Knowledge

Grand juries in the United States

Source ๐Ÿ“

170:
England, juries also handed down rulings on the law in addition to rulings on the facts of the case. The American grand jury was also indispensable to the American Revolution by challenging the Crown and Parliament, including by indicting British soldiers, refusing to indict people who criticized the crown, proposing boycotts and called for the support of the war after the Declaration of Independence. At the time of the founding of the United States, a grand jury indictment was required for almost all prosecutions and juries rendered the final verdict of almost all criminal and civil cases. During that period counties followed the traditional practice of requiring all decisions be made by at least twelve of the grand jurors, (e.g., for a twenty-three-person grand jury, twelve people would constitute a bare majority). Any citizen could bring a matter before a grand jury directly, from a public work that needed repair, to the delinquent conduct of a public official, to a complaint of a crime, and grand juries could conduct their own investigations. In that era most criminal prosecutions were conducted by private parties, either a law enforcement officer, a lawyer hired by a crime victim or their family, or even by laymen. A layman could bring a bill of indictment to the grand jury; if the grand jury found there was sufficient evidence for a trial, that the act was a crime under law, and that the court had jurisdiction, it would return the indictment to the complainant. The grand jury would then appoint the complaining party to exercise the authority of an attorney general, that is, one having a
131: 248: 31: 328:
proficiency, or other eligibility factors. They typically only appear in court a few days a month and meet in secret to protect jurors from intimidation or smear campaigns, prevent any innocent people from being subjected to unfounded charges, not to tip-off targets of an investigation who may be a flight risk, reduce the likelihood of witness tampering before a future trial, and encourage witnesses to be more forthcoming. Witnesses can typically reveal what occurred when they testified.
307:, grand juries are required to issue an indictment in felony cases. They are composed of 16 to 23 people who serve for a fixed term which varies depending on the county. These grand juries hear many different cases during their session. In addition to the well-known criminal functions they carry out, grand juries may also perform civil investigations; they may then issue a report, officially called a general presentment, or in some cases a special presentment. 230:(accusation) presented, by a competent public officer on their oath of office, must be a plain, concise, and definite written statement of the essential facts constituting the offense charged, and must give the official or customary citation of the statute, rule, regulation, or other provision of law that the defendant is alleged to have violated. If the grand jury returns an indictment, it must satisfy the same criteria. 117:, which resolves a particular civil or criminal case, a grand jury (typically having twelve to twenty-three members) serves as a group for a sustained period of time in all or many of the cases that come up in the jurisdiction, generally under the supervision of a federal U.S. attorney, a county district attorney, or a state attorney-general, and hears evidence 345:
reduces the accountability and transparency into the process, including for grand jurors who may want to respond to commentary after submitting their decision. Also, the grand juries may not be representative of the community and tend to be made up of older, more educated and wealthier citizens, though some counties use regular jury rolls for grand juries.
348:
Suja A. Thomas argues that juries (including grand juries) were intended by the founders as a co-equal check on the other branches of government such as the executive branch (prosecutors), the judicial branch (judges), the legislature and states, but that these other branches of government had taken
344:
Some criticize the process as being too easy to reach an indictment and that the District Attorney usually directs the investigation and that prosecutors are allowed to withhold evidence favorable to the defendant. Others argue that defendants should be allowed to have a lawyer present, that secrecy
287:
Only about half require a grand jury indictment to commence a criminal prosecution, and among those, many limit the requirement to felonies or even certain types of felonies. Suja A. Thomas argues that all states should be required to use Grand Juries per the constitution, and that jury rights are
238:
A grand jury's constitutional role is to prevent prosecutorial misconduct, verifying that the presented information (accusation) is sufficient evidence to pursue a prosecution. To achieve this, a grand jury is given investigative powers such as being able to issue subpoenas and compel witnesses to
331:
They are rarely read any instruction on the law, as this is not a requirement; their job is only to judge on what the prosecutor produced. The prosecutor drafts the charges and decides which witnesses to call. Individuals in grand jury proceedings can be charged with holding the court in contempt
327:
Typically between 16 and 23 grand jurors are drawn at random from lists of registered voters, actual voters or a similar list (typically the same one that is used for trial jurors). Unlike potential jurors in regular trials, grand jurors are not screened for bias, just for felony status, language
169:
grand juries played a major role in public matters. In the late 18th century, colonial civil, criminal and grand juries played major roles in checking the power of the executive, the legislature and the judiciary. In some American colonies (such as in New England and Virginia) and less often in
340:
Former Arizona prosecutor Paul Charlton described grand juries as taking on a more independent and hands-on approach in newsworthy or politically sensitive probes like those involving public corruption, while generally letting the prosecutors lead on cases like bank robberies.
