User talk:Ned Scott/archive7

1512:

times have changed. I think we should adjust EPISODE. I think it should unequivocally allow individual episode pages, while putting limits on them. In this Lost episode case, maybe we could say that upcoming episode info should go into the LOE, and only if backed up by RS. Also, I spend a lot of time removing copy vio summaries from LOEs. I wouldn't mind if it said that upcoming episodes shouldn't even have cells in the LOE table. Basically, I think WP is going to have enormous amounts of TV info inserted into it in the coming years. Instead of trying to keep it out, we should work on a system that allows us to manage it easily. I think adjusting EPISODE could be just the tool. -

2639:

faith in that? We can do a better job on this, and don't think so highly of yourself that you think you've considered every possible option. You don't have more of a say in this than the rest of us do. In only a few hours time, not even enough to let know there is help needed for the poll, all this was decided without consensus. You don't even give a chance for the rest of the community to help. We thought it was under-control, and would have come sooner. This poll format does not have consensus, unless you only listen to those forcing the issue. --

1924:, it has needed cleaning up for a while now. I noticed you bot has removed the navboxes from the bottom of the page because of this which is all fine and good except that the navigation in the infobox is currently broken, it doesn't point to either the next or previous episode. I'd be happy to fix it myself if you have other things to do but I'm not entirely sure how it works. Will I need to enter the episode title/links manually on each page or is there a better way? Any assistance with this new change would be appreciated. 31: 64: 1309:'s posts that are an exact parallel to what is on his page. Plain and simple it is indeed one and the same. Long story short, I could care less about Wiki admin egos. You can't convince me that someone who proudly claims they have 20,000 edits in Wiki is not throwing weight around. And in this case, admin weight around. I'll leave my page as-is since the info he was so eager to gain from me is clearly visible on 815:. I had an idea, and wanted to know what you think about it. I suggest that there be an absolute limit of no more than two (2) reasonably-sized wikiproject templates on any talk page, and (per my previous comment) that "daughter templates" (like the one on Asperger syndrome - "This article was selected on the Medicine portal as one of Knowledge's best articles related to Medicine.") be strictly prohibited. 2411:

time, especially considering the lack of input from others beside the few who already know about the situation. Your judgement on this issue is flawed. You continuously make needless conflict and push issues to the point of disruption. Some of your suggestions on the talk page of the article are down right absurd, and show just how much you don't understand how such articles should be written. --

2566: 544: 492: 1236:

his own actions. This is not the first time I have seen this happen with this user. If he had not begun to act this way toward me, I would have handled the situation myself, but now that I am directly involved in this, I know that it would be a conflict of interest for me to do too much. I appreciate your time with this, regardless of your opinion on the situation. Thanks,

1465:, who may or may not have mega forms. If it didn't happen in the manga or anime, then it's not relevant to that character. Bandai might want us to believe there is a significance, but really it's just an arbitrary decision someone made without the help of the anime writers. Maybe as a note of trivia, but that's about it. -- 1522:

it, all shows should have it. I just don't think things like that can be considered "consensus".. it's just monkey see monkey do. Even if we say they're all automatically notable, we still have issues with sources, indefinite stubs (that could be easier organized as a single page), possible copyright vios, and so on. --

955:. Many shows are broad, and simply should be turned into a taskforce. In my opinion: people create projects as fanclubs sometimes (not always..), and the project doesn't end up helping much. The Baywatch project (inactive) is a good example of this. Also, a project for a new show such as Heroes seems a little soon. 1437:

forms. Otherwise, make a separate page for each of them that referrs to there card/videogame versions and includes there mega form. Then include a link on the character page to the digimon page(other page on the same charcter). NOT EVERYONE HAS MEMORIZED ALL THE DIGIMON IN THEIR SPARE TIME, help them out.

2257:

Civil.. it gets to a point where we all just sound like phony jackasses. It's important to be polite, but it's also important to be honest and react in an honest way. I'm not going to tailer my comments to be "PC" out the ass, but I'm usually a pretty nice guy. As far as the Guerrilla BBQ Cook Off or

2093:

Secondly, there isn't a little coverage on the topic, there is a lot of it, over the internet. Some of the sources have already been provided on the article. There are multiple, reliable and secondary sources available on the subject, we aren't merely quoting ourselves or providing primary references

1511:

for example. EPISODE is basically saying; if a show started long enough ago that people created season pages for it, don't change them. I wasn't a pedian back when these season pages were created, but I imagine it was because, at that time, an individual episode page would fail AfD. It seems like,

1067:

When I tried to impliment that change, it ended up adding the licensor field to all the boxes, even the ones that were not licensed yet. This left a blank line for a field that didn't apply for anime that were't licensed, so it didn't seem like it could work with my current knowledge of how templates

2625:

Ned, can I ask what you were doing? The poll is open, people are voting, and the question is very open-ended so people can say whatever they want. I strongly dislike the fact that we're having a poll, so if your objection is a general one, I totally agree, but others decided we have to, and so given

2410:

That's not how things work here. The topic does not stand alone, and just because there's crap to be cut from both articles is not a good reason to not merge. Taking down the merge tags and thinking "Since it hasn't happened, I must have consensus" is absurd. Tags should be left for a good amount of

1998:

This information should not be lost. But I think many people will also contest it belongs in an Infobox (And the fact that Simpsons, Futurama, American Dad etc do put these running gags in there is no justification). But I think there is a better way to do this by adding the current information to a

1287:

Spy, listen to Chris, he's actually a really nice guy and there's logic in what he's trying to tell you. You didn't do the same thing he did, and this is not about admins vs "normal users". (notice that I am not an admin) Removing personal attacks is ok; blanking your talk page because you're mad is

969:

I have would prefered that El C reopen it, but I understand that he wants no further involvement. Anyhow, I moved the article back down to semiprotect and restored the AfD (rather than DRV) notice. I have no prior involvement with the AfD and no strong feelings either way, but the DRV showed way too

2680:

you just want to get it out of the way, is why you shouldn't have a stronger say in all this (speaking both of you and others). But now I've just been steamrolled, and as pissed off as that makes me, I can accept that. I'm an editor in good standing, let me at least get back to editing articles and

2173:

Hi. I saw that you recreated the userpage and talkpage of a user who has changed username, pointing to the new username. Of course I understand why this would be done as a general matter, but the user in question is a minor who had been editing under his real name and has been subjected to off-wiki

2074:

Ned, thanks. The problem with merging it (it's already been discussed on the talk page) is that it's just about too big to merge already, and in the wake of Essjay and the fact WP is cited more and more often in the news (almost weekly now) the amount of material written about editors is just going

1891:

Yeah, that was more of a testing of the waters than a long term thing. I'm hoping users break away from the idea of putting the entire season list in the infobox itself (a separate nav template, maybe). It's an easy revert, if needed. As for the other issues, the bot can do some nifty find/replace

2638:

I object to a handful of users forcing their way in because they don't care anymore. I've already noted what I feel is wrong about the poll itself on the talk page. A handful of users, after failing to be able to delete the poll, decide to push out this crap-basic version, and I'm supposed to have

2439:

Wow, that message was sooooo unexpected. and ZOMG, you said "Stop (period)". Get ever it, it's not a big deal. Quack has been pushing people's buttons on that article for a long while now, and I don't respect that. I doubt I'd say something like that again, but it just got to me this one time. I'm

1521:

Yes, but the real reason we get so many episode articles is because people have the misconception that they're supposed to make them (see it once place and it spreads like fire). It happens with tons of things on Knowledge, like with TV-show specific WikiProjects. People think that if one show has

1460:

The problem is that it's not canon to the anime. Many video games, card games, and v-pets will come up with their own line that you don't see in the anime, but that's really unrelated to the anime characters. Bandai is really willy nilly about the evolutions and is hardly consistent between media.

