Knowledge talk:WikiProject Film/Soviet and post-Soviet cinema task force

2082:

which is 74 years and a significant chunk of film history. Nazism as a state regime was around for, what 12 years? Whether you disliked this regime or not it still took up 3/4 of the twentieth century and given the growth of cinema during this period is perfectly valid. This also links together the history of cinema in the ex soviet states to which they were undeniably connected to Russian cinema, but then there is post Soviet cinema which clearly indicates this "regime is over", but still indicates that the project covers the new Russian cinema and the cinematic progression of the newer independent states. Personally I think it is a very good way of consolidating Russian and former Soviet bloc cinema as a whole. As for the legitimacy of countries like Azerbaijan or Estonia being seperate, I sincerely doubt there would be few if any editors interested in the individual cinemas of the ex Soviet states and as a topic is perfectly adequate for a taskforce. The only problem I see is that it excludes pre-Soviet cinema e.g

2564:. However, wedding it with the already-proposed Nordic cinema task force seems undesirable by outside editors who have already proposed the Nordic task force, nor is it warranted on an academic level, wherein virtually all of the film studies regarding Nordic or Scandinavian cinema omit any significant mention of the Baltic region's cinema. While there is no doubt from what has already been brought forward that there are Nordic co-productions, this is not in itself in the context of modern European film financing an exceptional occurrence, nor does it seem to be occurring in exceptional volume. Perhaps that may change in the future, but at the moment it's too tenuous a link to justify a Nordic-Baltic task force. However, as per above, it probably would be more beneficial to pursue expansion of the Baltic cinema article-base (and editorial pool), so as to preclude the need to have such a link. 2125:. You don't have ex-Nazi task force for films , do you? So why do you suggest ex Soviet for the name? I came here after I saw the posting about the new task force at the Baltic states notice board not because I have "interest" in the subject but because it's something I do for living and have been involved directly working in the area the task force should take care of. So far I don't see anybody signed up for this task force. Part of it is because political labels such as ex-Soviet are as insulting for related people exactly like calling somebody ex-Nazi or using N word for black people. So in case the name of this task force is meant to drive away editors, it's working on me at least. Come up and rename the task force with a politically neutral name, there are some suggestions up there, and we can move on with this.-- 1959:

by the Soviet authorities and than you have more liberal times, 60's and early 70's and then again back to nothing much during the Brezhnev era and then opening up during Perestroika. The thing is that within the Soviet Union, most often "Soviet cinema" has been only referred to the times when culture was under oppression. Nobody over there called the films done during liberal soviet eras "Soviet" since it very often included ani-Soviet (meaning anti censorship, anti single party rule etc.) themes. So the bottom line, the word Soviet by itself is just too controversial in my opinion. But in case there is a demand for such a task force, what do I know. So in case your suggestion have a separate Soviet task force makes sense to everybody else other than me, lets go for it. --

1609:

had extremely poor relations for decades, but I don't see anyone complaining that they're both in the Southeast Asian task force. How long is the Soviet connection going to be relevant? I would suppose until it's no longer an overwhelming proportion of their film legacy. To use your post-colonial example, an Indian task force would have been unthinkable had we existed in 1947, and neither New Zealand nor Australia would have merited ones until the past decade or two. As for some sense of "offense", that's not really relevant to the considerations here - the German task force includes all of the Nazi films as well, even though many of them are deeply offense and embarrassing to the German public of today. So I must ask you - can you please point out why this task force is

1729:

this grouping for a political one, when it is really more of a regional and historical one. We're trying to eventually have every country covered by national or regional task forces of sufficient size and scope, and I'm rather dubious that, at least as of 2008, there is enough content on Knowledge to merit a Baltic cinema task force (typically at least 150-200 articles). That's not to say that a possibility for a future split isn't in the cards, but simply that it has to be organic and practical, and not merely to serve nationalist interests, which I think it would not be unfair to say are rather sour between some of these countries at the moment, and thus may be injecting bias into an otherwise academic principle of workgroup division.

209: 185: 1644:? Perhaps it's time to re notify, it might have got lost in archives during summer holidays. In case the German task force would be called "Nazi post-Nazi task force" and include insignia of the totalitarian regime, that would be offensive indeed exactly like the current Soviet post-Soviet is. And what has this to do with associating Estonia with Russia? Exactly like what would Balkan, a region in Europe has to do with countries under the discussion that spread over 2 different continents? Sorry but we're not communicating too well. I'd put it on rest for now and hold up with any suggestions until there is more input from more, like you've put it: "post-soviet" wikiprojects.-- 2773:

because the countries were part of Soviet Union once and therefore the subjects were touched as a part of a wider study -Soviet cinema. that's from where it all starts from. The only available study in English I'm aware of that briefly touches the history of Cinema in Estonia-Latvia-Lithuania is 'Culture and Customs of the Baltic States' by Kevin O'Connor in his 'Media and Cinema' chapter, and 'Estonian Animation' By Chris Robinson that's a comprehensive study of the subject. In case you know any other works published in English, please let me know. --

267: 157: 2951:

have here is Estonia but combining Nordic and Baltic if this is desired sounds reasonable. I have a feeling that however it is split or named most if not all of its contributors will only work on one country like Estonia or Denmark by Cactuswriter would be worked on and neglect the rest. I guess though that any move to try to focus on each cinema under a merged taskforce however it is made is a positive step to make. I hope it would encourage more editors from the relative wikirprojects to join forces and develop their cinemas.

