User talk:Elcobbola/Archive4

4069:

is limited, it's not going to work so well. Also, once I am on "top" of things, and only having to cope with the new ones, it does become easier to keep on top of things. I've found that reviewing the new ones every morning, then catching the replies I can while I'm doing other wiki work throughout the day, and then three times a week going back through and getting any responses that I've missed works pretty good. FACs that required a LARGE number of comments, I'm much more likely to leave til that three times a week review of the whole list, rather than try to stay on top of all their replies. Sandy keeps trying to convince me to only source check the FACs that have garnered supports, but I figure since I have the time, doing every FAC helps educate folks on how things work. And, what... five or six months later, I've got most of the regular nominators trained to find their own errors. Note I said "most". I think part of the problem with images is that it's more than one problem. You have the fair-use issues, and then you have the nitpicky details missing from Commons. If you are strapped for time, pick ONE of those problems, and leave the other for others. If I was you, I'd stick with fair use, and just spot check Commons. In theory, Commons should be policing itself on the tags and sourcing.

6179:" because the existence of images of sister ships was not discussed. Here there is interplay with NFCC#8 and, as the image has since been deleted, I can't evaluate its purpose (if, for example, the purpose was merely to illustrate the ship, I'd be hard pressed to believe that an image of a sister ship wouldn't "serve the same encyclopedic purpose" (NFCC#1), which, presumably, is to convey a basic understanding of the ship's size, general configuration, etc.; unique livery and name aren't really relevant to that purpose). I would also note that I consider comments like "The nominator is clutching at straws to find a reason for deletion" (not made by you, obviously) utterly inappropriate and that they would preclude my entry into such a discussion. 8294:? It would seem to fall within the Australian definition of PD (if you can believe the license template), but if you follow the link and find the image (no persistent URLs, I'm afraid), you find the phrase "You must seek permission to reproduce this image." Other images I've found there that would, by virtue of the date, seem to meet the Aussie PD definition all seem to have the same phrase on their description pages. What do you think, is the Australian War Memorial trying going too far in trying to sell hard copies of images? Or are the images not really PD after all? I'd like to use an image or two I've found, so I'm eager to hear your response. Many thanks in advance. — 10277: 8223:(Obviously Dickens is public domain and the quotes are too short compared to the whole (see below), but I hope you see what I'm getting at). The quotations of copyrighted work we use in academia, our professional lives, etc. and that we see in various media are examples of fair use in action. A "real life" fair use consideration (see the Dispatch footnote) is "the amount and substantially of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole". When a use becomes so substantial as to cross from fair use into infringement, I don't know. Is it 0.1%, 1%, 5% of the whole? The matter just gets less and less grey as more is used. 8797:, so I don't necessarily think FP acted inappropriately. I'm at a substantial disadvantage not being able to see the image in context, its copyright tag or the image's rationale. I do agree that the IfD participants did not really adequately address the issues raised (NFCC#1 and 8). Yes, the image is historic and directly related to the BSA (the primary reasons to keep at the IfD), and is therefore within project scope; scope (NFCC#5), however, is but one of ten criteria and was not contested. If I correctly understand the concerns, hopefully the following will be a better articulation of some of the underlying questions: 5191:) are actual legal documents establishing, among others, parties, terms of use and termination, liabilities, etc. This tag, however, is moreso a mere declaration by the copyright holder without the legal "baggage". It's the concept from the Dispatch of "Copyleft images are still under copyright; their creators have merely waived some, but not all of the protection that copyright affords them". This tag asserts that Jcrocker holds the copyright (nothing wrong with that) and that certain protections have been waived ("use for any purpose"). If it helps, think of it as CC-by or GFDL without an underlying legal document. 10285:"Material featured on this site may be reproduced free of charge in any format or media without requiring specific permission. This is subject to the material being reproduced accurately and not being used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context. Where the material is being published or issued to others, the source must be prominently acknowledge. However, the permission to reproduce this material does not extend to any material on this site which is identified as being the copyright of the third party. Authorisation to reproduce such material be obtained from the copyright holders concerned." 9283:? The most significant hurdle I have pertinent to general Commons work (where I'm an admin) and en.wiki review work is the inability to see deleted en.wiki images. It's not uncommon for images to be incompletely transfered (in terms of sourcing and license information) to the Commons. When the local version is deleted per CSD#I8, I lose the ability to retrieve missing information and/or confirm the accuracy of the transfer. As admins can see the deleted local versions, they can help me by telling me what information, if any, was present on the local file. 1913:

the letter of the policy is followed, but the spirit is violated as the article would still contain the three copyrighted works (i.e. copyrighted material hasn't really been minimized). The question for the fountain, then, is whether this is still an issue given that the three images of are of the same copyrighted work. While I recognize that there may exist reasonable argument to the contrary, I think, in this case, that I still side with opinion that this doesn't cut the proverbial NFCC mustard. There is, further, the question of why we would need

3464:, on the grounds that Mrs. Pritchard played the title character in the first (and almost only) production of this (justly forgotten piece of high-minded but boring) drama. I have emailed the editors of the magazine in question, but they have not responded. I would very much like to know your opinion about the likely usability of this image, seeing as it is clearly by an artist who has now been dead for more than a hundred years, and whether or not that counts for anything. (I too am a Schiller fan, btw, although when I tried to read the 4090:(ec) Before Elcobbola, that was what I thought, too (if it's on Commons, it's good). Awadewit, don't be discouraged. The cadre is growing, and the shortages were due to past ignorance, which left Elcobbola pretty much alone on image review, taking the brunt of nominator hostility. Now that more people are aware, and now that Ec has written the Dispatch, I think we'll be over this hump soon, and it will become just another educational "wave" at FAC. I remember a few years back when every single FAC presented with 10875: 12636: 31: 5111:, with no commentary as to whether they belong to "the majority", we don't have anything usable. Further, the English of the readme is terrible (and I say that as a non-native speaker), especially for a document that, in part, is attempting to make a legal assertion. One could read "the majority" as not even referring to public domain, as "and e-mails of public domain" is the only use of the phrase. Does public domain apply to just the emails or the other, preceding sources as well? 2502:

and 8th. Tony would probably take the 8th for Monthly style guide updates (he can't have them ready by the 1st), and Featured topics probably wants the 1st (they have a pending milestone, but all in flux). So, unless you want the 25th for non-free images, we've got to scare up an interview. I know you've worked hard on this, and may want a break, but it would also be good to strike while the iron is hot, and have one follow on the heels of the other. All the best,

12141:

review of Rhinemaidens staging since the 1876 production; the image of the earliest production seems, in my view, to be well complemented by an image of one of the latest productions. There is surely a strong case for saying that both illustrations help towards understanding the text, a point made by a couple of editors who have commented at the review. Your words of wisdom are awaited (and many thanks for your help in establishing the PD of the Lili Lehmann image).

7936:). Obviously, however, utilizing a higher resolution is fine if there is a compelling reason to do so. The DPI isn't so much a concern, as one of the underlying considerations of the low resolution requirement is that Knowledge should not be a source of copyrighted material. Low resolution in terms of physical dimension dissuades reuse as, for example, increasing resolution would have a corresponding increase in loss of quality due to pixelation. In the case of 11160:, I think) deletion of text logos at the Commons recently; this image, it appears, is now amongst them. I've provided case law and US Copyright Office links in several deletion discussions, but armchair quarterbacks are winning the day with uninformed "it looks copyrightable to me" declarations. This, obviously, is a sore issue for me; the Commons simply has not been making good or informed decisions lately. If you want background reading for the text issue: 8831:

the absence of critical commentary, it does seem to be). The caption was the same as in the West article; isn't it, too, sufficient to convey the necessary understanding to the reader? The IfD brought up that it "illustrates for the reader the manner in which the BSA conveyed their leader's visage to the public"; why is this knowledge necessary or relevant to the history of the BSA? The article doesn't seem to discuss visages.

4555:, so to speak. He is a graphic artist and I find believable his claim of having created the image of the ring. Most of the image-related problems noted on his talk page come from a misunderstanding of Knowledge policy, not from dishonesty. Additionally, many of the notices are related to simple housekeeping for things like orphaned free-use. Just my 2¢ since this was linked to from the Texas Tech FA discussion. → 12258:

conditions and, implicitly, allows only use on Knowledge. That being the case, the image cannot be freely licensed and is, therefore, subject to the NFCC. The "fix" is A) to have IBM explicitly allow the aforementioned conditions or B) to successfully argue that the image does indeed make a significant contribution to the reader's understanding (the deletion discussion is per apparent failure to meet NFCC#8).

1275:

your own (e.g. by claiming copyright for NWS information -- see below), 2) use it in a manner that implies an endorsement or affiliation with NOAA/NWS, or 3) modify it in content and then present it as official government material. You also cannot present information of your own in a way that makes it appear to be official government information." - Doesn't that mean we can only assume public domain, not NOAA?

2282:

of legal exposure isn't really relevant. The issue is whether we should be representing the images as public domain in the UK (as we currently are) when they, per the cases sited, may actually not be. Images on Commons must be PD in the US and country of origin, thus the issue. Awadewit is correct that the images are fine on en.wiki, but I caution against them because, among other reasons, they will need

1955:(Oct 2007). The first two use collages of a logical series that go together just as this collage does. I think you understand that three collages of different company logos are a different thing than a collage of a series. However, if you do not or if this does not matter then the first two of these has seven FU images just like Crown Fountain. I will copy this to the FAC discussion for transparency.-- 369:

additionally, is not creative/original enough to defeat the intrinsic utilitarian function (thus the statement on the Copyright Office website). Basically, that logo is too utilitarian, too simple, too laking in originality, etc. to be eligible for copyright protection in the U.S. (although it does get Trademark protection). If it helps, ignore the legal lingo and just go for the concept via examples:

7874:

been bothering me. I make it a habit of reducing the resolution of copyrighted images -- usually by lowering the resolution to 50 dpi instead of 72 or 90 for downloaded images, but I'm wondering if there's any regulation in particular that I should be following. As one of the people with the greatest familiarity with Knowledge's image guidelines, I'm hoping you have an answer for me. Thanks!

9610:"we conduct an entirely different (type of) sport", so putting the English into the plural "two...sports" isn't, as a strictly technical matter, what was said. (I won't bore you with a German lesson, but "Sport" is not used as it is in English and can be a tricky thing to translate. The translation is probably how an English speaker would have said it, so this isn't really a big deal). 9061:

think these shadows will be a problem? If so, I can use the GIMP to remove the shadows from the image but this is more work for me and I'd rather not do it if I don't have to. I think the shadows are not a copyrightable element, and that they don't need to be removed, but Dr pda would feel more comfortable if someone more experienced would look over the matter, and suggested asking you.

9706:

nail in with a hammer, a rock or a hamster; the ultimate result will be the same, just accomplished with varying degrees of gracefulness. This, however, is Knowledge - an encyclopedia. Details, factuality, precision, etc. are all important and the subsequent necessity to be exact is something with which I indeed sympathize. I would certainly yield to your understanding of WP:V.

7463:. On the Commons, the image is indeed one-sided and sufficiently larger than the genuine article (the destruction of materials used in the making of the image isn't really pertinent in this case). I also looked around to see whether "specimen" stamping was required for images of US currency, but have found no support for that notion in statutes or government sites (see also 8951: 10897:) in the United States (although not necessarily in other jurisdictions). The linked book is A-OK (published in US before 1.1.1923), so have at it. I'm not so sure about never needing help; my English, as you've no doubt noticed, is not terribly good. If I ever get around to writing up another typewriter article, I may have to call in a copyedit. So, " 8865:

permissible use of a non-free image as the cover itself was the subject of sourced discussion in the article.". Would this exemption then apply: "It therefore falls under the exemption: "if the cover itself is the subject of sourced discussion in the article, and if the cover does not have its own article, it may be appropriate.""? The policy is at

4095:

encourage and motivate Elcobbola to return full force. What troubles me equally is that Ealdgyth is the only person reviewing sources; it boggles my mind when people support a FAC without checking the sourcing, and I wonder who will want to take on that tedious work if Ealdgyth ever tires. Thanks for taking on so many image reviews, Awadewit.

10878:. The book was originally published in New York in 1905. The Project Gutenberg rules appear to allow use of ebook material without condition. Would this allow me to upload a couple of the images? By the way, I have asked for your help so often, I wish I could return the favour in some way, but I can't conceive that you would ever need my help| 864:

metadata)? There are millions of photos of this grave site on Flickr; how do we know this image wasn't just grabbed from that or another site? This is precisely why IUP requires a verifiable source (an explicit assertion of authorship with contact information, in the case of "self-made" images) and a summary (details to corrobarate the tag).

12195:

What ever has happened to people's imagination or ability to visualize concepts? Frankly, I don't have the stamina to argue over NFCC issues; I won't continue the discussion at PR or bring it up at FAC. If others disagree with me, so be it; do what's best for Knowledge. Just promise me you'll actually add the bloody copyright tag. ;)

10035: 1373:#1 only allows fair use when there is and can be no free alternative. In this case, as the image is merely a page of text, the text could be transcribed and included as prose (as is already done). Unless there's some significance to the handwriting itself, there doesn't seem to be a need for the image. NFCC#8, further, requires a 2332: 4170: 4121:

like the many headed Hydra that is images, there really isn't that much to sources. I will admit that I've pretty much decided against taking any admin nomination offers, between FAC sourcing and trying to write articles, I just don't see how I'd have time to do admin work either. Oh, yeah, and RL should get SOME effort too!

5759:

ability to determine whether they're PD. Per the rights page, an unpublished photograph holds copyright in perpetuity (i.e. the PD clock doesn't start ticking until the image is published); to play devil's advocate, what if these were first published in 1960? That they are currently 110 years old won't be a consideration.

8869:. Would then a revision to the fair use criteria or an improvement to the article would allow the image to be legitimately used, Speedy is clearly inappropriate I think, but FP will never ever admit he was wrong and imposes his view on everyone else. The other problem is that even image people can not agree on this stuff. 6737:

search on that image to easily find it. My problem last night was sorting through the gazillion databases available from my library login to figure out which database the image was in; theoretically, with a direct link, one would find the image easily, but I don't have the means to log in directly with a username.

5993:(e.g. buildings, as works of architecture, are eligible for copyright protection; the structural steel beams therein, however, are not eligible in and of themselves). If, alternatively, this ring is a visible and obviously a deliberate "artistic" element of the completed sculpture, then yes, it would be "non-free". 7095:

from the function). The problem is that, as the amount of text grows, the likelihood that the text itself is eligible for copyright grows (for example, a picture of a piece of paper with only the word "the" on it would not be eligible, but a picture of a full page of text would be - see also my response to Sandy

8218:"It was the was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair." - how about now? 10932: 10206:(works of artistic craftsmanship). Although "spared" by the three dimensional nature in this case, plaques, as a whole (i.e. in other jurisdictions), won't always be immune, as there are complexities including, among others, the length of the text thereon and whether or not an "image" is incorporated. 6868:

I may also need to modify the clearance agreement to my standards... use on Wicki only or some such language... I don’t have a lot of time to presence this, can you send me this GNU free documentation license or a link to it... Myself and my lawyer will want to see this in its entirety... Thanks - dan

12185:

image; or is in just some green lines? Of course the section is important/significant, but does this image really assist our understanding thereof? If this image were removed, what significant detriment (the NFCC#8 test) would there be to the reader's understanding of the Nixen as a general concept

10839:

Welcome to the wonderfully wacky world of wiki images (the WWWWI?) :) There's no such thing as a bullet-proof "non-free" image. A good rationale just makes an image less likely to be questioned. I think the image is fine, as do others, but reasonable people can disagree (although I do question the

9848:

I own the copyright to the images attached. I grant permission to copy, distribute and/or modify these documents under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no

8706:

Thank you very much for the work. With regards to Bierstadt, I did a search for him (using only his family name) at the Library of Congress. Various results popped up with his lifetime. If you look at the one titled "Stereographs of Niagara Falls, New York " (Lot 13644), it even gives the lifetime

8314:

allow new copyrights to be generated on high quality derivatives, but Wikimedia does not recognize the validity of those claims (nor would the United States) and this does not appear to have the necessary quality anyway. Long story short, the copyright statement appears to be a site-wide "cover all"

7062:

The San Francisco Public Library sent a release they had me sign (hence the panic attack lower on your talk page), but they wrote in ONE TIME ONLY, inexplicably. That's why J.Smith said their images are useless. What do I need to tell them to change on it? Just that "One time only" should be removed?

6867:

Unfortunately this clearance language seems a little broad to me... does it clear third parties to then go and disseminate the web size file?, that would seriously impair my ability to license these photos, so this may not work out, in which case I might be more inclined to clear only one... and then

6762:

be verified", so the need for an account isn't terribly troubling. Given the "Copyright © 2008 ProQuest LLC ", I wonder whether it would just take a ProQuest account? I don'use that service (I usually take the lazy route and call my library's research services department), but maybe Awadewit would?

5700:. Do these doubts amount to a "don't use"? Trouble is, there are apparently so few free images for this expedition; there are lots of photographs from Borchgrevink's 1901 book on various websites, but the sites seem to be claiming copyright. Can I use any of these images? With grateful thanks again, 4120:

Heh. Mama Sandy worrying again (grins). I actually kinda enjoy it, it's productive and I can see folks are learning about sourcing. When I started doing it, it was as much to learn about FAC and it's culture, but now it's kinda fun. I sure learn a lot, that's for sure. And like I said above, it's not

3360:

It can wait a few days. The Commons thing doesn't seem to matter. There are already six people "supporting" the image whose responses show that they didn't even grasp the concern present. Its a sad state of affairs over there. JzG got harassed by another person, so it seems to be mob rule. It you are

3261:

I cannot edit commons, because a fly by admin blocked my IP for claims of "trolling". I pointed out in a deletion review that an image was cropped from another image that was hosted by Knowledge, without a clear statement that the image was a derivative or when the derivative was made. The "info" for

3117:

Ok. Nishkid, I appreciate your assistance. Elcobbola, I'm still thinking of how the images will be placed in the article, and I'm considering adding another. But I am also grateful for your help in getting the right template information for the riots image. That's the whipped cream and the cherry for

2842:

Ok, it's a start. You have for the purpose "It is the only published image of the riots during the first evening when they spontaneously began." This is more a description of the image than an articulation of its purpose. We want to explain why the image is being included (presumably to illustrate

2775:

template, obviously, is a good start and an easy way to articulate compliance with the more "mechanical" criteria (e.g. NFCC#3B). A good rationale will explain both the significant contribution the image is expected to make to our understanding (this is distinct from historical significance) and how

627:

Thanks. I have taken care of these issues. I just removed the Udupi image without verifyable source and added my won image. As far as the Hoysala emblem image, I have requested for deletion and assume that once the en.wiki image is deleted, the wiki commons equivalent image with automatically show up

358:

Imagine the "chaos" and impracticality that would arise from making everything that was created by a human (i.e. a work of authorship) eligible for copyright protection. You wouldn't be able to photograph cars, chairs, clothing, etc. Photographs at picnics could be nothing but naked people on grass

12140:

I wonder, could you possibly look again at the Covent Garden image in the last section of the article, and reconsider your expressed opinion that this does not meet the requirements of FU? The section to which it relates is substantial and important. I have re-ordered the section as a chronological

9247:

W&M article? I'm going to do my best to clean it all up, fix typos/errors/formatting issues etc, but it's always good to have multiple users check on one another. It's my personal goal on this site to get W&M as an FA, so any input into making that happen is more than welcome. Thanks again. -

8910:

I liken certain NFC criteria to WP:CIVIL or the importance versus notability question of CSD:A7, as all are policies open to interpretation and on which reasonable people can disagree. Its not indicative of a failing of the policy, merely that the governed aspect is inherently nebulous. There isn't

7692:

there. I think you've missed a fundamental concept and would suggest you reread, and critically so, the definition of publication. This isn't a task that can be done or assisted by a bot. Human eyes need to find relevant information (i.e. dates and authors) on reliable, external websites and make

6950:

I will suggest to the photographer that he release his images only at 300 pixels, I guess. Otherwise, I've already been turned down by one photographer, and I can't get the San Francisco Public Library to freakin' respond to my emails. I'm looking at an FA class article with potentially shit images.

6899:

The license would indeed allow third parties to disseminate the image in the size of their choosing. He might be able to manipulate this in a certain sense by, for example, only giving us a low resolution image (say 300x300). Subsequent increase of the image's dimensions would result in increasing

5441:

maybe, which was painful.) That blog seriously ruined the 2000th moment for me since I happened across it immediately after excitedly e-mailing Raul that the 2000th batch was ready and it included an educational project. In hindsight, it may have bothered me more than Elcobbola, since it dashed my

5106:

of the material of this CD has been collected from various Jain pathshala teachers and scholars of North America, from the past publications of similar CDs by the JAINA education committee under the leadership of Dr. Gada, from internet and e-mails of public domain" (emphasis added). The "majority"

4755:

I've had my head elsewhere lately (that is, whether I'm going to have to take off the delegate hat, put on the reviewer hat, recuse some FACs to Raul, and do something to kickstart FAC out of this 100KB-FACs-without-opposes-or-supports current mode it's in). Can't focus on images when there are now

4257:. The images from the Bayeux tapestry. There is no question that it's out of copyright, but images OF it, are they out of copyright? I'm so totally at see at this whole non-US copyright thing. What do I need to do to get these images up to snuff for a run at FAC? He's up next after the current one.. 4094:

footnote placement problems; we educated, and nowadays, that almost never shows up. I think image review will be under control within a few months, as more reviewers learn and as nominators realize they should get their images squared away in advance. And hopefully with other people helping, we can

4068:

Images are probably harder than sources in some respects, because folks are less educated. On the other hand, it should be easier once folks are educated, I'd hope. You don't have to copy my model of reviewing either, it's only for those that have a fair amount of time, which I do. If your wiki time

3915:

It's new to me. The SEL license seems as if it would be acceptable on Knowledge (a SEL copyright tag does not exist to my knowledge, but that is easily remedied), as it appears to be nothing more than GFDL with propriety "social commentary" baggage. I, however, don't see support for that license.

2501:

Elcobbola, what are your thoughts on Part 2? Are you burnt out, or do you want to get it over with? The reason I ask is that I have travel at the end of the month, and I want to nail down what we're going to do about the 25th. Free images is the 11th, TFA/R is the 18th, then we have the 25th, 1st

11924:

implications (talk page comments, like any Wiki text, are not considered reliable and the whole "verifiability, not truth, is the threshold for inclusion" axiom). One would hope, however, that this would be an easily solvable matter, as the talk page comment ends with "Mail to User:Elya". If Elya

9825:

It would seem the email J.S. received had verbiage that either implied or explicitly stated the image could only be used on Knowledge. If the wording is the same as previous emails you've sent successfully, it's possible previous OTRS folks missed something, or it's possible J.S. misread something

9638:, but since it is a direct quote that is being translated, it should be as true as possible. If we're only sourcing a statement, we just need to get the meaning, but it seems to me that when translating a direct quote, and including it in quotes, we should be as literal and exact as possible, no? 9345:

Do you want me to nom? Do you want co-noms? I'm ready to write it. After one bad experience, my terms are 1) only two co-noms, and 2) the nom doesn't go live 'til we've all approved, checked, copyedited etc. Someone put forward a not very well presented nom with three co-noms, one that I didn't

9246:

and for also pointing out errors that need to be addressed when trying to apply it for FA status. I can clearly see you know the Knowledge rules very well (I admit that I lack in knowing the exact guidelines), so I was wondering if I could request your assistance every now and then to look over the

8864:

RE your "I'm at a substantial disadvantage not being able to see the image in context, its copyright tag or the image's rationale"--this is why you need to accept our offer of an RFA nom! I can see your points but what about the argument that some would undoubtedly make that "the examples you are a

7533:) in his reply, the aforementioned link does not mention anything about labeling these currency images with the word "SPECIMEN". Nonetheless, Daniel made the change and requested the person clarify which part of US federal law he had been referring to. As far as I know, no reply was ever sent back. 6837:

Hello! Still in India! I avoided the Delhi bombings by a few hours but I've had to adjust my plans. Anyhow, could I delve into research databases when I return in about a week? Proquest actually owns many databases so it will take me awhile to figure out which one it is, but I'm sure I can find the

6545:

Mine looks much more natural; that one has strangely red cheeks. The one I found is gorgeous ... I feel like I'm in the museum ... all excited to be exploring my local library online. But now you're not going to believe what I did. I downloaded the image to my hard drive, and now I can't find the

5936:

So we've transcended to philosophical questions, I see. ;) There isn't really such a thing as a "work of art" in this sense. Copyright law uses the term "work of authorship", realizing that "art", as something in the eye of the beholder, is not exactly useful in such a context. I, Elcobbola, for

5559:

What do you mean by "beaten up": attacked or unable to handle the load/answer questions? I'm not exactly keen on entering a venue where image reviewers are being attacked. I'd been contemplating "moving" to FAR in the hopes the environment was different, especially as the recent FACs at which I've

4998:

is looking pretty sketchy. I'm trying to track down the source, but I think it might be a professional photo falsely uploaded. Anyway, if you feel like helping find an image of Said or any of the scholars listed in that section of the article or if any other inspired idea hits you, we would greatly

4139:

Welcome to my world. ;) The time is amazing, especially when you get images with a lot of flags and, consequently, have to go rummaging around Google images, Flickr, LoC, NYDL, NPG, Bridgeman, Everystockphoto, PicFindr, Spffy and all the rest. Then there's the issue of being attacked for your time

2638:

for the bullseye, but it doesn't mean their walls are free of holes. ;) Seriously though, I am indeed trying. I'm currently writing it "offline", as I prefer not to have the distraction of tinkering while the main thoughts are developing - not that they're exactly profound or many in this sort of

2281:

Indeed, they (at least Jimbo - Godwin is only saying the Foundation is not likely to be exposed to legal problems) endorse keeping the images; this is distinct, however, from whether or not the images are PD in the UK. Foundation servers are in Florida and the images are PD in the US, so the issue

2026:

A copyrighted work is a copyrighted work is a copyrighted work. The constant mention of mechanical image counts indicates a genuine failure to understand the intention of NFCC and the questions I have posed related thereto. Further, what other articles do or have done is absolutely irrelevant. I,

1912:

This has been the subject of some debate. Consider, for instance, an article about German auto makers. Ignoring the criterion of significance for a moment, let's say the author wanted "to comply" with minimal usage by consolidating the logos of BMW, Opel and Porsche into one image. In this case,

1764:

I am not saying I want to include images because other articles can. I am saying I can not find modern art and artist images that have passed at FAC in 2008. I am trying to understand how the standards apply. Please show me an example of a modern art or artist FA that has met your interpretation

701:

That's not correct. Images used in Knowledge articles, regardless of the where the file is on a Wikimedia server (e.g. whether it's in the Commons folder or the en.wiki folder), need to comply with Knowledge policy (which, by the way, is more lenient than Commons policy). I've nominated the files

11571:

The problem with this image is not the copyright tag, but, rather, that there is no explicit assertion of authorship. Did EMJALSJ take this him/herself? Did EMJALSJ find it on a website? Did a friend or relative of EMJALSJ take it? There isn't enough information there for us to know. Aside from

10205:

Hmm, well, the Dutch would be way liberal. The U.K., alternatively, is imprecise and unnecessarily complex (which, as a former Range Rover driver, seems par for the course - but I digress). Yes, those images (including the plaque) are fine, as U.K. FoP indeed extends to three dimensional objects

9705:

I'm biased; I spent years translating back in the university days, so I have a certain appreciation for the complexities of meaning. What are words but vehicles for the conveyance of meaning? Sure, some are more eloquent than others, but the end result can be the same. I can, after all, knock a

9303:

I'll trade you. If I pass the RfA (a nontrivial hurdle—I am often insistent, and insistent people have fewer friends), and assuming there are no rules of any kind stopping me from showing the images, then you can always ask me for this info, as long as you teach me about images... and other things

8830:

Similar questions: do we better understand the BSA, the BSA in the 1930s or West's involvement therewith by seeing this cover? Was this cover influential (e.g. did it impact public perception, participation, etc.), or is it merely an example of something scouting related from the 1930s (which, in

7094:

is tricky for the same reasons we discussed with the SF Examiner. Simple plaques with no images are generally considered useful articles (such items -- like cars, chairs, etc. -- don't get copyright protection because the creative/artistic elements cannot be separated and identified independently

5660:

Thank you for the follow-up. I've commented on remaining image issues at the FAC. I rarely review outside of images (largely due to time constraints) and typically only support articles on topics in which I have substantial enough knowledge to make an educated evaluation of comprehensiveness and

4400:

Cool. Okay, I can get soures for the two tapestry images, thankfully. The third has a source so that's good (although I'd avoided using manuscripts in British hands, but guess I didn't need to...) Luckily, medieval manuscripts are all PD! Thanks a BUNCH! Awa thanks you too, since she won't have to

2925:

The purpose looks good. If you really want to pick nits for FAC, you should probably reduce the resolution to 0.1 megapixels (NFCC#3B) and move the image to a place in the text more pertinent to the riot's participants than the lead is. I'd actually recommend the Inn image for the lead, but that

1274:

should be tagged with a NOAA tag when there is no information about who took the photo? The website claims "The information on government servers are in the public domain, unless specifically annotated otherwise, and may be used freely by the public so long as you do not 1) claim it is

513:

to no avail. Re dates, the Signpost never publishes on time, but this is scheduled for the August 4 edition (which hasn't published yet, but could publish any day), and you're scheduled for August 11. If you're interested in trying to clean that up, I'm not sure where you would post about it ...

12194:

That being said, my possible biases include my frequent patronage of performing arts (i.e. I've seen that lightning trick dozens of times), to say nothing of the fact that I recall precious little, if any, literature that required images to be understood. The Great Gatsby did not have pictures.

8812:

Does seeing West on the cover of Time help the reader, and significantly so, to understand West as a person or his scouting work? Certainly appearing on Time is indicative of importance/notability and may well have been an important event for West himself, but isn't that something that's readily

7873:

This is in regards to a recent comment you made on a FAC I submitted, and it's a question that's been bubbling in my mind for a while. When using a logo or other copyrighted image, what qualifies as "low resolution"? I've been unable to find specific instructions or regulations for this, and it's

7580:

says "Unless otherwise noted, images of Representatives are provided by, and should be credited to Collection of U.S. House of Representatives. Images of Senators are provided by, and should be credited to the U.S. Senate Historical Office." First, it doesn't say were such "otherwise information"

5758:

It's the same (frustrating) issue of publication. Were these published before or after the death of the author? If before, the term is 50 years after their death; if after, the term is 50 years from publication. I only see creation dates. Knowing the publication information is critical to our

5691:

article, now promoted. It seems that an attempt by someone to create difficulties was neatly averted. In a more general way I would like to thank you for your work on image issues at FA. Sometimes I find your judgements baffling, at other times frustrating, but I have absolute confidence in their

5580:

I'm rushed; check my contribs at FAR. And Elcobbola, you have to accept that when others don't understand images as well as you do, it's hard for us to know if someone is being unreasonable. As we learn, this will change, but until you weigh in, how do we know? Also, pls remember that it's not

2713:

I'm admittedly not familiar with the economics of UPI or McDarrah's freelance work, but there may be an issue with NFCC#2 if one or both market intellectual properties to media, etc. for the purpose of illustrating critical commentary. NFCC#8 is difficult to judge when the image is not yet being

1377:

contribution to our understanding. There may indeed be some historical value to this journal page, but is seeing it really necessary for a reader to understand the assassination? I don't believe so. As for replacement images, perhaps an image of California State Prison, Corcoran could be found

1353:

Seems I'm down to one image problem, which is Sirhan's diary. I think an image is needed in this section, so I was wondering if I could make a claim of fair use on this image from the FBI investigation? Otherwise I may need a slightly different image... any chance you can help me with this? My

11567:

Well, the copyright doesn't need to be released, just certain protections afforded thereby (the "copyleft licenses are still under copyright" concept). The protections that need to be released in order for an image to be "free" are those restricting use, redistribution, and creation of modified

9060:

will probably work, but "not wanting to be super-picky here but I think I can see a shadow!" The shadow in question is the shadow cast by the work's holes and edges onto a featureless white background that is not part of the work. Any two-dimensional work would cast shadows in this sense. Do you

6874:

Also, I'd like to use a newspaper front page for an obvious huge event that shook the city. Would I use a template for a magazine cover to do that? Are there any copyright restrictions if the article describes the enormity of the event and the headline illustrates it? I appreciate your response.

