Knowledge

Desuetude

Source 📝

155: 1755: 1769: 217:
tradition, where it can operate as a rare form of repeal. In Scotland, non-use is not the same as desuetude. Disuse must be accompanied by other identifiable provisions that would make the enforcement of the statute inconsistent: neglect over such a period of time that it would appear that a contrary
332:
The undeviating policy of nullification by Connecticut of its anti-contraceptive laws throughout all the long years that they have been on the statute books bespeaks more than prosecutorial paralysis ... "Deeply embedded traditional ways of carrying out state policy ..." – or not carrying it
226:
Desuetude requires for its operation a very considerable period, not merely of neglect, but a contrary usage of such a character as practically to infer such completely established habit of the community as to set up a counter law or establish a quasi
197:'s option in a case where it was available under the common law. Parliament hastily enacted that such mortal combat was illegal; promotors and commentators cited morality including promoting the public good. Similarly the law of residential 129:
into a constitution or charter of rights (as in Canada since 1982) or into regulations and other delegated/subordinate legislation made under an act (as in Australia since the early 1990s) can be regarded as a statutory codification of this
246:
asserted that: "It is obviously correct that no one acquires a vested or protected right in violation of the Constitution by long use, even when that span of time covers our entire national existence and indeed predates it."
170:
existed: the king's assent was required to nullify a clear or settled law; its second limb is similar, stating later Acts and other legislation are to be preferred when conflicting. The non-preparatory, constitutional
147: 262:, stating that "total disuse of any civil institution for ages past, may afford just and rational objections against disrespected and superannuated ordinances." 218:
custom had developed; and that a contrary practice had developed which is inconsistent with the law. Regarding the Scottish application, Lord McKay stated in
122:
that long and continued non-use of a law renders it invalid, at least in the sense that courts will no longer tolerate punishing its transgressors.
314:
While it may not be a violation of due process to enforce a desuetudinal law, the fact that a law has long gone unenforced may present a bar to
238: 1736: 1819: 205:
of estates had been little weakened despite widespread judicial displeasure before substantial, required reform via legislation.
278: 1829: 180: 540: 1162: 720: 619: 484: 444: 419: 1834: 1276: 1145: 1731: 1078: 979: 1238: 872: 166:
tradition. The doctrine went into decline from the Middle Ages, when the counter-notion became prevalent that
591: 1398: 877: 411: 1393: 561: 243: 1368: 867: 251: 1451: 1246: 1228: 377: 352: 214: 1580: 526: 1621: 1408: 897: 882: 339: 176: 106:, similar legislation, or legal principles to lapse and become unenforceable by a long habit of 1814: 1676: 1661: 1780: 1373: 1051: 862: 154: 300:
There has been open, notorious and pervasive violation of the statute for a long period; and
250:
It may, however, have validity as a doctrine in defense of penal prosecution. In 1825, the
1501: 847: 460:
Alphabetical Index of the 192 United Nations Member States and Corresponding Legal Systems
8: 1809: 1656: 796: 713: 439:. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag Berlin and Heidelberg GmbH & Co. p. 208. 179:
over the executive and any directly conflicting case law. In 1818, the English court of
172: 556: 1471: 1130: 984: 969: 947: 691: 671: 624: 614: 459: 185: 167: 435:
Walter, Christian (2004). "Specifics of National Legislation in Regard to Terrorism".
337:
Shortly thereafter, Connecticut's birth control law was enforced, and struck down, in
333:
out – "are often tougher and truer law than the dead words of the written text."
1456: 1378: 1216: 959: 954: 907: 832: 826: 666: 584: 480: 440: 415: 407: 1461: 1428: 927: 791: 786: 751: 287: 126: 30: 1824: 1710: 1683: 1671: 1651: 1585: 1563: 1543: 1538: 1518: 1383: 1363: 1358: 1261: 1221: 932: 857: 781: 766: 686: 190: 87: 236:
Desuetude does not apply to requirements of the United States Constitution. In
1787: 1595: 1513: 1102: 1068: 1019: 1004: 776: 681: 661: 651: 382: 372: 367: 315: 198: 119: 107: 95: 1803: 1641: 1600: 1486: 1466: 1438: 1388: 1353: 1327: 1322: 1315: 1266: 1206: 1046: 1036: 994: 917: 912: 842: 801: 725: 362: 325: 320: 281:
held that penal statutes may become void under the doctrine of desuetude if:
270: 255: 158:
Legal systems of the world. Common law countries are shaded the darker pink.
