450:
some to conclude that student athletes at "small residential liberal arts colleges (most of which are
Division III schools)" are more engaged than student athletes in Division I and Division II institutions. Variations in the levels of student-athlete engagement among institutions from different divisions may be explained by stated philosophies of each division. Institutions that compete at the Division III level "offer athletics because of its inherent educational value" and view athletics as an extension of the school's "educational mission." Member institutions of Division II broaden the focus of Division III members and place an equal amount of emphasis on academic, athletic and social success. According to the NCAA Division II Philosophy Statement, "the Division II approach provides growth opportunities through academic achievement, learning in high-level athletics competition and development of positive societal attitudes in service to community." The stated philosophy of Division I institutions places less emphasis on the personal, social and intellectual growth of their student-athletes and states that its "ultimate goal is for student-athletes to graduate" because "a college degree gives student-athletes more options in life."
474:
increasing learning through shared experience. Lenning and Ebbers (1999) defined four different types of learning communities: 1. Curricular communities which consist of students co-enrolled in multiple courses in the same field of study. 2. Classroom learning communities that focus on group learning activities in the classroom. 3. Residential learning communities that are formed off-campus that provide out of the classroom learning and discussion opportunities. 4. Student-type learning communities that are created for special groups of students. Within learning communities, students are able to interact with peers who share similar interests and stimulate conversation about the topic. Such conversations are beneficial because they expose the members of the community to new ideas and methods. Students that are a part of such communities are therefore able to generate and construct their knowledge and understanding through inquisitive conversations with peers, as opposed to being given information by the instructor. This type of engagement in the field leads to a deep understanding of the material and gives the student a personal connection to the topic (Zhao and Kuh 2004).
249:
studies have shown to be positively connected to student engagement. A family's income also has an effect on a child's engagement, because families with a higher socioeconomic status (SES) have been shown to expose their children to more intellectually enriching activities and know how to intervene in the school system to promote their child's education. A family's literacy may also affect a child's engagement; students such as immigrant or bilingual students may not have families that are literate in the language of the classroom. This language disconnect makes it especially difficult for these families to be involved in their child's education, as they may struggle to communicate with the child's teacher and form connections. Literacy resources and translators will help to make these connections between school and family for these students and aid in their engagement. Additionally, a school's engagement with its community brings a better understanding of the community values, implementing these values in the school environment will lead to more family involvement and therefore, student engagement.
459:
educational research, planning, teaching, evaluation, and decision-making. Providing teachers with training on how to promote student autonomy was beneficial in enhancing student engagement by providing students with a more autonomous environment, rather than a controlling environment. Another method of promoting student engagement is through the use of learning communities, a technique that has a group of students taking the same classes together. By being part of a group taking the same classes, students show an increase in academic performance and collaborative skills. Increasing student engagement is especially important at the university level in increasing student persistence. It may also increase students' mastery of challenging material.
421:
student athletes are as challenged academically, interact with faculty as frequently, and participate as often in active and collaborative learning activities," however, "female student athletes" when compared to female non-athletes "are more likely to interact with faculty and participate in active and collaborative learning activities." The size of the institution has also been studied as a possible factor in determining a student athlete's engagement. Some researchers argue that "more selective, smaller schools with low student-faculty ratios have higher levels of engagement, as well as schools classified as baccalaureate institutions."
478:
order to build on individual and team strengths and to identify and address areas of concern. Results are then used to identify students who are experiencing difficulty and need additional time and support for learning as well as students who are highly proficient and require enrichment and extension. Learning community programs also improve students' interpersonal dialogue, collaboration, and experiential learning within the context of diversity, these programs address a decreasing sense of community and connection and allow students to relate their college-level learning to larger personal and global questions.
408:"high-commitment athletes were distinguished from non-athletes by their lower perception of themselves throughout college as smart, intellectual, and artistic/creative, and a higher perception of themselves as socially skilled, outgoing, confident and good leaders." Despite the contrasts in where non-athletes and student athletes believe their strengths lie, "high-commitment athletes were as likely as non-athletes to report every year that they had grown as a person, pursued new activities and interests, gotten to know people from different backgrounds, and found a place at the college/university."
395:
behavior of students and student athletes, results have shown that student athletes perceive themselves as less intelligent, but more sociable than non-athletes. Surveys asking student athletes about their engagement with other groups on campus have found that the majority of student athletes engages in extracurricular activities and spends more than half of its time interacting with non-athletes. A trend in results developed as well; freshman student athletes proved to be more socially outgoing than senior student-athletes who admitted to spending more time with teammates.
487:
Learning
Research Hub, connected learning "advocates for broadened access to learning that is socially embedded, interest-driven, and oriented toward educational, economic, or political opportunity." Connected learning environments are learning communities where the walls that separate student learning in and out of school are taken down, opportunities outside of traditional school organizational systems are created, and curricula and instruction is better aligned with student interests.
104:
successful in, the learning process promoting higher level thinking for enduring understanding." Student engagement is also a usefully ambiguous term for the complexity of 'engagement' beyond the fragmented domains of cognition, behaviour, emotion or affect, and in doing so encompass the historically situated individual within their contextual variables (such as personal and familial circumstances) that at every moment influence how engaged an individual (or group) is in their learning.
183:
program and student participation in school reform activities. Engaged students show sustained behavioral involvement in learning activities accompanied by a positive emotional tone. They select tasks at the border of their competencies, initiate action when given the opportunity, and exert intense effort and concentration in the implementation of learning tasks; they show generally positive emotions during ongoing action, including enthusiasm, optimism, curiosity, and interest.
232:
internal factor is cognitive engagement, which concerns the student's mental processes of paying attention and pushing themselves past their expectations. The last factor deals with the student's positive or negative experience of learning, and is called emotional-affective engagement. These internal engagement factors are not stable, and can shift over time or change as the student moves in and out of the school environment, classroom environment, and different learning tasks.
