Knowledge

Lodomer

Source 📝

1020: 967:. Thirteen years earlier, he still subjected himself to Philip of Fermo and the pope's interests despite his better conviction, which caused the failure of the consolidation attempt. The royal troops subdued the rebellion by July, but the KƑszegis captured and imprisoned Andrew during his journey to Slavonia in August. Andrew was liberated within four months, after his supporters sent their relatives as hostages to the KƑszegis. Despite Lodomer's theoretical activity, Hungary was in a state of constant anarchy during Andrew's reign. The KƑszegis, the Csáks, the Borsas and other powerful families autonomously governed their domains, rising up nearly every year in open rebellion against Andrew in the second half of the 1290s. Andrew III again declared war against the KƑszegi brothers in August 1296, and Archbishop Lodomer excommunicated them. The archbishop personally participated in the military campaign with his 657:, but Pope Nicholas III refused to absolve him. Under such circumstances, Lodomer's primacy was overshadowed by the papal legate, who had no regard for local political conditions, forcing the Hungarian prelates to decide between the Hungarian monarch and the Roman Curia. Following Ladislaus' step, when the Cumans seized and imprisoned Philip of Fermo in early January 1280 on his demand, Lodomer and the bishops, who expressed "the liberty of the Church", turned against the royal power, and became his relentless opponents. Soon, Ladislaus was also captured. In less than two months, both the legate and the king were set free following mediation negotiations by Lodomer, and Ladislaus took a new oath to enforce the Cuman laws. 764: 919:
confronted with the Holy See after Andrew's coronation. Lodomer and his colleagues became the strongest pillars of the royal power, to protect the national sovereignty of the kingdom even against the pope's aspirations. On 31 January 1291, Pope Nicholas IV sent a letter to Lodomer, in which he expressed disappointment that the archbishop abandoned his previous "good habit" of continuous correspondence to inform the Holy See about the domestic conditions in Hungary. The pope noted "you've become almost a different person, who, to be addicted to a preventable indolence, did not inform the Holy See neither about the king's death, nor the situation of the country, nor the huge turmoil and nor the pretenders to the throne".
787:. All of them are primary sources for the political history of Hungary in the Age of Late ÁrpĂĄds, in addition their literary value. Historian KornĂ©l SzovĂĄk argued the individual style, the usage of terminology, and literary motifs prove that Lodomer personally wrote the letters. SzovĂĄk analyzed that Lodomer (or his chancellor) used his legal and theological knowledge as an argumentative weapon against Ladislaus. For instance, when quoted Ladislaus IV, who allegedly replied to Lodomer with the sentence "For me, I am the law and I do not tolerate that the laws of such priests constrain me", in response to criticisms, is a reference to the 616: 898: 40: 374: 2638: 220:. Referring to a papal letter allegedly from the end of the 13th century, historian JĂĄnos Török also argued in favour of the Ruthenian ancestry in 1853. He argued Lodomer's real name was John and called himself "Lodomericus" ("a man from Lodomeria") after arriving to Hungary. However contemporary scholar NĂĄndor Knauz proved that papal letter was written 100 years later, at the end of the 14th century, and it referred to then archbishop 2626: 453:. Thus it is possible that Lodomer was already installed as his successor in 1266, after leaving the office of vice chancellery. The Diocese of VĂĄrad laid in the territory of Stephen's realm during his election. Lodomer was granted the land of Henye for his advice and mediation role by BĂ©la IV still in that year. When Stephen V ascended the Hungarian throne in May 1270, he granted tax exemption for those serfs and 466: 984:(1496), Lodomer died on 2 January 1298. John Hont-PĂĄzmĂĄny became the leading figure of the royal council. The subsequent 1298 laws, which circumscribed the feudal institutions, reflected Lodomer's political will, but the delicate balance was broken between Andrew III and the prelates after his death, despite Archbishop John's efforts. With the election of the pro-Angevin 2614: 748:", as Lodomer described him in his letter, acquiesced in concluding an agreement with the archbishop in March 1288. Lodomer absolved Ladislaus on condition that the king would live in accordance with Christian morals. However, Ladislaus broke his promise in the next month, when imprisoned opponent lords in Buda. He also abducted his sister, 1286:, the personnel of his court in Esztergom; his first identified bailiff was Pasca of Cseke (mentioned in 1280), who soon was replaced by Maurice VĂĄzsony, Lodomer's relative around 1284. A certain Andrew Ajka was referred to as the archiepiscopal court's palatine in 1291, while Michael of Mencshely was styled as "master of the bakers" ( 851:, the founder of the Christian kingdom. Lodomer participated in the assembly of Föveny in June 1289, which ended without results. Following that the archbishop urged Pope Nicholas IV to proclaim a crusade against Ladislaus and the Cumans. With the consent of Lodomer, the KƑszegis offered the crown to the king's distant relative 1210:
KomĂĄrom County and 200 marks with the Hont-PĂĄzmĂĄny clan in 1287. Lodomer exchanged portions in ÖrmĂ©ny for ÚjvĂĄros (boroughs within Esztergom) with his own cathedral chapter in 1289. According to the document, the archbishop wanted to establish a mill and gardens there. In 1294, Lodomer was granted a portion in the village of
760:. According to Archbishop Lodomer, Ladislaus even stated, "If I had 15 or more sisters in as many cloistered communities as you like, I would snatch them from there to marry them off licitly or illicitly; in order to procure through them a kin-group who will support me by all their power in the fulfillment of my will". 301:" used by the well-educated Lodomer in 1292, historian TamĂĄs Körmendi argued that Maurice and Gregory were the archbishop's patrilineal relatives – thus Lodomer himself was indeed a member of the VĂĄzsony clan and the son of Mika. Historian PĂ©ter Kis considered that there were two MonoszlĂł clans at the end of the era of 632:. Bishop Philip soon realized, however, that most Cumans were still pagans in Hungary. He extracted a ceremonious promise from the Cuman chieftains of giving up their pagan customs, and persuaded the young King Ladislaus to swear an oath to enforce the keeping of the Cuman chieftains' promise. An assembly held at 1110:, Slovakia) to the archdiocese as part of the compensation. Since the former archbishop Philip TĂŒrje was robbed at his coronation, Ladislaus IV compensated the loss of the archdiocese at that time, donating the estate SzakĂĄllas in 1285. As a compensation for previous damages, Lodomer acquired the castle of 947:
of the document. The text describes the model of the perfect Christian ruler in Lodomer's eyes: " for the powerful monarchs of the countries, who are not restricted by law, the greatest glory is if they voluntarily obey the laws, and they embrace the right-inspiring, blessed compulsion in accordance
288:
For the first time, KarĂĄcsonyi's contemporary MĂłr Wertner identified Lodomer as a member of the VĂĄzsony kindred, as he considered BĂĄnd and Csaba belonged to that clan too. Later he revised his position and claimed the archbishop was the son of a certain Lawrence, a local landowner in Henye, mentioned
560:
were ascribed to her intercession, most of them referring to curing illnesses, even someone coming back from the dead. Among those giving testimony were 27 people for whom miracles had been wrought. Margaret was beatified still in that year, but canonization process was not successful, it took place
1209:
seized the village, causing a damage of 100 marks to Lodomer. As a compensation, John and his brothers handed over portions in Födémes in Nyitra County to the archbishopric. In 1284, Lodomer returned the estates to them in exchange for Béla. Lodomer also exchanged the acquired Gyorok for Bogdåny in
1048:
and Vienna, to pay custom to the chapter of Esztergom, when passing through the city. However there were several reports, that the traders avoided Esztergom and took their goods directly into Buda. As a result, Lodomer excommunicated some merchants in the next year. He had also conflicts with those
913:
Under Lodomer, the prelates became the strongest supporters of Andrew's reign, which decade was described as the "era of the early estates of the realm in Hungary" by historian JĂłzsef Gerics. Andrew and Lodomer were looking for an alliance with the lower nobility against the most powerful oligarchs
1035:
During Lodomer's episcopate, Ladislaus IV donated the land of ÖrmĂ©ny (a former borough of Esztergom) to the Order of Saint Augustine in 1281, where they established a monastery and conducted theological and artistic studies. The land donation was confirmed by Andrew III in his letter of coronation
885:
in the first days of September 1290, where he promised to preserve the rights and privileges of the nobility. Although, the KƑszegis and Lodomer jointly invited Andrew III to the Hungarian throne, their motivation was different: the oligarchs wanted a new controllable and weak-handed ruler to lead
597:
arrived in Hungary in early 1279. The clergy, including Lodomer became Philip's strongest ally, which also meant that they turned against Ladislaus in the long term. With the mediation of the papal legate, Pope Nicholas III appointed Lodomer as the new Archbishop of Esztergom on 13 June 1279. The
1085:
There is no record that Lodomer ever bought a landholding during his episcopate, unlike his predecessors, but exchanged estates ten times, according to the contemporary records. Historian PĂ©ter Kis considers Lodomer's unusually more active role in the secular domestic politics caused significant
682:
in October 1282. However Lodomer's efforts failed by the end of 1283, when Ladislaus was unable to defeat the KƑszegi family. As historian JenƑ SzƱcs noted, the young king adopted an "anachronistic autocratic" system, omitting the royal council, nobility and church. Ladislaus abandoned his wife,
457:
who were subjects of the Diocese of VĂĄrad, in addition to free use of mines for the bishopric. The king also permitted that the lands of the extinct local noble families have been transferred to the diocese. Lodomer founded monasteries, clerical schools and provided priests to numerous villages;
735:
and established her own court there under the protection of Lodomer and his troops. Then the archbishop summoned the prelates, the barons, and the noblemen to an assembly in Buda in November 1287 and excommunicated Ladislaus. Lodomer here also entrusted Peter MonoszlĂł to recover the arbitrarily
836:
The two archbishops, Lodomer and John Hont-PĂĄzmĂĄny compromised with the most powerful oligarchs, who divided the royal positions among them, while Ladislaus spent the last years of his life wandering from place to place, having lost all of his influence and support. To counterbalance the royal
458:
these all were part of a restoration attempt in the territory of the diocese, which suffered heavy damages during the Mongol invasion decades earlier. According to a charter, Lodomer summoned an assembly, where subjects of the Diocese of VĂĄrad took an oath of allegiance before the reliquary of
918:
outside. The 34 articles of the Diet of Óbuda reflect all these efforts. Lodomer and his suffragans acted royal advisers beside Andrew, excluding the barons of the realm. Lodomer, who was considered the advocate of the Roman Curia's interventions during the reign of Ladislaus IV in the 1280s,
880:
on 23 July 1290. The lords and prelates swore loyalty to Andrew only after he issued a charter promising the restoration of internal peace and respect for the privileges of the nobility and the clergymen. The document was formulated by Lodomer himself. Andrew convened a national assembly to
727:, Lodomer intended to declare a crusade against the Hungarian king and his Cuman subjects, but the pope's death in April 1287 prevented this goal. When Ladislaus left Buda to prepare a military campaign against the KƑszegi–Borsa league, Lodomer liberated Queen Isabella from her captivity at 660:
When Bishop Philip of Fermo left Hungary in the autumn of 1281, Lodomer attempted to restore political consolidation, which existed for a short time in 1277–78, before the violent intervention of the Roman Curia. He offered the support of the Hungarian Church to Ladislaus and interceded to
1302:" status. The lands of his servants and soldiers laid in Bars and Hont counties along the estates of the archdiocese to perform their defense function against the eastward attacks from the powerful Transdanubian oligarchs, primarily Matthew III Csák and the KƑszegi brothers, while the 487:'s regency. Initially, Lodomer was a staunch supporter of the young king, who represented the continuation of the desired strong royal power. Following his coronation sometime after September 1272, Ladislaus IV and his escort resided in Várad, when he donated the village of SzƑlƑs in 432:
outlined three social groups according to their motivations to join the ducal court. In this sense, Lodomer belonged to that youth with illustrious Transdanubian aristocratic origin, who remained without office due to the influence of older generations in the royal court of BĂ©la IV.
343:
in the cathedral chapter of Veszprém. Beside his duty to proclaim the Scripture readings used in the Liturgy of the Word, Lodomer was responsible for management of the cathedral school of Veszprém and teaching the clerics and the poor scholars, in accordance with the Canon 18 of the
943:(now Kopčany in Slovakia). In accordance with Lodomer's goal, the peace treaty prescribed the destruction of the fortresses that Albert of Austria had seized from the KƑszegis earlier. Lodomer and the three other prelates used the terminology of the Roman and canon laws in the 281:. Lodomer's biographer (2003), theologian Margit Beke supported Knauz's claim, arguing Lodomer issued his last surviving charter in late 1297 in Monoszló, two months before his death. However genealogist János Karácsonyi refused Knauz's theory, as Gregory Monoszló's father was 1061:) in 1284. After their confrontation in the next year, Ladislaus IV did not donate any more property to the archdiocese and Lodomer. Beside the monarch, secular nobles also donated lands to the archdiocese under Lodomer. For instance, Bartholomew Szemere bequeathed his estate 407:
Denis, who was a student of the University of Bologna on 26 October 1268 according to a register, is identical with the namesake prelate. However, at the latest, Lodomer was already styled as elected and confirmed Bishop of VĂĄrad on 9 November, according to a royal charter of
1165:(Nitra) counties that surrounded his seat in Esztergom in order to defend the archbishopric's interests against the neighboring powerful lords during the era of anarchy. Lodomer sought to create a coherent lordship through property exchanges. In 1280, he exchanged portion in 722:
clan, Ladislaus IV appointed his own loyal soldiers and lesser nobles to the high positions. As regards Lodomer, he finally finished the intent of reconciliation, when Ladislaus imprisoned his wife and granted all her revenues to his Cuman mistress, Aydua. At the command of
674:. According to Pope Martin's letters with optimistic tone throughout in 1282 and 1283, Lodomer "carefully, wisely and relentlessly contributed" in the reconciliation efforts between the monarch and the Holy See. For instance, Ladislaus and Lodomer jointly convened a general 1000:(today Spiƥ in Slovakia) in 1280 to secede from the affiliation of the St. Ladislaus parish and build a church for themselves, maintaining the suzerainty of the Archdiocese of Esztergom. Alongside Andrew III and other prelates, he was present at the consecration of the 744:, I shall exterminate the whole lot right up to Rome with the aid of Tartar swords", according to Lodomer's highly dubious report. The barons captured Ladislaus in the Szepesség in January 1288. Although his partisans soon liberated him, he, similarly to the "legendary 289:
by a royal charter in 1237. Historian Attila Zsoldos refused Wertner's argument, as the fact that Lodomer was granted landholding in Henye is not necessarily link to his hypothetical ancestry. Instead, Zsoldos clearly identified Maurice of Mencshely with
669:
over Hungarian church properties and dignities. Lodomer's hope to retake the king to the Christian affiliation has become real, when a Cuman army invaded the southern parts of Hungary in autumn 1282, and Ladislaus vanquished the invaders's army in the
1101:
branch) constantly plundered the estates of the archbishopric, unlawfully confiscating its revenues and tithes. According to an estimation, he caused a damage of altogether 3000 marks with his raids. With the intercession of the powerful oligarch
1065:
with two fishponds (in KomĂĄrom County, today KolĂĄrovo, Slovakia) in 1281. Royal donations reappeared after 1290, when Andrew III ascended the Hungarian throne. Andrew III donated the village NĂĄndor in Esztergom County but without the local
200:, courtesy of Lodomer. His ancestry, parentage and kinship relations have long been disputed among historians. Based on alleged "old manuscripts", 18th-century historian MiklĂłs Schmitth claimed Lodomer originated from the territory of the 508:), which declared the minor Ladislaus IV to be of age and authorized the 15-year-old monarch to restore internal peace with all possible means. In the next month, Ladislaus entrusted Lodomer to lead a six-member diplomatic mission to 491:
to Lodomer. The bishop distanced himself from the conflict between the baronial groups. Nevertheless, Lodomer and his strong ally, Peter MonoszlĂł, who held the dignity of Bishop of Transylvania since 1270, opposed the ambition of the
352:
in this capacity. For this reason, 19th-century scholar Vince Bunyitay considered Lodomer attended the clerical school in Veszprém. This biographical data is largely an assumption, nevertheless Lodomer was already referred to as a
1019: 1086:
additional expenditure to the archbishopric. In addition, due to the conditions of feudal anarchy in the second half of the 13th century, the income sources of the archdiocese dwindled. During Lodomer's appointment, the city of
403:, Körmendi agreed that Lodomer studied abroad (most likely in Italy) between 1261 and 1264. Based on the researches of literary historian Rabån Gerézdi (1941), Hungarian historiography claimed that a certain Lodomer, son of 922:
In 1291, Andrew III invaded Austria, forcing Albert to withdraw his garrisons from the towns and fortresses that he had captured years before. Following that Lodomer and John Hont-PĂĄzmĂĄny negotiated with Albert's envoys
886:
the kingdom instead of the unpredictable Ladislaus, while Lodomer and his suffragans were aimed to strengthen the royal power to put an end to the political anarchy. Lodomer and John Hont-PĂĄzmĂĄny welcomed the arriving
1242:
by Lodomer, who, tus, received Nyårhíd with its toll in Nyitra County (today a borough of Nové Zåmky). Lodomer expanded this estate, when acquired another portion from Ernye Hont-Påzmåny, who, in exchange, obtained
572:
in 1278, Lodomer became the most illustrious prelate in the Hungarian clergy, thanks to his political and church relationships in Rome and his outstanding literacy. Two representants of the rival baronial groups,
427:
between the king and the duke, but took on a role of a mediator and conciliator in order to prevent the escalation of their conflict. The motivation of Lodomer's loyalty to Duke Stephen remained hidden. Historian
482:
When Stephen V fell ill and died on 6 August 1272, it marked the beginning of the era of feudal anarchy, when two rival baronial groups struggled for power during the minority of Ladislaus IV under his mother,
636:
passed laws which, in accordance with the legate's demand, prescribed that the Cumans should leave their tents and live "in houses attached to the ground". Following that the papal legate convened a synod in
875:
monks to Vienna to inform Andrew of the king's death. With the monks' assistance, Andrew left his prison in disguise and hastened to Hungary. Upon his arrival, Archbishop Lodomer crowned Andrew III king in
357:
at the end of the 1250s, reflecting the acquisition of some basics of canonical studies by then. After 1260, Lodomer disappears from the sources for the next three years. As Margit Beke argued he studied
540:
clan swore loyalty to the monarch. Lodomer and the clergy supported Ladislaus' efforts to restore royal power against the oligarchs, but the assembly at CsanĂĄd proved to be a short-lived consolidation.
