1020:. A trial judgment must contain certain information, including the parties and their representatives, the court and judges involved in the decision, the date the proceedings finished, the merits of the case and the reasons for the judgment. Specifically, the legislation requires that "the claims asserted and the means of challenge or defence brought before the court, highlighting the petitions filed. The details of the circumstances and facts as well as the status of the dispute thus far are to be included by reference being made to the written pleadings, the records of the hearings, and other documents ... a brief summary of the considerations of the facts and circumstances of the case and the legal aspects on which the decision is based."
923:
767:, and stated that 'Whilst a judge should keep a record of the evidence and submissions, it is not the function of a judgment to be that record. Instead, the primary purpose of a judgment is: to identify the ultimate issues in the case; to set out, qualitatively by reference to the evidence that is accepted or rejected, the primary facts which the judge finds; to relate those findings to the factual issues in the case; to show how any inference has been drawn; to make the necessary findings of fact; to identify and apply the appropriate legal principles; and, ultimately, to make the appropriate dispositive orders'.
906:: If the defendant fails to plead or otherwise defend against the action, a default judgment may be entered. If the plaintiff's claim is for a fixed amount of money, then the plaintiff can request that the clerk enter judgment for that amount along with costs against the defendant. Otherwise, the plaintiff will be required to appear before the court and present evidence for the damages or relief requested to receive a default judgment. If the defendant can demonstrate "good cause" for not responding to the default judgment, then the court may set aside the judgment at its discretion.
842:
why the court has made the decision in question. Furthermore, providing reasons for judgment serves a practical purpose insofar as it necessarily requires the court to engage in thoughtful consideration of the cases presented. However, the Court also noted that the exercise of providing reasons for judgment is contextual and the standard of what is acceptable for a judgment will vary depending on the circumstances. The court appears to propose that the ultimate requirement is the court explaining, in some way, why it has made the decision in question.
181:: a judgment that determines the rights and liabilities of the parties without enforcing a judgment or otherwise requiring the parties to do anything. A declaratory judgment may be useful where the parties have differing views about their rights and duties or are wishing to clarify them without seeking any other remedy. It has been suggested, at least in the United States, that a declaratory judgment is a "milder" form of an
607:
call for different information or depth of reasoning based on the circumstances of the case. In general, Canadian courts are expected to provide reasons for judgment as a duty to the public at large, to demonstrate that the judge or judges have engaged with the parties' pleadings, to explain why the parties won or lost, and to allow for meaningful appellate review (in the event that the case may be appealed).
962:. A judgment "is given on behalf of the French people" and must contain certain information, including the date, the names of the judges, the level of court, and the names of the parties involved. A judgment must also describe the parties' claims and the grounds on which their claims are based, identifying both the final judgment and the reasons for the judgment. In light of compliance with the rules of the
528:. For instance, while the civil law imposes a statutory requirement to provide reasons for judgment, the common law recognizes a contextual duty to provide reasons depending on certain circumstances. The following section provides some information regarding judgments in different jurisdictions as well as examples of their treatment of other types of judgments, where available.
1090:. Judgments must be pronounced in a public hearing and must "include the grounds on which they were based and the legal authority thereof." A judgment may be rendered unanimously or by a majority vote. If the judgment contains a dissent, the majority decision in the judgment must address the dissenting opinion, and any dissenting judges must explain why they are dissenting.
192:: a judgment rendered in favour of one party based on the other party's failure to take action. Default judgments are commonly used where the defendant fails to appear before the court or submit a defence after being summoned. A default judgment grants the relief requested by the appearing party and does not require extensive factual or legal analysis from the court.
849:
has stated that where there has been a relatively long and expensive hearing/trial, it is important that the judgment (i) clearly identifies all the issues of fact and expert opinion that are in issue, and (ii) resolves in clear terms all such issues which are relevant on the judge's view of the law,
782:
immediately delivered an oral decision allowing the appeal, with written reasons to be handed down at a later date. 7 months later, the Judge handed down the written reasons for judgment dismissing the appeal, a result which was inconsistent with the oral decision announced at the end of the hearing.
158:
Written reasons for judgment are often provided in circumstances where a complex decision must be made, where the matter is likely to be appealed, or where the decision is considered to be of some significant importance to members of the legal community and/or the public at large. Written reasons for
1093:
Once a judgment has been issued, the judge or judges determine whether the parties involved agree with the ruling. If one party disagrees with the judgment, that party has a set number of days to request a written appeal. An appellate body will then review the judgment in the absence of the parties.
1072:
states that a final judgment must be made "when the suit is ripe for making a judicial decision." The judgment must contain the names of the parties, the court, the final date of oral argument, the facts, and the reasons for decision subject to some exceptions. A judgment must be rendered within two
969:
Traditional French judgments often consisted of a single sentence wherein the court provided its judgment. However, a drive towards modernization of French judgments has encouraged judges to write much clearer judgments to encourage simplification and accessibility. Modern French judgments generally
898:
A judgment must address all of the issues raised with respect to the rights and liabilities of the parties. If a judgment is rendered without addressing all the rights and liabilities, the action is not ended and the claims of the parties may be revised before the entry of a judgment that determines
758:
stated that the 'sheer length of the judge's
Reasons for Verdict brings with it considerable difficulties for the appeal courts and any other newcomer to the case in trying to unravel the relevant evidence and identify the real issues at trial. An unduly lengthy set of Reasons also creates problems
657:
SC) took in handing down her reserved judgment was 'wholly excessive' and 'extremely regrettable', and recognised that 'it may lead to a denial of justice as a Judge's memory of the evidence, the witnesses, the submissions and the trial itself may fade with time', but nonetheless upheld her decision
841:
has affirmed a common law duty to give reasons for a judgment, subject to some exceptions (such as an oral judgment or a summary judgment). The Court also noted that providing reasons for judgment "is a function of due process, and therefore of justice." Interested parties must be able to determine
606:
has recognized a common law duty to provide "adequate" reasons for judgment and has stated that "the giving of reasoned judgments is central to the legitimacy of judicial institutions in the eyes of the public." Determining whether reasons for judgment are adequate is a contextual exercise that may
610:
With the above guiding principles in mind, Canadian courts must "read as a whole, in the context of the evidence, the arguments and the trial, with an appreciation of the purposes or functions for which they are delivered..." to determine whether the reasons for judgment are adequate. The reasons
435:
The successful party may receive immediate payment from the unsuccessful party on the basis of the judgment and not require further action. A successful party who does not receive immediate payment must initiate a judgment enforcement process in order to collect the money or property that they are
167:
Types of judgments can be distinguished on a number of grounds, including the procedures the parties must follow to obtain the judgment, the issues the court will consider before rendering the judgment, and the effect of the judgment. Judgments that vary from a standard judgment on the merits of a
792:
further stated that 'In handing down the 1st written judgment purporting to set out his reasons for "dismissing" the appeal on 15 May 2008, the Judge must have forgotten about his earlier oral decision allowing the appeal and omitted to check the file. The delay in preparing his reasons must have
787:
stated that 'It must be reiterated and strongly emphasised that judges at all levels of court have a duty to deliver judgments within a reasonable time after the conclusion of the hearing. Where an oral decision has been given of the result, with reasons to follow later, it is incumbent upon the
209:
Reserved judgment or reserved decision: a judgment that is not given immediately after the conclusion of the hearing or trial. A reserved judgment may be released days, weeks, or even months after the hearing. In the United States, a reserved judgment is sometimes annotated in law reports by the
973:
A court may either provide their judgment at the end of the hearing or defer the judgment to a specified date. If an oral judgment is rendered, it must be read by at least one of the judges who heard the case. Parties to the proceedings are entitled to receive "a certified copy of the judgement
243:'s interpretation of the pleadings forms the basis of the judgment. For a summary judgment, the court will consider "the contents of the pleadings, the motions, and additional evidence adduced by the parties to determine whether there is a genuine issue of material fact rather than one of law."
742:
held that the trial judge failed to give adequate reasons for his decision and stated that 'the failure to deal with probably attributable to the delay in the preparation of the judgment'. The Court of Appeal therefore set aside the decision and ordered a re-trial before another judge of the
455:
Judgment creditors may also need to investigate whether judgment debtors are capable of paying. Understanding whether a judgment debtor is capable of fulfilling the judgment order may affect the enforcement mechanism used to recover the money or property. Some steps are available in different
478:
In
Germany, the judgment creditor is entitled to enforce the judgment 30 years past the judgment date. In California and Saskatchewan, the judgment creditor is entitled to enforce the judgment 10 years past the judgment date subject to exceptions that allow the judgment creditor to renew the
876:: a default judgment is available where the defendant does not file acknowledgment of service or fails to file a defence. A default judgment may be set aside or varied if he defendant demonstrates âa real prospect of successfully defending the claimâ or where exceptional circumstances apply.