24:
523:
rings equally true in higher education. Accomplishing that end is nearly impossible in introductory, general education classes with class enrolments reaching up to 300 students at some schools but relationship-building is a skill that is under-appreciated in the "college experience". In
Australia many schools offer an integrated program developed by
386:, researchers often measure personal development to determine whether the student is happy and having a fulfilling college experience. For a student-athlete, personal development, a necessary ingredient to leading a successful life, includes participation in activities outside the sphere of one's sport and interaction with non-athletes.
276:
communities of color (specifically black, Native
American, and Latino) experience more stressors due to their surroundings. Neighborhoods closely mirror the resources given to the schools in the area, and schools in low SES areas are underfunded and lack supplies, leading to an inequality gap in the education these children receive.
495:
areas of interests and expertise. A successful connected learning environment can deepen and expand each student's interests, expertise, and knowledge by challenging them to learn and explore content outside of their "islands of expertise," and emphasizing the importance of dialogue and connection practices.
522:
The J. Erik
Jonsson Community School (3 year-old-5th grade) in Dallas, TX has a simple formula for success: "Powerful Pedagogy + trusting relationships = student engagement" (Journal of Staff Development, 2008). The majority of research is done is early education (Pre-School-5th), but this sentiment
275:
Environmental stressors, predicted by both race-ethnicity and SES, play a large role in student engagement. Children from poor or low socioeconomic households may experience a disruption in family functioning due to economic hardships and financial strains, and children from low SES neighborhoods and
266:
A student's social identity (i.e. race-ethnicity and social class) contributes heavily to a child's engagement. Social positions influence access to resources and opportunities, exposure to stressors, and parental investment. It is vital to consider sociocultural factors when observing the engagement
248:
Family shapes a child's experience with learning and engaging through the home environment such as family values, and the family's access to opportunities. Parenting styles and the parents’ expectations for the child's success influence how much parents are involved with their child's learning, which
214:
Many factors contribute to a student's engagement at school, ranging from the student's internal experiences to the student's interactions with their environment. Research by
Fletcher identifies eight different ways student engagement is affected through these internal and external factors, including
151:
articulation of learning criteria with clear, immediate, and constructive feedback; show students the skills they need to be successful are within their grasp by clearly and systematically demonstrating these skills, and; demonstrate engagement in learning as a valuable aspect of their personalities.
507:
Student engagement represents two critical features of collegiate quality. The first is the amount of time and effort students put into their studies and other educationally purposeful activities. The second is how the institution deploys its resources and organizes the curriculum and other learning
477:
Organizing classrooms into learning communities allows instructors to constantly gather evidence of student learning to inform and improve their professional practice. They use common assessments and make results from those assessments easily accessible and openly shared among members of the team in
449:
from each division differ in their behavior and levels of engagement. For instance, "for both men and women, students at
Division III schools report higher levels of academic challenge..." and "interact with faculty more than students at Division I and Division II schools." Such findings have caused
381:
The body of literature concerning college student athletes and how they spend their time has increased in recent years. Many educators and scholars have inquired whether participating in college athletics enhances or detracts from a student athlete's college experience and whether participation in a
201:
Engagement is more than what students listen and do. A high level of engagement results in better learning, and the learner will be emotionally connected, feel satisfied with the course and the institution. proposes a frame work in terms of
Emotional, Behavioral & Cognitive. highlighted that the
112:
Student engagement is frequently used to, "depict students' willingness to participate in routine school activities, such as attending class, submitting required work, and following teachers' directions in class." However, the term is also increasingly used to describe meaningful student involvement
398:
Some literature that attempts to explain student athlete involvement in extracurricular activities looks at factors such as the profile of the sport, the educational, social, economic and cultural background of athletes and characteristics of the institution, which may or may not support and foster
292:
The factors mentioned above do not occur in isolation to one another - they are interconnected and shape student engagement. For example, research has shown a connection between school systems and race-ethnicity in that black male students and Latino male students are suspended at a rate far higher
420:
are as engaged in most educationally purposeful activities as their peers." However, other comparisons have been made among student athletes in order to better understand which kind of student athlete pursues greater educational engagement. For example, when "compared with male non-athletes, male
231:
Studies have concluded that there are three main factors that contribute to the student's internal process of engaging, the first of which is behavioral engagement. Behavioral engagement defines how the student appears to be engaging with learning, such as participating and persevering. The second
84:
occurs when "students make a psychological investment in learning. They try hard to learn what school offers. They take pride not simply in earning the formal indicators of success (grades and qualifications), but in understanding the material and incorporating or internalizing it in their lives."