239:
testify without a lawyer present. In practice, a grand jury is sometimes used to extend rather than restrict prosecutorial power, when prosecutors may not have enough evidence to pursue a prosecution and want to see whether a grand jury can secure sufficient evidence.
310:
Georgia law also provides for the formation of special purpose grand juries. Special purpose grand juries are different from regular grand juries in that they are focused on a single topic, may be empaneled for longer, and most importantly, since
349:
almost all of the jury's power by the 21st century. She further argues that juries are more impartial than judges and other decision-makers because they are free from political or status incentives to rule a certain way.
530: 255:
United States law also provides for the formation of special grand juries. While a regular grand jury primarily decides whether to bring charges, a special grand jury is called into existence to investigate whether
278:
in every judicial district having more than four million inhabitants must impanel a special grand jury at least once every 18 months as well as upon request by a designated official of the Justice Department.
211:
governs grand juries. It requires grand juries to be composed of 16 to 23 members and that 12 members must concur in an indictment. A grand jury is instructed to return an indictment if the
1056:
oday, the grand jury is the total captive of the prosecutor who, if he is candid, will concede that he can indict anybody, at any time, for almost anything, before any grand jury.
1087:
There's a facetious saying in legal circles about the ease with which prosecutors can secure indictments in grand jury cases: You can get a grand jury to "indict a ham sandwich."
1703: 1943: 1799: 1639: 911: 1435: 1863: 291:
The size of the grand jury and the number of grand jurors required to issue an indictment varies among the states and even, at times, within a single state. A
1100: 106:
As of 1971, generally speaking, a grand jury may issue an indictment for a crime, also known as a "true bill," only if it verifies that those presenting had
454: 1839: 1225: 157:
Some states have "civil grand juries," "investigating grand juries," or the equivalent, to oversee and investigate civil issues instead of criminal ones.
147: 1823: 531:"How do grand juries work? Their major role in criminal justice, and why prosecutors are using them to investigate efforts to overturn the 2020 election" 1266: 1257: 1269: 199:. A valid waiver must be made in open court and after the defendant has been advised of the nature of the charge and of the defendant's rights. 1208: 945: 1069: 455:"Seeing Is Believing: The Impact of Jury Service on Attitudes Toward Legal Institutions and the Implications for International Jury Reform" 1184: 364: 2034: 103:
also uses the system similar to civil grand juries used by some U.S. states to investigate corruption and other more systemic issues.
2054: 130: 588: 1008: 1738: 1161: 1136: 891: 671: 643: 618: 395: 1250: 208: 690:
The grand jury: considered from an historical, political and legal standpoint, and the law and practice relating thereto
266: 260:
is occurring in the community in which it sits. This could include, for instance, organized drug activity or organized
17: 860: 698: 1887: 1483: 332:(punishable with incarceration for the remaining term of the grand jury) if they refuse to appear before the jury. 182:. By the 21st century, the grand jury had lost almost all of its power as a check on other branches of government. 419: 1663: 1243: 1154:
The missing American jury: restoring the fundamental constitutional role of the criminal, civil, and grand juries
1129:
The missing American jury: restoring the fundamental constitutional role of the criminal, civil, and grand juries
884:
The missing American jury: restoring the fundamental constitutional role of the criminal, civil, and grand juries
664:
The missing American jury: restoring the fundamental constitutional role of the criminal, civil, and grand juries
636:
The missing American jury: restoring the fundamental constitutional role of the criminal, civil, and grand juries
611:
The missing American jury: restoring the fundamental constitutional role of the criminal, civil, and grand juries
469: 830: 295:
of jurors, such as two-third or three-fourths, is usually needed to recommend an indictment or criminal charge.
1550: 1235: 2044: 1687: 1620: 1384: 288:
the only rights from the Bill of Rights that the Supreme Court has not insisted that states must protect.
1427: 765: 745: 146:
The federal government is required to use grand juries for all felonies, though not misdemeanors, by the
1975: 1903: 1312: 798: 780: 720: 178:. The advent of official public prosecutors in the later decades of the 19th century largely displaced 912:"Everything You Ever Wanted to Know About Georgia Special Purpose Grand Juries But Were Afraid to Ask" 319:
190, 2011), may not issue indictments; instead they issue a presentment which usually becomes public.