1264:

has no problem wiping out the exact same discussion from his talk page, yet gets upset when I did the same on my talk page. It's clear hypocrisy. Why can't you leave things be Chris? My beef with you was over until you decided to wipe the slate clean on your end. And then decided that I somehow

1235:

About this, Ned, you're not associated with this situation at all, so would you mind taking a look at this user's conduct? My discussion with him started off fairly friendly, but he began to try to turn the tables on me when I had a real concern, looking for hypocrisy in me, rather than addressing

818:

Reasonably-sized, in this case, means that they are the same size they are now. I'll leave it to the wikiproject council to decide, in cases where an article has more than 2, which ones get priority (I think it should be the ones that have either made significant improvement to the article, and/or

230:

is there anyway that we can highlight the changes that have gone on, show the four months worth of work behind it all, to lessen some of the culture shock to editors? You've had a look round now that's pretty clear, so if you could let us know the salient feature that we need to stick on the front

2706:

stopped. Once a poll is up and running, publicized, and people are voting, it's disruptive to try to stop it. Also, please stop trying to characterize my views, because you've got them quite wrong. I didn't want the poll, still don't want it, have had very little to do with its development, don't

2536:

understand and respect the reasons we have the 3RR. Now I can't even participate in the discussion to help improve the poll. This block helps nothing, and I ask that you consider the situation at hand. There will be no more reverting, no more edit waring, only discussion on an important issue. --

1334:

Oh grow up. "oh no, the man has got me down!" If you act like an asshole then you have no right to bitch about people telling you to stop being an asshole. Trying to make this seem as "the man" going after you is laughable. Acting like this just makes you look bad, and pisses off users that would

1006:

I...you got balls. I've got my own opinions about the Essjay scandal but I'm staying far far far far FAR away from that article. To get the title of that article changed and actually get it to stick...maybe it wasn't difficult, but from where I'm standing, that took guts. Godspeed, man, godspeed.

597:

of the WikiProjects. This is, as you say, a separate issue from whether the template under discussion at TfD is suitable. But I'd be interested in any thoughts you would have on how to show people, with a minimum of talk page clutter, that there are 3 or 4 WikiProjects that consider an article to

2652:

Ned, you're speaking to me as though I'm somehow in control of this. In fact, I've taken very little to do with the development of this poll, because I think it's a bad idea. Others developed the questions, then there were arguments about that, and then a poll about the poll, and the whole thing

1269:

you should not behave like a hypocrite. Unless you have some barnstar for hypocrisy you haven't placed on your page yet. Apologies for the tone but nothing gets under my skin more than an admin—anywhere—using their privledge to behave one why while mere users are held to another standard. 100%

871:

Two more points: "Narrowest scope" sounds like a reasonable rule - that would also ensure maximum importance ratings. I'm a bit more uneasy about "significant improvement" though - that might be reasonable in some cases, but in other cases articles might have received a lot of attention from one

627:

There has been some revert warring over which characters should be listed for flashback/featured in Lost episodes, and it is being discussed again to either reassert the old consensus or see if there is a new one. I saw you were previously involved with discussions of this, so here's a heads up

2236:

May I ask, Ned, in which way are we insane? I am sure that most Wikipedians will agree the present mediation systems are not coping with the workload expeditiously enough, causing disputes that could be mediated to become exponentially worse the longer that they are not addressed by a competent

2064:

Actually, the edit summary was appropriate, just uncivil. For the incivility I'll apologies, but only for that. I also remind you that there is no consensus to keep the article, as shown by the last AfD. There is no sourcing issue, so I don't know why you bother to mention that. It's a retarded

1436:

Many people know all those digimon have mega forms that didn't appear in the show, and can't find them because there names have nothing to do with the form before them. I had a hard time finding them. I think it is fair and logical to have a link somewhere on those digimon's pages to there mega

1822:. Totally 100% clean. In between the subst: of the template on all the episode pages, you would have total mess, and it's kinda dangerious because it almost can't be reversed, so you need to tred very cautiously, but I think it's possible. What do you think Ned, is this acceptable to deal with 199:

that you have a "solution" as he called it. If you have a solution, could you please clarify? I was under the impression that you agreed with me that there was a point of obviousness about notable places named "Speed" being listed. If we can achieve a consensus, then we can perhaps make some

1115:

I will wait and see. I look forward to your contributions to the Essjay controversy article. I supplied the references on the talk page about Larry Sanger is the co-founder. It would not hurt to search for more references if you are so inclined to participate. Just a little careful wording is

2535:

This was hardly something normal, and had that poll been kept open any longer then the hopes of closing it back up would have been lost. This situation was very unique in that it could not just wait, unlike other page/article issues. Under normal situations I would not violate the 3RR, and I

1956:

You pointed out that the page Crests (Digimon) was a needless article because some of the stuff was discussed on other pages. However if the crest page was deleted, how comes you did not delete the digivice page. Alot of that information is on other pages throughout the site.

592:

Another thought about this. What do you think is the best way to handle articles covered by multiple WikiProjects? WikiProject advertising probably only works when there are only one or two WikiProject banners. When there are 3 or 4, then people are probably put off joining

2790:

I unblocked you because of the notion that you understand the significance of the issue at hand, and such a major shift should now be taken to the talkpage. It might also be good for you to take some time away from ATT to work on articles, like you suggested. —

238:

What a difference a night of sleep makes. Most of them are fine, I haven't looked at them all. Still not fond of the little blue icon, but other than that they're great. I guess I need a little more faith in my fellow Wikipedians. Good job on the templates. --

2707:

want to "get it out of the way," and the first I knew it had started was when I saw it appear on the mailing list. You're ascribing a centrality to me here that I just don't have. I've quite deliberately kept away from it because of the craziness.

598:

fall within their scope. Of course, that still doesn't avoid the problem of people clicking on a WikiProject link and ending up at a dead-end, inactive WikiProject (unless of course they revitalise the WikiProject). Tricky balancing act here.

2204:

Ah, I did not know that was the reason for the change. In that case I'll ask the user if he'd like bot help in changing his old sigs so they do not show his real name (since old sigs was the reason I thought a redirect might make sense). --

612:

I apologize too for losing my temper. If you check out my recent contributions, you'll see that I uploaded some new lost pictures which are scenes from the actual episodes. Tell me if you think they are suitable enough for the articles.

1356:

Since you're involved I don't want to ask you to do anything directly, but what is the next appropriate course of action with QuackGuru? Still think he's disrupting the page and the ANI thread seems dead/overlooked/ignored by him. -

1706:

How would using subst instead of a transclusion made any difference then? The templates will still be on the article, we'll just have a lot of code in the middle of the article instead of a transclusion from the template namespace.

2321:

Not that I care much, but really, Wales is one of the founders, not the only founder, and that's often forgotten in media and apparently here. I won't change it in either direction, but I don't think Quack was necessarily wrong.