1713:

birth of a new era with the formation of the Estonian Film Foundation and the subsequent arrival of a new generation of film makers. "Post-Soviet cinema" implies certain stylistic/cinematic themes that were common across all the former Soviet republics, however this is no longer the case, and as it stands it is rather misleading. So while keeping the title, I would remove all the categories and wikiprojects mentioned in this project and keep only WikiProject Soviet Union and Category:Cinema of the Soviet Union

219: 2008:

made for the purposes of communist propaganda, that was more or less the official definition of the term by the Communist party. Or it can mean "cinema of the Soviet Union" that has much broader meaning and includes films that were not considered Soviet by the Soviet state officials. Hope thats more clear. So what I got out of t, in case Soviet task force is needed I'd call it "Cinema of the USSR" or "Cinema of Soviet Union" etc. or something similar to avoid misinterpretations. --

335: 311: 32: 1487:

suddenly to be broken into another task force? Many of the Baltic filmmakers of recent years were trained in the USSR and a large chunk of the Baltic cinema was sponsored by the USSR, so to force it to be riven because of political changes doesn't seem very relatistic. (And to the best of my knowledge, none of the Baltic states had an overwhelmingly flourishing film industry prior to their takeover - Lithuania's doesn't even start until the 1930s.)

87: 63: 3465: 3135:). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found 345: 279: 97: 1491:

respect, nor would it be sufficiently large for our purposes, and since we're eventually hoping to create enough national and regional task forces to cover all countries, it's a far better alternative than simply ignoring these countries' cinemas as if they didn't exist. That all being said, I would be happy to continue to discuss the matter with if you have any further questions, concerns, or comments. Many thanks,

406: 442: 2910:

German one) several months later, no one showed up to actually join. That's why there are zero; it wasn't a build-it-first attitude, contrary to current appearances. Usually, however, we do try to have a sign up (often through the WP:COUNCIL subpage), as in the case of Southeast Asia, for example. For the moment, however, I'm going to bed. I'll start working on the rest of this tomorrow. Regards,

1682:

any better ideas at the moment since I don't understand like I hope I've explained, why would anybody put together such different cultures based on a transcontinental Soviet state that existed 20 years ago. Lets see if there is any interest at all to the subject and if anybody else has any different takes on the issues and then, lets take it from there--

3513:

discussing the Soviet-controlled film industry and business alliances with Germany and Britain. The history of Soviet films being shown in Britain would make an interesting article in itself, with many classic films banned for several years as Soviet propaganda, but with various challenges and loopholes to allow them to be shown. --

2652:

projects that are listed in the task force. Currently at least I'm not able to spot any notices on these national wikiprojects (with an exception of WikiProject_Russia). If the goal is to draw attention to cinema related articles and get some work done, all the listed national wikiprojects should be notified.--

3091:. We are planning to release the selection before December 2008, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Knowledge 1.0 Editorial team, 1993:, it comprises several radically different regions of the country's cinema, as well as both colonial and post-colonial films. The national/regional scopes also include works made outside of the countries by national filmmakers, international co-productions, and foreign films shooting in the countries. 2772:

But there aren't any academic film literature on the subject really since, do you really know any academic film literature published in English that would cover Cinema in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania as it's subject? the cinemas have been only or mostly referred to in connection with Soviet cinema only

2727:

and therefore professionally I'd be closest to a Nordic cinema task force. Also culturally Finland and Estonia especially in the sense of cinema are closest to each other. Priit Pärn an Estonian animation director has been busy starting up the animation tradition in Finland where he has been teaching

1958:

during Soviet era etc. I must admit, I'm not getting it really why would such a separate task force for a historical period would be necessary ? Also there is a huge difference periodically within the Soviet era cinema itself, the times when everything liberal was banned and censored without question

1481:

I wanted to let you know that I've temporarily reverted your changes. While I understand the historical divisions between the Baltic States and Russia, from a film history perspective, their national cinema was largely controlled by, trained by, and influenced by, the USSR for a great majority of the

2555:

Which brings me to the last point. I've seen a lot of work from Termer and Martintg in the past few weeks put into creating and developing articles for Estonian cinema topics. Should such a pace be maintained over the near-to-mid term, and with slightly more editors joining them, I see no reason why

1555:

I don't know from where this claim comes from. It simply isn't true since the 30's was an end of an era for the Lithuanian cinema exactly like elsewhere in the world due to the great depression. Lithuanians most important director from the era was Jurgis Linartas and his most notable films were made

3565:

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you?

3415:

the text. And the problem is compounded by the article's creator's limited grasp of English. As it stands I am going to end up nominating it for deletion, but I really hate doing that if there's a chance it's just my failure to understand. Especially as the editor has indicated they will be offline

2950:

though. However the problem with seperate nordic and baltic is that Finnish and Estonian cinema are indeed more related than Finland and Norway for example but overall Scandinavian cinema seems to have some form of identify which would mark it as seperate from the baltic states. The only problem we

2551:

member nations of the Commonwealth of Independent States. This makes sense in the light of regional grouping, common co-production amongst republics, and acknowledges the similar genealogy of these national cinemas to their Soviet period (as regards training and cultural cross-exposure). As for the

2329:

No, it's not a substitute for discussion, but if you'll read what you linked, you'll also see that it has its place. Given that we've had a lot of discussion and many proposals, a !vote may allow us to weed out some of these proposals and provide a focus on a few in particular. I'm not proposing it

2266:

I've removed WikiProject Estonia from this taskforce, it's claimed this film taskforce is a "joint taskforce" run between the national WikiProjects and WikiProject Films, but I see no evidence of this, since the concerns of the members of Wikiproject Estonia are being contested rather then be taken

2007:

I don't have problems with understanding how task forces work since I've initiated one by myself on WP and have participated in coupler as time has permitted. I mostly pointed out that the name "Soviet cinema" is controversial for the reasons I explained above. "Soviet cinema" can mean both, cinema

1712:

I understand the rationale for "post-Soviet" cinema, but there has to be a point in time when it is no longer "post-soviet". In the case of the Baltic states, that period ended in 1996, when the decline of cinema reached rock bottom with zero films produced in that year. In Estonia, 1997 marked the

1490:

This isn't intended as a sleight towards those countries, but simply a more logical (IMHO) way of organizing the geographic-based film task forces with a view towards common historical cinematic roots and cross-influences. Creating a separate Baltic states cinema task force does not make sense this

