Knowledge talk:WikiProject Oregon/Archive 13

3197:"Notes", for example military history biographies. My loose interpretation of the guidelines is that you should not change the prevailing style in an article to your preferred one, and I've certainly been reverted before. At times I disagree, but because the guidelines are so nebulous, I don't fight about it. And recently when my change of "Notes" back to "References" was reverted, the guideline I was pointed to seemed to support "Notes", and like EncMstr, I don't recall that it used to say that. However, I also agree there's no reason to change "Notes" to "References" if all you have is a pile of inline citations. I think it's too formal a designation for what usually are in fact references and not footnotes like you might find in a print source, which will also have a general bibliography. The prevailing style on the wiki in general also seems to prefer "References". I think of a Notes section as only being necessary for Harvard-style referencing such as Finetooth uses, or if you want to call attention to an explanatory footnote to differentiate it from a reference. But I'm also fine with explanatory footnotes mixed in with references. Especially on shorter articles. 321: 6585:

related Commons pages I read about the WMP's position--apparently they are aware that the issue is not fully resolved, legally speaking. But they are willing to risk being sued and defend their position in court, if it comes to that. After 120,000+ images have been uploaded to the Commons and sourced to websites that claim copyright, and no lawsuits yet as far as I know, it seemed reasonably safe to upload those two digitized painting files from the OHS. One could argue (as my friend did) that making faithful digital reproductions of artwork may involve a lot of work and expense, so it may be.. unfair? to simply take their results and upload to The Commons, without even asking (I know I could ask, but after reading about the OHS on Oregon project's blog I got the sense that they would be less than helpful, if they even replied at all--plus I am curious about testing this surprising WMF position about copyright). And anyway, while it may take work and money to digitize old artwork and make it available on the web, does that mean you can make blanket claims of copyright ownership? ..I mean, you

6557:

strongly as claimed). Nevertheless, the page goes on to say: "To put it plainly, WMF's position has always been that faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works of art are public domain, and that claims to the contrary represent an assault on the very concept of a public domain." And, "WMF has made it clear that in the absence of even a strong legal complaint, we don't think it's a good idea to dignify such claims of copyright on public domain works. And, if we ever were seriously legally challenged, we would have a good internal debate about whether we'd fight such a case, and build publicity around it." When I looked into how many images on the Commons have been uploaded under the PD-Art tag, linked to sources that claim copyright over said images, I was surprised to find over 120,000! That turned my cautiousness around. I figured I might as well try it out and see how it goes.

3238:). I had this exact problem on an article involving a famous American and his voyage into a certain local river, in which an author removed the same cite that had existed on every sentence in one paragraph because it was "over-cited", and then later that same editor added a fact tag to one of the sentences where he had removed the citation earlier. Thus the dynamic and ever-changing aspects of how Knowledge works bear out what is not a problem in printed media, which is one of the big arguments of the main proponent of only citing at the end of a paragraph if a single cite covers the entire paragraph. That is, a certain editor at FA likes to compare Knowledge and our style to printed media, which just doesn't pan out. As in it's a little difficult for me to insert new passages into my 5434: 5396: 5425: 2606: 5443: 3165:

Featured Article that says that claims "are verifiable against high-quality reliable sources and are supported by citations; this requires a "References" section that lists these sources, complemented by inline citations where appropriate". Sometimes editors at FAC and elsewhere will attempt to impose their favorite citation system on other editors, but absolute standardization has so far been successfully resisted. My opinion is that a system that consists solely of a "Reference" section that includes notes and citations all in one heap is fine, and that a system that breaks the citations into subgroups such as "References" and "Notes" is fine, as are even more complex systems such as the one used in the recent FA

5405: 2033:, originally List-Class didn't have an importance rating--I think that was a Knowledge-wide thing. When folks came by to standardize our template with the others (how dare they make us conform!), I believe they added the code for an importance rating parameter in list-class articles. I don't think it was a conscious decision by the project, we just were going with the prevailing standard. I think EncMstr would know the history best, he did the most work on the template. I used to think a list is a list is a list and agreed that they shouldn't have importance ratings, but I can now see how they would be useful. Sounds like a COTW to get all those rated. 6067:

wider view since there are many valid points of view for visitors. So I forwarded that change someone made on our list to our navbox as well. Consensus/precedent has already shown "attractions" is the term in use elsewhere. It's hard to get an international audience to think the same when there are so many cultures and subcultures even among English-speaking countries. Hence, those lessons carried over to the list so far for Portland. As the list stabilizes, it will be an easy outline to make a navbox. Then they can be maintained together. (And a quick note... my user name starts with an "I", not an "L". It's my first initial.)

3242:. Though if I did, it would be pretty obvious. The other problem is, that yes the original editor knows the citation covers the entire paragraph, but unless they leave notes somewhere, nobody else knows this. Which again, isn't a problem with printed media. But enough of pointing out the problems, here is what I will sometimes do: insert a different ref into the paragraph so that a single ref will not cover the entire thing. Then they can't really complain. As in, find another source that also covers the info and use it for one of the sentences. Then there are different refs, and thus people are less likely to be able to complain. 2895:, gets many details wrong, but that doesn't mean I won't still use them as sources. Knowing how much of the copy desk has been laid off at the O, and apparently at the S-J, it's likely that the oversight and fact-checking isn't quite up to the standard it used to be, and of course there has always been deadline pressure. So something might get looked at--briefly--by a couple other sets of eyes, including a rookie/outsourced (i.e. doesn't know the local area) copyeditor, and we can say it's had oversight. But multiple reliable sources are of course always the way to go. P.S. I forgot to say, AM, congrats on your journalism career. 2857:

legal liability reasons. But when exactly something was built is less pertinent, thus who's gonna check especially in these times of staff cuts, even though a search of their in-house archives (which I would hope are indexed) should quickly provide the answer. But, that aside, I agree The Oregonian should be considered a RS, but your exception to blogs actually applies as well to all sources, as I wouldn't want to cite the O for an article on particle physics either (or even much of their coverage of legal issues) or say the Willamette Week for British politics despite their reputation for covering Oregon politics.

6660:. Fair Use doctrine covers artwork as well. It is same basic rule that allows you to quote another written work if it’s footnoted properly (i.e. you can use art image to explain specific piece of art or art style if words alone can’t adequately describe work). When you use Fair Use rule with art-type images, it is important to ensure your image is “less” than original image in some way, so cropping and/or using lower resolution is good practice to ensure you are not duplicating original work. Here’s example of Fair Use applied to art image: 6191:. There are thousands of worthy causes across the globe, and while on the personal level we may want to assist some of these causes (such as thousands dying in Hati or the daily death tolls from Iraq), that just is not what Knowledge does. In essence we reflect the way the world is, not how we want it to be. That said, you could take the time to improve the articles on Knowledge related to Vernonia (city, high school, school district) in which you could cover this topic. Though you would need to abide by various guidelines about 2743:

can write a blog post on the paper's blog, and I've got the credibility of the O behind me. Or I can be an unknown writer who can write and put up an article on my webpage, or I could self-publish my material in a blog, and either way I don't have anything backing me up. (Though I will note, as I've discussed similarly before, that perhaps the bias toward being able to use Joe Blow's website as reliable-ish source but not Joe Schmoe, PhD's blog should be reexamined by the community at some point. But I digress.)

3212:

an otherwise unreferenced paragraph, it may appear that that cite covers the entire paragraph when it does no such thing but you can't go back and source the rest of paragraph without going to a lot of trouble (trip to the library, read the entire book, etc.). Which touches on a whole other debate about sentence-level vs. paragraph-level citations such as Tedder is engaged in right now. I'm pretty sure we've discussed that as a project before but perhaps we should start a separate section on that topic.

2769:. I've been around many reporters, including "seasoned professionals" at the Oregonian, and lived a few houses away from and interacted often—including dating—some local TV and radio station managers, news directors, reporters, anchors, etc. In several situations where I was the most informed resource on the topic, especially when my efforts were the story, they seem to go out of their way to get it wrong. The best question about any news article isn't whether it is "accurate" or not. It is 31: 6656:

used in bio article about dead person, but not in article about dead person’s profession—even if individual was leader in that profession). Because Fair Use image can only be use in specific article for which Fair Use claim is made, image cannot be uploaded into Wiki-Common—it can only be loaded in English Knowledge. Image will be removed speed-of-heat if it doesn’t meet Fair Use criterion or is used in another article. Here’s example of personal Fair Use image:

6382:

student for being moved to a different school (he/she said this part is even worse than the flooding). And since that's how I read it, I didn't think we should get too involved in local school district politics, since I doubt the state would allow the district to actually move children into a contaminated building. And that's why I explained that we don't do causes first. This is somewhat similar to the recent issue with the

3557:(one of those tagged with the portal) clicking on the portal link is not going to give you a greater understanding of Salem, but if you do click on the USA link at least you will find out where the US is in the instances where we have a foreign reader (not sure how many people with internet access don't know what and where the US is, but there's probably one person somewhere). As in, following the portal link from 5781: 6679:

looks to me like legally complex things like that--although I understand the basic idea. Still, I can't recall every having had a need for a Fair Use image before. But then I tend to concentrate on esoteric bits of history and geography, which rarely if ever requires Fair Use images. Anyway, I wrote this overly long question because I'm trying to draft up a good article on an article about the

5876: 1419: 1151: 129: 5546:, right?) state treasurer just died. Ben was a unique public servant and someone I liked very much. And he was very interested in WikiProject Oregon, an interest I'm sad we won't have the opportunity to explore. Anyway, seems it might be a good moment to launch his article out of "start" class. I'll be doing a little work on it later this evening, and welcome any assistance. - 6683:(really, that redlink will be blue in.. um, a month? Three?) that profoundly influenced the early history of Alaska, British Columbia, Washington, and Oregon. The urge to make quality articles makes me search for images. I think I have plenty now, but in searching I inevitably found all kinds of images that would be useful on Knowledge. Anyway, thanks for the replies. 3503:

discussion. 68.116 irritates me, but if someone else in the project suggested it, I would probably just shrug. If we think we need them, I think it would be better to either add them as we go when doing other substantive edits, like we do other maintenance things, or have someone whip out all 5,000 (!) some WP:ORE articles using AWB or a bot. I like option one better.

6619:, 499 U.S. 340 (1991). Otherwise, personally, I'm not to concerned about the OHS, as they in all likelihood do not own most of the copyrights they claim to own (we actually covered this topic recently somewhere, but I can't find it right now, but it also was in part about Commons related {{PD-scan}}). And on a side note, I'd personally rest my case more on 3169:. Since the choice of reference systems depends on the nature of the article and the complexity and nature of the references, I think the choice of systems should be left to the main contributor and should not be arbitrarily changed. All this said, I'm aware that the guidelines might be altered at any moment; if they are, I think the regulars at 2678:

Advance also owns Advance Internet, which owns OregonLive (and similar sites around the country). OregonLive is then also the online home to The Oregonian and The Argus, as well as some of its own content. As in they have separate management, different offices, and most importantly not everything on OregonLive is Oregonian content.

1602:(again). For a moment there, my head almost exploded with the convolutions. (Have I been working with Katr too long?) But they seem to be a small self-referencing loop of unused templates with no outside references. Unless someone objects, I'll delete them all in a day or so. Maybe I'll find a tag to that effect as well. — 3425:. I'm not a fan of the Portal:Oregon in most cases. In fact, I'm not much a fan of portals anyhow. It would be nice to have consensus about when they should and shouldn't be used. I'm leery of an article having a Seealso section with nothing but a portal, as I view Seealso sections as a sign an article isn't complete. Others? 3965:). Next, not only are so many portals featured portals, but specifically the Oregon Portal is one of them. And I played a pretty big part in that, and I'm about the only person who keeps it updated. So, I'm fine with portals. It's the SPAMing of the links to them that we have a problem with, and OVERLINK covers this. 6572:. These clearly fulfill the qualifications for using the PD-Art tag. The originals have long been public domain and the digitized photos (or perhaps scans) look "faithful" to me (although here one has to use common sense some guesses, since the source does not say anything about how they digitized the paintings). 5759:

are active in articles but are not yet members of the project; perhaps it should just suggest possible invitees (compare active editors with the list of existing project members) to prevent annoying invites from popping up all the time. Just giving you stuff to do to prevent actual work from occurring. --

6608:

For bar reasons, I can't give you legal advice (you are in a different state for one reason). But do note, in regards to your friends mention that "digital reproductions of artwork may involve a lot of work and expense," that although that may be true, copyright is about originality. To quote Justice

6532:

Hello everyone. I have some broad questions about Knowledge, The Commons, the Wikimedia Foundation, copyright, and such--big enough I wasn't sure where to post about it. This seemed like the right place not only because it involves a couple of Oregon history related paintings, but also because I know

6381:

Pete, I think it has to do with how we each read and interpreted the thread. You saw it as notifying us of an omission in coverage. I took the header and the cry for help regarding the middle school students being placed in a "MOLDY" (the only all caps entry) school as a peeve from this middle school

5758:

Just so I understand, does it look at WPORE articles and see all of who is editing them, or only people who are already listed as active/inactive? I can't remember if the long discussion covered this, but I was wondering if this would be a useful tool to extend invites on a regular basis to folks who

5620:

I think it's totally cool. I think we discussed just ditching our arbitrary active/inactive and let the bot do the dirty work. I think the general consensus (except for Aunt Betty) was 6 months of Knowledge inactivity or 12 months or WP:ORE inactivity. Just browsing the data, I'm sort of wondering if

5509:

Would anyone mind if I gave our blog (WikiProjectOregon.Wordpress.com) a design refresh? I love the current header image, but I'm thinking we could tinker with the rest a bit. Also, I have in my possession the actual .com and .org domains of wikiprojectoregon, if we ever want to move to a self-hosted

3960:

IP person. As tedder said, I stated I don't like them. Then I stated why, within Knowledge rules (including quoting parts of those rules versus pointing people at a guideline that does not cover anything you assert it covers) why these portal links should not be included, in most articles. As I later

3151:

The whole encyclopedia is by its nature unstable, and this includes the guidelines. One of the problems arising from this inherent instability (the Siamese twin of amazing flexibility) is that sometimes guidelines posted in different places either contradict or seem to contradict one another. To keep

2802:

OregonLive should be on a case-by-case basis, like any blog. It's okay for some things and not for others. Example: neighborhood community news that is fairly uncontroversial, definitely good. Local knowledge is unlikely to be covered by national media. For heated politics or particle physics? Not so

2777:

when connecting the facts. Reporters have a tendency to err in the direction of sensationalization—whether (subconsciously or consciously) it is for career advancement, fame and fortune, Pulitzers, self-gratification, or simply keeping their job. The more important the story seems, the higher their

2742:

blog is a blog, it is not a RS, but since the blog is just a new way to present information, as long as it is connected to a RS (with the community blogger caveat above) then it should also be considered a RS. As an analogy, I can be a reporter for the Daily-O and write an article for the paper, or I

2677:

as the current COTW (I plan on the next batch tonight), one of the sources is an OregonLive item. For those not familiar with OregonLive/The Oregonian/Advance, here is the lowdown. Advance owns The Oregonian and many other papers, including the Hillsboro Argus, but I believe only those two in Oregon.

1361:

For example, WA/ID/WY/UT don't allow constitutional amendments through their initiative systems, but the image that is currently used in these articles doesn't reflect that. I would like to use the image from Ballotpedia here at the English Knowledge, but I'm confused about the licensing info. I sent

4069:

She is the author of three memoirs as well as two novels. Her first memoir Waiting: The True Confessions of a Waitress was published by HarperCollins Publishers in 2000, followed by Raising Blaze: A Mother and Son's Long, Strange Journey Into Autism, which chronicled her longtime struggle to get her

3835:

were to occur because of the opinions of few, rather than many. A few editors reaching an agreement does not qualify to eradicate and change Knowledge policies and article formats that tens of thousands of users read. Please do not delete portal links in otherwise empty See Also sections, instead

3830:

The substantiations (above) for deleting portal links are highly subjective, and not in accordance with Knowledge policy. For example, someone above states that they don't like the Oregon portal and are deleting portal links to the Oregon portal at least in part because they don't personally "like"

3292:

For example, if you add a sentence with an inline cite to the end of an otherwise unreferenced paragraph, it may appear that that cite covers the entire paragraph when it does no such thing but you can't go back and source the rest of paragraph without going to a lot of trouble (trip to the library,

3164:

and on this (the Oregon project) talk page for guidance. My sense of things related to the reference and notes sections is that a fairly wide variety of systems is fine as long as in each particular article the citation system is internally consistent and meets the part of the 1(c) requirement for a

2988:

Now back on topic. I never meant this to be a broader discussion on The Oregonian and RS in general, but it seems we have consensus that it does pass RS. My query is more about the non-Oregonian blogs. And it seems the general consensus is it depends on the blog, but in general they are OK for local

2820:

or any other newspaper, we consider them to be generally reliable sources only because they are acknowledged to have an editorial structure that makes room for fact-checking. From my professional experience and personal discussions with journalists, no piece goes in print without passing by the eyes

2787:

That said, I think OregonLive tends to be about as reliable, on average, as the Oregonian and local television news. Obviously that varies from one article to the next by a single reporter, let alone from reporter/journalist to reporter/journalist. I suspect AM is implicitly suspecting COI amongst

1966:

As for lists, I think that's more of a historical artifact, than a reflection of a mindful decision. Up until recently, if I recall correctly, we didn't even tag lists for WP:ORE. Or maybe it's that the assessment system didn't allow for quality ratings for lists until recently. Or maybe my memory's

1939:

I think the greatest use for this is in planning out group activities, like the Collaboration of the Week (or more spontaneous collaborations). Looking at the table, I always find it tempting to set goals like, say, "Let's see if we can get more than one of our "high importance" articles to Featured

1671:

This is for Tedder, and all of you who have been doing great work on Oregon schools: I was contacted by a junior high school teacher in China, who's "learning with his 7th grade students" to edit Knowledge. He's working on an article about their school in user-space, hoping to publish it later. He's

