232:, he noted that people engage in social comparison as a means to reduce ambiguity and accurately evaluate their own qualities and abilities. However, controversy exists over whether providing children with social-comparison praise has beneficial impact on their motivation and performance. Some studies have demonstrated that students who received social-comparison praise (e.g., "you're doing better than most students" or "you're performance is amongst the best we've had") demonstrated greater motivation compared to no-praise or other control groups. Sarafino, Russo, Barker, Consentino and Titus found that students who received social-comparison voluntarily engaged in the task more so than those who received feedback that they performed similar to others. Though these studies demonstrate the possible positive influence of social-comparison praise, they have been criticized for inadequate control groups. For example, a control group given feedback that they are average may be seen as negative, rather than neutral. In addition, most social-comparison studies do not examine motivation or behavior following a subsequent unsuccessful task.
236:
has been hypothesized to decrease intrinsic motivation for the praised children because they may then view their behaviors as externally controlled. Contrastingly, it is suggested that praise that focused on a child's competence (mastery) rather than social comparison may be important for fostering motivation. This area is relatively understudied, though some interesting findings have emerged. In a study of adults, Koestner, Zuckerman, and Olsson found that gender moderated the influence of social-comparison and mastery praise, where women were more intrinsically motivated following mastery praise, while men were more motivated following social-comparison praise. In a study of children, Henderlong Corpus, Ogle & Love-Geiger found that social-comparison praise lead to decreased motivation following ambiguous feedback for all children, and also decreased motivation following positive feedback for girls only. Thus, mastery praise may be more conducive than social-comparison to fostering intrinsic motivation, particularly for females, though more research is needed to tease apart these relationships.
184:
detrimental impacts on a child's self-perceptions, motivation and learning. For example, praising children for their personal attributes, rather than specifics about their performance, may teach them to make inferences about their global worth, and may thus undermine their intrinsic motivation. In a study of person- versus process-oriented praise, Kamins and Dweck found that children who received person-oriented praise displayed more "helpless" responses following a failure including self-blame, than those in the process condition. Henderlong and Lepper suggest that person-oriented praise may function like tangible rewards, in that they produce desired outcomes in the short-run, but may undermine intrinsic motivation and subsequent perseverance. However, Skipper & Douglas found that although person- versus process-oriented praise (and an objective feedback control group) predicted more negative responses to the first failure, all three groups demonstrated similarly negative responses to the second failure. Thus, the long-term negative consequences of person-oriented praise are still unclear.
145:, wherein an observed behavior is made more likely to occur by contingently praising said behavior. Hundreds of studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of praise in promoting positive behaviors, notably in the study of teacher and parent use of praise on child in promoting improved behavior and academic performance, but also in the study of work performance. Praise has also been demonstrated to reinforce positive behaviors in non-praised adjacent individuals (such as a classmate of the praise recipient) through vicarious reinforcement. Praise may be more or less effective in changing behavior depending on its form, content and delivery. In order for praise to effect positive behavior change, it must be contingent on the positive behavior (i.e., only administered after the targeted behavior is enacted), must specify the particulars of the behavior that is to be reinforced, and must be delivered sincerely and credibly.
271:
influence motivation for older girls (4th/5th grade), while for preschool-age children, there were no differences in the effects of process, person and product praise, though all three forms of praise were associated with increased motivation as compared to neutral feedback. In a different study, Henderlong found that for older children, process praise enhanced post-failure motivation more so than person praise, and person praise decreased motivation as compared to neutral feedback. Contrastingly, for preschool-age children process praise enhanced post-failure motivation more than person praise, but both were better than neutral feedback. Some posit that younger children do not experience the negative effects of certain types of praise because they do not yet make causal attributions in complex ways, and they are more literal in their interpretations of adult speech.
188:
foster attributions regarding effort or strategy, such that children attribute their success (or failure) to these variables, rather than their stable trait or ability. This attributional style can foster more adaptive reactions to both success and failure. In support of this notion, Muller and Dweck experimentally found praise for child intelligence to be more detrimental to 5th graders' achievement motivation than praise for effort. Following a failure, the person-praised students displayed less task persistence, task enjoyment, and displayed worse task performance than those praised for effort. These findings are in line with personal theories of achievement striving, in which in the face of failure, performance tends to improve when individuals make attributions to a lack of effort, but worsen when they attribute their failure to a lack of ability.
158:
information about the values and expectations of the praiser to the recipient. Effective praise (i.e., praise that is welcomed or accepted by the recipient) may also have positive emotional effects by generating a positive affective state (e.g., happiness, joy, pride). Praise is also thought to convey that one has surpassed a noteworthy evaluative standard, and if the recipient of the praise is likely to experience a sense of pleasure stemming from a positive self-perception. Contrastingly, praise may create negative emotional consequences if it appears disingenuous or manipulative.
216:
related to greater intrinsic motivation (as measured by free-choice behavior and self-reported interest) while controlling praise was associated with less intrinsic motivation. For example, Pittman and colleagues found that adults demonstrated more free-choice engagement with a task after receiving informational ("e.g., "Compared to most of my subjects, you're doing really well."), rather than controlling (e.g., "I haven't been able to use most of the data I've gotten so far, but you're doing really well, and if you keep it up I'll be able to use yours.") praise.
