Knowledge

R (Daily Mail and General Trust plc) v HM Treasury

Source 📝

275:
subsequently modify that connecting factor. Certain States require that not merely the registered office but also the real head office, that is to say the central administration of the company, should be situated on their territory, and the removal of the central administration from that territory thus presupposes the winding-up of the company with all the consequences that winding-up entails in company law and tax law. The legislation of other States permits companies to transfer their central administration to a foreign country but certain of them, such as the
200: 37: 283:
company. Moreover, Article 220 of the Treaty provides for the conclusion, so far as is necessary, of agreements between the Member States with a view to securing inter alia the retention of legal personality in the event of transfer of the registered office of companies from one country to another. No convention in this area has yet come into force.
274:
20 As the Commission has emphasized, the legislation of the Member States varies widely in regard to both the factor providing a connection to the national territory required for the incorporation of a company and the question whether a company incorporated under the legislation of a Member State may
262:
article 49 did not apply, and so the rules requiring UK Treasury permission could operate. Given the wide variation in national laws about the required factor connecting a company to the national territory for the purposes of incorporation, and also the wide variation of national laws on transfer of
241:
and set up a subsidiary or branch in the UK instead. This was to be done for the purpose of selling a significant part of its non-permanent assets and using the sale proceeds to buy its own shares without having to pay the tax normally due on such transactions in the UK. It could not do this without
289:
23 It must therefore be held that the Treaty regards the differences in national legislation concerning the required connecting factor and the question whether - and if so how - the registered office or real head office of a company incorporated under national law may be transferred from one Member
282:
21 The Treaty has taken account of that variety in national legislation. In defining, in Article 58, the companies which enjoy the right of establishment, the Treaty places on the same footing, as connecting factors, the registered office, central administration and principal place of business of a
271:
and, in the present state of Community law, creatures of national law. They exist only by virtue of the varying national legislation which determines their incorporation and functioning.
17: 286:
22 It should be added that none of the directives on the coordination of company law adopted under Article 54(3)(g) of the Treaty deal with the differences at issue here.
279:, make that right subject to certain restrictions, and the legal consequences of a transfer, particularly in regard to taxation, vary from one Member State to another. 533: 290:
State to another as problems which are not resolved by the rules concerning the right of establishment but must be dealt with by future legislation or conventions.
508:
Judgment of the Court of 27 September 1988. The Queen v H. M. Treasury and Commissioners of Inland Revenue, ex parte Daily Mail and General Trust plc. Case 81/87
347: 243: 320: 375: 389: 415: 165: 361: 141: 403: 313: 128: 242:
permission from the UK Treasury. It argued this contravened its right of establishment under (what is now) the
89: 306: 62:
The Queen v H. M. Treasury and Commissioners of Inland Revenue, ex parte Daily Mail and General Trust plc.
427: 507: 79: 457: 41: 220: 191: 263:
a company’s head office from one place to another, companies cannot rely on articles 49 and 54.
445: 267:
19 ... it should be borne in mind that, unlike natural persons, companies are creatures of the
204: 152: 8: 482: 212:
R (Daily Mail and General Trust plc) v HM Treasury and Commissioners of Inland Revenue
160: 136: 298: 203:
The Daily Mail clock, on the Young Street side of the Barkers building just off
276: 527: 237:, was resident in the United Kingdom. It wanted to transfer residence to the 56: 199: 488: 439: 238: 233: 36: 470: 216: 231:
Daily Mail and General Trust plc, owners of the newspaper the