1264:

I notice many Oregon-related images are not tagged with the 'WikiProject Oregon' template, using 'Image' as the designated class on the quality scale. Is this not really an important task? If not, no worries, but if it is useful to tag Oregon images so that they are associated with the project, that

6584:

So the OHS make it clear that they claim to own the copyright to their digitized images of public domain artwork. The Wikimedia Foundation seems to be equally clear in rejecting the very notion that such claims hold any weight (and are even an "assault on the very concept of public domain"! On some

6552:

My understanding is that the tag is used to "assert that the photograph can have no independent copyright as it is simply a faithful reproduction of an old, public domain, two-dimensional work of art." And that if a public domain artwork is photographed as a "faithful reproduction" (that is, not an

6245:

Pete, how could we "tell every one to please hepl" within our guidelines? Should we also put a nice fund raising banner across the top of every page like we did a few months back for the big "Knowledge Forever" campaign? If we can, please let me know, otherwise that type of "help" is not consistent

3211:

P.S. I support the move away from general references except for list articles. It becomes messy and also many older articles I've run across are difficult to expand using inline cites when other specific items aren't cited inline. For example, if you add a sentence with an inline cite to the end of

2701:

Which leads us back to OregonLive content. The "writers" with OregonLive next to their name are generally staff of OregonLive, so I would count them as RS. if it says The Oregonian or The Argus next to the name I would count them as RS (same with any wire reports). On the other side of the coin all

1452:

Mine is of course better, mostly since I made it of course, but also since it breaks it down by Senate class. Also the other one has elections going back to 1860 and Senators weren't elected until the early 1900s. I still need to add a couple elections to my template, but it got tricky with lots of

623:

The bot updated the wall. If desired, the 3 column set-up can be changed to 2, and the DYK articles can be removed if you feel the list is too long. No need to keep the wall if project members do not like it, but it is nice that it updates automatically, and you can choose which parameters you wish

185:

and add them to , , and . I can find plenty of third-party references and everything, but at what point is the wind farm considered not notable enough for an article? I've generally only made a (short) article on one if it's 100MW or more and has been published in the news. Are there any guidelines

6678:

Thanks for the replies. I think I have the hang of it now. Looks like the the "brouhaha" was about a scale of Commons-uploading way being my activities. I'm on a roll if I upload a couple images in a row! Also, thanks for the thoughts about Fair Use. Being a legal-issue dummy, I shy away from what

6655:

In addition to Public Domain images, there’s Fair Use doctrine that may apply to some copyrighted images in specific cases where no Free Use image is available (e.g. using existing photo of someone who is dead). Fair Use images can only be used in articles directly related to subject (e.g. can be

6575:

And the source? Why, it's part of why I'm posting here--the Oregon Historical Society (which has been a topic of discussion, if not here then on the project's blog). Not surprisingly--and much like a great many similar organizations--the OHS claims to own the copyright to these images. Their page,

6556:

The Common's page linked above cited a court case that supposedly upholds all this, but I'm not sure whether the case applies very well (but am not a lawyer by any means! ..but a friend who is more knowledge on such things looked into it and thought the court case did not support WMF's position as

6066:

balloon in Portland.) For any changes there, the list will need help from Portland residents. So dive in with improvements. Similarly, when people added "shopping" to Silicon Valley's list page, it didn't strike me as an attraction at all. But for some people it is. Knowledge can simply take a

1309:

About a year ago I tagged a something like 400 images for the project, and I think that was about all of the non-commons ones at that time. In general I don't tag commons pics, as only categories can be added to the Knowledge version, and as far as I know any edits on Commons to a Knowledge tagged

6316:

In short, I think that notifying us of such a significant omission is very helpful behavior. All I would have liked is to see an initial sentence more along the lines of "thanks for letting us know." The rest of your reply is fine; I was just a little surprised to see you lead off with "sorry, we

5287:

Just an FYI for the OR Historic sites db, as far as I know it has every single Oregon NRHP in it, plus many others. I believe anytime an entity in the state has done an historic survey, or someone has submitted an application for NRHP status, all that info has gone into the database. So you might

3502:

be added to see also sections. So it's well within the rules. I'm rather ambivalent about portals myself, despite folks like Aboutmovies excellent work keeping ours up to date. What I object to was the anon putting, more or less, "add portal links to all WP:ORE articles" in our to-do list without

3469:

I've been watching this too (my watchlist is going crazy!). I'd say the IP has added portal links to at least 25 or 30 articles. Personally, I think it's just unnecessary clutter, especially when it's the only thing included in the See also section. The talk page of each article is already tagged

2980:

Yes, that's me, I know many here know my real identity (which some people assume is protected due to my alleged involvement in alleged activities that lead to people being allegedly killed if they allegedly know too much, so watch out!), but I can't remember who all knows. And Katr, thanks, but I

2352:

That's the best suggestion yet. The yuckiest part of the PA and NJ maps is that a fair amount of wasted space is introduced to make way for the US image. I think the US image can be made much smaller than in those examples since Oregon is big enough that it will show up fairly well at a reduced

589:

I will take a short time for the bot to do the work. I set up the templates for WikiProjects Cannabis and Rufus Wainwright yesterday, and they are working now. The DYKs can be suppressed, if desired--all you have to do is remove the "content-did-you-know-articles" line from the template. Featured

6592:

My one lingering qualm is whether or not I, as the person who actually uploaded the files, might be drawn into a legal battle, were the OHS to decide to sue the Wikimedia Foundation, for example. I figured that it was not a major risk. Images that violate copyright are constantly uploaded to the

6386:

where we have the local school folks in essence trying to whitewash their academic record and use their Knowledge entry as a marketing tool. We could be all patient and not bite, but I guess I've just grown tired of all the SPA POV pushers, and as such I'm a little more inclined to spell-out the

2856:

fact checking before print, not to mention inconsistencies (One Main Place is listed as built in 1980 or 1982 by the Portland Business Journal - also an Advance company). And like I said above, I think the "volatility" of the info determines how much fact checking goes into something, mainly for

2844:

EnMster, The COI is my own, check the bylines to the stories in the COI link I provided. Not that I have anything to really gain by using these sources on Knowledge, but sometimes its nice to fill in some content holes. And though I do think there can by COI amongst reporters and in general with

6580:

simply says, "The Oregon Historical Society (OHS) owns the content on the Oregon History Project. All materials, including essays and images, may not be reproduced in print or electronically without written permission from the Oregon Historical Society." And, "The reproduction of content of any

6154:

Vernonia is still in devestation tha twiped out our homes in the flood of of 2007 Even worse now the school district is still in meyham, putting elementry kids in a MOLDY school and kicking the middle schoolers outr of their new school to make way for hi schoolers, Please raise awearness of our

3226:

For me, you always need a references section. Otherwise notes are just notes, as in more of commentary, not references as indicated by the section titles. Now, if you want to break things down and have what is in essence an old school bibliography at the end and call it the references sections,

2470:

Nice work with the map an I noticed you didn't forget to change the coords. I have't say though that I really like Aboutmovies idea of having the U.S. map in the lower right side as us Oregonians know there is not just a whole lot down there. Well, there's Burns, Frenchglen, Malheur NWR and the

1641:

Lestatdelc last edited back in April, so he probably won't object if you snuffed them. We could also just get rid of the "See Also" line and solve the problem for now. I would prefer a different naming structure, but I'm not delving into those templates yet anyway. Thanks for looking into it. --

4981:

played basketball for Miami University (Oxford, Ohio) from 1978 to 1982. He was named an Academic All-American and an NCAA Postgraduate Scholar in 1982. In his four year collegiate career, he scored over 1,000 points (28th alltime) with 682 rebounds (8th alltime), and 317 free throws made (9th

4107:

is Knight Professor of Liberal Arts and Sciences in the Department of Philosophy at the University of Oregon. He is well-known for contributions to embodied philosophy, cognitive science and cognitive linguistics, some of which he has coauthored with George Lakoff such as Metaphors We Live By.

3196:

Finetooth covered this very well and I was going to bring up his articles that properly use both a "Notes" and "References" section, which I don't have a problem with at all. I've found that some types of articles overseen by other projects require the section, if there's only one, to be named

2681:

So, with Just Out, one source used was an OregonLive piece, which was not an Oregonian item. I can't tell exactly what type of blogger that author is/was, but I think it might be more akin to OregonLive's community bloggers. Thus, the question becomes, what do we think about the reliability of

6276:

Aboutmovies, you're right, of course. I was a little hasty in my comment. I think my point -- though poorly expressed -- is an important one, though: what we had here was a middle school student who found the article on his home town to be severely lacking in an important area. He or she then

3022:

Despite our reasonable consensus here, I do think that when WP:ORE articles and editors run into the larger community on important RS issues, we should keep in mind that the knee jerk reaction of nearly all Wikipedians is to say blogs are a no-no. Just a reminder, not that y'all needed it. :)

6492:

It actually shows a pretty meaty (8 paragraph) preview, and then offered me a link me to view the full article in their archives. The link to the archive is pretty lame--it just links to the archive search, and didn't remember what article I was just reading; you have to enter all new search

2821:

of at least one section editor and one copyeditor. Whether they truly verify the facts, we can never know. But it's the best we can get, and functionally speaking we should assume facts are being checked unless we have evidence to the contrary (like conflicting stories or unattributed data).

1640:

created them based on similar New York templates back in November 2008, but never hooked them up to anything (the NY ones are similarly unconnected); that and the fact that the naming is a little different from other elections stuff kept me from finding them, until I reinvented them. Anyway,

2710:(which anyone can see by reading these posts), and other procedures to ensure accuracy (which I can't divulge). And as to professional, mentioned at V, the question becomes what does that mean on Knowledge? As in the term often refers to remuneration, but FA articles are required to be of 2504:

I like Aboutmovies'/Droll's suggestion; while the current svg map is nice, I'm not too keen about large amount of wasted space at the top (aka Washington :P ). We could use this map for the few southeastern Oregon articles, and for the rest have the inset in the lower right hand corner.

3961:

wrote, there are some instances where these links are proper in an article. I, and I think everyone else here, believes these links are fine on article talk pages. BTW, the Oregon Portal link is incorporated into the WPORE banner, so every WPORE article does have a link to the portal (

556:

Looking more closely, I have a couple thoughts: (1) while it's nice to have all the DYK's on there, I fear they will overwhelm our portal. Can/should we suppress DYKs? We already have them featured, in a rotating fashion, on the portal page. (2) Will this include featured pictures?

3884:

Actually, it isn't policy, it's a guideline. The given policy doesn't indicate where portal links should be added, as far as I can tell. Finally, using censorship and "empty See Also sections" as an argument is entirely bogus. See also sections (note caps) are the hallmark of an

6222:

contains only 1.5 sentences on it, and they are rather outdated. The article clearly could benefit from a bit of attention, just in terms of providing factual information about this event and tying it in with the city's history. I'll try to do a little work there this weekend.

3312:

When the following referenced sentence was added, the {{cn}} was added to make it clear that the preceeding material is not covered by that reference. It is assumed that this material is covered in some of the general references, but it is not known which one(s).</ref:

1310:

WPORE image will not show up on Knowledge. The only exception to not tagging commons images was last week when I tagged the FP class ones so they would show up in the new bot run "special" content page (see several threads above). Other than that, I usually tag them with

6540:

are of less than wonderful quality, and I thought it would be nice to be able to find higher quality images. But looking just now I found that the image I uploaded to The Commons not 20 minutes ago has already been added to that page! Well, ok--so pages on Gray, the

5971:. You're welcome to use them as examples. That approach will work for any metro area which has enough content for it. I suggest starting with a category and list in order to help organize your thoughts before making a navbox. But that doesn't have to take long. 3620:

I agree with Tedder--I will definitely kill with fire any portal links in an otherwise empty See also section. I'll be open-minded about other situations, but it sounds like the rough consensus is that WP:ORE does not endorse the use of Portal links in mainspace.

3397:. Eeek! The logic of this suggests that every Oregon article needs at least one portal link and that every stream needs at least two portal links in its "See also" section. (You see where this is going.) In fact, the same user added four portal links today to 2689:

Now, on that point, first, do we think many stories at The Oregonian are actually fact checked? Personally I'm willing to bet stories on Sam Adams and his friend (who is all over the media but Knowledge refuses to name) are scrutinized, but I doubt the editors

6044:. (Just who is asserting that X is an attraction, but Y is not?) But having a navbox that is a bit broader than just parks does makes sense. But…is every park on that list truly an "attraction?" I'm not sure. Perhaps there's a role for each of these navboxes? 1449:). Should one of these be deleted, or redirected, or what? Sorry for an obvious question, but I wasn't sure if it make sense to redirect a template? Can one of our handy WPORministrators help out? We can delete mine if preferred and I can tweak the other one. 3007:

I'm personally fine with their use, but blogs that are not part of an established newspaper are not any more reliable if they're local people talking about non-controversial local concerns. There needs to be something positive we can say about the author. -

590:

pictures WILL be included, because I included the "content-featured-pictures" line in the template. Give it a day or two to update, and things should make more sense. Again, if project members do not like the changes, the edits can be reverted. You can click

5738:(moving left) Okay, found the bug, fixed it, reran. It takes longer to run now that the code actually does what it claims. Anyhow, I also added a column showing the number of Oregon edits in the past 90 days. It certainly shows who the usual suspects are. 2702:

the comments and anything in the forums are out. Which leaves us with why I came here, the other content. For instance the bloggers that they bring in to produce content. These are generally designated by "Community Blogger" next to the name. Using inside

6545:, and a number of others could benefit from these images. But they come from the Oregon Historical Society, which claims copyright over them. However! I was surprised tonight by discovering the Commons page about the {{PD-art}} tag and when to use it: 6298:

in editing; in my view, this includes on-wiki communication as much as direct article editing. I think very few middle schoolers would have a sophisticated understanding of Knowledge's policies, and may not even be all that interested in learning about

2367:

I would suggest making two maps with the inset within the state boundaries (saves space). You would need two so you could have the inset in say the upper right corner in one, with the other one in the lower right. But everything else would be the same.

5586:

So, what's next? Well, review the project requirements, look over the list, and see how it meshes with your feelings on who is active on the Oregon wikiproject. Certainly it highlights some "behind the scenes" contributors very well, and it shows that

524:

I went ahead and added the template so that the bot can update the page automatically. If project members end up not liking the "wall of recognized content" as created by the bot, we can simply revert the edit I made to return to the previous version.

5413: 2887:(ec) Yes, we should assume the facts are checked, even if we all have personal experience to the contrary. Otherwise the whole RS thing just kind of falls apart. I know any story on which I have known "the inside scoop", including things written in 3938:

Third, linking to a general portal about a whole state makes little sense for the vast majority of articles. For example, river articles are more relevant to a rivers portal, or water sports, or even hydroelectric, if portals were to be linked at

5272:

for Hayden Bridge. I'm not sure if every NRHP for Oregon is listed, but there's a complete list as an ASCII text file somewhere. If the one you're looking for isn't listed via the web site, holler and I'll see if I can find the ASCII version.

2845:

newspapers due to their advertisers, but its not really a Knowledge thing until they start editing here to further that agenda or adding links to OregonLive content indiscriminately in the ELs section to increase traffic ALA Boundless Oregon (

5716:

I see Cirt there too. I'm glad you know he has made edits to salad poisoning- I'm using him as a test case right now to distract me from what I really need to do. Anyhow, looks like my code isn't looking past a user's most recent 500 edits.

3173:

will quickly be aware of it and make alterations to the FA requirements. Meanwhile, I see no reason to change References to Notes generally or to favor one reference system (including the naming of sections and subsections) over all others.

2918:

Katr is right- we pretty much have to AGF that they are written correctly. We know some things are questionable or incorrect, but there's no reason to treat the Oregonian blog differently than we'd treat the O as far as being a RS. So- yes,

4136:

an American Jewish author of more than 50 children's books. His works include Caldecott Honor Book Hershel and the Hanukkah Goblins (illustrated by Trina Schart Hyman), and Sydney Taylor Book Award winners The Chanukkah Guest and Gershon's

4941:- I think that there might be some stuff about her out there, but I didn't find it easily. She's written a bunch of books based Star Trek and other media franchises, so she probably mentioned in magazines that aren't web searchable. - 3852:

A few editors reaching an agreement does not qualify to eradicate and/or change Knowledge policies and article formats that tens of thousands of users read. Knowledge is an online encyclopedia to enhance knowledge, not limit knowledge.

6593:

Commons, and then quickly (usually) deleted. If the two images I uploaded are copyright violations, would they not also just be deleted, with no trouble for me personally? In short, should I be concerned? Thanks for your thoughts.

5644:

I re-ran it to show the contributions instead of the userlink. Makes sense. I don't think the flux capacitor is broken- I think it's that some people have signed up for WikiProject Oregon but haven't made an edit in Oregon space

5621:

we need the overall Knowledge inactivity clause, since there seems to be a pretty strong correlation that if you've edited at all, you've probably done something on WP:ORE at some point. But I don't want to kill a good consensus.

2545:(for food carts and food trucks). Currently the parent cat is empty (!) so some work filling in with CC photos of famous Portland restaurants would be awesome. Perhaps we could even do a collaboration with Portland foodies like 1132:

There has been an IP and now new editor inserting some text to the above article that I continue to undo, as it appears to be POV and inappropriately sourced, not to mention UNDUE issues. Some additional opinions would be nice.

5156:

Thanks for sharing, tedder, and thanks for your wonderful contributions to the newly-created park articles. I've been checking in from home, and your expansions are fantastic. Thanks to others working on the articles as well!

6217:

Aboutmovies, with all due respect, I disagree -- I think the request above is perfectly consistent with policy. The 2007 flooding was devastating to Vernonia, as covered in any number of news outlets. However, our article on

3561:

to the portal is not going to cover anything about the river and unlikely to have much even remotely related to that topic, other than it's in Oregon, which a link to Oregon already exists. It would be the same for a link to

5843:

That does seem pretty dumb. I think I prefer the second one (seems to have more info in it, is slightly more compact, and not a big fan of the colors), but we should look around to see if a "standard" exists. Good catch.

