4494:(1952). This case centered on a program by the state of New York which allowed children to leave school during school hours to receive religious instruction outside the school. In upholding the New York program Justice Douglas stated: "We are a religious people whose institutions presuppose a Supreme Being. We guarantee the freedom to worship as one chooses. We make room for as wide a variety of beliefs and creeds as the spiritual needs of man deem necessary. We sponsor an attitude on the part of government that shows no partiality to any one group and that lets each flourish according to the zeal of its adherents and the appeal of its dogma. When the state encourages religious instruction or cooperates with religious authorities by adjusting the schedule of public events to sectarian needs, it follows the best of our traditions. For it then respects the religious nature of our people and accommodates the public service to their spiritual needs. To hold that it may not would be to find in the Constitution a requirement that the government show a callous indifference to religious groups. That would be preferring those who believe in no religion over those who do believe. Government may not finance religious groups nor undertake religious instruction nor blend secular and sectarian education nor use secular institutions to force one or some religion on any person. But we find no constitutional requirement which makes it necessary for government to be hostile to religion and to throw its weight against efforts to widen the effective scope of religious influence. The government must be neutral when it comes to competition between sects. It may not thrust any sect on any person. It may not make a religious observance compulsory. It may not coerce anyone to attend church, to observe a religious holiday, or to take religious instruction. But it can close its doors or suspend its operations as to those who want to repair to their religious sanctuary for worship or instruction."
4160:(1972), the Supreme Court said the right to petition encompasses "the approach of citizens or groups of them to administrative agencies (which are both creatures of the legislature, and arms of the executive) and to courts, the third branch of Government. Certainly the right to petition extends to all departments of the Government. The right of access to the courts is indeed but one aspect of the right of petition." Today, thus, this right encompasses petitions to all three branches of the federal government—the Congress, the executive and the judiciary—and has been extended to the states through incorporation. According to the Supreme Court, "redress of grievances" is to be construed broadly: it includes not solely appeals by the public to the government for the redressing of a grievance in the traditional sense, but also, petitions on behalf of private interests seeking personal gain. The right protects not only demands for "a redress of grievances" but also demands for government action. The petition clause includes according to the Supreme Court the opportunity to institute non-frivolous lawsuits and mobilize popular support to change existing laws in a peaceful manner.
1165:
2025:, which it failed to have, and so was declared unconstitutional. In this case the Supreme Court also stated that inquiries whether laws discriminate based on religion does not end with the text of the laws at issue. Facial neutrality of laws (i.e. laws which are apparently neutral in their language but in reality discriminate against a particular group) is not determinative in these inquiries, because both the Free Exercise Clause and the Establishment Clause extends beyond facial discrimination. The Supreme Court explained that "fficial action that targets religious conduct for distinctive treatment cannot be shielded by mere compliance with the requirement of facial neutrality" and "he Free Exercise Clause protects against governmental hostility which is masked as well as overt." The neutrality of a law is also suspect if First Amendment freedoms are curtailed to prevent isolated collateral harms not themselves prohibited by direct regulation. The Court also observed: "The Free Exercise Clause "protect religious observers against unequal treatment,"
1379:(1952) the Supreme Court further observed: "Government may not finance religious groups nor undertake religious instruction nor blend secular and sectarian education nor use secular institutions to force one or some religion on any person. But we find no constitutional requirement which makes it necessary for government to be hostile to religion and to throw its weight against efforts to widen the effective scope of religious influence. The government must be neutral when it comes to competition between sects. It may not thrust any sect on any person. It may not make a religious observance compulsory. It may not coerce anyone to attend church, to observe a religious holiday, or to take religious instruction. But it can close its doors or suspend its operations as to those who want to repair to their religious sanctuary for worship or instruction." In
1779:. The Court stated that to rule otherwise, "would be to make the professed doctrines of religious belief superior to the law of the land, and in effect permit every citizen to become a law unto himself. Government would exist only in name under such circumstances." If the purpose or effect of a law is to impede the observance of one or all religions, or is to discriminate invidiously between religions, that law is constitutionally invalid even though the burden may be characterized as being only indirect. But if the State regulates conduct by enacting a general law within its power, the purpose and effect of which is to advance the State's secular goals, the statute is valid despite its indirect burden on religious observance unless the State may accomplish its purpose by means which do not impose such a burden.
1675:
5374:
Association of
Connecticut in 1802. Many think this means a radical separation of religion and politics. Some have gone so far as to suggest that religion should be entirely personal and private, kept out of public life and institutions like public schools. That is incorrect: Jefferson wanted to protect states' freedom of religion from federal government control and religious groups' freedom to tend to their internal matters of faith and practice without government interference generally. Unfortunately, Jefferson's phrase is probably more widely known than the actual text of the Constitution's First Amendment: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."
3696:
3438:
2810:
First
Amendment prohibits "any law abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press ... It must be taken as a command of the broadest scope that explicit language, read in the context of a liberty-loving society, will allow. The assumption that respect for the judiciary can be won by shielding judges from published criticism wrongly appraises the character of American public opinion. For it is a prized American privilege to speak one's mind, although not always with perfect good taste, on all public institutions. And an enforced silence, however limited, solely in the name of preserving the dignity of the bench would probably engender resentment, suspicion, and contempt much more than it would enhance respect."
4439:
Amendment. The First
Amendment declares that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. The Fourteenth Amendment has rendered the legislatures of the states as incompetent as Congress to enact such laws. The constitutional inhibition of legislation on the subject of religion has a double aspect. On the one hand, it forestalls compulsion by law of the acceptance of any creed or the practice of any form of worship. Freedom of conscience and freedom to adhere to such religious organization or form of worship as the individual may choose cannot be restricted by law. On the other hand, it safeguards the free exercise of the chosen form of religion."
4507:: "The course of constitutionality neutrality in this area cannot be an absolutely straight line; rigidity could well defeat the basic purpose of these provisions, which is to insure that no religion be sponsored or favored, none commanded, and none inhibited. The general principle deducible from the First Amendment and all that has been said by the Court is this: that we will not tolerate either governmentally established religion or governmental interference with religion. Short of those expressly proscribed governmental acts there is room for play in the joints productive of a benevolent neutrality which will permit religious exercise to exist without sponsorship and without interference."
9008:, 310 U.S. 296 (1940): "When clear and present danger of riot, disorder, interference with traffic upon the public streets, or other immediate threat to public safety, peace, or order appears, the power of the State to prevent or punish is obvious ... we think that, in the absence of a statute narrowly drawn to define and punish specific conduct as constituting a clear and present danger to a substantial interest of the State, the petitioner's communication, considered in the light of the constitutional guarantees, raised no such clear and present menace to public peace and order as to render him liable to conviction of the common law offense in question."
2244:"But, above all else, the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message, its ideas, its subject matter, or its content. ... To permit the continued building of our politics and culture, and to assure self-fulfillment for each individual, our people are guaranteed the right to express any thought, free from government censorship. The essence of this forbidden censorship is content control. Any restriction on expressive activity because of its content would completely undercut the "profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open.""
1358:(1968) the Supreme Court outlined the broad principle of denominational neutrality mandated by the First Amendment: "Government in our democracy, state and national, must be neutral in matters of religious theory, doctrine, and practice. It may not be hostile to any religion or to the advocacy of no-religion, and it may not aid, foster, or promote one religion or religious theory against another or even against the militant opposite. The First Amendment mandates governmental neutrality between religion and religion, and between religion and nonreligion." The clearest command of the Establishment Clause is, according to the Supreme Court in
3926:, they are protected equally by the Free Speech Clause and the Free Press Clause, because both clauses do not distinguish between media businesses and nonprofessional speakers. This is further shown by the Supreme Court consistently refusing to recognize the First Amendment as providing greater protection to the institutional media than to other speakers. For example, in a case involving campaign finance laws the Court rejected the "suggestion that communication by corporate members of the institutional press is entitled to greater constitutional protection than the same communication by" non-institutional-press businesses. Justice
3450:
pornography, except for child pornography, is in practice free of governmental restrictions in the United States, though pornography about "extreme" sexual practices is occasionally prosecuted. The change in the twentieth century, from total prohibition in 1900 to near-total tolerance in 2000, reflects a series of court cases involving the definition of obscenity. The U.S. Supreme Court has found that most pornography is not obscene, a result of changing definitions of both obscenity and pornography. The legal tolerance also reflects changed social attitudes: one reason there are so few prosecutions for pornography is that
2861:
4177:... Both speech and petition are integral to the democratic process, although not necessarily in the same way. The right to petition allows citizens to express their ideas, hopes, and concerns to their government and their elected representatives, whereas the right to speak fosters the public exchange of ideas that is integral to deliberative democracy as well as to the whole realm of ideas and human affairs. Beyond the political sphere, both speech and petition advance personal expression, although the right to petition is generally concerned with expression directed to the government seeking redress of a grievance.
1160:... religious freedom is defined; and after a recital 'that to suffer the civil magistrate to intrude his powers into the field of opinion, and to restrain the profession or propagation of principles on supposition of their ill tendency, is a dangerous fallacy which at once destroys all religious liberty,' it is declared 'that it is time enough for the rightful purposes of civil government for its officers to interfere when principles break out into overt acts against peace and good order.' In these two sentences is found the true distinction between what properly belongs to the church and what to the State.
809:
3975:(pre-publication censorship). In this case, the Minnesota legislature passed a statute allowing courts to shut down "malicious, scandalous and defamatory newspapers", allowing a defense of truth only in cases where the truth had been told "with good motives and for justifiable ends". The Court applied the Free Press Clause to the states, rejecting the statute as unconstitutional. Hughes quoted Madison in the majority decision, writing, "The impairment of the fundamental security of life and property by criminal alliances and official neglect emphasizes the primary need of a vigilant and courageous press."
1431:
62:
1987:
6489:: "The 'establishment of religion' clause of the First Amendment means at least this: neither a state nor a Federal government can set up a church. Neither can pass laws which aid one religion, aid all religions or prefer one religion over another." The establishment clause, conservatives insist, precludes the national state from promoting any religious denomination but does not prohibit state governments and local communities from developing policies that encourage general religious beliefs that do not favor a particular sect and are consistent with the secular government's goals.
1218:, 374 U. S. 203, 374 U. S. 222 (1963)." The Establishment Clause acts as a double security, for its aim is as well the prevention of religious control over government as the prevention of political control over religion. The First Amendment's framers knew that intertwining government with religion could lead to bloodshed or oppression, because this happened too often historically. To prevent this dangerous development they set up the Establishment Clause as a line of demarcation between the functions and operations of the institutions of religion and government in society. The
588:'s correspondence to call for "a wall of separation between church and State", a literary but clarifying metaphor for the separation of religions from government and vice versa as well as the free exercise of religious beliefs that many Founders favored. Through decades of contentious litigation, the precise boundaries of the mandated separation have been adjudicated in ways that periodically created controversy. Speech rights were expanded significantly in a series of 20th and 21st century court decisions which protected various forms of political speech, anonymous speech,
2407:
949:, 330 U. S. 1, 330 U. S. 16, that it would be an "establishment" of a religion if the Government financed one church or several churches. For what better way to "establish" an institution than to find the fund that will support it? The "establishment" clause protects citizens also against any law which selects any religious custom, practice, or ritual, puts the force of government behind it, and fines, imprisons, or otherwise penalizes a person for not observing it. The Government plainly could not join forces with one religious group and decree a universal and symbolic
1867:(1961), the freedom to hold religious beliefs and opinions is absolute. Federal or state legislation cannot therefore make it a crime to hold any religious belief or opinion due to the Free Exercise Clause. Legislation by the United States or any constituent state of the United States which forces anyone to embrace any religious belief or to say or believe anything in conflict with his religious tenets is also barred by the Free Exercise Clause. Against this background, the Supreme Court stated that Free Exercise Clause broadly protects religious beliefs and opinions:
3957:, 303 U. S. 444, to play an important role in the discussion of public affairs. Thus, the press serves and was designed to serve as a powerful antidote to any abuses of power by governmental officials, and as a constitutionally chosen means for keeping officials elected by the people responsible to all the people whom they were selected to serve. Suppression of the right of the press to praise or criticize governmental agents and to clamor and contend for or against change, which is all that this editorial did, muzzles one of the very agencies the Framers of our
2095:(1982) the Court declared: "Congress and the courts have been sensitive to the needs flowing from the Free Exercise Clause, but every person cannot be shielded from all the burdens incident to exercising every aspect of the right to practice religious beliefs. When followers of a particular sect enter into commercial activity as a matter of choice, the limits they accept on their own conduct as a matter of conscience and faith are not to be superimposed on the statutory schemes which are binding on others in that activity." The Supreme Court in
2625:(1949) where the Supreme Court noted that the vitality of civil and political institutions in society depends on free discussion. Democracy requires free speech because it is only through free debate and free exchange of ideas that government remains responsive to the will of the people and peaceful change is effected. Restrictions on free speech are only permissible when the speech at issue is likely to produce a clear and present danger of a serious substantive evil that rises far above public inconvenience, annoyance, or unrest. Justice
2115:(2014) the Supreme Court had to decide, with a view to the First Amendment's Free Exercise Clause and the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act, "the profound cultural question of whether a private, profit-making business organized as a corporation can "exercise" religion and, if it can, how far that is protected from government interference." The Court decided that closely held, for-profit corporations have free exercise rights under the RFRA, but its decision was not based on the constitutional protections of the First Amendment.
1593:, the Court stated that the separation of church and state could never be absolute: "Our prior holdings do not call for total separation between church and state; total separation is not possible in an absolute sense. Some relationship between government and religious organizations is inevitable", the court wrote. "Judicial caveats against entanglement must recognize that the line of separation, far from being a 'wall', is a blurred, indistinct, and variable barrier depending on all the circumstances of a particular relationship."
3879:. In that case, the Court unanimously ruled that while the First Amendment may allow private property owners to prohibit trespass by political speakers and petition-gatherers, California was permitted to restrict property owners whose property is equivalent to a traditional public forum (often shopping malls and grocery stores) from enforcing their private property rights to exclude such individuals. However, the Court did maintain that shopping centers could impose "reasonable restrictions on expressive activity". Subsequently,
3939:
1086:
2033:
3794:. Justice Brennan suggested that public officials may sue for libel only if the statements in question were published with "actual malice"—"knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not". In sum, the court held that "the First Amendment protects the publication of all statements, even false ones, about the conduct of public officials except when statements are made with actual malice (with knowledge that they are false or in reckless disregard of their truth or falsity)."
1690:
religion, or what might be called "free exercise equality." Free exercise is the liberty of persons to reach, hold, practice and change beliefs freely according to the dictates of conscience. The Free
Exercise Clause prohibits governmental interference with religious belief and, within limits, religious practice. "Freedom of religion means freedom to hold an opinion or belief, but not to take action in violation of social duties or subversive to good order." The clause withdraws from legislative power,
4125:
2180:
2595:... believed that freedom to think as you will and to speak as you think are means indispensable to the discovery and spread of political truth; that without free speech and assembly discussion would be futile; that with them, discussion affords ordinarily adequate protection against the dissemination of noxious doctrine; that the greatest menace to freedom is an inert people; that public discussion is a political duty; and that this should be a fundamental principle of the American government.
2029:, 480 U. S. 136, 148 (1987) (STEVENS, J., concurring in judgment), and inequality results when a legislature decides that the governmental interests it seeks to advance are worthy of being pursued only against conduct with a religious motivation. The principle that government, in pursuit of legitimate interests, cannot in a selective manner impose burdens only on conduct motivated by religious belief is essential to the protection of the rights guaranteed by the Free Exercise Clause."
427:
439:
4106:, in which he said a claim for press privilege "should be judged on its facts by the striking of a proper balance between freedom of the press and the obligation of all citizens to give relevant testimony with respect to criminal conduct. The balance of these vital constitutional and societal interests on a case-by-case basis accords with the tried and traditional way of adjudicating such questions," has been frequently cited by lower courts since the decision.
451:
3003:(1931), found that because the provision of the New York law criminalizing "words" against the flag was unconstitutional, and the trial did not sufficiently demonstrate he had been convicted solely under the provisions not yet deemed unconstitutional, the conviction was unconstitutional. The Court, however, "resist the pulls to decide the constitutional issues involved in this case on a broader basis" and left the constitutionality of flag-burning unaddressed.
1783:
4143:
its powers in furtherance of the interest and prosperity of the petitioners and of their views on politically contentious matters." The right to petition the government for a redress of grievances therefore includes the right to communicate with government officials, lobbying government officials and petitioning the courts by filing lawsuits with a legal basis. The
Petition Clause first came to prominence in the 1830s, when Congress established the
2062:(1997), the Court struck down the provisions of RFRA that forced state and local governments to provide protections exceeding those required by the First Amendment, on the grounds that while the Congress could enforce the Supreme Court's interpretation of a constitutional right, the Congress could not impose its own interpretation on states and localities. Congress can enact legislation to expand First Amendment free exercise rights through its
13658:
3979:
4041:(1974), the Court unanimously struck down a state law requiring newspapers criticizing political candidates to publish their responses. The state claimed the law had been passed to ensure journalistic responsibility. The Supreme Court found that freedom, but not responsibility, is mandated by the First Amendment and so it ruled that the government may not force newspapers to publish that which they do not desire to publish.
2518:, who had been convicted of aiding and abetting another in failing to register for the draft." Following his speech, Debs was charged and convicted under the Espionage Act. In upholding his conviction, the Court reasoned that although he had not spoken any words that posed a "clear and present danger", taken in context, the speech had a "natural tendency and a probable effect to obstruct the recruiting services". In
1660:(1984), the Supreme Court observed that the "concept of a "wall" of separation between church and state is a useful metaphor, but is not an accurate description of the practical aspects of the relationship that in fact exists. The Constitution does not require complete separation of church and state; it affirmatively mandates accommodation, not merely tolerance, of all religions, and forbids hostility toward any."
711:
9016:, 314 U.S. 252 (1941): "And, very recently we have also suggested that 'clear and present danger' is an appropriate guide in determining the constitutionality of restrictions upon expression ... What finally emerges from the 'clear and present danger' cases is a working principle that the substantive evil must be extremely serious, and the degree of imminence extremely high, before utterances can be punished."
4102:. The issue decided in the case was whether a journalist could refuse to "appear and testify before state and Federal grand juries" basing the refusal on the belief that such appearance and testimony "abridges the freedom of speech and press guaranteed by the First Amendment". The decision was that such a protection was not provided by the First Amendment. However, a concurring opinion by Justice
2543:
2192:
say as well as what not to say. The speech covered by the First
Amendment covers many ways of expression and therefore protects what people say as well as how they express themselves. Free press means the right of individuals to express themselves through publication and dissemination of information, ideas, and opinions without interference, constraint, or prosecution by the government. In
943:, 319 U. S. 641. Certainly the "free exercise" clause does not require that everyone embrace the theology of some church or of some faith, or observe the religious practices of any majority or minority sect. The First Amendment, by its "establishment" clause, prevents, of course, the selection by government of an "official" church. Yet the ban plainly extends farther than that. We said in
12864:
12754:
10495:
10447:
10257:
666:
3761:... necessary for the preservation of peace and good order, of government and religion, the only solid foundations of civil liberty" and the argument that the need for a free press guaranteed by the Constitution outweighed the fear of what might be written. Consequently, very few changes were made in the first two centuries after the ratification of the First Amendment.
1144:(1878) the Supreme Court used these words to declare that "it may be accepted almost as an authoritative declaration of the scope and effect of the amendment thus secured. Congress was deprived of all legislative power over mere opinion, but was left free to reach actions which were in violation of social duties or subversive of good order." Quoting from Jefferson's
2128:"was not presumptively unconstitutional, because the state was neither criminalizing nor penalizing the study of theology." The Court ruled therefore that a state has a "substantial state interest" in denying funding a scholarship when it was going to be used for education in theology and when that state's constitution forbids state aid to religious institutions. In
2089:(2020) that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act's express remedies provision permits litigants, when appropriate, to obtain money damages against federal officials in their individual capacities. This decision is significant "not only for the plaintiffs but also for cases involving violations of religious rights more broadly." In the 1982 U.S. Supreme Court case
4085:(1991), the Supreme Court found that states may treat different types of the media differently, such as by taxing cable television, but not newspapers. The Court found that "differential taxation of speakers, even members of the press, does not implicate the First Amendment unless the tax is directed at, or presents the danger of suppressing, particular ideas."
3065:(2012), the Supreme Court struck down the Act, ruling that the First Amendment bars the government from punishing people for making false claims regarding military service or honors where the false claim was not "made to effect a fraud or secure moneys or other valuable considerations". The Supreme Court could not agree on a single rationale for its decision.
2124:(2004), the Court stated, "iven the historic and substantial state interest at issue, it cannot be concluded that the denial of funding for vocational religious instruction alone is inherently constitutionally suspect", explaining that denying funding a scholarship when it was going to be used for education in theology and when that state's constitution
1625:(1970) with respect to the separation of church and state: "No perfect or absolute separation is really possible; the very existence of the Religion Clauses is an involvement of sorts—one that seeks to mark boundaries to avoid excessive entanglement." He also coined the term "benevolent neutrality" as a combination of neutrality and accommodationism in
3622:(1969), the Court ruled that "f the First Amendment means anything, it means that a State has no business telling a man, sitting in his own house, what books he may read or what films he may watch." However, it is constitutionally permissible for the government to prevent the mailing or sale of obscene items, though they may be viewed only in private.
2234:(1964), "debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open." The Court further explained that just as erroneous statements must be protected to give freedom of expression the breathing space it needs to survive, so statements criticizing public policy and the implementation of it must be similarly protected. The Supreme Court in
1398:. The Supreme Court in the same case made it also clear that state governments and the federal government are prohibited from passing laws or imposing requirements which aid all religions as against non-believers, as well as aiding those religions based on a belief in the existence of God as against those religions founded on different beliefs. In
1300:
2198:(1943), the Supreme Court stated that "Freedom of press, freedom of speech, freedom of religion are in a preferred position". The Court added that a community may not suppress, or the state tax, the dissemination of views because they are unpopular, annoying, or distasteful. That would be a complete repudiation of the philosophy of the
781:
to write, or to publish their sentiments; and the freedom of the press, as one of the great bulwarks of liberty, shall be inviolable. The people shall not be restrained from peaceably assembling and consulting for their common good; nor from applying to the
Legislature by petitions, or remonstrances, for redress of their grievances.
3309:(1969), the Supreme Court extended free speech rights to students in school. The case involved several students who were punished for wearing black armbands to protest the Vietnam War. The Court ruled that the school could not restrict symbolic speech that did not "materially and substantially" interrupt school activities. Justice
2762:(2017) the Supreme Court noted that "the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment" contains "a bedrock First Amendment principle: Speech may not be banned on the ground that it expresses ideas that offend." The Court ruled that the government cannot ban expression merely because it is offensive. In the majority opinion, Justice
3768:(1964) fundamentally changed American defamation law. The case redefined the type of "malice" needed to sustain a libel case. Common law malice consisted of "ill-will" or "wickedness". Now, a public officials seeking to sustain a civil action against a tortfeasor needed to prove by "clear and convincing evidence" that there was
4211:... is not as to the auspices under which the meeting is held but as to its purpose; not as to the relations of the speakers, but whether their utterances transcend the bounds of the freedom of speech which the Constitution protects." The right of peaceable assembly was originally distinguished from the right to petition. In
3591:"Community" standards—not national standards—are applied to determine whether allegedly obscene material appeals to the prurient interest and is patently offensive. By contrast, the question whether a work lacks serious value depends upon "whether a reasonable person would find such value in the material, taken as a whole."
6444:
concerned about the dangers of establishment and less concerned to protect free exercise rights, particularly of religious minorities. Liberals, by contrast, have been opposed to any possibility of a religious establishment and they have been relatively more concerned to protect the free exercise rights of minorities.
2931:(2008), the Supreme Court declared the "Millionaire's Amendment" provisions of the BCRA to be unconstitutional. The Court held that easing BCRA restrictions for an opponent of a self-financing candidate spending at least $ 350,000 of his or her own money violated the freedom of speech of the self-financing candidate.
2824:(1960), the Court struck down a Los Angeles city ordinance that made it a crime to distribute anonymous pamphlets. Justice Hugo Black wrote in the majority opinion: "There can be no doubt that such an identification requirement would tend to restrict freedom to distribute information and thereby freedom of expression.
865:, which together form the religious liberty clauses of the First Amendment. The first clause prohibits any governmental "establishment of religion" and the second prohibits any governmental interference with "the free exercise thereof." These clauses of the First Amendment encompass "the two big arenas of religion in
1698:, the exertion of any restraint on the free exercise of religion. Its purpose is to secure religious liberty in the individual by prohibiting any invasions thereof by civil authority. "The door of the Free Exercise Clause stands tightly closed against any governmental regulation of religious beliefs as such,
1502:(1948) for a strict separation between state and church: "Separation means separation, not something less. Jefferson's metaphor in describing the relation between Church and State speaks of a 'wall of separation', not of a fine line easily overstepped. ... 'The great American principle of eternal separation'—
3750:
maintain public support of the government and true statements could damage this support even more than false ones. Instead, libel placed specific emphasis on the result of the publication. Libelous publications tended to "degrade and injure another person" or "bring him into contempt, hatred or ridicule".
1385:(2005) the Court explained that when the government acts with the ostensible and predominant purpose of advancing religion, then it violates that central Establishment Clause value of official religious neutrality, because there is no neutrality when the government's ostensible object is to take sides.
772:
where popular sentiment was against ratification (including
Virginia, Massachusetts, and New York) successfully proposed that their state conventions both ratify the Constitution and call for the addition of a bill of rights. The U.S. Constitution was eventually ratified by all thirteen states. In the
3223:
We have not discarded the 'common-sense' distinction between speech proposing a commercial transaction, which occurs in an area traditionally subject to government regulation, and other varieties of speech. To require a parity of constitutional protection for commercial and noncommercial speech alike
3150:
Commercial speech is speech done on behalf of a company or individual for the purpose of making a profit. Unlike political speech, the
Supreme Court does not afford commercial speech full protection under the First Amendment. To effectively distinguish commercial speech from other types of speech for
3028:
wrote in the decision that "if there is a bedrock principle underlying the First
Amendment, it is that government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea offensive or disagreeable." Congress then passed a federal law barring flag burning, but the Supreme Court
2809:
The ability to publicly criticize even the most prominent politicians and leaders without fear of retaliation is part of the First Amendment, because political speech is core First Amendment speech. As the Supreme Court stated with respect to the judicial branch of the government exemplarily that the
1250:
observes that, absent some common interpretations by jurists, the precise meaning of the Establishment Clause is unclear and that decisions by the United Supreme Court relating to the Establishment Clause often are by 5–4 votes. The Establishment Clause, however, reflects a widely held consensus that
780:
The civil rights of none shall be abridged on account of religious belief or worship, nor shall any national religion be established, nor shall the full and equal rights of conscience be in any manner, or on any pretext, infringed. The people shall not be deprived or abridged of their right to speak,
4526:
states: "Although a State would be "prohibiting the free exercise " in violation of the Clause if it sought to ban the performance of (or abstention from) physical acts solely because of their religious motivation, the Clause does not relieve an individual of the obligation to comply with a law that
4142:
The Petition Clause protects the right "to petition the government for a redress of grievances". The right expanded over the years: "It is no longer confined to demands for 'a redress of grievances', in any accurate meaning of these words, but comprehends demands for an exercise by the government of
3449:
According to the U.S. Supreme Court, the First Amendment's protection of free speech does not apply to obscene speech. Therefore, both the federal government and the states have tried to prohibit or otherwise restrict obscene speech, in particular the form that is now called pornography. As of 2019,
3422:
from accessing various websites impermissibly restricted lawful speech in violation of the First Amendment. The Court held that "a fundamental principle of the First Amendment is that all persons have access to places where they can speak and listen, and then, after reflection, speak and listen once
2906:
candidates to spend independently, but not both, which the Court agreed "placed an unconstitutional burden on the parties' right to make unlimited independent expenditures". The Court also ruled that the provision preventing minors from making political contributions was unconstitutional, relying on
2434:
imposed a maximum sentence of twenty years for anyone who caused or attempted to cause "insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty in the military or naval forces of the United States". Specifically, the Espionage Act of 1917 states that if anyone allows any enemies to enter or fly over
1036:
Just as the right to speak and the right to refrain from speaking are complementary components of a broader concept of individual freedom of mind, so also the individual's freedom to choose his own creed is the counterpart of his right to refrain from accepting the creed established by the majority.
3720:. For the first two hundred years of American jurisprudence, the basic substance of defamation law continued to resemble that existing in England at the time of the Revolution. An 1898 American legal textbook on defamation provides definitions of libel and slander nearly identical to those given by
3129:
employee to pay dues to a union of which he is not a member violated the First Amendment. According to the Court, "the First Amendment does not permit the government to compel a person to pay for another party's speech just because the government thinks that the speech furthers the interests of the
2887:
of 1971 and related laws, which restricted the monetary contributions that may be made to political campaigns and expenditure by candidates. The Court affirmed the constitutionality of limits on campaign contributions, saying they "serve the basic governmental interest in safeguarding the integrity
2385:
presided over sedition trials without indicating any reservations. The leading critics of the law, Vice President Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, argued for the Acts' unconstitutionality based on the First Amendment and other Constitutional provisions. Jefferson succeeded Adams as president, in
2191:
The First Amendment broadly protects the rights of free speech and free press. Free speech means the free and public expression of opinions without censorship, interference, or restraint by the government. The term "freedom of speech" embedded in the First Amendment encompasses the decision what to
771:
For the constitution to be ratified, however, nine of the thirteen states were required to approve it in state conventions. Opposition to ratification ("Anti-Federalism") was partly based on the Constitution's lack of adequate guarantees for civil liberties. Supporters of the Constitution in states
8091:
It is important to note that the First Amendment applies to many expressions, including verbal and non-verbal communication, written communication, sign language, body language, facial expressions, gestures, symbols, and images. This means that the First Amendment protects not just what we say but
4535:
98 U. S. 145, 98 U. S. 166–167. The only decisions in which this Court has held that the First Amendment bars application of a neutral, generally applicable law to religiously motivated action are distinguished on the ground that they involved not the Free Exercise Clause alone, but that Clause in
4221:
The right of the people peaceably to assemble for the purpose of petitioning Congress for a redress of grievances, or for anything else connected with the powers or duties of the National Government, is an attribute of national citizenship, and, as such, under protection of, and guaranteed by, the
3901:
The free speech and free press clauses have been interpreted as providing the same protection to speakers as to writers, except for radio and television wireless broadcasting which have, for historical reasons, been given less constitutional protections. The Free Press Clause protects the right of
3532:
test for obscenity was "whether to the average person, applying contemporary community standards, the dominant theme of the material, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest". This definition proved hard to apply, however, and in the following decade, members of the Court often reviewed
2007:(1990), which held no such interest was required under the Free Exercise Clause regarding a neutral law of general applicability that happens to affect a religious practice, as opposed to a law that targets a particular religious practice (which does require a compelling governmental interest). In
1689:
The acknowledgement of religious freedom as the first right protected in the Bill of Rights points toward the American founders' understanding of the importance of religion to human, social, and political flourishing. The First Amendment makes clear that it sought to protect "the free exercise" of
1347:
We repeat and again reaffirm that neither a State nor the Federal Government can constitutionally force a person 'to profess a belief or disbelief in any religion.' Neither can it constitutionally pass laws or impose requirements which aid all religions as against non-believers, and neither can it
889:
Plainly, a community may not suppress, or the state tax, the dissemination of views because they are unpopular, annoying or distasteful. If that device were ever sanctioned, there would have been forged a ready instrument for the suppression of the faith which any minority cherishes but which does
768:—disagreed, arguing that existing state guarantees of civil liberties were sufficient and any attempt to enumerate individual rights risked the implication that other, unnamed rights were unprotected. After a brief debate, Mason's proposal was defeated by a unanimous vote of the state delegations.
5373:
Today, the religious roots of the American order and the role of religion in its continued success are poorly understood. One source of the confusion is the phrase "separation of church and state," a phrase used by President Thomas Jefferson in a widely misunderstood letter to the Danbury Baptist
4044:
Content-based regulation of television and radio, however, have been sustained by the Supreme Court in various cases. Since there is a limited number of frequencies for non-cable television and radio stations, the government licenses them to various companies. However, the Supreme Court has ruled
3872:
State constitutions provide free speech protections similar to those of the U.S. Constitution. In a few states, such as California, a state constitution has been interpreted as providing more comprehensive protections than the First Amendment. The Supreme Court has permitted states to extend such
2322:
commented about this phraseology in a 1993 journal article: "I emphasize the word 'the' in the term 'the freedom of speech' because the definite article suggests that the draftsmen intended to immunize a previously identified category or subset of speech." Stevens said that, otherwise, the clause
1946:
would be "prohibiting the free exercise " if it sought to ban such acts or abstentions only when they are engaged in for religious reasons, or only because of the religious belief that they display. It would doubtless be unconstitutional, for example, to ban the casting of "statues that are to be
1058:
support not only from the interest in respecting the individual's freedom of conscience, but also from the conviction that religious beliefs worthy of respect are the product of free and voluntary choice by the faithful, and from recognition of the fact that the political interest in forestalling
6443:
First Amendment Politics: At the risk of oversimplifying a very complicated situation, I suggest that conservative justices tend to favor a weak reading of both the Free Exercise and Establishment clause, while liberals tend to favor strong readings. That is, conservative justices have been less
4779:(Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 2003). Madison also proposed a similar limitation upon the states, which was completely rejected: "No State shall violate the equal rights of conscience, or the freedom of the press, or the trial by jury in criminal cases." Madison, James.
4244:
the right of assembly was given a broad meaning, because the right of assembly can be used "for communication of views on national questions" as well as for "holding meetings and disseminating information whether for the organization of labor unions or for any other lawful purpose." In two 1960s
3749:
An action of libel required the same five general points as slander, except that it specifically involved the publication of defamatory statements. For certain criminal charges of libel, such as seditious libel, the truth or falsity of the statements was immaterial, as such laws were intended to
2663:: "In each case must ask whether the gravity of the 'evil', discounted by its improbability, justifies such invasion of free speech as necessary to avoid the danger." Clearly, Vinson suggested, clear and present danger did not intimate "that before the Government may act, it must wait until the
1057:
or Judaism. But when the underlying principle has been examined in the crucible of litigation, the Court has unambiguously concluded that the individual freedom of conscience protected by the First Amendment embraces the right to select any religious faith or none at all. This conclusion derives
848:
Religious liberty, also known as freedom of religion, is "the right of all persons to believe, speak, and act – individually and in community with others, in private and in public – in accord with their understanding of ultimate truth." The acknowledgement of religious freedom as the first right
3839:'s first sexual experience had been with his mother in an outhouse. Since Falwell was a public figure, the Court ruled that "importance of the free flow of ideas and opinions on matters of public interest and concern" was the paramount concern, and reversed the judgement Falwell had won against
1134:. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties.
785:
This language was greatly condensed by Congress, and passed the House and Senate with almost no recorded debate, complicating future discussion of the Amendment's intent. Congress approved and submitted to the states for their ratification twelve articles of amendment on September 25, 1789. The
4438:
explained: "We hold that the statute, as construed and applied to the appellants, deprives them of their liberty without due process of law in contravention of the Fourteenth Amendment. The fundamental concept of liberty embodied in that Amendment embraces the liberties guaranteed by the First
4031:
in a concurrent opinion, wrote that "only governmental allegation and proof that publication must inevitably, directly, and immediately cause the occurrence of an evil kindred to imperiling the safety of a transport already at sea can support even the issuance of an interim restraining order."
1129:
Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole
3950:
Whatever differences may exist about interpretations of the First Amendment, there is practically universal agreement that a major purpose of that Amendment was to protect the free discussion of governmental affairs. This, of course, includes discussions of candidates, structures and forms of
2905:
by national parties and the use of soft money by private organizations to fund certain advertisements related to elections. However, the Court struck down the "choice of expenditure" rule, which required that parties could either make coordinated expenditures for all its candidates, or permit
1263:
Virtually all jurists agree that it would violate the Establishment Clause for the government to compel attendance or financial support of a religious institution as such, for the government to interfere with a religious organization's selection of clergy or religious doctrine; for religious
1245:
The First Amendment's prohibition on an establishment of religion includes many things from prayer in widely varying government settings over financial aid for religious individuals and institutions to comment on religious questions. The Supreme Court stated in this context: "In these varied
3732:
Actionable words, such as those imputing the injured party: is guilty of some offense, suffers from a contagious disease or psychological disorder, is unfit for public office because of moral failings or an inability to discharge his or her duties, or lacks integrity in profession, trade or
744:
that included the sentence "The freedom of the press is one of the greatest bulwarks of liberty, and can never be restrained but by despotic Governments." Eight of the other twelve states made similar pledges. However, these declarations were generally considered "mere admonitions to state
2686:(1957), the Supreme Court limited the Smith Act prosecutions to "advocacy of action" rather than "advocacy in the realm of ideas". Advocacy of abstract doctrine remained protected while speech explicitly inciting the forcible overthrow of the government was punishable under the Smith Act.
2310:: "If the First Amendment means anything, it means that a State has no business telling a man, sitting alone in his own house, what books he may read or what films he may watch. Our whole constitutional heritage rebels at the thought of giving government the power to control men's minds."
2888:
of the electoral process without directly impinging upon the rights of individual citizens and candidates to engage in political debate and discussion." However, the Court overturned the spending limits, which it found imposed "substantial restraints on the quantity of political speech".
4594: (1977) (holding that in plurality opinions, the narrowest concurring opinion is the controlling opinion). In plurality opinions, a majority of Justices agree upon the proper disposition of the case, but “no single rationale explaining the result enjoys the assent of five justices.”
17752:
3951:
government, the manner in which government is operated or should be operated, and all such matters relating to political processes. The Constitution specifically selected the press, which includes not only newspapers, books, and magazines, but also humble leaflets and circulars, see
2392:(1964), the Court noted the importance of this public debate as a precedent in First Amendment law and ruled that the Acts had been unconstitutional: "Although the Sedition Act was never tested in this Court, the attack upon its validity has carried the day in the court of history."
3317:
First Amendment rights, applied in light of the special characteristics of the school environment, are available to teachers and students. It can hardly be argued that either students or teachers shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse
4527:
incidentally forbids (or requires) the performance of an act that his religious belief requires (or forbids) if the law is not specifically directed to religious practice and is otherwise constitutional as applied to those who engage in the specified act for nonreligious reasons.
3852:(1990), the Court ruled that the First Amendment offers no wholesale exception to defamation law for statements labeled "opinion", but instead that a statement must be provably false (falsifiable) before it can be the subject of a libel suit. Nonetheless, it has been argued that
1007:
and of the states to abridge the individual freedoms it protects. The First Amendment was adopted to curtail the power of Congress to interfere with the individual's freedom to believe, to worship, and to express himself in accordance with the dictates of his own conscience. The
637:—pre-publication censorship—in almost all cases. The Petition Clause protects the right to petition all branches and agencies of government for action. In addition to the right of assembly guaranteed by this clause, the Court has also ruled that the amendment implicitly protects
6204:
692:
14484:
2340:
The practice in America must be entitled to much more respect. In every state, probably, in the Union, the press has exerted a freedom in canvassing the merits and measures of public men, of every description, which has not been confined to the strict limits of the common
1735:
The Free Exercise Clause offers a double protection, for it is a shield not only against outright prohibitions with respect to the free exercise of religion, but also against penalties on the free exercise of religion and against indirect governmental coercion. Relying on
3640:
First Amendment freedoms are most in danger when the government seeks to control thought or to justify its laws for that impermissible end. The right to think is the beginning of freedom, and speech must be protected from the government because speech is the beginning of
1810:
the Free Exercise Clause to the states. While the right to have religious beliefs is absolute, the freedom to act on such beliefs is not absolute. Religious freedom is a universal right of all human beings and all religions, providing for the free exercise of religion or
869:. Establishment cases deal with the Constitution's ban on Congress endorsing, promoting or becoming too involved with religion. Free exercise cases deal with Americans' rights to practice their faith." Both clauses sometimes compete with each other. The Supreme Court in
4283:(1984), the Court stated that "implicit in the right to engage in activities protected by the First Amendment" is "a corresponding right to associate with others in pursuit of a wide variety of political, social, economic, educational, religious, and cultural ends". In
2256:"Numerous holdings of this Court attest to the fact that the First Amendment does not literally mean that we "are guaranteed the right to express any thought, free from government censorship." This statement is subject to some qualifications, as for example those of
1831:
made clear that "the right of free exercise does not relieve an individual of the obligation to comply with a "valid and neutral law of general applicability on the ground that the law proscribes (or prescribes) conduct that his religion prescribes (or proscribes)."
4472:
religious, political, and ideological causes must also guarantee the concomitant right to decline to foster such concepts. The right to speak and the right to refrain from speaking are complementary components of the broader concept of 'individual freedom of mind.'
2211:
The Supreme Court of the United States characterized the rights of free speech and free press as fundamental personal rights and liberties and noted that the exercise of these rights lies at the foundation of free government by free men. The Supreme Court stated in
997:(1970), consists "of ensuring governmental neutrality in matters of religion." The history of the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause and the Supreme Court's own constitutional jurisprudence with respect to these clauses was explained in the 1985 case
2554:
The Supreme Court denied a number of Free Speech Clause claims throughout the 1920s, including the appeal of a labor organizer, Benjamin Gitlow, who had been convicted after distributing a manifesto calling for a "revolutionary dictatorship of the proletariat". In
1479:, characterized the general tendency of the dissents as a weaker reading of the First Amendment; the dissents tend to be "less concerned about the dangers of establishment and less concerned to protect free exercise rights, particularly of religious minorities".
1825:(1890): "However free the exercise of religion may be, it must be subordinate to the criminal laws of the country, passed with reference to actions regarded by general consent as properly the subjects of punitive legislation." Furthermore, the Supreme Court in
1246:
settings, issues of about interpreting inexact Establishment Clause language, like difficult interpretative issues generally, arise from the tension of competing values, each constitutionally respectable, but none open to realization to the logical limit." The
665:
657:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of
2733:
decisions have fashioned the principle that the constitutional guarantees of free speech and free press do not allow a State to forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of force or law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing
17720:
2629:
wrote for the Court that "a function of free speech under our system is to invite dispute. It may indeed best serve its high purpose when it induces a condition of unrest, creates dissatisfaction with conditions as they are, or even stirs people to anger."
6317:
Accommodationists, on the other hand, read the establishment clause as prohibiting Congress from declaring a national religion or preferring one to another, but laws do not have to be shorn of morality and history to be declared constitutional. They apply
4073:(1936), the Court invalidated a state tax on newspaper advertising revenues, holding that the role of the press in creating "informed public opinion" was vital. Similarly, some taxes that give preferential treatment to the press have been struck down. In
4230:'s opinion for the Court carefully distinguished the right to peaceably assemble as a secondary right, while the right to petition was labeled to be a primary right. Later cases, however, paid less attention to these distinctions. An example for this is
2770:
Speech that demeans on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, disability, or any other similar ground is hateful; but the proudest boast of our free speech jurisprudence is that we protect the freedom to express "the thought that we hate."
4185:
of people to come together and collectively express, promote, pursue, and defend their collective or shared ideas. This right is equally important as those of free speech and free press, because, as observed by the Supreme Court of the United States in
2208:(1969), the Supreme Court stated that the First Amendment protects the right to receive information and ideas, regardless of their social worth, and to be generally free from governmental intrusions into one's privacy and control of one's own thoughts.
4604:
17808:
17475:
14874:
2327:
wrote: "The word 'the' can be read to mean what was understood at the time to be included in the concept of free speech." But what was understood at the time is not 100% clear. In the late 1790s, the lead author of the speech and press clauses,
1754:(2017) that religious observers are protected against unequal treatment by virtue of the Free Exercise Clause and laws which target the religious for "special disabilities" based on their "religious status" must be covered by the application of
4939:
15076:
14073:
3930:
stated in a concurring opinion in another case succinctly: "he purpose of the Constitution was not to erect the press into a privileged institution but to protect all persons in their right to print what they will as well as to utter it." In
17800:
14153:
19241:
16524:
1286:
The 'establishment of religion' clause of the First Amendment means at least this: Neither a state nor the Federal Government can set up a church. Neither can pass laws which aid one religion, aid all religions, or prefer one religion to
19374:
14508:
6636:
The free exercise of religion means, first and foremost, the right to believe and profess whatever religious doctrine one desires. Thus, the First Amendment obviously excludes all "governmental regulation of religious beliefs as such."
1871:
The free exercise of religion means, first and foremost, the right to believe and profess whatever religious doctrine one desires. Thus, the First Amendment obviously excludes all "governmental regulation of religious beliefs as such."
18827:
17872:
3474:
defined material as obscene if it tended "to deprave or corrupt those whose minds are open to such immoral influences, and into whose hands a publication of this sort may fall". In the early twentieth century, literary works including
6200:
4315:(2021), the Court ruled that California's requiring disclosure of the identities of nonprofit companies' big-money donors did not serve a narrowly tailored government interest and, thus, violated those donors' First Amendment rights.
