244:, and the consolidation of these ideals in the 18th century. There are challenges to traditional liberty concepts, particularly from French revolutionary thought, leading to shifts in political ideologies. The development of constitutionalism in America, contributes to the formation of state constitutions and the drafting of the federal Constitution. The influence of Bills of Rights, the principle of separation of powers, and the role of judicial review in safeguarding individual rights and limiting government powers are discussed. The narrative extends to the challenges faced by the American Constitution, including conflicts between the Executive and the Supreme Court. He emphasizes the importance of the American experiment in constitutionalism, noting its enduring success while acknowledging ongoing challenges and the need for constant vigilance to uphold the rule of law. Hayek discusses the historical development of the concept of the rule of law, focusing on its evolution in Europe, notably in Germany and France. He highlights the tension between the ideal of the rule of law and the realities of administrative power, emphasizing how administrative machinery often expanded at the expense of individual liberties despite efforts to establish constitutional limits. He discussed the establishment of administrative courts in Germany as a means to achieve judicial control over administrative actions, contrasting this with the situation in England. Ultimately, he reflects on the challenges and contradictions in realizing the rule of law amidst the growth of bureaucratic power and the emergence of the welfare state.
261:
influenced by socialist ideologies and the perceived need for efficiency in governance. The narrative discusses key figures and movements, such as the Fabian movement in
Britain and the public administration movement in the United States, which advocated for greater governmental control at the expense of individual liberties. Hayek also examines intellectual trends that undermined traditional legal principles, including attacks on the certainty of law and the promotion of administrative absolutism. Despite these trends, Hayek identifies signs of a reaction against these developments, particularly in countries that experienced totalitarian regimes, and emphasizes the importance of preserving the rule of law within a democratic framework. He concludes by acknowledging efforts to revive the tradition of the rule of law but notes a lack of clear awareness of its implications in contemporary society.
248:
boundaries. The judicial review controls administrative decisions and protecting individual rights. Hayek touches on the balance between individual freedoms and necessary government intervention, particularly in times of emergency, stressing the importance of compensation for any infringements on individual rights. He underscores the significance of the rule of law over procedural safeguards alone, warning against a mere adherence to legal formalities without a true commitment to the underlying principles of justice and fairness. The concept of freedom in economic affairs functions within the framework of the rule of law. Figures like
462:
with Hume being more willing to subject institutions to critical scrutiny based on public utility, while Burke's conservatism sometimes becomes indefensible. Robbins also disagreed with Hayek's classification of nineteenth century
English Utilitarians as "false" Continental Rationalists, and argued that their thought was squarely within the tradition of English empiricism and not deserving of the label "false" liberalism. Robbins also suggested that Bentham and his followers were not doctrinaire individualists, but rather had nuanced views on economic organization and were not necessarily supportive of collectivization.
469:
freedom. Knight accused Hayek of making anarchist statements that exclude rulers and limit legislation logically, and that Hayek's criticisms of democracy imply that the government should do nothing unless to enforce universally known laws. He also criticized Hayek's treatment of equality, arguing that his extreme absolutism is a mistake. Knight further accused Hayek of reaching a supreme absurdity in his discussion of equality of opportunity, ignoring the role of social structures in shaping opportunities and the consequences of history and social forces on individual achievements.
229:
significance of maintaining a balance between independence and employment is underscored, underscoring the need for a substantial number of independent individuals to safeguard freedom and diversity in society. Additionally, Hayek delves into the role of affluent individuals in supporting non-materialistic pursuits. Furthermore, he counters the demonization of wealth and success, contending that restricting individual achievements could impede societal progress.
967:
168:(1952). He was interested in the connection between societal transformation and the manner in which scientific knowledge is presented. In comparison to being a member of the economics department, he fared substantially better on the Committee on Social Thought. On March 7, 1954, Hayek requested funding from the Guggenheim Foundation for his travels to Italy and Greece. He did this not only for his study of
27:
213:
where it determines the relative position of individuals, is closely linked with the views about responsibility. The sense of responsibility has been weakened, by overextending the range of an individual’s responsibilities as by absolving him from the actual consequences of his actions. Effective responsibility must be individual responsibility.
