1472:, that would be amazing. You're right...it not having sources is a problem. If I could ask you and if you would be willing, perhaps you could type in "Schlosskirche Wittenberg" into google or something, and find a couple of German refs, see if you can find stuff to support what is said, and then use that as a source, but say that it's in German? When the text that is translated does get added, I think that we should disclaim that the article incorporates text from the version on the German Knowledge, maybe that'll be good enough? I dunno...do what you feel is best, I suppose. Thanks a bunch, though, I truly appreciate your time and effort,
1009:
thing from 1942-1945. Given the players working on this and the time period, it was very important to someone. Ultimately, I’m confident the information is out there, but I think significant research involving trips to libraries/archives would be needed to get it. That sort of effort is unreasonable to ask and certainly beyond the scope of a GA assessment. Once the information from the new sources is incorporated, I’ll be content (no pun intended). The caveat, however, is that this will likely never be a FA.
31:
2110:
1598:
741:
669:
239:
1924:
901:
that claim Spätzle originated elsewhere (see examples below). As there is no definite consensus, it’s irresponsible to ignore contradictory information and claim just one area. This is why phrasing such as “generally attributed” is preferable. (In the interest of full disclosure, I did indeed say “Spätzle are not from
Southern Germany, which is a lack of precision on my part; I meant “not
1450:. It isn't a very big article now, since I'm having trouble finding references in English. However, there is a large page on it in the German Knowledge, under the article name "Schloss Wittenberg". I am confident that, if this is translated and the information added to the English version, then All Saints' will surely be able to reach GA status. Thank you for you time,
825:. If you’d like me to review it again at that point, just let me know and I’d be happy to do so promptly (so you won’t have to wait the typical month or so). Otherwise, another reviewer will pick it up and go from there. There’s a lot of good content in the article and I suspect it will be easy to promote once the content is cohesive and referenced.
1787:. I recently suggested an overhaul of the templates and system used to organize GANs. You expressed earlier that you don't think the present system is overly complex. I disagree, and think that my proposal would make the process vastly easier for at least some (potential) editors, without any downside. Could you take a look and comment on it? Thanks! -
1344:
In
Germany he used the spelling, "Rosenstock-Hüssy." In the U.S., he used the anglicized spelling of "Rosenstock-Huessy." This may be ambiguous in the lede, but it's important because his bibliography has two spellings, depending on when he published. Except for the explanation of the name's spelling
1313:
I've done some more work on the Sivaji article. I hope I've addressed most of what it lacked. I've added critiques now...the DVD, I don't think is out and hence that is not included. Overall, I suppose it is a good all-round article. You may have a look at any questionable POVs from the article which
1295:
I did a makeover of the article now but, the article still lacks a critiques and a DVD section, which I shall be working towards it within the next few days. However, I was hoping to have your cooperation in this article yet again. If you can spare some time and give me a heads-up on the current look
1185:
Thankyou for passing this for GA and for the extensiev review your provided before you did so. just to note, The reason a discussion of health hazards of the 18thC West Indies was included was that my main sources mentioned this explicitly and so I believe it is important to explain in the article. i
1002:
The second bullet was more so pointing out irony than a substantial flaw; this thing is a leFH with a fancy chassis – the leFH gets and sentence while the armor plating gets a huge table. In any case, I suggested a source on the article’s talk page that will give you more information on the leFH (on
574:
We all make mistakes; I appreciate the prompt apology. Going forward, and especially as someone new, be careful to keep reactions tempered. Two edits, by anyone and for any reason, are not of sufficient quantity to justify claiming “flame war” and threatening a ban. Knowledge requires measured and
499:
Revisions made by 88.232.211.82 replaced valid links with a non-English site that asserts no relevance to the topics of .NET Framework or Search engine optimization. I have never touched an edit by you, “Igor Berger”, and I would welcome the notification of a synop in response to your unfounded and
163:
on the .com version (you the real number of articles by clicking until the end of the pages)) and the fact that half the links to city pages only actually say the place's name and give no information whatsoever about it, the other links you provide (ASAP and
Highbeam) do just about meet the criteria.