1773: 1523: 1491: 1446: 1184: 1179: 1150: 1063: 1041: 1009: 942: 922: 816: 756: 746: 698: 656: 634: 577: 259: 115: 1695: 1636: 1626: 1423: 1418: 1256: 1157: 1073: 1032: 999: 964: 887: 811: 761: 676: 293: 133: 324:, the Supreme Court refused to hear a challenge to Connecticut's ban on 1759: 1688: 1568: 1506: 1251: 1172: 1167: 1125: 1107: 1095: 1056: 902: 892: 852: 837: 821: 771: 708: 703: 357: 163: 146: 1666: 1631: 1573: 1548: 1413: 1310: 1298: 1283: 1271: 1199: 1117: 1090: 974: 303:
There has been a conspicuous policy of nonenforcement of the statute.
202: 194: 1754: 1715: 1700: 1403: 1288: 1085: 629: 1605: 1553: 1533: 1481: 1293: 1211: 1027: 989: 937: 545: 103: 1705: 1558: 1303: 1194: 1189: 1135: 806: 111: 102: 'outdated, no longer custom') is a doctrine that causes 42: 1646: 1590: 1496: 1337: 1140: 639: 54: 45: 479:. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. p. 110. 1528: 1476: 1332: 730: 646: 462:, Website of the Faculty of Law of the University of Ottawa 437:
Terrorism as a Challenge for National and International Law
110:
or lapse of time. It is what happens to laws that are not
69: 51: 277:, 187 W.Va. 182, 416 S.E.2d 720 (1992). In that case, the 600: 78: 48: 36: 20: 569: 75: 72: 477:
International Law and the Search for Normative Order
66: 57: 33: 63: 39: 269:The seminal modern case under U.S. state law is a 254:declined to enforce the traditional punishment of 162:The doctrine of desuetude has been diluted in the 150:English law generally applies in England and Wales 404:Kill All the Lawyers?: Shakespeare's Legal Appeal 318:in a suit to prevent its future enforcement. In 1801: 291:(wrong because prohibited by statute) and not 239:Walz v. Tax Commission of the City of New York 213:The doctrine exists in Scotland, being of the 585: 266:, 13 Serg. & Rawle 220, 228 (Pa. 1825). 131: 592: 578: 285:The statute proscribes only acts that are 470: 468: 401: 1737:History of the American legal profession 153: 145: 474: 307:This holding was reaffirmed in 2003 in 1802: 504:. William Hodge & Co. p. 179. 465: 434: 279:West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals 573: 499: 231: 517:S.L.T. 456, per Lord MacKay at 558. 275:Committee on Legal Ethics v. Printz 13: 220:Brown vs. Magistrates of Edinburgh 14: 1846: 721:Restitution and unjust enrichment 309:State ex rel. Canterbury v. Blake 1768: 1767: 1753: 515:Brown v Magistrates of Edinburgh 311:, 584 S.E.2d 512 (W. Va. 2003). 242:, 397 U.S. 664, 678 (1970), the 29: 1732:History of the legal profession 531:West Virginia Judiciary website 1820:Legal doctrines and principles 550: 534: 520: 508: 493: 453: 428: 395: 141: 1: 388: 273:opinion regarding desuetude, 412:University of Nebraska Press 208: 7: 1830:Civil law legal terminology 562:Legal Information Institute 346: 244:United States Supreme Court 10: 1851: 1399:International legal theory 878:International slavery laws 873:International human rights 868:International criminal law 402:Kornstein, Daniel (2005). 