205:
and adapt to changing circumstances, liberty is essential for innovation and progress. But Hayek warns against excessive control and the potential stifling of spontaneous forces essential for societal advancement. In a free society the advancement of the wealthy can benefit the rest, by making new innovations and standards of living.
257:
highlighted. Hayek argues against the pursuit of distributive justice, which conflicts with the rule of law and may lead to the abandonment of free market principles in favor of a centrally planned economy. Hayek underscores maintaining the rule of law is important to preserve individual freedom and economic efficiency.
172:, but also because he believed that visiting these non-industrialized regions would help him better understand how tradition and culture develop in agrarian societies. He was concerned in the development of nonrational, but nonverbally explicit, rules and traditions. He planned to publish two books on the liberal order,
264:"Why I am Not a Conservative" is a critique of conservatism. Conservatism is too focused on preserving the status quo and is resistant to change, therefore, can lead to a lack of progress and innovation, and conservatism is often associated with authoritarianism, and it can be a threat to individual liberty, for Hayek.
461:
agreed with Hayek's emphasis on the non-rational element in social habits and institutions, but expressed concern that this emphasis may lead to indiscriminate acceptance and admiration of all institutions and habits, including those that are harmful. Robbins noted a contrast between Hume and Burke,
224:
Democracy serves as a mechanism for establishing laws, whereas liberalism focuses on the fundamental principles that shape those laws. Hayek stresses the significance of recognizing that democracy alone does not automatically ensure the existence of sound legislation, and highlights the necessity of
212:
The decline in esteem for individual responsibility and individual liberty is the result of wrong interpretation of the lessons of science. Responsibility has become a legal concept. But it is no less a moral concept. Attitude toward the working of social order, approval or disapproval of the manner
482:
criticized Hayek's views on coercion and the difficulty in defining it within his theoretical framework. He criticized Hayek's proposed framework, arguing that it allows for the concentration of power in the hands of the state and can lead to the overthrow of personal liberty. Hamowy concluded that
228:
Liberalism and democracy share a complex relationship, necessitating limitations on government authority to ensure effective governance. Hayek explores the evolving dynamics between independent individuals and the employed majority, particularly within the framework of capitalism and democracy. The
220:
The inheritance of property and the role it plays in transmitting wealth across generations, the evolving perception of equality are discussed. Where Hayek argues value and merit, he writes that rewarding individuals based on perceived merit can undermine freedom and create societal tensions. Hayek
204:
Liberty as the absence of coercion by others is different with political freedom, inner freedom, and freedom as power or ability. Liberty is a distinct good that allows individuals to pursue their own goals without coercion, according to Hayek. Because liberty makes individuals pursue diverse paths
475:
argued that Hayek's conclusions are unconditional because Hayek selected extreme positions to attack and works with a limited set of values. According to Viner, This approach can lead to logical fallacies, such as attacking a straw man or the fallacy of the unexplored remainder. He also questioned
260:
Hayek outlines a historical narrative focusing on the erosion of the rule of law in various
Western countries, particularly in England and the United States, from the late 19th century to the mid-20th century. He highlights the transition towards administrative discretion over fixed legal rules,
454:
criticized Hayek's belief in the superiority of tradition over reason and his rejection of intelligent social control. Hook argued that history shows the dangers of relying solely on non-rational processes, and planning can coexist with democracy and freedom. Hook also criticizes Hayek's narrow
247:
The concept and importance of the rule of law are in ensuring individual liberty within a society governed by democratic principles. The need for clear rules that govern governmental actions, limiting administrative discretion and ensuring that coercive powers are exercised within defined legal
236:
The distinction between laws and specific commands is discussed. Laws are characterized by their generality and abstractness, allowing individuals to make their own decisions within the framework provided by the law. Hayek also argued how laws serve to coordinate individual actions, help mutual
232:
The importance of protecting individual spheres from interference is discussed. Property rights are essential for preventing coercion. Coercion prevention is a primary function of the state, while moral rules and conventions exert pressure on behavior without constituting severe coercion. These
233:
noncoercive rules facilitate social interaction without severely impeding liberty. Hayek discusses the concept of law and its relationship to freedom within society. Law as a set of general, abstract rules that apply equally to everyone, provides a secure and free sphere for individual action.
