Knowledge

talk:WikiCup - Knowledge

Source 📝

1586:: If we're comparing to GAs, then I'd like to point out that featured list candidates require 3 reviews, one of them being a source review, and a rough minimum of 20 days of time to be promoted. We've seen it plenty where certain types of GAs can be nominated quite quickly and reviewed the same day by only a single nominator. This doesn't make the work less valuable, but they can and have been "spammed", in that, someone can make a lot of nominations and they are reviewed and promoted the same day. This is not possible with FLs because of the number of reviewers and 104: 1103:, in my view it would indeed be eligible for an age bonus. The article had been deleted for only about three months, and it was undeleted rather than rewritten from scratch. If we remove these three months from consideration, it's been in mainspace for the same amount of time as an article that was created in December 2011 and never deleted. 1499:: I disagree actually because of the fact there's no limits (to my knowledge) on the number of featured picture nominations you can have. My suggestion is meant to compensate for the limits in place for featured lists. I think there's just not a lot of cross over between FP nominators and WikiCup participants. Looking at the 1336:, I noticed that as well. I don't know if I've announced it on-wiki, but I should announce this publicly here: The first competitor to get an FP this year will get a special award at the end of this year's cup, in addition to the standard awards given for the highest-scoring competitors in a certain category. – 1589:
As far as the high-multiplier FLs in the current WikiCup, a 3x multiplier still doesn't compete with FAs, and there are not a ton of high-multiplier FL opportunities out there aside from lists of cities. It was actually my goal to see how far I could get in the cup solely based on FLs and my pending
1006:, that would be more awkward, as his name was kept there for record-keeping purposes. He never formally withdrew, and he did score points during Round 2. Rather than removing his name from the Round 3 page, we might have to come up with something else, such as using a different color for his name. – 1503:
as an example, you had 12 pictures in round 1 (360 base pts), 13 pictures in round 2 (390 base points), and 14 pictures in round 3 (420 base points). These base point values just aren't possible with featured lists, so in a sense, it's actually moving things closer to being equal instead of further
1427:
In short, I believe the value of featured lists is not properly reflected with the current scoring. As such, I am proposing that featured list points be raised to 65 (3.08 FL per FA), 70 (2.86 FL per FA), or 80 (2.5 FL per FA) starting with the 2025 WikiCup. I'd very much appreciate any feedback on
1293:
I'm a bit shocked that this year there's been 0 FPs. Like, I left the Wikicup a few years back because it really felt that doing at all well with FPs in the cup was something that made people very upset, but that the celebration of all content on Knowledge now has 0 FPs? That feels weird. Ah, well,
1552:
In terms of article writing (as someone who has written all three), I feel that FLs are only slightly more difficult to accomplish than GAs, but are significantly less difficult to write than FAs. The current ratio of FL:FA points seems about right to me; I would not support increasing over 55.
1149:
Oh, okay - I see now. This is a real gray area, since you moved this to mainspace (which would make this a "new article" under most circumstances), but it has undeleted history dating back to 2011. My thinking is that if it qualified for DYK as a new article, then it should be scored as a new
1521:
On my best year ever, 2019 - and, remember, no-one is more productive than me - I had 99 FPs. That's 1970 points for the entire year. Last year, the winner had 2582 points in the final round alone. In 2021, the winner had over 5000, again, last round
1567:
There actually are some high-multiplier FLs in the current WikiCup submission round. I do not see a good argument to support a massive change to the points awarded to FLs. I agree with Airship that we need to compare to GAs as well.
911:. As the article is too short, a conversion of a redirect, and not on any other Wiki, I believe it does not fulfill any of the bonus point requirements. If possible, I'd like my score to reflect the accurate 5 point total. ~ 1106:
As long as you expanded this page fivefold from the undeleted version, I think it qualifies for the age multiplier. (On the other hand, had the article been rewritten from scratch rather than being undeleted, it would
700: 1518:
Yes. As far as I can tell, I have more FPs than any other person on Knowledge, and I still generally lost every year, even years I was literally spending entire days morning to night working on restoration.
