Knowledge talk:WikiCup/Archive/2009/10

1164: 1081:

1 point which doesn't make any sense at all. And I think the same could go for minor edits, they are fine as they are now, I really don't see the big deal about people thinking regular edits shouldn't be counted, creating Featured Content/Good Content isn't everything, some articles simply don't have enough information readily available on them to make FA/GA but that doesn't mean they aren't notable and don't deserve their own article, and I feel that lowering the point value of those edits would really keep participants in the cup away from those type of articles even when those type of articles are generally the ones that need the most work due to a lack of common info about them because they might be a more obscure topic. As the current changes are proposed, I feel that we are trying to force participants into a small group of articles that have lots of info about them a large topic base to draw on while pulling them away from more obscure topics that need more work because they may not be able to get a GA/FA from them. Best,

1728: 626: 1740: 1769: 641: 31: 1752:

drawing, one of the most significant and compelling images of the early republic, reminds us how short-lived the history of the United States might have been." It's images such as this one which are persuading more institutions to digitize in high resolution. I might fall behind and lose the Cup; the Tropenmuseum of Amsterdam launches its first collaborative exhibit with WMF at its physical galleries in November and I've committed to leading the digital restorations.

139:

going to get what looks to be at least 615 points in one month for this, I for one refuse to acknowledge him as being a participant within the Cup, let alone anyone who makes it into the final round or places. That is the equivalent to 12 Featured articles or 20 GAs, just from mass edits. By the way, many of his edits are things like "Added Index Fungorum external link", making redirects, or other stuff that doesn't add anything to the actual content of the article.

1695:

community and this contest is helping with that. I for one would like to kill off the feeling that FAs are the be all and end all of Knowledge's featured content and think that, used better than it is currently, the WikiCup can change that and encourage collaboration in underlooked areas of the project. Respectfully. However, I do like the "bonus points for the first item" idea. That could force people from doing the same thing over and over.

590:

points you get from edits is very little anyways, also also remember that this is a friendly competition about helping the encyclopedia and it really doesn't matter who wins because the whole beneficiary is supposed to be the encyclopedia, and arguing about peoples points doesn't really help anyone and it only serves to make people angry at each other and to add drama which takes tons of time of away from editing/content building. All the Best,

154: 2050: 1102: 2493:

waiting for X!'s email (please resend if that's been tried already). Basically what we do is bring people into the WikiVoices channel where most of the restorationists hang out. Microphones aren't required, but are very helpful (a cheap $ 10 microphone usually works fine). Very convenient to fullscreen the image software while chatting in voice, and trade files and screenshots as needed.

1717:. During the WikiCup I have also contributed a good article, four featured sounds, and nineteen DYKs, which most people would accept as contributing "even slightly". At the rate things are going I will probably retire after this year because more time is getting spent interfacing directly with cultural institutions. There's a world of significant material which has never been digitized. 1440:

I rather hate to say this, but I do have to feel that, after learning a major skill and buying quite a lot of books to scan for FPC, it does seem a bit devaluing that points can be gotten, identical to mine, for someone with no more connection to the work than "saw it, liked it". Can we make a ruling

1223:

Um... that is supposed to be her dad on the left? ... that is one of the worse depictions of him I've seen then. Blah. The posturing is of a young man - the hands, the shoulders, the way the feet are. His balding would be different if he was a man of daughters of Elizabeth's age. Plus, her father was

1001:

I would say this is worth applying to everything. Up the value of anything like FSs and FAs that are tougher/rarer, maybe lower something like FL (you could really get almost infinite FL if you took a bit of time doing random Awards/Nominations and Discographies) and I would say lower mainspace edits

357:

The problem is, they aren't minor edits, and it would be incorrect to mark them as such. It's also impossible to mark a new page creation or redirect as minor. Sorry if y'all don't like my edits, but it's part of a long term plan to get several thousand fungal taxon articles to start-class or higher.

2492:

Just so you're fully aware, I don't actually use GIMP (although I have a manual for it and can look up questions). Shoemaker's Holiday is our local GIMP expert. Most of the functions from Photoshop do have GIMP analogs, so it's usually worked out pretty well whichever software is in use. Am still

1751:

This is the closest the United States ever came to losing a war to a foreign power on its own soil. It's one thing to read the words "They burned Washington", another to see the capitol itself with a charred facade and collapsed roof. The official Library of Congress record states "George Munger's

1375:

There should probably be some kind of minimum level. There are a few people that are nominating work that they didn't do en masse. It is one thing if there was involvement with an item that helped get it listed -beyond- just putting it up on a process. If there was a ruling, then it would have to be

1080:

I don't think mainspace edits should be .01, that seems very low, because in my opinion, that makes it practically useless point wise for a user to go out and improve an article from a stub to maybe a B class article or to create some small content. Because you'd need 100 of those edits just to get

589:

I really don't see a problem with these edits, they are helping the encyclopedia and I really can't see any problems with them, I mean Durvora noms tons of FP's and no one complains (She's also in first as of now because of that). Also, Ottava remember to AGF and to try to stay civil, the amount of

2583:

I suppose someone forgot to tell him this is supposed to be for fun. It's great that he wants to improve articles and is providing unsolicited reviews, but the only reason he is doing it is because TheLeftorium is in the wikicup and he'll probably make another push to have him disqualified. Ottava,

1394:

I haven't included any ITNs which I haven't in some way edited so that's how I've been doing it anyway. I don't submit other people's DYKs ever unless I've done something with them so there's just my own there too. GAs if any are all brought to that level by me. What work are the "few people" doing

1265:

I'd probably have a whole lot more points by now, if it weren't for the fact that I seem to be the only person closing Featured pictures, so mine are languishing. Also, I got two content credits that I don't count because I had little interaction with them besides nominating. Oh, well! Just have to

1057:

FLs are still a bit hard to do and for certain users as myself who usually stays with sports, getting an FA is very hard in pro wrestling since it is complicating to explain clearly, and the sports section of GAN is always long and reviews are rare. I feel the amount of points for FLs is just right

431:

All these "spam" edits add useful and appropriate content to the pages I'm editing, and I challenge you to give me some examples of edits that don't. I know you "luv the dramah", but your constant accusations of me using a script are annoying, and your refusal to accept my explanations is something

308:

I can't help but agree with Ottava that it's a cheap tactic. We're supposed to encourage mainspace editing, yes. But, it's not supposed to encourage adding a template to 300 pages and getting 30 points for it. Adding a template to 300 pages shouldn't be worth the same amount of points as a GA, IMO.

138:

82 points from editing in what, 3/4 days? If that is going to be how this final round ends up, then I really think that there is going to be a major problem. WikiCup is supposed to be content. It takes a lot of work putting together actual content, but not much to put forth mass edits. If Sasata is

806:. He has even taken photographs of a high enough quality to be promoted to featured status. WikiCup or no WikiCup, I consider Sasata one of the best content contributors on Knowledge. I don't think he does anything in an attempt to cheat the WikiCup; his only motive is to improve our encyclopedia. 774:

That's a faulty analogy. Image clean-up increases the EV of the image from a tattered, dirty image into a clean and pretty one that you can actually understand and identify the subject. Sticking a category or some external link into a load of articles does not increase EV in any way shape or form.

