170:
England, juries also handed down rulings on the law in addition to rulings on the facts of the case. The
American grand jury was also indispensable to the American Revolution by challenging the Crown and Parliament, including by indicting British soldiers, refusing to indict people who criticized the crown, proposing boycotts and called for the support of the war after the Declaration of Independence. At the time of the founding of the United States, a grand jury indictment was required for almost all prosecutions and juries rendered the final verdict of almost all criminal and civil cases. During that period counties followed the traditional practice of requiring all decisions be made by at least twelve of the grand jurors, (e.g., for a twenty-three-person grand jury, twelve people would constitute a bare majority). Any citizen could bring a matter before a grand jury directly, from a public work that needed repair, to the delinquent conduct of a public official, to a complaint of a crime, and grand juries could conduct their own investigations. In that era most criminal prosecutions were conducted by private parties, either a law enforcement officer, a lawyer hired by a crime victim or their family, or even by laymen. A layman could bring a bill of indictment to the grand jury; if the grand jury found there was sufficient evidence for a trial, that the act was a crime under law, and that the court had jurisdiction, it would return the indictment to the complainant. The grand jury would then appoint the complaining party to exercise the authority of an attorney general, that is, one having a
131:
248:
31:
328:
proficiency, or other eligibility factors. They typically only appear in court a few days a month and meet in secret to protect jurors from intimidation or smear campaigns, prevent any innocent people from being subjected to unfounded charges, not to tip-off targets of an investigation who may be a flight risk, reduce the likelihood of witness tampering before a future trial, and encourage witnesses to be more forthcoming. Witnesses can typically reveal what occurred when they testified.
307:, grand juries are required to issue an indictment in felony cases. They are composed of 16 to 23 people who serve for a fixed term which varies depending on the county. These grand juries hear many different cases during their session. In addition to the well-known criminal functions they carry out, grand juries may also perform civil investigations; they may then issue a report, officially called a general presentment, or in some cases a special presentment.
230:(accusation) presented, by a competent public officer on their oath of office, must be a plain, concise, and definite written statement of the essential facts constituting the offense charged, and must give the official or customary citation of the statute, rule, regulation, or other provision of law that the defendant is alleged to have violated. If the grand jury returns an indictment, it must satisfy the same criteria.
117:, which resolves a particular civil or criminal case, a grand jury (typically having twelve to twenty-three members) serves as a group for a sustained period of time in all or many of the cases that come up in the jurisdiction, generally under the supervision of a federal U.S. attorney, a county district attorney, or a state attorney-general, and hears evidence
345:
reduces the accountability and transparency into the process, including for grand jurors who may want to respond to commentary after submitting their decision. Also, the grand juries may not be representative of the community and tend to be made up of older, more educated and wealthier citizens, though some counties use regular jury rolls for grand juries.
348:
Suja A. Thomas argues that juries (including grand juries) were intended by the founders as a co-equal check on the other branches of government such as the executive branch (prosecutors), the judicial branch (judges), the legislature and states, but that these other branches of government had taken
344:
Some criticize the process as being too easy to reach an indictment and that the
District Attorney usually directs the investigation and that prosecutors are allowed to withhold evidence favorable to the defendant. Others argue that defendants should be allowed to have a lawyer present, that secrecy
287:
Only about half require a grand jury indictment to commence a criminal prosecution, and among those, many limit the requirement to felonies or even certain types of felonies. Suja A. Thomas argues that all states should be required to use Grand Juries per the constitution, and that jury rights are
238:
A grand jury's constitutional role is to prevent prosecutorial misconduct, verifying that the presented information (accusation) is sufficient evidence to pursue a prosecution. To achieve this, a grand jury is given investigative powers such as being able to issue subpoenas and compel witnesses to
331:
They are rarely read any instruction on the law, as this is not a requirement; their job is only to judge on what the prosecutor produced. The prosecutor drafts the charges and decides which witnesses to call. Individuals in grand jury proceedings can be charged with holding the court in contempt
327:
Typically between 16 and 23 grand jurors are drawn at random from lists of registered voters, actual voters or a similar list (typically the same one that is used for trial jurors). Unlike potential jurors in regular trials, grand jurors are not screened for bias, just for felony status, language
169:
grand juries played a major role in public matters. In the late 18th century, colonial civil, criminal and grand juries played major roles in checking the power of the executive, the legislature and the judiciary. In some
American colonies (such as in New England and Virginia) and less often in
340:
Former
Arizona prosecutor Paul Charlton described grand juries as taking on a more independent and hands-on approach in newsworthy or politically sensitive probes like those involving public corruption, while generally letting the prosecutors lead on cases like bank robberies.