1150:
and donated it to Lodomer in 1293. The Hont-PĂĄzmĂĄnys (sons of Casimir) looted 15 archiepiscopal estates around the same time. Therefore, vice-judge royal Martin persuaded them to hand over the estates
702:
Lodomer persuaded Ladislaus to convene a general assembly in the early summer of 1286 in order to reconciliation between the king and the powerful KƑszegi family, who plundered villages and regions in
799:, which determined "the liberty of the Church" from secular powers. According to the archbishop, Ladislaus copulated with his favorite concubine, Aydua, whom the archbishop described as a "poisonous 412:. Nevertheless, Körmendi added if Lodomer is identical with that student, his relationship to the Atyusz kindred becomes more established, as there were two clan members named Denis during his time. 1012:
to Esztergom in 1294. Lodomer donated the Saint Vitus Basilica of Esztergom to the Williamite friars to defend themselves during the second Mongol invasion. Lodomer approved the regulation of the
585:
summoned them to Rome in June 1278. Nicholas refused to confirm either nomination, instead, he decided to appoint the archbishop himself in accordance with the canon law. Meanwhile, Nicholas sent
1106:, Lodomer had to settle for 300 marks of silver compensation. Sometime before 1287, Thomas and his brother Abraham also handed over the estate Gyorok in Nyitra County (today a borough of 395:), which reflect his deepened legal and philological knowledge, prove that he was one of the most educated Hungarian prelates of the 13th century, thus he certainly attended an Italian 1049:
butchers, who relocated their slaughterhouses from Esztergom in order to avoid paying the duty. After 1282, Ladislaus IV donated several lands to the Archdiocese of Esztergom: Óny in
691:
occurred during the winter of 1285–86, many of his subjects accused Ladislaus of inciting the Mongols to invade Hungary. In fact, Ladislaus employed Mongol prisoners of war, known as
168:
in the second half of the 13th century. He was Archbishop of Esztergom between 1279 and 1298, and Bishop of VĂĄrad (now Oradea in Romania) from 1268 till 1279. He was an opponent of
1078:) in 1291, on the grounds that Bernold von Tellesbrunn caused damage of 20,000 marks to the archdiocese during the 1291 Austrian–Hungarian war. He was also granted the village of 423:, who defected to the partisans of BĂ©la IV. Duke Stephen's relationship with his father BĂ©la IV deteriorated by the early 1260s. Lodomer remained loyal to Stephen in the emerging 859:. In response, Ladislaus prepared a war to Transdanubia, however he, who had always been partial towards his Cuman subjects, was assassinated by three Cumans at the castle of 297:. Zsoldos assumed Lodomer was the brother of Gregory's father, Saul, himself also a son of certain Mika. After philological and canon law considerations regarding the phrase " 779:. He listed the king's violations, scandals and his complaints regarding the chaotic situation in the kingdom. Two of his 1288 documents were discovered by French historian 446: 317:; in Croatia) and provided influential barons; and the second one, a significantly poorer and minor clan, Lodomer allegedly belonged to this, which came from MonoszlĂł in 2678: 1094:
to the chapter for two years. The archdiocese was also suffered from acts of domination. In the 1280s, a neighboring lord, Thomas Hont-PĂĄzmĂĄny (son of Abraham, from
1298:
in KomĂĄrom Castle, who joined Lodomer's court "with his estates and privileges" in 1284 in order to protect his wealth against the oligarchs. He was granted the "
1070:(to avoid conflict) upon Lodomer's request in 1291. After his coronation, Andrew III donated several landholdings to his ally Lodomer, including the town of 740:(present-day Bistrița, Romania) from the town's magistrate. In response, the infuriated king stated that "beginning with the archbishop of Esztergom and his 645:
and the other bishops attended. The Cumans did not obey the laws, however, and Ladislaus, himself a half-Cuman, failed to force them. In retaliation, Philip
536:(today Cenad, Romania) in early summer of 1278. Lodomer and other prelates were involved in the meeting, where the rebellious Geregyes were executed and the 628:
The arrival of papal legate Philip deepened the turmoil in Hungary. Initially, with the legate's mediation, Ladislaus IV concluded a peace treaty with the
290: 936: 399:, but the exact location and date are uncertain. Considering a standard three-year study leave among the canons, which was secured and encouraged by the 914:
to prevent the disintegration of the unified state. They also kept it in mind that they wished to keep the power aspirations of the Holy See and the
783:. He sent the two letters to JĂĄnos KarĂĄcsonyi in 1908, who translated and first published in 1910. Two other letters were found in the collection of 1219: 1189:
in Esztergom County (today FarnĂĄ, Slovakia) for two portions (LĂłcsa and Porosztolnok) in the lordship of SaskƑ (today Ć ĂĄĆĄovskĂœ hrad in Slovakia) in
1161:
The acquisition and sale of landholdings were consciously organized: Lodomer expanded his influence over the territories in Esztergom, KomĂĄrom and
1181:. In the same year, he was involved in a transaction with Andrew Hatvani too, exchanging the estate Levancstelki in NĂłgrĂĄd County for portions in 216:.) It is presumable that, in fact, Schmitth deduced that conclusion only from the prelate's forename and its similarity to Ruthenian principality 715: 221: 939:, which concluded the war, was signed on 26 August, and three days later Andrew and Albert of Austria confirmed it at their meeting in 1040:. Additionally, the king granted the privilege of the exemption from mining income to the archdiocese and its chapter. The king placed the 504:–MonoszlĂł league. In May 1277, Lodomer participated in that general assembly of the prelates, barons, noblemen, and Cumans in RĂĄkos (near 2376:
Kis, Péter (2000). "Az esztergomi érsekek uradalomszervezése a XIII. szåzad måsodik felében ". In Piti, Ferenc; Szabados, György (eds.).