1525:
If I don't participate, no-one would be stupid enough to participate who works with FPs. Whic is very, very much against the original goal of the Wikicup, to celebrate all varieties of featured content.
630: 1378:
I've discussed this in passing on Discord, but I think we should consider adjusting the points that are given for featured lists. I'm going to just spew some reasons and thoughts of mine on the matter;
1590:
elimination was the reason I actually started working on the Olympics lists. Besides the Olympics lists, the other opportunities are typically very large lists that would be a lot more work than GAs.
1061:
undeleted to be rewritten and republished it. The article is 90% new material. Should it still qualify for an age bonus as a DYK based on the original date of publication, as the bot has handled it?
1212:" was posted for under 24 hours before my Co-nom two. Can I claim points for this? While my name was on the review and I am the second highest contributor I didn't work on the review specifically. 686: 1461:
I think it could be beneficial to examine. Though not exploited in the most recent iteration of the cup, there have been concerns voiced on Discord about the gameability of ITN items.
714: 1405:
I feel as though we're simply not incentivizing the FL process for the cup, and I think the points could be increased to encourage a greater mix of content from participants.
1024:, that's good—what you say about tomorrow or today is understood. I absolutely agree. If anyone agrees about anything currently, they may be a serial troublemaker. Cheers! 808: 766: 640: 850: 836: 822: 794: 780: 752: 728: 1444: 1383:
Featured lists cannot be spammed like good articles, DYKs, or ITNs because of the limit on the number of featured list candidates you can have at any given time (2)
1199: 1175:, thanks for the ping. I think that it would be best to treat this as a new article as well, given that the vast majority of the content is new material. Best, 879: 889: 650: 1224: 119: 1447:
took place in 2019, when competitors were much less likely to submit FLs for points. We haven't changed the scoring rules substantially since then. –
862: 84: 1002:, we can do that. I'm going to reset everyone's points by tomorrow, so that shouldn't be a problem. If you're asking us to remove his name from 1399: 1562: 858: 1475:
I mean, at the moment, an FP is only worth ⅔ a FL, and less than a GA. If FLs get raised by themselves, FPs get more marginal.
1030: 1015: 1003: 995: 694: 218: 214: 169: 165: 1044: 1541: 1513: 1437: 1247: 1094: 452: 448: 439: 435: 426: 422: 418: 409: 405: 401: 392: 388: 379: 375: 366: 357: 353: 349: 345: 341: 332: 328: 324: 315: 311: 307: 303: 299: 295: 286: 282: 278: 274: 265: 261: 257: 248: 244: 235: 231: 227: 210: 206: 202: 198: 194: 190: 186: 182: 178: 161: 157: 153: 149: 145: 141: 137: 133: 129: 1076: 1470: 1456: 1238:
of the talkpage indicates that you were a co-nominator, so this should be fine regardless if you worked on the review. –
1490: 1365: 1345: 1052: 17: 1599: 1577: 1167: 1144: 1120: 1327: 1278: 1263: 1186: 1140: 1072: 939: 626: 605: 958: 51: 1373: 1082:
I think that in order to recive a bonus for existing in a year it must have been around for 51+% of that year.
1025: 980: 975: 582: 558: 534: 74: 1558: 1058: 1040: 1395:
The most featured articles in any round this year was 3 (by Generalissima), for a base point total of 600.
610: 1443:
I think these are good ideas to consider. Actually, perhaps it might be time for another scoring reform;
1214: 1158:
for their feedback, but I'm leaning toward treating this as a new article without any age-based bonuses.
1084: 41: 1235: 970:
I wonder. Could they be silently removed from the original list? I see no reason to see their name in
1595: 1509: 1466: 1433: 920: 678: 570: 546: 498: 987: 1309: 1554: 1036: 875: 1392:
The most featured lists in any round this year was 6 (by myself), for a base point total of 270.
1234:, yes, if you're the co-nominator, you may claim points if you were a significant contributor. 1231: 1220: 1090: 885: 510: 61: 1591: 1505: 1462: 1452: 1429: 1341: 1274: 1243: 1205: 1163: 1136: 1116: 1068: 1011: 935: 8: 1209: 527: 1129:
It is indeed not a 5x — it was 2327 characters RPS before and is 3140 characters now.