239:
testify without a lawyer present. In practice, a grand jury is sometimes used to extend rather than restrict prosecutorial power, when prosecutors may not have enough evidence to pursue a prosecution and want to see whether a grand jury can secure sufficient evidence.
310:
Georgia law also provides for the formation of special purpose grand juries. Special purpose grand juries are different from regular grand juries in that they are focused on a single topic, may be empaneled for longer, and most importantly, since
349:
almost all of the jury's power by the 21st century. She further argues that juries are more impartial than judges and other decision-makers because they are free from political or status incentives to rule a certain way.
530:
255:
United States law also provides for the formation of special grand juries. While a regular grand jury primarily decides whether to bring charges, a special grand jury is called into existence to investigate whether
278:
in every judicial district having more than four million inhabitants must impanel a special grand jury at least once every 18 months as well as upon request by a designated official of the
Justice Department.
211:
governs grand juries. It requires grand juries to be composed of 16 to 23 members and that 12 members must concur in an indictment. A grand jury is instructed to return an indictment if the
1056:
oday, the grand jury is the total captive of the prosecutor who, if he is candid, will concede that he can indict anybody, at any time, for almost anything, before any grand jury.
1087:
There's a facetious saying in legal circles about the ease with which prosecutors can secure indictments in grand jury cases: You can get a grand jury to "indict a ham sandwich."
1703:
1943:
1799:
1639:
911:
1435:
1863:
291:
The size of the grand jury and the number of grand jurors required to issue an indictment varies among the states and even, at times, within a single state. A
1100:
106:
As of 1971, generally speaking, a grand jury may issue an indictment for a crime, also known as a "true bill," only if it verifies that those presenting had
454:
1839:
1225:
157:
Some states have "civil grand juries," "investigating grand juries," or the equivalent, to oversee and investigate civil issues instead of criminal ones.
147:
1823:
531:"How do grand juries work? Their major role in criminal justice, and why prosecutors are using them to investigate efforts to overturn the 2020 election"
1266:
1257:
1269:
199:. A valid waiver must be made in open court and after the defendant has been advised of the nature of the charge and of the defendant's rights.
1208:
945:
1069:
455:"Seeing Is Believing: The Impact of Jury Service on Attitudes Toward Legal Institutions and the Implications for International Jury Reform"
1184:
364:
2034:
103:
also uses the system similar to civil grand juries used by some U.S. states to investigate corruption and other more systemic issues.
2054:
130:
588:
1008:
1738:
1161:
1136:
891:
671:
643:
618:
395:
1250:
208:
690:
The grand jury: considered from an historical, political and legal standpoint, and the law and practice relating thereto
266:
260:
is occurring in the community in which it sits. This could include, for instance, organized drug activity or organized
17:
860:
698:
1887:
1483:
332:(punishable with incarceration for the remaining term of the grand jury) if they refuse to appear before the jury.
182:. By the 21st century, the grand jury had lost almost all of its power as a check on other branches of government.
419:
1663:
1243:
1154:
The missing
American jury: restoring the fundamental constitutional role of the criminal, civil, and grand juries
1129:
The missing
American jury: restoring the fundamental constitutional role of the criminal, civil, and grand juries
884:
The missing
American jury: restoring the fundamental constitutional role of the criminal, civil, and grand juries
664:
The missing
American jury: restoring the fundamental constitutional role of the criminal, civil, and grand juries
636:
The missing
American jury: restoring the fundamental constitutional role of the criminal, civil, and grand juries
611:
The missing American jury: restoring the fundamental constitutional role of the criminal, civil, and grand juries
469:
830:
295:
of jurors, such as two-third or three-fourths, is usually needed to recommend an indictment or criminal charge.
1550:
1235:
2044:
1687:
1620:
1384:
288:
the only rights from the Bill of Rights that the Supreme Court has not insisted that states must protect.
1427:
765:
745:
146:
The federal government is required to use grand juries for all felonies, though not misdemeanors, by the
1975:
1903:
1312:
798:
780:
720:
178:. The advent of official public prosecutors in the later decades of the 19th century largely displaced
912:"Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About Georgia Special Purpose Grand Juries But Were Afraid to Ask"
319:
190, 2011), may not issue indictments; instead they issue a presentment which usually becomes public.