6861:'s article, and I have asked a professional photographer who took images of Milk for the rights to some of his images. I sent him the GNU Documentation release and he's understandably concerned, and in one of the replies in our correspondence, he asked the following, which I am unable to answer: 6715:

Well, you know the sourcing "ropes" better than I; would you take that as a source for text/data in an article? I suppose the test I like to use is whether there's enough information for a reader, so motivated, to verify the image's origin and the information included in the summary. That link

2590:

Thanks for the kind words. I don't disagree about the captions; unlike the previous images, those four don't really have a meaningful function other than eye candy. Superfluous images breed superfluous captions, I suppose. If you would like to suggest or implement alternative captions, I'd be

2108:

images. I don't know the author on one – and can't find dates of first publication for either. Given the possibility that the author might not have died 70+ years ago – and assuming we can't find this info – what do you recommend? My gut says to avoid using them, but the EP article simply cannot

1863:

I have offered to make a collage of the three image sequence that shows the face puckering and spouting water for TonyTheTiger. Would this be considered one image for fair use / NFCC purposes? If so I will make it, if not I will not bother. I defer to your understanding and thank you in advance,

863:

copyright tag). Per IUP, this is not good enough. It's a problem, further, because the en.wiki version was uploaded by WiscoBoy91 and the Commons version was uploaded by Estoymuybueno. Are they the same person? Which one is the real author (en.wiki was here first, but Commons version has the

9853:

I don't know J.S., and I'm cognizant of the constant confusion about and re-interpretation of image policy. I'm doing my best to adhere to copyright recognition by obtaining permission, and it has so far appeared that it has been successful. Why the sudden change? Does this void all my previous

8478:

Agree definitely about the Badgers. "Badger" is a swear word in my house. If you can make it, excellent, if not, understood. I wil also refuse to be photographed (I have a life and family that knows nothing of my wikipedian-ness) if I do show up at a meetup. Cheers, and good to know another

8309:

My understanding of Australian copyright law is that photographs taken before 1.1.1955 are indeed public domain and not burdened by considerations of the photographer's employment or whether the work was commissioned (two factors that can impact the copyright term for post 1954 works). Certain

6736:

I can't test it, because my login procedure is different. That page asks for a username and password. When I go through my local library, I enter a barcode and then navigate to that page. I don't have the means to determine if someone else could 1) log in to that site with a username, and 2)

4829:

Ah nuts, you've got to let me in on such schemes. ;) I would like to have known the outcome. (I do wonder from time to time whether "experts" get a pass in their field - i.e. would people be diligent about checking sources on an Ealdgyth nom, comprehensiveness on an Awadewit nom, images on an

12215:

Thank you very much for this detailed reply. I utterly respect your viewpoint. However, two contributors to the PR say that the image enhances their understanding of the section. I think the issue is balanced, but am inclined to take it to FAC and see what happens. If the fair use is strongly

8665:

receive and hold copyrights. We would have to know the details of the commission, especially whether the author not only transferred rights to the government, but actually released them altogether. I was able to find, however, that the image was published before 1.1.1923 and have updated the

1290:

We don't without the explicit assertion; you're right that we have merely a hosting entity, not an assertion of authorship (the image is actually likely to be the work product of the Emergency Management department of a certain county - although undoubtedly PD given the universal disclaimer).

68:

could be relocated nearer to its text reference, in view of stacking problems arising from its position in the lead section. I have been a little reluctant to do this, for reasons explained on the FAC page; however, another editor has done a trial, relocating the piper within the text. Can you

9826:

this time around; I can't know, obviously, without seeing the emails. It might be a hassle, but perhaps the best way around the problem would be to have the copyright holder send another email explicitly allowing use everywhere? In any case, though, I very much doubt J.S. has gone rouge. :)

7180:, one that showed Milk at the 1978 Gay Freedom Day Parade, and one of the local news interviewing him stepping in dog shit (seriously - it's in the article) and placed them in the appropriate sections? The documentary is in pieces on YouTube and I think the sections I'm referring to would be 4045:

I honestly don't know how you do the sourcing reviews. I've only just started reviewing every FAC for image violations and I know I won't be able to keep it up. I have no time for any other wiki-work and it is taking far too much time every day. :( We need an army of volunteers to do this and

12257:

The problem regarding the correspondence received by OTRS is that the "permission" from IBM is not sufficiently explicit. In order for an image to be "free", the copyright holder must explicitly allow derivatives, redistribution and use for any purpose. The IBM email does not address these

3339:

Ah, ok. Knowledge emails go to my German laptop; I'll be back in town late tomorrow (Thursday, realistically), so I'll be able to get it it then. I'm happy to correct the images in the mean time; if you'd like not to to wait for whatever reason, let me know and I'll send you my "US" email.

368:

Copyright law has a mechanism to alleviate this problem by granting exemption to "useful articles" (objects with "intrinsic utilitarian function"). The U.S. has case law which establishes typefaces, the characters therein, etc. as such "useful objects"; merely changing coloring/positioning,

9599:

Are we more concerned with translating as literally and true to the original as possible or just ensuring that the meaning is conveyed? I see two translated quotes in that diff., and they are certainly true to the meaning, although I might kibitz with translation if the former is the case.

7458:

In terms of copyright law, I don't see any problems (i.e. I agree authorship is rightly attributed to the federal government). In terms its usage in that article, it seems fine ("free" images are not subject to NFCC and, thus, do not need to pass the high barrier to entry of contributing

12522:(Talk page stalker reply) You need to forward your emails to the OTRS system. But make sure that the copyright holders state something along the lines of "I am the copyright holder/author of Image X. I license this image under X". Make sure it's plain that they know what they're saying. 6968:

to convert it to jpg or otherwise edit it. Swearing at this point is basically all there is left to do, and I'm doing a damn fine job of it here. I can send the pdf to you if you email me - if you're open to that. Otherwise, I'll just swear a lot until I can get some god*(&*&^

6563:

Oh, I can believe it; I can't imagine that anyone misplaces more websites than I. In any case, let me know if you need any help uploading it (assuming you relocate the source). Am I reading your log correctly; you've never uploaded an image? Could this be history in the making? ;)

3601:

I'm a professional photographer, albeit just starting out, and I donate my 'culls' to wikipedia. I don't donate the best stuff, obviously, but shooting generates a LOT of culls, and might as well make some use of them. (Some of the other "culls" go to stock photography, for example).

1061: 8907:, support use of the image. That's not to say that they couldn't. Indeed, with relevant commentary, such as impact on public perception, BSA participation, etc. (i.e. "if the cover itself is the subject of sourced discussion in the article"), the image could certainly be supported. 8191:

Title 17 (US copyright law) governs literary works (i.e. same rules as with images, with the caveat of alternative case law). Translations are derivative works. If I were to translate Harry Potter into German, Rowling could successfully sue me for copyright infringement. Exactly

12242:: it didn't work, and the image may get deleted. This is the only image we can find of a very important event in the history of AI and of the planet: the first time a computer beat the best in the world at a chess match. Can you tell me how to fix this? (I'm watchlisting.) - Dan 4346:

So, if I have a photograph of these in a book, even if that photograph was taken in the UK or in a non-US country, where Bridgeman v. Corel doesn't apply, I could still scan the image and use it as PD-Old on Knowledge? (I'm in the US) I think that's the basic question I'm asking.

4278:, the ruling that allows us to use exact copies of 2D works (like my good friend above, Schiller), could be seen as limited by the scope of what it was actually intending to address (2D paintings and slides thereof), but several of the cases underlying the Court's findings (e.g. 3413:

It's recoverable (just click the older date in the "file history" section). The Commons transfer script, however, only grabs the most recent version, so I'd just need to make the move manually (not a big deal - just more steps than I was interested in undertaking at the time).

4920:

Elcobbola, Awadewit let me know she's going to have limited access over the coming week; is there any chance I can entice you to do image reviews for about the next ten days? There are several articles ready to go but lacking image review, and several that I just restarted.

6045:

I responded at the FAC regarding the first question (no move needed). Regarding the other question, there isn't a really a limit on "free" images in a numerical sense (other than common sense), although the totality and spirit of several guidelines set something of a limit.

11500:- I didn't look back any further). If anything germane to IUP is in flux, it's the degree to which reviewers actually engage IUP (i.e. some just do a superficial check to see that a copyright tag exists, while others dig deeper). Generally speaking, as long as you hit the 5715:

Well, I don't think FN was attempting to cause problems; having an image pending deletion is never a good thing. The circumstances here, though, were such that an oppose was not really warranted. In any case, thank you for the kind words. I've been meaning to get back to

2742:

in 1969. Neither really attracted attention the way the images in Birmingham campaign did, but since the UPI image was taken during the riots-- the first night they broke out, I think -- and the only image I know of showing that. How would I load it with a good rationale?

481:

I'm confused; isn't it already the week before the Dispatch (August 11)? I don't like that this doesn't tell folks that they should be using the Commons. Knowledge should really only have fair use images and images PD in the US, but not in their originating country (per

9939:. Over the past three months, the page has been improved with additional scholarly works, trims, two new sections suggested in and attention to concerns raised during the last FAC. Thanks in advance for your time, attention and help to bring this important article to FA. 8071:

I did MOS:IMAGES clean-up and completed sourcing and other information on several images. There remain sourcing problems and at least one copyvio; I'll finish and comment tonight once I get on a computer better set up for copyvio hunting. Thanks for the heads up (is FN

9368: 5560:

commented "on my own devices" -- Crown Fountain and Croatia national football team -- have strongly reinforced my disillusion. If FAR is going to be more of the same, I might prefer to stick to being the image review vampire (i.e. only reviewing when invited to do so).

11740:

says that it's in the public domain and the credit is given as: "Ernest Hemingway Photograph Collection, John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum, Boston." We're currently discussing its inclusion at Crane's talk page, so any input would be greatly appreciated!

2157:

Her, but not hubby – d'oh! (Pics of her are plentiful and apparently clearly in the PD.) Thanks for the link, tho. You know you're always welcome to butt into conversations I start, especially when you're mentioned by name. (Gods know I butt into enough of yours, heh.)

4273:

Well, no need to worry about the international aspects on en.wiki. These are the types of images I struggle with, as there exists a difference between what I believe to be the "correct" answer in the real world, and the answer that would be acceptable to Knowledge.

11650:

states "all rights reserved", which, the site itself being a government work, probably does not bode well for the coins). My French is only good enough to get around town (ideally, a SNCF ticket east), so I didn't look further to see whether there are any statutes.

5967:

Simply put, once an "artistic idea" transitions from your mind to paper, stone, metal or some other "tangible medium", even if it's not yet complete ("or later developed"), the copyright has been generated (or, as you've put it, art has become art). Now, getting to

6516:

the painting could be subject to copyright in real life (depending upon the country in which they were created), but en.wiki and Commons do not recognize such claims, so there's no issue there either. A Google images search for "Thrale Reynolds" (sans quotes) hits

4714:

I didn't know whether you'd already had mental notes; you, obviously, pay much closer attention to FAC, so I thought you might be able to better gauge what was truly "frequent" in the realm of review. Your questions are never dumb, but I suppose I can go trawling.

2714:

used (i.e. how does one determine whether a contribution is significant when that contribution has yet to be made?), but it certainly seems reasonable to assume that either image could be successfully used in the article if accompanied by a well-reasoned rationale.

8915:

discussed on Knowledge, there will always be a dissenter - even amongst "image people". It's why we have discussion forums (e.g. IfD) and delete/restore buttons. For the life of me, though, I'll never understand why people get so passionate about non-free images.

11094:

Image:Newvrindabanaccordions.jpg Hi Henrydoktorsk, I've listed this image at possibly unfree images as I have concerns about its copyright tag. You're welcome to comment there. Let me know if you have questions. Regards, Эlcobbola talk 01:35, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

5779:

Thanks for the explanation. I'll hold off using these until I can get unimpeachable evidence of publication. I don't think these are from Borchgrevink's 1901 book, they could be from Bernacchi's (also pub. 1901), but who knows? The article can live without them.

8532:

I saw your request on Jb's talk page; it's time for you to submit to trial by ... er ... RfA so you can view deleted versions. I'd be happy to nominate or co-nominate (as long as there are only two co-noms, I don't believe in three); let's get on with it :-))

6921:

is the newspaper template. NFCC#1 is a hurdle for newspapers as, if the image is just text, it could be converted to prose and, thus, preclude the need for a "non-free" image. There are exceptions, of course, so I'd probably need to see the image in context.

805:

It looks like the notebook can only be found in chunks from websites with sketchy copyrights and in that book. However, could it be in the archives somwhere? Is there an RFK archive? I doubt the author of that one book had the original and kept it to himself.

7940:, the resolution is not a big deal and is merely a matter of crossing Ts and dotting Is for FAC. At ca. 0.25 megapixels (493x500 = 246,500), the image is a higher resolution than the rule of thumb and higher than strictly necessary to make its contribution. 4860:? It's at PR awaiting a review, and no doubt someone will look at the prose, but I'd really appreciate knowing whether there are any likely problems with the images, bearing in mind problems I've had in the past with these wretched expeditions. Many thanks 5642: 10971:

got the bronze star today. My next is Milk's. The star isn't a bribe, but if you could look at the images in the article and give any suggestions to make their inclusion beyond question before it gos up for FAC, you would be, if possible, more awesome.

6585:... I literally have so many stupid options from my local library database that I can NOT find the damn image again in spite of 20 minutes of searching. Oh, well. Maybe I'll come across it sometime, but I just can't find the database where I got it. 9346:

know about, before it was in good shape, which was really irritating; I wasn't happy finding myself as one of three co-noms after the fact, one of whom I didn't know. Ling's got different issues to overcome than you do ... his is going to be fun :-))

3683:

No matter how "free" copyleft licenses seem, one still needs to abide by the terms of license. If, for example, a license requires attribution (giving the original author credit), a failure to do so constitutes a breach (i.e. infringement). This is

8383:

than impressed with your level of sanity. I would be warmly enheartened to know that another Minnesotan is as smart as you appear on wiki :-) Feel free to delete this if it's too "close to home", feel free not to reply at all if you wish. Cheers,

11473:, but you hear it all the time) is "I can't keep up with all those guideline and policy changes". We've been getting monthly updates of some important guideline and policy pages into the Signpost recently. I've moved the project into WP-space, at 8813:

understood by merely saying "West was featured on the July 12, 1937 cover of Time in recognition of the first national Scout jamboree"? Doesn't that (former) caption, as mere prose (i.e. free), seem to reasonably convey the necessary understanding?

8117:), but checking, I believe it's unlikely to have been taken by a wiki-contributer and is probably some type of copyvio from some Russian military enthusisasts' website. How do I mark the picture to be checked for its copyright status? Thanks again, 2187: 650:

Do you happen to have a wikicommons account? If not, I think they allow ips to file copyright problems there. I brought up one problem in a discussion forum as an ip, but never filed a review, so I don't know if its allowable without an account.

5581:

optimal for me to be the one to step in when there are attacks; there is still an unstruck blatant, stunning, blockable personal attack on the Samuel Johnson FAC (delusional troll), and not a soul has said a word. I can't be the one to do it.

2292:

tags (which are often ignored, resulting in housekeeping headaches) and NPG's complaints may eventually rise above saber rattling (it's a long term thing; they may be problematic in the future, so it may just be wisest, as I said, to avoid them

6214:

Well, there wasn't necessarily a particular incident, rather a totality and (still) ongoing abuse and dismissal of image reviewers. In any case, I'm always happy to comment when "invited" and folks are working cooperatively and in good faith.

8667: 118:

I'm becoming a bit overwhelmed trying to sort out PD-Art. For example, we don't seem to have a complete list of countries and their rulings on photographic representations of 2D works of art. Do you know of one? I need information on Ireland.

12033: 11775:, as the current source (National Archives) says nothing about whether or not it was published - a notion quite different from mere creation (i.e. if we're claiming PD based on publication on a certain date, as we currently are, the source 2190:). Without weighing in (this is a big to-do on the Commons), it would probably be wise to avoid NPG, if possible. Scartol, let me respond in the morning; I've been too busy with the Dispatch to address other things and I need to head off. 10824:

Holy moley. A phrase is taken out, it's back in...The guidelines are muddy and interpretation is different from one editor to another, and the end result could be a deleted image despite anything I'm willing to do to keep it. Afwaaahhh??!

7403: 2524:

is basically nothing but a check list (i.e. it's mechanical exercise requiring far less critical thought). That said, however, it's a miracle part 1 got done when it did (kudos to the surprisingly good 3G coverage in New England). I can

1696:

Can you tell me how long you have been involved in FAC image licensing discussion and if any modern art has passed at FAC in that time. If any has I would like to see examples of modern art that would pass your FU standards. Please name

4224:

Thanks - it makes me feel slightly less guilty at walking away. I had reached the point where I did not see my contributions having much hope of making a difference and I wanted to keep it civil, so I left. As Thumper says in the film

2974:

I have an OTRS ticket number (2008080810018509) for the New York Public Library image of the Stonewall Inn. No one has altered the image file to reflect that, however. Usually an admin (or someone) does that. Any advice on that issue?

5741: 686:

Okay, good. Then you can file the appropriate action, right? We really need things on that end to go first, otherwise, it will still appear as GFDL compliant from this end. Could you add diffs to the RFK FAC page? That would help. :)

10710:

Yes, I see that, but it doesn't matter. We can't rely on a boilerplate template. We need an explicit assertion of authorship. Did the uploader take this image? Did a friend or relative take it? Did they find it on the website?

6108:

for a fair-use image. I'm not asking you to get involved in the discussion, but would like to hear your opinion (which I respect) on the validity of arguments presented there. (Note that the image formerly appeared in the infobox of

11572:

running afoul of WP:IUP, it runs afoul of the copyright tag, which requires "the copyright holder is properly attributed". So, unless EMJALSJ can add attribution of the author (last edit 12.07), another version would be advisable.

6030:)? Furthermore, I am wondering if an article can have any amount of "free" images as long as it is associated with the subject (i.e. do we subject "free" images to the same "appropriate" condition as fair-use images)? Thank you. 3934:), as indicated in the image summary (even if they're married, my understanding is that she alone would have the copyright - assuming she is still alive). Steve appears to be the webmaster at wearcam.org itself, but the site has a 3170:

and get back to me about them? We are prepping it for FA, and I want to settle the images first. I have a book that documents the owners of some of the paintings if necessary. I'm not that current on such materials that are so old.

5475:

It always helps to multiple people mentioning the same issues. I think we are making people aware that they need to check images - raising awareness (step 1) seems to have been accomplished. I have seen more people asking for help

8670:

is clearly an engraving. It doesn't bother me personally (I'm playing devil's advocate), but some may be concerned about misrepresenting Roebling's appearance (engravings being more so the product of the artist than "mechanical"

9314: 6609:

That made me *so* mad. I found it in a database called eLibrary. It says "Copyright ¿ 2004 Bridgeman. All Rights Reserved." It gives me a citation that includes the name of my local library, which I'm not willing to put out.

3281:

I added that I cropped and scanned the images of the dictionary pages to the source. 5. The 17 gough square image can be removed. Johnson didn't live there during the time the picture is placed in the article. I put in its place

12567:. If I recall correctly, an uncle or aunt or grandparent snapped the photo, using my Mom's camera. Who owns the copyright, and how do I assert proof of this? (especially without exposing a family member's name/email address. 12098:

is winding down, and the only item remaining really is an image audit. I realize you're busy reviewing stuff (as your talents in this area are so scarce :p), but I would really appreciate it if you checked the images. Thanks, —

4469:

The image appears professionally done (even lighting, etc.), is of low resolution, has no metadata and the uploader's talk page has number of image-related warning templates; are we sure the uploader is even the image's author?

8572: 7585:. When it is not on the image page, then look to Collection of U.S. House of Representatives" or "U.S. Senate Historical Office". Following this step, I could not find "Collection of U.S. House of Representatives", but I found 7312:, therefore, has not technically been published. In a literal sense, before this change, images of such sculptures were not in compliance with NFCC#4. That, obviously, was somewhat silly and never enforced - thus the change. 8816:

This wasn't brought up at the discussion, but if the rationale was indeed "To illustrate the national emphasis on Scouting in the 1930s", how does that meet the NFCC#10C requirement that "The rationale ... is relevant to each

7616:(yet to be created, obviously), which seems a more appropriate venue. I've only processed 20-30 of these things, as I'm partially waiting for the Commons version to close before rounding up folks for a more organized effort. 6199:

Thank you for the response. I appreciate your insight into the matter. I know that you had some sort of a run-in about images at FAC a while back so I was not trying to draw you into another one, by any means. Thanks again! —

5744:? I've looked at the copyright section and these photographs, taken 110 years ago, appear to be PD under Australian copyright. Is it possible to use them here? (Note also a couple of other additions to the article's images). 3571:, the uploader here, reports to be staff member of Rio Grande do Sul Museum of Art and a photographer, among other things. Some uploads have wrinkles (e.g. many uploads of items in a Greek museum - quite a ways from Brazil, 5141:

Thanks...That clears up the query. Too bad...they had good images depicting the life of Lord Mahavira..as well as from various themes of Jainism. Maybe I can correspond with them to get the exact status of the image. Thanks

1989: 1563: 12180:

needed to understand, well, anything? This lighting effect, literally, has half a sentence worth of mention in the article; that hardly appears to constitute critical commentary. Do we even really see a water effect in

11099:

Thank you for your concern. Perhaps I need to do the correct license, something which I haven't quite yet figured out. The image is from the New Vrindaban Archives, which I own. What license need I fill out? Many thanks.

2031:

and the collage (i.e. the images therein) are removed, as I can foresee no reasonable explanation of how they would pass NFCC#3A and NFCC#8. I do not intend to revisit the FAC; you are welcome to move relevant comments.

11074:

Ok. I've tried to strengthen the connection to the images in the text. Please give me your opinion on the changes. I'd like to put it up for FAC within the next couple of days, but I'm worried about fair-use rationales.

10989:

Great Denzel Washington on a cheddar cheese cracker, I forgot about Milk! There is indeed some image polishing to be done; is it okay if I get to it tonight (and where should I respond - here or on the article talk)?

9935:

Hello, you are receiving this message because you voted in the last FAC for this article. Currently, it is undergoing a peer review and I invite you to come view the page and offer any suggestions for improvement here

12175:

That leaves us with the lighting. Obviously, the image establishes the visual effect with more clarity than prose. Prose, however, is still capable of depicting the general idea. Is the image's superior "clarity"

5640:

Thanks for your comments on the featured article candidate. Really helped, appreciated. Just wanted to let you know that I fixed up all the images now. Thought this was holding you back from supporting or something.

12564: 434:

I'm contemplating putting the article up for FAC again, after responding to a good PR. Would you mind scanning the article and letting me know if anything jumps out at you that would create any road blocks. Thanks!

12190:

portrayal of the Nixen had a meaningful and significant impact on, say, public perception of the Nixen/Nibelungen or future portrayals thereof, this seems to be entirely unnecessary (a mere example of one of many

7467:

and the response below). The problem, if any, lies in what form the image would take in WP V.07 (i.e. if the size published therein is more than 3/4s of the real size and less than 1.5 times the real size, there

5114:

Whether the images on the calender are acceptable depends upon who took the photographs. Did a representative of Jaina.org take the images, or did Jaina.org just compile "found" images for their publication (see

11477:. Would you be interested in reporting on monthly changes to IUP, when there are any? You can get a sense of the level of detail we're looking for at that page. If so, I can create a new link for that page at 9801: 8428:

Heh. Yep I do, although I'm quite suburban (work and live in the northburbs) :-). I don't know why, but I feel much much better about this place knowing that you're here. Are you going to the Oct meetup? See

4639:, so hopefully I won't have to continue to rewrite the criteria to write about the criteria. ;) I did start making illustrations last night, so it is somewhat underway. Do let me know about the free FAQ, too. 12167:

To me, the latter is a nonstarter; prose is all that's needed to understand the performers were nude. The association of nudity with innocence is self-obvious and, even if it weren't, is not truly depicted by

11301:

There's already a murky image question there. Since that FAC has spun out of control in the past, I'm hoping you'll get in there quickly and address the issue already raised, and anything else you see. Best,

10311:" Knowledge only allows images for which one can freely create derivatives (i.e. "reproduced accurately" could be interpreted as disallowing derivatives). Also, Knowledge images need to be freely reusable in 9988:); in the "Wiki world", the precedent is that it's A-OK. We have a verifiable source (physical location with collection name and call number) that says early 1910s, so the tag, as it is written, is supported. 4432:

need a fair use rationale because it has the Texas Tech logo on it? Or is the Texas Tech logo too simple to guarantee it copyright? Or do pictures of logos once-removed not require fair use rationales? Or....?

7492:

My understanding is that the 0.5 release only included thumbnails of images; I haven't seen it explicitly stated whether 0.7 will do the same, but I'll make sure to raise the question. Thanks for looking into

3803:) be the best way to go about it? (I don't think it would fit nicely into the Dispatch - and I do worry about TLDR). Alternatively, there could probably even be a "Reviewing free images: part two" Dispatch. 12575: 5846: 2577:

Wonderful dispatch - many thanks to you and the editors who helped you. With the exception of the last four captions, this is better than most of the very polished how-tos and policies I've read on WP. --

1244:" (emphasis mine). As an object still in existence, it's unable to pass this criterion (this is, for example, why biographies of living people don't have fair use images - so too with ships, I'm afraid). 7723:

Can you look at the two images here? Some image admins say they're okay and some not. East718 uploaded the one at top and wrote the FUR. Can you give your input here? Thanks. Pls respond on the FAC page.

762:

at LOC; it should be a good replacement for the lead image. I'm uploading now. I don't think the journal page would pass NFCC#1 or NFCC#8, so it can't be salvaged. The grave stone image has an en.wiki

5320:

is also USFWS. Url works for me, but could you check, because if that image has to go as well I might as well forget pictures of the North American subspecies altogether since they are all USFWS. Thanks

1051: 1416:

That's just crazy enough to work. ;) (My non-image MOS knowledge is sketchy, so I assume there isn't a requirement that such things be relegated to, say, the notes/references/external links section).

12037: 11646:

Côte d'Ivoire is a signatory to the Berne Convention, so they'll have at least the 50 year minimum pma term. Whether or not government works get an exception, I don't know (although the President's

7340:

I see all kinds of strange tags on images, no image review. No MoS review either, but I'm about to give up on that front. There are a gazillion images there; would you mind looking at them? Best,

3273:

is stated to be owned by Mary Hyde in NJ on page xvii in Bate. Most of the duplicates of it cut the picture off just below the rounded edges at the top (at the line across the two paintings). 3,4.

2776:

our understanding of the topic would be impaired by removal of the image. Only the former remains a NFCC requirement, but the latter is highly recommended for additional support, "insurance", etc.

134:

The notions on which PD-ART is based generally fall out of case law (i.e. they're adjudicated, not necessarily statutory). As such, they're tricker to find (e.g. one might need a "local" analog of

8903:

Hmm, there seems to be a back story with FP? I won't ask. I think a point was either lost or obscured by my lengthy response. :) From what I can see sans mop, it doesn't look like the articles,

8507: 7637: 7613: 92:

doesn't matter to me and I don't consider the issue actionable); it's somehow vexing that it's even merited mention in the declarations of others. Do what makes sense and is best for the article.

12095: 12078: 12029: 8794: 8786: 6162:. A work consisting of editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications, which, as a whole, represent an original work of authorship, is a “derivative work”. (emphasis mine) 6050:

advises against redundancy (e.g. I agree with your comments about the multiple images of Alexandra) and recommends one be "judicious" in picking suitable images (e.g. although freely licensed, a

3938:

incompatible with Knowledge and I see no evidence that A) Christina transfered rights to Steve or B) that images on the site are published under SEL. Did I miss it? The site is straight out of

3768:

Ec, what do you think about adding these sorts of post-Dispatch questions into one FAQ section on the talk page of the Dispatch? Or even add them in to the Dispatch if you feel it's warranted?

1914: 10950:

for his invaluable help and extraordinary diligence in translating the baffling minutiae involved with providing kinda good articles with excellent images, making them wonderful pieces of art.

12493:

Elc... Are you involved in OTRS? Can you point me to someone who is? Oh, and can you confirm that this is the place to go to confirm that someone has provided permission to use an image?

12239: 11442: 2847:

in understanding the riots. What do we see in the image that words alone could not express? How would our understanding of the riots be harmed if the image were not present in the article?

886:

Are there any pictures of the grave on Flicker that are able to be taken onto Commons or justified? I've seen it done before with lolcats, but, yeah, they aren't going on an FA candidate. :)

9501:(Languages for an RfA? I don't think I've seen that before. German, English, Dutch, Swedish, Russian, Spanish, French - in that order, I'm sorry to say. I don't really understand or like 4523: 235: 9659:

Well, the other side of the coin is not being so literal as to make the translation sound odd to native speakers (e.g. no English speaker would be so starchy as to say "conduct a sport").

8661:- The LoC didn't have the details necessary to support PD-USGov (being commissioned for and being the work of the federal government are entirely different matters; the federal government 8649: 7928:, etc.) The rule of thumb is 0.1 megapixels, as this is decidedly low resolution and tends to keep image width around 300 pixels (once, I believe, the explicit maximum thumbnail size per 5990: 5222: 1037:

Bad news ... no one's checking images in spite of my talk page prompts. I'm seeing about four that are ready to be promoted, but for image clearance (including RFK). Also noticed these:

7906:

Exactly. Which is why I was looking for guidance. I had thought the Sugar Bowl logo was low resolution, but evidently Elco did not. If there's room for confusion, I want to iron it out.

5442:

excitement :-). But just look how far we've come since then ! Now there are many reviewers backing up Elcobbola and learning from him, where he used to be all alone facing the wrath.

1797:

I tried to rewrite and beef up my FURs to appease your concerns. It certainly would have been helpful if you would show me some modern art pages that have passed FAC under your watch.--

1378:(other than an image of Sirhan himself, I'm not sure what would be pertinent here). If you're just looking for something to break up the prose, perhaps a "toccolours" box (e.g. as used 12005: 10786: 10315:

context, even if subjectively "derogatory" or "misleading". What you may want to do is email the site and ask whether they'd be willing to release those conditions for this image (see

6896:, which seems to be what he would like to see and is indeed what he would want to present to his attorney for consideration. To address what appear to be his two "usability"questions: 12323:

I'm not the main editor on this one, but I'm trying to help it through the difficult stage of transition from GA to FAC. It's on PR at present. I'm uncertain about four of the images:

6105: 6026:

Hi, I was wondering if you could look at this FAC on a Queen of England and help us determine if the photos are of public domain in the UK, or should we upload them to Knowledge (ref:

6019: 2669:

to being to FA. There are two known images of the riots while they were occurring. I would like to use one of them at the top of the page. One is from a freelance photographer named

11891: 10109: 8508: 2373:

was published in 1911. Does this mean that images in those books are in the PD? If so, my life just got a little easier. (But of course neither book has an image of Mr. Pankhurst.)

1885: 7590: 10049:

Dear Elcobbola, I award you this heartfelt barnstar for your prodigious efforts to translate Knowledge's image policy to something intelligible to the rest of us mere mortals, in

9603:"Schicklichkeit und Anstand" is more like "decency and decorum" or "decency and modesty" (that latter of which seems better given the context); I wouldn't use "etiquette", though. 7561: 4522:

I suppose a fair use claim could be made, but I'd anticipate NFCC#8 to be a significant hurdle. Is it really that hard to imagine a ring with the logo on it, especially when the

12500:. NB I'm not entirely sure that the person who's provided the permission yet realizes what he's permitting. How can we make sure that this is all on the level and sorted out? 12336:

No inf. given as to when first published. It's from the Terra Nova expedition and the photo is probably by Ponting, the expedition's photographer who died in 1935. It's not from

8725:

With regards to the Roebling portrait, I uploaded a version that is more faithful to the source. Its larger size should also make it more distinct as an engraving-based image.

7589:. I then looked for U.S. Senate Historical Office's copyright notice, and couldn't find it. (Insert photo of my head spinning around HERE). Would you please post instructions at 6763:

As long as we can get to that image without having to know your library, we're ok. I'll drop her a note (knowing she's on vacation and may not be able to check for some time).

514:

perhaps directly to Mifter? Or if it's really bad, post to the Signpost newsroom, ask that it be deferred a week to run with ours, so you'll have time to provide suggestions ?