3534:

I have several newspaper sources from 1915 discussing this film, all stating that it was the first Russian film to be shown in England. It depicts conflict between the German forces and Russian civilians during World War I, which explains the British interest in it. Apart from these 1915 sources I

2651:

Also, it wouldn't hurt if other national wiki projects starting with WikiProject Azerbaijan to Uzbekistan etc, would be notified one by one that they are included in this "post-soviet" task force and the discussion here. We are deciding things regarding the CIS without consulting the relevant wiki

1681:

The Post-Soviet states article doesn't cite any direct references and sources to the subject and it should be common knowledge that in fact the term is just a political claptrap that was used by talking heads on TV after the collapse of the Soviet Union. It's been 20 years ever since. I don't have

1608:

notified, much as they were again when it was created. No one else has raised any objections. All I see you arguing, however, is that you have a distaste for associating Estonia with Russia. I don't see how that's relevant to the organization of a regional task force. East Timor and Indonesia have

1835:

has been behind 2 film companies in the Baltic countries, the Film Foundation system is based on the Scandinavian model. Therefor the Nordic Baltic cinema and Commonwealth of Independent States cinema task forces might be in better sync with current situation with cinemas and regions. In any case

1728:

Were the Baltic cinemas of sufficient size and scope, I'd agree with you; however, given their small size (and even smaller representation here in number of articles), it is not practical to split them simply because of a film foundation being started. I think the problem here is the confusion of

2909:

The Soviet, German, and Japanese task forces were all brought up at once on the project Talk space (and advertised to several of the national talk spaces), to gauge if there was interest. We got a handful of people pledging to join each, and unfortunately, when we got around to this one (and the

2819:

separate Baltic and Nordic task forces are fine by me. I just didn't know that you want to keep the task forces based on academic studies, I understood it so that the task forces should be based on regional criteria. And cultural traditions perhaps. but since 2 editors have objected the idea, we

2681:

Sorry but I don't think it would be really my job to coordinate how the film task forces and national task forces get integrated. I didn't think it was cool how the Baltic national task forces were included here without proper announcements and proposals, and I'm just suggesting that perhaps the

2081:

I think that you are unnecessarily looking far too much into politics rather than what it is intended for -film. It is difficult to organize films because of different political backgrounds for countries such as Russia and Germany. But nobody can deny that the Soviet Union existed from 1917-1991

1510:

The reverts were noticed. First of all, since you have mentioned wikiprojects Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania etc. on the task force's page, please notify all relevant wikiprojcets to get a broader take on the issues and see what people think. After all, it might be just me who feels the way the task

1451:

Since I'm not getting the idea of this task force, it makes no sense to create a task force based on a country that existed 20 years ago. If that's a pattern, should there be a task force "post-colonial British cinema" that would include cinema of India? Cinema should be categorized by different

2238:

made when this task force was proposed) and I believe that my motivation isn't just political. It makes perfect sense for me to have Soviet task force, but the Soviet cinema was different and what it was is now gone. First of all because Soviet system was different: everything was state funded,

2041:

It seems to turn into a more general discussion and I don't think I'd have much to add. I didn't get it really for what exactly did you ask a cited source for? Perhaps it was about that cinema in Soviet Union was considered to be the most important tool of propaganda according to the Communist

1486:

a part of the Soviet Union, it is entirely valid to call it post-Soviet and keep it within the grouping. Your suggestion breaks down when it comes to things such as the filmography of non-Russian directors who worked both in the USSR and their home country after 1991 - are their post-1991 films

1525:

From a film history perspective any country has been influenced by the Soviet cinema, starting with the Kuleshov Experiment up to implementing the editing techniques by Eisenstein. The former Soviet Republics have nothing more in common than during the Soviet era, after Stalin's death national

3512:

if anyone would like me to search for anything there. I have been trawling through results up to 1929 so far, and while only a relatively small number of Soviet films were shown in Britain before WWII, those that were shown received quite a bit of coverage. There are also quite a few articles

1773:

It's most likely me, because of my "nationalist bias", (after all, I'm a professional filmmaker (production artist) originally coming from the area), once again I miss to see how is this a regional and historical grouping? This grouping in fact is a political one since the name is politically

1747:

If you read my text, the issue is not political. "Post-Soviet" is an anachronism that implies a common cinematic theme of the past. Using "Post-Soviet" for simply a regional grouping does not make sense, since the Soviet Union extended to the Pacific. If you are concerned about taskforces of

2894:

There should be a clear place within WikiProject Films that can be announced for sing ups, or else should people just drop by of this talk page? And in case a post--soviet task force can be started up with 0 participants, why do we need to have this complicated procedure for the Baltic task

2026:

that's yielding diminishing returns, frankly. While that may be the more precise meaning (if you can provide some cited sources on that, it'd be great, btw), we already have existing task force structure that isn't organized in that way, nor is it likely that the average editor is going to

2804:

To my knowledge, the major books on Nordic cinema rarely - if ever - even mention any of the Baltic states or languages, for that matter. At all. That's including both pre-1940 and post-1991, and several of these books are recent or have had a recent revision. Nordic cinema, however, is a

2149:

Russia and CIS task force - rename the current task force- covers all films from Russia pre and post revolution, and the CIS (1991-), also covers Soviet period films. Georgia is out of the CIS now but no films have been made in the days since they have left, so we can ignore that fact for

3317: 2945:

The proposal makes sense, but the only problem I see is whether there are enough editors to sustian it. This is why I liked the idea of a combined taskforce. Personally I'd have accepted a single Russian taskforce from the 1890s to present. Out of all I'd be more interested in a

2144:

Guys, why are we still arguing about this? Termer makes a good point, if you want to attract people to the task force, this isn't going to help. Girolamo came up with a good suggestion for three task forces, I think we could combine two of them into purely geographical entities:

2696:

I see your point, but on the other hand, what we're mainly discussing is splitting off the Baltic states as well as an historical period, so from an integration perspective, they've already been notified; we're not otherwise changing the composition of the countries covered.