1008:(present-day Bratislava, Slovakia) on 26 March 1297, celebrated by vicar James. Pope Clement IV subordinated the Augustine monastery of 1158:(today Bíƈa and Kamenín in Slovakia, respectively) in 1295. However, Ugrin Hont-Påzmåny was only willing to give up the latter estate. 1283: 996:
Lodomer held at least four provincial synods (1286, 1292, 1294 and 1297) during his 19-year episcopate. He permitted the burghers of
255: 980:). He held a synod on 14 December 1297. He sent his last letter on 28 December. According to Pauline historian Gergely Gyöngyösi's 441:
Lodomer was elected Bishop of VĂĄrad (today Oradea, Romania) at the latest on 9 November 1268. By then his confirmation was made by
548:
appointed him to preside that church committee, which investigated and supervised the beatification process of the late princess
687:, and settled among the Cumans by the end of the year. The contemporary public mood is well characterized by that fact when the 2683: 1214:
in Esztergom County (today BĂșč, Slovakia) from the Tengerdi family in exchange for his fortified manor in the northern part of
2507: 2486: 2404: 2286: 932: 749: 684: 665:
in order to invalidate some of the radical measures and decisions of papal legate Philip. Lodomer also recognized the king's
420: 238:
and has put forward three arguments; Archbishop Lodomer called a certain Maurice of Mencshely and Gregory, son of Saul from
1013: 500:, where the vast majority of the Diocese of VĂĄrad located. Consequently, Lodomer apparently became a partisan of the rival 2355:
Hunyadi, SĂĄndor (2023). "LodomĂ©r esztergomi Ă©rsek birtokszervezƑi tevĂ©kenysĂ©ge ". In Hunyadi, SĂĄndor; et al. (eds.).
1036:
oath. In 1283, Ladislaus permitted that those nobles who died without legitimate heirs, could leave their fortune to the
424: 1146:
pillaged 11 villages of the archdiocese in the early 1290s. As a result, Andrew III confiscated their estate Kemence in
193: 2668: 2465: 2444: 2385: 2345: 2326: 2305: 2257: 1259:
with its fair in Nyitra County (today TvrdoĆĄovce, Slovakia). Still in the end of 1297, Lodomer exchanged his estates
688: 270:, who died without male heir, as a member of the MonoszlĂł clan. Thus Knauz identified Gregory, Lodomer's nephew with 955:
The Peace of Hainburg resulted that KƑszegis rose up in open rebellion against Andrew in spring 1292, acknowledging
176:
to adopt the Christian way of life. After Ladislaus' death, Lodomer and his suffragans were dedicated supporters of
2423: 863:(now Cheresig in Romania) on 10 July 1290. It is plausible that Lodomer was not involved in organizing the murder. 189: 2360: 552:, daughter of BĂ©la IV. The committee resumed its work in 1276 after a four-year forced break since the death of 763: 274:, the father of Egidius. A 1296 charter also mentioned that Gregory related to BĂĄnd and Csaba, members of the 593:, to Hungary to help Ladislaus restore royal power and to fill the position of Archbishop of Esztergom. The 1044:
of Pat under the jurisdiction of Lodomer in 1284. In 1288, Ladislaus obliged the traders, who arrived from
839: 817: 449:
was last appeared as bishop in contemporary documents on 17 October 1265, when King BĂ©la countersigned his
345: 2673: 1310:
counties existed with the aim to support potential westward royal campaigns against the provincial lords.
959:, as King of Hungary, whose claim was also supported by the Holy See. In response, Lodomer excommunicated 1123: 586: 549: 2604: 2454:
Zsoldos, Attila (2003). "III. Andrås". In Szovåk, Kornél; Szentpéteri, József; Szakåcs, Margit (eds.).
556:, Archbishop of Esztergom (1272). The necessary investigations were taken up between 1271 and 1276, 74 2554: 1282:, through which he could exercise his military and political influence. There are some data about the 757: 756:
Monastery of the Blessed Virgin on Rabbits' Island, and gave her in marriage to a Czech aristocrat,
337:
Lodomer is first mentioned by contemporary records between 1257 and 1261, when he functioned as the
1278:
Adapting to the new situation, Lodomer was the first archbishop, who established an ecclesiastical
977: 830: 528:(now Adrian in Romania), Ladislaus IV held a "general assembly" for seven counties along the River 2395:
Körmendi, TamĂĄs (2016). "LodomĂ©r pĂĄlyafutĂĄsa vĂĄradi pĂŒspöksĂ©ge elƑtt ". In Zsoldos, Attila (ed.).
2580: 964: 956: 780: 646: 469: 349: 169: 31: 1247:
in Nyitra County (today Ć urany, Slovakia) in 1297. In that year, the archbishop also exchanged
1239: 1057:, Slovakia) in 1285, while Queen Isabella donated Billeg in KomĂĄrom County (today a borough of 872: 642: 615: 459: 205: 877: 271: 2658: 1272: 1194: 901: 852: 621: 569: 520:. They ratified their covenant on 12 July 1277. After the royal army captured the rebellious 517: 474: 383: 367: 177: 2414:
SzovĂĄk, KornĂ©l (1991). "LodomĂ©r Ă©rsek leveleirƑl ". In BĂĄrdos, IstvĂĄn; Beke, Margit (eds.).
1223: 1082:
in KomĂĄrom County by Queen Fenenna in the same year, for the celebration of her coronation.
671: 409: 378: 285:, as he already outlined the clan's family tree at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries. 2663: 976:
In his last months, Lodomer resided in Monoszló, then Budafelhévíz (today a borough in the
924: 855:, who arrived to Hungary in early 1290. However Andrew was captured and surrendered him to 848: 822: 544:
The influence of Lodomer in the Roman Curia has increased by the second half of the 1270s.
496:
kindred, which had aspirations to establish dominion independently from the royal power in
416: 263: 251: 706:
in recent years. There Ladislaus provided one-year grace period to the KƑszegis and their
565: 8: 906: 856: 833:. Consequently, Lodomer's accounts about the events in the 1280s are quite questionable. 513: 484: 306: 197: 1260: 1182: 1103: 267: 254:
to them. When Gregory bought SĂĄsdi (near to MonoszlĂł) in 1297, the cathedral chapter of
232: 2630: 1143: 1037: 887: 784: 450: 310: 302: 165: 149: 2544: 1198: 843:
and to emphasize the role of the Christian king, Lodomer commissioned an unidentified
373: 318: 282: 180:, who aimed to restore strong royal power against the rebellious lords and oligarchs. 89: 39: 2482: 2461: 2440: 2419: 2400: 2381: 2378:"Magyaroknak eleirƑl". Ünnepi tanulmĂĄnyok a hatvan esztendƑs Makk Ferenc tiszteletĂ©re 2364: 2341: 2336:
Homonnai, Sarolta (2003). "Lodomér esztergomi érsek ". In Szentpéteri, József (ed.).
2322: 2301: 2282: 2253: 1299: 1268: 1127: 1095: 1067: 915: 792: 582: 525: 478:. Initially, Lodomer supported his efforts, but later became his inexorable opponent. 2522: 1174: 629: 488: 415:
Returning home, Lodomer served as vice-chancellor in the royal court of junior king
2618: 1135: 928: 897: 776: 741: 724: 564:
The episcopal see of Esztergom was virtually vacant since 1272. After the death of
537: 521: 2569: 1202: 578: 2590: 2530: 1215: 1178: 1119: 1107: 985: 753: 728: 590: 545: 493: 462:. Lodomer was a member of the royal council during the short reign of Stephen V. 442: 429: 213: 79: 2564: 1206: 1131: 1098: 960: 574: 553: 501: 69: 2642: 2397:
NagyvĂĄrad Ă©s Bihar az ÁrpĂĄd-kor vĂ©gĂ©n (TanulmĂĄnyok BiharorszĂĄg törtĂ©netĂ©bƑl 3.)
1307: 1295: 1287: 1054: 1050: 1041: 860: 768: 666: 662: 275: 201: 137: 997: 322: 2652: 2368: 1162: 940: 891: 775:
On 8 May 1288, Lodomer described the above mentioned events in his letter to
505: 209: 1256: 988:
as Lodomer's successor, the consistency between the clergy also eliminated.
641:
on 14 September 1279, where Archbishop Lodomer, his closest ally Archbishop
247: 2270:
At the Gate of Christendom: Jews, Muslims and "Pagans" in Medieval Hungary,
1235: 1071: 844: 718:
baronial group from the royal council. Neglecting the KƑszegis' rival, the
703: 594: 497: 696: 2246:
Beke, Margit (2003). "Monoszló nembeli Lodomér ". In Beke, Margit (ed.).