525:

By "winning" you mean I have two GAs and an FA? The FA took over 8 months to complete. The two GAs also took a long time to complete. These edits took only a few minutes at most. There is a huge difference. I am here to compete against people who are putting forth actual content and not gaming the

452:

Wouldn't really work for this round, but for future WikiCup's couldn't the value of individual edits be further toned down? Like make all simple edits worth .01 points? Even the best of spammers couldn't do much with that, even getting away with hundreds of edits would only yield a few points. The

2099:

Could you please manually update any new submissions you make into the contest at the scoring page? (i.e., click edit next to "Pool A".) It would be a great help... I would suggest using X!'s counter to count mainspace but obviously that won't differentiate mainspace from other spaces as well as

710:

And I don't think working on a picture for several hours is worth as much as (right now it is actually worth more than) a GA and working on it for a couple of days, OR working on FLs with the new requirements in place. I understand it is expensive, but restoration of pictures is not truly content

687:

Mifter - listing one category at a time across thousands of articles is not helping the encyclopedia. This is a content competition. That means actually spending time and writing content. DYK, GAs, and FAs all take a lot of time in writing. FP and FS take a lot of time that cannot even be seen on

220:

Spamming external links to a series of pages 800 times in three days is not contributing. I'm sorry, but if you don't understand that, then I have nothing to say to you. His actions are clearly inappropriate and amount to nothing less than a cheap tactic. It would be impossible to match his -spam

1359:

Well, the Whitman's about to pass, but it's a little frustrating, as you can imagine. Of course, the main reason I'm doing hit-and-run FSCs is to try and keep the process active in the hopes others will participate. Of course, Walt Whitman's ready to promote, so I'll have a non-hit-and-run soon.

64:

So, it seems Garden will be away from August 1st-15th. I'll be away from August 7th-15th. Thehelpfulone is still on a long Wikibreak for personal reasons. That means that you will not be getting a newsletter for the first week of Round 4, unfortunately. I think you'll all live, though. One of us

2510:

Been helping with the back end of new pages patrol since DragonflySixtyseven left for a very well-deserved break. In case that raises any eyebrows about mainspace edit count, let's discuss in advance. Most of these edits are Twinkle-assisted templating and prods with the occasional speedy for

1776:

As you may be aware, bot updates haven't been done in a week or so. ST47's bot seems to have been turned off, and he isn't replying to talk page messages. While there aren't any updates, I'm not bothering to make a newsletter, because there would be no updates. Very sorry for the inconvenience,

855:

Now that we're down to eight participants, how would the participants and judges feel about holding a Skypecast to discuss the WikiCup? Microphones not needed (but nice if you have them). Just a roundtable discussion to last about an hour. If you're interested please suggest a date and time.

824:

You do realize that he could write them without spamming each and every category one at a time to over inflate his mainspace count and be like the rest of us who feel that such gross behavior is unacceptable, right? And if he isn't doing it to get an unfair advantage, why is he doing it at all?

1465:

I've been toying with creating a version of this project for the Aviation WikiProject, in order to promote participation and article improvement there. I was wondering how you got things set up to have the bot automatically keep score. If it's not too difficult, I'd like to use it (with a few

1694:

Nergaal, most of the topics you suggest are very biased towards "traditional" article editing and that is expressly not what this is for. Yes, it's a content contest and we are an encyclopedia after all, but areas like FPC, ITN and in particular FSC are essentially overlooked by much of the

1570:

There's seven different ways to get credit from Article writing: Mainspace edits, DYK, ITN, GA, FA, GT, and FT. There's also the related FL. Given that, how on earth would this cap work? What I'd prefer is giving a bonus for the first of each type of content - maybe 50 points per type. This

1554:

I think there should be a cap for each category of points above which the points received should only count 50% or so. I don't think somebody should be able to win the wikicup ONLY because they restored a zillion of pictures, without bothering to create any sots of content, or even slightly

2238:<-- Candle, yes, that is the scenario, at least until ST47 becomes active again. I am placing a significant amount of trust in the final eight and while I'll try to check your point totals are correct I'm sure nobody is going to cheat in that way this late on. At least I hope not. 2421:

Anyone who wants to learn digital restoration is welcome to contact me for coaching and beginner material. There's more to be done than I can accomplish alone, particularly in light of a recent cache of historic photography obtained by the Swedish WMF chapter. Will gladly share.

1450:

That's 560 points right there, and 595 if you include the other nomination I have no connection with. This means that if I wanted to, I could rocket myself to the lead. However, if other people are going to be allowed drive-by noms, then for what reason am I holding back?

2065:

Due to a crisis that's not quite happening yet, but which looks very, very likely to happen, it looks like I may end up not able to work on Knowledge for a bit. Please ask at the end of this leg, and don't forward me to the four-person leg without my express confirmation.

1441:

on whether such things should be allowed? And, let me point out that if, to keep things even, I did claim poitns for things I had no connection to - well, on Featured sounds, we have a lack of nominators, so I make it a point to try and have things up much of the time.

2831:

Sorry about the wildly fluctuating score: I had agreed with Garden and iMatthew to claim 3 credits on the 9-part FS, since I did substantial work on it, but hadn't found it, but I had trouble getting the bot to understand some files didn't count. Should be fixed now.

1333:

We should probably get some kind of opinion on this. I personally would not condone "grab-and-run" points, even if FPC and FSC are the only real areas that this is a concern (FAC requires you to be a significant contribution, although admittedly GAN and ITN don't).

526:

system to show that they can produce content. The above is spamming, just as those gaming whatever processes would be inappropriate. Is it bad for me to demand people respecting what this competition is about? I will not acknowledge any ill gotten points.

1727: 711:

building. IF it were about A NEW animation or graphics, or map or whatever sure, it is actually work, but restoring by playing a touch-up artist should not be rewarded as high as it is now. It is exactly the equivalent of whatever Satsa is doing now.

358:

I have to access several different on-line databases to extract this information, and it's most efficient for me to do one task (i.e., 1 small addition to an article), save, move to the next batch of articles, and repeat ad nauseum until finished.

2625:

Did I say that Theleftorium should not have points for it? No. I am only scolding a reviewer who did not perform a complete review. They checked grammar and only grammar. Hell, there doesn't even seem to be anything about images or the rest.

1311:

I had a couple featured sounds promoted, but not ones I've had much of a hand in getting to Knowledge. Do you think it'd be alright to claim one? I certainly have no intention of claiming for all the dozen or so parts of the two nominations.

2804:

that I think watchers of this page could give informed input to. IMHO after "Keep the servers running" this could be the second most important strategy for the Wikimedia foundation (according to the strategy project at any rate).

1113:), I will probably be retiring from the WikiCup after this year's Cup ends. Call this announcement definite if I finish first, likely otherwise. It's been a great deal of fun being part of the Cup; wishing everyone the best. 797:

genera and species that we didn't cover at all before, and all are well referenced to respected literature, with full taxoboxes, useful external links, appropriate categories and so on. On top of that, Sasata has contributed a

265:

Let me make this clear - I will not acknowledge Sasata as a participant in the WikiCup with his "mainspace contributions". Everyone else can declare on their own if they will or will not. This is my feelings on the matter.

416:

You have a script that could easily do this, and the timing does not match doing it by hand. Furthermore, your excuse last time was very dubious. But it doesn't actually matter - your edits are not content, they are spam.

2545:

Further more, anything that is deleted will subsequently be decounted by the bot anyway, so the only points you will be granted will be the formatting work (something which does deserve points) if I understand correctly.

1140: 166:

If it makes you feel any better, Ottava, estimate what fraction of a point came from stringing each bead for this necklace. These things are about a millimeter wide; I may need to visit the ophthamologist. ;)

2998:

Why is that cheating? Apparently, she noticed she never submitted it for the round she could have used it in. It was passed in 2009, and since she never received points for it, I don't see how it's cheating.

545:

Just my two cents, but you don't have to use a script to go fast; I've reached 15-20 edits/minute (wasn't trying for speed, just time constraints) simply using copy and paste... and a fast browser. :)

1643:. If one keeps restoring relatively pointless pictures all day without doing pretty much anything else, and then wins the WikiCup do you think this would actually bring prestige to the WikiCup award? 949:

and a couple others), but to get a FA on the same thing would be exceptional. In my view, FAs should be worth 70–75–80 points, as they are certainly more than twice the work of a GA. Take a look at

1110: 729:

If you actually look at the imges, you'll see the one on the left is covered in dirt and crud that makes the underlying image very hard to see. This is not the case with Durova's restoration.