633:: a summary judgment may be available if âthere is no genuine issue requiring a trial with respect to a claim or defenceâ or if âthe parties agree to have all or part of the claim determined by a summary judgment and the court is satisfied that it is appropriate to grant summary judgment.â
918:: A party can seek a summary judgment on all or part of its claim. The court will grant a summary judgment if the party seeking the judgment demonstrates that there is no real dispute regarding the facts. The court must provide reasons for either granting or denying a summary judgment.
506:, upon either the satisfaction or withdrawal of a judgment, a judgment debtor can seek a discharge of judgment. If successful, the judgment is removed from the Judgment Registry and detached from any property registered on the Personal Property registry, titles, or interests in land.
788:
judge to deliver the reasons within a reasonable time. This is important not only for the parties, but it is essential to the maintenance of public confidence in the administration of justice. In the present case, the delay of seven-and-a-half months was unjustified'. The
498:, a judgment creditor must file an "Acknowledgment of Satisfaction of Judgment" where it has been paid in full by the judgment debtor within 15 days of the judgment debtor's request. This document has the effect of formally closing the case and terminating any ongoing
783:
After the appellant contacted the Judge's clerk, later the same day the Judge retracted the 'incorrect version' and delivered the 'correct version' of the written reasons for judgment. The correction was made before the court order and record had been perfected. The
970:
include " recounting the facts, the procedure and the claims of the parties, as a narrative ... Such judgments may also be divided to deal with each element of the claim separately." Generally, French judgments are much shorter than their common law counterparts.
451:
Judgment creditors can register their judgments through the property registry system in their jurisdictions, levy the property in question through a writ of execution, or seek a court order for enforcement depending on the options available in their jurisdiction.
1312:
882:: a summary judgment is made without requiring a trial. A court may grant a summary judgment if either the claimant or the defendant has no prospect of succeeding and âthere is no other compelling reason why the case or issue should be disposed of at a trial.â
669:
held that 'notwithstanding the regrettable delay in giving judgment, we come to the firm and clear view that the Judge gave cogent and adequate reasons for his findings and there is no error of law or facts in his findings', and dismissed the appeal.
1036:: an interlocutory judgment is rendered when the court has enough information to make a decision. An interlocutory judgment is considered to be a final judgment and not subject to appeal unless the court deems further consideration necessary.
175:: also referred to as an "agreed judgment", a consent judgment is a settlement agreed upon by the parties and authorized by a judge. Consent judgments are often used in the regulatory context, particularly in antitrust and environmental cases.
850:
and those issues which would be relevant if the judge's view of the law turns out to be wrong. Otherwise, there is a real risk of a complete or partial rehearing being ordered, which would bring the administration of law into disrepute.
185:
because it clarifies the parties' rights without actually directing the parties to do anything. Though a declaratory judgment is not binding, it is expected that the parties will act in accordance with what the court determines in its
351:
when a majority judgment is not obtained. An example of a plurality opinion is a court of three judges each rendering a different concurring decision, agreeing on a final outcome but disagreeing on the reasons justifying that final
978:. A judgment will be enforced once it becomes final subject to some exceptions. A judgment can only be enforced once a certified copy imprinted with an order of enforcement is provided and the affected parties have been notified.
985:
If one of the parties does not appear before the court, or one of the parties does not present their pleadings within the enumerated time limit, the appearing party is entitled to receive a default judgment on the merits of the
135:
and administrative bodies may also be colloquially referred to as "judgments," but they must be distinguished from true judgments in that they are not made by judges in courts of law. Judgments must also be distinguished from
102:(with an e) is considered acceptable. This variation arises depending on the country and the use of the word in a legal or non-legal context. British, Australian, New Zealand, American, and Canadian English generally use
379:
renders a judgment, it may state that the successful party has a right to recover money or property. However, the court will not collect the money or property on behalf of the successful party without further action. In
471:. Some jurisdictions, like California, also allow for additional enforcement mechanisms depending on the circumstances, such as suspending the judgment debtor's driver's license or professional license. In Germany, a
1030:: a default judgment is rendered based on the defendant's acknowledgment of their actions. A default judgment does not need to address the facts or merits of the case and does not require the provision of reasons.
110:
is commonly used in the United
Kingdom when referring to a non-legal decision. Translations from non-English texts demonstrate varied spelling of the word. For instance, the English translation of France's
650:
stated that 'litigants are entitled to have their cases decided with reasonable promptitude'. The Court considered that the 'extraordinary' and 'inordinate' delay of 30 months which the trial judge (
76:, the phrase "reasons for judgment" is often used interchangeably with "judgment," although the former refers to the court's justification of its judgment while the latter refers to the final
934:
provides some general rules regarding the purpose of and requirements for judgments as well as rules relating to summary judgments, default judgments, and interim or interlocutory judgments.
554:- A party may, at any time after a defendant files a notice of intention to defend, apply to the court under this part for judgment against the other party, if the court is satisfied thatâ
1023:
An appellate court judgment must include the findings of fact in the contested judgment, including any changes or amendments, and the reasons for the court's determination of the appeal.
2410:
1094:
If the appellate body agrees with the lower court's decision, it will stamp "final and enforceable" on the judgment without providing any reasons and will return the judgment to the
253:
whereby the judgment under review is set aside and a new trial is ordered. A vacated judgment is rendered where the original judgment failed to make an order in accordance with the
42:
regarding the rights and liabilities of parties in a legal action or proceeding. Judgments also generally provide the court's explanation of why it has chosen to make a particular
198:: an intermediate or interim judgment providing a temporary decision on an issue that requires timely action. Interlocutory orders are not final and may either not be subject to
2428:
857:
state that a judgment or order takes effect on the day it is rendered unless the court specifies otherwise and provide additional guidance on different types of judgments.
155:
Oral judgments are often provided at the conclusion of a hearing and are frequently used by courts with heavier caseloads or where a judgment must be rendered quickly.
754:, after a criminal trial lasting over one year, the trial judge (His Honour Judge Kevin Browne) gave Reasons for Verdict with 1,753 paragraphs spanning 465 pages. The
292:, the judgment may be delivered unanimously or it may be divided into a number of majority, concurring, plurality, and dissenting opinions. Only the opinion of the
912:: A party can seek an interlocutory injunction relating to a proceeding. The court must provide reasons for either granting or denying an interlocutory injunction.
759:
for the judge himself in focussing on the essential issues at trial so as to explain, clearly, concisely and expediently, why he came to the decision he did'. The
3435:
3409:
3383:
3357:
1001:
An interlocutory judgment, insofar as it gives rise to an investigation or an interim measure, stays the proceedings and does not equate to a final judgment.
805:, the President of the Court of Appeal and the Chief High Court Judge publish information about the indicative delivery times for reserved judgments in the
548:- if a defendant in a proceeding started by claim has not filed a notice of intention to defend and the time allowed under the State of Territory's rules;
895:
as "a decree and any order from which an appeal lies" and does not include "recitals of pleadings, a master's report, or a record of prior proceedings."
1102:
for reconsideration or, less commonly, may call the parties to present further arguments and write its own judgment based on the information presented.
1328:
589:
Whether the plaintiff would be irreparably prejudiced if the judgment is set aside which cannot be adequately compensated by a suitable award of costs.
89:
261:
is ordered to ensure a just outcome. The process of vacating a judgment is sometimes referred to as vacatur. The result of a vacated judgment is a
2323:
2308:
2293:
2278:
2260:
2242:
2224:
2205:
2187:
2376:
2357:
2338:
2168:
491:" document from the judgment creditor. This document affirms that the judgment debtor has fulfilled any obligations relating to the judgment.
611:
must tell the reader why the judgment was made, but do not need to tell the reader how the judge made the decision rendered in the judgment.
456:
jurisdictions to investigate or interview judgment creditors, and investigations may be conducted either by the judgment creditor or by a
1867:
1802:
1673:
366:
that rejects the conclusions of the majority decision in whole or in part, and explains the reasons for rejecting the majority decision.
1007:: a summary judgment may be granted at the request of one party in order to provide an order quickly as an alternative to a full trial.
1073:
months of the conclusion of oral arguments unless exceptional circumstances apply and becomes effective once it has been rendered.
1296:
570:
QDC 314 Shanahan DCJ set-down some principles in relation to setting aside a regularly entered default judgment. They include:
159:
judgment are not generally provided immediately following the hearing and may take days, weeks, or even months to be released.
838:
541:
At the State level various State and
Territory Courts allow for parties to obtain different types of judgments; including:
1830:
1786:
1769:
1721:
1626:
2392:
930:
A state code of civil procedure provides its own rules relating to judgments in state courts. For instance, California's
846:
775:
744:
3432:
3406:
3380:
3354:
566:
However, a Court may set aside a default judgment if the defendant can prove a number of key issues. In
Queensland, in
3461:
1242:
1169:
789:
784:
760:
647:
627:: a default judgment can be sought by the plaintiff where a defendant âhas been noted in defaultâ for certain claims.
515:
17:
864:: a consent judgment is available where the parties agree on the terms of the judgment or order that should be made.