3189:(1942), the Court upheld a New York City ordinance forbidding the "distribution in the streets of commercial and business advertising matter", ruling the First Amendment protection of free speech did not include commercial speech.
2950:(1990), which had upheld a state law that prohibited corporations from using treasury funds to support or oppose candidates in elections did not violate the First or Fourteenth Amendments. The Court also overruled the portion of
786:
revised text of the third article became the First Amendment, because the last ten articles of the submitted 12 articles were ratified by the requisite number of states on December 15, 1791, and are now known collectively as the
1506:'s phrase bears repetition—is one of the vital reliances of our Constitutional system for assuring unities among our people stronger than our diversities. It is the Court's duty to enforce this principle in its full integrity."
2569:. Holmes and Brandeis dissented in several more cases in this decade, however, advancing the argument that the Free Speech Clause protected a far greater range of political speech than the Court had previously acknowledged. In
2144:
on the basis of a Blaine Amendment in that state's constitution, which the Court said is subject to the "strictest scrutiny" and can only survive if it is "narrowly tailored" to promote "interests of the highest order". Citing
1578:(2002), the opinion of the Court considered secular purpose and the absence of primary effect; a concurring opinion saw both cases as having treated entanglement as part of the primary purpose test. Further tests, such as the
17864:
4452:
recently wrote: "We begin with the proposition that the right of freedom of thought protected by the First Amendment against state action includes both the right to speak freely and the right to refrain from speaking at all.
4006:
also noted an exception, allowing prior restraint in cases such as "publication of sailing dates of transports or the number or location of troops". This exception was a key point in another landmark case four decades later:
16532:
14930:
14551:
14161:
13974:
2435:
the United States and obtain information from a place connected with the national defense, they will be punished. Hundreds of prosecutions followed. In 1919, the Supreme Court heard four appeals resulting from these cases:
14041:
6722:, 435 U. S. 618 (1978), for example, we invalidated a state law that disqualified members of the clergy from holding certain public offices, because it "impose special disabilities on the basis of ... religious status,"
4674:
3024:, Texas. Charged with violating a Texas law prohibiting the vandalizing of venerated objects, Johnson was convicted, sentenced to one year in prison, and fined $ 2,000. The Supreme Court reversed his conviction. Justice
14594:
4222:
United States. The very idea of a government, republican in form, implies a right on the part of its citizens to meet peaceably for consultation in respect to public affairs and to petition for a redress of grievances.
3115:
to post notices informing patients they can obtain free or low-cost abortions and include the number of the state agency that can connect the women with abortion providers violated those centers' right to free speech.
648:, there is a common misconception that it prohibits anyone from limiting free speech, including private, non-governmental entities. Moreover, the Supreme Court has determined that protection of speech is not absolute.
2306:(1969), the right to receive information and ideas, regardless of their social worth, and to be generally free from governmental intrusions into one's privacy and control of one's thoughts. As stated by the Court in
6895:
3868:
Despite the common misconception that the First Amendment prohibits anyone from limiting free speech, the text of the amendment prohibits only the federal government, the states and local governments from doing so.
7546:
14468:
3206:
What is at issue is whether a State may completely suppress the dissemination of concededly truthful information about entirely lawful activity, fearful of that information's effect upon its disseminators and its
2637:, the bad tendency test was not explicitly overruled, and the clear and present danger test was not applied in several subsequent free speech cases involving incitement to violence. In 1940, Congress enacted the
17792:
16730:
2675:
The demands of free speech in a democratic society as well as the interest in national security are better served by candid and informed weighing of the competing interests, within the confines of the judicial
2641:, making it illegal to advocate "the propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force and violence". The statute provided law enforcement a tool to combat Communist leaders.
1264:
organizations or figures acting in a religious capacity to exercise governmental power; or for the government to extend benefits to some religious entities and not others without adequate secular justification.
1202:. Bancroft advised Waite to consult Jefferson and Waite then discovered the above quoted letter in a library after skimming through the index to Jefferson's collected works according to historian Don Drakeman.
17270:
5002:
963:
Those who would renegotiate the boundaries between church and state must therefore answer a difficult question: Why would we trade a system that has served us so well for one that has served others so poorly?
3809:(1985) the Court ruled that "actual malice" need not be shown in cases involving private individuals, holding that "n light of the reduced constitutional value of speech involving no matters of public concern
2997:. Street was arrested and charged with a New York state law making it a crime "publicly mutilate, deface, defile, or defy, trample upon, or cast contempt upon either by words or act ". The Court, relying on
2013:(1993), in which the meaning of "neutral law of general applicability" was elaborated by the court, the Supreme Court ruled Hialeah had passed an ordinance banning ritual slaughter, a practice central to the
17366:
17222:
14938:
14677:
14113:
2470:
had been convicted under the Espionage Act for publishing leaflets urging resistance to the draft. Schenck appealed, arguing that the Espionage Act violated the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment. In
10926:
6736:, concurring in judgment), and inequality results when a legislature decides that the governmental interests it seeks to advance are worthy of being pursued only against conduct with a religious motivation.
14129:
10918:
1205:
The Establishment Clause forbids federal, state, and local laws whose purpose is "an establishment of religion." The term "establishment" denoted in general direct aid to the church by the government. In
19134:
16362:
14962:
4066:
State governments retain the right to tax newspapers, just as they may tax other commercial products. Generally, however, taxes that focus exclusively on newspapers have been found unconstitutional. In
3902:
individuals to express themselves through publication and dissemination of information, ideas and opinions without interference, constraint or prosecution by the government. This right was described in
19342:
17832:
16778:
4947:
4704:
2109:, 205 F.2d 58, 61 (CA2 1953): "The First Amendment ... gives no one the right to insist that, in pursuit of their own interests others must conform their conduct to his own religious necessities." In
1858:"that laws affecting certain religious practices do not violate the right to free exercise of religion as long as the laws are neutral, generally applicable, and not motivated by animus to religion."
912:
The First Amendment commands government to have no interest in theology or ritual; it admonishes government to be interested in allowing religious freedom to flourish—whether the result is to produce
19126:
17688:
13648:
6177:
1654:, not public acknowledgements of God nor 'developing policies that encourage general religious beliefs that do not favor a particular sect and are consistent with the secular government's goals'. In
4253:
to statements made by private entities before public bodies: a monopolist may freely go before the city council and encourage the denial of its competitor's building permit without being subject to
3677:(1991). That statute did not prohibit publication of a memoir by a convicted criminal. Instead, it provided that all profits from the book were to be put in escrow for a time. The interest from the
991:
The First Amendment tolerates neither governmentally established religion nor governmental interference with religion. One of the central purposes of the First Amendment, the Supreme Court wrote in
18659:
17975:
17704:
17491:
15731:
1016:
imposes on the states the same limitations the First Amendment had always imposed on the Congress. This "elementary proposition of law" was confirmed and endorsed time and time again in cases like
20295:
3655:, ruling that prohibiting offers to provide and requests to obtain child pornography did not violate the First Amendment, even if a person charged under the Act did not possess child pornography.
17999:
17744:
16698:
15755:
12870:
12760:
10501:
10453:
10263:
4217:(1875), the first case in which the right to assembly was before the Supreme Court, the court broadly declared the outlines of the right of assembly and its connection to the right of petition:
19985:
19209:
17959:
17608:
16516:
4355:
2083:
RFRA secures Congress’ view of the right to free exercise under the First Amendment, and it provides a remedy to redress violations of that right. The Supreme Court decided in light of this in
1815:. Due to its nature as fundamental to the American founding and to the ordering of human society, it is rightly seen as a capricious right, i.e. universal, broad, and deep—though not absolute.
413:
337:
12219:, 501 U.S. 663 (1991) where the U.S. Supreme Court held that the press gets no special immunity from laws that apply to others, including those—such as copyright law—that target communication.
4173:
It is not necessary to say that the two Clauses are identical in their mandate or their purpose and effect to acknowledge that the rights of speech and petition share substantial common ground
14177:
3681:
account was used to fund the New York State Crime Victims Board—an organization that pays the medical and related bills of victims of crime. Similar laws in other states remain unchallenged.
280:
675:
The hand-written copy of the proposed articles of amendment passed by Congress in 1789, cropped to show just the text in the third article that would later be ratified as the First Amendment
19803:
17712:
17696:
16002:
15136:
13950:
126:
6485:
Conservatives claim that liberals misinterpret the establishment and free exercise clauses of the First Amendment. They point to the opinion written for the Supreme Court by Hugo Black in
4207:... The holding of meetings for peaceable political action cannot be proscribed. Those who assist in the conduct of such meetings cannot be branded as criminals on that score. The question
1983:(1972), the Court ruled that a law which "unduly burdens the practice of religion" without a compelling interest, even though it might be "neutral on its face", would be unconstitutional.
20310:
19740:
17816:
17467:
16746:
16738:
16508:
4196:... is one that cannot be denied without violating those fundamental principles of liberty and justice which lie at the base of all civil and political institutions—principles which the
2228:(1966), a case involving the Constitutional shield around the speech of elected officials, the Supreme Court declared that the First Amendment central commitment is that, in the words of
20260:
19294:
19150:
17664:
17632:
17568:
17451:
16829:
16613:
14685:
14492:
14209:
13149:
12818:
10552:
10527:
10429:
10304:
5832:
4292:
3257:
3230:
3194:
2070:
struck down the Religious Freedom Restoration Act RFRA in so far as it applied to states and other local municipalities within them., so that partly in response to it 21 states enacted
1400:
3803:(1988), the Court found that, with regard to private individuals, the First Amendment does "not necessarily force any change in at least some features of the common-law landscape". In
1486:, which permitted New Jersey school boards to pay for transportation to parochial schools, the Court has used various tests to determine when the wall of separation has been breached.
19841:
14882:
13646:
2756:
wrote in the majority opinion that Cohen's jacket fell in the category of protected political speech despite the use of an expletive: "One man's vulgarity is another man's lyric." In
1122:
539:
7595:
20108:
15851:
17:
7849:
2063:
17536:
16666:
10355:
7679:
2954:
that upheld such restrictions under the BCRA. In other words, the ruling was considered to hold that "political spending is a form of protected speech under the First Amendment".
2386:
part due to the unpopularity of the latter's sedition prosecutions; he and his party quickly overturned the Acts and pardoned those imprisoned by them. In the majority opinion in
1164:
4640:
4201:
1804:
1490:
laid down the test that establishment existed when aid was given to religion, but that the transportation was justifiable because the benefit to the children was more important.
572:
20210:
19193:
17680:
15112:
14145:
14017:
4682:
1395:
4296:(1995), the Court ruled that a group may exclude people from membership if their presence would affect the group's ability to advocate a particular point of view. Likewise, in
3922:
including newspapers, books, plays, movies, and video games. While it is an open question whether people who blog or use social media are journalists entitled to protection by
2161:(2022) that the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment protects against “indirect coercion or penalties on the free exercise of religion, not just outright prohibitions.”
1460:(1878), when the Court reviewed the history of the early Republic in deciding the extent of the liberties of Mormons. Chief Justice Morrison Waite, who consulted the historian
19980:
19201:
19110:
17856:
17294:
17278:
17131:
17123:
16621:
14401:
6928:
5629:
875:(2005) clarified this by the following example: When the government spends money on the clergy, then it looks like establishing religion, but if the government cannot pay for
8070:
20927:
18819:
18111:
14826:
3373:(2007), the Court ruled that schools could restrict student speech at school-sponsored events, even events away from school grounds, if students promote "illegal drug use".
2609:, who had been convicted under the Slave Insurrection Statute for advocating black rule in the southern United States. The Court reversed Herndon's conviction, holding that
760:, a Constitutional Convention delegate and the drafter of Virginia's Declaration of Rights, proposed that the Constitution include a bill of rights listing and guaranteeing
6905:
2022:
1130:
American people which declared that their legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof", thus building
20993:
20942:
17768:
17672:
17206:
16605:
16198:
9797:
7550:
5409:
2917:
20280:
2613:
had failed to demonstrate any "clear and present danger" in Herndon's political advocacy. The clear and present danger test was again invoked by the majority in the 1940
2278:
Attached to the core rights of free speech and free press are several peripheral rights that make these core rights more secure. The peripheral rights encompass not only
1404:(1994), the Court concluded that "government should not prefer one religion to another, or religion to irreligion." In a series of cases in the first decade of the 2000s—
19813:
19697:
19497:
19429:
14524:
20265:
13055:
6201:"The ACLJ Participates in Another Supreme Court Victory as the Court Upholds Coach Kennedy's Right to Pray after Football Games in Kennedy v. Bremerton School District"
5551:
879:, then many soldiers and sailors would be kept from the opportunity to exercise their chosen religions. The Supreme Court developed the preferred position doctrine. In
20963:
19683:
18712:
17063:
16629:
14193:
10602:
7426:
6724:
3107:
2908:
2795:(2017) affirmed the principle "that “the public expression of ideas may not be prohibited merely because the ideas are themselves offensive to some of their hearers.”
2693:, the Court's position on public criticism of the government changed drastically. Though the Court upheld a law prohibiting the forgery, mutilation, or destruction of
2076:
406:
272:
13647:
5010:
550:
20461:
19668:
19658:
18373:
16786:
16690:
2483:, writing for the Court, explained that "the question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a
2134:(2017), the Court ruled that denying a generally available public benefit on account of the religious nature of an institution violates the Free Exercise Clause. In
1110:
776:, following the state legislatures' request, James Madison proposed twenty constitutional amendments, and his proposed draft of the First Amendment read as follows:
257:
245:
20300:
7648:
2222:
embraces at the least the liberty to discuss publicly and truthfully all matters of public concern, without previous restraint or fear of subsequent punishment. In
19678:
19673:
19663:
19653:
16370:
15827:
15489:
14970:
12499:
9446:
4917:
4051:
2147:
1179:, while atop a hill in the background a statue labeled "Constitution" that states "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion" can be seen.
481:
267:
262:
252:
240:
2066:, but to do so "there must be a congruence and proportionality between the injury to be prevented or remedied and the means adopted to that end." The decision in
19633:
18392:
16902:
16894:
13450:
9381:
9012:
5352:
218:
13695:
8909:
3671:
to write memoirs about the murders he committed. The Supreme Court struck down a law of this type in New York as a violation of the First Amendment in the case
2619:
decision in which a state antipicketing law was invalidated. The importance of freedom of speech in the context of "clear and present danger" was emphasized in
19643:
19638:
19607:
19602:
17656:
17483:
16933:
16158:
15324:
14065:
13522:
7404:
5350:
4197:
2566:
1212:(1982) the Supreme Court stated that "the core rationale underlying the Establishment Clause is preventing 'a fusion of governmental and religious functions,'
1013:
230:
225:
203:
198:
12098:
5947:
4708:
19648:
19628:
19612:
18744:
18424:
18031:
18015:
17912:
16190:
14567:
14241:
13873:
13209:
13154:
13107:
13032:
12851:
12823:
12741:
12625:
12588:
12583:
12563:
12528:
12504:
12448:
12392:
12331:
12262:
12054:
12029:
11874:
11778:
11723:
11667:
11601:
11597:
11565:
11407:
11273:
11248:
11199:
11174:
11125:
11059:
11010:
10743:
10706:
10681:
10607:
10582:
10557:
10532:
10482:
10434:
10397:
10360:
10244:
10129:
10092:
10043:
9996:
9945:
9892:
9867:
9827:
9802:
9765:
9704:
9648:
9587:
9543:
9428:
9322:
9249:
9197:
9160:
9096:
8964:
8816:
8719:
8638:
8533:
7746:
7431:
7335:
7189:
7133:
7077:
7018:
6523:
6137:
6110:
6027:
5946:"In the words of Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect "a wall of separation between church and State". from
5924:
5899:
5874:
5837:
4584:
3805:
3384:", a free speech policy statement designed to combat censorship on campus. This statement was later adopted by a number of top-ranked universities including
3079:
The Supreme Court has determined that the First Amendment also protects citizens from being compelled by the government to say or to pay for certain speech.
1363:
235:
213:
208:
10820:
6169:
3753:
Concerns that defamation under common law might be incompatible with the new republican form of government caused early American courts to struggle between
1562:
test has been criticized by justices and legal scholars, but it has remained the predominant means by which the Court enforced the Establishment Clause. In
20205:
19579:
19334:
19225:
18736:
18298:
18194:
17624:
15156:
14409:
14105:
12902:
12736:
5713:"Jefferson S. Dunn, Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, Applicant v. Domineque Hakim Marcelle Ray on Application Number 18A815 to vacate stay"
5587:
4350:
4156:
3056:
188:
5470:
1291:... in the words of Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect 'a wall of separation between church and State'.
20456:
19584:
19548:
19286:
19185:
18961:
18539:
17736:
17576:
17214:
16862:
15165:
14661:
14121:
12789:
1438:
933:
193:
166:
6255:
4503:
Burger explained the term "benevolent neutrality" with respect to the interplay of the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause in this way in
20860:
20290:
20185:
19553:
19533:
19523:
17395:
17262:
17055:
16573:
15795:
15031:
14954:
14249:
14137:
9051:
7795:
4456:
3084:
2902:
2130:
1750:
1744:
938:
171:
151:
141:
7374:
5439:
20988:
20983:
19995:
19563:
19558:
19543:
19538:
19528:
19366:
19233:
18047:
17967:
17038:
16500:
16418:
13889:
10170:
6073:
Kritzer, H. M.; Richards, M. J. (2003). "Jurisprudential Regimes and Supreme Court Decisionmaking: The Lemon Regime and Establishment Clause Cases".
5351:
Jennifer A. Marshall (Director of the Richard and Helen DeVos Center for Religion and Civil Society at The Heritage Foundation) (December 20, 2010).
3300:
1942:, abstaining from certain foods or certain modes of transportation. It would be true, we think (though no case of ours has involved the point), that
1381:
982:
871:
593:
181:
176:
161:
156:
146:
618:(1964). Commercial speech, however, is less protected by the First Amendment than political speech, and is therefore subject to greater regulation.
17107:
16837:
16166:
14350:
14097:
14081:
13921:
9643:
6683:
5167:
4081:
law exempting "religious, professional, trade and sports journals" from taxation since the law amounted to the regulation of newspaper content. In
3919:
2901:
of 2002 (BCRA), a federal law that imposed new restrictions on campaign financing. The Supreme Court upheld provisions which barred the raising of
2561:(1925), the Court upheld the conviction, but a majority also found that the First Amendment applied to state laws as well as federal laws, via the
2248:
The level of protections with respect to free speech and free press given by the First Amendment is not limitless. As stated in his concurrence in
1918:
5033:
20386:
19487:
19467:
19422:
19013:
18768:
18119:
15084:
14516:
7987:
392:
383:
116:
96:
4851:
4027:. The Court found that the Nixon administration had not met the heavy burden of proof required for prior restraint. Justice Brennan, drawing on
20871:
19477:
19472:
18346:
17648:
16274:
13942:
7184:
6008:
4232:
2936:
2009:
1530:
1268:
Originally, the First Amendment applied only to the federal government, and some states continued official state religions after ratification.
1224:
106:
101:
7957:
6415:
4192:, 299 U.S. 353, 364, 365 (1937), the right of peaceable assembly is "cognate to those of free speech and free press and is equally fundamental
3515:(1922), stating that works must be considered in their entirety, rather than declared obscene on the basis of an individual part of the work.
936:. This freedom plainly includes freedom from religion, with the right to believe, speak, write, publish and advocate anti-religious programs.
885:(1943) the Supreme Court stated that "Freedom of press, freedom of speech, freedom of religion are in a preferred position". The Court added:
20240:
19482:
19462:
19457:
18563:
17528:
16802:
15763:
14201:
4648:
1629:
to characterize a way to ensure that there is no conflict between the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause. Burger's successor,
111:
91:
86:
9966:
8258:
4045:
that the problem of scarcity does not allow the raising of a First Amendment issue. The government may restrain broadcasters, but only on a
3224:
could invite a dilution, simply by a leveling process, of the force of the Amendment's guarantee with respect to the latter kind of speech.
1710:, 367 U. S. 488; nor penalize or discriminate against individuals or groups because they hold religious views abhorrent to the authorities,
20678:
19730:
19053:
18969:
18651:
18218:
16994:
16378:
16065:
15875:
12934:
12704:
7931:
7603:
4825:
4375:
4311:
3826:
2855:
2522:, four Russian refugees appealed their conviction for throwing leaflets from a building in New York; the leaflets argued against President
474:
317:
12204:, 532 U.S. 514 (2001) where the U.S. Supreme Court "draw no distinction between the media respondents and" a non-institutional respondent.
6671:, 456 U. S. 228, 456 U. S. 245 (1982), or lend its power to one or the other side in controversies over religious authority or dogma, see
6344:
3326:... are possessed of fundamental rights which the State must respect, just as they themselves must respect their obligations to the State.
2491:, the court again upheld an Espionage Act conviction, this time that of a journalist who had criticized U.S. involvement in foreign wars.
1906:, 456 U. S. 228, 456 U. S. 245 (1982), or lend its power to one or the other side in controversies over religious authority or dogma, see
20391:
20190:
18862:
18400:
18253:
17760:
15883:
14978:
14374:
14366:
5712:
4417:
9849:"'Wholly foreign to the First Amendment': the demise of campaign finance's equalizing rationale in Davis v. Federal Election Commission"
7687:
7513:
7481:
3583:... the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law, and (c)
19926:
19452:
19415:
17848:
17584:
16957:
16762:
16754:
15819:
15811:
15803:
13865:
11402:
8475:
Dry, Murray. Civil Peace and the Quest for Truth: The First Amendment Freedoms in Political Philosophy and American Constitutionalism,
7991:
6457:
4873:
3673:
1222:
as well as the state governments are prohibited from establishing or sponsoring religion, because, as observed by the Supreme Court in
78:
43:
10845:
9490:
9354:
8692:
8143:
7876:
3790:
for libel, saying the advertisement damaged his reputation. The Supreme Court unanimously reversed the $ 500,000 judgment against the
3039:
to the U.S. Constitution has been proposed repeatedly in Congress since 1989, and in 2006 failed to pass the Senate by a single vote.
2707:
would interfere with the "smooth and efficient functioning" of the draft system, the next year, the court handed down its decision in
20165:
20135:
19921:
19886:
19866:
18555:
18457:
17951:
16878:
16706:
16354:
15715:
15683:
15039:
14257:
14089:
12257:
12017:
9940:
7834:
4726:
3896:
2959:
2136:
753:
568:
523:
349:
344:
327:
12148:
8261:. The First Amendment Encyclopedia presented by the John Seigenthaler Chair of Excellence in First Amendment Studies. Archived from
7381:. The First Amendment Encyclopedia presented by the John Seigenthaler Chair of Excellence in First Amendment Studies. Archived from
6938:
6347:. The First Amendment Encyclopedia presented by the John Seigenthaler Chair of Excellence in First Amendment Studies. Archived from
6258:. The First Amendment Encyclopedia presented by the John Seigenthaler Chair of Excellence in First Amendment Studies. Archived from
5621:
5558:. The First Amendment Encyclopedia presented by the John Seigenthaler Chair of Excellence in First Amendment Studies. Archived from
5517:
5174:. The First Amendment Encyclopedia presented by the John Seigenthaler Chair of Excellence in First Amendment Studies. Archived from
3367:(1988), the Court found that schools need not tolerate student speech that is inconsistent with their basic educational mission. In
1422:(2010)—the Court considered the issue of religious monuments on federal lands without reaching a majority reasoning on the subject.
69:
20170:
16410:
15579:
14559:
14425:
13805:
13587:
13014:"Competition and the Noerr-Pennington doctrine: When should political activity be barred under European community competition law?"
10794:
9760:
8078:
3908:
as "a fundamental personal right" that is not confined to newspapers and periodicals, but also embraces pamphlets and leaflets. In
3629:
3501:
3322:... chools may not be enclaves of totalitarianism. School officials do not possess absolute authority over their students. Students
2971:, combined respectively in a two-year period known as an "election cycle", violated the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment.
2893:
2870:
2071:
1861:
To accept any creed or the practice of any form of worship cannot be compelled by laws, because, as stated by the Supreme Court in
1475:, the Court adopted Jefferson's words. The Court has affirmed it often, with majority, but not unanimous, support. Warren Nord, in
799:
13260:
12986:
12960:
10330:
5685:
5133:
4277:(1958), that this freedom was protected by the amendment and that privacy of membership was an essential part of this freedom. In
3819:(1974), the Court ruled that a private individual had to prove malice only to be awarded punitive damages, not actual damages. In
20381:
18835:
18103:
18023:
17888:
17728:
16581:
15779:
13051:
Wayne Batchis, Citizens United and the Paradox of "Corporate Speech": From Freedom of Association to Freedom of The Association,
12443:
8339:
8284:
8017:
7905:
4395:
4037:
3813:... the state interest adequately supports awards of presumed and punitive damages—even absent a showing of 'actual malice'." In
3575:'the average person, applying contemporary community standards' would find the work, as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest
3451:
1695:
1219:
821:
507:
467:
11965:
11092:
10934:
4147:
barring anti-slavery petitions from being heard; the rule was overturned by Congress several years later. Petitions against the
534:
the government for redress of grievances. It was adopted on December 15, 1791, as one of the ten amendments that constitute the
20471:
20140:
20018:
19266:
18314:
18039:
18007:
17991:
17499:
17099:
17047:
17026:
16565:
15787:
15210:
14754:
9887:
5417:
4115:
3361:(1986), the Court ruled that a student could be punished for his sexual-innuendo-laced speech before a school assembly and, in
3098:
2946:
2846:
of 1938, under which several Canadian films were defined as "political propaganda", requiring their sponsors to be identified.
2170:
1845:
1145:
1114:
1094:
531:
519:
20155:
6322:
only selectively because 'e are a religious people whose institutions presuppose a Supreme Being' as Justice Douglas wrote in
2377:
of any federal law regarding the Free Speech Clause until the 20th century. For example, the Supreme Court never ruled on the
853:
points toward the American founders' understanding of the importance of religion to human, social, and political flourishing.
20978:
20693:
19783:
19778:
19705:
18870:
18202:
17932:
17246:
17115:
16463:
15747:
14898:
14417:
13958:
13432:
13385:
13357:
13329:
13298:
13229:
13174:
13072:
13052:
12657:
12413:
11798:
11743:
11688:
11633:
11427:
10764:
9582:
8700:
7451:
7231:
7154:
7098:
7042:
6655:, 322 U. S. 78, 322 U. S. 86–88 (1944), impose special disabilities on the basis of religious views or religious status, see
5559:
2830:
1890:, 322 U. S. 78, 322 U. S. 86–88 (1944), impose special disabilities on the basis of religious views or religious status, see
1678:
1313:, a Jesuit missionary in the left and colonists meeting the people of the Yaocomico branch of the Piscatawy Indian Nation in
1228:(1970), the 'establishment' of a religion historically implied sponsorship, financial support, and active involvement of the
1199:
1186:
was the first Supreme Court decision to use the metaphor "a wall of separation between Church and State." American historian
756:
in Philadelphia proposed a new constitution on September 17, 1787, featuring among other changes a stronger chief executive.
288:
9923:
6044:
20426:
20220:
19217:
18079:
18063:
17326:
17155:
17083:
15229:
15002:
14441:
14382:
13479:
The Sacred Rights of Conscience: Selected Readings on Religious Liberty and Church-State Relations in the American Founding
13423:
12469:
11376:
4385:
3337:
3089:
2927:
2174:
1602:(2022), the Lemon Test may have been replaced or complemented with a reference to historical practices and understandings.
1598:
1090:
597:
18994:
9669:
4266:
3219:(1978), the Court ruled that commercial speech was not protected by the First Amendment as much as other types of speech:
3168:
Alone, each indicium does not compel the conclusion that an instance of speech is commercial; however, "he combination of
2828:... Anonymous pamphlets, leaflets, brochures and even books have played an important role in the progress of mankind." In
20802:
20421:
20013:
19166:
18915:
18531:
17784:
16682:
16597:
16540:
16010:
15120:
14310:
12387:
11869:
10577:
9611:
9216:
7656:
5407:
4287:
the Court held that associations may not exclude people for reasons unrelated to the group's expression, such as gender.
4009:
3994:
3875:
3283:
3234:(1980), the Court clarified what analysis was required before the government could justify regulating commercial speech:
3132:
3017:
2748:(1971), the Court voted reversed the conviction of a man wearing a jacket reading "Fuck the Draft" in the corridors of a
2111:
1807:
1617:
that "e are a religious people whose institutions presuppose a Supreme Being." Furthermore, as observed by Chief Justice
1521:, aid seemed irrelevant. The Court ruled on the basis that a legitimate action both served a secular purpose and did not
1517:
1449:
1339:
1279:
1214:
9456:
7357:"The McCulloch theory of the Fourteenth Amendment: City of Boerne v. Flores and the original understanding of section 5"
5264:"Wallace v. Jaffree, 472 U.S. 38 (1985), at 50–51. Partially quoting from Wooley v. Maynard, 430 U.S. 705 (1977) at 714"
4909:
2534:
dissented, holding that the government had demonstrated no "clear and present danger" in the four's political advocacy.
1089:
Thomas Jefferson's tombstone. The inscription, as he stipulated, reads "Here was buried Thomas Jefferson, author of the
20968:
20058:
18784:
18281:
16722:
15961:
15068:
14610:
14500:
13966:
13563:
13405:
The Law of Libel and Slander in Civil and Criminal Cases: As Administered in the Courts of the United States of America
12121:
10919:"Mandatory minimum drives US District Judge to countenance arguments for jury nullification in federal child porn case"
9064:
8916:
8871:
6673:
3389:
2097:
1908:
1768:
1062:
extends beyond intolerance among Christian sects – or even intolerance among "religions" – to encompass intolerance of
564:
361:
10983:
9397:
5469:. The First Amendment Encyclopedia presented by the John Seigenthaler Chair of Excellence in First Amendment Studies.
5360:
2318:
The First Amendment bars Congress from "abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press". U.S. Supreme Court Justice
1771:
found that while laws cannot interfere with religious belief and opinions, laws can regulate religious practices like
1348:
aid those religions based on a belief in the existence of God as against those religions founded on different beliefs.
20401:
19763:
19438:
19318:
18547:
17358:
16886:
16714:
16227:
15928:
15739:
15414:
15103:
13761:
13731:
12247:, 376 U.S. at 286 (applying identical First Amendment protection to a newspaper defendant and individual defendants).
11268:
10278:
9034:
8899:
8885:
7702:
6429:
6303:
5673:
5521:
5466:
4610:
4056:
3958:
3887:, Massachusetts and Puerto Rico courts have adopted the doctrine; California's courts have repeatedly reaffirmed it.
3624:
3341:
2475:, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected Schenck's appeal and affirmed his conviction. Debate continued over whether
2219:
2045:
1647:
51:
11844:
3695:
1639:(1985), because he believed this metaphor was based on bad history and proved itself useless as a guide to judging.
20906:
20901:
20245:
19118:
18803:
17983:
17776:
17091:
16338:
15843:
14653:
13102:
12144:
12090:
11828:
11317:
10676:
7412:
4279:
3923:
3799:
3647:
3437:
3357:
1994:
1208:
621:
The Free Press Clause protects publication of information and opinions, and applies to a wide variety of media. In
31:
6531:
5242:"Wallace v. Jaffree, 472 U.S. 38 (1985), at 50. Quoting from Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U. S. 296 (1940) at 303"
4306:
to admit an openly gay member, to be an unconstitutional abridgment of the Boy Scouts' right to free association.
1674:
20250:
20235:
18776:
18365:
17824:
17174:
17002:
15891:
15707:
15619:
15260:
11773:
5003:"Religion: Religious conservatives hopeful new Supreme Court majority will redefine religious liberty precedents"
4325:
3848:
3533:
films individually in a court building screening room to determine if they should be considered obscene. Justice
2843:
629:
399:
356:
10221:
7850:"Opinion analysis: Court rules that religious schools cannot be excluded from state funding for private schools"
5595:
3463:(1896), the Supreme Court adopted the same obscenity standard as had been articulated in a famous British case,
1572:
test was converted to simply being a factor in determining the effect of the challenged statute or practice. In
542:. The first two articles did not pass, so the article on disestablishment and free speech ended up being first.
20657:
19390:
18704:
18696:
18627:
18598:
17552:
17427:
17302:
16105:
15457:
15390:
14994:
14922:
14286:
13982:
13768:
13738:
13615:
13532:
13464:
12846:
12524:
12233:
8960:
8938:, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), which some commentators view as a modified version of the clear and present danger test.
8528:
7713:
6471:
6022:
4565:
4165:
4069:
3701:
2898:
2749:
2729:. Now the Supreme Court referred to the right to speak openly of violent action and revolution in broad terms:
2667:
is about to be executed, the plans have been laid and the signal is awaited." In a concurring opinion, Justice
2621:
2388:
2270:
2236:
2230:
1728:
1498:
1131:
741:
699:
614:
12793:
10204:
3945:'s depiction of the five freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment to the US Constitution in Washington, D.C.
2925:
to BCRA, holding that issue ads may not be banned from the months preceding a primary or general election. In
2296:", i.e., the right to distribute, the right to receive, and the right to read, as well as freedom of inquiry,
20998:
20973:
20431:
20371:
19960:
19158:
18135:
17640:
17592:
17435:
17318:
17018:
16925:
16142:
15969:
14025:
13897:
13204:
11377:"Interview: Julie Hilden discusses laws and ethics surrounding the intellectual property rights of prisoners"
10911:"Federal Judge Advocates Jury Nullification After Being Shocked by Overzealous Child Pornography Prosecution"
10639:
6259:
4298:
4271:
Although the First Amendment does not explicitly mention freedom of association, the Supreme Court ruled, in
2922:
2884:
1990:
1333:
1274:
945:
803:
580:
5964:
3667:
prohibiting convicted criminals from publishing memoirs for profit. These laws were a response to offers to
20921:
20719:
20150:
20023:
19828:
19710:
19510:
19037:
18523:
18178:
16346:
16243:
16134:
16097:
15376:
14946:
13798:
11928:
Mulligan, Josh (2004). "Finding A Forum in the Simulated City: Mega Malls, Gated Towns, and the Promise of
7382:
7128:
6933:
6837:
6728:, 494 U. S., at 877. ... The Free Exercise Clause "protect religious observers against unequal treatment,"
5591:
5443:
5408:
Mark Movsesian (Director of the Center for Law and Religion at St. John's University) (February 13, 2013).
5084:
4780:
4522:
4380:
3690:
3496:
3410:
3262:
2487:
that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent." One week later, in
2199:
2080:(2006), RFRA remains applicable to federal laws and so those laws must still have a "compelling interest."
2003:
1974:
1827:
1738:
1314:
1247:
891:
850:
787:
718:
535:
368:
295:
10305:"Opinion analysis: Divided court rules for anti-abortion pregnancy centers in challenge to California law"
10162:
5668:, p. 52, UPCC book collections on Project MUSE, Julia A. King, publisher, Univ. of Tennessee Press, 2012,
20935:
20839:
20797:
20792:
20195:
19881:
19846:
19278:
18924:
18760:
18720:
16965:
16394:
16290:
16041:
15635:
15562:
15449:
15398:
14890:
14433:
13598:
The Religious Roots of the First Amendment: Dissenting Protestants and the Separation of Church and State
12897:
11718:
11663:
9192:
9045:
4213:
4182:
4134:
3821:
3815:
3633:
3432:
2699:
2361:. Madison believed that legislation to be unconstitutional, and his adversaries in that dispute, such as
2264:
2091:
1834:
1105:
The precise meaning of the Establishment Clause can be traced back to the beginning of the 19th century.
12243:, 379 U.S. 64, 67–68 (1964) (applying Sullivan standard to statements by an elected district attorney);
11899:"Returning to the PruneYard: the unconstitutionality of state-sanctioned trespass in the name of speech"
7547:"Opinion analysis: Justices allow Muslim men placed on "no fly" list to sue FBI agents for money damage"
5175:
4415:
See for the topic First Amendment and state actor exemplarily the 2019 United States Supreme Court case
1716:, 345 U. S. 67; nor employ the taxing power to inhibit the dissemination of particular religious views,
1028:(1977). The central liberty that unifies the various clauses in the First Amendment is the individual's
20889:
20336:
20305:
20028:
19793:
19788:
18811:
18151:
17880:
16637:
16174:
15497:
15473:
13913:
13605:
5037:
4370:
3487:
3036:
2968:
2944:
were unconstitutional for violating the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment. The Court overruled
2772:
2463:
1394:(1961), the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution prohibits states and the federal government from
1256:
773:
733:
503:
13452:
Free Speech, "The People's Darling Privilege": Struggles for Freedom of Expression in American History
10927:"Nullifying Nullification: Will the Second Circuit Prohibit a Defendant's Jury Nullification Defense?"
7995:
7932:"freedom of speech In: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fifth Edition, 2020"
2940:(2010), the Court ruled that the BCRA's federal restrictions on electoral advocacy by corporations or
20637:
20517:
20316:
20048:
19871:
19748:
19594:
19310:
18667:
18515:
18499:
16306:
15859:
15643:
14730:
13682:
12215:
12049:
6643:
supra, 374 U.S. at 374 U. S. 402. The government may not compel affirmation of religious belief, see
6348:
4847:
4530:
4246:
3953:
3910:
3273:, including the regulations thereunder, was not facially unconstitutional. The lax interpretation of
3093:
2994:
2510:, in which he spoke of "most loyal comrades were paying the penalty to the working class—these being
2480:
2449:
2411:
1878:
supra, 374 U.S. at 374 U. S. 402. The government may not compel affirmation of religious belief, see
1763:
1238:
1140:
993:
749:
737:
703:
373:
12174:
10910:
4236:(1939), where it was decided that the freedom of assembly covered by the First Amendment applies to
1969:
regarding such a refusal. The case involved Adele Sherbert, who was denied unemployment benefits by
20606:
20476:
20340:
20200:
20119:
19965:
19955:
19823:
19021:
18606:
17544:
17520:
17147:
16492:
16471:
16089:
15867:
15651:
15611:
15406:
15381:
15337:
15268:
15215:
14778:
14476:
14233:
13990:
13663:
13553:
10392:
10239:
10124:
7965:
7330:
6651:
4032:
Justices Black and Douglas went still further, writing that prior restraints were never justified.
3918:
defined "press" as "every sort of publication which affords a vehicle of information and opinion".
3393:
3185:
3061:
3031:
2484:
2437:
2415:
2401:
2300:, and freedom to teach. The United States Constitution protects, according to the Supreme Court in
2058:
1886:
1574:
1468:
by James Madison, who drafted the First Amendment; Madison used the metaphor of a "great barrier".
841:
12714:
12145:"The American Heritage Foundation's Guide to the Constitution: Freedom of Speech and of the Press"
3632:, holding that, because the act "rohibit child pornography that does not depict an actual child" (
3088:(1943), the Court ruled that school children could not be punished for refusing either to say the
1922:, 426 U. S. 696, 426 U. S. 708–725 (1976). But the "exercise of religion" often involves not only
1586:, have been developed to determine whether a government action violated the Establishment Clause.
1175:
depicting an army of clergymen assaulting a fortress defended by newspaper editors including from
20396:
20344:
20270:
20098:
19975:
19970:
19906:
19876:
19818:
18728:
18688:
17411:
16645:
16235:
16219:
16182:
16033:
15936:
15542:
15441:
15357:
15316:
15284:
15253:
14770:
14746:
13791:
13377:
Americanization of the Common Law: The Impact of Legal Change on Massachusetts Society, 1760-1830
10282:
10038:
10032:
9092:
9004:
8929:
8262:
6421:
5894:
5356:
4821:
4539:
4094:(1972), the Court ruled that the First Amendment did not give a journalist the right to refuse a
3587:... the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
3544:
3112:
2999:
2753:
2735:
2651:
2580:
2455:
2378:
2346:
2288:
2194:
1799:
1718:
1704:, 310 U. S. 296, 310 U. S. 303. Government may neither compel affirmation of a repugnant belief,
1700:
1534:(1970), the Court ruled that a legitimate action could not entangle government with religion. In
1412:
1352:
At the core of the Establishment Clause lays the core principle of denominational neutrality. In
1018:
881:
813:
808:
12938:
11959:
Empresas Puertorriqueñas de Desarrollo, Inc. v. Hermandad Independiente de Empleados Telefónicos
7935:
1855:
1541:
1242:(1970), which are "secular in purpose, evenhanded in operation, and neutral in primary impact".
557:, and many of its provisions were interpreted more narrowly than they are today. Beginning with
20559:
20078:
20003:
19950:
19901:
19725:
18643:
18095:
17068:
16266:
15571:
15550:
15526:
15332:
14810:
10877:
10701:
9862:
9155:
6810:
6663:
4579:
4330:
3709:
3613:(1990), ruling that the government's interest in protecting children from abuse was paramount.
3459:
3363:
3025:
2860:
2682:
2279:
1898:
1712:
1307:
1098:
1004:
973:
638:
554:
312:
6774:
6649:, 367 U. S. 488 (1961), punish the expression of religious doctrines it believes to be false,
6295:
6226:
5719:
5663:
4937:
2633:
Although the Court referred to the clear and present danger test in a few decisions following
1884:, 367 U. S. 488 (1961), punish the expression of religious doctrines it believes to be false,
1633:, called for the abandonment of the "wall of separation between church and State" metaphor in
1037:
At one time, it was thought that this right merely proscribed the preference of one Christian
908:
illustrated the broad protections offered by the First Amendment's religious liberty clauses:
20766:
20145:
20113:
19944:
19773:
19720:
18483:
18245:
17374:
15587:
15300:
15276:
15059:
14914:
13690:
13456:
13213:
13158:
13111:
13036:
12906:
12855:
12827:
12745:
12629:
12592:
12567:
12532:
12508:
12452:
12396:
12335:
12266:
12058:
12033:
11878:
11782:
11727:
11671:
11605:
11569:
11411:
11277:
11252:
11203:
11178:
11129:
11063:
11014:
11005:
10747:
10710:
10685:
10611:
10586:
10561:
10536:
10486:
10438:
10401:
10364:
10248:
10133:
10096:
10047:
10000:
9949:
9896:
9871:
9831:
9806:
9769:
9708:
9652:
9591:
9547:
9432:
9326:
9253:
9201:
9164:
9100:
8968:
8820:
8811:
8723:
8642:
8537:
8476:
7750:
7520:
7488:
7435:
7339:
7193:
7137:
7081:
7022:
6463:
6141:
6114:
6031:
5928:
5903:
5878:
5841:
5811:"McCreary County v. American Civil Liberties Union of Ky., 545 U.S. 844 (2005), at Part II A"
4776:
4588:
4303:
4148:
3783:
3520:
3377:
2587:", Brandeis wrote a dissent in which he argued for broader protections for political speech:
2571:
2443:
2431:
2258:
1986:
1816:
1373: (1982), that one religious denomination cannot be officially preferred over another. In
1367:
1059:
1003:. The Supreme Court noted at the outset that the First Amendment limits equally the power of
970:
305:
12283:"Pennekamp v. Florida, 328 U.S. 331 (1946), at 364. Concurring opinion by Felix Frankfurter"
8688:
Perilous Times: Free Speech in Wartime from the Sedition Act of 1798 to the War on Terrorism
4944:(1991) by the Council for the Advancement of Citizenship and the Center for Civic Education"
4877:
4035:
The courts have rarely treated content-based regulation of journalism with any sympathy. In
1430:
61:
20911:
20466:
20180:
20175:
20130:
20103:
20053:
19798:
17459:
17403:
17286:
16674:
16298:
16282:
16057:
15981:
15699:
15667:
14794:
14718:
14342:
14318:
14057:
13828:
13678:
12304:
11120:
9538:
9494:
9424:
9358:
7880:
7155:"Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith 484 U.S. 872 (1990)"
4977:"McCreary County v. American Civil Liberties Union of Ky., 545 U.S. 844 (2005), at Part IV"
4591:
4390:
4360:
4169:(2011), the Supreme Court stated regarding the Free Speech Clause and the Petition Clause:
3915:
3556:
3385:
2820:
2615:
2610:
2584:
2406:
2214:
1669:
1354:
1295:... That wall must be kept high and impregnable. We could not approve the slightest breach.