1529: 1496: 1478: 1353: 1333: 1324: 1297: 1259: 1182: 999: 991: 954: 916: 481: 1402:, and this is only the second time that we've had more featured lists than articles. 467: 740: 575: 563: 551: 539: 515: 503: 1573: 1448: 1337: 1270: 1239: 1172: 1159: 1151: 1130: 1126: 1112: 1100: 1062: 1021: 1007: 931: 708: 1204:
So my and another user have been working our way though GAing every episode of
902: 587: 463: 1217: 1087: 636: 486: 103: 35: 1389:
Should featured articles really be more than 4x the value of featured lists?
1535: 1484: 1359: 1316: 1303: 1255: 1178: 1155: 950: 944: 927: 912: 908: 1411:
Featured article points were doubled from 100 to 200 prior to the 2014 cup
1408:
Featured list points were last increased from 40 to 45 prior the 2012 cup
1150:
article, and thus it wouldn't receive the age bonus. I'm going to ping @
974:
in a competition they will never win nor take part in. Just a thought.
468: 1583: 1569: 965: 930:, thanks for bringing this up. I've now adjusted the points for you. – 1386:
Far fewer lists are eligible for the interwiki bonus point multipliers
1253: 1176: 948: 1500: 907:
I believe the bot errantly awarded me 9 bonus points for my DYK on
465: 802: 760: 736: 1288: 469: 646: 609: 1423:
2015–present: 45 pts per FL vs 200 pts per FA (4.44 FL:1 FA)
1111:
be eligible as an expanded article, only as a new article.)
844: 830: 816: 788: 774: 746: 722: 1420:
2012–2014: 45 pts per FL vs 100 pts per FA (2.22 FL:1 FA)
1417:
2010–2011: 40 pts per FL vs 100 pts per FA (2.5 FL:1 FA)
1414:
The ratio was 2.5 lists being worth 1 FA from 2010–2011
64:
or in a previous discussion using the search box below.
1294:
probably just means I was right to leave when I did.
1200:
Co nominator finished a review before I looked at it
97: 990:, are you asking if we should remove his name from 1315:I would try, but Sca is very intimidating... 1350:Well, if someone wants to learn, poke me. 38:, for asking questions about the contest. 859:Philippines at the 1928 Summer Olympics 14: 1004:Knowledge:WikiCup/History/2024/Round 3 996:Knowledge:WikiCup/History/2024/Round 3 695:Scary Monsters and Nice Sprites (song) 60:Check to see if it is answered in the 26: 24: 25: 1613: 627:1994 Winter Olympics medal table 102: 1053:Recreated article — DYK scoring 52:Click here to start a new topic 1600:13:30, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 1578:10:05, 20 September 2024 (UTC) 1563:18:35, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 1542:20:13, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 1514:18:37, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 1491:18:26, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 1471:18:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 1457:18:18, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 1438:17:54, 19 September 2024 (UTC) 602:WikiCup content needing review 34:This is the talk page for the 13: 1: 1366:16:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC) 1346:14:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC) 1328:06:29, 8 September 2024 (UTC) 1310:05:56, 8 September 2024 (UTC) 1035:I think it's fine currently. 1059:Mercy Gilbert Medical Center 947:, I appreciate your honesty! 49:Put new text under old text. 7: 1374:Raise featured list points? 