3205:
727:(decided by Deputy District Judge Samson Hung), judgment was handed down between 31 and 33 months after the trial.
696:
has on occasion delivered its reasons for judgment a significant period of time after the hearing. For example, in
614:
Provincial rules of civil procedure provide further guidance relating to specific types of judgments. For example:
995:: an ex parte judgment may be granted "where the petitioner has good reason for not summoning the opposing party."
1891:
1843:
1741:
1697:
1646:
475:
is responsible for enforcing the judgment and is empowered to use a number of different enforcement mechanisms.
337:
that agrees with the final outcome of the majority opinion but disagrees in whole or in part with the reasoning.
3063:
3044:
3025:
3006:
2987:
2968:
2949:
2930:
2911:
2892:
2842:
2826:
2810:
2483: at para. 17, 1 AC 822 (26 February 2014), Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (England and Wales)
1344:
822:
810:
525:
436:
entitled to under the judgment. Once this process is initiated, the successful party may be referred to as the
665:, the trial judge (Mr Justice Louis Chan) delivered his reserved judgment over 32 months after the trial. The
1017:
821:'will endeavour to deliver judgment in an appeal within six months from the last day of the hearing'. In the
393:
2011:
1098:. If the appellate body disagrees with the lower court's decision, it may either send the case back to the
938:
818:
806:
802:
674:
764:
755:
739:
693:
666:
651:
467:
Different enforcement mechanisms exist, including seizure and sale of the judgment debtor's property or
1192:
942:
708:
922:
826:
814:
3331:
3308:
3285:
3266:
3243:
3224:
3180:
3161:
3142:
3123:
3104:
3082:
870:: a declaratory judgment can be made by the courts regardless of whether a remedy is being claimed.
401:
385:
621:: a declaratory judgment can be made by the court regardless of whether a remedy is being claimed.
3479:
2243:
2225:
2206:
1265:
1099:
1095:
603:
488:
2661:
2637:
2613:
2589:
2565:
2541:
2517:
2493:
1987:
735:
1232:
1159:
408:. Judgment enforcement, on a conceptual level, is conducted in a similar way across different
1412:
1053:
700:, the reasons for judgment, as well as the reserved decision as to costs, were delivered by
2480:
557:
the party has no real prospect of succeeding on all or a part of the plaintiffâs claim; and
178:
152:
A judgment may be provided either in written or oral form depending on the circumstances.
8:
1976:
The
Enforcement of Money Judgments Regulations, R.R.S. ch. E-9 22, Reg 1, s 11(2) (Can.).
1967:
The
Enforcement of Money Judgments Regulations, R.R.S. ch. E-9 22, Reg 1, s 11(1) (Can.).
224:
132:
1868:"European e-Justice Portal - European Judicial Network in civil and commercial matters"
1831:
http://www.sasklawcourts.ca/index.php/home/court-of-queen-s-bench/enforcement-of-orders
1803:"European e-Justice Portal - European Judicial Network in civil and commercial matters"
1787:
http://www.sasklawcourts.ca/index.php/home/court-of-queen-s-bench/enforcement-of-orders
1770:
http://www.sasklawcourts.ca/index.php/home/court-of-queen-s-bench/enforcement-of-orders
1674:"European e-Justice Portal - European Judicial Network in civil and commercial matters"
1116:
974:
imprinted with an order of enforcement." Once a judgment has been executed, it becomes
355:
326:
65:
of an appellate court (setting forth reasons for the disposition of an appeal) and the
966:
and the absence of an appeal, a judgment is presumed to have been executed correctly.
1789:(See specifically "Step 4 (Optional) â Give The Sheriff an Enforcement Instruction").
1238:
1165:
689:, Mr Justice Au handed down his reserved judgment 26 to 28 months after the hearing.
437:
340:
141:
137:
3433:
http://www.saudiembassy.net/about/country-information/laws/Law_of_the_Judiciary.aspx
3407:
http://www.saudiembassy.net/about/country-information/laws/Law_of_the_Judiciary.aspx
3381:
http://www.saudiembassy.net/about/country-information/laws/Law_of_the_Judiciary.aspx
3355:
http://www.saudiembassy.net/about/country-information/laws/Law_of_the_Judiciary.aspx
3193:
520:
The requirements for judgments share many similarities and some differences between
3462:
http://www.chambersandpartners.com/guide/practice-guides/location/241/6622/1434-200
829:, most decisions are delivered within three months of the last day of the hearing.
304:
293:
246:
232:
189:
73:
58:
54:
945:
generally requires states to recognize the records and judgments of other states.
3439:
3413:
3387:
3361:
1228:
1155:
1126:
441:
397:
275:
250:
50:
3206:
http://www.cortecostituzionale.it/documenti/pubblicazioni/testo-Costituzione.pdf
1919:
1131:
172:
577:
Whether there has been any delay by the defendant in bringing the application;
3473:
1136:
445:
425:
409:
279:
262:
195:
3064:
http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/Traductions/en-English/Legifrance-translations
3045:
http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/Traductions/en-English/Legifrance-translations
3026:
http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/Traductions/en-English/Legifrance-translations
3007:
http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/Traductions/en-English/Legifrance-translations
2988:
http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/Traductions/en-English/Legifrance-translations
2969:
http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/Traductions/en-English/Legifrance-translations
2950:
http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/Traductions/en-English/Legifrance-translations
2931:
http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/Traductions/en-English/Legifrance-translations
2912:
http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/Traductions/en-English/Legifrance-translations
2893:
http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/Traductions/en-English/Legifrance-translations
2843:
http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/Traductions/en-English/Legifrance-translations
2827:
http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/Traductions/en-English/Legifrance-translations
2811:
http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/Traductions/en-English/Legifrance-translations
487:
Depending on the jurisdiction, the judgment debtor may be able to obtain a "
1892:"Collecting the Judgment | Superior Court of California | County of Orange"
1844:"Collecting the Judgment | Superior Court of California | County of Orange"
1742:"Collecting the Judgment | Superior Court of California | County of Orange"
1698:"Collecting the Judgment | Superior Court of California | County of Orange"
1647:"Collecting the Judgment | Superior Court of California | County of Orange"
975:
779:
503:
421:
1833:(See specifically "Step 7 â Distribution of Monies Collected by Sheriff").
1545:
1040:
Judgments in most German courts are rendered "in the name of the people".
574:
Whether there is a good reason why the defendant failed to file a defence;
2841:(Fr.), art. 461, Legifrance Translations (Last accessed March 28, 2015),
2825:(Fr.), art. 455, Legifrance Translations (Last accessed March 28, 2015),
2809:(Fr.), art. 454, Legifrance Translations (Last accessed March 28, 2015),
738:
Ian
Carlson) took over 10 months to hand down his reserved judgment. The
701:
586:
Whether the defendant has raised a prima facie defence on the merits; and
499:
468:
77:
43:
1397:
Reasons for
Judgment: A Handbook for Judges and Other Judicial Officers
1384:
Reasons for
Judgment: A Handbook for Judges and Other Judicial Officers
1371:
Reasons for Judgment: A Handbook for Judges and Other Judicial Officers
1358:
Reasons for Judgment: A Handbook for Judges and Other Judicial Officers
495:
429:
381:
312:
289:
182:
1772:(See specifically "Step 5 (Optional) â Question the Judgment Debtor").
1064:
A court's duties regarding judgments are outlined in "æ°äș蚎èšæłćăłæ°äșäżć
šæłăź" (
94:
Judgment is considered a "free variation" word, and the use of either
69:
of an appellate court (the pronouncement of the disposition itself).
1494:
Capital Gains Income Streams Corporation v. Merrill Lynch Canada Inc.
1121:
1111:
654:
404:
legal systems judgment enforcement is regulated through the national
316:
300:-setting weight. Some examples of opinions within judgments include:
297:
3335:
3312:
3289:
3247:
990:
560:
there is no need for a trial of the claim or the part of the claim.
389:
319:
for future cases as it represents the views of the majority of the
801:
In accordance with section 170 of the Senior Courts Act 2016, the
123:
The legal definition of "judgment" contemplates decisions made by
3332:
http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=337360#Part2Chap5
3309:
http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=337360#Part2Chap5
3286:
http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=337360#Part2Chap5
3267:
http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=337360#Part2Chap5
3244:
http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=337360#Part2Chap5
3225:
http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/text.jsp?file_id=337360#Part2Chap5
3181:
https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_zpo/englisch_zpo.html
3162:
https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_zpo/englisch_zpo.html
3143:
https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_zpo/englisch_zpo.html
3124:
https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_zpo/englisch_zpo.html
3105:
https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_zpo/englisch_zpo.html
3083:
https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_zpo/englisch_zpo.html
521:
472:
461:
457:
413:
2320:
Han Mei Fang v All Occupiers of Flat F, 6th Floor, Kapok Mansion
725:
Han Mei Fang v All Occupiers of Flat F, 6th Floor, Kapok Mansion
580:
The defendantâs conduct in the action before and after judgment;
3066:(Select "Code of civil procedure-pdf" for English translation).