1265:

would certainly make a great collaboration of the week. When tagged, they can be grouped together, we can monitor edits made to them, and we will be able to brag about those images that reach valued or featured status. --

5469:, including mine. I had a great time at Ignite with tedder there, and since it's free it would be cool if more Oregon Wikipedians got out for the next one in September (there are ones in Salem, Bend, and Corvallis too). 1442: 4086:

American economist who became the 13th president of Oregon State University on July 31, 2003. Prior to joining Oregon State, Ray was executive vice president and provost of Ohio State University for the previous six

5987: 1243:

It sounds fun as a college project. But a permanent collaborative project that anyone can edit and which describes all aspects of cities of the world does seem the sort of wheel-reinventingish thing Betty would do.

735:, and I'm fairly certain it will work, but I'd appreciate it if someone would take a look to see if there are any inaccuracies... for one, who published the first edition? All I could find was "Or." (Oregon?) at 6511:

I see that too. Anymore, I've quit using oregonlive except for things I see in the previous week. I just use the databases I can pull things from (like LexisNexis), since the search and archiving are both poor.

5954: 4153:

retired American professional basketball player in the National Basketball Association for a number of teams, but most notably for the Portland Trail Blazers. He also has served in various coaching roles in the

4820: 2414:

Okay, I uploaded the map and updated the locator template. Wasted space seems to be somewhat of a necessary evil, especially for square states and vertical states (like NJ) to get it to fit well in an infobox.

1294:

and other non-free content cannot (or, at least, should not) be on commons. The straggling free content on en.wikipedia.org should be moved to commons. Somewhere there's a tag which causes a bot to do that.

4822: 3553:, as these are Wikilinks and there is likely nothing more from the portal that will help a reader of that article. It's a lot like linking United States in an article, but even worse. If you are reading say 2116:

P.S. There would be minor technical matters that would have to be addressed (namely making sure that the boarder coordinates correct) but this is not a serious obstacle and I could take care of that detail.

489:. The template could simply be copied over to the current page, and that way the page would automatically update featured content, including current and former FAs/FLs, GAs, DYKs, pictures, etc. Thoughts? -- 3497:

I did check as I recalled a previous general Knowledge discussion about whether portal links were "self-referential". According to the current guideline, they are encouraged to be added to talk pages, but

1595: 1579: 5610:

I suppose it's not surprising that General Eisenhower hasn't edited since 1970 since he died in 1969. Otherwise, weird that the TedderBot can't calculate dates on those other folks. Maybe it needs a new

5580:. Sort it by most recent Oregon edit and you'll see what users are active and which ones aren't. Scroll down to the inactive users and you'll see some that could be put back in the "active" status too. 5940: 2590:

showed up today, and appears to be notable. I know several of you are good at old biographies and Oregon history- I'm not. Can you flesh it out, or at least back up the existing information with refs?

2065:

we should probably do something fun, though maybe the day before or after since it's Valentine's as well. Wiki work party? Field day? Insane house party? (Just kidding. But a nice CotW would be good.)

1866: 2628: 981:, which seems to prefer them. If they don't work, I (or anyone) can always change it back to ISBN-10s. I didn't add dashes because Google Books doesn't use dashes, but those could be added in also. 5949:

would suggest it's better to name it "Portland, Oregon attractions" because of the same-named city in Maine which has a smaller but still real metro area of its own. According to the advice of

1818:

I know the COTW is over (sorry, AM), but has the auto-archival discussion ever been held here? I vote we archive anything over 120 days. The page is currently the length of 5.2 DYK nominations.

6056: 1833:

I was just about to manually archive. Auto works for me. When I've manually archived, I've found that 30 usually is about right, though 60 or 90 might make sense until we see how it feels. —

1599: 1587: 1446: 5660:

notifying users and managing the active/inactive list automagically. It's a good step to illustrate what the bot sees and to figure out if we are all happy with it. Yeah, there will always be

1384:(preferred, but maybe en.Knowledge), fill in the fields to give credit to them. Also provide a URL to the original. If the website doesn't give explicitly give permission for reuse (such as 1591: 1583: 339:

FWIW, I've seen them used in articles (though I haven't) and I'm pretty sure they're free. I think AM used some in his NRHP articles and he should know. I don't know how you tag them though.

5661: 3993: 1953:

Without the ability to click into a list of articles in a certain square in the grid, it's been difficult up till now to carry those thoughts to their conclusion. This tool will help a lot!

1225: 5980: 2686:

is the policy on point, but blogs on media sites can be acceptable (especially since they are not really self published in the regular sense) if they are subject to the editorial control.

6589:, but I don't think copyright is meant to reward mere hard work and money. So I put aside whatever qualms I had with regard to "taking" the work of the OHS against their apparent wishes. 4920:

I deprodded it. An anon added a couple of refs, although they're not available online for free. Someone can AfD it if they want, but either way it's no longer on of the unrefed BLPs. -

5626:

Could the links to the usernames go to their contributions? Not to be all nosy, but...I'm nosy and it would save a click. It's fun to see what people are working on from this table. --

6553:"artistic" photograph, but something more akin to scanning), then it "acquires no copyright protection of its own", whether or not claims of copyright are made (and they often are). 5801:

Katr67 wins, with 7596 Oregon edits, and 50.6% of all her edits in Oregon. Pete has 48.8% of his edits in Oregon, and Movies has 34.4% of his edits in Oregon (and the most total). -

4977: 2102: 6664:. Bottomline—you must be very careful when using Fair Use images; rules are very strict and wiki-picture police actively monitor new Fair Use claims, but it’s worth knowing about.-- 6421:

I lived in Olney from 1946 to 1963. Wonder if there are any pictures from the old Olney grade school, specifically of students between 1952 through 1959. Carlene (Snyder) McKillop

3706:, where you might get a little better understanding of those topics from what the portal has. But individual people, cities, forests, creeks, museums, etc. just shouldn't have them. 4009: 3517:

Oh yeah, and Portal:Environment is waaaay overbroad for a creek article. I would have reverted but I chose to unwatchlist a bunch of stuff instead as I was getting too aggravated.

3330:

This should make it clear what the new reference covers, calling attention to the need for a specific citation for the original paragraph without impugning any previous editors.

3984: 2846: 2738:

Your crack about the quality of the S-J made me about spew coffee on my keyboard. I think I agree with you on all your other points as well. I've seen folks say that because an

701:

It could be the cats the template adds, but I'm not sure where the bot is looking. Anyway, I tagged the image talk pages so they should appear next update one way or the other.

387:

Yes, those are public domain. As the copyright notice says, only a few are not PD, and those will say on the catalog record for the item that the source is not the HABS folks.

6637:

Those images are public domain. In other countries there are different rules. An American wikipedian did it with images taken from a British Museum and there was a bit of a

5043:, talking about how the garage is a bad idea: "A 12-story garage won't go away. This is a chance to do something special. We should try to do something special every decade." 4819:- Not much about this poet. He wrote the poem at the bottom of the Portlandia building, so maybe an Oregonian archive search could establish notability. Here's what I found. 3902:

Anything else? Oh- Aboutmovies is the someone who said they don't like portals, but gave arguments to back it up; they were not removed due to the subjective reason you gave.

3100:

and don't see any guideline changes with respect to this. Thinking back, I may not have read in the guidelines the way we do it, but simply replicated the pattern I saw: no

2691: 324:. Are they copyright-free because they are from the US Gov? They have a photographer listed, but no copyright tag. I'm confused and entirely unclear about public-domain laws. 2559: 195: 4950: 4929: 6602: 6527: 4768: 5566: 5145: 3029: 919:

Works for me! (though I found the longer isbns didn't work for a while, so I used shorter--should there be dashes in the longer one?) Why didn't we think of that before?

4835: 4811: 4792: 3891:

A reasonable number of relevant links that would be in the body of a hypothetical perfect article are suitable to add to the 'See also' appendix of a less developed one.

3819: 2571: 807: 780: 236: 218: 6650: 3017: 1754: 1725: 1078:

Weird. I picked the 2nd one: 6764971 as it had the most hits (66). The third one only had a copy at Yale, and the fourth one looks like it is the original manuscript.

667: 609: 566: 540: 519: 4729: 4727: 1237: 6434: 5531: 5459: 2866: 2159: 1711: 1697: 4879: 2323: 1462: 1435: 1048: 6549:. To be more sure I read all the related pages and talk pages, as well as browsing through images on the Commons already using the tag, which number over 120,000. 5002: 4967: 3512: 3492: 2276: 1304: 1114: 1087: 1073: 1020: 1006: 914: 6673: 6326: 6259: 6232: 5853: 5172: 5114: 5088: 5070: 4762: 4128:

American politician from the U.S. state of Oregon. A Republican, he is a member of the Oregon House of Representatives representing Yamhill County in District 24.

4024: 3836:

expand the see also section with relevant links. Portal links are to be placed in See also sections of articles, and serve to improve the quality of articles.

3119:

tag calls for eliminating general references and using inlines, and CITE suggests that general refs are common in less developed articles. (Recent discussion at

2773:

Organizations which perform fact checking help improve reliability, but not to the degree one might think. The impression an article leaves is mostly due to the

710: 696: 681: 584: 5926: 5912: 5892: 5583:

There's also a small number of users (eight right now) that TedderBot can't calculate Oregon edit dates properly. They show up with the Unix epoch time of 1970.

4162:

former special teams coach in the National Football League and a former college football coach. He also was an American college and professional football player.

3359: 2827: 6474: 6277:

managed, in what I'd consider a pretty impressive display of 'net sleuthing, to identify the group most likely to respond to those concerns, and left us a note.

6208: 6062:

Yeah, the parks on that list are pretty much what were already there - I didn't mess with them. (Except that I added Waterfront Park which was the site of the

5496: 5475: 5309: 5218: 5204: 4858: 4696: 4682: 3876: 3715: 3593: 3410: 2090: 2071: 467: 4972: 3911: 2527: 1405: 546: 304: 274: 176: 6400: 6356: 6143: 4747: 3974: 3002: 2429: 2377: 1976: 1926: 1329: 6167: 6094: 6076: 3798: 3741: 3630: 3575: 3269: 3251: 3134:

conform to what we're doing—especially if it is widespread (which is my experience)—or should we be revising the section names in non-conforming articles? —

2904: 2752: 2532: 2002: 1314: 1209: 1199: 1181: 1167: 639: 504: 400: 6175: 3183: 1280: 6632: 5325: 5282: 5260: 5246: 5132: 3864: 3813: 3689: 3434: 3206: 2732: 2222: 2192: 2170: 2362: 2150: 1993:

The pop pages list also gives a way to slide and dice things. In other words, it's interesting to see what poor-quality articles are (currently) popular.

1904: 1702:

Wow, thanks to you all -- Finetooth, Esprqii, Tesscass -- for the quick action there! I think that's exactly the sort of welcome the guy was hoping for. -

1685: 1650: 1611: 1142: 6661: 6521: 6485:

Hey, I just cited an OregonLive article that had a little subhead saying "The following article is part of our archive." Whaaaa?? They have an archive??

5867: 5793: 5768: 5726: 5699: 5673: 5635: 5569:

on a memberbot that would figure out who is active in our project and who is currently inactive. I've compiled the requirements and project status here:

4671: 3955: 3804:

Super. I parked my mop after doing 10 and veered off in some other direction. Thanks for doing the rest. The ones you spared sound like good exceptions.

2955: 2797: 1842: 1557: 1477: 1366: 1253: 296: 228: 187: 6025: 6007: 4711: 3667: 3645: 3584:

as my edit summary. That's more friendly than just reverting and gives 68.116.53.246 something to discuss if he or she wants to enter the conversation.

3544: 3526: 3464: 3221: 2658: 2640: 2618: 2480: 2042: 1807: 1521: 1499: 1038: 928: 428: 382: 364: 348: 333: 145: 2599: 1411: 1374: 6692: 6033:

Lkluft, thanks for taking an interest in this and for your helpful info about how other places have handled this subject. I especially appreciate the

4251: 3566:, in that sure boats have likely been on that river, but there's nothing at that portal that will expand the knowledge of the reader about the river. 2932: 1766: 4644:

There's been a big todo about unreferenced BLPs lately. We have more than a few here at WP:WPOR; does anyone want to help out by tackling this list?

3563: 3532: 761: 5592: 4653: 655:

However, I also think it would be nice to have this feed in to the portal; and if we do that, I think the DYKs would be extraneous for that purpose.

6163: 5994:

actually already fit that model. So make sure the parks get categorized under the attractions too. Then an attractions navbox can work well as a

5965: 5837: 5810: 4904: 4169: 4061:

is a beauty queen from Phoenix, Oregon who was Miss Teen USA 2003 and became Miss California USA, succeeding the dethroned Carrie Prejean, in 2009.

2542: 2538: 2131: 486: 6438: 4824: 4736: 3856:

What if all portal links in See also sections were eliminated in this manner? -- Answer: The quality of Knowledge would significantly decrease.

1672:

interested in feedback. Please take a look if you have a moment -- it's a very modest entry -- and make an edit, or send a word of encouragement!

4958:: Probably an AFD candidate. Actor best known for work with the Oregon Shakespeare Festival. A cursory Google search doesn't turn up anything. -- 3401:. Does anybody think these links are a good idea? Are they a good idea in some cases but not others? Should I stop deleting them if more appear? 2788:

them, but I think that has a small effect compared to the inherent wrongness of each article, largely due to the career mobility of reporters. —

1870: 1854: 1827: 768: 4145:

an American businessman and diplomat. He served as the United States ambassador to New Zealand and Samoa from November 2005 until December 2008.

2714:

which is carried out to be perfect grammar, spelling, etc. which may not correspond to the actual quality of paid writers, such as those at the

120: 4798: 4363: 4342: 171: 6155:

perdicament and tell every one to please hepl even a little awarness is good. Student of Vernonia middle school ********** March 11, 2010

5777:

The lists are only from people who have opted in (signed up). It would be interesting to have potential invitees. Thanks for the distractions

2631:

for anyone who wants to take a stab at it. I've got interior pics of Deepwood that I've been too lazy to upload, BTW. Hopefully this weekend.

1025:

Amazon and Google Books work both ways too. I think there was some glitch early on with the 13-digit version that has been worked out now. It

6615: 6505: 5055: 4588: 3997: 3143: 1885: 1490:

the templates, and it isn't like a redirect is needed to save things (imho). Katr, does your ADD go nuts to know you misspelled "organized"?

6581:

length without express permission from OHS is a violation of copyright even if the content is attributed to the Oregon Historical Society."

2550: 6486: 3364: 2183:

Ah, thanks Tedder. I never seem to remember the "What links here" button. I'm inclined to agree with Droll that the tall ones are too big.

94: 86: 81: 69: 64: 59: 6037:

link; I had somehow overlooked that the guideline for these things were all expressed in a single document, which explores the synergies.

5555: 5032:- basically, they were origianlly connected, but the city didn't buy them back when they got developed in the 1870s. So Park Block 5, aka 4915: 964: 6124: 5747: 5604: 5516: 3339: 1869:

will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the

3942:

Fourth, categories, lists, and wikilinks help readers navigate to similar topics. Adding portal links verges on breaking the spirit of

1913:

It looks cool though it will take a while to figure out what to do with it (for me, anyway). First thing I see in the new table is that

1792: 1363: 5753:

Looks great. So the folks who joined but have yet to make a WPORE edit are the only ones with the 1970 date. I'm in for implementation.

5289: 4659: 3672:

Nice link and good suggestion about WT:ORE. I used your list just now to remove about 10 of the 60 and adjusted my edit summary to say

434: 6462: 5484: 5480: 5297: 5293: 5269: 111:

has the been the target of some strange edits. Good faith stuff mixed with POV. Maybe someone could talk to the anon. Happy holidays!

5036:

is the new one right behind Fox Tower. It's pretty inspirational to see, and a far cry from the parking garage proposed around 1995.

4732: 3152:

from going mad trying to follow all the debates that go on on the talk pages of various guideline pages and project pages, I rely on

2306: 2210: 6533:

some of you are well versed in the sometimes convoluted ways of Knowledge and the larger scope Wikimedia Foundation. So, here goes.

4702:

I'll do Laura Viers and Mark Johnson (COI disclosure, I took a class from him once). I'm willing to do any other musician ones too.

3416:

Oh, the IP has been portalizing Oregon articles like crazy today, actually. Here are four examples in a random seven-minute period:

3353:

regarding changes to the founding members of a Portland-based startup, several of whom WP:ORE folks know for hosting WikiWednesday.

2247:

tall... it makes some of the well filled out infoboxes very long. If a reader doesn't know where Oregon is, they can just click the

1365:) and they said to feel free to use the image as long as it's attributed to the Citizens in Charge Foundation. What does this mean? 373:, which says "Material in these collections is generally considered to be in the public domain." So I feel slightly more confident. 6149: 5998:

trio with these. I can help a little with that. But I'm sure the people who live there will want to be in the lead of the effort.

3389:, that I have on my watchlist. I undid these four but then thought I might have been over-hasty. In three cases, the links were to 3344: 1544:

template and along the way added a couple links in related articles for future expansion of the whole Oregon System/direct primary/

388: 6422: 5192: 4753:

Redirect to talkdemonic. And high school athletes, unless they become notable as pros, aren't usually notable even if it was her.

3484: 2981:

don't know if I'd call it career so much as I have a lot of free time on my hands late at night and I thought I'd try my hand at

2519: 2302: 2268: 2056: 1106: 1065: 998: 799: 753: 316: 262: 6112: 5945:

Rather than just a parks navbox, it would be consistent with other metro areas to make a "Portland attractions" navbox. Though

2141:

in every case for the many Oregon stream articles I've worked on. I don't recall seeing the bigger one. Where is it being used?