1080:
862:
858:
672:
515:
511:
431:
6748:
6170:"Kennedy v. Bremerton School District – A Sledgehammer to the Bedrock of Nonestablishment"
4722:
3742:
That the words are not subject to legal protection, such as those uttered in Congress; and
2989:(1969). In response to hearing an erroneous report of the murder of civil rights activist
8:
20894:
20683:
20411:
20275:
20063:
20008:
19911:
19768:
18932:
18903:
18843:
18338:
17840:
17560:
17254:
17238:
17182:
16434:
16330:
16049:
15603:
15595:
15481:
15352:
14586:
13998:
13783:
13699:
13175:"Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian, And Bisexual Group of Boston 515 U.S. 557 (1995)"
12200:
11548:
11097:
9616:
9317:
9244:
8934:
6291:
5525:
5387:"Jefferson's Letter to the Danbury Baptists—The Final Letter, as Sent on January 1, 1802"
5107:
4365:
4119:
3779:
3652:
3477:
3397:
3013:
2963:(2014), the Court ruled that federal aggregate limits on how much a person can donate to
2744:
2709:
2576:
2323:
might absurdly immunize things like false testimony under oath. Like Stevens, journalist
2037:
1966:
1310:
1050:
900:
890:
not happen to be in favor. That would be a complete repudiation of the philosophy of the
854:
729:
527:
13584:
11331:
10765:"Uncertain Rights: Student Speech and Conflicting Interpretations of Morse v. Frederick"
6086:
2671:
proposed a "balancing test", which soon supplanted the "clear and present danger" test:
2345:
Madison wrote this in 1799, when he was in a dispute about the constitutionality of the
1930:
but the performance of (or abstention from) physical acts: assembling with others for a
1109:
wrote about the First Amendment and its restriction on Congress in an 1802 reply to the
20596:
20580:
20441:
20255:
20230:
20215:
20125:
20093:
20083:
20043:
20033:
19142:
19072:
18953:
18878:
18635:
18590:
18322:
18269:
18143:
18071:
17616:
17139:
17010:
16322:
16073:
15985:
15912:
15723:
15675:
15659:
15627:
15465:
15292:
15181:
14858:
14842:
14834:
14818:
14629:
14602:
14552:
Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church & State
14334:
14217:
14162:
Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church & State
13881:
13507:
13216:
13161:
13114:
13039:
12990:
12964:
12858:
12830:
12748:
12632:
12620:
12595:
12570:
12535:
12511:
12455:
12399:
12338:
12282:
12269:
12061:
12036:
11674:
11608:
11572:
11414:
11334:. Legal Information Institute at Cornell Law School at Cornell University. May 19, 2008
11280:
11255:
11243:
11206:
11181:
11169:
11066:
11054:
11017:
10846:"Supreme Court strikes down North Carolina law banning sex offenders from social media"
10750:
10738:
10713:
10688:
10614:
10589:
10564:
10539:
10489:
10441:
10251:
10136:
10099:
10050:
10019:
10003:
9991:
9952:
9899:
9874:
9834:
9809:
9655:
9594:
9516:
9451:
9256:
9204:
9167:
9103:
9039:
8823:
8726:
8577:
8540:
8412:
8387:
8365:
8313:
8235:
8213:
8191:
8169:
8047:
7753:
7625:
7572:
7438:
7342:
7308:
7286:
7264:
7209:
7196:
7140:
7084:
7072:
7025:
7013:
6987:
6965:
6872:
6850:
6788:
6699:
6645:
6639:
6619:
6597:
6575:
6553:
6501:
6370:
5931:
5906:
5881:
5869:
5844:
5810:
5788:
5766:
5689:
5492:
5141:
5062:
4976:
4546:
4188:
4090:
3904:
3831:
3774:
3754:
3721:
3705:, requiring the demonstration of "actual malice" in libel suits against public figures.
3618:
3603:
3539:
3381:
3369:
3051:
has been a punishable offense under federal law since the early twentieth century, the
2985:
2797:
2786:
2704:
2646:
2626:
2562:
2557:
2527:
2511:
2302:
2297:
2204:
1979:
1957:
1880:
1874:
1863:
1706:
1635:
1614:
1564:
1406:
1390:
1370:
1327:
1029:
1009:
999:
977:
905:
876:
866:
817:
601:
559:
30:"First Amendment" redirects here. For the first amendments to other constitutions, see
12909:
11881:
11730:
11132:
10404:
10367:
9772:
9550:
9329:
8645:
8343:
8288:
8025:
7909:
6392:
5744:
5329:
5307:
5285:
5263:
5241:
5219:
5197:
3136:(1977), which had upheld legally obligating public sector employees to pay such dues.
2838:
statute that made it a crime to distribute anonymous campaign literature. However, in
2479:
went against the right to freedom of speech protected by the First Amendment. Justice
20916:
20662:
20647:
20627:
20501:
20376:
20355:
20327:
19931:
19758:
19350:
18752:
18491:
18127:
17904:
17511:
17338:
17190:
16949:
16914:
16589:
16455:
16402:
16386:
16113:
15835:
15771:
15691:
15534:
15432:
14669:
14294:
14225:
14185:
14049:
13857:
13849:
13611:
13559:
13528:
13491:
13460:
13428:
13381:
13353:
13325:
13294:
12326:
11962:
11941:
11785:
9711:
9389:
9030:
8971:
8912:
8895:
8881:
8867:
8696:
7038:
6467:
6425:
6299:
6154:
6105:
5669:
5665:
Archaeology, Narrative, and the Politics of the Past: The View from Southern Maryland
4641:"First Amendment constraints don't apply to private platforms, Supreme Court affirms"
4490:
4345:
4340:
3967:
3927:
3857:
3616:
Personal possession of obscene material in the home may not be prohibited by law. In
3594:
3145:
2668:
2374:
2365:, advocated the narrow freedom of speech that had existed in the English common law.
2319:
2184:
1839:
1656:
1630:
1610:
1536:
1493:
1456:. It had been long established in the decisions of the Supreme Court, beginning with
1375:
1024:
724:
The right to petition for redress of grievances was a principle included in the 1215
623:
19407:
13555:
Freedom of Expression: Resistance and Repression in the Age of Intellectual Property
11523:
4938:
Director Religious Freedom Education Project Charles C. Haynes (December 26, 2002).
3717:
3055:
criminalized the act of not only wearing, but also verbally claiming entitlement to
2140:(2020), the Court ruled that the Free Exercise Clause forbad a state from denying a
20538:
20285:
20160:
20088:
20073:
19808:
19753:
19715:
19326:
19029:
18408:
18290:
18237:
18186:
18170:
18055:
17943:
17753:
Ibanez v. Florida Dept. of Business and Professional Regulation, Bd. of Accountancy
17419:
17230:
16870:
16556:
16426:
16314:
16081:
15505:
15144:
15128:
14986:
14866:
14802:
14762:
14637:
14169:
13905:
13499:
13027:
11992:
10885:
10217:
10205:
Pub.L. 103-322, The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, § 320109
10087:
9699:
8435:
7309:"Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520 (1993), at 542–543"
7210:"Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520 (1993), at 531–547"
6718:
6657:
6100:
6082:
5919:
4335:
4273:
4023:, classified government documents about the Vietnam War secretly copied by analyst
3938:
3482:
3074:
3052:
3008:
2980:
2879:
2601:
2515:
2354:
2293:
2125:
2085:
1892:
1618:
1579:
1453:
1435:
1418:
1236:. The Establishment Clause thus serves to ensure laws, as said by Supreme Court in
1106:
589:
585:
300:
13237:
13182:
13080:
12665:
12421:
11984:
11806:
11751:
11696:
11641:
11435:
10772:
10762:
9220:
9068:
8684:
8111:
7459:
7239:
7162:
7106:
7050:
3524:(1957) that the First Amendment did not protect obscenity. It also ruled that the
2032:
1965:" standard when refusing to accommodate religiously motivated conduct. This meant
1085:
20823:
20771:
20652:
20611:
20522:
20446:
20350:
20332:
20068:
20038:
19896:
19302:
19045:
18571:
18507:
18469:
18330:
18261:
17920:
17443:
17350:
16973:
16810:
16794:
16770:
16022:
15994:
15952:
15920:
15364:
15308:
15047:
14786:
14738:
14693:
14645:
14460:
14326:
14302:
14265:
13591:
13474:
13403:
13375:
13347:
13319:
13288:
13059:
12000:
11969:
11372:
11194:
10192:
8686:
7961:
7770:
6896:"An epic Supreme Court showdown over religion and LGBTQ rights ends in a whimper"
6733:
6285:
4249:, the Court established that the right to petition prohibited the application of
4138:(1875) that the right of assembly was a secondary right to the right to petition.
4103:
4024:
4019:
3989:
3984:
3972:
3668:
3609:
3543:(1964), famously said that, although he could not precisely define pornography, "
3511:
3121:
2865:
2467:
2427:
2358:
2157:
1962:
1821:
1772:
1755:
1511:
1461:
1187:
1169:
837:
761:
686:
634:
546:
455:
12477:
11428:"Simon & Schuster v. Members of the New York State Crime Victims Board 1991"
11380:
5386:
4848:"The New United States of America Adopted the Bill of Rights: December 15, 1791"
4675:"The Google memo is a reminder that we generally don't have free speech at work"
3797:
While actual malice standard applies to public officials and public figures, in
3782:
had acted violently in suppressing the protests of African-Americans during the
20761:
20740:
20724:
20688:
20632:
20601:
20416:
19358:
18432:
18416:
17310:
17198:
17075:
15426:
15023:
14543:
14358:
14033:
13549:
13315:
13127:
10982:. Legal Information Institute, Cornell University Law School. August 19, 2010.
10935:"Defending a Court's Discretion To Allow Arguments for Conscientious Acquittal"
9677:
8021:
7742:
7287:"Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520 (1993), at 539"
7265:"Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520 (1993), at 534"
6132:
4996:
4994:
4227:
4129:
4124:
3961:
thoughtfully and deliberately selected to improve our society and keep it free.
3664:
3534:
3442:
3415:
3332:
3048:
2990:
2656:
2606:
2605:(1937), the Court heard the case of African American Communist Party organizer
2547:
2531:
2523:
2503:
2382:
2120:
1970:
1931:
1252:
1191:
538:. In the original draft of the Bill of Rights, what is now the First Amendment
9621:
8878:
The Constitution in the Supreme Court: The Second Century, 1888–1986, Volume 2
8048:"Riley v. National Federation of the Blind, 487 U.S. 781 (1988), at 796 – 797"
3739:
That the charge must be articulated to a third person, verbally or in writing;
3445:
wrote that while he could not precisely define pornography, he " it when it".
3238:
Is the expression protected by the First Amendment? Lawful? Misleading? Fraud?
2179:
20957:
20866:
20787:
20745:
20714:
20642:
20564:
20436:
20406:
20322:
20225:
19936:
19891:
16150:
15344:
15173:
13581:
The Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation
13131:
13013:
12987:"Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization, 307 U.S. 496 (1939), at 525"
12961:"Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization, 307 U.S. 496 (1939), at 516"
11945:
11898:
11354:
9848:
9607:
9393:
8864:
The Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation
7599:
6900:
6459:
Recasting Conservatism: Oakeshott, Strauss, and the Response to Postmodernism
6127:
5512:
5510:
4488:
The quote from Justice William O. Douglas comes from his majority opinion in
4449:
4250:
4237:
4014:
3836:
3769:
3492:
3419:
3202:
and ruled that commercial speech was entitled to First Amendment protection:
3126:
2642:
2498:, the Court elaborated on the "clear and present danger" test established in
2362:
2329:
2324:
2224:
1790:
1583:
1269:
1113:, a religious minority that was concerned about the dominant position of the
765:
714:
13073:"National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama 1958"
11634:"Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc. 472 U.S. 749 (1985)"
9564:
7356:
4991:
1041:
over another, but would not require equal respect for the conscience of the
19091:
18306:
18087:
17896:
17600:
16985:
16941:
16257:
14906:
14850:
13284:
11894:
10979:
9822:
9419:
5413:
4933:
4931:
4929:
4927:
4561:
4465:
4435:
4151:
resulted in imprisonments. The Supreme Court did not rule on either issue.
3468:
3288:
3180:... the conclusion that the properly characterized as commercial speech."
2791:
2763:
2758:
2660:
2507:
2102:
1651:
1125:
to the newly elected president about their concerns. Jefferson wrote back:
950:
829:
757:
695:
645:
633:(1971), the Supreme Court ruled that the First Amendment protected against
13772:
13742:
13707:
10859:
10821:"35 Universities Adopt 'The Chicago Statement' On Free Speech—1,606 To Go"
7717:
5545:
5543:
5507:
3636:) it was overly broad and unconstitutional under the First Amendment and:
3247:
Is the regulation more extensive than is necessary to serve that interest?
2332:, argued against narrowing this freedom to what had existed under English
2048:(RFRA), seeking to restore the compelling interest requirement applied in
2040:, and some churches in the U.S. take strong stances on political subjects.
20818:
20698:
19382:
18210:
15517:
13518:
12086:
9967:"Divided Court strikes down campaign contribution caps: In Plain English"
8892:
Fundamental Liberties of a Free People: Religion, Speech, Press, Assembly
7906:"Police Dept. of City of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92 (1972), at 95–96"
7809:
7703:"Free Exercise of Religion by Closely Held Corporations: Implications of
7368:
7366:
5993:, University of South Carolina Press, 2000; p. 149; Daniel L. Driesbach,
5036:. Free Speech Center at Middle Tennessee State University. Archived from
4469:
4254:
3942:
3829:
in a ruling which protected parody, in this case a fake advertisement in
3725:
3561:
3506:
3266:
2941:
2690:
2423:
1948:
1939:
1118:
1067:
917:
913:
825:
725:
13666:
was created from a revision of this article dated 30 June 2006
13424:
Freedom for the Thought That We Hate: A Biography of the First Amendment
11845:"The First Amendment doesn't guarantee you the rights you think it does"
10763:
Kozlowski, Dan V.; Bullard, Melissa E.; Deets, Kristen (April 1, 2009).
7764:
7762:
5581:
5579:
5577:
4924:
4564:
did not participate because he had ordered the prosecutions when he was
3935:(1943) the Supreme Court laid out the purpose of the free press clause:
3244:
Does the regulation directly advance the governmental interest asserted?
2014:
1923:
450:
20543:
18679:
18474:
17673:
Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Utilities Comm'n of California
16606:
Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Utilities Comm'n of California
15240:
12705:"Findlaw Annotation 21—First Amendment—Rights of assembly and petition"
10334:
10308:
10276:
9970:
9927:
9382:"Why the Slants Took a Fight Over Their Band Name to the Supreme Court"
8340:"Police Dept. of City of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92 (1972), at 103"
7854:
7652:
7482:"Tanzin v. Tanvir, 592 U.S. ___ (2020), Opinion of the Court at page 1"
6929:"What the Supreme Court Ruling on Foster Care Means for LGBTQ+ Parents"
5540:
4773:
The First Amendment in Schools: A Guide from the First Amendment Center
4356:
List of United States Supreme Court cases involving the First Amendment
4099:
3880:
3713:
3310:
2694:
2350:
2333:
2141:
1943:
1927:
1786:
1782:
1691:
1503:
1322:
605:
443:
13511:
9670:"Court Upholds Government Labeling Certain Foreign Films 'Propaganda'"
7363:
20451:
17721:
Peel v. Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of Illinois
15137:
Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. Pennsylvania
13607:
Beyond the First Amendment: The Politics of Free Speech and Pluralism
7759:
7626:"Estate of Thornton v. Caldor, Inc., 472 U.S. 703 (1985) at page 710"
6554:"Abington School District v. Schempp, 374 U.S. 203 (1963) at 222-223"
5574:
3505:(1933), Judge John M. Woolsey established a new standard to evaluate
3351:
However, since 1969 the Court has also placed several limitations on
3006:
The ambiguity with regard to flag-burning statutes was eliminated in
2964:
2638:
2218:(1940) that the freedom of speech and of the press guaranteed by the
1973:
because she refused to work on Saturdays, something forbidden by her
1935:
1229:
553:. Initially, the First Amendment applied only to laws enacted by the
17633:
Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission
10528:
Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission
6851:"Employment Div. v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990), Syllabus at 872–872"
5995:
Thomas Jefferson and the Wall of Separation between Church and State
5652:
Thomas Jefferson and the Wall of Separation between Church and State
5134:"Walz v. Tax Comm'n of City of New York, 397 U.S. 664 (1970, at 669"
3231:
Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission
3164:
The disseminator is economically motivated to distribute the speech.
2017:
religion, while providing exceptions for some practices such as the
438:
19295:
Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.
19151:
Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Group of Boston
16614:
Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Group of Boston
15245:
13503:
13150:
Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Group of Boston
12819:
Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.
10553:
Posadas de Puerto Rico Associates v. Tourism Company of Puerto Rico
10430:
Virginia State Pharmacy Board v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council
7900:
7898:
5833:
Board of Education of Kiryas Joel Village School District v. Grumet
4517:
4293:
Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Group of Boston
4144:
4095:
4078:
3884:
3757:'s argument that the punishment of "dangerous or offensive writings
3258:
Posadas de Puerto Rico Associates v. Tourism Company of Puerto Rico
3195:
Virginia State Pharmacy Board v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council
2183:
Inscription of the First Amendment (December 15, 1791) in front of
1401:
Board of Education of Kiryas Joel Village School District v. Grumet
1282:
the Establishment Clause (i.e., made it apply against the states):
1259:. Against this background the National Constitution Center states:
1233:
921:
17689:
San Francisco Arts & Athletics, Inc. v. U.S. Olympic Committee
7700:
5686:"Abington School District v. Schempp, 374 U.S. 203 (1963), at 220"
4605:
Eastern Railroad presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc
3978:
1650:, the Establishment Clause solely prevents the establishment of a
1551:
its principal or primary effect advanced or inhibited religion; or
957:
or give tax exemptions only to those whose children were baptized.
20486:
19916:
17665:
Zauderer v. Off. of Disciplinary Counsel of Supreme Court of Ohio
17569:
Virginia State Pharmacy Bd. v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council
16509:
Perry Education Association v. Perry Local Educators' Association
15852:
American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression v. Strickland
12709:
8106:
8104:
8102:
8100:
5440:"Religious liberty in public life: Establishment Clause overview"
4060:
2550:
wrote several dissents in the 1920s upholding free speech claims.
2283:
2018:
1272:, for example, was officially Congregational until the 1830s. In
1063:
1046:
1042:
954:
929:
925:
833:
17809:
Los Angeles Police Department v. United Reporting Publishing Co.
17476:
Heffron v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc.
14875:
Heffron v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc.
13762:"Freedom of Speech and Press: Exceptions to the First Amendment"
13732:"Freedom of Speech and Press: Exceptions to the First Amendment"
13708:"Freedom of Speech and Press: Exceptions to the First Amendment"
13574:
Church-State Relations in the Early American Republic, 1787–1846
9517:"Bridges v. California, 314 U.S. 252 (1941), at 263 and 270-271"
7895:
7519:. United States Supreme Court. December 10, 2020. Archived from
7487:. United States Supreme Court. December 10, 2020. Archived from
6598:"Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery, 485 U.S. 439 (1988), at 450"
5108:"McCreary County vs. American Civil Liberties Union of Kentucky"
4302:(2000), the Court ruled that a New Jersey law, which forced the
3155:
The contents do "no more than propose a commercial transaction".
2659:
relied on Holmes' "clear and present danger" test as adapted by
2001:
The need for a compelling governmental interest was narrowed in
1947:
used for worship purposes," or to prohibit bowing down before a
710:
16739:
Board of Regents of the Univ. of Wisconsin System v. Southworth
16622:
Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic & Institutional Rights, Inc.
10331:"Opinion analysis: Court strikes down public-sector union fees"
9493:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. June 19, 2017. Archived from
9357:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. June 19, 2017. Archived from
8342:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. June 26, 1972. Archived from
8071:"How Would an Absolute First Amendment Benefit Modern Society?"
7908:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. June 26, 1972. Archived from
7879:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. June 21, 2022. Archived from
5965:"Memorial and Remonstrance against Religious AssessmentsPapers"
5688:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. June 17, 1963. Archived from
5493:"Larkin v. Grendel's Den, Inc., 459 U.S. 116 (1982) at 126-127"
3786:. The Montgomery Police Commissioner, L. B. Sullivan, sued the
3678:
3151:
purposes of litigation, the Court uses a list of four indicia:
3021:
2530:. The majority upheld their conviction, but Holmes and Justice
1776:
1682:
1554:
it fostered an excessive government entanglement with religion.
748:
After several years of comparatively weak government under the
17857:
Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Assn. v. Brentwood Academy
17367:
U.S. Civil Service Comm'n v. National Ass'n of Letter Carriers
17295:
Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Assn. v. Brentwood Academy
17279:
Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Assn.
17132:
Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Assn. v. Brentwood Academy
17124:
Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Assn.
14074:
Levitt v. Committee for Public Education and Religious Liberty
13558:. foreword by Lawrence Lessig. University of Minnesota Press.
12989:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. June 5, 1939. Archived from
12963:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. June 5, 1939. Archived from
8906:
Freedom of Expression in the Supreme Court: The Defining Cases
8097:
7934:. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company. Archived from
5585:
4903:
4901:
4899:
4897:
4895:
3211:... e conclude that the answer to this one is in the negative.
3102:(1940), which had upheld such punishments of school children.
27:
1791 amendment limiting government restriction of civil rights
17801:
Greater New Orleans Broadcasting Assn., Inc. v. United States
14827:
Gallagher v. Crown Kosher Super Market of Massachusetts, Inc.
14154:
Committee for Public Education and Religious Liberty v. Regan
13261:"Divided Court Invalidates California Donor Disclosure Rules"
8685:
Geoffrey R. Stone; Professor of Law Geoffrey R Stone (2004).
5353:"REPORT Religious Liberty: Why Does Religious Freedom Matter"
5140:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. May 4, 1970. Archived from
4725:. Cornell University Law School Legal Information Institute.
1054:
609:
19242:
Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican Party
17537:
Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Comm'n on Human Relations
16525:
International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. Lee
16199:
City of Austin v. Reagan National Advertising of Austin, LLC
12883:
Jeremy McBride, Freedom of Association, in The Essentials of
11093:"The Origins of Justice Stewart's 'I Know It When I See It'"
9798:
Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc.
6253:
2983:
as a form of protest first came before the Supreme Court in
2918:
Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc.
2721:
discarded the "clear and present danger" test introduced in
2542:
2023:
the Court ruled that it needed to have a compelling interest
1596:
After the Supreme Court ruling in the coach praying case of
691:
19375:
BE and K Construction Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
17873:
Jerman v. Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich LPA
17681:
Posadas de Puerto Rico Assoc. v. Tourism Co. of Puerto Rico
14525:
Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Juan v. Acevedo Feliciano
13484:
Daniel L. Dreisbach, Mark David Hall, and Jeffry Morrison.
12168:
12166:
11997:
Fashion Valley Mall, LLC, v. National Labor Relations Board
11467:
11465:
10163:"Amendment on Flag Burning Fails by One Vote in the Senate"
7514:"Tanzin v. Tanvir, 592 U.S. ___ (2020), Syllabus at page 1"
7232:"Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah 1993"
4892:
3825:(1988), the Court extended the "actual malice" standard to
3699:
Justice William J. Brennan Jr. wrote the landmark decision
3130:
person who does not want to pay." The Court also overruled
2891:
The court again scrutinized campaign finance regulation in
2835:
2064:
enforcement powers in Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment
1038:
18828:
Denver Area Ed. Telecommunications Consortium, Inc. v. FCC
18112:
Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett
16630:
National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra
15113:
Gonzales v. O Centro EspĂrita Beneficente UniĂŁo do Vegetal
14686:
Board of Ed. of Kiryas Joel Village School Dist. v. Grumet
14210:
Board of Ed. of Kiryas Joel Village School Dist. v. Grumet
14194:
Witters v. Washington Department of Services for the Blind
13813:
13321:
Plain, Honest Men: The Making of the American Constitution
10642:
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District
10603:
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District
8862:
Killian, Johnny H.; Costello, George; Thomas, Kenneth R.,
8366:"Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965), at 482–483"
6725:
Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. Smith
4781:"House of Representatives, Amendments to the Constitution"
3307:
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District
3108:
National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra
2909:
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District
764:. Other delegates—including future Bill of Rights drafter
13126:
12414:"New York Times Co. v. United States 403 U.S. 713 (1971)"
12091:"Justices Reject Ban on Violent Video Games for Children"
12020:(Forte and Spalding, eds., The Heritage Foundation 2014).
9447:"Justices Strike Down Law Banning Disparaging Trademarks"
8866:, Library of Congress, Government Printing Office, 2005,
7587:
5956:
567:
applied the First Amendment to states—a process known as
14971:
Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission
14402:
Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches Union Free School Dist.
12887:... Human Rights, Hodder Arnold, London, 2005, pp. 18–20
12871:
public domain material from this U.S government document
12761:
public domain material from this U.S government document
12500:
Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation
12163:
11482:
11480:
11462:
11450:
11035:
10719:
10502:
public domain material from this U.S government document
10454:
public domain material from this U.S government document
10277:
The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica (June 7, 2020).
10264:
public domain material from this U.S government document
10207:(p. 318 of the PDF version). Retrieved on June 30, 2012.
10160:
10142:
9741:
9114:
9112:
8908:, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 16. August 2000,
8668:
8666:
8616:
7701:
Legislative Attorney Cynthia Brown (November 12, 2015).
7680:"Hobby Lobby Wins Contraceptive Ruling in Supreme Court"
6338:
6336:
6334:
4267:
Freedom of association § United States Constitution
4052:
Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation
3111:(2018), the Court ruled that a California law requiring
2148:
Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Association
18713:
Greenbelt Cooperative Publishing Ass'n, Inc. v. Bresler
16821:
12368:
12356:
11504:
8792:
8604:
8494:
8118:. Legal Information Institute of the Cornell University
7877:"Carson v. Makin, 596 U.S. ___ (2022), Part II Section"
7649:"Argument preview: Religion, rights, and the workplace"
6873:"Employment Div. v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990), at 879"
5991:
Shaping America: the Supreme Court and American society
5105:
4753:
3628:(2002) further upheld these rights by invalidating the
1961:(1963), the Supreme Court required states to meet the "
1642:
David Shultz has said that accommodationists claim the
1466:
Memorial and Remonstrance against Religious Assessments
18745:
Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc.
17865:
Milavetz, Gallop & Milavetz, P.A. v. United States
17657:
Hoffman Estates v. The Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.
17484:
Hoffman Estates v. The Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.
13524:
Cyber Rights: Defending Free Speech in the Digital Age
13234:
Gender Issues and Sexuality: Essential Primary Sources
12122:"Bloggers, Media Shield Laws, And The First Amendment"
11598:
Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc.
8285:"Thornhill v. Alabama, 310 U.S. 88 (1940), at 101-102"
8192:"Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943), at 116"
8170:"Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943), at 115"
8144:"Reconsidering Citizens United as a Press Clause Case"
6524:"Supreme Court Cases: Reynolds v. United States, 1879"
5745:"Epperson v. Arkansas, 393 U.S. 97 (1968), at 103–104"
5198:"Wallace v. Jaffree, 472 U.S. 38 (1985), at 48 et seq"
5063:"Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943), at 115"
5031:
4940:"History of Religious Liberty in America. Written for
3806:
Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc.
3251:
Six years later, the U.S. Supreme Court, applying the
3016:
burned an American flag at a demonstration during the
2655:(1951), the Court upheld the Smith Act. Chief Justice
2021:. Since the ordinance was not "generally applicable",
1646:
test should be applied selectively. As such, for many
1396:
requiring any kind of religious test for public office
19437:
18032:
FEC v. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee
18016:
Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee v. FEC
17913:
Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants
16191:
Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants
14410:
Capitol Square Review & Advisory Board v. Pinette
13874:
County of Allegheny v. American Civil Liberties Union
13488:
Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2009.
12935:"The Successes of the American Civil Liberties Union"
11477:
11224:
10657:
10620:
10068:
9565:"Cybersmear: telecommunication's 200-year-old riddle"
9335:
9286:
9262:
9173:
9109:
9027:
Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States
8841:
8780:
8768:
8663:
8388:"Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 (1969), at 564–566"
8214:"Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 (1969), at 564-566"
6811:"Cantwell v. Connecticut—310 U.S. 296 (1940), at 303"
6753:, 582 U.S. ___ (2017), Opinion of the Court, Part II"
6331:
6068:
6066:
2781:, 279 U. S. 644, 655 (1929) (Holmes, J., dissenting).
2349:, which was legislation enacted in 1798 by President
2164:
1967:
the government needed to have a "compelling interest"
1331:(1961) the Supreme Court repeated its statement from
1299:
19335:
California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited
18737:
Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.
16533:
Arkansas Educational Television Commission v. Forbes
15325:
Communist Party v. Subversive Activities Control Bd.
14931:
Frazee v. Illinois Department of Employment Security
13494:, "Toward a General Theory of the First Amendment",
12737:
California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited
12541:
12344:
10279:"West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette"
8829:
8756:
8592:
8558:
8506:
8482:
8454:
8442:
8137:
8135:
8133:
7810:"Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer"
6960:
6958:
6956:
6887:
6371:"Zorach v. Clauson, 343 U.S. 306 (1952), at 313–314"
6279:
6277:
5286:"Wallace v. Jaffree, 472 U.S. 38 (1985), at 50 – 52"
5220:"Wallace v. Jaffree, 472 U.S. 38 (1985), at 48 – 49"
4351:
List of amendments to the United States Constitution
4157:
California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited
3158:
The contents may be characterized as advertisements.
2368:
1544:, declaring that an action was an establishment if:
20994:
Separation of church and state in the United States
17207:
Mt. Healthy City School Dist. Board of Ed. v. Doyle
16903:
USAID v. Alliance for Open Society International II
16863:
Regan v. Taxation with Representation of Washington
14042:
Board of Ed. of Central School Dist. No. 1 v. Allen
12699:
12697:
12695:
12693:
12691:
12689:
12687:
12685:
12683:
12305:"Mills v. Alabama, 384 U.S. 214 (1966), at 218-219"
11981:
Golden Gateway Ctr. v. Golden Gateway Tenants Ass'n
11830:
Milkovich revisited: "Saving" the Opinion Privilege
11799:"Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co. 497 U.S. 1 (1990)"
11528:
The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law
10195:, citing 42 Stat. 1286. Retrieved on June 30, 2012.
8238:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. November 21, 1939
7575:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. February 23, 1982
7573:"United States v. Lee, 455 U.S. 252 (1982), at 261"
5747:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. November 12, 1968
5495:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. December 13, 1982
4802:
4741:
4536:conjunction with other constitutional protections.
4468:, concurring). A system which secures the right to
1548:
the statute (or practice) lacked a secular purpose;
1317:, the site of Maryland's first colonial settlement.
745:legislatures", rather than enforceable provisions.
20861:Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787
17263:United States v. National Treasury Employees Union
17056:West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette
16934:Walker v. Texas Div., Sons of Confederate Veterans
16895:USAID v. Alliance for Open Society International I
15796:United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc.
14955:Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah
14595:Two Guys from Harrison-Allentown, Inc. v. McGinley
13696:First Amendment Center—The First Amendment Library
13579:Johnny Killian and George Costello (eds.) (2000).
13486:The Forgotten Founders on Religion and Public Life
13132:"What is Really Wrong with Compelled Association?"
12232:, 380 U.S. 356, 357 (1965) (per curiam) (applying
12147:. The American Heritage Foundation. Archived from
11355:"Protecting children speech that crosses the line"
9562:
9519:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. December 8, 1941
8320:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. December 5, 1966
7796:Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer
6751:Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer
6063:
5330:"Wallace v. Jaffree, 472 U.S. 38 (1985), at 52–54"
5000:
4790:
4457:West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette
3772:. The case involved an advertisement published in
3291:law prohibiting the publication of liquor prices.
3085:West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette
2131:Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer
1936:participating in sacramental use of bread and wine
1751:Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. Comer
20964:First Amendment to the United States Constitution
19367:Buckley v. American Constitutional Law Foundation
19234:New York State Board of Elections v. Lopez Torres
18195:Brown v. Socialist Workers '74 Campaign Committee
17968:Citizens Against Rent Control v. City of Berkeley
16419:Schenck v. Pro-Choice Network of Western New York
16167:Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. Crime Victims Board
13890:McCreary County v. American Civil Liberties Union
13016:. The George Washington International Law Review.
12411:
8413:"Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 (1969), at 565"
8236:"Schneider v. State, 308 U.S. 147 (1939), at 161"
8150:. 123 2013–2014 (November 2, 2013, Pages 266–529)
8130:
7372:
7096:
7037:
6953:
6789:"Braunfeld v. Brown, 366 U.S. 599 (1961), at 607"
6274:
5971:. University of Chicago Press. pp. 8:298–304
5588:"Common Interpretation: The Establishment Clause"
4013:(1971), in which the administration of President
3658:
3301:Freedom of speech in schools in the United States
2649:for attempting to organize a Communist Party. In
2286:in one's associations, but also, in the words of
1850:, 310 U.S. at 310 U. S. 595 (collecting cases)."
1382:McCreary County v. American Civil Liberties Union
983:McCreary County v. American Civil Liberties Union
872:McCreary County v. American Civil Liberties Union
18:First Amendment of the United States Constitution
20955:
17064:Tinker v. Des Moines Ind. Community School Dist.
16838:Minnesota Board for Community Colleges v. Knight
16003:Board of Airport Commissioners v. Jews for Jesus
14509:Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese v. Milivojevich
13922:American Legion v. American Humanist Association
12937:. American Civil Liberties Union. Archived from
12680:
12470:"Dan Paul, 85, leading lawyer for press freedom"
9924:"Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission"
8287:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. Archived from
7152:
6994:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. April 17, 1990
6966:"Braunfeld v. Brown, 366 U.S. 599 (1961) at 603"
6875:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. April 17, 1990
6853:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. April 17, 1990
6702:Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. Hialeah
6684:Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese v. Milivojevich
6626:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. April 17, 1990
6600:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. April 19, 1988
6576:"Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 (1963) at 402"
6373:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. April 28, 1952
6045:"Excerpts From Ruling on Use of Education Money"
5791:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. April 28, 1952
5789:"Zorach v. Clauson, 343 U.S. 306 (1952), at 314"
5769:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. April 21, 1982
5767:"Larson v. Valente, 456 U.S. 228 (1982), at 244"
3241:Is the asserted government interest substantial?
1919:Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese v. Milivojevich
1846:Minersville School Dist. Bd. of Educ. v. Gobitis
1789:, in South Dakota, is a sacred site for over 30
1745:Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. Hialeah
857:is protected by the First Amendment through its
19014:Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath
18769:Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. Connaughton
18120:American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. Bullock
17793:Glickman v. Wileman Brothers & Elliot, Inc.
17577:Linmark Assoc., Inc. v. Township of Willingboro
16731:Glickman v. Wileman Brothers & Elliot, Inc.
15085:Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru
14469:Gonzalez v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Manila
13277:
13077:Supreme Court Drama: Cases That Changed America
11893:
11748:Supreme Court Drama: Cases that Changed America
11686:
11432:Supreme Court Drama: Cases That Changed America
11371:
9491:"Matal v. Tam, 582 U.S. ___ (2017), Part III-B"
8415:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. April 7, 1969
8390:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. April 7, 1969
8216:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. April 7, 1969
7628:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. June 26, 1985
7354:
7311:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. June 11, 1993
7289:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. June 11, 1993
7267:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. June 11, 1993
7236:Supreme Court Drama: Cases that Changed America
7212:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. June 11, 1993
6755:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. June 26, 2017
6706:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. June 11, 1993
6578:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. June 17, 1963
6556:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. June 17, 1963
6072:
5813:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. June 27, 2005
5308:"Wallace v. Jaffree, 472 U.S. 38 (1985), at 50"
4979:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. June 27, 2005
4077:(1987), for instance, the Court invalidated an
3728:. An action of slander required the following:
2074:since 1993. According to the court's ruling in
1452:, derived from the correspondence of President
1132:a wall of separation between Church & State
832:. These laws stood in direct contrast with the
20872:Bibliography of the United States Constitution
18347:National Rifle Association of America v. Vullo
17396:Mutual Film Corp. v. Industrial Comm'n of Ohio
15209:
13011:
12813:
12811:
12307:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. May 23, 1966
12285:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. June 3, 1946
12175:"First Amendment (United States Constitution)"
10222:"Fake claims of war heroics a federal offense"
9606:
8880:, University of Chicago Press, 1994, p. 269,
8523:
8521:
8368:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. June 7, 1965
7185:Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah
6968:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. May 29, 1961
6791:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. May 29, 1961
6775:"Reynolds v. United States—98 U.S. 145 (1878)"
6455:
6413:
6395:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. June 4, 1985
6203:. American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ).
5554:Walz v. Tax Commission of the City of New York
5332:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. June 4, 1985
5310:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. June 4, 1985
5288:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. June 4, 1985
5266:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. June 4, 1985
5244:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. June 4, 1985
5222:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. June 4, 1985
5200:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. June 4, 1985
4233:Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization
3965:A landmark decision for press freedom came in
2937:Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
2506:, a political activist, delivered a speech in
2294:the freedom of the entire university community
2101:(1985) echoed this statement by quoting Judge
2010:Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah
1805:Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
1623:Walz v. Tax Commission of the City of New York
1531:Walz v. Tax Commission of the City of New York
1509:In the school prayer cases of the early 1960s
1225:Walz v. Tax Commission of the City of New York
604:precedent to increase the burden of proof for
573:Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
19423:
16803:Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association
14202:Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District
13799:
13481:. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund Press, 2009.
12467:
12172:
11090:
10974:
10972:
10970:
8433:Stevens, John Paul. "The Freedom of Speech",
8194:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. May 3, 1943
8172:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. May 3, 1943
7596:"9 Supreme Court cases that shaped the 2010s"
6730:Hobbie v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n of Fla.
5718:. United States Supreme Court. Archived from
5065:. Justia US Supreme Court Center. May 3, 1943
5032:Richard L. Pacelle Jr. (September 19, 2023).
3716:speech or publications traces its origins to
3042:
2738:and is likely to incite or cause such action.
2252:(1972), Chief Justice Warren E. Burger said:
2027:Hobbie v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n of Fla.
1838:, 455 U. S. 252, 455 U. S. 263, n. 3 (1982) (
1095:the Statute of Virginia for Religious Freedom
644:Although the First Amendment applies only to
475:
19054:Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta
18970:Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta
18652:Minneapolis Star Tribune Co. v. Commissioner
18219:Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta
17223:Smith v. Arkansas State Hwy. Employees Local
16574:West Virginia State Board of Ed. v. Barnette
16379:Clark v. Community for Creative Non-Violence
16066:Clark v. Community for Creative Non-Violence
14939:Swaggart Ministries v. Board of Equalization
14678:Swaggart Ministries v. Board of Equalization
14114:Public Funds for Public Schools v. Marburger
13702:Web Archives (archived October 16, 2004)
12784:
12782:
10161:Hulse, Carl; Holusha, John (June 27, 2006).
9911:See Part III of the Opinion of the Court in
9846:
6283:
4874:"American History: Massachusetts Bay Colony"
4376:Section 116 of the Constitution of Australia
4312:Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Bonta
4245:decisions collectively known as forming the
3971:(1931), in which the Supreme Court rejected
3827:intentional infliction of emotional distress
3745:That the charge must be motivated by malice.
2856:Campaign finance reform in the United States
1663:
1540:(1971), these points were combined into the
1198:regarding the views on establishment by the
1074:
18863:Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.
18254:Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck
17761:Lebron v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
17215:Givhan v. Western Line Consol. School Dist.
14979:Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. Cuomo
14568:Arizona Christian Sch. Tuition Org. v. Winn
14242:Arizona Christian Sch. Tuition Org. v. Winn
14130:Roemer v. Board of Public Works of Maryland
13498:, vol. 72, no. 5 (1963), pp. 877–956.
12808:
12085:
11836:
11403:Simon & Schuster v. Crime Victims Board
11101:. LawBlog at The Wall Street Journal Online
10769:Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly
9851:. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy.
8518:
6677:, 393 U. S. 440, 393 U. S. 445–452 (1969);
6168:Lupu, Ira; Tuttle, Robert (June 28, 2022).
5710:
5657:
4460:, 319 U. S. 624, 319 U. S. 633–634 (1943);
4418:Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck
3856:and other cases effectively provide for an
3674:Simon & Schuster v. Crime Victims Board
3047:While the unauthorized wear or sale of the
2126:forbids state aid to religious institutions
1912:, 393 U. S. 440, 393 U. S. 445–452 (1969);
920:, or to turn the people toward the path of
545:The Bill of Rights was proposed to assuage
19430:
19416:
18993:
17585:Carey v. Population Services International
17271:Board of Comm'rs, Wabaunsee Cty. v. Umbehr
17108:Westside Community Board of Ed. v. Mergens
16958:Houston Community College System v. Wilson
16363:USPS v. Council of Greenburgh Civic Assns.
15804:City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, Inc.
15764:American Booksellers Ass'n, Inc. v. Hudnut
15490:Nat'l Socialist Party v. Village of Skokie
14351:Westside Community Board of Ed. v. Mergens
13943:Walz v. Tax Comm'n of the City of New York
13866:Board of Trustees of Scarsdale v. McCreary
13806:
13792:
13706:Ruane, Kathleen Anne (September 8, 2014).
13600:. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.
12841:
12839:
11903:Harvard Journal of Law and Public Property
11842:
11352:
10967:
10921:. entencing.typepad.com. November 6, 2018.
9379:
6704:, 508 U.S. 520 (1993), at 533 and 542–543"
6687:, 426 U. S. 696, 426 U. S. 708–725 (1976).
6167:
5942:
5940:
5549:
5085:"McGowan v. Maryland: 366 U.S. 420 (1961)"
4876:. Encyclopaedia Britannica. Archived from
4668:
4666:
3998:(1971), a landmark press freedom decision.
3495:, 1928) were banned for obscenity. In the
3161:The contents reference a specific product.
2373:The Supreme Court declined to rule on the
953:. Nor could it require all children to be
482:
468:
19343:Smith v. Arkansas State Highway Employees
18556:Landmark Communications, Inc. v. Virginia
17952:First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti
17833:Thompson v. Western States Medical Center
17625:Consol. Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n
16879:National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley
16779:Ysursa v. Pocatello Education Association
16707:Communications Workers of America v. Beck
15716:United States v. 12 200-ft. Reels of Film
15684:United States v. Thirty-seven Photographs
15040:Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue
14963:Watchtower Society v. Village of Stratton
14258:Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue
14090:Committee for Public Education v. Nyquist
13691:Cornell Law School—Annotated Constitution
13349:The Law of Speech and the First Amendment
13179:Encyclopedia of the American Constitution
12779:
12662:Encyclopedia of the American Constitution
12418:Encyclopedia of the American Constitution
12258:First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti
12142:
12119:
11803:Encyclopedia of the American Constitution
11693:Encyclopedia of the American Constitution
11638:Encyclopedia of the American Constitution
9941:McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission
9667:
8141:
7835:Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue
7646:
7593:
7409:National Conference of State Legislatures
7159:Encyclopedia of the American Constitution
7103:Encyclopedia of the American Constitution
7047:Encyclopedia of the American Constitution
6893:
6681:, 344 U. S. 94, 344 U. S. 95–119 (1952);
6667:, 345 U. S. 67, 345 U. S. 69 (1953); cf.
6198:
5619:
4910:"What in the World is Religious Freedom?"
4260:
3897:Freedom of the press in the United States
3554:test was expanded when the Court decided
3340:refusal to recognize a campus chapter of
3125:(2018), the Court ruled that requiring a
2960:McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission
2137:Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue
1916:, 344 U. S. 94, 344 U. S. 95–119 (1952);
1902:, 345 U. S. 67, 345 U. S. 69 (1953); cf.
816:secured religious liberty in the English
598:exceptions to First Amendment protections
596:; these rulings also defined a series of
20989:Freedom of religion in the United States
20984:Christianity and law in the 18th century
20928:Scene at the Signing of the Constitution
18456:
18401:Jones v. North Carolina Prisoners' Union
15580:United States v. One Book Called Ulysses
14717:
14560:Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation
14426:Good News Club v. Milford Central School
13827:
13674:, and does not reflect subsequent edits.
13657:
12792:. First Amendment Center. Archived from
12658:"Branzburg v. Hayes 408 U.S. 665 (1972)"
11934:Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy
11927:
11332:"United States v. Williams (No. 06-694)"
10328:
10302:
10216:
9761:McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
8894:, Transaction Publishers, 2003, p. 304,
7768:
7677:
7099:"Wisconsin v. Yoder 406 U.S. 205 (1972)"
7043:"Sherbert v. Verner 374 U.S. 398 (1963)"
6502:"Lynch v. Donnelly, 465 U.S. 668 (1984)"
6393:"Wallace v. Jaffree, 472 U.S. 38 (1985)"
5442:. First Amendment Center. Archived from
5165:
5057:
5055:
4942:Civitas: A Framework for Civic Education
4672:
4123:
4109:
3977:
3937:
3694:
3630:Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996
3502:United States v. One Book Called Ulysses
3436:
2894:McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
2871:McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
2859:
2541:
2537:
2405:
2313:
2178:
2151:(1988) the Supreme Court decided in the
2072:State Religious Freedom Restoration Acts
2031:
1985:
1781:
1673:
1613:, in contrast, argue along with Justice
1429:
1298:
1163:
1084:
807:
800:Freedom of religion in the United States
709:
690:
19265:
19135:New York Club Ass'n v. City of New York
18902:
18836:Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. FCC
18104:Nevada Commission on Ethics v. Carrigan
18024:Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PAC
17976:FEC v. National Right to Work Committee
17889:Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman
17729:City of Cincinnati v. Discovery Network
16763:Davenport v. Washington Education Ass'n
16582:Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo
15820:United States v. American Library Ass'n
15780:United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc.
15732:Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. v. Conrad
13543:A People's History of the Supreme Court
12836:
12444:Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo
9612:"Court Hears Case on Unsigned Leaflets"
9412:
9029:, Wm. S. Hein Publishing, 1998, p 219,
8858:
8856:
8471:
8469:
8142:McConnell, Michael W. (November 2013).