3047:(Select "Code of civil procedure-pdf" for English translation).
3028:(Select "Code of civil procedure-pdf" for English translation).
3009:(Select "Code of civil procedure-pdf" for English translation).
2990:(Select "Code of civil procedure-pdf" for English translation).
2971:(Select "Code of civil procedure-pdf" for English translation).
2952:(Select "Code of civil procedure-pdf" for English translation).
2933:(Select "Code of civil procedure-pdf" for English translation).
2914:(Select "Code of civil procedure-pdf" for English translation).
2895:(Select "Code of civil procedure-pdf" for English translation).
2845:(Select "Code of civil procedure-pdf" for English translation).
2829:(Select "Code of civil procedure-pdf" for English translation).
2813:(Select "Code of civil procedure-pdf" for English translation).
2358:
1722:"Step 3 â Register Your Judgment with the Land Titles Registry"
595:
417:
203:
199:
53:
tend to use the term at the appellate level as synonymous with
1237:(3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 497.
1164:(3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 495.
2794:
California Code of Civil Procedure, C.C.P. § 1297.91â1297.95.
2377:
1049:
376:
363:
359:
348:
344:
334:
330:
320:
308:
285:
258:
240:
236:
211:
128:
124:
39:
1048:
The duty to provide reasons for a judgment is entrenched in
926:
Judicial judgment of debt, Greene County, Pennsylvania, 1815
61:
speakers prefer to maintain a clear distinction between the
1347:(select "Code of civil procedure" for English translation).
412:. Specific references to the judgment enforcement rules of
2684:
Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(a); see also Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9002(5).
2169:
707:
Similar delays have also been encountered in cases in the
2872:
Catherine Elliott, Eric Jeanpierre and Catherine Vernon,
2859:
Catherine Elliott, Eric Jeanpierre and Catherine Vernon,
2662:"Rules & Practice Directions - Civil Procedure Rules"
2638:"Rules & Practice Directions - Civil Procedure Rules"
2614:"Rules & Practice Directions - Civil Procedure Rules"
2590:"Rules & Practice Directions - Civil Procedure Rules"
2566:"Rules & Practice Directions - Civil Procedure Rules"
2542:"Rules & Practice Directions - Civil Procedure Rules"
2518:"Rules & Practice Directions - Civil Procedure Rules"
2494:"Rules & Practice Directions - Civil Procedure Rules"
1016:
A court's duties regarding judgments are outlined in the
958:
A court's duties regarding judgments are outlined in the
254:
31:
2429:"Judgment delivery expectations â Courts of New Zealand"
2411:"Judgment delivery expectations â Courts of New Zealand"
2393:"Judgment delivery expectations â Courts of New Zealand"
2013:
Unique Product Marketing Pty Ltd v. Bortek Sales Pty Ltd
440:
while the unsuccessful party will be referred to as the
734:, after a trial which lasted 12 days, the trial judge (
568:
Unique Product Marketing Pty Ltd v Bortek Sales Pty Ltd
2785:
California Code of Civil Procedure, C.C.P. § 1297.253.
2467:, E.W.C.A. Civ. 811 at para 14, 1 W.L.R. 377 (U.K.).
2448:, E.W.C.A. Civ. 811 at para 12, 1 W.L.R. 377 (U.K.).
80:
regarding the rights and liabilities of the parties.
1331:, see specifically, "Usage". Accessed March 28, 2015.
1086:
A court's duties regarding judgments are outlined in
839:
Court of Appeal of England and Wales (Civil Division)
2339:
2261:
2188:
384:
legal systems, judgment enforcement is regulated by
891:At the federal level, a judgment is defined in the
723:(decided by Deputy District Judge Timon Shum), and
2335:Welltus Limited v Fornton Knitting Company Limited
2257:China Medical Technologies v Samson Tsang Tak Yung
715:(decided by Deputy District Judge Richard Leung),
698:China Medical Technologies v Samson Tsang Tak Yung
235:: an accelerated judgment that does not require a
3428:, Royal Decree No.M/64, 14 Rajab 1395, art. 34 ,
3402:, Royal Decree No.M/64, 14 Rajab 1395, art. 35 ,
3376:, Royal Decree No.M/64, 14 Rajab 1395, art. 33 ,
3194:https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/zpo/__311.html
1916:SC-290 Acknowledgment of Satisfaction of Judgment
1223:
1221:
774:, at the end of the hearing of the appeal in the
90:American and British English spelling differences
3471:
2131:, R.S.S. 1998, ch. Q-1.01, § 11(b)(iii) (Can.).
1264:The Courts of British Columbia: Supreme Court,
2155:, R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 194, § 20.04(2)(b) (Can.).
1988:"Setting Aside Default Judgment in Queensland"
1218:
1148:
893:United States Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
719:(decided by Deputy District Judge Simon Lui),
2095:, 2002 S.C.C. 26 at para. 25, 1 S.C.R. 869.
2083:, 2002 S.C.C. 26 at para. 24, 1 S.C.R. 869.
2071:, 2002 S.C.C. 26 at para. 23, 1 S.C.R. 869.
2059:, 2002 S.C.C. 26 at para. 22, 1 S.C.R. 869.
2047:, 2002 S.C.C. 26 at para. 19, 1 S.C.R. 869.
1920:http://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/sc290.pdf
593:
509:
269:
2305:Golden Field Glass Works v Yeung Chun Keung
2035:, 2002 S.C.C. 26 at para. 5, 1 S.C.R. 869.
1599:, 99 The Georgetown L.J. 515 at 517 (2011).
721:Golden Field Glass Works v Yeung Chun Keung
370:
106:when referring to a court's formal ruling.
3452:
3450:
3448:
3093:
3091:
2855:
2853:
2851:
2802:
2800:
2119:, 2008 S.C.C. 51 at para. 17, 3 S.C.R. 3.
2107:, 2008 S.C.C. 51 at para. 16, 3 S.C.R. 3.
1595:James F. Spriggs II & David R. Stras,
2748:
2746:
2744:
2221:Lui Yuet Tin v Commissioner for Transport
1465:The Myth of the Mild Declaratory Judgment
683:Lui Yuet Tin v Commissioner for Transport
118:
3350:, Royal Decree No.M/64, 14 Rajab 1395 ,
2477:Coventry & Ors v Lawrence & Anor
2460:
2458:
2456:
2454:
2143:, R.R.O. 1990, Reg. 194, § 19.04 (Can.).
1797:
1795:
1668:
1666:
1621:
1619:
1617:
1567:
1565:
1516:
1514:
1477:
1475:
1473:
1447:
1445:
1407:
1405:
921:
479:enforcement for an additional 10 years.
206:procedure than other kinds of judgments.
3445:
3088:
2848:
2797:
1399:9â10 (Butterworth & Co. Ltd. 1980).
307:: the opinion of more than half of the
14:
3472:
2741:
2465:Flannery v Halifax Estate Agencies Ltd
2446:Flannery v Halifax Estate Agencies Ltd
1325:New Oxford American English Dictionary
1227:
1208:
1206:
1204:
1202:
1154:
2451:
2184:Dr Yip Chi Him Roger v Lee Kwok Leung
1985:
1792:
1663:
1614:
1562:
1511:
1470:
1442:
1402:
1386:15 (Butterworth & Co. Ltd. 1980).
1373:14 (Butterworth & Co. Ltd. 1980).
663:Dr Yip Chi Him Roger v Lee Kwok Leung
162:
1439:, 27 Antitrust 73 at 73 (2011â2012).
1360:8 (Butterworth & Co. Ltd. 1980).
1318:
1281:Oxford Dictionary of English Grammar
1279:Sylvia Chalker & Edmund Weiner,
673:Delays have occurred in a number of
489:satisfaction and release of judgment
147:
1914:The Judicial Branch of California,
1467:, 63 Duke L.J. 1091 at 1093 (2014).
1199:
24:
3204:Cost., art. 111, para. 6 (Italy),
3192:$ 311 Zivilprozessordnung (Ger.)
2774:California Code of Civil Procedure
2762:California Code of Civil Procedure
2382:, reported at (2008) 11 HKCFAR 637
2363:, reported at (2014) 17 HKCFAR 202
2174:, reported at (2007) 10 HKCFAR 552
1956:California Code of Civil Procedure
1944:California Code of Civil Procedure
1932:California Code of Civil Procedure
1234:Garner's Dictionary of Legal Usage
1161:Garner's Dictionary of Legal Usage
229:"the court wishes to be advised").