12376: 10749:

Hi, please revisit the FAC, I have removed disputed images and added new ones. Also, an editor pointed "At least one of the images is a b/w whose colors have been altered... se

9854:

permissions? I pestered the hell out of the people who have me permission to use their images, and I do not look forward to re-acquiring their permission to use their images. --

6027: 5365: 11501: 9819: 8522: 8637: 4459:(although there are those who would disagree with me; frankly, I think there's a reason the logo has a "TM" in the corner and not a copyright logo.) This is moot however, as: 2329:

image of Emmeline is dated 1913, but the field is "created/published" (I suspect the former - no halftones, etc.) - at least it gives us a date and (former?) copyright holder.

9023: 7308:, meaning "the distribution of copies or phonorecords of a work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending". A sculpture such as 341:

I know you're going to be disappointed (you may start hating me after all :-), but I didn't understand a single thing there. Does it matter, btw, that it's UK and not US?

4570:

That's good enough for me; I'm happy to AGF. The image is still a derivative, however, and would require permission of the ring's designer/creator to be freely published.

2183: 11771:

indeed says it's public domain; such a statement from the JFK Presidential Library is certainly good enough for me. I would note, however, that the current copyright tag

11546: 11379: 6518: 5218: 11617:

A week or so ago you checked out a couple of Gutenberg images for me on this article. Is there any chance you could visit its peer review and look at the other images? I

9505:

ratings - e.g. speaking a "professional level" seems like it should be higher than native, thus the reason I made my own boxes. I can give proficiencies in terms of the

12419: 11115: 8751: 8581:

and am wondering if I am correct in my reasons and actions. Could you run a check on them? For convenience, I list them here if you are only able to check the images.

7716: 7091: 7035: 5165: 3800: 9985: 9868:

EVERYONE CAN CALM DOWN NOW!! Because I know you were getting overwrought. The images in question came from a different source. Different release. Mini-freakout over. --

6347: 5316:

is) Is it possible that your browser has a problem with the USFWS site? I've reluctantly removed these images, the two best in the article, but one of the replacements

12623: 12605: 11768: 9084: 8114: 7937: 6154:, such as a translation, musical arrangement, dramatization, fictionalization, motion picture version, sound recording, art reproduction, abridgment, condensation, or 6020: 4298:). Although, frankly, the community would probably call me a loony for even doubting/questioning those (again, "real life" and Knowledge have a tendency to diverge). 1744:

is not a valid argument and I'm not interested in entertaining it. I've posed questions at the FAC that have yet to be answered adequately, or even in terms of NFCC.

7784: 6039: 12295: 4756:

several capable people on the job. Gosh, I guess I was a brutal reviewer; I lodged Fixes needed all over the place, and switched to oppose if they weren't fixed.

3242:

No problem. We have all the time in the world. Just trying to get everything 100% before a FA nomination. We don't want an FA, we want the best article possible. :)

12311: 4316:- is too 3D for my liking but, as I've said, I don't think my view would find support and it's not something about which I'm sure enough to raise the issue anyway. 3301:

What IP is it? I'm happy to review and unblock if it was indeed inappropriate. Alternatively, have you considered setting up a Commons account (or you could just

12398: 12238:

Hiya Elcobbola. I'm not good with OTRS issues but I'm willing to learn. Another user tried to get permission from IBM to use their image, and the results are at

5119:). We'd really need to see a "credits" page; are there cover pages or other, non-month pages that have been scanned and posted which might have this information? 2028: 9780:

Wouldn't do it justice? I dare say, at your most ill you'd be more insightful than I at my most healthy. ;) Not a problem at all. I hope you feel better soon.

6054:

wouldn't really belong in the article). Basically, use as many free images as needed to assist the reader without cramming so many in that there is sandwiching (

12465: 9077: 8585: 8030: 6246: 5045: 4613: 2613: 2554: 11621:

they're OK, but I didn't choose all of them, and there is an FU rationale. I like to get rid of potential problems before, rather than during, the FAC process.

8323:

the aforementioned copyright term expiration and the copyright "Status to be assessed" on the image page further suggests the copyright disclaimer is specious.

7030:

I'm still struggling to find images for a long article for Harvey Milk, and with the extended discussion at Jose Sarria I'm getting nervous about what I have.

4286:) seem more easily extended to a 3D work (a tapestry). The legal discussion aside, I don't foresee a problem with images whose subjects are very much 2D (e.g. 12156:

Well, the questions I posed at the PR weren't meant to be rhetorical, and they haven't really been answered... Anyway, the purpose establishes two functions:

11142: 9499:

Whoa, whoa, whoa - this train is going too fast for poor ol' Elco. Maybe if the OTRS is granted? Let me think about it; I have thoughts I need to sort out.

5830: 5815: 4995: 4875: 1939: 1041: 455: 5978:'s subject is an outdoor scene with no one or group of copyright-eligible work(s) as the implicit subject (the white structure is the implicit subject and is 377:(if the image is just text, it doesn't get copyright protection). The U.K. is somewhat different; typefaces are copyrightable as such, but not in their use. 10248: 9065: 7382: 7102: 7042: 1198: 7745: 1842:(undent) I don't recall any modern art FAs since I started paying attention in March/April. I'll look at the log and see whether anything jogs my memory. 10468: 10403: 10297: 10264: 9506: 8379:

but I just saw your post on the MN wikiproject. Are you minnesotan? I've seen you around FAC etc (I only read those pages mostly, rarely contribute), I'm

6893: 6326: 6257: 5188: 4677:

Well, I was hoping it would become "frequently asked questions" (as opposed to its current "frequently asked question") before making it more prominent...

4526:

is already used in the article? Sometimes I'm dumbfounded by what people claim needs illustrating; I think Wikipedians must watch too much television. ;)

1046: 12483: 5891:

I just made some minor tweaks to make the authorship more "accessible". Otherwise, everything looks goods (and a fancy new unified login, too, I see...)

310: 12440: 7717: 6689:

Reynolds, Sir Joshua (1723-92). "Mrs Thrale and her Daughter Hester (Queeney) 1777-78." 01 Oct 2004. Bridgeman. eLibrary. Proquest CSA. 10 Sep 2008. <

5108: 3685: 3395: 2698:. However, I was wondering, since only two images seem to exist regarding the riots, are either of them available for use? I appreciate your response. -- 12533:

Thanks for this, oh talk page stalker. Do you have a good, clear form of words? We can take this to email if it's simpler. (My email is enabled.) --

10696:

Thanks. The other is declared PD. "I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby release it into the public domain." A date stamp is present on photo. --

10519: 8840:) Absent a discussion of the impact of the cover on West's life or the BSA in the 1930s, it might indeed be the case that the image was not supported. 6964:

Along that vein, I wanted to post the image of the newspaper for you to see, but I have it only in pdf form and my shit computer at work won't allow me

4140:

and effort; FAC is not the place I thought it was - but I digress. No one will be more jubilant than I if Sandy's optimism comes to fruition, however.

2369:

Sorry for constantly bugging you about this, but I realized that Emmeline Pankhurst's autobiography was first published in 1914, and that Sylvia's book

791:

image on commons already. It looks like the commons version of the grave was moved from the wikipedia version, so delete the wiki and keep the commons?

10273: 10054: 10050: 8605: 5019: 4013:

time consuming. Wow. We need some sort of campaign to educate editors about image regulations so that they can learn to check the basics on their own.

702:

for deletion - your implicit request - but I bring them up at FAC (an appropriate venue) so you can actually fix and retain them or find alternatives.

12107: 11966: 2188:

Commons:Commons_talk:When_to_use_the_PD-Art_tag#According_to_these_guidelines.2C_all_National_Portrait_Gallery_images_must_be_deleted_from_the_Commons

12296: 11224:

Well, fear of repercussion is not really a factor. I need to be respectful of consensus, even if I disagree with it. Although the Axxo logo itself

5826: 5811: 3740:

Nope, Flickr images with dead links are still ok if they've had a Flickr review (i.e. a Flickrreview template has been added by a Commons admin or a

637: 620: 12455: 12434: 12413: 8303: 8066: 7418: 6710: 6406: 3854:

Correct, this does not require consent. Although "in images where the patient is identifiable ... consent is required" may not always be the case.

2843:

the riots - but that needs to be explicitly said). If illustration is indeed the purpose, it should then expand on why seeing the riots assists us

2027:

as I see is the case with several other reviewers, am tired of bickering on this subject. I'll try to approach it this way: my oppose stands until

2021: 1824: 1724: 1625: 1099: 353: 11225: 10174: 8285: 6391: 726:

be used? We do have the luxury of some of the images not being replaceable. Also, are there any others on the commons that haven't been found yet?

575: 12089: 12072: 12048: 12023: 11999: 11986: 11953: 11940: 11830: 11804: 11109: 10762: 10655: 10622: 10505: 10485: 10358: 10255:

Thanks for your comments. Have addressed your concerns about the images. Please strike out comments that you feel are addressed satisfactorily. --

8836:

Magazine covers are generally best suited for discussion of the cover itself, the reaction thereto, the impact thereof, etc. (see, for example,

8126: 7915: 7901: 7295: 6479: 3199: 753: 735: 12225: 12210: 11418: 11401: 11352: 11335: 11121: 10916: 10097: 10017: 10003: 9914: 9742: 9721: 9696: 9674: 9650: 9625: 9562: 9542: 9525: 9433: 9416: 9317:

would be a riot). If Sandy stays as persistent as she has been, I'll have no choice but to give in. That not withstanding, image "tutoring" is

9227: 8566: 8275: 8255: 8238: 8108: 8091: 7992: 7972: 7818: 7327: 6819: 6778: 6749: 6731: 6673: 6656: 6597: 6579: 6558: 6536: 6430: 6382: 6365: 6317: 6296: 5789: 5774: 5753: 5735: 5613: 5593: 5575: 5418: 5401: 4907: 4893: 4768: 4730: 4709: 4692: 4672: 4654: 3836: 3780: 3706: 2654: 2569: 2544: 2047: 1982: 1792: 1759: 1691: 1645: 1119: 1056: 549: 529: 505: 486:"It is recommended that free media ... be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons"). Also, it's concerning that it doesn't rely on the actual policy ( 417: 392: 359:(the blanket, clothes, bottles, glasses, plates, etc would all be subject to copyright) - and no one wants to see Uncle Wally naked. The horror. 107: 78: 10726: 10705: 10679: 10590: 10562: 10536: 10451: 10433: 10382: 10334: 9393: 9375: 9367:(ec) @Sandy: My issues are between me and my psychiatrist, thank you :-P... @ EC: It's a deal... Or maybe we could do a Three Musketeers thing: 9358: 5906: 5834: 5530: 5489: 5454: 5432: 5151: 5134: 4939:

I'm available to do some image checks if you want to throw some over my way. I've been neglecting making myself useful at FAC for a while now. —

4599: 4585: 4129: 4107: 3794: 3443: 3429: 3374: 3355: 3334: 3320: 3251: 3237: 3223: 2463: 1182: 1024: 895: 879: 815: 800: 782: 717: 696: 681: 12546: 12528: 11762: 8615: 8150: 8006: 7955: 5930: 11282: 11247: 11219: 11196: 9494: 9102: 8734: 8720: 8697: 8338: 7797: 6230: 6209: 6194: 6091: 6077: 5351: 4541: 4517: 2067: 1932: 1907: 1879: 1431: 1411: 1397: 1259: 1004: 990: 12476: 12150: 11666: 11601: 11587: 10249: 9894: 9795: 9336: 9308: 9298: 8674: 8630: 8493: 8471: 8447: 8423: 7824: 7397: 6013: 5287: 5273: 5206: 5063: 5037: 4945: 4845: 4800: 4628: 4495: 4409: 4379: 4355: 4331: 3991: 3971: 3957: 3883: 3869: 3818: 3763: 3590: 2529:

for the 25th, but am quite hesitant to commit given my schedule (I will not have a reprieve from travel until the second week of September).

2445: 2312: 1340: 1326: 1161: 1104:

I'll buy that the shirt is incidental inclusion, so I suppose it's ok (although I would prefer a closer crop to avoid the issue altogether).

217: 199: 179: 161: 11737: 10240: 10221: 7841: 7502: 7487: 4954:; very impressive to see the right call on something so mundane and seemingly benign. That sort of thing might get you attacked at FAC. ;) 4077: 4055: 4036: 3632: 3610: 3325:

I sent via email. I had an account on the commons before, but people seem to be more concerned about popular opinion than actual licensing.

2415: 2387: 2250: 2225: 853:

The reason the grave image is an issue is because it doesn't explicitly assert an author (we are forced "to rely" on the implication of the

12569:

Present company excluded, I wouldn't trust the average OTRS helper as far as I can throw him; many of those who handle the queue despise me

12287: 12273: 11537: 11523: 10572: 10154: 9210: 9184: 9158: 8931: 8890: 8747: 8185: 7883: 7708: 7653: 7631: 6171:

valid. I don't believe that a drawing based upon blueprints (which may or may not itself be considered a derivative, as defined above) is

5912: 5849:. I have changed that since then. I'm not sure if you haven't looked at it since, or whether you still think it violates WP:NFCC. Thanks. 3741: 3085:

Oh, that's odd. Usually they ticket the image and leave it up to the uploader or author to shift it to Commons. I'm completely confused. --

2495: 2268: 2172: 2144: 263: 11844: 11715: 11446: 11062: 11030: 11008: 10859: 10834: 10819: 9863: 9841: 7225: 7205: 7156: 7010: 6978: 6937: 5676: 4969: 3262:

both images were copy and paste of the other, without reference. It was a simple fix, but no one cares about being in compliant for that.

3147: 3127: 3112: 3094: 3040: 2984: 2941: 2896: 2862: 2821: 2791: 2752: 2729: 143: 11847:. I have seen a number of new articles which are consist of or contain verbatim or minimally-paraphrased text from the source. Regards, 11228:, the totality of the logo deletions is indicative that the community has affirmed an interpretation contrary to my own. There's always 9036:

and during review a question came up about that image's copyright status. It is a photograph of 2nd century AD papyrus fragment. I think

9033: 7862: 7663: 7363: 7255: 6521:

as the first result, so the colour versions appear plentiful. If your version is superior or verifiably made in the US, all the better.

3897: 3534: 3520: 11906: 10199: 9580: 7772: 7679: 7176:

If I took two screenshots from the documentary (three examples): one that showed Milk debating John Briggs and placed it in the section

6415:

Wehe mir. Straw men about procedure and unfortunate attitudes. The concerns are legitimate, but this isn't yet a "discussion" for me.

5654: 5380: 444: 12587: 11682: 10887: 8610: 6622: 6506: 4295: 1630:

Yep, I'll stop back today; I've been diverting the majority of my time the the Dispatch, so I apologize for not being terribly timely.

1363: 1127:

Let me see what I can do. Travel has me light on time and I need to finish the Dispatch today. It's also a time drain when I need to

335: 139: 59: 11856: 11561: 11372: 11314: 9877: 9143:

Ich? Hab' nichts getan. Wegen ähnlicher „Schläge“ hab' ich die FAC-Teilnahme ja reduziert. Das Zitat ist bloss allgemeine Weisheit.

8452:

I wasn't aware there was such a thing. I very much doubt so; cameras aren't a good thing, to say nothing of scheduling or that, as a

7519:

as the justification for including the words "SPECIMEN" over US currency from the 2004 Series and onwards. As noted by ticket handler

4637: 12619: 12583: 8196:

text (translated or otherwise) becomes a copyvio (i.e. how much is too much) is the million dollar question and similar to the issue

6907:

The condition of "Knowledge use only" would be a limitation on redistribution which would render the image "non-free" (i.e. a no-no).

6136: 3748:. Put simply, when legitimately tagged, these images are confirmed to have been published on Flickr with the license tag indicated. 289: 10840:

appropriateness of the policy reversion under these circumstances). At the end of the day, it's just an image; no need to stress.

8045: 12365: 11089: 9984:

Ah, a case where the "Wiki world" and "real world" diverge. In the "real world", we don't know (if you want to be depressed, read

9113: 6847: 6458: 6341: 6272: 5635: 5008: 3362: 559: 11552:

Would you advise us to find another version of this image? The tag doesn't explicitly release the copyright, to my understanding.

9952: 9730:

It's not a BLP, they aren't surprising or controversial statements, so I'm not fussed. If you can improve it, though, why not?

7352: 5089: 4869: 4635: 2361: 2339: 2205: 1917:

if the article has the compilation; both show the fountain in daylight from a functionally equivalent angle. Why are both needed?

919:

going to work? If folks are ok with it (i.e. it won't be reverted to the questionable one), I'll go ahead and strike that issue.

11721: 11640: 10798: 10309:

This is subject to the material being reproduced accurately and not being used in a derogatory manner or in a misleading context.

9593: 8595: 7778: 7241:. I'd appreciate your looking at them to let me know if I need to alter the fair use rationales. Thanks so much for your help. -- 6807:

It would be good to sort because, now that I know I can access my local library from home, I should be able to do more of same.

1590: 9899:

Well, didn't Norman Bates say "we all go a little mad sometimes"? At least here we didn't need to buy a new shower curtain. ;)

4211: 3734: 3208:

so you can see how the majority of images could be corrected. I'll stop back at the article talk and elaborate, etc. tomorrow.

2676:. I've emailed the address on the bottom of the page asking for permissions to use the image, but have not received a response. 2123: 916: 470: 12131: 10160: 10069: 9273: 7868: 6129: 5099: 4607: 1284: 65: 11728:

Hi, Elcobbola, I hope you don't mind me bothering you. Awadewit suggested that I check with you about an image I may use for

11021:

That exclamation alone deserves another barnstar... If you could reply on the article talk page, I'd appreciate it. Thanks! --

10568: 9371:. The only problem is, you have a sweet and pleasant disposition, unlike the other two members of that motley crew. :-) Later 9251: 7606: 6175:

expected to be created, as the existence, availability and accessibility of the blueprints have not been established. I say "

4564: 2628: 2514: 1857: 1078: 11497: 9472: 8837: 8398: 8369: 7557: 7452: 6884: 6281:... I capped my section; the other section in which I commented is really Awadewit's, so I should probably let her do that. 4313: 4185: 4155: 2926:

image appears to be a copyvio (NYPL does not support the GFDL tag - I'm not sure where that license claim is coming from...)

1471: 515: 427: 12040:)? I've gone through the images in each, but an outside reviewer (namely one with your expertise) is always best. Thanks, — 10185:

have any FOP concerns? Or are plaques immune? Thanks as always – I agree 100% with Sandy's comment above; you are the best.

5819: 4022: 3407: 3295: 3180: 138:) and only exist in relatively few jurisdictions (i.e. those with active IP legislation - mostly "first world" countries). 12615: 12579: 11678: 11592:

Ah, yes, what I meant to say was that the tag doesn't explicitly label the copyright holder - sorry I wasn't more precise.

10166: 8855: 8822: 8750:, Is there something in policy about time magazine that allows FP to rm this without discussion and then delete it? He did 8636:

If it is possible, could you also go through the article and judge if it has a fair chance at FAC? Leave your comments at

8620: 8164: 7432: 6634: 4933: 4660:... the FAQ is wonderful. If you think it's ready, I think you could add it to the bottom of the Dispatch as a See also. 4442: 3674: 2606: 1522: 1146: 12391: 11455: 11360:

So, looks like you won't touch it and Awadewit isn't touching it, and it's all wrapped up in ... ahem ... German PD law.

9978: 8173:. How come we don't deal with the issue of translations? When is a translation a copyvio? Where do we deal with this? 7586: 5709: 3848: 2475: 1218: 250: 11838: 11823: 11755: 11545: 9018: 8590: 8122: 7689: 7261: 6450: 5234: 4244: 1552: 1348: 458:

is going to come out the week before the Dispatch, so I thought you might need to have a look, lest anything is missed.

11149: 10415: 10364: 9137: 8775: 8545: 7138:

Probably, but yes, I'd need to see it to be sure (I'm actually OTRS now, BTW; they're just still setting up the account)

7096: 6490:

Elcobbola, I'm just learning how to negotiate my local library online from home. I found a beautiful, color version of

3079: 2132: 12614:

Thanks, SG. It's now resolved, thanks to Moni3 and a nice OTRS volunteer I've never heard of. Enjoy your wikibreak.--

10981: 8520: 8073: 7278: 4452: 3484: 3477: 2004: 1965: 1807: 1775: 1707: 1674: 1661: 1608: 1586: 1535: 12251: 6716:

takes me to a eLibrary login page. If I had a user account, would I reasonably be able to locate this image's entry?

6464:

Thanks for the ping. I don't get WP emails during the day, so it will be at least this evening before I can respond.

6278: 3909: 3022: 2326: 88:). My comment was meant to be explicit in its declaration of being merely a (helpful) observation (i.e. the placement 11878: 11084: 10959: 10776: 9003: 7921: 7515:

The person who sent the email (someone from a PR firm that works with the US Bureau of Engraving and Printing) cited

7129: 7116: 6915: 6250: 5858: 5357: 4823: 4785: 660: 11694: 11406:

Thank you: I don't know why I wasn't able to locate that, perhaps related to the thousands of KB on those FACs :-)

9547:

I'm having a hard enough time with Cyrillic; I'm sticking with the Latin alphabet from now on, thank you very much.

7546: 5177: 2707: 11883: 10869: 10177:

as well) are indicated as FOP. Correct me if I'm wrong: This means that, because they were taken in England, where

9774: 9243: 8984: 8551:

Thanks, Sandy, but I'm not sure I'm interested in being burnt. Happy he who learns to bear what he cannot change.

8405: 7997:

Thanks for the guideline! I'll be sure to keep copyrighted images in my articles below 100,000 pixels from now on.

7375: 7282: 6485: 5885: 5336:

Thanks for the follow-up; I responded at the FAC (I think I just happened to hit the USFWS site when it was down).

4987: 4977: 4265: 3559: 2008: 1969: 1811: 1779: 1711: 1678: 1612: 1539: 934: 821: 560: 316: 11945:

I've asked Eyla to forward the email to OTRS, and in the meantime, I'll remove the image. Thanks for your help, —

11490: 9965:, which seems to be PD in Australia, would be PD in US on the basis of the information available. It's related to 9683:

OK, left to your better judgment :-) I'm wondering why the original editor used a direct quote ... <shrug: -->

5330: 5183:

Conceptually, this is why the tags are properly called "copyright tags", not "license tags". True licenses (e.g.

3205: 11433: 11294: 9807: 8658: 8600: 8578: 8243:

We're going to have to do something about this tendency of yours to give incomplete answers :-) Thank you dear!

7250: 7085: 7075: 4198: 3228:

I went through, added the template with info to all the images (and on commons also). I hope I did it correctly.

2769: 2286: 276: 128: 10553:

The email does not say anything about license, should I ask what license is the creator want the img to have? --

10133: 9530:

I'm in no hurry, but can you please pick up some Chinese or Japanese while we wait? Sheesh, what a slacker ;)

8866: 7920:

The definition of low resolution has, for whatever reason, been relegated to template usage documentation (e.g.

7301:

Short answer: No impact. The change closed a loophole and brought the NFCC into alignment with common practice.

3498: 759: 266:. Would you mind looking over the fair use content? The article currently has two audio samples and two images. 84:

No, I'm not aware of policy or guidelines advising against the header displacement (stacking, however, is to be

12542: 12516: 12512: 11733: 11722: 11624: 10664:

on the Commons (the image is just fine). The other image, however, needs an explicit assertion of authorship.

9765:

I'm afraid I can't look over the dispatch - I'm quite ill at the moment and wouldn't be able to do it justice.

7464: 5075: 4465:(yes, jewelry, like equally mundane stuffed animals, is subject to copyright); this image is a derivative work. 2094: 2085: 10643:, please check these too, if you are not busy. One is showing a red link as the bot on commons is not working 8782: 5956:

5309: 4951: 3744:; FlickreviewR bot doesn't appear to be on the list, but it counts). A brief description of Flickr review is 2812:

with a non-free historic image template. Let me know if I need to amend or change it in any way. Thank you. --

11916:

requires a verifiable source which, in this case, would at a minimum be contact information for Ms. Findley (

9928: 9237: 8022: 7551: 7125:

I'd need to know a bit more about the purpose of the DVD captures to comment on whether they could work, but

6852: 4462:

The ring as a whole is copyrightable as an "original of authorship fixed in tangible medium of expression"

3931: 3745: 3714: 3575:

with borders, etc.), but, in the absence of evidence that the photos originated elsewhere, I'm happy to AGF.

3269:

can be found on Lane p. 207. Courage Ltd, London owns the original. Cooper-Bridgeman Library owns a copy. 2.

2105: 1227: 428: 321: 12479:

article at FAC. It is patently edited to add color.. do we care? The license is CC Attribution 2.0 Generic.

11925:

could just forward the email (or scanned letter, if it's physical mail) to OTRS, we could ticket the image.

8315:

and not necessarily applicable to all images thereon (yes, it is indeed likely that there is some degree of

8113:

Thanks for your assistance Elcobbola. You tidied up the spacing of the Russian soldier with the new helmet (

3835:

I believe it is only in images where the patient is identifiable that consent is required? So, for example,

3483:

I don't see any problem with making a PD claim for the image. The date 1750 is inscribed thereupon and the

12316: 10272:

Hi, Thanks for rectifying the image tags. Need your help. I found another image of Vithoba, to replace the

9256: 8430: 8197: 7925: 7530: 7022: 6240: 5692:

soundness, which is why I so frequently turn to you for advice. Which reminds me: when you looked at the

5317: 5258:

seems fine, as the image's origin - although imprecise - is obvious (provenance isn't really in question).

5069: 4999:

appreciate it. If you don't have time, we totally understand. (We are only at GAN, so absolutely no rush.)

4479:

Fair use wouldn't fly per NFCC#1. As an object still in existence, a free image could be obtained/created.

1470:. If you consider yourself either an active or semi-active member of the project please sign up as such at 1265: 5941:

art; the "authorship" verbiage removes that subjective interpretation, however, as merely being a work of

4634:

I'll see what I can do. My sorting through of preliminary thoughts has already caused NFCC to be changed

3099:

From the OTRS ticket, there's nothing to indicate that he knew about your localized upload of this image.

2583: 2109:

exist without an image of her husband. Is Fair Use my only option? Thanks in advance for your guidance. –

12559:

Elcobbola, you are wiser than all other Wikipedians combined, especially in matters of image copyright.

12352:

I seem to recall problems about use of images of 3D objects, but I can't remember what the problems were.

8666:

license accordingly. Also, the retouching may be a bit extreme; it now looks like a photograph when the

8655:

Very nicely done. If all images were so well sourced, I'd be out of a job. Some minor things, however:

8316: 7426: 7333: 7109:

a derivative; we'd need the artist's permission to freely license it (I assume this was taken in the US).

6438: 6143: 6099: 5946: 5918: 5251: 4851: 1945: 12172:

image; the Nixen here, from behind and in the shadows, do not appear particularly innocent or otherwise.

9163:

Ach so. OK that's enough German. I'm very rusty at it. A long time ago I was very good at it though ;-)

4990:

for FAC, but I'm having trouble finding an image of a modern scholar to include. I thought I had one of

4814:

and I was curious what they would say. I was sort of testing the FAC waters, but you were too quick! :)

4463: 12643: 12307: 12302:

Hi. Please take a look at this article and see if the images I have used are OK. It is in PR right now.

10226:

Okay, excellent. Thanks so much! You betcha! (Sorry, just got done watching Palin do her thing. Gack.)

9574: 8374: 7084:

Besiege immer wieder! I've never been been attacked or called a racist in my own user space, although

5989:

is of Cloud Gate being constructed? If the ring is merely a structural element, I would argue it is a

5305: 4291: 4189: 1557: 1475: 633: 571: 490:), but instead relies only on guidelines. It also encourages (implicitly) forcing image size. Grrrr. 267: 38: 11568:

versions (derivatives). This copyright right tag does indeed indicate a release of those protections.

8456:, I'm not really the genuine article anyway. Although hating the Badgers does transcend nationality. 7516: 1402:

How about a transwiki link to the wikisource text? I'd lose an image, but still break up the text...

1311:, alternatively, could be applied to get the specificity needed and avoid misrepresenting authorship. 184:

Oh, you need to know for the Republic? Is there an image in particular or is this general curiosity?

12333: 11105: 10182: 9482:

go to the spa. But if you're ready, I'll write a blurb in my sandbox. Which languages do you speak?

8911:

always a "right answer" to these discussions (or, if there is, I've never gotten the memo) and, like

5958:

now known or later developed, from which they can be perceived, reproduced, or otherwise communicated

5854: 5717: 5697: 5693: 5688: 5358: 4857: 4290:); I would become moreso concerned with images that begin to display the 3D nature of the work (e.g. 4001: 2466:. I think it is a wonderful dispatch - very clear. We've needed something like this for a long time. 1447: 449: 11496:

Well, IUP hasn't actually had a meaningful change in ages (e.g. nothing but non-substantive changes

7640:

to my user page. Also, feel free to post a note on my talk page when the instructions are ready. --

6058:), impairment of readability/flow, or disruption for those with different needs or hardware setups ( 12327: 10782: 10661: 10025: 8804: 7573: 7052:- the image I emailed to you. Is that magazine cover licensing? If not, what licensing would I use? 5876:. I was wondering if there was any other information that I was missing or if I made any mistakes. 4423: 3451: 2809: 370: 7829: 7185: 7027:

Would you rather fight with editors at FAC or have them besiege your talk page before nominating?

6260:

has passed 150KB and has become hard to sort; can I interest you in capping your sections? Best,

4169: 4028:

Heh. I just assume if it's on Commons, it's good to go. Now you know how I feel about sourcing...

3457: 208:, which I just added to an article. In the process, I buckled down and started looking at PD-Art. 11884: 11817: 11749: 9108: 8997: 8742: 6452: 5975: 5801: 5254:) - an admin and still-active editor) where s/he obtained it. If that doesn't pan out, however, 5015: 4697:

Meaning you want me to ask more dumb questions? Can you trawl through your talk page for some?

3830: 2457: 1128: 1032: 584: 7472:

an issue). I suppose I don't know enough about the particulars of currency to be of much help.

7304:

Long answer: Before the change, that criterion required previous publication. Publication is a

5998:

In both cases, obviously, the author of the photos would need to give permission for their use.

5074:

I was just wondering whetheryou could find time to check out these images as per my query here.

2579: 2335:

image of Emmeline gives us a publication date, but July 14, 1928, is well after January 1, 1923.

12601: 12451: 12430: 12409: 12387: 12361: 12221: 12146: 12034:

Knowledge:Featured list candidates/List of Nobel laureates affiliated with Princeton University

11874: 11414: 11368: 11348: 11310: 11201:

Alright, so I guess you won't restore the image for fear of backlash from the other admins? :(

10883: 10065: 10013: 9974: 9890: 9738: 9692: 9646: 9589: 9538: 9490: 9429: 9389: 9354: 9223: 8541: 8518: 8365: 8344: 8251: 8181: 8104: 8062: 8041: 7968: 7897: 7793: 7565: 7414: 7393: 7348: 7274: 6815: 6745: 6706: 6669: 6618: 6593: 6584:

I've never uploaded an image (don't ya know how much they scare me?? ... and ... <grrrr: -->

6554: 6512:

We can; were you told otherwise? Reynolds died in 1792, so the painting is indeed PD. Images

6502: 6491: 6402: 6378: 6337: 6313: 6268: 6117: 5986: 5785: 5749: 5705: 5589: 5526: 5450: 5414: 5376: 5212: 4929: 4903: 4865: 4796: 4764: 4705: 4668: 4624: 4103: 3776: 3670: 3568: 3159: 2624: 2565: 2510: 2000: 1961: 1803: 1771: 1703: 1670: 1655: 1604: 1582: 1531: 1295: 1190: 1178: 1095: 1074: 958: 534:

It's just contrary to MOS, so it's not a "stop the presses" issue. I'll drop Mifter a note.

525: 466: 413: 349: 331: 246: 74: 9937: 9846:

This is the language I got from Knowledge, that I have successfully used for previous images:

9269:

interested in learning about the intersection of admins and images...How can admins help you?

7404:

Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Mother and Child Reunion (Degrassi: The Next Generation)

12349: 12303: 12233: 11295: 10922: 10758: 10701: 10651: 10618: 10558: 10501: 10481: 10464: 10447: 10399: 10354: 10293: 10260: 9929: 9451:

Elcobbola--will you accept an rfa now? Then you can see those deleted images. Take the plunge

9265:

refreshing rigors of RfA in a period of four or five months... or so... from now. I would be

8023: 7977:

That's the plan. :) If memory serves, I haven't even added the actual criterion 3 wording.