8068:
7992:Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary
6530:. Pearson Prentice Hall. Archived from
6449:
6254:Michael P. Bobic; John R. Vile (2009).
5962:
5937:
5467:"Established Churches in Early America"
5161:
5159:
5001:Michelle Boorstein (November 3, 2020).
4663:
4396:Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
4038:Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo
3890:
2883:(1976), the Supreme Court reviewed the
1220:Federal government of the United States
932:or agnostics. On matters of this kind,
822:Rhode Island and Providence Plantations
14:
20956:
18871:Harper & Row v. Nation Enterprises
18040:Republican Party of Minnesota v. White
18008:Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce
18000:Eu v. S.F. Cty. Democratic Cent. Comm.
17992:FEC v. Massachusetts Citizens for Life
17745:United States v. Edge Broadcasting Co.
17500:Forsyth County v. Nationalist Movement
17100:Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier
17048:Minersville School District v. Gobitis
17027:Communist Party of Indiana v. Whitcomb
16995:American Communications Ass'n v. Douds
16699:Chicago Local Teachers Union v. Hudson
16566:Minersville School District v. Gobitis
15876:Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Ass'n
15756:Vance v. Universal Amusement Co., Inc.
14755:Minersville School District v. Gobitis
14375:Elk Grove Unif. School Dist. v. Newdow
13610:. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
13603:
13548:
13517:
13448:
13401:
13373:
13345:
13314:
13283:
12014:The Heritage Guide to the Constitution
11510:
11486:
11471:
11456:
11230:
10725:
10663:
10626:
10148:
10074:
9888:Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce
9444:
9341:
9268:
9179:
9118:
8986:
8984:
8982:
8980:
8847:
8786:
8672:
8622:
8407:
8405:
8308:
8306:
7259:
7257:
6407:
6227:"Kennedy v. Bremerton School District"
6207:from the original on November 23, 2022
6180:from the original on November 23, 2022
5586:Marci A. Hamilton; Michael McConnell.
5410:"How the Supreme Court Found the Wall"
4854:from the original on December 25, 2012
4796:
4759:
4707:. United States Courts. Archived from
4638:
4551:406 U. S. 205. Pp. 494 U. S. 876–882."
4116:Right to petition in the United States
3873:enhanced protections, most notably in
3601:test, as the Supreme Court decided in
3414:(2017), the Supreme Court held that a
3099:Minersville School District v. Gobitis
2947:Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce
2526:'s intervention in Russia against the
2171:Freedom of speech in the United States
1568:(1997), the entanglement prong of the
1146:Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom
928:nation, or to produce in the long run
793:
19411:
19264:
19210:Timmons v. Twin Cities Area New Party
19127:Rotary Int'l v. Rotary Club of Duarte
18992:
18901:
18455:
17960:California Medical Association v. FEC
17609:Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Association
17247:Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois
16517:Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense Fund
16411:Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc.
15748:Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.
15208:
14899:Bob Jones University v. United States
14716:
13959:Bob Jones University v. United States
13826:
13787:
13729:
13705:
13576:. London: Pickering and Chatto, 2013.
13420:
13053:36 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 5
12790:"Frequently Asked Questions—Petition"
12547:
12412:Frederick Schauer (January 1, 2000).
12374:
12362:
12350:
11041:
10479:Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Association
9747:
9583:McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission
9292:
8835:
8798:
8774:
8762:
8691:. W.W. Norton & Company. p.
8610:
8598:
8564:
8512:
8500:
8488:
8460:
8448:
8116:| Wex Legal Dictionary / Encyclopedia
7097:Richard E. Morgan (January 1, 2000).
5997:NYU Press 2002, unpaginated; Chap. 7.
5615:
5613:
5106:Sandra Day O'Connor (June 27, 2005).
5052:
4971:
4969:
4967:
4965:
4808:
4747:
4059:'s authority to restrict the use of "
4017:sought to ban the publication of the
3920:This right has been extended to media
3528:test was inappropriate; instead, the
3287:(1996), when the Court invalidated a
3217:Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Association
2831:McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission
1679:The First Church of Christ, Scientist
1496:called in his concurrence opinion in
19218:California Democratic Party v. Jones
18660:Arkansas Writers' Project v. Ragland
18080:FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc.
18064:Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. v. FEC
17849:Johanns v. Livestock Marketing Ass'n
17156:Mahanoy Area School District v. B.L.
17084:Island Trees School District v. Pico
16755:Johanns v. Livestock Marketing Ass'n
15884:FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.
14178:School Dist. of Grand Rapids v. Ball
13258:
12560:Arkansas Writers' Project v. Ragland
11843:Willingham, AJ (September 6, 2018).
11091:Peter Lattman (September 27, 2007).
9964:
8853:
8466:
7847:
7594:Millhiser, Ian (December 26, 2019).
7544:
7153:John G. West Jr. (January 1, 2000).
6926:
6414:Warren A. Nord (November 10, 2010).
5156:
4907:
4402:
4386:United States free speech exceptions
4075:Arkansas Writers' Project v. Ragland
3139:
2928:Davis v. Federal Election Commission
2175:United States free speech exceptions
2107:Otten v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co.
1605:
1599:Kennedy v. Bremerton School District
1464:, also discussed at some length the
1091:Declaration of American Independence
20895:Rotunda for the Charters of Freedom
20422:Incorporation of the Bill of Rights
19167:Christian Legal Society v. Martinez
18532:New York Times Co. v. United States
17785:44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island
17713:State University of New York v. Fox
17697:Shapero v. Kentucky Bar Association
16683:Abood v. Detroit Board of Education
16598:Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins
16541:Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky
16011:Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky
15121:Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
14311:Abington School District v. Schempp
13951:California v. Grace Brethren Church
12388:New York Times Co. v. United States
12101:from the original on March 31, 2019
11870:Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins
11687:Leonard W. Levy (January 1, 2000).
11552:, 596 F. Supp. 363 (S.D. N.Y. 1984)
10818:
10578:44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island
10173:from the original on March 31, 2019
9563:Chiger, Stephen J. (June 1, 2002).
9355:"Matal v. Tam, 582 U.S. ___ (2017)"
8977:
8402:
8303:
8069:Morillo, Elaine (January 4, 2023).
7705:Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
7355:Steven A. Engel (October 1, 1999).
7254:
6087:10.1046/j.0023-9216.2003.03704005.x
5473:from the original on August 3, 2020
5114:. Cornell university Law Department
4421:, No. 17-1702, 587 U.S. ___ (2019).
4010:New York Times Co. v. United States
3995:New York Times Co. v. United States
3876:Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins
3338:Central Connecticut State College's
3284:44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island
3133:Abood v. Detroit Board of Education
3068:
3018:1984 Republican National Convention
2974:
2849:
2813:
2804:
2112:Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
1748:(1993) the Supreme Court stated in
1518:Abington School District v. Schempp
1450:separation between church and state
1340:Abington School District v. Schempp
1215:Abington School District v. Schempp
24:
19986:Drafting and ratification timeline
19731:District of Columbia Voting Rights
18785:Obsidian Finance Group, LLC v. Cox
17817:United States v. United Foods Inc.
17468:Mine Workers v. Illinois Bar Assn.
16830:Steele v. Louisville & N.R. Co
16747:United States v. United Foods Inc.
15962:Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project
15069:NLRB v. Catholic Bishop of Chicago
14611:Estate of Thornton v. Caldor, Inc.
14501:Presbyterian Church v. Hull Church
13967:Estate of Thornton v. Caldor, Inc.
13644:
13442:
13136:Northwestern University Law Review
13012:William Cooney (January 1, 2003).
12468:Dennis Hevesi (February 2, 2010).
11744:"Hustler Magazine v. Falwell 1988"
10986:from the original on April 2, 2013
10937:. www.cato.org. December 20, 2018.
9930:, n.d. Retrieved November 1, 2012.
7716:. pp. 1 and 8. Archived from
7678:De Vogue, Ariane (June 30, 2014).
7647:Denniston, Lyle (March 20, 2014).
6992:, 494 U.S. 872 (1990), at 877-878"
6674:Presbyterian Church v. Hull Church
6456:Robert Devigne (August 28, 1996).
6234:Supreme Court of the United States
6199:Hutchison, Harry (June 29, 2022).
5610:
4962:
4920:from the original on May 14, 2020.
4828:from the original on April 4, 2013
4544:310 U. S. 296, 310 U. S. 304–307;
3403:
3390:Washington University in St. Louis
3344:was unconstitutional, reaffirming
3059:a person did not in fact earn. In
2165:Freedom of speech and of the press
2098:Estate of Thornton v. Caldor, Inc.
1909:Presbyterian Church v. Hull Church
1775:or the obsolete Hindu practice of
1441:in 1802 of "a wall of separation".
820:. Similar laws were passed in the
732:. In 1776, the second year of the
338:Drafting and ratification timeline
25:
21010:
19439:Constitution of the United States
19319:United Mine Workers v. Pennington
18203:McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Comm'n
17705:Riley v. Nat'l Fed'n of the Blind
17492:Riley v. Nat'l Fed'n of the Blind
17452:Railroad Trainmen v. Virginia Bar
17359:United Public Workers v. Mitchell
17327:Kennedy v. Bremerton School Dist.
16887:Legal Services Corp. v. Velazquez
16715:Keller v. State Bar of California
16355:Org. for a Better Austin v. Keefe
16228:Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.
15929:Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition
15740:Erznoznik v. City of Jacksonville
15415:Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus
15003:Kennedy v. Bremerton School Dist.
14493:Kreshik v. St. Nicholas Cathedral
14485:Kedroff v. St. Nicholas Cathedral
14442:Kennedy v. Bremerton School Dist.
14383:Kennedy v. Bremerton School Dist.
14367:Santa Fe Ind. School Dist. v. Doe
13975:Corp. of Presiding Bishop v. Amos
13730:Cohen, Henry (October 16, 2009).
13625:
13236:. January 1, 2006. Archived from
13181:. January 1, 2000. Archived from
13079:. January 1, 2000. Archived from
12664:. January 1, 2000. Archived from
12173:Eugene Volokh (January 8, 2014).
11989:Costco Companies, Inc. v. Gallant
11805:. January 1, 2000. Archived from
11750:. January 1, 2001. Archived from
11640:. January 1, 2000. Archived from
11269:Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition
9380:Coscarelli, Joe (June 20, 2017).
7458:. January 1, 2006. Archived from
7238:. January 1, 2001. Archived from
6777:. Justia US Supreme Court Center.
6679:Kedroff v. St. Nicholas Cathedral
6287:Encyclopedia of the Supreme Court
5632:from the original on May 12, 2013
5522:Lincoln University (Pennsylvania)
4908:Farr, Thomas (November 1, 2019).
4673:McGregor, Jena (August 8, 2017).
4611:United Mine Workers v. Pennington
4430:Writing for a unanimous Court in
4200:embodies in the general terms of
4057:Federal Communications Commission
3863:
3625:Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition
3342:Students for a Democratic Society
2897:(2003). The case centered on the
2834:(1995), the Court struck down an
2369:Speech critical of the government
2268:, 315 U. S. 568 (1942). See also
2046:Religious Freedom Restoration Act
2044:In 1993, the Congress passed the
1914:Kedroff v. St. Nicholas Cathedral
1425:
1053:of a non-Christian faith such as
19842:Convention to propose amendments
19119:Roberts v. United States Jaycees
18804:Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC
17984:FEC v. National Conservative PAC
17777:Florida Bar v. Went For It, Inc.
17116:Rosenberger v. Univ. of Virginia
17092:Bethel School District v. Fraser
16464:Rosenberger v. Univ. of Virginia
16339:Carroll v. Town of Princess Anne
15032:Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer
14418:Rosenberger v. Univ. of Virginia
14250:Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer
13717:. Congressional Research Service
13656:
13252:
13222:
13197:
13167:
13142:
13120:
13103:Roberts v. United States Jaycees
13095:
13065:
13045:
13020:
13005:
12979:
12953:
12927:
12915:
12890:
12877:
12862:
12767:
12752:
12729:
12650:
12638:
12613:
12601:
12576:
12553:
12517:
12492:
12461:
12436:
12405:
12380:
12319:
12297:
12275:
12250:
12239:to a statement by an arrestee);
12222:
12207:
12192:
12136:
12120:Mataconis, Doug (May 28, 2013).
12113:
12079:
12067:
12042:
12023:
12006:
11974:
11952:
11921:
11909:
11887:
11862:
11821:
11791:
11766:
11736:
11711:
11680:
11656:
11626:
11614:
11590:
11578:
11562:Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
11555:
11541:
11516:
11492:
11420:
11395:
11365:
11359:The FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin
11346:
11324:
11310:
11298:
11286:
11261:
11236:
11212:
11187:
11162:
11150:
11138:
11113:
11084:
11072:
11047:
11023:
10998:
10955:
10943:
10900:
10870:
10852:
10838:
10812:
10795:"Adopting the Chicago Statement"
10787:
10756:
10731:
10694:
10677:Bethel School District v. Fraser
10669:
10632:
10595:
10570:
10545:
10520:
10508:
10493:
10472:
10460:
10445:
10422:
10410:
10385:
10373:
10348:
10322:
10296:
10270:
10255:
10232:
10210:
10198:
10185:
10154:
10117:
10105:
10080:
10056:
10025:
10009:
9984:
9958:
9933:
9917:
9905:
9880:
9855:
9840:
9815:
9790:
9778:
9753:
9729:
9717:
9692:
9661:
9636:
9600:
9575:
9556:
9531:
9509:
9483:
9471:
9438:
9373:
9347:
9310:
9298:
9274:
9237:
9225:
9210:
9185:
9148:
9136:
9124:
9085:
9073:
9058:
9019:
8996:
8953:
8941:
8922:
8804:
8744:
8732:
8709:
8678:
8651:
8628:
8570:
8546:
8427:
8380:
8358:
8332:
8277:
8256:
8250:
8228:
8206:
8184:
8162:
8077:. Thesocialtalks. Archived from
8062:
8050:. Justia US Supreme Court Center
8040:
8010:
7980:
7950:
7924:
7869:
7841:
7827:
7802:
7788:
7735:
7694:
7671:
7640:
7618:
7565:
7538:
7506:
7474:
7444:
7419:
7397:
7348:
7323:
7301:
7279:
7224:
7202:
7177:
7146:
7121:
7090:
6894:Millhiser, Ian (June 17, 2021).
6813:. Justia US Supreme Court Center
6504:. Justia US Supreme Court Center
6342:
6012:, Oxford University Press, 2010.
5963:Madison, James (June 20, 1785).
5711:Elena Kagan (February 7, 2019).
5464:
5087:. Justia US Supreme Court Center
4729:from the original on May 1, 2013
4597:
4571:
4554:
4280:Roberts v. United States Jaycees
3800:Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps
3358:Bethel School District v. Fraser
3294:
1803:(1940), the Court held that the
1168:An April 22, 1885, cartoon from
1022:, 310 U. S. 296, 303 (1940) and
698:was the principal author of the
664:
449:
437:
425:
60:
32:First Amendment (disambiguation)
18777:Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.
18366:NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co.
18315:Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach
17825:Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Reilly
17529:Rowan v. U.S. Post Office Dept.
17175:Pickering v. Board of Education
17003:Garner v. Board of Public Works
16723:Lehnert v. Ferris Faculty Ass'n
15892:Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton
15708:Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton
15620:MANual Enterprises, Inc. v. Day
15261:Masses Publishing Co. v. Patten
13380:. University of Georgia Press.
13374:Nelson, William Edward (1994).
13230:"Boy Scouts of America v. Dale"
11774:Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.
11159:, 481 U.S. 497, 500-501 (1987).
10018:, 394 U.S. at 578 (quoting the
7769:Mawdsley, James (May 3, 2018).
7545:Howe, Amy (December 10, 2020).
7065:
7031:
7006:
6980:
6920:
6865:
6843:
6825:
6803:
6781:
6767:
6741:
6692:
6612:
6590:
6568:
6546:
6516:
6494:
6385:
6363:
6256:"Accommodationism and Religion"
6247:
6219:
6192:
6161:
6147:
6120:
6093:
6037:
6015:
6000:
5983:
5912:
5887:
5862:
5850:
5825:
5803:
5781:
5759:
5737:
5704:
5678:
5644:
5485:
5458:
5432:
5401:
5379:
5344:
5322:
5300:
5278:
5256:
5234:
5212:
5190:
5126:
5099:
5077:
5025:
4866:
4840:
4814:
4639:Lecher, Colin (June 17, 2019).
4510:
4497:
4482:
4442:
4424:
4326:Censorship in the United States
4055:, the Supreme Court upheld the
3992:(pictured here in 2018) led to
3849:Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.
3176:... provides strong support for
2921:(2007), the Court sustained an
2844:Foreign Agents Registration Act
2422:During the patriotic fervor of
2381:; three Supreme Court justices
1448:used the metaphor of a wall of
1190:was consulted by Chief Justice
924:, or to end in a predominantly
630:New York Times v. United States
600:. The Supreme Court overturned
510:from making laws respecting an
20457:Separation of church and state
19391:Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri
18705:Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts
18697:New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
18628:Grosjean v. American Press Co.
18599:Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
18548:Nebraska Press Ass'n v. Stuart
17553:Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar
17428:Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson
17303:Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri
16667:Ry. Emps. Department v. Hanson
15458:Terminiello v. City of Chicago
15391:New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
15096:Statutory religious exemptions
14995:Fulton v. City of Philadelphia
14287:McCollum v. Board of Education
13983:Texas Monthly, Inc. v. Bullock
13769:Congressional Research Service
13739:Congressional Research Service
12847:Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri
12774:California Motor Transport Co.
12525:Grosjean v. American Press Co.
12245:New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
11833:, Duke Law Journal, pp. 415–48
10878:"Packingham v. North Carolina"
10860:"Packingham v. North Carolina"
10356:Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products
9847:Samuel Gedge (June 22, 2009).
9445:Liptak, Adam (June 19, 2017).
8961:Terminiello v. City of Chicago
8529:New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
8318:, 385 U.S. 116 (1966), at 136"
8112:"First Amendment: An Overview"
8092:also how we express ourselves.
7714:Congressional Research Service
7405:"State Religious Freedom Acts"
6840:, 342–343 (U.S. 1890).
6624:, 494 U.S. 872 (1990), at 494"
6023:McCollum v. Board of Education
5138:Justia US Supreme Court Center
4765:
4715:
4697:
4632:
4409:
4166:Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri
4070:Grosjean v. American Press Co.
3766:New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
3764:The Supreme Court's ruling in
3736:That the charge must be false;
3702:New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
3659:Memoirs of convicted criminals
2899:Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act
2801:, 394 U. S. 576, 592 (1969)."
2622:Terminiello v. City of Chicago
2591:Those who won our independence
2395:
2389:New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
2271:New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
2250:Chicago Police Dept. v. Mosley
2237:Chicago Police Dept. v. Mosley
2231:New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
1729:Grosjean v. American Press Co.
1499:McCollum v. Board of Education
939:Board of Education v. Barnette
700:Virginia Declaration of Rights
615:New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
127:Amendments to the Constitution
13:
1:
19961:Virginia Ratifying Convention
19194:Democratic Party v. Wisconsin
19159:Boy Scouts of America v. Dale
19111:Hishon v. King & Spalding
18136:Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar
17641:Metromedia, Inc. v. San Diego
17593:Bates v. State Bar of Arizona
17436:Kingsley Books, Inc. v. Brown
17319:Heffernan v. City of Paterson
17019:Keyishian v. Board of Regents
16926:Pleasant Grove City v. Summum
16143:Metromedia, Inc. v. San Diego
15970:Williams-Yulee v. Florida Bar
14654:Larkin v. Grendel's Den, Inc.
14146:New York v. Cathedral Academy
14026:Everson v. Board of Education
14018:Cochran v. Board of Education
13898:Pleasant Grove City v. Summum
13815:United States First Amendment
13449:Curtis, Michael Kent (2000).
13205:Boy Scouts of America v. Dale
11689:"Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc."
10467:Virginia State Pharmacy Board
7411:. May 5, 2017. Archived from
6927:Ring, Trudy (June 17, 2021).
6732:, 480 U. S. 136, 148 (1987) (
6487:Everson v. Board of Education
6174:American Constitution Society
5034:"Preferred Position Doctrine"
4705:"What Does Free Speech Mean?"
4621:
4434:, 310 U. S. 296, 303 (1940),
4299:Boy Scouts of America v. Dale
4181:The right of assembly is the
3778:indicating that officials in
3684:
3651:(2008), the Court upheld the
3336:(1972), the Court ruled that
3198:(1976), the Court overturned
2885:Federal Election Campaign Act
2842:(1987), the Court upheld the
2713:(1969), expressly overruling
2462:In the first of these cases,
2202:, according to the Court. In
1997:cathedral in Washington, D.C.
1991:Washington National Cathedral
1334:Everson v. Board of Education
1275:Everson v. Board of Education
1253:nationally established church
1209:Larkin v. Grendel's Den, Inc.
946:Everson v. Board of Education
898:In his dissenting opinion in
804:Religion in the United States
738:Virginia colonial legislature
680:
581:Everson v. Board of Education
20979:United States Bill of Rights
20922:National Constitution Center
20720:Daniel of St. Thomas Jenifer
20019:Assemble and Petition Clause
19202:Tashjian v. Republican Party
19038:Bates v. City of Little Rock
18944:Protection from prosecution
18524:Lamont v. Postmaster General
18179:Bates v. City of Little Rock
16347:Coates v. City of Cincinnati
16244:Packingham v. North Carolina
16135:Lamont v. Postmaster General
14947:Employment Division v. Smith
13346:Jasper, Margaret C. (1999).
13278:General and cited references
11524:"New York Times v. Sullivan"
10913:. reason.com. June 11, 2016.
9668:Kamen, Al (April 29, 1987).
9435:___, 137 S. Ct. 1744 (2017).
7549:. SCOTUSblog. Archived from
7129:Employment Division v. Smith
5654:NYU Press 2002, unpaginated.
5592:National Constitution Center
4626:
4523:Employment Division v. Smith
4516:The inofficial, non-binding
4381:United States Postal Service
4063:" material in broadcasting.
3691:United States defamation law
3426:
3411:Packingham v. North Carolina
3263:Supreme Court of Puerto Rico
2004:Employment Division v. Smith
1828:Employment Division v. Smith
1739:Employment Division v. Smith
1248:National Constitution Center
1148:the court stated further in
7:
20793:Charles Cotesworth Pinckney
19847:State ratifying conventions
19784:Equal Opportunity to Govern
19779:Electoral College abolition
19706:Congressional Apportionment
19279:United States v. Cruikshank
18925:United States v. Cruikshank
18820:FCC v. WNCN Listeners Guild
18761:Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
18721:Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.
16966:Shurtleff v. City of Boston
16395:Ward v. Rock Against Racism
16291:Martin v. City of Struthers
16106:City of Erie v. Pap's A. M.
15636:Quantity of Books v. Kansas
15450:Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire
15399:Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
14923:O'Lone v. Estate of Shabazz
14434:Shurtleff v. City of Boston
12898:United States v. Cruikshank
11719:Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
11664:Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.
11353:Craig King (June 1, 2009).
10929:. ww.law.com. May 17, 2019.
9965:Howe, Amy (April 2, 2014).
9046:Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire
8439:, Vol. 102, p. 1296 (1993).
8259:"Schneider v. State (1939)"
7848:Howe, Amy (June 30, 2020).
6417:Does God Make a Difference?
6009:Does God Make a Difference?
5112:Legal Information Institute
4914:Religious Freedom Institute
4318:
4240:like streets and parks. In
4214:United States v. Cruikshank
4135:United States v. Cruikshank
3835:suggesting that evangelist
3822:Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
3816:Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.
3634:simulated child pornography
3518:The Supreme Court ruled in
3433:United States obscenity law
3418:law prohibiting registered
3271:Games of Chance Act of 1948
3096:. The Court also overruled
2969:political action committees
2418:test for free speech cases.
2265:Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire
2092:United States v. Lee (1982)
1842:, concurring in judgment);
1477:Does God Make a Difference?
1156:In the preamble of this act
730:1689 English Bill of Rights
551:Constitutional ratification
393:Preamble and Articles I–VII
289:Congressional Apportionment
10:
21015:
18812:FCC v. Pacifica Foundation
18152:FEC v. Ted Cruz for Senate
17881:Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc.
17769:Rubin v. Coors Brewing Co.
16638:303 Creative LLC v. Elenis
16175:R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul
15498:R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul
15474:Gregory v. City of Chicago
13914:Town of Greece v. Galloway
13604:Nelson, Samuel P. (2005).
13545:. New York: Penguin, 1999.
13402:Newell, Martin L. (1898).
13259:Howe, Amy (July 1, 2021).
12869:This article incorporates
12759:This article incorporates
11968:December 15, 2020, at the
10500:This article incorporates
10452:This article incorporates
10329:Amy Howe (June 27, 2018).
10303:Amy Howe (June 26, 2018).
10262:This article incorporates
9569:Communications and the Law
7373:Susan Gluck Mezey (2009).
5969:The Founders' Constitution
4785:The Founders' Constitution
4448:"Enlarging on this theme,
4371:Photography Is Not a Crime
4264:
4113:
3894:
3688:
3663:In some states, there are
3430:
3298:
3281:was soon restricted under
3143:
3072:
3043:Falsifying military awards
3037:Flag Desecration Amendment
3029:struck it down as well in
2853:
2464:Socialist Party of America
2399:
2220:United States Constitution
2168:
1667:
1278:(1947), the Supreme Court
1257:American Revolutionary War
1078:
934:government must be neutral
797:
774:1st United States Congress
734:American Revolutionary War
684:
584:(1947), the Court drew on
504:United States Constitution
29:
20969:1791 in American politics
20880:
20852:
20832:
20811:
20780:
20754:
20733:
20707:
20671:
20620:
20589:
20573:
20552:
20531:
20510:
20494:
20485:
20364:
20246:Privileges and Immunities
20059:Congressional enforcement
19994:
19981:Rhode Island ratification
19872:Articles of Confederation
19859:
19837:
19814:Parental Rights amendment
19739:
19696:
19621:
19593:
19572:
19509:
19505:
19496:
19445:
19311:Edwards v. South Carolina
19273:
19260:
19177:
19102:
19083:
19064:
19005:
19001:
18988:
18943:
18914:
18910:
18897:
18854:
18795:
18678:
18668:Cohen v. Cowles Media Co.
18617:
18582:
18516:Hannegan v. Esquire, Inc.
18500:Lovell v. City of Griffin
18468:
18464:
18451:
18384:
18357:
18280:
18229:
18162:
17931:
17510:
17385:
17337:
17166:
17037:
16984:
16913:
16852:
16656:
16555:
16482:
16445:
16307:Edwards v. South Carolina
16254:
16209:
16124:
16021:
15980:
15951:
15902:
15860:United States v. Kilbride
15844:United States v. Williams
15644:Ginzburg v. United States
15561:
15516:
15425:
15375:
15239:
15228:
15224:
15204:
15155:
15102:
15095:
15058:
15013:
14731:Reynolds v. United States
14725:
14712:
14621:
14578:
14535:
14452:
14393:
14276:
14009:
13932:
13839:
13835:
13822:
13128:Shiffrin, Seana Valentine
12216:Cohen v. Cowles Media Co.
12050:Lovell v. City of Griffin
11318:United States v. Williams
9049:315 U.S. 568 (1942); and
5170:Gillette v. United States
4531:Reynolds v. United States
4247:Noerr-Pennington doctrine
3911:Lovell v. City of Griffin
3648:United States v. Williams
2993:, Sidney Street burned a
2967:, political parties, and
2489:Frohwerk v. United States
2481:Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.
2450:Frohwerk v. United States
1764:Reynolds v. United States
1664:Free exercise of religion
1458:Reynolds v. United States
1315:St. Mary's City, Maryland
1239:Gillette v. United States
1141:Reynolds v. United States
1075:Establishment of religion
994:Gillette v. United States
754:Constitutional Convention
750:Articles of Confederation
704:Fifth Virginia Convention
516:free exercise of religion
512:establishment of religion
374:Reconstruction Amendments
20477:Unitary executive theory
20251:Privileges or Immunities
19966:New York Circular Letter
19956:Massachusetts Compromise
19022:Watkins v. United States
18607:Florida Star v. B. J. F.
17545:Lehman v. Shaker Heights
17521:Valentine v. Chrestensen
17148:Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski
16822:Compelled representation
16787:Knox v. SEIU, Local 1000
16493:Lehman v. Shaker Heights
16472:Uzuegbunam v. Preczewski
16090:United States v. Eichman
16042:United States v. O'Brien
15868:United States v. Stevens
15652:Memoirs v. Massachusetts
15612:Marcus v. Search Warrant
15407:United States v. Alvarez
15338:clear and present danger
15269:Schenck v. United States
14779:United States v. Ballard
14477:United States v. Ballard
14394:Private religious speech
14234:Zelman v. Simmons-Harris
13991:City of Boerne v. Flores
13473:Daniel L. Dreisbach and
10393:Valentine v. Chrestensen
10240:United States v. Alvarez
10193:Notes to 18 U.S.C. § 704
10125:United States v. Eichman
9193:United States v. O'Brien
9043:, 340 U.S. 315 (1951);
8890:Konvitz, Milton Ridvad,
8635:Schenck v. United States
7775:Encyclopaedia Britannica
7377:City of Boerne v. Flores
7331:City of Boerne v. Flores
6990:Employment Div. v. Smith
6661:, 435 U. S. 618 (1978);
6652:United States v. Ballard
6622:Employment Div. v. Smith
6075:Law & Society Review
4771:Haynes, Charles, et al.
3843:for emotional distress.
3567:, a work is obscene if:
3394:Johns Hopkins University
3186:Valentine v. Chrestensen
3113:crisis pregnancy centers
3062:United States v. Alvarez
3032:United States v. Eichman
2700:United States v. O'Brien
2485:clear and present danger
2473:Schenck v. United States
2438:Schenck v. United States
2416:clear and present danger
2402:Clear and present danger
2274:, 376 U. S. 254 (1964)."
2262:, 354 U. S. 476 (1957);
2059:City of Boerne v. Flores
1896:, 435 U. S. 618 (1978);
1887:United States v. Ballard
1742:(1990) and quoting from
1575:Zelman v. Simmons-Harris
1304:The Founding of Maryland
432:United States portal
42:This article is part of
20397:Dormant Commerce Clause
20241:Presidential succession
19976:Fayetteville Convention
19971:Hillsborough Convention
19907:Three-fifths Compromise
19887:Philadelphia Convention
19877:Mount Vernon Conference
19764:Campaign finance reform
19178:Primaries and elections
18729:Time, Inc. v. Firestone
18689:Beauharnais v. Illinois
18374:FTC v. Superior Ct. TLA
17412:Murdock v. Pennsylvania
16691:Ellis v. Railway Clerks
16646:Moody v. NetChoice, LLC
16236:City of Ladue v. Gilleo
16220:Schneider v. New Jersey
16183:Reed v. Town of Gilbert
16034:Stromberg v. California
15937:United States v. Hansen
15543:Elonis v. United States
15442:Cantwell v. Connecticut
15358:imminent lawless action
15317:Dennis v. United States
15285:Abrams v. United States
15254:Alien and Sedition Acts
14771:Murdock v. Pennsylvania
14747:Cantwell v. Connecticut
14453:Internal church affairs
13421:Lewis, Anthony (2007).
13352:. Oceana Publications.
12179:Encyclopædia Britannica
10283:Encyclopedia Britannica
10039:Stromberg v. California
10033:Stromberg v. California
9093:Dennis v. United States
9025:Antieu, Chester James,
9005:Cantwell v. Connecticut
8930:imminent lawless action
8479:(Lexington Books 2004).
7359:. The Yale Law Journal.
6422:Oxford University Press
6345:"Benevolent Neutrality"
5895:McCreary County v. ACLU
5626:Encyclopædia Britannica
5357:The Heritage Foundation
4850:. Library of Congress.
4540:Cantwell v. Connecticut
4432:Cantwell v. Connecticut
3710:American tort liability
3545:I know it when I see it
3488:Lady Chatterley's Lover
3452:juries will not convict
3000:Stromberg v. California
2754:John Marshall Harlan II
2736:imminent lawless action
2652:Dennis v. United States
2583:had been arrested for "
2581:Charlotte Anita Whitney
2520:Abrams v. United States
2456:Abrams v. United States
2379:Alien and Sedition Acts
2347:Alien and Sedition Laws
2289:Griswold v. Connecticut
2195:Murdock v. Pennsylvania
1800:Cantwell v. Connecticut
1719:Murdock v. Pennsylvania
1701:Cantwell v. Connecticut
1413:McCreary County v. ACLU
1019:Cantwell v. Connecticut
882:Murdock v. Pennsylvania
836:theocratic rule in the
814:Maryland Toleration Act
651:
612:suits, most notably in
20560:William Samuel Johnson
20432:Nondelegation doctrine
20004:Admission to the Union
19951:Anti-Federalist Papers
19902:Connecticut Compromise
19103:Membership restriction
18995:Freedom of association
18946:and state restrictions
18644:Houchins v. KQED, Inc.
18096:Citizens United v. FEC
17069:substantial disruption
16371:United States v. Grace
16267:Davis v. Massachusetts
16098:Barnes v. Glen Theatre
15572:Rosen v. United States
15551:Counterman v. Colorado
15527:Watts v. United States
15333:Yates v. United States
14883:Thomas v. Review Board
14811:Fowler v. Rhode Island
13780:– Updated May 24, 2005
13778:on September 24, 2005.
13652:
13632:Listen to this article
13590:April 9, 2022, at the
11963:150 D.P.R. 924 (2000).
11434:. 2001. Archived from
10702:Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
9863:Citizens United v. FEC
9156:Yates v. United States
8928:The Court adopted the
6664:Fowler v. Rhode Island
4580:Marks v. United States
4331:First Amendment audits
4261:Freedom of association
4224:
4202:its due process clause
4179:
4139:
3999:
3963:
3946:
3914:(1938), Chief Justice
3706:
3643:
3597:is not subject to the
3589:
3497:federal district court
3460:Rosen v. United States
3446:
3364:Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
3328:
3226:
3213:
3026:William J. Brennan Jr.
3012:(1989). In that case,
2979:The divisive issue of
2923:"as applied" challenge
2874:
2783:
2740:
2683:Yates v. United States
2678:
2597:
2551:
2419:
2343:
2280:freedom of association
2276:
2246:
2188:
2041:
1998:
1953:
1899:Fowler v. Rhode Island
1813:free exercise equality
1794:
1713:Fowler v. Rhode Island
1686:
1442:
1350:
1318:
1297:
1266:
1180:
1162:
1136:
1102:
1099:University of Virginia
1072:
966:
959:
896:
845:
783:
721:
707:
660:
639:freedom of association
20767:Richard Dobbs Spaight
20236:Presidential Electors
20211:Original Jurisdiction
20151:Full Faith and Credit
20024:Assistance of Counsel
19945:The Federalist Papers
19774:Crittenden Compromise
18855:Copyrighted materials
18484:Patterson v. Colorado
18393:Procunier v. Martinez
18246:Lloyd Corp. v. Tanner
17388:restriction of speech
17375:Broadrick v. Oklahoma
15588:Roth v. United States
15301:Whitney v. California
15277:Debs v. United States
15077:Hosanna-Tabor v. EEOC
15060:Ministerial exception
15014:Exclusion of religion
14915:Goldman v. Weinberger
13651:
13457:Duke University Press
13058:May 13, 2013, at the
12241:Garrison v. Louisiana
12124:. Outside The Beltway
11383:on September 24, 2015
11379:. NPR. Archived from
11321:, 553 U.S. 285 (2008)
11305:Free Speech Coalition
11293:Free Speech Coalition
11006:Roth v. United States
9055:, 335 U.S. 77 (1949).
9013:Bridges v. California
8950:, 310 U.S. 88 (1940).
8812:Whitney v. California
8716:Debs v. United States
8578:"Espionage Act, 1917"
7998:on September 16, 2019
7838:, 591 U.S. ___ (2020)
7799:, 582 U.S. ___ (2017)
7723:on September 26, 2020
7456:American Law Yearbook
7452:"Freedom of Religion"
6464:Yale University Press
6284:David Shultz (2005).
6158:, 403 U.S. 602 (1971)
5692:on September 11, 2023
5650:Daniel L. Driesbach,
5528:on September 10, 2020
5518:"Freedom of Religion"
5389:. Library of Congress
4824:. National Archives.
4304:Boy Scouts of America
4265:Further information:
4219:
4171:
4149:Espionage Act of 1917
4127:
4114:Further information:
4110:Petition and assembly
4047:content-neutral basis
3981:
3948:
3941:
3895:Further information:
3784:civil rights movement
3698:
3689:Further information:
3638:
3569:
3521:Roth v. United States
3440:
3431:Further information:
3378:University of Chicago
3315:
3261:(1986), affirmed the
3221:
3204:
3172:these characteristics
2863:
2768:
2731:
2715:Whitney v. California
2703:(1968), fearing that
2673:
2645:was convicted in the
2589:
2572:Whitney v. California
2545:
2538:Extending protections
2496:Debs v. United States
2444:Debs v. United States
2432:Espionage Act of 1917
2412:Oliver Wendell Holmes
2409:
2400:Further information:
2338:
2314:Wording of the clause
2259:Roth v. United States
2254:
2242:
2182:
2169:Further information:
2035:
1989:
1975:Seventh-day Adventist
1869:
1785:
1726:, 321 U. S. 573; cf.
1677:
1433:
1345:
1302:
1284:
1261:
1167:
1154:
1127:
1115:Congregational church
1088:
1034:
1030:freedom of conscience
961:
910:
887:
811:
778:
742:Declaration of Rights
713:
694:
685:Further information:
655:
414:Unratified Amendments
281:Unratified Amendments
70:Preamble and Articles
20999:Edicts of toleration
20974:1791 in American law
20936:A More Perfect Union
20912:Constitution Gardens
20833:Convention Secretary
20495:Convention President
20467:Symmetric federalism
20462:Separation of powers
20196:Necessary and Proper
20191:Natural-born citizen
20136:Freedom of the Press
20074:Copyright and Patent
20064:Contingent Elections
19882:Annapolis Convention
18458:Freedom of the press
18282:Official retaliation
17936:and political speech
17460:Freedman v. Maryland
17404:Cox v. New Hampshire
17287:Garcetti v. Ceballos
16675:Machinists v. Street
16299:Niemotko v. Maryland
16283:Thornhill v. Alabama
16159:Butterworth v. Smith
16058:Spence v. Washington
15700:Miller v. California
15668:Ginsberg v. New York
15016:from public benefits
14891:United States v. Lee
14795:Niemotko v. Maryland
14719:Free Exercise Clause
14343:Edwards v. Aguillard
14319:Epperson v. Arkansas
14066:Lemon v. Kurtzman II
14058:Tilton v. Richardson
13829:Establishment Clause
13715:Legislative Attorney
13683:More spoken articles
13596:Nicholas P. Miller,
12717:on November 12, 2020
12039: (1972), at 704.
11993:96 Cal. App. 4th 740
11121:Miller v. California
10952:, L. R. 3 Q. B. 360
10906:Jury nullification:
10419:, 316 U.S. at 53–54.
9610:(October 13, 1994).
9539:Talley v. California
8948:Thornhill v. Alabama
8148:The Yale Law Journal
8081:on November 21, 2023
7968:on February 29, 2020
7690:on December 7, 2020.
7659:on November 24, 2020
7606:on November 24, 2020
7553:on December 11, 2020
7526:on December 15, 2020
7494:on December 15, 2020
7415:on December 6, 2020.
6326:343 U.S. 306 (1952).
5446:on September 5, 2010
5420:on February 20, 2020
4391:Williamsburg Charter
4361:Marketplace of ideas
4198:Fourteenth Amendment
3916:Charles Evans Hughes
3891:Freedom of the press
3557:Miller v. California
3386:Princeton University
3090:pledge of allegiance
2821:Talley v. California
2752:courthouse. Justice
2616:Thornhill v. Alabama
2585:criminal syndicalism
2567:Fourteenth Amendment
2502:. On June 16, 1918,
2215:Thornhill v. Alabama
2036:The U.S. guarantees
1835:United States v. Lee
1724:Follett v. McCormick
1670:Free Exercise Clause
1355:Epperson v. Arkansas
1097:, and father of the
1081:Establishment Clause
1014:Fourteenth Amendment
863:Free Exercise Clause
859:Establishment Clause
540:occupied third place
524:freedom of the press
54:of the United States
20943:Worldwide influence
20684:Gunning Bedford Jr.
20412:Executive privilege
20392:Criminal sentencing
20315:Title of Nobility (
20306:Taxing and Spending
20206:Oath or Affirmation
20166:House Apportionment
20029:Case or Controversy
19912:Committee of Detail
19804:"Liberty" amendment
19769:Christian amendment
19267:Freedom to petition
18933:Presser v. Illinois
18904:Freedom of assembly
18844:Bartnicki v. Vopper
18425:Overton v. Bazzetta
18339:Gonzalez v. Trevino
17841:Nike, Inc. v. Kasky
17561:Bigelow v. Virginia
17255:Waters v. Churchill
17239:Rankin v. McPherson
17183:Perry v. Sindermann
16435:McCullen v. Coakley
16331:Adderley v. Florida
16050:Cohen v. California
15905:to criminal conduct
15828:Ashcroft v. ACLU II
15604:Smith v. California
15596:One, Inc. v. Olesen
15482:Cohen v. California
15353:Brandenburg v. Ohio
14587:McGowan v. Maryland
13999:Cutter v. Wilkinson
13933:Statutory religious
13748:on February 8, 2010
13700:Library of Congress
13130:(January 1, 2005).
12993:on October 26, 2023
12967:on October 26, 2023
12941:on October 26, 2023
12584:Leathers v. Medlock
12201:Bartnicki v. Vopper
11897:(January 1, 2009).
11827:Esward M. Sussman,
11549:Westmoreland v. CBS
11098:Wall Street Journal
10022:, §1425, subd. 16).
9674:The Washington Post
9617:The Washington Post
9318:Cohen v. California
9245:Brandenburg v. Ohio
8935:Brandenburg v. Ohio
8580:. National Archives
8265:on January 25, 2021
8018:"freedom of speech"
7958:"freedom of speech"
7385:on October 28, 2020
7041:(January 1, 2000).
6534:on October 19, 2019
6292:Infobase Publishing
5040:on February 2, 2024
5013:on November 5, 2020
5007:The Washington Post
4880:on December 4, 2020
4783:(June 8, 1789) via
4711:on January 4, 2022.
4685:on January 25, 2020
4679:The Washington Post
4477:at 319 U. S. 637.""
4366:Military expression
4120:Freedom of assembly
4083:Leathers v. Medlock
3780:Montgomery, Alabama
3653:PROTECT Act of 2003
3478:An American Tragedy
3398:Columbia University
3265:'s conclusion that
3014:Gregory Lee Johnson
2745:Cohen v. California
2725:and further eroded
2710:Brandenburg v. Ohio
2705:burning draft cards
2577:Communist Party USA
2105:from his 1953 case
2038:freedom of religion
1311:Father Andrew White
1251:there should be no
974:Sandra Day O'Connor
901:McGowan v. Maryland
855:Freedom of religion
794:Freedom of religion
592:, pornography, and
528:freedom of assembly
518:; or abridging the
456:Politics portal
407:Amendments XI–XXVII
20597:William Livingston
20581:Alexander Hamilton
20387:Criminal procedure
20382:Constitutional law
20317:Foreign Emoluments
20281:State of the Union
20266:Self-Incrimination
20256:Recess appointment
20049:Compulsory Process
19711:Titles of Nobility
19226:Clingman v. Beaver
19143:Dallas v. Stanglin
19073:Baggett v. Bullitt
18954:De Jonge v. Oregon
18879:Eldred v. Ashcroft
18636:Branzburg v. Hayes
18591:Time, Inc. v. Hill
18323:Nieves v. Bartlett
18299:Reichle v. Howards
18270:Murthy v. Missouri
18144:Thompson v. Hebdon
18072:Randall v. Sorrell
17617:Friedman v. Rogers
17140:Morse v. Frederick
17011:Speiser v. Randall
16323:Brown v. Louisiana
16074:Dallas v. Stanglin
15913:New York v. Ferber
15812:Ashcroft v. ACLU I
15724:Jenkins v. Georgia
15676:Stanley v. Georgia
15660:Redrup v. New York
15628:Jacobellis v. Ohio
15466:Feiner v. New York
15293:Gitlow v. New York
15182:Ramirez v. Collier
14859:Wisconsin v. Yoder
14843:Sherbert v. Verner
14835:Torcaso v. Watkins
14819:Braunfeld v. Brown
14630:Torcaso v. Watkins
14603:Braunfeld v. Brown
14335:Wallace v. Jaffree
14218:Agostini v. Felton
14106:Wheeler v. Barrera
13882:Van Orden v. Perry
13653:
13572:Kabala, James S.,
12776:, 404 U.S. at 510.
12621:Branzburg v. Hayes
12095:The New York Times
11244:Stanley v. Georgia
11170:New York v. Ferber
11055:Jacobellis v. Ohio
11044:, pp. 135–36.
10739:Morse v. Frederick
10517:, 436 U.S. at 455.
10469:, 425 U.S. at 773.
10167:The New York Times
10065:, 394 U.S. at 581.