1226:
renounced the tithes due to him in the villages HĂĄros, FödĂ©mes, CsĂșt and
1190: 1147: 1001: 803:", in public. Lodomer cited antique works (the tale of Proteus, poems of 719: 400: 188:
Lodomer or Ladomer was presumably born in the 1230s, not long before the
1139: 1062: 737: 239: 1252: 1201:
bequeathed the estate BĂ©la in KomĂĄrom County to the archbishopric, but
1045: 1005: 707: 127: 1155: 1058: 227:
Himself Knauz also dealt with the issue in his large-scale monography
1151: 1087: 969: 800: 796: 791:, which described the pagans' way of life with the same phrases, and 732: 711: 650: 363: 359: 326: 294: 217: 212:. (Lodomer can be interpreted as a Latinized form of the Slavic name 1264: 1244: 1166: 1074:(present-day RoĆŸĆˆava in Slovakia) with its revenues of silver mine ( 973:, but Andrew and his occasional ally, Albert could not subdue them. 963:, expressing his opposition to the Roman Curia and its protege, the 533: 2625: 1211: 1170: 1111: 1024: 654: 1186: 894:; she became the first wife of Andrew III before the end of 1290. 882: 2418:(in Hungarian). JĂłzsef Attila Megyei KönyvtĂĄr. pp. 141–143. 2399:(in Hungarian). Varadinum KulturĂĄlis AlapĂ­tvĂĄny. pp. 83–99. 1248: 1231: 1227: 1115: 1028: 871:
Following the assassination, Lodomer subsequently dispatched two
745: 633: 599: 557: 161: 2298:
The Realm of St Stephen: A History of Medieval Hungary, 895–1526
1275:, in order to establish a coherent lordship in that county too. 619:
Papal legate Philip of Fermo arrives Hungary as depicted in the
804: 679: 509: 339: 173: 2380:(in Hungarian). Szegedi KözĂ©pkorĂĄsz MƱhely. pp. 225–248. 1091: 1079: 1009: 949: 788: 529: 465: 982:
Vitae fratrum Eremitarum Ordinis Sancti Pauli Primi Eremitae
653:
in October. Ladislaus joined the Cumans and appealed to the
1142:, who also caused damage to the archbishop's holdings. The 812: 808: 638: 2481:(in Hungarian). HistĂłria, MTA TörtĂ©nettudomĂĄnyi IntĂ©zete. 2252:(in Hungarian). Szent IstvĂĄn TĂĄrsulat. pp. 128–134. 1865: 1863: 1861: 1686: 1684: 1682: 1680: 1678: 1486: 1476: 1474: 293:, the bailiff of Archbishop Lodomer's episcopal court in 2187: 2150: 2148: 2123: 2121: 2108: 2106: 1800: 1798: 1796: 1727: 1725: 1723: 1626: 1624: 1425: 1423: 1332: 1330: 1328: 1326: 1324: 1322: 1771: 1769: 1653: 1651: 1611: 1609: 1607: 1605: 1603: 1601: 1599: 1597: 2133: 2093: 2091: 2089: 2087: 2060: 2036: 2024: 2012: 1930: 1928: 1926: 1911: 1875: 1858: 1781: 1744: 1742: 1740: 1675: 1534: 1510: 1498: 1471: 1459: 1023:
Reconstruction drawing of Visk Castle (today ruins in
196:, also an Archbishop of Esztergom, who studied in the 2602: 2165: 2163: 2145: 2118: 2103: 2072: 2000: 1976: 1964: 1940: 1834: 1822: 1810: 1793: 1720: 1663: 1636: 1621: 1546: 1435: 1420: 1408: 1398: 1396: 1394: 1392: 1390: 1388: 1386: 1371: 1359: 1349: 1347: 1345: 1319: 445:(died weeks later). Lodomer's last known predecessor 2048: 1988: 1952: 1899: 1887: 1846: 1766: 1754: 1708: 1696: 1648: 1594: 1582: 1570: 1558: 1522: 821:), in addition to such recent Christian texts, like 581:
fought for the position of archbishop of Esztergom.
2084: 1923: 1737: 2679:13th-century Roman Catholic archbishops in Hungary 2223: 2211: 2199: 2175: 2160: 1383: 1342: 1193:and 70 marks with the same method from Thomas and 2460:(in Hungarian). Kossuth KiadĂł. pp. 119–227. 1447: 731:in September 1287. After that the queen moved to 2650: 1294:). A third member, Stephen, son of Fulkus was a 1230:in favor of the provost of CsĂșt (in present-day 1130:kindred, as a compensation for the pillaging of 172:whom he excommunicated for failing to force the 2477:MagyarorszĂĄg vilĂĄgi archontolĂłgiĂĄja, 1000–1301 2340:(in Hungarian). Kossuth KiadĂł. pp. 16–19. 1251:in Pozsony County (today Vajnory, a borough of 991: 2317:A korai rendisĂ©g EurĂłpĂĄban Ă©s MagyarorszĂĄgon 1234:). In exchange, Benedict was granted CsĂĄt in 1053:(1283), SzakĂĄllas (present-day a borough of 1306:lands with looser structure in KomĂĄrom and 602:on 7 May 1280, confirming the appointment. 332: 305:: the first, which originated from today's 2338:SzĂŒrke eminenciĂĄsok a magyar törtĂ©nelemben 1271:for SzakĂĄcsi and Udal in Bars County with 605: 192:. He had an unnamed sister, the mother of 38: 231:. He claimed Lodomer originated from the 2394: 2335: 2066: 1869: 1690: 1540: 1504: 1492: 1480: 1465: 1429: 1377: 1365: 1336: 1134:. He also acquired portion in Úrkuta in 1018: 896: 762: 736:confiscated queenly estates surrounding 710:. In September 1286, the king managed a 695:, when he subjugated a rebellion in the 614: 464: 372: 246:") in 1292, when he donated his land of 2474: 2453: 2354: 2193: 2154: 2127: 2112: 2042: 2030: 2018: 1917: 1881: 1787: 1630: 1552: 1516: 1441: 1414: 1185:(today PalotĂĄs). Lodomer also acquired 391:Körmendi noted that Lodomer's letters ( 348:(1179). Additionally, he led the local 2651: 2413: 2314: 2266: 2078: 2006: 1982: 1970: 1946: 1840: 1828: 1816: 1804: 1731: 1669: 1642: 837:court's recent ideological basis, the 610: 258:referred to him as Lodomer's nephew (" 2432: 2295: 2054: 1994: 1958: 1905: 1893: 1852: 1775: 1760: 1714: 1702: 1657: 1615: 1588: 1576: 1564: 1528: 847:friar to write the rhythmic story of 183: 2585:13 June 1279 – 2 January 1298 2245: 2097: 1934: 1748: 1402: 1353: 1122:. He obtained the estate Nevelen in 1014:Order of Saint Paul the First Hermit 935:about the conditions for peace. The 767:Cuman assassins murder Ladislaus in 377:Stephen V is crowned by his father, 2514:Vice-chancellor of the Junior King 2375: 2229: 2217: 2205: 2181: 2169: 2139: 1453: 771:(Cheresig, Romania) on 10 July 1290 714:, expelling members of the KƑszegi– 13: 436: 14: 2695: 2321:(in Hungarian). AkadĂ©miai KiadĂł. 229:Monumenta ecclesiae Strigoniensis 2636: 2624: 2612: 866: 190:First Mongol invasion of Hungary 44:Seal of Archbishop Lodomer, 1291 16:13th-century Catholic archbishop 512:to enter into an alliance with 2439:(in Hungarian). Osiris KiadĂł. 2281:. Cambridge University Press. 