267:) Thus, even though there is copying, it may have been of elements not expected to be eligible for protection in the first place. Further, regarding arrangement, the Commons version appears not to have slavishly copied the labels (e.g., Milwaukee is over Lake Michigan in Brown, but over Wisconsin in the Commons version.) To get really in the weeds, there is also the potential of the idea/expression merger doctrine: ideas/data/facts are not copyrightable; however, in some cases, it is so difficult to distinguish between an idea and its expression that they are considered to merge. Accordingly, when there is effectively only one way to express an idea (e.g., in relation to arrangement, the geographical location of a ship wreck), copying of that expression is allowed as preclusion would grant a monopoly of the idea.
420:, unless I am misunderstanding (which is a possibility), the solution is to take the USGS map, and re-do the icons and legends to something that clearly uses unique and freely available icons. While addressing Waueksha, WI. As an average lay observer, when I look at the two maps now, it is abundantly clear that to my eye, ""an average lay observer would recognize the alleged copy as having been appropriated from the copyrighted work." To find a subject matter expert to opine on the rest of the problem could take a long time. And since the map is used in many places, uploading a new one and overwriting the old file is the most expedient way to address the problem everywhere. (Except the websites where I have already seen the Knowledge file copied ... <sigh: -->
74:
195:
1901:
2024:
441:
public domain map for the lower transparency but then copied Brown's original expression related to the content for the top transparency. To be clear, more than
Waueksha, WI needs to be addressed; that is just one good tell as, if the uploader had genuinely been creating an original work (rather than copying), it would not be expected to have been included. The top transparency should be recreated without copying of the original elements from Brown.
1938:
1147:
857:
21:
2117:, blocked on the Commons. The Commons does not allow IP block exemptions for anonymous proxy editing, even for established users, unless there are "exceptional circumstances", which are typically related to users whose edits would be likely to expose them to persecution in their country of residence. You will need to discontinue use of your VPN if you wish to edit the Commons (see, for example
947:
1598:
this is the example that comes to me, but it's perhaps analogous to politicians who bemoan the bailing out of Wall Street as privatizing of gains and socialisation of losses whilst simultaneously advocating student loan forgiveness as if that weren't the same thing. I've not looked any deeper than the examples here, but, from the above, it's plausible
Coldwell is okay on images.
2098:, I assume due to my VPN. I've been a Knowledge user since I think 2007, so I promise I'm not a vandal! But there's are two copyrighted images I've found that I'd like to tag for removal, and I can't. I also can't request a password reset there. Can you unblock me? And is there a way to set it so that future admins don't block me due to the VPN, or no? Thanks for your help.
326:
also be the case if, for example, the icons had been published prior to 1978 without compliance with copyright formalities. These are things a content expert might be able to opine on. Somewhat similarly, if an alternative version is created, it could overwrite the existing file which would change the rationale/format of deletion. The
Commons deletion backlog is
283:
especially in aggregate with other factors, expression.) For example, Brown included
Waueksha, WI and so too did the Commons uploader. This seems telling; why a landlocked city on a shipwreck map, and one unnecessary for positional context given the close proximity of Milwaukee? Seems clearly to be slavish copying of Brown's (original) selections.
2041:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see
484:
aside and reference it no further. Add whatever labels, icons, cities, elaborations to the aforementioned dots, etc. you personally choose. If you happen to replicate something from Brown's map serendipitously (e.g., use of
Chicago and Milwaukee as identified cities), that is okay. Copyright law considers
270:
What concerns me are the wreck icons. A sinking ship icon (as opposed to say, a square, cross, or other common symbol--or even a non-sinking ship), especially with a westward bow, dark shade for crew loss, and light shade for stranded clearly are copied expression from Brown. (Changing the slope of
483:
Yes, but you needn't even go that far. Take the Brown map, and use it as a reference to place a mere dot for each of the wreck locations on the USGS base. The locations of the wrecks are facts of the world, so Brown's selection of positioning is not original, creative expression. Then place Brown
1597:
I don't know whether this helps. For what it's worth, among copyright abusers there can genuinely be a cognitive "wall" separating consideration of images and text (i.e., one can generally have a clue about image considerations but be simultaneously utterly clueless about prose). I don't know why
751:
Thank you for taking this on, Guerillero. Although I'm really just here for the IP, not the graphic design, would there perhaps be a benefit to reducing all font sizes so as to reduce the "busyness" and to allow the wreck sites (the true subject of the map) to have more focus? Even state/province
492:
found "A work may satisfy the independent creation requirement even though it closely resembles other works so long as the similarity is fortuitous, not the result of copying.'" The United States
Copyright Office explicitly says "if two authors created works that are similar or even identical, each
262:
For city/location labeling, Brown has used, and the
Commons uploader has clearly copied, black bullets and Times New Roman (?) font. It has been found, however, that additions such as "labels using standard fonts and shapes fall within the narrow category of works that lack even a minimum level of
1460:
The photographs themselves are presumed to be a work of the Flickr account owner, the San Diego Air & Space Museum. I don't really see red flags; camera EXIF data are intact, common camera model to each other and to other images in the photostream, uploads to Flickr are proximate to creation,
715:
Wow!!!....both good and fast. Not sure if you're interested in any ideas for tweaks but if you wanted to add any cities that were involved in the 1913 story, (going just from memory) some ideas would be the twin cities of Port Huron MI/ Sarnia ON, Superior WI (twin city of Duluth), Port Arthur ON
325:
Well, handling is an open question. If Brown's iconography is "standard, stock, or common to a particular subject matter or medium"--which is not a judgement I can make; all I know about ships is that
Olivers would make dandy anchors--they may not be eligible for copyright protection. This could
1618:
Yes, I see your page gets regularly LTA'd! So it seems that, with the exception of Hog Farm's example, the ones I asked about are OK, and once again, I demonstrate that I'm nowhere when it comes to images. I never had to learn because when I was FAC delegate, I had the best help! Thanks, and I
440:
This is correct, yes. Think of this as transparencies on an overhead (although perhaps that is now too dated a reference): the bottom transparency is a geographical map and the top transparency is all of the labels, icons, legend, etc. (together, content) This is a case where the uploader took a
282:
with respect to the entire work (on this I would argue no, as their inclusion is deliberate and fundamental to the purpose of the map). Related to this test, the
Commons version also appears to have copied the specific selection of cities (i.e., the inclusion or omission of cites is itself, and
1662:
may be problematic, but I'm less confident. Sometime I may go through the commons uploads and sort through some of the worse derivative work/freedom of panorama issues - most of his images are probably fine, although I've seen some fairly questionable ones like the New local book.jpg one.