5881: 5147: 5085: 4595: 4560: 4219: 3505:, that's for certain. I hope you managed to get unstuck later in life; it's truly profound. 3439: 3403: 3391: 3370: 3330: 3291: 3247: 3233: 3195: 3176: 2102: 1937:

Shouldn't this discussion be on the FAC page. Note the three most recent modern art FAs are

1084: 1020: 975:

There are thousands I didn't look through; I assumed one of these would work. Let me know.

891: 811: 796: 749: 731: 692: 656: 629: 567: 255: 10496:

Hi, i got a positive reply, can i upload the image in the link now. Please reply. Thanks. --

10178: 9046:

applies, as it is a faithful photographic reproduction of an original two-dimensional work.

7582: 4229:, if you can't say something nice, then don't say nothin' at all (or words to that effect). 3725:- Since this Flickr link isn't working, I believe we can no longer use this image, correct? 2233: 587:

is now on the Commons. The local en.wiki file should be tagged for speedy deletion (CSD:I8)

510:

Yea, I tried to put out the heads up (post on Ral315's talk page, he's the Signpost editor),

12343: 12317: 11672: 11426: 11101: 10165:

I know you're probably sick to death of this stuff, but I have two questions about images.

8982: 8002: 7911: 7879: 7210:

Sure, email away (I won't be able to get to it or the videos until this evening, however.)

7177: 7045:

is located to ask them if it's under copyright, who the artist was and whatnot. Derivative.

6370:

Seriously :-) But also, it's used in three featured articles, so really should be sorted.

5850: 4915: 3722: 3642: 3302: 2660: 1741: 1574: 1451: 1271: 374: 11469:. On the subject of WP:IUP ... the most common complaint (Moni just repeated it again at 5312:

both click straight through to the USFWS website for me and are not dead links (although

953: 69:

comment on this? Does the displacement of the next section heading represent a violation?

8: 12652: 12370: 12269: 12206: 12068: 12019: 11982: 11936: 11800: 11783: 11711: 11685:

with permissions, sent the email in on Friday. Can you check for that, please? Thanks. --

11662: 11583: 11519: 11397: 11331: 11275: 11243: 11212: 11192: 11135: 11058: 11004: 10912: 10855: 10815: 10722: 10675: 10586: 10532: 10429: 10378: 10330: 10217: 10150: 10093: 9999: 9957: 9910: 9837: 9791: 9717: 9670: 9621: 9558: 9521: 9412: 9381:

Well, wth, let's just nom The FAC Cabal, and watch The IRC Cabal object.</sarcasm: -->

9332: 9294: 9206: 9154: 9098: 9073: 8927: 8851: 8730: 8716: 8693: 8645: 8562: 8467: 8419: 8334: 8299: 8271: 8234: 8170: 8146: 8087: 7988: 7951: 7858: 7814: 7704: 7627: 7541: 7483: 7460: 7357: 7334: 7323: 7221: 7152: 7006: 6933: 6774: 6727: 6652: 6575: 6532: 6475: 6426: 6361: 6292: 6226: 6205: 6190: 6167:

That being the case, I think the argument that " image is not replaceable by a free one"

6125: 6087: 6073: 6051: 6035: 6009: 5902: 5770: 5731: 5682: 5672: 5609: 5571: 5397: 5347: 5326: 5269: 5202: 5130: 5080:

be acceptable as the Jaina calender is its own publication and put it in public domain.--

5059: 5033: 4965: 4889: 4841: 4726: 4688: 4650: 4581: 4537: 4513: 4491: 4375: 4327: 4234: 4151: 3987: 3953: 3891: 3865: 3814: 3759: 3702: 3586: 3572: 3516: 3425: 3351: 3316: 3219: 3143: 3107: 3074: 3036: 2937: 2858: 2787: 2725: 2695: 2650: 2602: 2540: 2411: 2357: 2308: 2201: 2057: 2043: 1928: 1897: 1869: 1853: 1755: 1641: 1427: 1407: 1393: 1359: 1322: 1305: 1255: 1201:? It's the only image available about the subject, but I can't find out the right tag at 1142: 1115: 1000: 986: 930: 875: 778: 713: 677: 616: 545: 501: 388: 306: 229: 205: 195: 157: 103: 47: 17: 10459:

I added three more images after your Image OK. Please check if they are fine. Thanks. --

10407: 10112:. Since this was published in a newspaper, I doubt it's GFDL. Pls handle as appropriate. 7569: 3567:

There are several professional photographers active on the Commons and other projects.

2097:

me a bit, but I'm curious to have your opinion: I'm working to FA-ize the article about

943: 12538: 12508: 12100: 12082: 12041: 11992: 11959: 11946: 11899: 11852: 11811: 11743: 11636: 11597: 11557: 10170: 9770: 9242:

Hi Elcobbola- I just wanted to drop a message saying thanks for doing some clean-up on

8787:

Knowledge:Images_and_media_for_deletion/2008_September_15#Image:1937-nj1-time-cover.jpg

8488: 8442: 8393: 8291: 7612:

Sure, instructions would actually be a good idea. I'll write some up and post them to

7436: 6843: 6445: 5938: 5926: 5485: 5428: 5283: 5230: 5184: 5173: 5004: 4819: 4805: 4438: 4406: 4352: 4262: 4126: 4074: 4051: 4033: 4018: 3967: 3905: 3879: 3844: 3790: 3730: 3628: 3607: 3555: 3305:)? If you're not interested in the Commons shenanigans; I can move/amend the images. 2684: 2471: 2441: 2264: 2140: 2098: 1951: 1888:. My understanding is that this would be used in place of three separate images in the 1441: 1336: 1280: 1157: 744:

for deletion, but it was one that you mentioned on the FAC about. Was this overlooked?

440: 213: 175: 124: 12330:

It's a very old photo, but there seems to be no evidence of original publication date.

12240:

Knowledge:Images_and_media_for_deletion/2008_October_7#Image:P11_kasparov_breakout.jpg

12216:

opposed I will withdraw the image. I have, as you requested, added the copyright tag.

11898:, but David wanted me to double check with you to see if that's sufficient. Thanks, — 11809:

Thanks! I've updated the copyright tag and will add it to the Crane article shortly.

11625: 10874:

I have found a couple of images in a Project Gutenberg ebook. The link to the book is

9421:

You mean we just need to send Malleus across the pond for a bit so he can pass RfA ?

7960:

Can that info be worked into the Dispatch so we'll be able to find it in the future?

948: 12594: 12444: 12423: 12402: 12380: 12357: 12217: 12142: 11867: 11460: 11407: 11361: 11341: 11303: 11229: 10879: 10316: 10233: 10192: 10058: 10009: 9970: 9883: 9731: 9685: 9639: 9582: 9531: 9483: 9422: 9382: 9347: 9216: 9014: 8534: 8527: 8515: 8358: 8244: 8174: 8097: 8055: 8034: 7961: 7890: 7786: 7751:

Very rational and well thought and stated reasoning. Thank you. I'll fix the issues.

7498: 7448: 7407: 7386: 7341: 7286: 7269: 6808: 6738: 6699: 6662: 6611: 6586: 6547: 6495: 6395: 6371: 6330: 6306: 6261: 6110: 5979: 5781: 5745: 5701: 5582: 5519: 5443: 5407: 5369: 5159: 4922: 4899: 4861: 4811: 4789: 4757: 4698: 4661: 4617: 4429: 4307: 4275: 4096: 3925: 3769: 3663: 3021:

Well that's a horse of a different colour. ;) The OTRS folks add those templates; I

2617: 2558: 2503: 2488: 2380: 2243: 2218: 2165: 2116: 2012: 1995: 1973: 1956: 1815: 1798: 1783: 1766: 1715: 1698: 1682: 1665: 1651: 1616: 1599: 1578: 1543: 1526: 1467: 1171: 1088: 1067: 518: 459: 406: 342: 324: 239: 70: 8215:"It was the was the best of times, it was the worst of times" - getting longer; now? 5438: 3650: 12593:

My favorite ec hasn't edited since the 23rd; Moni3 and Awadewit are up on images.

12523: 12283: 12247: 11533: 11505: 11486: 11478: 11474: 11450: 11156:, which is letters forming an image). Note, however, that there's been a rash of ( 10754: 10697: 10647: 10614: 10554: 10497: 10477: 10460: 10443: 10395: 10350: 10289: 10256: 10126: 9966: 9760: 9465: 9177: 9130: 8883: 8768: 8485: 8439: 8390: 7765: 7738: 7670: 7644: 7597: 7524: 7510: 6892:

I suppose I'm not sure what the "GNU Documentation release" is. The GFDL itself is

6059: 6047: 5877: 5301: 5143: 5081: 4591: 4556: 4301: 4287: 4249: 4160: 3542: 3435: 3399: 3387: 3366: 3326: 3287: 3243: 3229: 3191: 3172: 2673: 1202: 1016: 968: 963: 887: 857: 807: 792: 788: 745: 727: 688: 652: 483: 167: 11789:

with reference to the JFK Library's statement would be a supported copyright tag.

10034: 7443:

release on DVD. Seems like a case where we really, really don't want to screw up.

1379: 11690: 11470: 11173: 11153: 11080: 11026: 10977: 10968: 10955: 10830: 10794: 10103: 9940: 9873: 9859: 9815: 9502: 9054: 9040: 9029: 8976: 8682:

I'll do my best to stop by the article as well. Time is not abundant this week.

8320: 8135:" above? You found the one. ;) It's tagged for speedy deletion on the Commons. 8118: 7998: 7907: 7875: 7371: 7305: 7246: 7201: 7071: 6974: 6880: 6494:. If it's PD, why can't we upload that color version from my library database? 5650: 5245: 4941: 4456: 3547: 3491: 3123: 3090: 2980: 2892: 2817: 2748: 2703: 2666: 645: 295:

I'm traveling, so it may be a few days before I get to it, but I'll take a look.

12651:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

11609: 11340:

Ah, well, I'm slowly picking it up, and Awadewit has a great handle on images.

8573:

I do not have a bridge to sell to you, but I was wondering if these were free...

7066:

I appreciate your help, and you do deserve that barnstar Sandy just gave you. --

5022:(although I've yet to find Mr Pankhurst). ;) I'll take a look for these folks. 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

12259: 12196: 12058: 12009: 11972: 11926: 11895: 11866:

Thanks! I didn't know you were still there, and I appreciate the extra eyes.

11861: 11790: 11701: 11652: 11573: 11509: 11387: 11321: 11266: 11233: 11203: 11182: 11126: 11048: 10994: 10947: 10902: 10899:

someday, and that day may never come, I'll call upon you to do a service for me

10845: 10841: 10805: 10712: 10665: 10576: 10522: 10419: 10368: 10320: 10207: 10140: 10083: 9989: 9900: 9827: 9781: 9707: 9660: 9611: 9548: 9511: 9402: 9322: 9284: 9196: 9144: 9088: 9069: 8941: 8917: 8841: 8726: 8712: 8683: 8641: 8552: 8457: 8409: 8324: 8295: 8261: 8224: 8136: 8077: 7978: 7941: 7848: 7837: 7804: 7694: 7617: 7535: 7473: 7440: 7313: 7309: 7290: 7211: 7173:

The store owner just gave me permission to use the mural, so that's a relief...

7142: 6996: 6923: 6764: 6717: 6642: 6565: 6522: 6465: 6416: 6351: 6282: 6216: 6201: 6180: 6121: 6083: 6063: 6031: 5999: 5892: 5807: 5760: 5721: 5662: 5599: 5561: 5387: 5337: 5322: 5313: 5295: 5259: 5192: 5120: 5116: 5049: 5023: 4955: 4879: 4831: 4716: 4678: 4640: 4571: 4527: 4503: 4481: 4471: 4365: 4317: 4230: 4141: 3977: 3943: 3855: 3804: 3749: 3692: 3576: 3530: 3506: 3473: 3415: 3341: 3306: 3209: 3167: 3160: 3133: 3101: 3068: 3026: 2927: 2848: 2777: 2715: 2640: 2592: 2530: 2521: 2401: 2347: 2342:) would be considered PD in the U.S. and, thus, preclude fair use for Emmeline. 2298: 2191: 2053: 2033: 2016: 1977: 1918: 1893: 1889: 1865: 1843: 1819: 1787: 1745: 1737: 1719: 1686: 1631: 1620: 1567: 1547: 1510: 1502: 1417: 1403: 1383: 1370: 1355: 1312: 1245: 1237: 1212: 1207: 1191: 1132: 1105: 1062:

Knowledge:Featured article candidates/1998 Comfrey – St. Peter tornado outbreak

996: 976: 920: 865: 768: 703: 667: 606: 590: 535: 491: 378: 296: 185: 147: 113: 93: 12356:

Anyway, if you could put these on your list to look at, I'd be most grateful.

7181: 7059:? How do I indicate licensing for those? They would be news stories about him. 5873: 5661:

factual accuracy (e.g. economics/finance, literature and all things German).

3063: 12554: 12534: 12504: 12497: 12480: 11917: 11913: 11848: 11729: 11632: 11593: 11553: 10898: 10349:

The disputed image is removed. Can i upload any img from Flickr? Need help.--

9962:

When you have a moment I'd be most grateful if you could let me know if this

9766: 9372: 9305: 9270: 8480: 8434: 8385: 7933: 7581:

would be noted. I going to assume that it will be on the image page, such as

7577: 6839: 6755: 5922: 5863: 5515: 5481: 5424: 5279: 5255: 5226: 5169: 5095:

Apologies for the delay; this one got lost in travel and succeeding queries.

5078: 5000: 4983: 4815: 4434: 4402: 4348: 4258: 4122: 4070: 4047: 4029: 4014: 3963: 3901: 3875: 3840: 3786: 3726: 3624: 3603: 3551: 2670: 2467: 2437: 2260: 2136: 2090: 1518: 1514: 1506: 1498: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1483: 1332: 1276: 1153: 825: 594: 487: 436: 256: 209: 171: 120: 10181:, we can use the images without fear of copyright infringement. Right? Does 9369:

Knowledge:Requests for adminship/Elcobbola and Ling.Nut and Malleus Fatuorum

8677:- How did you determine Bierstadt's lifetime? I don't see it at the source. 6350:. I love when nominators don't realize the "real" reason you're asking. ;) 3066:. The uploader Howcheng was the one who dealt with the Moni3's OTRS ticket. 2683:, but I'm not sure. I'm trying to find a good image of it, but quickly it's 511: 12488: 12471: 12133: 11610: 11438: 10893:

Gutenberg is a fantastic resource, as it hosts only material that is free (

10750: 10644: 10227: 10186: 9963: 9008: 8970: 7593:

on the steps used to sort the good images from the bad ones. Thanks. -- --

7494: 7444: 4091: 3921: 3501:). Schiller didn't exactly take the direct route in developing a theme in 3461: 2482: 2374: 2237: 2212: 2159: 2110: 1479: 1463: 1459: 1455: 1052:

Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Anti-tobacco movement in Nazi Germany

12038:

List of Nobel laureates affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis

10442:

Thanks, would you please comment on the FAC, that Images are OK in bold.--

9579:

Elcobbola, would you be able to lend a green light to these translations?

8711:) as the source, since Lot 13644 does not seem to have a permanent link. 5386:

Meh, TLDR - closely, anyway ;). I just did my own review; hope it helps!

3398:- could you revert my editing and upload it then, or is it unrecoverable? 2738:

Ok. The Fred McDarrah image may be sold for profit. I think it ran in the

2694:

I'm familiar with NFCC #8. I wrote the section for "Images of the Day" in

2184:

Commons:Commons_talk:When_to_use_the_PD-Art_tag#Reply_to_call_for_revision

1598:

Can you recheck the images. This FAC is getting close to decision time.--

566:

Please confirm if all images meet wiki guidelines in this article. thanks,

12560: 12279: 12243: 11921: 11894:? There's apparently a statement granting permission to use the image on 11529: 11482: 11466: 11169:

United States Copyright Office: Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices

10286: 10115: 9635: 9454: 9248: 9166: 9119: 9047: 8872: 8757: 8708: 8354: 7754: 7727: 7667: 7641: 7594: 7520: 7238: 6858: 6135:

I'll go in somewhat backwards order, and you'll see why in a moment; the

5960:, either directly or with the aid of a machine or device. (emphasis mine) 5840: 4991: 3187: 1525:

page. Please help add any discussion you are aware of at this location.--

12096:

Knowledge:Featured list candidates/List of Nobel laureates in Literature

12079:

Knowledge:Featured list candidates/List of Nobel laureates in Literature

12030:

Knowledge:Featured list candidates/List of Nobel laureates in Literature

10931: 9802:

Knowledge GFDL release no longer good? Or rogue editor making things up?

7099:). I do think this has enough content to no longer be a "short phrase". 7048:

I think I would like to use a cropped version of the headlines from the

3550:- Do you think a professional photographer donated images to Knowledge? 1478:

and be advised that the project is now trying to keep all the project's

12397:

I'm going through almost 50 FACs and finding almost no image reviews.

11686: 11076: 11022: 10973: 10951: 10826: 10790: 9869: 9855: 9811: 8514:

Hi Elcobbola. Thanks for your comments on the FAC. I responded there. –

8350: 7929: 7367: 7242: 7197: 7067: 6970: 6901: 6876: 6055: 5646: 5241: 4590:

Thanks for the reply. I agree that it does need a fair-use rationale. →

4552: 4188:. The FAC Process would surely crumble without your continued efforts. 3270: 3266: 3119: 3086: 2976: 2888: 2813: 2744: 2699: 600: 454:

Heads up. Unfortunately (although I put out the alert), it looks like

135: 85: 11264:

Nah it's okay; in any case, I can always use the logo under fair use.

11124:

copyrightable? It's just text, but of a logo (for a software pirate).

9191:

I don't speak German; did you agree to RFA in there? <ducking: -->

7459:

significantly to our understanding). Any wrinkle would come from the

5869: 2236:(and Wales) both endorse keeping NPG images – am I missing something? 12379:

has some congenial confusion on images, if you care to have a look.

9882:

Given a perfectly good chance to freak out, why would I pass it by?

7833: 6329:

forward? Responses appear to have moved into the realm of sarcasm.

3526: 3469: 3283: 1236:. Regardless of the tag, however, I don't think this image can pass 741: 236:

Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Robert F. Kennedy assassination

7832:

looks like the last one you were unable to track down. Regards. --

7188:. To be clear: I would not use shots from YouTube, but screenshots. 4898:

Thanks for doing this. My bemused responses are on the review page.

3935: 722:

Now, once that goes through, can you help us figure out what images

6686:

If I take out the name of my library, the citation they supply is:

2400:

Never a bother! Yes indeed, images therein would be PD in the US.

2135:. I can give you some advice on getting one of these, if you want. 1301:

template would be tweaked to contain consideration of these cases;

11504:, you're just fine. That being said, though, I'm happy to update 10307:

I don't think that will do. I'm concerned about this condition: "

8052: 8029:

At FAR, three premature Keep delarations, warrants a close look:

7517:

http://www.moneyfactory.gov/newmoney/main.cfm/currency/regulations

1446:

According to my records, you have nominated at least one article (

11441:

brought up a question with a Fair use image used in the article (

11384:

German newspaper images seem to have a copyright term of 50 years

10640: 9313:

Maybe we can stand together (that is, at the same time; although

9006:

in a current FAC candidate would be most appreciated. Regards, --

8509:

Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Tropical Storm Erick (2007)

8453: 8131:

Good eye. Notice how I said "there remain sourcing problems and

7693:

determinations supported by due consideration of copyright law.

7268:. How does this affect public sculptures in the United States?-- 4254: 3716: 995:

I'm happy with the image changes that have been made so far, FYI

11647: 7664:

Knowledge:Bot_requests#Template:PD-USGov-Congress-Bio.2FClean-up

7063:

I can email the release I signed so you can read it if you wish.

5107:

is quite distinct from "all"; when the images are arranged like

3917: 3434:

Okay, thats good. I was afraid that it might have been damaged.

2052:

I have deleted the collage. Thanks for your time and expertise.

1240:#1: "Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent ... 12377:

Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Major depressive disorder

11449:. I was wondering if you could give a second opinion. Thanks, 10057:. They broke the mold when they made you! Thank you so much, 6690: 5366:

Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Voyage of the James Caird

4950:

Thanks, Giggy. By the way, I've been meaning to say kudos for

3278: 3274: 2259:

NPG images can be on Knowledge. Commons is a different matter.

9195:

Quizás más tarde. Lo que sea por un poco de tranquilidad. ;)

8638:

Knowledge:Peer review/Niagara Falls Suspension Bridge/archive1

4788:

whenever you think it's close enough for others to weigh in.

1892:

article. I will delete it if you think it is not justifiable.

1131:

when people would actually be better served learning to fish.

12186:

or the understanding of their presentation on stage? Unless

12077:

Take your time. That said, the one that should be checked is

11958:

Replied to your concerns at my FLC. Thanks for the review, —

9279:

You're a braver soul than I. ;) How can en.wiki admins help

8966: 7055:

Am I able to use screenshots from the DVD of the documentary

6661:

Apparently ... bit I'm still too mad to enjoy the irony :-)

6305:

I thought I had asked somewhere, but I couldn't find it :-)

4810:

I kind of wanted to see if anyone would review the images in

4455:) is indeed probably too simple, as it is really nothing but 4226: 3962:

What should we do? I'm thinking the image should be deleted.

3204:

Yes, you've provided good information. I made a sample edit

2887:

I added some more information to the Purpose of the image. --

605:

There is image Sandwiching in the "Age of Harihara" section.

11166:

Eltra Corp. v. Ringer, 579 F.2d 294, 296 n.4 (4th Cir. 1978)

8096:

Unclear. We need your Dispatch. They fall like flies :-(

7092:

Image:Bronze plate of Harvey Milk ashes on Castro Street.JPG

7036:

Image:Bronze plate of Harvey Milk ashes on Castro Street.JPG

3623:

Thanks! It is nice to have other opinions on these matters!

959:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/savannahgrandfather/2631053808/

599:

Images should not be left-aligned under level 2 headers per

12420:

Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Haumea (dwarf planet)

11779:

explicitly state a publication date - it does not). Using

7666:. This might give us a good, initial list to work with. -- 3939: 3801:

Knowledge talk:Knowledge Signpost/2008-08-11/Dispatches/FAQ

1170:

Thanks, Awadewit. Ec, the price of fame; you're the best.

8950: 6021:

Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Alexandra of Denmark

5514:

By the way, before I get out the door, we need you two at

3497:

tag should do, but don't upload the image to the Commons (

2481:

Yes, I also thank you for writing that up – very handy. –

10992:

Thanks for the star, BTW, and well deserved on Stonewall.

10476:

Thanks. will trouble ypu again if I add more images :) --

3064:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/Image:Stonewall_Inn_1969.jpg

824:

is password protected; a verifiable source (required per

12399:

Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Anglo-Zanzibar War

9215:

OK, manténgame informado (no diacritics on my laptop).

8586:

Image:Rail Road Suspension Bridge Near Niagara Falls.jpg

3286:. I put up the information as per the dictionary pages. 2211:

No worries. Thanks for taking the time to look into it.

12496:

In short, we have email permission to use an image for

10789:. I would appreciate your input into the discussion. -- 9986:

American non-acceptance of the rule of the shorter term

9315:

Knowledge:Requests for adminship/Elcobbola and Ling.Nut

8031:

Knowledge:Featured article review/Russian Ground Forces

7439:, which is provisionally accepted for inclusion in the 5740:

When you do get back, perhaps you'd give an opinion on

5720:; I'll be "home" tomorrow, so I'll try to pop in then. 3186:

Can anything be worked from the information I provided

1369:

I don't think there's a case to be made for fair use.

1015:

The first one gives a nice closeup of the grave stone.

954:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/stuart_spivack/1401954587/

10082:

for the kind words at WT:FAC. Very much appreciated.

7103:

Image:Mural_of_Harvey_Milk_in_former_Castro_Camera.JPG

7043:

Image:Mural of Harvey Milk in former Castro Camera.JPG

6104:

If you have a moment to spare, can you take a look at

3166:

When you have a chance, can you look at the images at

1940:

Three Studies for Figures at the Base of a Crucifixion

1042:

Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Proxima Centauri

12578:

and say I release the photo into the public domain?--

11152:(mere letters forming letters - in contrast to, say, 9024:

7383:

Knowledge:Featured article candidates/2005 Sugar Bowl

7038:

need a copyright holder if it's on a public sidewalk?

6082:

Thank you for the clarifications and enlightenment!

5917:

When does a work of art become a work of art? :) See

5598:

A conversation for when you are not rushed, perhaps.

5437:

Goodness, there's nothing to be ashamed of ! (Well,

3468:

in my early 20s I did get a bit stuck.) Many thanks.

1331:

Thanks. Just trying to get at the finer points here.

944:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/48352971@N00/2191978907/

12081:. I'm fairly sure the other two are fine. Thanks, — 9507:

Common European Framework of Reference for Languages

6258:

Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Samuel Johnson

6142:

kosher. Per Title 17 (United States copyright law)

5687:

Many thanks for your comments on the images for the

2679:

The other was taken by UPI, and may have run in the

2322:

Back to the issue at hand, I'm not having much luck

1990:

Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Crown Fountain

1564:

Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Crown Fountain

1047:

Knowledge:Featured article candidates/U.S. Route 491

12441:

Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Pilot (House)

11116:

Is a logo completely made up of text copyrightable?

8606:

Image:Locomotive Crossing the Suspension Bridge.jpg

7718:

Knowledge:Featured article candidates/William Hanna

3900:before? I haven't read it all the way through yet. 3456:Hi; I want to add the image of Hannah Pritchard on 3284:

a scan of the second edition of London's title page

949:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/wangtastic/1089688288/

9509:if you really want; Russian is B2, for reference.) 8577:Hi, Elcobbola. I have uploaded some pictures for 2691:, one of the main sources I used for the article. 2338:There's, of course, the NPG; certain images (e.g. 12375:... we have no more image reviewers at FAC :-)) 12297:Kannada literature in the Western Chalukya Empire 9401:? Oh dear, I've been in the states too long. ;) 7889:There's no link or definition on the NFCC page. 3799:I'm happy to do it. Would a separate page (e.g. 477:is going to come out the week before the Dispatch 9261:Hi EC, I'm thinking of subjecting myself to the 6904:(i.e. lose of quality) as the image gets larger. 6392:Knowledge:Featured article review/Calgary Flames 3920:which implies she is the author, not Steve Mann/ 3062:A duplicate version of Moni3's upload exists at 2432:Look at us. Trying so hard to find a picture of 1466:. You are not signed up as an active member of 969:http://www.flickr.com/photos/kenlund/2726453857/ 964:http://www.flickr.com/photos/foxypar4/415711131/ 767:Commons version; I'm debating how to handle it. 593:needs a verifiable source and image summary per 405:Interesting. (Where would we be without you?) 12466:do we care about color alteration in FA images? 12057:of images; I may need a few days to get to it. 11920:has an analogous requirement). There are also 10521:? I'll work with you through the OTRS system. 10078:You didn't need to do that; I'd meant to thank 8707:for George Barker. I am going to use one hit ( 8616:Image:Maria Spelterini at Suspension Bridge.jpg 6969:mother*^&R^^$ R^% bull$ %^$ ### to work. -- 5518:; Fasach Nua is getting beaten up over there. 5423:I feel so ashamed. I'm still an apprentice. :( 1566:on my latest efforts at FURs for everything in 1057:Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Wipeout 3 12028:On that note, could you review my other FLCs ( 11843:El: I cited a disussion between you and Sandy 8675:Image:Niagara Suspension Bridge End to End.jpg 8631:Image:Niagara Suspension Bridge End to End.jpg 8212:"It was the was the best of times" - same deal 5168:. Perhaps you could explain it to me? Thanks! 4502:Strike that last bit; I need to rethink that. 12159:A) underwater effect produced by lighting and 11631:Are coins from the Ivory Coast in the PD? :) 10250:Knowledge:Featured article candidates/Vithoba 9606:"Wir betreiben eine ganz andere Sportart" is 9064:Thanks for any advice you can provide at the 7435:)? I'm especially concerned about its use at 7431:Could you take a look at this Commons image ( 5240:I'd ask the uploader of the current version ( 5221:without a precise source? See the discussion 3648: 3132:Thanks, Moni. The article is looking great. 2232:Reading over that second link, it looks like 915:Let me look and see what I can find. Is the 9634:Just making sure we're within the bounds of 9034:Image:POxy.XX.2260.i-Philitas-highlight.jpeg 8807:: image used in the "scouting work section": 5945:is the threshold for copyright protection. 1521:discussion pages in one location at the new 828:) is one that can be accessed by the public. 64:You asked at FAC whether the piper image on 12565:tagged one of my family photos for deletion 11683:Image:Harvey Milk with Audrey Milk 1973.jpg 8626:Not in the article, but uploaded recently. 8611:Image:Entrance to the Suspension Bridge.jpg 8260:I'll just say "I don't know" next time. ;) 8203:"It" - just a word; I can't copyright that. 7364:Knowledge:Featured article candidates/4chan 5845:Hi, you have voiced concern about an image 5825:Never mind. It's all settled. Thx anyway. 5364:Can you put any sense to the discussion at 5077:. Secondly, Will the images here like this 4830:Elcobbola nom, prose on a Tony1 nom, etc?) 4296:Image:Bayeux tapestry laid work detail..jpg 204:I was working on improving the details for 170:was covered by UK law. I'm losing my mind. 12576:User:The Fat Man Who Never Came Back's Mom 10139:PUI'd. I've left the uploader a message. 8357:FACs, in case you're inclined to review. 7362:Hi, could you please take another look at 2674:you can find here, about 3/4 down the page 2549:Great. Then when I plead ignorance, I'll 2436:Pankhurst. What good feminists we are. :) 12574:Should I just create a sockpuppet called 11320:Apologies, Sandy; I'm not touching this. 10929: 10032: 8948: 5696:images at PR, you expressed doubts about 4856:Could you possibly look at the images on 3918:Christina Ruth Mann's page on wearcam.org 3466:Letters on the Aesthetic Education of Man 2553:be ignorant :-) How about putting it at 1884:I went ahead and made it and uploaded it 1664:) was still waiting for an image check.-- 1474:. Also, if you are a member, be aware of 262:hello. I currently have Janet Jackson in 10751:http://flickr.com/photos/an2/2623887237/ 10288:Can it be uploaded? If yes, what tag? -- 9969:which I am currently reviewing. Thanks, 9478:Well, don't take it yet; it's Friday, I 8596:Image:Charles Ellet Jr Daguerreotype.jpg 8319:is being employed). The site, however, 8286:Here to bug you with another question :) 6152:based upon one or more preexisting works 4659:Oh, did I forget to reply <smack: --> 3839:does not require the patient's consent? 2557:? We can move it when we have a date. 11890:Hey, could you check this image for my 11700:Sure, I'll respond through the system. 10781:All that dispatch yum yum for nothing. 7638:Template:PD-USGov-Congress-Bio/Clean-up 7614:Template:PD-USGov-Congress-Bio/Clean-up 7191:Shall I send you the release from SFPL? 7112:If you're going with all three parts - 4401:walk me through this at Stigand's FAC! 2131:Saw this and couldn't help butting in! 1915:Image:20070621 Crown Fountain Water.JPG 14: 12649:Do not edit the contents of this page. 4314:Image:British.Library.MS.Add.33241.jpg 4167: 66:Scottish National Antarctic Expedition 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 11679:Image:Robert and Harvey Milk 1934.JPG 11465:Thanks much for your image review at 11443:Image:Star-trek-II-spocks-funeral.png 11386:" is not correct. My tongue bleeds. 10008:Thank you for these words of wisdom. 8838:Leibovitz v. Paramount Pictures Corp. 8793:Well, there was indeed discussion at 8621:Image:Renovated Suspension Bridge.jpg 8404:Recognize the building(s) in back of 8290:What do you think of the license for 8206:"It was" - short phrase; no copyright 7825:Special:Contributions/Onemorewikiuser 7433:Image:US10dollarbill-Series 2004A.jpg 6325:Do you have any solutions for moving 4184:Thankyou for all the work you do for 2520:Fair use is actually much easier, as 2182:Be very careful with NPG images (see 1472:Knowledge:WikiProject Chicago/members 581:Only a few, relatively minor issues: 516:Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost/Newsroom 322:Talk:Tourettes Action#Image licensing 12630: 12346:No evidence of when first published. 11971:Thanks for the ping; replied there. 11481:. (Feel free to reply here.) - Dan 11163:Mazer v. Stein, 347 U.S. 201 (1954) 10804:Wehe mir. Knowledge, you so crazy. 8825:: image used in the "1930s" section: 8823:History of the Boy Scouts of America 8591:Image:Merritt Biography Portrait.jpg 7932:, now only the implicit maximum per 7237:Okeydoke. I've added four images to 7086:I am a total, dismal failure in life 6635:Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp. 5913:Existential question about sculpture 5480:FAC which is always a good sign. :) 5014:I've indeed gone image hunting from 1523:Knowledge:WikiProject Chicago/Review 25: 12162:B) nudity to demonstrate innocence. 9399:...a sweet and pleasant disposition 8867:Knowledge:Non-free_content#Images_2 7560:by working on the pages linking to 7262:Knowledge:Non-free content criteria 7256:Knowledge:Non-free content criteria 23: 8200:to Moni. Consider the following: 8051:FYI, since I mentioned your name: 6158:other form in which a work may be 1650:As of 03:38, 14 August 2008 (UTC) 60:Scottish piper image repositioning 24: 12667: 11732:, which is currently at FAC. Is 9244:The College of William & Mary 9116:...wirklich. Warum? Was tun Sie? 8310:Commonwealth countries (e.g. UK) 6443:Hope it wasn't too much trouble. 6028:FAC for Voyage of the James Caird 4451:The Texas Tech logo itself (e.g. 3651:"Legal milestone for open source" 12634: 11090:Image:Newvrindabanaccordions.jpg 10930: 10567:Yep, if they could just include 10518:Could you forward that email to 10110:Image:Newvrindabanaccordions.jpg 10033: 9810:I don't know what's going on. -- 8949: 8659:Image:John Augustus Roebling.jpg 8601:Image:John Augustus Roebling.jpg 7847:Yes indeed! Very much obliged. 5636:Croatian national team candidate 5098:No, those images won't do. The 4988:Reception history of Jane Austen 4551:I'll be a character witness for 4168: 3649:Shiels Maggie (14 August 2008). 2346:Still working on the husband... 2133:NPG has some images of Pankhurst 1886:Image:Crown Fountain collage.JPG 561:Literature in the Hoysala Empire 142:is probably the best you'll do ( 29: 12616:The Fat Man Who Never Came Back 12580:The Fat Man Who Never Came Back 12053:I'm happy to do so, but that's 11723:Image:Ernest Hemingway 1950.jpg 11434:Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan 11172:United States Copyright Office 9806:Can you give any insight as to 9192:16:23, 25 September 2008 (UTC) 9028:The featured article candidate 9002:If you have time, any input on 8975:It's much appreciated, Graham. 8965:for your assistance in helping 8668:image from which it was derived 8579:Niagara Falls Suspension Bridge 8349:... have already dominated the 7779:Use of FA star image questioned 7673: 7647: 7600: 7041:I've contacted the store where 6245:Elcobbola, I can't remember if 6160:recast, transformed, or adapted 5937:example, don't really consider 1197:Hi, could you please advise on 740:I noticed that you did not tag 166:Have I lost it? I thought only 12401:also has congenial concerns. 11528:Thanks, that's helpful. - Dan 11502:three policy-mandated elements 10161:We beseech you, O image wizard 10098:18:40, 29 September 2008 (UTC) 10070:18:37, 29 September 2008 (UTC) 10018:10:03, 29 September 2008 (UTC) 10004:00:51, 29 September 2008 (UTC) 9979:18:33, 28 September 2008 (UTC) 9953:00:10, 28 September 2008 (UTC) 9915:01:41, 28 September 2008 (UTC) 9895:00:22, 28 September 2008 (UTC) 9878:00:15, 28 September 2008 (UTC) 9864:20:19, 27 September 2008 (UTC) 9842:19:47, 27 September 2008 (UTC) 9820:19:07, 27 September 2008 (UTC) 9796:19:50, 27 September 2008 (UTC) 9775:16:10, 27 September 2008 (UTC) 9743:16:36, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 9722:16:07, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 9697:15:49, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 9675:15:47, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 9651:15:37, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 9626:15:24, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 9594:12:50, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 9563:20:33, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 9543:20:21, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 9526:17:13, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 9495:16:39, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 9473:16:36, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 9434:16:34, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 9417:16:28, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 9394:16:06, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 9376:16:03, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 9359:15:59, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 9337:15:54, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 9309:15:47, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 9299:15:36, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 9274:10:36, 26 September 2008 (UTC) 9252:23:11, 25 September 2008 (UTC) 9228:17:37, 25 September 2008 (UTC) 9211:16:39, 25 September 2008 (UTC) 9185:09:48, 25 September 2008 (UTC) 9159:02:48, 25 September 2008 (UTC) 9138:02:23, 25 September 2008 (UTC) 9103:15:51, 25 September 2008 (UTC) 9078:17:38, 24 September 2008 (UTC) 9019:14:46, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 8990: 8987: 8985:13:22, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 8932:21:47, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 8891:20:43, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 8856:17:07, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 8776:10:10, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 8735:16:25, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 8721:15:57, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 8698:14:51, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 8650:00:48, 21 September 2008 (UTC) 8567:15:37, 22 September 2008 (UTC) 8546:03:11, 20 September 2008 (UTC) 8523:23:59, 17 September 2008 (UTC) 8494:22:14, 17 September 2008 (UTC) 8472:22:07, 17 September 2008 (UTC) 8448:21:38, 17 September 2008 (UTC) 8424:21:18, 17 September 2008 (UTC) 8399:21:12, 17 September 2008 (UTC) 8370:17:07, 17 September 2008 (UTC) 8339:14:14, 17 September 2008 (UTC) 8304:00:00, 17 September 2008 (UTC) 8276:22:28, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 8256:22:19, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 8239:22:09, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 8186:21:27, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 8151:21:14, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 8127:21:04, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 8109:18:27, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 8092:18:20, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 8067:17:46, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 8046:13:49, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 8007:23:33, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 7993:15:25, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 7973:15:20, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 7956:14:52, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 7916:10:42, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 7902:02:21, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 7884:02:20, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 7869:Query on low-resolution images 7863:15:35, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 7842:15:17, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 7819:15:59, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 7798:14:03, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 7773:01:34, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 7746:11:44, 14 September 2008 (UTC) 7709:15:13, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 7680:07:21, 16 September 2008 (UTC) 7654:02:25, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 7632:18:40, 13 September 2008 (UTC) 7607:18:21, 13 September 2008 (UTC) 7562:Template:PD-USGov-Congress-Bio 7547:20:04, 12 September 2008 (UTC) 7503:21:35, 12 September 2008 (UTC) 7488:21:21, 12 September 2008 (UTC) 7453:16:51, 12 September 2008 (UTC) 7419:17:17, 13 September 2008 (UTC) 7398:17:14, 13 September 2008 (UTC) 7376:23:26, 11 September 2008 (UTC) 7353:23:09, 11 September 2008 (UTC) 7328:14:13, 11 September 2008 (UTC) 7296:04:08, 11 September 2008 (UTC) 7226:22:39, 29 September 2008 (UTC) 7206:20:22, 29 September 2008 (UTC) 7157:20:08, 29 September 2008 (UTC) 7076:19:31, 29 September 2008 (UTC) 7011:15:10, 11 September 2008 (UTC) 6979:14:59, 11 September 2008 (UTC) 6938:14:03, 11 September 2008 (UTC) 6885:22:03, 10 September 2008 (UTC) 6848:04:32, 15 September 2008 (UTC) 6820:16:01, 10 September 2008 (UTC) 6779:15:55, 10 September 2008 (UTC) 6750:15:42, 10 September 2008 (UTC) 6732:15:16, 10 September 2008 (UTC) 6711:04:25, 10 September 2008 (UTC) 6674:04:22, 10 September 2008 (UTC) 6657:04:17, 10 September 2008 (UTC) 6623:04:13, 10 September 2008 (UTC) 6598:03:28, 10 September 2008 (UTC) 6580:03:22, 10 September 2008 (UTC) 6559:03:08, 10 September 2008 (UTC) 6537:02:58, 10 September 2008 (UTC) 6507:00:05, 10 September 2008 (UTC) 6150:A “derivative work” is a work 4801:01:35, 11 September 2008 (UTC) 4608:Non-free image review Dispatch 4457:mere typographic ornamentation 3394:) 15:21, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 2665:Hi, Elcobbola. I'm working on 1454:and that has been promoted to 1450:) that includes a category at 13: 1: 7587:U.S. Senate Historical Office 7178:Harvey_milk#Briggs_Initiative 6546:place I downloaded it from. 6480:19:51, 8 September 2008 (UTC) 6459:17:56, 8 September 2008 (UTC) 6431:19:51, 8 September 2008 (UTC) 6407:16:44, 8 September 2008 (UTC) 6383:03:41, 7 September 2008 (UTC) 6366:03:33, 7 September 2008 (UTC) 6342:21:33, 6 September 2008 (UTC) 6318:18:54, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 6297:18:41, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 6273:18:09, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 6231:15:39, 4 September 2008 (UTC) 6210:15:10, 4 September 2008 (UTC) 6195:14:26, 4 September 2008 (UTC) 6130:05:05, 4 September 2008 (UTC) 6120:.) Many thanks in advance. — 6092:00:54, 5 September 2008 (UTC) 6078:15:32, 4 September 2008 (UTC) 6040:01:03, 4 September 2008 (UTC) 6014:16:21, 3 September 2008 (UTC) 5931:15:30, 3 September 2008 (UTC) 5907:14:02, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 5886:19:49, 1 September 2008 (UTC) 5790:19:24, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 5775:15:35, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 5754:14:20, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 5318:Image:Podiceps grisegena9.jpg 5304:images (thanks for checking) 2655:14:12, 3 September 2008 (UTC) 2629:03:56, 3 September 2008 (UTC) 429:Marriott School of Management 234:An unresolved image issue at 146:, to which Ireland belongs). 12624:20:37, 31 October 2008 (UTC) 12606:17:56, 31 October 2008 (UTC) 12588:13:54, 31 October 2008 (UTC) 12547:00:35, 30 October 2008 (UTC) 12529:00:13, 30 October 2008 (UTC) 12517:23:50, 29 October 2008 (UTC) 12484:03:39, 25 October 2008 (UTC) 12456:04:45, 24 October 2008 (UTC) 12435:04:30, 24 October 2008 (UTC) 12414:03:58, 24 October 2008 (UTC) 12392:03:26, 24 October 2008 (UTC) 12366:00:26, 24 October 2008 (UTC) 12312:00:14, 22 October 2008 (UTC) 12288:23:33, 20 October 2008 (UTC) 12274:21:47, 20 October 2008 (UTC) 12252:20:39, 20 October 2008 (UTC) 12226:23:06, 20 October 2008 (UTC) 12211:22:36, 20 October 2008 (UTC) 12151:23:19, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 12108:03:50, 27 October 2008 (UTC) 12090:21:50, 20 October 2008 (UTC) 12073:21:48, 20 October 2008 (UTC) 12049:03:00, 18 October 2008 (UTC) 12024:22:38, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 12000:22:31, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 11987:22:19, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 11967:22:07, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 11954:20:52, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 11941:20:41, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 11907:20:17, 17 October 2008 (UTC) 11879:21:01, 16 October 2008 (UTC) 11857:16:05, 15 October 2008 (UTC) 11831:12:11, 15 October 2008 (UTC) 11805:02:18, 15 October 2008 (UTC) 11763:01:34, 15 October 2008 (UTC) 11716:17:49, 13 October 2008 (UTC) 11695:16:37, 13 October 2008 (UTC) 11667:15:06, 10 October 2008 (UTC) 11641:14:45, 10 October 2008 (UTC) 11419:19:22, 16 October 2008 (UTC) 11402:12:58, 16 October 2008 (UTC) 11378:FWIW: Angr, Fasach Nua, and 11373:06:39, 16 October 2008 (UTC) 11353:02:19, 12 October 2008 (UTC) 11226:didn't really have consensus 10763:13:34, 25 October 2008 (UTC) 10727:18:33, 22 October 2008 (UTC) 10706:17:53, 22 October 2008 (UTC) 10680:16:34, 22 October 2008 (UTC) 10656:16:10, 22 October 2008 (UTC) 10623:15:59, 22 October 2008 (UTC) 10591:15:59, 22 October 2008 (UTC) 10563:15:55, 22 October 2008 (UTC) 10537:15:07, 22 October 2008 (UTC) 10506:14:54, 22 October 2008 (UTC) 10486:13:39, 22 October 2008 (UTC) 10469:14:29, 21 October 2008 (UTC) 9304:that you may know... Later! 8165:oh say, Mr. copyright expert 7542:Make articles, not wikidrama 6691:http://elibrary.bigchalk.com 5310:Image:Grèbejougrisparade.jpg 3108:Make articles, not wikidrama 3075:Make articles, not wikidrama 1152:I went ahead and did these. 7: 12418:And there's a weird one at 12334:Image:Crean & Bones.JPG 12260: 12197: 12059: 12010: 11973: 11927: 11839:Copyright discussion at DKY 11791: 11702: 11653: 11602:15:32, 8 October 2008 (UTC) 11588:15:15, 8 October 2008 (UTC) 11574: 11562:12:31, 8 October 2008 (UTC) 11547:Image:JaneAustenEpitaph.jpg 11538:15:46, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 11524:15:30, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 11510: 11491:15:02, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 11456:13:53, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 11388: 11336:14:22, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 11322: 11315:19:01, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 11283:15:48, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 11248:15:42, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 11234: 11220:15:09, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 11197:14:12, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 11183: 11143:15:59, 5 October 2008 (UTC) 11110:20:51, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 11085:17:04, 9 October 2008 (UTC) 11063:14:26, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 11049: 11031:14:10, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 11009:13:51, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 10995: 10982:04:00, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 10960:04:00, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 10917:23:39, 3 October 2008 (UTC) 10903: 10888:23:13, 3 October 2008 (UTC) 10860:03:07, 3 October 2008 (UTC) 10846: 10835:02:57, 3 October 2008 (UTC) 10820:00:47, 3 October 2008 (UTC) 10806: 10799:17:11, 2 October 2008 (UTC) 10713: 10666: 10577: 10523: 10452:16:07, 9 October 2008 (UTC) 10434:16:01, 9 October 2008 (UTC) 10420: 10404:15:49, 9 October 2008 (UTC) 10383:15:43, 9 October 2008 (UTC) 10369: 10359:15:30, 9 October 2008 (UTC) 10335:13:48, 6 October 2008 (UTC) 10321: 10298:12:01, 4 October 2008 (UTC) 10265:07:55, 2 October 2008 (UTC) 10241:02:37, 3 October 2008 (UTC) 10222:02:02, 3 October 2008 (UTC) 10208: 10200:02:42, 2 October 2008 (UTC) 10155:01:37, 3 October 2008 (UTC) 10141: 10134:02:12, 2 October 2008 (UTC) 10084: 9990: 9901: 9828: 9782: 9708: 9661: 9612: 9549: 9512: 9403: 9323: 9285: 9197: 9145: 9089: 8918: 8842: 8684: 8553: 8458: 8410: 8325: 8262: 8225: 8137: 8078: 7979: 7942: 7849: 7805: 7695: 7618: 7474: 7461:Secret Service restrictions 7314: 7251:22:55, 1 October 2008 (UTC) 7212: 7143: 6997: 6924: 6765: 6718: 6643: 6566: 6523: 6466: 6417: 6352: 6283: 6217: 6181: 6064: 6000: 5893: 5859:00:30, 31 August 2008 (UTC) 5835:21:53, 30 August 2008 (UTC) 5820:21:17, 30 August 2008 (UTC) 5761: 5736:15:28, 30 August 2008 (UTC) 5722: 5710:12:38, 30 August 2008 (UTC) 5677:14:36, 29 August 2008 (UTC) 5663: 5655:06:38, 29 August 2008 (UTC) 5614:15:25, 30 August 2008 (UTC) 5600: 5594:15:20, 30 August 2008 (UTC) 5576:15:16, 30 August 2008 (UTC) 5562: 5531:14:57, 30 August 2008 (UTC) 5490:14:43, 30 August 2008 (UTC) 5455:14:30, 30 August 2008 (UTC) 5433:23:33, 29 August 2008 (UTC) 5419:01:28, 29 August 2008 (UTC) 5402:01:19, 29 August 2008 (UTC) 5388: 5381:22:25, 28 August 2008 (UTC) 5352:14:07, 27 August 2008 (UTC) 5338: 5331:06:41, 27 August 2008 (UTC) 5306:Image:Podicepsgrisegena.jpg 5288:23:32, 29 August 2008 (UTC) 5274:14:41, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 5260: 5235:23:03, 25 August 2008 (UTC) 5207:15:24, 25 August 2008 (UTC) 5193: 5178:14:57, 25 August 2008 (UTC) 5152:18:52, 25 August 2008 (UTC) 5135:18:39, 25 August 2008 (UTC) 5121: 5090:13:16, 25 August 2008 (UTC) 5064:17:50, 25 August 2008 (UTC) 5050: 5038:16:00, 25 August 2008 (UTC) 5024: 5009:04:23, 25 August 2008 (UTC) 4986:and I are slowly preparing 4970:15:36, 25 August 2008 (UTC) 4956: 4946:11:34, 24 August 2008 (UTC) 4934:22:36, 23 August 2008 (UTC) 4908:21:48, 23 August 2008 (UTC) 4894:18:09, 23 August 2008 (UTC) 4880: 4870:09:54, 23 August 2008 (UTC) 4846:07:33, 23 August 2008 (UTC) 4832: 4824:05:29, 23 August 2008 (UTC) 4769:18:14, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 4731:18:05, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 4717: 4710:17:57, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 4693:17:56, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 4679: 4673:17:54, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 4655:17:52, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 4641: 4629:17:22, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 4600:16:37, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 4586:16:27, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 4572: 4565:16:21, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 4542:21:56, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 4528: 4518:21:46, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 4504: 4496:21:39, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 4482: 4443:20:57, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 4410:16:36, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 4380:16:29, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 4366: 4356:16:19, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 4332:16:13, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 4318: 4310:- needs a verifiable source 4304:- needs a verifiable source 4294:) or textural detail (e.g. 4292:Image:Bayeux Tapestry 4.jpg 4266:18:41, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 