498:
Connected learning environments allow students to be embedded in social networks and communities of different interests and expertise that they can call upon for help, feedback, and mentorship. Connected learning environments are characterized by their "low barriers to entry and a multiplicity of
473:
One method that has been gaining popularity in
University teaching is the creation or encouragement of learning communities (Zhao and Kuh 2004). Learning communities are widely recognized as an effective form of student engagement and consist of groups of students that form with the intention of
134:
and socio-cultural perspectives to represent student engagement as three dimensions including affect, behavior, and cognition. Using these perspectives, some researchers have further borrowed from work psychology research to suggest that the 'engaged' part of student engagement means that student
494:
The connected learning approach calls for a central focus to include the linking of deep "vertical" expertise with horizontal expertise and creating connections to other cultural domains and practices, and also expects an outcome of the learning approach to be to deepen and expand each student's
490:
Connected learning results when a pupil is able to pursue a passion or interest of theirs with the support of peers and caring adults and links their learning and interests to academic achievement, career success, and/or civic engagement. The critical components that encompass connected learning
394:
Many scholars approach research concerning student athletes by comparing student athletes to non-athletes. In studies, such as those presented in the article, "A Comparison of
Athletes and Nonathletes at Highly Selective Colleges: Academic Performance and Personal Development", which look at the
486:
The connected learning educational approach is based on evidence that suggests that the most resilient, adaptive, and effective learning involves individual interest as well as social support to overcome adversity and provide recognition. According to research conducted by the Digital Media and
205:
The opposite of engagement is disaffection. Disaffected students are passive, do not try hard, and give up easily in the face of challenges... be bored, depressed, anxious, or even angry about their presence in the classroom; they can be withdrawn from learning opportunities or even rebellious
257:
Peers have a strong influence on adolescent engagement, with research showing that adolescents will match their engagement level to that of their peer group, and conversely choose a peer group that matches their own engagement level. During this time, peers are an important part of a student's
182:
The term "student engagement" has been used to depict students' willingness to participate in routine school activities, such as attending classes, submitting required work, and following teachers' directions in class. That includes participating in the activities offered as part of the school
458:
Several methods have been demonstrated to promote higher levels of student engagement. Instructors can enhance student engagement by encouraging students to become more active participants in their education through setting and achieving goals and by providing collaborative opportunities for
125:
In a number of studies student engagement has been identified as a desirable trait in schools; however, there is little consensus among students and educators as to how to define it. Often, student engagement is defined according to one of the most popular measures of student engagement – the
103:
in education circles." Students are engaged when they are involved in their work, persist despite challenges and obstacles, and take visible delight in accomplishing their work. Student engagement also refers to a "student's willingness, need, desire and compulsion to participate in, and be
150:
Student engagement requires that teachers actively seek to create the conditions that foster this reaction. The first step to whole-school improvement in the area of student engagement is for the entire building faculty to share a definition of student engagement. Other steps include clear
154:
Relationships between students and adults in schools, and among students themselves, are a critical factor of student engagement. This is especially true among students considered to be at-risk and without other positive adult interaction. There are several strategies for developing these
407:
divisions and revenue generating and non-revenue generating sports have proven helpful. Some researchers believe that differences in how non-athletes and student athletes perceive themselves may determine their level of involvement on college/university campuses. Research has shown that
130:. Because of the lack of consensus on what student engagement is (and what it is not), researchers have begun to offer suggestions for moving the educational literature towards a unified conceptualization of student engagement. These researchers generally adopt a combination of
372:
population. Measuring how and why student athletes at colleges/universities engage with their surrounding academic and professional communities helps educational institutions better understand how they can help student athletes "make the most of the rich academic environment."
121:
and school building climate. It is also often used to refer as much to student involvement in extra-curricular activities in the campus life of a school/college/university which are thought to have educational benefits as it is to student focus on their curricular studies.
202:
engagement is related with the Mastery of academic work. described the process of student engagement. The author stated that the student engagement stimulates the curiosity.;; identified four dimensions including academic, Affective, Behavioral, & Cognitive
279:
Environmental stressors also include the prejudice, racism, and discrimination a student of color is subject to. A child's race determines the stereotypes they will face in and out of school, and research has shown that perceptions of discrimination and
198:, student-faculty interaction, enriching education experiences and a supportive learning environment. Indicators of the absence of student engagement include unexcused absences from classes, cheating on tests, and damaging school property.
671:
Bomia, L., Beluzo, L., Demeester, D., Elander, K., Johnson, M., & Sheldon, B. (1997). "The impact of teaching strategies on intrinsic motivation." Champaign, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Elementary and Early Childhood Education. p.
1232:
1301:
Wang, M.T., & Eccles, J. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28,
499:
roles, ways of participating, and improving and gaining expertise." The goal of connected learning is to integrate the peer culture, academics, and interests in the way that each individual student is best reached.
293:
than their white male peers. Observing the intersection between the factors (and the privileges and oppression inherent in each factor), help to create a deeper understanding of an individual student's engagement.
1321:
Skiba, R. J., Horner, R. H., Chung, C.-G., Rausch, M. K., May, S. L., & Tobin, T. (2011). Race is not neutral: A national investigation of African American and Latino disproportionality in school discipline.
1311:
Baysu, G., Celeste, L., Brown, R., Verschueren, K., & Phalet, K. (2016). Minority adolescents in ethnically diverse schools: Perceptions of equal treatment buffer threat effects. Child Development, 87,
305:
have raised concerns that definitions and assessments of student engagement are often exclusive to the values represented by dominant groups within the learning environment where the analysis is conducted.
258:
self-identity, with a strong connection to a peer group relating to higher levels of engagement. Peers also influence younger children as they learn to navigate how to socialize and socially conform.
1586:
Aries, Elizabeth; Danielle McCarthy; Peter Salovey; Mahzarin R. Banaji (2004). "A Comparison of Athletes and Nonathletes at Highly Selective Colleges: Academic Performance and Personal Development".
240:
There are a vast amount of external factors that influence a child's experience with engaging in learning, such as the family, school, peers, sociocultural factors, and environmental stressors.
1900:
Hake, R.R. 1997. Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. Am. J. Phys. Vol. 66, 64- 74.
1891:
Kuh, G.D., Cruce, T.M. and R. Shoup. 2008. Unmasking the Effects of Student Engagement on First-Year College Grades and Persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, Vol.79, 540–563.
956:
Burch, Gerald F.; Heller, Nathan A.; Burch, Jana J.; Freed, Rusty; Steed, Steve A. (May 19, 2015). "Student Engagement: Developing a Conceptual Framework and Survey Instrument".
1870:
Reeve,J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S. and Barch, J. 2004. Enhancing Students' Engagement by Increasing Teachers' Autonomy Support. Motivation and Emotion, Vol. 28, 147–169.
527:
which provides a type of micro-climate for students experiencing disengagement to develop trusting relationships in the context of practical, construction based, tasks.
368:
create one of the dominant groups in most learning environments in the United States of America. Most high schools and universities in the U.S. maintain a large
1127:
Skinner, E.A., & Belmont, M.J. (1993). "Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year."
491:
environments include: 1) greater depth and breadth of interests, 2) peer, adult, and institutional learning supports, and 3) greater academic orientation.
