1089:
data and ranking system. Within the context of information queries, a ranking system determines the search results, which in the case of topics such as politics can return politically biased search results. The bias presented in the search results can directly result from either biased data that collaborates with the ranking system or because of the structure of the ranking system itself. This questionable nature of search results raises questions of the impact on users and to what degree the ranking system can impact political opinions and beliefs, which can directly translate into voter behaviour. This can also affirm or encourage biased data within the Google search results. Whilst research has shown users do not place exclusive trust on the information provided by search engines, studies have shown that individuals who are undecided politically are susceptible to manipulation by bias relative to political candidates and the light in which their policies and actions are presented and conveyed. In the quantification of political bias, both the input data for search results and the ranking system in which they are presented to the user encapsulates bias to varying degrees.
1008:: When stories focus on what has the potential to occur with speculative phrasing such as "may", "what if", and "could" rather than focusing on the evidence of what has and/or definitely will occur. When a piece is not specifically labelled as an opinion and analysis article, it can lead to further speculative bias. This occurs in a political context, particularly introducing policies, or addressing opposing policies. This bias allows parties to make their policies more appealing and appear to address issues more directly, by speculating the positive and negative outcomes.
136:
73:
1067:
credible and sufficient information is provided, this bias can be significantly reduced. Framing further looks at the impact of slanting in political campaigning and its potential impact on the distribution of political power where political bias is present. It is important to understand framing is an omnipresent process used in analysis to discern connections between aspects of reality and to convey an interpretation of opinions that may not be entirely accurate.
982:, difficult-to-explain views. Concision bias aims to increase communication by selectively focusing on the important information and eliminating redundancy. In a political context, this can mean the omission of seemingly unnecessary details can constitute bias, depending on what information is deemed unnecessary. Political opinions are often reduced to a simple party understanding or belief system, with other challenging information excluded in its presentation.
889:
3331:
3321:
1121:
992:: A cognitive bias that favours and seeks information that affirms pre-existing beliefs and opinions. When set in a political atmosphere, individuals with like-minded political beliefs will seek and affirm their opinions, discounting contradictory information. A recent meta-analysis attempted to compare levels of confirmation bias among liberals and conservatives in the United States and found that both groups were roughly equally biased.
1160:, he looks at the omission of left leaning points of view from the mainstream print press. Kuypers determined politicians would receive positive press coverage only when covering and delivering topics that aligned with press-supported beliefs. This meant the press was engaging in bias within the media through their coverage and selection/release of political information, which was challenging the neutral conveyance of political messages.
32:
1117:
political opinions, which directly impact voter behaviour and decisions, because of the failed representation of information. This form of political bias has continuing impacts when used to change the opinions of others. Where media remains a powerful information source for political information, it can create political bias in the informational representation of political actors and policy issues.
257:
998:: Exists when the normalisation of an individual's opinions, beliefs and values are believed to be common. This bias exists in a group setting where the collective group opinion is attributed to the wider population, with little to no inter group challenges. This is the basis of political party formation and engages in the ongoing attempt to
1163:
David Baron similarly presents a game-theoretic model of media behaviour, suggesting that mass media outlets only hire journalists whose writing is aligned with their political positions. This engages false consensus bias, as beliefs are determined to be common because of being surrounding by aligned
1088:
topics such as political bias, the top search results can play a significant role in shaping opinions. Through the use of a bias quantification framework, bias can be measured within the political bias by rank within the search system. It can further address the sources of the bias through the input
1061:
is the social construction of political or social movements with a positive or negative representation. Political bias in this context is political leaders and parties presenting information to highlight a problem and offering solutions that favour their political position. This makes their position
963:
Political bias exists beyond simple presentation and understanding of view-points favouring a particular political leader or party, but transcends into the readings and interactions among individuals undertaken daily. The prevalence of political bias has a lasting impact with proven effects on voter
1043:
preferring to get their news from politically neutral media. Individuals responses to political bias and motivations are challenged when the engagement of bias furthers and assists their political party or ideology. The denunciation of political neutrality itself elicits a more aggravated response,
1148:
Political bias in the media is also discussed, showing how social leaders discuss political issues. To determine the existence of political bias, agenda determination is used. Agenda determination is designed to provide an understanding of the agenda behind the presentation of political issues and
1099:
Determining the difference between content and source bias is a significant focus of determining the role of political bias in search engines. This focus looks directly at the actual content of the information present and whether it is purposefully selective in the information presented, or rather
985:
Coverage bias: When political parties address topics and issues to different extents. This makes certain issues seem more prevalent and presents ideas as more important or necessary. In a political atmosphere, this applies to the presentation of policies and the issues they address, along with the
1030:
is the counteraction to political bias, looking to ensure the ability of public servants to carry out any official duties impartially, relative to their political beliefs. In areas like media coverage, legal and bureaucratic decisions and academic teachings, the need for taking corrective action
1066:
looks at the situations in which people are only presented with options within two frames, one presented negatively and the other positively. The framing effect is increasingly significant in opinion polls designed to encourage specific organisations that are commissioned to poll. If reliable,
1116:
or that of their readership. Determining media biases relative to political positioning, there are distinctive regulations which protect against the fabrication of information. The media, rather, may alter the representation of information to promote political positions. Media bias can change
1111:
highlights political bias in the reporting of political topics and the representation of politicians. Where a reporter sometimes emphasises particular points of view and conveys selected information to further their own political view, they may present biased information favouring their own
1048:
and generate accusations for any actions or messages perceived as politically biased. Biases remain embedded in contextual intergroup competition, meaning political considerations based on action or message can challenge specific ideologies or further enhance and advance an ideology.
1079:
to provide a balanced or equal representation of controversial issues. Search engines influence democracy because of the potential distrust of media, leading to increasing online searches for political information and understanding. Looking specifically at
America, the
1015:
selection, deselection and/or omission of stories based on individualised opinions. This is similarly related to agenda bias, primarily when focusing on politicians and how they choose to cover and present preferred policy discussions and issues.
1144:
model, looking at the "manufacturing" of political policies through the manipulation of mass media. This model further looked at the capital funding of media outlets and their ownership, which often relates to political ties.
180:, is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Knowledge.
