144:
438:
595:
35:
573:
540:
397:, examined both the unlimited discretion of the authorities in Opelika to withdraw a license as well as the amount of fees charged in order to get a license. The majority had considered that the amount of fees ($ 25.00 annually in some cases or $ 2.50 per day in others) was irrelevant because the issue had not been argued earlier, but the dissenters thought the amount to be relevant.
377:
tracts as a source of funds, the financial aspects of their transactions need not be wholly disregarded. To subject any religious or didactic group to a reasonable fee for their money-making activities does not require a finding that the licensed acts are purely commercial. It is enough that money is earned by the sale of articles.
414:
was now wrongly decided. The three justices stated that "our democratic form of government, functioning under the historic Bill of Rights, has a high responsibility to accommodate itselfto the religious views of minorities, however unpopular and unorthodox those views may be," and that "he First
376:
wrote that individual rights must be balanced against competing rights of the state. He asserted that the fact that a person is engaged in disseminating religious materials does not place his action above regulation by the state. When people choose to use the vending of their religious books and
380:
When traditional means of distribution are used by religious groups, they can be held to the same standards as non-religious groups. The court held that Jones had no standing to challenge that part of the statute because he did not have a license that was revoked arbitrarily by the state.
468:
The decision forced religious groups to meet the same requirements as nonreligious groups engaged in a similar activity. The fact that they were selling religious materials did not exempt them from statutes regulating commercial acts.
335:
held that a statute prohibiting the sale of books without a license was constitutional because it covered not a religious ritual but only individuals who engaged in a commercial activity.
347:, charged Jones with violating a statute by selling books without a license. All licenses were subject to immediate revocation by the city without requiring advance notice. Jones, a
709:
704:
689:
610:
560:
527:
504:
185:
694:
56:
49:
719:
318:
599:
408:, and Murphy also penned a separate opinion, denoted as a dissent, in which they argued that they now believed the Supreme Court's decision in
421:
699:
99:
71:
684:
491:
78:
410:
415:
Amendment does not put the right freely to exercise religion in a subordinate position. One year later, the Court overruled
85:
495:; a state may not prohibit distribution of religious handbills where handbills seek to raise funds in a lawful fashion.
332:
148:
118:
67:
17:
449:
714:
657:
92:
724:
639:
45:
648:
621:
614:
564:
531:
177:
167:
Jones v. City of
Opelika, Bowden et al. v. City of Fort Smith, Ark. Jobin v. State of Arizona
630:
352:
348:
8:
373:
356:
235:
192:
567:
534:
405:
247:
267:
243:
344:
180:
259:
215:
678:
577:
544:
394:
390:
255:
223:
437:
401:
231:
196:
666:
34:
594:
576:
This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the
543:
This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the
143:
389:
The two principal dissenting opinions, by Chief
Justice
505:
List of United States
Supreme Court cases, volume 316
489:(1942) on the basis of the principles articulated in
284:
Reed, joined by
Roberts, Frankfurter, Byrnes, Jackson
705:
United States
Supreme Court cases of the Stone Court
710:
Jehovah's
Witnesses litigation in the United States
690:United States free exercise of religion case law
676:
331:, 316 U.S. 584 (1942), was a case in which the
422:West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette
695:United States Free Speech Clause case law
485:, 319 U.S. 103 (1943), the Court vacated
119:Learn how and when to remove this message
720:Christianity and law in the 20th century
600:Jones v. City of Opelika (316 U.S. 584)
492:Murdock v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
300:Murphy, joined by Stone, Black, Douglas
292:Stone, joined by Murphy, Black, Douglas
14:
677:
411:Minersville School District v. Gobitis
384:
55:Please improve this article by adding
472:
131:1942 United States Supreme Court case
432:
28:
367:
24:
372:Writing for the majority, Justice
351:, alleged that his rights to both
333:Supreme Court of the United States
149:Supreme Court of the United States
25:
736:
700:United States Supreme Court cases
617:584 (1942) is available from:
587:
156:Argued February 5, April 30, 1942
593:
571:
538:
436:
142:
33:
685:1942 in United States case law
550:
517:
13:
1:
510:
483:Jones v. City of Opelika (II)
338:
57:secondary or tertiary sources
7:
498:
362:
10:
741:
428:
68:"Jones v. City of Opelika"
317:
312:
304:
296:
288:
280:
275:
209:
204:
172:
162:
155:
141:
136:
607:Jones v. City of Opelika
557:Jones v. City of Opelika
524:Jones v. City of Opelika
487:Jones v. City of Opelika
328:Jones v. City of Opelika
137:Jones v. City of Opelika
308:Black, Douglas, Murphy
44:relies excessively on
477:In the one paragraph
353:freedom of the press
319:U.S. Const. amend. I
158:Decided June 8, 1942
715:Lee County, Alabama
658:Library of Congress
385:Dissenting opinions
357:freedom of religion
191:62 S. Ct. 1231; 86
473:Subsequent history
448:. You can help by
406:William O. Douglas
248:William O. Douglas
220:Associate Justices
598:Works related to
466:
465:
349:Jehovah's Witness
324:
323:
268:Robert H. Jackson
244:Felix Frankfurter
129:
128:
121:
103:
16:(Redirected from
732:
725:1942 in religion
671:
665:
662:
656:
653:
647:
644:
638:
635:
629:
626:
620:
597:
581:
575:
574:
554:
548:
542:
541:
521:
461:
458:
440:
433:
368:Majority opinion
345:Opelika, Alabama
205:Court membership
146:
145:
134:
133:
124:
117:
113:
110:
104:
102:
61:
37:
29:
21:
18:Jones v. Opelika
740:
739:
735:
734:
733:
731:
730:
729:
675:
674:
669:
663:
660:
654:
651:
645:
642:
636:
633:
627:
624:
618:
590:
585:
584:
572:
555:
551:
539:
522:
518:
513:
501:
475:
462:
456:
453:
446:needs expansion
431:
387:
370:
365:
359:were violated.