509:
which in turn positively predicts deferential behavior and intergroup learning. We also demonstrate that, for those with a disposition to feel admiration, increasing admiration for an outgroup decreases willingness to take political action against that outgroup. Finally, we show that when the object of admiration is a subversive 'martyr,' admiration positively predicts political action tendencies and behavior aimed at challenging the status quo. These findings provide the first evidence for the important role of admiration in regulating social hierarchy.
297:
motivated by self-improvement. This cultural difference has also been found experimentally. Heine, Lehman, Markus & Katayama found that
Canadian students persisted longer after positive than negative performance feedback, while the opposite was true for Japanese students. Some posit that individuals from independent and interdependent cultures largely express different models of praise (independence-supportive and interdependence-supportive praise.
97:; it is an important aspect in the regulation of social hierarchy and the maintenance of group cohesion, influencing the potential for political action and social upheaval. When given by a dominant individual it takes the form of recognition and reassurance; when given by a submissive to a dominant individual it takes the form of
162:
effort to meet those standards. Lastly, praise may serve to influence interpersonal relations. For example, strong pressures to reciprocate praise have been found. It is thought that the mutual praise may serve to increase attraction and strengthen the interpersonal relationship, and this process may underlie the use of praise in
280:
Zuckerman & Koestner found that girls were more negatively influenced by praise that diminished perceived autonomy. Henderlong Corpus and Lepper found that process praise was more beneficial to motivation than person praise, but only for girls. This difference was found for older children, but not preschool-aged children.
270:
The function of praise on child performance and motivation may likely vary as a function of age. Few studies have directly examined developmental differences in praise, though some evidence has been found. Henderlong Corpus & Lepper found person praise (as opposed to process praise) to negatively
251:
The word , when applied to a person, means ‘beautiful’, ‘pretty’, ‘handsome’, ‘attractive’, and its antonym is aischros, ‘ugly’. The words are also applied to objects, sights and sounds and whatever can be heard about and thought about, such as an institution, an achievement or failure, or a virtuous
179:
Over the past several decades, researchers have distinguished between praise for a person's general abilities and qualities (e.g., "You're such a good drawer.") and for the process of performance (e.g., "You are working so hard at that drawing."). This distinction between person versus process praise
279:
The function of praise on child behavior and motivation has also found to vary as a function of child gender. Some researchers have shown that females are more susceptible to the negative effects of certain types of praise (person-oriented praise, praise that limits autonomy). For example, Koestner,
161:
Alternative views of the effects of praise on motivation exist. In one camp, praise is thought to decrease intrinsic motivation by increasing the presence of external control. However, praise has also been argued to define standards and expectations, which in turn may motivate an individual to exert
235:
Beyond methodology, the primary criticism to social-comparison praise is that it teaches children to evaluate themselves on the basis of the performance of others, and may therefore lead to maladaptive coping in situations in which one is outperformed by others individuals. Social-comparison praise
74:
of praise on an individual can depend on many factors, including the context, the meanings the praise may convey, and the characteristics and interpretations of the recipient. While praise may share some predictive relationships (both positive and negative) with tangible (material) rewards, praise
212:(and thus greater self-determination) while the controlling aspects promote a perceived external locus of control and thus extrinsic compliance or defiance. Thus, Deci & Ryan suggest that the effect of praise is moderated by the salience of informational versus controlling aspects of praise.
508:
We demonstrate that manipulating the legitimacy of status relations affects admiration for the dominant and that this emotion negatively predicts political action tendencies aimed at social change. In addition, we show that greater warmth and competence lead to greater admiration for an outgroup,
292:
Culture has been referred to as a "blind spot" in the praise literature. Yet, there is reason to believe that cultural differences in the effects of praise exist. Much of the discussion on culture and praise has focused on differences between independent and interdependent cultures (e.g.). Stated
183:
Traditionally, person(trait)-oriented praise was thought to instill a child's belief that they have the capacity to succeed, and thus help motivate them to learn. However, social-cognitive theorists have more recently suggested that person-oriented (as opposed to process-oriented) praise may have
296:
Looking through this cultural lens, clear differences in the use and impact of praise can be found. In comparison to the United States, praise is rarely in China and Japan (e.g.), as praise may be thought to be harmful to a child's character. In interdependent cultures, individuals are generally
219:
Several complexities of informational versus controlling praise have been acknowledged. First, though the differences between information and controlling praise have been well-established, it is difficult to determine whether the net effects of these forms of praise will be positive, negative or
215:
The theory that informational praise enhances self-determination over controlling praise has been supported by several empirical studies. In a metanalysis including five studies distinguishing informational from controlling praise, Deci, Koestner & Ryan found that informational-based praise
187:
Person and process (or performance) praise may also foster different attributional styles such that person-oriented praise may lead one to attribute success and failure to stable ability, which in turn may foster helplessness reactions in the face of setbacks. Contrastingly, process praise may
191:
In the studies mentioned above, person-oriented praise was found to be less beneficial than process-oriented praise, but this is not always found to be the case. Particularly, effort-oriented praise may be detrimental when given during tasks that are exceptionally easy. This may be especially
157:
Although the majority of early research on the influences of praise focused on behavior implications, more recent investigations have highlighted important implications in other domains. Praise may have cognitive influences on an individual, by attracting attention to the self, or by conveying
148:
Acknowledging the effect of praise as a positive reinforcement strategy, numerous behavioral and cognitive behavioral interventions have incorporated the use of praise in their protocols. The strategic use of praise is recognized as an evidence-based practice in both classroom management and
256:
Dover states there is a distinction of aesthetic and the moral senses of the term; "It must be emphasized that the Greeks did not call a person ‘beautiful’ by virtue of that person's morals, intelligence, ability or temperament, but solely by virtue of shape, colour, texture and movement".
