first place). Regards, 2332:

gets picked up, the template will get even bigger. I don't know yet how many of the lists (especially RACE characters and RACE technology) will be considered for mergers into Miscellaneous lists, which in turn would reduce the template a little again. What do you think? –

5581:

Hi, I notice your "speedy keep" there, but wasn't clear about the meaning of your comment "Speedy keep, at most we would mark it as historical (or some other tag)." Do you mean "as of" should be retained in some kind of historical category, but not be a standard link?

1732:

don't have that parameter yet), the ShortSummary should be transcluded correctly on the season page. If however LongSummary is added for another episode of the same season (work-in-progress kind of a situation), then LongSummary should be transcluded per the updated

2760:

I understand your decision of userfying and not losing time with this sort of stuff, but, if the result is deletion, then it should be deleted even if it's userfied, since the point of the deletion is that it shouldn't exist at all anywhere on the wikipedia.

1233:

editors. As a matter of fact, I can not think of a single instance where we have had a conflict. Nevertheless, I feel that it is a good thing for the Arb Com to draw a line and say "this behavior is unacceptable." You may feel that they only did this two

2822:

many times I discovered I was the one that was wrong), and follow the procedures. Well, you didn't cause any non-reparable damage, and the next time you know what *not* to do on a nomination process. You could say that you had an educative experience :D --

5286:

Before you finish with those deletions, I should tell you that I plan to bring that to DRV. The category was not meant to be an article collaboration category, but a technical aid category, and there were many things not even considered in the debate. --

5200:

I've been thinking about how to make it generic, but I'm not really sure how to do it yet. The best I can think up with is if we could find a way to just trigger on "List of" regardless of the show, but I haven't figured out a way to actually do that. --

1656:

Again, my question was what "good work" are you referring to in your defense of keeping this racist editor's user page up. If you dont have an answer, or don't wish to answer, I'll move on. I was just responding to what you said as support for your view.

3692: 3668: 6232:

It's like you're one of those typo nazis that just have to correct people every time they make a typo. Give it a rest and go report some of the guys who are actually trying to drive people off the project because they disagree about content issues. --

4894:

because they were creating formatting issues with the infobox becoming much too wide on many (all?) articles. Your edit looked well-intentioned so please feel free to try again. But please verify the results by checking a few knotting articles (e.g.

6083:

Maybe? Sort of. Kinda. I got rid of some that had absolutely no incoming links, hadn't been touched in over a month, and had only one revision. A pretty narrow subset, which I think in the overall scheme of deletions, is uncontroversial housekeeping.

1927:

Ned, your efforts to see VivianDarkbloom unblocked deserve some serious credit. You've also defended me and TTN on separate occasions, and for that you have my thanks and respect. I'm happy to have you as a fellow editor, and as a fellow human being.

2729:

he cited or was implying, not as direct falsification), and then the same thing is done by them with respect to reporting the arbitration. Or possibly even worse.... It is very clear to me now, it was not clear at first. The ArbComm decision almost

3118:

related. I understand that more people involved in a discussion sometimes has the effect of more drama, but that drama is short lived (and hardly that bad), and the value of having more comments from the community far outweighs the annoyance. --

983:

Hi Ned. I think that the "Written by" field should appear before the "directed by" field, because that is how they are usually billed on the TV shows, whether it's during the action after the opening credits, or on the scrolling end credits. --

3539:

a good reason to have such a category, it might even be more used than the general participants category. WikiProjects often maintain several project-specific maintenance categories, as well as having more than one participation category via

2914:

I've said it once before, it doesn't matter if you're right or worng when people assume the worst. No policy was violated, and "forum shopping" is very speculative. The disputed edits were a whooping total of three with a single revert. --

298:, minus the summaries. I copied the code from the Lost episode list "hack" and made one for Lassie. It is all working great, except I can't figure out how to make it so it doesn't show {{ShortSummary}} if there is no summary to include (see 5086:

was something I apologized about, and it was not a serious threat. Can you please help me get my user page unblocked? I am an old active user contributor and I have a bunch of material for articles I have been working on. I appreciate it.

2605:

I can only assume that your silence means that you are uniterested in this situation. I know I can't force any editor to care about a particular situation, but I wish I could get you to comment as I think your insight would be valuable.

1038:

Ned - I saw your question at the discussion about hidden categories. You may already have seen the note, but there is now a setting in the user preferences to toggle the display. It's under "Misc", titled "Show hidden categories". Cheers.

5447:

wish I noticed the discussion before it ended, so that I could ask for one of those extensions/relisting, and then note the discussion on other talk pages. I'm troubled by this concept that "you're too late" means "you don't matter". --

2151:

the two versions? WTF was controversial about the changes, which, to my eyes, removed fluff and strengthened the existing meanings without changing their substance. Frankly, it's the way it should have been written in the first place.

5754:

Would you like me to add up all the times I've gotten a user unblocked by using the unblock template? I don't see a need to change my methods of requesting unblocks. Also, I normally do post on ANI regarding the unblocks as well. --

4056:

Could you please not close the MfD? At least two (perhaps three) users feel the page should be deleted. I understand you don't, but couldn't you just vote rather than close? Deletion takes at least 5 days anyway. There's no "rush".

3255:

with other administrators to include a joke on every page in the encyclopedia. When a particular sysop countered his efforts, he retaliated with the aforementioned vulgar personal attack and by vandalising that sysop's user page.

516:

Hi Ned. Since you expressed interested, I wanted to let you know that I have created a RFC regarding the temporary injunction so the community can attempt to reach a consensus regarding this issue. Please comment with your views at

3747:

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for

2733:

keeping these pages. Sure, PHG can take them off-wiki, which then makes it more cumbersome for him to then pull material from them and copy it to the relevant Talk pages. That is inhibiting what ArbComm specifically encouraged.

3664: 859: 5359:

The other concern you appear to have concerns the number of commenters which may equal consensus. What seems like a "long time ago" to me, I suggested a minimum "quorum", but was shouted down due to it overlappingly violating

2699:

and being frustrated at why someone didn't tell me about something before I worked a lot on something, only to find a better way or that the idea was rejected, or something like that. It would also be a lot more efficient. --

2667:

What do you think about a Welcomebot? Has anything like that been tried before? I certainly believe we could do more to educate our newer editors and I like the automated tutorial idea, I just think it should be voluntary.

1989:

I'll take a look and see if I have anything to add. I was really interested in seeing what would happen regarding our privacy policy after finding out about that situation. Thanks for letting me know about your proposals. --

1209:

I know it could look odd or out of place. Kasuga just does such beautiful work, and I'd rather have that adorn an article than a deletable (and often contentious) live image. I just don't know how backlogged he is. Cheers,

4229:

and sign up - this is a great help in making sure everyone is around. We generally chat for about 10 minutes before 'going live' and the whole process takes about an hour, and I very much look forward to chatting to all!

518: 6149:

situation is Percy for an apology. And while it was a little too late, after making the edit summary and a following talk page comment I became fully aware that I needed to step away from the situation, which I did. --

3102:

Following your edits on Village Pump and the Administrators' noticeboard for incidents, I had a strong impression that you were trying to increase drama levels over the Daniel Brandt affair, and may have overreacted.

1593:

I didn't say you contacted anyone or asked them. There's no reason to blank the page, and the only rationale anyone has came up with is that "we did it for someone else". That translates to: no consensus to blank. --

3107: 3372:

And in that particular instance, I wasn't even certain that the edit was a prank (as opposed to an honest mistake). If I had been, I would have rolled it back (instead of reverting manually) and warned the user.

5545:

article to clean up a made up attack. But the problem is that the one responsible was also a repeat offender who did it with other Digimon articles which I took notice when I was cleaning up vandalism done to the

4721:

I just noticed the transclusions of the season tables which you introduced. Pure genius. One thing I don't understand is why the summaries aren't transcluded with the rest of the tables? Is there a trick to that?

3094: 2320:(which still lists some of the to-be-merged articles). The good about it is (1) it gets rid of a lot of redundance and (2) it lists all wikipedia articles (except episodes) that there are about the SG universe. 6340:

I am talking normally. What do you want to talk about? Do you feel I am being unreasonably harsh? How do you feel about the language you've used in the past, and do you think you need to better modify it?

5870:

his superficial reading of the issue. I think it'd be better if you told users about how to unblock rather than submit the request yourself via the template, or use ANI for a review like Jayron32 suggested.

5789:

I apologies if I seem a little short tonight. I'm just very frustrated at how so many admins are not understanding the concept that blocking is a last resort, and shouldn't be done based on speculation. --

3679: 1791:

uses to trigger table cells based on the existence of a parameter, rather than if it is filled out or not. I don't think the trick is actually documented anywhere. I figured it out one day when I noticed

5215: 5174: 3593: 1152:

Yes there are still several smaller issues, but its already working a lot better then I had ever expected it to work. I'll be working on finding the remaining bugs in the next couple of days or so. --

5915:

Please don't reorder my comments - they're replies to specific points and they don't make sense out of context. Now that I know you don't like having your comments split I'll try to avoid doing so.

447:. I'd like some feedback, tell everyone to nitpick it and point out things that should be fixed; I've been working on it so long I'm going blind so you guys might be able to find things I missed ;) 2590:? Then could you A.) post a reply to my idea and B.) if you agree, discuss how we could create and implement this robot? I truly believe this could help new editors before they create articles. 1567:

You're still assuming bad faith. I've not contacted any "like-minded users" to "help" with the reversions. No one "deserves" a userpage, which is why indef-banned users often have their's blanked.

836:

of text, font, etc. Don't get me wrong, I'm the one who uploaded the image and I'm all for its use, I just want to make absolutely sure we can safely say that it is free-use instead of fair-use.

6419:

G'day NotTheWikipediaWeeklian (p'raps we need a catchier nom de plume?) - it's terribly short notice but I'm going to be hosting a discussion tomorrow, Thursday 15th May at 23.00 UTC (head to the

573:

to run correctly are "poorly designed." I would like to learn what sort of template coding errors HTML Tidy is silently fixing up, so I can help make Knowledge's templates easier to port to other

5343:

I tend to follow the convention that if someone wishes to join in a discussion, they will. (Barring Wikibreak, or such) This has been illustrated for me time and again by the fact that we'll see

3649: 1737: 1726: 1716: 5622: 1298: 2064: 2056: 5997:

So you treat me as your enemy because I don't shun people like you do? The world is not black and white, and I find nothing wrong about working with editors who I sometimes disagree with. --

2775:

P.D.:Of course, feel free to give your opinion that it should be userfied, but please let an admin close the debate, since I want to be sure that the process is 100% adjusting to procedure --

1762:

is transcluded (just using the preview, no saving). The episode "Prophecy" of this test case just has ShortSummary, and "Full Circle (Part 1)" has ShortSummary and LongSummary as parameters.

1525:

I had never, to my knowledge, interacted with Boodles. Your edit summary of "feel free to gather more friends to outnumber me" was wildly inappropriate, and a complete and utter violation of

5311: 3524:

We already have 1 category for each Wikiproject. We don't need a second for only the new users, and I'd nominate such a category for deletion even if it was possible to execute accurately.

3284:

Edit warring is bad, but considering what day it was, I honestly can't see it as a big deal. It is something I hope we can avoid next year, which is one of the reasons I left my message on

2089:

Hi Ned, I saw your comment on Luna's page in response to my post there. I've created a meta account, but do not know my way around over there. A few pointers would be appreciated. Cheers,

6252:

From my perspective, you need to learn to take a break, and also consider how your comments can affect other users. We have standards of behaviour which document what is expected and why:

4099: 2000: 1608:

consisted of pushing his own POV in more obscure debates on Assyrian nationalism, where he received similar accusations of making heinous, despicable remarks against his opponents there.

2717: 6173:

Here's an idea, don't flip out just because you saw someone have a bad day. I had already backed off and recognized my error. So thanks but no thanks, "Dad", but I got it from here. --

4258: 3568:

Which pages do you want? Give me a list and I'll post them to your userspace for a day or so (protected of course), assuming their not BLPs and no one jumps on me in the next 5 mins.

6497:

I thank you for your attention to the issues, and especially for bearing with us in this challenging debate. While I can not speak for TeePee, I would assume he is equally grateful.

6078: 4646: 1967:

in relation to an incident where identifying IP data of sixteen Knowledge users was released in response to such a subpoena. I also left a note about these proposal at Village Pump,

5002:

It is a problem, and I hope the user puts out a better effort in the future. I just don't think it's something to jump on a block for, and a lot of things were being over-looked. --

4149:

Oh, yeah, and I invoked WP:IAR because it's a project with a lot of potencial to be beneficious to wikipedia, and we shouldn't allow rules to disturb it without a very good reason --

4517: 4372: 2310: 6507:(15:58, 17 May 2008 ) which provides references to the Jupp 2001 estimate and the ABS 2006 ancestry estimate, with caveats attached which explain their respective difficiencies. 273:

Cool...and I just realized that with those new fields, I can now more easily use this template for light novel lists since the graphic novel one isn't quite working well. *grin*

1765:

What I really haven't figured out yet is how to make the template check whether a parameter (i.e. LongSummary) even exists, and switch to ShortSummary otherwise. I already read

6066: 3123: 3052:) from your name on the list of participants. If you are no longer interested in the Council, you need take no action: your name will be removed from the participants list on 5929: 5162: 3589: 2300: 1021:. Feel free to notify as many other people/talk pages as you want, since there really wasn't a lot of feedback on this the last time it was discussed. The more the better. -- 303: 1436: 4353: 4343: 4333: 4319: 1897:

used that other account to edit while this one was blocked - but that is the reason why alternate accounts are blocked when the individual is in violation of WP policy (see

1322: 242: 5158: 2001: 1699: 1647:

Wait what? I'm talking about in context to this situation. Why would you try to turn around my comment to make it seem anti-semitic? That's obviously not what I meant. --

862:

also has a lot of good examples. Many images can also be trademarked, which can restrict how one uses something, but it's considered a different issue than copyrights. --

402: 364: 5701:

I first want to say that your efforts to advocate for blocked users are commendable, however I think your specific approach may be counterproductive for several reasons.