10020:New York Penal Law
9992:Street v. New York
9750:, pp. 177–78.
9480:, 430 U.S. at 193.
9452:The New York Times
9400:on August 10, 2023
9386:The New York Times
9040:Feiner v. New York
8876:Currie, David P.,
8075:Thesocialtalks.com
7073:Wisconsin v. Yoder
7014:Sherbert v. Verner
6646:Torcaso v. Watkins
6640:Sherbert v. Verner
6049:The New York Times
5870:Van Orden v. Perry
5859:, 512 U.S. at 703.
5363:on October 8, 2020
4762:, pp. 341–43.
4547:Wisconsin v. Yoder
4464:at 319 U. S. 645 (
4189:De Jonge v. Oregon
4140:
4091:Branzburg v. Hayes
4000:
3947:
3905:Branzburg v. Hayes
3775:The New York Times
3755:William Blackstone
3722:William Blackstone
3718:English common law
3707:
3619:Stanley v. Georgia
3604:New York v. Ferber
3560:(1973). Under the
3540:Jacobellis v. Ohio
3447:
3370:Morse v. Frederick
2986:Street v. New York
2875:
2798:Street v. New York
2750:Los Angeles County
2647:Foley Square trial
2627:William O. Douglas
2563:Due Process Clause
2558:Gitlow v. New York
2552:
2528:October Revolution
2420:
2303:Stanley v. Georgia
2298:freedom of thought
2205:Stanley v. Georgia
2189:
2042:
1999:
1980:Wisconsin v. Yoder
1958:Sherbert v. Verner
1881:Torcaso v. Watkins
1875:Sherbert v. Verner
1864:Braunfeld v. Brown
1819:put it clearly in
1795:
1732:, 297 U. S. 233."
1707:Torcaso v. Watkins
1687:
1636:Wallace v. Jaffree
1615:William O. Douglas
1565:Agostini v. Felton
1443:
1407:Van Orden v. Perry
1391:Torcaso v. Watkins
1328:Torcaso v. Watkins
1319:
1234:religious activity
1181:
1103:
1010:Due Process Clause
1000:Wallace v. Jaffree
978:concurring opinion
906:William O. Douglas
877:military chaplains
867:constitutional law
846:
818:colony of Maryland
722:
708:
602:English common law
560:Gitlow v. New York
514:; prohibiting the
318:D.C. Voting Rights
296:Titles of Nobility
20951:
20950:
20917:Constitution Week
20902:Independence Mall
20890:National Archives
20848:
20847:
20663:Gouverneur Morris
20648:Thomas Fitzsimons
20628:Benjamin Franklin
20502:George Washington
20402:Enumerated powers
20377:Concurrent powers
20372:Balance of powers
20201:No Religious Test
20141:Freedom of Speech
19932:Independence Hall
19855:
19854:
19759:Bricker amendment
19692:
19691:
19405:
19404:
19401:
19400:
19351:McDonald v. Smith
19287:Thomas v. Collins
19256:
19255:
19252:
19251:
19186:Cousins v. Wigoda
18984:
18983:
18980:
18979:
18962:Thomas v. Collins
18893:
18892:
18889:
18888:
18753:McDonald v. Smith
18540:Pell v. Procunier
18492:Near v. Minnesota
18447:
18446:
18443:
18442:
18128:McCutcheon v. FEC
17905:Iancu v. Brunetti
17737:Edenfield v. Fane
17512:Commercial speech
17191:Arnett v. Kennedy
16950:Iancu v. Brunetti
16853:Government grants
16848:
16847:
16659:of others' speech
16657:Compelled subsidy
16590:Wooley v. Maynard
16551:
16550:
16456:Widmar v. Vincent
16403:Burson v. Freeman
16387:Frisby v. Schultz
16114:Virginia v. Black
15947:
15946:
15836:Nitke v. Gonzales
15772:People v. Freeman
15692:Kois v. Wisconsin
15535:Virginia v. Black
15211:Freedom of speech
15200:
15199:
15196:
15195:
15192:
15191:
15166:Sossamon v. Texas
14708:
14707:
14704:
14703:
14670:Bowen v. Kendrick
14662:Larson v. Valente
14536:Taxpayer standing
14295:Zorach v. Clauson
14226:Mitchell v. Helms
14186:Aguilar v. Felton
14122:Meek v. Pittenger
14050:Lemon v. Kurtzman
13858:Lynch v. Donnelly
13850:Marsh v. Chambers
13649:
13492:Thomas I. Emerson
13434:978-0-465-01819-2
13387:978-0-8203-1587-4
13359:978-0-379-11335-8
13331:978-1-58836-726-6
13300:978-0-14-303675-3
13287:(April 4, 2006).
12796:on April 28, 2013
12377:, pp. 46–47.
12365:, pp. 44–45.
12327:Near v. Minnesota
12089:(June 27, 2011).
11474:, pp. 33–37.
11459:, pp. 37–41.
11375:(July 22, 2004).
10950:Regina v. Hicklin
10728:, pp. 62–63.
10382:, 463 U.S. at 67.
10151:, pp. 43–44.
9459:on April 10, 2024
8904:Eastland, Terry,
8874:, pp. 1096, 1100.
8801:, pp. 34–35.
8702:978-0-393-05880-2
8625:, pp. 65–66.
8613:, pp. 25–27.
8503:, pp. 16–17.
7039:Richard E. Morgan
6669:Larson v. Valente
6351:on August 3, 2020
6324:Zorach v. Clauson
6155:Lemon v. Kurtzman
6106:Lynch v. Donnelly
5725:on August 6, 2020
5622:"First Amendment"
5598:on April 15, 2020
4723:"First Amendment"
4491:Zorach v. Clauson
4450:THE CHIEF JUSTICE
4403:Explanatory notes
4346:Government speech
4341:Freedom of speech
3968:Near v. Minnesota
3954:Lovell v. Griffin
3928:Felix Frankfurter
3924:media shield laws
3858:opinion privilege
3595:Child pornography
3465:Regina v. Hicklin
3382:Chicago Statement
3146:Commercial speech
3140:Commercial speech
2995:48-star U.S. flag
2787:plurality opinion
2669:Felix Frankfurter
2575:(1927), in which
2375:constitutionality
2320:John Paul Stevens
2185:Independence Hall
1904:Larson v. Valente
1722:, 319 U. S. 105;
1657:Lynch v. Donnelly
1631:William Rehnquist
1611:Accommodationists
1606:Accommodationists
1537:Lemon v. Kurtzman
1525:assist religion.
1494:Felix Frankfurter
1376:Zorach v. Clauson
1360:Larson v. Valente
1025:Wooley v. Maynard
849:protected in the
842:Massachusetts Bay
728:, as well as the
717:, drafter of the
706:on June 12, 1776.
702:, adopted by the
624:Near v. Minnesota
532:right to petition
520:freedom of speech
492:
491:
16:(Redirected from
21006:
20907:Constitution Day
20798:Charles Pinckney
20607:William Paterson
20539:Nathaniel Gorham
20492:
20491:
20271:Speech or Debate
20099:Equal Protection
19809:Ludlow amendment
19794:Flag Desecration
19789:Federal Marriage
19754:Blaine amendment
19716:Corwin Amendment
19507:
19506:
19503:
19502:
19432:
19425:
19418:
19409:
19408:
19327:Cox v. Louisiana
19262:
19261:
19030:NAACP v. Alabama
19003:
19002:
18990:
18989:
18912:
18911:
18899:
18898:
18470:Prior restraints
18466:
18465:
18453:
18452:
18409:Turner v. Safley
18291:Hartman v. Moore
18238:Marsh v. Alabama
18187:Buckley v. Valeo
18171:NAACP v. Alabama
18163:Anonymous speech
18056:McConnell v. FEC
17944:Buckley v. Valeo
17933:Campaign finance
17420:Kunz v. New York
17231:Connick v. Myers
17167:Public employees
16871:Rust v. Sullivan
16819:
16818:
16557:Compelled speech
16427:Hill v. Colorado
16315:Cox v. Louisiana
16252:
16251:
16082:Texas v. Johnson
15506:Snyder v. Phelps
15237:
15236:
15226:
15225:
15219:
15206:
15205:
15145:Tanzin v. Tanvir
15129:Zubik v. Burwell
15100:
15099:
15011:
15010:
14987:Tandon v. Newsom
14867:McDaniel v. Paty
14803:Kunz v. New York
14763:Jamison v. Texas
14714:
14713:
14638:McDaniel v. Paty
14170:Mueller v. Allen
14138:Wolman v. Walter
13906:Salazar v. Buono
13837:
13836:
13824:
13823:
13808:
13801:
13794:
13785:
13784:
13779:
13777:
13771:. Archived from
13766:
13757:
13755:
13753:
13747:
13741:. Archived from
13736:
13726:
13724:
13722:
13712:
13673:
13671:
13660:
13659:
13650:
13640:
13638:
13633:
13621:
13569:
13538:
13496:Yale Law Journal
13470:
13438:
13417:
13415:
13413:
13398:
13396:
13394:
13370:
13368:
13366:
13342:
13340:
13338:
13324:. Random House.
13311:
13309:
13307:
13272:
13271:
13269:
13267:
13256:
13250:
13249:
13247:
13245:
13226:
13220:
13201:
13195:
13194:
13192:
13190:
13171:
13165:
13146:
13140:
13139:
13124:
13118:
13099:
13093:
13092:
13090:
13088:
13069:
13063:
13049:
13043:
13028:NAACP v. Alabama
13024:
13018:
13017:
13009:
13003:
13002:
13000:
12998:
12983:
12977:
12976:
12974:
12972:
12957:
12951:
12950:
12948:
12946:
12931:
12925:
12919:
12913:
12894:
12888:
12886:
12881:
12875:
12866:
12865:
12843:
12834:
12815:
12806:
12805:
12803:
12801:
12786:
12777:
12771:
12765:
12756:
12755:
12733:
12727:
12726:
12724:
12722:
12713:. Archived from
12701:
12678:
12677:
12675:
12673:
12654:
12648:
12642:
12636:
12617:
12611:
12605:
12599:
12580:
12574:
12557:
12551:
12545:
12539:
12521:
12515:
12496:
12490:
12489:
12487:
12485:
12476:. Archived from
12474:The Boston Globe
12465:
12459:
12440:
12434:
12433:
12431:
12429:
12420:. Archived from
12409:
12403:
12384:
12378:
12372:
12366:
12360:
12354:
12348:
12342:
12323:
12317:
12316:
12314:
12312:
12301:
12295:
12294:
12292:
12290:
12279:
12273:
12254:
12248:
12230:Henry v. Collins
12226:
12220:
12211:
12205:
12196:
12190:
12189:
12187:
12185:
12170:
12161:
12160:
12158:
12156:
12140:
12134:
12133:
12131:
12129:
12117:
12111:
12110:
12108:
12106:
12083:
12077:
12071:
12065:
12046:
12040:
12027:
12021:
12012:Volokh, Eugene.
12010:
12004:
11985:26 Cal. 4th 1013
11978:
11972:
11956:
11950:
11949:
11925:
11919:
11913:
11907:
11906:
11891:
11885:
11866:
11860:
11859:
11857:
11855:
11840:
11834:
11825:
11819:
11818:
11816:
11814:
11795:
11789:
11770:
11764:
11763:
11761:
11759:
11740:
11734:
11715:
11709:
11708:
11706:
11704:
11695:. Archived from
11684:
11678:
11660:
11654:
11653:
11651:
11649:
11630:
11624:
11618:
11612:
11594:
11588:
11582:
11576:
11559:
11553:
11545:
11539:
11538:
11536:
11534:
11520:
11514:
11513:, pp. 9–10.
11508:
11502:
11496:
11490:
11484:
11475:
11469:
11460:
11454:
11448:
11447:
11445:
11443:
11424:
11418:
11399:
11393:
11392:
11390:
11388:
11369:
11363:
11362:
11350:
11344:
11343:
11341:
11339:
11328:
11322:
11314:
11308:
11302:
11296:
11290:
11284:
11265:
11259:
11240:
11234:
11228:
11222:
11216:
11210:
11191:
11185:
11166:
11160:
11157:Pope v. Illinois
11154:
11148:
11142:
11136:
11117:
11111:
11110:
11108:
11106:
11088:
11082:
11076:
11070:
11051:
11045:
11039:
11033:
11027:
11021:
11002:
10996:
10995:
10993:
10991:
10976:
10965:
10959:
10953:
10947:
10941:
10938:
10930:
10922:
10914:
10904:
10898:
10897:
10895:
10893:
10886:Supremecourt.gov
10882:
10874:
10868:
10867:
10856:
10850:
10849:
10848:. June 19, 2017.
10842:
10836:
10835:
10833:
10831:
10816:
10810:
10809:
10807:
10805:
10791:
10785:
10784:
10782:
10780:
10771:. Archived from
10760:
10754:
10735:
10729:
10723:
10717:
10698:
10692:
10673:
10667:
10661:
10655:
10654:
10652:
10650:
10636:
10630:
10624:
10618:
10599:
10593:
10574:
10568:
10549:
10543:
10524:
10518:
10512:
10506:
10497:
10496:
10476:
10470:
10464:
10458:
10449:
10448:
10426:
10420:
10414:
10408:
10389:
10383:
10377:
10371:
10352:
10346:
10345:
10343:
10341:
10326:
10320:
10319:
10317:
10315:
10300:
10294:
10293:
10291:
10289:
10274:
10268:
10259:
10258:
10236:
10230:
10229:
10220:(May 27, 2008).
10214:
10208:
10202:
10196:
10189:
10183:
10182:
10180:
10178:
10158:
10152:
10146:
10140:
10121:
10115:
10109:
10103:
10088:Texas v. Johnson
10084:
10078:
10072:
10066:
10060:
10054:
10029:
10023:
10013:
10007:
9988:
9982:
9981:
9979:
9977:
9962:
9956:
9937:
9931:
9921:
9915:
9909:
9903:
9884:
9878:
9859:
9853:
9852:
9844:
9838:
9819:
9813:
9794:
9788:
9782:
9776:
9757:
9751:
9745:
9739:
9733:
9727:
9721:
9715:
9700:Buckley v. Valeo
9696:
9690:
9689:
9687:
9685:
9676:. Archived from
9665:
9659:
9640:
9634:
9633:
9631:
9629:
9620:. Archived from
9604:
9598:
9579:
9573:
9572:
9560:
9554:
9535:
9529:
9528:
9526:
9524:
9513:
9507:
9506:
9504:
9502:
9487:
9481:
9475:
9469:
9468:
9466:
9464:
9455:. Archived from
9442:
9436:
9416:
9410:
9409:
9407:
9405:
9396:. Archived from
9377:
9371:
9370:
9368:
9366:
9351:
9345:
9339:
9333:
9314:
9308:
9302:
9296:
9290:
9284:
9278:
9272:
9266:
9260:
9241:
9235:
9229:
9223:
9214:
9208:
9189:
9183:
9177:
9171:
9152:
9146:
9140:
9134:
9128:
9122:
9116:
9107:
9089:
9083:
9077:
9071:
9062:
9056:
9052:Kovacs v. Cooper
9037:. Antieu names
9023:
9017:
9000:
8994:
8988:
8975:
8957:
8951:
8945:
8939:
8926:
8920:
8860:
8851:
8845:
8839:
8833:
8827:
8808:
8802:
8796:
8790:
8784:
8778:
8772:
8766:
8760:
8754:
8748:
8742:
8736:
8730:
8713:
8707:
8706:
8682:
8676:
8670:
8661:
8655:
8649:
8632:
8626:
8620:
8614:
8608:
8602:
8596:
8590:
8589:
8587:
8585:
8574:
8568:
8562:
8556:
8550:
8544:
8525:
8516:
8510:
8504:
8498:
8492:
8486:
8480:
8473:
8464:
8458:
8452:
8446:
8440:
8436:Yale Law Journal
8431:
8425:
8424:
8422:
8420:
8409:
8400:
8399:
8397:
8395:
8384:
8378:
8377:
8375:
8373:
8362:
8356:
8355:
8353:
8351:
8336:
8330:
8329:
8327:
8325:
8310:
8301:
8300:
8298:
8296:
8281:
8275:
8274:
8272:
8270:
8254:
8248:
8247:
8245:
8243:
8232:
8226:
8225:
8223:
8221:
8210:
8204:
8203:
8201:
8199:
8188:
8182:
8181:
8179:
8177:
8166:
8160:
8159:
8157:
8155:
8139:
8128:
8127:
8125:
8123:
8108:
8095:
8094:
8088:
8086:
8066:
8060:
8059:
8057:
8055:
8044:
8038:
8037:
8035:
8033:
8028:on June 16, 2019
8024:. Archived from
8014:
8008:
8007:
8005:
8003:
7994:. Archived from
7984:
7978:
7977:
7975:
7973:
7964:. Archived from
7954:
7948:
7947:
7945:
7943:
7938:on July 28, 2020
7928:
7922:
7921:
7919:
7917:
7902:
7893:
7892:
7890:
7888:
7883:on June 23, 2022
7873:
7867:
7866:
7864:
7862:
7845:
7839:
7831:
7825:
7824:
7822:
7820:
7806:
7800:
7792:
7786:
7785:
7783:
7781:
7771:"Locke v. Davey"
7766:
7757:
7739:
7733:
7732:
7730:
7728:
7722:
7711:
7698:
7692:
7691:
7686:. Archived from
7675:
7669:
7668:
7666:
7664:
7655:. Archived from
7644:
7638:
7637:
7635:
7633:
7622:
7616:
7615:
7613:
7611:
7602:. Archived from
7591:
7585:
7584:
7582:
7580:
7569:
7563:
7562:
7560:
7558:
7542:
7536:
7535:
7533:
7531:
7525:
7518:
7510:
7504:
7503:
7501:
7499:
7493:
7486:
7478:
7472:
7471:
7469:
7467:
7448:
7442:
7423:
7417:
7416:
7401:
7395:
7394:
7392:
7390:
7370:
7361:
7360:
7352:
7346:
7327:
7321:
7320:
7318:
7316:
7305:
7299:
7298:
7296:
7294:
7283:
7277:
7276:
7274:
7272:
7261:
7252:
7251:
7249:
7247:
7228:
7222:
7221:
7219:
7217:
7206:
7200:
7181:
7175:
7174:
7172:
7170:
7161:. Archived from
7150:
7144:
7125:
7119:
7118:
7116:
7114:
7105:. Archived from
7094:
7088:
7069:
7063:
7062:
7060:
7058:
7049:. Archived from
7035:
7029:
7010:
7004:
7003:
7001:
6999:
6984:
6978:
6977:
6975:
6973:
6962:
6951:
6950:
6948:
6946:
6941:on June 18, 2021
6937:. Archived from
6924:
6918:
6917:
6915:
6913:
6908:on June 18, 2021
6904:. Archived from
6891:
6885:
6884:
6882:
6880:
6869:
6863:
6862:
6860:
6858:
6847:
6841:
6835:
6829:
6823:
6822:
6820:
6818:
6807:
6801:
6800:
6798:
6796:
6785:
6779:
6778:
6771:
6765:
6764:
6762:
6760:
6745:
6739:
6738:
6719:McDaniel v. Paty
6713:
6711:
6696:
6690:
6689:
6658:McDaniel v. Paty
6633:
6631:
6616:
6610:
6609:
6607:
6605:
6594:
6588:
6587:
6585:
6583:
6572:
6566:
6565:
6563:
6561:
6550:
6544:
6543:
6541:
6539:
6520:
6514:
6513:
6511:
6509:
6498:
6492:
6491:
6482:
6480:
6453:
6447:
6446:
6440:
6438:
6411:
6405:
6404:
6402:
6400:
6389:
6383:
6382:
6380:
6378:
6367:
6361:
6360:
6358:
6356:
6340:
6329:
6328:
6314:
6312:
6281:
6272:
6271:
6269:
6267:
6262:on June 14, 2020
6251:
6245:
6244:
6242:
6240:
6231:
6223:
6217:
6216:
6214:
6212:
6196:
6190:
6189:
6187:
6185:
6165:
6159:
6151:
6145:
6124:
6118:
6101:Endorsement test
6097:
6091:
6090:
6070:
6061:
6060:
6058:
6056:
6041:
6035:
6019:
6013:
6006:Warren A. Nord,
6004:
5998:
5989:Edward Mannino:
5987:
5981:
5980:
5978:
5976:
5960:
5954:
5944:
5935:
5920:Salazar v. Buono
5916:
5910:
5891:
5885:
5866:
5860:
5854:
5848:
5829:
5823:
5822:
5820:
5818:
5807:
5801:
5800:
5798:
5796:
5785:
5779:
5778:
5776:
5774:
5763:
5757:
5756:
5754:
5752:
5741:
5735:
5734:
5732:
5730:
5724:
5717:
5708:
5702:
5701:
5699:
5697:
5682:
5676:
5661:
5655:
5648:
5642:
5641:
5639:
5637:
5617:
5608:
5607:
5605:
5603:
5594:. Archived from
5583:
5572:
5571:
5569:
5567:
5562:on June 14, 2020
5550:Geoff McGovern.
5547:
5538:
5537:
5535:
5533:
5524:. Archived from
5514:
5505:
5504:
5502:
5500:
5489:
5483:
5482:
5480:
5478:
5462:
5456:
5455:
5453:
5451:
5436:
5430:
5429:
5427:
5425:
5416:. Archived from
5405:
5399:
5398:
5396:
5394:
5383:
5377:
5376:
5370:
5368:
5359:. Archived from
5348:
5342:
5341:
5339:
5337:
5326:
5320:
5319:
5317:
5315:
5304:
5298:
5297:
5295:
5293:
5282:
5276:
5275:
5273:
5271:
5260:
5254:
5253:
5251:
5249:
5238:
5232:
5231:
5229:
5227:
5216:
5210:
5209:
5207:
5205:
5194:
5188:
5187:
5185:
5183:
5178:on June 14, 2020
5163:
5154:
5153:
5151:
5149:
5144:on July 16, 2023
5130:
5124:
5123:
5121:
5119:
5103:
5097:
5096:
5094:
5092:
5081:
5075:
5074:
5072:
5070:
5059:
5050:
5049:
5047:
5045:
5029:
5023:
5022:
5020:
5018:
5009:. Archived from
4998:
4989:
4988:
4986:
4984:
4973:
4960:
4959:
4957:
4955:
4946:. Archived from
4935:
4922:
4921:
4905:
4890:
4889:
4887:
4885:
4870:
4864:
4863:
4861:
4859:
4844:
4838:
4837:
4835:
4833:
4822:"Bill of Rights"
4818:
4812:
4806:
4800:
4794:
4788:
4769:
4763:
4757:
4751:
4745:
4739:
4738:
4736:
4734:
4719:
4713:
4712:
4701:
4695:
4694:
4692:
4690:
4681:. Archived from
4670:
4661:
4660:
4658:
4656:
4651:on July 19, 2023
4647:. Archived from
4636:
4615:
4601:
4595:
4575:
4569:
4566:Attorney General
4558:
4552:
4514:
4508:
4501:
4495:
4486:
4480:
4446:
4440:
4428:
4422:
4413:
4336:Free speech zone
4274:NAACP v. Alabama
4210:
4206:
4195:
4183:individual right
4176:
3982:The leak of the
3933:Mills v. Alabama
3812:
3760:
3586:
3582:
3578:
3574:
3483:Theodore Dreiser
3325:
3321:
3210:
3179:
3175:
3075:Compelled speech
3069:Compelled speech
3053:Stolen Valor Act
3009:Texas v. Johnson
2981:flag desecration
2975:Flag desecration
2880:Buckley v. Valeo
2850:Campaign finance
2827:
2814:Anonymous speech
2805:Political speech
2602:Herndon v. Lowry
2594:
2355:Federalist Party
2086:Tanzin v. Tanvir
2019:kosher slaughter
1893:McDaniel v. Paty
1619:Warren E. Burger
1580:endorsement test
1454:Thomas Jefferson
1436:Thomas Jefferson
1419:Salazar v. Buono
1294:
1290:
1200:Founding Fathers
1159:
1111:Danbury Baptists
1107:Thomas Jefferson
987:
904:(1961), Justice
668:
590:campaign finance
586:Thomas Jefferson
484:
477:
470:
454:
453:
442:
441:
430:
429:
428:
64:
39:
38:
21:
21014:
21013:
21009:
21008:
21007:
21005:
21004:
21003:
20954:
20953:
20952:
20947:
20882:
20876:
20844:
20840:William Jackson
20828:
20824:Abraham Baldwin
20807:
20776:
20772:Hugh Williamson
20750:
20729:
20703:
20694:Richard Bassett
20667:
20653:Jared Ingersoll
20616:
20612:Jonathan Dayton
20585:
20569:
20548:
20527:
20523:Nicholas Gilman
20506:
20481:
20447:Reserved powers
20427:Judicial review
20360:
20156:General Welfare
20079:Double Jeopardy
19990:
19917:List of Framers
19897:New Jersey Plan
19851:
19833:
19829:Victims' Rights
19749:Balanced budget
19735:
19688:
19617:
19589:
19568:
19492:
19441:
19436:
19406:
19397:
19303:NAACP v. Button
19269:
19248:
19173:
19098:
19079:
19060:
19046:NAACP v. Button
18997:
18976:
18945:
18939:
18906:
18885:
18850:
18796:Broadcast media
18791:
18788:(9th Cir. 2014)
18674:
18619:
18613:
18578:
18572:Tory v. Cochran
18508:Tucker v. Texas
18472:
18460:
18439:
18380:
18353:
18331:Egbert v. Boule
18276:
18262:Lindke v. Freed
18225:
18158:
18048:FEC v. Beaumont
17935:
17927:
17921:Vidal v. Elster
17506:
17444:NAACP v. Button
17387:
17381:
17351:Ex parte Curtis
17342:
17333:
17162:
17033:
16980:
16974:Vidal v. Elster
16916:
16909:
16854:
16844:
16817:
16811:Janus v. AFSCME
16795:Harris v. Quinn
16771:Locke v. Karass
16658:
16652:
16547:
16501:Brown v. Glines
16484:
16478:
16447:
16441:
16256:
16250:
16211:
16210:Content-neutral
16205:
16126:
16120:
16025:
16023:Symbolic speech
16017:
15995:Smith v. Goguen
15984:
15976:
15953:Strict scrutiny
15943:
15921:Osborne v. Ohio
15904:
15903:Speech integral
15898:
15863:(9th Cir. 2009)
15855:(6th Cir. 2009)
15839:(S.D.N.Y. 2005)
15767:(7th Cir. 1985)
15583:(S.D.N.Y. 1933)
15557:
15512:
15430:
15421:
15380:
15371:
15365:Hess v. Indiana
15309:Fiske v. Kansas
15264:(S.D.N.Y. 1917)
15243:
15231:
15220:
15213:
15188:
15151:
15091:
15054:
15048:Carson v. Makin
15015:
15009:
14787:Tucker v. Texas
14739:Davis v. Beason
14721:
14700:
14694:Trump v. Hawaii
14646:Harris v. McRae
14617:
14574:
14531:
14461:Watson v. Jones
14448:
14389:
14327:Stone v. Graham
14303:Engel v. Vitale
14278:
14272:
14266:Carson v. Makin
14005:
13934:
13928:
13841:
13840:Public displays
13831:
13818:
13812:
13775:
13764:
13760:
13751:
13749:
13745:
13734:
13720:
13718:
13710:
13687:
13686:
13675:
13669:
13667:
13664:This audio file
13661:
13654:
13645:
13642:
13636:
13635:
13631:
13628:
13618:
13592:Wayback Machine
13585:Current version
13566:
13550:McLeod, Kembrew
13535:
13475:Mark David Hall
13467:
13445:
13443:Further reading
13435:
13427:. Basic Books.
13411:
13409:
13392:
13390:
13388:
13364:
13362:
13360:
13336:
13334:
13332:
13316:Beeman, Richard
13305:
13303:
13301:
13290:Speaking freely
13280:
13275:
13265:
13263:
13257:
13253:
13243:
13241:
13228:
13227:
13223:
13202:
13198:
13188:
13186:
13173:
13172:
13168:
13147:
13143:
13125:
13121:
13100:
13096:
13086:
13084:
13071:
13070:
13066:
13060:Wayback Machine
13050:
13046:
13025:
13021:
13010:
13006:
12996:
12994:
12985:
12984:
12980:
12970:
12968:
12959:
12958:
12954:
12944:
12942:
12933:
12932:
12928:
12920:
12916:
12895:
12891:
12884:
12882:
12878:
12863:
12844:
12837:
12816:
12809:
12799:
12797:
12788:
12787:
12780:
12772:
12768:
12753:
12734:
12730:
12720:
12718:
12703:
12702:
12681:
12671:
12669:
12656:
12655:
12651:
12643:
12639:
12618:
12614:
12606:
12602:
12581:
12577:
12558:
12554:
12546:
12542:
12522:
12518:
12497:
12493:
12483:
12481:
12466:
12462:
12441:
12437:
12427:
12425:
12410:
12406:
12385:
12381:
12373:
12369:
12361:
12357:
12349:
12345:
12324:
12320:
12310:
12308:
12303:
12302:
12298:
12288:
12286:
12281:
12280:
12276:
12255:
12251:
12227:
12223:
12212:
12208:
12197:
12193:
12183:
12181:
12171:
12164:
12154:
12152:
12151:on May 12, 2020
12143:Eugene Volokh.
12141:
12137:
12127:
12125:
12118:
12114:
12104:
12102:
12084:
12080:
12072:
12068:
12047:
12043:
12028:
12024:
12011:
12007:
12001:42 Cal. 4th 850
11979:
11975:
11970:Wayback Machine
11957:
11953:
11926:
11922:
11914:
11910:
11895:Gregory C. Sisk
11892:
11888:
11867:
11863:
11853:
11851:
11841:
11837:
11826:
11822:
11812:
11810:
11797:
11796:
11792:
11771:
11767:
11757:
11755:
11742:
11741:
11737:
11716:
11712:
11702:
11700:
11685:
11681:
11661:
11657:
11647:
11645:
11632:
11631:
11627:
11619:
11615:
11595:
11591:
11583:
11579:
11560:
11556:
11546:
11542:
11532:
11530:
11522:
11521:
11517:
11509:
11505:
11497:
11493:
11485:
11478:
11470:
11463:
11455:
11451:
11441:
11439:
11426:
11425:
11421:
11400:
11396:
11386:
11384:
11373:Madeleine Brand
11370:
11366:
11351:
11347:
11337:
11335:
11330:
11329:
11325:
11315:
11311:
11303:
11299:
11291:
11287:
11266:
11262:
11241:
11237:
11229:
11225:
11217:
11213:
11195:Osborne v. Ohio
11192:
11188:
11167:
11163:
11155:
11151:
11143:
11139:
11118:
11114:
11104:
11102:
11089:
11085:
11077:
11073:
11052:
11048:
11040:
11036:
11028:
11024:
11003:
10999:
10989:
10987:
10978:
10977:
10968:
10960:
10956:
10948:
10944:
10933:
10925:
10917:
10909:
10905:
10901:
10891:
10889:
10880:
10876:
10875:
10871:
10858:
10857:
10853:
10844:
10843:
10839:
10829:
10827:
10817:
10813:
10803:
10801:
10793:
10792:
10788:
10778:
10776:
10761:
10757:
10736:
10732:
10724:
10720:
10699:
10695:
10674:
10670:
10662:
10658:
10648:
10646:
10638:
10637:
10633:
10625:
10621:
10600:
10596:
10575:
10571:
10550:
10546:
10525:
10521:
10513:
10509:
10494:
10477:
10473:
10465:
10461:
10446:
10427:
10423:
10415:
10411:
10390:
10386:
10378:
10374:
10353:
10349:
10339:
10337:
10327:
10323:
10313:
10311:
10301:
10297:
10287:
10285:
10275:
10271:
10256:
10237:
10233:
10226:Chicago Tribune
10215:
10211:
10203:
10199:
10190:
10186:
10176:
10174:
10159:
10155:
10147:
10143:
10122:
10118:
10110:
10106:
10085:
10081:
10073:
10069:
10061:
10057:
10030:
10026:
10014:
10010:
9989:
9985:
9975:
9973:
9963:
9959:
9938:
9934:
9922:
9918:
9913:Citizens United
9910:
9906:
9885:
9881:
9860:
9856:
9845:
9841:
9820:
9816:
9795:
9791:
9783:
9779:
9758:
9754:
9746:
9742:
9734:
9730:
9722:
9718:
9697:
9693:
9683:
9681:
9666:
9662:
9641:
9637:
9627:
9625:
9605:
9601:
9580:
9576:
9561:
9557:
9536:
9532:
9522:
9520:
9515:
9514:
9510:
9500:
9498:
9497:on May 21, 2024
9489:
9488:
9484:
9476:
9472:
9462:
9460:
9443:
9439:
9417:
9413:
9403:
9401:
9378:
9374:
9364:
9362:
9361:on May 21, 2024
9353:
9352:
9348:
9340:
9336:
9315:
9311:
9303:
9299:
9291:
9287:
9279:
9275:
9267:
9263:
9242:
9238:
9230:
9226:
9217:50a U.S.C.
9215:
9211:
9190:
9186:
9178:
9174:
9153:
9149:
9141:
9137:
9129:
9125:
9117:
9110:
9090:
9086:
9078:
9074:
9063:
9059:
9024:
9020:
9009:
9001:
8997:
8989:
8978:
8958:
8954:
8946:
8942:
8932:test in 1969's
8927:
8923:
8903:
8889:
8875:
8861:
8854:
8846:
8842:
8834:
8830:
8809:
8805:
8797:
8793:
8785:
8781:
8773:
8769:
8761:
8757:
8749:
8745:
8737:
8733:
8714:
8710:
8703:
8683:
8679:
8671:
8664:
8656:
8652:
8633:
8629:
8621:
8617:
8609:
8605:
8597:
8593:
8583:
8581:
8576:
8575:
8571:
8563:
8559:
8551:
8547:
8526:
8519:
8511:
8507:
8499:
8495:
8487:
8483:
8474:
8467:
8459:
8455:
8447:
8443:
8432:
8428:
8418:
8416:
8411:
8410:
8403:
8393:
8391:
8386:
8385:
8381:
8371:
8369:
8364:
8363:
8359:
8349:
8347:
8346:on July 4, 2020
8338:
8337:
8333:
8323:
8321:
8312:
8311:
8304:
8294:
8292:
8291:on May 29, 2023
8283:
8282:
8278:
8268:
8266:
8255:
8251:
8241:
8239:
8234:
8233:
8229:
8219:
8217:
8212:
8211:
8207:
8197:
8195:
8190:
8189:
8185:
8175:
8173:
8168:
8167:
8163:
8153:
8151:
8140:
8131:
8121:
8119:
8110:
8109:
8098:
8084:
8082:
8067:
8063:
8053:
8051:
8046:
8045:
8041:
8031:
8029:
8016:
8015:
8011:
8001:
7999:
7986:
7985:
7981:
7971:
7969:
7962:Merriam-Webster
7956:
7955:
7951:
7941:
7939:
7930:
7929:
7925:
7915:
7913:
7912:on July 4, 2020
7904:
7903:
7896:
7886:
7884:
7875:
7874:
7870:
7860:
7858:
7846:
7842:
7832:
7828:
7818:
7816:
7808:
7807:
7803:
7793:
7789:
7779:
7777:
7767:
7760:
7740:
7736:
7726:
7724:
7720:
7709:
7699:
7695:
7676:
7672:
7662:
7660:
7645:
7641:
7631:
7629:
7624:
7623:
7619:
7609:
7607:
7592:
7588:
7578:
7576:
7571:
7570:
7566:
7556:
7554:
7543:
7539:
7529:
7527:
7523:
7516:
7512:
7511:
7507:
7497:
7495:
7491:
7484:
7480:
7479:
7475:
7465:
7463:
7450:
7449:
7445:
7427:Gonzales v. UDV
7424:
7420:
7403:
7402:
7398:
7388:
7386:
7371:
7364:
7353:
7349:
7328:
7324:
7314:
7312:
7307:
7306:
7302:
7292:
7290:
7285:
7284:
7280:
7270:
7268:
7263:
7262:
7255:
7245:
7243:
7230:
7229:
7225:
7215:
7213:
7208:
7207:
7203:
7182:
7178:
7168:
7166:
7151:
7147:
7126:
7122:
7112:
7110:
7095:
7091:
7070:
7066:
7056:
7054:
7036:
7032:
7011:
7007:
6997:
6995:
6986:
6985:
6981:
6971:
6969:
6964:
6963:
6954:
6944:
6942:
6925:
6921:
6911:
6909:
6892:
6888:
6878:
6876:
6871:
6870:
6866:
6856:
6854:
6849:
6848:
6844:
6833:Davis v. Beeson
6831:
6830:
6826:
6816:
6814:
6809:
6808:
6804:
6794:
6792:
6787:
6786:
6782:
6773:
6772:
6768:
6758:
6756:
6747:
6746:
6742:
6709:
6707:
6698:
6697:
6693:
6629:
6627:
6618:
6617:
6613:
6603:
6601:
6596:
6595:
6591:
6581:
6579:
6574:
6573:
6569:
6559:
6557:
6552:
6551:
6547:
6537:
6535:
6522:
6521:
6517:
6507:
6505:
6500:
6499:
6495:
6478:
6476:
6474:
6454:
6450:
6436:
6434:
6432:
6412:
6408:
6398:
6396:
6391:
6390:
6386:
6376:
6374:
6369:
6368:
6364:
6354:
6352:
6341:
6332:
6310:
6308:
6306:
6282:
6275:
6265:
6263:
6252:
6248:
6238:
6236:
6229:
6225:
6224:
6220:
6210:
6208:
6197:
6193:
6183:
6181:
6166:
6162:
6152:
6148:
6144:577 (1992).
6125:
6121:
6117:668 (1984).
6098:
6094:
6071:
6064:
6054:
6052:
6051:. June 11, 1998
6043:
6042:
6038:
6020:
6016:
6005:
6001:
5988:
5984:
5974:
5972:
5961:
5957:
5945:
5938:
5917:
5913:
5892:
5888:
5867:
5863:
5855:
5851:
5830:
5826:
5816:
5814:
5809:
5808:
5804:
5794:
5792:
5787:
5786:
5782:
5772:
5770:
5765:
5764:
5760:
5750:
5748:
5743:
5742:
5738:
5728:
5726:
5722:
5715:
5709:
5705:
5695:
5693:
5684:
5683:
5679:
5662:
5658:
5649:
5645:
5635:
5633:
5620:Eugene Volokh.
5618:
5611:
5601:
5599:
5584:
5575:
5565:
5563:
5548:
5541:
5531:
5529:
5516:
5515:
5508:
5498:
5496:
5491:
5490:
5486:
5476:
5474:
5463:
5459:
5449:
5447:
5438:
5437:
5433:
5423:
5421:
5406:
5402:
5392:
5390:
5385:
5384:
5380:
5366:
5364:
5349:
5345:
5335:
5333:
5328:
5327:
5323:
5313:
5311:
5306:
5305:
5301:
5291:
5289:
5284:
5283:
5279:
5269:
5267:
5262:
5261:
5257:
5247:
5245:
5240:
5239:
5235:
5225:
5223:
5218:
5217:
5213:
5203:
5201:
5196:
5195:
5191:
5181:
5179:
5164:
5157:
5147:
5145:
5132:
5131:
5127:
5117:
5115:
5104:
5100:
5090:
5088:
5083:
5082:
5078:
5068:
5066:
5061:
5060:
5053:
5043:
5041:
5030:
5026:
5016:
5014:
4999:
4992:
4982:
4980:
4975:
4974:
4963:
4953:
4951:
4950:on May 25, 2020
4936:
4925:
4906:
4893:
4883:
4881:
4872:
4871:
4867:
4857:
4855:
4846:
4845:
4841:
4831:
4829:
4820:
4819:
4815:
4807:
4803:
4795:
4791:
4770:
4766:
4758:
4754:
4750:, pp. 6–7.