468:
criticized Hayek for its lack of attention to the critical events and principles of the
Liberal Revolution that established democratic societies, emphasizing the importance of democracy, political order, and rule of law. Knight criticized Hayek for being scornful towards politically organized
216:
Equality of the general rules of law and conduct is conducive to liberty. It is bound to produce inequality in many respects. The transmission of standards and traditions within a family is intricately linked to the ability to pass on material possessions. It is challenging to comprehend how
208:
Hayek contrasts two appraches on liberty and reason; rationalistc and evolutionary. Rationalistic approaches emphasize deliberate design and control, and evolutionary perspectives stress the importance of tradition, spontaneous order, and the limitations of human reason. Due to the inherent
256:
advocated for economic freedom within legal boundaries, emphasizing the importance of general rules over government intervention. The distinction between legitimate government activities, such as providing services and setting standards, and arbitrary control over prices and quantities is
200:
to Hayek's ideas on political philosophy and economics, Dickinson asked for a positive program from opponents of collectivism, while Keynes wanted guidance on where to draw the line between good and bad government intervention. Hayek addressed these challenges in this book.
225:
shared principles to steer decisions made by the majority. Furthermore, he explores the perils associated with unrestrained majority authority, advocating for the safeguarding of individual freedoms within democratic frameworks.
240:
Hayek traces the evolution of individual liberty from 17th-century
England. He surveys medieval and classical influences, English struggles for liberty, philosophical justifications by figures like
237:
cooperation, and establish order in society without the need for centralized direction. The rule of law is essential for preserving individual liberty and enabling effective social organization.
221:
challenges conventional ideas about equality, merit, and justice, advocating for a nuanced understanding of these concepts in the context of individual freedom and societal organization.
455:
definition of freedom and his binary thinking. While he acknowledged Hayek's value as a cautionary voice, he ultimately said that Hayek's economic philosophy could lead to disaster.
876:
193:
971:
903:
852:
1209:
999:
503:
was placed 9th on the list of the 100 best non-fiction books of the twentieth century compiled by the biweekly conservative magazine
927:
552:
483:
Hayek's position on coercion and freedom must be rejected due to its inconsistencies. Hayek responded to Hamowy's criticism.
209:
complexity and unpredictability of human civilization, human reason must operate within the framework of societal evolution.
217:
restricting the improvement of material circumstances to just one generation would benefit the genuine welfare of society.
422:
1199:
1109:
650:
602:
577:
123:
1101:
497:, who reportedly interrupted a presentation to indicate, in reference to the book, that "This is what we believe".
1194:
1189:
1094:
1022:
992:
1168:
1125:
1077:
1067:
666:
Hook, Sidney (February 21, 1960). "Of
Tradition and Change: The Constitution of Liberty by F. A. Hayek".
141:
74:
911:
1037:
985:
1057:
490:
176:
and "The
Creative Powers of a Free Civilization" (eventually the title for the second chapter of
829:
Hayek, F. A. (1961). "Freedom and
Coercion: Some Comments on a Critique by Mr. Ronald Hamowy".
1204:
26:
948:
8:
1086:
1042:
857:
519:
197:
792:
749:
706:
327:
323:
1133:
1062:
923:
872:
784:
753:
741:
698:
646:
598:
573:
548:
494:
374:
118:
1151:
915:
848:
776:
733:
690:
253:
169:
50:
1027:
1008:
505:
137:
40:
1047:
919:
458:
1183:
788:
745:
702:
479:
406:
95:
1052:
1032:
465:
441:
412:
345:
291:
472:
451:
380:
368:
796:
710:
341:
249:
241:
476:
Hayek's doctrine appears similar to social
Darwinism and historicism.
402:
311:
160:
essays for a while; some of the early findings had been published in
64:
780:
694:
881:
737:
358:
334:
297:
60:
977:
966:
810:
Hamowy, Ronald (1961). "Hayek's concept of freedom: A critique".
317:
303:
284:
724:
Knight, Frank H. (December 1967). "Laissez Faire: Pro and Con".
595:
Hayek's challenge : an intellectual biography of F.A. Hayek
307:
156:
In 1950, when Hayek moved to
Chicago, he had been working on
597:. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 288–289.