2049:
1787:
1451:
1328:
1027:
1895:
1754:
1213:
949:
316:
171:
57:
1218:
953:
1935:
1695:
1585:
1518:
1510:
1443:
1344:
1074:
264:
in government. These lengthier cases may have jurors meet for up to three years. As provided in
1919:
1569:
1542:
1534:
1467:
1408:
1400:
1365:
27:
Groups of citizens empowered by United States federal or state law to conduct legal proceedings
385:
1967:
1807:
1679:
1577:
1296:
358:
247:
175:
1730:
1601:
304:
261:
8:
1959:
1927:
1879:
1871:
1831:
1647:
1491:
1229:
275:
179:
151:
30:
1911:
1847:
1815:
1762:
1746:
1336:
1047:
174:
to represent the state in the case. The grand jury served to screen out incompetent or
124:
35:
1951:
1655:
1593:
1475:
1157:
1132:
916:
887:
806:
694:
667:
639:
614:
429:
391:
65:
563:
270:
1999:
1855:
1722:
1671:
1105:
1039:
215:
standard has been met. The grand jury's decision is either a "true bill" (formerly
760:
740:
453:
Gastil, John; Fukurai, Hiroshi; Anderson, Kent; Nolan, Mark (September 13, 2014).
2039:
1991:
1526:
1459:
1392:
1009:"Inside the unusually aggressive Arizona grand jury that indicted Trump's allies"
688:
257:
150:. All states can use them, but only half actually do with the others using only
1983:
1320:
212:
196:
107:
2028:
2007:
1304:
1265:
810:
433:
292:
166:
54:
43:
982:
135:
861:"Legislating New Federalism: The Call for Grand Jury Reform in the States"
80:
589:"DeKalb judge keeps grand jury report from public but allows CEO access"
384:
Zapf, Patricia A.; Roesch, Ronald; Hart, Stephen D. (December 4, 2009).
87:. Today, the United States is one of only two jurisdictions, along with
1051:
424:
220:
114:
96:
92:
84:
76:
61:
83:
and spread through colonization to other jurisdictions as part of the
1070:"'Indict a Ham Sandwich' Remains on the Menu for Judges, Prosecutors"
1043:
1101:"The Judge Who Coined "Indict a Ham Sandwich" Was Himself Indicted"
119:
110:
to believe that a crime has been committed by a criminal suspect.
886:. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. pp. 159, 162โ3.
139:
88:
361: โ Randomly-selected people to deliberate on public issues
39:
227:
741:"Rule Fed. R. Crim. P. 7. The Indictment and the Information"
100:
69:
1197:โ Supports and promotes California's Civil Grand Jury system
638:. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. pp. 15โ16.
72:
and determining whether criminal charges should be brought.
1131:. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. pp. 3โ6.
666:. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. pp. 1โ2.
452:
1188:
613:. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. p. 24.
1156:. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. p. 7.
202:
687:
Edwards, George John (1906). Richard H. Ward (ed.).
494:
Cook, Joseph P. (1971), "Probable Cause to Arrest",
420:"It's Time to Abolish Grand Juries Once and for All"
1232:
on the history of grand juries in the United States
1194:
1007:Swan, Betsy Woodruff; Cheney, Kyle (May 10, 2024).
721:"If It's Not a Runaway, It's Not a Real Grand Jury"
367: โ Periods of democratic decline in the U.S.
195:The grand jury right may be waived, including by
148:Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution
2026:
383:
251:A special grand jury, photographed in May 1922
1786:
1251:
987:Civil Grand Jurors' Association of California
837:. US Attorneys Manual โ Department of Justice
417:
905:
903:
418:Shapiro, Chava; Clark, James (2023-09-27).
365:Democratic backsliding in the United States
1364:
1258:
1244:
1006:
940:
938:
936:
934:
761:"Rule Fed. R. Crim. P. 6. The Grand Jury"
1025:
900:
246:
129:
29:
980:
686:
14:
2027:
1151:
1126:
1067:
981:Jameson, Marianne (October 26, 2004).
931:
881:
858:
831:"158. Impaneling Special Grand Juries"
693:. University of Michigan: G.T. Bisel.
