991:
461:– I have never ever heard of a "crow-stepped" gable, and I can't figure out what it even means. There is no derivation explaining any "crow-ness" in the article. The term I know is common in the U.S., and I presume worldwide, is "Stepped gable", which is given as an alternate in the lede. In the U.S. stepped gables were brought by immigrants from the Netherlands, Germany, Dnemark etc., and turn out to be well-suited in some areas but do poorly in freeze-and-thaw weather of upstate New York, for example. (Also, by the way, there are frequently much less steep steps than in the photos shown, so balance on that is needed too.) I request move to simpler, more universally known, clear term.
953:
965:
941:
247:
229:
916:
the roof. The stepped gables in a number of these, along Seneca
Turnpike, were broken down so that a proper protruding gable roof could be extended, which would properly shed off snow and icicles and so on. Because there were always horrible leaks where the roof met the stepped gable. Apparently you can go up into the attics of old masonry buildings and see the remnants of the stepped gables inside. Perhaps there is not as much snow or freezing and thawing in Amsterdam or Germany (maybe just warmer) and not in Scandinavia either (maybe just colder without freezing and thawing). --
1095:) Should that be termed by us as a stepped gable, because it looks like one, although it does not have a matching one at other end of the roof, and although it is described as a false front. It does not seem to be essential in holding up the roof, it is form rather than function. "Stepped parapet" as a term sounds good to me, to describe Western false-front and other examples where it seems not functional in nature. It sure would be good to find any architecture textbook-like discussion asserting this distinction; i don't want to appear to be coining something new. --
1003:
979:
141:
120:
1038:
incorrect usage out there; we need to exercise some editorial discretion. Of course we need to refer to actual sources out there, and "coining" a new phrase would not be right, but I am figuring that there must be proper architectural expert discussion available somewhere. I am pretty sure proper architectural discusion about
Western false-front architecture does not use term "stepped gable", and I suspect actual usages are lower-quality, less-informed. Argh, still this kind of stuff is a bother to get right. --
279:
89:
72:
1062:
21:
890:, or in other Commercial architecture in the U.S. where there is basically a parapet with a low step up in the center. On the front facade only, and not really necessary to support the roof. At least the article should refer to them. Maybe these should be termed as having a "stepped parapet", instead, if they have one low step-up in the middle. The term "stepped parapet" is used in the NRHP document for a building in
151:
809:
Switzerland, and Sweden. / The step gable is a feature of the northern-renaissance revival styles." Again I take away that "step gable" is universal. It uses a photo that looks to me could not possibly be of anything in
Buffalo, New York, USA. Frankly it looks to me like a photo of one of the historic warehouses in Amsterdam or similar in Europe. Buffalo, New York, though maybe at the end of the
690:, says the steps originate in Germany 1620-1640 and are "for the use of crows", according to "1875 Chamber's Encyclopedia". Not sure an architect would design a gable to be useful for crows, the name was probably applied because they were used by crows. Searching for "corbie step" give 115 hits, but a lot are duplicates (the same article reprinted in many newspapers).
611:, but while those two sources do define the term, neither actually explains any crow association to me. Seems you are making up, on your own, the explanation "sometimes a resting place for crows", pretty much like what i assumed is a possibility, the other one I assumed possible is that they are the size of crows. But your explanation is not sourced.
1114:, titled "All About Parapets and Battlements: Fortification Details in Architecture" which seems helpful, is just about making the distinction. But then it also seems a bit non-reliable, as if written merely to garner clicks, although it does cite legitimate sources. It is a webpage published by "ThoughtCo.com", formerly
990:
894:, I just noticed, but I don't know what that building looks like, yet. These do not seem to me like really being "stepped gables", because you can't see any gable at all for these. Many of them have completely flat roofs, or there is a barrel vault or a very low gable or a shed-roof hidden behind the parapet.