2449:- rename the current task force- covers all films from Russia pre and post revolution, and the CIS (1991-), also covers Soviet period films. Georgia is out of the CIS now but no films have been made in the days since they have left, so we can ignore that fact for now. 2239:

centralised, censored, disregarded copyrights and so on. Secondly it was 20 years ago - everything has changed, the cinema now is made by different people, it has different stars and during those 20 almost nothing was produced, so there is almost no continuity. ~~

1778:. Well, it's just seems its more convenient to keep these cinemas all together for now for WP task force purposes. Fine but in that sense the naming of the grouping should be more considerate and according to the facts and status quo: for example something like 2217:

suggestions , that reflects the current status quo better perhaps. have Nordic-Baltic and Russian-Moldavian-Central Asian-Transcaucasian Cinema work groups, whatever, up to you, as long as offensive "ex-Soviet" etc. in workgroup names is avoided, I'm

1613:

for including the entire film histories of all of the republics? Something beyond personal nationalist grievances. For example, if we're going to create a Balkan task force, it's going to contain all of the Balkan countries; why should this be any

2286:

Now, continuing things, what I'd suggest is that we draw up a poll with a number of options for each point and open it up for the community for a !vote, so that the WP Film editors can perhaps indicate their preference in these matters. Thoughts?

1526:

filmmaking was made possible (after a brake since 1940 due to the Soviet takover) by financing and censoring it centrally from Moscow. To suggest that this created a bond between different cultures and their cinema simply has no bases whatsoever.

3265: 3535:

can't find anything else online about the film. Does anyone know anything about it, e.g. whether it may be listed under a different title? It looks like a film we should have an article on, but it would be good to have more details. Thanks. --

1565:

please do not assume but ask that question from the Wikiprojects that you have listed on this task force' page. I'd bet that nobody ever has and going to edit these related articles than the editors involved with the country projects

1465:

PS. Including for example Baltic states in a "post soviet Cinema" category doesn't make any sense since the film-making tradition in those independent countries with distinct languages and cultures predates the soviet takeover in

3095: 2510:

has existed thus far and should exist in the future, that's not a part of the discussion. It's about "post-soviet" , 20 years after it should be a good time to move on. Or else following the pattern, should we create a

3038: 2552:

case with Georgia, there's certainly on reason why a Caucasus cinema task force can't be created, but only providing that we already have a sufficient number of articles and editors to make such a task force feasible.

2648:

The Baltic cinema task force should be announced properly on every relevant national wiki project that such a task force has been proposed and clearly pointed out how and where exactly can you sign up for it.

2180:

Anna Lawton sees 5 conventional groups or subdivisions within Soviet cinema that are based on an ethnic and cultural backgrounds: based on her theses on "Soviet Cinema", I'd suggest renaming the workgroup into

3352: 3076:, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with 2282:

You are here; we are discussing the matter at the moment. When we decide what to do, then we can make the changes - all of them. There's nothing to be lost from maintaining the status quo until we reach a

1080: 3407:; and possibly some kind of connection with secret intelligence services. The article has several aspects that concern me, but mainly the problem is that I am failing to understand what it is actually 3345: 3006: 3158:, which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the 3061:. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at 3033: 2889: 2640: 2296: 1937: 1917: 1765: 1738: 1075: 564: 2978: 2114: 2098: 3423:

If anyone here is able to help, that would be much appreciated. Perhaps particularly if you speak Russian and can check the cited sources. Thanks in advance to anyone that can pitch in here! --

2919: 2904: 2857: 2843: 2829: 2814: 2782: 2767: 2706: 2691: 2676: 2339: 2062: 2036: 2017: 2002: 1867: 1706: 1673: 1626: 1500: 3579: 2134: 2086:

which had some notable silent films. All I could suggest is renaming it to Russian and ex-Soviet cinema task force or something. I don't think it is as problematic as you might suggest Termer

1858:

We try to grow organically - a Nordic task force has been on the list of potential task forces for some time now. Since there hasn't been editorial demand for one yet, it hasn't been created.

2743:

So it might be me since I've worked on both sides of the Baltic sea and am familiar with both film industries, it would make sense to make a Nordic Baltic task force unless anybody objects.--

3364: 2541:

to cover all of the films and film-topics involving the USSR from 1917-1991. This is a historically notable and well-covered topic, which has carved out its own niche in scholarly studies.

2758:

I've already had two editors object to the idea and, as stated above, there's no support for it in the academic film literature. No one's contesting that there are some ties which exist.

1044: 3339: 3432: 2027:

distinguish between the two. (As the task force scope itself notes, it includes Russian Empire cinema, but for the sake of a concise title doesn't include that in the task force name.)

1322: 559: 166: 73: 1985:

for editors who have common interests to collaborate on articles and advise on common issues that may be facing many of these articles. They are not necessarily homogeneous topically,

3558:! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the 2790:

was a citation from Kevin O'Connor's book regarding the culture. It has staid so ever since. Just that no studies have been published in English regarding Baltic Cinema in general. --

2871: 2414: 2227: 2194: 2153:

Nordic and Baltic task force - create a new task force - covers both regions, (Finland was considered a Baltic state pre-1940) also includes Soviet period in the case of the Baltics.

1968: 3083:

We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at

2370:

PS. while speaking of "Film editors" you also had me in mind right? Even though I haven't been the most active contributor since film is not my hobby but work, I've helped out with

1363: 1315: 415: 321: 3242: 2862:

I'll notify the national wiki-projects. I know Girolamo is currently busy with co-ordinator elections and other tasks, perhaps I can set up the Baltic task force page if he wants.