661:
633:
608:
1785:
1739:Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. Resweber
1363:
1282:
1281:
1239:
1098:
976:
974:
972:
970:
909:
854:
852:
735:
733:
657:
655:
604:
602:
242:
233:
1195:California Grand Jurors' Association
558:
556:
554:
552:
550:
524:
522:
520:
518:
516:
514:
493:
190:
53:are groups of citizens empowered by
875:
528:
390:. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. p. 182.
209:Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
203:Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
24:
1209:"FAQs about the Grand Jury System"
967:
946:"FAQs about the Grand Jury System"
849:
730:
652:
599:
446:
68:, chiefly investigating potential
25:
2066:
2035:Grand juries in the United States
1173:
1099:Levin, Josh (November 25, 2014).
547:
511:
127:involvement in the proceedings).
51:Grand juries in the United States
2055:United States criminal procedure
1484:Bravo-Fernandez v. United States
1217:. March 24, 2010. Archived from
1185:U.S. Federal Grand Jury Handbook
910:Bower, Anna (October 17, 2022).
727:, Vol. 33, No. 4, 1999โ2000, 821
1145:
1120:
1092:
1061:
1019:
1000:
983:"History of Civil Grand Juries"
823:
791:
781:"How Federal Grand Juries Work"
773:
753:
714:
680:
34:A grand jury investigating the
627:
581:
487:
411:
377:
185:
13:
1:
1267:United States Fifth Amendment
1032:J. Crim. L. & Criminology
1026:Campbell, William J. (1973).
859:Decker, John F. (Fall 2005).
371:
335:
282:
1688:Puerto Rico v. Sanchez Valle
1621:Blockburger v. United States
1385:Blockburger v. United States
1178:
1068:Zimmer, Ben (June 1, 2018).
529:Joy, Peter A. (2022-07-27).
165:In the early decades of the
91:, that continues to use the
7:
1428:United States v. Randenbush
766:Legal Information Institute
746:Legal Information Institute
387:Forensic Psychology and Law
352:
134:Federal grand jury for the
10:
2071:
1976:J. D. B. v. North Carolina
1904:Dickerson v. United States
1313:Wong Wing v. United States
1028:"Eliminate the Grand Jury"
593:WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta
564:"What is a US grand jury?"
322:
298:
160:
1888:Mitchell v. United States
1794:
1788:Self-Incrimination Clause
1781:
1714:
1632:Dual sovereignty doctrine
1631:
1612:
1561:
1502:
1452:Fong Foo v. United States
1419:
1377:Meaning of "same offense"
1376:
1372:
1359:
1329:United States v. Moreland
1291:
1277:
508:, 379 U.S. 89, 91 (1964).
226:Rule 7 requires that the
172:general power of attorney
123:(i.e. without suspect or
1896:United States v. Hubbell
1755:North Carolina v. Pearce
1704:Denezpi v. United States
1664:United States v. Wheeler
1214:American Bar Association
1201:
1152:Thomas, Suja A. (2016).
1127:Thomas, Suja A. (2016).
950:American Bar Association
882:Thomas, Suja A. (2016).
662:Thomas, Suja A. (2016).
634:Thomas, Suja A. (2016).
609:Thomas, Suja A. (2016).
1944:Corley v. United States
1936:United States v. Patane
1800:Curcio v. United States
1696:Gamble v. United States
1586:United States v. Dinitz
1519:Ludwig v. Massachusetts
1511:United States v. Wilson
1444:Burton v. United States
1345:United States v. Cotton
1075:The Wall Street Journal
1920:Yarborough v. Alvarado
1640:United States v. Lanza
1570:United States v. Perez
1551:Smith v. United States
1543:United States v. Dixon
1535:United States v. Felix
1468:Burks v. United States
1409:United States v. Dixon
1401:United States v. Felix
1366:Double Jeopardy Clause
799:"Who Is a Grand Jury?"
252:
223:), or "no true bill".