395:
545:
The constitution of liberty : the definitive edition
877:"The Tortured Saga of America's Least-Loved Policy Idea"
767:
Viner, Jacob (1961). "Hayek on Freedom and Coercion".
192:
According to Bruce Caldwell, the challenges posed by
636:
634:
643:
The constitution of liberty: the definitive edition
632:
630:
628:
626:
624:
622:
620:
618:
616:
614:
1181:
611:
351:
277:
184:in May 1959, with publication in February 1960.
993:
681:Robbins, Lionel (1961). "Hayek on Liberty".
547:. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
1000:
986:
541:Caldwell, Bruce, "Editorial Foreword", in
493:policy meeting and banged on the table by
25:
871:
847:
567:
592:
385:14. The Safeguards of Individual Liberty
680:
645:(1. publ ed.). London: Routledge.
396:Part III – Freedom in the Welfare State
388:15. Economic Policy and the Rule of Law
379:13. Liberalism and Administration: The
164:(1948), and more would be published in
1182:
809:
723:
981:
901:
828:
766:
640:
542:
433:23. Agriculture and Natural Resources
148:as the most important work by Hayek.
853:"Five myths about Margaret Thatcher"
665:
267:
1007:
13:
902:Feser, Edward (January 28, 2007),
570:Friedrich Hayek : a biography
14:
1221:
1210:University of Chicago Press books
1110:The Counter-Revolution of Science
959:
290:2. The Creative Powers of a Free
166:The Counter-Revolution of Science
140:, first published in 1960 by the
1102:Individualism and Economic Order
965:
908:The Cambridge Companion to Hayek
543:Hayek, Friedrich A. von (2011).
162:Individualism and Economic Order
144:. Many scholars have considered
16:1960 book by Friedrich von Hayek
1095:The Use of Knowledge in Society
941:
895:
865:
841:
822:
373:12. The American Contribution:
158:The Abuse and Decline of Reason
1023:Austrian business cycle theory
951:. National Review. 3 May 1999.
803:
760:
717:
674:
659:
586:
561:
535:
1:
528:
524:Hayek's most well-known work.
430:22. Housing and Town Planning
352:Part II – Freedom and the Law
278:Part I – The Value of Freedom
151:
1169:Friedrich Hayek bibliography
1126:Law, Legislation and Liberty
1068:Socialist calculation debate
726:Journal of Political Economy
446:
364:10. Law, Commands, and Order
20:The Constitution of Liberty
7:
1118:The Constitution of Liberty
972:The Constitution of Liberty
568:Ebenstein, Alan O. (2001).
512:
501:The Constitution of Liberty
487:The Constitution of Liberty
440:Postscript: Why I am Not a
187:
182:The Constitution of Liberty
178:The Constitution of Liberty
174:The Constitution of Liberty
146:The Constitution of Liberty
142:University of Chicago Press
133:The Constitution of Liberty
75:University of Chicago Press
10:
1226:
920:10.1017/ccol0521849772.001
912:Cambridge University Press
668:New York Times Book Review
491:British Conservative Party
436:24. Education and Research
427:21. The Monetary Framework
391:16. The Decline of the Law
1161:
1144:
1076:
1015:
769:Southern Economic Journal
489:was notably held up at a
117:
109:
101:
91:
81:
70:
56:
46:
36:
31:First edition dust jacket
24:
1200:Books by Friedrich Hayek
1038:Cultural group selection
831:New Individualist Review
812:New Individualist Review
593:Caldwell, Bruce (2004).
367:11. The Origins of the
296:3. The Common Sense of
1195:Books about capitalism
1190:1960 non-fiction books
970:Quotations related to
572:. New York: Palgrave.
316:5. Responsibility and
949:"The Non-Fiction 100"
851:(December 22, 2011).
641:Hayek, F. A. (2011).
136:is a book written by
405:and the Rise of the
1087:The Road to Serfdom
1058:Sraffa–Hayek debate
1043:Dispersed knowledge
1016:Concepts and career
858:The Washington Post
520:The Road To Serfdom
418:19. Social Security
401:17. The Decline of
198:John Maynard Keynes
21:
1129:(1973; 1976; 1979)
873:Mcdonough, John E.