4746:
4742:
4732:
4730:
4721:
4720:
4716:
4703:
4702:
4698:
4688:
4686:
4671:
4664:
4654:
4652:
4637:
4633:
4629:
4624:
4619:
4618:
4602:
4598:
4576:
4572:
4559:
4555:
4515:
4511:
4502:
4498:
4487:
4483:
4447:
4443:
4436:Justice Roberts
4429:
4425:
4414:
4410:
4405:
4400:
4321:
4269:
4263:
4208:
4204:
4193:
4174:
4122:
4112:
4104:Lewis F. Powell
4025:Daniel Ellsberg
4020:Pentagon Papers
3990:Daniel Ellsberg
3985:Pentagon Papers
3973:prior restraint
3899:
3893:
3866:
3810:
3758:
3693:
3687:
3669:David Berkowitz
3665:Son of Sam laws
3661:
3610:Osborne v. Ohio
3584:
3580:
3576:
3572:
3435:
3429:
3406:
3404:Internet access
3323:
3319:
3303:
3297:
3208:
3177:
3173:
3148:
3142:
3122:Janus v. AFSCME
3077:
3071:
3057:military awards
3045:
2977:
2868:, plaintiff in
2866:Mitch McConnell
2858:
2852:
2825:
2816:
2807:
2592:
2540:
2468:Charles Schenck
2428:First Red Scare
2414:formulated the
2404:
2398:
2371:
2359:seditious libel
2316:
2187:in Philadelphia
2177:
2167:
2158:Carson v. Makin
2155:follow-up case
2077:Gonzales v. UDV
1963:strict scrutiny
1932:worship service
1822:Davis v. Beason
1773:human sacrifice
1756:strict scrutiny
1685:, Massachusetts
1672:
1666:
1608:
1512:Engel v. Vitale
1482:Beginning with
1462:George Bancroft
1428:
1321:Citing Justice
1292:
1288:
1188:George Bancroft
1157:
1083:
1077:
1064:the disbeliever
989:
968:
806:
798:Main articles:
796:
762:civil liberties
689:
687:Anti-Federalism
683:
678:
677:
676:
674:
669:
654:
635:prior restraint
547:Anti-Federalist
496:First Amendment
488:
448:
436:
426:
424:
378:
322:
278:
277:
121:
53:
35:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
21012:
21002:
21001:
20996:
20991:
20986:
20981:
20976:
20971:
20966:
20949:
20948:
20946:
20945:
20940:
20932:
20924:
20919:
20914:
20909:
20904:
20899:
20898:
20897:
20886:
20884:
20878:
20877:
20875:
20874:
20869:
20864:
20856:
20854:
20850:
20849:
20846:
20845:
20843:
20842:
20836:
20834:
20830:
20829:
20827:
20826:
20821:
20815:
20813:
20809:
20808:
20806:
20805:
20800:
20795:
20790:
20784:
20782:
20781:South Carolina
20778:
20777:
20775:
20774:
20769:
20764:
20762:William Blount
20758:
20756:
20755:North Carolina
20752:
20751:
20749:
20748:
20743:
20737:
20735:
20731:
20730:
20728:
20727:
20725:Daniel Carroll
20722:
20717:
20711:
20709:
20705:
20704:
20702:
20701:
20696:
20691:
20689:John Dickinson
20686:
20681:
20675:
20673:
20669:
20668:
20666:
20665:
20660:
20655:
20650:
20645:
20640:
20635:
20633:Thomas Mifflin
20630:
20624:
20622:
20618:
20617:
20615:
20614:
20609:
20604:
20602:David Brearley
20599:
20593:
20591:
20587:
20586:
20584:
20583:
20577:
20575:
20571:
20570:
20568:
20567:
20562:
20556:
20554:
20550:
20549:
20547:
20546:
20541:
20535:
20533:
20529:
20528:
20526:
20525:
20520:
20514:
20512:
20508:
20507:
20505:
20504:
20498:
20496:
20489:
20483:
20482:
20480:
20479:
20474:
20472:Taxation power
20469:
20464:
20459:
20454:
20449:
20444:
20439:
20434:
20429:
20424:
20419:
20417:Implied powers
20414:
20409:
20404:
20399:
20394:
20389:
20384:
20379:
20374:
20368:
20366:
20365:Interpretation
20362:
20361:
20359:
20358:
20353:
20348:
20330:
20325:
20320:
20313:
20308:
20303:
20298:
20293:
20288:
20283:
20278:
20273:
20268:
20263:
20261:Recommendation
20258:
20253:
20248:
20243:
20238:
20233:
20228:
20223:
20218:
20213:
20208:
20203:
20198:
20193:
20188:
20183:
20178:
20173:
20168:
20163:
20158:
20153:
20148:
20146:Fugitive Slave
20143:
20138:
20133:
20128:
20123:
20116:
20114:Excessive Bail
20111:
20106:
20101:
20096:
20091:
20086:
20081:
20076:
20071:
20066:
20061:
20056:
20051:
20046:
20041:
20036:
20031:
20026:
20021:
20016:
20014:Appropriations
20011:
20006:
20000:
19998:
19992:
19991:
19989:
19988:
19983:
19978:
19973:
19968:
19963:
19958:
19953:
19948:
19941:
19940:
19939:
19934:
19929:
19924:
19919:
19914:
19909:
19904:
19899:
19894:
19884:
19879:
19874:
19869:
19863:
19861:
19857:
19856:
19853:
19852:
19850:
19849:
19844:
19838:
19835:
19834:
19832:
19831:
19826:
19824:Single subject
19821:
19816:
19811:
19806:
19801:
19796:
19791:
19786:
19781:
19776:
19771:
19766:
19761:
19756:
19751:
19745:
19743:
19737:
19736:
19734:
19733:
19728:
19723:
19718:
19713:
19708:
19702:
19700:
19694:
19693:
19690:
19689:
19687:
19686:
19681:
19676:
19671:
19666:
19661:
19656:
19651:
19646:
19641:
19636:
19631:
19625:
19623:
19619:
19618:
19616:
19615:
19610:
19605:
19599:
19597:
19595:Reconstruction
19591:
19590:
19588:
19587:
19582:
19576:
19574:
19570:
19569:
19567:
19566:
19561:
19556:
19551:
19546:
19541:
19536:
19531:
19526:
19521:
19515:
19513:
19511:Bill of Rights
19500:
19494:
19493:
19491:
19490:
19485:
19480:
19475:
19470:
19465:
19460:
19455:
19449:
19447:
19443:
19442:
19435:
19434:
19427:
19420:
19412:
19403:
19402:
19399:
19398:
19396:
19395:
19387:
19379:
19371:
19363:
19359:Meyer v. Grant
19355:
19347:
19339:
19331:
19323:
19315:
19307:
19299:
19291:
19283:
19274:
19271:
19270:
19258:
19257:
19254:
19253:
19250:
19249:
19247:
19246:
19238:
19230:
19222:
19214:
19206:
19198:
19190:
19181:
19179:
19175:
19174:
19172:
19171:
19163:
19155:
19147:
19139:
19131:
19123:
19115:
19106:
19104:
19100:
19099:
19097:
19096:
19087:
19085:
19081:
19080:
19078:
19077:
19068:
19066:
19065:Future Conduct
19062:
19061:
19059:
19058:
19050:
19042:
19034:
19026:
19018:
19009:
19007:
18999:
18998:
18986:
18985:
18982:
18981:
18978:
18977:
18975:
18974:
18966:
18958:
18949:
18947:
18941:
18940:
18938:
18937:
18929:
18920:
18918:
18908:
18907:
18895:
18894:
18891:
18890:
18887:
18886:
18884:
18883:
18875:
18867:
18858:
18856:
18852:
18851:
18849:
18848:
18840:
18832:
18824:
18816:
18808:
18799:
18797:
18793:
18792:
18790:
18789:
18781:
18773:
18765:
18757:
18749:
18741:
18733:
18725:
18717:
18709:
18701:
18693:
18684:
18682:
18676:
18675:
18673:
18672:
18664:
18656:
18648:
18640:
18632:
18623:
18621:
18615:
18614:
18612:
18611:
18603:
18595:
18586:
18584:
18580:
18579:
18577:
18576:
18568:
18560:
18552:
18544:
18536:
18528:
18520:
18512:
18504:
18496:
18488:
18479:
18477:
18462:
18461:
18449:
18448:
18445:
18444:
18441:
18440:
18438:
18437:
18433:Beard v. Banks
18429:
18421:
18417:Shaw v. Murphy
18413:
18405:
18397:
18388:
18386:
18382:
18381:
18379:
18378:
18370:
18361:
18359:
18355:
18354:
18352:
18351:
18343:
18335:
18327:
18319:
18311:
18303:
18295:
18286:
18284:
18278:
18277:
18275:
18274:
18266:
18258:
18250:
18242:
18233:
18231:
18227:
18226:
18224:
18223:
18215:
18207:
18199:
18191:
18183:
18175:
18166:
18164:
18160:
18159:
18157:
18156:
18148:
18140:
18132:
18124:
18116:
18108:
18100:
18092:
18084:
18076:
18068:
18060:
18052:
18044:
18036:
18028:
18020:
18012:
18004:
17996:
17988:
17980:
17972:
17964:
17956:
17948:
17939:
17937:
17929:
17928:
17926:
17925:
17917:
17909:
17901:
17893:
17885:
17877:
17869:
17861:
17853:
17845:
17837:
17829:
17821:
17813:
17805:
17797:
17789:
17781:
17773:
17765:
17757:
17749:
17741:
17733:
17725:
17717:
17709:
17701:
17693:
17685:
17677:
17669:
17661:
17653:
17645:
17637:
17629:
17621:
17613:
17605:
17597:
17589:
17581:
17573:
17565:
17557:
17549:
17541:
17533:
17525:
17516:
17514:
17508:
17507:
17505:
17504:
17496:
17488:
17480:
17472:
17464:
17456:
17448:
17440:
17432:
17424:
17416:
17408:
17400:
17391:
17389:
17383:
17382:
17380:
17379:
17371:
17363:
17355:
17346:
17344:
17335:
17334:
17332:
17331:
17323:
17315:
17311:Lane v. Franks
17307:
17299:
17291:
17283:
17275:
17267:
17259:
17251:
17243:
17235:
17227:
17219:
17211:
17203:
17199:Elrod v. Burns
17195:
17187:
17179:
17170:
17168:
17164:
17163:
17161:
17160:
17152:
17144:
17136:
17128:
17120:
17112:
17104:
17096:
17088:
17080:
17076:Healy v. James
17072:
17060:
17052:
17043:
17041:
17035:
17034:
17032:
17031:
17023:
17015:
17007:
16999:
16990:
16988:
16982:
16981:
16979:
16978:
16970:
16962:
16954:
16946:
16938:
16930:
16921:
16919:
16911:
16910:
16908:
16907:
16899:
16891:
16883:
16875:
16867:
16858:
16856:
16850:
16849:
16846:
16845:
16843:
16842:
16834:
16825:
16823:
16816:
16815:
16807:
16799:
16791:
16783:
16775:
16767:
16759:
16751:
16743:
16735:
16727:
16719:
16711:
16703:
16695:
16687:
16679:
16671:
16662:
16660:
16654:
16653:
16651:
16650:
16642:
16634:
16626:
16618:
16610:
16602:
16594:
16586:
16578:
16570:
16561:
16559:
16553:
16552:
16549:
16548:
16546:
16545:
16537:
16529:
16521:
16513:
16505:
16497:
16488:
16486:
16480:
16479:
16477:
16476:
16468:
16460:
16451:
16449:
16443:
16442:
16440:
16439:
16431:
16423:
16415:
16407:
16399:
16391:
16383:
16375:
16367:
16359:
16351:
16343:
16335:
16327:
16319:
16311:
16303:
16295:
16287:
16279:
16271:
16262:
16260:
16249:
16248:
16240:
16232:
16224:
16215:
16213:
16207:
16206:
16204:
16203:
16195:
16187:
16179:
16171:
16163:
16155:
16147:
16139:
16130:
16128:
16122:
16121:
16119:
16118:
16110:
16102:
16094:
16086:
16078:
16070:
16062:
16054:
16046:
16038:
16029:
16027:
16026:versus conduct
16019:
16018:
16016:
16015:
16007:
15999:
15990:
15988:
15978:
15977:
15975:
15974:
15966:
15957:
15955:
15949:
15948:
15945:
15944:
15942:
15941:
15933:
15925:
15917:
15908:
15906:
15900:
15899:
15897:
15896:
15888:
15880:
15872:
15864:
15856:
15848:
15840:
15832:
15824:
15816:
15808:
15800:
15792:
15784:
15776:
15768:
15760:
15752:
15744:
15736:
15728:
15720:
15712:
15704:
15696:
15688:
15680:
15672:
15664:
15656:
15648:
15640:
15632:
15624:
15616:
15608:
15600:
15592:
15584:
15576:
15567:
15565:
15559:
15558:
15556:
15555:
15547:
15539:
15531:
15522:
15520:
15514:
15513:
15511:
15510:
15502:
15494:
15486:
15478:
15470:
15462:
15454:
15446:
15437:
15435:
15433:heckler's veto
15427:Fighting words
15423:
15422:
15420:
15419:
15411:
15403:
15395:
15386:
15384:
15373:
15372:
15370:
15369:
15361:
15349:
15341:
15329:
15321:
15313:
15305:
15297:
15289:
15281:
15273:
15265:
15257:
15250:
15248:
15234:
15222:
15221:
15202:
15201:
15198:
15197:
15194:
15193:
15190:
15189:
15187:
15186:
15178:
15170:
15161:
15159:
15153:
15152:
15150:
15149:
15141:
15133:
15125:
15117:
15108:
15106:
15097:
15093:
15092:
15090:
15089:
15081:
15073:
15064:
15062:
15056:
15055:
15053:
15052:
15044:
15036:
15028:
15024:Locke v. Davey
15019:
15017:
15008:
15007:
14999:
14991:
14983:
14975:
14967:
14959:
14951:
14943:
14935:
14927:
14919:
14911:
14903:
14895:
14887:
14879:
14871:
14863:
14855:
14847:
14839:
14831:
14823:
14815:
14807:
14799:
14791:
14783:
14775:
14767:
14759:
14751:
14743:
14735:
14726:
14723:
14722:
14710:
14709:
14706:
14705:
14702:
14701:
14699:
14698:
14690:
14682:
14674:
14666:
14658:
14650:
14642:
14634:
14625:
14623:
14619:
14618:
14616:
14615:
14607:
14599:
14591:
14582:
14580:
14576:
14575:
14573:
14572:
14564:
14556:
14548:
14544:Flast v. Cohen
14539:
14537:
14533:
14532:
14530:
14529:
14521:
14513:
14505:
14497:
14489:
14481:
14473:
14465:
14456:
14454:
14450:
14449:
14447:
14446:
14438:
14430:
14422:
14414:
14406:
14397:
14395:
14391:
14390:
14388:
14387:
14379:
14371:
14363:
14359:Lee v. Weisman
14355:
14347:
14339:
14331:
14323:
14315:
14307:
14299:
14291:
14282:
14280:
14279:public schools
14274:
14273:
14271:
14270:
14262:
14254:
14246:
14238:
14230:
14222:
14214:
14206:
14198:
14190:
14182:
14174:
14166:
14158:
14150:
14142:
14134:
14126:
14118:
14110:
14102:
14098:Sloan v. Lemon
14094:
14086:
14082:Hunt v. McNair
14078:
14070:
14062:
14054:
14046:
14038:
14034:Flast v. Cohen
14030:
14022:
14013:
14011:
14010:Public funding
14007:
14006:
14004:
14003:
13995:
13987:
13979:
13971:
13963:
13955:
13947:
13938:
13936:
13930:
13929:
13927:
13926:
13918:
13910:
13902:
13894:
13886:
13878:
13870:
13862:
13854:
13845:
13843:
13842:and ceremonies
13833:
13832:
13820:
13819:
13811:
13810:
13803:
13796:
13788:
13782:
13781:
13758:
13727:
13703:
13693:
13676:
13662:
13655:
13643:
13630:
13629:
13627:
13626:External links
13624:
13623:
13622:
13616:
13601:
13594:
13577:
13570:
13565:978-0816650316
13564:
13546:
13539:
13533:
13515:
13504:10.2307/794655
13489:
13482:
13471:
13465:
13444:
13441:
13440:
13439:
13433:
13418:
13399:
13386:
13371:
13358:
13343:
13330:
13312:
13299:
13279:
13276:
13274:
13273:
13251:
13240:on May 9, 2013
13221:
13196:
13185:on May 9, 2013
13166:
13141:
13119:
13094:
13083:on May 9, 2013
13064:
13044:
13019:
13004:
12978:
12952:
12926:
12914:
12889:
12876:
12835:
12807:
12778:
12766:
12728:
12679:
12668:on May 9, 2013
12649:
12637:
12612:
12600:
12575:
12552:
12540:
12516:
12491:
12480:on May 9, 2013
12460:
12435:
12424:on May 9, 2013
12404:
12379:
12367:
12355:
12343:
12318:
12296:
12274:
12249:
12221:
12206:
12191:
12162:
12135:
12112:
12078:
12066:
12041:
12022:
12005:
11973:
11951:
11920:
11908:
11886:
11861:
11835:
11820:
11809:on May 9, 2013
11790:
11765:
11754:on May 9, 2013
11735:
11710:
11699:on May 9, 2013
11679:
11655:
11644:on May 9, 2013
11625:
11613:
11589:
11577:
11554:
11540:
11515:
11503:
11491:
11476:
11461:
11449:
11438:on May 9, 2013
11419:
11394:
11364:
11345:
11323:
11309:
11297:
11285:
11260:
11235:
11223:
11211:
11186:
11161:
11149:
11137:
11112:
11083:
11071:
11046:
11034:
11022:
10997:
10966:
10954:
10942:
10940:
10939:
10931:
10923:
10915:
10899:
10869:
10851:
10837:
10819:Lindsay, Tom.
10811:
10786:
10775:on May 9, 2013
10755:
10730:
10718:
10693:
10668:
10656:
10631:
10619:
10594:
10569:
10544:
10519:
10507:
10471:
10459:
10421:
10409:
10384:
10372:
10347:
10321:
10295:
10269:
10231:
10218:Crewdson, John
10209:
10197:
10184:
10153:
10141:
10116:
10104:
10079:
10067:
10055:
10024:
10008:
9983:
9957:
9932:
9916:
9904:
9879:
9854:
9839:
9814:
9789:
9777:
9752:
9740:
9728:
9716:
9691:
9680:on May 9, 2013
9660:
9644:Meese v. Keene
9635:
9624:on May 9, 2013
9608:Biskupic, Joan
9599:
9574:
9555:
9530:
9508:
9482:
9470:
9437:
9411:
9372:
9346:
9334:
9309:
9297:
9295:, p. 124.
9285:
9273:
9261:
9236:
9224:
9209:
9184:
9172:
9147:
9135:
9123:
9108:
9084:
9072:
9065:18 U.S.C.
9057:
9018:
8995:
8976:
8952:
8940:
8921:
8917:978-0847697113
8872:978-0160723797
8852:
8840:
8828:
8803:
8791:
8779:
8777:, p. 108.
8767:
8755:
8743:
8731:
8708:
8701:
8677:
8662:
8650:
8627:
8615:
8603:
8591:
8569:
8557:
8545:
8517:
8505:
8493:
8481:
8465:
8453:
8441:
8426:
8401:
8379:
8357:
8331:
8302:
8276:
8257:Vile, John R.
8249:
8227:
8205:
8183:
8161:
8129:
8096:
8061:
8039:
8022:Dictionary.com
8009:
7979:
7949:
7923:
7894:
7868:
7840:
7826:
7801:
7787:
7758:
7743:Locke v. Davey
7734:
7693:
7670:
7639:
7617:
7586:
7564:
7537:
7505:
7473:
7462:on May 9, 2013
7443:
7418:
7396:
7362:
7347:
7322:
7300:
7278:
7253:
7242:on May 9, 2013
7223:
7201:
7176:
7165:on May 9, 2013
7145:
7120:
7109:on May 9, 2013
7089:
7064:
7053:on May 9, 2013
7030:
7005:
6979:
6952:
6919:
6886:
6864:
6842:
6824:
6802:
6780:
6766:
6740:
6691:
6611:
6589:
6567:
6545:
6515:
6493:
6472:
6448:
6430:
6406:
6384:
6362:
6343:Vile, John R.
6330:
6304:
6273:
6246:
6218:
6191:
6160:
6146:
6133:Lee v. Weisman
6119:
6092:
6062:
6036:
6034:203 (1948)
6014:
5999:
5982:
5955:
5936:
5911:
5886:
5861:
5849:
5824:
5802:
5780:
5758:
5736:
5703:
5677:
5656:
5643:
5609:
5573:
5539:
5506:
5484:
5465:Vile, John R.
5457:
5431:
5400:
5378:
5343:
5321:
5299:
5277:
5255:
5233:
5211:
5189:
5166:John R. Vile.
5155:
5125:
5098:
5076:
5051:
5024:
4990:
4961:
4923:
4891:
4865:
4839:
4813:
4801:
4789:
4764:
4752:
4740:
4714:
4696:
4662:
4630:
4628:
4625:
4623:
4620:
4617:
4616:
4596:
4570:
4553:
4509:
4496:
4481:
4441:
4423:
4407:
4406:
4404:
4401:
4399:
4398:
4393:
4388:
4383:
4378:
4373:
4368:
4363:
4358:
4353:
4348:
4343:
4338:
4333:
4328:
4322:
4320:
4317:
4262:
4259:
4228:Morrison Waite
4130:Morrison Waite
4128:Chief Justice
4111:
4108:
3892:
3889:
3865:
3864:Private action
3862:
3747:
3746:
3743:
3740:
3737:
3734:
3686:
3683:
3660:
3657:
3535:Potter Stewart
3443:Potter Stewart
3428:
3425:
3416:North Carolina
3405:
3402:
3380:released the "
3333:Healy v. James
3299:Main article:
3296:
3293:
3275:Central Hudson
3253:Central Hudson
3249:
3248:
3245:
3242:
3239:
3166:
3165:
3162:
3159:
3156:
3144:Main article:
3141:
3138:
3092:or salute the
3073:Main article:
3070:
3067:
3049:Medal of Honor
3044:
3041:
2991:James Meredith
2976:
2973:
2851:
2848:
2840:Meese v. Keene
2815:
2812:
2806:
2803:
2774:United States
2657:Fred M. Vinson
2607:Angelo Herndon
2548:Louis Brandeis
2539:
2536:
2532:Louis Brandeis
2524:Woodrow Wilson
2504:Eugene V. Debs
2397:
2394:
2383:riding circuit
2370:
2367:
2315:
2312:
2200:Bill of Rights
2166:
2163:
2121:Locke v. Davey
2068:City of Boerne
1971:South Carolina
1665:
1662:
1607:
1604:
1556:
1555:
1552:
1549:
1427:
1426:Separationists
1424:
1192:Morrison Waite
1076:
1073:
960:
892:Bill of Rights
851:Bill of Rights
795:
792:
788:Bill of Rights
719:Bill of Rights
682:
679:
671:
670:
663:
662:
661:
653:
650:
549:opposition to
536:Bill of Rights
508:the government
490:
489:
487:
486:
479:
472:
464:
461:
460:
459:
458:
446:
444:Law portal
434:
419:
418:
417:
416:
410:
409:
403:
402:
400:Amendments I–X
396:
395:
387:
386:
380:
379:
377:
376:
371:
369:Bill of Rights
365:
364:
359:
353:
352:
347:
341:
340:
334:
331:
330:
324:
323:
321:
320:
315:
309:
308:
303:
298:
292:
291:
285:
276:
275:
270:
265:
260:
255:
249:
248:
243:
238:
233:
228:
222:
221:
216:
211:
206:
201:
196:
191:
185:
184:
179:
174:
169:
164:
159:
154:
149:
144:
139:
133:
130:
129:
123:
122:
120:
119:
114:
109:
104:
99:
94:
89:
83:
82:
81:
73:
72:
66:
65:
57:
56:
48:
47:
26:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
21011:
21000:
20997:
20995:
20992:
20990:
20987:
20985:
20982:
20980:
20977:
20975:
20972:
20970:
20967:
20965:
20962:
20961:
20959:
20944:
20941:
20938:
20937:
20933:
20930:
20929:
20925:
20923:
20920:
20918:
20915:
20913:
20910:
20908:
20905:
20903:
20900:
20896:
20893:
20892:
20891:
20888:
20887:
20885:
20879:
20873:
20870:
20868:
20867:Jacob Shallus
20865:
20863:
20862:
20858:
20857:
20855:
20851:
20841:
20838:
20837:
20835:
20831:
20825:
20822:
20820:
20817:
20816:
20814:
20810:
20804:
20803:Pierce Butler
20801:
20799:
20796:
20794:
20791:
20789:
20788:John Rutledge
20786:
20785:
20783:
20779:
20773:
20770:
20768:
20765:
20763:
20760:
20759:
20757:
20753:
20747:
20746:James Madison
20744:
20742:
20739:
20738:
20736:
20732:
20726:
20723:
20721:
20718:
20716:
20715:James McHenry
20713:
20712:
20710:
20706:
20700:
20697:
20695:
20692:
20690:
20687:
20685:
20682:
20680:
20677:
20676:
20674:
20670:
20664:
20661:
20659:
20656:
20654:
20651:
20649:
20646:
20644:
20643:George Clymer
20641:
20639:
20638:Robert Morris
20636:
20634:
20631:
20629:
20626:
20625:
20623:
20619:
20613:
20610:
20608:
20605:
20603:
20600:
20598:
20595:
20594:
20592:
20588:
20582:
20579:
20578:
20576:
20572:
20566:
20565:Roger Sherman
20563:
20561:
20558:
20557:
20555:
20551:
20545:
20542:
20540:
20537:
20536:
20534:
20532:Massachusetts
20530:
20524:
20521:
20519:
20516:
20515:
20513:
20511:New Hampshire
20509:
20503:
20500:
20499:
20497:
20493:
20490:
20488:
20484:
20478:
20475:
20473:
20470:
20468:
20465:
20463:
20460:
20458:
20455:
20453:
20450:
20448:
20445:
20443:
20440:
20438:
20437:Plenary power
20435:
20433:
20430:
20428:
20425:
20423:
20420:
20418:
20415:
20413:
20410:
20408:
20407:Equal footing
20405:
20403:
20400:
20398:
20395:
20393:
20390:
20388:
20385:
20383:
20380:
20378:
20375:
20373:
20370:
20369:
20367:
20363:
20357:
20354:
20352:
20349:
20346:
20342:
20338:
20334:
20331:
20329:
20328:Trial by Jury
20326:
20324:
20321:
20318:
20314:
20312:
20309:
20307:
20304:
20302:
20299:
20297:
20294:
20292:
20289:
20287:
20284:
20282:
20279:
20277:
20274:
20272:
20269:
20267:
20264:
20262:
20259:
20257:
20254:
20252:
20249:
20247:
20244:
20242:
20239:
20237:
20234:
20232:
20229:
20227:
20224:
20222:
20219:
20217:
20214:
20212:
20209:
20207:
20204:
20202:
20199:
20197:
20194:
20192:
20189:
20187:
20184:
20182:
20181:Ineligibility
20179:
20177:
20176:Import-Export
20174:
20172:
20169:
20167:
20164:
20162:
20159:
20157:
20154:
20152:
20149:
20147:
20144:
20142:
20139:
20137:
20134:
20132:
20131:Free Exercise
20129:
20127:
20124:
20122:
20121:
20120:Ex Post Facto
20117:
20115:
20112:
20110:
20107:
20105:
20104:Establishment
20102:
20100:
20097:
20095:
20092:
20090:
20087:
20085:
20082:
20080:
20077:
20075:
20072:
20070:
20067:
20065:
20062:
20060:
20057:
20055:
20054:Confrontation
20052:
20050:
20047:
20045:
20042:
20040:
20037:
20035:
20032:
20030:
20027:
20025:
20022:
20020:
20017:
20015:
20012:
20010:
20007:
20005:
20002:
20001:
19999:
19997:
19993:
19987:
19984:
19982:
19979:
19977:
19974:
19972:
19969:
19967:
19964:
19962:
19959:
19957:
19954:
19952:
19949:
19947:
19946:
19942:
19938:
19937:Syng inkstand
19935:
19933:
19930:
19928:
19925:
19923:
19920:
19918:
19915:
19913:
19910:
19908:
19905:
19903:
19900:
19898:
19895:
19893:
19892:Virginia Plan
19890:
19889:
19888:
19885:
19883:
19880:
19878:
19875:
19873:
19870:
19868:
19865:
19864:
19862:
19858:
19848:
19845:
19843:
19840:
19839:
19836:
19830:
19827:
19825:
19822:
19820:
19819:School Prayer
19817:
19815:
19812:
19810:
19807:
19805:
19802:
19800:
19797:
19795:
19792:
19790:
19787:
19785:
19782:
19780:
19777:
19775:
19772:
19770:
19767:
19765:
19762:
19760:
19757:
19755:
19752:
19750:
19747:
19746:
19744:
19742:
19738:
19732:
19729:
19727:
19724:
19722:
19719:
19717:
19714:
19712:
19709:
19707:
19704:
19703:
19701:
19699:
19695:
19685:
19682:
19680:
19677:
19675:
19672:
19670:
19667:
19665:
19662:
19660:
19657:
19655:
19652:
19650:
19647:
19645:
19642:
19640:
19637:
19635:
19632:
19630:
19627:
19626:
19624:
19620:
19614:
19611:
19609:
19606:
19604:
19601:
19600:
19598:
19596:
19592:
19586:
19583:
19581:
19578:
19577:
19575:
19571:
19565:
19562:
19560:
19557:
19555:
19552:
19550:
19547:
19545:
19542:
19540:
19537:
19535:
19532:
19530:
19527:
19525:
19522:
19520:
19517:
19516:
19514:
19512:
19508:
19504:
19501:
19499:
19495:
19489:
19486:
19484:
19481:
19479:
19476:
19474:
19471:
19469:
19466:
19464:
19461:
19459:
19456:
19454:
19451:
19450:
19448:
19444:
19440:
19433:
19428:
19426:
19421:
19419:
19414:
19413:
19410:
19393:
19392:
19388:
19385:
19384:
19380:
19377:
19376:
19372:
19369:
19368:
19364:
19361:
19360:
19356:
19353:
19352:
19348:
19345:
19344:
19340:
19337:
19336:
19332:
19329:
19328:
19324:
19321:
19320:
19316:
19313:
19312:
19308:
19305:
19304:
19300:
19297:
19296:
19292:
19289:
19288:
19284:
19281:
19280:
19276:
19275:
19272:
19268:
19263:
19259:
19244:
19243:
19239:
19236:
19235:
19231:
19228:
19227:
19223:
19220:
19219:
19215:
19212:
19211:
19207:
19204:
19203:
19199:
19196:
19195:
19191:
19188:
19187:
19183:
19182:
19180:
19176:
19169:
19168:
19164:
19161:
19160:
19156:
19153:
19152:
19148:
19145:
19144:
19140:
19137:
19136:
19132:
19129:
19128:
19124:
19121:
19120:
19116:
19113:
19112:
19108:
19107:
19105:
19101:
19094:
19093:
19089:
19088:
19086:
19082:
19075:
19074:
19070:
19069:
19067:
19063:
19056:
19055:
19051:
19048:
19047:
19043:
19040:
19039:
19035:
19032:
19031:
19027:
19024:
19023:
19019:
19016:
19015:
19011:
19010:
19008:
19006:Organizations
19004:
19000:
18996:
18991:
18987:
18972:
18971:
18967:
18964:
18963:
18959:
18956:
18955:
18951:
18950:
18948:
18942:
18935:
18934:
18930:
18927:
18926:
18922:
18921:
18919:
18917:
18916:Incorporation
18913:
18909:
18905:
18900:
18896:
18881:
18880:
18876:
18873:
18872:
18868:
18865:
18864:
18860:
18859:
18857:
18853:
18846:
18845:
18841:
18838:
18837:
18833:
18830:
18829:
18825:
18822:
18821:
18817:
18814:
18813:
18809:
18806:
18805:
18801:
18800:
18798:
18794:
18787:
18786:
18782:
18779:
18778:
18774:
18771:
18770:
18766:
18763:
18762:
18758:
18755:
18754:
18750:
18747:
18746:
18742:
18739:
18738:
18734:
18731:
18730:
18726:
18723:
18722:
18718:
18715:
18714:
18710:
18707:
18706:
18702:
18699:
18698:
18694:
18691:
18690:
18686:
18685:
18683:
18681:
18677:
18670:
18669:
18665:
18662:
18661:
18657:
18654:
18653:
18649:
18646:
18645:
18641:
18638:
18637:
18633:
18630:
18629:
18625:
18624:
18622:
18616:
18609:
18608:
18604:
18601:
18600:
18596:
18593:
18592:
18588:
18587:
18585:
18581:
18574:
18573:
18569:
18566:
18565:
18561:
18558:
18557:
18553:
18550:
18549:
18545:
18542:
18541:
18537:
18534:
18533:
18529:
18526:
18525:
18521:
18518:
18517:
18513:
18510:
18509:
18505:
18502:
18501:
18497:
18494:
18493:
18489:
18486:
18485:
18481:
18480:
18478:
18476:
18471:
18467:
18463:
18459:
18454:
18450:
18435:
18434:
18430:
18427:
18426:
18422:
18419:
18418:
18414:
18411:
18410:
18406:
18403:
18402:
18398:
18395:
18394:
18390:
18389:
18387:
18383:
18376:
18375:
18371:
18368:
18367:
18363:
18362:
18360:
18356:
18349:
18348:
18344:
18341:
18340:
18336:
18333:
18332:
18328:
18325:
18324:
18320:
18317:
18316:
18312:
18309:
18308:
18304:
18301:
18300:
18296:
18293:
18292:
18288:
18287:
18285:
18283:
18279:
18272:
18271:
18267:
18264:
18263:
18259:
18256:
18255:
18251:
18248:
18247:
18243:
18240:
18239:
18235:
18234:
18232:
18228:
18221:
18220:
18216:
18213:
18212:
18208:
18205:
18204:
18200:
18197:
18196:
18192:
18189:
18188:
18184:
18181:
18180:
18176:
18173:
18172:
18168:
18167:
18165:
18161:
18154:
18153:
18149:
18146:
18145:
18141:
18138:
18137:
18133:
18130:
18129:
18125:
18122:
18121:
18117:
18114:
18113:
18109:
18106:
18105:
18101:
18098:
18097:
18093:
18090:
18089:
18085:
18082:
18081:
18077:
18074:
18073:
18069:
18066:
18065:
18061:
18058:
18057:
18053:
18050:
18049:
18045:
18042:
18041:
18037:
18034:
18033:
18029:
18026:
18025:
18021:
18018:
18017:
18013:
18010:
18009:
18005:
18002:
18001:
17997:
17994:
17993:
17989:
17986:
17985:
17981:
17978:
17977:
17973:
17970:
17969:
17965:
17962:
17961:
17957:
17954:
17953:
17949:
17946:
17945:
17941:
17940:
17938:
17934:
17930:
17923:
17922:
17918:
17915:
17914:
17910:
17907:
17906:
17902:
17899:
17898:
17894:
17891:
17890:
17886:
17883:
17882:
17878:
17875:
17874:
17870:
17867:
17866:
17862:
17859:
17858:
17854:
17851:
17850:
17846:
17843:
17842:
17838:
17835:
17834:
17830:
17827:
17826:
17822:
17819:
17818:
17814:
17811:
17810:
17806:
17803:
17802:
17798:
17795:
17794:
17790:
17787:
17786:
17782:
17779:
17778:
17774:
17771:
17770:
17766:
17763:
17762:
17758:
17755:
17754:
17750:
17747:
17746:
17742:
17739:
17738:
17734:
17731:
17730:
17726:
17723:
17722:
17718:
17715:
17714:
17710:
17707:
17706:
17702:
17699:
17698:
17694:
17691:
17690:
17686:
17683:
17682:
17678:
17675:
17674:
17670:
17667:
17666:
17662:
17659:
17658:
17654:
17651:
17650:
17646:
17643:
17642:
17638:
17635:
17634:
17630:
17627:
17626:
17622:
17619:
17618:
17614:
17611:
17610:
17606:
17603:
17602:
17598:
17595:
17594:
17590:
17587:
17586:
17582:
17579:
17578:
17574:
17571:
17570:
17566:
17563:
17562:
17558:
17555:
17554:
17550:
17547:
17546:
17542:
17539:
17538:
17534:
17531:
17530:
17526:
17523:
17522:
17518:
17517:
17515:
17513:
17509:
17502:
17501:
17497:
17494:
17493:
17489:
17486:
17485:
17481:
17478:
17477:
17473:
17470:
17469:
17465:
17462:
17461:
17457:
17454:
17453:
17449:
17446:
17445:
17441:
17438:
17437:
17433:
17430:
17429:
17425:
17422:
17421:
17417:
17414:
17413:
17409:
17406:
17405:
17401:
17398:
17397:
17393:
17392:
17390:
17386:Licensing and
17384:
17377:
17376:
17372:
17369:
17368:
17364:
17361:
17360:
17356:
17353:
17352:
17348:
17347:
17345:
17340:
17336:
17329:
17328:
17324:
17321:
17320:
17316:
17313:
17312:
17308:
17305:
17304:
17300:
17297:
17296:
17292:
17289:
17288:
17284:
17281:
17280:
17276:
17273:
17272:
17268:
17265:
17264:
17260:
17257:
17256:
17252:
17249:
17248:
17244:
17241:
17240:
17236:
17233:
17232:
17228:
17225:
17224:
17220:
17217:
17216:
17212:
17209:
17208:
17204:
17201:
17200:
17196:
17193:
17192:
17188:
17185:
17184:
17180:
17177:
17176:
17172:
17171:
17169:
17165:
17158:
17157:
17153:
17150:
17149:
17145:
17142:
17141:
17137:
17134:
17133:
17129:
17126:
17125:
17121:
17118:
17117:
17113:
17110:
17109:
17105:
17102:
17101:
17097:
17094:
17093:
17089:
17086:
17085:
17081:
17078:
17077:
17073:
17070:
17066:
17065:
17061:
17058:
17057:
17053:
17050:
17049:
17045:
17044:
17042:
17040:
17039:School speech
17036:
17029:
17028:
17024:
17021:
17020:
17016:
17013:
17012:
17008:
17005:
17004:
17000:
16997:
16996:
16992:
16991:
16989:
16987:
16986:Loyalty oaths
16983:
16976:
16975:
16971:
16968:
16967:
16963:
16960:
16959:
16955:
16952:
16951:
16947:
16944:
16943:
16939:
16936:
16935:
16931:
16928:
16927:
16923:
16922:
16920:
16918:
16912:
16905:
16904:
16900:
16897:
16896:
16892:
16889:
16888:
16884:
16881:
16880:
16876:
16873:
16872:
16868:
16865:
16864:
16860:
16859:
16857:
16855:and subsidies
16851:
16840:
16839:
16835:
16832:
16831:
16827:
16826:
16824:
16820:
16813:
16812:
16808:
16805:
16804:
16800:
16797:
16796:
16792:
16789:
16788:
16784:
16781:
16780:
16776:
16773:
16772:
16768:
16765:
16764:
16760:
16757:
16756:
16752:
16749:
16748:
16744:
16741:
16740:
16736:
16733:
16732:
16728:
16725:
16724:
16720:
16717:
16716:
16712:
16709:
16708:
16704:
16701:
16700:
16696:
16693:
16692:
16688:
16685:
16684:
16680:
16677:
16676:
16672:
16669:
16668:
16664:
16663:
16661:
16655:
16648:
16647:
16643:
16640:
16639:
16635:
16632:
16631:
16627:
16624:
16623:
16619:
16616:
16615:
16611:
16608:
16607:
16603:
16600:
16599:
16595:
16592:
16591:
16587:
16584:
16583:
16579:
16576:
16575:
16571:
16568:
16567:
16563:
16562:
16560:
16558:
16554:
16543:
16542:
16538:
16535:
16534:
16530:
16527:
16526:
16522:
16519:
16518:
16514:
16511:
16510:
16506:
16503:
16502:
16498:
16495:
16494:
16490:
16489:
16487:
16481:
16474:
16473:
16469:
16466:
16465:
16461:
16458:
16457:
16453:
16452:
16450:
16444:
16437:
16436:
16432:
16429:
16428:
16424:
16421:
16420:
16416:
16413:
16412:
16408:
16405:
16404:
16400:
16397:
16396:
16392:
16389:
16388:
16384:
16381:
16380:
16376:
16373:
16372:
16368:
16365:
16364:
16360:
16357:
16356:
16352:
16349:
16348:
16344:
16341:
16340:
16336:
16333:
16332:
16328:
16325:
16324:
16320:
16317:
16316:
16312:
16309:
16308:
16304:
16301:
16300:
16296:
16293:
16292:
16288:
16285:
16284:
16280:
16277:
16276:
16272:
16269:
16268:
16264:
16263:
16261:
16259:
16253:
16246:
16245:
16241:
16238:
16237:
16233:
16230:
16229:
16225:
16222:
16221:
16217:
16216:
16214:
16208:
16201:
16200:
16196:
16193:
16192:
16188:
16185:
16184:
16180:
16177:
16176:
16172:
16169:
16168:
16164:
16161:
16160:
16156:
16153:
16152:
16151:Boos v. Barry
16148:
16145:
16144:
16140:
16137:
16136:
16132:
16131:
16129:
16125:Content-based
16123:
16116:
16115:
16111:
16108:
16107:
16103:
16100:
16099:
16095:
16092:
16091:
16087:
16084:
16083:
16079:
16076:
16075:
16071:
16068:
16067:
16063:
16060:
16059:
16055:
16052:
16051:
16047:
16044:
16043:
16039:
16036:
16035:
16031:
16030:
16028:
16024:
16020:
16013:
16012:
16008:
16005:
16004:
16000:
15997:
15996:
15992:
15991:
15989:
15987:
15983:
15979:
15972:
15971:
15967:
15964:
15963:
15959:
15958:
15956:
15954:
15950:
15939:
15938:
15934:
15931:
15930:
15926:
15923:
15922:
15918:
15915:
15914:
15910:
15909:
15907:
15901:
15894:
15893:
15889:
15886:
15885:
15881:
15878:
15877:
15873:
15870:
15869:
15865:
15862:
15861:
15857:
15854:
15853:
15849:
15846:
15845:
15841:
15838:
15837:
15833:
15830:
15829:
15825:
15822:
15821:
15817:
15814:
15813:
15809:
15806:
15805:
15801:
15798:
15797:
15793:
15790:
15789:
15785:
15782:
15781:
15777:
15774:
15773:
15769:
15766:
15765:
15761:
15758:
15757:
15753:
15750:
15749:
15745:
15742:
15741:
15737:
15734:
15733:
15729:
15726:
15725:
15721:
15718:
15717:
15713:
15710:
15709:
15705:
15702:
15701:
15697:
15694:
15693:
15689:
15686:
15685:
15681:
15678:
15677:
15673:
15670:
15669:
15665:
15662:
15661:
15657:
15654:
15653:
15649:
15646:
15645:
15641:
15638:
15637:
15633:
15630:
15629:
15625:
15622:
15621:
15617:
15614:
15613:
15609:
15606:
15605:
15601:
15598:
15597:
15593:
15590:
15589:
15585:
15582:
15581:
15577:
15574:
15573:
15569:
15568:
15566:
15564:
15560:
15553:
15552:
15548:
15545:
15544:
15540:
15537:
15536:
15532:
15529:
15528:
15524:
15523:
15521:
15519:
15515:
15508:
15507:
15503:
15500:
15499:
15495:
15492:
15491:
15487:
15484:
15483:
15479:
15476:
15475:
15471:
15468:
15467:
15463:
15460:
15459:
15455:
15452:
15451:
15447:
15444:
15443:
15439:
15438:
15436:
15434:
15428:
15424:
15417:
15416:
15412:
15409:
15408:
15404:
15401:
15400:
15396:
15393:
15392:
15388:
15387:
15385:
15383:
15378:
15374:
15367:
15366:
15362:
15359:
15355:
15354:
15350:
15347:
15346:
15345:Bond v. Floyd
15342:
15339:
15335:
15334:
15330:
15327:
15326:
15322:
15319:
15318:
15314:
15311:
15310:
15306:
15303:
15302:
15298:
15295:
15294:
15290:
15287:
15286:
15282:
15279:
15278:
15274:
15271:
15270:
15266:
15263:
15262:
15258:
15255:
15252:
15251:
15249:
15247:
15242:
15238:
15235:
15233:
15227:
15223:
15217:
15212:
15207:
15203:
15184:
15183:
15179:
15176:
15175:
15174:Holt v. Hobbs
15171:
15168:
15167:
15163:
15162:
15160:
15158:
15154:
15147:
15146:
15142:
15139:
15138:
15134:
15131:
15130:
15126:
15123:
15122:
15118:
15115:
15114:
15110:
15109:
15107:
15105:
15101:
15098:
15094:
15087:
15086:
15082:
15079:
15078:
15074:
15071:
15070:
15066:
15065:
15063:
15061:
15057:
15050:
15049:
15045:
15042:
15041:
15037:
15034:
15033:
15029:
15026:
15025:
15021:
15020:
15018:
15012:
15005:
15004:
15000:
14997:
14996:
14992:
14989:
14988:
14984:
14981:
14980:
14976:
14973:
14972:
14968:
14965:
14964:
14960:
14957:
14956:
14952:
14949:
14948:
14944:
14941:
14940:
14936:
14933:
14932:
14928:
14925:
14924:
14920:
14917:
14916:
14912:
14909:
14908:
14904:
14901:
14900:
14896:
14893:
14892:
14888:
14885:
14884:
14880:
14877:
14876:
14872:
14869:
14868:
14864:
14861:
14860:
14856:
14853:
14852:
14848:
14845:
14844:
14840:
14837:
14836:
14832:
14829:
14828:
14824:
14821:
14820:
14816:
14813:
14812:
14808:
14805:
14804:
14800:
14797:
14796:
14792:
14789:
14788:
14784:
14781:
14780:
14776:
14773:
14772:
14768:
14765:
14764:
14760:
14757:
14756:
14752:
14749:
14748:
14744:
14741:
14740:
14736:
14733:
14732:
14728:
14727:
14724:
14720:
14715:
14711:
14696:
14695:
14691:
14688:
14687:
14683:
14680:
14679:
14675:
14672:
14671:
14667:
14664:
14663:
14659:
14656:
14655:
14651:
14648:
14647:
14643:
14640:
14639:
14635:
14632:
14631:
14627:
14626:
14624:
14620:
14613:
14612:
14608:
14605:
14604:
14600:
14597:
14596:
14592:
14589:
14588:
14584:
14583:
14581:
14577:
14570:
14569:
14565:
14562:
14561:
14557:
14554:
14553:
14549:
14546:
14545:
14541:
14540:
14538:
14534:
14527:
14526:
14522:
14519:
14518:
14517:Jones v. Wolf
14514:
14511:
14510:
14506:
14503:
14502:
14498:
14495:
14494:
14490:
14487:
14486:
14482:
14479:
14478:
14474:
14471:
14470:
14466:
14463:
14462:
14458:
14457:
14455:
14451:
14444:
14443:
14439:
14436:
14435:
14431:
14428:
14427:
14423:
14420:
14419:
14415:
14412:
14411:
14407:
14404:
14403:
14399:
14398:
14396:
14392:
14385:
14384:
14380:
14377:
14376:
14372:
14369:
14368:
14364:
14361:
14360:
14356:
14353:
14352:
14348:
14345:
14344:
14340:
14337:
14336:
14332:
14329:
14328:
14324:
14321:
14320:
14316:
14313:
14312:
14308:
14305:
14304:
14300:
14297:
14296:
14292:
14289:
14288:
14284:
14283:
14281:
14275:
14268:
14267:
14263:
14260:
14259:
14255:
14252:
14251:
14247:
14244:
14243:
14239:
14236:
14235:
14231:
14228:
14227:
14223:
14220:
14219:
14215:
14212:
14211:
14207:
14204:
14203:
14199:
14196:
14195:
14191:
14188:
14187:
14183:
14180:
14179:
14175:
14172:
14171:
14167:
14164:
14163:
14159:
14156:
14155:
14151:
14148:
14147:
14143:
14140:
14139:
14135:
14132:
14131:
14127:
14124:
14123:
14119:
14116:
14115:
14111:
14108:
14107:
14103:
14100:
14099:
14095:
14092:
14091:
14087:
14084:
14083:
14079:
14076:
14075:
14071:
14068:
14067:
14063:
14060:
14059:
14055:
14052:
14051:
14047:
14044:
14043:
14039:
14036:
14035:
14031:
14028:
14027:
14023:
14020:
14019:
14015:
14014:
14012:
14008:
14001:
14000:
13996:
13993:
13992:
13988:
13985:
13984:
13980:
13977:
13976:
13972:
13969:
13968:
13964:
13961:
13960:
13956:
13953:
13952:
13948:
13945:
13944:
13940:
13939:
13937:
13931:
13924:
13923:
13919:
13916:
13915:
13911:
13908:
13907:
13903:
13900:
13899:
13895:
13892:
13891:
13887:
13884:
13883:
13879:
13876:
13875:
13871:
13868:
13867:
13863:
13860:
13859:
13855:
13852:
13851:
13847:
13846:
13844:
13838:
13834:
13830:
13825:
13821:
13816:
13809:
13804:
13802:
13797:
13795:
13790:
13789:
13786:
13774:
13770:
13763:
13759:
13744:
13740:
13733:
13728:
13716:
13709:
13704:
13701:
13697:
13694:
13692:
13689:
13688:
13684:
13680:
13665:
13619:
13613:
13609:
13608:
13602:
13599:
13595:
13593:
13589:
13586:
13582:
13578:
13575:
13571:
13567:
13561:
13557:
13556:
13551:
13547:
13544:
13541:Peter Irons,
13540:
13536:
13530:
13527:. MIT Press.