2799: 2208: 1853: 1597: 2499: 2469: 2256: 3451: 2573: 1039: 3411:(in policyese, what its assertion of notability is); and while it does cite some sources, they are all in Russian so I am unable to determine whether they can be considered to 3498: 1056: 1427: 3598: 1267: 1358: 1310: 1123: 1032: 1588:

Perhaps "post-Soviet" remains relevant until we no longer have many active producers, directors and leading actors spanning both eras. Perhaps ten or twenty more years?

3284: 2963: 2420:

I think straw poll would be better than grinding same arguments over and over again - what would be the choises ? Just renaiming or what to do with modern films too ? ~~

1351: 1291: 1111: 1020: 1902: 1774:

predefined and for example dismisses the regional and historical pre-Soviet cinema not only regards the Baltic states first period of independence but also for example

3603: 1231: 1159: 1099: 1008: 2848:

lets make it happen. Please make a place available for sign ups. I guess the national wiki-project members take care of announcements for the proposed task force. --

1818: 1339: 1303: 1255: 1219: 1171: 1147: 1051: 996: 941: 2478:, which would cover films produced in Soviet Union, when it existed ? I don't care about CIS as I don't know if their films are influenced by Russian films or not. 3648: 1279: 1262: 1243: 1207: 1195: 1183: 1135: 3544: 2176:

One more suggestion among many: Here comes something interesting I happened to come across that has a lot of ideas: it would help to sort this thing out I think:

1752:

Cinema" so that Finland, and the Scandinavian countries can come under a taskforce. Currently these countries are not covered. Then there should be taskforce for

1118: 1027: 977: 953: 3653: 2622: 1617:

If, however, I'm misunderstanding you, and this is purely an objection to the name or icon used, then by all means, feel free to suggest alternatives. Thanks,

1346: 1286: 1106: 1015: 929: 2455:- create a new task force - covers both regions, (Finland was considered a Baltic state pre-1940), strong Swedish influence pre-1940 and post-1991 in Estonia. 1482:

time since filmmaking became active in the region. That's why they've been grouped together in this respect. Given that these factors, and the fact that they

3166:

to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Knowledge:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at

3077: 2984: 2752: 2661: 2366: 2276: 2166: 1722: 1226: 1154: 1094: 1003: 965: 1664:

appears to be the common term; I could not divine a better one from anything within the article. If you have a better idea, please feel free to present it.

3633: 2995: 2524: 2396: 2350: 2323: 2307: 1802: 1691: 1653: 1580: 1475: 1461: 1334: 1298: 1250: 1214: 1166: 1142: 1068: 991: 936: 881: 3479: 3378: 3371: 1274: 1238: 1202: 1190: 1178: 1130: 482: 3522: 2437: 3329: 972: 948: 799: 3549: 3439: 3344: 3021: 924: 2805:

well-established topic of study, so I'm loathe to re-define it. Is there a good reason why Baltic cinema can't exist as an independent task force?

960: 634: 3567: 1452:

languages/cultures and in that sense the project should be renamed WikiProject Films/Russian and it should include movies made in Russian only!--

3289: 3269: 3253: 1063: 3151: 1886:

CIS task force - covers all films from the CIS (1991-), perhaps also covers their pre-Soviet films (e.g. Russian Empire and 1890's Azeri films)

895: 813: 3369: 789: 511: 3618: 3613: 730: 718: 621: 3268:

will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the

629: 1954:, I have some thoughts: the major difference I think, what you'd call Soviet cinema I'd call either Russian cinema during Soviet era or 3643: 3562:

that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

1928:

I've just been informed that Georgia has left the CIS (this week, no less). I'm not certain that this scheme works any better, either.

781: 606: 538: 3438:

Please note that the article has now been nominated for deletion. Interested editors can follow or participate on the articles entry:

2740:

is the major investor in the Nordic-Baltic film industry nowadays that has also started up the Baltic film school in Tallinn Estonia.

1632:

It might be me but for some reason I haven't noticed and still can't see anything about "Soviet and post-Soviet cinema task force" on

3229:

selling 100 million records which he had invented himself. Therefore Stefanovich is a highly unreliable source for such figures. See

3011: 890: 873: 849: 808: 667: 596: 551: 837: 655: 642: 725: 713: 616: 475: 241: 3628: 3623: 3058: 3046:

is a collection of English Knowledge articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The

2741: 1821: 861: 3066: 2969:

Which is the whole point of renaming/splitting/merging the taskforces, to arrive at a format that encourages people to join.

776: 533: 525: 1817:

in his second post make also sense to me. Since Baltic filmmakers work most closely with Scandinavians nowadays. There is a

706: 3658: 3638: 3593: 3203: 3047: 868: 844: 825: 662: 546: 1883:

Soviet task force - historical period task force; covers all films, from all republics, made during their time in the USSR

1519:

from a film history perspective, their national cinema was largely controlled by, trained by, and influenced by, the USSR

1378: 832: 650: 500: 3608: 3155: 3147: 1780: 1753: 588: 468: 232: 190: 1789:.That would cover all "pre-Soviet, Soviet and post-Soviet" periods of these countries including the most significant: 3493: 3132: 2050: 856: 576: 380: 3559: 2385: 2330:

as a concluding matter per se (unless it is overwhelming), but rather as the next step given the current situation.

1981:

I think this is at the heart of what (I believe) may be your misunderstanding of how our task forces work. They are

1889:

Nordic and Baltic task force - covers both regions, but only covers Baltic films pre and post inclusion in the USSR.

1571:

All for now, the bottom line, I think you should get some input and feedback from respective wikiprojects, Thanks!--

2732:

had perhaps more successful career in fimlmmaking in Finland than Estonia in the 1930's. Estonians and Finns speak

2667:

I was under the impression that we're still brainstorming. But feel free to notify them now if you're so inclined.

910: 769: 123: 3119:

subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering

2990: 3247: 3120: 2405:

If this is "joint" taskforce run between WP Film and the national WP's, I assume the national WPs get a say too?