1348:
As to the source of the material drawn from, there is no autobiographical material present. The two main sources are from close associates and former students who have furthered his work through publications (Argo Books) and a society whose purpose is to further his teaching (Eugen
Rosenstock-Huessy
1424:
I took a brief look at some of your reviews. I found that you did not give editors enough time to improve the article before you failed it. If the article doesn't pass, you should put it "on hold" for a few days to give others a chance to improve it to standard. After the hold expires, then you may
802:
Hi! I'm the author of the French version of this article. It was featured some time ago (February 2006) when, I believe, FA criterias where different both on en: and fr: I'm not very familiar with the GA procedure. What happens now? Do I have some time to correct the deficiencies you pointed out or
411:
Perhaps your viewpoint of what could be completed during the hold period and mine are different, and that's fine. Again, thank you for your feedback and your suggestions. I have begun to address your points, and after I have done so and commented on your points on the talk page, we shall see what
123:
Providing “general” articles about restaurants is inherently problematic given the nature of their business. If one is to write about a restaurant, one is going to write primarily about the food (i.e. a review). It is for this reason, therefore, that I believe discussion of volume and consistency
1383:
Yes, yes, of course. I will do my best, but it may take a while as I'm not at work for a while, and I'm pretty sure that the e-mails are at work. I also have about three home e-mails. I will have them before a week is up. I will need you to e-mail me with your e-mail, so that I can forward them to
1008:
I’m conflicted about the other requests. On the one hand, this was a fringe vehicle that only had three prototypes. It’s understandable, therefore, that information would be sparse. On the other hand, not one, but two, incredibly significant firms (Krupp and
Rheinmetall) played around with this
910:
I never claimed that they weren’t popular in
Schwabia; quite the contrary, I know all too well that they are popular there. The issue is that the phrasing “much favoured” is not appropriate for an encyclopedia article. Further, even if we were to change the phrasing to “popular in Schwabia”, it
900:
I said, "their origin is not known and is a matter of debate". Given that there is a debate, of course there are going to be some sources saying they're from
Southern Germany (I’m the one who added the “Food from Bavaria” reference in the first place). There are, however, also sources available
382:
can be reasonably expected to be completed before the hold expires" (emphasis added). I would not characterize the changes needed as minor. Similarly, I consider it unreasonable to expect that copy-editing and research and inclusion of the reactions of those whom the film parodied to take place
64:
To be honest, it was a borderline case. However, as the article failed to provide any third party sources beyond burger reviews, I felt that it did not meet assertion of importance standards. If you can provide a link to a newspaper article which talks about the place in general rather than just
1235:
Some of your concerns have been responded to, though not all of them. At this point, though relatively minor, I cannot make any more of your recommended changes in clean conscience, as I think they would worsen the article. I ask you to now pass it, fail it, or ask for a second opinion. Thanks,
820:
Greetings, now you’ll just want to address the concerns from the assessment; there are three main ones: inline citations are badly needed, grammar is poor (I assume this is just a translation issue) and cohesion/lucidity of thought. It’s never “too late” to have an article promoted. Once the
1986:
would have been so effective? 32 emails in one week! (Even if it does classify some as junk :P) I'm glad that I've been appointed after a nail biting and some might call, decision changing RFA, but if you ever need anything, just get in touch. The very best of luck for 2008 and beyond,
214:
The two links were assembled in haste to demonstrate that articles are indeed readily available and that the Matt’s
Article, consequently, meets the criteria of being notable; they are not, as you imply, the sole sources of coverage and it would be a simple matter to produce more.
1163:
Hey
Elcobbola, first off, thanks for giving me that second opinion. I was really stuck, because I unsure whether an article of that length and context was suitable for GA. I've left comments on the talk page, incorporating the points you made. Thank you once again. Best, —
976:
This was essentially a turret delivery vehicle that could carry ordinance once the turret had been deployed. Why, then, is there so little discussion about armament and so much about armor (something that, in the article’s current state, appears to be of minimal
859:
Hi - thanks for your comments re my reversion of your edit. You say that
Spaetzle is not known to come from Southern Germany. The following websites - the first a Bavarian website - show its origin from Southern Germany - and even mention Schwabia in particular.
91:
The article actually didn’t link to any burger reviews. The links, which I’ve reproduced hereinafter linked to reference support (i.e. proof) that Matt’s had indeed won the awards claimed. There is a distinct and important difference between a review and an
1846:
Yeah, I habitually watch user pages when I leave messages there…helps prevent flaking on discussions, esp. when people reply on their own pages. If that makes you feel like I'm stalking you, never fear, because that means I'm stalking half of Knowledge.
1340:. I very much appreciate the well-documented commentary, keyed to the review criteria. I'll review your points and when and if I can address them to achieve Knowledge criteria, I'll check back with you for a second look. A few points of clarification:
1560:
I wanted to get a notion of the level of activity of people who are members of WikiProject Companies with respect to monitoring the WikiProject Talk page and participating in discussions of interest and/or responding to requests for input.
721:
1565:
361:
A shame that you did not feel you could put the article on hold instead, and let me work on those points. Thanks anyways for the feedback and suggestions, I will implement your ideas and resubmit for GA nom.
1469:
983:
How is it that one of these survived, given the German desperation for materials late in the war? The PzKfW in the photo is at the United States Army Ordnance Museum. How did the US get their hands on one?
1405:
633:
I do belive Danny Sullivan is an expert on SE, but to add a confirmation by a Googler will provide more Authority to the article page. So lets just add this with Adam's quote to Danny's link ref, okay?
383:
before expiration of the hold. As the article meets neither of the criterion for a hold (and it need only miss one to be ineligible), I don't believe it appropriate to consider the failure "a shame".
