Knowledge

Phonetic transcription

Source 📝

84: 863: 496: 43: 511:. It was created in the nineteenth century by European language teachers and linguists. It soon developed beyond its original purpose as a tool of foreign language pedagogy and is now also used extensively as a practical alphabet of phoneticians and linguists. It is found in many dictionaries, where it is used to indicate the pronunciation of words, but most American dictionaries for native English-speakers, e.g., 280:) are often not modified to take account of such changes, and do not accurately represent the pronunciation. Words borrowed from other languages may retain the spelling from the original language, which may have a different system of correspondences between written symbols and speech sounds. Pronunciation can also vary greatly among dialects of a language. Standard orthography in some languages, such as 146: 912:(1943). Pike's system, which is part of a larger goal of scientific description of phonetics, is particularly interesting in its challenge against the descriptive method of the phoneticians who created alphabetic systems like the IPA. An example of Pike's system can be demonstrated by the following. A 667:
Strictly speaking, it is not possible to have a distinction between "broad" and "narrow" within phonemic transcription, since the symbols chosen represent only sounds that have been shown to be distinctive. However, the symbols themselves may be more or less explicit about their phonetic realization.
465:
that may be unfamiliar to nonspecialists. Broad transcription usually allows statements to be made which apply across accents and dialects, and is thus more appropriate for the pronunciation data in ordinary dictionaries, which may discuss phonetic details in the preface but rarely give them for each
331:
A basic principle of phonetic transcription is that it should be applicable to all languages, and its symbols should denote the same phonetic properties whatever the language being transcribed. It follows that a transcription devised for one individual language or group of languages is not a phonetic
900:
to denote the composition of chemical compounds. Although more descriptive than alphabetic notation, analphabetic notation is less practical for many purposes (e.g. for descriptive linguists doing fieldwork or for speech pathologists transcribing their impressions of speech disorders). As a result,
895:
phonetic notation. Instead of both the alphabetic and iconic notational types' general principle of using one symbol per sound, analphabetic notation uses long sequences of symbols to precisely describe the component features of an articulatory gesture (MacMahon 1996:842–844). This type of notation
327:
For most languages, phonetic transcription makes it possible to show pronunciation with something much nearer to a one-to-one relationship between sound and symbol than is possible with the language's orthography. Phonetic transcription allows one to step outside orthography, examine differences in
356:
is a particularly broad transcription that disregards all allophonic differences (for example the differences between individual speakers or even whole dialects of the same language). Phonemic transcription provides a representation only of a language's abstract word-distinguishing units of sound
373:
The advantage of narrower transcription is that it can help learners to produce exactly the right sound and allows linguists to make detailed analyses of language variation. The disadvantage is that a narrow transcription is rarely representative of all dialects or speakers of a language. Most
648:
in a narrow transcription would be , which notes several phonetic features that may not be evident even to a native speaker. An example of a broad transcription is , which indicates only some of the features that are easier to hear. A yet broader transcription would be in which every symbol
874:
phonetic notation, the shapes of the phonetic characters are designed so that they visually represent the position of articulators in the vocal tract. This is unlike alphabetic notation, where the correspondence between character shape and articulator position is arbitrary. This notation is
570:
phonetic alphabet despite having been widely used for languages outside the Americas. The principal difference between these alphabets and the IPA is that the specially created characters of the IPA are abandoned in favour of already existing typewriter characters with diacritics (e.g. many
449:
is also possible that ignores all the above specifics of these aforementioned dialects; this can be useful in situations where minor details are not important to distinguish or where the emphasis is on overarching patterns. For example, one typical phonemic transcription for the word
649:
represents an unambiguous speech sound but without going into any unnecessary detail. None of those transcriptions makes any claims about the phonemic status of the sounds. Instead, they represent certain ways in which it is possible to produce the sounds that make up the word.