5821: 5433: 2577: 214: 167: 6560:

I uploaded two "faithful reproductions" of paintings from circa 1793, by George Davidson, who sailed with Captain Gray on the

6623:

since that's a SCOTUS case, versus some district court case from New York that has precedential value only in that district.

5958: 5690:

and other such Rajneeshy things. I seem to recall he signed up with a different name originally; could that be something?? --

4053:

cardiovascular surgeon and pioneer, inventor of the Starr heart valve, who resides and practices in the Portland, Oregon area

3549:

I've never liked the portal links in the articles, period. I'm all for the portals, but links within the article really fail

2668: 2537:

For those working on Portland stuff, I have done some pruning and categorization on Commons of food-related media. I created

2471:

Steens but the map you just developed could be used for those places. It could be called Locator map Oregon SE or something.

1351: 550: 478: 5395: 2565:

Okay, there are now 15 decent photos in the main restaurants category, and seven each in the street food and cafes subcats.

5577: 3986: 2852:

Steven, with fact checking, I think the fact that they have a regular corrections area should speak for itself as to their

1940:

status." Or "Let's see if we can turn half of those "mid-importance" stubs into start class articles in the next 6 months."

1666: 1215: 1124: 3651: 2609:. I've got a three-day weekend, but I've already made too many other promises so if someone beats me to it, I won't mind. 1731:: They said we "tends to be the most active" of the projects they've recently highlighted, and noted our continued double 6430: 5424: 4030: 3872: 3370: 3257: 2711: 2106: 2096: 1578:

I looked to see if the non-preferred template could be deleted, but strangely there are two templates which reference it—

1172:

Thanks, I figured it was a disgruntled former student/employee and thought they would lose interest after a few months.

6450: 5028:

So I don't know how many people know the history of the Park Blocks in Portland. Steven Walling put up some tidbits on

3894: 3059: 2309:

that place the US map in a less awkward position. It is pretty much finished, so I can upload it if you'd like.

895: 472: 6610: 2723:

So, I'm posting here first to see what Oregonians think of an Oregon source before worrying about the RS noticeboard.

1917:

many of our lists have no importance. That seems odd. Did we make a decision at some point not to assess our lists? --

977:

It's about exactly the same, because I based it mainly off yours. :P As for the ISBNs, I used the ISBN-13s because of

5450:

Hopefully a video will come from the Ignite folks, but they *do* have 60 Ignites this week so it might take a while.

5442: 4257: 1746: 1259: 841: 47: 17: 2645:

Moved. It was created in both places, I generally bias towards the full name unless someone knows better. (see also

652:

So, I really like what you set up, and for its present purpose, I think having allllll those DYKs is perfectly fine.

5404: 4091: 3962: 3778: 2695: 1813: 1719: 1337: 5828:}}, that seem to be the same thing with a few minor differences. Is there a reason to have both, and if so why? -- 6171: 5367:@stevenwalling great job at #ip8. best way to a geek's heart is through their favorite free altruistic webipedia. 4990: 1848: 1468:

I like yours better. It doesn't make my ADD go haywire. In other words it's easier to read and better organized.

1358:. The Ballotpedia image mentions which states allow constitutional amendments through their initiative systems. 834: 353: 102: 6387:

rules. I'm more than willing to work with newbies that are willing to work with us (see the recent flair up at

5825: 3789:. Any disagreements on these? I'm fine with that, just marking where I intentionally didn't remove the portal. 3694:

One caveat with my argument, is the portal links on a rare occasion I think would pass LINKS, for instance on

3580:

Thank you one and all. I'll continue to apply my Swiffer mop to these links as I encounter them, and I'll use

3419: 6496:

But hey--progress? Maybe? The preview was meaty at least and was all I needed. Anybody else seen this yet? --

6383: 5687: 4885: 2546: 6113:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Oregon&action=historysubmit&diff=349494056&oldid=349152804

5858:

Wow, that first one is ugly. Yeah, time to be bold and just remove any uses of the first, then redirect it.

5649:. And yeah, the consensus was that someone needs to have made an edit in Oregon space in the past 12 months 5010: 3423: 645:

Ah, I see part of my confusion: I thought you were referring to the featured content section of our portal:

6040:

Personally, I've always been a little hesitant about the term "attraction" as it seems to brush up against

5522:

I support either or both changes! I also think you should post your Ignite Portland presentation there :) -

5023: 3227:

great, then you can have your separate notes section for Harvard style referencing (e.g. Johnson, p. 213.).

1352:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Initiatives_and_referenda_in_the_United_States#Types_of_initiatives_and_referendums

866: 736: 292: 250: 6657: 6480: 6013: 5991: 4775: 4465: 3921: 3479: 3049: 2514: 2263: 2138: 2110: 2027: 1673: 1101: 1060: 993: 794: 748: 591: 482: 3720:

Removed it from 10 too. Here are the ones I think should stay, out of the links currently near the top:

3615: 3421: 3417: 942: 6646: 6416: 5806: 5686:

Hmmm, I see Cirt on the never-edited-since-Eisenhower-died list, and I know he's made lots of edits on

5265: 5165: 5110: 5066: 4946: 4925: 4911: 4831: 4807: 4788: 4743: 4103: 3846: 3166: 3013: 2587: 1347: 1273: 632: 602: 533: 497: 210: 163: 38: 1865:

will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's

1538:

Great, thanks. I think I managed to sort out all the legislatively vs. popularly elected elections in

1011:

I checked and both versions of the isbn took me to the right page on Worldcat. I didn't check Amazon.

6537: 5922: 5888: 5833: 5815: 4179: 4108:

However, he has also written extensively on philosophical topics such as John Dewey, Kant and ethics.

3782: 3440: 1545: 888: 722: 3444: 3234:

properly reference a paragraph, I say cite every f'ing sentence (or close to it and not so much the

2946:

AM, I didn't realize that was you. Now your somewhat mystical words make a whole lot more sense. —

1779:

Mount Bailey quietly made GA on the 17th without any WP:ORE input! At least not lately. Congrats to

6641:. Not sure whatever happened there, but with you in the US, and the OHS in the US, you're fine. - 5560: 5019:

Only spent 3 years as an assistant basketball coach at Oregon. No other connection. No offense Tad.

2774: 658:

Also, it's interesting that the bot only caught one of our Featured Images. I wonder why that is? -

258: 6108: 3839:

Portals also help editors find related projects and things they can do to help improve Knowledge.

3636:

I'd suggest using an editsummary mentioning both overlink and WPORE consensus when removing them.

6577: 6102: 6063: 3868: 3753:

Went through and deportalized things (yeah, new word). I left the portal on the following pages:

1771: 883: 821: 731: 447: 6016:

so it's now using section headings which could be maintained as equivalents to navbox sections.

4078:

part of the band talkdemonic. She toured with The Decemberists for their Crane Wife tour. (stub)

2109:. I've thought for a long time that this map is just too tall to use in infoboxes and that that 107:

I'm leaving town, so I can't do it, but if anyone is celebrating by keeping an eye on the wiki,

3474: 2509: 2258: 1895:

articles are of a certain class. I've been hoping for this change for some time. Many thanks! -

1370: 1158:

Left welcome message and personal note on user page- surprised you hadn't done that, honestly.

1125: 1096: 1055: 988: 789: 743: 300: 232: 191: 1392:, etc.) then eventually someone will check for permission. I'm not sure how that's done, but 646: 572: 6642: 6628: 6444: 6396: 6322: 6255: 6228: 6204: 6139: 6090: 6052: 6047:

Regardless, thanks for bringing this up -- I'll look forward to further commentary on this. -

5802: 5570: 5551: 5527: 5305: 5158: 5106: 5062: 4942: 4921: 4907: 4875: 4827: 4803: 4784: 4739: 4501: 4429: 4296: 4020: 4005: 3970: 3711: 3571: 3443:

between Katr67, Aboutmovies, myself, and the IP, with only copy-pastes in reply from the IP.

3247: 3009: 2998: 2862: 2728: 2683: 2373: 1972: 1900: 1772: 1762: 1740: 1707: 1681: 1325: 1266: 1224:

is proposing a "Museum of the City". Based on Knowledge, but not on wikipedia. Hmm. Why does

1177: 1138: 776: 706: 692: 677: 663: 625: 595: 580: 562: 526: 515: 510:

That's very cool -- I'd love to do something along those lines. Thanks for pointing it out. -

490: 463: 416: 396: 206: 159: 108: 5466: 3350: 812:

Nifty! How does it compare to the version I use ('cos it's my favoritest citation evah)?...

594:

to see how the bot operates, as well as which content and optional parameters can be set. --

6426: 6159: 5918: 5884: 5829: 5537: 5377:

Great talk @StevenWalling! I hope you don't have to submit to the robot overlords too much.

5183:

Hi all- how do I properly format a NRHP reference? Is there a {{cite nrhp}} type template?

4780: 4410: 4225: 3860: 1453:

deaths and figuring out when actual popular elections started so I'll come back to that. --

151: 8: 6469: 5900: 5511: 5470: 5415:

File:Steven Walling other names for Wikipedians - Ignite Portland 8 - Portland Oregon.jpg

5331: 5278: 5242: 5199: 5140: 4677: 4512: 4404: 3809: 3685: 3589: 3406: 3354: 3179: 3120: 3024: 2822: 2761:

This is, at heart, a murky subject with little more than a few shades of gray separating

2624: 2566: 2554: 2188: 2146: 2066: 1891:

This is incredibly fantastic news! For the first time, we'll be able to directly explore

1692: 3451:, but it's disappointing that attempts to reach out have been met with little more than 2990: 1749:) for that!) For those who missed the initial interview, this item is a followup on the 1216:

http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2010/01/portland_state_prof_takes_on_a.html

672:

Pete, that's the only image that is tagged with the WPORE template, the others are not.

6680: 5366: 5356: 5343: 4870:(though the statement that he has over 100 published articles may be worth pursuing.) - 4867: 4609: 4481: 4247: 3677: 3673: 3581: 3394: 2985:. And career tends to imply payment, which is to say I earn as much there as I do here. 1732: 1445:); and of course, immediately discovered one had already been created but never used (: 972: 849: 254: 5386: 5381: 5352:

Very highly enjoyed @stevenwalling's talk on Knowledge. My favorite one so far toniht.

5351: 2062: 6501: 6352: 6120: 5849: 5764: 5695: 5631: 5227: 5178: 5029: 4998: 4963: 4854: 4667: 4420: 4141: 4065: 3951: 3890: 3786: 3774: 3770: 3703: 3699: 3139: 2951: 2920: 2793: 2716: 2358: 1922: 1838: 1646: 1607: 1553: 1458: 1431: 1401: 1381: 1300: 1291: 1287: 1249: 892: 878: 874: 838: 816: 723: 549:, right? Will the page remain empty until the bot comes along? Looks like the bot is 270: 182: 6546: 5376: 5371: 4726:

up for deletion? She's a musician, but she doesn't seem to be too notable for that.

1355: 249:

A complete list of wind farms would be useful even if some of the entries are not.

6669: 6624: 6569: 6517: 6458: 6392: 6388: 6318: 6251: 6224: 6219: 6200: 6135: 6130:

What, Vasquez didn't exist?! Dammit! I could have sworn that was an ancestor of my

6086: 6072: 6048: 6021: 6003: 5976: 5908: 5863: 5789: 5743: 5722: 5669: 5600: 5588: 5547: 5523: 5504: 5492: 5455: 5342:

was filled to capacity, with some of Portland's heavy nerdhitters in the audience-

5301: 5256: 5214: 5188: 5084: 5051: 4871: 4758: 4738:

but I don't know if that's the kind of thing we want to build an article around. -

4707: 4692: 4649: 4574: 4497: 4472: 4425: 4292: 4264: 4231: 4186: 4016: 4001: 3966: 3943: 3907: 3794: 3766: 3758: 3737: 3725: 3707: 3663: 3641: 3626: 3567: 3540: 3522: 3508: 3460: 3430: 3265: 3243: 3217: 3202: 3090: 2994: 2928: 2900: 2858: 2748: 2724: 2654: 2636: 2614: 2595: 2369: 2218: 2166: 2086: 2038: 1998: 1968: 1896: 1823: 1803: 1788: 1758: 1736: 1703: 1677: 1517: 1495: 1473: 1380:

That means that you can use their image, and modify it. But when you upload it to

1321: 1233: 1195: 1173: 1163: 1134: 1083: 1034: 1016: 960: 924: 910: 826: 772: 702: 688: 673: 659: 576: 558: 511: 459: 424: 392: 378: 360: 344: 329: 141: 116: 3300:

At the risk of stating the obvious, one possible solution would be the following:

2703: 6131: 5237:. Katr67 pointed me to the Oregon historic site database, which is really handy. 4955: 4846: 4602: 4567: 4397: 4335: 4082: 3550: 3153: 3114: 3108:

which contains the inline citation list plus possibly, a few general references.

2476: 2125: 1862: 1637: 1047:

Okay, I tried finding the OCLCs, but when I searched for the first edition I got

455: 201:

It's determined by news stories mostly. Wattage doesn't matter. It's up to the

6638: 5653:

an edit on Knowledge in the past 6 months. That is an overall inactivity- right?

5361: 5300:) not on the NRHP, but notable nonetheless. Even destroyed buildings are in it. 2993:

as she comes across as a little too opinionated/has an agenda. But's that's me.

2113:

would be more appropriate. I'm wondering if there is any support of the change.

440: 412: 370: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

6688: 6598: 6565: 6196: 6188: 6041: 5946: 5612: 5339: 5335: 5274: 5238: 4899: 4891: 4863: 4735:. If it's the same person, she's kind of notable for her HS basektball career, 4328: 4321: 4314: 4287: 4220: 3932: 3805: 3762: 3721: 3681: 3585: 3402: 3235: 3175: 3131: 3097: 3075: 2301:

I've been meaning to make a vector locator map for Oregon, similar to ones for

2184: 2142: 1780: 1221: 978: 451: 6493:

criteria. Eventually it asked me to log in to pay, which I politely declined.

6109:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Oregon&diff=prev&oldid=342339265

5576:

It certainly isn't ready to go, but I do have a preliminary report available:

5357:

Really enjoyed @stevenwalling 's #ip8 wikipedia talk. I am nerd, hear me roar!

4095:

former American football tight end who played in the National Football League.

2251:

link on basically any Oregon article to see Oregon highlighted within the US.

6613:(at the very end is a great set of quotes and explanation about this topic). 6184: 6034: 5995: 5950: 5234: 5033: 4816: 4723: 4623: 4595: 4556: 4524: 4477: 4243: 4238: 4149: 4074: 3554: 3448: 3390: 3386: 3382: 3335: 3170: 3161: 3157: 3071: 3055: 1880: 1540: 1487: 202: 5139:

Flanders) doesn't have an article, Bill Naito shouldn't have one either! ;)

687:

Ah ok, thanks. Here I was thinking it had something to do with categories. -

443:

of photos under a copyleft license! (Attribution/Share-alike, or CC-BY-SA).

6497: 6348: 6295: 6116: 5953:, I created a category/list/navbox trio for San Jose and Silicon Valley at 5845: 5760: 5691: 5627: 5061:

I hate trying to park downtown, and I'm not fond of the one way streets. -

4994: 4959: 4850: 4841: 4687:

I'm indenting those for you. That way we don't have to duplicate our work.

4663: 4518: 4449: 4349: 4272: 4215: 4210: 4200: 4158: 4057: 4049: 3947: 3729: 3398: 3374: 3135: 2989:(or regional) stuff. Which is fine by me, cause I don't think I'd cite the 2982: 2947: 2789: 2418: 2354: 2312: 1918: 1834: 1642: 1603: 1549: 1454: 1427: 1397: 1296: 1245: 1190:. The colleges especially seem to get enthusiasm on one side or the other. 266: 152: 5362:

Lots of well-deserved love for @stevenwalling and his funny Knowledge talk

5268:

is the general url. After I find what I want, I use the specific url like

6665: 6513: 6454: 6192: 6068: 6017: 5999: 5972: 5904: 5859: 5785: 5739: 5718: 5665: 5596: 5488: 5451: 5252: 5210: 5184: 5080: 5047: 4938: 4754: 4703: 4688: 4645: 4630: 4545: 4531: 4492: 4459: 4380: 4370: 4356: 4132: 4124: 4116: 3903: 3790: 3733: 3659: 3658:. Only about 60 articles right now, so it shouldn't be hard to clean up. 3637: 3622: 3558: 3536: 3518: 3504: 3456: 3426: 3378: 3261: 3213: 3198: 2924: 2896: 2744: 2707: 2650: 2632: 2610: 2591: 2214: 2162: 2082: 2034: 1994: 1819: 1799: 1784: 1513: 1491: 1469: 1229: 1191: 1159: 1079: 1030: 1012: 956: 920: 906: 420: 374: 356: 340: 325: 137: 112: 5372:@StevenWalling well done #ip8 talk. I welcome you and my robot ovelords. 2213:? I couldn't find one that is doing it now, but I did notice it before. 1853:

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the

5102: 5040: 4616: 4581: 4439: 4390: 3832: 2706:

I know that there is no disclaimer such as mentioned by footnote #4 at

2646: 2472: 2118: 6391:), but in general I guess I'm just getting grumpy in my Wiki-old age. 4000:. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. 3992:

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the

1586:. Both were created November 2008, and both those have links to it: 6684: 6594: 5016: 4538: 4307: 3825: 3096:

marker should be. I skipped back up to two years in the history of

6134:, I'd been planning on writing a Featured Article about the dude. - 5941:

Parks in Portland revisited: think bigger, like visitor attractions

4989:

Seems doubtful, and maybe not WP:OREworthy at all. He's not in the

4193: 3931:

Second, an article should not link to inward Knowledge content per

3452: 3331: 2674: 2253:

Is there a record for the most uses of 'Oregon' in one sentence? ;)

1876: 1486:

Whichever one you prefer, may as well delete the other. I mean, we

439:

Just noticed that the Democratic Party of Oregon has published its

2694:

to make sure the reporter had everything right. Which shows up in

1290:, as they should be. It makes little sense to tag them WP:ORE. 3831:

the portal, a subjective assessment. What would happen if mass

3754: 3695: 2698:

where if you see the comments you will see there was an error.