1279:09:40, 28 August 2024 (UTC) 1264:20:02, 24 August 2024 (UTC) 1248:13:06, 24 August 2024 (UTC) 1225:06:20, 24 August 2024 (UTC) 1221:Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 1187:18:16, 16 August 2024 (UTC) 1091:Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 10: 1618: 1168:03:59, 9 August 2024 (UTC) 1145:03:49, 9 August 2024 (UTC) 1121:03:44, 9 August 2024 (UTC) 1095:03:00, 9 August 2024 (UTC) 1077:02:34, 9 August 2024 (UTC) 1045:13:42, 30 June 2024 (UTC) 1031:23:41, 30 June 2024 (UTC) 1016:00:25, 30 June 2024 (UTC) 981:22:52, 29 June 2024 (UTC) 959:17:07, 24 June 2024 (UTC) 940:01:22, 24 June 2024 (UTC) 921:01:13, 24 June 2024 (UTC) 601: 100: 680:United States' Telegraph 876:William L. Breckinridge 73:Submission pages list ( 1534:Has about 8.9% of all 1483:Has about 8.9% of all 1358:Has about 8.9% of all 1302:Has about 8.9% of all 1555:~~ AirshipJungleman29 1037:~~ AirshipJungleman29 1027:——Serial Number 54129 977:——Serial Number 54129 886:Sport in Vatican City 658:Good topic candidates 1445:the last such reform 1206:Doctor Who series 14 1400:pulled some numbers 988:Serial Number 54129 1208:. The review for " 18:Knowledge talk:CUP 1232:OlifanofmrTennant 1000:Knowledge:WikiCup 992:Knowledge:WikiCup 898: 897: 663:Featured pictures 614: 597: 596: 475: 474: 96: 95: 91: 90: 16:(Redirected from 1609: 1540: 1489: 1364: 1323: 1319: 1308: 1266: 1189: 1133: 1065: 1028: 978: 973: 961: 853: 839: 825: 811: 797: 783: 769: 755: 731: 717: 703: 689: 621:Featured content 613: 604: 599: 598: 477: 476: 470: 106: 98: 69: 68: 44: 27: 21: 1617: 1616: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1592:Hey man im josh 1539: 1527: 1506:Hey man im josh 1488: 1476: 1463:Hey man im josh 1430:Hey man im josh 1376: 1363: 1351: 1321: 1317: 1307: 1295: 1291: 1202: 1131: 1063: 1055: 1026: 976: 971: 968: 905: 849: 835: 821: 807: 793: 779: 765: 751: 727: 713: 709:Geoffrey Cuming 699: 685: 593: 471: 466: 457: 92: 78: 45: 40: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 1615: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1587: 1565: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1544: 1533: 1523: 1519: 1482: 1473: 1425: 1424: 1421: 1418: 1415: 1412: 1409: 1406: 1403: 1396: 1393: 1390: 1387: 1384: 1375: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1357: 1330: 1301: 1290: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1201: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1192: 1191: 1190: 1104: 1097: 1054: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1033: 998:? If you mean 967: 964: 963: 962: 942: 904: 901: 896: 895: 894: 893: 883: 867: 866: 856: 842: 828: 814: 800: 786: 772: 758: 744: 734: 720: 706: 692: 655: 654: 644: 634: 616: 615: 603: 595: 594: 592: 591: 579: 567: 555: 543: 531: 519: 507: 494: 491: 490: 473: 472: 464: 462: 459: 458: 456: 455: 442: 429: 412: 395: 382: 369: 360: 335: 318: 289: 268: 251: 238: 221: 172: 123: 115: 112: 111: 108: 94: 93: 89: 88: 80: 79: 72: 67: 66: 65: 55: 32: 30: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1614: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1588: 1585: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1575: 1571: 1566: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1551: 1543: 1537: 1532: 1531: 1524: 