743:
in English, they receive separate symbols in the phonemic analysis. However, a native English speaker would recognize that underneath this, they represent the same plural ending. This can be indicated with the pipe notation. If the plural ending is thought to be essentially an
668:
A frequently cited example is the symbol chosen for the English consonant at the beginning of the words 'rue', 'rye', 'red': this is frequently transcribed as /r/, despite the symbol suggesting an association with the IPA symbol which is used for a tongue-tip
474:
Most phonetic transcription is based on the assumption that linguistic sounds are segmentable into discrete units that can be represented by symbols. Many different types of transcription, or "notation", have been tried out: these may be divided into
680:; this is the more common realization for English pronunciation in America and England. Phonemic symbols will frequently be chosen to avoid diacritics as much as possible, under a 'one sound one symbol' policy, or may even be restricted to the 365:
focuses on more exact articulatory or acoustic details, whether in a broader or narrower way. A transcription which includes some allophonic detail but is still closely linked to the phonemic structure of an utterance is called an
1633:. International Journal of American Linguistics (Vol. 24, No. 1, Part 3); Indiana University Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore, and Linguistics, publ. 7. Baltimore. (Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1953). 630:"/ /" instead. If one is unsure, it is best to use brackets since by setting off a transcription with slashes, one makes a theoretical claim that every symbol phonemically contrasts for the language being transcribed. 583:. In the days before it was possible to create phonetic fonts for computer printers and computerized typesetting, this system allowed material to be typed on existing typewriters to create printable material. 633:
For phonetic transcriptions, there is flexibility in how closely sounds may be transcribed. A transcription that gives only a basic idea of the sounds of a language in the broadest terms is called a
437:
can be represented as something like in many American, Canadian, and Australian accents but in a southern England accent. Furthermore, in Australian accents especially, the first-syllable vowel of
1572: 445:
than in North America, leading to the possibility of employing an even narrower phonetic transcription to indicate this, such as . On the other hand, a broad phonemic transcription of
700:, which is easier to type. Phonemic symbols should always be backed up by an explanation of their use and meaning, especially when they are as divergent from actual pronunciation as 637:; in some cases, it may be equivalent to a phonemic transcription (only without any theoretical claims). A close transcription, indicating precise details of the sounds, is called a 1664:
The Principles of the International Phonetic Association, Being a Description of the International Phonetic Alphabet and the Manner of Using It, Illustrated by Texts in 51 Languages
352:
in the utterance. The difference between broad and narrow is a continuum, but the difference between phonemic and phonetic transcription is usually treated as a binary distinction.
348:. Broad transcription indicates only the most noticeable phonetic features of an utterance, whereas narrow transcription encodes more information about the phonetic details of the 802:, then a diaphonemic transcription that accommodates for variety A and variety B at the same time would transcribe the three lexical sets in three different ways, for instance 458:, as is common in both British and American English dictionaries. (Slashes, rather than square brackets, are used to indicate phonemic rather than phonetic representations.) 652:
There are also several possibilities in how to transcribe the word phonemically, but here, the differences are generally of not precision but analysis. For example,
479:(which are based on the same principle as that which governs ordinary alphabetic writing, namely that of using one single simple symbol to represent each sound) and 875:
potentially more flexible than alphabetic notation in showing more shades of pronunciation (MacMahon 1996:838–841). An example of iconic phonetic notation is the
167: 850:. It is also common to italicize such words, but the chevrons indicate specifically that they are in the original language's orthography, and not in English 664:. The latter transcription suggests that there are two vowels in the word even if they cannot both be heard, but the former suggests that there is only one. 513: 231: 834:
To avoid confusion with IPA symbols, it may be desirable to specify when native orthography is being used, so that, for example, the English word
521: 517: 508: 340:
Phonetic transcription may be used to transcribe the phones of a language. In all systems of transcription there is a distinction between
154: 388: 56: 779:
transcription. Diaphonemic transcriptions accommodate for the variation between the phonemic systems of different varieties or
2021: 1996: 1941: 1820: 1795: 1748: 1722: 1678: 1646: 641:. They are not binary choices but the ends of a continuum, with many possibilities in between. All are enclosed in brackets. 328:
pronunciation between dialects within a given language and identify changes in pronunciation that may take place over time.
1525: 532: 538:
Another commonly encountered alphabetic tradition was originally created by American linguists for the transcription of
466:
entry. Most linguists use a narrow transcription only when necessary, and at all other times use a broad transcription.
611: 1870: 1845: 192: 127: 105: 70: 17: 98: 320:
between orthography and pronunciation, while a few languages may claim to have a fully phonemic spelling system (a
1567: 504: 361:), and thus is not really a phonetic transcription at all (though at times it may coincide with one). Instead, a 261: 213: 827:
would mean ‘pronounced in variety A and in variety B.’ Other ways to mark diaphonemic transcriptions include
31: 1671:
Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: a guide to the use of the international phonetic alphabet
1552: 567: 424: 288:, is often irregular and makes it difficult to predict pronunciation from spelling. For example, the words 824: 820: 813: 806: 772: 765: 761: 753: 749: 736: 732: 728: 724: 701: 697: 693: 673: 661: 657: 455: 418: 394: 375: 227: 223: 2073: 1733:
Phonetics: A Critical Analysis of Phonetic Theory and a Technique for the Practical Description of Sounds
1562: 62: 487:
alphabetic) which represent each sound by a composite symbol made up of a number of signs put together.