283:
Others have found young girls to be more negatively influenced by the evaluations of adults more generally. Some have posited that this gender difference is due to girls more often attributing failure to lack of ability rather than a lack of motivation or effort. Gender differences may be
293:
briefly, independent cultures, common in
Western cultures, generally value and seek to promote individualism and autonomy, while interdependent cultures promote fundamental connectedness and harmony in interpersonal relationships.
149:
parenting training interventions, though praise is often subsumed in intervention research into a larger category of positive reinforcement, which includes strategies such as strategic attention and behavioral rewards.
1746:
Dweck, Carol S.; Davidson, William; Nelson, Sharon; Enna, Bradley (1978). "Sex differences in learned helplessness: II. The contingencies of evaluative feedback in the classroom and III. An experimental analysis".
592:
Garland, Ann F.; Hawley, Kristin M.; Brookman-Frazee, Lauren; Hurlburt, Michael S. (May 2008). "Identifying Common
Elements of Evidence-Based Psychosocial Treatments for Children's Disruptive Behavior Problems".
1411:
Sarafino, Edward P.; Russo, Alyce; Barker, Judy; Consentino, Annmarie; Consentino, Annmarie (September 1982). "The Effect of
Rewards on Intrinsic Interest: Developmental Changes in the Underlying Processes".
220:
neutral compared to a control condition. In addition, it is often difficult to determine the extent to which informational, controlling, or both, which may muddy interpretations of results.
284:
attributable to normative socialization practices, in which people generally emphasize dependence and interpersonal relationships for girls, but achievement and independence for boys.
252:
or vicious action; kalos expresses a favourable reaction (‘admirable’, ‘creditable’, ‘honourable’) and aischros an unfavour-able reaction (‘disgraceful’, ‘repulsive’, ‘contemptible’).
1446:
Corpus, Jennifer
Henderlong; Ogle, Christin M.; Love-Geiger, Kelly E. (25 August 2006). "The Effects of Social-Comparison Versus Mastery Praise on Children's Intrinsic Motivation".
772:
Simonsen, Brandi; Fairbanks, Sarah; Briesch, Amy; Myers, Diane; Sugai, George (2008). "Evidence-based
Practices in Classroom Management: Considerations for Research to Practice".
55:
Verbal praise consists of a positive evaluations of another's attributes or actions, where the evaluator presumes the validity of the standards on which the evaluation is based.
180:
is sometimes referred to as ability versus effort praise, though ability and effort statements can be seen as subcategories of person and process statements, respectively.
924:
Henderlong Corpus, Jennifer; Lepper, Mark R. (2007). "The
Effects of Person Versus Performance Praise on Children's Motivation: Gender and age as moderating factors".
1708:
Koestner, R.; Zuckerman, M.; Koestner, J. (1 March 1989). "Attributional Focus of Praise and
Children's Intrinsic Motivation: The Moderating Role of Gender".
244:
Beauty is worth praise, "if the praise is directed at the beauty itself without giving credit for having it to the person whose beauty it happens to be.".
247:
Sir
Kenneth Dover provides us with clarity over the question of beauty and praise, with his voice on our two main senses giving us the feeling to praise:
75:
tends to be less salient and expected, conveys more information about competence, and is typically given more immediately after the desired behavior.
192:
apparent for older children as they see effort and ability to be inversely related and thus an overemphasis on effort may suggest a lack of ability.
1376:
Blanck, Peter D.; Reis, Harry T.; Jackson, Linda (March 1984). "The effects of verbal reinforcement of intrinsic motivation for sex-linked tasks".
1516:
Koestner, Richard; Zuckerman, Miron; Olsson, Jennifer (March 1990). "Attributional style, comparison focus of praise, and intrinsic motivation".
411:"The differential effects of tangible rewards and praise on intrinsic motivation: A comparison of cognitive evaluation theory and operant theory"
1233:
Pittman, T. S.; Davey, M. E.; Alafat, K. A.; Wetherill, K. V.; Kramer, N. A. (1 June 1980). "Informational versus
Controlling Verbal Rewards".
1198:
Deci, E. L.; Koestner, R.; Ryan, R. M. (1 January 2001). "Extrinsic Rewards and Intrinsic Motivation in Education: Reconsidered Once Again".
977:
Kamins, Melissa L.; Dweck, Carol S. (1999). "Person versus process praise and criticism: Implications for contingent self-worth and coping".
1917:
Heine, Steven H.; Lehman, Darrin R.; Markus, Hazel Rose; Kitayama, Shinobu (1999). "Is there a universal need for positive self-regard?".
1777:
Wang, Y. Z.; Wiley, A. R.; Chiu, C.-Y. (1 January 2008). "Independence-supportive praise versus interdependence-promoting praise".