1520: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1502: 1498: 1494: 1493: 1492: 1486: 1481: 1480: 1474: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1454: 1450: 1446: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1422: 1419: 1416: 1413: 1410: 1407: 1404: 1401: 1397: 1394: 1391: 1388: 1385: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1367: 1361: 1356: 1355: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1343: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1329: 1326: 1320: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1305: 1300: 1299: 1280: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1267: 1265: 1261: 1257: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1245: 1241: 1237: 1233: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1223: 1222: 1219: 1216: 1211: 1207: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1174: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1142: 1138: 1134: 1128: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1105: 1102: 1098: 1096: 1093: 1092: 1089: 1086: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1060: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1032: 1029: 1023: 1019: 1018: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1005: 1001: 997: 993: 989: 985: 984: 983: 982: 979: 960: 956: 952: 946: 943: 941: 937: 933: 929: 925: 924: 923: 922: 918: 914: 910: 900: 891: 887: 884: 881: 877: 874: 873: 872: 871: 864: 860: 857: 854: 852: 846: 843: 840: 838: 832: 829: 826: 824: 818: 815: 812: 810: 804: 801: 798: 796: 790: 787: 784: 782: 776: 773: 770: 768: 762: 759: 756: 754: 748: 745: 742: 738: 735: 732: 730: 724: 721: 718: 716: 710: 707: 704: 702: 696: 693: 690: 688: 682: 681: 677: 676: 675: 674: 670: 669: 665: 664: 660: 659: 652: 648: 645: 642: 638: 637:Chagatai Khan 635: 632: 628: 625: 624: 623: 622: 618: 617: 612: 607: 600: 589: 585: 584: 580: 577: 573: 572: 568: 565: 561: 560: 556: 553: 549: 548: 544: 541: 537: 536: 532: 529: 525: 524: 520: 517: 513: 512: 508: 505: 501: 500: 496: 495: 493: 492: 488: 484: 483: 479: 478: 461: 460: 454: 450: 446: 443: 441: 437: 433: 430: 428: 424: 420: 416: 413: 411: 407: 403: 399: 396: 394: 390: 386: 383: 381: 377: 373: 370: 368: 364: 361: 359: 355: 351: 347: 343: 339: 336: 334: 330: 326: 322: 319: 317: 313: 309: 305: 301: 297: 293: 290: 288: 284: 280: 276: 272: 269: 267: 263: 259: 255: 252: 250: 246: 242: 239: 237: 233: 229: 225: 222: 220: 216: 212: 208: 204: 200: 196: 192: 188: 184: 180: 176: 173: 171: 167: 163: 159: 155: 151: 147: 143: 139: 135: 131: 127: 124: 122: 121: 117: 116: 114: 113: 109: 107: 105: 99: 87: 86: 82: 81: 76: 71: 70: 63: 59: 56: 53: 50: 47: 46: 43: 39: 37: 31: 29: 28: 19: 1530:Adam Cuerden 1528: 1497:Adam Cuerden 1479:Adam Cuerden 1477: 1428:the matter. 1426: 1377: 1354:Adam Cuerden 1352: 1334:Adam Cuerden 1298:Adam Cuerden 1296: 1292: 1236:This version 1213: 1203: 1108: 1083: 1056: 969: 909:Flemish bond 906: 899: 869: 868: 848: 834: 820: 806: 792: 778: 764: 750: 726: 712: 698: 684: 679: 672: 671: 667: 666: 662: 661: 657: 656: 620: 619: 581: 569: 557: 545: 533: 522: 521: 509: 497: 480: 444: 431: 414: 397: 384: 371: 362: 337: 320: 291: 270: 253: 240: 223: 174: 125: 118: 101: 83: 58:Got a query? 57: 48: 33: 1135:(she/her • 1067:(she/her • 903:Many points 583:Newsletters 559:Submissions 535:Contestants 42:edit header 1501:2022 stats 1449:Epicgenius 1338:Epicgenius 1271:Cwmhiraeth 1269:I concur. 