2049: 1787: 1451: 1328: 1027: 1895: 1754: 1213: 949: 316: 171: 57: 1218: 953: 1935: 1695: 1585: 1518: 1510: 1443: 1344: 1074: 264:
in government. These lengthier cases may have jurors meet for up to three years. As provided in
1919: 1569: 1542: 1534: 1467: 1408: 1400: 1365: 27:
Groups of citizens empowered by United States federal or state law to conduct legal proceedings
385: 1967: 1807: 1679: 1577: 1296: 358: 247: 175: 1730: 1601: 304: 261: 8: 1959: 1927: 1879: 1871: 1831: 1647: 1491: 1229: 275: 179: 151: 30: 1911: 1847: 1815: 1762: 1746: 1336: 1047: 174:
to represent the state in the case. The grand jury served to screen out incompetent or
124: 35: 1951: 1655: 1593: 1475: 1157: 1132: 916: 887: 806: 694: 667: 639: 614: 429: 391: 65: 563: 270: 1999: 1855: 1722: 1671: 1105: 1039: 215:
standard has been met. The grand jury's decision is either a "true bill" (formerly
760: 740: 453:
Gastil, John; Fukurai, Hiroshi; Anderson, Kent; Nolan, Mark (September 13, 2014).
2039: 1991: 1526: 1459: 1392: 1009:"Inside the unusually aggressive Arizona grand jury that indicted Trump's allies" 688: 257: 150:. All states can use them, but only half actually do with the others using only 1983: 1320: 212: 196: 107: 2028: 2007: 1304: 1265: 810: 433: 292: 166: 54: 43: 982: 135: 861:"Legislating New Federalism: The Call for Grand Jury Reform in the States" 80: 589:"DeKalb judge keeps grand jury report from public but allows CEO access" 384:
Zapf, Patricia A.; Roesch, Ronald; Hart, Stephen D. (December 4, 2009).
87:. Today, the United States is one of only two jurisdictions, along with 1051: 424: 220: 114: 96: 92: 84: 76: 61: 83:
and spread through colonization to other jurisdictions as part of the
1070:"'Indict a Ham Sandwich' Remains on the Menu for Judges, Prosecutors" 1043: 1101:"The Judge Who Coined "Indict a Ham Sandwich" Was Himself Indicted" 119: 110:
to believe that a crime has been committed by a criminal suspect.
886:. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. pp. 159, 162โ€“3. 139: 88: 361: โ€“ Randomly-selected people to deliberate on public issues 39: 227: 741:"Rule Fed. R. Crim. P. 7. The Indictment and the Information" 100: 69: 1197:โ€“ Supports and promotes California's Civil Grand Jury system 638:. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. pp. 15โ€“16. 72:
and determining whether criminal charges should be brought.
1131:. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. pp. 3โ€“6. 666:. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. pp. 1โ€“2. 452: 1188: 613:. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. p. 24. 1156:. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. p. 7. 202: 687:
Edwards, George John (1906). Richard H. Ward (ed.).