25:
3491:
3458:Saudi Arabia â Law & Practice
1550:LII / Legal Information Institute
1413:"Supreme Court - About Judgments"
832:
763:endorsed the remarks made by the
516:Lists of landmark court decisions
3460:(Last accessed March 28, 2015),
3419:
3393:
3367:
3341:
3318:
3295:
3272:
3253:
3230:
3211:
3198:
3186:
3167:
3148:
3129:
3110:
3069:
3050:
3031:
3012:
2993:
2974:
2955:
2936:
2917:
2898:
2879:
2866:
2832:
2816:
2275:Leung Chi Wang v Leung Yui Shing
2202:Data Key Ltd v Director of Lands
1918:(Last accessed March 28, 2015),
1829:(Last accessed March 28, 2015),
1785:(Last accessed March 28, 2015),
1768:(Last accessed March 28, 2015),
1496:, OJ No 2606 at para 32 (Can.).
1076:
886:
793:contributed to this oversight'.
713:Leung Chi Wang v Leung Yui Shing
679:Data Key Ltd v Director of Lands
3456:Hatem Abbas Ghazzawi & Co,
2788:
2779:
2767:
2755:
2732:
2723:
2714:
2705:
2696:
2687:
2678:
2654:
2630:
2606:
2582:
2558:
2534:
2510:
2486:
2470:
2439:
2421:
2403:
2385:
2373:HKSAR v Tin's Label Factory Ltd
2366:
2347:
2328:
2313:
2298:
2283:
2268:
2250:
2232:
2214:
2195:
2177:
2165:Mak Kang Hoi v Ho Yuk Wah David
2158:
2146:
2134:
2122:
2110:
2098:
2086:
2074:
2062:
2050:
2038:
2026:
2004:
1979:
1970:
1961:
1949:
1937:
1925:
1908:
1884:
1860:
1836:
1819:
1775:
1758:
1734:
1714:
1690:
1639:
1602:
1589:
1577:
1538:
1526:
1499:
1487:
1457:
1429:
1389:
1376:
1363:
1350:
1334:
1081:
772:HKSAR v Tin's Label Factory Ltd
658:as it was 'objectively sound'.
644:Mak Kang Hoi v Ho Yuk Wah David
27:Formal decision made by a court
1597:Explaining Plurality Decisions
1302:
1286:
1273:
1270:(Last accessed March 28, 2015)
1258:
1185:
855:The Civil Procedure Rules 1998
817:respectively. As of 2017, the
796:
13:
1:
2876:162 (2d. ed., Pearson, 2006).
2863:158 (2d. ed., Pearson, 2006).
1293:New Zealand Oxford Dictionary
1142:
531:
115:uses "judgement" throughout.
2239:DI v Director of Immigration
1437:Regulation by Consent Decree
1309:Australian Oxford Dictionary
948:
939:Full Faith and Credit Clause
803:Chief Justice of New Zealand
704:after a delay of 34 months.
687:DI v Director of Immigration
637:
536:
432:) are made in this section.
343:: the opinions of different
168:case include the following:
7:
3176:, § 280(2) and 304 (Ger.),
1986:Davis, Wayne (2016-07-27).
1105:
583:The defendantâs good faith;
83:
10:
3496:
2211:, reported at 2 HKLRD 158
1315:. Accessed March 28, 2015.
1299:. Accessed March 28, 2015.
1011:
899:all of the issues raised.
732:Welltus v Fornton Knitting
513:
502:arrangements or liens. In
358:: the opinion of a single
329:: the opinion of a single
273:
202:or may follow a different
87:
3002:(Fr.), art. 468-69; 471,
2738:Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(a)(2).
2720:Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2).
2711:Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(1).
2290:Kan Yay Shan v Mo You Mut
953:
717:Kan Yay Shan v Mo You Mut
510:Judgments by legal system
270:Opinions within judgments
3426:The Law of the Judiciary
3400:The Law of the Judiciary
3374:The Law of the Judiciary
3348:The Law of the Judiciary
3057:Code de procédure civile
3038:Code de procédure civile
3019:Code de procédure civile
3000:Code de procédure civile
2981:Code de procédure civile
2962:Code de procédure civile
2943:Code de procédure civile
2924:Code de procédure civile
2905:Code de procédure civile
2886:Code de procédure civile
2839:Code de procédure civile
2823:Code de procédure civile
2807:Code de procédure civile
2344:, reported at 5 HKC 106
1825:Courts of Saskatchewan,
1781:Courts of Saskatchewan,
1764:Courts of Saskatchewan,
1341:Code de procédure civile
1283:(Oxford U.P. 1994), 160.
1088:The Law of the Judiciary
1059:
1043:
960:Code de procédure civile
910:Interlocutory injunction
386:administrative divisions
371:Enforcement of judgments
3304:, art. 251(1) (Japan),
3281:, art. 254(1) (Japan),
3262:, art. 253(1) (Japan),
3239:, art. 243(1) (Japan),
1066:Code of Civil Procedure
999:Interlocutory Judgment:
932:Code of Civil Procedure
776:Court of First Instance
745:Court of First Instance
736:Deputy High Court Judge
677:cases. For example, in
604:Supreme Court of Canada
406:Code of Civil Procedure
315:. This opinion becomes
113:Code of Civil Procedure
2752:Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a).
2729:Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(c).
2702:Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a).
2693:Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b).
2481:[2014] UKSC 13
2433:www.courtsofnz.govt.nz
2415:www.courtsofnz.govt.nz
2397:www.courtsofnz.govt.nz
1609:Blackâs Law Dictionary
1584:Blackâs Law Dictionary
1572:Blackâs Law Dictionary
1533:Blackâs Law Dictionary
1521:Blackâs Law Dictionary
1506:Blackâs Law Dictionary
1482:Blackâs Law Dictionary
1452:Blackâs Law Dictionary
1213:Blackâs Law Dictionary
1193:Blackâs Law Dictionary
1034:Interlocutory judgment
927:
296:is considered to have
196:Interlocutory judgment
119:Who renders a judgment
2776:, C.C.P. § 437.c-438.
2153:Courts of Justice Act
2141:Courts of Justice Act
1611:1265 (10th ed. 2014).
1574:1266 (10th ed. 2014).
1535:1782 (10th ed. 2014).
1523:1664 (10th ed. 2014).
925:
790:Court of Final Appeal
785:Court of Final Appeal
761:Court of Final Appeal
648:Court of Final Appeal
133:quasi-judicial bodies
131:of law. Decisions of
3327:, art. 250 (Japan),
1586:352 (10th ed. 2014).
1508:465 (10th ed. 2014).
1484:507 (10th ed. 2014).
1454:971 (10th ed. 2014).
1215:970 (10th ed. 2014).
1196:970 (10th ed. 2014).
943:federal Constitution
868:Declaratory judgment
702:Mr Justice Barma, JA
619:Declaratory judgment
483:Release of judgments
179:Declaratory judgment
140:, which are made by
3138:, § 313(b) (Ger.),
2874:French Legal System
2861:French Legal System
2764:, C.C.P. § 577-579.
1958:, C.C.P. § 706.027.
1946:, C.C.P. § 724.003.
1934:, C.C.P. § 724.005.
1872:e-justice.europa.eu
1807:e-justice.europa.eu
1678:e-justice.europa.eu
1018:Zivilprozessordnung
249:: a judgment of an
225:Curia advisari vult
38:is a decision of a
3438:2015-04-02 at the
3412:2015-04-02 at the
3386:2015-04-02 at the
3360:2015-04-02 at the
3174:Zivilprozeáșordnung
3155:Zivilprozeáșordnung
3136:Zivilprozeáșordnung
3117:Zivilprozeáșordnung
3098:Zivilprozeáșordnung
3076:Zivilprozeáșordnung
2666:www.justice.gov.uk
2642:www.justice.gov.uk
2618:www.justice.gov.uk
2594:www.justice.gov.uk
2570:www.justice.gov.uk
2546:www.justice.gov.uk
2522:www.justice.gov.uk
2498:www.justice.gov.uk
2354:HKSAR v Yip Kim Po
2324:DCMP 3071/2012
2309:DCCJ 1942/2012
2294:DCMP 1886/2011
2279:DCCJ 3435/2012
1627:"Enforcing orders"
1345:Legifrance.gouv.fr
1117:Procedural history
928:
752:HKSAR v Yip Kim Po
711:. For example, in
594:Canada (excluding
356:Dissenting opinion
327:Concurring opinion
163:Types of judgments
142:arbitral tribunals
3059:(Fr.), art. 484,
3040:(Fr.), art. 483,
3021:(Fr.), art. 493,
2983:(Fr.), art. 503,
2964:(Fr.), art. 501,
2945:(Fr.), art. 500,
2926:(Fr.), art. 465,
2907:(Fr.), art. 452,
2888:(Fr.), art. 450,
2129:Queenâs Bench Act
983:Default judgment:
438:judgment creditor
341:Plurality opinion
294:majority judgment
284:If more than one
239:and in which the
216:"Cur. adv. vult."