402:

Didn't we go through this before? The only "script" I use is fingers, brain, and coffee. I don't even know what you're showing me with those pages. What do you think they're supposed to mean?

2198: 2125: 2022: 1964: 1922: 1884: 1805: 1402: 474: 199: 113: 192:

Is that humour? To me it seems like an extreme reaction to ostracise Sasata for contributing too much to Knowledge. But maybe it's because I am not viewing this as a personal contest... --

1739: 1635:

You realize that that is not the point I was trying to make. Probably most of the things nominated here are obscure at best, but the cup should not aim at incentivizing people to work

625: 868:

Don't have a mic, but certainly interested in listening in. Lets say Saturday August 22nd. Can't come up with a time... let's see where everyone lives and a time good for everyone.

3019:

So, submitting something from a much less competitive round to a much more competitive round is fine? Effectively having more time than the other competitors to gain points is fine

1733:

United States Capitol, 1814. The only painting known to survive of the capitol after the British burned Washington during the War of 1812. Digitized from the original watercolor.

2602:

I don't want to have this discussion again. Please just ignore it, Scorpion0422. I respect Ottava Rima's opinion and I believe his comments have helped me become a better editor.

1592:. They are both fine submissions but if this is indeed a Wikicup, it should reward users who contribute in every field, not just in renovating pictures, and perhaps some edits to 739: 2265:(User:X!) about coding one of his SoxBots to take over the WikiCup bot tasks. I explained what ST47's bot did, and he thinks he can do it for us. Let's keep our fingers crossed! 309:

It would be very nice if Sasata would mark those kind of edits as minor, but if s/he won't, I don't think I can't stop it. :-/ (Comment not intended to be a dig at Sasata, btw).

1019:

There will be two months after this year's cup finishes to discuss next year's point system. Let's hold things off until then; we'll have more people commenting at that stage.

1163: 245:

Actually worth a question, should simply uploading a free license photo (it'd have to be confirmed free license, obv) used in an article get you some points? This picture,

793:

Maybe I'm biased because I love fungi, but I just want to defend Sasata here. His mass edits have improved Knowledge's coverage of fungi no end- we now have articles on

103: 2560:

If that's cool with everybody. A fairly small portion of total points anyway. Just didn't want to rub any fur in the wrong direction. Thanks for the responses. :)

3026: 3014: 2861: 1385: 1298: 1285: 1242: 1233: 1218: 1209: 3075:

I'm going to wait for the next bot update before I mark the bottom four as eliminated. You still have a very small amount of time to add anything last minute. :)

2821: 688:

Wiki. As you can see, he is able to get about 300 edits per day, which is the equivalent of one GA. 300 categories is -not- the same as one GA or anything close.

2206: 2133: 2030: 1972: 1930: 1892: 1813: 1410: 482: 207: 121: 1679: 1666: 1652: 1618: 1605: 1575: 733: 3050:

It's hard to make a decision like that solo. When Garden is around tomorrow, I'll discuss it with him. Until then, I'm going to remove the points from Sasata.

3040: 2283: 2088: 1364: 1328: 747: 2620: 758:

A bot or a script can do what Sasata is doing right now. A bot or a script cannot examine something and change pixel by pixel to clean up damage to an image.

82: 2649: 2635: 1512: 3125: 3105: 2957: 2937: 2212: 2036: 1978: 1952: 1936: 1910: 1430: 1416: 1073: 535: 510: 488: 230: 213: 2158:

Okay, added two new featured picture promotions. Not paying much attention to mainspace, but for reference which date and hour did the bot stop tracking?

1787: 1543: 2922: 2153: 834: 815: 2010: 1849: 1837: 1819: 1011: 127: 3159: 3139: 2521: 2312: 784: 767: 720: 697: 462: 395: 2691: 2555: 2223: 2193: 2178: 2139: 2120: 2076:

Erm, alright then. Remember of course that this leg ends on the 30th of September. Good luck with sorting out the imminent enigmatic crisis however.

2017: 1959: 1917: 1898: 1879: 1868: 1864: 1800: 1397: 1150: 1134: 469: 441: 426: 275: 258: 249:(which I uploaded), and other similar images provide significant EV to Wiki regardless of any Featured (or Valued, as suggested for next year) status. 194: 187: 108: 2379: 2361: 2343: 996: 2788: 2566: 2499: 2191:

score and will not receive shouts of anger for such an action? And a "judge" is requesting that this be done?) Is this all written down somewhere? --

2164: 670: 59: 2540: 2144:

Surely there's an edit counter that differentiates between major and minor edits? Not sure there is one that filters out edits with tools though...

1052: 881: 599: 322: 2070: 1707: 411: 367: 2469: 2250: 1346: 1090: 945:

Maybe we should up the points for FAs next year—it can be easy to get multiple GAs through if you write on a limited topic (heck, I did that with

610: 303: 2596: 1270: 2404: 862: 2725:

All of those who want to "keep an eye on the competition" (or just participate with conversation relating to next year's cup please watchlist

2456: 3090: 2505: 1874: 1855: 1109:

Hi all, dropping by with an announcement. Due to commitments that are shifting more from direct contribution to volunteer outreach (such as

2902: 2970: 2796: 1322:

I haven't tried to claim credit on any FPs I didn't actually restore. There doesn't seem to be any rule about grab-and-run points though.

2278: 1564: 1481: 1195: 2842:

Oh, by the way, I'm likely to get a lot of points at the start of the 30th. I'm hoping that we're not closing at the end of the 29th. =/

1758: 2872: 2846: 2836: 2112: 1957:

I've never heard of that either but am going to guess that it relates to the relative ease with which Shappy would be crowned winner. --

604:

Well, if you think digital image restoration amounts to cheap points then you're welcome to fire up Photoshop or Gimp and duplicate it.

3031:

I okayed with Islanders27 prior to submitting. If it makes you feel better Shoe, I promise to donate all my prize winnings to charity.

2714: 1792: 282:

I am completely happy with your non-acceptance of my participation. Does that mean you'll stop talking about me now? :) (p.s. from the

2992: 2059: 1455: 1316: 3022:

Withdraw me. If rules so basic that they shouldn't need to be said are not even seen by the judges, I don't want to be part of this.

2486: 977: 2771: 2428: 1025: 1421:

There was a rash of bulk nominations at a non-ITN process in which the individual nominating did nothing in regards to the page.

2897: 983:

I agree. I think after this year, we'll hold a poll to see what everyone thinks the correct point value of each item should be.

2882:

It seems I've all but been eliminated, so I'd like to extend my wishes of good luck to the remaining contestants. May the best

2755: 2183:

Wait, so all the featured content/DYK type submissions have to be added now? And we have to do it ourselves? (Just to clarify,

917: 3065: 1478: 1119: 934: 899: 850: 246: 2477:

Durova, if you have the time, I'd also be interested in learning to use GIMP, and I'd love to restore some older pictures.

148: 2726: 583: 453:

less mainspace edits are worth the more people will have to focus on generating content, the supposed goal of this Cup.

2740: 347: 467:

Yet Ottava is now both winning and the most upset. @Staxringold: I don't think the bot can count that or something. --

173: 887: 553: 2581: 2576: 65:

should be around on Sunday, August 16th to get the second week's newsletter done. So while we're gone, I've asked

2733: 950: 378:

Do huggle edits count? Huggle is a script. If they do not count, then Sasata's script should not count. He uses

2336: 2217:

Anyone who wishes to review my addition is welcome to check the submission page; am updating everything there.

1549: 1505: 1045: 970: 576: 221:

edits- by content contribution alone in one month. To allow him to do such is a mockery of this whole system.