2248: 2209:

Is/was that why the bottom (?) edge of image is cut off in our

2078: 830: 411:

As a followup, I cranked through a TON of these. For instance,

5483:

to Steven's talk. And if you want to watch just one more, see

5101:

I got caught by the max guy once for not paying. Anyways, is

3082:

is for general references—that is, not inline citations—and a

1393: 6611:"making clear that copyright rewards originality, not effort" 6536:

Ha, I was going to say that some of the images on pages like

5656:

This log is an intermediate step, headed towards the goal of

4779:- It now has refs, but it might not pass an AfD. Discussion 3058:

editor adding zoo navigation templates caught my eye when he

181:

I was trying to create more articles about wind farms in the

5105:

the guy I'm thinking of, and he doesn't have an article!? -

1343: 952: 948: 5899:

Are you going to redirect the template and remove it from

3130:

So, how did the de facto style come about? Should either

2081:. But sure- maybe a dual COTW, one "good" and one "evil"? 1755:

Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost/2009-07-27/WikiProject report

1051:, each with a different OCLC! Which one is the right one? 5046:

This is why I edit on Knowledge- to preserve these gems.

4731:

The mentions are only in passing or about her band, like

3447:

is likely the same individual in a previous incarnation.

5209:

I thought there might be a specific one, like GNIS has.

4676:

I can commit to taking on Zusman, Jaquiss, and Parsons.

3123:

questions whether general references should be allowed;

3470:

with WPORE, so it's also kind of redundant. Sincerely,

1187: 1286:

I expect that the vast majority of media files are on

1092:

Added OCLCs; everything is working now... I think. :)

253:

might be a good place for a detailed list, similar to

3732:(maybe?). OTOH, the subregions may not it- thoughts? 785:

Great, thanks! I'll update the template accordingly.

419:, mostly buildings that were destroyed 30 years ago. 6528:

Uploading images to The Commons under the PD-Art tag

5664:

who doesn't like it, but what can we do about that?

3996:. I have found some concerns which you can see at 485:

to create a "Wall of Recognized Content" similar to

6662:

File:Mount Rainer by Clevelan S. Rockwell, 1891.jpg

6246:with policy. Now, what you suggest is, but that is 1441:

So I started a new template for Senate elections (:

1354:is a good one, but there is a more detailed one at 136:Watching, left a personal message for the IP, etc. 5414: 5387:Yay! @stevenwalling is killing it about wikipedia 4866:-- Nothing stated in the article text would pass 3531:You're off about the number of articles we have- 3256:AM- can you join the discussion on references at 2778:chances of reproducing—to use a Dilbert metaphor. 1443:Template:United States Senate elections in Oregon 1356:http://ballotpedia.org/index.php/File:IR_map1.png 947:One more suggestion--for the older editions (pre- 5988:Category:Visitor attractions in Portland, Oregon 5382:@StevenWalling Rocked at #ip8! Great job Steven. 4993:as claimed, and I can't link him to Tualatin. -- 873: 5079:I don't own a car. I know Katr doesn't either. 3393:; in the case of Abiqua Creek, the link was to 1691:Thanks for the note Pete, we're happy to help. 5955:Category:Visitor attractions in Silicon Valley 295:. I'll expand it later when I get the chance. 177:Question about wind farm notability/thresholds 6616:Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service 6453:? I'm overwhelmed trying to sort through it. 6250:what I suggested with my last two sentences. 3998:Talk:Willamette University College of Law/GA1 3285:(Outdent) Katr above said (21:02 on 13 Feb): 2533:Work to do on Commons for Portland task force 1210:Knowledge model, Portland, Museum of the City 5326:Steven Walling Ignite Portland 8 placeholder 3698:. Or any really broad Oregon topic, such as 446:I've uploaded a few to Commons -- photos of 3373:, added Portal links today to two streams, 3258:User talk:Materialscientist#overreferencing 1596:Template:Oregon U.S. Presidential elections 1580:Template:Oregon U.S. Presidential elections 3928:gives no advice about linking to a portal. 3849:, of a total of 544 portals on Knowledge. 1412:new, but apparently not original, template 5542:Our beloved (sorry, I can be non-neutral 5412: 3535:says 9141 articles as of four hours ago. 3349:Just want to point out my recent comment 3127:articles are the major counterargument.) 3070:on several articles. When I pointed out 2023:Re: Lists: When we as a project revamped 1344:http://en.wikipedia.org/File:I%26rmap.JPG 3824:Please read official Portal guidelines: 1753:interview with several of us last July: 815: 729:I just created this template for citing 6189:soapbox for all the causes in the world 5966:San Jose and Silicon Valley attractions 1188:my obligatory school-related xkcd comic 649:But, now I see this is a separate page. 322:These images at the Library of Congress 263:List of wind farms in the United States 14: 6487:Check out the article I was looking at 5198:I would just use {{cite web}} myself. 4769:Possible AfD/redirect/merge candidates 4476:, already has a couple of references - 2549:, but for food, since categories like 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 6347:Nice updates to the articles Pete! -- 5959:List of attractions in Silicon Valley 5251:What OR site database would that be? 4802:- Some other user took care of it. - 4070:son the education he was entitled to. 3987:Willamette University College of Law 3230:As to how many cites does it take to 1600:Template:Oregon U.S. Senate elections 1588:Template:Oregon U.S. Senate elections 1512:No, but apparently your OCD does. ;) 1447:Template:Oregon U.S. Senate elections 1362:an email to the address on the page ( 1342:Hello, I have a question. The image ( 1029:been three years since the switch... 158:I guess he's running for governor. - 5778: 5578:User:TedderBot/OreBot/MemberActivity 4120:former Major League Baseball player. 1592:Template:Oregon U.S. House elections 1584:Template:Oregon U.S. House elections 25: 6547:Commons: When to use the PD-Art tag 3963:as in please don't add a second one 2107:File:Oregon Locator Map with US.PNG 23: 6451:Al Kennedy Alternative High School 6294:We generally encourage newbies to 3895:Knowledge:Self-references to avoid 3232:get to the center of a Tootsie Pop 2627:? He's far better known that way. 1426:At least I think it's resolved. — 435:Yeehaw, photos of Democratic pols! 24: 6710: 4890:The following articles have been 4258:Peter_Buckley_(Oregon_politician) 4242:, only 3-term mayor of Seattle -- 3074:he pointed out that MOS leads to 1783:--we should give him a barnstar! 18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Oregon 6150:Oregons Vernonia School district 5874: 5779: 5441: 5432: 5423: 5403: 5394: 4092:James_Whalen_(American_football) 3897:seems entirely appropriate here. 3820:Official Knowledge Portal Policy 3779:Index of Oregon-related articles 3345:Change to Oregon company article 3156:and the debates and examples at 2553:are also bereft of good photos. 2103:Template:Location map USA Oregon 1417: 1149: 391:with the correct copyright tag. 127: 29: 6489:to make sure I'm not dreaming. 4991:Indiana Basketball Hall of Fame 2704:information (slight COI notice) 2543:Street food in Portland, Oregon 2539:Restaurants in Portland, Oregon 2419: 2313: 2243:I agree that the taller one is 2057:What are we doing for the 14th? 1724:We were mentioned again in the 835:Oregon Historical Society Press 571:p.s. I'm a little confused, as 369:I accidentally stumbled across 317:Are these public-domain images? 2847:this guy's autobiography aside 2623:Could you move the article to 2582:Not from dead Oregonians, but 2578:Dead Oregon people help needed 647:Oregon portal#Featured content 575:still shows the old content. - 573:Oregon portal#Featured content 389:This is a more complete upload 13: 1: 6384:Academy of Arts and Academics 6107:Wow, how'd we miss this one? 5822:Current Oregon State Senators 5003:19:53, 12 February 2010 (UTC) 4968:22:14, 16 February 2010 (UTC) 4951:01:56, 17 February 2010 (UTC) 4916:05:09, 24 February 2010 (UTC) 4880:04:02, 17 February 2010 (UTC) 4859:22:16, 16 February 2010 (UTC) 4836:01:47, 17 February 2010 (UTC) 4812:05:01, 20 February 2010 (UTC) 4793:22:52, 21 February 2010 (UTC) 4763:13:52, 12 February 2010 (UTC) 4748:04:16, 12 February 2010 (UTC) 4712:23:43, 10 February 2010 (UTC) 4697:22:29, 10 February 2010 (UTC) 4683:22:16, 10 February 2010 (UTC) 4672:21:29, 10 February 2010 (UTC) 4654:21:24, 10 February 2010 (UTC) 4252:01:28, 18 February 2010 (UTC) 4025:07:19, 26 February 2010 (UTC) 4010:15:21, 19 February 2010 (UTC) 3975:08:10, 19 February 2010 (UTC) 3956:04:24, 19 February 2010 (UTC) 3912:04:03, 19 February 2010 (UTC) 3877:03:43, 19 February 2010 (UTC) 3814:02:45, 10 February 2010 (UTC) 3799:01:41, 10 February 2010 (UTC) 3475: 3360:00:56, 16 February 2010 (UTC) 3340:04:23, 15 February 2010 (UTC) 3270:15:17, 14 February 2010 (UTC) 3252:08:35, 14 February 2010 (UTC) 3222:21:02, 13 February 2010 (UTC) 3207:20:52, 13 February 2010 (UTC) 3184:19:53, 13 February 2010 (UTC) 3144:17:56, 13 February 2010 (UTC) 3111:Somewhat related is that the 3030:05:46, 12 February 2010 (UTC) 3018:03:00, 12 February 2010 (UTC) 3003:22:41, 11 February 2010 (UTC) 2956:21:43, 11 February 2010 (UTC) 2933:21:38, 11 February 2010 (UTC) 2905:21:31, 11 February 2010 (UTC) 2867:21:17, 11 February 2010 (UTC) 2828:20:51, 11 February 2010 (UTC) 2798:20:12, 11 February 2010 (UTC) 2753:19:29, 11 February 2010 (UTC) 2733:18:50, 11 February 2010 (UTC) 2669:Oregonian, OregonLive, and RS 2659:06:39, 11 February 2010 (UTC) 2641:06:09, 11 February 2010 (UTC) 2619:05:52, 11 February 2010 (UTC) 2600:05:25, 11 February 2010 (UTC) 2572:05:48, 12 February 2010 (UTC) 2528:01:31, 10 February 2010 (UTC) 2510: 2481:01:23, 10 February 2010 (UTC) 2259: 1097: 1056: 989: 887:(7th ed.). Portland, Oregon: 790: 744: 401:05:40, 22 December 2009 (UTC) 383:02:22, 22 December 2009 (UTC) 365:02:02, 22 December 2009 (UTC) 349:02:00, 22 December 2009 (UTC) 334:01:16, 22 December 2009 (UTC) 305:05:49, 27 December 2009 (UTC) 275:04:45, 27 December 2009 (UTC) 237:04:22, 27 December 2009 (UTC) 219:03:48, 27 December 2009 (UTC) 196:03:16, 27 December 2009 (UTC) 172:23:54, 25 December 2009 (UTC) 146:22:34, 25 December 2009 (UTC) 121:19:52, 25 December 2009 (UTC) 5986:And with a quick look I see 5288:find info for buildings (or 4845:: Musician, redir/merge to 3742:20:33, 5 February 2010 (UTC) 3716:20:24, 5 February 2010 (UTC) 3690:19:19, 5 February 2010 (UTC) 3668:18:56, 5 February 2010 (UTC) 3646:18:32, 5 February 2010 (UTC) 3631:18:26, 5 February 2010 (UTC) 3594:17:59, 5 February 2010 (UTC) 3576:08:47, 5 February 2010 (UTC) 3545:04:14, 5 February 2010 (UTC) 3527:03:59, 5 February 2010 (UTC) 3513:03:57, 5 February 2010 (UTC) 3493:03:38, 5 February 2010 (UTC) 3485: 3465:03:21, 5 February 2010 (UTC) 3435:03:06, 5 February 2010 (UTC) 3411:02:50, 5 February 2010 (UTC) 3293:read the entire book, etc.). 2560:22:16, 4 February 2010 (UTC) 2520: 2430:22:54, 9 February 2010 (UTC) 2378:21:45, 9 February 2010 (UTC) 2363:17:47, 9 February 2010 (UTC) 2324:16:19, 9 February 2010 (UTC) 2277:15:19, 9 February 2010 (UTC) 2269: 2223:06:55, 9 February 2010 (UTC) 2193:04:58, 9 February 2010 (UTC) 2171:03:59, 9 February 2010 (UTC) 2151:03:53, 9 February 2010 (UTC) 2132:02:21, 9 February 2010 (UTC) 2091:22:28, 5 February 2010 (UTC) 2072:22:26, 5 February 2010 (UTC) 2043:18:46, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 2003:18:23, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 1977:18:20, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 1927:18:01, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 1905:17:53, 29 January 2010 (UTC) 1886:03:44, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 1843:08:15, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 1828:07:40, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 1808:03:10, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 1793:02:35, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 1767:23:00, 20 January 2010 (UTC) 1712:20:02, 15 January 2010 (UTC) 1698:06:53, 15 January 2010 (UTC) 1686:06:14, 15 January 2010 (UTC) 1667:School/outreach opportunity? 1651:06:37, 12 January 2010 (UTC) 1612:06:00, 12 January 2010 (UTC) 1558:03:44, 12 January 2010 (UTC) 1522:03:29, 12 January 2010 (UTC) 1500:03:22, 12 January 2010 (UTC) 1478:21:03, 11 January 2010 (UTC) 1463:20:34, 11 January 2010 (UTC) 1436:07:36, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 1406:07:44, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 1330:08:09, 12 January 2010 (UTC) 1320:if they are "free" content. 1305:06:13, 12 January 2010 (UTC) 1281:05:05, 12 January 2010 (UTC) 1254:17:53, 12 January 2010 (UTC) 1238:03:21, 12 January 2010 (UTC) 1107: 1066: 999: 800: 754: 686:</me smacks forehead: --> 293:List of wind farms in Oregon 251:List of wind farms in Oregon 203:general notability guideline 7: 6658:File:E.R. Jackman, 1948.jpg 6014:Tourism in Portland, Oregon 5992:Tourism in Portland, Oregon 5820:There are two templates, {{ 4776:Sandra_K._(Fischer)_Ellston 4031:unreferenced BLPs in Oregon 3844:{{Featured portals number}} 3826:Knowledge Portal Guidelines 3480: 3240:Almanac of American History 2515: 2264: 2139:File:Oregon Locator Map.PNG 2111:File:Oregon Locator Map.PNG 2097:Current Oregon location map 1726:most recent edition of the 1674:User:Charles Jeffrey Danoff 1375:02:51, 9 January 2010 (UTC) 1200:22:41, 7 January 2010 (UTC) 1182:22:32, 7 January 2010 (UTC) 1168:22:06, 7 January 2010 (UTC) 1143:21:58, 7 January 2010 (UTC) 1115:02:32, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 1102: 1088:00:57, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 1074:00:34, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 1061: 1039:00:27, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 1021:00:23, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 1007:00:11, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 994: 965:00:06, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 929:00:02, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 915:00:00, 5 January 2010 (UTC) 808:23:51, 4 January 2010 (UTC) 795: 781:23:47, 4 January 2010 (UTC) 762:23:41, 4 January 2010 (UTC) 749: 711:08:04, 7 January 2010 (UTC) 697:07:52, 7 January 2010 (UTC) 682:07:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC) 668:07:13, 7 January 2010 (UTC) 640:00:25, 6 January 2010 (UTC) 610:21:50, 3 January 2010 (UTC) 585:19:20, 3 January 2010 (UTC) 567:19:16, 3 January 2010 (UTC) 553:, which isn't long to wait. 541:18:58, 3 January 2010 (UTC) 520:22:58, 2 January 2010 (UTC) 505:20:26, 2 January 2010 (UTC) 468:19:55, 2 January 2010 (UTC) 458:. Feel free to join me :) - 429:05:40, 2 January 2010 (UTC) 10: 6715: 6693:09:20, 27 March 2010 (UTC) 6674:01:56, 23 March 2010 (UTC) 6651:23:28, 22 March 2010 (UTC) 6633:11:42, 22 March 2010 (UTC) 6603:10:09, 22 March 2010 (UTC) 6570:Columbia's Winter Quarters 6522:00:16, 25 March 2010 (UTC) 6506:00:11, 25 March 2010 (UTC) 6475:18:50, 18 March 2010 (UTC) 6463:17:38, 18 March 2010 (UTC) 6439:06:30, 17 March 2010 (UTC) 6401:09:03, 14 March 2010 (UTC) 6357:05:15, 14 March 2010 (UTC) 6327:04:02, 14 March 2010 (UTC) 6260:23:20, 12 March 2010 (UTC) 6233:17:18, 12 March 2010 (UTC) 6209:18:02, 11 March 2010 (UTC) 6176:17:29, 11 March 2010 (UTC) 6144:04:04, 14 March 2010 (UTC) 6125:21:44, 12 March 2010 (UTC) 6095:04:08, 14 March 2010 (UTC) 6012:I've made some updates to 5927:06:32, 12 March 2010 (UTC) 5913:01:57, 12 March 2010 (UTC) 5893:01:52, 12 March 2010 (UTC) 5872: 5868:01:35, 12 March 2010 (UTC) 5854:01:14, 12 March 2010 (UTC) 5838:00:50, 12 March 2010 (UTC) 5811:07:24, 12 March 2010 (UTC) 5794:18:00, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 5769:17:42, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 5748:03:55, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 5727:00:54, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 5700:00:43, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 5674:00:23, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 5636:00:11, 10 March 2010 (UTC) 5485:this talk from caseorganic 4104:Mark_Johnson_(philosopher) 3365:Portal links in "See also" 3167:Upper and Lower Table Rock 2647:Hugh Harrison Hurt, Junior 2588:William Christmas Knighton 2079:Worst Day of the Year Ride 1859:Saturday, January 23, 2010 1415: 1348:Direct democracy in Oregon 473:Wall of Recognized Content 6538:Robert Gray (sea captain) 6077:06:19, 9 March 2010 (UTC) 6057:02:37, 9 March 2010 (UTC) 6026:04:23, 8 March 2010 (UTC) 6008:01:45, 8 March 2010 (UTC) 5981:01:36, 8 March 2010 (UTC) 5605:22:49, 9 March 2010 (UTC) 5556:01:16, 8 March 2010 (UTC) 5532:01:16, 8 March 2010 (UTC) 5517:07:01, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 5497:01:10, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 5476:01:02, 5 March 2010 (UTC) 5460:05:01, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 5310:07:27, 7 March 2010 (UTC) 5283:04:24, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 5261:04:06, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 5247:03:11, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 5219:00:24, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 5205:00:01, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 5193:00:00, 4 March 2010 (UTC) 5173:15:41, 2 March 2010 (UTC) 5146:06:54, 2 March 2010 (UTC) 5115:06:30, 2 March 2010 (UTC) 5089:06:22, 2 March 2010 (UTC) 5071:06:03, 2 March 2010 (UTC) 5056:05:45, 2 March 2010 (UTC) 4930:00:19, 2 March 2010 (UTC) 4180:Brian_Hunter_(outfielder) 3783:Outline of Oregon history 3449:Not all the edits are bad 3369:An an unregistered user, 2551:Cafés in Portland, Oregon 1733:collaboration of the week 1548:as it relates to that. -- 1546:Direct Legislation League 1260:WikiProject Oregon images 984:After ec: Okay, will do. 889:Oregon Historical Society 481:should use the automated 479:the featured content page 5658:overall world domination 5567:we had a long discussion 4015:Taken care of and kept. 3441:these weird interchanges 2101:The current map used by 2077:I'm moto-supporting the 1855:WP 1.0 assessment system 1814:time for auto-archiving? 1720:Kudos from the Signpost! 1338:Question about image use 551:set to update once a day 259:List of shoals of Oregon 6183:While sad, that is not 6085:Oops -- sorry Ikluft! - 6064:DARPA Network Challenge 4903:- Doesn't look notable. 2712:a professional standard 2692:checked on this article 1871:WP 1.0 project homepage 1849:WP 1.0 bot announcement 884:Oregon Geographic Names 822:Oregon Geographic Names 732:Oregon Geographic Names 448:Mary Nolan (politician) 103:Merry vandalism/POV/??? 4466:Eduardo González Viaña 4268:(could still use more) 3842:At present, there are 2629:Here's a Google search 1735:series. (Big kudos to 1126:University of Portland 1049:four different results 6449:Can someone clean up 6197:neutral point of view 6185:What Knowledge is for 5826:Oregon State Senators 5571:User:TedderBot/OreBot 4892:proposed for deletion 3086:section is where the 2160:And the survey says.. 767:Good work! I think I 417:Chemawa Indian School 109:Cottage Grove, Oregon 42:of past discussions. 6566:Columbia in a Squall 5591:hasn't abandoned us 5294:some A&W statues 5024:semi-inspiring quote 4973:George_Webb_Sweigert 4411:Matt_Johnson_(actor) 4226:Paul_Wright_(singer) 3985:GA reassessmnet of 2991:Forest Grove person, 2921:the footnote of WP:V 2682:OregonLive content? 1396:is the key to it. — 413:I uploaded 46 images 6481:OregonLive archive? 