272:
That in all criminal prosecutions, every man hath a right to be informed of the accusation against him; to have a copy of the
Indictment, or charge, in due time (if required) to prepare for his defence; to be allowed counsel; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have process for his
146:
The legitimacy supposedly established by unanimity has been used by dictatorial regimes in an attempt to gain support for their position. Participants in a legislature may be coerced or intimidated into supporting the position of a dictator, with the legislature becoming little more than a
109:
introduced the concept of "constructive abstention", where a member can abstain in a vote where unanimity is required without thereby blocking the success of the vote. This is intended to allow states to symbolically withhold support while not paralysing decision-making.
397:
Note 7: The result of the voting on the second and sixth preambular paragraphs of the draft resolution S/1994/280 was as follows: 14 in favour, none against and 1 abstention (United States of
America); all the other paragraphs were approved
377:
410:
Philippart, E.; Monika Sie Dhian Ho (2003). "Flexibility and the new constitutional treaty of the
European Union". In Jacques Pelkmans; Monika Sie; Dhian Ho; Bas Limonard (eds.).
86:, a "unanimous vote" is not specifically defined, although an abstention is not counted as a vote regardless of the voting threshold. Also in this book, action could be taken by "
273:
witnesses; to examine the witnesses for and against him on oath; and to a speedy trial by an impartial jury, without whose unanimous consent he ought not to be found guilty.
245:
515:
479:
264:
jury trial. Many U.S. state constitutions have their own provisions requiring jury unanimity for a finding of guilty; for example, article 21 of the
257:
235:
385:
90:", or "general consent", if there are no objections raised. However, unanimous consent may not necessarily be the same as a unanimous vote (see
98:
166:
361:
564:
462:
423:
556:
91:
64:
or implicitly by a lack of objections. It does not necessarily mean uniformity and can sometimes be the opposite of
600:
445:
489:
535:
261:
249:
224:
186:
174:
131:
82:
31:
289:
41:
17:
280:, since the Juries Act 1974, a guilty verdict may be returned where not more than 2 jurors dissent.
277:
119:
148:
127:
217:
178:
454:
519:
265:
415:
216:, many jurisdictions require a guilty verdict by a jury to be unanimous. This is not so in
123:
8:
106:
44:
by all people in a given situation. Groups may consider unanimous decisions as a sign of
190:
590:
522:
304:
253:
228:
510:
458:
419:
357:
299:
240:
158:
87:
440:
94:). In either case, it does not take into account the members who were not present.
238:
mandates unanimity in all federal and state criminal jury trials. This overturned
595:
484:
162:
154:
135:
53:
381:
194:
102:
76:
Practice varies as to whether a vote can be considered unanimous if some voter
584:
170:
65:
450:
294:
210:
324:
213:
77:
57:
49:
130:. Unanimity is often a political endeavor. Although governments and
480:"Claiming 100 Percent Vote for Hussein, Iraq Hails Its 'Democracy'"
60:, and unity. Unanimity may be assumed explicitly after a unanimous
356:(11th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Da Capo Press. pp. 54–56.
138:
is most often a more achievable aspiration for elected officials.
182:
61:
45:
409:
198:
157:
can restrict nominees to one per seat in elections and use
101:
is not considered "unanimous" if a member abstains. In the
438:
325:"Frequently Asked Questions about RONR (Question 6)"
165:to create an impression of popular unanimity. The
582:
557:"Juries Act 1974 (c.23), §17: Majority verdicts"
244:, which held that the Due Process Clause of the
30:"Unanimous" redirects here. For other uses, see
536:"Maryland Constitution - Declaration of Rights"
477:
134:may occasionally achieve unanimous decisions,
329:The Official Robert's Rules of Order Web Site
260:mandates unanimity for a guilty verdict in a
99:United Nations Security Council resolution
167:1962 North Korean parliamentary election
177:. 100% votes have also been claimed by
14:
583:
538:. Maryland Government. 4 November 2008
352:Robert, Henry M.; et al. (2011).
351:
27:Agreement by all people in a situation
354:Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised
478:Chandrasekaran, Rajiv (2002-10-17).
443:(1990). "Most One-Sided Elections".
347:
345:
565:Office of Public Sector Information
258:Sixth Amendment to the Constitution
236:Sixth Amendment to the Constitution
24:
248:did not require jury unanimity in
25:
612:
412:Nederland en de Europese grondwet
342:
118:The occurrence of unanimity in a
331:. The Robert's Rules Association
268:'s Declaration of Rights states:
141:
384:. 18 March 1994. Archived from
151:for a more powerful authority.
549:
528:
503:
471:
446:Guinness Book of World Records
432:
403:
370:
317:
113:
92:Not the same as unanimous vote
13:
1:
488:. p. A14. Archived from
310:
126:and variety of opinions in a
7:
283:
225:United States Supreme Court
132:international organizations
10:
617:
32:Unanimous (disambiguation)
29:
418:Press. pp. 128–136.