3070: 2256: 2094: 1745:

To the best of my knowledge, this is the only digital restoration that has ever been performed on this image.

1798:

How then is it to be decided who progresses? Shall we just continue with no eliminations? :D :D :D :D :D --

1238:

First illustrated edition. Don't blame me, blame this for being historically important, despite its flaws.

178:

Well, since you said that you weren't going to list it for FPC, then you get 0 points for that picture. :P

2812: 2515:

where appropriate (not marked as minor). Does that sit well? If not, would be amenable to downgrading.

2044: 1589: 2907:

I have been renamed from iMatthew to Islanders27. So, don't think there's a new judge or something. :)

1763: 1528: 640: 38: 3023: 2989: 2869: 2843: 2833: 2711: 2067: 1676: 1615: 1585: 1572: 1473: 1452: 1361: 1313: 1295: 1267: 1260: 1239: 1215: 1192: 1125:

Would it be appropriate for the Wiki Lollipop Guild to sing "Ding dong the Wiki Witch is dead"? ^__^

730: 2852:

If you need some more points, I think I can possibly steal some from Durova before she notices. ;/

1066: 2416: 1672: 1584:

That's a fine point, but how many people do you think google/search on wikipedia how the capitol

946: 940: 1214:

Mr. Darcy isn't in that image. Are you suggesting an incestuous version of Pride and Prejudice?

2895: 2807: 2610: 2594: 2512: 1460: 47: 17: 2739:

The Signpost article that should be published at the end of this contest is in development at

2732:

This week's newsletter is done but has not been sent out due to bugs in AWB. It's located at

2118:

Ah OK, so everybody just guesses their own scores and inserts a number then... makes sense. --

2001:

Cough - article contrib is a fail way of determining contributions. It isn't a major loss. :)

3152: 3118: 3101: 3083: 3058: 3007: 2950: 2933: 2915: 2857: 2645: 2631: 2174: 2006: 1426: 1381: 1281: 1229: 1205: 1130: 1007: 830: 780: 763: 693: 531: 506: 458: 422: 391: 271: 254: 226: 183: 144: 802:

number of did you knows, has written a comparable number of fungal GAs/FAs to everyone else

2719: 2451: 2399: 2015:

I hope you covered your mouth - what isn't a major loss? I don't understand that either. --

1611: 1468: 8: 2767: 2551: 2482: 2149: 1942: 1657:

On a side-note, core and vital articles should receive double/triple the regular points.

1059: 811: 558:

My two cents: adding a template to 300 pages probably shouldn't equal a GA. However, it

2743:

if you wish to edit it or watchlist it for the future. Any help would be appreciated!

2736:

if you want to read it, but I'll try to send it again or even manually send it tonight.

2535: 2374: 2356: 2330: 2307: 2273: 1832: 1785: 1499: 1096: 1039: 991: 964: 912: 876: 570: 317: 77: 3135: 3096:

Well, how often does the bot update and how do we contact its operator about bribes?

2888: 2605: 2589: 1824:

The eliminations aren't until the end of September. Hopefully he's back before then!

1662: 1648: 1601: 1560: 738:

Nergaal, this is one of the doors digital image restoration is opening for Knowledge.

716: 666: 631: 343: 283: 2588:

for me? It's a FAC (although it probably shouldn't be), and needs a good review. --

3146: 3112: 3097: 3077: 3052: 3036: 3001: 2944: 2929: 2909: 2853: 2826: 2779: 2746: 2682: 2641: 2627: 2241: 2170: 2103: 2079: 2002: 1915:

I don't know much about that and had to check what it was. TV game show I think? --

1698: 1614:, a very obscure Victorian play. Should I have gotten fewer Wikicup points for it? 1534: 1488: 1422: 1377: 1337: 1277: 1225: 1201: 1126: 1086: 1003: 925: 826: 776: 759: 689: 595: 527: 502: 454: 437: 418: 407: 387: 363: 299: 267: 250: 222: 179: 140: 2802: 2877: 2701: 2511:

copyvio. Also light formatting and copyediting (all marked as minor) and adding

2203: 2130: 2027: 1969: 1927: 1889: 1810: 1407: 634:

during his final hours of life. Scanned from the original pencil sketch of 1848.

550: 479: 204: 118: 2984:

If this isn't fixed, if we're going to just let anyone get away with any bit of

2169:

I call dibs to determine both mine and Durova's mainspace count. Mwah ha ha ha!

46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2976: 2965: 2763: 2710:

need to drop out of the cup at the end of this month (unless someone beats me)

2584:

if you want to spend so much time going over others' work, how about reviewing

2547: 2478: 2145: 1522: 1306: 1276:

From what I see, it looks like you have one that is a guarantee close as pass.

1224:

normally more composed and sat more often, as to emphasize the character type.

807: 2585: 2529: 2368: 2350: 2324: 2301: 2267: 1826: 1779: 1493: 1200:

I'm confused - am I supposed to be Mr Darcy or Elizabeth in that picture. :D

1033: 985: 958: 906: 870: 564: 311: 71: 3131: 2445: 2393: 1658: 1644: 1597: 1556: 712: 662: 339: 2980:

is now a valid way to gain points. Do the rules not even matter anymore?

1176:

But you said you weren't going to join this year! I was convinced I'd win!

382:

to mass edit in links in the external links section. This can be verified

3032: 2561: 2516: 2494: 2464: 2423: 2292: 2218: 2159: 2054: 1753: 1323: 1145: 1114: 1082: 1020: 894: 857: 742: 605: 591: 433: 403: 359: 295: 168: 133: 93: 1002:

to .01 (and eliminate point values for minors, or make them like .001).

547: 161:: 298 beads on the tassel alone. Two days' work; 0.1 total Cup points. 1466:

modifications) to score our contest. Do you think this is possible? -

661:

How is cutting down the writing and removing yellow content building?

3110:

I believe it updates in about an hour, and X! is on a wiki-break. :P

1518: 158: 153: 2762:

Thanks a lot for those links; I wasn't watching any of those pages.

1675:. Got it. Don't think there's any point continuing this discussion. 1181:: Pride and Prejudice goeth before a fall. Or illustrations thereof. 2868:

I have now been told to take all 9, after having my work reviewed.

89: 1531:) to do it for you - he wrote this bot and is a very helpful guy. 379: 2729:. This is where much of the future discussion should take place. 2439: 2387: 2288: 2262: 2049: 383: 66: 1101: 740:

Knowledge:Wikipedia_Signpost/2009-08-10/Tropenmuseum_partnership

69:

to just look over the place and make sure nothing breaks (lol).

2299:

now running WikiCup bot updates every six hours! Thank you X!!

338:

edits should receive the same amount of points as minor edits.

2640:

I've also chastised many reviewers at FAC for the same thing.

1713:

Wow, might as well ping directly when a criticism is code for

1768: 1031:

Heh, you make a good point. :-) Apologies for that. Cheers, —

1191:

I present to you... a scene from 2010. And now I must hide.

2463:

Coolness. Email me for my Skype ID; let's get started. :)

1376:

retroactive and would change quite a few point variables.

562:

help the encyclopedia, and this is for fun, so why not? —

2988:

they bloody well care to try, count me out of the cup.

102: 501:

No, I just mean count the same edits for less points.