2053:

is not appropriate. if you feel the article is without merit, feel free to AfD it for community review. I undid your no-consensus redirect, and added another source, a UK article written about the community today. thank you. -

1220:

and supposed Wiki guideline violations for others. Or is it something else? Because if that's the case, I'll just wipe my talk page clean. Is that cool with you? Or do I have to reach the level of admin to hide discussion?

2151:

The Knowledge community can easily be defined by one's perspective and isn't something we can just tie down to some specifics. A separate article will likely encourage a false impression of what the community actually is. --

1032:

You previously expressed a strongly-stated opinion about a video game navbox or all video game navboxes in general, or perhaps I clicked on your talk page by mistake. Whichever it is, you are invited to offer your opinion at

950:

I've noticed you post on the proposed projects page a bit, so I thought I would ask you this. Maybe you have an answer? Is there any chance show specific projects can just be changed into taskforces? Examples here:

1988:. Is there a way to add those fields back in without reverting your edits? (My attempts have all failed.) I realize your project is aimed at reducing episode articles, but I have to admit I enjoy reading them. 2237:

person. The aim of this initiative is to avoid the issues caused by cases "rotting" on mediation request lists by providing rapid mediator assistance. Does this seem insane to you? Please, I implore you, remember

1560: 1068:

work. Is there a way to impliment the licensor field so that it doesn't appear in the box until someone includes the licensor= {{{licensor}}} parameter into the article that is using the template?--

1865:

PS. saw your changes to the Futurama episode box. Note the above stated problems on a plain subst: with this method, and also note that there is now a "Season list" if people prefer this. See also

511:

and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!

226:. There's reams of talk pages to go through in both projects and in this regard you may be able to help me/us. What I'd like to look at was your first impression, the second you walked in and went 455: 1969: 1836: 1807: 1595: 1555: 2090:

WP:ASR is a logically fallacious argument in this case. We are not making self-references here in anyway. See the examples provided on the guideline page, and you will understand what I mean.

559:

prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for

1684:

Let's just say i don't feel like adding Infoboxes to all those articles :D So this is the lazy and quick way out of it for now. If someone wants to do it more thoroughly, by all means :P --

2520:. Although this was a tough decision, it might help give you some valuable hours away from the site — you've been taking a lot of heat today, and it's understandable that you are upset. — 2346:

Quack keeps trying to make a point over a separate dispute on that article, and it's long since gotten old. I don't care one way or another, as well, but the guy needs to knock it off. --

1172: 1580: 255: 1590: 2174:

harassment and trolling, and I would prefer to delete these redirects. Please advise if you see any problem with this (if appropriate, respond by e-mail instead of here). Thank you.

2130:

Knowledge's community is really just explaining how Knowledge works. If the Knowledge article is too big to describe such a fundamental concept as our editors.. then we should move

1933: 1730:?? As such a subst: of the above templates is basically replacing these template with one template which at least isn't show specific, making way to remove the showspecific ones. -- 655: 1575: 884: 456: 2217: 1570: 917:

Scratch that question. I misused Whatlinkshere. (I used the links for the talk page instead of the template). I'm doing stupid things today. Protection is still appropriate.

306: 2464:

Admins are not police. Unless you need admin privs then admins are no more involved than anyone else. You also might want to take a look at your blocking policy as well. --

1787: 1724: 1585: 1550: 1901:

And for Futurama I did end up just taking the episode succession box out, since they also had a season/series nav box as well. All the others were just subst converted. --

2276: 2653:

became farcical. Therefore, others decided just to ask for people's opinions. It's a fair enough compromise, far from ideal, but at least people will now have their say.

1667:

They could all be easily replaced with the standard TV infobox as well, which is why I thought maybe this was a removal request. Might just want to take these to TfD. --

2107:

This article will easily be as bulletproof content wise as Essjay's article in short order, and is already there sourcing wise. I will move this discussion back to the

1939: 1605: 1611:

with their contents? That should rid us of more duplicating templates. I think it's best to start with the Ed, Edd n' Eddy one, because it's not used that much. --

466: 2280: 1946: 1600: 1565: 1545: 2230: 1938:

Hello, I've noticed that you're interested in the video game articles. You might be interested in adding your opinion to the discussion currently taking place on

1379: 1153:

My suggestion was to just use wording that didn't involve bringing up the word founder at all, so I don't see why you are telling me this... Wrong talk page? --

2386:

The discussion for merging the article is long been past. The article has expanded. It is too big to merge. If it is not to your satisfactory then AFD it. :) -

1503:

I know. It doesn't line up with what's happening on wikipedia, though. All the new shows with a significant fan base have LOEs with individual episode pages:

428: 1826: 1797: 1034: 1783:

So in the being lazy department... What the above does is not really good on infoboxes, because it can leave a {{{optioname|}}} as the actual option for a

1892:

text stuff that shouldn't make it a problem. Basically it will just equivocate template values with the new template instead of using the subst method. --

1057: 773: 647: 276: 1314: 1275: 1222: 651: 567:. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.-- 2262: 2252: 1526: 1516: 1498: 803: 669: 1278: 836:

as possible exceptions to the rule of "max 2". There may be others. (That page doesn't look too bad, since the project templates have small=yes). --

783: 1469: 1265:

can't do that myself? Clear admin hypocrisy. I don't have time for this B.S., but if you're going to engage in these kind of destructive debates

1027: 826: 581: 2611: 2075:

to grow... if it got merged today, for example, and if I were to follow all the RS that came out, I'd easily myself have enough content myself to

1021: 858:

Hm. I don't know. By the way: We're not talking Echo and 1.0 here, but rather the usual Wikiprojects like Anime and manga or Japan here, right? --

317: 1992: 762: 2594: 2529: 2373: 2350: 1339: 1317: 1292: 832:

Sorry in advance if it's wrong of me to respond on Ned's talk page (I happened to have it watchlisted). Please consider bordering cases such as

2769: 2738: 2713: 2685: 2659: 2643: 2895: 2873: 2860: 2840: 2823: 2810: 2585:

User has agreed to at least temporarily withdraw from the edit war, and has assured that no more revert warring will occur over this issue. —

2553: 2540: 2477: 2468: 2444: 2415: 2199: 2156: 2115: 2069: 2029:

While I'm inclined to agree with your actions, you could have used a more civil edit summary. Please do not try to stir up conflict. Thanks –

1905: 1671: 1403:

article and came across an answers.com version of the article with what appears to be a clearer version of the image currently in the article

1157: 1011: 952: 351: 2016: 876: 862: 853: 840: 2270: 2209: 1425: 921: 908: 894: 2505: 2499: 1769: 1662: 1653: 704: 695: 681: 410: 243: 208: 2426: 1928: 1896: 1640: 1205: 1104: 636: 2549:

At least let me get back to articles. I'll stay away from the ATT poll, but there's no reason to block me from even editing articles. --

935: 602: 1389: 1225: 2303:

within the last few months I wonder if you have an opinion about the use of screenshots in this article and would welcome your opinion

2219: 1976:

to refer back to the standard Television episode box, we lost some of the unique fields for those series. American Dad! episodes list

1963: 1760: 1747: 1715: 1178:. If your bot can replace usage of that template with the standard infobox template however, then that would be a good idea perhaps. -- 882: 442:

article. We currently have about 400 -mon articles. By the end of this merge, we'll probably still have about 60 articles for -mons. --

341: 2283:

and you like you to weigh in so that we may actually have a consensus on this matter as it doesn't seem there exists one either way. -

1886: 1701: 845:

The problem with exceptions is that as soon as you carve one out, everyone tries to claim it. What's to stop people from arguing that

2097:

Thirdly, article has the potential to develop and grow into more than a stub, redirection and merging would definitely restrict that.