1252:Seconding! 1240:Epicgenius 1215:Questions? 1173:Epicgenius 1160:Epicgenius 1152:Cwmhiraeth 1132:Sammi Brie 1127:Epicgenius 1113:Epicgenius 1101:Sammi Brie 1085:Questions? 1064:Sammi Brie 1022:Epicgenius 1008:Epicgenius 932:Epicgenius 523:Discussion 511:Frequeries 110:Archives: 972:scary red 576:WP:WC/REV 564:WP:WC/SUB 552:WP:WC/SCO 540:WP:WC/CON 516:WP:WC/FAQ 504:WP:WC/HIS 85:User list 994:or from 120:Archives 1504:apart. 1318:Panini! 1256:Frostly 1179:Frostly 1156:Frostly 1020:Thanks 966:Vami IV 951:Frostly 945:Pbritti 928:Pbritti 913:Pbritti 803:WNAC-TV 761:KOLD-TV 737:KAUT-TV 588:WP:WC/N 571:Reviews 547:Scoring 499:History 482:WikiCup 36:WikiCup 1522:alone. 1057:I had 528:WT:CUP 487:WP:CUP 1584:Kusma 1570:Kusma 1210:Rogue 1154:and @ 851:start 837:start 823:start 809:start 795:start 781:start 767:start 753:start 729:start 715:start 701:start 687:start 647:Jochi 1596:talk 1574:talk 1559:talk 1510:talk 1467:talk 1453:talk 1434:talk 1342:talk 1275:talk 1260:talk 1244:talk 1218:four 1183:talk 1164:talk 1117:talk 1088:four 1041:talk 1012:talk 955:talk 936:talk 917:talk 845:WUVN 831:WSJV 817:WOGX 789:KZJO 775:KTSF 747:KCTV 723:KEXC 611:edit 606:view 445:2024 432:2023 415:2022 398:2021 385:2020 372:2019 363:2018 338:2017 321:2016 292:2015 271:2014 254:2013 241:2012 224:2011 175:2010 126:2009 75:how? 1536:FPs 1485:FPs 1360:FPs 1304:FPs 1289:FPs 1109:not 890:rev 880:rev 863:nom 741:nom 673:GAN 668:DYK 651:nom 641:nom 631:nom 62:FAQ 1598:) 1576:) 1561:) 1512:) 1469:) 1455:) 1436:) 1398:I 1344:) 1325:🥪 1277:) 1262:) 1254:— 1246:) 1185:) 1177:— 1166:) 1143:) 1139:• 1119:) 1075:) 1071:• 1043:) 1014:) 957:) 949:— 938:) 919:) 870:PR 608:• 451:/ 447:: 438:/ 434:: 425:/ 421:/ 417:: 408:/ 404:/ 400:: 391:/ 387:: 378:/ 374:: 365:: 356:/ 352:/ 348:/ 344:/ 340:: 331:/ 327:/ 323:: 314:/ 310:/ 306:/ 302:/ 298:/ 294:: 285:/ 281:/ 277:/ 273:: 264:/ 260:/ 256:: 247:/ 243:: 234:/ 230:/ 226:: 219:11 217:/ 215:10 213:/ 209:/ 205:/ 201:/ 197:/ 193:/ 189:/ 185:/ 181:/ 177:: 170:11 168:/ 166:10 164:/ 160:/ 156:/ 152:/ 148:/ 144:/ 140:/ 136:/ 132:/ 128:: 1594:( 1582:@ 1572:( 1568:— 1557:( 1538:. 1508:( 1495:@ 1487:. 1465:( 1451:( 1432:( 1362:. 1340:( 1332:@ 1322:• 1306:. 1273:( 1258:( 1242:( 1230:@ 1181:( 1162:( 1141:c 1137:t 1125:@ 1115:( 1099:@ 1073:c 1069:t 1039:( 1010:( 986:@ 953:( 934:( 926:@ 915:( 892:) 888:( 882:) 878:( 865:) 861:( 855:) 847:( 841:) 833:( 827:) 819:( 813:) 805:( 799:) 791:( 785:) 777:( 771:) 763:( 757:) 749:( 743:) 739:( 733:) 725:( 719:) 711:( 705:) 697:( 691:) 683:( 653:) 649:( 643:) 639:( 633:) 629:( 590:) 586:( 578:) 574:( 566:) 562:( 554:) 550:( 542:) 538:( 530:) 526:( 518:) 514:( 506:) 502:( 489:) 485:( 453:2 449:1 440:2 436:1 427:3 423:2 419:1 410:3 406:2 402:1 393:2 389:1 380:2 376:1 367:1 358:5 354:4 350:3 346:2 342:1 333:3 329:2 325:1 316:6 312:5 308:4 304:3 300:2 296:1 287:4 283:3 279:2 275:1 266:4 262:3 258:1 249:2 245:1 236:3 232:2 228:1 211:9 207:8 203:7 199:6 195:5 191:4 187:3 183:2 179:1 162:9 158:8 154:7 150:6 146:5 142:4 138:3 134:2 130:1 77:) 54:. 20:)

Index

Knowledge talk:CUP
WikiCup
edit header
Click here to start a new topic
FAQ
how?
User list

Archives
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.