1517:

If you are really interested it would be best to ask

2663:

We'll be safe from creeps and killers when they come

1266:wait for my sets to be finished and nominate them. 956:, more than a month in the making. It takes a lot. — 2706:Just to note, the situation has resolved, and I do 1290:Aye. But that one was supposed to have been closed 1946: 1904: 1854:If he isn't, then Cup is award to me by default. 1843: 2678:Then I don't know what'll happen when they come. 2658:We'll be safe inside our fortress when they come 1139:Hm, maybe I'll restore the Wicked Witch next... 1555:contributing to other sections of wikipedia. 1444:Beethoven's Diabelli variations just passed. 1571:encourages people to try diverse processes. 2654:Okay, hatchets back in the emergency hold. 2261:So, while on IRC, I approached Knowledge's 432:that you'll have to deal with on your own. 1722:Anatomy of a non-encyclopedic contribution 3144:Or in other words, the bot just updated. 2527:Twinkle edits aren't counted by the bot. 60:WikiCup goes Judge-less! (for a few days) 3130:Or in other words, good luck with that. 2801:There's a proposal on the strategy Wiki 2048: 1903:...Sounds like a bad day on Family Feud. 1767: 1162: 1100: 152: 1671:Relatively. Pointless. Pictures. Okay, 14: 1105:It's San Diego in August! I'm melting! 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 2506:Mainspace points and new pages patrol 1588:and how many do you think care about 247:File:Chess board opening staunton.jpg 2797:And you thought this was just a game 25: 2727:Knowledge talk:WikiCup/2010 Signups 2284:It does! We have a new WikiCup bot! 23: 2903:Just so you all don't get confused 2741:Knowledge:WikiCup/Signpost Article 2366:Minor problem being worked on ... 294:here on Knowledge." italics mine) 24: 3177: 96:! But don't worry, I won't smash 1738: 1726: 639: 624: 286:: "The purpose of the cup is to 101: 29: 2974:Evidently, claiming stuff from 2734:Knowledge:WikiCup/Newsletter/31 3066:23:46, 30 September 2009 (UTC) 3041:23:44, 30 September 2009 (UTC) 3027:23:42, 30 September 2009 (UTC) 3015:23:36, 30 September 2009 (UTC) 2993:23:27, 30 September 2009 (UTC) 2958:17:20, 28 September 2009 (UTC) 2938:17:18, 28 September 2009 (UTC) 2923:16:31, 28 September 2009 (UTC) 2898:01:02, 27 September 2009 (UTC) 2873:16:34, 28 September 2009 (UTC) 2862:23:45, 24 September 2009 (UTC) 2847:23:30, 24 September 2009 (UTC) 2837:06:05, 24 September 2009 (UTC) 2822:22:16, 23 September 2009 (UTC) 2789:18:37, 20 September 2009 (UTC) 2772:18:29, 20 September 2009 (UTC) 2756:18:13, 20 September 2009 (UTC) 2715:02:12, 16 September 2009 (UTC) 2692:19:25, 16 September 2009 (UTC) 2650:23:40, 12 September 2009 (UTC) 2636:23:38, 12 September 2009 (UTC) 2621:23:28, 12 September 2009 (UTC) 2597:23:24, 12 September 2009 (UTC) 2567:18:46, 11 September 2009 (UTC) 2556:19:27, 10 September 2009 (UTC) 2541:19:07, 10 September 2009 (UTC) 2522:19:03, 10 September 2009 (UTC) 2500:19:34, 11 September 2009 (UTC) 2487:19:33, 10 September 2009 (UTC) 13: 1: 2668:Unless they have a blow-torch 2470:16:05, 7 September 2009 (UTC) 2457:00:01, 7 September 2009 (UTC) 2429:15:19, 3 September 2009 (UTC) 2405:00:03, 7 September 2009 (UTC) 2380:23:53, 6 September 2009 (UTC) 2362:23:48, 6 September 2009 (UTC) 2344:23:47, 6 September 2009 (UTC) 2313:23:46, 6 September 2009 (UTC) 2279:00:01, 3 September 2009 (UTC) 2251:22:04, 2 September 2009 (UTC) 2224:04:53, 2 September 2009 (UTC) 2213:04:02, 2 September 2009 (UTC) 2179:22:10, 1 September 2009 (UTC) 2165:21:11, 1 September 2009 (UTC) 2100:minor from major... sorry... 1865: 1719: 851:WikiVoices meets the WikiCup? 617: 893:San Diego: US Pacific time. 7: 3160:00:38, 1 October 2009 (UTC) 3140:00:37, 1 October 2009 (UTC) 3126:00:33, 1 October 2009 (UTC) 3106:00:08, 1 October 2009 (UTC) 3091:00:00, 1 October 2009 (UTC) 2154:22:06, 31 August 2009 (UTC) 2140:22:04, 31 August 2009 (UTC) 2113:18:51, 31 August 2009 (UTC) 2089:18:43, 31 August 2009 (UTC) 2071:10:35, 31 August 2009 (UTC) 2060:18:04, 31 August 2009 (UTC) 2053:Best wishes and good luck, 2037:03:43, 31 August 2009 (UTC) 2011:03:12, 31 August 2009 (UTC) 1979:03:12, 31 August 2009 (UTC) 1953:03:07, 31 August 2009 (UTC) 1937:03:05, 31 August 2009 (UTC) 1911:03:01, 31 August 2009 (UTC) 1899:02:59, 31 August 2009 (UTC) 1869:16:35, 30 August 2009 (UTC) 1856: 1850:15:05, 30 August 2009 (UTC) 1838:12:16, 29 August 2009 (UTC) 1820:02:18, 29 August 2009 (UTC) 1793:00:06, 29 August 2009 (UTC) 1777:hopefully it's fixed soon. 1759:15:46, 30 August 2009 (UTC) 1708:21:30, 22 August 2009 (UTC) 1680:20:53, 22 August 2009 (UTC) 1667:20:44, 22 August 2009 (UTC) 1653:20:43, 22 August 2009 (UTC) 1619:19:13, 22 August 2009 (UTC) 1606:18:23, 22 August 2009 (UTC) 1576:17:37, 22 August 2009 (UTC) 1565:17:03, 22 August 2009 (UTC) 1544:22:22, 21 August 2009 (UTC) 1513:23:45, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 1482:19:43, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 1456:00:03, 21 August 2009 (UTC) 1431:14:19, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 1417:14:06, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 1386:02:45, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 1365:19:53, 19 August 2009 (UTC) 1347:19:19, 19 August 2009 (UTC) 1329:18:01, 19 August 2009 (UTC) 1317:17:59, 16 August 2009 (UTC) 1299:20:35, 10 August 2009 (UTC) 1286:19:56, 10 August 2009 (UTC) 1271:19:39, 10 August 2009 (UTC) 1243:14:59, 11 August 2009 (UTC) 1234:14:34, 11 August 2009 (UTC) 1219:14:28, 11 August 2009 (UTC) 1210:14:15, 11 August 2009 (UTC) 1196:09:54, 11 August 2009 (UTC) 1091:14:47, 10 August 2009 (UTC) 935:16:44, 16 August 2009 (UTC) 835:21:59, 10 August 2009 (UTC) 816:21:34, 10 August 2009 (UTC) 785:18:24, 10 August 2009 (UTC) 768:17:22, 10 August 2009 (UTC) 748:00:54, 11 August 2009 (UTC) 734:00:38, 11 August 2009 (UTC) 721:17:19, 10 August 2009 (UTC) 698:15:47, 10 August 2009 (UTC) 671:17:20, 10 August 2009 (UTC) 611:15:29, 10 August 2009 (UTC) 600:14:31, 10 August 2009 (UTC) 288:encourage mainspace editing 10: 3182: 1873:Yeah, I agree. Give it to 1151:21:27, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 1135:21:04, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 1120:20:44, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 