494:
Cook, Joseph P. (1971), "Probable Cause to Arrest",
420:"It's Time to Abolish Grand Juries Once and for All" 1232:
on the history of grand juries in the United States
1194: 1007:Swan, Betsy Woodruff; Cheney, Kyle (May 10, 2024). 721:"If It's Not a Runaway, It's Not a Real Grand Jury" 367: โ€“ Periods of democratic decline in the U.S. 195:The grand jury right may be waived, including by 148:Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution 2026: 383: 251:A special grand jury, photographed in May 1922 1786: 1251: 987:Civil Grand Jurors' Association of California 837:. US Attorneys Manual โ€“ Department of Justice 417: 905: 903: 418:Shapiro, Chava; Clark, James (2023-09-27). 365:Democratic backsliding in the United States 1364: 1258: 1244: 1006: 940: 938: 936: 934: 761:"Rule Fed. R. Crim. P. 6. The Grand Jury" 1025: 900: 246: 129: 29: 980: 686: 14: 2027: 1151: 1126: 1067: 981:Jameson, Marianne (October 26, 2004). 931: 881: 858: 831:"158. Impaneling Special Grand Juries" 693:. University of Michigan: G.T. Bisel. 661: 633: 608: 1785: 1739:Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. Resweber 1363: 1282: 1281: 1239: 1098: 976: 974: 972: 970: 909: 854: 852: 735: 733: 657: 655: 604: 602: 242: 233: 1195:California Grand Jurors' Association 558: 556: 554: 552: 550: 524: 522: 520: 518: 516: 514: 493: 190: 53:are groups of citizens empowered by 875: 528: 390:. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. p. 182. 209:Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 203:Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 24: 1209:"FAQs about the Grand Jury System" 967: 946:"FAQs about the Grand Jury System" 849: 730: 652: 599: 446: 68:, chiefly investigating potential 25: 2066: 2035:Grand juries in the United States 1173: 1099:Levin, Josh (November 25, 2014). 547: 511: 127:involvement in the proceedings). 51:Grand juries in the United States 2055:United States criminal procedure 1484:Bravo-Fernandez v. United States 1217:. March 24, 2010. Archived from 1185:U.S. Federal Grand Jury Handbook 910:Bower, Anna (October 17, 2022). 727:, Vol. 33, No. 4, 1999โ€“2000, 821 1145: 1120: 1092: 1061: 1019: 1000: 983:"History of Civil Grand Juries" 823: 791: 781:"How Federal Grand Juries Work" 773: 753: 714: 680: 34:A grand jury investigating the 627: 581: 487: 411: 377: 185: 13: 1: 1267:United States Fifth Amendment 1032:J. Crim. L. & Criminology 1026:Campbell, William J. (1973). 859:Decker, John F. (Fall 2005). 371: 335: 282: 1688:Puerto Rico v. Sanchez Valle 1621:Blockburger v. United States 1385:Blockburger v. United States 1178: 1068:Zimmer, Ben (June 1, 2018). 529:Joy, Peter A. (2022-07-27). 165:In the early decades of the 91:, that continues to use the 7: 1428:United States v. Randenbush 766:Legal Information Institute 746:Legal Information Institute 387:Forensic Psychology and Law 352: 134:Federal grand jury for the 10: 2071: 1976:J. D. B. v. North Carolina 1904:Dickerson v. United States 1313:Wong Wing v. United States 1028:"Eliminate the Grand Jury" 593:WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta 564:"What is a US grand jury?" 322: 298: 160: 1888:Mitchell v. United States 1794: 1788:Self-Incrimination Clause 1781: 1714: 1632:Dual sovereignty doctrine 1631: 1612: 1561: 1502: 1452:Fong Foo v. United States 1419: 1377:Meaning of "same offense" 1376: 1372: 1359: 1329:United States v. Moreland 1291: 1277: 508:, 379 U.S. 89, 91 (1964). 