236:
connection between activation of S1 and somatosensory awareness, and observed that early SEPs (P60, N80), generated in the contralateral S1, were independent of stimulus perception. In contrast, amplitude enhancements were observed for the P100 and N140 for consciously perceived stimuli. The authors concluded that early activation of S1 is not sufficient to warrant conscious stimulus perception. Conscious stimulus processing differs significantly from unconscious processing starting around 100 ms after stimulus presentation when the signal is processed in parietal and frontal cortices, brain regions crucial for stimulus access into conscious perception. In another study, Iwadate et al. (2005) looked at the relationship between physical exercise and somatosensory processing using SEPs. The study compared SEPs in athletes (soccer players) and non-athletes, using two oddball tasks following separate somatosensory stimulation at the median nerve and at the tibial nerve. In the athlete group the N140 amplitudes were larger during upper- and lowerlimb tasks when compared to non-athletes. The authors concluded that plastic changes in somatosensory processing might be induced by performing physical exercises that require attention and skilled movements.
107:
the far-field potentials are widely distributed over the scalp. Consequently, they reach their maximal amplitude when the reference electrode is non-cephalic. A non-cephalic reference common to all channels is adequate for all near-field recordings. One relevant issue is that electrical physiological (electrocardiogram, electromyogram, etc.) noise level increases with the distance between the active and reference electrodes in non-cephalic reference montages. The routine four-channel montages proposed in the
International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (IFCN) guidelines explore the afferent peripheral volley, the segmental spinal responses at the neck and lumbar spine levels, as well as the subcortical far-field and early cortical SEPs, using scalp electrodes placed in the parietal and frontal regions for upper limb SEPs and at the vertex for lower limb SEPs.
69:, a neurological condition characterized by abrupt, involuntary, jerk-like contractions of a muscle or muscle group. Because of their relatively large amplitude and low frequency compatible with a low sampling rate of A/D conversion, the cortical SEPs were the first studied in normal subjects and patients. In the 1970s and early 1980s spinal and subcortical (far-field) potentials were identified. Although the origins and mechanisms of far-field SEPs are still debated in the literature, correlations among abnormal waveforms, lesion site, and clinical observations are fairly well established. However, the most recent advances were brought about by multichannel recordings of evoked potentials coupled with source modeling and source localization in 3D images of brain volume provided by
91:
82:
each SEP component, which is suitable for responses reflecting the sequential activation fibers and synaptic relays of the somatosensory pathways. Conversely, source modeling suggests that the evoked field distribution at a given moment may result from activities of multiple distributed sources that overlap in time. This model fits better with the parallel activation and the feedback controls that characterize the processing of somatosensory inputs at the cortical level.
158:
pathways) have also been reported in females as compared to males, and conduction velocities are also known to be affected by changes in limb temperature. It has always been assumed that cortical SEPs peaking before 50 ms following stimulation of the upper limb are not significantly affected by cognitive processes. However, Desmedt et al. (1983) identified a P40 potential in response to target stimuli in an
210:
due to anesthetic agents. Over time, SEP testing and monitoring in surgery have become standard techniques widely used to reduce risk of postoperative neurologic problems for the patient. Continuous SEP monitoring can warn a surgeon about potential spinal cord damage, which can prompt intervention before impairment becomes permanent. Overall, SEPs can meet a variety of specific clinical objectives, including:
197:
98:
When recording SEPs, one usually seeks to study peripheral, spinal, brainstem, and early cortical SEPs during the same run. Electrodes placed on the scalp pick up both SEPs generated in the cortex and thalamocortical fibers (which are picked up as near-field responses located in restricted areas) and
35:
from the periphery up to the cortex. SEP components include a series of positive and negative deflections that can be elicited by virtually any sensory stimuli. For example, SEPs can be obtained in response to a brief mechanical impact on the fingertip or to air puffs. However, SEPs are most commonly
209:
SEP monitoring is widely used for monitoring the spinal cord during scoliosis procedures and other surgical interventions in which the spinal cord is at risk for damage. Recording of far field intracranially generated peaks can facilitate monitoring even when the primary cortical peaks are impaired
183:
deficiency. When a patient suffers from sensory impairment, and when the clinical localization of the sensory impairment is unclear, SEPs can be helpful in distinguishing whether the sensory impairment is due to CNS problems as opposed to peripheral nervous system problems. Median nerve SEP is also
106:
The literature is filled with discussions about the most appropriate site for the reference electrode to record each of the components. Considering the field distribution, the optimal recording condition is in theory that in which the reference is not influenced by the activity under study. Most of
110:
Median nerve SEP begins with the delivery of an electrical stimulus to that nerve at the wrist. A 100–300 microsecond square wave electrical pulse is delivered at intensities strong enough to cause a 1–2 cm thumb twitch. Upon delivery of such a stimulus, nerve action volleys travel up sensory
81:
Modeling sources from the field distribution results in models of brain activation that may substantially differ from the observations of clinical correlations between the abnormal waveform and the lesion site. The approach based on clinical correlations supports the idea of a single generator for
157:
The effects of age on SEP latencies mainly reflect conduction slowing in the peripheral nerves evidenced by the increase of the N9 component after median nerve stimulation. Shorter central conduction times (CCT, the transit time of the ascending volley in the central segments of the somatosensory
235:
Besides the clinical setting, SEPs have shown to be useful in distinct experimental paradigms. Schubert et al. (2006) used SEPs to investigate the differential processing of consciously perceived versus unperceived somatosensory stimuli. The authors used an 'extinction' paradigm to examine the
115:
pathway then joins the posterior columns, sending off collateral branches to synapse in the midcervical cord. This midcervical cord activity gives rise to a peak known as N13. The N13 is best measured over the fifth cervical spine. Further conduction in the posterior columns passes through the
204:
In the recent decade, the clinical usefulness of SEPs entered the operating room, allowing the intraoperative monitoring of the CNS and, thus, safeguarding CNS structures during high risk surgeries. Continuous SEP monitoring can warn a surgeon and prompt intervention before impairment becomes
170:
Median and posterior tibial SEPs are used in a variety of clinical settings. They can detect, localize and quantify focal interruptions along the somatosensory pathways, which may be due to any number of focal neurological problems, including trauma, compression,
40:
of the upper limb (e.g., the median nerve) or lower limb (e.g., the posterior tibial nerve), and then recorded from the scalp. In general, somatosensory stimuli evoke early cortical components (N25, P60, N80), generated in the contralateral
135:
Posterior tibial nerve stimulation at the ankle gives rise to a similar series of subsequent peaks. An N8 potential can be detected over the posterior tibial nerve at the knee. An N22 potential can be detected over the upper
111:
fibers and motor fibers to the shoulder, producing a peak as they enter. This peak is formally known as N9. In the course of conduction, the sensory fibers then transverse the cervical roots and enter the cervical cord. The
57:, marked by a parietal P100 and bilateral frontal N140. SEPs are routinely used in neurology today to confirm and localize sensory abnormalities, to identify silent lesions and to monitor changes during surgical procedures.
162:, suggesting that attention-related processes could affect early cortical SEPs. Finally, some changes in the amplitude, waveform, and latency of the parietal N20 have been reported during natural sleep in normal subjects.
455:
Desmedt, John E; Nguyen Tran Huy; Bourguet, Marc (October 1983). "The cognitive P40, N60 and P100 components of somatosensory evoked potentials and the earliest electrical signs of sensory processing in man".
188:: if the cortical N20 and subsequent components are completely absent 24 hours or more after the cardiac arrest, essentially all of the patients go on to die or have vegetative neurological sequelae.