5901:Oregon State Senate 5332:User:Steven Walling 5011:Removed from WP:ORE 4513:Jim_Warren_(artist) 4405:Nina_Kiriki_Hoffman 3994:GA Sweeps process 3652:here's the list of 3381:, and two cities, 3050:References v. Notes 2696:this Oregonian blog 2625:William C. Knighton 2547:Knowledge Loves Art 771:to your question… - 6681:maritime fur trade 6417:Olney Grade School 6187:, as we are not a 5133:George H. Flanders 4610:Barbara_Coombs_Lee 3656:with Portal:Oregon 3395:Portal:Environment 3311:{{cn}}<ref: --> 2028:WikiProject Oregon 1967:just all crufty. - 1798:Which I just did. 1728:Knowledge Signpost 951:) you can put the 879:McArthur, Lewis L. 875:McArthur, Lewis A. 857:Unknown parameter 817:McArthur, Lewis A. 291:Good idea. I made 255:Lost Lake (Oregon) 6578:Permission to Use 6543:Columbia Rediviva 6429:comment added by 6317:don't do that." - 6195:and abiding by a 6179: 6162:comment added by 5917:Has been done. -- 5816:Template question 5565:Hi- a while ago, 5336:Ignite Portland 8 5030:South Park Blocks 4641: 4640: 4421:Jodi_Ann_Paterson 4142:William_McCormick 4066:Debra_M._Ginsberg 3880: 3863:comment added by 3787:Outline of Oregon 3775:History of Oregon 3771:Oregon State Seal 3704:Economy of Oregon 3700:History of Oregon 3533:our little helper 2717:Statesman Journal 2586:dead Oregonians. 2254: 1884: 976: 724:Template:Cite OGN 545:I take it that's 183:Pacific Northwest 100: 99: 54: 53: 48:current talk page 6706: 6643:Peregrine Fisher 6472: 6441: 6389:Mary Ramsey Wood 6220:Vernonia, Oregon 6178: 6156: 5970: 5964: 5895: 5878: 5877: 5803:Peregrine Fisher 5784: 5783: 5782: 5561:MemberBot status 5514: 5473: 5445: 5436: 5427: 5418: 5416: 5407: 5398: 5330:So Oregon's own 5232: 5226: 5202: 5168: 5161: 5160:Another Believer 5143: 5107:Peregrine Fisher 5063:Peregrine Fisher 4943:Peregrine Fisher 4922:Peregrine Fisher 4908:Peregrine Fisher 4828:Peregrine Fisher 4804:Peregrine Fisher 4785:Peregrine Fisher 4740:Peregrine Fisher 4680: 4575:Terry_Dischinger 4473:Robert_Sylwester 4265:Christine_Becker 4232:Todd_Christensen 4187:Ferrin_Barr,_Jr. 4040:Extended content 4036: 4035: 3879: 3857: 3847:featured portals 3767:Oregon Territory 3759:Portland, Oregon 3726:Oregon Territory 3619: 3489: 3487: 3482: 3477: 3357: 3118: 3095: 3089: 3078:which says that 3066:section name to 3027: 3010:Peregrine Fisher 2825: 2771:How wrong is it? 2569: 2557: 2524: 2522: 2517: 2512: 2428: 2425: 2423: 2322: 2319: 2317: 2273: 2271: 2266: 2261: 2252: 2211:county templates 2129: 2123: 2069: 2032: 2026: 1874: 1695: 1438: 1421: 1420: 1319: 1313: 1276: 1269: 1268:Another Believer 1157: 1153: 1152: 1111: 1109: 1104: 1099: 1070: 1068: 1063: 1058: 1003: 1001: 996: 991: 970: 946: 901: 870: 864: 860: 855: 853: 845: 804: 802: 797: 792: 769:found the answer 758: 756: 751: 746: 635: 628: 627:Another Believer 605: 598: 597:Another Believer 536: 529: 528:Another Believer 500: 493: 492:Another Believer 261:. There's also 227:Got it. Thanks! 207:Peregrine Fisher 160:Peregrine Fisher 135: 131: 130: 78: 56: 55: 33: 32: 26: 6714: 6713: 6709: 6708: 6707: 6705: 6704: 6703: 6530: 6483: 6470: 6447: 6424: 6419: 6157: 6152: 6105: 6103:Vasquez de Gama 5968: 5962: 5943: 5919:Brian Halvorsen 5896: 5885:Brian Halvorsen 5882: 5880: 5875: 5830:Brian Halvorsen 5818: 5780: 5563: 5540: 5512: 5507: 5471: 5446: 5437: 5428: 5419: 5408: 5399: 5328: 5230: 5224: 5200: 5181: 5171: 5166: 5159: 5141: 5026: 5013: 4978:Notable enough? 4956:Josiah_Phillips 4888: 4847:The Shaky Hands 4771: 4678: 4642: 4603:Barrett_Tillman 4568:Lolita_Ritmanis 4398:Raymond_F._Rees 4336:Alberto_Salazar 4083:Edward_John_Ray 4041: 4033: 3990: 3858: 3822: 3613: 3564:Portal:Nautical 3473: 3367: 3355: 3347: 3112: 3093: 3087: 3052: 3025: 2823: 2671: 2580: 2567: 2555: 2541:and the subcat 2535: 2508: 2426: 2416: 2320: 2310: 2257: 2126: 2119: 2099: 2067: 2059: 2030: 2024: 1851: 1816: 1777: 1722: 1693: 1669: 1638:User:Lestatdelc 1439: 1425: 1423: 1418: 1414: 1340: 1317: 1311: 1279: 1274: 1267: 1262: 1212: 1150: 1148: 1130: 1095: 1054: 987: 940: 898: 862: 858: 856: 847: 846: 788: 742: 727: 638: 633: 626: 608: 603: 596: 539: 534: 527: 503: 498: 491: 475: 456:Greg Macpherson 437: 319: 179: 156: 128: 126: 105: 74: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 6712: 6702: 6701: 6700: 6699: 6698: 6697: 6696: 6695: 6639:legal brouhaha 6529: 6526: 6525: 6524: 6482: 6479: 6478: 6477: 6471:Steven Walling 6446: 6443: 6418: 6415: 6414: 6413: 6412: 6411: 6410: 6409: 6408: 6407: 6406: 6405: 6404: 6403: 6368: 6367: 6366: 6365: 6364: 6363: 6362: 6361: 6360: 6359: 6336: 6335: 6334: 6333: 6332: 6331: 6330: 6329: 6307: 6306: 6305: 6304: 6303: 6302: 6301: 6300: 6285: 6284: 6283: 6282: 6281: 6280: 6279: 6278: 6267: 6266: 6265: 6264: 6263: 6262: 6238: 6237: 6236: 6235: 6212: 6211: 6151: 6148: 6147: 6146: 6104: 6101: 6100: 6099: 6098: 6097: 6080: 6079: 6031: 6030: 6029: 6028: 5942: 5939: 5938: 5937: 5936: 5935: 5934: 5933: 5932: 5931: 5930: 5929: 5873: 5817: 5814: 5799: 5798: 5797: 5796: 5772: 5771: 5755: 5754: 5736: 5735: 5734: 5733: 5732: 5731: 5730: 5729: 5707: 5706: 5705: 5704: 5703: 5702: 5679: 5678: 5677: 5676: 5654: 5639: 5638: 5623: 5622: 5617: 5616: 5613:flux capacitor 5593:like we feared 5562: 5559: 5539: 5536: 5535: 5534: 5513:Steven Walling 5506: 5503: 5502: 5501: 5500: 5499: 5472:Steven Walling 5448: 5447: 5440: 5438: 5431: 5429: 5422: 5420: 5411: 5409: 5402: 5400: 5393: 5390: 5389: 5384: 5379: 5374: 5369: 5364: 5359: 5354: 5340:Bagdad Theater 5327: 5324: 5323: 5322: 5321: 5320: 5319: 5318: 5317: 5316: 5315: 5314: 5313: 5312: 5201:Steven Walling 5180: 5177: 5176: 5175: 5163: 5154: 5153: 5152: 5151: 5150: 5149: 5148: 5142:Steven Walling 5122: 5121: 5120: 5119: 5118: 5117: 5094: 5093: 5092: 5091: 5074: 5073: 5025: 5022: 5021: 5020: 5012: 5009: 5008: 5007: 5006: 5005: 4984: 4983: 4970: 4953: 4935: 4934: 4933: 4932: 4900:Olga Volchkova 4887: 4884: 4883: 4882: 4864:Lewis_Goldberg 4861: 4838: 4814: 4795: 4770: 4767: 4766: 4765: 4720: 4719: 4718: 4717: 4716: 4715: 4679:Steven Walling 4674: 4639: 4638: 4635: 4634: 4627: 4620: 4613: 4606: 4599: 4592: 4585: 4578: 4571: 4563: 4562: 4561: 4560: 4550: 4549: 4542: 4535: 4528: 4521: 4516: 4508: 4507: 4506: 4505: 4486: 4485: 4469: 4462: 4456: 4455: 4454: 4453: 4443: 4442: 4436: 4435: 4434: 4433: 4414: 4413: 4408: 4401: 4394: 4386: 4385: 4384: 4383: 4375: 4374: 4367: 4360: 4353: 4346: 4339: 4332: 4329:Cheryl_Strayed 4325: 4322:Jonathan_Stark 4318: 4315:Barrie_Gilbert 4311: 4303: 4302: 4301: 4300: 4288:James_Rassmann 4279: 4276: 4269: 4261: 4254: 4235: 4228: 4223: 4221:Leland_M._Roth 4218: 4213: 4206: 4197: 4190: 4183: 4175: 4174: 4173: 4172: 4170:Shauna_Parsons 4164: 4163: 4155: 4146: 4138: 4129: 4121: 4112: 4111: 4110: 4109: 4097: 4096: 4088: 4079: 4071: 4062: 4054: 4043: 4042: 4039: 4034: 4032: 4029: 4028: 4027: 3989: 3983: 3982: 3981: 3980: 3979: 3978: 3977: 3944:no advertising 3940: 3936: 3929: 3920:First of all, 3915: 3914: 3899: 3898: 3821: 3818: 3817: 3816: 3763:Flag of Oregon 3751: 3750: 3749: 3748: 3747: 3746: 3745: 3744: 3722:Flag of Oregon 3648: 3611: 3610: 3609: 3608: 3607: 3606: 3605: 3604: 3603: 3602: 3601: 3600: 3599: 3598: 3597: 3596: 3366: 3363: 3356:Steven Walling 3346: 3343: 3328: 3327: 3326: 3325: 3319: 3315: 3308: 3298: 3297: 3296: 3295: 3283: 3282: 3281: 3280: 3279: 3278: 3277: 3276: 3275: 3274: 3273: 3272: 3228: 3189: 3188: 3187: 3186: 3160:as well as on 3051: 3048: 3047: 3046: 3045: 3044: 3043: 3042: 3041: 3040: 3039: 3038: 3037: 3036: 3035: 3034: 3033: 3032: 3026:Steven Walling 2986: 2967: 2966: 2965: 2964: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2960: 2959: 2958: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2913: 2912: 2911: 2910: 2909: 2908: 2907: 2876: 2875: 2874: 2873: 2872: 2871: 2870: 2869: 2850: 2835: 2834: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2824:Steven Walling 2809: 2808: 2807: 2806: 2805: 2804: 2782: 2781: 2780: 2779: 2756: 2755: 2684:WP:SELFPUBLISH 2670: 2667: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2579: 2576: 2575: 2574: 2568:Steven Walling 2556:Steven Walling 2534: 2531: 2502: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2492: 2491: 2490: 2489: 2488: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2484: 2483: 2449: 2448: 2447: 2446: 2445: 2444: 2443: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2439: 2438: 2437: 2436: 2435: 2434: 2433: 2432: 2395: 2394: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2380: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2288: 2287: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2200: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2195: 2176: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2154: 2153: 2098: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2068:Steven Walling 2058: 2055: 2054: 2053: 2052: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2045: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2005: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1959: 1958: 1957: 1956: 1955: 1954: 1946: 1945: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1932: 1931: 1930: 1929: 1908: 1907: 1850: 1847: 1846: 1845: 1815: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1776: 1770: 1721: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1694:Steven Walling 1668: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1654: 1653: 1636:It looks like 1623: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1567: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1560: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1524: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1481: 1480: 1416: 1413: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1339: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1332: 1271: 1261: 1258: 1257: 1256: 1228:come to mind? 1219: 1218: 1211: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1203: 1202: 1129: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1117: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1041: 982: 938: 937: 936: 935: 934: 933: 932: 931: 904: 903: 902: 897:978-0875952772 896: 871: 726: 721: 720: 719: 718: 717: 716: 715: 714: 713: 656: 653: 650: 630: 624:to display. -- 621: 620: 619: 618: 617: 616: 615: 614: 613: 612: 600: 554: 531: 495: 474: 471: 452:Richard Devlin 436: 433: 432: 431: 409: 408: 407: 406: 405: 404: 403: 318: 315: 314: 313: 312: 311: 310: 309: 308: 307: 282: 281: 280: 279: 278: 277: 242: 241: 240: 239: 222: 221: 178: 175: 155: 150: 149: 148: 104: 101: 98: 97: 92: 89: 84: 79: 72: 67: 62: 52: 51: 34: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 6711: 6694: 6690: 6686: 6682: 6677: 6676: 6675: 6671: 6667: 6663: 6659: 6654: 6653: 6652: 6648: 6644: 6640: 6636: 6635: 6634: 6630: 6626: 6622: 6618: 6617: 6612: 6607: 6606: 6605: 6604: 6600: 6596: 6590: 6588: 6582: 6579: 6573: 6571: 6567: 6563: 6558: 6554: 6550: 6548: 6544: 6539: 6534: 6523: 6519: 6515: 6510: 6509: 6508: 6507: 6503: 6499: 6494: 6490: 6488: 6476: 6473: 6467: 6466: 6465: 6464: 6460: 6456: 6452: 6445:plea for help 6442: 6440: 6436: 6432: 6431:66.58.179.132 6428: 6423: 6402: 6398: 6394: 6390: 6385: 6380: 6379: 6378: 6377: 6376: 6375: 6374: 6373: 6372: 6371: 6370: 6369: 6358: 6354: 6350: 6346: 6345: 6344: 6343: 6342: 6341: 6340: 6339: 6338: 6337: 6328: 6324: 6320: 6315: 6314: 6313: 6312: 6311: 6310: 6309: 6308: 6297: 6293: 6292: 6291: 6290: 6289: 6288: 6287: 6286: 6275: 6274: 6273: 6272: 6271: 6270: 6269: 6268: 6261: 6257: 6253: 6249: 6244: 6243: 6242: 6241: 6240: 6239: 6234: 6230: 6226: 6221: 6216: 6215: 6214: 6213: 6210: 6206: 6202: 6198: 6194: 6190: 6186: 6182: 6181: 6180: 6177: 6173: 6169: 6165: 6161: 6145: 6141: 6137: 6133: 6129: 6128: 6127: 6126: 6122: 6118: 6115:. Oh well. -- 6114: 6110: 6096: 6092: 6088: 6084: 6083: 6082: 6081: 6078: 6074: 6070: 6065: 6061: 6060: 6059: 6058: 6054: 6050: 6045: 6043: 6038: 6036: 6027: 6023: 6019: 6015: 6011: 6010: 6009: 6005: 6001: 5997: 5993: 5989: 5985: 5984: 5983: 5982: 5978: 5974: 5967: 5960: 5956: 5952: 5948: 5928: 5924: 5920: 5916: 5915: 5914: 5910: 5906: 5902: 5898: 5897: 5894: 5890: 5886: 5871: 5870: 5869: 5865: 5861: 5857: 5856: 5855: 5851: 5847: 5842: 5841: 5840: 5839: 5835: 5831: 5827: 5823: 5813: 5812: 5808: 5804: 5795: 5791: 5787: 5776: 5775: 5774: 5773: 5770: 5766: 5762: 5757: 5756: 5752: 5751: 5750: 5749: 5745: 5741: 5728: 5724: 5720: 5715: 5714: 5713: 5712: 5711: 5710: 5709: 5708: 5701: 5697: 5693: 5689: 5685: 5684: 5683: 5682: 5681: 5680: 5675: 5671: 5667: 5663: 5659: 5655: 5652: 5648: 5643: 5642: 5641: 5640: 5637: 5633: 5629: 5625: 5624: 5619: 5618: 5614: 5609: 5608: 5607: 5606: 5602: 5598: 5594: 5590: 5584: 5581: 5579: 5574: 5572: 5568: 5558: 5557: 5553: 5549: 5545: 5533: 5529: 5525: 5521: 5520: 5519: 5518: 5515: 5498: 5494: 5490: 5486: 5482: 5479: 5478: 5477: 5474: 5468: 5464: 5463: 5462: 5461: 5457: 5453: 5444: 5439: 5435: 5430: 5426: 5421: 5417: 5410: 5406: 5401: 5397: 5392: 5391: 5388: 5385: 5383: 5380: 5378: 5375: 5373: 5370: 5368: 5365: 5363: 5360: 5358: 5355: 5353: 5350:Caseorganic: 5349: 5348: 5347: 5345: 5341: 5337: 5334:presented at 5333: 5311: 5307: 5303: 5299: 5295: 5291: 5286: 5285: 5284: 5280: 5276: 5271: 5267: 5264: 5263: 5262: 5258: 5254: 5250: 5249: 5248: 5244: 5240: 5236: 5235:Hayden Bridge 5229: 5222: 5221: 5220: 5216: 5212: 5208: 5207: 5206: 5203: 5197: 5196: 5195: 5194: 5190: 5186: 5174: 5169: 5162: 5155: 5147: 5144: 5138: 5134: 5130: 5129: 5128: 5127: 5126: 5125: 5124: 5123: 5116: 5112: 5108: 5104: 5100: 5099: 5098: 5097: 5096: 5095: 5090: 5086: 5082: 5078: 5077: 5076: 5075: 5072: 5068: 5064: 5060: 5059: 5058: 5057: 5053: 5049: 5044: 5042: 5037: 5035: 5034:Director Park 5031: 5018: 5015: 5014: 5004: 5000: 4996: 4992: 4988: 4987: 4986: 4985: 4980: 4979: 4974: 4971: 4969: 4965: 4961: 4957: 4954: 4952: 4948: 4944: 4940: 4937: 4936: 4931: 4927: 4923: 4919: 4918: 4917: 4913: 4909: 4905: 4902: 4901: 4897: 4896: 4895: 4893: 4881: 4877: 4873: 4869: 4865: 4862: 4860: 4856: 4852: 4848: 4844: 4843: 4839: 4837: 4833: 4829: 4825: 4823: 4821: 4818: 4817:Ronald_Talney 4815: 4813: 4809: 4805: 4801: 4800: 4796: 4794: 4790: 4786: 4782: 4778: 4777: 4773: 4772: 4764: 4760: 4756: 4752: 4751: 4750: 4749: 4745: 4741: 4737: 4734: 4730: 4728: 4725: 4724:Lisa Molinaro 4722:Should I put 4714: 4713: 4709: 4705: 4700: 4699: 4698: 4694: 4690: 4686: 4685: 4684: 4681: 4675: 4673: 4669: 4665: 4661: 4658: 4657: 4656: 4655: 4651: 4647: 4637: 4636: 4633: 4632: 4628: 4626: 4625: 4624:Matt_Lattanzi 4621: 4619: 4618: 4614: 4612: 4611: 4607: 4605: 4604: 4600: 4598: 4597: 4596:Rick_Reynolds 4593: 4591: 4590: 4586: 4584: 4583: 4579: 4577: 4576: 4572: 4570: 4569: 4565: 4564: 4559: 4558: 4557:Nigel_Jaquiss 4554: 4553: 4552: 4551: 4548: 4547: 4543: 4541: 4540: 4536: 4534: 4533: 4529: 4527: 4526: 4525:Keith_Packard 4522: 4520: 4517: 4515: 4514: 4510: 4509: 4503: 4499: 4495: 4494: 4490: 4489: 4488: 4487: 4483: 4479: 4475: 4474: 4470: 4468: 4467: 4463: 4461: 4458: 4457: 4452: 4451: 4447: 4446: 4445: 4444: 4441: 4438: 4437: 4431: 4427: 4423: 4422: 4418: 4417: 4416: 4415: 4412: 4409: 4407: 4406: 4402: 4400: 4399: 4395: 4393: 4392: 4388: 4387: 4382: 4379: 4378: 4377: 4376: 4373: 4372: 4368: 4366: 4365: 4361: 4359: 4358: 4354: 4352: 4351: 4347: 4345: 4344: 4340: 4338: 4337: 4333: 4331: 4330: 4326: 4324: 4323: 4319: 4317: 4316: 4312: 4310: 4309: 4305: 4304: 4298: 4294: 4290: 4289: 4285: 4284: 4283: 4282: 4278: 4277: 4275: 4274: 4270: 4267: 4266: 4262: 4260: 4259: 4255: 4253: 4249: 4245: 4241: 4240: 4239:Charles_Royer 4236: 4234: 4233: 4229: 4227: 4224: 4222: 4219: 4217: 4214: 4212: 4209: 4205: 4204: 4202: 4198: 4196: 4195: 4191: 4189: 4188: 4184: 4182: 4181: 4177: 4176: 4171: 4168: 4167: 4166: 4165: 4161: 4160: 4156: 4152: 4151: 4150:Jerome_Kersey 4147: 4144: 4143: 4139: 4135: 4134: 4130: 4127: 4126: 4122: 4119: 4118: 4114: 4113: 4106: 4105: 4101: 4100: 4099: 4098: 4094: 4093: 4089: 4085: 4084: 4080: 4077: 4076: 4075:Lisa_Molinaro 4072: 4068: 4067: 4063: 4060: 4059: 4055: 4052: 4051: 4047: 4046: 4045: 4044: 4038: 4037: 4026: 4022: 4018: 4014: 4013: 4012: 4011: 4007: 4003: 3999: 3995: 3988: 3976: 3972: 3968: 3964: 3959: 3958: 3957: 3953: 3949: 3945: 3941: 3937: 3934: 3930: 3927: 3925: 3919: 3918: 3917: 3916: 3913: 3909: 3905: 3901: 3900: 3896: 3892: 3888: 3883: 3882: 3881: 3878: 3874: 3870: 3866: 3865:68.116.43.139 3862: 3854: 3850: 3848: 3845: 3840: 3837: 3834: 3828: 3827: 3815: 3811: 3807: 3803: 3802: 3801: 3800: 3796: 3792: 3788: 3784: 3780: 3776: 3772: 3768: 3764: 3760: 3756: 3743: 3739: 3735: 3731: 3727: 3723: 3719: 3718: 3717: 3713: 3709: 3705: 3701: 3697: 3693: 3692: 3691: 3687: 3683: 3679: 3675: 3671: 3670: 3669: 3665: 3661: 3657: 3655: 3649: 3647: 3643: 3639: 3635: 3634: 3633: 3632: 3628: 3624: 3617: 3595: 3591: 3587: 3583: 3579: 3578: 3577: 3573: 3569: 3565: 3560: 3556: 3555:Salem, Oregon 3552: 3548: 3547: 3546: 3542: 3538: 3534: 3530: 3529: 3528: 3524: 3520: 3516: 3515: 3514: 3510: 3506: 3501: 3496: 3495: 3494: 3491: 3490: 3488: 3483: 3478: 3468: 3467: 3466: 3462: 3458: 3454: 3450: 3446: 3442: 3438: 3437: 3436: 3432: 3428: 3424: 3422: 3420: 3418: 3415: 3414: 3413: 3412: 3408: 3404: 3400: 3396: 3392: 3391:Portal:Oregon 3388: 3387:Burns, Oregon 3384: 3383:Salem, Oregon 3380: 3376: 3372: 3371:68.116.43.139 3362: 3361: 3358: 3352: 3342: 3341: 3337: 3333: 3324: 3323:</ref: --> 3320: 3318: 3316: 3314: 3309: 3307: 3305: 3304: 3303: 3302: 3301: 3294: 3290: 3289: 3288: 3287: 3286: 3271: 3267: 3263: 3259: 3255: 3254: 3253: 3249: 3245: 3241: 3237: 3233: 3229: 3225: 3224: 3223: 3219: 3215: 3210: 3209: 3208: 3204: 3200: 3195: 3194: 3193: 3192: 3191: 3190: 3185: 3181: 3177: 3172: 3168: 3163: 3159: 3155: 3150: 3149: 3148: 3147: 3146: 3145: 3141: 3137: 3133: 3128: 3126: 3122: 3116: 3109: 3107: 3103: 3099: 3092: 3085: 3081: 3077: 3073: 3069: 3065: 3061: 3057: 3031: 3028: 3021: 3020: 3019: 3015: 3011: 3006: 3005: 3004: 3000: 2996: 2992: 2987: 2984: 2979: 2978: 2977: 2976: 2975: 2974: 2973: 2972: 2971: 2970: 2969: 2968: 2957: 2953: 2949: 2945: 2944: 2943: 2942: 2941: 2940: 2939: 2938: 2937: 2936: 2935: 2934: 2930: 2926: 2922: 2906: 2902: 2898: 2894: 2890: 2886: 2885: 2884: 2883: 2882: 2881: 2880: 2879: 2878: 2877: 2868: 2864: 2860: 2855: 2851: 2848: 2843: 2842: 2841: 2840: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2829: 2826: 2819: 2818:The Oregonian 2815: 2814: 2813: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2801: 2800: 