252:Pennsylvania Supreme Court 1747: 1724: 1614: 1452:Administration of justice 1437: 1346: 1237: 1116: 1018: 739: 607: 502:Trial of Abraham Thornton 1229:Basic structure doctrine 1079:Natural and legal rights 960:Public international law 378:Statute Law Revision Act 353:Civil law (legal system) 193:remained available at a 125:The policy of inserting 1835:Civil law legal systems 1409:Principle of typicality 883:International trade law 599: 558:Griswold v. Connecticut 500:Hall, Sir John (1926). 475:Oglesby, R. R. (1971). 340:Griswold v. Connecticut 258:for women convicted as 177:Parliamentary supremacy 335: 297:(intrinsically wrong); 229: 175:clarified the fact of 159: 151: 132: 1404:Principle of legality 1163:Delegated legislation 863:Intellectual property 330: 224: 157: 149: 1622:Barristers' chambers 1564:Legal representation 1502:Justice of the peace 848:Financial regulation 183:held in the case of 1657:Election commission 1369:Expressive function 898:Landlord–tenant law 797:Consumer protection 528:Canterbury v. Blake 173:Bill of Rights 1689 1615:Legal institutions 1482:Lawsuit/Litigation 1472:Dispute resolution 1277:Catholic canon law 985:State of emergency 948:Will and testament 672:Law of obligations 625:Constitutional law 615:Administrative law 186:Ashford v Thornton 168:enrolled bill rule 160: 152: 1797: 1796: 1457:Constitutionalism 1379:Law and economics 1217:Act of parliament 955:Product liability 908:Legal archaeology 833:Environmental law 827:Entertainment law 667:International law 408:Lincoln, Nebraska 232:United States law 199:property distress 114:when they become 1842: 1772: 1771: 1770: 1758: 1757: 1581:Question of fact 1462:Criminal justice 792:Construction law 787:Conflict of laws 752:Agricultural law 594: 587: 580: 571: 570: 564: 554: 548: 538: 532: 524: 518: 512: 506: 505: 497: 491: 490: 472: 463: 457: 451: 450: 432: 426: 425: 399: 288:malum prohibitum 137: 85: 84: 81: 80: 77: 74: 71: 68: 65: 60: 59: 56: 53: 50: 47: 44: 41: 38: 35: 1850: 1849: 1845: 1844: 1843: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1793: 1766: 1752: 1743: 1720: 1711:Political party 1684:Legal education 1672:Law enforcement 1652:Court of equity 1610: 1586:Question of law 1539:Practice of law 1519:Judicial review 1433: 1384:Legal formalism 1364:Comparative law 1359:Contract theory 1342: 1262:Legal pluralism 1233: 1222:Act of Congress 1146:Executive order 1112: 1014: 933:Nationality law 858:Immigration law 782:Competition law 735: 603: 598: 568: 567: 555: 551: 539: 535: 525: 521: 513: 509: 498: 494: 487: 473: 466: 458: 454: 447: 433: 429: 422: 400: 396: 391: 349: 264:Wright v. Crane 234: 211: 191:trial by combat 144: 108:non-enforcement 62: 32: 28: 17: 12: 11: 5: 1848: 1838: 1837: 1832: 1827: 1822: 1817: 1812: 1795: 1794: 1792: 1791: 1784: 1777: 1763: 1760:Law portal 1748: 1745: 1744: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1728: 1726: 1722: 1721: 1719: 1718: 1713: 1708: 1703: 1698: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1669: 1664: 1659: 1654: 1649: 1644: 1639: 1634: 1629: 1624: 1618: 1616: 1612: 1611: 1609: 1608: 1603: 1598: 1596:Trial advocacy 1593: 1588: 1583: 1578: 1577: 1576: 1571: 1566: 1561: 1556: 1551: 1546: 1536: 1531: 1526: 1521: 1516: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1504: 