630:
Adam Lasnik "Therefore, as you might guess, if there’s a page you want to have kept secret or absolutely kept out of Google, you’d be better off: - putting it behind an authenticated login (best)"
538:(diff) (hist) . . m Search engine optimization; 20:51 . . (+45) . . Elcobbola (Talk | contribs) (Reverted 1 edit by 88.232.211.82 identified as vandalism to last revision by Igorberger. using TW)
146:. The measure of notability is as follows: “A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject”, not Google hits.
1974:
who all offered to do co-nominations, but I unfortunately had to decline. I had all these funny ideas that it would fail again, and I was prepared for the worst, but at least it showed that
1531:
Thanks for the Barnstar of Good Humor!! Didn't even know that existed, but seeing it I think everybody should try to earn one of them now and then, just to keep things on a lighter plane.
789:
193:
The City Pages links are solely meant to prove that Matt’s did indeed win the award claimed, not to provide any other substantive material. To that end, I put them in only to comply with
1784:
317:
1894:
2168:
1654:
Asserting a company has a reasonably long continued importance and holds a number of patents is in my view both assertions of importance.Any assertion isenough to pass speedy.
1545:
880:
2002:
1186:
also think discussion of a persons offspring is always relevant in a biographical article, as long as it doesn't dominate the page. Anyway, thankyou again and regards.--
1900:
1680:
1279:
622:
1912:
1675:
That's it! I've had enough! I'm leaving! Maybe the Wookiepedia will accept me... Just for the future: Leia is sooooooooooo hot in that bikini! Au revoir...
1520:
1402:
160:
1583:
430:
2044:
164:
Nevertheless, I suspect some other editors might still tag it for notability issues if you recreate the article - two sources is hardly significant coverage.
1323:
1308:
653:
617:
493:
471:
421:
406:
794:
371:
1165:
302:
288:
2137:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
1625:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
1349:
Fund). Both are non-profits. Each entity provided a source of biographical material. Each paragraph shows which entity is the source, when applicable.
768:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
266:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
1756:
1730:
1357:
980:
Do historians or contemporary figures (axis and/or allies) have opinions about the vehicle’s expected impact on the war effort, had it been utilized?
814:
641:
609:
553:
485:
463:
201:, which also contains names without further elaboration. The point, in both cases, is that being listed is an indication of importance/significance.
1947:
1328:
1882:
1856:
1833:
1815:
1713:
1435:
1229:
1345:
while he lived in Germany and as author to the German works of that period in the bibliography, "Rosenstock-Huessy" is used throughout elsewhere.
1390:
1273:
1072:
1142:
1112:
1050:
1032:
598:
561:
523:
219:
180:
150:
1988:
955:
848:
446:
996:
143:
881:
http://www.london.diplo.de/Vertretung/london/en/01/German__Food__Wine/Regional__specialities/Spaetzle__DownloadDatei,property=Daten.pdf
66:
1931:
1377:
1773:
1747:
1501:
1447:
1244:
1215:
353:
923:
961:
1553:
1173:
1796:
1458:
137:
The latter is a print article; I have photographs of the original, which I'd be happy to produce if you're truly interested.
2015:
863:
1644:
1676:
550:
I am very stupid, please forgive me...I am new here and still having trouble with the context code...really, really sory!
135:
Youngblood, Dick (March 12, 1997), “Matt's dispels report predicting the demise of Jucy Lucy cheeseburger”, Star Tribune.
1684:
1540:
1195:
447:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Search_engine_optimization&curid=187946&diff=173345909&oldid=173344583
2064:
1418:
1288:
Dear Elcobbola, I chanced upon the above article and I contributed my might in improving the article. I looked at your
1492:
Hey - you had this tagged as on review since December 27. I hope you don't mind that I've gone ahead and reviewed it.
1480:
916:
Here are some non-Southern Germany examples (some are German, which I assume you can read since you have babel DE-4):
85:
2186:
2081:
872:
2068:
1764:
1738:
1362:
649:
417:
367:
894:
2156:
2100:
175:
80:
1996:
345:
1719:
1665:
716:
159:
Apart from a quibble about your google search (it does not include a + by Minneapolis, and I actually only get
198:
1566:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Companies/Member information#2008 Quarter 1 (Jan-Mar): Talk page monitoring survey
1512:
1493:
1200:
1156:
283:
335:
I've ever had. Your lucid and thoughtful arguments led to subtle but important improvements in the article.
2009:
same message on participants' talk pages who indicated "Put something on my talk page if you want my input"
1993:
1640:
1169:
927:
911:
would be silly, as they’re just as popular in many other places. There’s no need to single out Schwabia.
699:. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the
413:
363:
2138:
1975:
1626:
769:
700:
627:
I took a look at the link the attacker tried to change, and came up with a higher Authority reference.
440:
267:
38:
1371:
I will try to find the e-mails that I have stating that I may use the images and forward them to you.
1289:
332:
261:
1511:, could you possibly take a look at the German source and see if you can make a difference? Thanks,
451:
I do not know who's ip is this so I would like an investigation by administartion of this incident.
1967:
1620:
1515:
1496:
293:
Thanks that's a very detailed, accurate assessment, and you obviously put a lot of work into it.