205:
permanent. Testing with median nerve SEPs is used to identify the sensory and motor cortex during craniotomies and in monitoring surgery at the midcervical or upper cervical levels. Posterior
140:, corresponding to the collateral activity as the sensory fibers synapse in the lumbar spinal cord. More rostrally, a cervical potential can occasionally be detected over the mid- or upper
518:
Schubert, Ruth; Blankenburg, Felix; Lemm, Steven; Villringer, Arno; Curio, Gabriel (January 2006). "Now you feel it-now you don't: ERP correlates of somatosensory awareness".
553:
Iwadate, Masako; Mori, Akio; Ashizuka, Tomoko; Takayose, Masaki; Ozawa, Toru (7 December 2004). "Long-term physical exercise and somatosensory event-related potentials".
27:) is the electrical activity of the brain that results from the stimulation of touch. SEP tests measure that activity and are a useful, noninvasive means of assessing
45:(S1), related to the processing of the physical stimulus attributes. About 100 ms after stimulus application, additional cortical regions are activated, such as the
116:
synapse at the cervicomedullary junction and enters the lemniscal decussation. A scalp P14 peak is generated at this level. As conduction continues up the
606:
31:
functioning. By combining SEP recordings at different levels of the somatosensory pathways, it is possible to assess the transmission of the
629:
144:. Finally, a P37 scalp potential is seen over the midline scalp lateral to the midsagittal plane, but ipsilateral to the leg stimulated.
860:
599:
132:
contralateral to the wrist stimulated, corresponding to arrival of the nerve impulses at the primary somatosensory region.
65:
The modern history of SEPs began with George Dawson's 1947 recordings of somatosensory cortical responses in patients with
654:
94:
Way of nerve signal transduction and electrode positions for tibial (left) and median (right) nerve SEP recordings
886:
592:
281:
680:
363:
266:
46:
881:
715:
256:
120:
to upper midbrain and into the thalamus, a scalp negative peak is detected, the N18. After synapsing in the
428:
Nuwer, Marc R (February 1998). "Fundamentals of evoked potentials and common clinical applications today".
42:
404:
Mauguiere, F (1999). "Somatosensory evoked potentials". In E. Niedermeyer & F. Lopes da Silva (ed.).
179:(CNS) disorders. This is seen in a variety of neurodegenerative disorders and metabolic problems such as
891:
70:
36:
elicited by bipolar transcutaneous electrical stimulation applied on the skin over the trajectory of
845:
730:
271:
261:
251:
766:
634:
276:
675:
644:
615:
246:
176:
175:, tumor or other focal lesions. SEPs are also sensitive to cortical attenuation due to diffuse
639:
129:
28:
99:
far-field positivities reflecting the evoked activity generated in peripheral, spinal and
8:
819:
760:
745:
720:
710:
700:
336:
331:
311:
306:
296:
286:
840:
776:
735:
172:
441:
570:
535:
531:
500:
496:
469:
37:
214:
to establish objective evidence of abnormality when signs or symptoms are equivocal;
850:
664:
562:
527:
492:
483:
Nuwer, Marc R. (May 1998). "Spinal Cord
Monitoring With Somatosensory Techniques".
465:
437:
371:
125:
117:
406:
Electroencephalography: basic principles, clinical applications and related fields
362:
Vibell, J.; Gillmeister, H.; Sel, A.; Haggarty, C.J.; Van Velzen, J.; Forster, B.
375:
90:
32:
584:
185:
141:
566:
875:
814:
50:
804:
574:
539:
206:
159:
137:
112:
54:
504:
180:
799:
794:
784:
809:
789:
690:
341:
100:
66:
121:
824:
517:
223:
to provide evidence about the general category of the pathology;
855:
364:"Electroencephalography of Touch | Springer Nature Experiments"
226:
to monitor objective changes in the patient's status over time.