290:Consensus decision-making
204:
71:
173:and a 100% vote for the
122:can be elusive with the
120:representative democracy
561:UK Statute Law Database
175:Workers' Party of Korea
128:participatory democracy
83:Robert's Rules of Order
275:
187:Félix Houphouët-Boigny
68:in terms of outcomes.
601:Group decision-making
270:
266:Maryland Constitution
416:Amsterdam University
388:on February 10, 2008
278:In England and Wales
246:Fourteenth Amendment
107:Treaty of Amsterdam
439:McFarlan, Donald;
305:Unanimous fairness
254:concurring opinion
230:Ramos v. Louisiana
185:in 1975 and 1982,
511:Apodaca v. Oregon
363:978-0-306-82020-5
300:Unanimous consent
241:Apodaca v. Oregon
179:Ahmed Sékou Touré
159:compulsory voting
88:unanimous consent
16:(Redirected from
608:
575:
574:
572:
571:
553:
547:
546:
544:
543:
532:
526:
507:
501:
500:
498:
497:
475:
469:
468:
441:Norris McWhirter
436:
430:
429:
407:
401:
400:
394:
393:
378:"Resolution 904"
374:
368:
367:
349:
340:
339:
337:
336:
321:
169:reported a 100%
155:One-party states
21:
616:
615:
611:
610:
609:
607:
606:
605:
581:
580:
579:
578:
569:
567:
555:
554:
550:
541:
539:
534:
533:
529:
508:
504:
495:
493:
485:Washington Post
476:
472:
465:
437:
433:
426:
408:
404:
391:
389:
376:
375:
371:
364:
350:
343:
334:
332:
323:
322:
318:
313:
286:
207:
163:electoral fraud
144:
136:popular consent
116:
97:In contrast, a
74:
35:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
614:
604:
603:
598:
593:
577:
576:
548:
527:
502:
470:
463:
431:
424:
402:
382:United Nations
369:
362:
341:
315:
314:
312:
309:
308:
307:
302:
297:
292:
285:
282:
206:
203:
195:Saddam Hussein
143:
140:
115:
112:
103:European Union
73:
70:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
613:
602:
599:
597:
594:
592:
589:
588:
586:
566:
562:
558:
552:
537:
531:
524:
521:
517:
513:
512:
506:
492:on 2020-04-13
491:
487:
486:
481:
474:
466:
464:0-553-28452-5
460:
456:
452:
448:
447:
442:
435:
427:
425:90-5356-656-2
421:
417:
414:. Amsterdam:
413:
406:
399:
387:
383:
379:
373:
365:
359:
355:
348:
346:
330:
326:
320:
316:
306:
303:
301:
298:
296:
293:
291:
288:
287:
281:
279:
274:
269:
267:
263:
262:federal court
259:
255:
251:
247:
243:
242:
237:
233:
231:
226:
221:
220:jury trials.
219:
215:
212:
202:
200:
196:
193:in 1985, and
192:
191:CĂ´te d'Ivoire
188:
184:
180:
176:
172:
168:
164:
160:
156:
152:
150:
142:Dictatorships
139:
137:
133:
129:
125:
121:
111:
108:
104:
100:
95:
93:
89:
85:
84:
79:
69:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
43:
39:
33:
19:
568:. Retrieved
560:
551:
540:. Retrieved
530:
509:
505:
494:. Retrieved
490:the original
483:
473:
451:Bantam Books
444:
434:
411:
405:
398:unanimously.
396:
390:. Retrieved
386:the original
372:
353:
333:. Retrieved
328:
319:
295:Liberum veto
276:
271:
250:state courts
239:
229:
222:
211:criminal law
208:
153:
149:rubber stamp
145:
117:
96:
81:
75:
37:
36:
525: (1972)
214:jury trials
114:Democracies
56:agreement,
585:Categories
570:2009-01-30
542:2009-01-30
496:2009-01-30
453:. p.
392:2009-01-30
335:2015-12-27
311:References
58:solidarity
54:procedural
591:Unanimity
256:that the
252:, with a
234:that the
227:ruled in
218:civil law
201:in 2002.
124:diversity
50:political
42:agreement
38:Unanimity
18:Unanimous
284:See also
78:abstains
66:majority
171:turnout
596:Voting
461:
422:
360:
232:(2020)
205:Juries
183:Guinea
105:, the
72:Voting
46:social
518:
80:. In
520:U.S.
459:ISBN
420:ISBN
358:ISBN
223:The
199:Iraq
62:vote
523:404
516:406
455:361
209:In
197:in
189:in
181:in
161:or
52:or
40:is
587::
563:.
559:.
514:,
482:.
457:.
449:.
395:.
380:.
344:^
327:.
48:,
573:.
545:.
499:.
467:.
428:.
366:.
338:.
34:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.