2355:

Probably so, but he then needs to be knocked where he's violating rules, not what essentially is a good edit. All IMO, of course. --

2311: 1385:

WOAH!!!! before you fly in ;) we've added optional icons to all the uw- warnings which you mentioned previously might interest you.

2340: 654:

which is the same picture on the article now, just under a different file name. It was deleted in favior of Image:AnaLucia.jpg via

2451: 2304: 2079:

to split it righ back off in another month or so per the actual policies on forking. this was the closing admin's comments on the

1752:

I see. That makes sense now. Seems like a pretty clever trick to make it easy for a bot to change templates around on articles. --

1488: 757: 2458: 2433: 2404: 2058: 1452: 1440: 1366: 763: 2178: 1361: 1001: 725: 262: 232: 222:, don't worry you didn't make an ass of yersel at all. You're not the first and certainly won't be the last that's going to go 2489: 1083: 812: 779:

Yeah, me too. I just kinda said "screw it" and stuck something up there. It could probably look nicer, but it's a start :) --

662: 2672:

You started it again after it had stopped. We were lined up for some discussion with people who were fresh to the situation.

1147: 617: 1444: 1254: 1052: 996: 587: 300: 187: 2033: 1915: 1247: 849:

is just such an exception, and deserves wikiproject tags from all the wikiprojects for all the countries that border it?

462:

I've done some heavy editing. Would you consider taking another look and reconsidering your vote? Thanks for your input,

424:. Also, Digimon is different from Pokemon, but even there I don't think there should be an article for every Pokemon. -- 407: 323: 293: 904:

over to it, and keep forgetting to do the same for the others. In general it has about 150 pages it's being used on. --

450: 2316: 2288: 1211: 982: 2184:

Please do not do this again, Ned. I deleted the pages on request of the user, and he wants to vanish under that name.

1803:

It looked kinda messy to leave around such stuff in the page source. But I think I found a way to do it properly. For

1415: 940: 629: 182: 2369: 2336: 2294: 1973: 1921: 1859: 1628: 571: 2046: 480: 2851:

I believe it's fixed; I used the autoblock ID finder, unblocked, and now it's struck out. Still having problems? —

2800: 959: 2632: 2398: 1195: 1130: 901: 718: 388: 1484:

to say individual eps are preferred over season pages, and future eps shouldn't have pages. Good compromise? -

798: 2226:.< I'm... just going to take this off my watch list and pretend it doesn't exist. You people are insane. -- 213: 164: 159: 154: 149: 144: 2421: 2381: 2038: 743: 533: 530: 504: 139: 134: 129: 523:→ For being the only one to answer my question about removing comments on talk pages. Have a good day, Ned! 1866: 1351: 1062: 748: 622: 124: 116: 106: 101: 96: 91: 86: 81: 1110: 2626:

that, this very open question is probably the best way to proceed. What exactly is your objection to it?

2022: 2008: 1878: 1851: 1739: 1693: 1620: 1187: 564: 556: 196: 68: 1814: 2517: 2510: 2249: 2168: 1406:. It also appears that you uploaded both of the images. What happened to the clearer of the two? — 641: 249: 72: 38: 2300: 1335:

otherwise be happy to work with you. Why do you have to come around here and be a jerk like that? --

552: 2279:

that became inactive in December. Due to the length of the previous discussion, I have proposed a

1504: 1448: 1431: 1048: 978: 633: 2473:

No, but people do get blocked for personal attacks. If I was an admin I would have blocked you. -

1999:

seperate section. I think that Ned wants to use his bot to do this at some point in time. Ned ? --

1968:

First of all, I am an Infobox newbie. But it appears that when you changed the episode boxes for

328:

There's been lots of vandalism on your user page lately, so I requested semi-protection for it on

1508: 1475: 1242: 987: 929: 393: 288: 2134:

things to a second page if we have to. Separating the article just doesn't make any sense to me.

1820: 1817: 992:

That looks ok to me and thanks for taking the extra effort to straighten out the whole problem.

402:

of the digimon together as one whole article? I find that they should all be separate, like the

1645:

No, he means the templates are currently transcluded, but he wants them to be subst instead. --

712: 188: 819:

the ones that have the narrowest scope). This would alleviate the need for the metatemplate.

2363: 2330: 2242: 2100:

The article on Essjay controversy was later kept because of some of the reasons stated above.

2080: 1536: 1513: 1485: 2767: 2711: 2657: 2630: 1394: 770: 515: 173: 8: 2891: 2856: 2796: 2607: 2590: 2525: 2496: 2474: 2455: 2430: 2112: 2108: 2055: 2039: 2023: 1358: 1310: 1230: 1142: 1038: 974: 722: 614: 607: 568: 551:

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be

337: 267: 47: 17: 1541:

Hi Ned, do you think that your bot could replace the following templates transclusions:

1306: 1271: 1266: 1261: 1237: 1217: 1008: 560: 508: 471: 365: 310: 283: 2284: 2193: 1989: 1925: 1481: 1163: 1097: 1076: 833: 524: 498: 201: 63: 2357: 2324: 2175: 1753: 1708: 1646: 945: 795: 754: 691: 677: 443: 769:

Thank you for trying to help rein this in, I was trying to figure out how myself.

2785: 2764: 2708: 2654: 2627: 2238: 2004: 1874: 1847: 1735: 1689: 1616: 1183: 873: 859: 837: 599: 403: 259: 416:

I wish I could give a better example, but after explaining so many times... see

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2888: 2870: 2853: 2837: 2820: 2807: 2793: 2735: 2682: 2640: 2604: 2587: 2550: 2537: 2522: 2465: 2441: 2412: 2388: 2347: 2259: 2227: 2206: 2153: 2066: 1902: 1893: 1766: 1668: 1659: 1637: 1523: 1495: 1466: 1422: 1404: 1336: 1289: 1202: 1154: 1118: 1018: 993: 964: 905: 780: 701: 659: 578: 425: 417: 357: 348: 333: 329: 314: 240: 1819:. But now after you subst: the Desperate Housewives ep template you would get 1378:

are looking at redirecting the old templates to the new ones with a strawpoll

890:

Is it planned for actual use? It's not clear whether it will actually be used.

2620: 2506: 2308: 2065:

article split, and it doesn't make sense from an organization standpoint. --

2030: 1494:

But the whole point of WP:EPISODE is to discourage individual episodes... --

1274:

just left the discussion on his talk page. And I will gladly do the same. --

956: 846: 421: 358: 1940:

Knowledge talk:WikiProject Final Fantasy#Banning spoiler warnings completely

543: 2440:

human, not an emotionless machine that can take his abuse all day long. --

2186: 2012: 1943: 1882: 1855: 1743: 1697: 1624: 1408: 1375: 1191: 1090: 1069: 918: 891: 850: 823: 740: 538: 477: 219: 179: 656:

Knowledge:Images and media for deletion/2006 November 27#Image:Anamich.jpg

272:

I commend the boldness, but I'm not sure I understand why you removed the

2486: 1400: 753:

I prefer that one actually; I will edit my statement to reflect that. --

736: 730: 687: 673: 485: 231:

page in radioactive lurid lettering, that would be appreciated? Regards

2000: 1870: 1843: 1731: 1685: 1612: 1179: 872:

project, while still being horribly needy of attention from another. --

789: 735:

Just a friendly warning that you have had 3 reverts within 24 hours on

307:

Knowledge:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 February 5#Template:Cancelled

1313:'s page right now. All in all, he got what he wanted. So win win! -- 1382:

and remembering our previous discussions, thought you'd want a say.