1502:
is
Caldwell, that may also be an issue if the photograph was taken by a friend (or any human being)--as opposed to being on a timer--as copyright initially vests in the author (photographer), not the subject. Again, however, my real concern is not copyright, but how anyone would expect
1587:
as the genuine subject is the complete display, not the placard. If a subject is not eligible for copyright protection in the first place, consideration of freedom of panorama is not necessary (although I don't believe Colombia FoP would apply as this is not a category identified by
278:) I certainly would expect this to be so. The questions, then, may be: 1) are Brown's icons themselves lacking in originality (i.e., by virtue of lacking a creative spark, being "standard, stock, or common to a particular subject matter or medium", etc.) and/or 2) are the icons
1744:
requires "In all cases the uploader must provide appropriate evidence to demonstrate either that the file is in the public domain" but is in reality very seldom enforced if the image "looks old enough", an irresponsible practise with which I disagree, but it is what it is.
1469:) and may just be an efficiency measure--a single designation to spare the poor intern uploading images to Flickr the effort of specifying separate licenses for own and donated works. In sum, in the absence of evidence of ownership by another party, I don't see an issue.
1732:) are irreparably problematic and need to go. The latter two, like the library logo, are state (GA), not federal authorship. They are too recent (2000) to be PD by virtue of non-compliance with copyright formalities, and there is no FoP in the US for literary works.
1461:
etc. Even the lower resolution makes sense, as it is not uncommon to freely license low resolution versions while retaining higher resolutions for oneself or commercial purposes. The only curiosity is the "No known copyright restrictions" "license" at
1582:
would be expected to be the same for similar reasons as above. For the latter, the text on either of the two placards (especially the bottom) seems unlikely to be sufficiently original and, even if one or both were, would likely be
630:
as a source of the wreck locations. The locations are non-protectable facts of the world, so you may derive them from any source as long as the source's original expression thereof is not copied. The second paragraph in
1721:
1643:
1546:
is, like the specific images above, a derivative work. The photograph itself appears fine for the same reasons (intact camera EXIF, common camera model to others, etc.) The most prominent element, the flag
1783:
on the Pinduoduo Talk page, but there hasn’t been any discussion so far. I was wondering if you as a member of the Companies WikiProject might be willing to take a look at the proposal? Thanks very much.
1049:; if weather.gov is copying Commons images without attribution, that casts a reliable source in a poor light, so there is concern. But I don't know that we can be sure the image was "ours" first. Bst,
271:
the deck, the sail to a cross, and a line detail merely results in a derivate work and does not eliminate underlying copyright in the original.) There are also, as you note, similarities in the legend.
1967:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1176:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
884:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
219:
Is the Image too closely copied? Did Knowledge use too much of Brown’s work? The FA was promoted in 2007 and you can see how much work has already gone in to the FAR. What next? Best regards,
1729:
1725:
1659:
1655:
187:
1236:. Doug Coldwell's content contains not only copyvio, but one of every other kind of mess as well (OR, POV, failed verification, poor writing, you name it). And he was a prolific DYK'er.
577:
Guerillero, you are so awesome. One idea I had (not sure how practical it is) is that the size of the icons could correspond to the number of lives lost (bigger icon, more lives lost).
937:
306:
You, as always, are a gem. I suspected this was tricky and would need your IP expertise. Also, because I don't speak Commons, does that file need to be subjected to deletion ? Best,
2153:
1983:
1192:
900:
467:
from the Brown map), I'm legally creating a new work of my own which includes / is built on a public domain map? And then with the upload I'd release it into the public domain.
274:
In consideration of the work (map) as a whole, a test is whether "an average lay observer would recognize the alleged copy as having been appropriated from the copyrighted work." (
1952:
1161:
870:
1702:, too (just now opened by me). Licensed is based on US federal government creation, but it's the work of a local county government, which doesn't have the blanket PD in the US.