648:
below asserts some usage in newspapers in the U.S., so maybe acknowledging usage "rarely in the U.S." or "at least sometimes in the U.S." or the like would be necessary). But I think "stepped gable" will be understood and used everywhere. And similarly explain where the "Corbie-stepped" variant has
1147:
Would be very helpful if the waterproofing methods from the "Construction" section were accompanied by some diagrams. I admit I need this for personal research, but a more objective reason is that the article itself is just hard to read and understand without diagrams. I assume the source is Hogan's
915:
across central New York State, which were pretty much built by "immigrants" from
Connecticut and elsewhere in New England, who were previously immigrants from Europe. In "real" stepped gables you have stepped gables really supporting the roof, and often/usually with a stepped gable at both ends of
804:
The second uses the term "Roof and crow stepped gable" for a specific historic building, photographed, which I think is in
Edinburgh, Scotland, and states "Crowsteps are squared stones which form step-like projections on the sloping sides of a gable. They were common in Scottish architecture in the
643:
It seems to me that the article should be titled "Stepped gable" with description that these occur historically in
Flemish-lands, German-lands, Scandinavia AND the U.S. And explain that "Crow-stepped" has been alternative or even primary usage in Scotland and other places where we can find sources
614:
Your first source, the
Sturgis reprint, gives merely "Crow step: Any one of the steps of a stepped gable.(Called also Cat Step, Corbel Step, and Corbie Step)", with no derivation info, and kind of asserting that a "stepped gable" is a thing, without actually asserting that "crow-stepped gable" is a
339:
The section titled "World-wide examples" seems to be a completely arbitrary, short and not extremely informative list. Some of the entries there are redlinked entirely. Unless some effort is made to systematise it or at least shape it up a good deal, I suggest that it should be removed. I can't see
813:
completed in the 1820s, is not a city of small canals and small warehouses of merchants using pulleys to lift bales of goods into a small doorway into a small upperlevel space. Places like that were common, however in
Amsterdam in its Golden Age, like in the 1500s or 1600s. Offhand I don't think
499:
is the best independent-of-wikipedia discussion I can find, and it uses "stepped gable" and "crow-stepped gable" interchangeably without explanation of any difference intended. I dunno, are the steps supposedly the size of crows (not true in general)? I suppose that crows might sit on the steps,
800:
for all that. The first one mentions "the corbie or ‘crow-stepped’ gable that is often seen combined with a clay pantile roof, particularly in the picturesque East Neuk fishing villages. Although seen elsewhere along the eastern coast and inland, these distinctive roofs contribute...", and later
630:
gables, were common in
Netherlands, German, Scandinavian areas and "influenced architecture East Anglia and Eastern Scotland." It does not use "crow-stepped gable" as a term either, and by the way the latter omits mentioning usage in the United States (and I would assume also in Canada), where I
808:
The third one I've seen, is this already used in the article? It is the "Buffalo as an
Architectural Museum"'s "Illustrated Architecture Dictionary"'s definition for term "Crow-stepped gable". It includes: "Early examples, from the 15th century onwards, are found in England, Denmark, Germany,
694:
article says the "crow-stepped gable" is more commonly known as "stair-stepped gable"" - but our WP article doesn't even mention stair-stepped in the lead (just a brief mention in alternative terms section). Searching on "stair-stepped gable" gives just two hits, so this is probably not a common
1037:
topic. Please see new Talk page section at the article that redirects to.) Yeah, about these Old West storefronts. I don't want to call them "stepped gables", even if that term has been used sometimes. I am inclined to call them "stepped parapets". We don't have to ratify what is arguably
801:
comments about, in Rotterdam, "the so called ‘Scottish Houses’ (Het Lammeken, built in 1539, and De Stuys, built in 1561) both of which, although much altered, have stepped gables (‘trapgevel’)." My takeaway is partly that "stepped gable" is a universal term.
375:
Please add the Overstolzenhaus in Cologne, it was built in 1230, some 200 odd years before the 15th century. The style spread from the German northwest into Holland and Denmark, and was carried by the German Order to exclaves in Latvia, etc.
577:
Perhaps this is too obvious, but the gable has steps, and those steps are (at least figuratively, but sometimes in practice) a resting place for crows. Hence crow step. A gable with crow steps is a "crow-stepped gable". If you need some
687:: I did a search in Newspapers.com and found 77 hits in newspapers (1862 - later 20th century) describing buildings (in both US and Europe) as having "crow-step gable"s or "crow-stepped gable". The only one explaining the term,
695:
term. Searching on "step gable" and "stepped gable" give hundreds of hits (these would include those with "crow" prefixed but it is still clearly the most used term, as far as I can tell with this crude and quick method. So
758:
This is a very common architectural term in both Scotland & Northern England. The style no doubt emanated from contact with the Dutch & Flemish traders, and second hand from those of Scandinavia & the Baltic.