1494: 1489: 1484: 1479: 1474: 1469: 1464: 1459: 1454: 1449: 1443: 1441: 1435: 1434: 1432: 1431: 1426: 1421: 1416: 1411: 1406: 1401: 1396: 1391: 1386: 1381: 1376: 1371: 1366: 1361: 1356: 1350: 1348: 1344: 1343: 1341: 1340: 1335: 1330: 1325: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1301: 1296: 1291: 1286: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1264: 1259: 1254: 1249: 1243: 1241: 1235: 1234: 1232: 1231: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1219: 1214: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1192: 1187: 1182: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1170: 1165: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1148: 1143: 1133: 1128: 1126:Ballot measure 1122: 1120: 1114: 1113: 1111: 1110: 1105: 1103:Legal treatise 1100: 1099: 1098: 1093: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1071: 1069:Letters patent 1066: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1049: 1044: 1039: 1030: 1024: 1022: 1020:Sources of law 1016: 1015: 1013: 1012: 1007: 1005:Unenforced law 1002: 997: 992: 987: 982: 977: 972: 967: 962: 957: 952: 951: 950: 945: 935: 930: 925: 920: 915: 910: 905: 900: 895: 890: 885: 880: 875: 870: 865: 860: 855: 850: 845: 840: 835: 830: 824: 819: 814: 809: 804: 799: 794: 789: 784: 779: 777:Commercial law 774: 769: 764: 759: 754: 749: 743: 741: 737: 736: 734: 733: 728: 723: 718: 717: 716: 706: 701: 696: 695: 694: 689: 679: 674: 669: 664: 659: 654: 649: 644: 643: 642: 632: 627: 622: 617: 611: 609: 605: 604: 597: 596: 589: 582: 574: 566: 565: 549: 533: 519: 507: 492: 485: 464: 452: 445: 427: 420: 414:. p. 47. 393: 392: 390: 387: 386: 385: 383:Unenforced law 380: 375: 373:Standing (law) 370: 368:Legal doctrine 365: 360: 355: 348: 345: 305: 304: 301: 298: 233: 230: 210: 207: 143: 140: 127:sunset clauses 120:legal doctrine 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1847: 1836: 1833: 1831: 1828: 1826: 1823: 1821: 1818: 1816: 1815:Statutory law 1813: 1811: 1808: 1807: 1805: 1790: 1789: 1785: 1783: 1782: 1778: 1776: 1775: 1764: 1762: 1761: 1756: 1750: 1749: 1746: 1738: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1730: 1729: 1727: 1723: 1717: 1714: 1712: 1709: 1707: 1704: 1702: 1699: 1697: 1694: 1690: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1682: 1678: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1670: 1668: 1665: 1663: 1660: 1658: 1655: 1653: 1650: 1648: 1645: 1643: 1642:Civil society 1640: 1638: 1635: 1633: 1630: 1628: 1625: 1623: 1620: 1619: 1617: 1613: 1607: 1604: 1602: 1601:Trier of fact 1599: 1597: 1594: 1592: 1589: 1587: 1584: 1582: 1579: 1575: 1572: 1570: 1567: 1565: 1562: 1560: 1557: 1555: 1552: 1550: 1547: 1545: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1537: 1535: 1532: 1530: 1527: 1525: 1522: 1520: 1517: 1515: 1512: 1508: 1505: 1503: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1495: 1493: 1490: 1488: 1487:Legal opinion 1485: 1483: 1480: 1478: 1475: 1473: 1470: 1468: 1467:Court-martial 1465: 1463: 1460: 1458: 1455: 1453: 1450: 1448: 1445: 1444: 1442: 1440: 1439:Jurisprudence 1436: 1430: 1427: 1425: 1422: 