1510: 1705:
Kemp, J. Alan. (1994). Phonetic Transcription: History. In R. E. Asher & J. M. Y. Simpson (Eds.),
308:
do not rhyme in English even though their spellings might suggest otherwise. Other languages, such as
1768:. Henderson, Eugénie J. A. (Ed.). Language and Language Learning 28. London: Oxford University Press. 1499: 539: 531:
systems based on the English alphabet, with diacritical marks over the vowels and stress marks. (See
422: 402: 386: 1713:
MacMahon, Michael K. C. (1996). "Phonetic Notation". In Daniels, Peter T.; Bright, William (eds.).
1606: 723:
could be transcribed phonetically as and (in a fairly narrow transcription), and phonemically as
712: 559: 92: 1907: 880: 461:
A further disadvantage of narrow transcription is that it involves a large number of symbols and
159: 1530: 109: 1013:
In Pike's notation there are 5 main components (which are indicated using the example above):
507:(IPA) is the most widely used and well-known of present-day phonetic alphabets and has a long 1659:(Parts 1 & 5). London: Philological Society by Asher & Co.; London: Trübner & Co. 1594: 1587: 572: 677: 321: 8: 627: 563: 1695: 547: 317: 260:. The most common type of phonetic transcription uses a phonetic alphabet, such as the 1694:
Kelly, John. (1981). The 1847 Alphabet: An Episode of Phonotypy. In R. E. Asher &
2017: 1992: 1937: 1866: 1841: 1816: 1791: 1744: 1718: 1674: 1642: 1639:
A handbook of phonetics: "natural" phonetics: articulatory, auditory & functional
1515: 551: 285: 252: 1886: 916: 897: 891:
Another type of phonetic notation that is more precise than alphabetic notation is
828: 595: 555: 543: 414: 313: 309: 281: 1129:
The components of the notational hierarchy of this consonant are explained below:
1891: 1600: 1540: 851: 669: 1689:
The Articulations of Speech Sounds Represented by Means of Analphabetic Symbols
1612: 919: 905: 876: 430: 401:(often represented as ), but speakers in southern England pronounce the /t/ as 383: 1507:, deliberately nonstandard spelling to demonstrate pronunciation in literature 862: 2067: 273: 1535: 909: 708: 696:, a close approximation of its actual pronunciation, or more abstractly as 672:. It is equally possible within a phonemic transcription to use the symbol 410: 404: 374:
American, Canadian, and Australian speakers of English would pronounce the
276:
of words in all languages changes over time. However, their written forms (
1766:
The Indispensable Foundation: A Selection from the Writings of Henry Sweet
1617: 1504: 784: 277: 776: 527: 462: 442: 1520: 783:
of a language. For example, if a speaker of variety A pronounces the
780: 615: 349: 1573:
Comparison of ASCII encodings of the International Phonetic Alphabet
1631:
The International Phonetic Alphabet: Its Background and Development
913: 542:
and European languages and is still commonly used by linguists of
219: 748:, as English spelling would suggest, the words can be transcribed 30:
This article is about phonetic transcription. For other uses, see
1582: 1557: 839: 740: 623: 619: 587: 495: 358: 257: 571:
characters are borrowed from Eastern European orthographies) or
335: 145: 398: 2016:(4th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 100–101. 1910:". Collins English Dictionary. HarperCollins Publishers, 2023. 1913: 1577: 685: 681: 794:, whereas a speaker of variety B pronounces the lexical set 591: 1641:. LINCOM textbooks in linguistics. Munich: LINCOM Europa. 586:
There are also extended versions of the IPA, for example:
1936:(2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 118. 1815:(2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 160. 904:
Two examples of this type were developed by the Danish
575:. Examples of this transcription may be seen in Pike's 1666:. London: University College, Department of Phonetics. 605: 514:
American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language
250:) is the visual representation of speech sounds (or 218:. For an introductory guide on IPA symbols, see 622:"". A transcription that specifically denotes only 525:, avoid phonetic transcription and instead employ 1739:Pullum, Geoffrey K.; Ladusaw, William A. (1986). 707:Occasionally a transcription will be enclosed in 2065: 1991:. Edinburgh University Press. pp. 128–129. 1131: 232:IPA § Brackets and transcription delimiters 1934:Dictionaries: the art and craft of lexicography 1709:(Vol. 6, pp. 3040–3051). Oxford: Pergamon. 644:For example, in some dialects the English word 518:Random House Dictionary of the English Language 579:and in many of the papers reprinted in Joos's 469: 1790:. Weidenfeld & Nicolson. pp. 21–40. 1785: 1738: 1717:. Oxford University Press. pp. 821–846. 336:Narrow versus broad; phonemic versus phonetic 316:have a more consistent (but still imperfect) 1707:The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics 1662:International Phonetic Association. (1949). 522:Webster's Third New International Dictionary 1986: 1919: 1860: 1840:. Cambridge University Press. p. 550. 1757:Sweet, Henry. (1880–1881). Sound Notation. 71:Learn how and when to remove these messages 2056:. Cambridge University Press. p. 551. 1735:. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 2041:(9th ed.). Heffer. pp. 335–336. 1702:. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.| 711:("| |"). This goes beyond phonology into 684:symbols of a typical keyboard, as in the 193:Learn how and when to remove this message 128:Learn how and when to remove this message 1759:Transactions of the Philological Society 1743:. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1712: 1636: 879:system, created by Scottish phonetician 861: 838:is not read as "yet". This is done with 688:alphabet. For example, the English word 494: 433:). Thus, on the one hand, phonetically, 170:of all important aspects of the article. 91:This article includes a list of general 1810: 896:is reminiscent of the notation used in 14: 2066: 1931: 1813:The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language 1183:I = degree of air-stream interruption 166:Please consider expanding the lead to 27:Visual representation of speech sounds 2051: 2036: 2011: 1835: 1546: 267: 1971: 1956: 1861:Ball, Martin; Rahilly, Joan (1999). 1673:. Cambridge University Press. 2021. 1526:Pronunciation respelling for English 618:transcription should be enclosed in 533:Pronunciation respelling for English 222:. For the distinction between , 139: 77: 36: 1478:S = of the segment in the syllable 1178:e = subvalvate esophageal stricture 901:this type of notation is uncommon. 606:Aspects of alphabetic transcription 24: 1037:description of stricture (i.e., AP 922:consonant ( in IPA) is notated as 676:, which in IPA usage refers to an 612:International Phonetic Association 332:transcription but an orthography. 97:it lacks sufficient corresponding 25: 2085: 1779: 1655:Ellis, Alexander J. (1869–1889). 1597:, (Revista de Filología Española) 715:analysis. For example, the words 52:This article has multiple issues. 1863:Phonetics: the Science of Speech 1154:D = direction of the air stream 144: 82: 41: 2045: 2039:An Outline of English Phonetics 2030: 2014:English Phonetics and Phonology 2005: 1980: 1965: 1623: 1568:International Phonetic Alphabet 1030:– manner of controlling (i.e., 886: 831:("! !") or pipes ("| |"). 798:with an as in the lexical set 790:with an as in the lexical set 775:") is sometimes used to mark a 505:International Phonetic Alphabet 262:International Phonetic Alphabet 214:International Phonetic Alphabet 158:may be too short to adequately 60:or discuss these issues on the 1950: 1925: 1900: 1892:Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary 1879: 1854: 1829: 1804: 1700:Towards a History of Phonetics 1657:On Early English Pronunciation 1020:– manner of production (i.e., 168:provide an accessible overview 32:Transcription (disambiguation) 13: 1: 1989:Elements of General Phonetics 1786:Shariatmadari, David (2019). 