366:
Henderlong, Jennifer; Lepper, Mark R. (2002). "The effects of praise on children's intrinsic motivation: A review and synthesis".
208:: information and control. Taking this perspective, the informational aspect of praise is thought to promote a perceived internal
1032:"Is no praise good praise? Effects of positive feedback on children's and university students' responses to subsequent failures"
1270:
Social Comparison and Education. In J.M. Levine & Wang, M.C. Eds. Teacher and Student Perception: Implications for Learning
228:
Social comparison is a psychological process that is widely prevalent, particularly so in educational settings. In Festinger's
1075:
Mueller, Claudia M.; Dweck, Carol S. (1998). "Praise for intelligence can undermine children's motivation and performance".
630:"Task clarification, performance feedback, and social praise: Procedures for improving the customer service of bank tellers"
1812:
Markus, Hazel R.; Kitayama, Shinobu (1991). "Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation".
1183:
Deci, E. L.; Ryan, R. M. (1980). "The empirical exploration of intrinsic motivational processes". In L. Berkowitz (ed.).
311:
122:
1623:
1598:
1567:
1964:
1681:
Ackerman, Brian P. (1981). "Young children's understanding of a speaker's intentional use of a false utterance".
1654:
Barker, George P.; Graham, Sandra (1987). "Developmental study of praise and blame as attributional cues".
1481:
Kohn, A. (1 January 1996). "By All Available Means: Cameron and Pierce's Defense of Extrinsic Motivators".
1641:
Beneficial and detrimental effects of praise on children's motivation: Performance versus person feedback
833:
Delin, Catherine R.; Baumeister, Roy F. (September 1994). "Praise: More Than Just Social Reinforcement".
201:
542:"Naturalistic assessment of children's compliance to teachers' requests and consequences for compliance"
540:
Strain, Phillip S.; Lambert, Deborah L.; Kerr, Mary Margaret; Stagg, Vaughan; Lenkner, Donna A. (1983).
1618:(New ed.). Berkeley and Los Angeles: United States: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. p. 16.
460:"Admiration regulates social hierarchy: Antecedents, dispositions, and effects on intergroup behavior"
59:
1931:
1826:
1145:
Covington, V. (1984). "The self-worth theory of achievement motivation: Findings and implications".
991:
229:
1983:
1559:
1110:
Weiner, B. (1 January 1994). "Integrating Social and Personal Theories of Achievement Striving".
20:
2006:
1926:
1821:
986:
142:
94:
90:
67:
86:
138:
82:(more neutral forms of recognition) and from encouragement (expressedly future-oriented).
8:
2001:
458:
Sweetman, Joseph; Spears, Russell; Livingstone, Andrew G.; Manstead, Antony S.R. (2013).
1896:
1839:
1794:
1725:
1498:
1463:
1393:
1300:
1250:
1215:
1162:
1127:
1012:
941:
846:
789:
751:
743:
703:
678:
654:
629:
566:
541:
523:
494:
459:
435:
410:
391:
205:
204:(Deci & Ryan) have focused on two aspects of praise thought to influence a child's
1861:
Educating hearts and minds: Reflections on Japanese preschool and elementary education
1944:
1900:
1859:
1729:
1619:
1594:
1563:
1529:
1502:
1349:
Pretty, Grace H.; Seligman, Clive (1984). "Affect and the overjustification effect".
1254:
1166:
1131:
1092:
1054:
1050:
1004:
793:
755:
708:
659:
610:
571:
499:
481:
440:
383:
45:
1843:
1798:
1593:. Cambridge, Cambridge: United States: Cambridge University Press. 2008. p. 2.
1467:
1397:
1304:
1219:
1016:
945:
330:
Kanouse, D. E.; Gumpert, P.; Canavan-Gumpert, D. (1981). "The semantics of praise".
1936:
1888:
1831:
1786:
1756:
1717:
1690:
1663:
1555:
1525:
1490:
1455:
1425:
1421:
1385:
1358:
1331:
1292:
1242:
1207:
1154:
1119:
1084:
1046:
996:
933:
842:
781:
735:
698:
690:
649:
641:
602:
561:
553:
525:
History of behavior modification: Experimental foundations of contemporary research
489:
471:
430:
422:
395:
375:
209:
71:
1319:
628:
Crowell, Charles R.; Anderson, D. Chris; Abel, Dawn M.; Sergio, Joseph P. (1988).
606:
30:
1940:
1362:
379:
2011:
1892:
1835:
1760:
1694:
1296:
1031:
1000:
476:
1667:
1494:
1459:
1211:
1123:
1088:
937:
679:"The effect of vicarious reinforcement on attentive behavior in the classroom"
1995:
1978:
1790:
1721:
557:
485:
63:
41:
1879:
Salili, F. (1 March 1996). "Learning and Motivation: An Asian Perspective".
1545:"Beauty of Body, Nobility of Soul: The Pursuit of Love in Plato's Symposium"
1246:
645:
1948:
1058:
1008:
712:
694:
663:
614:
575:
503:
444:
387:
163:
134:
1096:
133:
The concept of praise as a means of behavioral reinforcement is rooted in
106:
1912:
1910:
1701:
1389:
1283:
Festinger, L. (1 May 1954). "A Theory of Social Comparison Processes".