1908:
996:
I assume I've only been notified as the creator (in 2008!) of the redirect. I'm similarly unaware of contemporary issues, but I'll take a look at the discussion and comment.
1565:
either in composition or content (the lower placard is an unoriginal recitation of fact. The upper placard text is possibly sufficiently original, but I suspect would to be
1376:
959:
1579:
377:
IMO what is most likely is that Brown also used the USGS map. The inclusion of Waukesha is a pretty unique feature, and USGS certainly didn't copy it's map from Brown.
1491:
1733:
1647:
1803:
I think since you accepted my abuse filter, you suddenly blocked me to be mistaken as a long-term abuser. Can you try to unblock my Commons account please? Thanks.
1486:), but I write (wrote) about antique typewriters, so I'm perhaps a poor judge of what is of interest to the world. The one I'd be most concerned about as being a
251:
1699:
1046:
971:
1527:
215:
when the article was promoted FA. We had pretty much the same structure, and what strikes me as a replication of the map. I don’t have a copy of the book.
632:
2033:
927:
1450:
680:
663:
394:
256:
2076:
1095:
286:
Ideally, the what next would be for someone to produce an alternative with alterative icons so as not to copy original expression from Brown.
2010:
1592:
and may or may not "situated in permanent form" as contemplated by copyright ("permanent" generally meaning the natural lifetime of a work)).
1219:
752:
abbreviations rather than complete spelling might help reduce visual clutter. Is the pink shading population? Contemporary or as of 1913?
2018:
1465:(after all, if you're the copyright holder, you are expected to be aware of the status), but even this is commonly used by archives (e.g.,
1449:, but this is dubious as the bear's designer, Donald Greame Kelley, is not, and was not, an employee of, the Government of California, and
1232:
Ec, once again, I turn to the expert. There is a massive mess with many pieces, all of which can be found by looking at the main links at
1083:
1239:
It is my understanding (can't recall from where) that many of User:Doug Coldwell's images have already been removed for copyvio, but both
1519:
1478:, I also don't see a copyright issue. I'm not entirely sure how pictures of random, unremarkable books from an unremarkable library are
847:
746:
591:
572:
488:, meaning that an author created a work without copying from other works, and does not require such creation to be new (novel). Indeed,
1133:
1030:
1011:
991:
566:
if you would like, I can make a new version from scratch. I just need someone to point out where I can source the wreck locations from.
550:
456:
435:
368:
349:
320:
301:
781:
627:
205:
1779:
Hi, I’m an employee of Pinduoduo, one of the largest companies in Asia. I posted a proposal to make some updates about the company at
977:
Ec, I cannot determine what that redirect discussion is trying to accomplish, but I use the shortcut all the time. Help me out here?
813:
790:
767:
727:
703:
677:
650:
614:
528:
512:
478:
463:
OK, if I did that, and in order to do that, learned about where the various wrecks are from reading multiple sources (but didn't use
421:... ) An aside: Elc is an international IP expert, and chooses his words carefully; I have found it useful to always pay him heed :)
412:
388:
1523:
2053:
1780:
1740:, however, and thus may potentially be salvageable if cropped and provenance can be found (does anyone have access to that book?)
1425:
was standardised 1953, is safely PD by virtue of publication without compliance with copyright formalities between 1928 and 1977--
1495:
716:(now renamed to Thunder Bay) Also, is there a chance of squeezing in the names of the ships, even if in fine print? Sincerely,
536:
let me know when you have uploaded the new version, so I can re-add it everywhere I deleted it (commented it out). Thanks, Elc!
1930:
1548:
1139:
249:), where original means owing its origin to its author (a prohibition on copying) and exhibiting some minimal creative spark. (
2065:
1507:
to be of genuine educational utility. (I didn't intend the alliteration, but hey, come from the grumpiness and stay for wit.)
1409:
1250:
2006:
1215:
923:
211:
Have a look also at the Table of Contents of Brown’s book— it is organized by Prologue, then Storm dates, then Aftermath.
259:), so we need only consider the selection, coordination, and arrangement of the other elements (labels, iconography, etc.)
233:
1511:
1392:
1370:
1347:
1325:
1308:
1302:
1045:
Ec, it took me a long time to sort out what the original poster was saying, but I pinged you to an image discussion at
955:
939:
212:
2037:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a
1812:
1860:
1514:
from Flickr is okay; Flickr users not uncommonly shuffle, rename, and prune their streams. Creative Commons license
1633:
1613:
1575:
1353:
1265:
become public domain? There is dubious stuff like this all over DC's images; Hog Farm might give you more examples.
2107:
1798:
1713:
1693:
1674:
603:
Cool. Regarding sourcing the locatons, I think that elcobbola's 21:08, 4 November 2021 post is important guidance.
194:
I can’t decipher the page numbers, but there are maps viewable very early on in Amazon’s “Look Inside” featured of
1063:
2136:
2084:
2002:
1840:
1262:
1211:
919:
1925:
1793:
1760:
2042:
242:
To overexplain both because it is my nature and to provide more basis, if needed, to assist discussion at FAR:
2089:
2070:
1878:
1854:
1679:
As you can see from above, I'm hopeless on images :) I relied on Ec for everything when I was FAC delegate.