176:malicious prosecutions
143:
47:
1968:Berghuis v. Thompkins
1808:Griffin v. California
1680:United States v. Lara
1578:United States v. Jorn
1436:Ball v. United States
1297:Hurtado v. California
496:Vanderbilt Law Review
468:: 126. Archived from
250:
133:
79:originated under the
33:
1864:Doe v. United States
1731:Palko v. Connecticut
1602:Blueford v. Arkansas
1228:by Susan Brenner in
989:(Reference material)
725:Creighton Law Review
180:private prosecutions
152:preliminary hearings
2045:Deliberative groups
1960:Maryland v. Shatzer
1928:Missouri v. Seibert
1880:McNeil v. Wisconsin
1872:Illinois v. Perkins
1832:Williams v. Florida
1648:Bartkus v. Illinois
1613:Multiple punishment
1492:McElrath v. Georgia
1230:Virginia Law Review
865:Oklahoma Law Review
787:. October 26, 2005.
769:. 30 November 2011.
595:. 12 February 2013.
475:on 26 February 2015
276:U.S. District Court
95:to screen criminal
1912:Chavez v. Martinez
1848:Edwards v. Arizona
1840:Michigan v. Tucker
1816:Miranda v. Arizona
1763:Benton v. Maryland
1747:Baxstrom v. Herold
1337:Beck v. Washington
1270:criminal procedure
359:Citizens' assembly
253:
243:Special grand jury
234:Investigatory role
219:, resulting in an
144:
125:person of interest
48:
36:Arcadia Hotel fire
18:Federal grand jury
2022:
2021:
2018:
2017:
1952:Florida v. Powell
1824:Boulden v. Holman
1777:
1776:
1773:
1772:
1656:Waller v. Florida
1594:Oregon v. Kennedy
1476:Evans v. Michigan
1355:
1354:
1163:978-1-107-05565-0
1138:978-1-107-05565-0
956:on April 24, 2011
893:978-1-316-61803-5
673:978-1-107-05565-0
645:978-1-107-05565-0
620:978-1-107-05565-0
397:978-0-470-57039-5
191:Grand Jury Clause
66:legal proceedings
46:in December 1913.
16:(Redirected from
2062:
2050:Direct democracy
2000:Salinas v. Texas
1856:Oregon v. Elstad
1783:
1782:
1723:Ex parte Bigelow
1672:Heath v. Alabama
1503:After conviction
1374:
1373:
1361:
1360:
1279:
1278:
1260:
1253:
1246:
1237:
1236:
1222:
1168:
1167:
1149:
1143:
1142:
1124:
1118:
1117:
1115:
1113:
1096:
1090:
1089:
1084:
1082:
1065:
1059:
1058:
1023:
1017:
1016:
1004:
998:
997:
995:
994:
978:
965:
964:
962:
961:
952:. Archived from
942:
929:
928:
926:
924:
907:
898:
897:
879:
873:
872:
856:
847:
846:
844:
842:
827:
821:
820:
818:
817:
795:
789:
788:
777:
771:
770:
757:
751:
750:
737:
728:
718:
712:
711:
709:
707:
684:
678:
677:
659:
650:
649:
631:
625:
624:
606:
597:
596:
585:
579:
578:
576:
575:
570:. March 13, 2023
560:
545:
544:
542:
541:
535:The Conversation
526:
509:
503:
491:
485:
484:
482:
480:
474:
459:
450:
444:
443:
441:
440:
415:
409:
408:
406:
404:
381:
313:Kenerly v. State
273:
70:criminal conduct
21:
2070:
2069:
2065:
2064:
2063:
2061:
2060:
2059:
2025:
2024:
2023:
2014:
1992:Howes v. Fields
1790:
1769:
1710:
1627:
1608:
1557:
1527:Grady v. Corbin
1498:
1460:Ashe v. Swenson
1420:After acquittal
1415:
1393:Grady v. Corbin
1368:
1351:
1287:
1273:
1264:
1207:
1204:
1181:
1176:
1171:
1164:
1150:
1146:
1139:
1125:
1121:
1111:
1109:
1097:
1093:
1080:
1078:
1066:
1062:
1044:10.2307/1142987
1024:
1020:
1005:
1001:
992:
990:
979:
968:
959:
957:
944:
943:
932:
922:
920:
908:
901:
894:
880:
876:
871:: 341, 354โ355.