956:
Bias emerges in a political context when individuals engage in an inability or an unwillingness to understand a politically opposing point of view. Such bias in individuals may have its roots in their
3238:
1276:
1096:. This involves presenting political information dependent on common searches and users' focus, further re-affirming political bias and reducing exposure to politically neutral content.
166:
967:
With an understanding of political bias comes the acknowledgment of its violation of expected political neutrality. A lack of political neutrality is the result of political bias.
190:
1031:
against politically biased actions is the foundation of political neutrality enforcement. Research suggests that political neutrality is favoured over political bias, with
1164:
views. This effectively heightens the political bias within media representation of information, and creates false narratives about the nations political climate.
960:
and thinking styles; it is unclear whether individuals at particular positions along the political spectrum are more biased than any other individuals.
3334:
1539:
1487:
Ditto, Peter H.; Liu, Brittany S.; Clark, Cory J.; Wojcik, Sean P.; Chen, Eric E.; Grady, Rebecca H.; Celniker, Jared B.; Zinger, Joanne F. (2018).
200:
Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article.
3044:
2906:
3016:
83:
1576:
2881:
2053:
1742:
917:
3049:
1574:
Hofstetter, C. Richard; Buss, Terry F. (1978). "Bias in television news coverage of political events: A methodological analysis".
978:: Refers to perspective reporting using only the words necessary to explain a view quickly and spends little or no time to detail
2911:
1204:
185:
3365:
3252:
1841:
1496:
2255:
2207:
1199:
3360:
3189:
1075:
Search results from search engines like Google often shape opinions and perceptions of political issues and candidates.
221:
Content in this edit is translated from the existing
Portuguese Knowledge article at ]; see its history for attribution.
3214:
3009:
2190:
208:
2154:
1605:
785:
311:
293:
117:
59:
2308:
1254:
1076:
1044:
directly controlling a normative acceptance of political bias. Limitations of political neutrality exist regarding
1040:
1032:
391:
2983:
2901:
2711:
2136:
1092:
There is distinctive political bias in social media where the algorithm that structures user content facilitates
275:
45:
1019:
Partisan bias: Exists in the media when reporters serve and create the leaning of a particular political party.
910:
780:
558:
406:
2830:
1800:
Entman, Robert (2008). "Media framing biases and political power: Explaining slant in news of
Campaign 2008".
1740:
Entman, Robert (2010). "Media framing biases and political power: Explaining slant in news of
Campaign 2008".
3324:
3298:
3002:
2716:
2370:
2261:
795:
2280:
1100:
whether the source of information is projecting personalised opinions relative to their political opinions.
3167:
2365:
1189:
544:
376:
347:
2488:
1892:
1785:
1547:
1084:
was introduced in 1949 to avoid political bias in all licensed broadcasting media. Within the context of
848:
267:
1489:"At Least Bias Is Bipartisan: A Meta-Analytic Comparison of Partisan Bias in Liberals and Conservatives"
1002:
these views within the wider population with little recognition of different beliefs outside the party.
2824:
2350:
381:
352:
3385:
3209:
3115:
3064:
2954:
2678:
2478:
2456:
1184:
1058:
999:
903:
508:
3291:
3184:
3084:
2978:
2891:
2773:
2538:
2518:
2414:
1718:
1652:"When do we care about political neutrality? The hypocritical nature of reaction to political bias"
1337:"When do we care about political neutrality? The hypocritical nature of reaction to political bias"
1307:
Gentzknow, Matthew; Shapiro, Jesse; Stone, Daniel (2014). "Media Bias in the
Marketplace: Theory".
623:
513:
216:
99:
2281:
When do we care about political neutrality? The hypocritical nature of reaction to political bias:
1209:
3231:
3130:
1623:
Kernaghan, Kenneth (1986). "Political Rights and
Political Neutrality: finding the bland point".
553:
3284:
2964:
2648:
2628:
2409:
2387:
1085:
1036:
995:
790:
732:
678:
2274:
2131:
Robinson, Piers (25 October 2018). "Does the
Propaganda Model Actually Theorise Propaganda?".
2743:
2658:
2633:
2578:
2051:
Stromberg, David (2002). "Mass Media
Competition, Political Competition, and Public Policy".
1214:
1081:
610:
443:
237:
148:
1005:
3025:
2696:
2548:
2424:
2301:
1665:
1453:
1348:
1027:
720:
591:
581:
566:
493:
411:
8:
3380:
3370:
3174:
2851:
2768:
2668:
2603:
2543:
2533:
2528:
2392:
2005:"Search bias quantification: investigating political bias in social media and web search"
1939:"Search bias quantification: investigating political bias in social media and web search"
1890:
Bernhardt, Dan (2007). "Political
Polarization and the Electoral Effects of Media Bias".
1444:
950:
942:
832:
742:
596:
498:
448:
386:
230:
95:
51:
2275:
Search bias quantification: investigating political bias in social media and web search:
1669:
1457:
1352:
91:
3074:
2748:
2733:
2493:
2483:
2466:
2182:
2105:
2072:
1919:
1817:
1759:
1688:
1651:
1636:
1521:
1371:
1336:
1281:
1113:
870:
463:
1465:
3375:
3277:
3194:
2861:
2798:
2783:
2706:
2688:
2623:
2419:
2335:
2186:
2150:
2110:
2092:
2031:
1965:
1821:
1780:
1763:
1693:
1513:
1469:
1376:
1179:
1141:
1093:
989:
865:
539:
401:
396:
357:
330:
212:
1525:
19:
This article discusses bias in a political context. For bias in other contexts, see
3305:
3199:
3147:
2928:
2788:
2728:
2653:
2638:
2498:
2451:
2360:
2355:
2340:
2140:
2100:
2084:
2026:
2016:
1960:
1950:
1923:
1909:
1901:
1809:
1751:
1683:
1673:
1632:
1585:
1505:
1461:
1366:
1356:
1194:
1133:
1129:
815:
571:
425:
2088:
1905:
3125:
3059:
2896:
2886:
2663:
2643:
2558:
2461:
2436:
2431:
2404:
2382:
2294:
1678:
1361:
1224:
893:
875:
700:
685:
1062:
appear more favourable and their policies as the expected course of action. The
3162:
2938:
2933:
2846:
2763:
2723:
2673:
2618:
2608:
2593:
2588:
2553:
2508:
2473:
2377:
2326:
2073:"Partisan Bias in Message Selection: Media Gatekeeping of Party Press Releases"
1219:
1153:
1063:
1045:
979:
949:, it commonly refers to how a reporter, news organisation, or TV show covers a
771:
690:
644:
586:
2021:
2004:
1955:
1938:
1589:
937:
or perceived bias involving the slanting or altering of information to make a
3355:
3349:
3089:
2876:
2856:
2819:
2793:
2778:
2758:
2738:
2701:
2613:
2573:
2568:
2563:
2441:
2345:
2096:
1813:
1755:
1509:
695:
673:
648:
478:
3239:
R v Bow Street
Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet (No 2)
1858:
Patterson, Thomas (2013). "The News Media: Communicating Political Images".