1955:
1636:
1536:
1408:. If you would like to assist sweeping, please show me a few GA reviews that you have completed.
1337:
1330:
2060:
1778:
1720:
690:
115:
113:
111:
109:
107:
105:
103:
2109:
1962:
all inspired me to run for a second candidacy. I would also like to make a special mention to
1597:
1314:
shall be edited suitably. Thereafter, I intend to push this for a GA. Your thoughts? Regards,
740:
668:
238:
101:
2152:
2125:
2096:
1878:
1852:
1829:
1811:
1792:
1613:
1485:
1431:
1414:
1201:
1157:
796:
756:
675:
254:
99:
59:
1441:
1178:
645:
637:
613:
557:
489:
467:
298:
8:
2176:
1709:
1319:
1304:
1269:
1250:
As you wish. It’s unfortunate that suggestions have been met with a combative reaction.
1191:
1108:
1028:
951:
919:
866:
844:
784:
594:
519:
481:
459:
402:
170:
75:
47:
17:
1873:
WikiAnschauung? Yeah, I usually skp the big words. It makes reading so much easier! ;) -
864:
http://www.food-from-bavaria.de/de/reg_spez/einzelprodukt.php?an=228&display_lang=en
2038:
1906:
1577:
1532:
1508:
340:
1404:, I am sorry to tell you that it's only available through invitation, as indicated on
2161:
2072:
2055:
1963:
1649:
1396:
890:
809:
713:
280:
2148:
2092:
2054:
I was not offended and may myself owe you an apology for such a snarky statement.--
1971:
1874:
1848:
1825:
1807:
1788:
1670:
1526:
1426:
1409:
1406:
Knowledge:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force/Sweeps#Participation
1238:
1223:
1209:
854:
2171:
Thanks for reverting the change to my user page. I'd no idea I was so popular ;-)
1089:
Design looks good, but competition still says the Krupp Heuschrecke was superior.
873:
http://www.travelplaces.co.uk/travelplaces/renault/mr-destination-nurburgring4.htm
476:
This is not my ip address and you are starting a flame war on Knowledge, I motion
2132:
1917:
1899:
Template created - input requested before listing on Main WikiProject page. See
1385:
1372:
1354:
1135:
1065:
1043:
989:
294:
133:, which also establishes national (U.S.) coverage of Matt’s. Another example is
134:
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
2172:
2076:
2049:
1691:
1463:
1364:
1315:
1300:
1251:
1187:
1090:
1010:
963:
933:
826:
780:
576:
501:
477:
455:
384:
216:
165:
147:
70:
1901:
Knowledge talk:WikiProject Companies#Deletion discussion notification template
608:
Thank you for teaching me, I have alot to contribute, but have more to learn.
1661:
1588:
1486:
1474:
1452:
1281:
822:
729:
659:
452:
336:
307:
194:
1468:
Yeah, I think that if you could translate it and put it into a sandbox, say
1207:
All of your concerns have been either addressed or responded to. Thoughts? -
1179:
886:
869:
804:
710:
277:
124:
of awards is a reasonable and practical means of establishing significance.
2086:
1951:
245:
229:
2116:
1959:
877:
this source mentions the particular popularity of the dish in Schwabia
763:
747:
724:
680:
130:
1604:
696:
1568:
and adding yourself to one or more of the several groupings listed?
695:, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the
316:
129:
An example, in the vein of what you’ve requested, is available from
1979:
1656:
436:
1336:
Dear Elcobbola, Thank you very much for taking the time to review
987:
Sorry, but if you could help find those, I will put them in. <
1690:
I'll miss the time we shared. You are truly an intellectual.
69:
on Google is very poor for something which claims notability.
65:
saying they do a good burger, I guess it would pass. However,
2167:
1983:
1923:
1726:
Even if he did stop you should leave it on AIV. Your choice,
1041:
How is it now? Anything else to work on to get it to GA? <
2120:
1608:
751:
684:
453:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/88.232.211.82
443:
page, and you have not reverted that but you reverted this
249:
1296:
of the article, it will greatly help me in improving it.
722:
An article which you started, or significantly expanded,
378:
Holds are to be applied "if the changes needed are minor
1806:
GAN?? Just as I'm starting to enjoy working with you?? -
1895:
WP Companies: Deletion discussion notification template
2031:
Revisions to the Main Page: Revision to opening inches
1930:
Dear Elcobbola, my sincere thanks for your support in
867:
http://www.florilegium.org/files/FOOD/recipes-msg.html
547:
Oh very, very sory, the guy vandalized my last edit...
1546:
Activity survey for members of WikiProject Companies
2003:
WikiProject Companies - 4 recent discussion threads
142:The non-UK version of Google, by the way, produces
1003:which a similar table would be nice – hint, hint).
821:revisions have been made, re-nominate the article
532:Something is wrong or I am reading this wrong way.
973:The reason(s) it was not put into active service.