1772: 1553:Americanist phonetic notation 1423:a = of articulating movement 1281:a = of articulating movement 626:contrasts may be enclosed in 490: 1629:Albright, Robert W. (1958). 566:. This is often labeled the 7: 1987:Abercrombie, David (1967). 1715:The world's writing systems 1603:to represent sign languages 1563:Cyrillic phonetic alphabets 1493: 1431:s = of acoustic impression 1289:s = of acoustic impression 1121:– phonetic function (i.e., 470:Types of notational systems 10: 2090: 1932:Landau, Sidney I. (2001). 1865:. Arnold. pp. 142–3. 1637:Canepari, Luciano (2005). 1511:Orthographic transcription 1455: 1207: 1186:p = partial (continuants) 1134: 29: 1974:Readings in Linguistics 1 1961:. University of Michigan. 1731:Pike, Kenneth L. (1943). 1687:Jespersen, Otto. (1889). 1500:English Phonetic Alphabet 1379:= degree of articulation 1251:= degree of articulation 1143:a = air-stream mechanism 857: 756:. If it is essentially a 581:Readings in Linguistics 1 1976:. University of Chicago. 1607:Uralic Phonetic Alphabet 1475:= function phonetically 1393:v = with cavity friction 1357:= point of articulation 1328:= point of articulation 1229:= point of articulation 1169:= controlling mechanism 560:Uralic Phonetic Alphabet 535:for a generic version.) 368:allophonic transcription 2054:Principles of Phonetics 1838:Principles of Phonetics 1811:Crystal, David (1997). 1444:= shape of articulator 1401:= type of articulation 1350:(Features of stricture) 1321:(Features of stricture) 1302:= shape of articulator 1267:= type of articulation 1222:(Features of stricture) 1140:= productive mechanism 881:Alexander Melville Bell 210:phonetic transcriptions 112:more precise citations. 2037:Jones, Daniel (1967). 1972:Joos, M., ed. (1957). 1957:Pike, Kenneth (1947). 1764:Sweet, Henry. (1971). 1531:Pronunciation spelling 1172:V = valvate stricture 1111:– segment type (i.e., 867: 692:may be transcribed as 500: 421:as a vowel resembling 363:phonetic transcription 354:Phonemic transcription 240:Phonetic transcription 207:This article contains 2012:Roach, Peter (2009). 1741:Phonetic symbol guide 1595:RFE Phonetic Alphabet 1588:IPA chart for English 865: 498: 483:(notations which are 2052:Laver, John (1994). 1836:Laver, John (1994). 1788:Don't Believe a Word 1481:s = syllabic contoid 1420:= relative strength 1278:= relative strength 908:(1889) and American 678:alveolar approximant 639:narrow transcription 346:narrow transcription 322:phonemic orthography 1922:, pp. 111–112. 1410:v = vibratory trill 1313:(Rank of stricture) 1211:(Rank of stricture) 848:⟨jet⟩ 635:broad transcription 564:Caucasian languages 558:(here known as the 342:broad transcription 2074:Phonetic alphabets 1895:. Merriam-Webster. 1696:E. J. A. Henderson 1691:. Marburg: Elwert. 1547:Notational systems 1195:n = resonant nasal 1175:o = oral stricture 868: 614:recommends that a 501: 268:Versus orthography 2023:978-0-521-71740-3 1998:978-0-85224-028-1 1943:978-0-521-78512-9 1822:978-0-521-55050-5 1797:978-1-4746-0843-5 1750:978-0-226-68531-1 1724:978-0-19-507993-7 1680:978-0-521-65236-0 1648:978-3-89586-480-3 1516:Phonetic spelling 1491: 1490: 1461:= segmental type 1189:v = nonfrictional 898:chemical formulas 883:(Ellis 1869:15). 