88:
Since the U.S. college dropout rate for first-time-in college degree-seeking students is nearly 50%, it is increasingly seen as an indicator of successful
1257:
Wang, M. T., Degol, J. L., & Henry, D. A. (2019). An integrative development-in-sociocultural-context model for children’s engagement in learning.
913:
Fredricks, Jennifer A; Blumenfeld, Phyllis C; Paris, Alison H (March 1, 2004). "School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence".
1632:
Gayles, Joy; Shouping Hu (2009). "Influence of Student Engagement and Sport Participation on College Outcomes among Division I Student Athletes".
34:
126:
National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). Other studies have shown that student engagement overlaps with, but is not the same as, student
1276:
382:
sport negatively or positively affects other areas of a student-athlete's college life. When analyzing the career of any college student or
1882:
Zhao, C. and G.D. Kuh. 2004. Adding Value: Learning Communities and Student Engagement. Research in Higher Education, Vol. 45, 115–138.
795:
Kezar, Adrianna J.; Kinzie, Jillian (March 8, 2006). "Examining the Ways Institutions Create Student Engagement: The Role of Mission".
1456:"Engagement assessment for the educational web-service based on largest Lyapunov exponent calculation for user reaction time series"
741:
Chapman, E. (2003) "Assessing student engagement rates," ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation. ERIC identifier: ED482269.
541:
399:
student-athletes' involvement in groups and clubs outside of their team. In determining levels of student engagement among college
1404:"Learning analytics should not promote one size fits all: The effects of instructional conditions in predicting academic success"
508:
opportunities to get students to participate in activities that decades of research studies show are linked to student learning.
267:
behavior of youths of color, because they experience intergenerational oppression, discrimination, and socioeconomic inequality.
1037:
McCombs, B.L., & Pope, J.E. (1994). "Motivating hard to reach students." Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
349:
exists in educational databases, so there is an excellent opportunity to use these datasets to understand student engagement in
1833:
1403:
551:
171:
598:
1570:"A Comparison of Athletes and Nonathletes at Highly Selective Colleges: Academic Performance and Personal Development"
691:
68:
2038:
1101:
Natriello, G. (1984). "Problems in the evaluation of students and student disengagement from secondary schools."
1557:"Influence of Student Engagement and Sport Participation on College Outcomes among Division I Student Athletes"
317:, can be used to aid this process. Researchers also use direct observations, work sample analyses, and focused
167:
throughout the learning environment. There have been multiple formats identified for this type of engagement.
1431:
1983:
1920:
301:
Assessing student engagement is seen as an essential step towards a school becoming a successful proponent.
1073:
782:
524:
1024:
Strong, R. Silver, H. and Robinson, A. (1995) "What do students want (and what really motivates them)?"
2028:
346:
186:
Another study identified five indicators for student engagement in college. They included the level of
709:"Engagement in language learning: A systematic review of 20 years of research methods and definitions"
2023:
1767:"Intercollegiate Athletes and Effective Educational Practices: Winning Combination or Losing Effort?"
1741:"Intercollegiate Athletes and Effective Educational Practices: Winning Combination or Losing Effort?"
1672:"Intercollegiate Athletes and Effective Educational Practices: Winning Combination or Losing Effort?"
314:
216:
174:
identifies dozens of everyday indicators of student engagement throughout colleges and universities.
809:
624:
345:
environments has recently gained traction. A massive amount of data about student interactions with
164:
160:
50:
1363:
1225:
330:
46:
1792:
1012:
804:
584:
195:
599:"Completing College: A State-Level View of Student Attainment Rates (Signature Report No. 8a)"
309:
There are several methods to measure student engagement. They include self-reporting, such as
1000:
Student Engagement at School: a sense of belonging and participation: Results from PISA 2000.
772:, Melbourne: Australian Scholarly Publishing & Trinity College, University of Melbourne.
42:
118:
8:
1599:
662:
Schlechty, P. (1994). "Increasing Student Engagement." Missouri Leadership Academy. p. 5.
442:
438:
350:
1487:
Siemens, George (August 20, 2013). "Learning Analytics: The Emergence of a Discipline".
329:
In addition to the traditional methods of collecting data of student engagement such as
138:
Student engagement is used to discuss students' attitudes towards school, while student
2008:
1766:
1740:
1721:
1713:
1671:
1649:
1611:
1603:
1512:
981:
938:
895:
830:
724:
561:
546:
468:
354:
403:, methods of comparison between student athletes and non-athletes, females and males,
135:
harness themselves to their role, and thus show a high level of activation or energy.
1653:
1585:
1516:
1504:
1436:
1348:
Hurtado, S. (1999) "Reaffirming Educators Judgment: Educational Value of Diversity."
973:
930:
899:
887:
822:
728:
687:
434:
338:
310:
302:
281:
1725:
1615:
985:
834:
1705:
1641:
1595:
1533:
1496:
1467:
1426:
1418:
1375:
1013:"University Faculty Members' Perceptions of Student Engagement: An Interview Study.
965:
942:
922:
877:
869:
814:
716:
597:
Shapiro, D.; Dundar, A.; Wakhungu, P.; Yuan, X. & Harrell, A. (February 2015).
556:
536:
969:
1811:
1764:
1738:
1669:
1559:. The Journal of Higher Education: Ohio State University Press. pp. 315–333.
1422:
873:
765:
446:
417:
400:
383:
369:
365:
191:
1364:"Online microlearning and student engagement in computer games higher education"
860:
Kahu, Ella R. (June 1, 2013). "Framing student engagement in higher education".
2033:
1116:
Meaningful student involvement: Guide to students as partners in school change.
1086:
517:
1709:
926:
849:
The Innovative School: organization and instruction. Praeger/Greenwood. p. 85.
720:
651:
Mission and Place: Strengthening Learning and Community Through Campus Design.
284:
play a large role in the development of engagement amongst children of color.
2017:
1857:
Meaningful Student Involvement Guide to Students as Partners in School Change
1508:
1500:
1440:
977:
934:
891:
826:
334:
220:
156:
96:
1968:
1790:
1472:
1455:
1395:
1696:
Porter, Stephen (2006). "Institutional Structures and Student Engagement".