1035:

Knowledge talk:WikiProject Video games#Navboxes III: Son of Navboxes

2516:

Hi Ned. I am forced to block you for 24 hours for 3RR violation on

463: 2111:

talk page, where we should continue this. please respond there! -

1017:

Nah, it just didn't seem like an intimidating situation to me. --

1793:

call. Now for the above templates, i didn't really care, but for

398:

Just curious, why are you (or the WikiProject Digimon) merging

457:

Knowledge:Featured list candidates/List of Dad's Army episodes

1720:

Oh, I forgot to tell that i fixed all these templates to use

1421:

I believe I've only uploaded one photo for that article.. --

1816:. See the demo here: For a moment, you get very ugly pages: 811:

First, I wanted to say that I agree 100% with what you said

953:

Knowledge:WikiProject Television#Show-specific WikiProjects

1951: 1934:

Banning spoiler warnings on the Final Fantasy Wikiproject

491: 2258:

whatever it is, I don't care, one way or another. --

900:

Used in general or for the Digimon lists? I switched

739:. I am sure you wouldn't want to overstep the mark : 1201:No problemo, NedBot is working on it right now. -- 364:I suppose, as opposed to "cooked" plot summaries? 2495:I know, but still... that was brutal and mean. - 2271:Revived discussion concerning fair use in portals 1116:warranted. May your edits last the test of time. 1305:In this case, the whole talk page is made up of 1270:ridiculous. I'm adding this can all end well if 934:Thanks. I can turn a phrase when I try hard :) 700:Well, I guess it worked out, thanks anyways. -- 563:, even if they do not technically violate the 518:}} to their talk page with a friendly message. 2275:I am contacting everyone who participated in 1399:I was looking for some sources to add to the 650:, as this image was actually used to replace 630:Talk:Characters of Lost#Flashback characters 258:if you'd like to continue the discussion. -- 2869:Seems to be fixed now, thank you again. -- 2681:I'll leave that whole poll thing alone. -- 1658:Really? 'cause I'd love to nuke them... -- 1561:Template:Ed, Edd n' Eddy Episode Navigation 2220:Wikipedia_talk:Guerrilla Mediation Network 1461:The main articles are now for anime/manga 808:(Cross-posted to Kirill's talk page too) 632:. Input would be appreciated, thanks. -- 804:A thought regarding wikiproject templates 794:It is fine with me this banner as well.-- 178:Having some fun with edit summaries? ;-) 1028:Centralized video game navbox discussion 61: 764:Knowledge:WikiProject Council/Proposals 309:, granted that it's not over yet.. but 14: 555:from editing Knowledge. Note that the 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1596:Template:SpongeBob episode navigation 1556:Template:Diagnosis: Murder navigation 686:Or not. I've restored the first one. 668:The same image is still available on 646:I was wondering if you could restore 2836:My IP still seems to be blocked. -- 1920:Hello, thanks for trying to fix the 25: 2454:. That is beyond hostile, sorry. - 476:Ahahahahahahahaahhaahha tooo funny 23: 1964:Unique fields on episode infoboxes 1581:Template:Will & Grace episodes 542: 514:Smile at others by adding {{subst: 507:has smiled at you! Smiles promote 490: 24: 2911: 2819:It still says I'm blocked O.o -- 2734:Then I give you my apologies. -- 2083:. Numbers 2-4 are most important: 1120: 2564: 1765:NedBot's subst'ing them now. -- 1591:Template:Transformers navigation 62: 58: 29: 2560: 1754: 1709: 1647: 1636:You mean like, remove them? -- 1367:Summat that might interest you. 1132: 902:List of Digimon Savers episodes 444: 375: 373: 371: 369: 367: 1576:Template:Mighty Max navigation 1099: 1092: 1078: 1071: 1002:Are you trying to be an admin? 936: 885:template:Japanese episode list 822:What do you think of my idea? 254:I've replied to your comments 224:What the f..... happened here? 13: 1: 2763:Thank you. Much appreciated. 2582:for the following reason(s): 2194: 1040: 909:22:27, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 895:21:25, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 877:16:36, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 863:16:39, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 854:16:34, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 841:16:30, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 827:16:17, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 799:09:18, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 784:08:05, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 774:08:01, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 758:22:39, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 744:02:57, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 726:02:28, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 705:20:04, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 696:18:30, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 682:18:28, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 663:03:26, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 637:22:46, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 618:16:32, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 603:11:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 582:21:59, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 572:21:58, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 534:07:52, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 481:21:49, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 467:01:58, 16 February 2007 (UTC) 451:13:09, 16 February 2007 (UTC) 429:03:49, 16 February 2007 (UTC) 411:18:46, 15 February 2007 (UTC) 202: 2576:Your request to be unblocked 2187: 1867:Pilot (Prison Break episode) 1837:Desperate Housewives episode 1808:Desperate Housewives episode 1571:Template:Futurama navigation 588:WikiProject template banners 389:09:44, 8 February 2007 (UTC) 352:19:31, 7 February 2007 (UTC) 342:10:26, 7 February 2007 (UTC) 318:08:15, 6 February 2007 (UTC) 301:08:09, 6 February 2007 (UTC) 263:16:05, 5 February 2007 (UTC) 244:16:53, 5 February 2007 (UTC) 233:12:05, 5 February 2007 (UTC) 209:18:53, 3 February 2007 (UTC) 183:04:34, 1 February 2007 (UTC) 7: 2094:from Knowledge or a mirror. 