1242:
limited merge. The various French regional sections all seem much the same as each other & elsewhere in Europe frankly. The last section on urban houses has more to pick. I could do it if people are ok with that.
834:
1148:"History of Muchalls Castle", which I, unfortunately, haven't been able to find. If anyone could provide it I'd be grateful (or any other source on waterproofing methods for stepped gables).
585:
No idea whether or not "stepped gable" is or has become more common, but there are plenty of sources using this terminology, of much greater antiquity than Knowledge. For example:
850:, I also ran across a mention that the typical old-west storefront facade is also called a stepped gable - although instead of many small steps, they usually have just one big one.
1162:
863:
These aren't the best images (I'm sure you can envision an image from any old western movie), and I don't have a source but it's something someone could maybe add to the article.
387:
534:, but it does briefly mention stepped gables. I've found that it those three volumes by Sturgis don't mention it, it probably bisn't important. I support the move.
431:
1104:
1075:, built in 1906 at a winery in Napa Valley, California, NRHP-listed in 2015. "The most unusual feature is the defensive stepped false front façade including a
1047:
207:
1183:
869:
1115:
1122:. I dunno, i too have "written about architecture" for approaching on 20 years now (well, more than 1 decade contributing in Knowledge, anyhow). --
1142:
1002:
370:
64:
391:
1157:
797:
778:
1277:
197:
328:
415:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
1272:
1267:
722:
551:
253:
234:
765:
679:
496:
364:
952:
658:
598:
334:
173:
1131:
826:
570:
525:
509:
448:
349:
397:
485:
762:
Also known as a corbie stepped gable from the Scots word for crow (from the Latin corvus via the French corbeaux or corbel).
383:
940:
925:
891:
705:
257:
911:
On the other hand, there are "real" stepped gables in the U.S. built by immigrants, including a series along the historic
516:
FYI, i just posted notice of this move request at three wikiprojects' Talk pages, for Architecture, NRHP, and HSITES. --
964:
164:
125:
309:
1282:
814:
that there are buildings like that in Copenhagen, Denmark, either, which seems to me to have later, bigger buildings.
1252:
1216:
1198:
644:
saying that term is explicitly used and is the common term (which I think will not be the case for the U.S., though
887:
788:
618:
Your second source, the Oxford Dictionary, defines "crow-steps" as "steps forming the stepped tops of a gable, the
1033:
for adding more and making that into a "packed" gallery. (And interesting about your constructive involvement on
252:
This article has been created, improved, or expanded by a translator from the Open Knowledge Association. See the
691:
500:
but I see no images or mention of that anywhere, as if that in fact never happens at all, much less commonly. --
1230:
978:
305:
100:
1008:
753:
805:
16th and 17th centuries, and are often referred to as 'corbie-steps' from the French 'corbie' or crow."
688:
1179:
732:
406:
1204:
1164:
1153:
1071:
Continuing about what is a "real" stepped gable or not, another problematic-to-classify example is
419:
after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
172:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
1111:
301:
88:
586:
582:
579:
766:
https://flemish.wp.st-andrews.ac.uk/2013/12/06/crowsteps-in-fife-the-flemish-connection-part-1/
744:
740:
416:
106:
36:
1175:
718:
543:
481:
379:
1092:
8:
1149:
441:
291:
246:
228:
156:
970:
594:
454:
360:
345:
48:
1248:
1226:
1212:
1194:
1127:
1100:
1072:
1065:
1043:
921:
822:
784:
675:
654:
566:
521:
505:
466:
324:
20:
636:
And the 1843 source describes a church having "that peculiarly Scotch feature, the
1119:
1034:
1012:
912:
714:
537:
477:
436:
140:
119:
1261:
1168:
775:
608:
590:
495:: Further, browsing in google results yields no explanation of crow for me.
458:
356:
341:
640:
gable." None of these explicitly explain "crow-ness" or "cat-ness", anyhow.