1380:
818:
1047:
596:
113:
throughout the learning environment, including students participating in
1831:
1717:
1607:
1569:
433:, colleges and universities are placed in one of three classifications:
1856:
1645:
1402:
Gašević, Dragan; Dawson, Shane; Rogers, Tim; Gasevic, Danijela (2016).
1115:
882:
752:
342:
318:
131:
127:
114:
360:
142:
engagement identifies withdrawing from school in any significant way.
1941:
770:
A large and liberal education': higher education for the 21st century
707:
Hiver, Phil; Al-Hoorie, Ali H.; Vitta, Joseph P.; Wu, Janice (2021).
313:, questionnaires, checklists and rating scales. Technologies such as
92:
89:
781:
Taylor, L., & Parsons, J. (2011). Improving Student Engagement.
1765:
Umbach, Paul; Megan M. Palmer; George D. Kuh; Stephanie J. Hannah.
1739:
Umbach, Paul; Megan M. Palmer; George D. Kuh; Stephanie J. Hannah.
1670:
Umbach, Paul; Megan M. Palmer; George D. Kuh; Stephanie J. Hannah.
1556:
187:
100:
1974:
Workshop: Novel Approaches to Promoting Student Engagement (NAPSE)
1336:
324:
1978:
2003:
1973:
581:
Student Engagement and Achievement in American Secondary Schools
1791:
The National Collegiate Athletic Association (September 2008).
1087:"Alternative approaches to assessing student engagement rates."
1015:
Center for Teaching, Learning and Technology. Retrieved 7/2/07.
1002:
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. p. i.
33:
deal primarily with the United States and do not represent a
389:
430:
404:
1401:
1339:. University of Tennessee – Chattanooga. Retrieved 7/2/07.
209:
1998:
1988:
912:
708:
1993:
1921:"Connected Learning: An Agenda For Research and Design"
1834:"The National Athletic Collegiate Athletic Association"
1594:(6). Research in Higher Education: Springer: 577–602.
682:
Hiver, Phil; Al-Hoorie, Ali H.; Mercer, Sarah (2021).
1979:
Speak Out – the Alberta Student Engagement Initiative
1534:"Siena Saints Official Athletic Site – Siena College"
1480:
955:
706:
2009:
What is Student Engagement, and why is it important?
1878:
1876:
1233:
National Association of Elementary School Principals
1103:
Journal of Research and Development in Education, 17
681:
1148:
1146:
502:
361:
Measuring student engagement among student-athletes
287:
99:. The phrase was identified in 1996 as "the latest
1275:
1090:Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 8
1873:
1631:
1432:20.500.11820/bb8a1388-d48b-495d-a0e7-807b14f491f1
376:
2015:
1984:High School Survey of Student Engagement (HSSSE)
1143:
604:. National Student Clearinghouse Research Center
453:
1528:
1526:
1140:Kenny, G. Kenny, D. and Dumont, R. (1995) p. 37
753:Guide to Students as Partners in School Change.
625:"BENEFITS AND STRATEGIES OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT"
325:Measuring student engagement in online settings
296:
1999:Community College Survey of Student Engagement
1832:The National Collegiate Athletic Association.
1453:
1554:
847:Sharan, S. Shachar, H. and Levine, T. (1999)
31:The examples and perspective in this article
1627:
1625:
1523:
1362:McKee, Connor; Ntokos, Konstantinos (2022).
684:Student engagement in the language classroom
1794:NCAA Division III Governance Issues Booklet
1665:
1663:
1581:
1579:
1577:
1361:
1337:"UTC working to enhance student engagement"
794:
1861:Olympia, WA: SoundOut. Retrieved 10/20/10.
1215:Skinner, E.A., & Belmont, M.J. (1993).
1048:Stories of meaningful student involvement.
649:Kenny, G. Kenny, D. and Dumont, R. (1995)
424:
416:Many studies have shown that "on average,
270:
1622:
1471:
1430:
1379:
881:
808:
756:Olympia, WA: SoundOut. Retrieved 2/20/08.
390:Student athletes and non-student athletes
69:Learn how and when to remove this message
1660:
1574:
1076:. Longwood University. Retrieved 7/2/07.
542:High School Survey of Student Engagement
411:
261:
1486:
462:
155:relationships, including acknowledging
2016:
1695:
797:Journal of College Student Development
210:Factors Influencing Student Engagement
1994:National Survey of Student Engagement
1914:
1912:
1910:
1908:
1906:
1253:
1251:
1249:
1247:
1245:
1243:
1241:
1129:Journal of Educational Psychology, 85
1061:Student Perceptions in the Classroom.
686:. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
552:National Survey of Student Engagement
481:
172:National Survey of Student Engagement
1495:(10). SAGE Publications: 1380–1400.
859:
17:
1918:
1063:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. p. 27.
1011:Berardi, L. and Gerschick, T. (nd)
235:
226:
13:
1903:
1600:10.1023/B:RIHE.0000040264.76846.e9
1305:
1238:
622:
14:
2050:
1962:
1454:Nikulchev, E.; Gusev, A. (2023).
1411:The Internet and Higher Education
1226:"Stepping up student engagement,"
1050:Olympia, WA: CommonAction. p. 19.
958:Journal of Education for Business
511:
206:towards teachers and classmates.
1188:Christenson & Anderson, 2002
1118:Olympia, WA: CommonAction. p. 4.
1059:Schunk, D. and Meece, J. (1992)
503:Displaying work in the community
288:Intersection of External Factors
22:
1934:
1894:
1885:
1864:
1848:
1825:
1804:
1784:
1758:
1732:
1689:
1634:The Journal of Higher Education
1563:
1548:
1447:
1368:Research in Learning Technology
1355:
1342:
1329:
1315:
1295:
1268:
1218:
1209:
1200:
1191:
1182:
1173:
1164:
1155:
1134:
1121:
1108:
1095:
1079:
1066:
1053:
1040:
1031:
1018:
1005:
992:
949:
906:
853:
841:
788:
775:
759:
744:
145:
1928:Digital Media and Research Hub
915:Review of Educational Research
735:
715:. Advance online publication.