829:exclamation marks 771:A double slash (" 760:, these would be 417:) and the second 248:phonetic notation 203: 202: 195: 185: 184: 138: 137: 130: 75: 18:Phonetic notation 16:(Redirected from 2081: 2058: 2057: 2049: 2043: 2042: 2034: 2028: 2027: 2009: 2003: 2002: 1984: 1978: 1977: 1969: 1963: 1962: 1954: 1948: 1947: 1929: 1923: 1920:Abercrombie 1967 1917: 1911: 1904: 1898: 1896: 1883: 1877: 1876: 1858: 1852: 1851: 1833: 1827: 1826: 1808: 1802: 1801: 1783: 1754: 1728: 1684: 1652: 1149:l = for lung air 1132: 849: 826: 822: 819: 815: 812: 808: 805: 801: 797: 793: 789: 774: 767: 766:|bɛdz| 763: 762:|pɛtz| 755: 754:|bɛds| 751: 750:|pɛts| 738: 734: 730: 726: 703: 699: 695: 675: 663: 659: 596:Luciano Canepari 457: 428: 420: 415:t-glottalization 408: 396: 393:and the initial 392: 377: 229: 225: 198: 191: 180: 177: 171: 148: 140: 133: 126: 122: 119: 113: 108:this article by 99:inline citations 86: 85: 78: 67: 45: 44: 37: 21: 2089: 2088: 2084: 2083: 2082: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2061: 2050: 2046: 2035: 2031: 2024: 2010: 2006: 1999: 1985: 1981: 1970: 1966: 1955: 1951: 1944: 1930: 1926: 1918: 1914: 1905: 1901: 1885: 1884: 1880: 1873: 1859: 1855: 1848: 1834: 1830: 1823: 1809: 1805: 1798: 1784: 1780: 1775: 1751: 1725: 1681: 1669: 1649: 1626: 1601:Stokoe notation 1549: 1541:Transliteration 1496: 1371:g = vocal folds 889: 860: 852:transliteration 847: 817: 810: 803: 799: 795: 791: 787: 620:square brackets 608: 540:Native American 493: 472: 338: 270: 244:phonetic script 242:(also known as 237: 236: 235: 199: 188: 187: 186: 181: 175: 172: 165: 153:This article's 149: 134: 123: 117: 114: 104:Please help to 103: 87: 83: 46: 42: 35: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 2087: 2077: 2076: 2060: 2059: 2044: 2029: 2022: 2004: 1997: 1979: 1964: 1949: 1942: 1924: 1912: 1899: 1878: 1871: 1853: 1846: 1828: 1821: 1803: 1796: 1777: 1776: 1774: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1762: 1755: 1749: 1736: 1729: 1723: 1710: 1703: 1692: 1685: 1679: 1667: 1660: 1653: 1647: 1634: 1625: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1615: 1613:Visible Speech 1610: 1604: 1598: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1585: 1580: 1575: 1565: 1560: 1555: 1548: 1545: 1544: 1543: 1538: 1533: 1528: 1523: 1518: 1513: 1508: 1502: 1495: 1492: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1467:p = perceptual 1465: 1454: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1450: 1449: 1448: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1415: 1414: 1413: 1412: 1411: 1408: 1404:i = iterative 1396: 1395: 1394: 1391: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1368:= articulator 1363: 1362: 1361: 1352: 1347: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1339:= articulator 1334: 1333: 1332: 1323: 1317:S = secondary 1315: 1310: 1309: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1273: 1272: 1271: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1259: 1258: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1243:t = tongue tip 1240:= articulator 1235: 1234: 1233: 1224: 1216: 1213: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1201: 1200: 1199: 1198: 1197: 1196: 1190: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1176: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1160: 1159: 1158: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1146:I = initiator 1127: 1126: 1116: 1106: 1035: 1025: 1011: 1010: 920:alveolar nasal 906:Otto Jespersen 888: 885: 877:Visible Speech 866:Visible Speech 859: 856: 840:angle brackets 607: 604: 492: 489: 471: 468: 431:L-vocalization 337: 334: 269: 266: 256:) by means of 230:⟩, see 206: 205: 204: 201: 200: 183: 182: 162:the key points 152: 150: 143: 136: 135: 90: 88: 81: 76: 50: 49: 47: 40: 26: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2086: 2075: 2072: 2071: 2069: 2055: 2048: 2040: 2033: 2025: 2019: 2015: 2008: 2000: 1994: 1990: 1983: 1975: 1968: 1960: 1953: 1945: 1939: 1935: 1928: 1921: 1916: 1909: 1903: 1894: 1893: 1888: 1882: 1874: 1872:0-340-70010-6 1868: 1864: 1857: 1849: 1847:0-521-45655-X 1843: 1839: 1832: 1824: 1818: 1814: 1807: 1799: 1793: 1789: 1782: 1778: 1767: 1763: 1760: 1756: 1752: 1746: 1742: 