226:Rule 7 requires that the 172:general power of attorney 123:(i.e. without suspect or 1896:United States v. Hubbell 1755:North Carolina v. Pearce 1704:Denezpi v. United States 1664:United States v. Wheeler 1214:American Bar Association 1201: 1152:Thomas, Suja A. (2016). 1127:Thomas, Suja A. (2016). 950:American Bar Association 882:Thomas, Suja A. (2016). 662:Thomas, Suja A. (2016). 634:Thomas, Suja A. (2016). 609:Thomas, Suja A. (2016). 1944:Corley v. United States 1936:United States v. Patane 1800:Curcio v. United States 1696:Gamble v. United States 1586:United States v. Dinitz 1519:Ludwig v. Massachusetts 1511:United States v. Wilson 1444:Burton v. United States 1345:United States v. Cotton 1075:The Wall Street Journal 1920:Yarborough v. Alvarado 1640:United States v. Lanza 1570:United States v. Perez 1551:Smith v. United States 1543:United States v. Dixon 1535:United States v. Felix 1468:Burks v. United States 1409:United States v. Dixon 1401:United States v. Felix 1366:Double Jeopardy Clause 799:"Who Is a Grand Jury?" 252: 223:), or "no true bill". 176:malicious prosecutions 143: 47: 1968:Berghuis v. Thompkins 1808:Griffin v. California 1680:United States v. Lara 1578:United States v. Jorn 1436:Ball v. United States 1297:Hurtado v. California 496:Vanderbilt Law Review 468:: 126. Archived from 250: 133: 79:originated under the 33: 1864:Doe v. United States 1731:Palko v. Connecticut 1602:Blueford v. Arkansas 1228:by Susan Brenner in 989:(Reference material) 725:Creighton Law Review 180:private prosecutions 152:preliminary hearings 2045:Deliberative groups 1960:Maryland v. Shatzer 1928:Missouri v. Seibert 1880:McNeil v. Wisconsin 1872:Illinois v. Perkins 1832:Williams v. Florida 1648:Bartkus v. Illinois 1613:Multiple punishment 1492:McElrath v. Georgia 1230:Virginia Law Review 865:Oklahoma Law Review 787:. October 26, 2005. 769:. 30 November 2011. 595:. 12 February 2013. 475:on 26 February 2015 276:U.S. District Court 95:to screen criminal 1912:Chavez v. Martinez 1848:Edwards v. Arizona 1840:Michigan v. Tucker 1816:Miranda v. Arizona 1763:Benton v. Maryland 1747:Baxstrom v. Herold 1337:Beck v. Washington 1270:criminal procedure 359:Citizens' assembly 253: 243:Special grand jury 234:Investigatory role 219:, resulting in an 144: 125:person of interest 48: 36:Arcadia Hotel fire 18:Federal grand jury 2022: 2021: 2018: 2017: 1952:Florida v. Powell 1824:Boulden v. Holman 1777: 1776: 1773: 1772: 1656:Waller v. Florida 1594:Oregon v. Kennedy 1476:Evans v. Michigan 1355: 1354: 1163:978-1-107-05565-0 1138:978-1-107-05565-0 956:on April 24, 2011 893:978-1-316-61803-5 673:978-1-107-05565-0 645:978-1-107-05565-0 620:978-1-107-05565-0 397:978-0-470-57039-5 191:Grand Jury Clause 66:legal proceedings 46:in December 1913. 16:(Redirected from 2062: 2050:Direct democracy 2000:Salinas v. Texas 1856:Oregon v. Elstad 1783: 1782: 1723:Ex parte Bigelow 1672:Heath v. Alabama 1503:After conviction 1374: 1373: 1361: 1360: 1279: 1278: 1260: 1253: 1246: 1237: 1236: 1222: 1168: 1167: 1149: 1143: 1142: 1124: 1118: 1117: 1115: 1113: 1096: 1090: 1089: 1084: 1082: 1065: 1059: 1058: 1023: 1017: 1016: 1004: 998: 997: 995: 994: 978: 965: 964: 962: 961: 952:. Archived from 942: 929: 928: 926: 924: 907: 898: 897: 879: 873: 872: 856: 847: 846: 844: 842: 827: 821: 820: 818: 817: 795: 789: 788: 777: 771: 770: 757: 751: 750: 737: 728: 718: 712: 711: 709: 707: 684: 678: 677: 659: 650: 649: 