1783:Hi Elco, just pinging you re: the discussion at
969:I have not found any references for any of this
623:I woud like to add some authority by Adam Lasnik
331:Thanks for the most intellectually stimulating
2014:Discussion threads opened in the past week at
431:I am sory it was not my edit that you reverted
2025:Brand names section on Main page - expansion
1470:User:Bmrbarre/German to English Translation
1946:neutral. I would especially like to thank
1063:Still wrong? Yes? No? Maybe? Toaster? <
462:) You are making false claims against me.
289:Thanks for the GA assessment on Gold a a i
2129:was updated with a fact from the article
1617:was updated with a fact from the article
760:was updated with a fact from the article
314:
258:was updated with a fact from the article
870:http://www.topicala.com/tag/sp%C3%A4tzle
1448:All Saints' Church, Wittenberg, Germany
14:
2022:Indicating participants who are admins
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
2016:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Companies
535:If I am my apology to you, dear Sir.
25:
2018:in case you would like to comment:
1824:Uh, ever heard of a watchlist? ;) -
1401:Hello. Regarding about the GA sweep
1292:after failing the GA nomination.
23:
1922:
1299:Merry Christmas and best regards,
24:
2197:
2166:
2108:
1752:I Put it back. Constant Vandal.
1596:
739:
667:
315:
237:
29:
2091:Real life ... a moment (or 15)
2028:WikiProject Parentage statement
1932:my second request for adminship
1929:
1386:
1373:
1136:
1066:
1044:
990:
778:Thanks for your contributions!
1702:
1262:
1101:
1021:
944:
837:
587:
512:
412:the next GA reviewer thinks.
395:
166:
71:
13:
1:
1982:don't. Who would have though
1692:
1358:03:08, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
1309:15:11, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
1274:02:29, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
1252:
1245:01:37, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
1230:20:45, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
1216:15:49, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
1196:09:57, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
1174:16:35, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
1143:01:23, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
1113:01:18, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
1091:
1073:01:12, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
1011:
934:
827:
654:22:56, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
618:23:59, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
599:23:26, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
577:
562:22:03, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
524:21:59, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
502:
494:21:48, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
472:21:45, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
422:07:57, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
407:00:26, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
385:
372:20:07, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
346:02:04, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
303:23:02, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
284:09:02, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
171:
76:
2187:04:00, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
2157:21:02, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
2101:20:30, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
2082:00:09, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
2045:00:57, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
1997:16:36, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
1948:my admin coach and nominator
1913:12:44, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
1883:23:16, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
1857:23:04, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
1834:22:51, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
1816:21:46, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
1797:19:08, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
1774:02:57, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
1748:02:56, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
1714:02:53, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
1685:02:47, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
1666:01:14, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
1571:Thanks for your assistance.
1552:placed on talk pages of all
1051:21:34, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
1033:16:05, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
997:22:56, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
956:23:27, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
895:22:49, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
849:18:32, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
815:18:02, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
790:20:40, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
717:20:29, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
220:15:20, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
197:. An analogy is the list of
181:14:24, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
176:
151:19:30, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
86:16:45, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
81:
7:
1978:really does have something
1697:
1645:13:01, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
1584:03:55, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
1541:03:36, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
1521:22:02, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
1502:22:58, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
1481:03:05, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
1459:18:49, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
1446:Hello, I am the creator of
1436:21:48, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
1419:21:36, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
1391:19:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
1378:19:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
1324:05:47, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
1257:
1096:
1016:
939:
832:
582:
575:proportional interactions.
507:
390:
10:
2202:
687:, a fact from the article
441:Search engine optimization
1284:- Requesting a look again
321:
262:Oliver Typewriter Company
905:from Southern Germany”).
2139:Did you know? talk page
1627:Did you know? talk page
1621:Pearson's Candy Company
1564:Could you please visit
1338:Eugen Rosenstock-Huessy
1331:Eugen Rosenstock-Huessy
770:Did you know? talk page
701:Did you know? talk page
268:Did you know? talk page
1927:
1721:User talk:76.213.150.5
795:Your GA assessment of
691:Lincoln Snacks Company
500:inappropriate threat.
414:Curt Wilhelm VonSavage
364:Curt Wilhelm VonSavage
354:Your GA assessment of
1926:
1202:Covering of the Senne
1158:Wolf Armoured Vehicle
1133:I've got it now! <
797:Ancient Greek cuisine
325:The Socratic Barnstar
199:Fortune 500 companies
42:of past discussions.
131:the Associated Press
2147:-- sorry for delay
1968:Dihyrdogen Monoxide
1958:who in addition to
1934:, which ended with
1903:. --User:Ceyockey (
1517:Dihydrogen Monoxide
1507:Given the comments
1498:Dihydrogen Monoxide
1425:go on and fail it.