857:
850:
840:
838:
829:
828:
824:
815:
813:
797:
796:
792:
779:
778:
774:
759:
758:
754:
739:
738:
731:
723:, Roger Roots,
719:
715:
705:
703:
701:
685:
681:
674:
660:
653:
646:
632:
628:
621:
607:
600:
587:
586:
582:
573:
571:
562:
561:
548:
539:
537:
527:
512:
492:
488:
478:
476:
472:
457:
451:
447:
438:
436:
416:
412:
402:
400:
398:
382:
378:
374:
355:
338:
325:
301:
285:
265:
258:organized crime
245:
236:
205:
193:
188:
163:
64:law to conduct
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
2068:
2058:
2057:
2052:
2047:
2042:
2037:
2020:
2019:
2016:
2015:
2013:
2012:
2004:
1996:
1988:
1984:Bobby v. Dixon
1980:
1972:
1964:
1956:
1948:
1940:
1932:
1924:
1916:
1908:
1900:
1892:
1884:
1876:
1868:
1860:
1852:
1844:
1836:
1828:
1820:
1812:
1804:
1795:
1792:
1791:
1779:
1778:
1775:
1774:
1771:
1770:
1768:
1767:
1759:
1751:
1743:
1735:
1727:
1718:
1716:
1712:
1711:
1709:
1708:
1700:
1692:
1684:
1676:
1668:
1660:
1652:
1644:
1635:
1633:
1629:
1628:
1626:
1625:
1616:
1614:
1610:
1609:
1607:
1606:
1598:
1590:
1582:
1574:
1565:
1563:
1562:After mistrial
1559:
1558:
1556:
1555:
1547:
1539:
1531:
1523:
1515:
1506:
1504:
1500:
1499:
1497:
1496:
1488:
1480:
1472:
1464:
1456:
1448:
1440:
1432:
1423:
1421:
1417:
1416:
1414:
1413:
1405:
1397:
1389:
1380:
1378:
1370:
1369:
1357:
1356:
1353:
1352:
1350:
1349:
1341:
1333:
1325:
1321:Maxwell v. Dow
1317:
1309:
1301:
1292:
1289:
1288:
1275:
1274:
1263:
1262:
1255:
1248:
1240:
1234:
1233:
1223:
1221:on 2011-04-24.
1203:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1192:
1180:
1177:
1175:
1174:External links
1172:
1170:
1169:
1162:
1144:
1137:
1119:
1091:
1060:
1038:(2): 174โ182.
1018:
999:
966:
930:
899:
892:
874:
848:
822:
805:. 1998-08-05.
790:
772:
752:
729:
713:
699:
679:
672:
651:
644:
626:
619:
598:
580:
546:
510:
486:
445:
410:
396:
375:
373:
370:
369:
368:
362:
354:
351:
337:
334:
324:
321:
300:
297:
284:
281:
271:ยง 3331(a)
244:
241:
235:
232:
213:probable cause
207:Rule 6 of the
204:
201:
197:plea agreement
192:
189:
187:
184:
162:
159:
108:probable cause
81:law of England
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2067:
2056:
2053:
2051:
2048:
2046:
2043:
2041:
2038:
2036:
2033:
2032:
2030:
2010:
2009:
2008:Vega v. Tekoh
2005:
2002:
2001:
1997:
1994:
1993:
1989:
1986:
1985:
1981:
1978:
1977:
1973:
1970:
1969:
1965:
1962:
1961:
1957:
1954:
1953:
1949:
1946:
1945:
1941:
1938:
1937:
1933:
1930:
1929:
1925:
1922:
1921:
1917:
1914:
1913:
1909:
1906:
1905:
1901:
1898:
1897:
1893:
1890:
1889:
1885:
1882:
1881:
1877:
1874:
1873:
1869:
1866:
1865:
1861:
1858:
1857:
1853:
1850:
1849:
1845:
1842:
1841:
1837:
1834:
1833:
1829:
1826:
1825:
1821:
1818:
1817:
1813:
1810:
1809:
1805:
1802:
1801:
1797:
1796:
1793:
1789:
1784:
1780:
1765:
1764:
1760:
1757:
1756:
1752:
1749:
1748:
1744:
1741:
1740:
1736:
1733:
1732:
1728:
1725:
1724:
1720:
1719:
1717:
1713:
1706:
1705:
1701:
1698:
1697:
1693:
1690:
1689:
1685:
1682:
1681:
1677:
1674:
1673:
1669:
1666:
1665:
1661:
1658:
1657:
1653:
1650:
1649:
1645:
1642:
1641:
1637:
1636:
1634:
1630:
1623:
1622:
1618:
1617:
1615:
1611:
1604:
1603:
1599:
1596:
1595:
1591:
1588:
1587:
1583:
1580:
1579:
1575:
1572:
1571:
1567:
1566:
1564:
1560:
1553:
1552:
1548:
1545:
1544:
1540:
1537:
1536:
1532:
1529:
1528:
1524:
1521:
1520:
1516:
1513:
1512:
1508:
1507:
1505:
1501:
1494:
1493:
1489:
1486:
1485:
1481:
1478:
1477:
1473:
1470:
1469:
1465:
1462:
1461:
1457:
1454:
1453:
1449:
1446:
1445:
1441:
1438:
1437:
1433:
1430:
1429:
1425:
1424:
1422:
1418:
1411:
1410:
1406:
1403:
1402:
1398:
1395:
1394:
1390:
1387:
1386:
1382:
1381:
1379:
1375:
1371:
1367:
1362:
1358:
1347:
1346:
1342:
1339:
1338:
1334:
1331:
1330:
1326:
1323:
1322:
1318:
1315:
1314:
1310:
1307:
1306:
1305:Ex parte Bain
1302:
1299:
1298:
1294:
1293:
1290:
1285:
1280:
1276:
1271:
1268:
1261:
1256:
1254:
1249:
1247:
1242:
1241:
1238:
1231:
1227:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1215:
1210:
1206:
1205:
1196:
1193:
1190:
1186:
1183:
1182:
1165:
1159:
1155:
1148:
1140:
1134:
1130:
1123:
1108:
1107:
1102:
1095:
1088:
1077:
1076:
1071:
1064:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1033:
1029:
1022:
1014:
1010:
1003:
988:
984:
977:
975:
973:
971:
955:
951:
947:
941:
939:
937:
935:
919:
918:
913:
906:
904:
895:
889:
885:
878:
870:
866:
862:
855:
853:
836:
832:
826:
812:
808:
804:
800:
794:
786:
782:
776:
768:
767:
762:
756:
748:
747:
742:
736:
734:
726:
722:
717:
702:
700:0-404-09113-X
696:
692:
691:
683:
675:
669:
665:
658:
656:
647:
641:
637:
630:
622:
616:
612:
605:
603:
594:
590:
584:
569:
565:
559:
557:
555:
553:
551:
536:
532:
525:
523:
521:
519:
517:
515:
507:
501:
497:
490:
471:
467:
463:
456:
449:
435:
431:
427:
426:
421:
414:
399:
393:
389:
388:
380:
376:
366:
363:
360:
357:
356:
350:
346:
342:
333:
329:
320:
318:
314:
308:
306:
296:
294:
293:supermajority
289:
280:
277:
272:
268:
263:
259:
249:
240:
231:
229:
224:
222:
218:
214:
210:
200:
198:
183:
181:
177:
173:
168:
167:United States
158:
155:
153:
149:
141:
137:
132:
128:
126:
122:
121:
116:
111:
109:
104:
102:
98:
94:
90:
86:
82:
78:
73:
71:
67:
63:
59:
56:
55:United States
52:
45:
44:Massachusetts
41:
37:
32:
19:
2006:
1998:
1990:
1982:
1974:
1966:
1958:
1950:
1942:
1934:
1926:
1918:
1910:
1902:
1894:
1886:
1878:
1870:
1862:
1854:
1846:
1838:
1830:
1822:
1814:
1806:
1798:
1761:
1753:
1745:
1737:
1729:
1721:
1702:
1694:
1686:
1678:
1670:
1662:
1654:
1646:
1638:
1619:
1600:
1592:
1584:
1576:
1568:
1549:
1541:
1533:
1525:
1517:
1509:
1490:
1482:
1474:
1466:
1458:
1450:
1442:
1434:
1426:
1407:
1399:
1391:
1383:
1343:
1335:
1327:
1319:
1311:
1303:
1295:
1283:
1226:1995 Article
1219:the original
1212:
1153:
1147:
1128:
1122:
1110:. Retrieved
1104:
1094:
1086:
1079:. Retrieved
1073:
1063:
1055:
1035:
1031:
1021:
1012:
1002:
991:. Retrieved
986:
958:. Retrieved
954:the original
921:. Retrieved
915:
883:
877:
868:
864:
839:. Retrieved
834:
825:
814:. Retrieved
802:
793:
784:
775:
764:
755:
744:
724:
716:
704:. Retrieved
689:
682:
663:
635:
629:
610:
592:
583:
572:. Retrieved
567:
538:. Retrieved
534:
506:Beck v. Ohio
505:
499:
495:
489:
477:. Retrieved
470:the original
465:
462:Court Review
461:
448:
437:. Retrieved
423:
413:
401:. Retrieved
386:
379:
347:
343:
339:
330:
326:
312:
309:
302:
290:
286:
254:
237:
225:
216:
206:
194:
164:
156:
145:
136:Roy Olmstead
118:
112:
105:
74:
50:
49:
1112:January 15,
1081:January 15,
923:22 December
835:justice.gov
228:information
186:Federal law
97:indictments
2029:Categories
1284:Grand Jury
993:2024-05-18
960:2011-05-11
816:2024-06-18
574:2024-05-13
540:2024-05-13
504:, quoting
479:2 December
439:2024-05-02
425:The Nation
403:2 December
372:References
336:Assessment
283:State laws
262:corruption
221:indictment
217:billa vera
115:petit jury
93:grand jury
85:common law
77:grand jury
1179:Handbooks
811:1091-2339
434:0027-8378
267:18 U.S.C.