1420: 1417: 1415: 1412: 1410: 1407: 1405: 1402: 1400: 1397: 1395: 1392: 1390: 1387: 1385: 1382: 1380: 1377: 1375: 1372: 1370: 1367: 1365: 1362: 1360: 1357: 1355: 1352: 1351: 1349: 1345: 1339: 1336: 1334: 1331: 1329: 1328:Statutory law 1326: 1324: 1323:Socialist law 1321: 1317: 1316:Byzantine law 1314: 1313: 1312: 1309: 1305: 1302: 1300: 1297: 1295: 1292: 1290: 1287: 1285: 1282: 1278: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1270: 1269: 1268: 1267:Religious law 1265: 1263: 1260: 1258: 1255: 1253: 1250: 1248: 1245: 1244: 1242: 1240: 1239:Legal systems 1236: 1230: 1227: 1223: 1220: 1218: 1215: 1213: 1210: 1209: 1208: 1207:Statutory law 1205: 1201: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1193: 1191: 1188: 1186: 1183: 1181: 1178: 1174: 1171: 1169: 1166: 1164: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1156: 1152: 1149: 1147: 1144: 1142: 1139: 1138: 1137: 1134: 1132: 1129: 1127: 1124: 1123: 1121: 1119: 1115: 1109: 1106: 1104: 1101: 1097: 1094: 1092: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1084: 1080: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1072: 1070: 1067: 1065: 1062: 1058: 1055: 1054: 1053: 1050: 1048: 1045: 1043: 1040: 1038: 1037:Statutory law 1034: 1031: 1029: 1026: 1025: 1023: 1021: 1017: 1011: 1008: 1006: 1003: 1001: 998: 996: 995:Transport law 993: 991: 988: 986: 983: 981: 978: 976: 973: 971: 968: 966: 963: 961: 958: 956: 953: 949: 946: 944: 941: 940: 939: 936: 934: 931: 929: 926: 924: 921: 919: 916: 914: 913:Legal fiction 911: 909: 906: 904: 901: 899: 896: 894: 891: 889: 886: 884: 881: 879: 876: 874: 871: 869: 866: 864: 861: 859: 856: 854: 851: 849: 846: 844: 843:Financial law 841: 839: 836: 834: 831: 828: 825: 823: 820: 818: 815: 813: 810: 808: 805: 803: 802:Corporate law 800: 798: 795: 793: 790: 788: 785: 783: 780: 778: 775: 773: 770: 768: 765: 763: 760: 758: 755: 753: 750: 748: 745: 744: 742: 738: 732: 729: 727: 726:Statutory law 724: 722: 719: 715: 712: 711: 710: 707: 705: 702: 700: 697: 693: 690: 688: 685: 684: 683: 680: 678: 675: 673: 670: 668: 665: 663: 660: 658: 655: 653: 650: 648: 645: 641: 638: 637: 636: 633: 631: 628: 626: 623: 621: 618: 616: 613: 612: 610: 608:Core subjects 606: 602: 595: 590: 588: 583: 581: 576: 575: 572: 563: 560: 559: 553: 547: 544: 543: 542:Poe v. Ullman 537: 530: 529: 523: 516: 511: 503: 496: 488: 486:9789024750795 482: 478: 471: 469: 461: 456: 448: 446:9783540212256 442: 438: 431: 423: 421:9780803278219 417: 413: 409: 405: 398: 394: 384: 381: 379: 376: 374: 371: 369: 366: 364: 363:Holding (law) 361: 359: 356: 354: 351: 350: 344: 342: 341: 334: 329: 327: 326:birth control 323: 322: 321:Poe v. Ullman 317: 312: 310: 302: 299: 296: 295: 290: 289: 284: 283: 282: 280: 276: 272: 271:West Virginia 267: 265: 261: 260:common scolds 257: 253: 248: 245: 241: 240: 228: 223: 221: 216: 206: 204: 200: 196: 192: 188: 187: 182: 178: 174: 169: 165: 156: 148: 139: 136: 135: 128: 123: 121: 118:. It is the 117: 113: 109: 105: 101: 97: 93: 89: 83: 26: 22: 16:Legal concept 1786: 1779: 1765: 1751: 1524:Jurisdiction 1492:Legal remedy 1447:Adjudication 1347:Legal theory 1185:Ratification 