1074:03:45, 7 August 2009 (UTC) 1053:19:25, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 1026:17:00, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 1012:12:56, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 997:10:52, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 978:07:12, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 918:21:53, 5 August 2009 (UTC) 900:16:38, 5 August 2009 (UTC) 882:21:09, 3 August 2009 (UTC) 863:04:04, 3 August 2009 (UTC) 584:07:12, 6 August 2009 (UTC) 554:00:28, 4 August 2009 (UTC) 536:23:13, 3 August 2009 (UTC) 511:00:52, 4 August 2009 (UTC) 489:22:28, 3 August 2009 (UTC) 463:22:10, 3 August 2009 (UTC) 442:21:59, 3 August 2009 (UTC) 427:21:52, 3 August 2009 (UTC) 412:21:48, 3 August 2009 (UTC) 396:21:44, 3 August 2009 (UTC) 368:21:32, 3 August 2009 (UTC) 348:21:28, 3 August 2009 (UTC) 323:21:17, 3 August 2009 (UTC) 304:20:35, 3 August 2009 (UTC) 276:19:35, 3 August 2009 (UTC) 259:22:14, 3 August 2009 (UTC) 231:19:33, 3 August 2009 (UTC) 214:19:21, 3 August 2009 (UTC) 188:19:19, 3 August 2009 (UTC) 174:19:11, 3 August 2009 (UTC) 149:14:29, 3 August 2009 (UTC) 128:04:08, 1 August 2009 (UTC) 2348:Haha! I meant "now." lol 1586:might have looked in 1814 1487:It may be easier to copy 1447:Which is 16 audio files. 620:Digital image restoration 83:01:34, 31 July 2009 (UTC) 2673:Or a poison gas injector 2577:Guess who is at it again 922:GMT. Ain't got no mic. 1945:, now you get my point? 1641:limited-usfulness-stuff 947:Design A-150 battleship 2513:Category:Living people 2322:running..." Fail. :P — 2062: 1773: 1550:proposal for next year 1183: 1106: 162: 18:Knowledge talk:WikiCup 3071:A little more time... 2384:Minor problem fixed. 2257:Does X mark the spot? 2095:Note to all competing 2052: 1771: 1610:One of my FAs was on 1166: 1104: 156: 42:of past discussions. 1612:Creatures of Impulse 3024:Shoemaker's Holiday 2990:Shoemaker's Holiday 2870:Shoemaker's Holiday 2844:Shoemaker's Holiday 2834:Shoemaker's Holiday 2712:Shoemaker's Holiday 2187:am allowed to edit 2068:Shoemaker's Holiday 2045:Possible withdrawal 1943:Sale of the Century 1772:What are we to do?! 1677:Shoemaker's Holiday 1616:Shoemaker's Holiday 1573:Shoemaker's Holiday 1453:Shoemaker's Holiday 1362:Shoemaker's Holiday 1314:Shoemaker's Holiday 1296:Shoemaker's Holiday 1268:Shoemaker's Holiday 1240:Shoemaker's Holiday 1216:Shoemaker's Holiday 1193:Shoemaker's Holiday 731:Shoemaker's Holiday 2886:editor win... :) – 2063: 1774: 1764:ST47 is missing :( 1184: 1171: 1143:Another 35 points! 1107: 163: 2787: 2754: 2690: 2455: 2403: 2341: 2249: 2111: 2087: 1706: 1542: 1510: 1489:Milhist's contest 1345: 1261:Me in the WikiCup 1167: 1157: 1144: 1050: 975: 954:-class battleship 933: 904:US Eastern time. 646:After restoration 632:John Quincy Adams 581: 290:and make editing 157:Illustration for 54: 53: 48:current talk page 3173: 3157: 3155: 3149: 3123: 3121: 3115: 3088: 3086: 3080: 3063: 3061: 3055: 3012: 3010: 3004: 2955: 2953: 2947: 2928:Booooooooooooo! 2920: 2918: 2912: 2891: 2819: 2815: 2810: 2786: 2784: 2777: 2753: 2751: 2744: 2689: 2687: 2680: 2616: 2613: 2608: 2592: 2564: 2537: 2532: 2519: 2497: 2467: 2448: 2442: 2437: 2426: 2396: 2390: 2385: 2376: 2371: 2358: 2353: 2342: 2339: 2333: 2329: 2327: 2309: 2304: 2275: 2270: 2248: 2246: 2239: 2221: 2211: 2209: 2201: 2196: 2162: 2138: 2136: 2128: 2123: 2110: 2108: 2101: 2086: 2084: 2077: 2057: 2035: 2033: 2025: 2020: 1977: 1975: 1967: 1962: 1948: 1935: 1933: 1925: 1920: 1906: 1897: 1895: 1887: 1882: 1866: 1862: 1845: 1842:And if he isn't? 1834: 1829: 1818: 1816: 1808: 1803: 1789: 1782: 1756: 1742: 1730: 1705: 1703: 1696: 1541: 1539: 1532: 1511: 1508: 1502: 1498: 1496: 1476: 1471: 1415: 1413: 1405: 1400: 1344: 1342: 1335: 1326: 1169:Scene from 2010: 1153: 1148: 1142: 1117: 1071: 1064: 1058:at the moment.-- 1051: 1048: 1042: 1038: 1036: 1023: 993: 988: 976: 973: 967: 963: 961: 932: 930: 923: 914: 909: 897: 878: 873: 860: 745: 643: 628: 608: 582: 579: 573: 569: 567: 487: 485: 477: 472: 319: 314: 212: 210: 202: 197: 171: 126: 124: 116: 111: 105: 88:Yay, we can all 79: 74: 33: 32: 26: 3181: 3180: 3176: 3175: 3174: 3172: 3171: 3170: 3153: 3151: 3147: 3119: 3117: 3113: 3084: 3082: 3078: 3073: 3059: 3057: 3053: 3008: 3006: 3002: 2968: 2951: 2949: 2945: 2916: 2914: 2910: 2905: 2889: 2880: 2829: 2817: 2813: 2808: 2799: 2780: 2778: 2747: 2745: 2722: 2704: 2683: 2681: 2614: 2611: 2606: 2590: 2579: 2562: 2534: 2530: 2517: 2508: 2495: 2465: 2446: 2440: 2424: 2419: 2417:A renewed offer 2394: 2388: 2373: 2369: 2355: 2351: 2337: 2331: 2325: 2323: 2306: 2302: 2286: 2272: 2268: 2259: 2242: 2240: 2219: 2207: 2199: 2194: 2192: 2160: 2134: 2126: 2121: 2119: 2104: 2102: 2097: 2080: 2078: 2055: 2047: 2031: 2023: 2018: 2016: 1973: 1965: 1960: 1958: 1931: 1923: 1918: 1916: 1893: 1885: 1880: 1878: 1831: 1827: 1814: 1806: 1801: 1799: 1784: 1780: 1766: 1754: 1749: 1746: 1743: 1734: 1731: 1699: 1697: 1673:WP:IDON'TLIKEIT 1552: 1535: 1533: 1506: 1500: 1494: 1492: 1474: 1469: 1463: 1411: 1403: 1398: 1396: 1338: 1336: 1324: 1309: 1263: 1146: 1115: 1099: 1067: 1060: 1046: 1040: 1034: 1032: 1021: 1010: 990: 986: 971: 965: 959: 957: 943: 941:FA at 50 points 926: 924: 911: 907: 895: 890: 875: 871: 858: 853: 783: 743: 650: 647: 644: 635: 629: 606: 577: 571: 565: 563: 509: 483: 475: 470: 468: 461: 331:Simple solution 316: 312: 257: 208: 200: 195: 193: 169: 136: 122: 114: 109: 107: 76: 72: 62: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3179: 3169: 3168: 3167: 3166: 3165: 3164: 3163: 3162: 3072: 3069: 3048: 3047: 3046: 3045: 3044: 3043: 3020: 2983: 2967: 2964: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2960: 2904: 2901: 2879: 2876: 2867: 2865: 2864: 2841: 2828: 2825: 2798: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2776:No problem :) 2759: 2758: 2737: 2730: 2721: 2718: 2703: 2700: 2699: 2698: 2697: 2696: 2695: 2694: 2675: 2670: 2665: 2660: 2638: 2623: 2578: 2575: 2574: 2573: 2572: 2571: 2570: 2569: 2507: 2504: 2503: 2502: 2475: 2474: 2473: 2472: 2460: 2459: 2418: 2415: 2414: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2407: 2285: 2282: 2258: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2236: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2096: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2046: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2039: 