336: 259: 268: 255: 328: 30:R (Daily Mail and General Trust plc) v HM Treasury 525: 534:Court of Justice of the European Union case law 349:R (Daily Mail and General Trust plc) v Treasury 244:Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union 18:R (Daily Mail and General Trust plc) v Treasury 123:High Court of Justice, Queen' s Bench Division 314: 377:Centros Ltd v Erhvervs- og Selskabsstyrelsen 363:Gebhard v Avvocati e Procuratori di Milano 321: 307: 391:Überseering BV v Nordic Construction GmbH 198: 181:Interprets articles 52 and 58 of the EEC 14: 526: 404:Kamer van Koophandel v Inspire Art Ltd 302: 24: 99:Reference for a preliminary ruling 25: 545: 416:Cartesio Oktató és Szolgáltató bt 35: 501: 329:Freedom of establishment cases 13: 1: 515: 7: 294: 249: 10: 550: 458:Demir and Baykara v Turkey 466: 454: 436: 424: 412: 400: 386: 372: 358: 344: 334: 190: 185: 180: 175: 171: 158: 147: 134: 127: 119: 111: 103: 95: 85: 75: 67: 55: 51:Decided 27 September 1988 48: 42:European Court of Justice 34: 29: 495: 226: 221:freedom of establishment 192:Freedom of establishment 223:in the European Union. 49:Submitted 19 March 1987 446:ITWF v Viking Line ABP 292: 207: 205:Kensington High Street 112:Nationality of parties 265: 219:case, concerning the 202: 176:Legislation affecting 153:Lord Mackenzie Stuart 428:Commission v Germany 483:European Union law 208: 120:Procedural history 90:ECLI:EU:C:1988:456 478: 477: 431:(2007) C-112/2005 353:(1988) Case 81/87 197: 196: 129:Court composition 16:(Redirected from 541: 510: 505: 392: 378: 364: 350: 323: 316: 309: 300: 299: 256:Court of Justice 161:Advocate General 137:Judge-Rapporteur 39: 27: 26: 21: 549: 548: 544: 543: 542: 540: 539: 538: 524: 523: 518: 513: 506: 502: 498: 479: 474: 462: 450: 449:(2007) C-438/05 432: 420: 419:(2008) C-210/06 408: 407:(2003) C-167/01 396: 395:(2002) C-208/00 390: 382: 381:(1999) C-212/97 376: 368: 362: 354: 348: 340: 330: 327: 297: 252: 229: 164: 151: 140: 50: 44: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 547: 537: 536: 522: 521: 517: 514: 512: 511: 499: 497: 494: 493: 492: 485: 476: 475: 467: 464: 463: 455: 452: 451: 437: 434: 433: 425: 422: 421: 413: 410: 409: 401: 398: 397: 387: 384: 383: 373: 370: 369: 367:(1995) C-55/94 359: 356: 355: 345: 342: 341: 335: 332: 331: 326: 325: 318: 311: 303: 296: 293: 277:United Kingdom 251: 248: 228: 225: 195: 194: 188: 187: 183: 182: 178: 177: 173: 172: 169: 168: 156: 155: 145: 144: 132: 131: 125: 124: 121: 117: 116: 115:United Kingdom 113: 109: 108: 105: 101: 100: 97: 93: 92: 87: 83: 82: 77: 73: 72: 69: 65: 64: 59: 57:Full case name 53: 52: 46: 45: 40: 32: 31: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 546: 535: 532: 531: 529: 520: 519: 509: 504: 500: 491: 490: 486: 484: 481: 480: 473: 472: 465: 460: 459: 453: 448: 447: 442: 441: 435: 430: 429: 423: 418: 417: 411: 406: 405: 399: 394: 393: 385: 380: 379: 371: 366: 365: 357: 352: 351: 343: 338: 333: 324: 319: 317: 312: 310: 305: 304: 301: 291: 287: 284: 280: 278: 272: 270: 264: 261: 257: 247: 245: 240: 236: 235: 224: 222: 218: 215:(1988) is an 214: 213: 206: 201: 193: 189: 184: 179: 174: 170: 167: 163: 162: 157: 154: 150: 146: 143: 139: 138: 133: 130: 126: 122: 118: 114: 110: 106: 102: 98: 94: 91: 88: 84: 81: 78: 74: 70: 66: 63: 60: 58: 54: 47: 43: 38: 33: 28: 19: 503: 487: 469: 456: 444: 438: 426: 414: 402: 388: 374: 360: 346: 288: 285: 281: 273: 266: 253: 246:article 49. 232: 230: 211: 210: 209: 159: 148: 135: 107:Full chamber 61: 489:Wilson v UK 440:The Rosella 239:Netherlands 80:61987CJ0081 516:References 339:arts 49-55 258:held that 234:Daily Mail 461:ECHR 1345 166:M. Darmon 149:President 96:Case type 528:Category 295:See also 250:Judgment 186:Keywords 104:Chamber 76:CelexID 471:EU law 217:EU law 142:O. Due 496:Notes 227:Facts 71:81/87 468:See 337:TFEU 260:TFEU 254:The 86:ECLI 68:Case 443:or 269:law 530:: 322:e 315:t 308:v 20:)

Index

R (Daily Mail and General Trust plc) v Treasury

European Court of Justice
Full case name
61987CJ0081
ECLI:EU:C:1988:456
Court composition
Judge-Rapporteur
O. Due
Lord Mackenzie Stuart
Advocate General
M. Darmon
Freedom of establishment

Kensington High Street
EU law
freedom of establishment
Daily Mail
Netherlands
Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Court of Justice
TFEU
law
United Kingdom
v
t
e
TFEU
R (Daily Mail and General Trust plc) v Treasury
Gebhard v Avvocati e Procuratori di Milano

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.