1641: 820: 503: 115: 17: 2234:

I have to agree with those who say this should be renamed (BTW I can't find any notice to WikiProject Latvia or

3192: 3124: 2547:

to cover all pre-1917 (or SSR annexation) films, as well as all 1991-present films from countries which are or

1434: 754: 742: 520: 3457: 3167: 3029: 2915: 2885: 2839: 2810: 2763: 2702: 2672: 2636: 2569: 2335: 2292: 2032: 1998: 1933: 1898: 1863: 1734: 1702: 1669: 1633: 1622: 1496: 691: 686: 583: 127: 119: 2682:

other national task forces might have some ideas too regarding their proposed involvement here. Thats all --

1836:

it's strange that Nordic countries are not covered at all considering such a giant in the World cinema like

3136: 2083: 1824: 1775: 1637: 1399: 571: 376: 358: 316: 292: 195: 43: 2529: 2375: 1538:. For how long this fact is going to be relevant? 25 years, 30, 50 after the collapse of the Soviet Union? 2601:

to work together on a common goal, and I know at least five people who are willing to work together in a

2105:

Why not "Russia and Ex-empire cinema", then we could include Poland, Finland and Alaska too. I'm joking.

240:(USSR) on Knowledge. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join 3062: 2631:

If you can get five people here to sign onboard to a proposed Baltic cinema task force, then so be it.

495: 448: 208: 184: 110: 68: 3264:

will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's

3509: 3294: 3084: 3043: 2199:

PS. I'd encourage everybody interested to read the book, very comprehensive and competent material!--

1385: 749: 737: 2579: 3110: 3101: 3025: 2911: 2881: 2835: 2806: 2759: 2698: 2668: 2632: 2565: 2346: 2331: 2303: 2288: 2028: 1994: 1951: 1929: 1894: 1859: 1730: 1698: 1665: 1618: 1507: 1492: 2952: 2733: 2087: 1542:

none of the Baltic states had an overwhelmingly flourishing film industry prior to their takeover

3390: 1413: 1392: 3527: 3490: 3222: 3128: 3088: 1406: 363: 49: 2534:

Here's the latest proposal based on what seems to be most feasible (IMHO), and my reasoning

2737: 2382: 1955: 1748:

sufficient size and regional scope, then the Baltic states should really be grouped under "

3051: 8: 3398: 3238: 2876:

Whoa, hold on there. Let's find a group of interested editors to sign up for it first...

2023: 224: 2177: 2043: 2042:

Party? there are a lot of citations by Soviet authorities regarding cinema published in

1557: 3575: 2974: 2867: 2618: 2465: 2410: 2272: 2162: 2110: 1913: 1761: 1718: 1661: 1604:

This task force was proposed back in May, and all of the relevant country WikiProjects

3307:

There has been a lot of discussion recently about deleting these unreferenced articles

3382: 3318:

Knowledge:WikiProject Film/Soviet and post-Soviet cinema task force/Unreferenced BLPs

3178:

to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome

3092: 2047: 3065:. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at 1563:

Creating a separate Baltic states cinema task force does not make sense this respect

3540: 3518: 3485: 3306: 3179: 2900: 2853: 2825: 2795: 2778: 2748: 2687: 2657: 2520: 2392: 2362: 2319: 2223: 2204: 2190: 2130: 2058: 2013: 1990: 1964: 1849: 1798: 1790: 1687: 1649: 1593: 1576: 1471: 1457: 679: 3073: 266: 3555: 3447: 3428: 3360: 3261: 2880:

that happens, then let me know, and I'll be happy to take care of setting it up.

2371: 1749: 156: 114:. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can 3234: 3226: 3214: 3197: 3116: 2378: 2235: 1841: 1837: 1446: 3587: 3571: 3417: 3302: 3279: 3187: 2970: 2863: 2614: 2494: 2461: 2432: 2406: 2354: 2311: 2268: 2251: 2214: 2158: 2121:

You should come up with politically neutral name for the task force to avoid

2106: 1909: 1814: 1784: 1757: 1714: 1420: 350: 284: 1823:

thats a major contributor at the region, that has also helped to launch the

3218: 3217:

site claims 33.3 million viewers while the number gets deleted by a fan of

3039:

Knowledge 0.7 articles have been selected for Soviet and post-Soviet cinema

2729: 2717: 1828: 237: 3416:

for several months soon, and thus will not be able to argue their case at

2989:

Members of this task force may be interested in commenting on the AFD for

2788:

were oriented mostly toward modernist European and especially Nordic art.'

2716:

It might be me since I've worked the most of my career about 12 years for

1548:

since we're dealing with nations of about 1 million, 2 and 3 respectively.

3536: 3514: 3503: 3480:

Knowledge talk:Manual of Style#Merge the Cyrillic advice to one guideline

3412: 3175: 3080:, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible. 2896: 2849: 2821: 2791: 2774: 2744: 2683: 2653: 2585:

I'm agreeable to the proposal as it splits the current task force into a

2516: 2388: 2358: 2315: 2219: 2200: 2186: 2126: 2054: 2009: 1960: 1845: 1794: 1683: 1645: 1589: 1572: 1467: 1453: 674: 102: 3252:

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the

1511:

force has been attempted to put together is a bit, sorry but just weird.