1998: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1877:by default. -- 1765: 1762: 1748: 1747: 1744: 1737: 1735: 1732: 1725: 1723: 1711: 1710: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1682: 1655: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1579: 1578: 1551: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1515: 1462: 1461:Scoring system 1459: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1395:"en masse"? -- 1389: 1388: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1369: 1368: 1367: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1308: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1292:three days ago 1262: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1255: 1254: 1253: 1252: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1177: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1098: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1006: 952:North Carolina 942: 939: 938: 937: 920: 902: 889: 886: 885: 884: 852: 849: 848: 847: 846: 845: 844: 843: 842: 841: 840: 839: 838: 837: 819: 818: 788: 787: 779: 771: 770: 756: 755: 754: 753: 752: 751: 750: 703: 702: 701: 700: 682: 681: 680: 679: 678: 677: 676: 675: 674: 673: 649: 648: 645: 638: 636: 630: 623: 621: 616: 615: 614: 613: 543: 542: 541: 540: 539: 538: 518: 517: 516: 515: 514: 513: 505: 494: 493: 492: 491: 457: 449: 448: 447: 446: 445: 444: 399: 398: 375: 374: 373: 372: 371: 370: 333: 332: 328: 327: 326: 325: 279: 278: 262: 261: 253: 242: 241: 240: 239: 238: 237: 236: 235: 234: 233: 135: 132: 131: 130: 94:naughty things 61: 58: 56: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3178: 3161: 3158: 3156: 3150: 3143: 3142: 3141: 3137: 3133: 3129: 3128: 3127: 3124: 3122: 3116: 3109: 3108: 3107: 3103: 3099: 3095: 3094: 3093: 3092: 3089: 3087: 3081: 3068: 3067: 3064: 3062: 3056: 3042: 3038: 3034: 3030: 3029: 3028: 3025: 3021: 3018: 3017: 3016: 3013: 3011: 3005: 2997: 2996: 2995: 2994: 2991: 2987: 2981: 2979: 2978: 2972: 2971: 2959: 2956: 2954: 2948: 2941: 2940: 2939: 2935: 2931: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2924: 2921: 2919: 2913: 2900: 2899: 2896: 2893: 2892: 2885: 2875: 2874: 2871: 2863: 2859: 2855: 2851: 2850: 2849: 2848: 2845: 2839: 2838: 2835: 2824: 2823: 2820: 2816: 2811: 2803: 2790: 2785: 2783: 2775: 2774: 2773: 2769: 2765: 2761: 2760: 2757: 2752: 2750: 2742: 2738: 2735: 2731: 2728: 2724: 2723: 2717: 2716: 2713: 2709: 2693: 2688: 2686: 2679: 2676: 2674: 2671: 2669: 2666: 2664: 2661: 2659: 2656: 2655: 2653: 2652: 2651: 2647: 2643: 2639: 2637: 2633: 2629: 2624: 2622: 2619: 2618: 2617: 2609: 2601: 2600: 2599: 2598: 2595: 2593: 2587: 2586:Matt Groening 2582: 2568: 2565: 2559: 2558: 2557: 2553: 2549: 2544: 2543: 2542: 2538: 2536: 2533: 2526: 2525: 2524: 2523: 2520: 2514: 2501: 2498: 2491: 2490: 2489: 2488: 2484: 2480: 2471: 2468: 2462: 2461: 2458: 2453: 2449: 2443: 2436:raises hand* 2435: 2434: 2433: 2432: 2431: 2430: 2427: 2406: 2401: 2397: 2391: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2377: 2375: 2372: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2359: 2357: 2354: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2340: 2334: 2328: 2321: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2310: 2308: 2305: 2298: 2294: 2290: 2281: 2280: 2276: 2274: 2271: 2264: 2252: 2247: 2245: 2237: 2225: 2222: 2216: 2215: 2214: 2210: 2205: 2202: 2197: 2190: 2186: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2176: 2172: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2163: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2151: 2147: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2137: 2132: 2129: 2124: 2117: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2109: 2107: 2090: 2085: 2083: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2069: 2061: 2058: 2051: 2038: 2034: 2029: 2026: 2021: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2008: 2004: 2000: 1999: 1980: 1976: 1971: 1968: 1963: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1951: 1944: 1940: 1939: 1938: 1934: 1929: 1926: 1921: 1914: 1913: 1912: 1909: 1902: 1901: 1900: 1896: 1891: 1888: 1883: 1876: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1867: 1863: 1861: 1860: 1853: 1852: 1851: 1848: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1835: 1833: 1830: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1817: 1812: 1809: 1804: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1790: 1788: 1786: 1783: 1770: 1761: 1760: 1757: 1741: 1736: 1729: 1724: 1721: 1720: 1718: 1716: 1709: 1704: 1702: 1693: 1692: 1681: 1678: 1674: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1664: 1660: 1656: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1620: 1617: 1613: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1577: 1574: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1562: 1558: 1545: 1540: 1538: 1530: 1527: 1524: 1520: 1516: 1514: 1509: 1503: 1497: 1490: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1480: 1479: 1477: 1472: 1458: 1457: 1454: 1448: 1445: 1442: 1432: 1428: 1424: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1414: 1409: 1406: 1401: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1390: 1387: 1383: 1379: 1374: 1373: 1366: 1363: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1354: 1353: 1348: 1343: 1341: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1327: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1315: 1300: 1297: 1293: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1283: 1279: 1275: 1274: 1273: 1272: 1269: 1244: 1241: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1231: 1227: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1217: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1207: 1203: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1194: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1182: 1180: 1175: 1170: 1165: 1156: 1152: 1149: 1141: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1118: 1112: 1103: 1092: 1088: 1084: 1079: 1075: 1072: 1070: 1065: 1063: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1049: 1043: 1037: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1024: 1013: 1009: 1005: 