1: 2684:13th-century Hungarian people 2248:Esztergomi Ă©rsekek 1001–2003 1313: 1238:along with 17 possessions in 1126:in a similar manner from the 649:him and placed Hungary under 419:from 1264 to 1266, replacing 160:1235 – 2 January 1298) was a 157: 116: 104: 2456:Szent IstvĂĄn Ă©s III. AndrĂĄs 1267:(today Vlkyƈa, Slovakia) in 1173:) for FödĂ©mes and SzƑlƑs in 840:Gesta Hunnorum et Hungarorum 346:Third Council of the Lateran 266:mentioned his loyal servant 7: 2416:EgyhĂĄzak a vĂĄltozĂł vilĂĄgban 1197:in 1283. Before his death, 992:His ecclesiastical lordship 10: 2700: 2300:. I.B. Tauris Publishers. 2238: 2587: 2578: 2561: 2551: 2542: 2536: 2529: 2519: 2512: 2504: 2499: 244:consanguineorum nostrorum 242:as his blood relatives (" 133: 123: 111: 100: 95: 85: 75: 65: 57: 49: 37: 30: 23: 2669:Archbishops of Esztergom 2475:Zsoldos, Attila (2011). 2361:Eötvös LorĂĄnd University 1004:' Virgin Mary Church in 978:2nd district of Budapest 333:Early career and studies 204:, and was a relative of 2581:Archbishop of Esztergom 2315:Gerics, JĂłzsef (1987). 781:Charles-Victor Langlois 606:Archbishop of Esztergom 451:last will and testament 350:place of authentication 268:Egidius, son of Gregory 170:Ladislaus IV of Hungary 32:Archbishop of Esztergom 2531:Catholic Church titles 1291: 1032: 948:with the voice of the 910: 831:theory of "two swords" 772: 689:Second Mongol invasion 625: 561:only centuries later. 479: 388: 314: 206:Rostislav Mikhailovich 153: 2267:Berend, Nora (2001). 1022: 900: 818:Ab Urbe Condita Libri 766: 622:Illuminated Chronicle 618: 598:Roman Curia sent his 570:Archbishop of Kalocsa 518:Ottokar II of Bohemia 475:Illuminated Chronicle 468: 384:Illuminated Chronicle 376: 368:University of Bologna 178:Andrew III of Hungary 115:2 January 1298 (aged 2433:SzƱcs, JenƑ (2002). 2357:Micae Mediaevales XI 1292:magister paniferorum 1284:Nobles of the Church 925:Bernhard of Prambach 849:Stephen I of Hungary 823:Bernard of Clairvaux 758:ZĂĄviĆĄ of Falkenstein 370:during that period. 264:Charles I of Hungary 2296:Engel, PĂĄl (2001). 2142:, pp. 227–228. 1177:with his confidant 1118:) from the sons of 907:Chronica Hungarorum 853:Andrew the Venetian 699:in September 1285. 611:Ladislaus' opponent 514:Rudolf I of Germany 472:as depicted in the 307:Podravska Moslavina 272:Gregory II MonoszlĂł 198:University of Padua 2500:Political offices 2435:Az utolsĂł ÁrpĂĄdok 2363:. pp. 53–66. 1224:bishop of VeszprĂ©m 1068:conditional nobles 1038:Esztergom Basilica 1033: 911: 785:Pietro della Vigna 773: 752:, prioress of the 672:Battle of Lake HĂłd 667:right of patronage 626: 480: 410:BĂ©la IV of Hungary 389: 184:Theories of origin 166:Kingdom of Hungary 2601: 2600: 2596: 2588:Succeeded by 2575: 2552:Succeeded by 2520:Succeeded by 2488:978-963-9627-38-3 2406:978-973-0-21419-2 2288:978-0-521-02720-5 2196:, pp. 60–62. 1495:, pp. 94–95. 1300:conditional noble 1203:John, son of Paul 1169:(today ChotĂ­n in 1114:(today Vyshkovo, 937:Peace of Hainburg 916:Holy Roman Empire 827:De consideratione 793:Pope Innocent III 643:John Hont-PĂĄzmĂĄny 583:Pope Nicholas III 143: 142: 2691: 2674:Bishops of VĂĄrad 2641: 2640: 2639: 2629: 2628: 2617: 2616: 2615: 2608: 2594: 2573: 2562:Preceded by 2549:1268–1279 2537:Preceded by 2505:Preceded by 2497: 2496: 2492: 2471: 2450: 2429: 2410: 2391: 2372: 2359:(in Hungarian). 2351: 2332: 2311: 2292: 2263: 2233: 2227: 2221: 2215: 2209: 2203: 2197: 2191: 2185: 2179: 2173: 2167: 2158: 2152: 2143: 2137: 2131: 2125: 2116: 2110: 2101: 2095: 2082: 2076: 2070: 2064: 2058: 2052: 2046: 2040: 2034: 2028: 2022: 2016: 2010: 2004: 1998: 1992: 1986: 1980: 1974: 1968: 1962: 1956: 1950: 1944: 1938: 1932: 1921: 1915: 1909: 1903: 1897: 1891: 1885: 1879: 1873: 1867: 1856: 1850: 1844: 1838: 1832: 1826: 1820: 1814: 1808: 1802: 1791: 1785: 1779: 1773: 1764: 1758: 1752: 1746: 1735: 1729: 1718: 1712: 1706: 1700: 1694: 1688: 1673: 1667: 1661: 1655: 1646: 1640: 1634: 1628: 1619: 1613: 1592: 1586: 1580: 1574: 1568: 1562: 1556: 1550: 1544: 1538: 1532: 1526: 1520: 1514: 1508: 1502: 1496: 1490: 1484: 1478: 1469: 1463: 1457: 1451: 1445: 1439: 1433: 1427: 1418: 1412: 1406: 1400: 1381: 1375: 1369: 1363: 1357: 1351: 1340: 1334: 1255:, Slovakia) for 1136:Esztergom County 1104:Matthew III CsĂĄk 933:Bishop of Seckau 929:Bishop of Passau 904:depicted in the 829:, regarding the 777:Pope Nicholas IV 725:Pope Honorius IV 522:Nicholas Geregye 159: 118: 106: 96:Personal details 42: 21: 20: 2699: 2698: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2649: 2648: 2647: 2637: 2635: 2623: 2613: 2611: 2603: 2597: 2593: 2591:Gregory Bicskei 2584: 2576: 2572: 2568: 2557: 2548: 2545:Bishop of VĂĄrad 2540: 2525: 2516: 2510: 2495: 2489: 2468: 2447: 2426: 2407: 2388: 2348: 2329: 2308: 2289: 2260: 2241: 2236: 2228: 2224: 2216: 2212: 2204: 2200: 2192: 2188: 2180: 2176: 2168: 2161: 2153: 2146: 2138: 2134: 2126: 2119: 2111: 2104: 2096: 2085: 2077: 2073: 2065: 2061: 2053: 2049: 2041: 2037: 2029: 2025: 2017: 2013: 2005: 2001: 1993: 1989: 1981: 1977: 1969: 1965: 1957: 1953: 1945: 1941: 1933: 1924: 1916: 1912: 1904: 1900: 1892: 1888: 1880: 1876: 1868: 1859: 1851: 1847: 1839: 1835: 1827: 1823: 1815: 1811: 1803: 1794: 1786: 1782: 1774: 1767: 1759: 1755: 1747: 1738: 1730: 1721: 1713: 1709: 1701: 1697: 1689: 1676: 1668: 1664: 1656: 1649: 1641: 1637: 1629: 1622: 1614: 1595: 1587: 1583: 1575: 1571: 1563: 1559: 1551: 1547: 1539: 1535: 1527: 1523: 1515: 1511: 1503: 1499: 1491: 1487: 1479: 1472: 1464: 1460: 1452: 1448: 1440: 1436: 1428: 1421: 1413: 1409: 1401: 1384: 1376: 1372: 1364: 1360: 1352: 1343: 1335: 1320: 1316: 1216:Margaret Island 1199:Matthew II CsĂĄk 1120:James Cseszneki 1042:castle warriors 994: 986:Gregory Bicskei 869: 729:Rabbits' Island 613: 608: 591:Bishop of Fermo 546:Pope Innocent V 524:'s fortress at 443:Pope Clement IV 439: 437:Bishop of VĂĄrad 425:1260s civil war 335: 319:VeszprĂ©m County 291:Maurice VĂĄzsony 236:(clan) MonoszlĂł 186: 90:Bishop of VĂĄrad 80:Gregory Bicskei 45: 26: 17: 12: 11: 5: 2697: 2687: 2686: 2681: 2676: 2671: 2666: 2661: 2646: 2645: 2633: 2621: 2599: 2598: 2589: 2586: 2577: 2563: 2559: 2558: 2553: 2550: 2541: 2538: 2534: 2533: 2527: 2526: 2523:Peter MonoszlĂł 2521: 2518: 2511: 2506: 2502: 2501: 2494: 2493: 2487: 2472: 2466: 2451: 2445: 2430: 2424: 2411: 2405: 2392: 2386: 2373: 2352: 2346: 2333: 2327: 2312: 2306: 2293: 2287: 2264: 2258: 2242: 2240: 2237: 2235: 2234: 2232:, p. 247. 