3443: 3424: 3356: 3230: 3213:

There is a dispute going on about the viewing numbers of the film. The

2721: 3225:, the director of the film. He has later admitted starting rumours on 3100: 2736:

that they can both understand. The Nordic Baltic Film Fund founded by

3386: 3336: 334: 310: 2443:

I see the choice as two taskforces that people are willing to join:

375:

Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the

3275: 2483: 2421: 2240: 2183:

Russian, Baltic, Moldavian, Central Asian and Transcaucasian Cinema

131: 3312:

The unreferenced articles related to your project can be found at

441: 86: 62: 2724: 2597:

as suggested. By definition a "task force" is a group of people

3403: 3394: 3221:

and replaced by a greater number based on an oral statement by

1832: 367: 2593:. However I don't see the sense in delaying the creation of a 1879:

Okay, I've been thinking over matters, and I have a proposal:

3206: 1544:. None of the Baltic states never had or never going to have 1374: 906: 765: 702: 460: 436: 3355:, all of them should be deleted or preserved. Please decide. 405: 3468: 3309:, so it is important that these articles are referenced. 236:, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the 3599:

Project-Class Soviet and post-Soviet cinema articles

340: 274: 214: 92: 3604:Soviet and post-Soviet cinema task force articles 3440:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Yorick and Yurick 3585: 3554:Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the 3351:Almost blanked. There are several similar pages 2482:would be fine for pre- and post- Soviet films ~~ 2384:based on the discussion we had in December 2007 2123:unnecessarily looking far too much into politics 2022:I think you're starting to get into a degree of 432: 3649:Project-Class Russia (performing arts) articles 3154:. We are also in the process of implementing a 3052:automated selection of articles for Version 0.7 3024:. General comments are also requested. Thanks, 2044:Film Propaganda: Soviet Russia and Nazi Germany 130:. To improve this article, please refer to the 2834:Okay, looks like we have a proposal, then? :) 1553:Lithuania's doesn't even start until the 1930s 3654:Performing arts in Russia task force articles 3353:Category:Russian Guild of Film Critics Awards 3328:want this wikiproject to participate, please 2985:AfD: One Day in the Life of Andrei Arsenevich 476: 3566:We have collected all of these questions at 3215:http://www.kinokultura.com/plus/prokat2.html 3634:NA-importance Project-Class Russia articles 3074:list of selected articles with cleanup tags 1546:an overwhelmingly flourishing film industry 3474:Pointer to relevant discussion elsewhere. 3301:, of unreferenced living people articles ( 2351:polling is not a substitute for discussion 2308:polling is not a substitute for discussion 483: 469: 126:. To use this banner, please refer to the 3550:Request for information on WP1.0 web tool 3346:Russian Guild of Film Critics Awards 2000 2728:at the Arts Academy of Turku since 1994. 42:does not require a rating on Knowledge's 2991:One Day in the Life of Andrei Arsenevich 2611:Soviet and post-Soviet cinema task force 416:the performing arts in Russia task force 167:Soviet and post-Soviet cinema task force 3290:Unreferenced living people articles bot 3107:This is a notice to let you know about 3057:We would like to ask you to review the 2515:task force and include Canada in it? -- 1697:Fair enough. Thanks for your patience. 14: 3586: 3393:; their relationship to the character 2374:where my edits are among the last 500 3067:Knowledge:Release Version Nominations 2381:where my edits are among the last 50 3048:Knowledge:Version 1.0 Editorial Team 1987:nor are they necessarily meant to be 31: 29: 25: 3619:NA-importance Soviet Union articles 3614:Project-Class Soviet Union articles 3570:where you can leave your response. 3059:articles selected from this project 3000:"unreachable by rational discourse" 2178:The Red Screen By Anna Lawton p 293 1840:and modern most known name such as 238:Union of Soviet Socialist Republics 48:It is of interest to the following 23: 3377:An editor has created the article 3330:add your project name to this list 3016:Editors interested in a suggested 2353:since Knowledge works by building 2310:since Knowledge works by building 1781:Commonwealth of Independent States 1754:Commonwealth of Independent States 1076:Avant-garde and experimental films 404: 265: 250:Knowledge:WikiProject Soviet Union 155: 24: 3670: 3644:WikiProject Soviet Union articles 3142:If you are already subscribed to 3012:Proposed Baltic cinema task force 356:This page is within the scope of 253:Template:WikiProject Soviet Union 230:This page is within the scope of 164:This article is supported by the 108:This page is within the scope of 3463: 440: 343: 333: 309: 277: 217: 207: 183: 124:regional and topical task forces 95: 85: 61: 30: 1642:Knowledge:WikiProject_Lithuania 18:Knowledge talk:WikiProject Film 3200:} 09:42, 15 March, 2009 (UTC) 3096:16:09, 28 September 2008 (UTC) 1908:Yes, that is a good proposal. 1756:to cover the other countries. 13: 1: 3629:NA-importance Russia articles 3624:Project-Class Russia articles 3545:09:43, 30 December 2018 (UTC) 3523:15:24, 29 December 2018 (UTC) 3168:Knowledge talk:Article alerts 3034:02:21, 3 September 2008 (UTC) 3007:01:15, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 2979:20:40, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 2964:20:26, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 2920:07:19, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 2905:07:13, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 2890:07:03, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 2872:06:55, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 2858:06:52, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 2844:06:36, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 2830:06:24, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 2815:06:16, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 2800:06:12, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 2783:06:02, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 2768:05:31, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 2753:05:16, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 2707:05:49, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 2692:05:38, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 2677:05:30, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 2662:04:48, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 2641:03:59, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 2623:03:51, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 2574:02:41, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 2525:20:56, 1 September 2008 (UTC) 2500:20:34, 1 September 2008 (UTC) 2470:06:08, 1 September 2008 (UTC) 1634:Knowledge:WikiProject_Estonia 1323:Soviet and post-Soviet cinema 244:and see a list of open tasks. 