3179:
3152:
3079:
3054:
3039:
2836:
2598:
2583:
2114:
1697:
1517:
1473:
1380:
1137:
957:
458:
2753:
2523:
2513:
2503:
2399:
1488:
1272:
1120:
1012:
762:
727:
630:
618:
483:
888:
3270:
3135:
2994:
2871:
2866:
2841:
1914:
1108:
946:
852:
842:
837:
576:
438:
219:
to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary is
2145:
3110:
2959:
2446:
1174:
737:
635:
518:
473:
453:
2071:
Haselmayer, Martin; Wagner, Markus; Meyer, Thomas M. (3 July 2017).
3245:
3157:
3141:
3069:
2918:
2803:
1656:
938:
860:
820:
503:
488:
468:
337:
1716:
Sheufele, Dietram (1999). "Framing as a Theory of Media Effects".
2179:
Press Bias and Politics: How the Media Frame Controversial Issues
1409:
Saez-Trumper, Diego. "Gatekeeping, Coverage and Statement bias".
1158:
Press Bias and Politics: How the Media Frame Controversial Issues
775:
433:
16:
Bias towards a political side in supposedly-objective information
177:
1128:
An example of quantification of political bias in the media is
1070:
825:
767:
665:
2133:
The Propaganda Model Today: Filtering Perception and Awareness
1011:
Gatekeeping bias: This type of bias exists through the use of
3094:
82:
deal primarily with the United States and do not represent a
1783:(2001). "On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who can Frame?".
3120:
2317:
2237:
Baron, David (April 2013). "Game Theory: An Introduction".
1200:
Manufacturing Consent § Five filters of editorial bias
1057:
Political bias exists primarily in the concept of framing.
975:
934:
20:
1603:
Soroka, Stuart (2016). "Gatekeeping and Negativity Bias".
2286:
1149:
attempt to determine the political bias that is present.
189:
to this template: there are already 469 articles in the
970:
945:
seem more attractive. With a distinct association with
169:
a machine-translated version of the Portuguese article.
2070:
1306:
1649:
173:
1486:
1277:"Who Are More Biased: Liberals or Conservatives?"
3347:
2066:
2064:
1442:Shermer, Michael (2006). "The Political Brain".
3045:Conflict of interest in the healthcare industry
1429:The Psychology of Judgement and Decision Making
270:for grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling
1573:
1103:
215:accompanying your translation by providing an
160:Click for important translation instructions.
147:expand this article with text translated from
3335:Conflicts of interest on Knowledge (category)
3010:
2302:
2061:
1650:Yair, Omar; Sulitzeanu-Kenan, Raanan (2018).
1052:
964:behaviour and consequent political outcomes.
911:
80:The examples and perspective in this article
2054:Institute for International Economic Studies
1802:Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism
1743:Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism
1071:Evidence of political bias in search engines
3215:Sponsorship of continuing medical education
2208:"Game Theory: An Introduction, 2nd Edition"
2002:
1936:
1842:"Study: Does Google have a Political Bias?"
60:Learn how and when to remove these messages
3017:
3003:
2965:Heuristics in judgment and decision-making
2309:
2295:
1427:Plous, Scott (1993). "Confirmation Bias".
1285:. Vol. 43, no. 4. pp. 24–27
986:actual coverage by media and politicians.
918:
904:
2144:
2104:
2050:
2030:
2020:
1964:
1954:
1913:
1889:
1857:
1687:
1677:
1622:
1370:
1360:
312:Learn how and when to remove this message
294:Learn how and when to remove this message
118:Learn how and when to remove this message
3024:
2130:
1779:
1715:
1408:
1119:
2176:
1998:
1996:
1839:
1441:
1205:Mass media impact on spatial perception
1022:
3348:
3253:R v Sussex Justices, ex parte McCarthy
2232:
2230:
2228:
2172:
2170:
2168:
2166:
2126:
2124:
2046:
2044:
2042:
1994:
1992:
1990:
1988:
1986:
1984:
1982:
1980:
1978:
1976:
1885:
1883:
1881:
1879:
1877:
1875:
1873:
1853:
1851:
1799:
1739:
1602:
1540:"False Consensus and False Uniqueness"
1210:Media in Alberta § Political bias
1124:Use of media to further political bias
2998:
2290:
2236:
1835:
1833:
1831:
1775:
1773:
1735:
1733:
1711:
1709:
1707:
1618:
1616:
1569:
1567:
1565:
1497:Perspectives on Psychological Science
1426:
1422:
1420:
1404:
1402:
1400:
1398:
1396:
1394:
1392:
1390:
1334:
1330:
1328:
1326:
1324:
1322:
1320:
1318:
1302:
1300:
1271:
1249:
1247:
1245:
1243:
1241:
971:Types of bias in a political context
250:
129:
66:
25:
3190:Pharmaceutical sales representative
2225:
2163:
2121:
2039:
1973:
1870:
1848:
13:
3050:Conflicts of interest on Knowledge
2249:
1828:
1770:
1730:
1704:
1637:10.1111/j.1754-7121.1986.tb00205.x
1613:
1562:
1417:
14:
3397:
2268:
2205:
1466:10.1038/scientificamerican0706-36
1387:
1315:
1297:
1238:
1077:Google does not design algorithms
786:Biology and political orientation
41:This article has multiple issues.