1244:
1222:
1208:
1190:
1123:
1096:
1091:
below. The parapet obscures the wood shake covered gable roof behind it." (
1039:
917:
886:
Yeah, we need for the article deal with the steps that sometimes appear in
847:
818:
770:
671:
650:
562:
517:
501:
462:
320:
169:
1076:
1061:
316:
297:
53:
810:
649:
been used and is most common (which I think will not include U.S.). --
31:
278:
296:
What is the difference (if any) between a crow-stepped gable and a
1088:
1084:
1080:
1030:
864:
700:
645:
57:
40:
column on 27 October 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:
1174:
Draft has information that is not in article and can be added.
835:
stepped gables vs. false-front facades having stepped parapets?
1110:
Google searching on "stepped gable vs. stepped parapet" finds
150:
739:
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this
355:
OK, since no one has objected I will remove this section.
1189:
Huh? What draft? It redirects here, so what's the point?
622:
being the topmost stone at the apex" and comments that
497:
This "Crowsteps in Fife the Flemish connection" article
817:
Anyhow, thanks again for these good sources to use. --
319:
article (perhaps a redlink when question was asked). —
731:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
530:
I see no reference to "crow-stepped gable in my 1900
56:
which was decorative, but also facilitated access to
168:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
146:
747:. No further edits should be made to this section.
1259:
315:Dutch gables have curves, as now covered in
86:
1221:Ah, thanks - I'll ponder. Header changed.
1203:I think the actual proposed merge is from
776:https://buffaloah.com/a/DCTNRY/c/crow.html
405:The following is a closed discussion of a
841:(subsection and its title inserted later)
1143:Diagrams/source on waterproofing methods
1060:
771:https://canmore.org.uk/collection/564969
371:Most notable earliest example is missing
266:Knowledge:WikiProject Intertranswiki/OKA
1120:bio about Jackie Craven, article author
532:Dictionary of Architecture and Building
269:Template:WikiProject Intertranswiki/OKA
65:Knowledge:Recent additions/2006/October
1260:
996:in "Old West" TV set near Boerne Texas
52:is a roof slope design arising in the
1087:, which appear again above the stone
63:A record of the entry may be seen at
1278:Mid-importance Architecture articles
892:East Side Downtown Historic District
424:The result of the move request was:
162:This article is within the scope of
82:
15:
1093:NRHP document, with numerous photos
105:It is of interest to the following
13:
182:Knowledge:WikiProject Architecture
70:
14:
1294:
1273:Start-Class Architecture articles
631:have never seen "crow" mentioned.
185:Template:WikiProject Architecture
71:
1001:
989:
977:
963:
951:
939:
888:Western false-front architecture
340:what it adds, information-wise.
277:
245:
227:
149:
139:
118:
87:
19:
1268:Knowledge Did you know articles
469:) 03:29, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
202:This article has been rated as
398:Requested move 2 November 2019
1:
1158:12:42, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
1132:19:53, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
1105:18:35, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
1048:12:02, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
926:00:31, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
870:00:13, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
827:22:55, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
789:08:07, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
723:11:02, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
706:03:49, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
680:02:30, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
659:22:35, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
599:03:20, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
571:02:30, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
552:00:35, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
526:00:10, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
449:00:15, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
176:and see a list of open tasks.
510:03:47, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
486:14:15, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
365:15:17, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
350:18:25, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
329:15:04, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
310:20:33, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
7:
1009:Gen. Orrin Hutchinson House
10:
1299:
258:WikiProject Intertranswiki
208:project's importance scale
1253:13:05, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
1231:14:15, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
1217:05:50, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
1199:03:14, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
1184:00:32, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
670:per nom. The usual term.
561:per nom. The usual term.
240:
201:
134:
113:
1283:Start-Class OKA articles
1205:Draft:Crow-stepped gable
1165:Draft:Crow-stepped gable
737:Please do not modify it.
412:Please do not modify it.
392:17:19, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
165:WikiProject Architecture
30:appeared on Knowledge's
1068:
95:This article is rated
76:
1064:
335:"World-wide examples"
188:Architecture articles
74:
1079:parapet composed of
958:Circle Square Ranch
946:Circle Square Ranch
754:Crow Stepped Gable.