2222: 2220:, p. 243. 2210: 2208:, p. 239. 2198: 2186: 2184:, p. 233. 2174: 2172:, p. 230. 2159: 2144: 2132: 2117: 2102: 2100:, p. 131. 2083: 2081:, p. 304. 2071: 2059: 2057:, p. 456. 2047: 2045:, p. 183. 2035: 2033:, p. 180. 2023: 2021:, p. 177. 2011: 2009:, p. 247. 1999: 1997:, p. 454. 1987: 1985:, p. 246. 1975: 1973:, p. 286. 1963: 1961:, p. 449. 1951: 1949:, p. 283. 1939: 1937:, p. 130. 1922: 1920:, p. 149. 1910: 1908:, p. 447. 1898: 1896:, p. 110. 1886: 1884:, p. 131. 1874: 1857: 1855:, p. 442. 1845: 1843:, p. 142. 1833: 1831:, p. 244. 1821: 1819:, p. 141. 1809: 1807:, p. 176. 1792: 1790:, p. 132. 1780: 1778:, p. 439. 1765: 1763:, p. 437. 1753: 1751:, p. 129. 1736: 1734:, p. 174. 1719: 1717:, p. 436. 1707: 1705:, p. 432. 1695: 1674: 1672:, p. 171. 1662: 1660:, p. 431. 1647: 1645:, p. 243. 1635: 1620: 1618:, p. 109. 1593: 1591:, p. 416. 1581: 1579:, p. 108. 1569: 1567:, p. 408. 1557: 1545: 1533: 1531:, p. 169. 1521: 1519:, p. 120. 1509: 1497: 1485: 1470: 1458: 1456:, p. 242. 1446: 1444:, p. 323. 1434: 1419: 1417:, p. 322. 1407: 1405:, p. 128. 1382: 1370: 1358: 1356:, p. 132. 1341: 1317: 1315: 1312: 1296:castle warrior 1175:KomĂĄrom County 1051:Pozsony County 993: 990: 957:Charles Martel 878:SzĂ©kesfehĂ©rvĂĄr 868: 865: 663:Pope Martin IV 647:excommunicated 612: 609: 607: 604: 566:Stephen BĂĄncsa 489:KomĂĄrom County 438: 435: 334: 331: 185: 182: 141: 140: 138:Roman Catholic 135: 131: 130: 125: 121: 120: 113: 109: 108: 102: 98: 97: 93: 92: 87: 83: 82: 77: 73: 72: 67: 63: 62: 61:2 January 1298 59: 55: 54: 51: 47: 46: 43: 35: 34: 28: 27: 24: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2696: 2685: 2682: 2680: 2677: 2675: 2672: 2670: 2667: 2665: 2662: 2660: 2657: 2656: 2654: 2644: 2634: 2632: 2627: 2622: 2620: 2610: 2609: 2606: 2592: 2583: 2582: 2571: 2570:Peter KƑszegi 2566: 2560: 2556: 2547: 2546: 2535: 2532: 2528: 2524: 2515: 2509: 2503: 2498: 2490: 2484: 2480: 2478: 2473: 2469: 2467:963-09-4461-8 2463: 2459: 2457: 2452: 2448: 2446:963-389-271-6 2442: 2438: 2436: 2431: 2427: 2421: 2417: 2412: 2408: 2402: 2398: 2393: 2389: 2387:963-482-500-1 2383: 2379: 2374: 2370: 2366: 2362: 2358: 2353: 2349: 2347:963-09-4499-5 2343: 2339: 2334: 2330: 2328:963-05-4218-8 2324: 2320: 2318: 2313: 2309: 2307:1-86064-061-3 2303: 2299: 2294: 2290: 2284: 2280: 2277: 2273: 2269: 2265: 2261: 2259:963-361-472-4 2255: 2251: 2249: 2244: 2243: 2231: 2226: 2219: 2214: 2207: 2202: 2195: 2190: 2183: 2178: 2171: 2166: 2164: 2157:, p. 59. 2156: 2151: 2149: 2141: 2136: 2130:, p. 63. 2129: 2124: 2122: 2115:, p. 62. 2114: 2109: 2107: 2099: 2094: 2092: 2090: 2088: 2080: 2075: 2069:, p. 19. 2068: 2067:Homonnai 2003 2063: 2056: 2051: 2044: 2039: 2032: 2027: 2020: 2015: 2008: 2003: 1996: 1991: 1984: 1979: 1972: 1967: 1960: 1955: 1948: 1943: 1936: 1931: 1929: 1927: 1919: 1914: 1907: 1902: 1895: 1890: 1883: 1878: 1872:, p. 18. 1871: 1870:Homonnai 2003 1866: 1864: 1862: 1854: 1849: 1842: 1837: 1830: 1825: 1818: 1813: 1806: 1801: 1799: 1797: 1789: 1784: 1777: 1772: 1770: 1762: 1757: 1750: 1745: 1743: 1741: 1733: 1728: 1726: 1724: 1716: 1711: 1704: 1699: 1693:, p. 17. 1692: 1691:Homonnai 2003 1687: 1685: 1683: 1681: 1679: 1671: 1666: 1659: 1654: 1652: 1644: 1639: 1633:, p. 82. 1632: 1627: 1625: 1617: 1612: 1610: 1608: 1606: 1604: 1602: 1600: 1598: 1590: 1585: 1578: 1573: 1566: 1561: 1555:, p. 99. 1554: 1549: 1543:, p. 97. 1542: 1541:Körmendi 2016 1537: 1530: 1525: 1518: 1513: 1507:, p. 95. 1506: 1505:Körmendi 2016 1501: 1494: 1493:Körmendi 2016 1489: 1483:, p. 90. 1482: 1481:Körmendi 2016 1477: 1475: 1468:, p. 96. 1467: 1466:Körmendi 2016 1462: 1455: 1450: 1443: 1438: 1432:, p. 87. 1431: 1430:Körmendi 2016 1426: 1424: 1416: 1411: 1404: 1399: 1397: 1395: 1393: 1391: 1389: 1387: 1380:, p. 85. 1379: 1378:Körmendi 2016 1374: 1368:, p. 84. 1367: 1366:Körmendi 2016 1362: 1355: 1350: 1348: 1346: 1339:, p. 16. 1338: 1337:Homonnai 2003 1333: 1331: 1329: 1327: 1325: 1323: 1318: 1311: 1309: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1281: 1276: 1274: 1273:Dominic RĂĄtĂłt 1270: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1250: 1246: 1241: 1240:Somogy County 1237: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1217: 1213: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1195:OrbĂĄsz BĂĄncsa 1192: 1188: 1184: 1180: 1176: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1159: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1138:in 1292 from 1137: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1124:NĂłgrĂĄd County 1121: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1105: 1100: 1097: 1093: 1090:has not paid 1089: 1083: 1081: 1077: 1073: 1069: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1030: 1026: 1021: 1017: 1016:around 1297. 