3330:
3329:
3320:
3319:
2262:The New Media's Role in Politics
887:
255:
134:
71:
30:
3325:Conflict of interest (category)
2199:
2137:University of Westminster Press
1930:
1793:
1643:
1596:
227:{{Translated|pt|ViĂ©s polĂtico}}
49:or discuss these issues on the
1625:Canadian Public Administration
1532:
1480:
1435:
1265:
781:Theories of political behavior
407:Political history of the world
225:You may also add the template
1:
3366:Barriers to critical thinking
2277:Information Retrieval Journal
2089:10.1080/10584609.2016.1265619
2009:Information Retrieval Journal
1943:Information Retrieval Journal
1906:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.01.006
1411:Social Media News Communities
1231:
796:Critique of political economy
3299:Who Killed the Electric Car?
2256:Game Theory: An Introduction
1679:10.1371/journal.pone.0196674
1362:10.1371/journal.pone.0196674
1190:Freedom of speech by country
377:Outline of political science
7:
3361:Communication of falsehoods
2831:DĂ©formation professionnelle
1893:Journal of Public Economics
1259:Boundless Political Science
1167:
1104:Political bias in the media
197:will aid in categorization.
94:, discuss the issue on the
10:
3402:
2825:Basking in reflected glory
2316:
2003:Kulshrestha, Juhi (2018).
1937:Kulshrestha, Juhi (2019).
1132:, a concept introduced by
1053:Political bias and framing
382:Index of politics articles
172:Machine translation, like
18:
3315:
3262:
3223:
3103:
3065:Judicial disqualification
3032:
2973:
2955:Cognitive bias mitigation
2947:
2812:
2687:
2324:
2032:21.11116/0000-0005-F9A1-C
2022:10.1007/s10791-018-9341-2
1966:21.11116/0000-0005-F9A1-C
1956:10.1007/s10791-018-9341-2
1590:10.1080/08838157809363907
1185:Framing (social sciences)
149:the corresponding article
3185:Pharmaceutical marketing
2539:Illusion of transparency
1814:10.1177/1464884910367587
1756:10.1177/1464884910367587
1719:Journal of Communication
1510:10.1177/1745691617746796
3232:Nemo iudex in causa sua
2077:Political Communication
1606:Political Communication
1577:Journal of Broadcasting
1152:Within a 2002 study by
791:Political organisations
554:International relations
392:Politics by subdivision
236:For more guidance, see
3116:Arm's length principle
1840:Bentley, Matt (2017).
1125:
2907:Arab–Israeli conflict
2634:Social influence bias
2579:Out-group homogeneity
2283:Plos Research Article
2177:Kuypers, Jim (2002).
1215:Political correctness
1123:
871:Political campaigning
611:Public administration
444:Collective leadership
238:Knowledge:Translation
209:copyright attribution
3026:Conflict of interest
2549:Mere-exposure effect
2479:Extrinsic incentives
2425:Selective perception
1028:Political neutrality
1023:Political neutrality
996:False consensus bias
721:Separation of powers
592:Political psychology
567:Comparative politics
545:political scientists
532:Academic disciplines
412:Political philosophy
100:create a new article
92:improve this article
3175:Medical ghostwriter
2774:Social desirability
2669:von Restorff effect
2544:Mean world syndrome
2519:Hostile attribution
1670:2018PLoSO..1396674Y
1550:on 17 November 2007
1458:2006SciAm.295a..36S
1445:Scientific American
1353:2018PLoSO..1396674Y
1335:Yair, Omer (2018).
1006:Speculative content
953:or a policy issue.
951:political candidate
943:political candidate
894:Politics portal
743:Election commission
714:Government branches
597:Political sociology
449:Confessional system
387:Politics by country
3075:Regulatory capture
2689:Statistical biases
2467:Curse of knowledge
2183:Praeger Publishing
2139:. pp. 53–67.
1900:(5–6): 1092–1104.
1282:Skeptical Inquirer
1130:a propaganda model
1126:
939:political position
577:Political analysis
509:Semi-parliamentary
274:You can assist by
217:interlanguage link
3343:
3342:
3195:Pharmacovigilance
2992:
2991:
2629:Social comparison
2410:Choice-supportive
2146:10.16997/book27.e
1786:Political Science
1544:Psychology Campus
1180:False equivalence
1142:political economy
1114:political opinion
1094:confirmation bias
1082:Fairness Doctrine
990:Confirmation bias
928:
927:
876:Political parties
816:Electoral systems
540:Political science
514:Semi-presidential
426:Political systems
402:Political history
397:Political economy
322:
321:
314:
304:
303:
296:
249:
248:
161:
157:
128:
127:
120:
102:, as appropriate.
64:
3393:
3386:Cognitive biases
3333:
3332:
3323:
3322:
3306:Taken for a Ride
3200:Political ethics
3148:Follow the money
3019:
3012:
3005:
2996:
2995:
2789:Systematic error
2744:Omitted-variable
2659:Trait ascription
2499:Frog pond effect
2327:Cognitive biases
2311:
2304:
2297:
2288:
2287:
2243:
2242:
2234:
2223:
2222:
2220:
2218:
2203:
2197:
2196:
2174:
2161:
2160:
2148:
2128:
2119:
2118:
2108:
2068:
2059:
2058:
2048:
2037:
2036:
2034:
2024:
2015:(1–2): 188–227.
2000:
1971:
1970:
1968:
1958:
1949:(1–2): 188–227.