494:
153:
148:
143:
138:
2160:
2094:
Hello there! I'm so sorry to contact you this way, but it's my only option. :) It looks like you've blocked
2114:
1976:
1185:
893:
178:
133:
128:
123:
118:
113:
108:
103:
98:
93:
1988:
1436:
1197:
1112:
905:
2038:
1774:
1589:
690:
1279:
962:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.
208:, which seems to replicate Brown’s work very closely, including detail like how the legend is set up.
255:) The underlying map is verifiably from the USGS as purported (the image's source link is dead, but
1499:
1429:
201:. (Our article is cited to a 2002 version.) If you scroll just a few pages in, you will find them.
1561:). The overall compilation of components (rock, flag, and two placards) is unlikely to reach the
354:
It sounds like the safest route here is to re-do the map, and overwrite the existing file. Best,
1888:
1475:
1402:
1243:
and I suspect the problem goes deeper and that some sort of CCI will also be needed at Commons.
732:
Can the lake names be in black? They are hard to see … you continue to be awesome, Guerillero.
1921:
1689:
1629:
1555:
1534:
1388:
1366:
1343:
1321:
1298:
1275:
1108:
1079:
1059:
1026:
987:
742:
587:
546:
431:
364:
316:
229:
493:
work could be registered provided that the authors did not copy expression from each other." (
1964:
1504:
1377:
Colombia_lunar_sample_displays#/media/File:Lunar_fragments_from_the_Taurus–Littrow_Valley.jpg
1173:
881:
809:
723:
673:
610:
524:
474:
384:
245:
Copyright subsists in original works of authorship fixed in a tangible medium of expression (
1975:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1375:
Not Doug Coldwell, but found in the same series, what is freedom of panorama in Colombia ?
1184:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1040:
892:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
73:
8:
2152:
Hi, can I know why you deleted the category:Mohamed Amine Trabelsi and the photos in it?
2103:
1808:
1789:
1466:
967:
2118:
1462:
1708:
1669:
1651:
1543:
1422:
1331:
49:
I seldom edit on weekends and do not access Knowledge email during the day (CET/CEST).
2080:
1946:
1917:
1680:
1639:
1620:
1443:
1379:
1357:
1334:
1312:
1289:
1266:
1155:
1099:
1070:
1050:
1017:
978:
864:
777:
733:
578:
537:
422:
355:
307:
220:
1995:
1960:
1204:
1169:
912:
877:
327:
2061:
1850:
1737:
1413:
1255:
1233:
797:
785:
710:
698:
657:
626:
Indeed per the 21:08, 4 November 2021 comment, it is perfectly fine to use Brown/
621:
598:
567:
246:
1900:
2122:
2099:
1972:
1864:
1826:
1804:
1785:
1746:
1599:
1479:
1181:
1119:
997:
963:
889:
773:
753:
687:
636:
561:
557:
533:
498:
442:
417:
398:
335:
287:
265:
William Darden v. Marybeth Peters, Register of Copyrights, 488 F.3d 277 (2007)
163:
1968:
1741:
1703:
1664:
1454:
1240:
1227:
1177:
885:
252:
Feist Publications, Inc., v. Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 U.S. 340 (1991)
1736:
is unacceptable in its current state; the cover photo seems likely to be PD
2147:
1562:
1416:- Several works to consider: 1) the flag and 2) the photographs themselves:
951:
167:
1567:
1487:
1483:
1089:
1979:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1188:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
896:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
169:
2057:
1956:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1846:
1820:
1522:
its presence on Flickr with the claimed license, and we can confirm as
1165:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
874:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
780:: I have carried out most of the changes and uploaded a new version at
1937:
1146:
856:
276:
Folio Impressions, Inc. v. Byer Cal., 937 F.2d 759, 766 (2d Cir.1991)
53:
1286:
188:
Knowledge:Featured article review/Great Lakes Storm of 1913/archive2
960:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 12#MOS:CAPTION
165:
1246:
As you know, I don't speak images. As a starter example, how does
662:
The blank underlying public domain map is (copied from above) at
1781:
Talk:Pinduoduo#Fixing problems with NPOV and PROMOTIONAL language
2095:
1992:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
1201:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
909:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
1982:
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
1950:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All
1191:
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
1159:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All
950:
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect
899:
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
1845:
Blocked and tagged. Could you request a global lock at meta?--
946:
868:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
170:
517:
Thanks for your thorough expert help and immense expertise.
239:
Greetings Sandy, I am well indeed and hope you are the same.
694:
1405:
a page exclusively for LTA buffoonery? Because it's you:
334:), so expediency on this end would likely be for naught.
2142:
1963:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1700:
Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mcdllogo-sm2.gif
1580:
File:Lunar fragments from the Taurus–Littrow Valley.jpg
1172:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1047:
Knowledge:Featured article review/Cirrus cloud/archive1
880:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
784:. No dice on labeling the wrecks. It was too busy --
635:
of my model essay might help explain the notion too.