157:Architecture portal
1163:Proposed merge of
1069:
984:west portal NJ one
971:Tombstone, Arizona
455:Crow-stepped gable
302:Richard New Forest
263:Intertranswiki/OKA
235:Intertranswiki/OKA
101:content assessment
77:
49:crow-stepped gable
1073:Chateau Pacheteau
1066:Chateau Pacheteau
842:
713:. Usual term. --
583:Oxford Dictionary
548:
488:
435:
432:non-admin closure
394:
382:comment added by
289:
288:
285:
284:
222:
221:
218:
217:
214:
213:
81:
80:
1290:
1138:
1137:
1005:
993:
981:
967:
955:
943:
840:
549:
546:
542:
540:
470:
445:
439:
429:
414:
377:
281:
274:
273:
270:
267:
264:
249:
242:
241:
231:
224:
223:
190:
189:
186:
183:
180:
159:
154:
153:
143:
136:
135:
130:
122:
115:
114:
98:
92:
91:
83:
73:
60:for maintenance?
23:
16:
1298:
1297:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1258:
1257:
1176:Robert McClenon
1172:
1145:
1136:Another hit is
1116:About Education
1035:Seneca Turnpike
1016:
1013:Seneca Turnpike
1006:
997:
994:
985:
982:
973:
968:
959:
956:
947:
944:
913:Seneca Turnpike
837:
756:
751:
580:Sturgis reprint
544:
538:
536:
443:
437:
410:
400:
384:188.118.139.112
373:
337:
294:
271:
268:
265:
262:
261:
187:
184:
181:
178:
177:
155:
148:
128:
99:on Knowledge's
96:
12:
11:
5:
1296:
1286:
1285:
1280:
1275:
1270:
1256:
1255:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1201:
1171:
1161:
1150:AndreiMiculita
1144:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1134:
1118:(according to
1059:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1018:
1017:
1007:
1000:
998:
995:
988:
986:
983:
976:
974:
969:
962:
960:
957:
950:
948:
945:
938:
935:
934:
933:
932:
931:
930:
929:
928:
902:
901:
900:
899:
898:
897:
896:
895:
877:
876:
875:
874:
873:
872:
856:
855:
854:
853:
852:
851:
836:
833:
832:
831:
830:
829:
815:
806:
802:
755:
752:
750:
749:
733:requested move
727:
726:
725:
708:
682:
664:
663:
662:
661:
641:
634:
633:
632:
616:
602:
601:
587:Bradshaw, 1843
574:
573:
555:
554:
528:
513:
512:
452:
422:
421:
407:requested move
401:
399:
396:
372:
369:
368:
367:
336:
333:
332:
331:
293:
290:
287:
286:
283:
282:
275:
254:OKA task force
250:
238:
237:
232:
220:
219:
216:
215:
212:
211:
204:Mid-importance
200:
194:
193:
191:
174:the discussion
161:
160:
144:
132:
131:
129:Mid‑importance
123:
111:
110:
104:
93:
79:
78:
68:
62:
61:
24:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1295:
1284:
1281:
1279:
1276:
1274:
1271:
1269:
1266:
1265:
1263:
1254:
1250:
1246:
1241:
1238:
1237:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1202:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1181:
1177:
1170:
1169:Stepped gable
1166:
1160:
1159:
1155:
1151:
1135:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1067:
1063:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1036:
1032:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1015:in central NY
1014:
1010:
1004:
999:
992:
987:
980:
975:
972:
966:
961:
954:
949:
942:
937:
936:
927:
923:
919:
914:
910:
909:
908:
907:
906:
905:
904:
903:
893:
889:
885:
884:
883:
882:
881:
880:
879:
878:
871:
868:
867:
862:
861:
860:
859:
858:
857:
849:
846:
845:
844:
843:
839:
838:
828:
824:
820:
816:
812:
807:
803:
799:
796:Thank you to
795:
794:
793:
792:
791:
790:
786:
781:
780:
777:
773:
772:
768:
767:
763:
760:
748:
746:
742:
738:
734:
729:
728:
724:
720:
716:
712:
709:
707:
704:
703:
698:
693:
689:
686:
683:
681:
677:
673:
669:
666:
665:
660:
656:
652:
647:
642:
639:
635:
629:
625:
621:
617:
613:
612:
610:
606:
605:
604:
603:
600:
596:
592:
588:
584:
581:
576:
575:
572:
568:
564:
560:
557:
556:
553:
550:
547:
541:
533:
529:
527:
523:
519:
515:
514:
511:
507:
503:
498:
494:
491:
490:
489:
487:
483:
479:
476:
475:
468:
464:
460:
459:Stepped gable
456:
451:
450:
447:
446:
440:
433:
428:as proposed.