631: 625: 624: 606: 597: 596: 585: 579: 578: 576: 575: 570:. March 13, 2023 560: 545: 544: 542: 541: 535:The Conversation 526: 509: 503: 491: 485: 484: 482: 480: 474: 459: 450: 444: 443: 441: 440: 415: 409: 408: 406: 404: 381: 313:Kenerly v. State 273: 70:criminal conduct 21: 2070: 2069: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2061: 2060: 2059: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2014: 1992:Howes v. Fields 1790: 1769: 1710: 1627: 1608: 1557: 1527:Grady v. Corbin 1498: 1460:Ashe v. Swenson 1420:After acquittal 1415: 1393:Grady v. Corbin 1368: 1351: 1287: 1273: 1264: 1207: 1204: 1181: 1176: 1171: 1164: 1150: 1146: 1139: 1125: 1121: 1111: 1109: 1097: 1093: 1080: 1078: 1066: 1062: 1044:10.2307/1142987 1024: 1020: 1005: 1001: 992: 990: 979: 968: 959: 957: 944: 943: 932: 922: 920: 908: 901: 894: 880: 876: 871:: 341, 354โ€“355. 857: 850: 840: 838: 829: 828: 824: 815: 813: 797: 796: 792: 779: 778: 774: 759: 758: 754: 739: 738: 731: 723:, Roger Roots, 719: 715: 705: 703: 701: 685: 681: 674: 660: 653: 646: 632: 628: 621: 607: 600: 587: 586: 582: 573: 571: 562: 561: 548: 539: 537: 527: 512: 492: 488: 478: 476: 472: 457: 451: 447: 438: 436: 416: 412: 402: 400: 398: 382: 378: 374: 355: 338: 325: 301: 285: 265: 258:organized crime 245: 236: 205: 193: 188: 163: 64:law to conduct 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 2068: 2058: 2057: 2052: 2047: 2042: 2037: 2020: 2019: 2016: 2015: 2013: 2012: 2004: 1996: 1988: 1984:Bobby v. Dixon 1980: 1972: 1964: 1956: 1948: 1940: 1932: 1924: 1916: 1908: 1900: 1892: 1884: 1876: 1868: 1860: 1852: 1844: 1836: 1828: 1820: 1812: 1804: 1795: 1792: 1791: 1779: 1778: 1775: 1774: 1771: 1770: 1768: 1767: 1759: 1751: 1743: 1735: 1727: 1718: 1716: 1712: 1711: 1709: 1708: 1700: 1692: 1684: 1676: 1668: 1660: 1652: 1644: 1635: 1633: 1629: 1628: 1626: 1625: 1616: 1614: 1610: 1609: 1607: 1606: 1598: 1590: 1582: 1574: 1565: 1563: 1562:After mistrial 1559: 1558: 1556: 1555: 1547: 1539: 1531: 1523: 1515: 1506: 1504: 1500: 1499: 1497: 1496: 1488: 1480: 1472: 1464: 1456: 1448: 1440: 1432: 1423: 1421: 1417: 1416: 1414: 1413: 1405: 1397: 1389: 1380: 1378: 1370: 1369: 1357: 1356: 1353: 1352: 1350: 1349: 1341: 1333: 1325: 1321:Maxwell v. Dow 1317: 1309: 1301: 1292: 1289: 1288: 1275: 1274: 1263: 1262: 1255: 1248: 1240: 1234: 1233: 1223: 1221:on 2011-04-24. 1203: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1192: 1180: 1177: 1175: 1174:External links 1172: 1170: 1169: 1162: 1144: 1137: 1119: 1091: 1060: 1038:(2): 174โ€“182. 1018: 999: 966: 930: 899: 892: 874: 848: 822: 805:. 1998-08-05. 790: 772: 752: 729: 713: 699: 679: 672: 651: 644: 626: 619: 598: 580: 546: 510: 486: 445: 410: 396: 375: 373: 370: 369: 368: 362: 354: 351: 337: 334: 324: 321: 300: 297: 284: 281: 271:ยง 3331(a) 244: 241: 235: 232: 213:probable cause 207:Rule 6 of the 204: 201: 197:plea agreement 192: 189: 187: 184: 162: 159: 108:probable cause 81:law of England 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2067: 2056: 2053: 2051: 2048: 2046: 2043: 2041: 2038: 2036: 2033: 2032: 2030: 2010: 2009: 2008:Vega v. Tekoh 2005: 2002: 2001: 1997: 1994: 1993: 1989: 1986: 1985: 1981: 1978: 1977: 1973: 1970: 1969: 1965: 1962: 1961: 1957: 1954: 1953: 1949: 1946: 1945: 1941: 1938: 1937: 1933: 1930: 1929: 1925: 1922: 1921: 1917: 1914: 1913: 1909: 1906: 1905: 1901: 1898: 1897: 1893: 1890: 1889: 1885: 1882: 1881: 1877: 1874: 1873: 1869: 1866: 1865: 1861: 