1934:
1928:
1927:
1917:
1887:
1868:
1867:
1855:
1846:
1845:
1837:
1826:
1825:
1797:
1791:
1790:
1777:
1768:
1767:
1737:
1728:
1727:
1713:
1702:
1701:
1691:
1681:
1647:
1641:
1640:
1620:
1611:
1610:
1600:
1594:
1593:
1571:
1560:
1559:
1557:
1555:
1546:. Archived from
1536:
1530:
1529:
1493:
1484:
1478:
1477:
1439:
1433:
1432:
1424:
1415:
1414:
1406:
1385:
1384:
1374:
1364:
1332:
1313:
1312:
1304:
1295:
1294:
1292:
1290:
1269:
1263:
1262:
1251:
1195:Mainstream media
1134:Edward S. Herman
920:
913:
906:
892:
891:
682:
627:
582:Political theory
572:Election science
562:
548:
326:
325:
317:
310:
299:
292:
288:
285:
279:
259:
258:
251:
228:
222:
196:
195:|topic=
193:, and specifying
178:Google Translate
159:
155:
138:
137:
130:
123:
116:
112:
109:
103:
75:
74:
67:
56:
34:
33:
26:
3401:
3400:
3396:
3395:
3394:
3392:
3391:
3390:
3346:
3345:
3344:
3339:
3311:
3258:
3219:
3126:Business ethics
3099:
3085:Self-regulation
3060:Insider trading
3028:
3023:
2993:
2988:
2969:
2943:
2808:
2683:
2664:Turkey illusion
2432:Compassion fade
2329:
2320:
2315:
2271:
2252:
2250:Further reading
2247:
2246:
2235:
2226:
2216:
2214:
2204:
2200:
2193:
2175:
2164:
2157:
2129:
2122:
2069:
2062:
2049:
2040:
2001:
1974:
1935:
1931:
1888:
1871:
1856:
1849:
1838:
1829:
1798:
1794:
1781:Druckman, James
1778:
1771:
1738:
1731:
1714:
1705:
1664:(5): e0196674.
1648:
1644:
1621:
1614:
1601:
1597:
1572:
1563:
1553:
1551:
1538:
1537:
1533:
1491:
1485:
1481:
1440:
1436:
1425:
1418:
1407:
1388:
1347:(5): e0196674.
1333:
1316:
1305:
1298:
1288:
1286:
1270:
1266:
1253:
1252:
1239:
1234:
1229:
1225:Self-censorship
1170:
1106:
1073:
1055:
1025:
973:
924:
886:
881:
880:
811:
810:
801:
800:
758:
757:
748:
747:
716:
715:
706:
705:
701:Public interest
686:Domestic policy
676:
669:
668:
657:
656:
621:
614:
613:
602:
601:
563:
556:
549:
542:
534:
533:
524:
523:
429:
428:
417:
416:
372:
371:
362:
331:Politics series
318:
307:
306:
305:
300:
289:
283:
280:
273:
260:
256:
245:
244:
243:
226:
220:
194:
162:
139:
135:
124:
113:
107:
104:
89:
76:
72:
35:
31:
24:
17:
12:
11:
5:
3399:
3389:
3388:
3383:
3378:
3373:
3368:
3363:
3358:
3341:
3340:
3338:
3337:
3327:
3316:
3313:
3312:
3310:
3309:
3302:
3295:
3288:
3281:
3274:
3266:
3264:
3260:
3259:
3257:
3256:
3249:
3242:
3235:
3227:
3225:
3221:
3220:
3218:
3217:
3212:
3210:Revolving door
3207:
3205:Political bias
3202:
3197:
3192:
3187:
3182:
3177:
3172:
3171:
3170:
3163:Medical ethics
3160:
3155:
3150:
3145:
3138:
3133:
3128:
3123:
3118:
3113:
3107:
3105:
3101:
3100:
3098:
3097:
3092:
3087:
3082:
3077:
3072:
3067:
3062:
3057:
3052:
3047:
3042:
3036:
3034:
3030:
3029:
3022:
3021:
3014:
3007:
2999:
2990:
2989:
2987:
2986:
2981:
2974:
2971:
2970:
2968:
2967:
2962:
2957:
2951:
2949:
2948:Bias reduction
2945:
2944:
2942:
2941:
2936:
2931:
2926:
2924:Political bias
2921:
2916:
2915:
2914:
2909:
2904:
2899:
2894:
2889:
2884:
2879:
2869:
2864:
2859:
2854:
2852:Infrastructure
2849:
2844:
2839:
2834:
2827:
2822:
2816:
2814:
2810:
2809:
2807:
2806:
2801:
2796:
2791:
2786:
2781:
2776:
2771:
2769:Self-selection
2766:
2761:
2756:
2751:
2746:
2741:
2736:
2731:
2726:
2721:
2720:
2719:
2709:
2704:
2699:
2693:
2691:
2685:
2684:
2682:
2681:
2676:
2671:
2666:
2661:
2656:
2651:
2646:
2641:
2636:
2631:
2626:
2621:
2616:
2611:
2606:
2604:Pro-innovation
2601:
2596:
2591:
2589:Overton window
2586:
2581:
2576:
2571:
2566:
2561:
2556:
2551:
2546:
2541:
2536:
2531:
2526:
2521:
2516:
2511:
2506:
2501:
2496:
2491:
2486:
2481:
2476:
2471:
2470:
2469:
2459:
2457:Dunning–Kruger
2454:
2449:
2444:
2439:
2434:
2429:
2428:
2427:
2417:
2412:
2407:
2402:
2397:
2396:
2395:
2385:
2380:
2375:
2374:
2373:
2371:Correspondence
2368:
2366:Actor–observer
2358:
2353:
2348:
2343:
2338:
2332:
2330:
2325:
2322:
2321:
2314:
2313:
2306:
2299:
2291:
2285:
2284:
2278:
2270:
2269:External links
2267:
2266:
2265:
2259:
2258:, Baron, David
2251:
2248:
2245:
2244:
2224:
2206:Baron, David.
2198:
2192:978-0275977597
2191:
2162:
2155:
2120:
2083:(3): 367–384.
2060:
2038:
1972:
1929:
1869:
1847:
1827:
1808:(4): 389–408.
1792:
1769:
1750:(4): 389–408.
1729:
1703:
1642:
1631:(4): 639–652.
1612:
1595:
1584:(4): 517–530.
1561:
1531:
1504:(2): 273–291.