1332:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/9161595@N03/4433689811
204:
We have a map created in 2007 (best I can tell?) at
67:
2052:will be deleted after seven days, as described in
52:Issues related to the Commons should be addressed
693:from the data in my datastore. It is going to be
495:The Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices
1401:What are you doing here, Sandy? Don't you know
1287:https://commons.wikimedia.org/Category:MeL_books
1650:? My gut tells me both are problematic from a
2054:section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion
2048:Note that any non-free images not used in any
1722:File:Ludington library new wing plans 2011.jpg
1644:File:Ludington library new wing plans 2011.jpg
1094:Ec, I removed a post from your talk page and
44:please include links to the pertinent page(s)
1619:hope you are well and staying warm. Best,
1899:
782:File:Great Lakes 1913 Storm Shipwrecks.png
206:File:Great Lakes 1913 Storm Shipwrecks.png
2113:I have not blocked your account; you are
2075:hello. Get out of your block, dear admin
2019:Orphaned non-free image File:Sobelogo.png
1482:(essentially the Commons equivalent of
1016:It was clarified there ... thanks, Ec!
1410:File:California flag of Apollo 17.jpg
1251:File:California flag of Apollo 17.jpg
1947:2023 Arbitration Committee elections
1730:File:Ludington courthouse side 2.jpg
1726:File:Ludington courthouse side 1.jpg
1660:File:Ludington courthouse side 2.jpg
1656:File:Ludington courthouse side 1.jpg
1530:of the Georgia flag is safely PD as
1285:Here's a whole category to look at:
1156:2022 Arbitration Committee elections
865:2021 Arbitration Committee elections
15:
1931:ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
1576:Apollo 17 lunar sample display#Fate
1551:on a white field), is safely PD as
1453:works are not to be conflated with
1354:Apollo 17 lunar sample display#Fate
1140:ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
1069:Thank you Ec; you're still a star!
848:ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
697:due to some of the data I used. --
31:Unless otherwise requested, I will
13:
2022:
1512:File:Georgia Apollo 17 display.jpg
1309:File:Georgia Apollo 17 display.jpg
14:
2171:
1549:the coat of arms of Massachusetts
190:, and need help from the master.
183:Hello, ElC; I hope you are well !
1936:
1263:San Diego Air & Space Museum
1145:
958:. This discussion will occur at
945:
855:
72:
19:
1986:and submit your choices on the
1518:and, here, a dispassionate bot
1195:and submit your choices on the
903:and submit your choices on the
2161:22:33, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
1:
2066:18:45, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
2043:our policy for non-free media
2011:00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
1965:Knowledge arbitration process
1926:07:48, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
1799:Unblock my account on Commons
1498:. If the person depicted in
1220:00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
1174:Knowledge arbitration process
1031:18:27, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
1012:17:40, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
992:15:37, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
972:13:10, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
928:00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
882:Knowledge arbitration process
2115:not now, and have never been
2096:my Wikimedia Commons account
1879:14:26, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
1855:13:03, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
1841:09:34, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
1813:12:01, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
1761:14:55, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
1714:19:48, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
1694:19:45, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
1675:17:55, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
1634:20:37, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
1614:19:58, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
1393:15:29, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
1371:14:54, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
1348:14:53, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
1326:14:51, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
1303:14:43, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
1280:14:39, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
814:15:08, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
791:00:00, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
768:19:17, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
747:18:55, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
728:18:26, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
704:17:51, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
678:16:59, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
651:16:13, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
615:16:56, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
592:16:08, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
573:15:57, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
551:21:38, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
529:21:14, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
513:21:08, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
479:20:55, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
457:18:28, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
436:18:17, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
413:17:43, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
389:17:38, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
369:18:09, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
350:17:34, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
321:16:49, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
302:16:35, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
234:05:48, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
154:Archive 13 (11.2010–12.2021)
149:Archive 12 (08.2010–10.2010)
144:Archive 11 (05.2010–07.2010)
139:Archive 10 (02.2010–04.2010)
134:Archive 09 (11.2009–01.2010)
129:Archive 08 (08.2009–10.2009)
124:Archive 07 (05.2009–07.2009)
119:Archive 06 (02.2009–04.2009)
114:Archive 05 (11.2008–01.2009)
109:Archive 04 (08.2008–10.2008)
104:Archive 03 (05.2008–07.2008)
99:Archive 02 (02.2008–04.2008)
94:Archive 01 (11.2007–01.2008)
7:
1494:, but Hog Farm has already
1421:The California flag, which
691:This is what I put together
58:will not receive a response
10:
2176:
2090:Block on Wikimedia Commons
2071:off block in the wikimedia
2003:MediaWiki message delivery
1311:is no longer on Flicker.
1212:MediaWiki message delivery
1096:requested attention at ANI
1084:15:53, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
1064:21:48, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
920:MediaWiki message delivery
2137:16:45, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
2108:16:29, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
2023:
1907:
1898:
1437:flag is generally claimed
1261:a flicker image from the
1134:02:13, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
1113:01:38, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
938:"MOS:CAPTIONS" listed at
393:This doesn't parse. The
2085:09:09, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
2000:to your user talk page.
1794:15:57, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
1720:I agree at least three (
1563:threshold of originality
1500:File:WikiPreparation.jpg
1492:File:Mel book rearch.JPG
1408:For the specific files,
1330:Is this a good license?
1209:to your user talk page.
940:Redirects for discussion
917:to your user talk page.
1775:Pinduoduo article help?
1734:File:New local book.jpg
1648:File:New local book.jpg
1118:Very much appreciated.