1858: 1857: 1853: 1850: 1849: 1845: 1842: 1841: 1837: 1834: 1833: 1829: 1826: 1825: 1821: 1818: 1817: 1813: 1810: 1809: 1805: 1802: 1801: 1797: 1796: 1793: 1789: 1784: 1780: 1765: 1764: 1760: 1757: 1756: 1752: 1749: 1748: 1744: 1741: 1740: 1736: 1733: 1732: 1728: 1725: 1724: 1720: 1719: 1717: 1713: 1706: 1705: 1701: 1698: 1697: 1693: 1690: 1689: 1685: 1682: 1681: 1677: 1674: 1673: 1669: 1666: 1665: 1661: 1658: 1657: 1653: 1650: 1649: 1645: 1642: 1641: 1637: 1636: 1634: 1630: 1623: 1622: 1618: 1617: 1615: 1611: 1604: 1603: 1599: 1596: 1595: 1591: 1588: 1587: 1583: 1580: 1579: 1575: 1572: 1571: 1567: 1566: 1564: 1560: 1553: 1552: 1548: 1545: 1544: 1540: 1537: 1536: 1532: 1529: 1528: 1524: 1521: 1520: 1516: 1513: 1512: 1508: 1507: 1505: 1501: 1494: 1493: 1489: 1486: 1485: 1481: 1478: 1477: 1473: 1470: 1469: 1465: 1462: 1461: 1457: 1454: 1453: 1449: 1446: 1445: 1441: 1438: 1437: 1433: 1430: 1429: 1425: 1424: 1422: 1418: 1411: 1410: 1406: 1403: 1402: 1398: 1395: 1394: 1390: 1387: 1386: 1382: 1381: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1367: 1362: 1358: 1347: 1346: 1342: 1339: 1338: 1334: 1331: 1330: 1326: 1323: 1322: 1318: 1315: 1314: 1310: 1307: 1306: 1305:Ex parte Bain 1302: 1299: 1298: 1294: 1293: 1290: 1285: 1280: 1276: 1271: 1268: 1261: 1256: 1254: 1249: 1247: 1242: 1241: 1238: 1231: 1227: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1215: 1210: 1206: 1205: 1196: 1193: 1190: 1186: 1183: 1182: 1165: 1159: 1155: 1148: 1140: 1134: 1130: 1123: 1108: 1107: 1102: 1095: 1088: 1077: 1076: 1071: 1064: 1057: 1053: 1049: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1033: 1029: 1022: 1014: 1010: 1003: 988: 984: 977: 975: 973: 971: 955: 951: 947: 941: 939: 937: 935: 919: 918: 913: 906: 904: 895: 889: 885: 878: 870: 866: 862: 855: 853: 836: 832: 826: 812: 808: 804: 800: 794: 786: 782: 776: 768: 767: 762: 756: 748: 747: 742: 736: 734: 726: 722: 717: 702: 700:0-404-09113-X 696: 692: 691: 683: 675: 669: 665: 658: 656: 647: 641: 637: 630: 622: 616: 612: 605: 603: 594: 590: 584: 569: 565: 559: 557: 555: 553: 551: 536: 532: 525: 523: 521: 519: 517: 515: 507: 501: 497: 490: 471: 467: 463: 456: 449: 435: 431: 427: 426: 421: 414: 399: 393: 389: 388: 380: 376: 366: 363: 360: 357: 356: 350: 346: 342: 333: 329: 320: 318: 314: 308: 306: 296: 294: 293:supermajority 289: 280: 277: 272: 268: 263: 259: 249: 240: 231: 229: 224: 222: 218: 214: 210: 200: 198: 183: 181: 177: 173: 168: 167:United States 158: 155: 153: 149: 141: 137: 132: 128: 126: 122: 121: 116: 111: 109: 104: 102: 98: 94: 90: 86: 82: 78: 73: 71: 67: 63: 59: 56: 55:United States 52: 45: 44:Massachusetts 41: 37: 32: 19: 2006: 1998: 1990: 1982: 1974: 1966: 1958: 1950: 1942: 1934: 1926: 1918: 1910: 1902: 1894: 1886: 1878: 1870: 1862: 1854: 1846: 1838: 1830: 1822: 1814: 1806: 1798: 1761: 1753: 1745: 1737: 1729: 1721: 1702: 1694: 1686: 1678: 1670: 1662: 1654: 1646: 1638: 1619: 1600: 1592: 1584: 1576: 1568: 1549: 1541: 1533: 1525: 1517: 1509: 1490: 1482: 1474: 1466: 1458: 1450: 1442: 1434: 1426: 1407: 1399: 1391: 1383: 1343: 1335: 1327: 1319: 1311: 1303: 1295: 1283: 1226:1995 Article 1219:the original 1212: 1153: 1147: 1128: 1122: 1110:. Retrieved 1104: 1094: 1086: 1079:. Retrieved 1073: 1063: 1055: 1035: 1031: 1021: 1012: 1002: 991:. Retrieved 986: 958:. Retrieved 954:the original 921:. Retrieved 915: 883: 877: 868: 864: 839:. Retrieved 834: 825: 814:. Retrieved 802: 793: 784: 775: 764: 755: 744: 724: 