13526:
13525:
13520:
13516:
13513:
13509:
13505:
13501:
13497:
13493:
13490:
13487:
13483:
13480:
13476:
13472:
13468:
13462:
13458:
13454:
13453:
13447:
13446:
13436:
13430:
13426:
13425:
13419:
13407:
13406:
13400:
13389:
13383:
13379:
13378:
13372:
13361:
13355:
13351:
13350:
13344:
13333:
13327:
13323:
13322:
13317:
13313:
13302:
13296:
13292:
13291:
13286:
13285:Abrams, Floyd
13282:
13281:
13262:
13255:
13239:
13235:
13231:
13225:
13218:
13215:
13211:
13207:
13206:
13200:
13184:
13180:
13176:
13170:
13163:
13160:
13156:
13152:
13151:
13145:
13137:
13133:
13129:
13123:
13116:
13113:
13109:
13105:
13104:
13098:
13082:
13078:
13074:
13068:
13061:
13057:
13054:
13048:
13041:
13038:
13034:
13030:
13029:
13023:
13015:
13008:
12992:
12988:
12982:
12966:
12962:
12956:
12940:
12936:
12930:
12923:
12918:
12911:
12908:
12904:
12900:
12899:
12893:
12880:
12874:
12872:
12861: (2011).
12860:
12857:
12853:
12849:
12848:
12842:
12840:
12832:
12829:
12825:
12821:
12820:
12814:
12812:
12795:
12791:
12785:
12783:
12775:
12770:
12764:
12762:
12751: (1972).
12750:
12747:
12743:
12739:
12738:
12732:
12716:
12712:
12711:
12706:
12700:
12698:
12696:
12694:
12692:
12690:
12688:
12686:
12684:
12667:
12663:
12659:
12653:
12646:
12641:
12634:
12631:
12627:
12623:
12622:
12616:
12609:
12604:
12597:
12594:
12590:
12586:
12585:
12579:
12572:
12569:
12565:
12561:
12556:
12550:, p. 46.
12549:
12544:
12537:
12534:
12530:
12527:
12526:
12520:
12513:
12510:
12506:
12502:
12501:
12495:
12479:
12475:
12471:
12464:
12457:
12454:
12450:
12446:
12445:
12439:
12423:
12419:
12415:
12408:
12401:
12398:
12394:
12390:
12389:
12383:
12376:
12371:
12364:
12359:
12353:, p. 43.
12352:
12347:
12340:
12337:
12333:
12329:
12328:
12322:
12306:
12300:
12284:
12278:
12271:
12268:
12264:
12260:
12259:
12253:
12246:
12242:
12238:
12236:
12231:
12225:
12218:
12217:
12210:
12203:
12202:
12195:
12180:
12176:
12169:
12167:
12150:
12146:
12139:
12123:
12116:
12100:
12096:
12092:
12088:
12082:
12075:
12070:
12063:
12060:
12056:
12052:
12051:
12045:
12038:
12035:
12031:
12026:
12019:
12015:
12009:
12002:
11998:
11994:
11990:
11986:
11982:
11977:
11971:
11967:
11964:
11960:
11955:
11947:
11943:
11939:
11935:
11931:
11924:
11917:
11912:
11904:
11900:
11896:
11890:
11883:
11880:
11876:
11872:
11871:
11865:
11850:
11846:
11839:
11832:
11831:
11824:
11808:
11804:
11800:
11794:
11787:
11784:
11780:
11776:
11775:
11769:
11753:
11749:
11745:
11739:
11732:
11729:
11725:
11721:
11720:
11714:
11698:
11694:
11690:
11683:
11676:
11673:
11669:
11666:
11665:
11659:
11643:
11639:
11635:
11629:
11622:
11617:
11610:
11607:
11603:
11600:
11599:
11593:
11586:
11581:
11574:
11571:
11567:
11563:
11558:
11551:
11550:
11544:
11529:
11525:
11519:
11512:
11507:
11500:
11495:
11489:, p. 93.
11488:
11483:
11481:
11473:
11468:
11466:
11458:
11453:
11437:
11433:
11429:
11423:
11416:
11413:
11409:
11405:
11404:
11398:
11382:
11378:
11374:
11368:
11360:
11356:
11349:
11333:
11327:
11320:
11319:
11313:
11306:
11301:
11294:
11289:
11282:
11279:
11275:
11271:
11270:
11264:
11257:
11254:
11250:
11246:
11245:
11239:
11233:, p. 51.
11232:
11227:
11220:
11215:
11208:
11205:
11201:
11197:
11196:
11190:
11183:
11180:
11176:
11172:
11171:
11165:
11158:
11153:
11146:
11141:
11134:
11131:
11127:
11123:
11122:
11116:
11100:
11099:
11094:
11087:
11080:
11075:
11068:
11065:
11061:
11057:
11056:
11050:
11043:
11038:
11031:
11026:
11019:
11016:
11012:
11008:
11007:
11001:
10985:
10981:
10975:
10973:
10971:
10963:
10958:
10951:
10946:
10936:
10932:
10928:
10924:
10920:
10916:
10912:
10908:
10907:
10903:
10892:September 25,
10888:
10887:
10879:
10873:
10865:
10861:
10855:
10847:
10841:
10826:
10822:
10815:
10800:
10796:
10790:
10774:
10770:
10766:
10759:
10752:
10749:
10745:
10741:
10740:
10734:
10727:
10722:
10715:
10712:
10708:
10704:
10703:
10697:
10690:
10687:
10683:
10679:
10678:
10672:
10666:, p. 62.
10665:
10660:
10645:
10643:
10635:
10629:, p. 61.
10628:
10623:
10616:
10613:
10609:
10605:
10604:
10598:
10591:
10588:
10584:
10580:
10579:
10573:
10566:
10563:
10559:
10555:
10554:
10548:
10541:
10538:
10534:
10530:
10529:
10523:
10516:
10511:
10505:
10503:
10492: (1978).
10491:
10488:
10484:
10480:
10475:
10468:
10463:
10457:
10455:
10444: (1976).
10443:
10440:
10436:
10432:
10431:
10425:
10418:
10413:
10406:
10403:
10399:
10395:
10394:
10388:
10381:
10376:
10369:
10366:
10362:
10358:
10357:
10351:
10336:
10332:
10325:
10310:
10306:
10299:
10284:
10280:
10273:
10267:
10265:
10254: (2012).
10253:
10250:
10246:
10242:
10241:
10235:
10227:
10223:
10219:
10213:
10206:
10201:
10194:
10188:
10172:
10168:
10164:
10157:
10150:
10145:
10138:
10135:
10131:
10127:
10126:
10120:
10113:
10108:
10101:
10098:
10094:
10090:
10089:
10083:
10077:, p. 43.
10076:
10071:
10064:
10059:
10052:
10049:
10045:
10041:
10040:
10035:
10034:
10028:
10021:
10017:
10012:
10005:
10002:
9998:
9994:
9993:
9987:
9972:
9968:
9961:
9954:
9951:
9947:
9943:
9942:
9936:
9929:
9925:
9920:
9914:
9908:
9901:
9898:
9894:
9890:
9889:
9883:
9876:
9873:
9869:
9865:
9864:
9858:
9850:
9843:
9836:
9833:
9829:
9825:
9824:
9818:
9811:
9808:
9804:
9800:
9799:
9793:
9786:
9781:
9774:
9771:
9767:
9763:
9762:
9756:
9749:
9744:
9737:
9732:
9725:
9720:
9713:
9710:
9706:
9702:
9701:
9695:
9679:
9675:
9671:
9664:
9657:
9654:
9650:
9646:
9645:
9639:
9623:
9619:
9618:
9613:
9609:
9603:
9596:
9593:
9589:
9585:
9584:
9578:
9570:
9566:
9559:
9552:
9549:
9545:
9541:
9540:
9534:
9518:
9512:
9496:
9492:
9486:
9479:
9474:
9458:
9454:
9453:
9448:
9441:
9434:
9430:
9426:
9422:
9421:
9415:
9399:
9395:
9391:
9387:
9383:
9376:
9360:
9356:
9350:
9344:, p. 46.
9343:
9338:
9331:
9328:
9324:
9320:
9319:
9313:
9306:
9301:
9294:
9289:
9282:
9277:
9271:, p. 32.
9270:
9265:
9258:
9255:
9251:
9247:
9246:
9240:
9233:
9228:
9222:
9218:
9213:
9206:
9203:
9199:
9195:
9194:
9188:
9182:, p. 29.
9181:
9176:
9169:
9166:
9162:
9158:
9157:
9151:
9144:
9139:
9132:
9127:
9121:, p. 28.
9120:
9115:
9113:
9105:
9102:
9098:
9095:
9094:
9088:
9081:
9076:
9070:
9066:
9061:
9054:
9053:
9048:
9047:
9042:
9041:
9036:
9035:9781575884431
9032:
9028:
9022:
9015:
9014:
9007:
9006:
8999:
8992:
8987:
8985:
8983:
8981:
8973:
8970:
8966:
8963:
8962:
8956:
8949:
8944:
8937:
8936:
8931:
8925:
8918:
8914:
8911:
8907:
8901:
8900:9780765809544
8897:
8893:
8887:
8886:9780226131122
8883:
8879:
8873:
8869:
8865:
8859:
8857:
8850:, p. 26.
8849:
8844:
8838:, p. 36.
8837:
8832:
8825:
8822:
8818:
8814:
8813:
8807:
8800:
8795:
8789:, p. 24.
8788:
8783:
8776:
8771:
8765:, p. 27.
8764:
8759:
8752:
8747:
8740:
8735:
8728:
8725:
8721:
8717:
8712:
8704:
8698:
8694:
8690:
8689:
8681:
8675:, p. 23.
8674:
8669:
8667:
8659:
8654:
8647:
8644:
8640:
8636:
8631:
8624:
8619:
8612:
8607:
8601:, p. 25.
8600:
8595:
8579:
8573:
8567:, p. 53.
8566:
8561:
8554:
8549:
8542:
8539:
8535:
8531:
8530:
8524:
8522:
8515:, p. 20.
8514:
8509:
8502:
8497:
8491:, p. 15.
8490:
8485:
8478:
8472:
8470:
8463:, p. 41.
8462:
8457:
8451:, p. 40.
8450:
8445:
8438:
8437:
8430:
8414:
8408:
8406:
8389:
8383:
8367:
8361:
8345:
8341:
8335:
8319:
8317:
8316:Bond v. Floyd
8309:
8307:
8290:
8286:
8280:
8264:
8260:
8253:
8237:
8231:
8215:
8209:
8193:
8187:
8171:
8165:
8149:
8145:
8138:
8136:
8134:
8117:
8113:
8107:
8105:
8103:
8101:
8093:
8080:
8076:
8072:
8065:
8049:
8043:
8027:
8023:
8019:
8013:
7997:
7993:
7989:
7988:"free speech"
7983:
7967:
7963:
7959:
7953:
7937:
7933:
7927:
7911:
7907:
7901:
7899:
7882:
7878:
7872:
7857:
7856:
7851:
7844:
7837:
7836:
7830:
7815:
7811:
7805:
7798:
7797:
7791:
7776:
7772:
7765:
7763:
7755:
7752:
7748:
7745:
7744:
7738:
7719:
7715:
7708:
7706:
7697:
7689:
7685:
7681:
7674:
7658:
7654:
7650:
7643:
7627:
7621:
7605:
7601:
7597:
7590:
7574:
7568:
7552:
7548:
7541:
7522:
7515:
7509:
7490:
7483:
7477:
7461:
7457:
7453:
7447:
7440:
7437:
7433:
7429:
7428:
7422:
7414:
7410:
7406:
7400:
7384:
7380:
7378:
7369:
7367:
7358:
7351:
7344:
7341:
7337:
7333:
7332:
7326:
7310:
7304:
7288:
7282:
7266:
7260:
7258:
7241:
7237:
7233:
7227:
7211:
7205:
7198:
7195:
7191:
7187:
7186:
7180:
7164:
7160:
7156:
7149:
7142:
7139:
7135:
7131:
7130:
7124:
7108:
7104:
7100:
7093:
7086:
7083:
7079:
7075:
7074:
7068:
7052:
7048:
7044:
7040:
7034:
7027:
7024:
7020:
7016:
7015:
7009:
6993:
6991:
6983:
6967:
6961:
6959:
6957:
6940:
6936:
6935:
6930:
6923:
6907:
6903:
6902:
6897:
6890:
6874:
6868:
6852:
6846:
6839:
6834:
6828:
6812:
6806:
6790:
6784:
6776:
6770:
6754:
6752:
6744:
6737:
6735:
6731:
6727:
6726:
6721:
6720:
6705:
6703:
6695:
6688:
6686:
6685:
6680:
6676:
6675:
6670:
6666:
6665:
6660:
6659:
6654:
6653:
6648:
6647:
6642:
6641:
6625:
6623:
6615:
6599:
6593:
6577:
6571:
6555:
6549:
6533:
6529:
6525:
6519:
6503:
6497:
6490:
6488:
6475:
6469:
6465:
6461:
6460:
6452:
6445:
6433:
6431:9780199890224
6427:
6423:
6419:
6418:
6410:
6394:
6388:
6372:
6366:
6350:
6346:
6339:
6337:
6335:
6327:
6325:
6321:
6307:
6305:9780816067398
6301:
6297:
6293:
6289:
6288:
6280:
6278:
6261:
6257:
6250:
6235:
6228:
6222:
6206:
6202:
6195:
6179:
6175:
6171:
6164:
6157:
6156:
6150:
6143:
6139:
6135:
6134:
6129:
6128:coercion test
6123:
6116:
6112:
6108:
6107:
6102:
6096:
6088:
6084:
6081:(4): 827–40.
6080:
6076:
6069:
6067:
6050:
6046:
6040:
6033:
6029:
6025:
6024:
6018:
6011:
6010:
6003:
5996:
5992:
5986:
5970:
5966:
5959:
5953:
5951:
5943:
5941:
5933:
5930:
5926:
5922:
5921:
5915:
5908:
5905:
5901:
5897:
5896:
5890:
5883:
5880:
5876:
5872:
5871:
5865:
5858:
5853:
5846:
5843:
5839:
5835:
5834:
5828:
5812:
5806:
5790:
5784:
5768:
5762:
5746:
5740:
5721:
5714:
5707:
5696:September 11,
5691:
5687:
5681:
5675:
5674:9781572338883
5671:
5667:
5666:
5660:
5653:
5647:
5631:
5627:
5623:
5616:
5614:
5597:
5593:
5589:
5582:
5580:
5578:
5561:
5557:
5555:
5546:
5544:
5527:
5523:
5519:
5513:
5511:
5494:
5488:
5472:
5468:
5461:
5445:
5441:
5435:
5419:
5415:
5411:
5404:
5388:
5382:
5375:
5362:
5358:
5354:
5347:
5331:
5325:
5309:
5303:
5287:
5281:
5265:
5259:
5243:
5237:
5221:
5215:
5199:
5193:
5177:
5173:
5171:
5162:
5160:
5143:
5139:
5135:
5129:
5118:September 13,
5113:
5109:
5102:
5086:
5080:
5064:
5058:
5056:
5039:
5035:
5028:
5012:
5008:
5004:
4997:
4995:
4978:
4972:
4970:
4968:
4966:
4949:
4945:
4943:
4934:
4932:
4930:
4928:
4919:
4915:
4911:
4904:
4902:
4900:
4898:
4896:
4879:
4875:
4869:
4853:
4849:
4843:
4827:
4823:
4817:
4811:, p. 10.
4810:
4805:
4798:
4793:
4786:
4782:
4778:
4774:
4768:
4761:
4756:
4749:
4744:
4728:
4724:
4718:
4710:
4706:
4700:
4684:
4680:
4676:
4669:
4667:
4650:
4646:
4642:
4635:
4631:
4613:
4612:
4607:
4606:
4600:
4593:
4590:
4586:
4582:
4581:
4574:
4567:
4563:
4557:
4550:
4548:
4543:
4541:
4534:
4532:
4525:
4524:
4519:
4513:
4506:
4500:
4493:
4492:
4485:
4479:
4476:
4471:
4467:
4463:
4459:
4458:
4451:
4445:
4437:
4433:
4427:
4420:
4419:
4412:
4408:
4397:
4394:
4392:
4389:
4387:
4384:
4382:
4379:
4377:
4374:
4372:
4369:
4367:
4364:
4362:
4359:
4357:
4354:
4352:
4349:
4347:
4344:
4342:
4339:
4337:
4334:
4332:
4329:
4327:
4324:
4323:
4316:
4314:
4313:
4307:
4305:
4301:
4300:
4295:
4294:
4288:
4286:
4282:
4281:
4276:
4275:
4268:
4258:
4256:
4252:
4251:antitrust law
4248:
4243:
4239:
4238:public forums
4235:
4234:
4229:
4223:
4218:
4216:
4215:
4203:
4199:
4191:
4190:
4184:
4178:
4170:
4168:
4167:
4161:
4159:
4158:
4152:
4150:
4146:
4137:
4136:
4131:
4126:
4121:
4117:
4107:
4105:
4101:
4097:
4093:
4092:
4086:
4084:
4080:
4076:
4072:
4071:
4064:
4062:
4058:
4054:
4053:
4048:
4042:
4040:
4039:
4033:
4030:
4026:
4022:
4021:
4016:
4015:Richard Nixon
4012:
4011:
4005:
3997:
3996:
3991:
3987:
3986:
3980:
3976:
3974:
3970:
3969:
3962:
3960:
3956:
3955:
3944:
3940:
3936:
3934:
3929:
3925:
3921:
3917:
3913:
3912:
3907:
3906:
3898:
3888:
3886:
3882:
3878:
3877:
3870:
3861:
3859:
3855:
3851:
3850:
3844:
3842:
3838:
3837:Jerry Falwell
3834:
3833:
3828:
3824:
3823:
3818:
3817:
3808:
3807:
3802:
3801:
3795:
3793:
3789:
3785:
3781:
3777:
3776:
3771:
3770:actual malice
3767:
3762:
3756:
3751:
3744:
3741:
3738:
3735:
3731:
3730:
3729:
3727:
3723:
3719:
3715:
3711:
3704:
3703:
3697:
3692:
3682:
3680:
3676:
3675:
3670:
3666:
3656:
3654:
3650:
3649:
3642:
3637:
3635:
3631:
3627:
3626:
3621:
3620:
3614:
3612:
3611:
3606:
3605:
3600:
3596:
3592:
3588:
3568:
3566:
3564:
3559:
3558:
3553:
3548:
3546:
3542:
3541:
3536:
3531:
3527:
3523:
3522:
3516:
3514:
3513:
3508:
3504:
3503:
3498:
3494:
3493:D.H. Lawrence
3490:
3489:
3484:
3480:
3479:
3473:
3471:
3466:
3462:
3461:
3455:
3453:
3444:
3439:
3434:
3424:
3421:
3420:sex offenders
3417:
3413:
3412:
3401:
3399:
3395:
3391:
3387:
3383:
3379:
3376:In 2014, the
3374:
3372:
3371:
3366:
3365:
3360:
3359:
3354:
3349:
3347:
3343:
3339:
3335:
3334:
3327:
3314:
3312:
3308:
3302:
3295:School speech
3292:
3290:
3286:
3285:
3280:
3276:
3272:
3268:
3264:
3260:
3259:
3255:standards in
3254:
3246:
3243:
3240:
3237:
3236:
3235:
3233:
3232:
3225:
3220:
3218:
3212:
3203:
3201:
3197:
3196:
3190:
3188:
3187:
3181:
3171:
3163:
3160:
3157:
3154:
3153:
3152:
3147:
3137:
3135:
3134:
3128:
3127:public sector
3124:
3123:
3117:
3114:
3110:
3109:
3103:
3101:
3100:
3095:
3094:American flag
3091:
3087:
3086:
3080:
3076:
3066:
3064:
3063:
3058:
3054:
3050:
3040:
3038:
3034:
3033:
3027:
3023:
3019:
3015:
3011:
3010:
3004:
3002:
3001:
2996:
2992:
2988:
2987:
2982:
2972:
2970:
2966:
2962:
2961:
2955:
2953:
2949:
2948:
2943:
2939:
2938:
2932:
2930:
2929:
2924:
2920:
2919:
2913:
2911:
2910:
2904:
2900:
2896:
2895:
2889:
2886:
2882:
2881:
2873:
2872:
2867:
2864:U.S. Senator
2862:
2857:
2847:
2845:
2841:
2837:
2833:
2832:
2823:
2822:
2811:
2802:
2800:
2799:
2794:
2793:
2788:
2782:
2780:
2779:
2775:
2767:
2765:
2761:
2760:
2755:
2751:
2747:
2746:
2739:
2737:
2730:
2728:
2724:
2720:
2716:
2712:
2711:
2706:
2702:
2701:
2696:
2692:
2687:
2685:
2684:
2677:
2672:
2670:
2666:
2662:
2658:
2654:
2653:
2648:
2644:
2643:Eugene Dennis
2640:
2636:
2631:
2628:
2624:
2623:
2618:
2617:
2612:
2608:
2604:
2603:
2596:
2588:
2586:
2582:
2578:
2574:
2573:
2568:
2564:
2560:
2559:
2549:
2544:
2535:
2533:
2529:
2525:
2521:
2517:
2513:
2509:
2505:
2501:
2497:
2492:
2490:
2486:
2482:
2478:
2474:
2469:
2465:
2460:
2458:
2457:
2452:
2451:
2446:
2445:
2440:
2439:
2433:
2429:
2425:
2417:
2413:
2408:
2403:
2393:
2391:
2390:
2384:
2380:
2376:
2366:
2364:
2363:John Marshall
2360:
2356:
2352:
2348:
2342:
2337:
2335:
2331:
2330:James Madison
2326:
2325:Anthony Lewis
2321:
2311:
2309:
2305:
2304:
2299:
2295:
2291:
2290:
2285:
2281:
2275:
2273:
2272:
2267:
2266:
2261:
2260:
2253:
2251:
2245:
2241:
2240:(1972) said:
2239:
2238:
2233:
2232:
2227:
2226:
2225:Bond v. Floyd
2221:
2217:
2216:
2209:
2207:
2206:
2201:
2197:
2196:
2186:
2181:
2176:
2172:
2162:
2160:
2159:
2154:
2150:
2149:
2143:
2139:
2138:
2133:
2132:
2127:
2123:
2122:
2116:
2114:
2113:
2108:
2104:
2100:
2099:
2094:
2093:
2088:
2087:
2081:
2079:
2078:
2073:
2069:
2065:
2061:
2060:
2055:
2051:
2047:
2039:
2034:
2030:
2028:
2024:
2020:
2016:
2012:
2011:
2006:
2005:
1996:
1992:
1988:
1984:
1982:
1981:
1976:
1972:
1968:
1964:
1960:
1959:
1952:
1950:
1945:
1941:
1940:proselytizing
1937:
1933:
1929:
1925:
1921:
1920:
1915:
1911:
1910:
1905:
1901:
1900:
1895:
1894:
1889:
1888:
1883:
1882:
1877:
1876:
1868:
1866:
1865:
1859:
1857:
1854:also set the
1853:
1849:
1847:
1841:
1837:
1836:
1830:
1829:
1824:
1823:
1818:
1817:Justice Field
1814:
1809:
1806:
1802:
1801:
1792:
1791:Plains tribes
1788:
1784:
1780:
1778:
1774:
1770:
1769:Supreme Court
1766:
1765:
1759:
1757:
1753:
1752:
1747:
1746:
1741:
1740:
1733:
1731:
1730:
1725:
1721:
1720:
1715:
1714:
1709:
1708:
1703:
1702:
1697:
1693:
1684:
1680:
1676:
1671:
1661:
1659:
1658:
1653:
1649:
1648:conservatives
1645:
1640:
1638:
1637:
1632:
1628:
1624:
1620:
1616:
1612:
1603:
1601:
1600:
1594:
1592:
1587:
1585:
1584:coercion test
1581:
1577:
1576:
1571:
1567:
1566:
1561:
1553:
1550:
1547:
1546:
1545:
1543:
1539:
1538:
1533:
1532:
1526:
1524:
1520:
1519:
1514:
1513:
1507:
1505:
1501:
1500:
1495:
1491:
1489:
1485:
1480:
1478:
1474:
1469:
1467:
1463:
1459:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1440:
1437:
1432:
1423:
1421:
1420:
1415:
1414:
1409:
1408:
1403:
1402:
1397:
1393:
1392:
1386:
1384:
1383:
1378:
1377:
1372:
1369:
1365:
1361:
1357:
1356:
1349:
1344:
1342:
1341:
1336:
1335:
1330:
1329:
1324:
1316:
1312:
1309:
1305:
1301:
1296:
1283:
1281:
1277:
1276:
1271:
1270:Massachusetts
1265:
1260:
1258:
1254:
1249:
1243:
1241:
1240:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1226:
1221:
1217:
1216:
1211:
1210:
1203:
1201:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1178:
1174:
1172:
1166:
1161:
1153:
1151:
1147:
1143:
1142:
1135:
1133:
1126:
1124:
1120:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1087:
1082:
1071:
1069:
1068:the uncertain
1065:
1061:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1040:
1033:
1031:
1027:
1026:
1021:
1020:
1015:
1011:
1006:
1002:
1001:
996:
995:
988:
985:
984:
979:
975:
972:
965:
958:
956:
952:
948:
947:
942:
940:
935:
931:
927:
923:
919:
915:
909:
907:
903:
902:
895:
893:
886:
884:
883:
878:
874:
873:
868:
864:
860:
856:
852:
843:
839:
835:
831:
827:
823:
819:
815:
810:
805:
801:
791:
789:
782:
777:
775:
769:
767:
766:James Madison
763:
759:
755:
751:
746:
743:
739:
735:
731:
727:
720:
716:
715:James Madison
712:
705:
701:
697:
693:
688:
673:
667:
659:
649:
647:
642:
640:
636:
632:
631:
626:
625:
619:
617:
616:
611:
607:
603:
599:
595:
594:school speech
591:
587:
583:
582:
576:
574:
571:—through the
570:
569:incorporation
566:
565:Supreme Court
562:
561:
556:
552:
548:
543:
541:
537:
533:
529:
525:
521:
517:
513:
509:
505:
501:
497:
485:
480:
478:
473:
471:
466:
465:
463:
462:
457:
452:
447:
445:
440:
435:
433:
423:
422:
421:
420:
415:
412:
411:
408:
405:
404:
401:
398:
397:
394:
391:
390:
389:
388:
385:
382:
381:
375:
372:
370:
367:
366:
363:
362:Republicanism
360:
358:
355:
354:
351:
348:
346:
343:
342:
339:
336:
335:
333:
332:
329:
326:
325:
319:
316:
314:
311:
310:
307:
304:
302:
299:
297:
294:
293:
290:
287:
286:
283:
282:
274:
271:
269:
266:
264:
261:
259:
256:
254:
251:
250:
247:
244:
242:
239:
237:
234:
232:
229:
227:
224:
223:
220:
217:
215:
212:
210:
207:
205:
202:
200:
197:
195:
192:
190:
187:
186:
183:
180:
178:
175:
173:
170:
168:
165:
163:
160:
158:
155:
153:
150:
148:
145:
143:
140:
138:
135:
134:
132:
131:
128:
125:
124:
118:
115:
113:
110:
108:
105:
103:
100:
98:
95:
93:
90:
88:
85:
84:
80:
77:
76:
75:
74:
71:
68:
67:
63:
59:
58:
55:
50:
49:
45:
41:
40:
37:
33:
19:
20934:
20926:
20859:
20658:James Wilson
20621:Pennsylvania
20518:John Langdon
20276:Speedy Trial
20118:
20009:Appointments
19943:
19726:Equal Rights
19622:20th century
19518:
19389:
19381:
19373:
19365:
19357:
19349:
19341:
19333:
19325:
19317:
19309:
19301:
19293:
19285:
19277:
19240:
19232:
19224:
19216:
19208:
19200:
19192:
19184:
19165:
19157:
19149:
19141:
19133:
19125:
19117:
19109:
19092:In re Primus
19090:
19084:Solicitation
19071:
19052:
19044:
19036:
19028:
19020:
19012:
18968:
18960:
18952:
18931:
18923:
18877:
18869:
18861:
18842:
18834:
18826:
18818:
18810:
18802:
18783:
18775:
18767:
18759:
18751:
18743:
18735:
18727:
18719:
18711:
18703:
18695:
18687:
18666:
18658:
18650:
18642:
18634:
18626:
18618:Taxation and
18605:
18597:
18589:
18570:
18562:
18554:
18546:
18538:
18530:
18522:
18514:
18506:
18498:
18490:
18482:
18431:
18423:
18415:
18407:
18399:
18391:
18372:
18364:
18345:
18337:
18329:
18321:
18313:
18307:Wood v. Moss
18305:
18297:
18289:
18268:
18260:
18252:
18244:
18236:
18230:State action
18217:
18209:
18201:
18193:
18185:
18177:
18169:
18150:
18142:
18134:
18126:
18118:
18110:
18102:
18094:
18088:Davis v. FEC
18086:
18078:
18070:
18062:
18054:
18046:
18038:
18030:
18022:
18014:
18006:
17998:
17990:
17982:
17974:
17966:
17958:
17950:
17942:
17919:
17911:
17903:
17897:Matal v. Tam
17895:
17887:
17879:
17871:
17863:
17855:
17847:
17839:
17831:
17823:
17815:
17807:
17799:
17791:
17783:
17775:
17767:
17759:
17751:
17743:
17735:
17727:
17719:
17711:
17703:
17695:
17687:
17679:
17671:
17663:
17655:
17649:In re R.M.J.
17647:
17639:
17631:
17623:
17615:
17607:
17601:In re Primus
17599:
17591:
17583:
17575:
17567:
17559:
17551:
17543:
17535:
17527:
17519:
17498:
17490:
17482:
17474:
17466:
17458:
17450:
17442:
17434:
17426:
17418:
17410:
17402:
17394:
17373:
17365:
17357:
17349:
17343:similar laws
17325:
17317:
17309:
17301:
17293:
17285:
17277:
17269:
17261:
17253:
17245:
17237:
17229:
17221:
17213:
17205:
17197:
17189:
17181:
17173:
17154:
17146:
17138:
17130:
17122:
17114:
17106:
17098:
17090:
17082:
17074:
17062:
17054:
17046:
17025:
17017:
17009:
17001:
16993:
16972:
16964:
16956:
16948:
16942:Matal v. Tam
16940:
16932:
16924:
16901:
16893:
16885:
16877:
16869:
16861:
16836:
16828:
16809:
16801:
16793:
16785:
16777:
16769:
16761:
16753:
16745:
16737:
16729:
16721:
16713:
16705:
16697:
16689:
16681:
16673:
16665:
16644:
16636:
16628:
16620:
16612:
16604:
16596:
16588:
16580:
16572:
16564:
16539:
16531:
16523:
16515:
16507:
16499:
16491:
16470:
16462:
16454:
16448:public forum
16433:
16425:
16417:
16409:
16401:
16393:
16385:
16377:
16369:
16361:
16353:
16345:
16337:
16329:
16321:
16313:
16305:
16297:
16289:
16281:
16275:Hague v. CIO
16273:
16265:
16258:public forum
16242:
16234:
16226:
16218:
16212:restrictions
16197:
16189:
16181:
16173:
16165:
16157:
16149:
16141:
16133:
16127:restrictions
16112:
16104:
16096:
16088:
16080:
16072:
16064:
16056:
16048:
16040:
16032:
16009:
16001:
15993:
15968:
15960:
15935:
15927:
15919:
15911:
15890:
15882:
15874:
15866:
15858:
15850:
15842:
15834:
15826:
15818:
15810:
15802:
15794:
15788:Reno v. ACLU
15786:
15778:
15770:
15762:
15754:
15746:
15738:
15730:
15722:
15714:
15706:
15698:
15690:
15682:
15674:
15666:
15658:
15650:
15642:
15634:
15626:
15618:
15610:
15602:
15594:
15586:
15578:
15570:
15549:
15541:
15533:
15525:
15518:True threats
15504:
15496:
15488:
15480:
15472:
15464:
15456:
15448:
15440:
15413:
15405:
15397:
15389:
15382:false speech
15363:
15351:
15343:
15331:
15328:(1955; 1961)
15323:
15315:
15307:
15299:
15291:
15283:
15275:
15267:
15259:
15180:
15172:
15164:
15143:
15135:
15127:
15119:
15111:
15083:
15075:
15067:
15046:
15038:
15030:
15022:
15001:
14993:
14985:
14977:
14969:
14961:
14953:
14945:
14937:
14929:
14921:
14913:
14907:Bowen v. Roy
14905:
14897:
14889:
14881:
14873:
14865:
14857:
14851:Cruz v. Beto
14849:
14841:
14833:
14825:
14817:
14809:
14801:
14793:
14785:
14777:
14769:
14761:
14753:
14745:
14737:
14729:
14692:
14684:
14676:
14668:
14660:
14652:
14644:
14636:
14628:
14609:
14601:
14593:
14585:
14566:
14558:
14550:
14542:
14523:
14515:
14507:
14499:
14491:
14483:
14475:
14467:
14459:
14440:
14432:
14424:
14416:
14408:
14400:
14381:
14373:
14365:
14357:
14349:
14341:
14333:
14325:
14317:
14309:
14301:
14293:
14285:
14264:
14256:
14248:
14240:
14232:
14224:
14216:
14208:
14200:
14192:
14184:
14176:
14168:
14160:
14152:
14144:
14136:
14128:
14120:
14112:
14104:
14096:
14088:
14080:
14072:
14064:
14056:
14048:
14040:
14032:
14024:
14016:
13997:
13989:
13981:
13973:
13965:
13957:
13949:
13941:
13920:
13912:
13904:
13896:
13888:
13880:
13872:
13864:
13856:
13848:
13814:
13773:the original
13750:. Retrieved
13743:the original
13719:. Retrieved
13714:
13606:
13597:
13580:
13573:
13554:
13542:
13523:
13519:Godwin, Mike
13495:
13485:
13478:
13451:
13422:
13410:. Retrieved
13404:
13391:. Retrieved
13376:
13363:. Retrieved
13348:
13335:. Retrieved
13320:
13304:. Retrieved
13289:
13264:. Retrieved
13254:
13242:. Retrieved
13238:the original
13233:
13224:
13203:
13199:
13187:. Retrieved
13183:the original
13178:
13169:
13148:
13144:
13135:
13122:
13101:
13097:
13085:. Retrieved
13081:the original
13076:
13067:
13047:
13026:
13022:
13007:
12995:. Retrieved
12991:the original
12981:
12969:. Retrieved
12965:the original
12955:
12943:. Retrieved
12939:the original
12929:
12921:
12917:
12896:
12892:
12879:
12868:
12845:
12817:
12798:. Retrieved
12794:the original
12773:
12769:
12758:
12735:
12731:
12719:. Retrieved
12715:the original
12708:
12670:. Retrieved
12666:the original
12661:
12652:
12644:
12640:
12619:
12615:
12607:
12603:
12582:
12578:
12559:
12555:
12543:
12523:
12519:
12498:
12494:
12482:. Retrieved
12478:the original
12473:
12463:
12442:
12438:
12426:. Retrieved
12422:the original
12417:
12407:
12386:
12382:
12370:
12358:
12346:
12325:
12321:
12309:. Retrieved
12299:
12287:. Retrieved
12277:
12256:
12252:
12244:
12240:
12234:
12229:
12224:
12214:
12209:
12199:
12194:
12182:. Retrieved
12178:
12153:. Retrieved
12149:the original
12138:
12126:. Retrieved
12115:
12103:. Retrieved
12094:
12081:
12073:
12069:
12048:
12044:
12025:
12013:
12008:
11996:
11988:
11980:
11976:
11958:
11954:
11940:: 533, 557.
11937:
11933:
11929:
11923:
11915:
11911:
11902:
11889:
11868:
11864:
11852:. Retrieved
11848:
11838:
11829:
11823:
11811:. Retrieved
11807:the original
11802:
11793:
11772:
11768:
11756:. Retrieved
11752:the original
11747:
11738:
11717:
11713:
11701:. Retrieved
11697:the original
11692:
11682:
11662:
11658:
11646:. Retrieved
11642:the original
11637:
11628:
11620:
11616:
11596:
11592:
11584:
11580:
11561:
11557:
11547:
11543:
11531:. Retrieved
11527:
11518:
11506:
11498:
11494:
11452:
11440:. Retrieved
11436:the original
11431:
11422:
11401:
11397:
11385:. Retrieved
11381:the original
11367:
11358:
11348:
11336:. Retrieved
11326:
11316:
11312:
11304:
11300:
11292:
11288:
11267:
11263:
11242:
11238:
11226:
11218:
11214:
11193:
11189:
11168:
11164:
11156:
11152:
11144:
11140:
11119:
11115:
11105:December 31,
11103:. Retrieved
11096:
11086:
11078:
11074:
11053:
11049:
11037:
11029:
11025:
11004:
11000:
10988:. Retrieved
10961:
10957:
10949:
10945:
10902:
10890:. Retrieved
10884:
10872:
10864:www.oyez.org
10863:
10854:
10840:
10828:. Retrieved
10824:
10814:
10802:. Retrieved
10798:
10789:
10777:. Retrieved
10773:the original
10768:
10758:
10737:
10733:
10721:
10700:
10696:
10675:
10671:
10659:
10647:. Retrieved
10641:
10634:
10622:
10601:
10597:
10576:
10572:
10551:
10547:
10526:
10522:
10514:
10510:
10499:
10478:
10474:
10466:
10462:
10451:
10428:
10424:
10416:
10412:
10391:
10387:
10379:
10375:
10354:
10350:
10338:. Retrieved
10324:
10312:. Retrieved
10298:
10286:. Retrieved
10272:
10261:
10238:
10234:
10225:
10212:
10200:
10187:
10175:. Retrieved
10166:
10156:
10144:
10123:
10119:
10111:
10107:
10086:
10082:
10070:
10062:
10058:
10053: (1931).
10037:
10031:
10027:
10015:
10011:
10006: (1969).
9990:
9986:
9974:. Retrieved
9960:
9939:
9935:
9919:
9912:
9907:
9886:
9882:
9877: (2010).
9861:
9857:
9842:
9823:Davis v. FEC
9821:
9817:
9796:
9792:
9784:
9780:
9759:
9755:
9743:
9735:
9731:
9723:
9719:
9698:
9694:
9682:. Retrieved
9678:the original
9673:
9663:
9642:
9638:
9626:. Retrieved
9622:the original
9615:
9602:
9581:
9577:
9568:
9558:
9537:
9533:
9521:. Retrieved
9511:
9499:. Retrieved
9495:the original
9485:
9477:
9473:
9461:. Retrieved
9457:the original
9450:
9440:
9420:Matal v. Tam
9418:
9414:
9404:December 30,
9402:. Retrieved
9398:the original
9385:
9375:
9363:. Retrieved
9359:the original
9349:
9337:
9316:
9312:
9304:
9300:
9288:
9280:
9276:
9264:
9243:
9239:
9231:
9227:
9212:
9191:
9187:
9175:
9154:
9150:
9142:
9138:
9130:
9126:
9091:
9087:
9079:
9075:
9060:
9050:
9044:
9038:
9026:
9021:
9011:
9003:
8998:
8990:
8959:
8955:
8947:
8943:
8933:
8924:
8905:
8891:
8877:
8863:
8843:
8831:
8810:
8806:
8794:
8782:
8770:
8758:
8750:
8746:
8738:
8734:
8715:
8711:
8687:
8680:
8657:
8653:
8634:
8630:
8618:
8606:
8594:
8582:. Retrieved
8572:
8560:
8552:
8548:
8527:
8508:
8496:
8484:
8456:
8444:
8434:
8429:
8419:December 27,
8417:. Retrieved
8394:December 27,
8392:. Retrieved
8382:
8370:. Retrieved
8360:
8348:. Retrieved
8344:the original
8334:
8322:. Retrieved
8315:
8295:November 11,
8293:. Retrieved
8289:the original
8279:
8269:February 10,
8267:. Retrieved
8263:the original
8252:
8242:February 10,
8240:. Retrieved
8230:
8218:. Retrieved
8208:
8196:. Retrieved
8186:
8174:. Retrieved
8164:
8152:. Retrieved
8147:
8120:. Retrieved
8115:
8090:
8085:November 21,
8083:. Retrieved
8079:the original
8074:
8064:
8052:. Retrieved
8042:
8030:. Retrieved
8026:the original
8012:
8000:. Retrieved
7996:the original
7982:
7970:. Retrieved
7966:the original
7952:
7940:. Retrieved
7936:the original
7926:
7914:. Retrieved
7910:the original
7885:. Retrieved
7881:the original
7871:
7859:. Retrieved
7853:
7843:
7833:
7829:
7817:. Retrieved
7813:
7804:
7794:
7790:
7778:. Retrieved
7774:
7741:
7737:
7727:December 14,
7725:. Retrieved
7718:the original
7704:
7696:
7688:the original
7683:
7673:
7663:December 14,
7661:. Retrieved
7657:the original
7642:
7632:December 14,
7630:. Retrieved
7620:
7608:. Retrieved
7604:the original
7589:
7577:. Retrieved
7567:
7557:December 29,
7555:. Retrieved
7551:the original
7540:
7530:December 29,
7528:. Retrieved
7521:the original
7508:
7498:December 29,
7496:. Retrieved
7489:the original
7476:
7464:. Retrieved
7460:the original
7455:
7446:
7425:
7421:
7413:the original
7408:
7399:
7389:December 14,
7387:. Retrieved
7383:the original
7376:
7350:
7329:
7325:
7313:. Retrieved
7303:
7291:. Retrieved
7281:
7269:. Retrieved
7244:. Retrieved
7240:the original
7235:
7226:
7214:. Retrieved
7204:
7183:
7179:
7167:. Retrieved
7163:the original
7158:
7148:
7127:
7123:
7111:. Retrieved
7107:the original
7102:
7092:
7071:
7067:
7055:. Retrieved
7051:the original
7046:
7033:
7012:
7008:
6996:. Retrieved
6989:
6982:
6970:. Retrieved
6943:. Retrieved
6939:the original
6934:The Advocate
6932:
6922:
6910:. Retrieved
6906:the original
6899:
6889:
6879:November 10,
6877:. Retrieved
6867:
6857:November 10,
6855:. Retrieved
6845:
6838:333 U.S.
6832:
6827:
6815:. Retrieved
6805:
6793:. Retrieved
6783:
6769:
6757:. Retrieved
6750:
6743:
6729:
6723:
6717:
6715:
6708:. Retrieved
6701:
6694:
6682:
6678:
6672:
6668:
6662:
6656:
6650:
6644:
6638:
6635:
6628:. Retrieved
6621:
6614:
6602:. Retrieved
6592:
6580:. Retrieved
6570:
6558:. Retrieved
6548:
6536:. Retrieved
6532:the original
6528:PHSchool.com
6527:
6518:
6506:. Retrieved
6496:
6486:
6484:
6479:December 31,
6477:. Retrieved
6458:
6451:
6442:
6437:December 31,
6435:. Retrieved
6416:
6409:
6397:. Retrieved
6387:
6375:. Retrieved
6365:
6353:. Retrieved
6349:the original
6323:
6319:
6316:
6311:December 31,
6309:. Retrieved
6286:
6264:. Retrieved
6260:the original
6249:
6237:. Retrieved
6233:
6221:
6209:. Retrieved
6194:
6182:. Retrieved
6173:
6163:
6153:
6149:
6131:
6122:
6104:
6095:
6078:
6074:
6053:. Retrieved
6048:
6039:
6021:
6017:
6007:
6002:
5994:
5990:
5985:
5973:. Retrieved
5968:
5958:
5949:
5934: (2010).
5918:
5914:
5909: (2005).
5893:
5889:
5884: (2005).
5868:
5864:
5856:
5852:
5847: (1994).
5831:
5827:
5815:. Retrieved
5805:
5793:. Retrieved
5783:
5771:. Retrieved
5761:
5749:. Retrieved
5739:
5727:. Retrieved
5720:the original
5706:
5694:. Retrieved
5690:the original
5680:
5664:
5659:
5651:
5646:
5634:. Retrieved
5625:
5600:. Retrieved
5596:the original
5564:. Retrieved
5560:the original
5553:
5530:. Retrieved
5526:the original
5497:. Retrieved
5487:
5475:. Retrieved
5460:
5448:. Retrieved
5444:the original
5434:
5422:. Retrieved
5418:the original
5414:First Things
5403:
5393:February 13,
5391:. Retrieved
5381:
5372:
5367:November 12,
5365:. Retrieved
5361:the original
5346:
5334:. Retrieved
5324:
5312:. Retrieved
5302:
5290:. Retrieved
5280:
5268:. Retrieved
5258:
5246:. Retrieved
5236:
5224:. Retrieved
5214:
5202:. Retrieved
5192:
5180:. Retrieved
5176:the original
5169:
5146:. Retrieved
5142:the original
5137:
5128:
5116:. Retrieved
5111:
5101:
5089:. Retrieved
5079:
5067:. Retrieved
5042:. Retrieved
5038:the original
5027:
5017:November 10,
5015:. Retrieved
5011:the original
5006:
4981:. Retrieved
4952:. Retrieved
4948:the original
4941:
4913:
4884:December 15,
4882:. Retrieved
4878:the original
4868:
4856:. Retrieved
4842:
4830:. Retrieved
4816:
4804:
4799:, p. 2.