4245:15:00, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 4212:08:47, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 4186:Featured article candidates 4156:12:52, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 4142: 4130:01:20, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 4108:01:09, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 4078:01:17, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 4056:01:05, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 4037:00:48, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 4023:00:44, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 3992:12:54, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 3978: 3972:00:46, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 3958:21:21, 19 August 2008 (UTC) 3944: 3910:16:32, 19 August 2008 (UTC) 3884:16:18, 19 August 2008 (UTC) 3870:14:06, 19 August 2008 (UTC) 3856: 3849:10:44, 19 August 2008 (UTC) 3819:16:23, 19 August 2008 (UTC) 3805: 3795:16:18, 19 August 2008 (UTC) 3781:16:10, 19 August 2008 (UTC) 3764:13:57, 19 August 2008 (UTC) 3750: 3735:10:34, 19 August 2008 (UTC) 3707:13:48, 18 August 2008 (UTC) 3693: 3675:20:45, 17 August 2008 (UTC) 3633:14:22, 18 August 2008 (UTC) 3611:14:06, 18 August 2008 (UTC) 3591:14:03, 18 August 2008 (UTC) 3577: 3560:16:40, 17 August 2008 (UTC) 3535:09:20, 16 August 2008 (UTC) 3521:02:21, 16 August 2008 (UTC) 3507: 3478:21:09, 15 August 2008 (UTC) 3444:16:52, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 3430:16:48, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 3416: 3408:16:44, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 3375:00:15, 20 August 2008 (UTC) 3356:23:54, 19 August 2008 (UTC) 3342: 3335:17:29, 19 August 2008 (UTC) 3321:17:12, 19 August 2008 (UTC) 3307: 3296:17:05, 19 August 2008 (UTC) 3252:14:24, 18 August 2008 (UTC) 3238:05:14, 16 August 2008 (UTC) 3224:02:30, 16 August 2008 (UTC) 3210: 3200:16:04, 15 August 2008 (UTC) 3181:20:41, 14 August 2008 (UTC) 3148:16:25, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 3134: 3128:16:00, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 3113:15:42, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 3095:15:37, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 3080:15:34, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 3041:15:22, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 3027: 2985:15:10, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 2942:14:48, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 2928: 2897:14:19, 25 August 2008 (UTC) 2863:14:06, 25 August 2008 (UTC) 2849: 2822:20:18, 23 August 2008 (UTC) 2808:Ok. I uploaded this image: 2792:14:19, 18 August 2008 (UTC) 2778: 2753:19:31, 15 August 2008 (UTC) 2730:00:24, 15 August 2008 (UTC) 2716: 2708:15:29, 14 August 2008 (UTC) 2641: 2607:17:30, 23 August 2008 (UTC) 2593: 2570:22:04, 14 August 2008 (UTC) 2545:22:02, 14 August 2008 (UTC) 2531: 2515:20:37, 14 August 2008 (UTC) 2496:00:16, 13 August 2008 (UTC) 2476:00:03, 13 August 2008 (UTC) 2446:16:42, 17 August 2008 (UTC) 2416:02:23, 16 August 2008 (UTC) 2402: 2388:19:23, 15 August 2008 (UTC) 2362:14:59, 13 August 2008 (UTC) 2348: 2313:14:28, 13 August 2008 (UTC) 2299: 2269:04:21, 13 August 2008 (UTC) 2251:04:13, 13 August 2008 (UTC) 2226:04:05, 13 August 2008 (UTC) 2206:03:33, 13 August 2008 (UTC) 2192: 2173:00:15, 13 August 2008 (UTC) 2145:00:07, 13 August 2008 (UTC) 2124:23:53, 12 August 2008 (UTC) 2068:20:16, 20 August 2008 (UTC) 2048:18:25, 20 August 2008 (UTC) 2034: 2022:18:14, 20 August 2008 (UTC) 1983:18:14, 20 August 2008 (UTC) 1933:17:56, 20 August 2008 (UTC) 1919: 1908:16:00, 20 August 2008 (UTC) 1880:03:44, 20 August 2008 (UTC) 1858:16:29, 19 August 2008 (UTC) 1844: 1825:15:58, 19 August 2008 (UTC) 1793:03:40, 16 August 2008 (UTC) 1760:01:12, 16 August 2008 (UTC) 1746: 1725:21:15, 15 August 2008 (UTC) 1692:08:07, 14 August 2008 (UTC) 1646:14:14, 13 August 2008 (UTC) 1632: 1626:13:57, 13 August 2008 (UTC) 1591:13:56, 12 August 2008 (UTC) 1553:18:07, 11 August 2008 (UTC) 1432:21:23, 11 August 2008 (UTC) 1418: 1412:21:20, 11 August 2008 (UTC) 1398:21:17, 11 August 2008 (UTC) 1384: 1364:15:43, 10 August 2008 (UTC) 1349:RFK assassination FAC again 1341:22:58, 11 August 2008 (UTC) 1327:18:43, 11 August 2008 (UTC) 1313: 1285:14:13, 10 August 2008 (UTC) 1260:12:40, 10 August 2008 (UTC) 1246: 1219:12:12, 10 August 2008 (UTC) 1183:15:05, 10 August 2008 (UTC) 1162:14:21, 10 August 2008 (UTC) 1147:12:55, 10 August 2008 (UTC) 1133: 1120:12:55, 10 August 2008 (UTC) 1106: 1100:03:40, 10 August 2008 (UTC) 1079:01:40, 10 August 2008 (UTC) 977: 921: 866: 769: 704: 668: 607: 536: 492: 379: 297: 186: 148: 94: 10: 12672: 10844:is good for a laugh, too. 10575:, we'll be in good shape. 10043:The Working Man's Barnstar 6251:WP:FCDW/September 15, 2008 5868:Low priority - I uploaded 5698:Image:Borchgrevink Hut.jpg 4786:WP:FCDW/September 15, 2008 4616:will be on September 15. 3785:Excellent - good to know. 1765:of the standards for FU.-- 1562:Can you please comment at 1476:Knowledge:Meetup/Chicago 3 1025:21:22, 8 August 2008 (UTC) 1005:21:17, 8 August 2008 (UTC) 991:20:59, 8 August 2008 (UTC) 935:20:32, 8 August 2008 (UTC) 896:20:27, 8 August 2008 (UTC) 880:19:56, 8 August 2008 (UTC) 816:19:29, 8 August 2008 (UTC) 801:19:18, 8 August 2008 (UTC) 783:19:14, 8 August 2008 (UTC) 754:19:10, 8 August 2008 (UTC) 736:19:08, 8 August 2008 (UTC) 718:19:01, 8 August 2008 (UTC) 697:18:56, 8 August 2008 (UTC) 682:18:54, 8 August 2008 (UTC) 661:18:51, 8 August 2008 (UTC) 638:03:17, 8 August 2008 (UTC) 621:00:35, 8 August 2008 (UTC) 576:15:56, 7 August 2008 (UTC) 550:00:38, 8 August 2008 (UTC) 530:00:28, 8 August 2008 (UTC) 506:00:23, 8 August 2008 (UTC) 471:15:31, 7 August 2008 (UTC) 445:14:55, 6 August 2008 (UTC) 418:16:24, 6 August 2008 (UTC) 393:13:13, 6 August 2008 (UTC) 354:16:38, 5 August 2008 (UTC) 336:08:25, 5 August 2008 (UTC) 311:12:22, 5 August 2008 (UTC) 290:13:35, 4 August 2008 (UTC) 251:04:30, 4 August 2008 (UTC) 218:03:13, 4 August 2008 (UTC) 200:02:59, 4 August 2008 (UTC) 180:02:53, 4 August 2008 (UTC) 162:02:43, 4 August 2008 (UTC) 129:01:45, 4 August 2008 (UTC) 108:19:26, 3 August 2008 (UTC) 79:08:20, 3 August 2008 (UTC) 12525:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs 12328:Image:HMS Howe (1859).jpg 11991:Actually done now. ;-) — 11452:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs 11232:, if you're so inclined. 11047:Will do! Mmm, brisket... 10946:I award this barnstar to 10940:The Barnstar of Diligence 10936: 10783:Image:Stonewall_riots.jpg 10777:Deletable dispatch fodder 10662:Image:Alandi_Palki_08.jpg 10055:Reviewing non-free images 10039: 8955: 8115:Image:Russiansoldier1.jpg 7938:Image:Sugar Bowl Logo.gif 7591:PD-USGov-Congress-Bio TfD 7260:In this week's signpost, 5718:Southern Cross Expedition 5694:Southern Cross Expedition 5689:Voyage of the James Caird 5359:Voyage of the James Caird 4858:Southern Cross Expedition 4174: 3874:Thank you! You're a gem! 2810:Image:Stonewall riots.jpg 2591:happy to have you do so. 1732:don't have FU standards; 1448:Oliver Typewriter Company 1354:image knowledge is zilch 11885:Image:Betty Williams.jpg 11437:is undergoing a GAN and 10870:Project Gutenberg images 10418:on Redtigerxyz talk: --> 10367:on Redtigerxyz talk: --> 10167:this image of the statue 8805:James E. West (Scouting) 8209:"It was the" - same deal 7556:I desire to help out at 7130:Non-free film screenshot 7117:Non-free newspaper image 7057:The Times of Harvey Milk 6966:to open an image program 6916:Non-free newspaper image 6486:Dumb question of the day 5300:Just a follow up on the 4978:Do you find images, too? 3896:Have you ever seen this 3487:reiterates the date. A 2616:is aiming for Sept 15? 585:Image:Hoysala emblem.JPG 317:If you have a chance ... 12338:Scott's Last Expedition 10753:" Is that a problem? -- 9808:what is happening here? 7566:Image:RudyBoschwitz.jpg 6951:I'm having an argh day. 6492:Image:Hester Thrale.jpg 5806:Can you please comment 5278:What a relief! Thanks! 2029:Image:CrownFountain.jpg 1946:Triptych, May–June 1973 12350:Image:Crean statue.jpg 12094:Hey, just noting that 11626:Coins from Ivory Coast 10613:Forwarded the mail. -- 9263:traumatic flagellation 8905:in their current state 7381:Ec, can you glance at 7050:San Francisco Examiner 6164: 6118:old version with image 5962: 2770:Non-free use rationale 2462:I added some comments 2287:Do not move to Commons 2086:Hate to be a bother... 1085:Image:Oliver Sacks.jpg 12647:of past discussions. 12561:This medddlesome user 12344:Image:Tom Crean2b.JPG 11508:if IUP ever changes. 11296:Roman Catholic Church 10051:Reviewing free images 9930:Roman Catholic Church 9238:Thanks for your input 9083:<commented at the 8024:Russian Ground Forces 7578:bioguide.congress.gov 7552:PD-USGov-Congress-Bio 7465:my query to Nishkid64 7266:Or publicly displayed 6853:Need some expert help 6641:delightfully ironic. 6247:Knowledge:FCDW/TempNF 6148: 5954: 5406:Thanks, reassuring. 4614:Knowledge:FCDW/TempNF 4448:Several things here: 3723:Image:Lyme Park 2.jpg 3688:still under copyright 2685:here on the cover of 2614:Knowledge:FCDW/TempNF 2555:Knowledge:FCDW/TempNF 2101:and I've come across 1224:The "generic" tag is 666:I'm a Commons admin. 42:of past discussions. 12318:Tom Crean (explorer) 11176:, revised July 2006 9257:of admins and images 8479:Minnesooootan, eh? 8133:at least one copyvio 7385:please? Thank you, 6241:Post-travel catch-up 5070:A question on images 3976:I agree; IfD calls. 3936:copyright disclaimer 3686:Copyleft images are 3118:the whole sundae. -- 1988:Discussion moved to 1270:How do we know that 1266:Yet another question 1228:Non-free fair use in 1199:Image:Behr paima.gif 456:User:Mifter/Signpost 206:Image:LadyMorgan.jpg 11498:since at least July 11382:are in agreement; " 10842:User:Angr#A_parable 8292:Image:Darwin 42.jpg 7688:Suntag, please see 7662:I posted a request 7427:Image check, please 7335:Group (mathematics) 6439:I sent you an email 6100:Your opinion sought 4852:Image check request 4784:You can move it to 4178:The Reviewers Award 4009:Image reviewing is 2696:Birmingham campaign 2681:New York Daily News 2634:Well, dart players 2186:and the subsequent 140:The brief list here 18:User talk:Elcobbola 10179:FOP is way liberal 10171:Emmeline Pankhurst 9575:German translation 8781:For my reference: 8375:Not to be too nosy 7437:Alexander Hamilton 4612:It's looking like 4308:Image:William1.jpg 4046:educated editors! 3916:The image is from 3460:to the article on 2612:Elcobbola, I hope 2340:this 1911 postcard 2099:Emmeline Pankhurst 1558:Crown Fountain FAC 940:Pick your poison: 12659: 12658: 12653:current talk page 12191:interpretations). 11829: 11761: 11181:Hope this helps. 10993: 10965: 10964: 10639:2 more images at 10279:, with copyright: 10274:Image:Vitthal.png 10237: 10196: 10075: 10074: 9849:Back-Cover Texts. 9510: 8995: 8994: 8789: 7803:Commented there. 7564:. I started with 7294: 7264:criteria 4 added 7135:would be the tag. 6637:? That would be 6633:Bridgeman? As in 6137:replacement image 4812:Proserpine (play) 4302:Image:Stigand.jpg 4288:Image:Stigand.jpg 4276:Bridgeman v Corel 4241: 4217: 4216: 4209: 2492: 2384: 2247: 2222: 2169: 2120: 2064: 2020: 1981: 1904: 1876: 1823: 1791: 1736:has an FU policy 1723: 1690: 1624: 1594: 1577:comment added by 1551: 450:Signpost heads up 287: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 12663: 12638: 12637: 12631: 12598: 12526: 12448: 12427: 12406: 12384: 12304:Dineshkannambadi 12266: 12203: 12105: 12087: 12065: 12046: 12016: 12004:That's not what 11997: 11979: 11964: 11951: 11933: 11904: 11871: 11826: 11820: 11815: 11814: 11797: 11788: 11782: 11773:is not supported 11758: 11752: 11747: 11746: 11708: 11659: 11580: 11516: 11506:Knowledge:Update 11453: 11411: 11394: 11365: 11345: 11328: 11307: 11281: 11278: 11269: 11240: 11218: 11215: 11206: 11189: 11141: 11138: 11129: 11055: 11001: 10991: 10934: 10927: 10926: 10909: 10852: 10812: 10719: 10672: 10583: 10529: 10426: 10375: 10327: 10238: 10235: 10230: 10214: 10197: 10194: 10189: 10173:(and presumably 10147: 10132: 10129: 10123: 10090: 10062: 10037: 10030: 10029: 10026:You are the best 9996: 9967:Darwin Rebellion 9949: 9948: 9945: 9907: 9887: 9834: 9788: 9735: 9714: 9689: 9667: 9643: 9618: 9586: 9555: 9535: 9518: 9500: 9487: 9471: 9468: 9462: 9426: 9409: 9386: 9380:<sarcasm: --> 9351: 9329: 9291: 9220: 9203: 9183: 9180: 9174: 9151: 9136: 9133: 9127: 9095: 9059: 9053: 9045: 9039: 8991: 8988: 8980: 8971:Featured Article 8953: 8946: 8945: 8924: 8889: 8886: 8880: 8848: 8780: 8774: 8771: 8765: 8690: 8559: 8538: 8491: 8487: 8483: 8464: 8445: 8441: 8437: 8416: 8396: 8392: 8388: 8362: 8331: 8268: 8248: 8231: 8178: 8143: 8101: 8084: 8059: 8038: 7985: 7965: 7948: 7894: 7855: 7811: 7790: 7771: 7768: 7762: 7744: 7741: 7735: 7701: 7675: 7649: 7624: 7602: 7538: 7480: 7411: 7390: 7345: 7320: 7272: 7218: 7149: 7134: 7128: 7121: 7115: 7003: 6930: 6920: 6914: 6812: 6771: 6742: 6724: 6703: 6666: 6649: 6615: 6590: 6572: 6551: 6529: 6499: 6472: 6455: 6448: 6423: 6399: 6375: 6358: 6334: 6310: 6289: 6265: 6249:is on track for 6223: 6187: 6070: 6052:pogo stick image 6006: 5899: 5767: 5728: 5669: 5606: 5586: 5568: 5523: 5447: 5411: 5394: 5373: 5344: 5302:Red-necked Grebe 5266: 5199: 5164:I'm confused by 5127: 5117:derivative works 5056: 5030: 4962: 4926: 4886: 4838: 4793: 4761: 4723: 4702: 4685: 4665: 4647: 4621: 4578: 4534: 4510: 4488: 4424:Logos everywhere 4372: 4324: 4239: 4208: 4199: 4196: 4172: 4165: 4164: 4148: 4100: 3984: 3950: 3862: 3811: 3773: 3756: 3742:trusted reviewer 3699: 3667: 3662: 3660: 3658: 3583: 3548:Image:0064MC.jpg 3513: 3496: 3490: 3452:Hannah Pritchard 3422: 3348: 3313: 3303:unify your login 3216: 3140: 3104: 3071: 3033: 2934: 2855: 2784: 2774: 2768: 2765:Filling out the 2722: 2647: 2621: 2599: 2562: 2537: 2507: 2493: 2490: 2485: 2408: 2385: 2382: 2377: 2354: 2305: 2291: 2285: 2248: 2245: 2240: 2223: 2220: 2215: 2198: 2170: 2167: 2162: 2121: 2118: 2113: 2062: 2040: 1998: 1959: 1949:(Aug 2007), and 1925: 1902: 1874: 1850: 1801: 1769: 1752: 1701: 1668: 1638: 1602: 1593: 1571: 1529: 1424: 1390: 1319: 1310: 1304: 1300: 1294: 1252: 1242:could be created 1235: 1210: 1175: 1139: 1112: 1092: 1071: 983: 927: 872: 862: 856: 775: 710: 674: 630:Dineshkannambadi 613: 568:Dineshkannambadi 542: 522: 498: 463: 410: 385: 346: 328: 303: 286: 277: 274: 243: 192: 168:Northern Ireland 154: 100: 33: 32: 26: 12671: 12670: 12666: 12665: 12664: 12662: 12661: 12660: 12635: 12596: 12557: 12524: 12503:Many thanks. -- 12491: 12475:appears in the 12468: 12446: 12439:And a query at 12425: 12404: 12382: 12373: 12321: 12300: 12272: 12236: 12209: 12138: 12101: 12083: 12071: 12042: 12022: 11993: 11985: 11960: 11947: 11939: 11900: 11888: 11869: 11864: 11841: 11824: 11818: 11810: 11803: 11786: 11780: 11756: 11750: 11742: 11726: 11714: 11677:Heya. I loaded 11675: 11665: 11629: 11615: 11586: 11550: 11522: 11471:Talk:Everglades 11463: 11451: 11429: 11409: 11400: 11363: 11343: 11334: 11305: 11299: 11276: 11267: 11265: 11246: 11213: 11204: 11202: 11195: 11158:patently absurd 11136: 11127: 11125: 11118: 11102:Henry Doktorski 11092: 11061: 11007: 10969:Stonewall riots 10925: 10915: 10872: 10858: 10818: 10787:up for deletion 10779: 10725: 10678: 10589: 10535: 10432: 10381: 10333: 10253: 10234: 10228: 10220: 10193: 10187: 10163: 10153: 10127: 10116: 10113: 10106: 10096: 10060: 10028: 10002: 9960: 9946: 9943: 9942: 9933: 9913: 9885: 9840: 9804: 9794: 9763: 9733: 9720: 9687: 9673: 9641: 9624: 9584: 9577: 9561: 9533: 9524: 9485: 9466: 9455: 9452: 9424: 9415: 9384: 9349: 9335: 9297: 9259: 9240: 9218: 9209: 9178: 9167: 9164: 9157: 9131: 9120: 9117: 9111: 9109:Etwas wichtiges 9101: 9057: 9051: 9043: 9037: 9030:Philitas of Cos 9026: 9000: 8998:Image feedback. 8978: 8944: 8930: 8884: 8873: 8870: 8854: 8769: 8758: 8755: 8745: 8743:Image questions 8696: 8640:. Thank you. 8575: 8565: 8536: 8530: 8512: 8489: 8481: 8470: 8443: 8435: 8422: 8394: 8386: 8377: 8360: 8347: 8337: 8288: 8274: 8246: 8237: 8176: 8167: 8149: 8099: 8090: 8057: 8036: 8027: 7991: 7963: 7954: 7892: 7871: 7861: 7827: 7817: 7788: 7781: 7766: 7755: 7752: 7739: 7728: 7725: 7721: 7707: 7676: 7650: 7630: 7603: 7554: 7545: 7534: 7513: 7486: 7429: 7409: 7388: 7360: 7343: 7338: 7326: 7258: 7224: 7155: 7132: 7126: 7119: 7113: 7025: 7009: 6995:Email sent. ;) 6936: 6918: 6912: 6857:I'm working on 6855: 6810: 6777: 6740: 6730: 6701: 6664: 6655: 6613: 6588: 6578: 6549: 6535: 6497: 6488: 6478: 6453: 6446: 6441: 6429: 6397: 6373: 6364: 6332: 6308: 6295: 6263: 6243: 6229: 6193: 6102: 6076: 6024: 6012: 5915: 5905: 5866: 5851:EnemyOfTheState 5843: 5804: 5802:Flipping images 5773: 5734: 5685: 5675: 5638: 5612: 5584: 5574: 5521: 5445: 5409: 5400: 5371: 5362: 5350: 5314:Image:Grebe.jpg 5298: 5272: 5215: 5205: 5162: 5133: 5072: 5062: 5036: 4980: 4968: 4924: 4918: 4892: 4854: 4844: 4808: 4791: 4759: 4729: 4700: 4691: 4663: 4653: 4619: 4610: 4584: 4540: 4516: 4494: 4426: 4378: 4330: 4252: 4238: 4222: 4200: 4190: 4163: 4154: 4098: 4007: 3990: 3956: 3894: 3868: 3833: 3831:Medical consent 3817: 3771: 3762: 3720: 3705: 3691:" in practice. 3665: 3656: 3654: 3645: 3589: 3545: 3519: 3494: 3488: 3454: 3428: 3354: 3319: 3265:Regardless: 1. 3222: 3164: 3146: 3111: 3100: 3078: 3067: 3039: 3025:for Nishkid64. 2940: 2861: 2790: 2772: 2766: 2728: 2689:by David Carter 2667:Stonewall riots 2663: 2653: 2619: 2605: 2560: 2543: 2505: 2489: 2483: 2460: 2458:Dispatch review 2414: 2381: 2375: 2371:The Suffragette 2360: 2311: 2289: 2283: 2244: 2238: 2219: 2213: 2204: 2166: 2160: 2117: 2111: 2088: 2061: 2046: 1931: 1901: 1873: 1856: 1758: 1644: 1572: 1560: 1444: 1430: 1396: 1351: 1325: 1308: 1302: 1298: 1292: 1268: 1258: 1225: 1208: 1195: 1173: 1145: 1118: 1090: 1069: 1035: 1033:No image checks 989: 933: 878: 860: 854: 820:The source for 787:There was also 781: 716: 680: 648: 628:in the article. 619: 591:Image:Udupi.JPG 564: 548: 520: 504: 461: 452: 432: 408: 391: 371:the White Album 344: 326: 319: 309: 278: 268: 260: 241: 232: 198: 160: 116: 106: 62: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 12669: 12657: 12656: 12639: 12629: 12628: 12627: 12626: 12609: 12608: 12556: 12553: 12552: 12551: 12550: 12549: 12490: 12487: 12467: 12464: 12463: 12462: 12461: 12460: 12459: 12458: 12372: 12369: 12354: 12353: 12347: 12341: 12331: 12320: 12315: 12299: 12294: 12293: 12292: 12291: 12290: 12278:Thanks! - Dan 12268: 12235: 12232: 12231: 12230: 12229: 12228: 12205: 12192: 12173: 12165: 12164: 12163: 12160: 12137: 12130: 12129: 12128: 12127: 12126: 12125: 12124: 12123: 12122: 12121: 12120: 12119: 12118: 12117: 12116: 12115: 12114: 12113: 12112: 12111: 12110: 12067: 12018: 11981: 11935: 11887: 11882: 11863: 11860: 11840: 11837: 11836: 11835: 11834: 11833: 11799: 11725: 11720: 11719: 11718: 11710: 11674: 11671: 11670: 11669: 11661: 11628: 11623: 11614: 11608: 11607: 11606: 11605: 11604: 11582: 11569: 11549: 11544: 11543: 11542: 11541: 11540: 11518: 11462: 11459: 11428: 11425: 11424: 11423: 11422: 11421: 11396: 11358: 11357: 11356: 11355: 11330: 11298: 11293: 11292: 11291: 11290: 11289: 11288: 11287: 11286: 11285: 11255: 11254: 11253: 11252: 11251: 11250: 11242: 11191: 11179: 11178: 11177: 11170: 11167: 11164: 11150:useful article 11122:Image:AXXo.jpg 11117: 11114: 11113: 11112: 11091: 11088: 11072: 11071: 11070: 11069: 11068: 11067: 11066: 11065: 11057: 11038: 11037: 11036: 11035: 11034: 11033: 11014: 11013: 11012: 11011: 11003: 10967:Rock on, man. 10963: 10962: 10943: 10942: 10937: 10935: 10924: 10921: 10920: 10919: 10911: 10871: 10868: 10867: 10866: 10865: 10864: 10863: 10862: 10854: 10814: 10778: 10775: 10774: 10773: 10772: 10771: 10770: 10769: 10768: 10767: 10766: 10765: 10738: 10737: 10736: 10735: 10734: 10733: 10732: 10731: 10730: 10729: 10721: 10687: 10686: 10685: 10684: 10683: 10682: 10674: 10634: 10633: 10632: 10631: 10630: 10629: 10628: 10627: 10626: 10625: 10602: 10601: 10600: 10599: 10598: 10597: 10596: 10595: 10594: 10593: 10585: 10569:this statement 10544: 10543: 10542: 10541: 10540: 10539: 10531: 10511: 10510: 10509: 10508: 10491: 10490: 10489: 10488: 10457: 10456: 10455: 10454: 10437: 10436: 10428: 10392: 10391: 10390: 10389: 10388: 10387: 10386: 10385: 10377: 10342: 10341: 10340: 10339: 10338: 10337: 10329: 10283: 10282: 10281: 10280: 10252: 10247: 10246: 10245: 10244: 10243: 10216: 10162: 10159: 10158: 10157: 10149: 10105: 10102: 10101: 10100: 10092: 10073: 10072: 10046: 10045: 10040: 10038: 10027: 10024: 10023: 10022: 10021: 10020: 9998: 9959: 9956: 9932: 9927: 9926: 9925: 9924: 9923: 9922: 9921: 9920: 9919: 9918: 9917: 9909: 9851: 9836: 9803: 9800: 9799: 9798: 9790: 9762: 9759: 9758: 9757: 9756: 9755: 9754: 9753: 9752: 9751: 9750: 9749: 9748: 9747: 9746: 9745: 9725: 9724: 9716: 9700: 9699: 9678: 9677: 9669: 9654: 9653: 9629: 9628: 9620: 9604: 9576: 9573: 9572: 9571: 9570: 9569: 9568: 9567: 9566: 9565: 9557: 9520: 9449: 9448: 9447: 9446: 9445: 9444: 9443: 9442: 9441: 9440: 9439: 9438: 9437: 9436: 9411: 9343: 9342: 9341: 9340: 9339: 9331: 9293: 9258: 9255: 9239: 9236: 9235: 9234: 9233: 9232: 9231: 9230: 9205: 9189: 9188: 9187: 9153: 9110: 9107: 9106: 9105: 9097: 9025: 9022: 8999: 8996: 8993: 8992: 8962: 8961: 8956: 8954: 8943: 8940: 8939: 8938: 8937: 8936: 8935: 8934: 8926: 8908: 8896: 8895: 8894: 8893: 8859: 8858: 8850: 8834: 8833: 8832: 8827: 8826: 8819: 8818: 8814: 8809: 8808: 8799: 8798: 8744: 8741: 8740: 8739: 8738: 8737: 8723: 8701: 8700: 8692: 8680: 8679: 8678: 8672: 8634: 8633: 8624: 8623: 8618: 8613: 8608: 8603: 8598: 8593: 8588: 8574: 8571: 8570: 8569: 8561: 8529: 8526: 8511: 8506: 8505: 8504: 8503: 8502: 8501: 8500: 8499: 8498: 8497: 8496: 8466: 8418: 8376: 8373: 8346: 8345:Image disputes 8343: 8342: 8341: 8333: 8287: 8284: 8283: 8282: 8281: 8280: 8279: 8278: 8270: 8233: 8221: 8220: 8219: 8216: 8213: 8210: 8207: 8204: 8166: 8163: 8162: 8161: 8160: 8159: 8158: 8157: 8156: 8155: 8154: 8153: 8145: 8086: 8026: 8021: 8020: 8019: 8018: 8017: 8016: 8015: 8014: 8013: 8012: 8011: 8010: 8009: 7987: 7950: 7870: 7867: 7866: 7865: 7857: 7826: 7823: 7822: 7821: 7813: 7780: 7777: 7776: 7775: 7720: 7715: 7714: 7713: 7712: 7711: 7703: 7683: 7682: 7672: 7659: 7658: 7657: 7656: 7646: 7626: 7599: 7553: 7550: 7539: 7512: 7509: 7508: 7507: 7506: 7505: 7482: 7428: 7425: 7424: 7423: 7422: 7421: 7359: 7356: 7337: 7332: 7331: 7330: 7322: 7310:Crown Fountain 7302: 7257: 7254: 7235: 7234: 7233: 7232: 7231: 7230: 7229: 7228: 7220: 7194: 7193: 7192: 7189: 7174: 7164: 7163: 7162: 7161: 7160: 7159: 7151: 7141:Thanks, Moni! 7139: 7136: 7123: 7110: 7100: 7079: 7078: 7064: 7060: 7053: 7046: 7039: 7024: 7021: 7020: 7019: 7018: 7017: 7016: 7015: 7014: 7013: 7005: 6986: 6985: 6984: 6983: 6982: 6981: 6957: 6956: 6955: 6954: 6953: 6952: 6943: 6942: 6941: 6940: 6932: 6910: 6909: 6908: 6905: 6872: 6871: 6870: 6869: 6854: 6851: 6835: 6834: 6833: 6832: 6831: 6830: 6829: 6828: 6827: 6826: 6825: 6824: 6823: 6822: 6792: 6791: 6790: 6789: 6788: 6787: 6786: 6785: 6784: 6783: 6782: 6781: 6773: 6726: 6697: 6696: 6695: 6679: 6678: 6677: 6676: 6651: 6607: 6606: 6605: 6604: 6603: 6602: 6601: 6600: 6574: 6540: 6539: 6531: 6487: 6484: 6483: 6482: 6474: 6440: 6437: 6436: 6435: 6434: 6433: 6425: 6410: 6409: 6388: 6387: 6386: 6385: 6360: 6323: 6322: 6321: 6320: 6300: 6299: 6291: 6242: 6239: 6238: 6237: 6236: 6235: 6234: 6233: 6225: 6189: 6165: 6146: 6113:Empire Galahad 6101: 6098: 6097: 6096: 6095: 6094: 6072: 6023: 6018: 6017: 6016: 6008: 5996: 5995: 5994: 5991:useful article 5983: 5970: 5969: 5964: 5963: 5951: 5950: 5914: 5911: 5910: 5909: 5901: 5865: 5862: 5842: 5839: 5838: 5837: 5803: 5800: 5799: 5798: 5797: 5796: 5795: 5794: 5793: 5792: 5769: 5730: 5684: 5681: 5680: 5679: 5671: 5637: 5634: 5633: 5632: 5631: 5630: 5629: 5628: 5627: 5626: 5625: 5624: 5623: 5622: 5621: 5620: 5619: 5618: 5617: 5616: 5608: 5570: 5544: 5543: 5542: 5541: 5540: 5539: 5538: 5537: 5536: 5535: 5534: 5533: 5501: 5500: 5499: 5498: 5497: 5496: 5495: 5494: 5493: 5492: 5464: 5463: 5462: 5461: 5460: 5459: 5458: 5457: 5396: 5361: 5356: 5355: 5354: 5346: 5297: 5294: 5293: 5292: 5291: 5290: 5268: 5214: 5213:Lack of source 5211: 5210: 5209: 5201: 5161: 5158: 5157: 5156: 5155: 5154: 5138: 5137: 5129: 5112: 5071: 5068: 5067: 5066: 5058: 5048:, by the way. 5041: 5040: 5032: 4979: 4976: 4975: 4974: 4973: 4972: 4964: 4917: 4914: 4913: 4912: 4911: 4910: 4888: 4853: 4850: 4849: 4848: 4840: 4807: 4804: 4782: 4781: 4780: 4779: 4778: 4777: 4776: 4775: 4774: 4773: 4772: 4771: 4742: 4741: 4740: 4739: 4738: 4737: 4736: 4735: 4734: 4733: 4725: 4687: 4649: 4609: 4606: 4605: 4604: 4603: 4602: 4580: 4549: 4548: 4547: 4546: 4545: 4544: 4536: 4512: 4499: 4498: 4490: 4476: 4466: 4460: 4425: 4422: 4421: 4420: 4419: 4418: 4417: 4416: 4415: 4414: 4413: 4412: 4389: 4388: 4387: 4386: 4385: 4384: 4383: 4382: 4374: 4362:modus operandi 4339: 4338: 4337: 4336: 4335: 4334: 4326: 4311: 4305: 4280:Mazer v. Stein 4251: 4248: 4235: 4221: 4218: 4215: 4214: 4193:The Bookkeeper 4181: 4180: 4175: 4173: 4162: 4159: 4150: 4137: 4136: 4135: 4134: 4133: 4132: 4113: 4112: 4111: 4110: 4085: 4084: 4083: 4082: 4081: 4080: 4061: 4060: 4059: 4058: 4040: 4039: 4006: 4005:time consuming 4000: 3999: 3998: 3997: 3996: 3995: 3994: 3986: 3952: 3893: 3890: 3889: 3888: 3887: 3886: 3864: 3832: 3829: 3828: 3827: 3826: 3825: 3824: 3823: 3822: 3821: 3813: 3758: 3719: 3713: 3712: 3711: 3710: 3709: 3701: 3678: 3677: 3644: 3641: 3640: 3639: 3638: 3637: 3636: 3635: 3616: 3615: 3614: 3613: 3596: 3595: 3594: 3593: 3585: 3544: 3541: 3540: 3539: 3538: 3537: 3515: 3453: 3450: 3449: 3448: 3447: 3446: 3424: 3384: 3383: 3382: 3381: 3380: 3379: 3378: 3377: 3350: 3315: 3259: 3258: 3257: 3256: 3255: 3254: 3240: 3218: 3168:Samuel Johnson 3163: 3161:Samuel Johnson 3158: 3157: 3156: 3155: 3154: 3153: 3152: 3151: 3150: 3142: 3105: 3072: 3060: 3059: 3058: 3057: 3056: 3055: 3054: 3053: 3052: 3051: 3050: 3049: 3048: 3047: 3046: 3045: 3044: 3043: 3035: 3002: 3001: 3000: 2999: 2998: 2997: 2996: 2995: 2994: 2993: 2992: 2991: 2990: 2989: 2988: 2987: 2957: 2956: 2955: 2954: 2953: 2952: 2951: 2950: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2946: 2945: 2944: 2936: 2910: 2909: 2908: 2907: 2906: 2905: 2904: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2900: 2899: 2874: 2873: 2872: 2871: 2870: 2869: 2868: 2867: 2866: 2865: 2857: 2831: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2826: 2825: 2824: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2786: 2758: 2757: 2756: 2755: 2733: 2732: 2724: 2662: 2659: 2658: 2657: 2649: 2610: 2609: 2601: 2575: 2574: 2573: 2572: 2539: 2499: 2498: 2459: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2450: 2449: 2448: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2419: 2418: 2410: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2356: 2344: 2343: 2336: 2330: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2307: 2274: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2254: 2253: 2229: 2228: 2200: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2176: 2175: 2150: 2149: 2148: 2147: 2087: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2081: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2058: 2042: 1927: 1898: 1890:Crown Fountain 1870: 1852: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1836: 1835: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1754: 1640: 1568:Crown Fountain 1559: 1556: 1443: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1426: 1392: 1382:) would work? 1350: 1347: 1346: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1321: 1267: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1254: 1194: 1192:PNS Behr Paima 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1165: 1164: 1141: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1114: 1065: 1064: 1059: 1054: 1049: 1044: 1034: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1007: 985: 973: 972: 971: 966: 961: 956: 951: 946: 929: 913: 912: 911: 910: 909: 908: 907: 906: 905: 904: 903: 902: 901: 900: 899: 898: 874: 840: 839: 838: 837: 836: 835: 834: 833: 832: 831: 830: 829: 803: 777: 738: 720: 712: 676: 647: 644: 643: 642: 641: 640: 624: 623: 615: 603: 597: 588: 563: 558: 557: 556: 555: 554: 553: 552: 544: 500: 479: 451: 448: 431: 426: 425: 424: 423: 422: 421: 420: 398: 397: 396: 395: 387: 363: 362: 361: 360: 318: 315: 314: 313: 305: 271:The Bookkeeper 259: 254: 231: 228: 227: 226: 225: 224: 223: 222: 221: 220: 194: 156: 115: 112: 111: 110: 102: 61: 58: 56: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 12668: 12654: 12650: 12646: 12645: 12640: 12633: 12632: 12625: 12621: 12617: 12613: 12612: 12611: 12610: 12607: 12603: 12599: 12592: 12591: 12590: 12589: 12585: 12581: 12577: 12572: 12570: 12566: 12562: 12548: 12544: 12540: 12536: 12532: 12531: 12530: 12527: 12521: 12520: 12519: 12518: 12514: 12510: 12506: 12501: 12499: 12498:Julia Alvarez 12494: 12486: 12485: 12482: 12478: 12474: 12473: 12457: 12453: 12449: 12442: 12438: 12437: 12436: 12432: 12428: 12421: 12417: 12416: 12415: 12411: 12407: 12400: 12396: 12395: 12394: 12393: 12389: 12385: 12378: 12368: 12367: 12363: 12359: 12351: 12348: 12345: 12342: 12339: 12335: 12332: 12329: 12326: 12325: 12324: 12319: 12314: 12313: 12309: 12305: 12298: 12289: 12285: 12281: 12277: 12276: 12275: 12271: 12267: 12265: 12264: 12256: 12255: 12254: 12253: 12249: 12245: 12241: 12234:OTRS screwup? 