113:Unlike a
1272:case law
1013:Politico
502:: 317โ39
353:See also
317:Ga. App.
120:ex parte
1052:1142987
917:Lawfare
841:May 13,
323:Process
305:Georgia
299:Georgia
161:History
140:Seattle
138:trial,
89:Liberia
58:federal
2040:Juries
2011:(2022)
2003:(2013)
1995:(2012)
1987:(2011)
1979:(2011)
1971:(2010)
1963:(2010)
1955:(2010)
1947:(2009)
1939:(2004)
1931:(2004)
1923:(2004)
1915:(2003)
1907:(2000)
1899:(2000)
1891:(1999)
1883:(1991)
1875:(1990)
1867:(1988)
1859:(1985)
1851:(1981)
1843:(1974)
1835:(1970)
1827:(1969)
1819:(1966)
1811:(1965)
1803:(1957)
1766:(1969)
1758:(1969)
1750:(1966)
1742:(1947)
1734:(1937)
1726:(1885)
1707:(2022)
1699:(2019)
1691:(2016)
1683:(2004)
1675:(1985)
1667:(1978)
1659:(1970)
1651:(1959)
1643:(1922)
1624:(1932)
1605:(2012)
1597:(1982)
1589:(1976)
1581:(1971)
1573:(1824)
1554:(2023)
1546:(1993)
1538:(1992)
1530:(1990)
1522:(1976)
1514:(1833)
1495:(2024)
1487:(2016)
1479:(2013)
1471:(1978)
1463:(1970)
1455:(1962)
1447:(1906)
1439:(1896)
1431:(1834)
1412:(1993)
1404:(1992)
1396:(1990)
1388:(1932)
1348:(2002)
1340:(1962)
1332:(1922)
1324:(1900)
1316:(1896)
1308:(1887)
1300:(1884)
1286:Clause
1160:
1135:
1050:
890:
809:
706:22 May
697:
670:
642:
617:
432:
394:
274:, the
269:
142:, 1926
40:Boston
1715:Other
1202:Other
1106:Slate
1048:JSTOR
803:Slate
473:(PDF)
458:(PDF)
315:(311
101:Japan
62:state
1158:ISBN
1133:ISBN
1114:2020
1083:2020
925:2022
888:ISBN
843:2024
807:ISSN
708:2011
695:ISBN
668:ISBN
640:ISBN
615:ISBN
481:2014
430:ISSN
405:2014
392:ISBN
75:The
1189:PDF
1040:doi
785:NPR
568:BBC
303:In
60:or
38:in
2031::
1211:.
1103:.
1085:.
1072:.
1054:.
1046:.
1036:64
1034:.
1030:.
1011:.
985:.
969:^
948:.
933:^
914:.
902:^
869:58
867:.
863:.
851:^
833:.
801:.
783:.
763:.
743:.
732:^
654:^
601:^
591:.
566:.
549:^
533:.
513:^
500:24
498:,
466:48
464:.
460:.
428:.
422:.
154:.
99:.
42:,
1259:e
1252:t
1245:v
1191:)
1187:(
1166:.
1141:.
1116:.
1042::
1015:.
996:.
963:.
927:.
896:.
845:.
819:.
749:.
710:.
676:.
648:.
623:.
577:.
543:.
483:.
442:.
407:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.