700:
675:
665:
656:
643:
616:
590:
573:
377:Measurement through comparison
107:
1:
1489:American Behavioral Scientist
970:10.1080/08832323.2015.1019821
567:
454:Increasing student engagement
177:
95:, and as a valued outcome of
1698:Research in Higher Education
1588:Research in Higher Education
1423:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.10.002
1324:School Psychology Review, 40
874:10.1080/03075079.2011.598505
297:Measuring student engagement
7:
2004:Hands On Learning Australia
862:Studies in Higher Education
783:Current Issues in Education
530:
525:Hands On Learning Australia
45:, discuss the issue on the
10:
2055:
1969:Student engagement library
1555:Gayles, Joy; Shouping Hu.
713:Language Teaching Research
515:
466:
347:Learning management system
1919:Ito; et al. (2013).
1710:10.1007/s11162-005-9006-z
1235:. Retrieved Jan 10, 2024.
927:10.3102/00346543074001059
721:10.1177/13621688211001289
445:. Research suggests that
341:of student activities in
315:audience response systems
243:
1704:(5). Springer: 521–558.
1501:10.1177/0002764213498851
1224:Fletcher, A.F.C. (2023)
252:
165:youth-adult partnerships
161:intergenerational equity
1473:10.3390/educsci13020141
1092:(13). Retrieved 7/2/07.
1026:Educational Leadership.
425:Comparisons by division
271:Environmental Stressors
2039:Educational psychology
1417:. Elsevier BV: 68–84.
1161:(Fredrick et al. 2004)
585:Teachers College Press
196:collaborative learning
1381:10.25304/rlt.v30.2680
1259:American Psychologist
1170:Newmann et al. (1992)
819:10.1353/csd.2006.0018
653:Oryx/Greenwood. p. 37
412:Comparisons by gender
262:Sociocultural Factors
1854:Fletcher, A. (2005)
1282:umsl.vitalsource.com
1206:Russell et al., 2005
1179:Strong et al. (1995)
1114:Fletcher, A. (2005)
1085:Chapman, E. (2003).
1046:Fletcher, A. (2005)
998:Willms, J.D. (2003)
750:Fletcher, A. (2005)
463:Learning communities
119:classroom management
51:create a new article
43:improve this article
1152:Chapman, E. (2003).
579:Newmann, F. (1992)
1646:10.1353/jhe.0.0051
1460:Education Sciences
1229:Principal Magazine
562:Learning analytics
547:Learning community
482:Connected learning
469:Learning community
355:learning analytics
339:digital footprints
303:Critical educators
82:Student engagement
2029:Popular education
1800:. pp. 69–70.
1536:. Sienasaints.com
1350:Liberal Education
1028:September. p. 25.
282:stereotype threat
79:
78:
71:
53:, as appropriate.
2046:
2024:Education theory
1957:
1956:
1954:
1952:
1938:
1932:
1931:
1925:
1916:
1901:
1898:
1892:
1889:
1883:
1880:
1871:
1868:
1862:
1852:
1846:
1845:
1843:
1841:
1829:
1823:
1822:
1820:
1818:
1808:
1802:
1801:
1799:
1788:
1782:
1781:
1779:
1777:
1771:
1762:
1756:
1755:
1753:
1751:
1745:
1736:
1730:
1729:
1693:
1687:
1686:
1684:
1682:
1676:
1667:
1658:
1657:
1629:
1620:
1619:
1583:
1572:
1567:
1561:
1560:
1552:
1546:
1545:
1543:
1541:
1530:
1521:
1520:
1484:
1478:
1477:
1475:
1451:
1445:
1444:
1434:
1408:
1399:
1393:
1392:
1390:
1388:
1383:
1359:
1353:
1346:
1340:
1333:
1327:
1319:
1313:
1309:
1303:
1299:
1293:
1292:
1290:
1288:
1279:
1272:
1266:
1255:
1236:
1222:
1216:
1213:
1207:
1204:
1198:
1195:
1189:
1186:
1180:
1177:
1171:
1168:
1162:
1159:
1153:
1150:
1141:
1138:
1132:
1125:
1119:
1112:
1106:
1099:
1093:
1083:
1077:
1070:
1064:
1057:
1051:
1044:
1038:
1035:
1029:
1022:
1016:
1009:
1003:
996:
990:
989:
953:
947:
946:
910:
904:
903:
885:
857:
851:
845:
839:
838:
812:
792:
786:
779:
773:
763:
757:
748:
742:
739:
733:
732:
704:
698:
697:
679:
673:
669:
663:
660:
654:
647:
641:
640:
638:
636:
620:
614:
613:
611:
609:
603:
594:
588:
577:
557:Youth engagement
537:Education theory
447:student athletes
418:student athletes
401:student athletes
366:Student athletes
236:External Factors
227:Internal Factors
74:
67:
63:
60:
54:
26:
25:
18:
2054:
2053:
2049:
2048:
2047:
2045:
2044:
2043:
2014:
2013:
1965:
1960:
1950:
1948:
1940:
1939:
1935:
1923:
1917:
1904:
1899:
1895:
1890:
1886:
1881:
1874:
1869:
1865:
1853:
1849:
1839:
1837:
1830:
1826:
1816:
1814:
1810:
1809:
1805:
1797:
1789:
1785:
1775:
1773:
1769:
1763:
1759:
1749:
1747:
1743:
1737:
1733:
1694:
1690:
1680:
1678:
1674:
1668:
1661:
1630:
1623:
1584:
1575:
1568:
1564:
1553:
1549:
1539:
1537:
1532:
1531:
1524:
1485:
1481:
1452:
1448:
1406:
1400:
1396:
1386:
1384:
1360:
1356:
1352:, Spring, p. 28
1347:
1343:
1334:
1330:
1320:
1316:
1310:
1306:
1300:
1296:
1286:
1284:
1274:
1273:
1269:
1256:
1239:
1223:
1219:
1214:
1210:
1205:
1201:
1196:
1192:
1187:
1183:
1178:
1174:
1169:
1165:
1160:
1156:
1151:
1144:
1139:
1135:
1126:
1122:
1113:
1109:
1100:
1096:
1084:
1080:
1071:
1067:
1058:
1054:
1045:
1041:
1036:
1032:
1023:
1019:
1010:
1006:
997:
993:
954:
950:
911:
907:
858:
854:
846:
842:
810:10.1.1.407.8730
793:
789:
780:
776:
766:Donald Markwell
764:
760:
749:
745:
740:
736:
705:
701:
694:
680:
676:
670:
666:
661:
657:
648:
644:
634:
632:
623:Waston, Sarah.