1180:Promulgation 1151:Proclamation 1131:Codification 1064:Human rights 1052:Divine right 1042:Constitution 1010:Women in law 928:Military law 923:Marriage law 918:Maritime law 817:Election law 757:Aviation law 747:Abortion law 699:Property law 635:Criminal law 557: 552: 541: 536: 527: 522: 514: 510: 501: 495: 476: 455: 436: 430: 403: 397: 338: 336: 331: 319: 313: 308: 306: 292: 286: 274: 268: 263: 249: 237: 235: 225: 219: 212: 184: 181:King's Bench 161: 124: 99: 91: 24: 18: 1696:Legislature 1627:Bureaucracy 1424:Rule of man 1419:Rule of law 1394:Libertarian 1257:Chinese law 1158:Legislation 1108:Regulations 1096:Law reports 1074:Natural law 970:Reparations 965:Refugee law 888:Jurimetrics 829:(Media law) 767:Banking law 762:Amnesty law 740:Disciplines 677:Private law 328:, writing: 294:malum in se 142:English law 134:jus commune 94:, from 86:; from 1810:Common law 1804:Categories 1689:Law school 1569:Prosecutor 1507:Magistrate 1294:Jewish law 1252:Common law 1173:Rulemaking 1168:Regulation 1118:Law making 1057:Divine law 1033:Legal code 980:Sports law 903:Law of war 853:Health law 838:Family law 822:Energy law 772:Bankruptcy 709:Punishment 704:Public law 389:References 358:Common law 164:common law 138:doctrine. 1667:Judiciary 1662:Executive 1637:The bench 1574:Solicitor 1549:Barrister 1429:Sociology 1414:Pseudolaw 1354:Anarchist 1311:Roman law 1299:Parsi law 1284:Hindu law 1272:Canon law 1247:Civil law 1200:Concordat 1091:Precedent 1000:Trust law 975:Space law 812:Drugs law 682:Procedure 620:Civil law 215:civil law 209:Scots law 203:attainder 195:defendant 100:desuetudo 92:désuétude 25:desuetude 1774:Category 1716:Tribunal 1701:Military 1544:Attorney 1514:Judgment 1374:Feminist 1289:Jain law 1086:Case law 807:Cyberlaw 714:Corporal 692:Criminal 662:Evidence 652:Doctrine 630:Contract 347:See also 316:standing 116:obsolete 112:repealed 104:statutes 1788:Outline 1725:History 1632:The bar 1606:Verdict 1554:Counsel 1534:Justice 1389:History 1212:Statute 1028:Charter 990:Tax law 938:Probate 546:FindLaw 256:ducking 227:repeal. 201:and of 1825:Custom 1706:Police 1677:Agency 1559:Lawyer 1304:Sharia 1195:Treaty 1190:Repeal 1136:Decree 1047:Custom 943:Estate 893:Labour 657:Equity 483:  443:  418:  88:French 1781:Index 1647:Court 1591:Trial 1497:Judge 1338:Yassa 1141:Edict 687:Civil 640:Crime 189:that 98: 96:Latin 90: 1529:Jury 1477:Fiqh 1333:Xeer 731:Tort 647:Deed 481:ISBN 441:ISBN 416:ISBN 601:Law 21:law 19:In 1806:: 1035:/ 467:^ 410:: 406:. 343:. 222:: 82:-/ 55:uː 52:tj 46:uː 43:sj 23:, 593:e 586:t 579:v 489:. 449:. 424:. 79:ɪ 76:w 73:s 70:ɛ 67:d 64:ˈ 61:, 58:d 49:ɪ 40:ˈ 37:ɪ 34:d 31:/ 27:(

Index

law
/dɪˈsjɪtjd,ˈdɛswɪ-/
French
Latin
statutes
non-enforcement
repealed
obsolete
legal doctrine
sunset clauses
jus commune


common law
enrolled bill rule
Bill of Rights 1689
Parliamentary supremacy
King's Bench
Ashford v Thornton
trial by combat
defendant
property distress
attainder
civil law
Walz v. Tax Commission of the City of New York
United States Supreme Court
Pennsylvania Supreme Court
ducking
common scolds
West Virginia

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.