716: 704:. Retrieved 689: 682: 663: 635: 629: 610: 592: 583: 572:. Retrieved 567: 538:. Retrieved 534: 506:Beck v. Ohio 505: 499: 495: 489: 477:. Retrieved 470:the original 465: 462:Court Review 461: 448: 437:. Retrieved 423: 413: 401:. Retrieved 386: 379: 347: 343: 339: 330: 326: 312: 309: 302: 290: 286: 254: 237: 225: 216: 206: 194: 164: 156: 145: 136:Roy Olmstead 118: 112: 105: 74: 50: 49: 1112:January 15, 1081:January 15, 923:22 December 835:justice.gov 228:information 186:Federal law 97:indictments 2029:Categories 1284:Grand Jury 993:2024-05-18 960:2011-05-11 816:2024-06-18 574:2024-05-13 540:2024-05-13 504:, quoting 479:2 December 439:2024-05-02 425:The Nation 403:2 December 372:References 336:Assessment 283:State laws 262:corruption 221:indictment 217:billa vera 115:petit jury 93:grand jury 85:common law 77:grand jury 1179:Handbooks 811:1091-2339 434:0027-8378 267:18 U.S.C. 113:Unlike a 1272:case law 1013:Politico 502:: 317โ€“39 353:See also 317:Ga. App. 120:ex parte 1052:1142987 917:Lawfare 841:May 13, 323:Process 305:Georgia 299:Georgia 161:History 140:Seattle 138:trial, 89:Liberia 58:federal 2040:Juries 2011:(2022) 2003:(2013) 1995:(2012) 1987:(2011) 1979:(2011) 1971:(2010) 1963:(2010) 1955:(2010) 1947:(2009) 1939:(2004) 1931:(2004) 1923:(2004) 1915:(2003) 1907:(2000) 1899:(2000) 1891:(1999) 1883:(1991) 1875:(1990) 1867:(1988) 1859:(1985) 1851:(1981) 1843:(1974) 1835:(1970) 1827:(1969) 1819:(1966) 1811:(1965) 1803:(1957) 1766:(1969) 1758:(1969) 1750:(1966) 1742:(1947) 1734:(1937) 1726:(1885) 1707:(2022) 1699:(2019) 1691:(2016) 1683:(2004) 1675:(1985) 1667:(1978) 1659:(1970) 1651:(1959) 1643:(1922) 1624:(1932) 1605:(2012) 1597:(1982) 1589:(1976) 1581:(1971) 1573:(1824) 1554:(2023) 1546:(1993) 1538:(1992) 1530:(1990) 1522:(1976) 1514:(1833) 1495:(2024) 1487:(2016) 1479:(2013) 1471:(1978) 1463:(1970) 1455:(1962) 1447:(1906) 1439:(1896) 1431:(1834) 1412:(1993) 1404:(1992) 1396:(1990) 1388:(1932) 1348:(2002) 1340:(1962) 1332:(1922) 1324:(1900) 1316:(1896) 1308:(1887) 1300:(1884) 1286:Clause 1160:  1135:  1050:  890:  809:  706:22 May 697:  670:  642:  617:  432:  394:  274:, the 269:  142:, 1926 40:Boston 1715:Other 1202:Other 1106:Slate 1048:JSTOR 803:Slate 473:(PDF) 458:(PDF) 315:(311 101:Japan 62:state 1158:ISBN 1133:ISBN 1114:2020 1083:2020 925:2022 888:ISBN 843:2024 807:ISSN 708:2011 695:ISBN 668:ISBN 640:ISBN 615:ISBN 481:2014 430:ISSN 405:2014 392:ISBN 75:The 1189:PDF 1040:doi 785:NPR 568:BBC 303:In 60:or 38:in 2031:: 1211:. 1103:. 1085:. 1072:. 1054:. 1046:. 1036:64 1034:. 1030:. 1011:. 985:. 969:^ 948:. 933:^ 914:. 902:^ 869:58 867:. 863:. 851:^ 833:. 801:. 783:. 763:. 743:. 732:^ 654:^ 601:^ 591:. 566:. 549:^ 533:. 513:^ 500:24 498:, 466:48 464:. 460:. 428:. 422:. 154:. 99:. 42:, 1259:e 1252:t 1245:v 1191:) 1187:( 1166:. 1141:. 1116:. 1042:: 1015:. 996:. 963:. 927:. 896:. 845:. 819:. 749:. 710:. 676:. 648:. 623:. 577:. 543:. 483:. 442:. 407:. 20:)

Index

Federal grand jury

Arcadia Hotel fire
Boston
Massachusetts
United States
federal
state
legal proceedings
criminal conduct
grand jury
law of England
common law
Liberia
grand jury
indictments
Japan
probable cause
petit jury
ex parte
person of interest

Roy Olmstead
Seattle
Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution
preliminary hearings
United States
general power of attorney
malicious prosecutions
private prosecutions

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

โ†‘