954:and has thus listed it
681:archive.org captured it
664:archive.org captured it
257:archive.org captured it
213:Here’s our 2007 version
2156:Mohamed Amine Trabelsi
2028:
196:David G. Brown’s 2004
2031:Thanks for uploading
2026:
1961:Arbitration Committee
1944:Hello! Voting in the
1170:Arbitration Committee
1153:Hello! Voting in the
878:Arbitration Committee
862:Hello! Voting in the
1889:Precious anniversary
1505:this blurry banality
1476:c:Category:MeL books
486:independent creation
179:Help from the master
1895:
1825:This is Jermboy27.
1467:Library of Congress
1457:, but I digress...)
397:is entirely blank.
2029:
1977:arbitration policy
1893:
1652:Commons:Commons:DW
1642:- any thoughts on
1186:arbitration policy
894:arbitration policy
628:the previous image
2119:m:No open proxies
2039:claim of fair use
2034:File:Sobelogo.png
2013:
1914:
1913:
1222:
935:
934:
930:
176:
175:
66:
65:
2167:
2129:
2025:
2001:
1999:
1940:
1903:
1896:
1892:
1871:
1833:
1824:
1753:
1686:
1626:
1606:
1560:
1554:
1544:The Flickr image
1539:
1533:
1496:raised the issue
1448:
1442:
1434:
1428:
1385:
1363:
1340:
1318:
1295:
1272:
1210:
1208:
1149:
1126:
1105:
1076:
1056:
1023:
1004:
984:
949:
918:
916:
859:
852:
851:
801:
788:
760:
739:
714:
701:
661:
643:
625:
602:
584:
570:
565:
543:
505:
449:
428:
405:
361:
342:
313:
294:
226:
186:I am working on
171:
76:
68:
23:
22:
16:
2175:
2174:
2170:
2169:
2168:
2166:
2165:
2164:
2150:
2145:
2135:
2123:
2092:
2073:
2056:. Thank you. --
2021:
2016:
2015:
1993:
1941:
1933:
1891:
1877:
1865:
1839:
1827:
1818:
1801:
1777:
1759:
1747:
1712:
1684:
1673:
1624:
1612:
1600:
1558:
1552:
1537:
1531:
1524:it was archived
1516:are irrevocable
1510:The absence of
1488:derivative work
1446:
1440:
1432:
1430:PD-US-no notice
1426:
1414:File:Moon_4.jpg
1383:
1361:
1338:
1316:
1293:
1270:
1256:File:Moon_4.jpg
1230:
1225:
1224:
1202:
1150:
1142:
1132:
1120:
1103:
1092:
1074:
1054:
1043:
1021:
1010:
998:
982:
943:
910:
850:
795:
786:
766:
754:
737:
708:
699:
655:
649:
637:
619:
596:
582:
568:
555:
541:
511:
499:
455:
443:
426:
411:
399:
359:
348:
336:
311:
300:
288:
247:17 U.S.C. § 102
224:
198:White Hurricane
181:
172:
166:
82:
42:If applicable,
20:
12:
11:
5:
2173:
2149:
2146:
2144:
2141:
2140:
2139:
2131:
2091:
2088:
2072:
2069:
2020:
2017:
1984:the candidates
1953:eligible users
1942:
1935:
1934:
1932:
1929:
1912:
1911:
1905:
1904:
1890:
1887:
1886:
1885:
1884:
1883:
1882:
1881:
1873:
1859:Much obliged.
1835:
1800:
1797:
1776:
1773:
1772:
1771:
1770:
1769:
1768:
1767:
1766:
1765:
1764:
1763:
1755:
1718:
1717:
1716:
1706:
1667:
1654:perspective.
1608:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1574:The images at
1572:
1541:
1508:
1471:
1470:
1458:
1455:works-for-hire
1418:
1417:
1396:
1395:
1373:
1350:
1328:
1305:
1259:
1258:
1253:
1229:
1226:
1193:the candidates
1162:eligible users
1151:
1144:
1143:
1141:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1128:
1091:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1042:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1006:
956:for discussion
942:
936:
933:
932:
901:the candidates
871:eligible users
860:
849:
846:
845:
844:
843:
842:
841:
840:
839:
838:
837:
836:
835:
834:
833:
832:
831:
830:
829:
828:
827:
826:
825:
824:
823:
822:
821:
820:
819:
818:
817:
816:
762:
749:
730:
653:
645:
617:
594:
507:
451:
415:
407:
375:
374:
373:
372:
371:
344:
296:
284:
272:
268:
263:creativity." (
260:
243:
240:
217:
216:
209:
202:
180:
177:
174:
173:
168:
164:
162:
159:
158:
157:
156:
151:
146:
141:
136:
131:
126:
121:
116:
111:
106:
101:
96:
88:
87:
84:
83:
78:
77:
71:
64:
63:
62:
61:
54:on the Commons
50:
47:
40:
24:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2172:
2163:
2162:
2159:
2158:
2157:
2138:
2134:
2130:
2128:
2127:
2120:
2116:
2112:
2111:
2110:
2109:
2105:
2101:
2097:
2087:
2086:
2082:
2078:
2068:
2067:
2063:
2059:
2055:
2051:
2046:
2044:
2040:
2036:
2035:
2014:
2012:
2008:
2004:
1997:
1991:
1990:
1985:
1980:
1978:
1974:
1970:
1966:
1962:
1957:
1955:
1954:
1949:
1948:
1939:
1928:
1927:
1923:
1919:
1910:
1906:
1902:
1897:
1880:
1876:
1872:
1870:
1869:
1862:
1858:
1857:
1856:
1852:
1848:
1844:
1843:
1842:
1838:
1834:
1832:
1831:
1822:
1817:
1816:
1815:
1814:
1810:
1806:
1796:
1795:
1791:
1787:
1782:
1762:
1758:
1754:
1752:
1751:
1743:
1739:
1735:
1731:
1727:
1723:
1719:
1715:
1711:
1710:
1705:
1701:
1697:
1696:
1695:
1691:
1687:
1683:
1678:
1677:
1676:
1672:
1671:
1666:
1661:
1657:
1653:
1649:
1645:
1641:
1637:
1636:
1635:
1631:
1627:
1623:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1611:
1607:
1605:
1604:
1596:
1591:
1586:
1581:
1577:
1573:
1571:as depicted).