2799: 2795: 2791: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2783: 2776: 2772: 2768: 2764: 2760: 2759: 2758: 2757: 2754: 2750: 2746: 2741: 2737: 2736: 2735: 2734: 2730: 2726: 2721: 2719: 2718: 2713: 2709: 2705: 2699: 2697: 2693: 2687: 2685: 2679: 2676: 2660: 2656: 2652: 2648: 2644: 2643: 2642: 2638: 2634: 2630: 2626: 2622: 2621: 2620: 2616: 2612: 2608: 2604: 2603: 2602: 2601: 2597: 2593: 2589: 2585: 2573: 2570: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2558: 2552: 2548: 2544: 2540: 2530: 2529: 2526: 2525: 2523: 2518: 2513: 2482: 2478: 2474: 2469: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2465: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2459: 2458: 2457: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2450: 2431: 2424: 2422: 2413: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2401: 2400: 2399: 2398: 2397: 2396: 2379: 2375: 2371: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2360: 2356: 2351: 2350: 2349: 2348: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2344: 2343: 2342: 2341: 2340: 2339: 2338: 2325: 2318: 2316: 2308: 2304: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2291: 2290: 2289: 2278: 2275: 2274: 2272: 2267: 2262: 2250: 2246: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2234: 2233: 2224: 2220: 2216: 2212: 2208: 2207: 2206: 2205: 2204: 2203: 2202: 2201: 2194: 2190: 2186: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2179: 2178: 2177: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2161: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2152: 2148: 2144: 2140: 2136: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2130: 2128: 2124: 2122: 2114: 2112: 2108: 2104: 2092: 2088: 2084: 2080: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2070: 2064: 2044: 2040: 2036: 2029: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2004: 2000: 1996: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1978: 1974: 1970: 1965: 1964: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1928: 1924: 1920: 1916: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1887: 1882: 1878: 1872: 1868: 1867:summary table 1864: 1860: 1856: 1844: 1840: 1836: 1832: 1831: 1830: 1829: 1825: 1821: 1809: 1805: 1801: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1790: 1786: 1782: 1774: 1769: 1768: 1764: 1760: 1756: 1752: 1748: 1745: 1742: 1738: 1734: 1730: 1729: 1713: 1709: 1705: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1696: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1652: 1648: 1644: 1639: 1635: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1628: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1624: 1613: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1568: 1559: 1555: 1551: 1547: 1543: 1542: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1523: 1519: 1515: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1501: 1497: 1493: 1489: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1482: 1479: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1460: 1456: 1450: 1448: 1444: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1391: 1387: 1383: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1359: 1357: 1353: 1349: 1345: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1316: 1308: 1307: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1284: 1283: 1282: 1277: 1270: 1255: 1251: 1247: 1242: 1241: 1240: 1239: 1235: 1231: 1227: 1223: 1217: 1214: 1213: 1201: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1184: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1170: 1169: 1165: 1161: 1156: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1127: 1116: 1113: 1112: 1110: 1105: 1100: 1091: 1090: 1089: 1085: 1081: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1072: 1071: 1069: 1064: 1059: 1050: 1046: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1005: 1004: 1002: 997: 992: 983: 980: 974: 973:edit conflict 969: 968: 967: 966: 962: 958: 954: 950: 944: 930: 926: 922: 918: 917: 916: 912: 908: 905: 899: 894: 890: 886: 885: 880: 876: 872: 868: 851: 843: 842:0-87595-277-1 840: 836: 832: 828: 824: 823: 818: 814: 813: 811: 810: 809: 806: 805: 803: 798: 793: 784: 783: 782: 778: 774: 770: 766: 765: 764: 763: 760: 759: 757: 752: 747: 739:. Sincerely, 738: 734: 733: 725: 712: 708: 704: 700: 699: 698: 694: 690: 685: 684: 683: 679: 675: 671: 670: 669: 665: 661: 657: 654: 651: 648: 644: 643: 642: 641: 636: 629: 611: 606: 599: 593: 588: 587: 586: 582: 578: 574: 570: 569: 568: 564: 560: 555: 552: 548: 544: 543: 542: 537: 530: 523: 522: 521: 517: 513: 509: 508: 507: 506: 501: 494: 488: 484: 480: 470: 469: 465: 461: 457: 453: 449: 444: 442: 441:Flickr stream 430: 426: 422: 418: 414: 410: 402: 398: 394: 390: 386: 385: 384: 380: 376: 372: 368: 367: 366: 362: 358: 355: 352: 351: 350: 346: 342: 338: 337: 336: 335: 331: 327: 323: 306: 302: 298: 294: 290: 289: 288: 287: 286: 285: 284: 283: 276: 272: 268: 264: 260: 256: 252: 248: 247: 246: 245: 244: 243: 238: 234: 230: 226: 225: 224: 223: 220: 216: 212: 208: 204: 200: 199: 198: 197: 193: 189: 184: 174: 173: 169: 165: 161: 154: 147: 143: 139: 134: 125: 124: 123: 122: 118: 114: 110: 96: 93: 90: 88: 85: 83: 80: 77: 73: 71: 68: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 6620: 6614: 6591: 6586: 6583: 6574: 6561: 6559: 6555: 6551: 6542: 6535: 6531: 6495: 6491: 6484: 6468:Sure thing. 6448: 6420: 6247: 6153: 6106: 6046: 6039: 6032: 5944: 5819: 5800: 5737: 5657: 5650: 5646: 5585: 5582: 5575: 5564: 5543: 5541: 5538:Ben Westlund 5508: 5467:IP8 playlist 5449: 5329: 5290:my old house 5182: 5136: 5045: 5038: 5027: 4976: 4898: 4889: 4842:Mayhaw_Hoons 4840: 4799:Jacklyn_Lick 4797: 4774: 4721: 4701: 4662:, anyone? -- 4643: 4629: 4622: 4615: 4608: 4601: 4594: 4587: 4580: 4573: 4566: 4555: 4544: 4537: 4530: 4523: 4519:Dan_Kuenster 4511: 4491: 4471: 4464: 4450:Dan_Saltzman 4448: 4419: 4403: 4396: 4389: 4369: 4364:Randy_Alcorn 4362: 4355: 4350:Tanja_Kostic 4348: 4343:Reclinerland 4341: 4334: 4327: 4320: 4313: 4306: 4286: 4281: 4280: 4273:Kate_Wilhelm 4271: 4263: 4256: 4237: 4230: 4216:Anthony_Wynn 4211:Gary_Guthman 4208: 4207: 4203: 4201:Wayne_Krantz 4199: 4192: 4185: 4178: 4159:Joe_Avezzano 4157: 4148: 4140: 4131: 4123: 4115: 4102: 4090: 4081: 4073: 4064: 4058:Tami_Farrell 4056: 4050:Albert_Starr 4048: 3991: 3923: 3886: 3859:— Preceding 3855: 3851: 3843: 3841: 3838: 3829: 3823: 3752: 3730:Oregon Coast 3653: 3612: 3499: 3472: 3471: 3399:Flood basalt 3375:Abiqua Creek 3368: 3348: 3329: 3322:<ref: --> 3321: 3317: 3310: 3306: 3299: 3291: 3284: 3239: 3231: 3129: 3124: 3110: 3105: 3101: 3083: 3079: 3067: 3063: 3053: 2917: 2892: 2888: 2853: 2817: 2770: 2766: 2762: 2739: 2722: 2715: 2700: 2688: 2680: 2672: 2607:very notable 2583: 2581: 2536: 2507: 2506: 2503: 2420: 2314: 2307:Pennsylvania 2256: 2255: 2244: 2127: 2120: 2115: 2100: 2060: 1914: 1892: 1858: 1852: 1817: 1778: 1773:Mount Bailey 1750: 1743: 1727: 1723: 1670: 1539: 1451: 1440: 1389: 1385: 1367:TimeClock871 1360: 1341: 1263: 1220: 1154: 1131: 1094: 1093: 1053: 1052: 1026: 986: 985: 939: 882: 865:suggested) ( 820: 787: 786: 741: 740: 737:Google Books 730: 728: 622: 476: 445: 438: 320: 297:TimeClock871 229:TimeClock871 188:TimeClock871 180: 157: 153:Chris Dudley 132: 106: 75: 43: 37: 6625:Aboutmovies 6425:—Preceding 6393:Aboutmovies 6252:Aboutmovies 6201:Aboutmovies 6158:—Preceding 5481:Direct link 5465:Here's the 5346:, for one. 5302:Aboutmovies 5296:, and even 4939:S._D._Perry 4868:WP:ACADEMIC 4631:Kenny_Moore 4589:Deane_Ogden 4546:Marisa_Lino 4532:Dave_Gambee 4493:Larry_Crane 4460:Peter_Sears 4381:Mark_Zusman 4371:Laura_Veirs 4357:Jim_Zalesky 4133:Eric_Kimmel 4125:Jim_Weidner 4117:Ben_Petrick 4017:Aboutmovies 4002:Jezhotwells 3967:Aboutmovies 3893:" Further, 3708:Aboutmovies 3674:WP:OVERLINK 3582:WP:OVERLINK 3568:Aboutmovies 3559:Alsea River 3379:Alsea River 3244:Aboutmovies 2995:Aboutmovies 2859:Aboutmovies 2725:Aboutmovies 2370:Aboutmovies 1737:Aboutmovies 1322:Aboutmovies 1222:Chet Orloff 1174:Aboutmovies 1135:Aboutmovies 859:|coauthors= 825:(7th ed.). 703:Aboutmovies 674:Aboutmovies 393:Aboutmovies 354:Here ya go. 36:This is an 6609:O'Connor: 6132:aunt Betty 5510:solution. 5103:Bill Naito 5041:Bill Naito 4617:Doris_Burn 4582:Kevin_Boss 4440:Alex_Frost 4391:James_Paul 3926:you linked 3889:article: " 3887:incomplete 3833:censorship 3728:(maybe?), 3439:Also note 3106:References 3080:References 3064:References 2767:unreliable 2303:New Jersey 2137:I've used 1863:WP 1.0 bot 1751:Signpost's 1315:to commons 1226:Aunt Betty 415:about the 186:for this? 95:Archive 20 87:Archive 15 82:Archive 14 76:Archive 13 70:Archive 12 65:Archive 11 60:Archive 10 6164:RedneckEN 5824:}} and {{ 5338:tonight. 5275:Finetooth 5239:Finetooth 5179:NRHP ref? 5017:Tad_Boyle 4982:alltime). 4539:Mark_Budz 4308:John_Moen 3924:guideline 3806:Finetooth 3682:Finetooth 3586:Finetooth 3453:/dev/null 3403:Finetooth 3176:Finetooth 2740:Oregonian 2673:OK, with 2185:Finetooth 2143:Finetooth 1873:. — Carl 1781:Ceranthor 1186:Time for 881:(2003) . 861:ignored ( 850:cite book 819:(2003) . 547:this edit 6562:Columbia 6427:unsigned 6193:sourcing 6172:contribs 6160:unsigned 5879:Resolved 5505:Our blog 5270:this one 5228:cite web 5131:Hey, if 5039:Anyhow, 4244:Tesscass 4194:Ken_Bone 4137:Monster. 3873:contribs 3861:unsigned 3654:articles 3551:WP:LINKS 3481:Mountain 3154:WP:WIAFA 3104:, but a 2923:is key. 2893:Newsweek 2763:reliable 2675:Just Out 2516:Mountain 2353:size. — 2265:Mountain 2063:realized 1747:contribs 1422:Resolved 1292:Fair use 1103:Mountain 1062:Mountain 995:Mountain 955:number. 863:|author= 827:Portland 796:Mountain 750:Mountain 487:this one 477:I think 215:contribs 168:contribs 6498:Esprqii 6349:Esprqii 6296:be bold 6248:exactly 6117:Esprqii 6042:WP:NPOV 5947:WP:NPOV 5846:Esprqii 5761:Esprqii 5692:Esprqii 5662:someone 5628:Esprqii 4995:Esprqii 4960:Esprqii 4886:PRODded 4851:Esprqii 4664:Esprqii 3948:EncMstr 3933:WP:SELF 3445:This IP 3236:WP:LEAD 3136:EncMstr 3132:WP:CITE 3121:WT:CITE 3098:WP:CITE 3091:reflist 3076:WP:CITE 3060:changed 2948:EncMstr 2816:As for 2790:EncMstr 2421:Niagara 2355:EncMstr 2315:Niagara 1919:Esprqii 1835:EncMstr 1643:Esprqii 1604:EncMstr 1550:Esprqii 1455:Esprqii 1428:EncMstr 1398:EncMstr 1382:commons 1297:EncMstr 1288:commons 1246:Esprqii 979:WP:ISBN 891:Press. 267:EncMstr 39:archive 6666:Orygun 6514:tedder 6455:tedder 6069:Ikluft 6035:WP:CLN 6018:Ikluft 6000:Ikluft 5996:WP:CLN 5973:Ikluft 5951:WP:CLN 5905:tedder 5860:tedder 5786:tedder 5740:tedder 5719:tedder 5666:tedder 5597:tedder 5489:tedder 5452:tedder 5344:Merlyn 5253:tedder 5233:as in 5223:I use 5211:tedder 5185:tedder 5135:(yes, 5081:tedder 5048:tedder 4755:Katr67 4704:Katr67 4689:tedder 4646:tedder 4087:years. 3904:tedder 3791:tedder 3755:Oregon 3734:tedder 3696:Oregon 3678:WT:ORE 3660:tedder 3638:tedder 3623:Katr67 3537:tedder 3519:Katr67 3505:Katr67 3476:Little 3457:tedder 3427:tedder 3385:, and 3262:tedder 3214:Katr67 3199:Katr67 3171:WP:FAC 3162:WP:MOS 3158:WP:FAC 3115:inline 3072:WP:MOS 3056:WP:ZOO 2925:tedder 2897:Katr67 2854:actual 2745:Katr67 2651:tedder 2633:Katr67 2611:Katr67 2592:tedder 2511:Little 2415: 2260:Little 2249:Oregon 2215:Katr67 2163:tedder 2083:tedder 2035:Katr67 1995:tedder 1861:, the 1820:tedder 1800:Katr67 1785:Katr67 1598:, and 1514:Katr67 1492:tedder 1470:Katr67 1230:tedder 1192:tedder 1160:tedder 1098:Little 1080:Katr67 1057:Little 1031:Katr67 1013:Katr67 990:Little 957:Katr67 921:Katr67 907:Katr67 831:Oregon 791:Little 745:Little 454:, and 421:tedder 375:tedder 357:Katr67 341:Katr67 326:tedder 138:tedder 113:Katr67 6621:Feist 5298:trees 3650:BTW, 3102:Notes 3084:Notes 3068:Notes 2983:WP:OR 2803:much. 2775:slant 2605:Yep, 2473:Droll 2121:droll 1893:which 1857:. On 1346:) in 1128:edits 16:< 6689:talk 6685:Pfly 6670:talk 6647:talk 6629:talk 6599:talk 6595:Pfly 6568:and 6518:talk 6502:talk 6459:talk 6435:talk 6397:talk 6353:talk 6323:talk 6319:Pete 6256:talk 6229:talk 6225:Pete 6205:talk 6168:talk 6140:talk 6136:Pete 6121:talk 6111:and 6091:talk 6087:Pete 6073:talk 6053:talk 6049:Pete 6022:talk 6004:talk 5990:and 5977:talk 5961:and 5923:talk 5909:talk 5889:talk 5864:talk 5850:talk 5834:talk 5807:talk 5790:talk 5765:talk 5744:talk 5723:talk 5696:talk 5688:Osho 5670:talk 5647:ever 5632:talk 5601:talk 5589:Pete 5552:talk 5548:Pete 5544:here 5528:talk 5524:Pete 5493:talk 5456:talk 5306:talk 5279:talk 5266:Here 5257:talk 5243:talk 5215:talk 5189:talk 5167:Talk 5137:that 5111:talk 5085:talk 5067:talk 5052:talk 4999:talk 4964:talk 4947:talk 4926:talk 4912:talk 4876:talk 4872:Pete 4855:talk 4832:talk 4808:talk 4789:talk 4781:here 4759:talk 4744:talk 4733:this 4708:talk 4693:talk 4668:talk 4660:COTW 4650:talk 4502:talk 4498:Pete 4482:talk 4478:Tess 4430:talk 4426:Pete 4297:talk 4293:Pete 4248:talk 4154:NBA. 4021:talk 4006:talk 3971:talk 3952:talk 3939:all. 3922:the 3908:talk 3869:talk 3810:talk 3795:talk 3738:talk 3712:talk 3686:talk 3676:and 3664:talk 3642:talk 3627:talk 3590:talk 3572:talk 3541:talk 3523:talk 3509:talk 3461:talk 3431:talk 3407:talk 3377:and 3351:here 3336:talk 3266:talk 3248:talk 3218:talk 3203:talk 3180:talk 3140:talk 3125:list 3062:the 3014:talk 2999:talk 2952:talk 2929:talk 2901:talk 2891:and 2889:Time 2863:talk 2794:talk 2765:and 2749:talk 2729:talk 2708:WP:V 2655:talk 2637:talk 2615:talk 2596:talk 2477:talk 2374:talk 2359:talk 2305:and 2219:talk 2189:talk 2167:talk 2147:talk 2087:talk 2039:talk 1999:talk 1973:talk 1969:Pete 1923:talk 1901:talk 1897:Pete 1881:talk 1839:talk 1824:talk 1804:talk 1789:talk 1763:talk 1759:Pete 1741:talk 1708:talk 1704:Pete 1682:talk 1678:Pete 1647:talk 1608:talk 1582:and 1554:talk 1518:talk 1496:talk 1488:!own 1474:talk 1459:talk 1432:talk 1402:talk 1394:this 1390:GFDL 1386:free 1371:talk 1350:and 1326:talk 1301:talk 1275:Talk 1250:talk 1234:talk 1196:talk 1178:talk 1164:talk 1155:Done 1139:talk 1084:talk 1035:talk 1017:talk 961:talk 953:OCLC 949:ISBN 925:talk 911:talk 893:ISBN 867:help 839:ISBN 777:talk 773:Pete 707:talk 693:talk 689:Pete 678:talk 664:talk 660:Pete 634:Talk 604:Talk 592:here 581:talk 577:Pete 563:talk 559:Pete 535:Talk 516:talk 512:Pete 499:Talk 464:talk 460:Pete 425:talk 397:talk 379:talk 371:this 361:talk 345:talk 330:talk 301:talk 271:talk 265:. — 257:and 233:talk 211:talk 205:. - 192:talk 164:talk 142:talk 133:Done 117:talk 6587:can 6299:it. 3946:. — 3785:, 3781:, 3777:, 3773:, 3769:, 3765:, 3761:, 3757:, 3500:may 3332:YBG 3313:--> 2649:). 2584:for 2245:too 2105:is 1915:all 1877:CBM 1027:has 483:bot 213:) ( 166:) ( 6691:) 6672:) 6649:) 6631:) 6601:) 6564:: 6520:) 6504:) 6461:) 6437:) 6399:) 6355:) 6325:) 6258:) 6231:) 6207:) 6199:. 6174:) 6170:• 6142:) 6123:) 6093:) 6075:) 6055:) 6024:) 6006:) 5979:) 5969:}} 5963:{{ 5957:, 5925:) 5911:) 5903:? 5891:) 5883:-- 5881:– 5866:) 5852:) 5844:-- 5836:) 5809:) 5792:) 5767:) 5746:) 5725:) 5698:) 5672:) 5651:or 5634:) 5603:) 5595:. 5573:. 5554:) 5530:) 5495:) 5487:. 5458:) 5308:) 5292:, 5281:) 5259:) 5245:) 5231:}} 5225:{{ 5217:) 5191:) 5157:-- 5113:) 5087:) 5069:) 5054:) 5001:) 4975:: 4966:) 4949:) 4928:) 4914:) 4906:- 4894:: 4878:) 4857:) 4849:-- 4834:) 4826:- 4810:) 4791:) 4783:- 4761:) 4746:) 4710:) 4695:) 4670:) 4652:) 4250:) 4023:) 4008:) 3973:) 3954:) 3910:) 3875:) 3871:• 3812:) 3797:) 3740:) 3724:, 3714:) 3702:, 3688:) 3680:. 3666:) 3644:) 3629:) 3618:) 3592:) 3574:) 3543:) 3525:) 3511:) 3463:) 3455:. 3433:) 3409:) 3338:) 3268:) 3260:? 3250:) 3220:) 3205:) 3182:) 3142:) 3117:}} 3113:{{ 3094:}} 3088:{{ 3054:A 3016:) 3001:) 2954:) 2931:) 2903:) 2865:) 2849:). 2796:) 2751:) 2731:) 2720:. 2657:) 2639:) 2617:) 2598:) 2479:) 2427: 2417: 2376:) 2361:) 2321: 2311: 2221:) 2191:) 2169:) 2149:) 2089:) 2061:I 2041:) 2031:}} 2025:{{ 2001:) 1975:) 1925:) 1903:) 1879:· 1841:) 1826:) 1806:) 1791:) 1775:GA 1765:) 1710:) 1684:) 1649:) 1610:) 1594:, 1590:, 1556:) 1541:my 1520:) 1498:) 1476:) 1461:) 1434:) 1424:– 1404:) 1388:, 1373:) 1328:) 1318:}} 1312:{{ 1303:) 1252:) 1244:-- 1236:) 1198:) 1180:) 1166:) 1141:) 1086:) 1037:) 1019:) 963:) 945:) 927:) 913:) 877:; 854:: 852:}} 848:{{ 837:. 833:: 829:, 779:) 709:) 695:) 680:) 666:) 583:) 565:) 525:-- 518:) 466:) 450:, 427:) 399:) 381:) 363:) 347:) 332:) 303:) 273:) 235:) 217:) 194:) 170:) 144:) 119:) 91:→ 6687:( 6668:( 6645:( 6627:( 6597:( 6516:( 6500:( 6457:( 6433:( 6395:( 6351:( 6321:( 6254:( 6227:( 6223:- 6203:( 6166:( 6138:( 6119:( 6089:( 6071:( 6051:( 6020:( 6002:( 5975:( 5921:( 5907:( 5887:( 5862:( 5848:( 5832:( 5805:( 5788:( 5763:( 5742:( 5721:( 5694:( 5668:( 5630:( 5615:? 5599:( 5550:( 5526:( 5491:( 5454:( 5304:( 5277:( 5255:( 5241:( 5213:( 5187:( 5170:) 5164:( 5109:( 5083:( 5065:( 5050:( 4997:( 4962:( 4945:( 4924:( 4910:( 4874:( 4853:( 4830:( 4806:( 4787:( 4757:( 4742:( 4706:( 4691:( 4666:( 4648:( 4504:) 4500:( 4496:- 4484:) 4480:( 4432:) 4428:( 4424:- 4299:) 4295:( 4291:- 4246:( 4019:( 4004:( 3969:( 3950:( 3935:. 3906:( 3867:( 3808:( 3793:( 3736:( 3710:( 3684:( 3662:( 3640:( 3625:( 3616:← 3614:( 3588:( 3570:( 3539:( 3521:( 3507:( 3486:5 3459:( 3429:( 3405:( 3334:( 3264:( 3246:( 3216:( 3201:( 3178:( 3138:( 3012:( 2997:( 2950:( 2927:( 2899:( 2861:( 2792:( 2747:( 2727:( 2653:( 2635:( 2613:( 2594:( 2521:5 2475:( 2372:( 2357:( 2270:5 2217:( 2187:( 2165:( 2145:( 2117:– 2085:( 2037:( 1997:( 1971:( 1921:( 1899:( 1883:) 1875:( 1837:( 1822:( 1802:( 1787:( 1761:( 1757:- 1744:· 1739:( 1706:( 1680:( 1676:- 1645:( 1606:( 1552:( 1516:( 1494:( 1472:( 1457:( 1430:( 1400:( 1369:( 1324:( 1299:( 1295:— 1278:) 1272:( 1248:( 1232:( 1194:( 1176:( 1162:( 1137:( 1108:5 1082:( 1067:5 1033:( 1015:( 1000:5 975:) 971:( 959:( 943:← 941:( 923:( 909:( 900:. 869:) 844:. 801:5 775:( 755:5 705:( 691:( 676:( 662:( 637:) 631:( 607:) 601:( 579:( 561:( 557:- 538:) 532:( 514:( 502:) 496:( 462:( 423:( 395:( 377:( 359:( 343:( 328:( 299:( 269:( 231:( 209:( 190:( 162:( 140:( 115:( 50:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.