4129:

Only two users endorse the deletion, and mainly because of misuse of userspace. However, the interpretation of WP:USER that the page being discutted is for a project not

4841:

about 10 minutes ago, and I apologise for the unorthodox approach I took to the blocking. In retrospect, however, I do find it a little concerning that first edits like

3732:

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion

3623: 1502: 770: 1971:. Since you have participated in the January Village Pump discussion, I hope that you will contribute to the discussion of the current suggestions at the WMF website, 6093: 5955: 4800: 4781: 2718: 193:

already exported the xml file, and technically a list of contributors satisfies the GFDL as well. I'm fine with completely redirecting it or taking it to deletion. --

2624:

Sorry, I've just been spending a bit less time on Wiki lately over all. I'll give it a look now, since from what I skimmed through it seems like a very good idea. --

2079: 914: 2260: 2227: 2223: 294:(588 episodes, 19 seasons). I remembered reading about what was done with Lost so that the episode lists were transcluded from individual season pages into the main 5511:

Though I realise that this has the potential of opening up a huge kettle of worms (to mix metaphors), but since both of you are here in the same thread, let me ask:

5265: 5190: 3638: 2527: 2270: 2211: 1968: 1327:

Regarding this case, I know a lot of discussion is floating around, but I really feel strongly about this and wanted to get more attention to this comment I made:

1290:. This is to inform you, that I have made a proposal for resolution for the issue. I am informing all of the users who participated, so this is not an attempt to 311: 299: 278: 250: 6022:

stand up for you if you were ever wrongfully blocked. No matter how much you insult me right now that's something that will always be true. Keep that in mind. --

5720:

and do so in a neutral tone that does not accuse admins of sloppiness or bad faith then you are likely to get better results. If nothing else, a block review at

2540: 1343: 952: 935: 3515:

Have a userbox with a hardcoded date. If the date is less than X number of days since, then place in the category. It would take care of all the maintenance. --

2280: 1965: 4924:

Ack, I removed the formatting that was supposed to go back in. Sorry about that. I probably won't bother with it until getting some more feedback on the RFC at

2746: 2348: 3751: 3735: 3720: 3696: 3653: 690: 1266: 4869: 4795: 4777: 3104: 2478: 1224: 6433: 5705:

Asking for general block reviews by using the unblock template is unlikely to generate positive results. The proper forum to ask for a block review is at

4266: 4247: 1568: 1535: 1246: 906: 902: 790: 490: 5297:

Thank you for the notice. As an aside, I'd be interested what facet of "technical aid" wasn't brought up. (I thought Black Falcon was fairly thorough.) -

3147:

Thanks for the notification, I assume it will be at the usual place? (Also, do you want any further explanation from me regarding the deletions?) Cheers,

2416: 2242: 1437:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:Attention-deficit_hyperactivity_disorder_controversies&curid=4833604&diff=195740692&oldid=195740454

5261: 5186: 4691: 2114: 1953: 307: 274: 246: 6411: 6054: 5337:

First, absolutely "nothing personal" taken. Discussion is a hallmark of Knowledge. And by the way, I appreciate your thoughts, and your notes/notices.

4848: 3972:

of information regarding this claim still belches forth from a single point, that of convicted felon Kevin Poulsen via his position at Wired magazine.

3608: 2980: 771: 6026: 6016: 6001: 5686:

No problem, and I hope your future experiences here on Knowledge are more positive. If you ever need any help (with anything) feel free to ask me. --

5437:

page. Trying to clump it into an XfD/DrV nomination, merely confuses the topic, and is unlikely to gain you the actual "discussion" you're seeking. -

4576:

should do the trick. It's an ifeq statement that surounds the entire ShortSummary section, and triggers depending if the current title of the page is

2491: 4498:. There's also a chance he might come back to en.wikipedia, with some sort of restrictions, but that's up to the ArbCom if they want to try that. -- 4198: 3174:

I noticed that you gave this to Viridae, and I'm just wondering what's so funny about adding a vulgar personal attack to every article. Thanks! —

2878: 503: 5194: 4874: 4704: 4636: 4588: 3960: 3032:. The WikiProject Council is currently having a roll-call; if you are still interested in participating in the inter-project discussion forum that 2724:

I started to get truly exercised about this when I realized that the ArbComm decision was being misrepresented before the MfD. ArbComm specifically

1983: 1921: 1551: 1317: 1012: 586: 5570: 5045: 4494:

I'm not much for getting smashed, but I wouldn't mind meeting others in real life :) . If you're looking to contact Jack you can still find him on

4158: 4144: 2438: 2423: 2219: 2212: 2107: 1773: 1666: 1651: 1642: 1627: 1617: 1598: 1584: 1562: 1008:

Hmm, I had not considered that. I'll see what the others think about it, but since we've only just started it would probably be an easy change. --

5269: 5205: 555:

you say "However, with a little bit of tweaking, it can be used without changing Tidy." Can you give me some hints about what you changed to make

282: 264: 6571: 5547: 4276: 4242: 2813: 2795: 2615: 1686: 871:

Can you just add all those links to policy pages also to the image's talk page, w/ some clarification as to why it is ineligible for copyright?

6537: 5152: 3426: 3398: 3377: 3329: 3300: 3263: 3251:

We obviously don't see eye-to-eye on the issue of pranks in general, buy yeah, that's the only one that I regard as vulgar or a personal attack.

3234: 3217: 3196: 2955: 2703: 2677: 2628: 1260: 760: 751: 733: 6557: 6247: 5794: 5776: 5560: 5464: 5332: 5243: 5222: 5006: 4997: 4982: 4973: 4577: 4524: 4439: 4419: 4222:

participating...). With that in mind, if you'd like to reply to this message, please do so at my talk page, and I'll respond as soon as I can.

3776:

I will get through all of them, but I must sleep right now. So add any others and I'll get them tomorrow. its not like their going anywhere.

3619: 3356: 2650: 2487:

Oh, ok. Sorry for the slow response, too. I haven't been very active on Knowledge in the last week or so. Let me know if you need any help. --

2376: 2055:

or to comment on any AfD, RfD, DRV, or similar discussion initiated by another editor, as appropriate. Enforcement of this remedy is specified

1947: 1853: 1692: 1025: 594: 546: 540: 224: 215: 206: 197: 5857: 5836: 5827: 5759: 4287:

The comment about deleting the pages by the end of the day was a joke, but the pages are all under MfD. I trust you have seen that. Cheers, ~

4045: 3547: 3533: 3519: 3498: 3230:

Oh, you're talking about that one specifically. No, I do not think that is acceptable, but the other versions were pretty much fine by me. --

2967: 1878: 1836: 1423: 1407: 1365: 6483: 6036: 5897:

IIRC, most resulted in unblocking. I understand how these blocks work just fine, and a disturbing number of them are being made in error. --

5672: 5071: 3917: 3884: 3851: 3826: 3801: 3784: 3767: 2936: 2919: 2894: 2872: 1394: 1131:

Ah, thanks! But I notice the on/off thingie in the corner, next to "log out" doesn't work, so it always defaults to being on when I edit. --

473: 315: 254: 6360: 6350: 6319: 6298: 6237: 6191: 6177: 6168: 5901: 5690: 4863: 4379: 4363: 3449: 2362: 5656: 5647: 5629: 4932: 4566: 4502: 4310: 4304: 4010: 3163: 3096: 2909: 2179: 2136: 1994: 1190: 1165: 1135: 1126: 1104: 1066: 1002: 211:

Was just making sure it (and anything else related) was still on your radar; I don't particularly care what you do with it at this point. —

186: 5473: 5451: 5441: 5406: 5375: 5318: 5301: 4853: 3981: 3472: 3459: 1219: 880: 866: 845: 827: 818: 800: 6153: 6107:

edit summary is neither civil nor in keeping with our policy on personal attacks. Please could you modify your behaviour. All the best,

5502: 4812: 4460: 4409: 3634: 3088: 1910: 1520: 1018: 5748: 5356:. But I think (for the most part) these things are handled tolerably. And I have to say I respect nearly every regular closer of WP:DRV. 4226: 466: 6116: 5991: 5924: 4918: 3717:

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion

3045: 3029: 910: 6135: 5891: 5724:

may reveal more information from the blocking administrator that would indeed show that they were quite justified in making the block.

4447:

For the moment, I've stopped deleting them. Some of the arguments presented in favor of keeping them are kinda silly and remind me of

3582:

Hard to tell what was deleted, and I have no way of knowing which ones even have any real content, but here's what I've got right now:

2342: 925: 6104: 4697: 1371: 6007:

maid... it keeps the dust away. I find it annoying and useless in someone who pretends to be working on building this encyclopedia.

5528: 3178: 2205: 1937: 5943: 5939: 5601:

Basically, proposals that don't gain support, or that are even totally rejected, are very often kept and placed with a tag such as

4776: 4573: 4488: 2253:

the intention to propose it in the SG wikiproject later (I don't expect much of a response there, as it is pretty much abandoned).

2831: 2784: 2770: 566: 452:

I'm off to sleep, but I should be around again in 8 hours or so and will be free to fix any mistakes after then. All the best, --

5123: 4978:

Edit summaries aren't required, they're just encouraged. We always have the option of looking at what they're actually doing. --

4204: 4188: 3440: 3041: 2463: 2445:). We haven't decided how to do it yet, but it looks like a template is going to be needed. I'd like to create a template like 1515: 701: 6456: 5040:, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to 1078: 530: 5536: 4882: 3966: 3296:

we'll have a bit of fun too. That being said, while what happened this year is not desirable, I still thought it was funny. --

2599: 2409: 173: 5291: 4294: 3950: 3349: 2337: 973: 6098: 3604: 3017: 1824:

is used, if it is then it will do one thing, if anything else is used (including "nothing") then, it will do something else.

425: 383: 338: 236: 3325:

Well, I don't regard the simultaneous vandalism of every page as funny or minor, so we'll just have to agree to disagree. —

2848:

the deletion of the Daniel Brandt redirect - it is extremely disruptive. This will be grounds for blocking if you continue.

931:

Thank you. Although, after your own explanation of why you listed it, I no longer felt insulted or anything like that :) --

5696: 5178: 5170: 4806: 4787: 4384: 4339:

tags that are used on pages that are not indef blocked and removing them. The majority of pages have duplicate tags (both

2987: 1110: 998: 472:

Oh - a friend and I went over her again and found a few little things I want to fix. I'm making a list on the talk page at

4953: 4868:

Thanks Ned. I don't know why you helped me but you did so I thank you.If there's anything you need I'll see what I can do.

4094: 2226:. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, 2126: 1491: 1477: 1463: 1448: 1056: 5552: 5349:

of people commenting on a page, but very few actually commenting on more than just the nom of their own personal concern.

4035: 3037: 2861: 2404: 2388: 2093: 1575: 1542: 1094: 178:

What's up here? This has been in this "sort of a weird middle stage" since mid-November. (ran across this while browsing

6386: 5103:

issue. We actually have had Wikipedians who have had some scary encounters in real life because of wiki discussions. On

3941:

and I'm very keen to be able to include as many folk as possible - hence my trip here! - how does that sound? - cheers,

2328:

also seem to do this. The bad thing is it is pretty big (I have a widescreen monitor, so I don't really mind). Also, if

2168: 5147: 4465: 1253: 2369: 2190:

Hi Ned Flanders, I have helped with the numerical digimon list. I real create the actual page now. [[User:Looney 176

1383:

is what I was reverting, I have no idea why anything else was deleted with it but I was only removing the one thread.

805:

Yeah, but it's a screenshot that could technically include graphics/images what have you with a claim of ownership by

6438: 6207: 5772:. The rationale you used there is far more acceptable than the reason given by the blocking and reviewing admins. -- 5769: 5680: 5371:

That said, please feel free to start a discussion about the processes somewhere. I know I'd be interested in them. -

5094: 5061: 4508: 3205:

You honestly believe that it's acceptable to add a message claiming that certain sysops have sticks up their rectums

2521: 2197: 978: 946: 919: 421: 398: 379: 360: 334: 6406: 6225: 5427:"That said, please feel free to start a discussion about the processes somewhere. I know I'd be interested in them." 5402:

Like I asked you before, is it really too troublesome that that we simply give more attention to this situation? --

4415:

Oops, just left a message on your talk page asking if it was simply that, but I guess this answers the question. --

3158:

I of course respect your opinion and will respect the consensus of the community as decided at the deletion review.

2513: 1401: 1380: 6182:

I haven't flipped out, I am simply reminding you what the accepted behaviour is on Knowledge. Hope that clarifies.

6103:

Ned, I have asked you before to keep your comments civil and avoid personal attacks, especially in edit summaries.

2587: 2025: 739: 552: 6478: 4000: 2449:, but I'm out of practice and reading that page's code is difficult for me. If it's easy for you, could you chop 430: 6488:

ATTN: PelleSmith, Pippu d'angelo, Itsmejudith, Blnguyen, Angusmclellan, Conman, SQL, Ned Scott and AussieLegend

6413: 4495: 4218: 4206: 4115: 4071: 2147:

Such a senseless revert is likely to make the copy-editor very annoyed. You provided no reason. Did you actually

1888: 1400:

Maybe you were viewing an old version of the page? *shrug* The section was removed though, so no worries on that

1204: 5469:

Fair enough. (I had thoughts in response to your last comment, but I think I'll wait for the new discussion.) -

3576: 3445:

Would there be any prejudges to a "new participant" category that implored a technical method of management? --

1962: 1226: 302:). With 588 eps, it will be awhile before they all have summaries. :P Do you know how I can fix the template at 5971: 5907: 5852: 5822: 5743: 5732:

instead so that many people may review and fuller sense of consensus on the matter can be reached. Thanks. --

5353: 5340:

Second, it sounds like you have concerns about the process. And not just UCFD specifically, but XfD in general.

3169: 2441:

we're working on condensing our thousands of creature pages into a number of list pages (see the discussion at

1871: 1755: 164: 159: 154: 149: 144: 5595: 4836: 3152: 3011: 1712:

last month, but I gave up because I couldn't get the following case to work: When an templated episode (think

5166: 5033: 4282: 4135:

It's a research project about how experts collaborate on wikipedia, I think it qualifies by a wide margin. --

3026: 3018: 2572: 2450: 2185: 134: 129: 4824: 499:

Awesome!! I'll be sure to tell everyone. Again, thank you sooo much for taking this on. She looks great. --

5077: 5067:

Commenting on your decision is not a personal attack. I thought it was a poor decision, and I still do. --

4830: 4424:

Y'know, I've always liked the fact that you always do what do you think is right. Thanks for the heads up.