454:
220:
to define an anatomical level of impairment along a pathway;
740:
705:
695:
685:
552:
326:
301:
291:
196:
755:
750:
321:
316:
361:
184:
helpful in predicting neurological sequelae following
458:
Electroencephalography and
Clinical Neurophysiology
430:
Electroencephalography and
Clinical Neurophysiology
630:Amplitude integrated electroencephalography (aEEG)
873:
614:
600:
85:
152:
861:Neurophysiological Biomarker Toolbox (NBT)
607:
593:
399:
397:
395:
393:
391:
476:
423:
421:
419:
417:
415:
403:
230:
147:
195:
191:
89:
546:
388:
165:
874:
412:
217:to look for clinically silent lesions;
588:
482:
427:
716:Contingent negative variation (CNV)
655:Brainstem auditory evoked potential
485:Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
13:
448:
14:
903:
532:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00379.x
497:10.1097/00004691-199805000-00002
76:
282:Lateralized readiness potential
128:, the N20 is recorded over the
650:Somatosensory evoked potential
511:
368:experiments.springernature.com
355:
267:Early left anterior negativity
47:secondary somatosensory cortex
17:Somatosensory evoked potential
1:
846:Difference due to memory (Dm)
442:10.1016/S0013-4694(97)00117-X
348:
257:Contingent negative variation
200:SEP recording of median nerve
645:Magnetoencephalography (MEG)
616:Electroencephalography (EEG)
470:10.1016/0013-4694(83)90252-3
376:10.1007/978-1-0716-3068-6_19
43:primary somatosensory cortex
7:
640:Electrocorticography (ECoG)
555:Experimental Brain Research
239:
10:
908:
71:magnetic resonance imaging
60:
833:
775:
663:
622:
567:10.1007/s00221-004-2125-5
86:Component characteristics
272:Error-related negativity
262:Difference due to memory
153:Non-pathological factors
49:(S2), and the posterior
767:Late positive component
635:Event-related potential
408:. Williams and Wilkins.
277:Late positive component
887:Electroencephalography
676:Bereitschaftspotential
247:Bereitschaftspotential
231:Experimental paradigms
201:
177:central nervous system
148:Functional sensitivity
103:somatosensory fibers.
95:
199:
192:Clinical applications
93:
882:Diagnostic neurology
166:Pathological factors
130:somatosensory cortex
29:somatosensory system
820:Sensorimotor rhythm
777:Neural oscillations
721:Mismatch negativity
332:P300 (neuroscience)
287:Mismatch negativity
124:and traversing the
202:
173:multiple sclerosis
96:
892:Evoked potentials
869:
868:
763:(late positivity)
665:Evoked potentials
38:peripheral nerves
899:
851:Oddball paradigm
609:
602:
595:
586:
585:
579:
578:
550:
544:
543:
520:Psychophysiology
515:
509:
508:
480:
474:
473:
452:
446:
445:
425:
410:
409:
401:
386:
385:
383:
382:
359:
126:internal capsule
118:medial lemniscus
55:frontal cortices
907:
906:
902:
901:
900:
898:
897:
896:
872:
871:
870:
865:
829:
771:
659:
618:
613:
583:
582:
551:
547:
516:
512:
481:
477:
453:
449:
426:
413:
402:
389:
380:
378:
360:
356:
351:
346:
242:
233:
194:
168:
155:
150:
88:
79:
63:
33:afferent volley
12:
11:
5:
905:
895:
894:
889:
884:
867:
866:
864:
863:
858:
853:
848:
843:
837:
835:
831:
830:
828:
827:
822:
817:
812:
807:
802:
797:
792:
787:
781:
779:
773:
772:
770:
769:
764:
758:
753:
748:
743:
738:
733:
728:
724:
723:
718:
713:
708:
703:
698:
693:
688:
683:
678:
673:
669:
667:
661:
660:
658:
657:
652:
647:
642:
637:
632:
626:
624:
620:
619:
612:
611:
604:
597:
589:
581:
580:
561:(4): 528–532.
545:
510:
491:(3): 183–193.
475:
464:(4): 272–282.
447:
436:(2): 142–148.
