457:
38:
294:
ignored. Such a context is presented here, where the powerfully incriminating extrajudicial statements of a codefendant, who stands accused side-by-side with the defendant, are deliberately spread before the jury in a joint trial. Not only are the incriminations devastating to the defendant but their credibility is inevitably suspect . . . . The unreliability of such evidence is intolerably compounded when the alleged accomplice, as here, does not testify and cannot be tested by cross-examination."
377:
293:
As the basis for its holding, the
Supreme Court stated that "There are some contexts in which the risk that the jury will not, or cannot, follow instructions is so great, and the consequences of failure so vital to the defendant, that the practical and human limitations of the jury system cannot be
272:
by his codefendant was introduced in their joint trial, regardless of whether the jury received instructions only to consider it against the confessor. This has become known as the
532:
281:
392:
239:
79:
221:
381:
537:
527:
517:
522:
342:"THE ADMISSION OF A CODEFENDANT'S CONFESSION AFTER BRUTON V. UNITED STATES: THE QUESTIONS AND A PROPOSAL FOR THEIR RESOLUTION"
498:
464:
42:
341:
125:
430:
358:
261:
403:
491:
412:
472:
17:
133:
327:
396:
243:
71:
484:
265:
456:
8:
421:
246:
121:
264:
ruling in which the Court held that a defendant was deprived of his rights under the
157:
304:
269:
74:
468:
137:
511:
145:
105:
149:
113:
439:
86:
211:
Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
376:
330:. North Carolina Criminal Law: A UNC School of Government Blog.
37:
533:
United States
Supreme Court cases of the Warren Court
174:
Brennan, joined by Warren, Douglas, Stewart, Fortas
229:This case overturned a previous ruling or rulings
509:
359:"Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 (1968)"
492:
499:
485:
510:
325:
25:1968 United States Supreme Court case
451:
13:
465:Supreme Court of the United States
43:Supreme Court of the United States
14:
549:
538:United States Supreme Court stubs
528:United States Supreme Court cases
399:123 (1968) is available from:
369:
326:Smith, Jessica (August 6, 2012).
260:, 391 U.S. 123 (1968), is a 1968
455:
375:
36:
518:1968 in United States case law
351:
334:
319:
1:
523:Confrontation Clause case law
312:
471:. You can help Knowledge by
463:This article related to the
288:
282:Delli Paoli v. United States
236:Delli Paoli v. United States
7:
328:"The Bruton Rule: A Primer"
297:
262:United States Supreme Court
10:
554:
450:
440:Oyez (oral argument audio)
15:
234:
227:
220:
215:
210:
202:
194:
186:
178:
170:
165:
99:
94:
66:
56:
49:
35:
30:
16:Not to be confused with
389:Bruton v. United States
382:Bruton v. United States
257:Bruton v. United States
198:White, joined by Harlan
61:Bruton v. United States
31:Bruton v. United States
18:Burton v. United States
279:. The case overruled
134:William J. Brennan Jr.
222:U.S. Const. amend. VI
50:Argued March 11, 1968
266:Confrontation Clause
52:Decided May 20, 1968
431:Library of Congress
347:. Duke Law Journal.
190:Black (in judgment)
85:88 S. Ct. 1620; 20
122:William O. Douglas
110:Associate Justices
480:
479:
380:Works related to
253:
252:
158:Thurgood Marshall
126:John M. Harlan II
545:
501:
494:
487:
459:
452:
444:
438:
435:
429:
426:
420:
417:
411:
408:
402:
379:
363:
362:
355:
349:
348:
346:
338:
332:
331:
323:
305:Cruz v. New York
95:Court membership
40:
39:
28:
27:
553:
552:
548:
547:
546:
544:
543:
542:
508:
507:
506:
505:
448:
442:
436:
433:
427:
424:
418:
415:
409:
406:
400:
372:
367:
366:
357:
356:
352:
344:
340:
339:
335:
324:
320:
315:
300:
291:
230:
148:
136:
124:
90:
51:
45:
26:
21:
12:
11:
5:
551:
541:
540:
535:
530:
525:
520:
504:
503:
496:
489:
481:
478:
477:
460:
446:
445:
413:Google Scholar
385:
371:
370:External links
368:
365:
364:
350:
333:
317:
316:
314:
311:
310:
309:
299:
296:
290:
287:
251:
250:
232:
231:
228:
225:
224:
218:
217:
213:
212:
208:
207:
204:
200:
199:
196:
192:
191:
188:
184:
183:
180:
176:
175:
172:
168:
167:
163:
162:
161:
160:
138:Potter Stewart
111:
108:
103:
97:
96:
92:
91:
84:
68:
64:
63:
58:
57:Full case name
54:
53:
47:
46:
41:
33:
32:
24:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
550:
539:
536:
534:
531:
529:
526:
524:
521:
519:
516:
515:
513:
502:
497:
495:
490:
488:
483:
482:
476:
474:
470:
466:
461:
458:
454:
453:
449:
441:
432:
423:
414:
405:
404:CourtListener
398:
394:
390:
386:
384:at Wikisource
383:
378:
374:
373:
360:
354:
343:
337:
329:
322:
318:
307:
306:
302:
301:
295:
286:
284:
283:
278:
276:
271:
267:
263:
259:
258:
248:
245:
241:
237:
233:
226:
223:
219:
214:
209:
205:
201:
197:
193:
189:
185:
181:
177:
173:
169:
166:Case opinions
164:
159:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
135:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
112:
109:
107:
104:
102:Chief Justice
101:
100:
98:
93:
88:
82:
81:
76:
73:
69:
65:
62:
59:
55:
48:
44:
34:
29:
23:
19:
473:expanding it
462:
447:
388:
353:
336:
321:
303:
292:
280:
274:
273:
256:
255:
254:
235:
216:Laws applied
153:
141:
129:
117:
78:
60:
22:
249: (1957)
187:Concurrence
179:Concurrence
146:Byron White
106:Earl Warren
512:Categories
313:References
270:confession
150:Abe Fortas
114:Hugo Black
289:Reasoning
87:L. Ed. 2d
67:Citations
387:Text of
298:See also
285:(1957).
171:Majority
203:Dissent
195:Dissent
182:Stewart
443:
437:
434:
428:
425:
422:Justia
419:
416:
410:
407:
401:
308:(1987)
275:Bruton
238:,
206:Harlan
156:
154:·
152:
144:
142:·
140:
132:
130:·
128:
120:
118:·
116:
467:is a
395:
345:(PDF)
268:if a
242:
469:stub
397:U.S.
277:rule
244:U.S.
80:more
72:U.S.
70:391
393:391
247:232
240:352
89:476
75:123
514::
391:,
500:e
493:t
486:v
475:.
361:.
83:)
77:(
20:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