2536:

I don't know if he was or wasn't, but an indef block is skipping a lot of steps in resolving the issue. --

966: 414: 391: 372: 353: 327: 124: 116: 111: 106: 101: 96: 91: 86: 81: 6491:

I think it is in all our interests that we resolve the debate on the cited number of Chilean-Australians.

1759: 1747: 6213: 5976: 4483: 4397: 3486: 2751: 2643: 2583: 1496: 1161: 1122: 1090: 1048: 511: 68: 6469:. Thanks for your reply btw - the Zen will start to work our way at some point. We are right after all. 5728:

Please stop posting so many unblock requests for other users, and if you wish to advocate for them, use

5634:

So do I understand that you don't support the proposal to delete, aside from your technical suggestion?

389:

I propose to create a new guideline which will restrict users from creating such nonsensical userboxes.

6012: 5987: 4818: 2900:

Krimpet is coming from. Frankly, this strikes me as a block which adds drama and doesn't do much else.

2474: 2459: 2247: 697: 72: 38: 2881:

the thread to an unrelated noticeboard it was explicitly removed from that page is crossing the line.

5281: 5181:. I've checked the code and can't see anything wrong, so I was wondering if you could take a look. 5041: 4393: 4181: 3693:

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion

3669:

User:Hut 8.5/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

2642:

of topics still left uncovered). We might be able to combined a form of this proposal with a form of

2577: 2519:

He seemed to be more of a benefit for our project on balance than a detriment, though. Sincerely, --

2113: 2019: 1766: 1431: 1215: 1033: 483: 459: 2932:

For anyone who is reading this later on, I was unblocked by Krimpet shortly after being blocked. --

2317: 642:

after the #if statement, then go to the next line to start the table row or table cell. For example:

6429: 6050: 5104: 4389: 4238: 3946: 2442: 2049: 1906: 1867: 1372: 1072: 992: 5260:

Thanks. :) I'm suspecting its that apostrophe too since I think its the first I've seen using it.

5135: 5082:

Hi. You are among the few ones that noticed that my comment on the discussion page of the article

3259:

when I blocked Viridae, and only for the remainder of the day (which amounted to twelve hours). —

3136: 6519: 5951: 5920: 5556: 4843: 4368: 2398: 2290: 2142: 2037: 1662: 1638: 1613: 1571: 1538: 444: 291: 6544: 6504: 6315:

It's ok if you just want to talk to me normally. We don't have to be formal on my talk page. --

5312:

Knowledge:Deletion review/Log/2008 April 22#Category:Wikipedians by operating system and subcats

5236: 3935: 2099:

I don't really do much over there either, but I have commented a few times on the talk page for

1722:) in a season article doesn't have a LongSummary parameter (because most episodes using the old 1468:

I've reposted it. It will give them the chance to apologize. If not I will follow your advice.--

408:

Why you are so eager in these bogus and nonsensical userboxes. If you like this userboxes, then

4168: 3285: 3033: 2836: 2382: 2325: 1751: 1709: 6243:

I'm sorry, I know you're just trying to help, but that's how it feels from my perspective. --

4859:

Thank you, and no hard feelings. We're a wiki after all, and nothing is ever set in stone. --

2222:. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, 6553: 6008: 5983: 5832:

Again, very sorry about that. And thank you for your honest feedback, I will consider it. --

5652:

I don't support deleting the page itself. I have no opinion on the advice the page gives. --

5143: 5029: 4938: 4925: 4891: 4884: 4765: 4738: 4448: 4154: 4140: 4090: 4016: 3070: 2827: 2809: 2780: 2766: 2470: 2455: 2446: 2429: 2201: 2007:

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above.

1788: 1299:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Proposed resolution (Mikkalai vow of silence)

960: 806: 295: 4474:

If we find ourselves in the same city in the near future, want to go get drunk and brood? --

3369:

You can call me whatever names you please, but I remain unapologetic about upholding policy.

2067:

enacted by the Committee on February 3 in relation to this case now ceases to be in effect.

370:

But in this line tons of nonsensical userboxes can be created. Then wikipedia will be mess.

6466: 6382: 6045:

and reformatted the header to allow faster review of the concerns you have raised. Cheers.

5946:

has been removed. I am of the view it should remain, and I wondered what you opinion is. --

4175: 2951: 2673: 2611: 2595: 2507: 2321: 2193: 1890: 1804:

would not show up, and instead you would get nothing (since nothing was entered). By using

1511: 1242: 1211: 747: 582: 477: 476:, so if you and others can leave comments there I'll work on them this evening. Thanks! -- 453: 8: 6522:. If you have not responded by 20 May I will presume you have elected not to take part. 6425: 6402: 6089: 6046: 5666: 5615: 5457: 5088: 4993: 4969: 4949: 4653: 4652:, as that's my next project and will eventually be transcluding the same way. Cheers. -- 4598: 4528: 4456: 4435: 4405: 4234: 4108: 4064: 4051: 3942: 3540: 2845: 2358: 1933: 1902: 985: 526: 212: 183: 47: 17: 5671:

Thank you for helping me with my unblock request. This has been a stressful week for me.

3665:

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

629:). I already knew how to do this, but when I did I got extra line breaks in my boxes, a 290:

Have another question for you :) I'm working on the rather ambitious task of creating a

6510:

Now I respectfully ask if you could pass judgement on my text for this version, with a

6474: 5947: 5916: 5846: 5816: 5811:

with claiming or implying that admins intentionally or neglectfully use their tools. --

5737: 5018: 4584:, the ShortSummary section is excluded, but on all other pages it will be included. -- 4020: 3977: 3529: 3494: 3080: 2392: 2090: 1695:

about the ShortSummary and LongSummary parameters. I hope that you as the developer of

1658: 1634: 1609: 1418: 1389: 1360: 970: 6444: 6212:

Just to let you know that I've requested input on this matter from outside parties at

4750: 4723: 6533: 6071: 5605: 5057: 3986: 2905: 2888: 2855: 2329: 2043: 519:

Knowledge talk:Requests for arbitration/Episodes and characters 2/Request for Comment

63: 5966:

available for viewing by admins, of course, it's not like it's been oversighted. :)

4261:

for the naming and organization of user categories that involve media and genres. -

3292:

and non-offensive, that most people can agree with, then things will go much better

2100: 245:

to see if I summarized the changes to the Japanese episode list template correctly?

6549: 6346: 6294: 6221: 6187: 6164: 6112: 5884: 5676: 5139: 5129: 5110: 4988:

is extremely rude. An attempt was made to communicate, it was apparently rejected.

4896: 4262: 4150: 4136: 4086: 2823: 2805: 2776: 2762: 2238: 2084: 2075: 1313: 1291: 6494:

TeePee and myself have presented our arguments and rebuttals for some days now.

5365: 6391: 6378: 5642: 5590: 5520:

Could you (plural) explain your position on User categories. Please also include

4913: 4478: 4288: 3996: 3423: 3374: 3326: 3260: 3214: 3175: 3006: 2947: 2669: 2607: 2591: 2163: 2031: 1979: 1961:

I posted some suggestions for changes in the WMF privacy policy at the WMF site:

1507: 1487: 1473: 1459: 1444: 1309: 1238: 1157: 1118: 1086: 855: 743: 680: 670: 578: 559: 1529:

required. Just because you feel the guy deserves to have user page content does

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

6568: 6461: 6420: 6397: 6357: 6316: 6244: 6234: 6174: 6150: 6085: 6042: 6023: 5998: 5931: 5898: 5833: 5791: 5773: 5756: 5687: 5653: 5626: 5567: 5461: 5448: 5403: 5361: 5329: 5315: 5288: 5240: 5219: 5202: 5120: 5083: 5068: 5003: 4989: 4979: 4965: 4945: 4929: 4900: 4860: 4701: 4585: 4499: 4452: 4431: 4416: 4401: 4301: 4273: 4195: 4103: 4059: 4042: 4007: 3957: 3914: 3848: 3818:

All done. Temp pages will be deleted in 24 hours or sooner if you tell me to.

3798: 3764: 3544: 3516: 3469: 3446: 3395: 3353: 3297: 3231: 3193: 3120: 2984: 2933: 2916: 2869: 2792: 2700: 2647: 2625: 2537: 2499: 2488: 2420: 2373: 2353: 2176: 2133: 2104: 1991: 1944: 1929: 1918: 1898: 1850: 1833: 1648: 1624: 1595: 1559: 1404: 1340: 1279: 1257: 1187: 1132: 1101: 1063: 1022: 1009: 932: 896: 876: 863: 851: 841: 824: 814: 797: 786: 757: 730: 537: 522: 500: 261: 221: 203: 194: 179: 4373:

Knowledge:Templates_for_deletion/Log/2008_April_10#Template:Temporary_userpage

704:

you can see what changes I had to make. Make sure that you have the templates

6470: 6452: 6131: 5842: 5812: 5733: 5729: 5721: 5717: 5706: 5576: 5498: 4960:

this person's attention to let them know why this time it's become an issue.

4030: 3973: 3563: 3525: 3490: 3062: 2992: 2976: 2962: 2742: 2568: 2334: 2013: 1875: 1770: 1526: 1413: 1384: 1351: 1283: 1268: 536:

That's actually different from what I had in mind, but I'll check it out. --

3036:

has become, or you are interested in continuing to develop and maintain the

3025:

Hi there. You are receiveing this message because your name appears on the

2505:

some good edits, but was getting to be a major time-sink for other editors.

6529: 5967: 5960: 5434: 5052: 4904: 4594: 3878: 3820: 3778: 3594:

User:Hut 8.5/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States (2nd nomination)

3570: 3159: 3148: 2901: 2883: 2850: 2218:

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located

1917:

if Vivian was simply a little clearer about what had actually happened. --

901:

Dear Ned Scott, because of the open-mindedness and reasonability expressed

409: 348: 1969:

WP:Village_pump_(policy)#Suggestions_for_changes_in_the_WMF_privacy_policy

823:

But it doesn't include any graphics or images. It's a picture of text. --

6525:

I myself, and I would hope and expect TeePee, will abide by your ruling.

6342: 6290: 6217: 6183: 6160: 6108: 5873: 3142: 2234: 2071: 718: 696:. Navbox/core is the part that needs the update, and that can be seen on 618: 435: 220:

It is, I'm just dragging my feet on that more boring clean up work :) --

3485:

Out of curiosity, how would you do the template coding for that? Modify

777:

Could you explain further on the talk page for this image, specifically

5635: 5583: 5542: 5173:. The Blue Heelers is working fine, but the one for McLeod's Daughters 4908: 4475: 3992: 2999: 2156: 2121: 1975: 1483: 1469: 1455: 1440: 1303: 1153: 1114: 1082: 1041: 729:

Let me know if you need any more help, or if it doesn't work right. --

708: 653: 602: 320: 5134:

Thought you might like to know the above editor is being discussed at

2961:

considered forum shopping as long as the notices are clearly NPOV. ···

1633:

feel sorry that you feel the need to say you "don't care" about them.

5525: 5470: 5438: 5372: 5298: 4964:

edit summary yesterday would have prevented all that happened after.

4527:, but without including the ep summary. Is this fixable? Regards, -- 4376: 4360: 3456: 2347:

I consider rather rude to remove someone else's comments, as you did

2120:... has now been deleted so you can do your page move. kind regards, 1847:{{#ifeq:{{{LongSummary|ʁ}}}|ʁ|{{{ShortSummary}}}|{{{LongSummary}}} }} 872: 837: 810: 782: 574: 570: 569:(and down a few paragraphs from the link point), templates that need 344: 4716: 4225:

If you are able to attend at the given time, please do head over to

4100:

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/User:KatherinePanciera/WPMentoring

1482:

I would appreciate it if you posted your complaint about Ss there.--

6448: 6126: 5493: 4769: 4742: 4426: 4400:

were not significant enough to require keeping the page. Cheers. --

4326: 3956:

I should be able to find out tomorrow what my work schedule is. --

3053: 2738: 2564: 2256:

I've been thinking for a while about merging all the SG templates (

2008: 1866:

Thank you very much. Works great. See "The Enemy Within" (ep 3) in

796:

Because it's just some text, common error message text at that. --

5433:

Noting that "starting a discussion" implies some proposal page or

5218:, since it should work like that. I'll give it a shot, though. -- 3913:

All clear, feel free to delete them at any time. Thanks again. --

3543:. Your objection to this really doesn't make any sense at all. -- 3129: 1972: 306:

to tell it to leave the summary blank if there isn't one to show?

5566:

Thank you for letting me know, I'll be sure to check it out. --

917:

the bit on you in my evidence of the ArbCom case. Sincerely, --

850:

No worries. I tried to find a page to help describe it. I found

5050:

attacking my decisions. Comment on content, not the contributor

742:, thank you very much indeed for the most impressive answer. -- 6059: 5024: 4593:

Thank you. It's much appreciated. I'm about to take it all to

3590:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/United States (2nd nomination)

2737:

Thanks for all your support for good causes, by the way ... --

2387:

Do you know where can I find a pure Mediawiki code version of

6065: 5713:

be mocked or reprimanded is unlikely to get positive results.

1769:

and the related pages, but was unable to find a solution. –

944:

You're welcome and that's encouraging to read. Sincerely, --

2002:

Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Episodes and characters 2

1019:

Template talk:Episode list#Order of DirectedBy and WrittenBy

5138:. Thought you might be able to contribute something there. 4272:

Thank you for the notice, I'll be sure to check it out. --

4127:

Please note that I invoked WP:IAR to close the nomination.

4029:

Are you sure you meant to decategorize the template? :P --

3624:

User:Hut 8.5/Wikipedia:Articles for Deletion/George W. Bush

3056: 6079:

Re: Again with the orphaned talk page redirect deletions..

6500:

But now is the time to get this debate finally finished.

5982:

name names, but I believe you are aware of them already.