1737: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1720: 1716: 1711: 1708: 1704: 1701: 1697: 1693: 1690: 1686: 1682: 1676: 1672: 1668: 1665: 1661: 1658: 1654: 1650: 1644: 1640: 1635: 1632: 1628: 1627: 1619: 1616: 1614: 1611: 1608: 1605: 1602: 1599: 1596: 1593: 1589: 1586: 1584: 1581: 1579: 1576: 1574: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1566: 1564: 1561: 1559: 1556: 1554: 1551: 1550: 1542: 1539: 1537: 1534: 1532: 1529: 1527: 1524: 1522: 1519: 1517: 1514: 1512: 1509: 1506: 1503: 1501: 1498: 1497: 1480: 1479: 1477: 1476: 1474: 1471: 1466: 1463: 1462: 1460: 1457: 1456: 1446: 1445: 1443: 1440: 1433: 1432: 1430: 1425: 1424: 1422: 1421: 1419: 1416: 1409: 1406: 1405: 1403: 1402: 1400: 1397: 1392: 1389: 1384: 1383: 1381: 1380: 1378: 1375: 1370: 1369: 1367: 1364: 1359: 1358: 1356: 1353: 1351: 1348: 1346: 1341: 1340: 1338: 1335: 1330: 1329: 1327: 1324: 1322: 1319: 1318: 1316: 1314: 1311: 1304: 1303: 1301: 1298: 1291: 1290: 1288: 1283: 1282: 1280: 1279: 1277: 1274: 1269: 1268: 1266: 1263: 1256: 1255: 1253: 1252: 1250: 1247: 1242: 1241: 1239: 1236: 1231: 1230: 1228: 1225: 1223: 1220: 1219: 1217: 1214: 1212: 1209: 1208: 1194: 1193: 1191: 1188: 1187: 1185: 1184: 1182: 1177: 1174: 1173: 1171: 1170: 1168: 1165: 1157:e = egressive 1156: 1155: 1153: 1148: 1147: 1145: 1144: 1142: 1141: 1139: 1136: 1135: 1133: 1130: 1124: 1120: 1117: 1114: 1110: 1107: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1084: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1033: 1029: 1026: 1023: 1019: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1008: 1004: 1000: 996: 992: 988: 984: 980: 976: 972: 968: 964: 960: 956: 952: 948: 944: 940: 936: 932: 928: 925: 924: 923: 921: 918: 915: 911: 907: 902: 899: 894: 884: 882: 878: 873: 864: 855: 853: 845: 841: 837: 832: 830: 786: 782: 778: 769: 759: 747: 742: 739:are separate 722: 718: 714: 713:morphological 710: 705: 691: 687: 683: 679: 671: 665: 655: 650: 647: 642: 640: 636: 631: 629: 625: 621: 617: 613: 603: 601: 597: 593: 589: 584: 582: 578: 574: 569: 565: 561: 557: 553: 549: 545: 541: 536: 534: 530: 529: 524: 523: 519: 515: 510: 506: 497: 488: 486: 482: 478: 467: 464: 459: 453: 448: 444: 440: 436: 432: 426: 416: 412: 406: 400: 390: 385: 381: 371: 369: 364: 360: 355: 351: 347: 343: 333: 329: 325: 323: 319: 315: 311: 307: 303: 299: 295: 291: 287: 283: 279: 275: 274:pronunciation 265: 263: 259: 255: 254: 249: 245: 241: 233: 221: 217: 215: 211: 197: 194: 179: 176:December 2019 169: 163: 161: 156: 151: 147: 142: 141: 132: 129: 121: 111: 107: 101: 100: 94: 89: 80: 79: 74: 72: 65: 64: 59: 58: 53: 48: 39: 38: 33: 19: 2053: 2047: 2038: 2032: 2013: 2007: 1988: 1982: 1973: 1967: 1958: 1952: 1933: 1927: 1915: 1902: 1890: 1881: 1862: 1856: 1837: 1831: 1812: 1806: 1787: 1781: 1765: 1758: 1740: 1732: 1714: 1706: 1699: 1688: 1670: 1663: 1656: 1638: 1630: 1624:Bibliography 1536:Romanization 1472: 1458: 1441: 1417: 1398: 1382:t = in time 1376: 1365: 1354: 1349: 1336: 1325: 1320: 1312: 1299: 1275: 1264: 1254:t = in time 1248: 1237: 1232:a = alveolar 1226: 1221: 1218:P = primary 1210: 1166: 1137: 1128: 1122: 1118: 1112: 1108: 1102: 1098: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1058: 1054: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1031: 1027: 1021: 1017: 1012: 1006: 1002: 998: 994: 990: 986: 982: 978: 974: 970: 966: 962: 958: 954: 950: 946: 942: 938: 934: 930: 926: 910:Kenneth Pike 903: 893:analphabetic 892: 890: 887:Analphabetic 871: 869: 843: 835: 833: 823:, where the 770: 757: 745: 720: 716: 706: 689: 666: 653: 651: 645: 643: 638: 634: 632: 609: 599: 585: 580: 576: 537: 526: 512: 502: 484: 481:Analphabetic 480: 476: 473: 460: 451: 446: 441:tends to be 438: 434: 411:glottal stop 379: 378:in the word 372: 367: 362: 353: 345: 341: 339: 330: 326: 318:relationship 305: 301: 297: 293: 289: 271: 251: 247: 243: 239: 238: 226:and ⟨ 209: 208: 189: 173: 157: 155:lead section 124: 115: 96: 68: 61: 55: 54:Please help 51: 1618:Teuthonista 1505:Eye dialect 1360:g = glottal 785:lexical set 777:diaphonemic 662:/ˈprɛts.