19:
1177:
1176:
1134:The Fatal Conceit
1063:Spontaneous order
929:978-0-521-84977-7
914:, pp. 1–12,
849:Berlinski, Claire
554:978-0-226-31537-9
495:Margaret Thatcher
421:20. Taxation and
375:Constitutionalism
268:Table of Contents
129:
128:
92:Publication place
1217:
1152:August von Hayek
1002:
995:
988:
979:
978:
969:
953:
952:
945:
939:
938:
937:
936:
899:
893:
892:
890:
889:
875:(May 22, 2021).
869:
863:
862:
845:
839:
838:
826:
820:
819:
807:
801:
800:
764:
758:
757:
721:
715:
714:
678:
672:
671:
663:
657:
656:
638:
609:
608:
590:
584:
583:
565:
559:
558:
539:
254:John Stuart Mill
180:). He completed
170:John Stuart Mill
83:Publication date
29:
22:
18:
1225:
1224:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1173:
1157:
1140:
1072:
1028:Austrian School
1011:
1009:Friedrich Hayek
1006:
962:
957:
956:
947:
946:
942:
934:
932:
930:
900:
896:
887:
885:
870:
866:
846:
842:
827:
823:
808:
804:
781:10.2307/1055089
765:
761:
722:
718:
695:10.2307/2550455
679:
675:
664:
660:
653:
639:
612:
605:
591:
587:
580:
566:
562:
555:
540:
536:
531:
515:
506:National Review
449:
398:
354:
280:
270:
194:H. D. Dickinson
190:
154:
138:Friedrich Hayek
102:Media type
84:
41:Friedrich Hayek
32:
17:
12:
11:
5:
1223:
1213:
1212:
1207:
1202:
1197:
1192:
1175:
1174:
1172:
1171:
1165:
1163:
1159:
1158:
1156:
1155:
1148:
1146:
1142:
1141:
1139:
1138:
1130:
1122:
1114:
1106:
1098:
1091:
1082:
1080:
1074:
1073:
1071:
1070:
1065:
1060:
1055:
1050:
1048:Extended order
1045:
1040:
1035:
1030:
1025:
1019:
1017:
1013:
1012:
1005:
1004:
997:
990:
982:
976:
975:
961:
960:External links
958:
955:
954:
940:
928:
904:"Introduction"
894:
864:
840:
821:
802:
775:(3): 230–236.
759:
738:10.1086/259359
732:(6): 782–795.
716:
689:(109): 66–81.
673:
658:
651:
610:
603:
585:
578:
560:
553:
533:
532:
530:
527:
526:
525:
514:
511:
459:Lionel Robbins
448:
445:
438:
437:
434:
431:
428:
425:
423:Redistribution
419:
416:
415:and Employment
409:
397:
394:
393:
392:
389:
386:
383:
377:
371:
365:
362:
353:
350:
349:
348:
338:
331:
320:
314:
300:
294:
288:
279:
276:
275:
274:
269:
266:
189:
186:
153:
150:
127:
126:
121:
115:
114:
111:
107:
106:
103:
99:
98:
93:
89:
88:
85:
82:
79:
78:
72:
68:
67:
58:
54:
53:
48:
44:
43:
38:
34:
33:
30:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1222:
1211:
1208:
1206:
1203:
1201:
1198:
1196:
1193:
1191:
1188:
1187:
1185:
1170:
1167:
1166:
1164:
1160:
1153:
1150:
1149:
1147:
1143:
1136:
1135:
1131:
1128:
1127:
1123:
1120:
1119:
1115:
1112:
1111:
1107:
1104:
1103:
1099:
1096:
1092:
1089:
1088:
1084:
1083:
1081:
1079:
1075:
1069:
1066:
1064:
1061:
1059:
1056:
1054:
1051:
1049:
1046:
1044:
1041:
1039:
1036:
1034:
1031:
1029:
1026:
1024:
1021:
1020:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1003:
998:
996:
991:
989:
984:
983:
980:
973:
968:
964:
963:
950:
944:
931:
925:
921:
917:
913:
909:
905:
898:
884:
883:
878:
874:
868:
860:
859:
854:
850:
844:
836:
832:
825:
817:
813:
806:
798:
794:
790:
786:
782:
778:
774:
770:
763:
755:
751:
747:
743:
739:
735:
731:
727:
720:
712:
708:
704:
700:
696:
692:
688:
684:
677:
669:
662:
654:
652:9780415035309
648:
644:
637:
635:
633:
631:
629:
627:
625:
623:
621:
619:
617:
615:
606:
604:0-226-09193-7
600:
596:
589:
581:
579:0-312-23344-2
575:
571:
564:
556:
550:
546:
538:
534:
523:
521:
517:
516:
510:
508:
507:
502:
498:
496:
492:
488:
484:
481:
480:Ronald Hamowy
477:
474:
470:
467:
463:
460:
456:
453:
444:
443:
435:
432:
429:
426:
424:
420:
417:
414:
410:
408:
407:Welfare State
404:
400:
399:
390:
387:
384:
382:
378:
376:
372:
370:
366:
363:
361:and the State
360:
356:
355:
347:
343:
339:
336:
332:
329:
325:
321:
319:
315:
313:
309:
305:
301:
299:
295:
293:
289:
287:and Liberties
286:
282:
281:
272:
271:
265:
262:
258:
255:
251:
245:
243:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
206:
202:
199:
195:
185:
183:
179:
175:
171:
167:
163:
159:
149:
147:
143:
139:
135:
134:
125:
124:0-226-32084-7
122:
120:
116:
112:
108:
104:
100:
97:
96:United States
94:
90:
86:
80:
76:
73:
69:
66:
62:
59:
55:
52:
49:
45:
42:
39:
35:
28:
23:
1205:Conservatism
1162:Bibliography
1132:
1124:
1117:
1116:
1108:
1100:
1085:
1053:Free banking
1033:Catallactics
974:at Wikiquote
943:
933:, retrieved
907:
897:
886:. Retrieved
880:
867:
856:
843:
834:
830:
824:
815:
811:
805:
772:
768:
762:
729:
725:
719:
686:
682:
676:
667:
661:
642:
594:
588:
569:
563:
544:
537:
518:
504:
500:
499:
486:
485:
478:
471:
466:Frank Knight
464:
457:
450:
442:Conservative
439:
413:Labor Unions
346:Independence
292:Civilization
273:Introduction
263:
259:
246:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
211:
207:
203:
191:
181:
177:
173:
165:
161:
157:
155:
145:
132:
131:
130:
837:(2): 70–72.
818:(1): 28–31.
473:Jacob Viner
452:Sidney Hook
381:Rechtsstaat
369:Rule of Law
330:, and Merit
1184:Categories
935:2022-01-31
888:2022-01-31
529:References
342:Employment
250:Adam Smith
242:John Locke
152:Background
789:0038-4038
754:154046112
746:0022-3808
703:0013-0427
683:Economica
447:Reception
403:Socialism
312:Tradition
71:Publisher
65:Economics
1154:(father)
1097:" (1945)
882:POLITICO
513:See also
359:Coercion
335:Majority
324:Equality
298:Progress
188:Contents
61:Politics
47:Language
797:1055089
711:2550455
522:(1944),
318:Freedom
304:Freedom
285:Liberty
57:Subject
51:English
1145:Family
1137:(1988)
1121:(1960)
1113:(1952)
1105:(1948)
1090:(1944)
926:
795:
787:
752:
744:
709:
701:
649:
601:
576:
551:
310:, and
308:Reason
37:Author
1078:Works
793:JSTOR
750:S2CID
707:JSTOR
328:Value
110:Pages
105:Print
924:ISBN
785:ISSN
742:ISSN
699:ISSN
647:ISBN
599:ISBN
574:ISBN
549:ISBN
411:18.
344:and
337:Rule
252:and
196:and
119:ISBN
87:1960
77:(US)
916:doi
777:doi
734:doi
691:doi
357:9.
340:8.
333:7.
322:6.
302:4.
283:1.
113:576
1186::
922:,
910:,
906:,
879:.
855:.
833:.
814:.
791:.
783:.
773:27
771:.
748:.
740:.
730:75
728:.
705:.
697:.
687:28
685:.
613:^
509:.
326:,
306:,
63:,
1093:"
1001:e
994:t
987:v
918::
891:.
861:.
835:1
816:1
799:.
779::
756:.
736::
713:.
693::
670:.
655:.
607:.
582:.
557:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
.jpg)