Knowledge

Talk:Political bias

Source đź“ť

142: 214: 435: 106: 351: 330: 179: 361: 538: 520: 64: 21: 299: 601:"Exists when the normalisation of an individual's opinions, beliefs and values are believed to be common." By whom? Normalisation is a process. How is that a bias? "Normalisation ... are". Write simply and clearly, using the active voice. 467:, a collaborative effort to improve Knowledge's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the 636: 456: 632: 502: 699: 150: 41:. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. 689: 492: 225: 417: 112: 694: 624: 468: 185: 640: 684: 628: 553: 525: 674: 407: 659: 654: 463: 440: 234:
at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be
195:
to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to
679: 28: 664: 383: 240: 669: 235: 71: 80: 84: 231: 44: 32: 374: 335: 200: 120: 598:
This is a university assignment submission for article review. Please post any feedback possible. Thank you
610: 310: 196: 192: 128: 213: 155: 87:. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about 92: 382:
on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
548: 277: 50: 178: 316: 270: 8: 606: 298: 124: 615: 131:
exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.
116: 620: 38: 593: 366: 602: 88: 76: 160: 648: 544: 53:
when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
455: 434: 164: 360: 350: 329: 165: 537: 519: 379: 162: 105: 166: 123:. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If 378:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 356: 244:
of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
700:Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors 646: 199:regarding potentially objectionable content and 191:Images or details contained within this article 154:. Please read recent comments and look in the 119:while commenting or presenting evidence, and 563:Knowledge:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors 690:High-importance Alternative Views articles 566:Template:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors 226:Social sciences and society good articles 193:may be graphic or otherwise objectionable 631:? Dá mais acessos no google trends. att 477:Knowledge:WikiProject Alternative Views 296: 695:WikiProject Alternative Views articles 647: 633:2804:14C:5BB1:8AF2:DC0F:2B01:9366:59C8 480:Template:WikiProject Alternative Views 461:This article is within the scope of 372:This article is within the scope of 292: 173: 136: 100: 58: 15: 315:It is of interest to the following 13: 685:C-Class Alternative Views articles 14: 711: 675:High-importance politics articles 151:previous arguments being restated 536: 518: 454: 433: 359: 349: 328: 297: 212: 177: 140: 104: 62: 19: 660:Knowledge objectionable content 497:This article has been rated as 412:This article has been rated as 201:options for not seeing an image 43:Content must be written from a 27:The subject of this article is 655:Knowledge controversial topics 611:04:40, 13 September 2021 (UTC) 569:Guild of Copy Editors articles 392:Knowledge:WikiProject Politics 230:nominee, but did not meet the 197:Knowledge's content disclaimer 1: 680:WikiProject Politics articles 623:Poderias mover o artigo para 464:WikiProject Alternative views 395:Template:WikiProject Politics 386:and see a list of open tasks. 75:for general discussion about 665:Former good article nominees 641:20:42, 24 October 2021 (UTC) 121:do not make personal attacks 7: 37:When updating the article, 10: 716: 503:project's importance scale 483:Alternative Views articles 418:project's importance scale 238:. Editors may also seek a 670:C-Class politics articles 531: 496: 449: 411: 344: 323: 252: 248: 186:Knowledge is not censored 147:Discussions on this page 39:be bold, but not reckless 305:This article is rated 31:and content may be in 560:Guild of Copy Editors 557:, on 9 February 2021. 