411:
387:
353:
352:
350:
347:
345:
344:
339:
334:
329:
324:
319:
314:
309:
304:
299:
294:
289:
284:
279:
274:
269:
264:
259:
254:
249:
243:
241:
238:
232:
229:
228:
227:
224:
221:
218:
215:
193:
190:
186:cardiac arrest
167:
164:
154:
151:
149:
146:
142:cervical spine
87:
84:
78:
75:
62:
59:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
904:
893:
890:
888:
885:
883:
880:
879:
877:
862:
859:
857:
854:
852:
849:
847:
844:
842:
839:
838:
836:
832:
826:
823:
821:
818:
816:
815:Sleep spindle
813:
811:
808:
806:
803:
801:
798:
796:
793:
791:
788:
786:
783:
782:
780:
778:
774:
768:
765:
762:
759:
757:
754:
752:
749:
747:
744:
742:
739:
737:
734:
732:
729:
726:
725:
722:
719:
717:
714:
712:
709:
707:
704:
702:
699:
697:
694:
692:
689:
687:
684:
682:
679:
677:
674:
671:
670:
668:
666:
662:
656:
653:
651:
648:
646:
643:
641:
638:
636:
633:
631:
628:
627:
625:
623:Related tests
621:
617:
610:
605:
603:
598:
596:
591:
590:
587:
576:
572:
568:
564:
560:
556:
549:
541:
537:
533:
529:
525:
521:
514:
506:
502:
498:
494:
490:
486:
479:
471:
467:
463:
459:
451:
443:
439:
435:
431:
424:
422:
420:
418:
416:
407:
400:
398:
396:
394:
392:
377:
373:
369:
365:
358:
354:
343:
340:
338:
335:
333:
330:
328:
325:
323:
320:
318:
315:
313:
310:
308:
305:
303:
300:
298:
295:
293:
290:
288:
285:
283:
280:
278:
275:
273:
270:
268:
265:
263:
260:
258:
255:
253:
250:
248:
245:
244:
237:
225:
222:
219:
216:
213:
212:
211:
208:
198:
189:
187:
182:
178:
174:
163:
161:
145:
143:
139:
133:
131:
127:
123:
119:
114:
108:
104:
102:
92:
83:
77:Theory/source
74:
72:
68:
58:
56:
52:
48:
44:
39:
34:
30:
26:
22:
18:
841:10-20 system
805:Theta rhythm
649:
558:
554:
548:
526:(1): 31–40.
523:
519:
513:
488:
484:
478:
461:
457:
450:
433:
429:
405:
379:. Retrieved
367:
357:
234:
207:tibial nerve
203:
169:
160:oddball task
156:
138:lumbar spine
134:
113:median nerve
109:
105:
97:
80:
64:
24:
20:
16:
15:
731:C1 & P1
181:vitamin B12
876:Categories
800:Delta wave
795:Gamma wave
785:Alpha wave
727:Positivity
672:Negativity
381:2024-06-26
349:References
810:K-complex
790:Beta wave
691:Visual N1
342:Visual N1
252:C1 and P1
101:brainstem
67:myoclonus
575:15586274
540:16629683
240:See also
122:thalamus
51:parietal
825:Mu wave
505:9681556
73:(MRI).
61:History
856:EEGLAB
834:Topics
573:
538:
503:
761:P600
746:P300
741:P200
711:N400
706:N2pc
701:N200
696:N170
686:N100
681:ELAN
571:PMID
536:PMID
501:PMID
337:P600
327:P200
312:N400
307:N200
302:N170
297:N100
292:N2pc
53:and
25:SSEP
756:P3b
751:P3a
736:P50
563:doi
559:160
528:doi
493:doi
466:doi
438:doi
434:106
372:doi
322:P3b
317:P3a
23:or
21:SEP
878::
569:.
557:.
534:.
524:43
522:.
499:.
489:15
487:.
462:56
460:.
432:.
414:^
390:^
370:.
366:.
608:e
601:t
594:v
577:.
565::
542:.
530::
507:.
495::
472:.
468::
444:.
440::
384:.
374::
19:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