427:
420:
418:
413:
408:
403:
402:
395:
393:
389:
385:
381:
366:
362:
358:
354:
353:
352:
351:
347:
343:
330:
326:
322:
318:
314:
313:
312:
311:
307:
303:
299:
280:
276:
259:
255:
251:
248:
244:
243:
239:
236:
233:
230:
226:
225:
209:
205:
199:
196:
195:
192:
175:
171:
167:
166:
158:
152:
147:
145:
142:
138:
137:
133:
127:
124:
121:
117:
116:
112:
108:
102:
94:
90:
85:
84:
69:
66:
59:
55:
51:
50:
45:
42:
41:
39:
38:
33:
29:
28:Stepped gable
25:
22:
18:
17:
1239:
1173:
1146:
1112:this article
1070:
865:
798:User:Reb0118
782:
774:
769:
764:
761:
757:
736:
730:
710:
701:
696:
684:
667:
638:crow-stepped
637:
627:
624:crow-stepped
623:
619:
558:
535:
531:
492:
473:
472:
453:
442:
425:
423:
411:
404:
378:— Preceding
374:
338:
295:
272:OKA articles
203:
179:Architecture
170:Architecture
163:
126:Architecture
107:WikiProjects
47:
44:Did you know
43:
37:Did you know
35:
27:
26:A fact from
1077:crenellated
1029:Hi, thanks
745:move review
628:cat-stepped
615:valid term.
417:move review
317:Dutch gable
298:Dutch gable
292:Dutch gable
97:Start-class
54:Middle Ages
46:... that a
1262:Categories
811:Erie Canal
715:Necrothesp
626:gables or
620:crow-stone
539:Acroterion
478:Cwmhiraeth
474:Relisting.
741:talk page
75:Knowledge
32:Main Page
743:or in a
609:Theramin
607:Thanks,
591:Theramin
578:sources.
380:unsigned
357:Yakikaki
342:Yakikaki
256:page of
58:chimneys
1245:Johnbod
1240:Support
1223:Johnbod
1209:Tollens
1191:Johnbod
1124:Doncram
1097:Doncram
1089:portico
1085:merlons
1081:crenels
1040:Doncram
1031:User:MB
918:Doncram
848:Doncram
819:Doncram
779:Reb0118
711:Support
697:Support
685:Comment
672:Johnbod
668:Support
651:Doncram
646:User:MB
563:Johnbod
559:Support
518:Doncram
502:Doncram
493:Comment
463:Doncram
321:Doncram
206:on the
34:in the
545:(talk)
103:scale.
1167:into
1011:, on
444:Slash
426:Moved
1249:talk
1227:talk
1213:talk
1195:talk
1180:talk
1154:talk
1128:talk
1101:talk
1083:and
1044:talk
922:talk
823:talk
785:talk
719:talk
692:This
676:talk
655:talk
595:talk
589:.
567:talk
522:talk
506:talk
482:talk
467:talk
388:talk
361:talk
346:talk
325:talk
306:talk
783:--(
438:Red
300:?
198:Mid
1264::
1251:)
1229:)
1215:)
1207:.
1197:)
1182:)
1156:)
1130:)
1103:)
1046:)
924:)
866:MB
825:)
787:)
735:.
721:)
702:MB
699:.
678:)
657:)
597:)
569:)
524:)
508:)
484:)
457:→
409:.
390:)
363:)
348:)
327:)
308:)
1247:(
1225:(
1211:(
1193:(
1178:(
1152:(
1126:(
1099:(
1042:(
920:(
821:(
717:(
674:(
653:(
593:(
565:(
520:(
504:(
480:(
471:—
465:(
434:)
430:(
386:(
359:(
344:(
323:(
304:(
260:.
210:.
109::
67:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
,_logo.png){kind=logo}