əl/ 658:/ˈprɛts.l̩/ 568:Americanist 278:orthography 110:introducing 1773:References 1761:, 177–235. 1434:n = normal 1426:n = normal 1292:n = normal 1284:n = normal 1270:n = normal 1192:n = nasal 933:VoeIpvnnAP 781:diasystems 731:. Because 528:respelling 491:Alphabetic 477:Alphabetic 463:diacritics 350:allophones 93:references 57:improve it 1959:Phonemics 1521:Phonetics 1407:t = trill 1342:v = velic 1331:v = velic 1034:VoeIpvnn) 656:could be 577:Phonemics 160:summarize 118:June 2018 63:talk page 2068:Category 1887:"little" 1698:(Eds.), 1494:See also 1464:r = real 1447:f = flat 1390:w = wide 1385:l = long 1305:f = flat 1257:l = long 1215:A = acme 914:syllabic 844:chevrons 741:phonemes 694:/tʃɝːtʃ/ 624:phonemic 616:phonetic 573:digraphs 456:/ˈlɪtᵊl/ 359:phonemes 224:/ / 220:Help:IPA 1583:X-SAMPA 1558:ARPABET 1057:ansnsfS 953:ansnsfS 654:pretzel 646:pretzel 628:slashes 588:Ext-IPA 552:Semitic 509:history 314:Italian 310:Spanish 306:through 286:Tibetan 282:English 258:symbols 212:in the 106:improve 2020:  1995:  1940:  1908:Little 1869:  1844:  1819:  1794:  1747:  1721:  1677:  1645:  1024:aIlDe) 917:voiced 872:iconic 858:Iconic 816:, and 814:⫽træp⫽ 807:⫽pɑːm⫽ 729:/bɛdz/ 725:/pɛts/ 690:church 594:, and 562:) and 556:Uralic 544:Slavic 452:little 447:little 443:higher 439:little 435:little 413:; see 399:dark L 380:little 302:though 253:phones 228:  95:, but 1609:(UPA) 1578:SAMPA 929:aIlDe 821:⫽baθ⫽ 709:pipes 702:/crc/ 698:/crc/ 686:SAMPA 682:ASCII 670:trill 548:Indic 427:] 423:[ 407:] 403:[ 397:as a 391:] 387:[ 382:as a 298:cough 294:tough 290:bough 216:(IPA) 2018:ISBN 1993:ISBN 1938:ISBN 1867:ISBN 1842:ISBN 1817:ISBN 1792:ISBN 1745:ISBN 1719:ISBN 1675:ISBN 1643:ISBN 1101:ansn 1093:tlwv 1077:anss 997:ansn 989:tlwv 973:anss 818:BATH 811:TRAP 804:PALM 800:TRAP 796:BATH 792:PALM 788:BATH 764:and 752:and 735:and 727:and 721:beds 719:and 717:pets 610:The 592:VoQS 503:The 344:and 312:and 304:and 284:and 272:The 1125:Ss) 1115:rp) 1097:itv 1069:tlv 993:itv 965:tlv 870:In 842:or 836:jet 825:⫽a⫽ 737:/z/ 733:/s/ 674:/ɹ/ 660:or 600:IPA 598:'s 499:IPA 485:not 454:is 419:/l/ 409:(a 395:/l/ 384:tap 376:/t/ 324:). 246:or 2070:: 1889:. 1105:f) 1081:fT 1049:tl 1009:Ss 1005:rp 977:fT 945:tl 854:. 846:: 809:, 773:⫽⫽ 768:. 704:. 602:. 590:, 554:, 550:, 546:, 520:, 516:, 370:. 300:, 296:, 292:, 264:. 66:. 2026:. 2001:. 1946:. 1906:" 1897:. 1875:. 1850:. 1825:. 1800:. 1753:. 1727:. 1683:. 1651:. 1473:F 1459:S 1442:s 1418:r 1399:t 1377:d 1366:a 1355:p 1337:a 1326:p 1300:s 1276:r 1265:t 1249:d 1238:a 1227:p 1167:C 1138:M 1123:F 1119:F 1113:S 1109:S 1103:s 1099:r 1095:t 1091:d 1089:g 1087:a 1085:g 1083:p 1079:s 1075:r 1073:n 1071:t 1067:d 1065:v 1063:a 1061:v 1059:p 1055:r 1053:n 1051:t 1047:d 1045:t 1043:a 1041:a 1039:p 1032:C 1028:C 1022:M 1018:M 1007:F 1003:S 1001:f 999:s 995:r 991:t 987:d 985:g 983:a 981:g 979:p 975:s 971:r 969:n 967:t 963:d 961:v 959:a 957:v 955:p 951:r 949:n 947:t 943:d 941:t 939:a 937:a 935:p 931:C 927:M 758:z 746:s 429:( 425:o 405:ʔ 389:ɾ 357:( 234:. 196:) 190:( 178:) 174:( 164:. 131:) 125:( 120:) 116:( 102:. 73:) 69:( 34:. 20:)

Index

Phonetic notation
Transcription (disambiguation)
improve it
talk page
Learn how and when to remove these messages
references
inline citations
improve
introducing
Learn how and when to remove this message

lead section
summarize
provide an accessible overview
Learn how and when to remove this message
phonetic transcriptions
International Phonetic Alphabet
Help:IPA
IPA § Brackets and transcription delimiters
phones
symbols
International Phonetic Alphabet
pronunciation
orthography
English
Tibetan
Spanish
Italian
relationship
phonemic orthography

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.