5768:

And thank you for giving a non-sock reason for declining

4396:

didn't have anything other than a redirect. The edits to

2981:

Knowledge:Deletion review/Log/2008 March 24#Daniel Brandt

2719:

Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/PHG's archived articles

2228:

Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Betacommand 2/Workshop

2224:

Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Betacommand 2/Evidence

1743:. ShortSummary should always be transcluded on the LoE. 202:

That is, assuming arbcom won't block me for doing so. --

5239:

to see if anyone else might be able to help as well. --

3639:

User:Hut 8.5/Wikipedia:Articles for Deletion/Jimmy Wales

1808:

this can actually be usable to trigger other things. If

3394:

Then from this day forward your name will be Steve. --

676:

that has all this converted already. Basically there's

4227:

Knowledge:NotTheWikipediaWeekly#Confirmed_Participants

860:

Category:Public domain images ineligible for copyright

565:

portable to wikis not running HTML Tidy? According to

1800:) but no text was entered for it. When you did that, 1323:

Re Requests for arbitration/Episodes and characters 2

1301: 1278:

You are a previous participant in the discussion at

5177:is not working. The summaries are still showing on 5165:, I helped another editor learn do to the same for 4349:and an indef blocked tag), but a few have only the 3455:I'm not certain I understand, could you clarify? - 1781:{{#ifeq:{{{PARAMETER|ʁ}}}|ʁ|IF NOT THERE|IF THERE}} 1708:I messed around with the Short/LongSummary idea in 772:

Image:2008 01 25 Scientology site error message.jpg

5235:I've also started a thread on the VIllage Pump at 3609:User:Hut 8.5/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Human 5352:Do some things slip through the cracks? Yes. And 4907:, etc.) after changing the template. Thanks. -- 4749:Nevermind, you've answered the same right above. 2439:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons 2417:wikia:digimon:Template:Infobox_animanga_character 5048:and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. 2454:once we have that, we can modify it. Thanks. - 2213:Knowledge:Requests for arbitration/Betacommand 2 2063:inflame this dispute. Please also note that the 1412:Sorry for the problem and thanks for fixing it! 666:In any case, I went ahead and made a version of 5456:I closed the DRV early. I'll take the issue to 5423:To answer, I'll quote myself (directly above): 4176: 1943:Thank you, I appreciate that you said that. -- 478: 454: 4890:Hi there... I reverted the edits you made to 4582:List of Degrassi: The Next Generation episodes 4578:List of Degrassi: The Next Generation episodes 4525:List of Degrassi: The Next Generation episodes 4041:Oops, I see what you mean now. My mistake. -- 3620:Knowledge:Articles for Deletion/George W. Bush 3209:? If so, I'm curious as to what you consider 2757:getting lame complaints of un-appropiateness. 2122: 450:that to paths for greater accuracy, as well. 5541:I noticed your revert edit on April 6 of the 3114:kept the notice to only places that would be 1832:would ever be used for a parameter value. -- 4248:User categories relating to media and genres 4194:No worries, feel free to take your time. -- 3097:Knowledge talk:Biographies of living persons 1812:is not listed then it displays the default " 5053: 4084:Which MFD? <gets sneaking suspicion: --> 3680:Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/Main Page 3635:Knowledge:Articles for Deletion/Jimmy Wales 1954:Suggested changes in the WMF privacy policy 6396:Ned I thank you for your support as well! 3105:Anticipation of a New Lover's Arrival, The 3046:Knowledge:WikiProject Council/Participants 1079:User talk:Cacycle/wikEd_development#Safari 5157:Hi. Following the same example used for 4642:Actually, could you do the same thing at 4300:Ah, ok. Sorry if I was on edge there. -- 1787:This is actually the trick that the main 1352: 1331:actions, and addresses the core issue of 5216:Template:Episode list/McLeod's Daughters 5175:Template:Episode list/McLeod's Daughters 2233:On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, 2175:the change then go to the talk page. -- 2070:On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, 61: 4580:or not. In this case, when the page is 4174:the FPC will go that much better ;) -- 1687:ShortSummary and LongSummary parameters 14: 6484:Chilean-Australian. Resolution sought 3650:Knowledge:Miscellany for deletion/temp 2946:question and the block was overkill. 2520: 1794:{{{PARAMETER|DEFAULT if not defined}}} 945: 918: 638:The trick that I found out was to use 547:Porting Template:Navbox to other wikis 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 6037:re User: Esanchez7587 reported to ANI 5623:Category:Knowledge rejected proposals 3797:No problems, and thank you again. -- 3605:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Human 3468:A time switch on a user template. -- 1353: 1294:support for any particular position. 474:Image talk:Wikipe-tan full length.svg 325:I have not understand your question. 6503:I have drafted a comprimise version 6262: 5153:McLeod's Daughters episode list hack 4311:Template Temporary userpage category 1796:worked when a parameter was listed ( 781:it is "ineligible for copyright" ? 25: 5179:List of McLeod's Daughters episodes 5171:List of McLeod's Daughters episodes 3063: 2389:Template:Infobox animanga character 1828:is used because it's unlikely that 1521:Stop with the bad-faith assumptions 1506:that has to be typed or pasted in. 1227:this ( . . . a kiss is stil a kiss) 1077:I have a little present for you :D 23: 6069:When a "thank you" is due... :) -- 4133:to wikipedia is graping at straws. 3071: 2877:...I've blocked you for 24 hours. 1760:User:Sgeureka/Sandbox#Real_Sandbox 1754:as the episode template, and used 1748:User:Sgeureka/Sandbox#Real_Sandbox 858:that kind of explains some of it. 434: 241:Hi. Can you take a quick look at 24: 6585: 5643: 5636: 5591: 5584: 3007: 3000: 2164: 2157: 412:will be the right place for you. 6064: 5621:. For example, see the pages in 5107:, make an unblock request using 5028:With regard to your comments on 5023: 4425: 2469:Never mind, I figured it out. - 1335:rather than content judgements. 62: 58: 29: 4496:commons:User talk:Jack Merridew 4183: 3441:Category:New users to WP:NOVELS 2889: 2884: 2856: 2851: 2343:Please don't remove my comments 1109:Note that you will have to set 485: 461: 6567:you both the best of luck. -- 5537:A thing you should be aware of 4257:...You are invited to discuss 3967:Anonymous of Project Chanology 3348:And you've been a kill-joy on 2804:answered on nomination page -- 2451:Template:D&D creature list 2352: 1872:List of Stargate SG-1 episodes 1756:List of Stargate SG-1 episodes 1297:The proposal can be found at: 415: 392: 373: 354: 328: 174:List of Armor Digimon (Part 2) 13: 1: 6099:Civility and personal attacks 5167:List of Blue Heelers episodes 4870: 4513:Hi. I'm trying to transclude 4484: 4479: 4315:I've reverted your change to 4290: 3095:Removal of your comment from 2963: 2508: 2405: 1738:Episode list/NAME_OF_THE_SHOW 1727:Episode list/NAME_OF_THE_SHOW 1717:Episode list/NAME_OF_THE_SHOW 1454:would you file a complaint?-- 1344:04:25, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 1247:07:03, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 1220:05:42, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 1191:03:51, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 1166:11:32, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 1136:03:09, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 1127:02:56, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 1105:02:41, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 1095:02:31, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 1067:02:40, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 1057:08:39, 27 February 2008 (UTC) 1026:05:17, 29 February 2008 (UTC) 1013:02:40, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 1003:06:52, 26 February 2008 (UTC) 974:12:28, 24 February 2008 (UTC) 953:06:24, 21 February 2008 (UTC) 936:06:23, 21 February 2008 (UTC) 926:06:09, 21 February 2008 (UTC) 905:, the friendliness expressed 881:06:42, 21 February 2008 (UTC) 867:06:26, 21 February 2008 (UTC) 846:06:10, 21 February 2008 (UTC) 828:06:09, 21 February 2008 (UTC) 819:06:07, 21 February 2008 (UTC) 801:06:05, 21 February 2008 (UTC) 791:06:04, 21 February 2008 (UTC) 761:03:51, 21 February 2008 (UTC) 752:07:26, 20 February 2008 (UTC) 734:03:49, 19 February 2008 (UTC) 724:, and everything should work. 587:00:56, 19 February 2008 (UTC) 541:01:38, 18 February 2008 (UTC) 531:20:26, 17 February 2008 (UTC) 504:21:50, 16 February 2008 (UTC) 491:10:57, 16 February 2008 (UTC) 467:10:49, 16 February 2008 (UTC) 426:08:47, 16 February 2008 (UTC) 403:08:16, 16 February 2008 (UTC) 384:08:11, 16 February 2008 (UTC) 365:08:05, 16 February 2008 (UTC) 339:08:03, 16 February 2008 (UTC) 316:08:05, 16 February 2008 (UTC) 283:03:38, 15 February 2008 (UTC) 265:03:33, 15 February 2008 (UTC) 255:03:30, 15 February 2008 (UTC) 237:Japanese episode list updates 225:02:38, 16 February 2008 (UTC) 216:23:01, 15 February 2008 (UTC) 207:00:47, 15 February 2008 (UTC) 198:00:09, 15 February 2008 (UTC) 187:18:46, 14 February 2008 (UTC) 5716:If you take up the issue at 5697:Advocating for blocked users 5163:Template:Episode list/Lassie 5136:WP:AE#And so it begins again 4385:Re: Talk pages for redirects 4104: 4060: 3991:for helping on the unblock. 3137:User talk:Thebainer#Blanking 2523:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 2393: 1527:the assumption of good faith 1186:Looking forward to it :D -- 948:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 921:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 909:, and the apology expressed 304:Template:Episode list/Lassie 7: 6214:Knowledge:Wikiquette alerts 5058: 4523:from each season page onto 4398:Talk:Sakura Card Arc: 60-70 3487:Template:Birth date and age 3288:. If we can find something 3081: 2399: 1750:as "season" test page with 1049: 243:Portal:Anime and manga/News 10: 6590: 5925:10:10, 28 April 2008 (UTC) 5902:01:54, 30 April 2008 (UTC) 5892:20:32, 29 April 2008 (UTC) 5858:06:10, 28 April 2008 (UTC) 5837:06:07, 28 April 2008 (UTC) 5828:06:05, 28 April 2008 (UTC) 5795:06:03, 28 April 2008 (UTC) 5777:06:00, 28 April 2008 (UTC) 5760:05:58, 28 April 2008 (UTC) 5749:05:55, 28 April 2008 (UTC) 5691:04:58, 28 April 2008 (UTC) 5681:03:56, 28 April 2008 (UTC) 5657:09:10, 29 April 2008 (UTC) 5648:09:27, 28 April 2008 (UTC) 5630:05:26, 28 April 2008 (UTC) 5596:08:15, 27 April 2008 (UTC) 5571:03:54, 24 April 2008 (UTC) 5561:06:32, 23 April 2008 (UTC) 5529:17:06, 23 April 2008 (UTC) 5503:01:17, 23 April 2008 (UTC) 5474:21:58, 22 April 2008 (UTC) 5465:21:38, 22 April 2008 (UTC) 5452:21:10, 22 April 2008 (UTC) 5442:21:06, 22 April 2008 (UTC) 5407:21:02, 22 April 2008 (UTC) 5376:20:51, 22 April 2008 (UTC) 5333:20:34, 22 April 2008 (UTC) 5319:19:55, 22 April 2008 (UTC) 5302:19:31, 22 April 2008 (UTC) 5292:19:27, 22 April 2008 (UTC) 5270:19:19, 22 April 2008 (UTC) 5244:19:17, 22 April 2008 (UTC) 5223:19:01, 22 April 2008 (UTC) 5206:18:38, 22 April 2008 (UTC) 5195:14:52, 22 April 2008 (UTC) 5159:Template:Episode list/Lost 5148:20:19, 21 April 2008 (UTC) 5124:04:29, 22 April 2008 (UTC) 5072:02:17, 21 April 2008 (UTC) 5062:16:08, 20 April 2008 (UTC) 5007:03:05, 21 April 2008 (UTC) 4998:02:34, 21 April 2008 (UTC) 4983:02:18, 21 April 2008 (UTC) 4974:17:23, 20 April 2008 (UTC) 4954:13:50, 20 April 2008 (UTC) 4933:05:52, 20 April 2008 (UTC) 4919:02:35, 20 April 2008 (UTC) 4875:15:03, 18 April 2008 (UTC) 4864:05:15, 18 April 2008 (UTC) 4854:15:13, 17 April 2008 (UTC) 4705:06:38, 18 April 2008 (UTC) 4692:21:01, 15 April 2008 (UTC) 4637:21:00, 15 April 2008 (UTC) 4589:20:39, 15 April 2008 (UTC) 4567:20:25, 15 April 2008 (UTC) 4503:21:03, 13 April 2008 (UTC) 4489:13:52, 13 April 2008 (UTC) 4466:Reactions to Jack Merridew 4461:04:54, 15 April 2008 (UTC) 4440:03:58, 14 April 2008 (UTC) 4420:06:30, 13 April 2008 (UTC) 4410:06:28, 13 April 2008 (UTC) 4380:15:52, 10 April 2008 (UTC) 4364:15:35, 10 April 2008 (UTC) 3124:03:09, 27 March 2008 (UTC) 3108:00:28, 26 March 2008 (UTC) 3089:22:24, 24 March 2008 (UTC) 3012:06:08, 24 March 2008 (UTC) 2988:07:26, 25 March 2008 (UTC) 2968:04:03, 24 March 2008 (UTC) 2956:02:51, 24 March 2008 (UTC) 2937:02:32, 24 March 2008 (UTC) 2920:21:07, 23 March 2008 (UTC) 2910:14:55, 23 March 2008 (UTC) 2895:06:26, 23 March 2008 (UTC) 2873:05:51, 23 March 2008 (UTC) 2862:05:47, 23 March 2008 (UTC) 2832:09:30, 24 March 2008 (UTC) 2814:13:31, 21 March 2008 (UTC) 2796:12:18, 21 March 2008 (UTC) 2785:10:12, 21 March 2008 (UTC) 2771:10:07, 21 March 2008 (UTC) 2747:16:21, 19 March 2008 (UTC) 2704:03:49, 24 March 2008 (UTC) 2678:03:40, 24 March 2008 (UTC) 2651:03:19, 24 March 2008 (UTC) 2629:03:05, 24 March 2008 (UTC) 2616:02:55, 24 March 2008 (UTC) 2600:06:05, 19 March 2008 (UTC) 2573:16:36, 19 March 2008 (UTC) 2541:07:27, 19 March 2008 (UTC) 2528:15:54, 18 March 2008 (UTC) 2514:07:19, 18 March 2008 (UTC) 2492:07:22, 19 March 2008 (UTC) 2479:19:14, 18 March 2008 (UTC) 2464:07:17, 18 March 2008 (UTC) 2424:05:15, 18 March 2008 (UTC) 2410:05:07, 18 March 2008 (UTC) 2377:04:43, 18 March 2008 (UTC) 2363:04:35, 18 March 2008 (UTC) 2338:00:45, 17 March 2008 (UTC) 2243:15:41, 16 March 2008 (UTC) 2206:13:02, 16 March 2008 (UTC) 2180:12:22, 15 March 2008 (UTC) 2169:11:36, 15 March 2008 (UTC) 2155:Proper reasons please???? 