12227: 12223: 12219: 12214: 12213: 12212: 12208: 12204: 12202: 12201: 12193: 12189: 12184: 12179: 12174: 12171: 12166: 12161: 12158: 12157: 12155: 12154: 12153: 12152: 12148: 12144: 12135: 12109: 12106: 12104: 12103:sephiroth bcr 12097: 12093: 12092: 12091: 12088: 12086: 12085:sephiroth bcr 12080: 12076: 12075: 12074: 12070: 12066: 12064: 12063: 12056: 12052: 12051: 12050: 12047: 12045: 12044:sephiroth bcr 12039: 12035: 12031: 12027: 12026: 12025: 12021: 12017: 12015: 12014: 12007: 12003: 12002: 12001: 11998: 11996: 11995:sephiroth bcr 11990: 11989: 11988: 11984: 11980: 11978: 11977: 11970: 11969: 11968: 11965: 11963: 11962:sephiroth bcr 11957: 11956: 11955: 11952: 11950: 11949:sephiroth bcr 11944: 11943: 11942: 11938: 11934: 11932: 11931: 11923: 11919: 11915: 11911: 11910: 11909: 11908: 11905: 11903: 11902:sephiroth bcr 11897: 11896:its talk page 11893: 11886: 11881: 11880: 11876: 11872: 11859: 11858: 11854: 11850: 11846: 11832: 11827: 11821: 11813: 11808: 11807: 11806: 11802: 11798: 11796: 11795: 11785: 11778: 11774: 11770: 11767: 11766: 11765: 11764: 11759: 11753: 11745: 11739: 11736:kosher? The 11735: 11731: 11730:Stephen Crane 11724: 11717: 11713: 11709: 11707: 11706: 11699: 11698: 11697: 11696: 11692: 11688: 11684: 11680: 11668: 11664: 11660: 11658: 11657: 11649: 11648:official site 11645: 11644: 11643: 11642: 11638: 11634: 11627: 11622: 11620: 11612: 11603: 11599: 11595: 11591: 11590: 11589: 11585: 11581: 11579: 11578: 11570: 11566: 11565: 11564: 11563: 11559: 11555: 11548: 11539: 11535: 11531: 11527: 11526: 11525: 11521: 11517: 11515: 11514: 11507: 11503: 11499: 11495: 11494: 11493: 11492: 11488: 11484: 11480: 11476: 11472: 11468: 11458: 11457: 11454: 11448: 11444: 11440: 11436: 11435: 11420: 11416: 11412: 11405: 11404: 11403: 11399: 11395: 11393: 11392: 11385: 11381: 11377: 11376: 11375: 11374: 11370: 11366: 11354: 11350: 11346: 11339: 11338: 11337: 11333: 11329: 11327: 11326: 11319: 11318: 11317: 11316: 11312: 11308: 11297: 11284: 11279: 11273: 11272: 11263: 11262: 11261: 11260: 11259: 11258: 11257: 11256: 11249: 11245: 11241: 11239: 11238: 11231: 11227: 11223: 11222: 11221: 11216: 11210: 11209: 11200: 11199: 11198: 11194: 11190: 11188: 11187: 11180: 11175: 11171: 11168: 11165: 11162: 11161: 11159: 11155: 11151: 11147: 11146: 11145: 11144: 11139: 11133: 11132: 11123: 11111: 11107: 11103: 11098: 11097: 11096: 11087: 11086: 11082: 11078: 11064: 11060: 11056: 11054: 11053: 11046: 11045: 11044: 11043: 11042: 11041: 11040: 11039: 11032: 11028: 11024: 11020: 11019: 11018: 11017: 11016: 11015: 11010: 11006: 11002: 11000: 10999: 10988: 10987: 10986: 10985: 10984: 10983: 10979: 10975: 10970: 10961: 10957: 10953: 10949: 10945: 10944: 10941: 10938: 10933: 10928: 10923:Raining stars 10918: 10914: 10910: 10908: 10907: 10900: 10896: 10892: 10891: 10890: 10889: 10885: 10881: 10877: 10861: 10857: 10853: 10851: 10850: 10843: 10838: 10837: 10836: 10832: 10828: 10823: 10822: 10821: 10817: 10813: 10811: 10810: 10803: 10802: 10801: 10800: 10796: 10792: 10788: 10784: 10764: 10760: 10756: 10752: 10748: 10747: 10746: 10745: 10744: 10743: 10742: 10741: 10740: 10739: 10728: 10724: 10720: 10718: 10717: 10709: 10708: 10707: 10703: 10699: 10695: 10694: 10693: 10692: 10691: 10690: 10689: 10688: 10681: 10677: 10673: 10671: 10670: 10663: 10659: 10658: 10657: 10653: 10649: 10645: 10642: 10638: 10637: 10636: 10635: 10624: 10620: 10616: 10612: 10611: 10610: 10609: 10608: 10607: 10606: 10605: 10604: 10603: 10592: 10588: 10584: 10582: 10581: 10574: 10571:and choose a 10570: 10566: 10565: 10564: 10560: 10556: 10552: 10551: 10550: 10549: 10548: 10547: 10546: 10545: 10538: 10534: 10530: 10528: 10527: 10520: 10517: 10516: 10515: 10514: 10513: 10512: 10507: 10503: 10499: 10495: 10494: 10493: 10492: 10487: 10483: 10479: 10475: 10474: 10473: 10472: 10471: 10470: 10466: 10462: 10453: 10449: 10445: 10441: 10440: 10439: 10438: 10435: 10431: 10427: 10425: 10424: 10417: 10413: 10412: 10411: 10409: 10405: 10401: 10397: 10384: 10380: 10376: 10374: 10373: 10366: 10362: 10361: 10360: 10356: 10352: 10348: 10347: 10346: 10345: 10344: 10343: 10336: 10332: 10328: 10326: 10325: 10318: 10314: 10310: 10306: 10305: 10304: 10303: 10302: 10301: 10300: 10299: 10295: 10291: 10287: 10278: 10275: 10271: 10270: 10269: 10268: 10267: 10266: 10262: 10258: 10251: 10242: 10239: 10231: 10225: 10224: 10223: 10219: 10215: 10213: 10212: 10204: 10203: 10202: 10201: 10198: 10190: 10184: 10180: 10176: 10172: 10168: 10156: 10152: 10148: 10146: 10145: 10138: 10137: 10136: 10135: 10130: 10124: 10122: 10120: 10111: 10099: 10095: 10091: 10089: 10088: 10081: 10077: 10076: 10071: 10067: 10063: 10056: 10052: 10048: 10047: 10044: 10041: 10036: 10031: 10019: 10015: 10011: 10007: 10006: 10005: 10001: 9997: 9995: 9994: 9987: 9983: 9982: 9981: 9980: 9976: 9972: 9968: 9964: 9955: 9954: 9951: 9950: 9938: 9931: 9916: 9912: 9908: 9906: 9905: 9898: 9897: 9896: 9892: 9888: 9881: 9880: 9879: 9875: 9871: 9867: 9866: 9865: 9861: 9857: 9852: 9850: 9845: 9844: 9843: 9839: 9835: 9833: 9832: 9824: 9823: 9822: 9821: 9817: 9813: 9809: 9797: 9793: 9789: 9787: 9786: 9779: 9778: 9777: 9776: 9772: 9768: 9744: 9740: 9736: 9729: 9728: 9727: 9726: 9723: 9719: 9715: 9713: 9712: 9704: 9703: 9702: 9701: 9698: 9694: 9690: 9682: 9681: 9680: 9679: 9676: 9672: 9668: 9666: 9665: 9658: 9657: 9656: 9655: 9652: 9648: 9644: 9637: 9633: 9632: 9631: 9630: 9627: 9623: 9619: 9617: 9616: 9609: 9605: 9602: 9601: 9598: 9597: 9596: 9595: 9591: 9587: 9581: 9564: 9560: 9556: 9554: 9553: 9546: 9545: 9544: 9540: 9536: 9529: 9528: 9527: 9523: 9519: 9517: 9516: 9508: 9504: 9498: 9497: 9496: 9492: 9488: 9481: 9477: 9476: 9475: 9474: 9469: 9463: 9461: 9459: 9435: 9431: 9427: 9420: 9419: 9418: 9414: 9410: 9408: 9407: 9400: 9397: 9396: 9395: 9391: 9387: 9379: 9378: 9377: 9374: 9370: 9366: 9365: 9364: 9363: 9362: 9361: 9360: 9356: 9352: 9344: 9338: 9334: 9330: 9328: 9327: 9320: 9316: 9312: 9311: 9310: 9307: 9302: 9301: 9300: 9296: 9292: 9290: 9289: 9282: 9278: 9277: 9276: 9275: 9272: 9268: 9264: 9254: 9253: 9250: 9245: 9229: 9225: 9221: 9214: 9213: 9212: 9208: 9204: 9202: 9201: 9194: 9193: 9190: 9186: 9181: 9175: 9173: 9171: 9162: 9161: 9160: 9156: 9152: 9150: 9149: 9142: 9141: 9140: 9139: 9134: 9128: 9126: 9124: 9115: 9104: 9100: 9096: 9094: 9093: 9086: 9082: 9081: 9080: 9079: 9075: 9071: 9067: 9062: 9056: 9049: 9042: 9035: 9031: 9021: 9020: 9017: 9016: 9011: 9010: 9005: 8989: 8986: 8983: 8981: 8972: 8968: 8964: 8963: 8960: 8957: 8952: 8947: 8933: 8929: 8925: 8923: 8922: 8914: 8909: 8906: 8902: 8901: 8900: 8899: 8898: 8897: 8892: 8887: 8881: 8879: 8877: 8868: 8863: 8862: 8861: 8860: 8857: 8853: 8849: 8847: 8846: 8839: 8835: 8829: 8828: 8824: 8821: 8820: 8815: 8811: 8810: 8806: 8803: 8802: 8801: 8800: 8796: 8792: 8791: 8790: 8788: 8784: 8778: 8777: 8772: 8766: 8764: 8762: 8753: 8749: 8736: 8732: 8728: 8724: 8722: 8718: 8714: 8710: 8705: 8704: 8703: 8702: 8699: 8695: 8691: 8689: 8688: 8681: 8676: 8673: 8671:photographs). 8669: 8664: 8660: 8657: 8656: 8654: 8653: 8652: 8651: 8647: 8643: 8639: 8632: 8629: 8628: 8627: 8622: 8619: 8617: 8614: 8612: 8609: 8607: 8604: 8602: 8599: 8597: 8594: 8592: 8589: 8587: 8584: 8583: 8582: 8580: 8568: 8564: 8560: 8558: 8557: 8550: 8549: 8548: 8547: 8543: 8539: 8525: 8524: 8521: 8519: 8517: 8510: 8495: 8492: 8484: 8477: 8476: 8475: 8474: 8473: 8469: 8465: 8463: 8462: 8455: 8451: 8450: 8449: 8446: 8438: 8432: 8427: 8426: 8425: 8421: 8417: 8415: 8414: 8407: 8406:my typewriter 8403: 8402: 8401: 8400: 8397: 8389: 8382: 8372: 8371: 8367: 8363: 8356: 8352: 8340: 8336: 8332: 8330: 8329: 8322: 8318: 8313: 8308: 8307: 8306: 8305: 8301: 8297: 8293: 8277: 8273: 8269: 8267: 8266: 8259: 8258: 8257: 8253: 8249: 8242: 8241: 8240: 8236: 8232: 8230: 8229: 8222: 8217: 8214: 8211: 8208: 8205: 8202: 8201: 8199: 8195: 8190: 8189: 8188: 8187: 8183: 8179: 8172: 8152: 8148: 8144: 8142: 8141: 8134: 8130: 8129: 8128: 8124: 8120: 8116: 8112: 8111: 8110: 8106: 8102: 8095: 8094: 8093: 8089: 8085: 8083: 8082: 8075: 8070: 8069: 8068: 8064: 8060: 8053: 8050: 8049: 8048: 8047: 8043: 8039: 8032: 8025: 8008: 8004: 8000: 7996: 7995: 7994: 7990: 7986: 7984: 7983: 7976: 7975: 7974: 7970: 7966: 7959: 7958: 7957: 7953: 7949: 7947: 7946: 7939: 7935: 7931: 7927: 7923: 7919: 7918: 7917: 7913: 7909: 7905: 7904: 7903: 7899: 7895: 7888: 7887: 7886: 7885: 7881: 7877: 7864: 7860: 7856: 7854: 7853: 7846: 7845: 7844: 7843: 7839: 7835: 7831: 7820: 7816: 7812: 7810: 7809: 7802: 7801: 7800: 7799: 7795: 7791: 7785: 7774: 7769: 7763: 7761: 7759: 7750: 7749: 7748: 7747: 7742: 7736: 7734: 7732: 7719: 7710: 7706: 7702: 7700: 7699: 7691: 7687: 7686: 7685: 7684: 7681: 7678: 7677: 7669: 7665: 7661: 7660: 7655: 7652: 7651: 7643: 7639: 7635: 7634: 7633: 7629: 7625: 7623: 7622: 7615: 7611: 7610: 7609: 7608: 7605: 7604: 7596: 7592: 7588: 7584: 7579: 7575: 7571: 7567: 7563: 7559: 7549: 7548: 7543: 7537: 7532: 7529: 7526: 7522: 7518: 7504: 7500: 7496: 7491: 7490: 7489: 7485: 7481: 7479: 7478: 7471: 7466: 7462: 7457: 7456: 7455: 7454: 7450: 7446: 7442: 7438: 7434: 7420: 7416: 7412: 7405: 7401: 7400: 7399: 7395: 7391: 7384: 7380: 7379: 7378: 7377: 7373: 7369: 7365: 7355: 7354: 7350: 7346: 7336: 7329: 7325: 7321: 7319: 7318: 7311: 7307: 7303: 7300: 7299: 7298: 7297: 7292: 7288: 7284: 7280: 7276: 7271: 7267: 7263: 7253: 7252: 7248: 7244: 7240: 7227: 7223: 7219: 7217: 7216: 7209: 7208: 7207: 7203: 7199: 7195: 7190: 7187: 7183: 7179: 7175: 7172: 7171: 7170: 7169: 7168: 7167: 7166: 7165: 7158: 7154: 7150: 7148: 7147: 7140: 7137: 7131: 7124: 7118: 7111: 7108: 7104: 7101: 7098: 7093: 7090: 7089: 7087: 7083: 7082: 7081: 7080: 7077: 7073: 7069: 7065: 7061: 7058: 7054: 7051: 7047: 7044: 7040: 7037: 7033: 7032: 7031: 7028: 7012: 7008: 7004: 7002: 7001: 6994: 6993: 6992: 6991: 6990: 6989: 6988: 6987: 6980: 6976: 6972: 6967: 6963: 6962: 6961: 6960: 6959: 6958: 6949: 6948: 6947: 6946: 6945: 6944: 6939: 6935: 6931: 6929: 6928: 6917: 6911: 6906: 6903: 6898: 6897: 6895: 6891: 6890: 6889: 6888: 6887: 6886: 6882: 6878: 6866: 6865: 6864: 6863: 6862: 6860: 6850: 6849: 6845: 6841: 6821: 6817: 6813: 6806: 6805: 6804: 6803: 6802: 6801: 6800: 6799: 6798: 6797: 6796: 6795: 6794: 6793: 6780: 6776: 6772: 6770: 6769: 6761: 6758:verbiage is " 6757: 6753: 6752: 6751: 6747: 6743: 6735: 6734: 6733: 6729: 6725: 6723: 6722: 6714: 6713: 6712: 6708: 6704: 6698: 6692: 6688: 6687: 6685: 6684: 6683: 6682: 6681: 6680: 6675: 6671: 6667: 6660: 6659: 6658: 6654: 6650: 6648: 6647: 6640: 6636: 6632: 6631: 6627: 6626: 6625: 6624: 6620: 6616: 6599: 6595: 6591: 6583: 6582: 6581: 6577: 6573: 6571: 6570: 6562: 6561: 6560: 6556: 6552: 6544: 6543: 6542: 6541: 6538: 6534: 6530: 6528: 6527: 6520: 6515: 6511: 6510: 6509: 6508: 6504: 6500: 6493: 6481: 6477: 6473: 6471: 6470: 6463: 6462: 6461: 6460: 6457: 6456: 6451: 6449: 6432: 6428: 6424: 6422: 6421: 6414: 6413: 6412: 6411: 6408: 6404: 6400: 6393: 6390: 6389: 6384: 6380: 6376: 6369: 6368: 6367: 6363: 6359: 6357: 6356: 6349: 6346: 6345: 6344: 6343: 6339: 6335: 6328: 6319: 6315: 6311: 6304: 6303: 6302: 6301: 6298: 6294: 6290: 6288: 6287: 6280: 6277: 6276: 6275: 6274: 6270: 6266: 6259: 6254: 6252: 6248: 6232: 6228: 6224: 6222: 6221: 6213: 6212: 6211: 6207: 6203: 6198: 6197: 6196: 6192: 6188: 6186: 6185: 6178: 6174: 6170: 6166: 6163: 6161: 6157: 6153: 6147: 6144: 6141: 6138: 6134: 6133: 6132: 6131: 6127: 6123: 6119: 6115: 6114: 6107: 6093: 6089: 6085: 6081: 6080: 6079: 6075: 6071: 6069: 6068: 6061: 6057: 6053: 6049: 6044: 6043: 6042: 6041: 6037: 6033: 6029: 6022: 6015: 6011: 6007: 6005: 6004: 5997: 5992: 5988: 5984: 5981: 5977: 5974: 5973: 5972: 5971: 5966: 5965: 5961: 5959: 5953: 5952: 5949:the legalese: 5948: 5944: 5940: 5935: 5934: 5933: 5932: 5928: 5924: 5920: 5908: 5904: 5900: 5898: 5897: 5890: 5889: 5888: 5887: 5883: 5879: 5875: 5871: 5861: 5860: 5856: 5852: 5848: 5836: 5832: 5828: 5824: 5823: 5822: 5821: 5817: 5813: 5809: 5791: 5787: 5783: 5778: 5777: 5776: 5772: 5768: 5766: 5765: 5757: 5756: 5755: 5751: 5747: 5743: 5739: 5738: 5737: 5733: 5729: 5727: 5726: 5719: 5714: 5713: 5712: 5711: 5707: 5703: 5699: 5695: 5690: 5678: 5674: 5670: 5668: 5667: 5659: 5658: 5657: 5656: 5652: 5648: 5644: 5615: 5611: 5607: 5605: 5604: 5597: 5596: 5595: 5591: 5587: 5579: 5578: 5577: 5573: 5569: 5567: 5566: 5558: 5557: 5556: 5555: 5554: 5553: 5552: 5551: 5550: 5549: 5548: 5547: 5546: 5545: 5532: 5528: 5524: 5517: 5513: 5512: 5511: 5510: 5509: 5508: 5507: 5506: 5505: 5504: 5503: 5502: 5491: 5487: 5483: 5479: 5474: 5473: 5472: 5471: 5470: 5469: 5468: 5467: 5466: 5465: 5456: 5452: 5448: 5440: 5436: 5435: 5434: 5430: 5426: 5422: 5421: 5420: 5416: 5412: 5405: 5404: 5403: 5399: 5395: 5393: 5392: 5385: 5384: 5383: 5382: 5378: 5374: 5367: 5360: 5353: 5349: 5345: 5343: 5342: 5335: 5334: 5333: 5332: 5328: 5324: 5319: 5315: 5311: 5307: 5303: 5289: 5285: 5281: 5277: 5276: 5275: 5271: 5267: 5265: 5264: 5257: 5253: 5250: 5247: 5243: 5239: 5238: 5237: 5236: 5232: 5228: 5224: 5220: 5208: 5204: 5200: 5198: 5197: 5190: 5186: 5182: 5181: 5180: 5179: 5175: 5171: 5167: 5153: 5149: 5145: 5140: 5139: 5136: 5132: 5128: 5126: 5125: 5118: 5113: 5110: 5105: 5101: 5097: 5096: 5094: 5093: 5092: 5091: 5087: 5083: 5079: 5076: 5065: 5061: 5057: 5055: 5054: 5047: 5043: 5042: 5039: 5035: 5031: 5029: 5028: 5021: 5017: 5013: 5012: 5011: 5010: 5006: 5002: 4997: 4993: 4989: 4985: 4971: 4967: 4963: 4961: 4960: 4953: 4949: 4948: 4947: 4944: 4943: 4938: 4937: 4936: 4935: 4931: 4927: 4909: 4905: 4901: 4897: 4896: 4895: 4891: 4887: 4885: 4884: 4877: 4874: 4873: 4872: 4871: 4867: 4863: 4859: 4847: 4843: 4839: 4837: 4836: 4828: 4827: 4826: 4825: 4821: 4817: 4813: 4803: 4802: 4798: 4794: 4787: 4770: 4766: 4762: 4754: 4753: 4752: 4751: 4750: 4749: 4748: 4747: 4746: 4745: 4744: 4743: 4732: 4728: 4724: 4722: 4721: 4713: 4712: 4711: 4707: 4703: 4696: 4695: 4694: 4690: 4686: 4684: 4683: 4676: 4675: 4674: 4670: 4666: 4658: 4657: 4656: 4652: 4648: 4646: 4645: 4638: 4636: 4633: 4632: 4631: 4630: 4626: 4622: 4615: 4601: 4597: 4593: 4589: 4588: 4587: 4583: 4579: 4577: 4576: 4569: 4568: 4567: 4566: 4562: 4558: 4554: 4543: 4539: 4535: 4533: 4532: 4525: 4521: 4520: 4519: 4515: 4511: 4509: 4508: 4501: 4500: 4497: 4493: 4489: 4487: 4486: 4480: 4477: 4475: 4473: 4467: 4464: 4461: 4458: 4454: 4450: 4449: 4447: 4446: 4445: 4444: 4440: 4436: 4431: 4411: 4408: 4404: 4399: 4398: 4397: 4396: 4395: 4394: 4393: 4392: 4391: 4390: 4381: 4377: 4373: 4371: 4370: 4363: 4359: 4358: 4357: 4354: 4350: 4345: 4344: 4343: 4342: 4341: 4340: 4333: 4329: 4325: 4323: 4322: 4315: 4312: 4309: 4306: 4303: 4300: 4299: 4297: 4293: 4289: 4285: 4281: 4277: 4272: 4271: 4270: 4269: 4268: 4267: 4264: 4260: 4256: 4247: 4246: 4243: 4242: 4232: 4228: 4220:Re: Thank You 4213: 4210: 4206: 4205: 4204:of the Occult 4197: 4195: 4194: 4187: 4183: 4182: 4179: 4176: 4171: 4166: 4158: 4157: 4153: 4149: 4147: 4146: 4131: 4128: 4124: 4119: 4118: 4117: 4116: 4115: 4114: 4109: 4105: 4101: 4093: 4089: 4088: 4087: 4086: 4079: 4076: 4072: 4067: 4066: 4065: 4064: 4063: 4062: 4057: 4053: 4049: 4044: 4043: 4042: 4041: 4038: 4035: 4031: 4027: 4026: 4025: 4024: 4020: 4016: 4012: 4004: 3993: 3989: 3985: 3983: 3982: 3975: 3974: 3973: 3969: 3965: 3961: 3960: 3959: 3955: 3951: 3949: 3948: 3941: 3937: 3933: 3930: 3927: 3923: 3919: 3914: 3913: 3912: 3911: 3907: 3903: 3899: 3885: 3881: 3877: 3873: 3872: 3871: 3867: 3863: 3861: 3860: 3853: 3852: 3851: 3850: 3846: 3842: 3838: 3820: 3816: 3812: 3810: 3809: 3802: 3798: 3797: 3796: 3792: 3788: 3784: 3783: 3782: 3778: 3774: 3767: 3766: 3765: 3761: 3757: 3755: 3754: 3747: 3743: 3739: 3738: 3737: 3736: 3732: 3728: 3724: 3718: 3715:Sad loss for 3708: 3704: 3700: 3698: 3697: 3690: 3689: 3682: 3681: 3680: 3679: 3676: 3672: 3668: 3652: 3647: 3646: 3634: 3630: 3626: 3622: 3621: 3620: 3619: 3618: 3617: 3612: 3609: 3605: 3600: 3599: 3598: 3597: 3592: 3588: 3584: 3582: 3581: 3574: 3570: 3566: 3565: 3564: 3563: 3562: 3561: 3557: 3553: 3549: 3536: 3532: 3528: 3525:Many thanks. 3524: 3523: 3522: 3518: 3514: 3512: 3511: 3504: 3500: 3493: 3486: 3482: 3481: 3480: 3479: 3475: 3471: 3467: 3463: 3459: 3445: 3441: 3437: 3433: 3432: 3431: 3427: 3423: 3421: 3420: 3412: 3411: 3410: 3409: 3405: 3401: 3397: 3393: 3389: 3376: 3372: 3368: 3364: 3359: 3358: 3357: 3353: 3349: 3347: 3346: 3338: 3337: 3336: 3332: 3328: 3324: 3323: 3322: 3318: 3314: 3312: 3311: 3304: 3300: 3299: 3298: 3297: 3293: 3289: 3285: 3280: 3276: 3272: 3268: 3263: 3253: 3249: 3245: 3241: 3239: 3235: 3231: 3227: 3226: 3225: 3221: 3217: 3215: 3214: 3207: 3203: 3202: 3201: 3197: 3193: 3189: 3185: 3184: 3183: 3182: 3178: 3174: 3169: 3162: 3149: 3145: 3141: 3139: 3138: 3131: 3130: 3129: 3125: 3121: 3116: 3115: 3114: 3109: 3103: 3098: 3097: 3096: 3092: 3088: 3084: 3083: 3082: 3081: 3076: 3070: 3065: 3042: 3038: 3034: 3032: 3031: 3024: 3020: 3019: 3018: 3017: 3016: 3015: 3014: 3013: 3012: 3011: 3010: 3009: 3008: 3007: 3006: 3005: 3004: 3003: 2986: 2982: 2978: 2973: 2972: 2971: 2970: 2969: 2968: 2967: 2966: 2965: 2964: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2960: 2959: 2958: 2943: 2939: 2935: 2933: 2932: 2924: 2923: 2922: 2921: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2912: 2911: 2898: 2894: 2890: 2886: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2876: 2875: 2864: 2860: 2856: 2854: 2853: 2846: 2845:significantly 2841: 2840: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2823: 2819: 2815: 2811: 2807: 2806: 2805: 2804: 2803: 2802: 2801: 2800: 2793: 2789: 2785: 2783: 2782: 2771: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2760: 2759: 2754: 2750: 2746: 2741: 2740:Village Voice 2737: 2736: 2735: 2734: 2731: 2727: 2723: 2721: 2720: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2705: 2701: 2697: 2692: 2690: 2688: 2682: 2677: 2675: 2672: 2671:Fred McDarrah 2668: 2656: 2652: 2648: 2646: 2645: 2637: 2633: 2632: 2631: 2630: 2626: 2622: 2615: 2608: 2604: 2600: 2598: 2597: 2589: 2588: 2587: 2585: 2581: 2571: 2567: 2563: 2556: 2552: 2548: 2547: 2546: 2542: 2538: 2536: 2535: 2528: 2523: 2519: 2518: 2517: 2516: 2512: 2508: 2497: 2494: 2486: 2480: 2479: 2478: 2477: 2473: 2469: 2465: 2447: 2443: 2439: 2435: 2431: 2430: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2426: 2425: 2424: 2417: 2413: 2409: 2407: 2406: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2395: 2394: 2389: 2386: 2378: 2372: 2368: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2359: 2355: 2353: 2352: 2341: 2337: 2334: 2331: 2328: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2314: 2310: 2306: 2304: 2303: 2296: 2288: 2280: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2276: 2275: 2270: 2266: 2262: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2252: 2249: 2241: 2235: 2231: 2230: 2227: 2224: 2216: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2197: 2196: 2189: 2185: 2174: 2171: 2163: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2146: 2142: 2138: 2134: 2130: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2126: 2125: 2122: 2114: 2107: 2104: 2100: 2096: 2092: 2069: 2066: 2065: 2055: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2045: 2041: 2039: 2038: 2030: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2018: 2014: 2010: 2006: 2002: 1997: 1993: 1991: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1979: 1975: 1971: 1967: 1963: 1958: 1954: 1953: 1952:André Kertész 1948: 1947: 1942: 1941: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1924: 1923: 1916: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1906: 1905: 1895: 1891: 1887: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1878: 1877: 1867: 1862: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1855: 1851: 1849: 1848: 1826: 1821: 1817: 1813: 1809: 1805: 1800: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1789: 1785: 1781: 1777: 1773: 1768: 1763: 1762: 1761: 1757: 1753: 1751: 1750: 1743: 1742:WP:OTHERSTUFF 1739: 1735: 1731: 1728: 1727: 1726: 1721: 1717: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1700: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1688: 1684: 1680: 1676: 1672: 1667: 1663: 1660: 1657: 1653: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1643: 1639: 1637: 1636: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1622: 1618: 1614: 1610: 1606: 1601: 1597: 1596: 1595: 1592: 1588: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1569: 1565: 1555: 1554: 1549: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1516: 1512: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1497: 1493: 1489: 1485: 1481: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1452:WP:CHIBOTCATS 1449: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1423: 1422: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1395: 1391: 1389: 1388: 1381: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1367: 1366: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1330: 1329: 1328: 1324: 1320: 1318: 1317: 1307: 1297: 1296:PD-USGov-NOAA 1291:Ideally, the 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1282: 1278: 1273: 1261: 1257: 1253: 1251: 1250: 1243: 1239: 1233: 1229: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1211: 1204: 1200: 1193: 1184: 1180: 1176: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1163: 1159: 1155: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1144: 1140: 1138: 1137: 1130: 1129:give out fish 1121: 1117: 1113: 1111: 1110: 1103: 1102: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1086: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1063: 1060: 1058: 1055: 1053: 1050: 1048: 1045: 1043: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1026: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1006: 1002: 998: 994: 993: 992: 988: 984: 982: 981: 974: 970: 967: 965: 962: 960: 957: 955: 952: 950: 947: 945: 942: 941: 939: 938: 937: 936: 932: 928: 926: 925: 918: 897: 893: 889: 885: 884: 883: 882: 881: 877: 873: 871: 870: 859: 852: 851: 850: 849: 848: 847: 846: 845: 844: 843: 842: 841: 827: 823: 819: 818: 817: 813: 809: 804: 802: 798: 794: 790: 786: 785: 784: 780: 776: 774: 773: 766: 761: 757: 756: 755: 751: 747: 743: 739: 737: 733: 729: 725: 721: 719: 715: 711: 709: 708: 700: 699: 698: 694: 690: 685: 684: 683: 679: 675: 673: 672: 665: 664: 663: 662: 658: 654: 639: 635: 631: 626: 625: 622: 618: 614: 612: 611: 604: 602: 598: 596: 592: 589: 586: 583: 582: 580: 579: 578: 577: 573: 569: 562: 551: 547: 543: 541: 540: 533: 532: 531: 527: 523: 517: 512: 509: 508: 507: 503: 499: 497: 496: 489: 485: 480: 478: 475: 474: 473: 472: 468: 464: 457: 447: 446: 442: 438: 430: 419: 415: 411: 404: 403: 402: 401: 400: 399: 394: 390: 386: 384: 383: 376: 372: 367: 366: 365: 364: 357: 356: 355: 351: 347: 340: 339: 338: 337: 333: 329: 323: 312: 308: 304: 302: 301: 294: 293: 292: 291: 288: 284: 283: 282:of the Occult 275: 273: 272: 265: 258: 257:Janet Jackson 253: 252: 248: 244: 237: 219: 215: 211: 207: 203: 202: 201: 197: 193: 191: 190: 183: 182: 181: 177: 173: 169: 165: 164: 163: 159: 155: 153: 152: 145: 141: 137: 133: 132: 131: 130: 126: 122: 109: 105: 101: 99: 98: 91: 87: 83: 82: 81: 80: 76: 72: 67: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 12648: 12642: 12573: 12568: 12558: 12502: 12495: 12492: 12470: 12469: 12374: 12358:Brianboulton 12355: 12340:, pub. 1913. 