728:, was selected for
18:User talk:Elcobbola
1956:Ryan Postlethwaite
1928:
1637:The Placebo Effect
2183:
2145:
2144:
2080:
2042:
2035:--User:Ceyockey (
1910:
1633:
1632:
1581:
1574:--User:Ceyockey (
1329:GA assessment of
1280:GA Assessment on
813:
776:
775:
707:
706:
656:
640:comment added by
351:
350:
343:
274:
273:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
2193:
2181:
2170:
2112:
2105:
2104:
2058:
2036:
1999:
1991:
1904:
1772:
1767:
1759:
1746:
1741:
1733:
1706:
1701:
1696:
1600:
1593:
1592:
1575:
1479:
1477:
1457:
1455:
1388:
1375:
1266:
1261:
1256:
1241:
1226:
1212:
1138:
1105:
1100:
1095:
1068:
1046:
1025:
1020:
1015:
992:
962:GA assesment of
948:
943:
938:
841:
836:
831:
807:
803:is it too late?
788:
743:
736:
735:
679:was updated. On
671:
664:
663:
635:
591:
586:
581:
516:
511:
506:
484:) to be banned!
399:
394:
389:
341:
319:
312:
311:
241:
234:
233:
178:
173:
168:
83:
78:
73:
33:
32:
26:
2201:
2200:
2196:
2195:
2194:
2192:
2191:
2190:
2180:
2164:
2133:Son Goku (band)
2089:
2052:
2005:
2000:
1989:
1920:
1897:
1781:
1770:
1765:
1757:
1753:
1744:
1739:
1731:
1727:
1724:
1712:
1673:
1652:
1591:
1548:
1529:
1490:
1475:
1473:
1466:
1453:
1451:
1444:
1399:
1369:
1355:User:HopsonRoad
1334:
1286:
1272:
1239:
1224:
1210:
1205:
1183:
1172:
1161:
1111:
1031:
967:
954:
857:
847:
800:
779:
734:
662:
625:
597:
522:
433:
405:
359:
310:
291:
232:
62:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2199:
2177:
2163:
2160:
2143:
2142:
2113:
2088:
2085:
2051:
2048:
2033:
2032:
2029:
2026:
2023:
2012:
2011:
2004:
2001:
1921:
1919:
1916:
1896:
1893:
1892:
1891:
1890:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1886:
1885:
1864:
1863:
1862:
1861:
1860:
1859:
1839:
1838:
1837:
1836:
1819:
1818:
1780:
1779:GAN suggestion
1777:
1762:
1736:
1723:
1718:
1717:
1716:
1708:
1672:
1669:
1651:
1648:
1631:
1630:
1601:
1590:
1587:
1558:
1557:
1547:
1544:
1528:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1489:
1484:
1465:
1462:
1443:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1398:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1368:
1365:Heuschrecke 10
1361:
1351:
1350:
1346:
1333:
1327:
1285:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1268:
1233:
1232:
1204:
1199:
1182:
1177:
1168:
1160:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1152:
1151:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1140:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1107:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1070:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1048:
1036:
1035:
1027:
1005:
1004:
994:
985:
984:
981:
978:
974:
966:
964:Heuschrecke 10
960:
959:
958:
950:
931:
930:
929:
925:
921:
913:
912:
907:
906:
856:
853:
852:
851:
843:
799:
793:
774:
773:
744:
733:
720:
705:
704:
672:
661:
658:
624:
621:
606:
605:
604:
603:
602:
601:
593:
567:
566:
565:
564:
551:
548:
542:
541:
540:
539:
536:
533:
527:
526:
518:
432:
429:
428:
427:
426:
425:
401:
358:
352:
349:
348:
328:
327:
322:
320:
309:
306:
290:
287:
272:
271:
242:
231:
228:
227:
226:
225:
224:
223:
222:
207:
206:
205:
204:
203:
202:
186:
185:
184:
183:
154:
153:
139:
138:
126:
125:
120:
119:
118:
117:
94:
93:
61:
58:
56:
52:
51:
34:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2198:
2189:
2188:
2185:
2184:
2174:
2169:
2159:
2158:
2154:
2150:
2140:
2136:
2135:
2134:
2128:
2127:
2126:Did you know?
2122:
2118:
2114:
2111:
2107:
2106:
2103:
2102:
2098:
2094:
2084:
2083:
2078:
2074:
2070:
2066:
2062:
2057:
2047:
2046:
2041:
2040:
2030:
2027:
2024:
2021:
2020:
2019:
2017:
2010:
2007:
2006:
1998:
1995:
1992:
1985:
1981:
1977:
1976:the community
1973:
1969:
1965:
1961:
1957:
1953:
1949:
1945:
1942:opposes, and
1941:
1937:
1933:
1925:
1915:
1914:
1909:
1908:
1902:
1884:
1880:
1876:
1872:
1871:
1870:
1869:
1868:
1867:
1866:
1865:
1858:
1854:
1850:
1845:
1844:
1843:
1842:
1841:
1840:
1835:
1831:
1827:
1823:
1822:
1821:
1820:
1817:
1813:
1809:
1805:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1798:
1794:
1790:
1786:
1776:
1775:
1771:
1768:
1761:
1760:
1750:
1749:
1745:
1742:
1735:
1734:
1722:
1715:
1711:
1707:
1705:
1700:
1695:
1689:
1688:
1687:
1686:
1682:
1678:
1677:70.245.109.89
1668:
1667:
1663:
1659:
1658:
1647:
1646:
1642:
1638:
1628:
1624:
1623:
1622:
1616:
1615:
1614:Did you know?