1916:Futurama Infobox and Navbox 1586:Template:Young Ones episode 1551:Template:Friends navigation 1089:Wow, thanks for that. ^^ -- 324:Vandalism on your user page 197:Talk:Speed (disambiguation) 10: 2916: 2896:06:02, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 2874:06:02, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 2861:05:57, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 2841:05:48, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 2824:05:40, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 2811:05:38, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 2801:05:33, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 2770:06:31, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 2739:05:37, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 2714:05:35, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 2686:05:23, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 2660:05:10, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 2644:04:45, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 2633:04:38, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 2612:05:31, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 2595:05:31, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 2563: 2554:05:06, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 2541:04:27, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 2530:04:12, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 2518:Knowledge:Attribution/Poll 2511:Knowledge:Attribution/Poll 2500:07:59, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 2490:04:25, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 2478:07:59, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 2469:00:06, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 2459:00:00, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 2445:00:06, 31 March 2007 (UTC) 2434:23:57, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 2416:23:34, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 2405:23:22, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 2374:23:09, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 2351:23:06, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 2341:23:01, 30 March 2007 (UTC) 2312:22:47, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2263:05:01, 27 March 2007 (UTC) 2253:18:03, 26 March 2007 (UTC) 2231:05:58, 26 March 2007 (UTC) 2210:16:45, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 2200:16:41, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 2179:16:12, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 2157:16:53, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 2116:16:30, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 2070:14:52, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 2059:02:09, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 2034:01:11, 25 March 2007 (UTC) 2017:22:32, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 1993:20:17, 23 March 2007 (UTC) 1947:22:00, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 1929:12:53, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 1906:04:43, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 1897:04:42, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 1887:04:18, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 1860:04:02, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 1770:03:49, 21 March 2007 (UTC) 1761:15:40, 20 March 2007 (UTC) 1748:15:14, 20 March 2007 (UTC) 1716:11:32, 20 March 2007 (UTC) 1702:12:56, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 1672:12:35, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 1663:12:14, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 1654:11:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 1641:10:25, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 1629:10:02, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 1527:12:42, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 1517:07:19, 18 March 2007 (UTC) 1499:06:42, 18 March 2007 (UTC) 1489:06:38, 18 March 2007 (UTC) 1470:23:36, 17 March 2007 (UTC) 1453:19:43, 17 March 2007 (UTC) 1426:23:36, 17 March 2007 (UTC) 1416:17:11, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 1390:16:04, 15 March 2007 (UTC) 1362:13:42, 14 March 2007 (UTC) 1340:09:59, 14 March 2007 (UTC) 1318:08:28, 14 March 2007 (UTC) 1293:08:22, 14 March 2007 (UTC) 1279:08:09, 14 March 2007 (UTC) 1255:07:58, 14 March 2007 (UTC) 1226:07:36, 14 March 2007 (UTC) 1212:Chris Griswold Talk Issues 1206:05:46, 14 March 2007 (UTC) 1196:19:35, 13 March 2007 (UTC) 1158:07:37, 12 March 2007 (UTC) 1148:05:50, 12 March 2007 (UTC) 1105:06:33, 12 March 2007 (UTC) 1084:05:10, 12 March 2007 (UTC) 1022:22:08, 10 March 2007 (UTC) 195:Mikkalai is suggesting in 2676:you don't like the poll, 2301:List of The Wire episodes 2295:List of The Wire episodes 1173:Infobox Entourage episode 1168:Hi Ned I just redirected 1058:07:30, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 1012:03:57, 9 March 2007 (UTC) 997:21:07, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 983:02:48, 6 March 2007 (UTC) 960:20:33, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 941:04:25, 4 March 2007 (UTC) 922:00:02, 1 March 2007 (UTC) 717:You may be interested in 408:Power level (Dragon Ball) 2395: 1922:Futurama episode infobox 1505:List of 30 Rock episodes 970:much built up pressure. 347:Thank you very much. -- 218:Ned, saw your revert on 2299:Noting that you edited 1606:Template:SFU navigation 1509:List of Heroes episodes 973:Thanks for being bold. 2013:WikiProject Television 1883:WikiProject Television 1856:WikiProject Television 1744:WikiProject Television 1698:WikiProject Television 1625:WikiProject Television 1601:Template:SP navigation 1566:Template:FG navigation 1546:Template:AD navigation 1480:Maybe we could change 1192:WikiProject Television 548: 495: 434:And we're not merging 214:Not a problem and help 189:Speed (disambiguation) 2422:Grossly inappropriate 2317:'a' wikipedia founder 2051:"what a fucking joke" 1443:comment was added by 1260:I'd like to add that 546: 494: 145:mid 05/08 - mid 07/08 140:mid 02/08 - mid 05/08 42:of past discussions. 1352:Question as an admin 1063:Re: Animanga infobox 749:WikiProject Template 623:Flashback characters 516:User:Cowman109/Smile 438:digimon together as 2600:Request handled by: 2427:This is out of line 2382:Knowledge Community 2307:if you have time.-- 2109:Knowledge community 2040:Knowledge community 2024:Knowledge community 1980:and Futurama lists 1813:change contents to 634:Milo H Minderbinder 200:progress. Thanks! 125:05/07 - early 08/07 18:User talk:Ned Scott 2169:Userpage redirects 1978:newspaper_headline 1788:Episode navigation 1725:Episode navigation 1216:It's nepotism for 648:Image:AnaLucia.jpg 642:Image:AnaLucia.jpg 549: 496: 313:comes to mind. -- 250:Template: CATV_USA 204:Stevie is the man! 2702:I don't think it 2618: 2617: 2485:You're my hero. 1456: 1137: 1125: 1111:Sanger's response 1056: 834:Talk:Sea of Japan 652:Image:Anamich.jpg 565:three-revert rule 557:three-revert rule 519: 171: 170: 150:mid 07/08 - 11/08 135:11/07 - mid 02/08 54: 53: 48:current talk page 2907: 2886:Your welcome. — 2571: 2568: 2567: 2561: 2402: 2391: 2372: 2366: 2360: 2339: 2333: 2327: 2196: 2189: 2045:Hello Ned, this 1982:opening_subtitle 1841: 1835: 1831: 1825: 1812: 1806: 1802: 1796: 1792: 1786: 1758: 1729: 1723: 1713: 1651: 1514:Peregrine Fisher 1486:Peregrine Fisher 1438: 1432:Digimon Articles 1411: 1250: 1245: 1177: 1171: 1146: 1139: 1135: 1127: 1123: 1101: 1094: 1080: 1073: 1046: 1044: 938: 513: 448: 406:articles are... 385: 383: 381: 379: 377: 296: 291: 281: 275: 206: 66: 59: 33: 32: 26: 2915: 2914: 2910: 2909: 2908: 2906: 2905: 2904: 2788: 2623: 2569: 2565: 2514: 2424: 2401: 2389: 2384: 2368: 2362: 2356: 2335: 2329: 2323: 2319: 2297: 2291: 2273: 2241:. Thank you. -- 2223: 2198: 2171: 