621:
617:
607:
605:
601:
595:
591:
578:
574:
570:
533:
520:
514:
505:
484:
471:
465:
456:
427:
414:
392:
384:student athlete
379:
370:student athlete
363:
351:online learning
327:
299:
290:
273:
264:
255:
246:
238:
229:
212:
180:
163:and sustaining
148:
110:
75:
64:
58:
55:
40:
27:
23:
12:
11:
5:
2052:
2042:
2041:
2036:
2031:
2026:
2012:
2011:
2006:
2001:
1996:
1991:
1986:
1981:
1976:
1971:
1964:
1963:External links
1961:
1959:
1958:
1933:
1902:
1893:
1884:
1872:
1863:
1847:
1824:
1812:"Go Argos.com"
1803:
1783:
1757:
1731:
1688:
1659:
1621:
1573:
1562:
1547:
1522:
1479:
1446:
1394:
1354:
1341:
1328:
1314:
1304:
1294:
1267:
1237:
1217:
1208:
1199:
1190:
1181:
1172:
1163:
1154:
1142:
1133:
1120:
1107:
1094:
1078:
1065:
1052:
1039:
1030:
1017:
1004:
991:
964:(4): 224–229.
948:
905:
868:(5): 758–773.
852:
840:
803:(2): 149–172.
787:
774:
758:
743:
734:
699:
692:
674:
664:
655:
642:
631:. Sarah Watson
615:
589:
571:
569:
566:
565:
564:
559:
554:
549:
544:
539:
532:
529:
518:School climate
516:Main article:
513:
512:School climate
510:
504:
501:
483:
480:
467:Main article:
464:
461:
455:
452:
426:
423:
413:
410:
391:
388:
378:
375:
362:
359:
335:questionnaires
326:
323:
298:
295:
289:
286:
272:
269:
263:
260:
254:
251:
245:
242:
237:
234:
228:
225:
211:
208:
179:
176:
147:
144:
109:
106:
77:
76:
37:of the subject
35:worldwide view
30:
28:
21:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2051:
2040:
2037:
2035:
2032:
2030:
2027:
2025:
2022:
2021:
2019:
2010:
2007:
2005:
2002:
2000:
1997:
1995:
1992:
1990:
1987:
1985:
1982:
1980:
1977:
1975:
1972:
1970:
1967:
1966:
1947:
1943:
1937:
1929:
1922:
1915:
1913:
1911:
1909:
1907:
1897:
1888:
1879:
1877:
1867:
1860:
1858:
1851:
1835:
1828:
1813:
1807:
1796:
1795:
1787:
1768:
1761:
1742:
1735:
1727:
1723:
1719:
1715:
1711:
1707:
1703:
1699:
1692:
1673:
1666:
1664:
1655:
1651:
1647:
1643:
1639:
1635:
1628:
1626:
1617:
1613:
1609:
1605:
1601:
1597:
1593:
1589:
1582:
1580:
1578:
1571:
1566:
1558:
1551:
1535:
1529:
1527:
1518:
1514:
1510:
1506:
1502:
1498:
1494:
1490:
1483:
1474:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1457:
1450:
1442:
1438:
1433:
1428:
1424:
1420:
1416:
1412:
1405:
1398:
1382:
1377:
1373:
1369:
1365:
1358:
1351:
1345:
1338:
1332:
1325:
1318:
1308:
1298:
1287:September 18,
1283:
1278:
1271:
1264:
1260:
1254:
1252:
1250:
1248:
1246:
1244:
1242:
1234:
1230:
1227:
1221:
1212:
1203:
1197:Newmann, 1992
1194:
1185:
1176:
1167:
1158:
1149:
1147:
1137:
1130:
1124:
1117:
1111:
1104:
1098:
1091:
1088:
1082:
1075:
1069:
1062:
1056:
1049:
1043:
1034:
1027:
1021:
1014:
1008:
1001:
995:
987:
983:
979:
975:
971:
967:
963:
959:
952:
944:
940:
936:
932:
928:
924:
921:(1): 59–109.
920:
916:
909:
901:
897:
893:
889:
884:
879:
875:
871:
867:
863:
856:
850:
844:
836:
832:
828:
824:
820:
816:
811:
806:
802:
798:
791:
785:, 14(1), p.5.