1610:
1606:
1602:
1599:
1595:
1594:
1586:
1585:
1580:
1579:
1572:
1569:
1567:
1562:
1556:
1555:
1550:
1549:
1543:
1542:
1538:
1534:
1533:Wasted Time R
1522:
1519:
1518:
1514:
1510:
1506:
1505:
1504:
1503:
1500:
1499:
1495:
1488:
1487:Speed Monster
1483:
1482:
1478:
1471:
1461:
1460:
1456:
1449:
1437:
1434:
1433:
1430:
1429:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1420:
1417:
1416:
1413:
1412:
1407:
1403:
1392:
1389:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1376:
1366:
1360:
1359:
1356:
1353:Sincerely, --
1347:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1339:
1332:
1326:
1325:
1321:
1317:
1311:
1310:
1306:
1302:
1297:
1293:
1291:
1283:
1275:
1271:
1267:
1265:
1260:
1255:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1246:
1243:
1242:
1231:
1228:
1227:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1214:
1213:
1203:
1198:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1181:
1176:
1175:
1171:
1170:Contributions
1167:
1159:
1144:
1139:
1134:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1104:
1099:
1094:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1074:
1069:
1064:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1052:
1047:
1042:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1024:
1019:
1014:
1007:
1006:
1001:
1000:
999:
998:
993:
988:
982:
979:
975:
972:
971:
970:
965:
957:
953:
949:
947:
942:
937:
932:
928:
926:
924:
922:
920:
918:
917:
915:
914:
909:
908:
904:
899:
898:
897:
896:
892:
888:
883:
882:
878:
875:
874:
871:
868:
865:
861:
850:
846:
842:
840:
835:
830:
824:
819:
818:
817:
816:
811:
806:
798:
792:
791:
786:
782:
771:
767:
766:
765:
759:
758:
757:Did you know?
753:
749:
745:
742:
738:
737:
731:
727:
726:
719:
718:
715:
712:
702:
698:
694:
693:
692:
686:
682:
678:
677:
676:Did you know?
673:
670:
666:
665:
657:
655:
651:
647:
643:
639:
631:
628:
620:
619:
615:
611:
600:
596:
592:
590:
585:
580:
573:
572:
571:
570:
569:
568:
563:
559:
555:
552:
549:
546:
545:
544:
543:
537:
534:
531:
530:
529:
528:
525:
521:
517:
515:
510:
505:
498:
497:
496:
495:
491:
487:
483:
479:
474:
473:
469:
465:
461:
457:
454:
449:
448:
444:
442:
438:
435:I only added
423:
419:
415:
410:
409:
408:
404:
400:
398:
393:
388:
381:
377:
376:
375:
373:
369:
365:
357:
347:
344:
338:
334:
330:
329:
326:
323:
318:
313:
305:
304:
300:
296:
286:
285:
282:
279:
269:
265:
264:
263:
257:
256:
255:Did you know?
251:
247:
243:
240:
236:
235:
221:
218:
213:
212:
211:
210:
209:
208:
200:
196:
192:
191:
190:
189:
188:
187:
182:
179:
174:
169:
162:
158:
157:
156:
155:
152:
149:
145:
141:
140:
136:
132:
128:
127:
122:
121:
116:
114:
112:
110:
108:
106:
104:
102:
100:
98:
97:
96:
95:
90:
89:
88:
87:
84:
79:
74:
68:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
2175:
2165:
2146:
2131:
2130:
2124:
2090:
2056:TonyTheTiger
2053:
2037:
2034:
2013:
2008:
1980:other places
1964:Phoenix-wiki
1943:
1939:
1935:
1905:
1898:
1803:
1782:
1755:
1754:
1751:
1729:
1728:
1725:
1703:
1698:
1693:
1674:
1655:
1653:
1634:
1619:
1618:
1612:
1576:
1573:
1570:
1563:
1559:
1554:participants
1551:
1530:
1516:
1497:
1491:
1467:
1445:
1442:Translation?
1432:
1427:
1415:
1410:
1400:
1370:
1352:
1335:
1312:
1298:
1294:
1287:
1263:
1258:
1253:
1237:
1234:
1222:
1208:
1206:
1184:
1180:John Balchen
1162:
1102:
1097:
1092:
1022:
1017:
1012:
986:
977:importance)?