2137:09:33, 15 March 2008 (UTC) 2127:08:58, 15 March 2008 (UTC) 2108:07:57, 14 March 2008 (UTC) 2094:09:56, 12 March 2008 (UTC) 2080:23:59, 10 March 2008 (UTC) 698:User:Ned Scott/Navbox/core 6439:Episodes and Characters 3 6398:<font color="red": --> 6075:18:06, 11 May 2008 (UTC) 5237:WP:VPT#Apostrophe in ifeq 5032:: Please see Knowledge's 4509:Degrassi episode template 4394:Talk:Clow Card Arc: 36-46 4305:21:31, 8 April 2008 (UTC) 4295:04:01, 8 April 2008 (UTC) 4277:01:24, 8 April 2008 (UTC) 4267:10:06, 7 April 2008 (UTC) 4243:00:56, 7 April 2008 (UTC) 4199:01:22, 6 April 2008 (UTC) 4189:11:33, 4 April 2008 (UTC) 4159:09:08, 4 April 2008 (UTC) 4145:09:03, 4 April 2008 (UTC) 4095:08:30, 4 April 2008 (UTC) 4046:01:23, 6 April 2008 (UTC) 4036:16:09, 3 April 2008 (UTC) 4011:05:44, 4 April 2008 (UTC) 4001:09:26, 3 April 2008 (UTC) 3982:15:19, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 3961:05:17, 3 April 2008 (UTC) 3951:09:59, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 3918:05:44, 4 April 2008 (UTC) 3885:01:17, 4 April 2008 (UTC) 3852:03:26, 3 April 2008 (UTC) 3827:02:59, 3 April 2008 (UTC) 3802:06:53, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 3785:06:46, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 3768:06:35, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 3577:06:16, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 3548:01:21, 6 April 2008 (UTC) 3534:15:07, 5 April 2008 (UTC) 3520:05:17, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 3499:04:10, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 3473:03:44, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 3460:03:43, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 3450:01:06, 1 April 2008 (UTC) 3427:03:22, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 3399:03:15, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 3378:03:12, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 3357:03:07, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 3330:03:12, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 3301:03:05, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 3264:02:56, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 3235:02:44, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 3218:02:39, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 3197:02:35, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 3179:02:31, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 3164:02:34, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 3153:01:54, 2 April 2008 (UTC) 3048:and remove the asterisk ( 2415:Made one a while back at 1995:07:47, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 1984:12:46, 8 March 2008 (UTC) 1948:07:44, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 1938:10:18, 8 March 2008 (UTC) 1922:07:44, 9 March 2008 (UTC) 1911:09:05, 8 March 2008 (UTC) 1879:21:08, 5 March 2008 (UTC) 1854:20:40, 5 March 2008 (UTC) 1837:20:35, 5 March 2008 (UTC) 1774:20:12, 5 March 2008 (UTC) 1767:meta:Help:ParserFunctions 1667:21:29, 5 March 2008 (UTC) 1652:21:04, 5 March 2008 (UTC) 1643:20:58, 5 March 2008 (UTC) 1628:19:34, 5 March 2008 (UTC) 1618:19:21, 5 March 2008 (UTC) 1599:19:19, 5 March 2008 (UTC) 1585:19:13, 5 March 2008 (UTC) 1563:19:07, 5 March 2008 (UTC) 1552:18:59, 5 March 2008 (UTC) 1516:12:04, 5 March 2008 (UTC) 1503:Template:Indefblockeduser 1492:06:27, 4 March 2008 (UTC) 1478:06:26, 4 March 2008 (UTC) 1464:05:58, 4 March 2008 (UTC) 1449:05:48, 4 March 2008 (UTC) 1424:07:29, 4 March 2008 (UTC) 1408:05:41, 4 March 2008 (UTC) 1395:05:38, 4 March 2008 (UTC) 1366:00:08, 3 March 2008 (UTC) 1318:02:04, 1 March 2008 (UTC) 1261:02:48, 1 March 2008 (UTC) 979:The episode list template 6572:04:47, 18 May 2008 (UTC) 6558:17:24, 17 May 2008 (UTC) 6538:16:40, 17 May 2008 (UTC) 6479:19:44, 16 May 2008 (UTC) 6457:12:06, 15 May 2008 (UTC) 6434:02:09, 15 May 2008 (UTC) 6407:16:42, 14 May 2008 (UTC) 6387:06:37, 16 May 2008 (UTC) 6361:01:42, 17 May 2008 (UTC) 6351:09:30, 16 May 2008 (UTC) 6320:21:09, 15 May 2008 (UTC) 6299:13:09, 15 May 2008 (UTC) 6248:12:35, 15 May 2008 (UTC) 6238:12:28, 15 May 2008 (UTC) 6226:12:16, 15 May 2008 (UTC) 6192:11:52, 15 May 2008 (UTC) 6178:04:53, 15 May 2008 (UTC) 6169:12:52, 14 May 2008 (UTC) 6154:03:55, 14 May 2008 (UTC) 6136:00:18, 14 May 2008 (UTC) 6117:23:50, 13 May 2008 (UTC) 6094:00:58, 13 May 2008 (UTC) 5930:Differenciating between 5105:User talk:Camilo Sanchez 4390:Talk:Clow Card Arc: 1-18 2443:User:BOZ/Monster Sandbox 1868:Stargate SG-1 (season 1) 1373:User talk:Kirill Lokshin 6520:Talk:Chilean Australian 6421:'NotTheWikipediaWeekly' 6399:Battoubro</font: --> 6055:09:37, 5 May 2008 (UTC) 6027:08:30, 5 May 2008 (UTC) 6017:08:20, 5 May 2008 (UTC) 6002:07:48, 5 May 2008 (UTC) 5992:07:41, 5 May 2008 (UTC) 5972:14:39, 2 May 2008 (UTC) 5956:16:01, 1 May 2008 (UTC) 5354:WP:Consensus can change 5044:for disruption. Please 4647:Episode list/7th Heaven 4369:User:Ryan Postlethwaite 4122:08:42, 4 Apr 2008 (UTC) 4078:06:34, 4 Apr 2008 (UTC) 3286:MediaWiki talk:Tagline‎ 3207:to millions of articles 1205:Sorry for the confusion 649:{{#if:|<nowiki/: --> 416:Otolemur crassicaudatus 393:Otolemur crassicaudatus 374:Otolemur crassicaudatus 355:Otolemur crassicaudatus 329:Otolemur crassicaudatus 292:List of Lassie episodes 5934:and related guidelines 5908:Reordering my comments 3213:. (Goatse images?) — 3170:Barnstar of Good Humor 2586:and my comment on the 2582:Could you please read 2326:Template:Buffyversenav 2316:) into something like 1758:as the LoE page where 1752:User:Sgeureka/Template 1710:User:Sgeureka/Template 1017:I started a thread at 856:Typeface#Legal aspects 832:Right, but with their 738:As I mentioned on the 439: 6414:NotTheWikipediaWeekly 6412:An invitation to the 5942:you introduced to an 5524:you feel that way. - 5214:I'm a bit stumped on 5030:User talk:Niteshift36 4926:Template talk:Infobox 4892:Template:Knot-details 4885:Template:Knot-details 4518:Episode list/Degrassi 4449:think of the children 4325:in which you removed 4283:re: April Fools joke? 4207:NotTheWikipediaWeekly 3350:far lesser offensives 2447:Template:Episode list 2311:Stargate SG-1 Seasons 2186:Digimon numbered list 1789:Template:Episode list 807:Prolexic Technologies 633:of extra line breaks. 567:this other discussion 438: 431:She's done! (I think) 296:List of Lost episodes 260:Sounds perfect :) -- 145:mid 05/08 - mid 07/08 140:mid 02/08 - mid 05/08 42:of past discussions. 5078:User Unblock Request 3752:User:Ned Scott/Page5 3736:User:Ned Scott/Page4 3721:User:Ned Scott/Page3 3697:User:Ned Scott/Page2 3683:Single edit nonsense 3654:User:Ned Scott/Page1 2322:Template:Harrypotter 2065:temporary injunction 1891:User:VivianDarkbloom 1691:This is in reply to 1501:The instructions on 1111:wikEdSkipBrowserTest 300:the work in progress 6443:Your input welcome 5977:Opposing viewpoints 5089:User:Camilo Sanchez 5036:policy. Comment on 5034:no personal attacks 3027:WikiProject Council 3019:WikiProject Council 2752:guestbook barnstart 2301:Stargate Characters 1899:Good Hand, Bad Hand 1779:Long answer short: 1497:Indefblock template 852:Copyright#Typefaces 512:Request for Comment 125:05/07 - early 08/07 18:User talk:Ned Scott 6445:about the question 4354:temporary userpage 4344:temporary userpage 4334:temporary userpage 4320:temporary userpage 3422:amused me. :-) — 2975:The matter of the 2248:Stargate templates 1212:Chris (クリス • フィッチ) 1113:for my version. -- 740:template talk page 440: 6385: 6349: 6297: 6281: 6280: 6224: 6190: 6167: 6115: 6074: 5855: 5849: 5825: 5819: 5746: 5740: 5460:or something. -- 5368:. So here we are. 5282:Wikipedians by OS 5098: 4917: 4690: 4685: 4635: 4630: 4565: 4560: 4186: 4124: 4080: 3497: 3086: 3038:WikiProject Guide 3030:participants list 2954: 2791:the barnstar. -- 2676: 2644:flagged revisions 2614: 2598: 2578:New user proposal 2330:Stargate Universe 2208: 2196:comment added by 2115:Giromon (Digimon) 1820:checks to see if 1700:Episode list/Lost 1582: 1573: 1549: 1540: 1534:you're mistaken. 1432:it is out of hand 1364: 1316: 1245: 1054: 1034:Hidden categories 577:wikis. Thanks. -- 488: 464: 171: 170: 150:mid 07/08 - 11/08 135:11/07 - mid 02/08 54: 53: 48:current talk page 6581: 6381: 6345: 6293: 6263: 6220: 6186: 6163: 6111: 6070: 6068: 6041:Hi. I have been 6009:Kyaa the Catlord 5984:Kyaa the Catlord 5890: 5887: 5881: 5853: 5847: 5823: 5817: 5744: 5738: 5645: 5640: 5620: 5614: 5610: 5604: 5593: 5588: 5118: 5091: 5059: 5055: 5027: 4911: 4897:Constrictor knot 4872: 4851: 4846: 4840: 4813:deleted contribs 4688: 4654: 4651: 4645: 4633: 4599: 4563: 4529: 4522: 4516: 4486: 4481: 4429: 4358: 4352: 4348: 4342: 4338: 4332: 4324: 4318: 4292: 4185: 4182: 4178: 4106: 4102: 4062: 4058: 4033: 4025: 4019: 3881: 3823: 3781: 3573: 3493: 3184:Because it is a 3083: 3078: 3075: 3067: 3051: 3009: 3004: 2965: 2950: 2891: 2886: 2858: 2853: 2672: 2610: 2594: 2526: 2524: 2510: 2471:Peregrine Fisher 2456:Peregrine Fisher 2407: 2401: 2395: 2361: 2315: 2309: 2305: 2299: 2295: 2289: 2285: 2279: 2275: 2269: 2265: 2259: 2191: 2166: 2161: 2124: 2053: 2026:deleted contribs 1848: 1831: 1827: 1823: 1819: 1815: 1811: 1807: 1803: 1799: 1795: 1782: 1742: 1736: 1731: 1725: 1721: 1715: 1704: 1698: 1576: 1572: 1543: 1539: 1362: 1359: 1356: 1355: 1308: 1307: 1241: 1073:WikEd for Safari 1051: 1046: 1001: 951: 949: 924: 922: 723: 717: 713: 707: 695: 689: 685: 679: 675: 669: 658: 652: 641: 640:<nowiki/: --> 628: 624: 623: 617: 612: 608: 607: 601: 564: 558: 487: 484: 480: 463: 460: 456: 417: 394: 375: 356: 330: 66: 59: 33: 32: 26: 6589: 6588: 6584: 6583: 6582: 6580: 6579: 6578: 6486: 6464: 6441: 6417: 6394: 6210: 6101: 6081: 6062: 6039: 5979: 5963: 5936: 5910: 5885: 5874: 5871: 5699: 5669: 5618: 5612: 5608: 5602: 5579: 5539: 5284: 5155: 5132: 5108: 5095:IP: 68.197.6.70 5080: 5021: 4941: 4888: 4849: 4842: 4798: 4792: 4719: 4683: 4679: 4675: 4671: 4667: 4663: 4659: 4649: 4643: 4628: 4624: 4620: 4616: 4612: 4608: 4604: 4558: 4554: 4550: 4546: 4542: 4538: 4534: 4520: 4514: 4511: 4468: 4387: 4356: 4350: 4346: 4340: 4336: 4330: 4322: 4316: 4313: 4285: 4250: 4211: 4177:Editor at Large 4171: 4054: 4031: 4027: 4023: 4017: 4006:No problem. -- 3989: 3969: 3938: 3879: 3821: 3779: 3571: 3566: 3495:formerly tjstrf 3443: 3189: 3172: 3145: 3132: 3100: 3092: 3049: 3044:, please visit 3023: 2995: 2979:is now at DRV, 2839: 2754: 2722: 2580: 2522: 2502: 2432: 2385: 2345: 2313: 2307: 2303: 2297: 2293: 2287: 2283: 2277: 2273: 2267: 2263: 2257: 2250: 2216: 2188: 2145: 2143:Your NFC revert 2118: 2101:m:Interwiki map 2087: 2011: 2005: 1956: 1894: 1846: 1829: 1825: 1821: 1817: 1813: 1809: 1805: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1780: 1740: 1734: 1729: 1723: 1719: 1713: 1702: 1696: 1689: 1581: 1548: 1523: 1499: 1434: 1377: 1361: 1325: 1276: 1230: 1207: 1075: 1053: 1036: 991: 981: 963: 947: 920: 899: 775: 721: 715: 711: 705: 693: 687: 683: 677: 673: 667: 660: 656: 650: 639: 626: 621: 615: 614: 610: 605: 599: 598: 562: 556: 549: 514: 479:Editor at Large 455:Editor at Large 433: 323: 239: 176: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 6587: 6577: 6576: 6575: 6574: 6561: 6560: 6485: 6482: 6463: 6460: 6440: 6437: 6426:Privatemusings 6416: 6410: 6393: 6390: 6374: 6373: 6372: 6371: 6370: 6369: 6368: 6367: 6366: 6365: 6364: 6363: 6329: 6328: 6327: 6326: 6325: 6324: 6323: 6322: 6306: 6305: 6304: 6303: 6302: 6301: 6279: 6278: 6275: 6270:from forming. 6267: 6260: 6258: 6257: 6256: 6255: 6254: 6253: 6209: 6206: 6205: 6204: 6203: 6202: 6201: 6200: 6199: 6198: 6197: 6196: 6195: 6194: 6141: 6140: 6139: 6138: 6100: 6097: 6080: 6077: 6061: 6058: 6047:LessHeard vanU 6038: 6035: 6034: 6033: 6032: 6031: 6030: 6029: 5978: 5975: 5962: 5959: 5935: 5928: 5909: 5906: 5905: 5904: 5867: 5866: 5865: 5864: 5863: 5862: 5861: 5860: 5802: 5801: 5800: 5799: 5798: 5797: 5782: 5781: 5780: 5779: 5763: 5762: 5726: 5725: 5714: 5710: 5698: 5695: 5694: 5693: 5668: 5665: 5664: 5663: 5662: 5661: 5660: 5659: 5578: 5575: 5574: 5573: 5538: 5535: 5534: 5533: 5532: 5531: 5515: 5514: 5513: 5512: 5506: 5505: 5488: 5487: 5486: 5485: 5484: 5483: 5482: 5481: 5480: 5479: 5478: 5477: 5476: 5431: 5430: 5429: 5414: 5413: 5412: 5411: 5410: 5409: 5395: 5394: 5393: 5392: 5391: 5390: 5381: 5380: 5379: 5378: 5369: 5357: 5350: 5341: 5335: 5324: 5323: 5322: 5321: 5305: 5304: 5283: 5280: 5279: 5278: 5277: 5276: 5275: 5274: 5273: 5272: 5251: 5250: 5249: 5248: 5247: 5246: 5228: 5227: 5226: 5225: 5209: 5208: 5154: 5151: 5131: 5128: 5127: 5126: 5084:FIFA World Cup 5079: 5076: 5075: 5074: 5020: 5017: 5016: 5015: 5014: 5013: 5012: 5011: 5010: 5009: 4940: 4937: 4936: 4935: 4901:Buntline hitch 4887: 4881: 4880: 4879: 4878: 4877: 4796:Jacob Green696 4791: 4778:Jacob Green696 4775: 4774: 4773: 4718: 4715: 4714: 4713: 4712: 4711: 4710: 4709: 4708: 4707: 4681: 4677: 4673: 4669: 4665: 4661: 4657: 4626: 4622: 4618: 4614: 4610: 4606: 4602: 4556: 4552: 4548: 4544: 4540: 4536: 4532: 4510: 4507: 4506: 4505: 4467: 4464: 4445: 4444: 4443: 4442: 4386: 4383: 4371:beat me to it 4312: 4309: 4308: 4307: 4284: 4281: 4280: 4279: 4249: 4246: 4235:Privatemusings 4210: 4203: 4202: 4201: 4170: 4169:Wikipe-tan FPC 4167: 4166: 4165: 4164: 4163: 4162: 4161: 4147: 4131:enough related 4053: 4050: 4049: 4048: 4026: 4015: 4014: 4013: 3988: 3985: 3968: 3965: 3964: 3963: 3943:Privatemusings 3937: 3934: 3933: 3932: 3931: 3930: 3929: 3928: 3927: 3926: 3925: 3924: 3923: 3922: 3921: 3920: 3898: 3897: 3896: 3895: 3894: 3893: 3892: 3891: 3890: 3889: 3888: 3887: 3863: 3862: 3861: 3860: 3859: 3858: 3857: 3856: 3855: 3854: 3836: 3835: 3834: 3833: 3832: 3831: 3830: 3829: 3809: 3808: 3807: 3806: 3805: 3804: 3790: 3789: 3788: 3787: 3771: 3770: 3759: 3757: 3756: 3755: 3754: 3741: 3740: 3739: 3738: 3726: 3725: 3724: 3723: 3711: 3710: 3702: 3701: 3700: 3699: 3687: 3686: 3685: 3684: 3674: 3673: 3672: 3671: 3659: 3658: 3657: 3656: 3644: 3643: 3642: 3641: 3629: 3628: 3627: 3626: 3614: 3613: 3612: 3611: 3599: 3598: 3597: 3596: 3584: 3583: 3565: 3562: 3561: 3560: 3559: 3558: 3557: 3556: 3555: 3554: 3553: 3552: 3551: 3550: 3506: 3505: 3504: 3503: 3502: 3501: 3478: 3477: 3476: 3475: 3463: 3462: 3442: 3439: 3438: 3437: 3436: 3435: 3434: 3433: 3432: 3431: 3430: 3429: 3408: 3407: 3406: 3405: 3404: 3403: 3402: 3401: 3385: 3384: 3383: 3382: 3381: 3380: 3370: 3362: 3361: 3360: 3359: 3343: 3342: 3341: 3340: 3339: 3338: 3337: 3336: 3335: 3334: 3333: 3332: 3312: 3311: 3310: 3309: 3308: 3307: 3306: 3305: 3304: 3303: 3273: 3272: 3271: 3270: 3269: 3268: 3267: 3266: 3252: 3242: 3241: 3240: 3239: 3238: 3237: 3223: 3222: 3221: 3220: 3200: 3199: 3187: 3171: 3168: 3167: 3166: 3144: 3141: 3131: 3128: 3127: 