4792:
4784:
4772:
4767:
4755:
4743:
4731:. Retrieved
4717:
4709:the original
4699:
4687:. Retrieved
4683:the original
4678:
4653:. Retrieved
4649:the original
4644:
4634:
4609:
4603:
4599:
4578:
4573:
4562:Tom C. Clark
4556:
4545:
4537:
4528:
4521:
4512:
4504:
4499:
4489:
4484:
4478:
4474:
4461:
4454:
4444:
4431:
4426:
4416:
4411:
4310:
4308:
4297:
4291:
4290:However, in
4289:
4284:
4278:
4272:
4270:
4241:
4231:
4225:
4220:
4212:
4187:
4180:
4172:
4164:
4162:
4155:
4153:
4141:
4133:
4089:
4087:
4082:
4074:
4068:
4065:
4050:
4046:
4043:
4036:
4034:
4028:
4018:
4008:
4003:
4001:
3993:
3983:
3966:
3964:
3959:Constitution
3952:
3949:
3932:
3909:
3903:
3900:
3874:
3871:
3867:
3853:
3847:
3845:
3840:
3830:
3820:
3814:
3804:
3798:
3796:
3791:
3787:
3773:
3765:
3763:
3752:
3748:
3708:
3700:
3672:
3662:
3646:
3644:
3639:
3623:
3617:
3615:
3608:
3602:
3598:
3593:
3590:
3570:
3562:
3555:
3551:
3549:
3538:
3529:
3525:
3519:
3517:
3510:
3500:
3486:
3485:, 1925) and
3476:
3469:
3467:(1868). The
3464:
3458:
3456:
3448:
3409:
3407:
3375:
3368:
3362:
3356:
3352:
3350:
3345:
3331:
3329:
3316:
3306:
3304:
3289:Rhode Island
3282:
3278:
3274:
3270:
3256:
3252:
3250:
3229:
3227:
3222:
3216:
3214:
3205:
3199:
3193:
3191:
3184:
3182:
3169:
3167:
3149:
3131:
3120:
3118:
3106:
3104:
3097:
3083:
3081:
3078:
3060:
3046:
3030:
3007:
3005:
2998:
2984:
2978:
2958:
2956:
2951:
2945:
2935:
2933:
2926:
2916:
2914:
2907:
2892:
2890:
2878:
2876:
2869:
2839:
2829:
2819:
2817:
2808:
2796:
2792:Matal v. Tam
2790:
2784:
2777:
2773:
2769:
2759:Matal v. Tam
2757:
2743:
2741:
2732:
2726:
2722:
2718:
2714:
2708:
2698:
2688:
2681:
2679:
2674:
2664:
2661:Learned Hand
2650:
2634:
2632:
2620:
2614:
2600:
2598:
2590:
2570:
2556:
2553:
2519:
2514:, Baker and
2508:Canton, Ohio
2499:
2495:
2493:
2488:
2476:
2472:
2461:
2454:
2448:
2442:
2436:
2421:
2387:
2372:
2344:
2339:
2317:
2307:
2301:
2287:
2282:, including
2277:
2269:
2263:
2257:
2255:
2249:
2247:
2243:
2235:
2229:
2223:
2213:
2210:
2203:
2193:
2190:
2156:
2152:
2146:
2135:
2129:
2119:
2117:
2110:
2106:
2103:Learned Hand
2096:
2090:
2084:
2082:
2075:
2067:
2057:
2053:
2049:
2043:
2026:
2008:
2002:
2000:
1978:
1956:
1954:
1917:
1913:
1907:
1903:
1897:
1891:
1885:
1879:
1873:
1870:
1862:
1860:
1851:
1843:
1833:
1826:
1820:
1812:
1798:
1796:
1767:(1878), the
1762:
1760:
1749:
1743:
1737:
1734:
1727:
1723:
1717:
1711:
1705:
1699:
1688:
1655:
1652:state church
1643:
1641:
1634:
1626:
1622:
1609:
1597:
1595:
1590:
1588:
1573:
1569:
1563:
1559:
1557:
1535:
1529:
1527:
1522:
1516:
1510:
1508:
1497:
1492:
1487:
1483:
1481:
1476:
1472:
1470:
1465:
1457:
1445:
1444:
1417:
1416:(2005), and
1411:
1405:
1399:
1389:
1387:
1380:
1374:
1359:
1353:
1351:
1346:
1338:
1332:
1326:
1320:
1303:
1285:
1280:incorporated
1273:
1267:
1262:
1244:
1237:
1223:
1213:
1207:
1204:
1195:
1183:
1182:
1176:
1170:
1155:
1149:
1139:
1137:
1128:
1104:
1035:
1023:
1017:
998:
992:
990:
981:
967:
962:
951:circumcision
944:
937:
911:
899:
897:
888:
880:
870:
847:
830:Pennsylvania
784:
779:
770:
758:George Mason
747:
723:
696:George Mason
656:
646:state actors
643:
628:
622:
620:
613:
579:
577:
563:(1925), the
558:
544:
499:
495:
493:
313:Equal Rights
279:
136:
52:Constitution
36:
20819:William Few
20699:Jacob Broom
20679:George Read
20553:Connecticut
20487:Signatories
20337:Legislative
20311:Territorial
20231:Presentment
20216:Origination
20171:Impeachment
20126:Extradition
20094:Engagements
20084:Due Process
20034:Citizenship
19721:Child Labor
19383:Doe v. Reed
18564:Lowe v. SEC
18211:Doe v. Reed
15982:Overbreadth
15775:(Cal. 1988)
15230:Unprotected
14277:Religion in
13408:. Callaghan
13293:. Penguin.
13219: (2000)
13164: (1995)
13117: (1984)
13042: (1958)
12997:October 26,
12971:October 26,
12912: (1875)
12833: (1961)
12635: (1972)
12598: (1991)
12573: (1987)
12538: (1936)
12514: (1978)
12458: (1974)
12402: (1971)
12341: (1931)
12311:January 10,
12289:October 24,
12272: (1978)
12087:Adam Liptak
12064: (1938)
11884: (1980)
11788: (1990)
11733: (1988)
11677: (1974)
11611: (1985)
11575: (1988)
11511:Jasper 1999
11487:Nelson 1994
11472:Newell 1898
11457:Newell 1898
11417: (1991)
11338:January 16,
11283: (2002)
11258: (1969)
11231:Jasper 1999
11209: (1990)
11184: (1982)
11135: (1973)
11069: (1964)
11020: (1957)
10980:"Obscenity"
10753: (2007)
10726:Jasper 1999
10716: (1988)
10691: (1986)
10664:Jasper 1999
10627:Jasper 1999
10617: (1969)
10592: (1996)
10567: (1986)
10542: (1980)
10407: (1942)
10370: (1983)
10149:Jasper 1999
10139: (1990)
10102: (1989)
10075:Jasper 1999
9955: (2014)
9902: (1990)
9837: (2008)
9812: (2007)
9775: (2003)
9714: (1976)
9658: (1987)
9597: (1995)
9553: (1960)
9523:December 2,
9342:Jasper 1999
9332: (1971)
9305:Brandenburg
9281:Brandenburg
9269:Jasper 1999
9259: (1969)
9207: (1968)
9180:Jasper 1999
9170: (1957)
9119:Jasper 1999
9106: (1951)
9069:§ 2385
8991:Terminiello
8974: (1949)
8848:Jasper 1999
8826: (1927)
8787:Jasper 1999
8729: (1919)
8673:Jasper 1999
8648: (1919)
8623:Abrams 2006
8543: (1964)
8324:February 9,
8220:January 16,
8198:January 10,
8176:January 10,
7819:October 11,
7756: (2004)
7610:December 1,
7579:December 5,
7441: (2006)
7345: (1997)
7315:December 5,
7293:December 5,
7271:October 25,
7216:December 5,
7199: (1993)
7143: (1990)
7087: (1972)
7028: (1963)
6734:STEVENS, J.
5975:January 26,
5817:November 8,
5336:November 8,
5314:November 8,
5292:November 8,
5270:November 8,
5248:November 8,
5226:November 8,
5204:November 8,
5069:January 10,
5044:February 2,
4983:November 8,
4797:Jasper 1999
4760:Beeman 2009
4608:(1961) and
4538:See, e.g.,
4529:See, e.g.,
4470:proselytize
4257:liability.
4255:Sherman Act
3943:The Newseum
3726:Edward Coke
3607:(1982) and
3507:James Joyce
3277:adopted by
3267:Puerto Rico
3207:recipients.
2719:Brandenburg
2695:draft cards
2691:Vietnam War
2689:During the
2512:Wagenknecht
2424:World War I
2396:World War I
1949:golden calf
1840:STEVENS, J.
1119:Connecticut
1060:intolerance
918:Protestants
916:, Jews, or
826:Connecticut
726:Magna Carta
658:grievances.
627:(1931) and
500:Amendment I
306:Child Labor
20958:Categories
20931:(painting)
20883:and legacy
20741:John Blair
20590:New Jersey
20544:Rufus King
20442:Preemption
20356:War Powers
20291:Suspension
20109:Exceptions
19799:Human Life
19698:Unratified
19498:Amendments
18680:Defamation
18620:privileges
18475:censorship
16917:as speaker
16915:Government
16446:Designated
15377:Defamation
15241:Incitement
13935:exemptions
13752:January 1,
13679:Audio help
13670:2006-06-30
13617:0801881730
13534:0262571684
13466:0822325292
12922:Cruikshank
12548:Lewis 2007
12375:Lewis 2007
12363:Lewis 2007
12351:Lewis 2007
11079:Jacobellis
11042:Lewis 2007
10830:August 26,
10804:August 26,
10335:SCOTUSblog
10309:SCOTUSblog
9971:SCOTUSblog
9928:SCOTUSblog
9748:Lewis 2007
9423:, No.
9293:Lewis 2007
9283:, at 450–1
9221:§ 462
9002:Including
8836:Lewis 2007
8799:Lewis 2007
8775:Lewis 2007
8763:Lewis 2007
8611:Lewis 2007
8599:Lewis 2007
8565:Lewis 2007
8513:Lewis 2007
8501:Lewis 2007
8489:Lewis 2007
8461:Lewis 2007
8449:Lewis 2007
7855:SCOTUSblog
7653:SCOTUSblog
6972:August 12,
6817:August 25,
6795:January 5,
6582:January 5,
6560:January 5,
6538:August 28,
6473:0300068689
6377:August 20,
6294:. p.
6211:August 20,
6184:August 20,
5795:August 20,
5773:August 20,
5751:August 20,
5729:August 20,
5499:January 5,
4809:Lewis 2007
4748:Lewis 2007
4622:References
4466:Murphy, J.
4100:grand jury
3881:New Jersey
3714:defamatory
3685:Defamation
3311:Abe Fortas
3035:(1990). A
2965:candidates
2903:soft money
2854:See also:
2579:organizer
2516:Ruthenberg
2351:John Adams
2334:common law
2142:tax credit
1977:faith. In
1928:profession
1787:Bear Butte
1668:See also:
1542:Lemon test
1504:Elihu Root
1434:President
1337:(1947) in
1323:Hugo Black
1255:after the
1121:, who had
1079:See also:
681:Background
606:defamation
357:Federalism
345:Convention
20452:Saxbe fix
20341:Executive
20296:Take Care
20286:Supremacy
20161:Guarantee
20089:Elections
19860:Formation
19573:1795–1804
17339:Hatch Act
16483:Nonpublic
15986:Vagueness
15563:Obscenity
14579:Blue laws
13721:March 18,
13412:April 19,
13393:April 19,
13244:April 13,
13189:April 13,
13087:April 13,
12800:April 19,
12672:April 19,
12645:Branzburg
12484:April 19,
12428:April 19,
12228:See also
12184:April 18,
12155:April 18,
12128:August 9,
12105:April 19,
11946:1069-0565
11930:Pruneyard
11916:Pruneyard
11813:April 19,
11758:April 19,
11703:April 19,
11648:April 19,
11621:Greenmoss
11533:March 11,
11442:April 10,
11387:April 28,
10990:April 10,
10779:April 11,
10649:April 11,
10417:Valentine
9976:April 11,
9785:McConnell
9684:April 11,
9628:April 11,
9394:0362-4331
8584:March 27,
8477:pp. 68–70
8154:April 19,
8122:April 18,
7466:April 19,
7246:April 19,
7169:April 19,
7113:April 19,
7057:April 19,
6355:August 3,
5636:April 11,
5477:August 3,
4645:The Verge
4627:Citations
4132:ruled in
4002:However,
3854:Milkovich
3733:business;
3509:'s novel
3427:Obscenity
3200:Valentine
2952:McConnell
2778:Schwimmer
2639:Smith Act
2635:Thornhill
2466:official
2292:(1965), "
2153:Espinoza
1995:Episcopal
1856:precedent
1523:primarily
1343:(1963):
1230:sovereign
1049:, or the
914:Catholics
844:colonies.
740:passed a
530:, or the
506:prevents
502:) to the
384:Full text
20734:Virginia
20708:Maryland
20672:Delaware
20574:New York
20351:Vicinage
20345:Judicial
20069:Contract
20039:Commerce
19927:Printing
19741:Proposed
19453:Preamble
19446:Articles
18358:Boycotts
15246:sedition
13817:case law
13681: ·
13588:Archived
13552:(2007).
13521:(2003).
13365:April 4,
13337:April 4,
13318:(2009).
13306:April 4,
13056:Archived
12945:June 26,
12924:, at 552
12721:June 28,
12610:, at 453
12608:Leathers
12237:standard
12235:Sullivan
12099:Archived
12076:, at 452
11995:(2002);
11987:(2001);
11966:Archived
11854:March 1,
11499:Sullivan
11307:, at 253
11295:, at 240
11221:, at 761
11081:, at 197
11032:, at 489
10984:Archived
10340:June 27,
10314:June 27,
10288:June 21,
10177:April 4,
10171:Archived
10114:, at 414
9787:, at 213
9463:June 30,
9307:, at 447
9234:, at 379
9145:, at 509
9133:, at 510
9082:, at 497
8753:, at 216
8741:, at 213
8555:, at 276
8553:Sullivan
8372:July 30,
8054:July 28,
8032:July 28,
8002:July 28,
7972:July 28,
7942:July 28,
7684:ABC News
6998:July 23,
6945:June 17,
6912:June 17,
6759:July 23,
6710:July 23,
6630:July 23,
6604:July 23,
6399:June 25,
6266:June 14,
6239:July 20,
6205:Archived
6178:Archived
6126:For the
6099:For the
5952:decision
5630:Archived
5566:June 14,
5471:Archived
5424:June 16,
5182:June 14,
5148:July 16,
4918:Archived
4858:April 4,
4852:Archived
4832:April 4,
4826:Archived
4727:Archived
4689:March 1,
4655:June 18,
4592:188, 193
4560:Justice
4518:Syllabus
4319:See also
4226:Justice
4145:gag rule
4096:subpoena
4079:Arkansas
4061:indecent
3885:Colorado
3641:thought.
3441:Justice
2676:process.
2546:Justice
2426:and the
2410:Justice
2050:Sherbert
2015:SanterĂa
1410:(2005),
1196:Reynolds
1184:Reynolds
1173:magazine
1150:Reynolds
1051:adherent
1005:Congress
955:baptized
930:atheists
838:Plymouth
555:Congress
79:Preamble
44:a series
20881:Display
20853:Related
20812:Georgia
20333:Vesting
20301:Takings
20186:Militia
20044:Compact
19996:Clauses
19922:Signing
19867:History
18583:Privacy
18385:Prisons
17067:(1969,
15356:(1969,
15336:(1957,
13698:at the
13668: (
13639:minutes
13266:July 2,
13062:(2012).
12710:FindLaw
11918:, at 94
11147:, at 39
10964:, at 43
10515:Ohralik
10112:Johnson
9738:, at 39
9736:Buckley
9726:, at 58
9724:Buckley
9501:May 21,
9425:15-1293
9365:May 21,
9232:O'Brien
8660:, at 52
8658:Schenck
8350:July 3,
7916:July 3,
7887:July 4,
7861:July 2,
7780:July 2,
7600:Vox.com
7379:(1997)"
6508:May 28,
5950:Everson
5602:May 12,
5556:(1970)"
5532:May 28,
5450:May 28,
5172:(1971)"
5091:May 25,
4954:May 25,
4285:Roberts
4098:from a
3841:Hustler
3832:Hustler
3579:... (b)
3526:Hicklin
3512:Ulysses
3470:Hicklin
3423:more."
3313:wrote:
3279:Posadas
2766:wrote:
2723:Schenck
2611:Georgia
2565:of the
2500:Schenck
2477:Schenck
2357:to ban
2308:Stanley
2284:privacy
1944:a state
1848:, supra
1808:applied
1696:federal
1488:Everson
1484:Everson
1473:Everson
1446:Everson
1308:depicts
1306:(1634)
1287:another
1123:written
1047:atheist
1043:infidel
1012:of the
986:(2005).
976:in her
971:Justice
941:, supra
834:Puritan
350:Signing
328:History
20939:(film)
20323:Treaty
20226:Postal
20221:Pardon
19394:(2011)
19386:(2010)
19378:(2002)
19370:(1999)
19362:(1988)
19354:(1985)
19346:(1979)
19338:(1972)
19330:(1965)
19322:(1965)
19314:(1963)
19306:(1963)
19298:(1961)
19290:(1945)
19282:(1876)
19245:(2008)
19237:(2008)
19229:(2005)
19221:(2000)
19213:(1997)
19205:(1986)
19197:(1981)
19189:(1975)
19170:(2010)
19162:(2000)
19154:(1995)
19146:(1989)
19138:(1988)
19130:(1987)
19122:(1984)
19114:(1984)
19095:(1978)
19076:(1964)
19057:(2021)
19049:(1963)
19041:(1960)
19033:(1958)
19025:(1957)
19017:(1951)
18973:(2021)
18965:(1945)
18957:(1937)
18936:(1886)
18928:(1876)
18882:(2003)
18874:(1985)
18866:(1977)
18847:(2001)
18839:(1997)
18831:(1996)
18823:(1981)
18815:(1978)
18807:(1969)
18780:(1990)
18772:(1989)
18764:(1988)
18756:(1985)
18748:(1985)
18740:(1984)
18732:(1976)
18724:(1974)
18716:(1970)
18708:(1967)
18700:(1964)
18692:(1952)
18671:(1991)
18663:(1987)
18655:(1983)
18647:(1978)
18639:(1972)
18631:(1936)
18610:(1989)
18602:(1975)
18594:(1967)
18575:(2005)
18567:(1985)
18559:(1978)
18551:(1976)
18543:(1974)
18535:(1971)
18527:(1965)
18519:(1946)
18511:(1946)
18503:(1938)
18495:(1931)
18487:(1907)
18436:(2006)
18428:(2003)
18420:(2001)
18412:(1987)
18404:(1977)
18396:(1974)
18377:(1990)
18369:(1982)
18350:(2024)
18342:(2024)
18334:(2022)
18326:(2019)
18318:(2018)
18310:(2014)
18302:(2012)
18294:(2006)
18273:(2024)
18265:(2024)
18257:(2019)
18249:(1972)
18241:(1946)
18222:(2021)
18214:(2010)
18206:(1995)
18198:(1982)
18190:(1976)
18182:(1960)
18174:(1958)
18155:(2022)
18147:(2019)
18139:(2015)
18131:(2014)
18123:(2012)
18115:(2011)
18107:(2011)
18099:(2010)
18091:(2008)
18083:(2007)
18075:(2006)
18067:(2006)
18059:(2003)
18051:(2003)
18043:(2002)
18035:(2001)
18027:(2000)
18019:(1996)
18011:(1990)
18003:(1989)
17995:(1986)
17987:(1985)
17979:(1982)
17971:(1981)
17963:(1981)
17955:(1978)
17947:(1976)
17924:(2024)
17916:(2020)
17908:(2019)
17900:(2017)
17892:(2017)
17884:(2011)
17876:(2010)
17868:(2010)
17860:(2007)
17852:(2005)
17844:(2003)
17836:(2002)
17828:(2001)
17820:(2001)
17812:(1999)
17804:(1999)
17796:(1997)
17788:(1996)
17780:(1995)
17772:(1995)
17764:(1995)
17756:(1994)
17748:(1993)
17740:(1993)
17732:(1993)
17724:(1990)
17716:(1989)
17708:(1988)
17700:(1988)
17692:(1987)
17684:(1986)
17676:(1986)
17668:(1985)
17660:(1982)
17652:(1982)
17644:(1981)
17636:(1980)
17628:(1980)
17620:(1979)
17612:(1978)
17604:(1978)
17596:(1977)
17588:(1977)
17580:(1977)
17572:(1976)
17564:(1975)
17556:(1975)
17548:(1974)
17540:(1973)
17532:(1970)
17524:(1942)
17503:(1992)
17495:(1988)
17487:(1982)
17479:(1981)
17471:(1967)
17463:(1965)
17455:(1964)
17447:(1963)
17439:(1957)
17431:(1952)
17423:(1951)
17415:(1943)
17407:(1941)
17399:(1915)
17378:(1973)
17370:(1973)
17362:(1947)
17354:(1882)
17330:(2022)
17322:(2016)
17314:(2014)
17306:(2011)
17298:(2007)
17290:(2006)
17282:(2001)
17274:(1996)
17266:(1995)
17258:(1994)
17250:(1990)
17242:(1987)
17234:(1983)
17226:(1979)
17218:(1979)
17210:(1977)
17202:(1976)
17194:(1974)
17186:(1972)
17178:(1968)
17159:(2021)
17151:(2021)
17143:(2007)
17135:(2007)
17127:(2001)
17119:(1995)
17111:(1990)
17103:(1988)
17095:(1986)
17087:(1982)
17079:(1972)
17059:(1943)
17051:(1940)
17030:(1974)
17022:(1967)
17014:(1958)
17006:(1951)
16998:(1950)
16977:(2024)
16969:(2022)
16961:(2022)
16953:(2019)
16945:(2017)
16937:(2015)
16929:(2009)
16906:(2020)
16898:(2013)
16890:(2001)
16882:(1998)
16874:(1991)
16866:(1983)
16841:(1984)
16833:(1944)
16814:(2018)
16806:(2016)
16798:(2014)
16790:(2012)
16782:(2009)
16774:(2008)
16766:(2007)
16758:(2005)
16750:(2001)
16742:(2000)
16734:(1997)
16726:(1991)
16718:(1990)
16710:(1988)
16702:(1986)
16694:(1984)
16686:(1977)
16678:(1961)
16670:(1956)
16649:(2024)
16641:(2023)
16633:(2018)
16625:(2006)
16617:(1995)
16609:(1986)
16601:(1980)
16593:(1977)
16585:(1974)
16577:(1943)
16569:(1940)
16544:(2018)
16536:(1997)
16528:(1992)
16520:(1985)
16512:(1983)
16504:(1980)
16496:(1974)
16475:(2021)
16467:(1995)
16459:(1981)
16438:(2014)
16430:(2000)
16422:(1997)
16414:(1994)
16406:(1992)
16398:(1989)
16390:(1988)
16382:(1984)
16374:(1983)
16366:(1981)
16358:(1971)
16350:(1971)
16342:(1968)
16334:(1966)
16326:(1966)
16318:(1965)
16310:(1963)
16302:(1951)
16294:(1943)
16286:(1940)
16278:(1939)
16270:(1897)
16255:In the
16247:(2017)
16239:(1994)
16231:(1986)
16223:(1939)
16202:(2022)
16194:(2020)
16186:(2015)
16178:(1992)
16170:(1991)
16162:(1990)
16154:(1988)
16146:(1981)
16138:(1965)
16117:(2003)
16109:(2000)
16101:(1991)
16093:(1990)
16085:(1989)
16077:(1989)
16069:(1984)
16061:(1974)
16053:(1971)
16045:(1968)
16037:(1931)
16014:(2018)
16006:(1987)
15998:(1974)
15973:(2015)
15965:(2010)
15940:(2023)
15932:(2002)
15924:(1990)
15916:(1982)
15895:(2025)
15887:(2012)
15879:(2011)
15871:(2010)
15847:(2008)
15831:(2004)
15823:(2003)
15815:(2002)
15807:(2002)
15799:(2000)
15791:(1997)
15783:(1994)
15759:(1980)
15751:(1976)
15743:(1975)
15735:(1975)
15727:(1974)
15719:(1973)
15711:(1973)
15703:(1973)
15695:(1972)
15687:(1971)
15679:(1969)
15671:(1968)
15663:(1967)
15655:(1966)
15647:(1966)
15639:(1964)
15631:(1964)
15623:(1962)
15615:(1961)
15607:(1959)
15599:(1958)
15591:(1957)
15575:(1896)
15554:(2023)
15546:(2015)
15538:(2003)
15530:(1969)
15509:(2011)
15501:(1992)
15493:(1977)
15485:(1971)
15477:(1969)
15469:(1951)
15461:(1949)
15453:(1942)
15445:(1940)
15418:(2014)
15410:(2012)
15402:(1988)
15394:(1964)
15368:(1973)
15348:(1966)
15320:(1951)
15312:(1927)
15304:(1927)
15296:(1925)
15288:(1919)
15280:(1919)
15272:(1919)
15256:(1798)
15232:speech
15216:portal
15185:(2022)
15177:(2015)
15169:(2011)
15157:RLUIPA
15148:(2020)
15140:(2020)
15132:(2016)
15124:(2014)
15116:(2006)
15088:(2020)
15080:(2012)
15072:(1979)
15051:(2022)
15043:(2020)
15035:(2017)
15027:(2004)
15006:(2022)
14998:(2021)
14990:(2021)
14982:(2020)
14974:(2018)
14966:(2002)
14958:(1993)
14950:(1990)
14942:(1989)
14934:(1989)
14926:(1987)
14918:(1986)
14910:(1986)
14902:(1983)
14894:(1982)
14886:(1981)
14878:(1981)
14870:(1978)
14862:(1972)
14854:(1972)
14846:(1963)
14838:(1961)
14830:(1961)
14822:(1961)
14814:(1953)
14806:(1951)
14798:(1951)
14790:(1946)
14782:(1944)
14774:(1943)
14766:(1943)
14758:(1940)
14750:(1940)
14742:(1890)
14734:(1879)
14697:(2018)
14689:(1994)
14681:(1989)
14673:(1988)
14665:(1982)
14657:(1982)
14649:(1980)
14641:(1978)
14633:(1961)
14614:(1985)
14606:(1961)
14598:(1961)
14590:(1961)
14571:(2011)
14563:(2007)
14555:(1982)
14547:(1968)
14528:(2020)
14520:(1979)
14512:(1976)
14504:(1969)
14496:(1960)
14488:(1952)
14480:(1944)
14472:(1929)
14464:(1872)
14445:(2022)
14437:(2022)
14429:(2001)
14421:(1995)
14413:(1995)
14405:(1993)
14386:(2022)
14378:(2004)
14370:(2000)
14362:(1992)
14354:(1990)
14346:(1987)
14338:(1985)
14330:(1980)
14322:(1968)
14314:(1963)
14306:(1962)
14298:(1952)
14290:(1948)
14269:(2022)
14261:(2020)
14253:(2017)
14245:(2011)
14237:(2002)
14229:(2000)
14221:(1997)
14213:(1994)
14205:(1993)
14197:(1986)
14189:(1985)
14181:(1985)
14173:(1983)
14165:(1982)
14157:(1980)
14149:(1977)
14141:(1977)
14133:(1976)
14125:(1975)
14117:(1974)
14109:(1974)
14101:(1973)
14093:(1973)
14085:(1973)
14077:(1973)
14069:(1973)
14061:(1971)
14053:(1971)
14045:(1968)
14037:(1968)
14029:(1947)
14021:(1930)
14002:(2005)
13994:(1997)
13986:(1989)
13978:(1987)
13970:(1985)
13962:(1983)
13954:(1982)
13946:(1970)
13925:(2019)
13917:(2014)
13909:(2010)
13901:(2009)
13893:(2005)
13885:(2005)
13877:(1989)
13869:(1985)
13861:(1984)
13853:(1983)
13614:
13562:
13531:
13512:794655
13510:
13463:
13431:
13384:
13356:
13328:
13297:
13208:,
12885:
12867:
12850:,
12822:,
12757:
12740:,
12074:Lovell
12018:p. 409
12003:(2007)
11944:
11623:at 761
11587:at 775
11501:at 280
11219:Ferber
11145:Miller
10825:Forbes
10498:
10481:,
10450:
10433:,
10396:,
10380:Bolger
10260:
10243:,
10063:Street
10042:,
10016:Street
9995:,
9944:,
9891:,
9866:,
9826:,
9801:,
9427:,
9392:
9219:
9143:Dennis
9131:Dennis
9080:Dennis
9067:
9033:
8993:, at 4
8915:
8898:
8884:
8870:
8699:
6836:,
6470:
6428:
6302:
6055:May 3,
5923:,
5898:,
5873:,
5857:Grumet
5836:,
5672:
4733:May 3,
4614:(1965)
4209:
4205:
4194:
4175:
3811:
3759:
3679:escrow
3599:Miller
3585:
3581:
3577:
3573:
3563:Miller
3396:, and
3353:Tinker
3346:Tinker
3324:
3320:
3209:
3178:
3174:
3022:Dallas
2942:unions
2826:
2727:Dennis
2665:putsch
2593:
2453:, and
2430:, the
1993:, the
1924:belief
1777:suttee
1683:Boston
1293:
1289:
1158:
1045:, the
926:Moslem
922:Buddha
736:, the
526:, the
522:, the
301:Corwin
46:on the
16485:forum
14622:Other
13776:(PDF)
13765:(PDF)
13746:(PDF)
13735:(PDF)
13711:(PDF)
13508:JSTOR
13212:
13157:
13110:
13035:
12905:
12854:
12826:
12744:
12647:, 667
12628:
12591:
12566:
12531:
12507:
12451:
12395:
12334:
12265:
12057:
12032:
11877:
11781:
11726:
11670:
11604:
11585:Hepps
11568:
11410:
11276:
11251:
11202:
11177:
11128:
11062:
11013:
10962:Rosen
10881:(PDF)
10746:
10709:
10684:
10610:
10585:
10560:
10535:
10485:
10437:
10400:
10363:
10247:
10132:
10095:
10046:
9999:
9948:
9895:
9870:
9830:
9805:
9768:
9707:
9651:
9590:
9546:
9478:Marks
9431:
9325:
9252:
9200:
9163:
9099:
8967:
8910:p. 47
8819:
8722:
8641:
8536:
7749:
7721:(PDF)
7710:(PDF)
7524:(PDF)
7517:(PDF)
7492:(PDF)
7485:(PDF)
7434:
7338:
7192:
7136:
7080:
7021:
6320:Lemon
6230:(PDF)
6140:
6113:
6030:
5927:
5902:
5877:
5840:
5723:(PDF)
5716:(PDF)
4777:p. 13
4587:
4242:Hague
4049:. In
3792:Times
3788:Times
3537:, in
3499:case
3355:. In
3318:gate.
2764:Alito
2056:. In
2054:Yoder
1852:Smith
1692:state
1644:Lemon
1591:Lemon
1570:Lemon
1560:Lemon
1439:wrote
1366:
1093:, of
1055:Islam
610:libel
273:XXVII
253:XXIII
226:XVIII
18473:and
15431:the
15244:and
15104:RFRA
13754:2012
13723:2021
13612:ISBN
13560:ISBN
13529:ISBN
13461:ISBN
13429:ISBN
13414:2013
13395:2013
13382:ISBN
13367:2013
13354:ISBN
13339:2013
13326:ISBN
13308:2013
13295:ISBN
13268:2021
13246:2013
13214:U.S.
13191:2013
13159:U.S.
13112:U.S.
13089:2013
13037:U.S.
12999:2023
12973:2023
12947:2020
12907:U.S.
12856:U.S.
12828:U.S.
12802:2013
12746:U.S.
12723:2020
12674:2013
12630:U.S.
12593:U.S.
12568:U.S.
12533:U.S.
12509:U.S.
12486:2013
12453:U.S.
12430:2013
12397:U.S.
12336:U.S.
12313:2022
12291:2020
12267:U.S.
12213:See
12198:See
12186:2014
12157:2014
12130:2013
12107:2013
12059:U.S.
12034:U.S.
11942:ISSN
11879:U.S.
11856:2019
11815:2013
11783:U.S.
11760:2013
11728:U.S.
11705:2013
11672:U.S.
11650:2013
11606:U.S.
11570:U.S.
11535:2014
11444:2013
11412:U.S.
11389:2013
11340:2022
11278:U.S.
11253:U.S.
11204:U.S.
11179:U.S.
11130:U.S.
11107:2014
11064:U.S.
11030:Roth
11015:U.S.
10992:2013
10894:2017
10832:2019
10806:2019
10799:FIRE
10781:2013
10748:U.S.
10711:U.S.
10686:U.S.
10651:2013
10612:U.S.
10587:U.S.
10562:U.S.
10537:U.S.
10487:U.S.
10439:U.S.
10402:U.S.
10365:U.S.
10342:2018
10316:2018
10290:2020
10249:U.S.
10191:See
10179:2013
10134:U.S.
10097:U.S.
10048:U.S.
10001:U.S.
9978:2014
9950:U.S.
9897:U.S.
9872:U.S.
9832:U.S.
9807:U.S.
9770:U.S.
9709:U.S.
9686:2013
9653:U.S.
9630:2013
9592:U.S.
9548:U.S.
9525:2022
9503:2024
9465:2019
9433:U.S.
9406:2021
9390:ISSN
9367:2024
9327:U.S.
9254:U.S.
9202:U.S.
9165:U.S.
9101:U.S.
9031:ISBN
9010:And
8969:U.S.
8913:ISBN
8896:ISBN
8882:ISBN
8868:ISBN
8821:U.S.
8751:Debs
8739:Debs
8724:U.S.
8697:ISBN
8643:U.S.
8586:2014
8538:U.S.
8421:2020
8396:2020
8374:2020
8352:2020
8326:2021
8297:2023
8271:2021
8244:2021
8222:2022
8200:2022
8178:2022
8156:2014
8124:2014
8087:2023
8056:2020
8034:2020
8004:2020
7974:2020
7944:2020
7918:2020
7889:2022
7863:2020
7821:2021
7814:Oyez
7782:2020
7751:U.S.
7729:2020
7665:2020
7634:2020
7612:2020
7581:2020
7559:2020
7532:2020
7500:2020
7468:2013
7436:U.S.
7391:2020
7340:U.S.
7317:2020
7295:2020
7273:2020
7248:2013
7218:2020
7194:U.S.
7171:2013
7138:U.S.
7115:2013
7082:U.S.
7059:2013
7023:U.S.
7000:2020
6974:2020
6947:2021
6914:2021
6881:2020
6859:2020
6819:2013
6797:2022
6761:2020
6712:2020
6632:2020
6606:2020
6584:2022
6562:2022
6540:2016
6510:2020
6481:2007
6468:ISBN
6439:2007
6426:ISBN
6401:2020
6379:2020
6357:2020
6313:2007
6300:ISBN
6268:2020
6241:2022
6213:2022
6186:2022
6142:U.S.
6130:see
6115:U.S.
6103:see
6057:2013
6032:U.S.
5977:2017
5948:the
5929:U.S.
5904:U.S.
5879:U.S.
5842:U.S.
5819:2020
5797:2020
5775:2020
5753:2020
5731:2020
5698:2023
5670:ISBN
5638:2013
5604:2020
5568:2020
5534:2020
5501:2022
5479:2020
5452:2020
5426:2020
5395:2014
5369:2020
5338:2020
5316:2020
5294:2020
5272:2020
5250:2020
5228:2020
5206:2020
5184:2020
5150:2023
5120:2012
5093:2020
5071:2022
5046:2024
5019:2020
4985:2020
4956:2020
4886:2020
4860:2013
4834:2013
4735:2013
4691:2019
4657:2019
4589:U.S.
4577:See
4520:for
4505:Walz
4455:See
4118:and
4029:Near
4004:Near
3724:and
3712:for
3565:test
3552:Roth
3550:The
3530:Roth
3472:test
2836:Ohio
2341:law.
2173:and
2052:and
1926:and
1844:see
1694:and
1627:Walz
1582:and
1558:The
1515:and
1368:U.S.
1177:Puck
1171:Puck
1066:and
1039:sect
861:and
840:and
828:and
812:The
802:and
752:, a
652:Text
608:and
494:The
268:XXVI
258:XXIV
246:XXII
219:XVII
199:XIII
172:VIII
19488:VII
19468:III
17341:and
15429:and
15379:and
13583:,.
13500:doi
13217:640
13210:530
13162:557
13155:515
13115:609
13108:468
13040:449
13033:357
12910:542
12859:379
12852:564
12831:127
12824:365
12749:508
12742:404
12633:665
12626:408
12596:439
12589:499
12571:221
12564:481
12536:233
12529:297
12512:726
12505:438
12456:241
12449:418
12400:713
12393:403
12339:697
12332:283
12270:765
12263:435
12062:444
12055:303
12037:665
12030:408
11932:".
11875:447
11849:CNN
11779:497
11724:485
11675:323
11668:418
11609:749
11602:472
11573:767
11566:475
11415:105
11408:502
11281:234
11274:535
11256:557
11249:394
11207:103
11200:495
11182:747
11175:458
11126:413
11067:184
11060:378
11018:476
11011:354
10751:393
10744:551
10714:260
10707:484
10689:675
10682:478
10615:503
10608:393
10590:484
10583:517
10565:328
10558:478
10540:557
10533:447
10490:447
10483:436
10442:748
10435:425
10398:316
10361:463
10252:709
10245:567
10137:310
10130:496
10100:397
10093:491
10051:359
10044:283
10004:576
9997:394
9953:185
9946:572
9900:652
9893:494
9875:310
9868:558
9835:724
9828:554
9810:449
9803:551
9766:540
9705:424
9656:465
9649:481
9595:334
9588:514
9544:362
9429:582
9323:403
9257:444
9250:395
9205:367
9198:391
9168:298
9161:354
9104:494
9097:341
8965:337
8824:357
8817:274
8727:211
8720:249
8693:193
8639:249
8541:254
8534:376
7754:712
7747:540
7439:418
7432:546
7343:507
7336:521
7197:520
7190:508
7141:872
7134:494
7085:205
7078:406
7026:398
7019:374
6901:Vox
6716:In
6296:144
6138:505
6111:465
6083:doi
6028:333
5932:700
5925:559
5907:844
5900:545
5882:677
5875:545
5845:687
5838:512
4585:430
4475:Id.
4462:id.
4309:In
4163:In
4154:In
4088:In
3988:by
3846:In
3645:In
3571:(a)
3547:".
3457:In
3408:In
3330:In
3305:In
3269:'s
3228:In
3215:In
3192:In
3183:In
3170:all
3119:In
3105:In
3082:In
3020:in
2957:In
2934:In
2915:In
2877:In
2818:In
2789:in
2776:v.
2742:In
2697:in
2680:In
2599:In
2494:In
2118:In
1955:In
1797:In
1761:In
1681:in
1621:in
1589:In
1528:In
1471:In
1388:In
1371:228
1364:456
1325:in
1232:in
1194:in
1138:In
1117:in
980:in
578:In
263:XXV
241:XXI
231:XIX
214:XVI
204:XIV
194:XII
167:VII
147:III
117:VII
97:III
20960::
20343:/
20339:/
19684:27
19679:26
19674:25
19669:24
19664:23
19659:22
19654:21
19649:20
19644:19
19639:18
19634:17
19629:16
19613:15
19608:14
19603:13
19585:12
19580:11
19564:10
19483:VI
19473:IV
19463:II
13767:.
13737:.
13713:.
13637:36
13506:.
13477:.
13459:.
13455:.
13232:.
13177:.
13153:,
13134:.
13106:,
13075:.
13031:,
12903:92
12901:,
12838:^
12810:^
12781:^
12707:.
12682:^
12660:.
12624:,
12587:,
12562:,
12503:,
12472:.
12447:,
12416:.
12391:,
12330:,
12261:,
12177:.
12165:^
12097:.
12093:.
12053:,
12016:,
11999:,
11991:,
11983:,
11961:,
11938:13
11936:.
11901:.
11882:74
11873:,
11847:.
11801:.
11777:,
11746:.
11731:46
11722:,
11691:.
11636:.
11564:,
11526:.
11479:^
11464:^
11430:.
11406:,
11357:.
11272:,
11247:,
11198:,
11173:,
11133:15
11124:,
11095:.
11058:,
11009:,
10969:^
10883:.
10862:.
10823:.
10797:.
10767:.
10742:,
10705:,
10680:,
10606:,
10581:,
10556:,
10531:,
10405:52
10368:60
10359:,
10333:.
10307:.
10281:.
10224:.
10169:.
10165:.
10128:,
10091:,
10036:,
9969:.
9926:,
9773:93
9764:,
9703:,
9672:.
9647:,
9614:.
9586:,
9567:.
9551:60
9542:,
9449:.
9388:.
9384:.
9330:15
9321:,
9248:,
9196:,
9159:,
9111:^
8979:^
8855:^
8815:,
8718:,
8695:.
8665:^
8646:47
8637:,
8532:,
8520:^
8468:^
8404:^
8305:^
8146:.
8132:^
8114:.
8099:^
8089:.
8073:.
8020:.
7990:.
7960:.
7897:^
7852:.
7812:.
7773:.
7761:^
7712:.
7682:.
7651:.
7598:.
7454:.
7430:,
7407:.
7365:^
7334:,
7256:^
7234:.
7188:,
7157:.
7132:,
7101:.
7076:,
7045:.
7017:,
6955:^
6931:.
6898:.
6714:.
6634:.
6526:.
6483:.
6466:.
6462:.
6441:.
6424:.
6420:.
6333:^
6315:.
6298:.
6290:.
6276:^
6232:.
6176:.
6172:.
6136:,
6109:,
6079:37
6077:.
6065:^
6047:.
6026:,
5967:.
5939:^
5628:.
5624:.
5612:^
5590:.
5576:^
5542:^
5520:.
5509:^
5412:.
5371:.
5355:.
5158:^
5136:.
5110:.
5054:^
5005:.
4993:^
4964:^
4926:^
4916:.
4912:.
4894:^
4775:,
4677:.
4665:^
4643:.
4583:,
3883:,
3860:.
3454:.
3400:.
3392:,
3388:,
3348:.
2912:.
2785:A
2717:.
2459:.
2447:,
2441:,
2353:'
2336::
1951:."
1938:,
1934:,
1758:.
1362:,
1152::
1101:."
1032::
969:--
824:,
790:.
641:.
575:.
236:XX
209:XV
189:XI
177:IX
162:VI
152:IV
142:II
112:VI
102:IV
92:II
20347:)
20335:(
20319:)
19559:9
19554:8
19549:7
19544:6
19539:5
19534:4
19529:3
19524:2
19519:1
19478:V
19458:I
19431:e
19424:t
19417:v
17071:)
15360:)
15340:)
15218:)
15214:(
13807:e
13800:t
13793:v
13756:.
13725:.
13685:)
13677:(
13672:)
13641:)
13634:(
13620:.
13568:.
13537:.
13514:.
13502::
13469:.
13437:.
13416:.
13397:.
13369:.
13341:.
13310:.
13270:.
13248:.
13193:.
13138:.
13091:.
13001:.
12975:.
12949:.
12873:.
12804:.
12763:.
12725:.
12676:.
12488:.
12432:.
12315:.
12293:.
12188:.
12159:.
12132:.
12109:.
11948:.
11905:.
11858:.
11817:.
11786:1
11762:.
11707:.
11652:.
11537:.
11446:.
11391:.
11361:.
11342:.
11109:.
10994:.
10896:.
10866:.
10834:.
10808:.
10783:.
10653:.
10644:"
10640:"
10504:.
10456:.
10344:.
10318:.
10292:.
10266:.
10228:.
10181:.
9980:.
9712:1
9688:.
9632:.
9571:.
9527:.
9505:.
9467:.
9408:.
9369:.
8972:1
8919:.
8902:.
8888:.
8705:.
8588:.
8423:.
8398:.
8376:.
8354:.
8328:.
8314:"
8299:.
8273:.
8246:.
8224:.
8202:.
8180:.
8158:.
8126:.
8058:.
8036:.
8006:.
7976:.
7946:.
7920:.
7891:.
7865:.
7823:.
7784:.
7731:.
7707:"
7667:.
7636:.
7614:.
7583:.
7561:.
7534:.
7502:.
7470:.
7393:.
7375:"
7319:.
7297:.
7275:.
7250:.
7220:.
7173:.
7117:.
7061:.
7002:.
6988:"
6976:.
6949:.
6916:.
6883:.
6861:.
6821:.
6799:.
6763:.
6749:"
6700:"
6620:"
6608:.
6586:.
6564:.
6542:.
6512:.
6403:.
6381:.
6359:.
6270:.
6243:.
6215:.
6188:.
6089:.
6085::
6059:.
5979:.
5821:.
5799:.
5777:.
5755:.
5733:.
5700:.
5640:.
5606:.
5570:.
5552:"
5536:.
5503:.
5481:.
5454:.
5428:.
5397:.
5340:.
5318:.
5296:.
5274:.
5252:.
5230:.
5208:.
5186:.
5168:"
5152:.
5122:.
5095:.
5073:.
5048:.
5021:.
4987:.
4958:.
4888:.
4862:.
4836:.
4787:.
4737:.
4693:.
4659:.
4568:.
4549:,
4542:,
4533:,
3491:(
3481:(
1793:.
1070:.
894:.
498:(
483:e
476:t
469:v
284::
182:X
157:V
137:I
107:V
87:I
34:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.