1000: 999: 998: 994: 992: 989: 982: 981: 980: 979: 974: 968: 962: 955: 953: 948: 936: 931: 929: 921: 919: 915: 913: 910: 903: 901: 898: 892: 891: 883: 879: 877: 874: 867: 866: 865: 864: 861: 836: 832: 828: 823: 822: 821: 820: 817: 813: 809: 805: 801: 796: 792: 791: 790: 789: 786: 782: 778: 773: 772: 769: 765: 761: 757: 749: 746: 741: 737: 736: 735: 732: 728: 727: 726: 725: 724: 723: 722: 718: 714: 709: 708: 707: 706: 705: 704: 699: 695: 691: 686: 685: 684: 683: 672: 668: 664: 660: 659: 658: 657: 656: 655: 654: 653: 652: 651: 642: 637: 633: 627: 622: 619: 618: 612: 609: 603: 602: 601: 597: 593: 588: 587: 586: 585: 580: 574: 568: 561: 556: 555: 552: 549: 537: 533: 529: 524: 523: 522: 521: 520: 519: 512: 508: 504: 500: 499: 498: 497: 496: 495: 490: 486: 481: 478: 473: 466: 465: 464: 460: 456: 451: 450: 443: 439: 435: 430: 429: 428: 424: 420: 415: 414: 413: 409: 405: 401: 400: 397: 393: 389: 385: 381: 377: 376: 369: 365: 361: 356: 355: 354: 353: 352: 351: 350: 349: 345: 341: 337: 330: 329: 324: 320: 318: 315: 307: 306: 305: 301: 297: 293: 289: 285: 281: 280: 277: 273: 269: 264: 263: 260: 256: 252: 248: 244: 243: 232: 228: 224: 219: 218: 217: 216: 215: 211: 206: 203: 198: 191: 190: 189: 185: 181: 177: 176: 175: 172: 165: 164: 160: 155: 151: 150: 146: 142: 129: 125: 120: 117: 112: 104: 99: 95: 91: 87: 86: 85: 84: 80: 78: 75: 68: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3145: 3111: 3076: 3074: 3051: 3049: 3000: 2985: 2982: 2975: 2973: 2969: 2943: 2908: 2906: 2890:Juliancolton 2887: 2883: 2881: 2866: 2840: 2830: 2806: 2800: 2781: 2748: 2720:A few things 2707: 2705: 2684: 2677: 2672: 2667: 2662: 2657: 2604: 2603: 2580: 2528: 2509: 2476: 2420: 2367: 2349: 2319: 2300: 2296: 2287: 2266: 2260: 2243: 2188: 2184: 2105: 2098: 2081: 2064: 1949: 1941:Ok. Its the 1907: 1858: 1857: 1846: 1825: 1778: 1775: 1750: 1714: 1712: 1700: 1640: 1636: 1593: 1553: 1536: 1525: 1467: 1464: 1449: 1446: 1443: 1439: 1339: 1310: 1291: 1264: 1178: 1174:Ottava Rima: 1173: 1172: 1168: 1154: 1108: 1068: 1061: 1018: 984: 951: 944: 927: 905: 869: 854: 804:put together 803: 799: 794: 559: 557: 544: 335: 334: 310: 291: 287: 284:project page 137: 97: 70: 63: 55: 43: 37: 3098:Ottava Rima 2930:Ottava Rima 2854:Ottava Rima 2642:Ottava Rima 2628:Ottava Rima 2171:Ottava Rima 2003:Ottava Rima 1423:Ottava Rima 1378:Ottava Rima 1278:Ottava Rima 1226:Ottava Rima 1202:Ottava Rima 1127:Ottava Rima 1004:Staxringold 827:Ottava Rima 777:Staxringold 760:Ottava Rima 690:Ottava Rima 528:Ottava Rima 503:Staxringold 455:Staxringold 419:Ottava Rima 388:Ottava Rima 268:Ottava Rima 251:Staxringold 223:Ottava Rima 180:Ottava Rima 141:Ottava Rima 36:This is an 1097:Retirement 888:Time zones 336:Repetitive 3148:Islanders 3114:Islanders 3079:Islanders 3054:Islanders 3003:Islanders 2946:Islanders 2911:Islanders 2764:J Milburn 2548:J Milburn 2479:J Milburn 2338:Contribs) 2146:J Milburn 1596:article. 1507:Contribs) 1491:format. — 1047:Contribs) 972:Contribs) 808:J Milburn 800:fantastic 578:Contribs) 159:seed bead 90:misbehave 2986:cheating 2827:My score 2818:Chequers 2591:Scorpion 2531:iMatthew 2370:iMatthew 2352:iMatthew 2303:iMatthew 2269:iMatthew 1828:iMatthew 1781:iMatthew 1590:cartoons 1529:contribs 1475:MacInnis 987:iMatthew 908:iMatthew 872:iMatthew 313:iMatthew 98:anything 73:iMatthew 3132:Useight 2884:cheater 2878:Comment 2702:October 2318:"...is 2289:User:X! 2263:BotKing 1659:Nergaal 1645:Nergaal 1598:Nergaal 1557:Nergaal 795:so many 713:Nergaal 663:Nergaal 340:Nergaal 92:and do 67:User:X! 39:archive 3033:Sasata 2966:Sasata 2782:GARDEN 2749:GARDEN 2685:GARDEN 2563:Durova 2518:Durova 2496:Durova 2466:Durova 2425:Durova 2293:SoxBot 2244:GARDEN 2220:Durova 2161:Durova 2106:GARDEN 2082:GARDEN 2056:Durova 1875:Shappy 1859:Shappy 1755:Durova 1715:Durova 1701:GARDEN 1537:GARDEN 1470:Trevor 1340:GARDEN 1325:Durova 1307:Sounds 1179:Durova 1155:Cackle 1147:Durova 1116:Durova 1083:Mifter 1022:Durova 928:GARDEN 896:Durova 859:Durova 744:Durova 607:Durova 592:Mifter 551:(talk) 434:Sasata 404:Sasata 360:Sasata 296:Sasata 170:Durova 2814:Spiel 2615:orium 2450:) · 2398:) · 2332:(Talk 2208:wicke 2135:wicke 2032:wicke 1974:wicke 1947:Mitch 1932:wicke 1905:Mitch 1894:wicke 1844:Mitch 1815:wicke 1501:(Talk 1412:wicke 1041:(Talk 966:(Talk 572:(Talk 484:wicke 209:wicke 123:wicke 16:< 3136:talk 3102:talk 3037:talk 2934:talk 2858:talk 2809:Ϣere 2768:talk 2646:talk 2632:talk 2612:left 2552:talk 2483:talk 2452:@043 2447:talk 2400:@044 2395:talk 2175:talk 2150:talk 2007:talk 1663:talk 1649:talk 1637:only 1602:talk 1561:talk 1523:talk 1519:ST47 1427:talk 1382:talk 1282:talk 1230:talk 1206:talk 1131:talk 1111:this 1087:talk 1062:Will 1008:talk 831:talk 812:talk 781:talk 764:talk 717:talk 694:talk 667:talk 596:talk 560:does 532:talk 507:talk 459:talk 438:talk 423:talk 408:talk 392:talk 384:here 380:this 364:talk 344:talk 300:talk 272:talk 255:talk 227:talk 184:talk 145:talk 2977:May 2942:=[ 2708:not 2607:The 2539:at 2378:at 2360:at 2320:not 2311:at 2297:not 2295:is 2291:'s 2277:at 2200:dle 2195:can 2127:dle 2122:can 2024:dle 2019:can 1966:dle 1961:can 1924:dle 1919:can 1886:dle 1881:can 1836:at 1807:dle 1802:can 1791:at 1639:on 1404:dle 1399:can 995:at 916:at 880:at 476:dle 471:can 321:at 292:fun 201:dle 196:can 134:82? 115:dle 110:can 81:at 3154:27 3138:) 3120:27 3104:) 3085:27 3060:27 3039:) 3009:27 2952:27 2936:) 2917:27 2894:| 2860:) 2770:) 2648:) 2634:) 2554:) 2485:) 2454:· 2444:· 2441:X! 2402:· 2392:· 2389:X! 2335:• 2326:Ed 2189:my 2177:) 2152:) 2009:) 1950:32 1908:32 1847:32 1665:) 1651:) 1604:) 1594:an 1563:) 1504:• 1495:Ed 1429:) 1384:) 1294:. 1284:) 1232:) 1208:) 1133:) 1089:) 1044:• 1035:Ed 969:• 960:Ed 833:) 814:) 766:) 719:) 696:) 669:) 598:) 575:• 566:Ed 548:JJ 534:) 440:) 425:) 410:) 394:) 386:. 366:) 346:) 302:) 274:) 229:) 186:) 147:) 106:-- 100:! 3134:( 3100:( 3035:( 2932:( 2856:( 2766:( 2644:( 2630:( 2550:( 2481:( 2438:( 2386:( 2204:• 2185:I 2173:( 2148:( 2131:• 2028:• 2005:( 1970:• 1928:• 1890:• 1811:• 1661:( 1647:( 1600:( 1559:( 1526:· 1521:( 1425:( 1408:• 1380:( 1280:( 1228:( 1204:( 1129:( 1085:( 1069:C 829:( 810:( 762:( 715:( 692:( 665:( 594:( 530:( 480:• 436:( 421:( 406:( 390:( 362:( 342:( 298:( 270:( 225:( 205:• 182:( 143:( 119:• 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.