554:Guild of Copy Editors 526:Guild of Copy Editors 232:good article criteria 45:neutral point of view 375:WikiProject Politics 278:Good article nominee 79:. Any such comments 158:before commenting. 551:, a member of the 549:Twofingered Typist 311:content assessment 271:September 11, 2020 253:Article milestones 153: 74: 585: 584: 581: 580: 577: 576: 543:This article was 513: 512: 509: 508: 474:Alternative Views 441:Alternative Views 428: 427: 424: 423: 398:politics articles 291: 290: 287: 286: 207: 206: 172: 171: 148: 135: 134: 99: 98: 70: 57: 56: 707: 571: 570: 567: 564: 561: 540: 533: 532: 522: 515: 514: 485: 484: 481: 478: 475: 458: 451: 450: 445: 437: 430: 429: 400: 399: 396: 393: 390: 369: 364: 363: 353: 346: 345: 340: 332: 325: 324: 308: 302: 301: 293: 273: 250: 249: 216: 209: 208: 181: 174: 167: 144: 143: 137: 127:is not reached, 108: 107: 101: 66: 65: 59: 23: 22: 16: 715: 714: 710: 709: 708: 706: 705: 704: 645: 644: 618: 596: 568: 565: 562: 559: 558: 499:High-importance 482: 479: 476: 473: 472: 444:High‑importance 443: 414:High-importance 397: 394: 391: 388: 387: 367:Politics portal 365: 358: 339:High‑importance 338: 309:on Knowledge's 306: 269: 168: 163: 141: 129:other solutions 63: 20: 12: 11: 5: 713: 703: 702: 697: 692: 687: 682: 677: 672: 667: 662: 657: 617: 614: 595: 592: 590: 587: 583: 582: 579: 578: 575: 574: 572: 541: 529: 528: 523: 511: 510: 507: 506: 495: 489: 488: 486: 459: 447: 446: 438: 426: 425: 422: 421: 410: 404: 403: 401: 384:the discussion 371: 370: 354: 342: 341: 333: 321: 320: 314: 303: 289: 288: 285: 284: 281: 274: 266: 265: 262: 259: 255: 254: 246: 245: 220:Political bias 217: 205: 204: 190: 182: 170: 169: 161: 159: 149:often lead to 145: 133: 132: 109: 97: 96: 93:Reference desk 89:Political bias 81:may be removed 77:Political bias 67: 55: 54: 24: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 712: 701: 698: 696: 693: 691: 688: 686: 683: 681: 678: 676: 673: 671: 668: 666: 663: 661: 658: 656: 653: 652: 650: 643: 642: 638: 634: 630: 626: 622: 613: 612: 608: 604: 599: 591: 588: 573: 556: 555: 550: 546: 542: 539: 535: 534: 530: 527: 524: 521: 517: 516: 504: 500: 494: 491: 490: 487: 470: 466: 465: 460: 457: 453: 452: 448: 442: 439: 436: 432: 431: 419: 415: 409: 406: 405: 402: 385: 381: 377: 376: 368: 362: 357: 355: 352: 348: 347: 343: 337: 334: 331: 327: 326: 322: 318: 312: 304: 300: 295: 294: 282: 280: 279: 275: 272: 268: 267: 263: 260: 257: 256: 251: 247: 243: 242: 237: 233: 229: 228: 227: 221: 218: 215: 211: 210: 202: 198: 194: 188: 187: 183: 180: 176: 175: 157: 152: 146: 139: 138: 130: 126: 122: 118: 114: 110: 103: 102: 94: 90: 86: 82: 78: 73: 69:This page is 68: 61: 60: 52: 48: 46: 40: 36: 34: 30: 29:controversial 25: 18: 17: 621:Luizpuodzius 619: 600: 597: 589: 586: 552: 498: 462: 413: 373: 317:WikiProjects 276: 241:reassessment 239: 224: 223: 219: 184: 111:Please stay 42: 26: 625:social-bias 545:copy edited 236:renominated 72:not a forum 649:Categories 616:Good night 469:discussion 283:Not listed 85:refactored 629:sociobias 603:Ferridder 125:consensus 51:citations 594:Untitled 389:Politics 380:politics 336:Politics 156:archives 49:Include 501:on the 416:on the 307:C-class 261:Process 91:at the 33:dispute 313:scale. 264:Result 222:was a 117:civil 637:talk 607:talk 493:High 408:High 258:Date 115:and 113:calm 627:or 547:by 83:or 651:: 639:) 609:) 635:( 605:( 505:. 471:. 420:. 319:: 203:. 189:. 95:. 47:. 35:.

Index

controversial
dispute
be bold, but not reckless
neutral point of view
citations
not a forum
Political bias
may be removed
refactored
Political bias
Reference desk
calm
civil
do not make personal attacks
consensus
other solutions
previous arguments being restated
archives
Censorship warning
Knowledge is not censored
may be graphic or otherwise objectionable
Knowledge's content disclaimer
options for not seeing an image
Former good article nominee
Social sciences and society good articles
good article criteria
renominated
reassessment
September 11, 2020
Good article nominee

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