919:
917:
915:
913:
862:
Objective self-awareness. In Advances in experimental social psychology
785:
747:
426:
102:
34:
1441:
1439:
1437:
1435:
1907:
1335:
306:
98:
1544:
1272:. Hillsdale: N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. pp. 29–55.
910:
595:
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
591:
1432:
1158:
739:
114:
79:
1552:
Maieusis: Essays in Ancient Philosophy in Honour of Myles Burnyeat
457:
49:
1320:"Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation"
1772:
1770:
1191:
828:
826:
824:
822:
820:
818:
361:
359:
357:
355:
353:
351:
349:
347:
345:
118:
1410:
886:
Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior
771:
329:
16:
Expression of positive recognition, reassurance or admiration
1767:
1070:
1068:
815:
342:
1232:
1178:
1176:
1023:
972:
970:
897:
895:
809:
Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents
110:
141:. Through this lens, praise has been viewed as a means of
62:, praise becomes a form of reward and furthers behavioral
1916:
1707:
1643:(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Stanford University.
1616:
Greek Popular Morality in the Time of Plato and Aristotle
1065:
627:
1187:(13 ed.). New York: Academic Press. pp. 39–80.
1173:
967:
892:
879:
877:
875:
873:
871:
800:
1745:
1515:
923:
767:
765:
539:
1445:
868:
587:
585:
762:
223:
195:
1858:
582:
522:
1865:. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
1375:
323:
152:
1993:
1197:
726:Brophy, Jere (1981). "On praising effectively".
365:
260:
1779:International Journal of Behavioral Development
1741:
1739:
832:
1874:
1872:
1811:
1348:
1029:
128:
1776:
1030:Skipper, Yvonne; Douglas, Karen (June 2012).
864:. New York: Academic Press. pp. 233–275.
1736:
1653:
1554:. Oxford University Press. pp. 97–135.
1351:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
1324:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
1103:
1077:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
1074:
901:
719:
1869:
976:
806:
670:
78:Praise is distinct from acknowledgement or
40:Praise is expressed verbally as well as by
1710:Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
1638:
1235:Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
1185:Advances in experimental social psychology
835:Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour
402:
1930:
1825:
1560:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199289974.003.0006
1282:
1144:
1039:British Journal of Educational Psychology
990:
702:
653:
565:
493:
475:
464:Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
434:
1680:
1613:
1182:
961:You child's self-esteem: The key to life
883:
859:
807:Weisz, John R.; Kazdin, Alan E. (2010).
174:
1543:Nehamas, Alexander (13 December 2007).
1542:
1994:
1878:
1267:
1109:
958:
725:
676:
520:
408:
332:New Directions in Attribution Research
33:expresses recognition, reassurance or
1881:Psychology & Developing Societies
1856:
904:Ingraktion: An attributional approach
117:rites and practices (see for example
1480:
1317:
683:Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
634:Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
546:Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
774:Education and Treatment of Children
529:. Baltimore: University Park Press.
312:Praise and worship (disambiguation)
13:
1518:Journal of Research in Personality
847:10.1111/j.1468-5914.1994.tb00254.x
14:
2023:
1958:
1656:Journal of Educational Psychology
1414:The Journal of Genetic Psychology
902:Jones, E.E.; Wortman, C. (1973).
884:Deci, E. L.; Ryan, R. M. (1985).
1051:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02028.x
224:Social-comparison versus mastery
196:Controlling versus informational
1850:
1805:
1674:
1647:
1632:
1607:
1583:
1536:
1509:
1474:
1404:
1369:
1342:
1311:
1276:
1261:
1226:
1138:
952:
853:
1483:Review of Educational Research
1426:10.1080/00221325.1982.10533454
1200:Review of Educational Research
1112:Review of Educational Research
621:
533:
514:
451:
153:Effects beyond behavior change
1:
1147:The Elementary School Journal
906:. US: General Learning Press.
728:The Elementary School Journal
409:Carton, John (19 June 1989).
317:
261:Factors that affect influence
169:
1984:Resources in other libraries
1530:10.1016/0092-6566(90)90008-T
607:10.1097/CHI.0b013e31816765c2
7:
1941:10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.766
1550:. In Scott, Dominic (ed.).
1363:10.1037/0022-3514.46.6.1241
470:(3). Elsevier BV: 534–542.
380:10.1037/0033-2909.128.5.774
300:
202:cognitive evaluation theory
129:As behavioral reinforcement
10:
2028:
1893:10.1177/097133369600800104
1836:10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
1761:10.1037/0012-1649.14.3.268
1695:10.1037/0012-1649.17.4.472
1297:10.1177/001872675400700202
1001:10.1037/0012-1649.35.3.835
477:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.10.007
287:
18:
1979:Resources in your library
1668:10.1037/0022-0663.79.1.62
1495:10.3102/00346543066001001
1460:10.1007/s11031-006-9039-4
1212:10.3102/00346543071001001
1124:10.3102/00346543064004557
1089:10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.33
938:10.1080/01443410601159852
888:. New York: Plenum Press.
274:
239:
1791:10.1177/0165025407084047
1749:Developmental Psychology
1722:10.1177/0146167289151006
1683:Developmental Psychology
1614:Kenneth, Dover (1974b).
1318:Deci, Edward L. (1971).
979:Developmental Psychology
677:Kazdin, Alan E. (1973).