1570:
1569:
1564:
1557:
1556:PD-US-expired
1550:
1545:
1542:
1536:
1535:PD-US-expired
1529:
1525:
1521:
1517:
1513:
1509:
1506:
1501:
1497:
1493:
1489:
1485:
1481:
1477:
1473:
1472:
1468:
1464:
1459:
1456:
1452:
1445:
1438:
1431:
1424:
1420:
1419:
1415:
1411:
1407:
1406:
1404:
1400:
1399:
1398:
1397:
1394:
1390:
1386:
1382:
1378:
1374:
1372:
1368:
1364:
1360:
1355:
1351:
1349:
1345:
1341:
1337:
1333:
1329:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1310:
1306:
1304:
1300:
1296:
1292:
1288:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1269:
1264:
1257:
1254:
1252:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1244:
1242:
1237:
1235:
1223:
1221:
1217:
1213:
1206:
1200:
1199:
1194:
1189:
1187:
1183:
1179:
1175:
1171:
1166:
1164:
1163:
1158:
1157:
1148:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1125:
1124:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1097:
1085:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1048:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1020:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1009:
1005:
1003:
1002:
995:
994:
993:
989:
985:
981:
976:
975:
974:
973:
969:
965:
961:
957:
953:
948:
941:
931:
929:
925:
921:
914:
908:
907:
902:
897:
895:
891:
887:
883:
879:
873:
872:
867:
866:
861:
858:
854:
853:
815:
811:
807:
806:
799:
794:
793:
792:
789:
783:
779:
775:
771:
770:
769:
765:
761:
759:
758:
750:
748:
744:
740:
736:
731:
729:
725:
721:
720:
712:
707:
706:
705:
702:
696:
692:
689:
685:
684:
682:
679:
675:
671:
670:
665:
659:
654:
652:
648:
644:
642:
641:
634:
629:
623:
618:
616:
612:
608:
607:
600:
595:
593:
589:
585:
581:
576:
575:
574:
571:
563:
559:
554:
553:
552:
548:
544:
540:
535:
532:
531:
530:
526:
522:
521:
516:
515:
514:
510:
506:
504:
503:
496:
491:
487:
482:
481:
480:
476:
472:
471:
466:
462:
461:
460:
459:
458:
454:
450:
448:
447:
439:
438:
437:
433:
429:
425:
419:
416:
414:
410:
406:
404:
403:
396:
392:
391:
390:
386:
382:
381:
376:
370:
366:
362:
358:
353:
352:
351:
347:
343:
341:
340:
333:
329:
328:nearly a year
324:
323:
322:
318:
314:
310:
305:
304:
303:
299:
295:
293:
292:
285:
281:
277:
273:
269:
266:
261:
258:
254:
253:
248:
244:
241:
238:
237:
236:
235:
231:
227:
223:
214:
210:
207:
203:
200:
199:
193:
192:
191:
189:
184:
161:
160:
155:
152:
150:
147:
145:
142:
140:
137:
135:
132:
130:
127:
125:
122:
120:
117:
115:
112:
110:
107:
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
92:
91:
90:
89:
86:
85:
81:
75:
70:
69:
60:if left here.
59:
55:
51:
48:
45:
41:
38:
34:
30:
29:
28:
25:
18:
17:
2155:
2154:
2151:
2132:
2125:
2124:
2093:
2074:
2049:
2047:
2032:
2030:
1987:
1981:
1958:
1951:
1945:
1943:
1918:Gerda Arendt
1915:
1874:
1867:
1866:
1836:
1829:
1828:
1802:
1778:
1756:
1749:
1748:
1707:
1681:
1668:
1640:SandyGeorgia
1621:
1609:
1602:
1601:
1590:FoP-Colombia
1584:
1566:
1528:That variant
1515:
1451:commissioned
1423:I understand
1380:
1358:
1335:
1313:
1290:
1267:
1260:
1245:
1238:
1231:
1196:
1190:
1167:
1160:
1154:
1152:
1129:
1122:
1121:
1100:
1093:
1071:
1051:
1044:
1041:Cirrus cloud
1018:
1007:
1000:
999:
979:
952:MOS:CAPTIONS
944:
904:
898:
875:
869:
863:
804:
803:
778:SandyGeorgia
763:
756:
755:
734:
718:
717:
668:
667:
646:
639:
638:
633:this section
605:
604:
579:
538:
519:
518:
508:
501:
500:
489:
485:
469:
468:
464:
452:
445:
444:
423:
408:
401:
400:
379:
378:
356:
345:
338:
337:
331:
308:
297:
290:
289:
279:
275:
264:
250:
221:
218:
197:
185:
182:
79:
57:
43:
36:
32:
26:
1989:voting page
1909:Five years!