1479:
1434:
1416:
1386:
1314:
1296:
1264:
1236:
1235:
1233:
1230:
1228:
1227:
1222:
1220:Schismogenesis
1217:
1212:
1207:
1202:
1197:
1192:
1187:
1182:
1177:
1171:
1169:
1166:
1154:Jim A. Kuypers
1105:
1102:
1072:
1069:
1064:framing effect
1054:
1051:
1046:media coverage
1024:
1021:
980:unconventional
976:Concision bias
972:
969:
931:Political bias
926:
925:
923:
922:
915:
908:
900:
897:
896:
883:
882:
879:
878:
873:
868:
863:
858:
857:
856:
840:
835:
830:
829:
828:
818:
812:
808:
807:
806:
803:
802:
799:
798:
793:
788:
783:
778:
765:
759:
756:Related topics
755:
754:
753:
750:
749:
746:
745:
740:
735:
730:
724:
723:
717:
713:
712:
711:
708:
707:
704:
703:
698:
693:
691:Foreign policy
688:
683:
670:
664:
663:
662:
659:
658:
655:
654:
653:
652:
638:
633:
628:
615:
609:
608:
607:
604:
603:
600:
599:
594:
589:
587:Policy studies
584:
579:
574:
569:
564:
552:
550:
538:
535:
531:
530:
529:
526:
525:
522:
521:
516:
511:
506:
501:
496:
491:
486:
481:
476:
471:
466:
461:
456:
451:
446:
441:
436:
430:
424:
423:
422:
419:
418:
415:
414:
409:
404:
399:
394:
389:
384:
379:
373:
370:Primary topics
369:
368:
367:
364:
363:
361:
360:
355:
350:
344:
341:
340:
334:
333:
320:
319:
302:
301:
263:
261:
254:
247:
246:
242:
241:
234:
223:
201:
198:
186:adding a topic
181:
170:
163:
144:
143:
142:
140:
133:
126:
125:
86:of the subject
84:worldwide view
79:
77:
70:
65:
39:
38:
36:
29:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3398:
3387:
3384:
3382:
3379:
3377:
3374:
3372:
3369:
3367:
3364:
3362:
3359:
3357:
3354:
3353:
3351:
3336:
3328:
3326:
3318:
3317:
3314:
3308:
3307:
3303:
3301:
3300:
3296:
3294:
3293:
3289:
3287:
3286:
3282:
3280:
3279:
3275:
3273:
3272:
3268:
3267:
3265:
3261:
3255:
3254:
3250:
3248:
3247:
3243:
3241:
3240:
3236:
3234:
3233:
3229:
3228:
3226:
3222:
3216:
3213:
3211:
3208:
3206:
3203:
3201:
3198:
3196:
3193:
3191:
3188:
3186:
3183:
3181:
3178:
3176:
3173:
3169:
3166:
3165:
3164:
3161:
3159:
3156:
3154:
3151:
3149:
3146:
3144:
3143:
3139:
3137:
3134:
3132:
3129:
3127:
3124:
3122:
3119:
3117:
3114:
3112:
3109:
3108:
3106:
3102:
3096:
3093:
3091:
3090:State capture
3088:
3086:
3083:
3081:
3078:
3076:
3073:
3071:
3068:
3066:
3063:
3061:
3058:
3056:
3053:
3051:
3048:
3046:
3043:
3041:
3038:
3037:
3035:
3031:
3027:
3020:
3015:
3013:
3008:
3006:
3001:
3000:
2997:
2985:
2982:
2980:
2976:
2975:
2972:
2966:
2963:
2961:
2958:
2956:
2953:
2952:
2950:
2946:
2940:
2937:
2935:
2932:
2930:
2927:
2925:
2922:
2920:
2917:
2913:
2910:
2908:
2905:
2903:
2902:United States
2900:
2898:
2895:
2893:
2890:
2888:
2885:
2883:
2880:
2878:
2877:False balance
2875:
2874:
2873:
2870:
2868:
2865:
2863:
2860:
2858:
2855:
2853:
2850:
2848:
2845:
2843:
2840:
2838:
2835:
2833:
2832:
2828:
2826:
2823:
2821:
2818:
2817:
2815:
2811:
2805:
2802:
2800:
2797:
2795:
2792:
2790:
2787:
2785:
2782:
2780:
2777:
2775:
2772:
2770:
2767:
2765:
2762:
2760:
2757:
2755:
2752:
2750:
2749:Participation
2747:
2745:
2742:
2740:
2737:
2735:
2732:
2730:
2727:
2725:
2722:
2718:
2717:Psychological
2715:
2714:
2713:
2710:
2708:
2705:
2703:
2700:
2698:
2695:
2694:
2692:
2690:
2686:
2680:
2677:
2675:
2672:
2670:
2667:
2665:
2662:
2660:
2657:
2655:
2652:
2650:
2647:
2645:
2642:
2640:
2637:
2635:
2632:
2630:
2627:
2625:
2622:
2620:
2617:
2615:
2612:
2610:
2607:
2605:
2602:
2600:
2597:
2595:
2592:
2590:
2587:
2585:
2582:
2580:
2577:
2575:
2572:
2570:
2567:
2565:
2562:
2560:
2557:
2555:
2552:
2550:
2547:
2545:
2542:
2540:
2537:
2535:
2532:
2530:
2527:
2525:
2522:
2520:
2517:
2515:
2512:
2510:
2507:
2505:
2502:
2500:
2497:
2495:
2492:
2490:
2487:
2485:
2484:Fading affect
2482:
2480:
2477:
2475:
2472:
2468:
2465:
2464:
2463:
2460:
2458:
2455:
2453:
2450:
2448:
2445:
2443:
2440:
2438:
2435:
2433:
2430:
2426:
2423:
2422:
2421:
2418:
2416:
2413:
2411:
2408:
2406:
2403:
2401:
2398:
2394:
2391:
2390:
2389:
2386:
2384:
2381:
2379:
2376:
2372:
2369:
2367:
2364:
2363:
2362:
2359:
2357:
2354:
2352:
2349:
2347:
2344:
2342:
2339:
2337:
2334:
2333:
2331:
2328:
2323:
2319:
2312:
2307:
2305:
2300:
2298:
2293:
2292:
2289:
2282:
2279:
2276:
2273:
2272:
2264:, Owen, Diana
2263:
2260:
2257:
2254:
2253:
2240:
2233:
2231:
2229:
2213:
2209:
2202:
2194:
2188:
2184:
2180:
2173:
2171:
2169:
2167:
2158:
2156:9781912656165
2152:
2147:
2142:
2138:
2134:
2127:
2125:
2116:
2112:
2107:
2102:
2098:
2094:
2090:
2086:
2082:
2078:
2074:
2067:
2065:
2056:
2055:
2047:
2045:
2043:
2033:
2028:
2023:
2018:
2014:
2010:
2006:
1999:
1997:
1995:
1993:
1991:
1989:
1987:
1985:
1983:
1981:
1979:
1977:
1967:
1962:
1957:
1952:
1948:
1944:
1940:
1933:
1925:
1921:
1916:
1911:
1907:
1903:
1899:
1895:
1894:
1886:
1884:
1882:
1880:
1878:
1876:
1874:
1865:
1861:
1860:We the People
1854:
1852:
1843:
1836:
1834:
1832:
1823:
1819:
1815:
1811:
1807:
1803:
1796:
1788:
1787:
1782:
1776:
1774:
1765:
1761:
1757:
1753:
1749:
1745:
1744:
1736:
1734:
1725:
1721:
1720:
1712:
1710:
1708:
1699:
1695:
1690:
1685:
1680:
1675:
1671:
1667:
1663:
1659:
1658:
1653:
1646:
1638:
1634:
1630:
1626:
1619:
1617:
1608:
1607:
1599:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1579:
1578:
1570:
1568:
1566:
1549:
1545:
1541:
1535:
1527:
1523:
1519:
1515:
1511:
1507:
1503:
1499:
1498:
1490:
1483:
1475:
1471:
1467:
1463:
1459:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1446:
1438:
1430:
1423:
1421:
1412:
1405:
1403:
1401:
1399:
1397:
1395:
1393:
1391:
1382:
1378:
1373:
1368:
1363:
1358:
1354:
1350:
1346:
1342:
1338:
1331:
1329:
1327:
1325:
1323:
1321:
1319:
1310:
1303:
1301:
1284:
1283:
1278:
1274:
1268:
1260:
1256:
1250:
1248:
1246:
1244:
1242:
1237:
1226:
1223:
1221:
1218:
1216:
1213:
1211:
1208:
1206:
1203:
1201:
1198:
1196:
1193:
1191:
1188:
1186:
1183:
1181:
1178:
1176:
1173:
1172:
1165:
1161:
1159:
1155:
1150:
1146:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1122:
1118:
1115:
1110:
1101:
1097:
1095:
1090:
1087:
1083:
1078:
1068:
1065:
1060:
1050:
1047:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1029:
1020:
1017:
1014:
1009:
1007:
1003:
1001:
997:
993:
991:
987:
983:
981:
977:
968:
965:
961:
959:
954:
952:
948:
944:
940:
936:
932:
921:
916:
914:
909:
907:
902:
901:
899:
898:
895:
890:
885:
884:
877:
874:
872:
869:
867:
864:
862:
859:
854:
850:
846:
845:
844:
841:
839:
836:
834:
831:
827:
824:
823:
822:
819:
817:
814:
813:
805:
804:
797:
794:
792:
789:
787:
784:
782:
779:
777:
773:
769:
766:
764:
761:
760:
752:
751:
744:
741:
739:
736:
734:
731:
729:
726:
725:
722:
719:
718:
710:
709:
702:
699:
697:
696:Civil society
694:
692:
689:
687:
684:
680:
675:
674:Public policy
672:
671:
667:
661:
660:
650:
646:
642:
641:
639:
637:
634:
632:
629:
625:
620:
617:
616:
612:
606:
605:
598:
595:
593:
590:
588:
585:
583:
580:
578:
575:
573:
570:
568:
565:
560:
555:
551:
546:
541:
537:
536:
528:
527:
520:
517:
515:
512:
510:
507:
505:
502:
500:
497:
495:
494:Parliamentary
492:
490:
487:
485:
482:
480:
479:Hybrid regime
477:
475:
472:
470:
467:
465:
462:
460:
457:
455:
452:
450:
447:
445:
442:
440:
437:
435:
432:
431:
427:
421:
420:
413:
410:
408:
405:
403:
400:
398:
395:
393:
390:
388:
385:
383:
380:
378:
375:
374:
366:
365:
359:
356:
354:
351:
349:
346:
345:
343:
342:
339:
336:
335:
332:
328:
327:
324:
316:
313:
298:
295:
287:
277:
271:
269:
264:This article
262:
253:
252:
239:
235:
232:
224:
218:
214:
210:
206:
202:
199:
192:
191:main category
188:
187:
182:
179:
175:
171:
168:
165:
164:
158:
152:
151:in Portuguese
150:
145:You can help
141:
132:
131:
122:
119:
111:
101:
97:
93:
87:
85:
78:
69:
68:
63:
61:
54:
53:
48:
47:
42:
37:
28:
27:
22:
3304:
3297:
3292:Side Effects
3290:
3283:
3276:
3269:
3251:
3244:
3237:
3230:
3204:
3180:Moral hazard
3153:Legal ethics
3140:
3080:Self-dealing
3055:Funding bias
3040:Chinese wall
2923:
2862:In education
2829:
2813:Other biases
2799:Verification
2784:Survivorship
2734:Non-response
2707:Healthy user
2649:Substitution
2624:Self-serving
2420:Confirmation
2388:Availability
2336:Acquiescence
2238:
2215:. Retrieved
2211:
2201:
2178:
2132:
2080:
2076:
2052:
2012:
2008:
1946:
1942:
1932:
1897:
1891:
1863:
1859:
1805:
1801:
1795:
1784:
1747:
1741:
1723:
1717:
1661:
1655:
1645:
1628:
1624:
1604:
1598:
1581:
1575:
1552:. Retrieved
1548:the original
1543:
1534:
1501:
1495:
1482:
1449:
1443:
1437:
1428:
1410:
1344:
1340:
1308:
1287:. Retrieved
1280:
1273:Vyse, Stuart
1267:
1258:
1255:"Media Bias"
1162:
1157:
1151:
1147:
1138:Noam Chomsky
1127:
1107:
1098:
1091:
1074:
1056:
1037:Independents
1026:
1018:
1010:
1004:
994:
988:
984:
974:
966:
962:
955:
930:
929:
624:street-level
499:Presidential
459:Dictatorship
329:Part of the
323:
308:
290:
281:
268:copy editing
266:may require
265:
213:edit summary
204:
184:
156:(March 2024)
154:
146:
114:
105:
81:
57:
50:
44:
43:Please help
40:
2929:Publication
2882:Vietnam War
2729:Length time
2712:Information
2654:Time-saving
2514:Horn effect
2504:Halo effect
2452:Distinction
2361:Attribution
2356:Attentional
1915:10419/25843
1033:Republicans
1013:ideological
763:Sovereignty
728:Legislature
631:Technocracy
619:Bureaucracy
484:Meritocracy
464:Directorial
284:August 2023
3381:Media bias
3371:Prejudices
3350:Categories
3285:Inside Job
3278:Big Pharma
3271:Bad Pharma
3136:Corruption
2892:South Asia
2867:Liking gap
2679:In animals
2644:Status quo
2559:Negativity
2462:Egocentric
2437:Congruence
2415:Commitment
2405:Blind spot
2393:Mean world
2383:Automation
2217:8 February
1309:NBER Paper
1289:22 October
1232:References
1140:. It is a
1109:Media bias
1086:polarising
947:media bias
853:Governance
843:Government
838:Federalism
439:City-state
276:editing it
108:March 2021
46:improve it
3111:AllTrials
2960:Debiasing
2939:White hat
2934:Reporting
2847:Inductive
2764:Selection
2724:Lead time
2697:Estimator
2674:Zero-risk
2639:Spotlight
2619:Restraint
2609:Proximity
2594:Precision
2554:Narrative
2509:Hindsight
2494:Frequency
2474:Emotional
2447:Declinism
2378:Authority
2351:Anchoring
2341:Ambiguity
2212:wiley.com
2097:1058-4609
1822:145491355
1764:145491355
1452:(1): 36.