2043: 2027: 1986:opening_cartoon 1966: 1954: 1936: 1918: 1839: 1833: 1829: 1823: 1810: 1804: 1800: 1794: 1790: 1784: 1727: 1721: 1539: 1478: 1476:Future episodes 1439:—The preceding 1434: 1409: 1397: 1369: 1354: 1288:just silly. -- 1252: 1248: 1243: 1233: 1214: 1175: 1169: 1166: 1117: 1113: 1065: 1030: 1004: 990: 988:Essjay redirect 967: 948: 932: 930:Re: RfC summary 888: 806: 792: 767: 751: 733: 719:this discussion 715: 670:Season2-ana.jpg 644: 625: 610: 590: 541: 521: 488: 474: 460: 404:Pocket Monsters 396: 394:Digimon merging 362: 326: 298: 294: 289: 279: 273: 270: 252: 216: 193: 176: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2913: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2900: 2899: 2898: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2864: 2863: 2848: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2844: 2843: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2826: 2814: 2813: 2806:Thank you. -- 2787: 2784: 2783: 2782: 2781: 2780: 2779: 2778: 2777: 2776: 2775: 2774: 2773: 2772: 2750: 2749: 2748: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2744: 2743: 2742: 2741: 2723: 2722: 2721: 2720: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2647: 2646: 2622: 2619: 2616: 2615: 2584: 2583: 2572: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2556: 2544: 2543: 2513: 2504: 2503: 2502: 2483: 2482: 2481: 2480: 2448: 2447: 2423: 2420: 2419: 2418: 2397: 2383: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2376: 2318: 2315: 2296: 2293: 2287: 2277:the discussion 2272: 2269: 2268: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2222: 2216: 2215: 2214: 2213: 2212: 2192: 2170: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2118: 2102: 2101: 2098: 2095: 2091: 2087: 2086: 2085: 2084: 2042: 2037: 2026: 2021: 2020: 2019: 1965: 1962: 1953: 1950: 1935: 1932: 1917: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1609: 1608: 1603: 1598: 1593: 1588: 1583: 1578: 1573: 1568: 1563: 1558: 1553: 1548: 1538: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1477: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1445:74.115.108.238 1433: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1396: 1393: 1368: 1365: 1353: 1350: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1311:Jack Szwergold 1307:Chris Griswold 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1282: 1281: 1272:Chris Griswold 1267:Chris Griswold 1262:Chris Griswold 1241: 1238:Chris Griswold 1232: 1229: 1213: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1165: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1112: 1109: 1108: 1107: 1064: 1061: 1029: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1003: 1000: 989: 986: 966: 963: 947: 944: 931: 928: 927: 926: 925: 924: 912: 911: 887: 881: 880: 879: 869: 868: 867: 866: 865: 805: 802: 791: 788: 787: 786: 766: 761: 750: 747: 732: 729: 723:Kirill Lokshin 714: 713:Template stuff 711: 710: 709: 708: 707: 684: 643: 640: 624: 621: 615:CyberGhostface 609: 606: 589: 586: 585: 584: 569:CyberGhostface 540: 537: 512: 489: 487: 484: 473: 470: 459: 454: 432: 431: 395: 392: 361: 356: 355: 354: 325: 322: 321: 320: 287: 284:Chris Griswold 269: 266: 251: 248: 247: 246: 215: 212: 192: 186: 175: 172: 169: 168: 162: 157: 152: 147: 142: 137: 132: 127: 120: 114: 109: 104: 99: 94: 89: 84: 76: 75: 67: 56: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2912: 2897: 2894: 2893: 2890: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2880: 2875: 2872: 2868: 2867: 2866: 2865: 2862: 2859: 2858: 2855: 2850: 2849: 2842: 2839: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2825: 2822: 2818: 2817: 2816: 2815: 2812: 2809: 2805: 2804: 2803: 2802: 2799: 2798: 2795: 2771: 2768: 2766: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2758: 2757: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2753: 2752: 2751: 2740: 2737: 2733: 2732: 2731: 2730: 2729: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2724: 2715: 2712: 2710: 2705: 2701: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2697: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2687: 2684: 2679: 2675: 2671: 2670: 2669: 2668: 2667: 2666: 2661: 2658: 2656: 2651: 2650: 2649: 2648: 2645: 2642: 2637: 2636: 2635: 2634: 2631: 2629: 2614: 2613: 2610: 2609: 2606: 2601: 2597: 2596: 2593: 2592: 2589: 2581: 2577: 2573: 2562: 2555: 2552: 2548: 2547: 2546: 2545: 2542: 2539: 2534: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2528: 2527: 2524: 2519: 2512: 2508: 2501: 2498: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2491: 2488: 2479: 2476: 2472: 2471: 2470: 2467: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2457: 2453: 2446: 2443: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2432: 2428: 2417: 2414: 2409: 2408: 2407: 2406: 2400: 2393: 2392: 2375: 2371: 2365: 2359: 2354: 2353: 2352: 2349: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2338: 2332: 2326: 2314: 2313: 2310: 2306: 2302: 2292: 2290: 2286: 2282: 2281:new amendment 2278: 2264: 2261: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2251: 2247: 2246: 2240: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2229: 2221: 2211: 2208: 2203: 2202: 2201: 2197: 2191: 2190: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2177: 2158: 2155: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2145: 2144: 2143: 2133: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2122: 2117: 2114: 2110: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2103: 2099: 2096: 2092: 2089: 2088: 2082: 2078: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2068: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2060: 2057: 2052: 2048: 2041: 2036: 2035: 2032: 2025: 2018: 2014: 2010: 2006: 2002: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1991: 1987: 1983: 1979: 1975: 1971: 1970:American Dad! 1961: 1958: 1949: 1948: 1945: 1941: 1931: 1930: 1927: 1923: 1907: 1904: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1895: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1884: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1868: 1864: 1863: 1862: 1861: 1857: 1853: 1849: 1845: 1838: 1828: 1821: 1818: 1815: 1809: 1799: 1789: 1771: 1768: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1759: 1757: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1745: 1741: 1737: 1733: 1726: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1714: 1712: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1673: 1670: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1661: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1652: 1650: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1639: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1626: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1607: 1604: 1602: 1599: 1597: 1594: 1592: 1589: 1587: 1584: 1582: 1579: 1577: 1574: 1572: 1569: 1567: 1564: 1562: 1559: 1557: 1554: 1552: 1549: 1547: 1544: 1543: 1542: 1537:More Bot work 1528: 1525: 1520: 1519: 1518: 1515: 1510: 1506: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1497: 1493: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1487: 