3126: 3099: 3093: 3022: 3016: 3015: 2994: 2991: 2973: 2972: 2971: 2970: 2958: 2940: 2939: 2929: 2928: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2924: 2923: 2922: 2846:forum shopping 2838: 2837:Forum shopping 2835: 2819: 2818: 2817: 2816: 2799: 2798: 2753: 2750: 2721: 2716: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2687: 2686: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2658: 2657: 2656: 2655: 2654: 2653: 2634: 2633: 2632: 2631: 2619: 2618: 2579: 2576: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2555: 2546: 2545: 2544: 2543: 2531: 2530: 2501: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2482: 2481: 2431: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2384: 2383:Transwiki help 2381: 2380: 2379: 2344: 2341: 2291:StargateTopics 2261:Stargate Races 2249: 2246: 2215: 2210: 2187: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2144: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2117: 2112: 2111: 2110: 2086: 2083: 2004: 1999: 1998: 1997: 1955: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1925: 1924: 1903:LessHeard vanU 1893: 1887: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1840: 1839: 1784: 1783: 1688: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1602: 1601: 1588: 1587: 1577: 1544: 1522: 1519: 1498: 1495: 1433: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1376: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1324: 1321: 1288:vow of silence 1275: 1273:vow of silence 1265: 1264: 1263: 1229: 1223: 1206: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1175: 1174: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1168: 1143: 1142: 1141: 1140: 1139: 1138: 1074: 1071: 1070: 1069: 1047: 1035: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 980: 977: 962: 959: 958: 957: 956: 955: 939: 938: 898: 895: 894: 893: 892: 891: 890: 889: 888: 887: 886: 885: 884: 883: 774: 769: 768: 767: 766: 765: 764: 763: 756:Anytime :D -- 726: 725: 662: 648: 646: 644: 643: 635: 634: 548: 545: 544: 543: 513: 510: 509: 508: 507: 506: 494: 493: 451: 448: 432: 429: 406: 405: 368: 367: 322: 319: 288: 287: 286: 285: 268: 267: 238: 235: 234: 233: 232: 231: 230: 229: 228: 227: 180:Special:Random 175: 172: 169: 168: 162: 157: 152: 147: 142: 137: 132: 127: 120: 114: 109: 104: 99: 94: 89: 84: 76: 75: 67: 56: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 6586: 6573: 6570: 6565: 6564: 6563: 6562: 6559: 6555: 6551: 6546: 6542: 6541: 6540: 6539: 6535: 6531: 6526: 6523: 6521: 6517: 6513: 6508: 6506: 6501: 6498: 6495: 6492: 6489: 6481: 6480: 6476: 6472: 6468: 6459: 6458: 6454: 6450: 6446: 6436: 6435: 6431: 6427: 6424:can! cheers, 6422: 6415: 6409: 6408: 6404: 6400: 6389: 6388: 6384: 6380: 6362: 6359: 6354: 6353: 6352: 6348: 6344: 6339: 6338: 6337: 6336: 6335: 6334: 6333: 6332: 6331: 6330: 6321: 6318: 6314: 6313: 6312: 6311: 6310: 6309: 6308: 6307: 6300: 6296: 6292: 6287: 6286: 6285: 6284: 6283: 6282: 6276: 6274: 6268: 6265: 6264: 6261: 6251: 6250: 6249: 6246: 6242: 6241: 6240: 6239: 6236: 6230: 6229: 6228: 6227: 6223: 6219: 6215: 6193: 6189: 6185: 6181: 6180: 6179: 6176: 6172: 6171: 6170: 6166: 6162: 6157: 6156: 6155: 6152: 6147: 6146: 6145: 6144: 6143: 6142: 6137: 6133: 6129: 6128: 6123: 6122: 6121: 6120: 6119: 6118: 6114: 6110: 6106: 6096: 6095: 6091: 6087: 6076: 6073: 6067: 6057: 6056: 6052: 6048: 6044: 6028: 6025: 6020: 6019: 6018: 6014: 6010: 6005: 6004: 6003: 6000: 5996: 5995: 5994: 5993: 5989: 5985: 5974: 5973: 5969: 5958: 5957: 5953: 5949: 5948:Gavin Collins 5945: 5944:earlier draft 5941: 5933: 5927: 5926: 5922: 5918: 5917:Percy Snoodle 5913: 5903: 5900: 5896: 5895: 5894: 5893: 5888: 5882: 5880: 5878: 5859: 5856: 5850: 5844: 5840: 5839: 5838: 5835: 5831: 5830: 5829: 5826: 5820: 5814: 5810: 5806: 5805: 5804: 5803: 5796: 5793: 5788: 5787: 5786: 5785: 5784: 5783: 5778: 5775: 5771: 5767: 5766: 5765: 5764: 5761: 5758: 5753: 5752: 5751: 5750: 5747: 5741: 5735: 5731: 5723: 5719: 5715: 5711: 5708: 5704: 5703: 5702: 5692: 5689: 5685: 5684: 5683: 5682: 5678: 5674: 5658: 5655: 5651: 5650: 5649: 5646: 5641: 5639: 5633: 5632: 5631: 5628: 5624: 5617: 5607: 5600: 5599: 5598: 5597: 5594: 5589: 5587: 5572: 5569: 5565: 5564: 5563: 5562: 5558: 5554: 5553:71.59.237.110 5549: 5548:Koji Minamoto 5544: 5530: 5527: 5523: 5519: 5518: 5517: 5516: 5510: 5509: 5508: 5507: 5504: 5500: 5496: 5495: 5489: 5475: 5472: 5468: 5467: 5466: 5463: 5459: 5455: 5454: 5453: 5450: 5445: 5444: 5443: 5440: 5436: 5432: 5428: 5425: 5424: 5422: 5421: 5420: 5419: 5418: 5417: 5416: 5415: 5408: 5405: 5401: 5400: 5399: 5398: 5397: 5396: 5387: 5386: 5385: 5384: 5383: 5382: 5377: 5374: 5370: 5367: 5363: 5358: 5355: 5351: 5348: 5347: 5342: 5339: 5338: 5336: 5334: 5331: 5326: 5325: 5320: 5317: 5313: 5309: 5308: 5307: 5306: 5303: 5300: 5296: 5295: 5294: 5293: 5290: 5271: 5267: 5263: 5259: 5258: 5257: 5256: 5255: 5254: 5253: 5252: 5245: 5242: 5238: 5234: 5233: 5232: 5231: 5230: 5229: 5224: 5221: 5217: 5213: 5212: 5211: 5210: 5207: 5204: 5199: 5198: 5197: 5196: 5192: 5188: 5182: 5180: 5176: 5172: 5168: 5164: 5160: 5150: 5149: 5145: 5141: 5137: 5125: 5122: 5116: 5112: 5106: 5101: 5100: 5099: 5097: 5096: 5090: 5085: 5073: 5070: 5066: 5065: 5064: 5063: 5060: 5056: 5051: 5047: 5043: 5039: 5035: 5031: 5026: 5008: 5005: 5001: 5000: 4999: 4995: 4991: 4986: 4985: 4984: 4981: 4977: 4976: 4975: 4971: 4967: 4963: 4958: 4957: 4956: 4955: 4951: 4947: 4939:Kanabekobaton 4934: 4931: 4927: 4923: 4922: 4921: 4920: 4915: 4910: 4906: 4902: 4898: 4893: 4886: 4876: 4873: 4867: 4866: 4865: 4862: 4858: 4857: 4856: 4855: 4852: 4845: 4838: 4835: 4832: 4829: 4826: 4823: 4820: 4817: 4814: 4811: 4808: 4805: 4802: 4797: 4789: 4786: 4783: 4779: 4771: 4767: 4763: 4761: 4757: 4753: 4748: 4747: 4746: 4744: 4740: 4736: 4734: 4730: 4726: 4717:Lost episodes 4706: 4703: 4699: 4696: 4695: 4694: 4693: 4686: 4684: 4648: 4641: 4640: 4639: 4638: 4631: 4629: 4596: 4592: 4591: 4590: 4587: 4583: 4579: 4575: 4572: 4571: 4570: 4569: 4568: 4561: 4559: 4526: 4519: 4504: 4501: 4497: 4493: 4492: 4491: 4490: 4487: 4482: 4477: 4472: 4463: 4462: 4458: 4454: 4450: 4441: 4437: 4433: 4428: 4423: 4422: 4421: 4418: 4414: 4413: 4412: 4411: 4407: 4403: 4399: 4395: 4391: 4382: 4381: 4378: 4374: 4370: 4366: 4365: 4362: 4355: 4345: 4335: 4328: 4321: 4306: 4303: 4299: 4298: 4297: 4296: 4293: 4278: 4275: 4271: 4270: 4269: 4268: 4264: 4260: 4256: 4255: 4245: 4244: 4240: 4236: 4231: 4228: 4223: 4220: 4214: 4208: 4200: 4197: 4193: 4192: 4191: 4190: 4187: 4179: 4160: 4156: 4152: 4148: 4146: 4142: 4138: 4134: 4132: 4126: 4125: 4123: 4120: 4118: 4113: 4112: 4107: 4101: 4098: 4097: 4096: 4092: 4088: 4083: 4082: 4081: 4079: 4076: 4074: 4069: 4068: 4063: 4047: 4044: 4040: 4039: 4038: 4037: 4034: 4022: 4012: 4009: 4005: 4004: 4003: 4002: 3998: 3994: 3984: 3983: 3979: 3975: 3962: 3959: 3955: 3954: 3953: 3952: 3948: 3944: 3919: 3916: 3912: 3911: 3910: 3909: 3908: 3907: 3906: 3905: 3904: 3903: 3902: 3901: 3900: 3899: 3886: 3883: 3882: 3875: 3874: 3873: 3872: 3871: 3870: 3869: 3868: 3867: 3866: 3865: 3864: 3853: 3850: 3846: 3845: 3844: 3843: 3842: 3841: 3840: 3839: 3838: 3837: 3828: 3825: 3824: 3817: 3816: 3815: 3814: 3813: 3812: 3811: 3810: 3803: 3800: 3796: 3795: 3794: 3793: 3792: 3791: 3786: 3783: 3782: 3775: 3774: 3773: 3772: 3769: 3766: 3762: 3761: 3760: 3753: 3749: 3745: 3744: 3743: 3742: 3737: 3733: 3730: 3729: 3728: 3727: 3722: 3718: 3715: 3714: 3713: 3712: 3708: 3704: 3703: 3698: 3694: 3691: 3690: 3689: 3688: 3681: 3678: 3677: 3676: 3675: 3670: 3666: 3663: 3662: 3661: 3660: 3655: 3651: 3648: 3647: 3646: 3645: 3640: 3636: 3633: 3632: 3631: 3630: 3625: 3621: 3618: 3617: 3616: 3615: 3610: 3606: 3603: 3602: 3601: 3600: 3595: 3591: 3588: 3587: 3586: 3585: 3581: 3580: 3579: 3578: 3575: 3574: 3549: 3546: 3542: 3537: 3536: 3535: 3531: 3527: 3523: 3522: 3521: 3518: 3514: 3513: 3512: 3511: 3510: 3509: 3508: 3507: 3500: 3496: 3492: 3488: 3484: 3483: 3482: 3481: 3480: 3479: 3474: 3471: 3467: 3466: 3465: 3464: 3461: 3458: 3454: 3453: 3452: 3451: 3448: 3428: 3425: 3421: 3418: 3417: 3416: 3415: 3414: 3413: 3412: 3411: 3410: 3409: 3400: 3397: 3393: 3392: 3391: 3390: 3389: 3388: 3387: 3386: 3379: 3376: 3371: 3368: 3367: 3366: 3365: 3364: 3363: 3358: 3355: 3351: 3347: 3346: 3345: 3344: 3331: 3328: 3324: 3323: 3322: 3321: 3320: 3319: 3318: 3317: 3316: 3315: 3314: 3313: 3302: 3299: 3295: 3291: 3287: 3283: 3282: 3281: 3280: 3279: 3278: 3277: 3276: 3275: 3274: 3265: 3262: 3258: 3253: 3250: 3249: 3248: 3247: 3246: 3245: 3244: 3243: 3236: 3233: 3229: 3228: 3227: 3226: 3225: 3224: 3219: 3216: 3212: 3208: 3204: 3203: 3202: 3201: 3198: 3195: 3191: 3190: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3180: 3177: 3165: 3161: 3157: 3156: 3155: 3154: 3150: 3140: 3139: 3138: 3125: 3122: 3117: 3112: 3111: 3110: 3109: 3106: 3098: 3091: 3090: 3087: 3084: 3076: 3074: 3068: 3066: 3060: 3058: 3055: 3047: 3043: 3039: 3035: 3031: 3028: 3020: 3014: 3013: 3010: 3005: 3003: 2990: 2989: 2986: 2982: 2978: 2969: 2966: 2959: 2957: 2953: 2949: 2944: 2943: 2942: 2941: 2938: 2935: 2931: 2930: 2921: 2918: 2913: 2912: 2911: 2907: 2903: 2898: 2897: 2896: 2893: 2892: 2887: 2880: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2871: 2866: 2865: 2864: 2863: 2860: 2859: 2854: 2847: 2844: 2834: 2833: 2829: 2825: 2815: 2811: 2807: 2803: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2797: 2794: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2786: 2782: 2778: 2773: 2772: 2768: 2764: 2758: 2749: 2748: 2744: 2740: 2735: 2732: 2727: 2720: 2705: 2702: 2697: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2679: 2675: 2671: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2660: 2659: 2652: 2649: 2645: 2640: 2639: 2638: 2637: 2636: 2635: 2630: 2627: 2623: 2622: 2621: 2620: 2617: 2613: 2609: 2604: 2603: 2602: 2601: 2597: 2593: 2589: 2585: 2584:this proposal 2575: 2574: 2570: 2566: 2552: 2551: 2550: 2549: 2548: 2547: 2542: 2539: 2535: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2529: 2525: 2518: 2517: 2516: 2515: 2512: 2511: 2493: 2490: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2480: 2476: 2472: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2461: 2457: 2452: 2448: 2444: 2440: 2435: 2430:Template help 2425: 2422: 2418: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2408: 2402: 2396: 2390: 2378: 2375: 2371: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2360: 2357: 2356: 2350: 2340: 2339: 2336: 2331: 2327: 2323: 2319: 2312: 2302: 2292: 2282: 2272: 2271:StargateLists 2262: 2254: 2245: 2244: 2240: 2236: 2231: 2229: 2225: 2221: 2214: 2209: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2195: 2181: 2178: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2167: 2162: 2160: 2153: 2150: 2138: 2135: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2128: 2125: 2116: 2109: 2106: 2102: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2092: 2091:Jack Merridew 2082: 2081: 2077: 2073: 2068: 2066: 2060: 2058: 2051: 2048: 2045: 2042: 2039: 2036: 2033: 2030: 2027: 2024: 2021: 2018: 2015: 2010: 2003: 1996: 1993: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1981: 1977: 1973: 1970: 1966: 1963: 1959: 1949: 1946: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1923: 1920: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1908: 1904: 1900: 1892: 1880: 1877: 1873: 1869: 1865: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1860: 1855: 1852: 1845:So basically 1844: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1838: 1835: 1790: 1786: 1785: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1772: 1768: 1763: 1761: 1757: 1753: 1749: 1744: 1739: 1728: 1718: 1711: 1706: 1701: 1694: 1668: 1664: 1660: 1659:Boodlesthecat 1655: 1654: 1653: 1650: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1635:Boodlesthecat 1631: 1630: 1629: 1626: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1615: 1611: 1610:Boodlesthecat 1606: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1600: 1597: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1589: 1586: 1583: 1580: 1574: 1570: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1561: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1550: 1547: 1541: 1537: 1532: 1528: 1518: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1504: 1494: 1493: 1489: 1485: 1480: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1466: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1451: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1438: 1425: 1422: 1421: 1417: 1416: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1406: 1402: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1393: 1392: 1388: 1387: 1382: 1374: 1367: 1363: 1357: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1342: 1336: 1334: 1328: 1320: 1319: 1315: 1311: 1306: 1305: 1300: 1295: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1284:User:Mikkalai 1281: 1274: 1270: 1269:User:Mikkalai 1267:Proposal RE: 1262: 1259: 1255: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1228: 1222: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1192: 1189: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1177: 1176: 1167: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1137: 1134: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1107: 1106: 1103: 1100:Kick ass! -- 1099: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1068: 1065: 1062:Ah, nice. -- 1061: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1055: 1052: 1044: 1043: 1027: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1011: 1007: 1006: 1005: 1004: 1000: 997: 994: 990: 987: 976: 975: 972: 971:Jack Merridew 968: 961:need a laugh? 