558:10.1901/jaba.1983.16-243
230:social comparison theory
103:admiration or exultation
1639:Henderlong, J. (2000).
1247:10.1177/014616728062007
860:Wicklund, R.A. (1975).
646:10.1901/jaba.1988.21-65
85:Praise is given across
21:Praise (disambiguation)
1448:Motivation and Emotion
1268:Levine, J. M. (1983).
959:Briggs, D. C. (1975).
926:Educational Psychology
695:10.1901/jaba.1973.6-71
368:Psychological Bulletin
265:
254:
143:positive reinforcement
89:, and both within the
1857:Lewis, C. C. (1995).
521:Kazdin, Alan (1978).
249:
175:Person versus process
1919:Psychological Review
1814:Psychological Review
139:operant conditioning
19:For other uses, see
963:. Random House LLC.
60:social manipulation
1390:10.1007/BF00287554
786:10.1353/etc.0.0007
427:10.1007/BF03393167
206:self-determination
123:praise and worship
31:social interaction
1965:Library resources
811:. Guilford Press.
113:may form part of
46:facial expression
2019:
1953:
1952:
1934:
1914:
1905:
1904:
1876:
1867:
1866:
1864:
1854:
1848:
1847:
1829:
1809:
1803:
1802:
1774:
1765:
1764:
1743:
1734:
1733:
1705:
1699:
1698:
1678:
1672:
1671:
1651:
1645:
1644:
1636:
1630:
1629:
1611:
1605:
1604:
1591:Plato: Symposium
1587:
1581:
1580:
1578:
1576:
1549:
1540:
1534:
1533:
1513:
1507:
1506:
1478:
1472:
1471:
1443:
1430:
1429:
1408:
1402:
1401:
1384:(5–6): 369–386.
1373:
1367:
1366:
1357:(6): 1241–1253.
1346:
1340:
1339:
1336:10.1037/h0030644
1315:
1309:
1308:
1280:
1274:
1273:
1265:
1259:
1258:
1230:
1224:
1223:
1195:
1189:
1188:
1180:
1171:
1170:
1142:
1136:
1135:
1107:
1101:
1100:
1072:
1063:
1062:
1036:
1027:
1021:
1020:
994:
974:
965:
964:
956:
950:
949:
921:
908:
907:
899:
890:
889:
881:
866:
865:
857:
851:
850:
830:
813:
812:
804:
798:
797:
769:
760:
759:
723:
717:
716:
706:
674:
668:
667:
657:
625:
619:
618:
589:
580:
579:
569:
537:
531:
530:
528:
518:
512:
511:
497:
479:
455:
449:
448:
438:
415:Behavior Analyst
406:
400:
399:
363:
340:
339:
327:
210:locus of control
119:prayer of praise
87:social hierarchy
2027:
2026:
2022:
2021:
2020:
2018:
2017:
2016:
1992:
1991:
1990:
1989:
1988:
1973:
1972:
1968:
1961:
1956:
1932:10.1.1.321.2156
1915:
1908:
1877:
1870:
1855:
1851:
1827:10.1.1.320.1159
1810:
1806:
1775:
1768:
1744:
1737:
1706:
1702:
1679:
1675:
1652:
1648:
1637:
1633:
1626:
1612:
1608:
1601:
1589:
1588:
1584:
1574:
1572:
1570:
1547:
1541:
1537:
1514:
1510:
1479:
1475:
1444:
1433:
1409:
1405:
1374:
1370:
1347:
1343:
1316:
1312:
1285:Human Relations
1281:
1277:
1266:
1262:
1231:
1227:
1196:
1192:
1181:
1174:
1143:
1139:
1108:
1104:
1073:
1066:
1034:
1028:
1024:
992:10.1.1.395.3991
975:
968:
957:
953:
922:
911:
900:
893:
882:
869:
858:
854:
831:
816:
805:
801:
770:
763:
724:
720:
675:
671:
626:
622:
590:
583:
538:
534:
519:
515:
456:
452:
407:
403:
364:
343:
328:
324:
320:
303:
290:
277:
268:
263:
242:
226:
198:
177:
172:
155:
131:
93:and towards an
24:
17:
12:
11:
5:
2025:
2015:
2014:
2009:
2004:
1987:
1986:
1981:
1975:
1974:
1963:
1962:
1960:
1959:External links
1957:
1955:
1954:
1925:(4): 766–794.
1906:
1868:
1849:
1820:(2): 224–253.
1804:
1766:
1755:(3): 268–276.
1735:
1700:
1689:(4): 472–480.
1673:
1646:
1631:
1625:978-0872202450
1624:
1606:
1600:978-0521682985
1599:
1582:
1568:
1535:
1508:
1473:
1454:(4): 333–343.
1431:
1403:
1368:
1341:
1330:(1): 105–115.
1310:
1291:(2): 117–140.
1275:
1260:
1241:(2): 228–233.
1225:
1190:
1172:
1159:10.1086/461388
1137:
1118:(4): 557–573.
1102:
1064:
1045:(2): 327–339.
1022:
985:(3): 835–847.
966:
951:
932:(4): 487–508.
909:
891:
867:
852:
841:(3): 219–241.
814:
799:
780:(1): 351–380.
761:
740:10.1086/461229
734:(5): 269–278.
718:
669:
620:
601:(5): 505–514.