784:
778:
771:
767:
762:
755:
754:
747:
738:
730:
726:
722:
718:
714:
710:
703:
695:
693:9781788923590
689:
685:
678:
668:
659:
652:
646:
630:
626:
619:
600:
593:
586:
582:
576:
572:
563:
560:
558:
555:
553:
550:
548:
545:
543:
540:
538:
535:
534:
528:
526:
519:
509:
500:
496:
492:
488:
479:
475:
470:
460:
451:
448:
444:
440:
436:
432:
422:
419:
409:
406:
402:
396:
387:
385:
374:
371:
367:
358:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
322:
320:
316:
312:
307:
304:
294:
285:
283:
277:
268:
259:
250:
241:
233:
224:
222:
218:
207:
203:
199:
197:
193:
189:
184:
175:
173:
168:
166:
162:
159:, increasing
158:
157:student voice
152:
143:
141:
136:
133:
132:psychological
129:
123:
120:
116:
105:
102:
98:
97:school reform
94:
91:
86:
83:
73:
70:
62:
59:December 2020
52:
48:
44:
38:
36:
29:
20:
19:
16:
1949:. Retrieved
1945:
1942:"About NSSE"
1936:
1927:
1896:
1887:
1866:
1855:
1850:
1838:. Retrieved
1827:
1815:. Retrieved
1806:
1793:
1786:
1774:. Retrieved
1772:. p. 12
1760:
1748:. Retrieved
1746:. p. 11
1734:
1701:
1697:
1691:
1679:. Retrieved
1677:. p. 10
1637:
1633:
1591:
1587:
1565:
1550:
1538:. Retrieved
1492:
1488:
1482:
1463:
1459:
1449:
1414:
1410:
1397:
1385:. Retrieved
1371:
1367:
1357:
1349:
1344:
1331:
1326:(1), 85–107.
1323:
1317:
1307:
1297:
1285:. Retrieved
1281:
1270:
1262:
1258:
1228:
1220:
1211:
1202:
1193:
1184:
1175:
1166:
1157:
1136:
1131:(4). p. 572.
1128:
1123:
1110:
1102:
1097:
1089:
1081:
1068:
1060:
1055:
1042:
1033:
1025:
1020:
1007:
999:
994:
961:
957:
951:
918:
914:
908:
865:
861:
855:
848:
843:
800:
796:
790:
777:
769:
761:
751:
746:
737:
712:
702:
683:
677:
667:
658:
650:
645:
633:. Retrieved
628:
618:
608:February 23,
606:. Retrieved
592:
580:
575:
521:
506:
497:
493:
489:
485:
476:
472:
457:
443:Division III
428:
415:
397:
393:
380:
364:
328:
319:case studies
308:
300:
291:
278:
274:
265:
256:
247:
239:
230:
217:manipulation
213:
204:
200:
185:
181:
169:
153:
149:
146:Requirements
139:
137:
124:
111:
87:
81:
80:
65:
56:
32:
15:
1989:Hope Survey
1074:Definitions
883:10179/15152
439:Division II
429:Within the
190:challenge,
108:Definitions
93:instruction
2018:Categories
1640:(3): 317.
1466:(2): 141.
1312:1352–1366.
1277:"Register"
1265:(9), 1086.
587:. pp. 2–3.
568:References
435:Division I
343:e-learning
178:Indicators
128:motivation
115:curriculum
1840:April 18,
1817:April 18,
1776:March 13,
1750:March 13,
1681:March 13,
1654:145171187
1517:145692984
1509:0002-7642
1441:1096-7516
978:0883-2323
935:0034-6543
900:144824842
892:0307-5079
827:1543-3382
805:CiteSeerX
729:233655097
357:methods.
90:classroom
47:talk page
1951:March 4,
1726:55961920
1718:40197601
1616:17656528
1608:40197362
1387:March 9,
1374:: 2680.
1231:Sep 26.
986:62584306
835:17127791
768:(2007),
635:June 28,
531:See also
337:, using
188:academic
117:design,
101:buzzword
41:You may
1540:May 13,
1335:(2005)
943:8063400
629:Edufena
331:surveys
311:surveys
1836:. NCAA
1724:
1716:
1652:
1614:
1606:
1515:
1507:
1439:
1302:12–23.
1105:p. 14.
984:
976:
941:
933:
898:
890:
833:
825:
807:
727:
690:
353:using
244:Family
221:equity
192:active
2034:Youth
1924:(PDF)
1798:(PDF)
1770:(PDF)
1744:(PDF)
1722:S2CID
1714:JSTOR
1675:(PDF)
1650:S2CID
1612:S2CID
1604:JSTOR
1513:S2CID
1407:(PDF)
1072:(nd)
982:S2CID
939:S2CID
896:S2CID
831:S2CID
725:S2CID
602:(PDF)
253:Peers
49:, or
1953:2015
1946:NSSE
1842:2012
1819:2012
1778:2012
1752:2012
1683:2012
1542:2012
1505:ISSN
1437:ISSN
1389:2022
1289:2023
974:ISSN
931:ISSN
888:ISSN
823:ISSN
688:ISBN
672:294.
637:2015
610:2016
441:and
431:NCAA
405:NCAA
333:and
219:and
194:and
170:The
1706:doi
1642:doi
1596:doi
1497:doi
1468:doi
1427:hdl
1419:doi
1376:doi
966:doi
923:doi
878:hdl
870:doi
815:doi
717:doi
140:dis
2020::
1944:.
1926:.
1905:^
1875:^
1720:.
1712:.
1702:47
1700:.
1662:^
1648:.
1638:80
1636:.
1624:^
1610:.
1602:.
1592:45
1590:.
1576:^
1525:^
1511:.
1503:.
1493:57
1491:.
1464:13
1462:.
1458:.
1435:.
1425:.
1415:28
1413:.
1409:.
1372:30
1370:.
1366:.
1280:.
1263:74
1261:,
1240:^
1145:^
980:.
972:.
962:90
960:.
937:.
929:.
919:74
917:.
894:.
886:.
876:.
866:38
864:.
829:.
821:.
813:.
801:47
799:.
723:.
711:.
627:.
583:.
437:,
321:.
223:.
1955:.
1930:.
1859:.
1844:.
1821:.
1780:.
1754:.
1728:.
1708::
1685:.
1656:.
1644::
1618:.
1598::
1544:.
1519:.
1499::
1476:.
1470::
1443:.
1429::
1421::
1391:.
1378::
1291:.
988:.
968::
945:.
925::
902:.
880::
872::
837:.
817::
731:.
719::
696:.
639:.
612:.
72:)
66:(
61:)
57:(
39:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.