954: 950: 943: 942: 941: 940: 937: 934: 930: 929: 928: 927: 923: 916: 912: 908: 904: 882: 878: 874: 870: 869: 868: 865: 861: 857: 853: 849: 848: 847: 843: 839: 835: 831: 830: 829: 826: 822: 821: 820: 816: 812: 808: 804: 803: 802: 799: 795: 794: 793: 792: 788: 784: 780: 773: 762: 759: 755: 754: 753: 749: 745: 741: 737: 736: 735: 732: 728: 727: 720: 710: 703: 699: 692: 682: 672: 665: 664: 663: 655: 647: 637: 636: 632: 620: 604: 596: 591: 590: 589: 588: 584: 580: 576: 572: 568: 561: 554: 542: 539: 535: 534: 533: 532: 528: 524: 520: 505: 502: 498: 497: 496: 495: 492: 489: 481: 475: 471: 470: 469: 468: 465: 457: 446: 437: 428: 427: 423: 419: 418: 411: 404: 400: 396: 395: 388: 387: 386: 385: 381: 377: 376: 366: 362: 358: 357: 350: 346: 343: 342: 341: 340: 336: 332: 331: 318: 317: 313: 309: 305: 301: 297: 293: 284: 280: 276: 272: 271: 270: 269: 266: 263: 259: 258: 257: 256: 252: 248: 244: 226: 223: 219: 218: 217: 214: 210: 209: 208: 205: 201: 200: 199: 196: 191: 190: 189: 188: 185: 181: 167: 166: 165:05/11 - 06/18 161: 160:06/09 - 04/11 156: 155:12/08 - 05/09 151: 146: 141: 136: 131: 130:08/07 - 10/07 126: 121: 119: 118: 117:04/07 - 05/07 113: 112:02/07 - 03/07 108: 107:11/06 - 01/07 103: 102:10/06 - 11/06 98: 97:08/06 - 09/06 93: 92:07/06 - 08/06 88: 83: 82:02/06 - 05/06 78: 77: 74: 70: 65: 60: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 6528:Thank you. 6527: 6524: 6518:provided on 6515: 6511: 6509: 6502: 6499: 6496: 6493: 6490: 6487: 6465: 6442: 6418: 6395: 6375: 6271: 6259: 6231: 6211: 6125: 6102: 6082: 6063: 6040: 5980: 5964: 5940:the preamble 5938:I note that 5937: 5914: 5911: 5876: 5875: 5868: 5808: 5727: 5700: 5670: 5637: 5585: 5580: 5540: 5521: 5492: 5426: 5345: 5344: 5285: 5262:Collectonian 5187:Collectonian 5183: 5156: 5133: 5114: 5092: 5081: 5049: 5037: 5022: 4961: 4942: 4905:Carrick bend 4889: 4833: 4827: 4821: 4815: 4809: 4803: 4794:I unblocked 4793: 4784: 4759: 4755: 4751: 4732: 4728: 4724: 4720: 4687: 4655: 4632: 4600: 4581: 4562: 4530: 4512: 4473: 4469: 4446: 4388: 4367: 4314: 4286: 4253: 4252: 4251: 4232: 4224: 4219:project page 4215: 4212: 4172: 4130: 4128: 4121: 4116: 4110: 4077: 4072: 4066: 4055: 4028: 3990: 3970: 3939: 3936:g'day ned... 3877: 3819: 3777: 3758: 3706: 3569: 3567: 3444: 3419: 3293: 3289: 3256: 3211:unacceptable 3210: 3206: 3186: 3185: 3173: 3146: 3134: 3133: 3130:Re: Blanking 3115: 3101: 3077: 3072: 3064: 3061: 3024: 3001: 2996: 2974: 2882: 2849: 2842: 2840: 2820: 2774: 2759: 2755: 2736: 2730: 2725: 2723: 2581: 2561: 2506: 2503: 2436: 2433: 2386: 2354: 2346: 2281:StargateTech 2255: 2251: 2232: 2217: 2189: 2158: 2154: 2148: 2146: 2119: 2088: 2069: 2061: 2046: 2040: 2034: 2028: 2022: 2016: 2006: 1960: 1957: 1926: 1895: 1764: 1745: 1707: 1693:your comment 1690: 1578: 1545: 1530: 1524: 1500: 1481: 1467: 1452: 1435: 1419: 1414: 1390: 1385: 1378: 1337: 1332: 1329: 1326: 1302: 1296: 1287: 1277: 1272: 1234: 1231: 1208: 1076: 1045: 1040: 1037: 995: 988: 982: 964: 900: 833: 778: 776: 661: 645: 630: 595:Digimon Wiki 553:this comment 550: 515: 441: 413: 410:Uncyclopedia 407: 390: 371: 369: 352: 349:Uncyclopedia 326: 324: 308:Collectonian 289: 275:Collectonian 247:Collectonian 240: 177: 139: 122: 79: 55: 43: 37: 6550:TeePee-20.7 5809:a lot wrong 5366:WP:NOT#BURO 5140:John Carter 5093:Posted via 4259:a guideline 4151:Enric Naval 4137:Enric Naval 4087:Kim Bruning 4052:MfD closing 3876:All clear? 3847:Thanks! -- 3763:Thanks! -- 3541:task forces 2824:Enric Naval 2806:Enric Naval 2777:Enric Naval 2763:Enric Naval 2198:86.7.79.141 2192:—Preceding 2132:Thanks! -- 1974:. Regards, 1798:|PARAMETER= 691:Navbox/core 625:to replace 609:to replace 36:This is an 6379:Ursasapien 6208:Wikiquette 6060:WikiThanks 5770:this block 5616:historical 5543:Terriermon 5310:Listed on 5019:April 2008 4831:block user 4825:filter log 4213:Hi folks, 3424:David Levy 3375:David Levy 3327:David Levy 3261:David Levy 3215:David Levy 3176:David Levy 3034:WT:COUNCIL 2948:Ursasapien 2726:encouraged 2670:Ursasapien 2608:Ursasapien 2592:Ursasapien 2509:Black Kite 2044:block user 2038:filter log 1705:can help. 1569:Bellwether 1536:Bellwether 1508:Carcharoth 1314:count/logs 1239:Ursasapien 1225:Regarding 969:. Cheers, 744:Teratornis 579:Teratornis 521:. Cheers! 6569:Ned Scott 6467:Well done 6358:Ned Scott 6317:Ned Scott 6245:Ned Scott 6235:Ned Scott 6175:Ned Scott 6151:Ned Scott 6086:MZMcBride 6024:Ned Scott 5999:Ned Scott 5899:Ned Scott 5834:Ned Scott 5792:Ned Scott 5774:Ned Scott 5757:Ned Scott 5688:Ned Scott 5667:thank you 5654:Ned Scott 5627:Ned Scott 5568:Ned Scott 5462:Ned Scott 5449:Ned Scott 5404:Ned Scott 5330:Ned Scott 5316:Ned Scott 5289:Ned Scott 5241:Ned Scott 5220:Ned Scott 5203:Ned Scott 5121:Ned Scott 5069:Ned Scott 5046:stay cool 5004:Ned Scott 4990:DarkAudit 4980:Ned Scott 4966:DarkAudit 4946:DarkAudit 4930:Ned Scott 4883:edits to 4871:Mr. Green 4861:Ned Scott 4837:block log 4768:) 21:52, 4741:) 21:40, 4739:vandalise 4702:Ned Scott 4586:Ned Scott 4500:Ned Scott 4453:MZMcBride 4432:MZMcBride 4417:Ned Scott 4402:MZMcBride 4302:Ned Scott 4274:Ned Scott 4254:Ned Scott 4196:Ned Scott 4105:Equazcion 4061:Equazcion 4043:Ned Scott 4021:Uw-lblock 4008:Ned Scott 3987:Thank you 3958:Ned Scott 3915:Ned Scott 3849:Ned Scott 3799:Ned Scott 3765:Ned Scott 3545:Ned Scott 3517:Ned Scott 3470:Ned Scott 3447:Ned Scott 3396:Ned Scott 3354:Ned Scott 3298:Ned Scott 3232:Ned Scott 3194:Ned Scott 3121:Ned Scott 3042:Directory 3021:roll call 2985:Ned Scott 2934:Ned Scott 2917:Ned Scott 2879:Re-adding 2870:Ned Scott 2793:Ned Scott 2701:Ned Scott 2648:Ned Scott 2626:Ned Scott 2538:Ned Scott 2489:Ned Scott 2434:Hey Ned, 2421:Ned Scott 2406:Salvadori 2374:Ned Scott 2177:Ned Scott 2134:Ned Scott 2105:Ned Scott 2050:block log 1992:Ned Scott 1945:Ned Scott 1930:Pixelface 1919:Ned Scott 1851:Ned Scott 1834:Ned Scott 1810:PARAMETER 1649:Ned Scott 1625:Ned Scott 1596:Ned Scott 1560:Ned Scott 1405:Ned Scott 1341:Ned Scott 1292:WP:CANVAS 1258:Ned Scott 1188:Ned Scott 1133:Ned Scott 1102:Ned Scott 1064:Ned Scott 1023:Ned Scott 1010:Ned Scott 933:Ned Scott 913:, I have 864:Ned Scott 825:Ned Scott 798:Ned Scott 758:Ned Scott 731:Ned Scott 702:this diff 575:MediaWiki 571:HTML Tidy 538:Ned Scott 523:Redfarmer 501:Ned Scott 345:Knowledge 262:Ned Scott 222:Ned Scott 213:Random832 204:Ned Scott 195:Ned Scott 184:Random832 6471:Eusebeus 5854:contribs 5843:Jayron32 5824:contribs 5813:Jayron32 5745:contribs 5734:Jayron32 5606:rejected 5130:Eusebeus 4807:contribs 4788:contribs 4770:April 15 4743:April 15 4327:CAT:TEMP 4032:lucasbfr 3993:50MWdoug 3974:Zaphraud 3748:deletion 3526:VegaDark 3491:erachima 3116:directly 3054:April 30 2977:redirect 2731:requires 2437:Over at 2335:sgeureka 2194:unsigned 2085:nofollow 2020:contribs 1876:sgeureka 1771:sgeureka 1375:deletion 1354:FayssalF 1235:one side 1162:contribs 1123:contribs 1091:contribs 999:Contribs 69:Archives 6530:Kransky 6512:support 6392:Thanks! 6043:WP:BOLD 5968:Keilana 5932:WP:FICT 5458:WT:UCFD 5362:WP:BOLD 5115:Request 5111:Unblock 5054:Scarian 5038:content 4745:, 2008 4209:message 3880:MBisanz 3822:MBisanz 3780:MBisanz 3572:MBisanz 3160:Keilana 3149:Keilana 2902:JoshuaZ 2885:krimpet 2852:krimpet 2841:Please 2400:Curtisi 2149:compare 1958:Hello, 1802:DEFAULT 1746:I used 1280:WP:AN/I 986:Matthew 915:removed 809:, no? 700:. With 347:is not 39:archive 6516:oppose 6462:Yessir 6383:(talk) 6343:Hiding 6291:Hiding 6218:Hiding 6184:Hiding 6161:Hiding 6124:amen. 6109:Hiding 5730:WP:ANI 5722:WP:ANI 5718:WP:ANI 5707:WP:ANI 5673:R00m c 5644:(talk) 5592:(talk) 5364:, and 5042:blocks 4850:Rudget 4772:, 2008 4359:tag.-- 4289:Riana 4233:best, 3750:-: --> 3734:-: --> 3719:-: --> 3695:-: --> 3682:-: --> 3667:-: --> 3652:-: --> 3637:-: --> 3622:-: --> 3607:-: --> 3592:-: --> 3257:That's 3008:(talk) 2952:(talk) 2674:(talk) 2612:(talk) 2596:(talk) 2500:Mbstpo 2419::) -- 2394:Samuel 2359:scribe 2235:Daniel 2165:(talk) 2072:Daniel 1282:about 1243:(talk) 897:Notice 681:Navbox 671:Navbox 560:Navbox 5912:Ned, 5879:levse 5625:. -- 5577:as of 5435:WP:VP 5314:. -- 4928:. -- 4909:Dfred 4766:troll 4700:. -- 4597:. -- 4595:WP:FT 4377:Doug. 4361:Doug. 3707:maybe 3564:Pages 3352:. -- 3188:JOKE. 3135:See: 3082:STOP! 3065:Melon 2993:reply 2983:. -- 2646:. -- 2372:. -- 2370:reply 2123:nancy 1976:Nsk92 1806:#ifeq 1484:scuro 1470:scuro 1456:scuro 1441:scuro 1415:Benji 1403:. -- 1386:Benji 1333:force 1304:Jerry 1256:. -- 1254:reply 1154:TheDJ 1115:TheDJ 1083:TheDJ 1042:Ckatz 834:style 613:(and 87:06/06 16:< 6554:talk 6545:here 6534:talk 6505:here 6475:talk 6453:talk 6430:talk 6403:talk 6132:talk 6105:This 6090:talk 6051:talk 6013:talk 5988:talk 5961:Talk 5952:talk 5921:talk 5886:Talk 5848:talk 5818:talk 5739:talk 5677:talk 5638:TONY 5586:TONY 5557:talk 5526:jc37 5499:talk 5471:jc37 5439:jc37 5373:jc37 5346:lots 5299:jc37 5266:talk 5191:talk 5169:and 5161:and 5144:talk 4994:talk 4970:talk 4950:talk 4914:talk 4844:this 4819:logs 4801:talk 4782:talk 4698:Done 4574:This 4457:talk 4436:talk 4406:talk 4392:and 4239:talk 4184:talk 4155:talk 4141:talk 4091:talk 3997:talk 3978:talk 3947:talk 3705:And 3530:talk 3489:? -- 3457:jc37 3420:That 3290:mild 3057:2008 3002:Tony 2906:talk 2843:stop 2828:talk 2810:talk 2781:talk 2767:talk 2743:talk 2569:talk 2475:talk 2460:talk 2349:here 2324:and 2318:this 2239:talk 2220:here 2202:talk 2159:Tony 2076:talk 2057:here 2032:logs 2014:talk 1980:talk 1934:talk 1907:talk 1874:. – 1870:and 1818:ifeq 1663:talk 1639:talk 1614:talk 1512:talk 1488:talk 1474:talk 1460:talk 1445:talk 1381:this 1379:Hi, 1310:talk 1216:talk 1158:talk 1119:talk 1087:talk 1081:. -- 993:talk 967:here 965:See 911:here 907:here 903:here 877:talk 873:Cirt 854:and 842:talk 838:Cirt 815:talk 811:Cirt 787:talk 783:Cirt 748:talk 714:and 686:and 583:talk 527:talk 486:talk 462:talk 445:here 422:talk 399:talk 380:talk 361:talk 335:talk 312:talk 279:talk 251:talk 163:17. 158:16. 153:15. 148:14. 143:13. 138:12. 133:11. 128:10. 6514:or 6449:Kww 6127:DGG 6072:Cat 5611:or 5522:why 5494:DGG 4962:One 4476:Kiz 4375:.-- 3294:and 3192:-- 3143:DRV 3073:Bot 3040:or 2964:日本穣 2739:Abd 2588:RfC 2565:Abd 2403:di 2397:di 2391:?-- 2368:My 2355:WjB 2009:TTN 1889:Re 1849:-- 1816:". 1531:not 1420:boi 1391:boi 1286:'s 1271:'s 1252:My 1050:spy 779:why 631:lot 551:In 182:) — 123:9. 115:8. 110:7. 105:6. 100:5. 95:4. 90:3. 85:2. 80:1. 6556:) 6536:) 6477:) 6455:) 6432:) 6405:) 6277:” 6266:“ 6216:. 6134:) 6092:) 6084:-- 6053:) 6015:) 5990:) 5970:| 5954:) 5923:) 5889:• 5883:• 5872:— 5679:) 5619:}} 5613:{{ 5609:}} 5603:{{ 5559:) 5501:) 5268:) 5193:) 5146:) 5117:}} 5109:{{ 4996:) 4972:) 4952:) 4903:, 4899:, 4762:el 4760:tt 4758:ro 4756:ft 4754:or 4735:el 4733:tt 4731:ro 4729:ft 4727:or 4650:}} 4644:{{ 4521:}} 4515:{{ 4459:) 4438:) 4430:-- 4408:) 4357:}} 4351:{{ 4347:}} 4341:{{ 4337:}} 4331:{{ 4323:}} 4317:{{ 4265:@ 4263:LA 4241:) 4205:a 4180:• 4157:) 4143:) 4093:) 4085:-- 4024:}} 4018:{{ 3999:) 3980:) 3949:) 3532:) 3162:| 3151:| 3103:-- 3059:. 2908:) 2830:) 2812:) 2783:) 2769:) 2761:-- 2745:) 2571:) 2477:) 2462:) 2314:}} 2308:{{ 2306:, 2304:}} 2298:{{ 2296:, 2294:}} 2288:{{ 2286:, 2284:}} 2278:{{ 2276:, 2274:}} 2268:{{ 2266:, 2264:}} 2258:{{ 2241:) 2230:. 2204:) 2078:) 2059:. 1982:) 1936:) 1928:-- 1909:) 1741:}} 1735:{{ 1730:}} 1724:{{ 1720:}} 1714:{{ 1703:}} 1697:{{ 1665:) 1641:) 1616:) 1514:) 1490:) 1476:) 1462:) 1447:) 1439:-- 1358:- 1312:¤ 1218:) 1164:) 1160:• 1125:) 1121:• 1093:) 1089:• 1039:-- 879:) 844:) 817:) 789:) 750:) 722:}} 719:!! 716:{{ 712:}} 706:{{ 694:}} 688:{{ 684:}} 678:{{ 674:}} 668:{{ 659:- 657:}} 651:{{ 627:|| 622:}} 619:!! 616:{{ 606:}} 600:{{ 585:) 563:}} 557:{{ 529:) 482:• 458:• 424:) 401:) 382:) 363:) 351:. 337:) 321:Re 314:) 281:) 253:) 71:• 6552:( 6532:( 6473:( 6451:( 6447:. 6428:( 6401:( 6347:T 6295:T 6222:T 6188:T 6165:T 6130:( 6113:T 6088:( 6049:( 6011:( 5986:( 5950:( 5919:( 5877:R 5851:. 5845:. 5821:. 5815:. 5742:. 5736:. 5709:. 5675:( 5555:( 5551:- 5497:( 5264:( 5189:( 5142:( 5113:| 4992:( 4968:( 4948:( 4916:) 4912:( 4839:) 4834:· 4828:· 4822:· 4816:· 4810:· 4804:· 4799:( 4790:) 4785:· 4780:( 4764:( 4752:D 4737:( 4725:D 4689:@ 4682:• 4680:Щ 4678:• 4676:Ə 4674:• 4672:ʰ 4670:• 4668:ṭ 4666:• 4664:Ł 4662:• 4660:α 4658:• 4656:ṃ 4634:@ 4627:• 4625:Щ 4623:• 4621:Ə 4619:• 4617:ʰ 4615:• 4613:ṭ 4611:• 4609:Ł 4607:• 4605:α 4603:• 4601:ṃ 4564:@ 4557:• 4555:Щ 4553:• 4551:Ə 4549:• 4547:ʰ 4545:• 4543:ṭ 4541:• 4539:Ł 4537:• 4535:α 4533:• 4531:ṃ 4485:r 4480:o 4455:( 4434:( 4404:( 4291:⁂ 4237:( 4153:( 4139:( 4119:• 4117:C 4114:/ 4111:✗ 4109:• 4089:( 4075:• 4073:C 4070:/ 4067:✗ 4065:• 3995:( 3976:( 3945:( 3709:: 3528:( 3373:— 3085:) 3079:( 3069:‑ 3050:* 2904:( 2890:✽ 2857:✽ 2826:( 2808:( 2779:( 2765:( 2741:( 2567:( 2473:( 2458:( 2237:( 2200:( 2074:( 2052:) 2047:· 2041:· 2035:· 2029:· 2023:· 2017:· 2012:( 1978:( 1932:( 1905:( 1830:ʁ 1826:ʁ 1822:ʁ 1814:ʁ 1661:( 1637:( 1612:( 1579:C 1546:C 1510:( 1486:( 1472:( 1458:( 1443:( 1214:( 1156:( 1117:( 1085:( 996:| 989:| 875:( 840:( 813:( 785:( 746:( 709:! 654:! 611:I 603:! 581:( 525:( 420:( 397:( 378:( 359:( 333:( 310:( 277:( 249:( 73:ℹ 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index