1483: 1471: 1468: 1464: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1427: 1424: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1417: 1413: 1412: 1405: 1402: 1392: 1391: 1386: 1383: 1381: 1377: 1372: 1364: 1363: 1360: 1341: 1338: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1326: 1319: 1316: 1312: 1308: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1294: 1291: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1280: 1277: 1273: 1268: 1263: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1251: 1246: 1239: 1228: 1227: 1224: 1219: 1207: 1204: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1174: 1159: 1156: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1145: 1144: 1141: 1140: 1138: 1129: 1128: 1126: 1106: 1103: 1102: 1096: 1095: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1082: 1081: 1075: 1074: 1060: 1059: 1054: 1050: 1045: 1043: 1036: 1023: 1020: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1013: 1010: 1009:Indiawilliams 999: 998: 995: 985: 984: 981: 980: 976: 971: 962: 961: 958: 954: 943: 942: 939: 923: 920: 916: 915: 914: 913: 910: 907: 903: 899: 898: 897: 896: 893: 886: 878: 875: 870: 864: 861: 857: 856: 855: 852: 848: 847:Pacific ocean 844: 843: 842: 839: 835: 831: 830: 829: 828: 825: 820: 816: 814: 809: 801: 800: 797: 785: 782: 778: 777: 776: 775: 772: 765: 760: 759: 756: 746: 745: 742: 738: 728: 727: 724: 720: 706: 703: 699: 698: 697: 693: 689: 685: 683: 679: 675: 671: 667: 666: 665: 664: 661: 657: 653: 649: 639: 638: 635: 631: 620: 619: 616: 605: 604: 601: 596: 583: 580: 576: 575: 574: 573: 570: 566: 562: 558: 554: 545: 536: 535: 532: 529: 527: 520: 517: 510: 506: 503: 501: 493: 483: 482: 479: 469: 468: 465: 458: 453: 452: 449: 447: 441: 437: 430: 427: 423: 419: 415: 414: 413: 412: 409: 405: 401: 391: 390: 387: 386: 360: 353: 350: 346: 345: 344: 343: 339: 335: 331: 319: 316: 312: 308: 305: 304: 303: 302: 297: 292: 285: 278: 265: 264: 261: 257: 245: 242: 237: 236: 235: 234: 229: 225: 221: 211: 210: 207: 205: 198: 190: 185: 184: 181: 167: 166: 165:05/11 - 06/18 161: 160:06/09 - 04/11 156: 155:12/08 - 05/09 151: 146: 141: 136: 131: 130:08/07 - 10/07 126: 121: 119: 118: 117:04/07 - 05/07 113: 112:02/07 - 03/07 108: 107:11/06 - 01/07 103: 102:10/06 - 11/06 98: 97:08/06 - 09/06 93: 92:07/06 - 08/06 88: 83: 82:02/06 - 05/06 78: 77: 74: 70: 65: 60: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 2887: 2852: 2792: 2789: 2703: 2677: 2673: 2624: 2603: 2599: 2598: 2586: 2579: 2575: 2574: 2521: 2515: 2484: 2449: 2425: 2387: 2385: 2320: 2298: 2285:ΖαππερΝαππερ 2274: 2244: 2224: 2218:Copied from 2185: 2172: 2131: 2076: 2050: 2047:edit summary 2044: 2028: 1990:Hoof Hearted 1985: 1981: 1977: 1967: 1960:thelastvamp 1959: 1955: 1937: 1926:Stardust8212 1919: 1782: 1755: 1710: 1648: 1610: 1540: 1479: 1462: 1435: 1407: 1398: 1395:older photo? 1387: 1384: 1373: 1370: 1355: 1234: 1215: 1167: 1143: 1133: 1131: 1121: 1119: 1114: 1098: 1091: 1077: 1070: 1066: 1041: 1031: 1005: 991: 977: 972: 968: 949: 933: 889: 821: 817: 810: 807: 793: 768: 752: 734: 716: 645: 626: 611: 594: 591: 561:edit warring 550: 525: 522: 499: 497: 475: 461: 445: 439: 435: 433: 399: 397: 366: 363: 327: 282:template. -- 271: 253: 227: 223: 217: 203: 194: 177: 174:SAVE MY BABY 122: 111: 79: 55: 43: 37: 2358:Kickstart70 2325:Kickstart70 2176:Newyorkbrad 1401:Lina Medina 1315:SpyMagician 1276:SpyMagician 1231:SpyMagician 1223:SpyMagician 796:Yannismarou 755:Cielomobile 737:Justin Cook 608:Lost images 311:WP:SNOWBALL 268:If I Did It 36:This is an 2765:SlimVirgin 2709:SlimVirgin 2655:SlimVirgin 2628:SlimVirgin 2452:put to ANI 2429:. Stop. - 2289:Alexandria 1827:B5 episode 1798:B5 episode 1482:WP:EPISODE 1463:characters 874:GunnarRene 860:GunnarRene 838:GunnarRene 600:Carcharoth 577:Funny. -- 472:Conspiracy 260:Bill Clark 2871:Ned Scott 2838:Ned Scott 2821:Ned Scott 2808:Ned Scott 2736:Ned Scott 2683:Ned Scott 2641:Ned Scott 2578:has been 2551:Ned Scott 2538:Ned Scott 2466:Ned Scott 2442:Ned Scott 2413:Ned Scott 2348:Ned Scott 2260:Ned Scott 2228:Ned Scott 2207:Ned Scott 2154:Ned Scott 2067:Ned Scott 1903:Ned Scott 1894:Ned Scott 1767:Ned Scott 1669:Ned Scott 1660:Ned Scott 1638:Ned Scott 1524:Ned Scott 1496:Ned Scott 1467:Ned Scott 1423:Ned Scott 1371:Hey Ned, 1337:Ned Scott 1290:Ned Scott 1203:Ned Scott 1164:bot work? 1155:Ned Scott 1039:A Man In 1019:Ned Scott 994:Gwen Gale 975:Cool Hand 906:Ned Scott 781:Ned Scott 702:Ned Scott 660:Ned Scott 613:Thanks.-- 579:Ned Scott 426:Ned Scott 349:Ned Scott 334:SpuriousQ 315:Ned Scott 241:Ned Scott 2399:contribs 2309:Opark 77 2245:Turnbull 2243:Nicholas 2239:WP:CIVIL 2195:(o rly?) 2009:contribs 1974:Futurama 1952:Deletion 1879:contribs 1852:contribs 1740:contribs 1694:contribs 1621:contribs 1441:unsigned 1388:Cheers 1188:contribs 1053:past ops 1049:conspire 957:RobJ1981 946:Question 509:WikiLove 277:canceled 69:Archives 2889:Deckill 2854:Deckill 2794:Deckill 2786:Unblock 2678:because 2674:Because 2605:Deckill 2588:Deckill 2580:granted 2523:Deckill 2390:Mr.Guru 2188:Majorly 1944:Kariteh 1756:`/aksha 1711:`/aksha 1649:`/aksha 1410:pd_THOR 919:Circeus 892:Circeus 851:Raul654 824:Raul654 741:Abtract 553:blocked 547:Warning 478:thuglas 446:`/aksha 418:WP:FICT 330:WP:RFPP 180:Circeus 39:archive 2507:WP:3RR 2487:Risker 2250:(talk) 965:Essjay 721:. ;-) 688:Stifle 674:Stifle 422:WP:WAF 359:WP:NOT 2621:Query 2497:Denny 2475:Denny 2456:Denny 2431:Denny 2225:: --> 2132:other 2113:Denny 2056:Denny 2001:TheDJ 1871:TheDJ 1844:TheDJ 1732:TheDJ 1686:TheDJ 1613:TheDJ 1376:WP:UW 1359:Denny 1180:TheDJ 1042:Bl♟ck 771:Chris 658:. -- 368:: --> 220:WP:VP 191:again 87:06/06 16:< 2450:No, 2305:here 2077:have 2005:talk 1984:and 1972:and 1875:talk 1848:talk 1842:? -- 1832:and 1736:talk 1690:talk 1617:talk 1507:and 1449:talk 1380:here 1218:some 1184:talk 1124:uack 1037:. - 979:Luke 937:Teke 883:re: 813:here 692:talk 678:talk 539:Warn 531:ceNT 505:ceNT 384:< 338:talk 256:here 163:17. 158:16. 153:15. 148:14. 143:13. 138:12. 133:11. 128:10. 2704:had 2509:on 2081:Afd 2049:of 2031:Qxz 1374:We/ 1136:uru 731:3RV 595:any 486:^_^ 464:RHB 440:one 436:all 400:all 332:. - 228:Eh? 123:9. 115:8. 110:7. 105:6. 100:5. 95:4. 90:3. 85:2. 80:1. 2892:er 2857:er 2797:er 2608:er 2602:— 2591:er 2526:er 2403:) 2322:-- 2248:| 2015:) 2011:• 2007:• 1942:. 1885:) 1881:• 1877:• 1869:-- 1858:) 1854:• 1850:• 1840:}} 1834:{{ 1830:}} 1824:{{ 1811:}} 1805:{{ 1801:}} 1795:{{ 1791:}} 1785:{{ 1746:) 1742:• 1738:• 1728:}} 1722:{{ 1707:-- 1700:) 1696:• 1692:• 1627:) 1623:• 1619:• 1451:) 1414:| 1253:) 1221:-- 1194:) 1190:• 1186:• 1176:}} 1170:{{ 1051:| 790:Re 694:) 680:) 672:. 528:ea 502:ea 420:, 340:) 299:) 280:}} 274:{{ 71:• 2570:Y 2396:/ 2394:( 2370:C 2367:- 2364:T 2361:- 2337:C 2334:- 2331:T 2328:- 2003:( 1873:( 1846:( 1734:( 1688:( 1615:( 1455:. 1447:( 1249:☓ 1244:☎ 1240:( 1182:( 1134:G 1122:Q 1100:八 1093:十 1079:八 1072:十 1055:) 1047:( 690:( 676:( 526:P 500:P 382:t 380:n 378:a 376:i 374:d 372:a 370:R 336:( 295:☓ 290:☎ 286:( 73:ℹ 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index