12337: 12322: 12301: 12284:send/receive 12262: 12261: 12248:send/receive 12237: 12218:Brianboulton 12199: 12198: 12187: 12182: 12177: 12169: 12143:Brianboulton 12139: 12134:Rhinemaidens 12102: 12084: 12061: 12060: 12054: 12043: 12012: 12011: 11994: 11975: 11974: 11961: 11948: 11929: 11928: 11901: 11889: 11865: 11842: 11793: 11792: 11776: 11772: 11727: 11704: 11703: 11676: 11673:OTRS tickets 11655: 11654: 11630: 11618: 11616: 11611:Rhinemaidens 11576: 11575: 11551: 11534:send/receive 11512: 11511: 11487:send/receive 11464: 11439:User:Protonk 11432: 11430: 11427:Take a look? 11390: 11389: 11383: 11359: 11324: 11323: 11300: 11270: 11236: 11235: 11207: 11185: 11184: 11157: 11130: 11119: 11093: 11073: 11051: 11050: 10997: 10996: 10966: 10939: 10905: 10904: 10894: 10880:Brianboulton 10873: 10848: 10847: 10808: 10807: 10780: 10715: 10714: 10668: 10667: 10579: 10578: 10573:free license 10525: 10524: 10458: 10422: 10421: 10393: 10371: 10370: 10323: 10322: 10312: 10308: 10284: 10254: 10210: 10209: 10164: 10143: 10142: 10118: 10117: 10107: 10086: 10085: 10079: 10042: 10010:Brianboulton 9992: 9991: 9971:Brianboulton 9961: 9941: 9934: 9903: 9902: 9847: 9830: 9829: 9805: 9784: 9783: 9764: 9710: 9709: 9663: 9662: 9614: 9613: 9607: 9578: 9551: 9550: 9514: 9513: 9479: 9457: 9456: 9450: 9405: 9404: 9398: 9325: 9324: 9318: 9287: 9286: 9280: 9266: 9262: 9260: 9241: 9199: 9198: 9169: 9168: 9147: 9146: 9122: 9121: 9112: 9091: 9090: 9063: 9050:writes that 9027: 9013: 9007: 9004:these images 9001: 8974: 8969:to become a 8958: 8920: 8919: 8912: 8904: 8875: 8874: 8844: 8843: 8779: 8760: 8759: 8746: 8686: 8685: 8662: 8635: 8625: 8576: 8555: 8554: 8531: 8516:Juliancolton 8513: 8460: 8459: 8412: 8411: 8380: 8378: 8348: 8327: 8326: 8321:acknowledges 8311: 8289: 8264: 8263: 8227: 8226: 8198:I brought up 8193: 8171:WP:COPYRIGHT 8168: 8139: 8138: 8132: 8080: 8079: 8028: 7981: 7980: 7944: 7943: 7872: 7851: 7850: 7828: 7807: 7806: 7782: 7757: 7756: 7730: 7729: 7722: 7697: 7696: 7671: 7645: 7636:OK, I added 7620: 7619: 7598: 7568:, and found 7555: 7527: 7514: 7476: 7475: 7469: 7430: 7361: 7339: 7316: 7315: 7306:defined term 7270:TonyTheTiger 7265: 7259: 7236: 7214: 7213: 7145: 7144: 7106: 7056: 7049: 7029: 7026: 6999: 6998: 6965: 6926: 6925: 6873: 6856: 6836: 6767: 6766: 6759: 6720: 6719: 6645: 6644: 6638: 6629: 6628: 6608: 6568: 6567: 6525: 6524: 6513: 6489: 6468: 6467: 6444: 6442: 6419: 6418: 6354: 6353: 6324: 6285: 6284: 6255: 6244: 6219: 6218: 6183: 6182: 6176: 6172: 6168: 6159: 6155: 6151: 6149: 6139: 6112: 6103: 6066: 6065: 6025: 6002: 6001: 5957: 5955: 5942: 5916: 5895: 5894: 5867: 5844: 5805: 5782:Brianboulton 5763: 5762: 5746:Brianboulton 5724: 5723: 5702:Brianboulton 5686: 5665: 5664: 5639: 5602: 5601: 5564: 5563: 5477: 5439:except this, 5390: 5389: 5363: 5340: 5339: 5299: 5262: 5261: 5248: 5216: 5195: 5194: 5163: 5123: 5122: 5104:The majority 5103: 5073: 5052: 5051: 5026: 5025: 4981: 4958: 4957: 4940: 4919: 4916:Image review 4900:Brianboulton 4882: 4881: 4862:Brianboulton 4855: 4834: 4833: 4809: 4783: 4719: 4718: 4681: 4680: 4643: 4642: 4611: 4574: 4573: 4550: 4530: 4529: 4506: 4505: 4484: 4483: 4478: 4468: 4427: 4368: 4367: 4361: 4360:That is our 4320: 4319: 4283: 4279: 4253: 4233: 4223: 4203: 4202: 4192: 4191: 4177: 4144: 4143: 4138: 4010: 4008: 4002: 3980: 3979: 3946: 3945: 3928: 3895: 3858: 3857: 3834: 3807: 3806: 3752: 3751: 3721: 3695: 3694: 3687: 3655:. Retrieved 3643:Translation? 3579: 3578: 3546: 3509: 3508: 3502: 3465: 3462:Irene (play) 3455: 3418: 3417: 3385: 3363:very curious 3344: 3343: 3309: 3308: 3264: 3260: 3212: 3211: 3165: 3136: 3135: 3061: 3029: 3028: 2930: 2929: 2851: 2850: 2844: 2780: 2779: 2739: 2718: 2717: 2693: 2686: 2680: 2678: 2664: 2661:Image advice 2643: 2642: 2635: 2611: 2595: 2594: 2582:, 2008-08-23 2576: 2550: 2533: 2532: 2526: 2500: 2461: 2433: 2404: 2403: 2370: 2350: 2349: 2345: 2321: 2301: 2300: 2294: 2194: 2193: 2181: 2089: 2056: 2036: 2035: 1996:TonyTheTiger 1987: 1957:TonyTheTiger 1950: 1944: 1943:(May 2007), 1938: 1921: 1920: 1896: 1868: 1846: 1845: 1841: 1799:TonyTheTiger 1767:TonyTheTiger 1748: 1747: 1733: 1729: 1699:TonyTheTiger 1666:TonyTheTiger 1658: 1652:SandyGeorgia 1634: 1633: 1600:TonyTheTiger 1579:TonyTheTiger 1561: 1527:TonyTheTiger 1445: 1420: 1419: 1386: 1385: 1374: 1352: 1315: 1314: 1269: 1248: 1247: 1241: 1231: 1213: 1206: 1205:. Cheers. -- 1196: 1135: 1134: 1126: 1108: 1107: 1066: 1036: 979: 978: 923: 922: 914: 868: 867: 771: 770: 764: 723: 706: 705: 670: 669: 649: 609: 608: 565: 538: 537: 494: 493: 476: 453: 433: 381: 380: 320: 299: 298: 281: 280: 270: 269: 261: 233: 188: 187: 150: 149: 144:direct to UK 117: 96: 95: 89: 71:Brianboulton 63: 55: 43: 37: 12641:This is an 12371:I guess ... 12132:Those **** 11738:JFK Library 11467:Harvey Milk 11148:No, it's a 10755:Redtigerxyz 10698:Redtigerxyz 10648:Redtigerxyz 10615:Redtigerxyz 10555:Redtigerxyz 10498:Redtigerxyz 10478:Redtigerxyz 10461:Redtigerxyz 10444:Redtigerxyz 10396:Redtigerxyz 10351:Redtigerxyz 10290:Redtigerxyz 10257:Redtigerxyz 10183:this plaque 9958:Image query 9066:review page 9048:User:Dr pda 8355:Frank Zappa 8076:now, too?) 7690:my response 7358:FAC revisit 7239:Harvey Milk 6859:Harvey Milk 5939:some things 5878:Ottava Rima 5683:More thanks 5217:Can we use 4992:Edward Said 4592:Wordbuilder 4557:Wordbuilder 3892:Odd license 3436:Ottava Rima 3400:Ottava Rima 3388:Ottava Rima 3367:Ottava Rima 3327:Ottava Rima 3288:Ottava Rima 3244:Ottava Rima 3230:Ottava Rima 3192:Ottava Rima 3173:Ottava Rima 3023:left a note 2295:if possible 1573:—Preceding 1375:significant 1017:Ottava Rima 888:Ottava Rima 808:Ottava Rima 793:Ottava Rima 746:Ottava Rima 728:Ottava Rima 689:Ottava Rima 653:Ottava Rima 264:peer review 230:Another one 36:This is an 12472:This photo 11784:PD-Because 11174:Circular 1 10317:WP:COPYREQ 8959:Thank You! 8913:everything 8454:transplant 8351:Cloud Gate 8119:Buckshot06 7999:JKBrooks85 7930:MOS:IMAGES 7908:JKBrooks85 7876:JKBrooks85 7830:This image 7558:TfD orphan 7366:. Thanks. 7287:WP:CHICAGO 7196:Thanks. -- 7107:definitely 6902:pixelation 6875:Thanks. -- 6279:I'm aiming 6173:reasonably 6056:MOS:IMAGES 5987:this image 5976:This image 5968:specifics: 5943:authorship 5827:Ferrylodge 5812:Ferrylodge 5643:Here it is 5225:. Thanks! 4806:Too funny! 3653:. BBC News 3573:landscapes 3499:long story 2013:WP:CHICAGO 1974:WP:CHICAGO 1816:WP:CHICAGO 1784:WP:CHICAGO 1716:WP:CHICAGO 1683:WP:CHICAGO 1617:WP:CHICAGO 1544:WP:CHICAGO 1468:WP:CHICAGO 1442:WP:CHICAGO 1306:PD-because 1272:this image 822:that image 601:MOS:IMAGES 12263:Эlcobbola 12200:Эlcobbola 12062:Эlcobbola 12013:Эlcobbola 12008:says. ;P 11976:Эlcobbola 11930:Эlcobbola 11794:Эlcobbola 11769:This page 11705:Эlcobbola 11656:Эlcobbola 11577:Эlcobbola 11513:Эlcobbola 11479:WP:Update 11475:WP:Update 11461:WP:Update 11391:Эlcobbola 11380:Elcobbola 11325:Эlcobbola 11237:Эlcobbola 11230:COM:UNDEL 11186:Эlcobbola 11052:Эlcobbola 10998:Эlcobbola 10948:Elcobbola 10906:Эlcobbola 10849:Эlcobbola 10809:Эlcobbola 10716:Эlcobbola 10669:Эlcobbola 10580:Эlcobbola 10526:Эlcobbola 10423:Эlcobbola 10416:responded 10394:Thanks.-- 10372:Эlcobbola 10365:responded 10324:Эlcobbola 10211:Эlcobbola 10144:Эlcobbola 10087:Эlcobbola 9993:Эlcobbola 9904:Эlcobbola 9831:Эlcobbola 9785:Эlcobbola 9711:Эlcobbola 9664:Эlcobbola 9615:Эlcobbola 9608:literally 9552:Эlcobbola 9515:Эlcobbola 9406:Эlcobbola 9326:Эlcobbola 9288:Эlcobbola 9200:Эlcobbola 9148:Эlcobbola 9092:Эlcobbola 9070:Eubulides 8921:Эlcobbola 8845:Эlcobbola 8727:Jappalang 8713:Jappalang 8687:Эlcobbola 8642:Jappalang 8556:Эlcobbola 8528:Adminship 8461:Эlcobbola 8413:Эlcobbola 8328:Эlcobbola 8296:Bellhalla 8265:Эlcobbola 8228:Эlcobbola 8169:Browsing 8140:Эlcobbola 8081:Эlcobbola 7982:Эlcobbola 7945:Эlcobbola 7852:Эlcobbola 7808:Эlcobbola 7698:Эlcobbola 7621:Эlcobbola 7536:Nishkid64 7477:Эlcobbola 7317:Эlcobbola 7215:Эlcobbola 7146:Эlcobbola 7023:Either or 7000:Эlcobbola 6927:Эlcobbola 6768:Эlcobbola 6721:Эlcobbola 6646:Эlcobbola 6569:Эlcobbola 6526:Эlcobbola 6469:Эlcobbola 6420:Эlcobbola 6355:ЭLСОВВОLД 6286:ЭLСОВВОLД 6220:ЭLСОВВОLД 6202:Bellhalla 6184:ЭLСОВВОLД 6122:Bellhalla 6084:Jappalang 6067:ЭLСОВВОLД 6060:WP:ACCESS 6048:WP:IMAGES 6032:Jappalang 6003:ЭLСОВВОLД 5985:I assume 5896:ЭLСОВВОLД 5764:ЭLСОВВОLД 5725:ЭLСОВВОLД 5666:ЭLСОВВОLД 5603:ЭLСОВВОLД 5565:ЭLСОВВОLД 5391:ЭLСОВВОLД 5341:ЭLСОВВОLД 5323:jimfbleak 5263:ЭLСОВВОLД 5219:this logo 5196:ЭLСОВВОLД 5160:Confusion 5124:ЭLСОВВОLД 5102:" says: " 5053:ЭLСОВВОLД 5027:ЭLСОВВОLД 4959:ЭLСОВВОLД 4883:ЭLСОВВОLД 4876:Responded 4835:ЭLСОВВОLД 4720:ЭLСОВВОLД 4682:ЭLСОВВОLД 4644:ЭLСОВВОLД 4575:ЭLСОВВОLД 4531:ЭLСОВВОLД 4507:ЭLСОВВОLД 4485:ЭLСОВВОLД 4369:ЭLСОВВОLД 4321:ЭLСОВВОLД 4237:<: --> 4231:Ruhrfisch 4145:ЭLСОВВОLД 3981:ЭLСОВВОLД 3947:ЭLСОВВОLД 3859:ЭLСОВВОLД 3808:ЭLСОВВОLД 3753:ЭLСОВВОLД 3696:ЭLСОВВОLД 3657:17 August 3580:ЭLСОВВОLД 3569:Tetraktys 3510:ЭLСОВВОLД 3458:this page 3419:ЭLСОВВОLД 3345:ЭLСОВВОLД 3310:ЭLСОВВОLД 3213:ЭLСОВВОLД 3137:ЭLСОВВОLД 3102:Nishkid64 3069:Nishkid64 3030:ЭLСОВВОLД 2931:ЭLСОВВОLД 2852:ЭLСОВВОLД 2781:ЭLСОВВОLД 2719:ЭLСОВВОLД 2687:Stonewall 2644:ЭLСОВВОLД 2639:writing. 2596:ЭLСОВВОLД 2534:ЭLСОВВОLД 2405:ЭLСОВВОLД 2351:ЭLСОВВОLД 2302:ЭLСОВВОLД 2195:ЭLСОВВОLД 2060:<: --> 2054:Ruhrfisch 2037:ЭLСОВВОLД 1922:ЭLСОВВОLД 1900:<: --> 1894:Ruhrfisch 1872:<: --> 1866:Ruhrfisch 1847:ЭLСОВВОLД 1749:ЭLСОВВОLД 1734:Knowledge 1635:ЭLСОВВОLД 1421:ЭLСОВВОLД 1404:Fritzpoll 1387:ЭLСОВВОLД 1356:Fritzpoll 1316:ЭLСОВВОLД 1249:ЭLСОВВОLД 1203:WP:ICT/FU 1136:ЭLСОВВОLД 1109:ЭLСОВВОLД 997:Fritzpoll 980:ЭLСОВВОLД 924:ЭLСОВВОLД 869:ЭLСОВВОLД 772:ЭLСОВВОLД 707:ЭLСОВВОLД 671:ЭLСОВВОLД 610:ЭLСОВВОLД 539:ЭLСОВВОLД 495:ЭLСОВВОLД 484:WP:IMAGES 382:ЭLСОВВОLД 300:ЭLСОВВОLД 189:ЭLСОВВОLД 151:ЭLСОВВОLД 97:ЭLСОВВОLД 12543:contribs 12535:jbmurray 12513:contribs 12505:jbmurray 12481:Ling.Nut 11849:Kablammo 11633:Awadewit 11594:Awadewit 11554:Awadewit 10660:I fixed 10175:this one 9767:Awadewit 9761:Dispatch 9503:WP:BABEL 9373:Ling.Nut 9321:gratis. 9306:Ling.Nut 9271:Ling.Nut 9085:FAC talk 8748:see here 8709:this one 7531:contribs 7511:Re:Query 6840:Awadewit 6106:this IFD 5923:Awadewit 5482:Awadewit 5425:Awadewit 5280:Awadewit 5252:contribs 5227:Awadewit 5170:Awadewit 5166:this tag 5142:again.-- 5001:Awadewit 4996:this one 4984:Simmaren 4816:Awadewit 4435:Awadewit 4403:Ealdgyth 4349:Ealdgyth 4259:Ealdgyth 4250:Query... 4161:Barnstar 4123:Ealdgyth 4071:Ealdgyth 4048:Awadewit 4030:Ealdgyth 4015:Awadewit 3964:Awadewit 3932:contribs 3902:Awadewit 3876:Awadewit 3841:Awadewit 3787:Awadewit 3727:Awadewit 3717:Janeites 3625:Awadewit 3604:Ealdgyth 3552:Awadewit 3543:Hmmm.... 3386:Thanks! 2468:Awadewit 2438:Awadewit 2261:Awadewit 2137:Awadewit 2093:'s been 2091:Awadewit 1662:contribs 1587:contribs 1575:unsigned 1333:Awadewit 1277:Awadewit 1154:Awadewit 917:new lead 758:I found 437:Eustress 210:Awadewit 172:Awadewit 121:Awadewit 12644:archive 12597:Georgia 12477:Vithoba 12447:Georgia 12426:Georgia 12405:Georgia 12383:Georgia 12006:Dorothy 11870:Georgia 11410:Georgia 11364:Georgia 11344:Georgia 11306:Georgia 10641:Vithoba 10229:Scartol 10188:Scartol 10104:Image ? 10061:Georgia 9886:Georgia 9734:Georgia 9688:Georgia 9642:Georgia 9585:Georgia 9534:Georgia 9486:Georgia 9425:Georgia 9385:Georgia 9350:Georgia 9219:Georgia 9114:Achtung 9009:HJensen 8977:Graham 8973:today. 8795:the IfD 8752:it here 8537:Georgia 8361:Georgia 8247:Georgia 8177:Georgia 8100:Georgia 8058:Georgia 8037:Georgia 7964:Georgia 7893:Georgia 7789:Georgia 7495:Maralia 7445:Maralia 7441:WP:V0.7 7410:Georgia 7389:Georgia 7344:Georgia 7291:WP:LOTM 6838:image. 6811:Georgia 6741:Georgia 6702:Georgia 6665:Georgia 6614:Georgia 6589:Georgia 6550:Georgia 6498:Georgia 6447:Serendi 6398:Georgia 6374:Georgia 6333:Georgia 6309:Georgia 6264:Georgia 5585:Georgia 5522:Georgia 5446:Georgia 5410:Georgia 5372:Georgia 4925:Georgia 4878:there. 4792:Georgia 4760:Georgia 4701:Georgia 4664:Georgia 4620:Georgia 4364:, yes. 4255:Stigand 4099:Georgia 3922:Glogger 3898:license 3772:Georgia 3666:Georgia 3503:Letters 2620:Georgia 2586:15:15z 2580:Jeandré 2561:Georgia 2522:WP:NFCC 2506:Georgia 2484:Scartol 2376:Scartol 2239:Scartol 2214:Scartol 2161:Scartol 2112:Scartol 2095:guiding 2017:WP:LOTM 1978:WP:LOTM 1820:WP:LOTM 1788:WP:LOTM 1720:WP:LOTM 1697:them.-- 1687:WP:LOTM 1621:WP:LOTM 1548:WP:LOTM 1511:WP:FPOC 1503:WP:FLRC 1371:WP:NFCC 1238:WP:NFCC 1232:Article 1174:Georgia 1091:Georgia 1070:Georgia 858:PD-self 646:Commons 521:Georgia 462:Georgia 409:Georgia 375:3M logo 345:Georgia 327:Georgia 242:Georgia 86:avoided 39:archive 12280:Dank55 12244:Dank55 12178:really 12136:again! 11914:WP:IUP 11912:Nope, 11862:Revert 11613:images 11530:Dank55 11483:Dank55 10901:." ;) 10410:work? 9319:always 9249:Jrcla2 9055:PD-Art 9041:PD-Art 8942:Thanks 8482:Keeper 8436:Keeper 8387:Keeper 7934:WP:PIC 7783:Huh? 7668:Suntag 7642:Suntag 7595:Suntag 7572:, and 7521:Daniel 7470:may be 6756:WP:IUP 6256:Also, 6177:may be 6169:may be 6140:is not 5980:exempt 5947:Here's 5516:WP:FAR 5478:before 5296:Images 5256:WP:IAR 5100:readme 4994:, but 3492:PD-Old 2551:really 2234:Godwin 1519:WP:AFD 1517:, and 1515:WP:FPC 1507:WP:FTC 1499:WP:FLC 1496:WP:GAC 1492:WP:GAR 1488:WP:FAR 1484:WP:FAC 826:WP:IUP 595:WP:IUP 488:WP:IUP 114:PD-Art 90:really 12595:Sandy 12555:Help! 12445:Sandy 12424:Sandy 12403:Sandy 12381:Sandy 12055:a lot 11918:COM:L 11868:Sandy 11819:habla 11812:María 11751:habla 11744:María 11687:Moni3 11619:think 11431:Hey, 11408:Sandy 11362:Sandy 11342:Sandy 11304:Sandy 11077:Moni3 11023:Moni3 10974:Moni3 10952:Moni3 10895:libre 10827:Moni3 10791:Moni3 10408:this 10406:Will 10121:levse 10059:Sandy 9947:Heise 9944:Nancy 9884:Sandy 9870:Moni3 9856:Moni3 9812:Moni3 9732:Sandy 9686:Sandy 9640:Sandy 9583:Sandy 9532:Sandy 9484:Sandy 9460:levse 9423:Sandy 9383:Sandy 9348:Sandy 9217:Sandy 9172:levse 9125:levse 9087:: --> 9032:uses 8967:Virus 8878:levse 8817:use"? 8763:levse 8754:too. 8535:Sandy 8408:? ;) 8359:Sandy 8245:Sandy 8175:Sandy 8098:Sandy 8056:Sandy 8035:Sandy 7962:Sandy 7891:Sandy 7787:Sandy 7760:levse 7733:levse 7493:this. 7408:Sandy 7387:Sandy 7368:Giggy 7342:Sandy 7243:Moni3 7198:Moni3 7088:. ;) 7068:Moni3 7034:Does 6971:Moni3 6877:Moni3 6809:Sandy 6760:could 6739:Sandy 6700:Sandy 6693:: --> 6663:Sandy 6612:Sandy 6587:Sandy 6548:Sandy 6496:Sandy 6396:Sandy 6372:Sandy 6331:Sandy 6307:Sandy 6262:Sandy 5864:Byron 5742:these 5647:Domiy 5583:Sandy 5520:Sandy 5444:Sandy 5408:Sandy 5370:Sandy 5242:Bobak 5144:Anish 5082:Anish 4942:Giggy 4923:Sandy 4790:Sandy 4758:Sandy 4699:Sandy 4662:Sandy 4618:Sandy 4553:Elred 4472:Quack 4428:Does 4284:Feist 4236:: --> 4227:Bambi 4097:Sandy 4092:Wp:FN 3770:Sandy 3664:Sandy 3120:Moni3 3087:Moni3 2977:Moni3 2889:Moni3 2814:Moni3 2745:Moni3 2700:Moni3 2618:Sandy 2559:Sandy 2504:Sandy 2103:these 2059:: --> 1899:: --> 1871:: --> 1480:WP:PR 1464:WP:GA 1460:WP:FL 1456:WP:FA 1209:Isles 1172:Sandy 1089:Sandy 1087:??? 1068:Sandy 519:Sandy 460:Sandy 407:Sandy 343:Sandy 325:Sandy 240:Sandy 136:Lexis 16:< 12620:talk 12602:Talk 12584:talk 12563:has 12539:talk 12509:talk 12489:OTRS 12452:Talk 12431:Talk 12410:Talk 12388:Talk 12362:talk 12308:talk 12270:talk 12222:talk 12207:talk 12188:this 12183:this 12170:this 12147:talk 12069:talk 12020:talk 11983:talk 11937:talk 11922:WP:V 11875:Talk 11853:talk 11845:here 11825:migo 11801:talk 11777:must 11757:migo 11734:this 11712:talk 11691:talk 11681:and 11663:talk 11637:talk 11598:talk 11584:talk 11558:talk 11520:talk 11447:here 11415:Talk 11398:talk 11369:Talk 11349:Talk 11332:talk 11311:Talk 11277:talk 11271:King 11268:Gary 11244:talk 11214:talk 11208:King 11205:Gary 11193:talk 11154:this 11137:talk 11131:King 11128:Gary 11106:talk 11081:talk 11059:talk 11027:talk 11005:talk 10978:talk 10956:talk 10913:talk 10884:talk 10876:this 10856:talk 10831:talk 10816:talk 10795:talk 10759:talk 10723:talk 10702:talk 10676:talk 10652:talk 10619:talk 10587:talk 10559:talk 10533:talk 10502:talk 10482:talk 10465:talk 10448:talk 10430:talk 10414:< 10400:talk 10379:talk 10363:< 10355:talk 10331:talk 10294:talk 10261:talk 10218:talk 10151:talk 10128:Talk 10108:See 10094:talk 10066:Talk 10053:and 10014:talk 10000:talk 9975:talk 9911:talk 9891:Talk 9874:talk 9860:talk 9838:talk 9816:talk 9792:talk 9771:talk 9739:Talk 9718:talk 9693:Talk 9671:talk 9647:Talk 9636:WP:V 9622:talk 9590:Talk 9559:talk 9539:Talk 9522:talk 9491:Talk 9480:must 9467:Talk 9430:Talk 9413:talk 9390:Talk 9355:Talk 9333:talk 9295:talk 9267:very 9224:Talk 9207:talk 9179:Talk 9155:talk 9132:Talk 9099:talk 9074:talk 9015:talk 8979:Colm 8928:talk 8885:Talk 8852:talk 8785:and 8770:Talk 8731:talk 8717:talk 8694:talk 8646:talk 8563:talk 8542:Talk 8468:talk 8433:... 8431:here 8420:talk 8381:more 8366:Talk 8353:and 8335:talk 8300:talk 8272:talk 8252:Talk 8235:talk 8194:when 8182:Talk 8147:talk 8123:prof 8105:Talk 8088:talk 8063:Talk 8042:Talk 8003:talk 7989:talk 7969:Talk 7952:talk 7926:here 7922:here 7912:talk 7898:Talk 7880:talk 7859:talk 7838:talk 7834:Whpq 7815:talk 7794:Talk 7767:Talk 7740:Talk 7705:talk 7628:talk 7583:this 7574:this 7570:this 7525:talk 7499:talk 7484:talk 7449:talk 7415:Talk 7402:And 7394:Talk 7372:talk 7349:Talk 7324:talk 7247:talk 7222:talk 7202:talk 7186:6/10 7184:and 7182:5/10 7153:talk 7097:here 7072:talk 7007:talk 6975:talk 6934:talk 6894:here 6881:talk 6844:talk 6816:Talk 6775:talk 6754:The 6746:Talk 6728:talk 6707:Talk 6670:Talk 6653:talk 6619:Talk 6594:Talk 6576:talk 6555:Talk 6533:talk 6519:this 6503:Talk 6476:talk 6427:talk 6403:Talk 6379:Talk 6362:talk 6348:Done 6338:Talk 6327:this 6314:Talk 6293:talk 6269:Talk 6227:talk 6206:talk 6191:talk 6126:talk 6088:talk 6074:talk 6036:talk 6010:talk 5927:talk 5919:here 5903:talk 5882:talk 5874:this 5872:and 5870:this 5855:talk 5847:here 5831:talk 5816:talk 5808:here 5786:talk 5771:talk 5750:talk 5732:talk 5706:talk 5673:talk 5651:talk 5645:. 5610:talk 5590:Talk 5572:talk 5527:Talk 5486:talk 5451:Talk 5429:talk 5415:Talk 5398:talk 5377:Talk 5348:talk 5327:talk 5308:and 5284:talk 5270:talk 5246:talk 5231:talk 5223:here 5203:talk 5189:GFDL 5187:and 5174:talk 5148:talk 5131:talk 5109:this 5086:talk 5060:talk 5046:here 5044:See 5034:talk 5020:time 5016:time 5005:talk 4982:So, 4966:talk 4952:this 4930:Talk 4904:talk 4890:talk 4866:talk 4842:talk 4820:talk 4797:Talk 4765:Talk 4727:talk 4706:Talk 4689:talk 4669:Talk 4651:talk 4625:Talk 4596:talk 4582:talk 4561:talk 4538:talk 4524:logo 4514:talk 4492:talk 4453:this 4439:talk 4430:this 4407:Talk 4376:talk 4353:Talk 4328:talk 4282:and 4263:Talk 4152:talk 4127:Talk 4104:Talk 4075:Talk 4052:talk 4034:Talk 4019:talk 3988:talk 3968:talk 3954:talk 3940:dada 3926:talk 3906:talk 3880:talk 3866:talk 3845:talk 3837:this 3815:talk 3791:talk 3777:Talk 3760:talk 3746:here 3731:talk 3703:talk 3671:Talk 3659:2008 3629:talk 3608:Talk 3587:talk 3556:talk 3531:talk 3527:Lexo 3517:talk 3474:talk 3470:Lexo 3440:talk 3426:talk 3404:talk 3396:This 3392:talk 3371:talk 3352:talk 3331:talk 3317:talk 3292:talk 3279:this 3277:and 3275:This 3271:This 3267:This 3248:talk 3234:talk 3220:talk 3206:here 3196:talk 3188:here 3177:talk 3144:talk 3124:talk 3091:talk 3037:talk 2981:talk 2938:talk 2893:talk 2859:talk 2818:talk 2788:talk 2749:talk 2726:talk 2704:talk 2651:talk 2625:Talk 2603:talk 2566:Talk 2541:talk 2511:Talk 2472:talk 2464:here 2442:talk 2412:talk 2358:talk 2333:This 2327:This 2309:talk 2265:talk 2202:talk 2141:talk 2044:talk 1929:talk 1854:talk 1756:talk 1738:here 1656:talk 1642:talk 1583:talk 1428:talk 1408:talk 1394:talk 1380:here 1360:talk 1337:talk 1323:talk 1281:talk 1256:talk 1214:Cape 1179:Talk 1158:talk 1143:talk 1116:talk 1096:Talk 1075:Talk 1021:talk 1001:talk 987:talk 931:talk 892:talk 876:talk 812:talk 797:talk 789:this 779:talk 760:this 750:talk 742:this 732:talk 714:talk 693:talk 678:talk 657:talk 634:talk 617:talk 572:talk 546:talk 526:Talk 502:talk 467:Talk 441:talk 414:Talk 389:talk 373:and 350:Talk 332:Talk 307:talk 247:Talk 214:talk 196:talk 176:talk 158:talk 125:talk 104:talk 75:talk 12571:). 12443:. 12422:. 11892:FLC 11822:con 11754:con 11120:Is 10785:is 10319:). 10313:any 10276:at 10236:Tok 10195:Tok 10169:of 10080:you 9684:. 8783:log 8663:can 8317:FUD 8312:may 8074:out 8054:. 8033:. 7406:? 7283:bio 6630:The 6454:ous 6394:. 6156:any 6111:MV 6062:). 5841:FAC 5368:? 5018:to 3485:NPG 2636:aim 2527:try 2491:Tok 2383:Tok 2297:). 2246:Tok 2221:Tok 2168:Tok 2119:Tok 2106:two 2009:bio 1970:bio 1812:bio 1780:bio 1740:. 1712:bio 1679:bio 1613:bio 1540:bio 1462:or 765:and 724:can 238:. 12622:) 12604:) 12586:) 12545:) 12541:• 12515:) 12511:• 12454:) 12433:) 12412:) 12390:) 12364:) 12310:) 12286:) 12250:) 12224:) 12149:) 12036:, 12032:, 11877:) 11855:) 11787:}} 11781:{{ 11693:) 11639:) 11600:) 11560:) 11536:) 11489:) 11445:) 11417:) 11371:) 11351:) 11313:) 11108:) 11083:) 11075:-- 11029:) 10980:) 10972:-- 10958:) 10886:) 10833:) 10825:-- 10797:) 10761:) 10704:) 10654:) 10646:-- 10621:) 10561:) 10504:) 10484:) 10467:) 10450:) 10402:) 10357:) 10296:) 10263:) 10232:• 10191:• 10131:• 10125:• 10114:— 10068:) 10016:) 9977:) 9893:) 9876:) 9862:) 9818:) 9773:) 9741:) 9695:) 9649:) 9592:) 9541:) 9493:) 9470:• 9464:• 9453:— 9432:) 9392:) 9357:) 9281:me 9226:) 9182:• 9176:• 9165:— 9135:• 9129:• 9118:— 9076:) 9068:. 9058:}} 9052:{{ 9044:}} 9038:{{ 9012:, 8888:• 8882:• 8871:— 8773:• 8767:• 8756:— 8733:) 8719:) 8648:) 8544:) 8490:76 8444:76 8395:76 8368:) 8302:) 8254:) 8184:) 8125:) 8107:) 8065:) 8044:) 8005:) 7971:) 7924:, 7914:) 7900:) 7882:) 7840:) 7796:) 7770:• 7764:• 7753:— 7743:• 7737:• 7726:— 7576:. 7501:) 7451:) 7417:) 7396:) 7374:) 7351:) 7293:) 7249:) 7204:) 7133:}} 7127:{{ 7120:}} 7114:{{ 7105:- 7074:) 6977:) 6919:}} 6913:{{ 6883:) 6846:) 6818:) 6748:) 6709:) 6672:) 6639:so 6621:) 6596:) 6557:) 6514:of 6505:) 6405:) 6381:) 6340:) 6316:) 6271:) 6253:? 6208:) 6128:) 6090:) 6038:) 5982:). 5929:) 5921:. 5884:) 5857:) 5833:) 5818:) 5788:) 5752:) 5708:) 5653:) 5592:) 5529:) 5488:) 5453:) 5431:) 5417:) 5379:) 5329:) 5286:) 5233:) 5185:CC 5176:) 5150:) 5088:) 5007:) 4932:) 4906:) 4868:) 4822:) 4799:) 4767:) 4708:) 4671:) 4627:) 4598:) 4563:) 4441:) 4405:- 4351:- 4261:- 4125:- 4106:) 4073:- 4054:) 4032:- 4021:) 4011:so 4003:So 3970:) 3942:. 3908:) 3882:) 3847:) 3793:) 3779:) 3733:) 3673:) 3631:) 3606:- 3558:) 3533:) 3495:}} 3489:{{ 3476:) 3442:) 3406:) 3373:) 3365:. 3333:) 3294:) 3250:) 3236:) 3198:) 3190:? 3179:) 3126:) 3093:) 2983:) 2975:-- 2895:) 2820:) 2773:}} 2767:{{ 2751:) 2743:-- 2706:) 2627:) 2568:) 2513:) 2487:• 2474:) 2444:) 2434:Mr 2379:• 2290:}} 2284:{{ 2267:) 2242:• 2217:• 2164:• 2158:– 2143:) 2115:• 2019:) 1994:-- 1980:) 1822:) 1790:) 1722:) 1689:) 1623:) 1589:) 1585:• 1570:. 1550:) 1513:, 1509:, 1505:, 1501:, 1494:, 1490:, 1486:, 1482:, 1458:, 1410:) 1362:) 1339:) 1309:}} 1303:{{ 1299:}} 1293:{{ 1283:) 1234:}} 1226:{{ 1181:) 1160:) 1098:) 1077:) 1023:) 1003:) 894:) 861:}} 855:{{ 814:) 799:) 752:) 734:) 695:) 659:) 636:) 574:) 528:) 469:) 443:) 435:-- 416:) 352:) 334:) 249:) 216:) 178:) 127:) 77:) 12655:. 12618:( 12600:( 12582:( 12537:( 12507:( 12450:( 12429:( 12408:( 12386:( 12360:( 12306:( 12282:( 12246:( 12220:( 12145:( 11873:( 11851:( 11828:) 11816:( 11760:) 11748:( 11689:( 11635:( 11596:( 11556:( 11532:( 11485:( 11413:( 11367:( 11347:( 11309:( 11280:) 11274:( 11217:) 11211:( 11140:) 11134:( 11104:( 11079:( 11025:( 10976:( 10954:( 10882:( 10829:( 10793:( 10757:( 10700:( 10650:( 10617:( 10557:( 10500:( 10480:( 10463:( 10446:( 10398:( 10353:( 10292:( 10259:( 10119:R 10064:( 10012:( 9973:( 9889:( 9872:( 9858:( 9814:( 9769:( 9737:( 9691:( 9645:( 9588:( 9537:( 9489:( 9458:R 9428:( 9388:( 9353:( 9222:( 9170:R 9123:R 9072:( 8876:R 8761:R 8729:( 8715:( 8644:( 8540:( 8486:ǀ 8440:ǀ 8391:ǀ 8364:( 8298:( 8250:( 8180:( 8121:( 8103:( 8061:( 8040:( 8001:( 7967:( 7910:( 7896:( 7878:( 7836:( 7792:( 7758:R 7731:R 7674:☼ 7648:☼ 7601:☼ 7544:) 7540:( 7528:· 7523:( 7497:( 7447:( 7413:( 7392:( 7370:( 7347:( 7289:/ 7285:/ 7281:/ 7279:c 7277:/ 7275:t 7273:( 7245:( 7200:( 7122:. 7070:( 6973:( 6879:( 6842:( 6814:( 6744:( 6705:( 6694:. 6668:( 6617:( 6592:( 6553:( 6501:( 6401:( 6377:( 6336:( 6312:( 6267:( 6204:( 6145:: 6124:( 6116:( 6086:( 6034:( 5925:( 5880:( 5853:( 5829:( 5814:( 5810:? 5784:( 5748:( 5704:( 5649:( 5588:( 5525:( 5484:( 5449:( 5427:( 5413:( 5375:( 5325:( 5282:( 5249:· 5244:( 5229:( 5172:( 5146:( 5084:( 5003:( 4928:( 4902:( 4864:( 4818:( 4795:( 4763:( 4704:( 4667:( 4623:( 4594:( 4559:( 4474:? 4437:( 4240:° 4207:) 4201:( 4102:( 4050:( 4017:( 3966:( 3929:· 3924:( 3904:( 3878:( 3843:( 3789:( 3775:( 3729:( 3684:" 3669:( 3661:. 3627:( 3554:( 3529:( 3472:( 3438:( 3402:( 3390:( 3369:( 3329:( 3290:( 3246:( 3232:( 3194:( 3175:( 3122:( 3110:) 3106:( 3089:( 3077:) 3073:( 2979:( 2891:( 2816:( 2747:( 2702:( 2623:( 2584:t 2564:( 2509:( 2470:( 2440:( 2263:( 2139:( 2063:° 2015:/ 2011:/ 2007:/ 2005:c 2003:/ 2001:t 1999:( 1992:. 1976:/ 1972:/ 1968:/ 1966:c 1964:/ 1962:t 1960:( 1903:° 1875:° 1818:/ 1814:/ 1810:/ 1808:c 1806:/ 1804:t 1802:( 1786:/ 1782:/ 1778:/ 1776:c 1774:/ 1772:t 1770:( 1730:I 1718:/ 1714:/ 1710:/ 1708:c 1706:/ 1704:t 1702:( 1685:/ 1681:/ 1677:/ 1675:c 1673:/ 1671:t 1669:( 1659:· 1654:( 1619:/ 1615:/ 1611:/ 1609:c 1607:/ 1605:t 1603:( 1581:( 1546:/ 1542:/ 1538:/ 1536:c 1534:/ 1532:t 1530:( 1406:( 1358:( 1335:( 1279:( 1230:| 1177:( 1156:( 1094:( 1073:( 1019:( 999:( 890:( 810:( 795:( 748:( 730:( 691:( 655:( 632:( 570:( 524:( 465:( 439:( 412:( 348:( 330:( 285:) 279:( 245:( 212:( 174:( 123:( 73:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index