581:
552:(2): 243–249.
532:
513:
450:
421:(2): 237–255.
401:
374:(5): 774–795.
341:
321:
319:
316:
315:
314:
309:
302:
299:
289:
286:
276:
273:
267:
264:
262:
259:
241:
238:
225:
222:
200:Proponents of
197:
194:
176:
173:
171:
168:
154:
151:
130:
127:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2024:
2013:
2010:
2008:
2007:Social graces
2005:
2003:
2000:
1999:
1997:
1985:
1982:
1980:
1977:
1976:
1971:
1966:
1950:
1946:
1942:
1938:
1933:
1928:
1924:
1920:
1913:
1911:
1902:
1898:
1894:
1890:
1886:
1882:
1875:
1873:
1863:
1862:
1853:
1845:
1841:
1837:
1833:
1828:
1823:
1819:
1815:
1808:
1800:
1796:
1792:
1788:
1784:
1780:
1773:
1771:
1762:
1758:
1754:
1750:
1742:
1740:
1731:
1727:
1723:
1719:
1715:
1711:
1704:
1696:
1692:
1688:
1684:
1677:
1669:
1665:
1661:
1657:
1650:
1642:
1635:
1627:
1621:
1617:
1610:
1602:
1596:
1592:
1586:
1571:
1569:9780191711008
1565:
1561:
1557:
1553:
1546:
1539:
1531:
1527:
1524:(1): 87–100.
1523:
1519:
1512:
1504:
1500:
1496:
1492:
1488:
1484:
1477:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1457:
1453:
1449:
1442:
1440:
1438:
1436:
1427:
1423:
1419:
1415:
1407:
1399:
1395:
1391:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1372:
1364:
1360:
1356:
1352:
1345:
1337:
1333:
1329:
1325:
1321:
1314:
1306:
1302:
1298:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1279:
1271:
1264:
1256:
1252:
1248:
1244:
1240:
1236:
1229:
1221:
1217:
1213:
1209:
1205:
1201:
1194:
1186:
1179:
1177:
1168:
1164:
1160:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1141:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1106:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1071:
1069:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1040:
1033:
1026:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1002:
998:
993:
988:
984:
980:
973:
971:
962:
955:
947:
943:
939:
935:
931:
927:
920:
918:
916:
914:
905:
898:
896:
887:
880:
878:
876:
874:
872:
863:
856:
848:
844:
840:
836:
829:
827:
825:
823:
821:
819:
810:
803:
795:
791:
787:
783:
779:
775:
768:
766:
757:
753:
749:
745:
741:
737:
733:
729:
722:
714:
710:
705:
700:
696:
692:
688:
684:
680:
673:
665:
661:
656:
651:
647:
643:
639:
635:
631:
624:
616:
612:
608:
604:
600:
596:
588:
586:
577:
573:
568:
563:
559:
555:
551:
547:
543:
536:
527:
526:
517:
510:
505:
501:
496:
491:
487:
483:
478:
473:
469:
465:
461:
454:
446:
442:
437:
432:
428:
424:
420:
416:
412:
405:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
377:
373:
369:
362:
360:
358:
356:
354:
352:
350:
348:
346:
337:
333:
326:
322:
313:
310:
308:
305:
304:
298:
294:
285:
281:
272:
258:
253:
248:
245:
237:
233:
231:
221:
217:
213:
211:
207:
203:
193:
189:
185:
181:
167:
165:
159:
150:
146:
144:
140:
136:
126:
124:
120:
116:
112:
108:
104:
100:
96:
92:
88:
83:
81:
76:
73:
69:
65:
64:reinforcement
61:
58:As a form of
56:
53:
51:
47:
43:
42:body language
38:
36:
32:
29:as a form of
28:
22:
1969:
1922:
1918:
1887:(1): 55–81.
1884:
1880:
1860:
1852:
1817:
1813:
1807:
1785:(1): 13–20.
1782:
1778:
1752:
1748:
1716:(1): 61–72.
1713:
1709:
1703:
1686:
1682:
1676:
1662:(1): 62–66.
1659:
1655:
1649:
1640:
1634:
1615:
1609:
1590:
1585:
1573:. Retrieved
1551:
1538:
1521:
1517:
1511:
1486:
1482:
1476:
1451:
1447:
1420:(1): 29–39.
1417:
1413:
1406:
1381:
1377:
1371:
1354:
1350:
1344:
1327:
1323:
1313:
1288:
1284:
1278:
1269:
1263:
1238:
1234:
1228:
1203:
1199:
1193:
1184:
1150:
1146:
1140:
1115:
1111:
1105:
1083:(1): 33–52.
1080:
1076:
1042:
1038:
1025:
982:
978:
960:
954:
929:
925:
903:
885:
861:
855:
838:
834:
808:
802:
777:
773:
731:
727:
721:
689:(1): 71–78.
686:
682:
672:
640:(1): 65–71.
637:
633:
623:
598:
594:
549:
545:
535:
524:
516:
507:
467:
463:
453:
418:
414:
404:
371:
367:
335:
331:
325:
295:
291:
282:
278:
269:
255:
250:
246:
243:
234:
227:
218:
214:
199:
190:
186:
182:
178:
164:ingratiation
160:
156:
147:
137:'s model of
135:B.F. Skinner
132:
109:. Praise of
84:
77:
68:conditioning
57:
54:
39:
26:
25:
1206:(1): 1–27.