148:Form of judgments
18:Reserved decision
16:(Redirected from
3487:
3465:
3454:
3443:
3423:
3417:
3397:
3391:
3371:
3365:
3345:
3339:
3322:
3316:
3299:
3293:
3276:
3270:
3257:
3251:
3234:
3228:
3215:
3209:
3202:
3196:
3190:
3184:
3171:
3165:
3157:, § 303 (Ger.),
3152:
3146:
3133:
3127:
3119:, § 540 (Ger.),
3114:
3108:
3100:, § 313 (Ger.),
3095:
3086:
3073:
3067:
3054:
3048:
3035:
3029:
3016:
3010:
2997:
2991:
2978:
2972:
2959:
2953:
2940:
2934:
2921:
2915:
2902:
2896:
2883:
2877:
2870:
2864:
2857:
2846:
2836:
2830:
2820:
2814:
2804:
2795:
2792:
2786:
2783:
2777:
2771:
2765:
2759:
2753:
2750:
2739:
2736:
2730:
2727:
2721:
2718:
2712:
2709:
2703:
2700:
2694:
2691:
2685:
2682:
2676:
2675:
2673:
2672:
2658:
2652:
2651:
2649:
2648:
2634:
2628:
2627:
2625:
2624:
2610:
2604:
2603:
2601:
2600:
2586:
2580:
2579:
2577:
2576:
2562:
2556:
2555:
2553:
2552:
2538:
2532:
2531:
2529:
2528:
2514:
2508:
2507:
2505:
2504:
2490:
2484:
2474:
2468:
2462:
2449:
2443:
2437:
2436:
2425:
2419:
2418:
2407:
2401:
2400:
2389:
2383:
2379:
2370:
2364:
2360:
2351:
2345:
2341:
2332:
2326:
2317:
2311:
2302:
2296:
2287:
2281:
2272:
2266:
2263:
2254:
2248:
2245:
2236:
2230:
2227:
2218:
2212:
2208:
2199:
2193:
2190:
2181:
2175:
2171:
2162:
2156:
2150:
2144:
2138:
2132:
2126:
2120:
2114:
2108:
2102:
2096:
2090:
2084:
2078:
2072:
2066:
2060:
2054:
2048:
2042:
2036:
2030:
2024:
2023:
2022:
2021:
2008:
2002:
2001:
1999:
1998:
1983:
1977:
1974:
1968:
1965:
1959:
1953:
1947:
1941:
1935:
1929:
1923:
1912:
1906:
1905:
1903:
1902:
1896:www.occourts.org
1888:
1882:
1881:
1879:
1878:
1864:
1858:
1857:
1855:
1854:
1848:www.occourts.org
1840:
1834:
1827:Enforcing Orders
1823:
1817:
1816:
1814:
1813:
1799:
1790:
1783:Enforcing Orders
1779:
1773:
1766:Enforcing Orders
1762:
1756:
1755:
1753:
1752:
1746:www.occourts.org
1738:
1732:
1731:
1729:
1728:
1718:
1712:
1711:
1709:
1708:
1702:www.occourts.org
1694:
1688:
1687:
1685:
1684:
1670:
1661:
1660:
1658:
1657:
1651:www.occourts.org
1643:
1637:
1636:
1634:
1633:
1623:
1612:
1606:
1600:
1593:
1587:
1581:
1575:
1569:
1560:
1559:
1557:
1556:
1542:
1536:
1530:
1524:
1518:
1509:
1503:
1497:
1491:
1485:
1479:
1468:
1461:
1455:
1449:
1440:
1435:Robert B. Bell,
1433:
1427:
1426:
1424:
1423:
1409:
1400:
1393:
1387:
1380:
1374:
1367:
1361:
1354:
1348:
1338:
1332:
1322:
1316:
1306:
1300:
1290:
1284:
1277:
1271:
1262:
1256:
1255:
1253:
1251:
1229:Garner, Bryan A.
1225:
1216:
1210:
1197:
1189:
1183:
1182:
1180:
1178:
1156:Garner, Bryan A.
1152:
1028:Default judgment
1005:Summary judgment
916:Summary judgment
904:Default judgment
880:Summary judgment
874:Default judgment
862:Consent judgment
847:UK Supreme Court
631:Summary judgment
625:Default judgment
552:Summary judgment
546:Default judgment
494:For example, in
305:Majority opinion
247:Vacated judgment
233:Summary judgment
190:Default judgment
183:injunction order
173:Consent judgment
74:Canadian English
59:American English
55:judicial opinion
21:
3495:
3494:
3490:
3489:
3488:
3486:
3485:
3484:
3470:
3469:
3468:
3455:
3446:
3440:Wayback Machine
3424:
3420:
3414:Wayback Machine
3398:
3394:
3388:Wayback Machine
3372:
3368:
3362:Wayback Machine
3346:
3342:
3323:
3319:
3300:
3296:
3277:
3273:
3258:
3254:
3235:
3231:
3216:
3212:
3203:
3199:
3191:
3187:
3172:
3168:
3153:
3149:
3134:
3130:
3115:
3111:
3096:
3089:
3074:
3070:
3055:
3051:
3036:
3032:
3017:
3013:
2998:
2994:
2979:
2975:
2960:
2956:
2941:
2937:
2922:
2918:
2903:
2899:
2884:
2880:
2871:
2867:
2858:
2849:
2837:
2833:
2821:
2817:
2805:
2798:
2793:
2789:
2784:
2780:
2772:
2768:
2760:
2756:
2751:
2742:
2737:
2733:
2728:
2724:
2719:
2715:
2710:
2706:
2701:
2697:
2692:
2688:
2683:
2679:
2670:
2668:
2660:
2659:
2655:
2646:
2644:
2636:
2635:
2631:
2622:
2620:
2612:
2611:
2607:
2598:
2596:
2588:
2587:
2583:
2574:
2572:
2564:
2563:
2559:
2550:
2548:
2540:
2539:
2535:
2526:
2524:
2516:
2515:
2511:
2502:
2500:
2492:
2491:
2487:
2475:
2471:
2463:
2452:
2444:
2440:
2427:
2426:
2422:
2409:
2408:
2404:
2391:
2390:
2386:
2371:
2367:
2352:
2348:
2333:
2329:
2318:
2314:
2303:
2299:
2288:
2284:
2273:
2269:
2255:
2251:
2237:
2233:
2219:
2215:
2200:
2196:
2182:
2178:
2163:
2159:
2151:
2147:
2139:
2135:
2127:
2123:
2115:
2111:
2103:
2099:
2091:
2087:
2079:
2075:
2067:
2063:
2055:
2051:
2043:
2039:
2031:
2027:
2019:
2017:
2010:
2009:
2005:
1996:
1994:
1992:Stonegate Legal
1984:
1980:
1975:
1971:
1966:
1962:
1954:
1950:
1942:
1938:
1930:
1926:
1913:
1909:
1900:
1898:
1890:
1889:
1885:
1876:
1874:
1866:
1865:
1861:
1852:
1850:
1842:
1841:
1837:
1824:
1820:
1811:
1809:
1801:
1800:
1793:
1780:
1776:
1763:
1759:
1750:
1748:
1740:
1739:
1735:
1726:
1724:
1720:
1719:
1715:
1706:
1704:
1696:
1695:
1691:
1682:
1680:
1672:
1671:
1664:
1655:
1653:
1645:
1644:
1640:
1631:
1629:
1625:
1624:
1615:
1607:
1603:
1594:
1590:
1582:
1578:
1570:
1563:
1554:
1552:
1544:
1543:
1539:
1531:
1527:
1519:
1512:
1504:
1500:
1492:
1488:
1480:
1471:
1463:Samuel L Bray,
1462:
1458:
1450:
1443:
1434:
1430:
1421:
1419:
1417:www.bccourts.ca
1411:
1410:
1403:
1395:Roman N Komar,
1394:
1390:
1382:Roman N Komar,
1381:
1377:
1369:Roman N Komar,
1368:
1364:
1356:Roman N Komar,
1355:
1351:
1339:
1335:
1323:
1319:
1307:
1303:
1291:
1287:
1278:
1274:
1267:About Judgments
1263:
1259:
1249:
1247:
1245:
1226:
1219:
1211:
1200:
1190:
1186:
1176:
1174:
1172:
1153:
1149:
1145:
1127:Question of law
1108:
1084:
1079:
1062:
1046:
1014:
956:
951:
889:
835:
823:Court of Appeal
811:Court of Appeal
799:
765:Court of Appeal
756:Court of Appeal
740:Court of Appeal
694:Court of Appeal
675:judicial review
667:Court of Appeal
640:
600:
539:
534:
518:
512:
442:judgment debtor
398:federated state
373:
282:
276:Ratio decidendi
272:
251:appellate court
165:
150:
138:arbitral awards
121:
92:
86:
51:British English
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
3493:
3483:
3482:
3480:Judgment (law)
3467:
3466:
3444:
3418:
3392:
3366:
3340:
3317:
3294:
3271:
3252:
3229:
3210:
3197:
3185:
3166:
3147:
3128:
3109:
3087:
3068:
3049:
3030:
3011:
2992:
2973:
2954:
2935:
2916:
2897:
2878:
2865:
2847:
2831:
2815:
2796:
2787:
2778:
2766:
2754:
2740:
2731:
2722:
2713:
2704:
2695:
2686:
2677:
2653:
2629:
2605:
2581:
2557:
2533:
2509:
2485:
2469:
2450:
2438:
2420:
2402:
2384:
2365:
2346:
2327:
2312:
2297:
2282:
2267:
2249:
2231:
2213:
2194:
2176:
2157:
2145:
2133:
2121:
2109:
2097:
2093:R. v. Sheppard
2085:
2081:R. v. Sheppard
2073:
2069:R. v. Sheppard
2061:
2057:R. v. Sheppard
2049:
2045:R. v. Sheppard
2037:
2033:R. v. Sheppard
2025:
2003:
1978:
1969:
1960:
1948:
1936:
1924:
1907:
1883:
1859:
1835:
1818:
1791:
1774:
1757:
1733:
1713:
1689:
1662:
1638:
1613:
1601:
1588:
1576:
1561:
1537:
1525:
1510:
1498:
1486:
1469:
1456:
1441:
1428:
1401:
1388:
1375:
1362:
1349:
1333:
1317:
1301:
1285:
1272:
1257:
1243:
1217:
1198:
1184:
1170:
1146:
1144:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1134:
1132:Standing (law)
1129:
1124:
1119:
1114:
1107:
1104:
1083:
1080:
1078:
1075:
1061:
1058:
1045:
1042:
1038:
1037:
1031:
1013:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1002:
996:
987:
955:
952:
950:
947:
920:
919:
913:
907:
888:
885:
884:
883:
877:
871:
865:
834:
833:United Kingdom
831:
798:
795:
709:District Court
661:Similarly, in
652:Madam Recorder
639:
636:
635:
634:
628:
622:
599:
592:
591:
590:
587:
584:
581:
578:
575:
564:
563:
562:
561:
558:
549:
538:
535:
533:
530:
511:
508:
372:
369:
368:
367:
353:
338:
324:
288:is deciding a
271:
268:
267:
266:
244:
230:
207:
193:
187:
176:
164:
161:
149:
146:
120:
117:
85:
82:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3492:
3481:
3478:
3477:
3475:
3463:
3459:
3453:
3451:
3449:
3441:
3437:
3434:
3431:
3430:translated at
3427:
3422:
3415:
3411:
3408:
3405:
3404:translated at
3401:
3396:
3389:
3385:
3382:
3379:
3378:translated at
3375:
3370:
3363:
3359:
3356:
3353:
3352:translated at
3349:
3344:
3337:
3333:
3330:
3329:translated at
3326:
3325:Minji SoshĆhĆ
3321:
3314:
3310:
3307:
3306:translated at
3303:
3302:Minji SoshĆhĆ
3298:
3291:
3287:
3284:
3283:translated at
3280:
3279:Minji SoshĆhĆ
3275:
3268:
3265:
3264:translated at
3261:
3260:Minji SoshĆhĆ
3256:
3249:
3245:
3242:
3241:translated at
3238:
3237:Minji SoshĆhĆ
3233:
3226:
3223:
3222:translated at
3219:
3218:Minji SoshĆhĆ
3214:
3207:
3201:
3195:
3189:
3182:
3179:
3178:translated at
3175:
3170:
3163:
3160:
3159:translated at
3156:
3151:
3144:
3141:
3140:translated at
3137:
3132:
3125:
3122:
3121:translated at
3118:
3113:
3106:
3103:
3102:translated at
3099:
3094:
3092:
3084:
3081:
3080:translated at
3077:
3072:
3065:
3062:
3061:translated at
3058:
3053:
3046:
3043:
3042:translated at
3039:
3034:
3027:
3024:
3023:translated at
3020:
3015:
3008:
3005:
3004:translated at
3001:
2996:
2989:
2986:
2985:translated at
2982:
2977:
2970:
2967:
2966:translated at
2963:
2958:
2951:
2948:
2947:translated at
2944:
2939:
2932:
2929:
2928:translated at
2925:
2920:
2913:
2910:
2909:translated at
2906:
2901:
2894:
2891:
2890:translated at
2887:
2882:
2875:
2869:
2862:
2856:
2854:
2852:
2844:
2840:
2835:
2828:
2824:
2819:
2812:
2808:
2803:
2801:
2791:
2782:
2775:
2770:
2763:
2758:
2749:
2747:
2745:
2735:
2726:
2717:
2708:
2699:
2690:
2681:
2667:
2663:
2657:
2643:
2639:
2633:
2619:
2615:
2609:
2595:
2591:
2585:
2571:
2567:
2561:
2547:
2543:
2537:
2523:
2519:
2513:
2499:
2495:
2489:
2482:
2478:
2473:
2466:
2461:
2459:
2457:
2455:
2447:
2442:
2434:
2430:
2424:
2416:
2412:
2406:
2398:
2394:
2388:
2381:
2374:
2369:
2362:
2355:
2350:
2343:
2342: 268/2011
2336:
2331:
2325:
2321:
2316:
2310:
2306:
2301:
2295:
2291:
2286:
2280:
2276:
2271:
2265:
2264: 197/2014
2258:
2253:
2247:
2246: 135/2014
2240:
2235:
2229:
2222:
2217:
2210:
2209: 164/2014
2203:
2198:
2192:
2191: 174/2015
2185:
2180:
2173:
2166:
2161:
2154:
2149:
2142:
2137:
2130:
2125:
2118:
2113:
2106:
2101:
2094:
2089:
2082:
2077:
2070:
2065:
2058:
2053:
2046:
2041:
2034:
2029:
2015:
2014:
2007:
1993:
1989:
1982:
1973:
1964:
1957:
1952:
1945:
1940:
1933:
1928:
1921:
1917:
1911:
1897:
1893:
1887:
1873:
1869:
1863:
1849:
1845:
1839:
1832:
1828:
1822:
1808:
1804:
1798:
1796:
1788:
1784:
1778:
1771:
1767:
1761:
1747:
1743:
1737:
1723:
1717:
1703:
1699:
1693:
1679:
1675:
1669:
1667:
1652:
1648:
1642:
1628:
1622:
1620:
1618:
1610:
1605:
1598:
1592:
1585:
1580:
1573:
1568:
1566:
1551:
1547:
1541:
1534:
1529:
1522:
1517:
1515:
1507:
1502:
1495:
1490:
1483:
1478:
1476:
1474:
1466:
1460:
1453:
1448:
1446:
1438:
1432:
1418:
1414:
1408:
1406:
1398:
1392:
1385:
1379:
1372:
1366:
1359:
1353:
1346:
1343:(French), at
1342:
1337:
1330:
1326:
1321:
1314:
1310:
1305:
1298:
1294:
1289:
1282:
1276:
1269:
1268:
1261:
1250:September 10,
1246:
1244:9780195384208
1240:
1236:
1235:
1230:
1224:
1222:
1214:
1209:
1207:
1205:
1203:
1195:
1194:
1188:
1177:September 10,
1173:
1171:9780195384208
1167:
1163:
1162:
1157:
1151:
1147:
1138:
1137:Trier of fact
1135:
1133:
1130:
1128:
1125:
1123:
1120:
1118:
1115:
1113:
1110:
1109:
1103:
1101:
1097:
1091:
1089:
1077:Religious law
1074:
1071:
1067:
1057:
1055:
1051:
1041:
1035:
1032:
1029:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1021:
1019:
1006:
1003:
1000:
997:
994:
992:
988:
984:
981:
980:
979:
977:
971:
967:
965:
961:
946:
944:
940:
935:
933:
924:
917:
914:
911:
908:
905:
902:
901:
900:
896:
894:
887:United States
881:
878:
875:
872:
869:
866:
863:
860:
859:
858:
856:
851:
848:
843:
840:
830:
828:
824:
820:
819:Supreme Court
816:
812:
808:
807:Supreme Court
804:
794:
791:
786:
781:
778:, Mr Justice
777:
773:
768:
766:
762:
757:
753:
748:
746:
741:
737:
733:
728:
726:
722:
718:
714:
710:
705:
703:
699:
695:
690:
688:
684:
680:
676:
671:
668:
664:
659:
656:
653:
649:
645:
632:
629:
626:
623:
620:
617:
616:
615:
612:
608:
605:
597:
588:
585:
582:
579:
576:
573:
572:
571:
569:
559:
556:
555:
553:
550:
547:
544:
543:
542:
529:
527:
526:legal systems
523:
517:
507:
505:
501:
497:
492:
490:
485:
484:
480:
476:
474:
470:
465:
463:
459:
453:
449:
447:
446:North America
443:
439:
433:
431:
427:
426:United States
423:
419:
415:
411:
410:legal systems
407:
403:
399:
395:
391:
387:
383:
378:
365:
361:
357:
354:
350:
346:
342:
339:
336:
332:
328:
325:
322:
318:
314:
310:
306:
303:
302:
301:
299:
295:
291:
287:
281:
280:Obiter dictum
277:
264:
263:trial de novo
260:
256:
252:
248:
245:
242:
238:
234:
231:
228:
226:
221:
217:
213:
208:
205:
201:
197:
194:
191:
188:
184:
180:
177:
174:
171:
170:
169:
160:
156:
153:
145:
143:
139:
134:
130:
126:
116:
114:
109:
105:
101:
97:
91:
81:
79:
75:
70:
68:
64:
60:
56:
52:
47:
45:
41:
37:
33:
19:
3457:
3429:
3425:
3421:
3403:
3399:
3395:
3377:
3373:
3369:
3351:
3347:
3343:
3328:
3324:
3320:
3305:
3301:
3297:
3282:
3278:
3274:
3263:
3259:
3255:
3240:
3236:
3232:
3221:
3217:
3213:
3200:
3188:
3177:
3173:
3169:
3158:
3154:
3150:
3139:
3135:
3131:
3120:
3116:
3112:
3101:
3097:
3079:
3075:
3071:
3060:
3056:
3052:
3041:
3037:
3033:
3022:
3018:
3014:
3003:
2999:
2995:
2984:
2980:
2976:
2965:
2961:
2957:
2946:
2942:
2938:
2927:
2923:
2919:
2908:
2904:
2900:
2889:
2885:
2881:
2873:
2868:
2860:
2838:
2834:
2822:
2818:
2806:
2790:
2781:
2773:
2769:
2761:
2757:
2734:
2725:
2716:
2707:
2698:
2689:
2680:
2669:. Retrieved
2665:
2656:
2645:. Retrieved
2641:
2632:
2621:. Retrieved
2617:
2608:
2597:. Retrieved
2593:
2584:
2573:. Retrieved
2569:
2560:
2549:. Retrieved
2545:
2536:
2525:. Retrieved
2521:
2512:
2501:. Retrieved
2497:
2488:
2476:
2472:
2464:
2445:
2441:
2432:
2423:
2414:
2405:
2396:
2387:
2372:
2368:
2361: 12/2013
2353:
2349:
2334:
2330:
2319:
2315:
2304:
2300:
2289:
2285:
2274:
2270:
2256:
2252:
2238:
2234:
2228: 42/2014
2220:
2216:
2201:
2197:
2183:
2179:
2172: 20/2006
2164:
2160:
2152:
2148:
2140:
2136:
2128:
2124:
2117:R. v. R.E.M.