968:
945:
940:
935:
902:
884:
879:
876:
862:
858:
838:
833:
828:
801:
777:
762:
761:
755:
723:
708:
689:
688:
674:
632:
629:
626:
607:
588:
583:
578:
513:
508:
503:
475:
450:
445:
434:
396:
391:
386:
379:
360:
355:
324:
292:
275:
260:
259:
253:
63:
55:
43:
37:
2149:Victuallers
2093:Victuallers
1972:OhanaUnited
1758:Compwhiz II
1732:Compwhiz II
1428:OhanaUnited
1411:OhanaUnited
1240:Oreo Priest
1225:Oreo Priest
1211:Oreo Priest
903:necessarily
636:—Preceding
610:Igor Berger
554:Igor Berger
486:Igor Berger
464:Igor Berger
246:16 November
36:This is an
2117:29 January
2073:WP:CHICAGO
2039:talk to me
1938:supports,
1907:talk to me
1578:talk to me
1387:Dreamafter
1374:Dreamafter
1290:assessment
1137:DREAMAFTER
1067:DREAMAFTER
1045:DREAMAFTER
991:DREAMAFTER
764:Jays Foods
748:December 3
725:Jays Foods
681:1 December
642:Igorberger
356:Semi-Tough
295:Smallbones
60:Matt's bar
2179:<: -->
2173:Ruhrfisch
2162:Thank you
1650:asserting
1605:9 January
1397:GA Sweeps
1316:Mspraveen
1301:Mspraveen
1188:Jackyd101
781:Nishkid64
697:Main Page
478:Elcobbola
456:Elcobbola
333:GA review
217:Elcobbola
148:Elcobbola
144:4650 hits
1766:Contribs
1740:Contribs
1671:Leaving!
1476:Benjamin
1454:Benjamin
885:Regards
855:Spaetzle
650:contribs
638:unsigned
437:linkbait
337:Awadewit
161:196 hits
67:197 hits
2077:WP:LOTD
1918:Rudget!
1804:leaving
1802:You're
1221:Ditto.-
887:Kunchan
805:Jastrow
711:Zzyzx11
439:to the
278:Zzyzx11
39:archive
2050:Oliver
1990:Rudget
1952:Rlevse
1527:Thanks
1464:Thanks
1367:images
1282:Sivaji
1166:Rudget
810:Λέγετε
714:(Talk)
281:(Talk)
195:WP:REF
167:пﮟოьεԻ
92:award.
72:пﮟოьεԻ
2178:: -->
1984:Gmail
1960:Ioeth
1384:you.
1141:: -->
1071:: -->
1049:: -->
995:: -->
308:Award
16:<
2153:talk
2121:2008
2097:talk
1970:and
1954:and
1879:talk
1875:Pete
1853:talk
1849:Pete
1830:talk
1826:Pete
1812:talk
1808:Pete
1793:talk
1789:Pete
1710:talk
1699:ƈơƅƅ
1681:talk
1662:talk
1641:talk
1609:2008
1537:talk
1509:here
1320:talk
1305:talk
1270:talk
1259:ƈơƅƅ
1192:talk
1109:talk
1098:ƈơƅƅ
1029:talk
1018:ƈơƅƅ
952:talk
941:ƈơƅƅ
891:talk
845:talk
834:ƈơƅƅ
823:here
785:talk
752:2007
685:2007
646:talk
614:talk
595:talk
584:ƈơƅƅ
558:talk
520:talk
509:ƈơƅƅ
490:talk
482:talk
468:talk
460:talk
418:talk
403:talk
392:ƈơƅƅ
368:talk
342:talk
299:talk
250:2007
2115:On
2087:DKY
2069:bio
1936:113
1785:GAN
1704:ơƚɑ
1657:DGG
1603:On
1589:DYK
1363:Re:
1264:ơƚɑ
1103:ơƚɑ
1023:ơƚɑ
946:ơƚɑ
839:ơƚɑ
746:On
730:DYK
660:DYK
589:ơƚɑ
514:ơƚɑ
397:ơƚɑ
380:and
244:On
230:DYK
2155:)
2141:.
2123:,
2119:,
2099:)
2079:)
2043:)
1966:,
1950:,
1940:11
1911:)
1881:)
1855:)
1832:)
1814:)
1795:)
1694:Ɛƚ
1683:)
1664:)
1643:)
1635:--
1629:.
1611:,
1607:,
1582:)
1539:)
1322:)
1307:)
1254:Ɛƚ
1194:)
1093:Ɛƚ
1013:Ɛƚ
936:Ɛƚ
893:)
829:Ɛƚ
772:.
754:,
750:,
709:--
703:.
683:,
652:)
648:•
616:)
579:Ɛƚ
560:)
504:Ɛƚ
492:)
470:)
420:)
387:Ɛƚ
374:.
370:)
339:|
301:)
276:--
270:.
252:,
248:,
2182:°
2151:(
2095:(
2075:/
2071:/
2067:/
2065:c
2063:/
2061:t
2059:(
1994:.
1944:4
1877:(
1851:(
1847:-
1828:(
1810:(
1791:(
1769:)
1763:(
1743:)
1737:(
1679:(
1660:(
1639:(
1535:(
1513:—
1494:—
1318:(
1303:(
1190:(
889:(
812:)
808:(
787:)
783:(
732:!
644:(
612:(
556:(
488:(
480:(
466:(
458:(
424:.
416:(
366:(
297:(
177:7
172:5
82:7
77:5
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.