107:deification
2002:Evaluation
1996:Categories
1489:(1): 1–4.
318:References
170:Dimensions
35:admiration
1927:CiteSeerX
1901:144645049
1822:CiteSeerX
1730:145795039
1503:145139185
1378:Sex Roles
1255:144553494
1167:143762609
1132:145537347
987:CiteSeerX
794:145087451
756:144444174
486:0022-1031
338:: 97–115.
307:Gratitude
115:religious
99:deference
72:influence
1949:10560328
1844:13606371
1799:18336523
1468:53403876
1398:56256434
1305:18918768
1220:11589745
1153:: 5–20.
1059:22583094
1017:16428720
1009:10380873
946:46322544
713:16795397
664:16795713
615:18356768
576:16795665
504:23690651
445:22478261
388:12206194
301:See also
95:outgroup
80:feedback
50:gestures
1097:9686450
748:1001606
704:1310808
655:1286094
567:1307879
495:3657193
436:2733619
396:9601124
288:Culture
91:ingroup
1970:Praise
1967:about
1947:
1929:
1899:
1842:
1824:
1797:
1728:
1622:
1597:
1575:20 May
1566:
1501:
1466:
1396:
1303:
1253:
1218:
1165:
1130:
1095:
1057:
1015:
1007:
989:
944:
792:
754:
746:
711:
701:
662:
652:
613:
574:
564:
502:
492:
484:
443:
433:
394:
386:
275:Gender
240:Beauty
70:. The
27:Praise
2012:Honor
1897:S2CID
1840:S2CID
1795:S2CID
1726:S2CID
1548:(pdf)
1499:S2CID
1464:S2CID
1394:S2CID
1301:S2CID
1251:S2CID
1216:S2CID
1163:S2CID
1128:S2CID
1035:(PDF)
1013:S2CID
942:S2CID
790:S2CID
752:S2CID
744:JSTOR
392:S2CID
105:, or
1945:PMID
1620:ISBN
1595:ISBN
1577:2019
1564:ISBN
1093:PMID
1055:PMID
1005:PMID
709:PMID
660:PMID
611:PMID
572:PMID
500:PMID
482:ISSN
441:PMID
384:PMID
121:and
111:gods
48:and
1937:doi
1923:106
1889:doi
1832:doi
1787:doi
1757:doi
1718:doi
1691:doi
1664:doi
1556:doi
1526:doi
1491:doi
1456:doi
1422:doi
1418:141
1386:doi
1359:doi
1332:doi
1293:doi
1243:doi
1208:doi
1155:doi
1120:doi
1085:doi
1047:doi
997:doi
934:doi
843:doi
782:doi
736:doi
699:PMC
691:doi
650:PMC
642:doi
603:doi
562:PMC
554:doi
490:PMC
472:doi
431:PMC
423:doi
376:doi
372:128
266:Age
125:).
66:by
52:).
1998::
1943:.
1935:.
1921:.
1909:^
1895:.
1883:.
1871:^
1838:.
1830:.
1818:98
1816:.
1793:.
1783:32
1781:.
1769:^
1753:14
1751:.
1738:^
1724:.
1714:15
1712:.
1687:17
1685:.
1660:79
1658:.
1562:.
1522:24
1520:.
1497:.
1487:66
1485:.
1462:.
1452:30
1450:.
1434:^
1416:.
1392:.
1382:10
1380:.
1355:46
1353:.
1328:18
1326:.
1322:.
1299:.
1287:.
1249:.
1237:.
1214:.
1204:71
1202:.
1175:^
1161:.
1151:85
1149:.
1126:.
1116:64
1114:.
1091:.
1081:75
1079:.
1067:^
1053:.
1043:82
1041:.
1037:.
1011:.
1003:.
995:.
983:35
981:.
969:^
940:.
930:27
928:.
912:^
894:^
870:^
839:24
837:.
817:^
788:.
778:31
776:.
764:^
750:.
742:.
732:81
730:.
707:.
697:.
685:.
681:.
658:.
648:.
638:21
636:.
632:.
609:.
599:47
597:.
584:^
570:.
560:.
550:16
548:.
544:.
506:.
498:.
488:.
480:.
468:49
466:.
462:.
439:.
429:.
419:19
417:.
413:.
390:.
382:.
370:.
344:^
334:.
166:.
101:,
37:.
1951:.
1939::
1903:.
1891::
1885:8
1846:.
1834::
1801:.
1789::
1763:.
1759::
1732:.
1720::
1697:.
1693::
1670:.
1666::
1628:.
1603:.
1579:.
1558::
1532:.
1528::
1505:.
1493::
1470:.
1458::
1428:.
1424::
1400:.
1388::
1365:.
1361::
1338:.
1334::
1307:.
1295::
1289:7
1257:.
1245::
1239:6
1222:.
1210::
1169:.
1157::
1134:.
1122::
1099:.
1087::
1061:.
1049::
1019:.
999::
948:.
936::
849:.
845::
796:.
784::
758:.
738::
715:.
693::
687:6
666:.
644::
617:.
605::
578:.
556::
474::
447:.
425::
398:.
378::
336:3
44:(
23:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.