2116:
2112:
2105:R. v. R.E.M.
2104:
2100:
2092:
2088:
2080:
2076:
2068:
2064:
2056:
2052:
2044:
2040:
2032:
2028:
2018:, retrieved
2016:, 2000-11-01
2012:
2006:
1995:. Retrieved
1991:
1981:
1972:
1963:
1955:
1951:
1943:
1939:
1931:
1927:
1915:
1910:
1899:. Retrieved
1895:
1886:
1875:. Retrieved
1871:
1862:
1851:. Retrieved
1847:
1838:
1826:
1821:
1810:. Retrieved
1806:
1782:
1777:
1765:
1760:
1749:. Retrieved
1745:
1736:
1725:. Retrieved
1716:
1705:. Retrieved
1701:
1692:
1681:. Retrieved
1677:
1654:. Retrieved
1650:
1641:
1630:. Retrieved
1608:
1604:
1596:
1591:
1583:
1579:
1571:
1553:. Retrieved
1549:
1540:
1532:
1528:
1520:
1505:
1501:
1493:
1489:
1481:
1464:
1459:
1451:
1436:
1431:
1420:. Retrieved
1416:
1396:
1391:
1383:
1378:
1370:
1365:
1357:
1352:
1340:
1336:
1324:
1320:
1308:
1304:
1292:
1288:
1280:
1275:
1266:
1260:
1248:. Retrieved
1233:
1212:
1191:
1187:
1175:. Retrieved
1160:
1150:
1092:
1087:
1085:
1082:Saudi Arabia
1069:
1065:
1063:
1054:Constitution
1047:
1039:
1033:
1027:
1022:
1015:
1004:
998:
989:
982:
976:res judicata
972:
968:
963:
959:
957:
936:
931:
929:
915:
909:
903:
897:
892:
890:
879:
873:
867:
861:
854:
852:
844:
836:
800:
780:Pang Kin-kee
771:
769:
751:
749:
731:
729:
724:
720:
716:
712:
706:
697:
691:
686:
682:
678:
672:
662:
660:
643:
641:
630:
624:
618:
613:
609:
601:
567:
565:
551:
545:
540:
519:
504:Saskatchewan
493:
486:
482:
481:
477:
466:
454:
450:
434:
422:Saskatchewan
405:
374:
283:
223:
219:
215:
166:
157:
154:
151:
122:
112:
107:
103:
99:
95:
93:
71:
66:
62:
49:Speakers of
48:
35:
29:
2380: 5/2008
1100:trial court
1096:trial court
797:New Zealand
500:garnishment
469:garnishment
424:), and the
400:, while in
311:deciding a
78:court order
44:court order
2671:2024-04-25
2647:2024-04-25
2623:2024-04-25
2599:2024-04-25
2575:2024-04-25
2551:2024-04-25
2527:2024-04-25
2503:2024-04-25
2020:2019-11-11
1997:2019-11-11
1901:2024-04-25
1877:2024-04-25
1853:2024-04-25
1812:2024-04-25
1751:2024-04-25
1727:2024-05-10
1707:2024-04-19
1683:2024-04-19
1656:2024-04-19
1632:2024-05-10
1555:2023-12-12
1422:2024-04-25
1329:"Judgment"
1313:"Judgment"
1297:"Judgment"
1143:References
827:High Court
815:High Court
532:Common law
514:See also:
496:California
430:California
388:such as a
382:common law
274:See also:
257:and a new
88:See also:
3220:(Japan),
1546:"vacatur"
1122:Plaintiff
1112:Defendant
949:Civil law
853:Further,
655:Gladys Li
638:Hong Kong
537:Australia
522:countries
402:civil law
394:territory
317:precedent
298:precedent
186:judgment.
108:Judgement
100:judgement
3474:Category
3436:Archived
3410:Archived
3384:Archived
3358:Archived
3336:WIPO Lex
3313:WIPO Lex
3290:WIPO Lex
3248:WIPO Lex
3078:(Ger.),
1231:(2011).
1158:(2011).
1106:See also
993:judgment
991:Ex parte
825:and the
390:province
352:outcome.
220:"c.a.v."
104:judgment
96:judgment
84:Spelling
67:judgment
36:judgment
1068:). The
1012:Germany
941:of the
473:bailiff
462:bailiff
458:sheriff
414:Germany
375:When a
347:of the
214:phrase
63:opinion
2375:,
2356:,
2337:,
2322:,
2307:,
2292:,
2277:,
2259:,
2241:,
2223:,
2204:,
2186:,
2167:,
1241:
1168:
954:France
646:, the
596:Quebec
418:Canada
364:judges
345:judges
335:judges
309:judges
204:appeal
200:appeal
125:judges
2479:
1060:Japan
1050:Italy
1044:Italy
986:case.
396:, or
377:court
360:judge
349:court
331:judge
321:court
286:judge
259:trial
241:court
237:trial
212:Latin
129:court
127:in a
40:court
2378:FACC
2359:FAMC
2340:CACV
2262:CACV
2244:HCAL
2226:HCAL
2207:HCAL
2189:CACV
2170:FACV
1252:2023
1239:ISBN
1179:2023
1166:ISBN
1070:Code
964:Code
937:The
845:The
837:The
813:and
692:The
685:and
602:The
524:and
313:case
290:case
278:and
34:, a
1052:'s
770:In
750:In
730:In
642:In
460:or
444:in
362:or
333:or
255:law
218:or
98:or
72:In
32:law
30:In
3476::
3447:^
3338:).
3315:).
3292:).
3250:).
3090:^
2850:^
2799:^
2743:^
2664:.
2640:.
2616:.
2592:.
2568:.
2544:.
2520:.
2496:.
2453:^
2431:.
2413:.
2395:.
1990:.
1894:.
1870:.
1846:.
1805:.
1794:^
1744:.
1700:.
1676:.
1665:^
1649:.
1616:^
1564:^
1548:.
1513:^
1472:^
1444:^
1415:.
1404:^
1327:,
1311:,
1295:,
1220:^
1201:^
1056:.
809:,
747:.
681:,
464:.
448:.
416:,
392:,
227:,
144:.
57:.
46:.
3464:.
3442:.
3416:.
3390:.
3364:.
3334:(
3311:(
3288:(
3269:.
3246:(
3227:.
3208:.
3183:.
3164:.
3145:.
3126:.
3107:.
3085:.
2674:.
2650:.
2626:.
2602:.
2578:.
2554:.
2530:.
2506:.
2435:.
2417:.
2399:.
2000:.
1922:.
1904:.
1880:.
1856:.
1815:.
1754:.
1730:.
1710:.
1686:.
1659:.
1635:.
1558:.
1425:.
1254:.
1181:.
598:)
428:(
420:(
323:.
265:.
222:(
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.