1015: 1011: 1007: 1003: 999: 998:Szepes Castle 989: 987: 983: 979: 974: 972: 971: 966: 962: 958: 953: 951: 946: 942: 938: 934: 931:and Leopold, 930: 926: 920: 917: 909: 908: 903: 899: 895: 893: 892:Upper Hungary 889: 888:Queen Fenenna 884: 879: 874: 867:Andrew's ally 864: 862: 858: 854: 850: 846: 842: 841: 834: 832: 828: 824: 820: 819: 814: 810: 806: 802: 798: 794: 790: 786: 782: 778: 770: 765: 761: 759: 755: 751: 747: 743: 739: 734: 730: 726: 721: 717: 713: 709: 705: 700: 698: 694: 690: 686: 681: 677: 673: 668: 664: 658: 656: 652: 648: 644: 640: 635: 631: 624: 623: 617: 603: 601: 596: 592: 588: 584: 580: 579:Peter KƑszegi 576: 571: 567: 562: 559: 555: 551: 547: 542: 539: 535: 531: 527: 523: 519: 515: 511: 507: 503: 499: 495: 490: 486: 477: 476: 471: 467: 463: 461: 460:St. Ladislaus 456: 452: 448: 444: 434: 431: 426: 422: 418: 413: 411: 406: 402: 398: 394: 386: 385: 380: 375: 371: 369: 365: 361: 356: 351: 347: 342: 341: 330: 328: 324: 320: 316: 312: 308: 304: 300: 299:consanguineus 296: 292: 286: 284: 280: 278: 273: 269: 265: 262:"). In 1317, 261: 257: 253: 249: 245: 241: 237: 235: 230: 225: 223: 222:John Kanizsai 219: 215: 211: 207: 203: 199: 195: 191: 181: 179: 175: 171: 167: 163: 155: 151: 147: 139: 136: 132: 129: 126: 122: 114: 110: 103: 99: 94: 91: 88: 86:Other post(s) 84: 81: 78: 74: 71: 68: 64: 60: 56: 52: 48: 41: 36: 33: 29: 22: 19: 2659:1230s births 2579: 2565:Nicholas KĂĄn 2543: 2513: 2479: 2476: 2458: 2455: 2437: 2434: 2425:963-7631-453 2415: 2396: 2377: 2356: 2337: 2319: 2316: 2297: 2279: 2275: 2271: 2268: 2250: 2247: 2225: 2213: 2201: 2194:Hunyadi 2023 2189: 2177: 2155:Hunyadi 2023 2135: 2128:Hunyadi 2023 2113:Hunyadi 2023 2074: 2062: 2050: 2043:Zsoldos 2003 2038: 2031:Zsoldos 2003 2026: 2019:Zsoldos 2003 2014: 2002: 1990: 1978: 1966: 1954: 1942: 1918:Zsoldos 2003 1913: 1901: 1889: 1882:Zsoldos 2003 1877: 1848: 1836: 1824: 1812: 1788:Zsoldos 2003 1783: 1756: 1710: 1698: 1665: 1638: 1631:Zsoldos 2011 1584: 1572: 1560: 1553:Zsoldos 2011 1548: 1536: 1524: 1517:Zsoldos 2011 1512: 1500: 1488: 1461: 1449: 1442:Zsoldos 2011 1437: 1415:Zsoldos 2011 1410: 1373: 1361: 1303: 1279: 1277: 1269:Gömör County 1236:Tolna County 1220:Benedict RĂĄd 1207:ban of MacsĂł 1160: 1128:Hont-PĂĄzmĂĄny 1099:Szentgyörgyi 1084: 1075: 1072:RozsnyĂłbĂĄnya 1034: 995: 981: 975: 968: 961:Ivan KƑszegi 954: 944: 921: 912: 905: 870: 838: 835: 826: 816: 774: 704:Transdanubia 701: 692: 675: 659: 627: 620: 595:papal legate 575:Nicholas KĂĄn 563: 554:Philip TĂŒrje 543: 498:Bihar County 481: 473: 470:Ladislaus IV 454: 440: 414: 404: 396: 392: 390: 382: 354: 338: 336: 298: 287: 276: 259: 243: 233: 228: 226: 187: 145: 144: 134:Denomination 70:Nicholas KĂĄn 53:13 June 1279 18: 2664:1298 deaths 2631:Catholicism 2079:Gerics 1987 2007:Gerics 1987 1983:Gerics 1987 1971:Gerics 1987 1947:Gerics 1987 1841:SzovĂĄk 1991 1829:Gerics 1987 1817:SzovĂĄk 1991 1805:Berend 2001 1732:Berend 2001 1670:Berend 2001 1643:Gerics 1987 1218:. In 1295, 1191:Bars County 1148:Hont County 1002:Franciscans 857:Duke Albert 845:Augustinian 676:congregatio 401:Roman Curia 397:universitas 252:Zala County 202:Kievan Rus' 124:Nationality 66:Predecessor 2653:Categories 2517:1264–1266 2055:SzƱcs 2002 1995:SzƱcs 2002 1959:SzƱcs 2002 1906:SzƱcs 2002 1894:Engel 2001 1853:SzƱcs 2002 1776:SzƱcs 2002 1761:SzƱcs 2002 1715:SzƱcs 2002 1703:SzƱcs 2002 1658:SzƱcs 2002 1616:Engel 2001 1589:SzƱcs 2002 1577:Engel 2001 1565:SzƱcs 2002 1529:SzƱcs 2002 1314:References 1257:Tardoskedd 1253:Bratislava 1179:MikĂł SzĂ©cs 1108:NovĂ© ZĂĄmky 1096:the clan's 1046:Regensburg 902:Andrew III 873:Williamite 742:suffragans 708:familiares 430:JenƑ SzƱcs 381:(from the 321:, near to 58:Term ended 2619:Biography 2595:(elected) 2574:(elected) 2369:2062-2198 2098:Beke 2003 1935:Beke 2003 1749:Beke 2003 1403:Beke 2003 1354:Beke 2003 1205:, former 1088:Esztergom 1055:KameničnĂĄ 1006:Pressburg 970:banderium 950:Holy Writ 861:Körösszeg 797:decretals 769:Körösszeg 754:Dominican 750:Elizabeth 738:Beszterce 733:Esztergom 712:self-coup 697:SzepessĂ©g 651:interdict 485:Elizabeth 364:Roman law 360:canon law 327:Mencshely 311:Hungarian 295:Esztergom 218:Lodomeria 150:Hungarian 128:Hungarian 76:Successor 50:Installed 2508:Benedict 2230:Kis 2000 2218:Kis 2000 2206:Kis 2000 2182:Kis 2000 2170:Kis 2000 2140:Kis 2000 1454:Kis 2000 1304:familial 1265:Velkenye 1171:Slovakia 1140:Apor PĂ©c 1025:Vyshkovo 965:Angevins 941:KöpcsĂ©ny 685:Isabella 655:Holy See 630:KƑszegis 558:miracles 550:Margaret 538:Gutkeled 516:against 421:Benedict 393:missilis 355:magister 315:MonoszlĂł 256:VeszprĂ©m 240:MonoszlĂł 214:Vladimir 210:Rurikids 208:and the 2643:Hungary 2605:Portals 2539:Zosimus 2239:Sources 1308:Pozsony 1280:familia 1261:PĂŒspöki 1232:Budafok 1228:Kocsola 1132:Vadkert 1116:Ukraine 1059:NaszĂĄly 1029:Ukraine 746:Proteus 693:nyögĂ©rs 600:pallium 526:AdorjĂĄn 494:Geregye 447:Zosimus 417:Stephen 379:BĂ©la IV 366:at the 323:VĂĄzsony 164:in the 162:prelate 154:LodomĂ©r 146:Lodomer 25:Lodomer 2555:Thomas 2485:  2464:  2443:  2422:  2403:  2384:  2367:  2344:  2325:  2304:  2285:  2256:  1249:PrĂĄcsa 1245:SurĂĄny 1222:, the 1187:Farnad 1183:Hatvan 1167:HetĂ©ny 1163:Nyitra 1156:KĂ©mĂ©nd 1144:RĂĄtĂłts 1092:tithes 1076:urbura 945:arenga 805:Horace 680:Szeged 634:TĂ©tĂ©ny 587:Philip 510:Vienna 455:hospes 340:cantor 303:ÁrpĂĄds 283:Thomas 279:Atyusz 194:Thomas 174:Cumans 2567:& 1288:Latin 1080:Mocsa 1010:Titel 883:Óbuda 801:viper 789:Bible 716:Borsa 678:near 534:Cenad 532:near 530:Tisza 405:comes 260:nepos 248:Henye 2483:ISBN 2462:ISBN 2441:ISBN 2420:ISBN 2401:ISBN 2382:ISBN 2365:ISSN 2342:ISBN 2323:ISBN 2302:ISBN 2283:ISBN 2278:1300 2274:1000 2254:ISBN 1263:and 1212:BĂșcs 1154:and 1152:BĂ©ny 1112:Visk 1063:Guta 813:Livy 811:and 809:Ovid 639:Buda 577:and 506:Pest 502:CsĂĄk 362:and 325:and 277:gens 234:gens 112:Died 107:1235 101:Born 2276:-c. 2272:c. 952:". 890:in 825:'s 815:'s 795:'s 720:Aba 250:in 119:63) 2655:: 2162:^ 2147:^ 2120:^ 2105:^ 2086:^ 1925:^ 1860:^ 1795:^ 1768:^ 1739:^ 1722:^ 1677:^ 1650:^ 1623:^ 1596:^ 1473:^ 1422:^ 1385:^ 1344:^ 1321:^ 1290:: 1027:, 927:, 807:, 589:, 568:, 329:. 313:: 224:. 158:c. 156:; 152:: 117:c. 105:c. 2607:: 2491:. 2470:. 2449:. 2428:. 2409:. 2390:. 2371:. 2350:. 2331:. 2310:. 2291:. 2262:. 1031:) 387:) 309:( 148:(

Index

Archbishop of Esztergom

Nicholas KĂĄn
Gregory Bicskei
Bishop of VĂĄrad
Hungarian
Roman Catholic
Hungarian
prelate
Kingdom of Hungary
Ladislaus IV of Hungary
Cumans
Andrew III of Hungary
First Mongol invasion of Hungary
Thomas
University of Padua
Kievan Rus'
Rostislav Mikhailovich
Rurikids
Vladimir
Lodomeria
John Kanizsai
gens (clan) MonoszlĂł
MonoszlĂł
Henye
Zala County
Veszprém
Charles I of Hungary
Egidius, son of Gregory
Gregory II MonoszlĂł

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