1175:Fake news
1041:Democrats
1000:normalise
833:Unitarism
821:Elections
809:Subseries
738:Judiciary
733:Executive
636:Adhocracy
519:Theocracy
474:Feudalism
454:Democracy
231:talk page
183:Consider
96:talk page
52:talk page
3376:Politics
3246:R v Neil
3158:Lobbying
3142:Cui bono
3131:Cochrane
3070:Nepotism
2857:Inherent
2820:Academic
2794:Systemic
2779:Spectrum
2759:Sampling
2739:Observer
2702:Forecast
2614:Response
2574:Optimism
2569:Omission
2564:Normalcy
2534:In-group
2529:Implicit
2442:Cultural
2346:Affinity
2115:29170614
1698:29723271
1657:PLOS One
1526:46921775
1518:29851554
1474:16830675
1381:29723271
1341:PLOS ONE
1275:(2019).
1168:See also
861:Ideology
679:doctrine
640:Service
504:Republic
489:Monarchy
469:Federacy
358:Category
338:Politics
207:provide
90:You may
3104:Related
2979:General
2977:Lists:
2912:Ukraine
2837:Funding
2599:Present
2584:Outcome
2489:Framing
2106:5679709
1924:7821669
1689:5933769
1666:Bibcode
1454:Bibcode
1372:5933769
1349:Bibcode
1059:Framing
866:Culture
776:Country
434:Anarchy
348:Outline
229:to the
211:in the
153:.
3033:Issues
2984:Memory
2897:Sweden
2887:Norway
2754:Recall
2524:Impact
2400:Belief
2318:Biases
2189:
2153:
2113:
2103:
2095:
1922:
1820:
1762:
1696:
1686:
1554:15 May
1524:
1516:
1472:
1431:: 233.
1379:
1369:
1039:, and
958:traits
826:voting
768:Polity
666:Policy
645:Public
559:theory
3263:Media
3168:cases
3095:Shill
2872:Media
2842:FUTON
2239:Wiley
1920:S2CID
1818:S2CID
1760:S2CID
1522:S2CID
1492:(PDF)
933:is a
849:forms
772:State
649:Civil
353:Index
174:DeepL
98:, or
3356:Bias
3121:Bias
2219:2021
2187:ISBN
2151:ISBN
2111:PMID
2093:ISSN
1694:PMID
1556:2019
1514:PMID
1470:PMID
1377:PMID
1291:2019
1136:and
935:bias
205:must
203:You
167:View
21:Bias
3224:Law
2919:Net
2804:Wet
2141:doi
2101:PMC
2085:doi
2027:hdl
2017:doi
1961:hdl
1951:doi
1910:hdl
1902:doi
1810:doi
1752:doi
1684:PMC
1674:doi
1633:doi
1586:doi
1506:doi
1462:doi
1450:295
1367:PMC
1357:doi
941:or
176:or
3352::
2227:^
2210:.
2185:.
2181:.
2165:^
2149:.
2135:.
2123:^
2109:.
2099:.
2091:.
2081:34
2079:.
2075:.
2063:^
2041:^
2025:.
2013:22
2011:.
2007:.
1975:^
1959:.
1947:22
1945:.
1941:.
1918:.
1908:.
1898:92
1896:.
1872:^
1864:10
1862:.
1850:^
1830:^
1816:.
1806:11
1804:.
1772:^
1758:.
1748:11
1746:.
1732:^
1724:49
1722:.
1706:^
1692:.
1682:.
1672:.
1662:13
1660:.
1654:.
1629:29
1627:.
1615:^
1582:22
1580:.
1564:^
1542:.
1520:.
1512:.
1502:14
1500:.
1494:.
1468:.
1460:.
1448:.
1419:^
1389:^
1375:.
1365:.
1355:.
1345:13
1343:.
1339:.
1317:^
1299:^
1279:.
1257:.
1240:^
1156::
1035:,
851:/
774:/
770:/
647:/
55:.
3018:e
3011:t
3004:v
2310:e
2303:t
2296:v
2241:.
2221:.
2195:.
2159:.
2143::
2117:.
2087::
2057:.
2035:.
2029::
2019::
1969:.
1963::
1953::
1926:.
1912::
1904::
1866:.
1844:.
1824:.
1812::
1789:.
1766:.
1754::
1726:.
1700:.
1676::
1668::
1639:.
1635::
1609:.
1592:.
1588::
1558:.
1528:.
1508::
1476:.
1464::
1456::
1413:.
1383:.
1359::
1351::
1311:.
1293:.
1261:.
919:e
912:t
905:v
855:)
847:(
681:)
677:(
651:)
643:(
626:)
622:(
561:)
557:(
547:)
543:(
315:)
309:(
297:)
291:(
286:)
282:(
278:.
272:.
240:.
233:.
121:)
115:(
110:)
106:(
88:.
62:)
58:(
23:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.