1638:Elcobbola,
1403:this is now
1198:voting page
906:voting page
35:respond on
1973:topic bans
1585:de minimis
1568:de minimis
1463:the source
1228:A big mess
1182:topic bans
890:topic bans
798:Guerillero
787:Guerillero
711:Guerillero
700:Guerillero
658:Guerillero
622:Guerillero
599:Guerillero
569:Guerillero
280:de mininis
2126:Đlcobbola
2100:Beginning
1969:site bans
1868:Đlcobbola
1830:Đlcobbola
1805:Smugkosen
1786:Snowy2000
1750:Đlcobbola
1603:Đlcobbola
1178:site bans
1123:Đlcobbola
1001:Đlcobbola
964:Thryduulf
886:site bans
805:North8000
774:North8000
757:Đlcobbola
719:North8000
688:North8000
669:North8000
640:Đlcobbola
606:North8000
562:Elcobbola
558:North8000
534:North8000
520:North8000
502:Đlcobbola
470:North8000
446:Đlcobbola
418:North8000
402:Đlcobbola
380:North8000
339:Đlcobbola
291:Đlcobbola
37:this page
2050:articles
1894:Precious
1742:COM:EVID
1738:in truth
1704:Hog Farm
1665:Hog Farm
1520:verified
1480:in scope
1444:PD-CAGov
1435:. (The
1352:More at
1241:Hog Farm
1234:WP:DCGAR
465:anything
395:USGS map
80:Archives
2148:Commons
2143:Commons
2077:Daraghe
1996:NoACEMM
1685:Georgia
1625:Georgia
1384:Georgia
1362:Georgia
1339:Georgia
1317:Georgia
1294:Georgia
1271:Georgia
1205:NoACEMM
1104:Georgia
1075:Georgia
1055:Georgia
1022:Georgia
983:Georgia
913:NoACEMM
738:Georgia
583:Georgia
542:Georgia
427:Georgia
360:Georgia
312:Georgia
225:Georgia
33:usually
27:General
1439:to be
802:Cool!
2058:B-bot
1847:Bbb23
1821:Bbb23
1682:Sandy
1622:Sandy
1381:Sandy
1359:Sandy
1336:Sandy
1314:Sandy
1291:Sandy
1268:Sandy
1101:Sandy
1072:Sandy
1052:Sandy
1019:Sandy
980:Sandy
735:Sandy
580:Sandy
539:Sandy
490:Feist
424:Sandy
357:Sandy
309:Sandy
222:Sandy
2133:talk
2104:talk
2081:talk
2062:talk
2007:talk
1959:The
1922:talk
1875:talk
1861:Done
1851:talk
1837:talk
1809:talk
1790:talk
1757:talk
1709:Talk
1698:And
1690:Talk
1670:Talk
1658:and
1646:and
1630:Talk
1610:talk
1578:and
1526:. (
1484:WP:N
1474:For
1412:and
1389:Talk
1367:Talk
1344:Talk
1322:Talk
1307:And
1299:Talk
1276:Talk
1216:talk
1168:The
1130:talk
1109:Talk
1080:Talk
1060:Talk
1027:Talk
1008:talk
988:Talk
968:talk
924:talk
876:The
810:talk
764:talk
743:Talk
724:talk
695:LGPL
674:talk
666:).
647:talk
611:talk
588:Talk
560:and
547:Talk
525:talk
509:talk
475:talk
453:talk
432:Talk
409:talk
385:talk
365:Talk
346:talk
317:Talk
298:talk
230:Talk
56:and
2121:).
2045:).
1692:)
1632:)
1490:is
1391:)
1369:)
1346:)
1324:)
1301:)
1278:)
1111:)
1090:ANI
1082:)
1062:)
1029:)
990:)
745:)
590:)
549:)
434:)
367:)
332:!!!
319:)
232:)
2106:)
2083:)
2064:)
2009:)
1998:}}
1994:{{
1971:,
1924:)
1916:--
1863:.
1853:)
1811:)
1792:)
1728:,
1724:,
1559:}}
1553:{{
1540:).
1538:}}
1532:{{
1447:}}
1441:{{
1433:}}
1427:{{
1356:.
1218:)
1207:}}
1203:{{
1180:,
1098:.
970:)
926:)
915:}}
911:{{
888:,
812:)
726:)
683:)
676:)
613:)
527:)
497:)
477:)
387:)
2102:(
2079:(
2060:(
2027:âš
2005:(
1920:(
1849:(
1823::
1819:@
1807:(
1788:(
1688:(
1628:(
1547:(
1387:(
1365:(
1342:(
1320:(
1297:(
1274:(
1214:(
1107:(
1078:(
1058:(
1025:(
986:(
966:(
922:(
808:(
800::
796:@
776:/
772:@
741:(
722:(
713::
709:@
686:@
672:(
660::
656:@
624::
620:@
609:(
601::
597:@
586:(
564::
556:@
545:(
523:(
473:(
430:(
383:(
363:(
330:(
315:(
228:(
46:.
39:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