341:
260:James F. Byrnes
258:
246:
236:Stanley F. Reed
234:
216:Harlan F. Stone
200:
157:
151:
132:
125:
114:
108:
105:
62:
60:
54:
50:primary sources
38:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
738:
728:
727:
722:
717:
712:
707:
702:
697:
692:
687:
673:
672:
640:Google Scholar
603:
589:
588:External links
586:
583:
582:
549:
515:
514:
512:
509:
508:
507:
500:
497:
474:
471:
464:
463:
443:
441:
430:
427:
386:
383:
369:
366:
364:
361:
340:
337:
322:
321:
315:
314:
310:
309:
306:
302:
301:
298:
294:
293:
290:
286:
285:
282:
278:
277:
273:
272:
271:
270:
221:
218:
213:
207:
206:
202:
201:
190:
174:
170:
169:
164:
163:Full case name
160:
159:
153:
152:
147:
139:
138:
130:
127:
126:
41:
39:
32:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
737:
726:
723:
721:
718:
716:
713:
711:
708:
706:
703:
701:
698:
696:
693:
691:
688:
686:
683:
682:
680:
668:
659:
650:
641:
632:
623:
622:CourtListener
616:
612:
608:
604:
602:at Wikisource
601:
596:
592:
591:
579:
578:public domain
570: (1943).
569:
566:
562:
558:
553:
546:
545:public domain
537: (1942).
536:
533:
529:
525:
520:
516:
506:
503:
502:
496:
494:
493:
488:
484:
480:
470:
460:
451:
447:
444:This section
442:
439:
435:
434:
426:
424:
423:
418:
413:
412:
407:
403:
398:
396:
392:
382:
378:
375:
360:
358:
354:
350:
346:
336:
334:
330:
329:
320:
316:
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
276:Case opinions
274:
269:
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
222:
219:
217:
214:
212:Chief Justice
211:
210:
208:
203:
198:
194:
188:
187:
182:
179:
175:
171:
168:
165:
161:
154:
150:
140:
135:
123:
120:
112:
101:
98:
94:
91:
87:
84:
80:
77:
73:
70: –
69:
65:
64:Find sources:
58:
52:
51:
47:
42:This article
40:
36:
31:
30:
27:
19:
606:
556:
552:
523:
519:
490:
486:
482:
478:
476:
467:
454:
450:adding to it
445:
420:
416:
409:
399:
395:Frank Murphy
393:and Justice
391:Harlan Stone
388:
379:
371:
343:The city of
342:
327:
326:
325:
313:Laws applied
263:
256:Frank Murphy
251:
239:
227:
224:Owen Roberts
184:
166:
115:
106:
96:
89:
82:
75:
63:
43:
26:
195:1691; 1942
109:August 2019
679:Categories
667:OpenJurist
511:References
479:per curiam
402:Hugo Black
339:Background
232:Hugo Black
197:U.S. LEXIS
79:newspapers
46:references
481:decision
457:June 2008
400:Justices
173:Citations
605:Text of
499:See also
363:Decision
281:Majority
631:Findlaw
429:Effects
417:Gobitis
305:Dissent
297:Dissent
289:Dissent
93:scholar
670:
664:
661:
655:
652:
649:Justia
646:
643:
637:
634:
628:
625:
619:
559:,
526:,
266:
264:·
262:
254:
252:·
250:
242:
240:·
238:
230:
228:·
226:
193:L. Ed.
95:
88:
81:
74:
66:
613:
563:
530:
100:JSTOR
86:books
615:U.S.
565:U.S.
532:U.S.
374:Reed
355:and
186:more
178:U.S.
176:316
72:news
611:316
568:103
561:319
535:584
528:316
452:.
419:in
199:447
181:584
48:to
681::
609:,
425:.
404:,
59:.
580:.
547:.
459:)
455:(
189:)
183:(
122:)
116:(
111:)
107:(
97:·
90:·
83:·
76:·
53:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