3580:04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC) 3381:, that appears to deal with 3305:) related to your project. 3285:03:57, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 3243:12:10, 8 December 2009 (UTC) 2605:, while there are currently 2513:Post-colonial British Cinema 2480:Nordic and Baltic task force 2453:Nordic and Baltic task force 2084:Cinema of the Russian Empire 1825:Baltic Film and Media School 1776:Cinema of the Russian Empire 1638:Knowledge:WikiProject_Latvia 1598:10:15, 17 January 2017 (UTC) 584:Announcements and open tasks 389:Knowledge:WikiProject Russia 7: 3659:WikiProject Film talk pages 3639:WikiProject Russia articles 3594:Project-Class film articles 2438:13:13, 25 August 2008 (UTC) 2415:00:04, 25 August 2008 (UTC) 2397:00:02, 25 August 2008 (UTC) 2367:23:45, 24 August 2008 (UTC) 2340:23:53, 24 August 2008 (UTC) 2324:23:45, 24 August 2008 (UTC) 2297:23:37, 24 August 2008 (UTC) 2277:23:27, 24 August 2008 (UTC) 2257:21:43, 23 August 2008 (UTC) 2228:21:27, 23 August 2008 (UTC) 2209:21:27, 23 August 2008 (UTC) 2195:21:27, 23 August 2008 (UTC) 2167:21:11, 23 August 2008 (UTC) 2135:17:36, 23 August 2008 (UTC) 2115:21:11, 23 August 2008 (UTC) 2099:12:29, 23 August 2008 (UTC) 2063:04:37, 23 August 2008 (UTC) 2037:04:02, 23 August 2008 (UTC) 2018:02:36, 23 August 2008 (UTC) 2003:01:54, 23 August 2008 (UTC) 1969:01:36, 23 August 2008 (UTC) 1938:01:54, 23 August 2008 (UTC) 1918:01:25, 23 August 2008 (UTC) 1903:00:34, 23 August 2008 (UTC) 1868:00:22, 23 August 2008 (UTC) 1854:00:10, 23 August 2008 (UTC) 1803:16:16, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 1766:22:00, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 1739:09:12, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 1723:08:41, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 1707:05:00, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 1692:03:12, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 1674:02:47, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 1654:02:40, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 1627:01:06, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 1581:00:40, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 1501:16:30, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 1476:08:06, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 1462:07:55, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 392:Template:WikiProject Russia 10: 3675: 3461: 3340:02:48, 28 March 2010 (UTC) 3258:Saturday, January 23, 2010 3063:Knowledge talk:Version 0.7 2820:better move on I guess. -- 1536:a part of the Soviet Union 413:This page is supported by 290:This page is supported by 140:Knowledge:WikiProject Film 3609:WikiProject Film articles 3510:British Newspaper Archive 3499:07:03, 29 July 2018 (UTC) 3297:provides a list, updated 3295:User:DASHBot/Wikiprojects 3162:parameter, but forget to 2447:Russia and CIS task force 1377: 1086: 1040:Marvel Cinematic Universe 983: 916: 909: 882:Spotlight cleanup listing 768: 705: 463: 412: 366:dedicated to coverage of 328: 273: 202: 163: 143:Template:WikiProject Film 80: 56: 3452:06:08, 6 July 2017 (UTC) 3433:16:52, 2 July 2017 (UTC) 3365:09:34, 25 May 2016 (UTC) 3254:WP 1.0 assessment system 3018:Baltic cinema task force 2603:Baltic cinema task force 2595:Baltic cinema task force 2587:Soviet cinema task force 2558:Baltic cinema task force 2539:Soviet cinema task force 2508:Soviet cinema task force 2476:Soviet cinema task force 1400:DVD liner notes citation 630:Nominations for deletion 233:WikiProject Soviet Union 3270:WP 1.0 project homepage 3248:WP 1.0 bot announcement 3204:Distribution number of 1819:Nordic Baltic Film Fund 560:Copy-editing essentials 379:, or contribute to the 3391:Innokenty Smoktunovsky 3146:, it is now easier to 3085:this project's subpage 1311:Southeast Asian cinema 409: 270: 160: 74:Soviet and post-Soviet 3508:I have access to the 3458:Cyrillic advice merge 3223:Alexander Stefanovich 3131:and other workflows ( 3121:Articles for deletion 3089:User:SelectionBot/0.7 2591:Russia/CIS task force 2545:Russia/CIS task force 1991:the Indian task force 1513:Now to the business: 1088:National and regional 572:Notability guidelines 464:General information ( 408: 269: 256:Soviet Union articles 159: 3370:Problematic article 3152:request new features 3125:Requests for comment 3078:copyediting requests 2738:Egmont (media group) 2556:there couldn't be a 2349:, please note that 2306:, please note that 1956:Cinema of Azerbaijan 707:Project organization 3026:Girolamo Savonarola 2912:Girolamo Savonarola 2882:Girolamo Savonarola 2836:Girolamo Savonarola 2807:Girolamo Savonarola 2760:Girolamo Savonarola 2699:Girolamo Savonarola 2669:Girolamo Savonarola 2633:Girolamo Savonarola 2566:Girolamo Savonarola 2347:Girolamo Savonarola 2332:Girolamo Savonarola 2304:Girolamo Savonarola 2289:Girolamo Savonarola 2029:Girolamo Savonarola 1995:Girolamo Savonarola 1952:Girolamo Savonarola 1930:Girolamo Savonarola 1895:Girolamo Savonarola 1860:Girolamo Savonarola 1731:Girolamo Savonarola 1699:Girolamo Savonarola 1666:Girolamo Savonarola 1619:Girolamo Savonarola 1532:the fact that they 1508:Girolamo Savonarola 1493:Girolamo Savonarola 687:Fiction noticeboard 512:Discussion archives 225:Soviet Union portal 116:join the discussion 1662:Post-Soviet states 1556:in 1928 and 1931. 1263:New Zealand cinema 547:Naming conventions 410: 381:project discussion 359:WikiProject Russia 293:WikiProject Russia 271: 161: 44:content assessment 3383:Vladimir Vysotsky 3379:Yorick and Yurick 3372:Yorick and Yurick 3283: 3183: 3001: 2948:Nordic task force 2498: 2436: 2255: 2213:PPS. or based on 1989:. If you look at 1750:Northern European 1444: 1443: 1440: 1439: 1369: 1368: 1359:Venezuelan cinema 1119:Australian cinema 1028:Documentary films 901: 900: 760: 759: 697: 696: 496:Main project page 455: 454: 431: 430: 427: 426: 423: 422: 304: 303: 300: 299: 178: 177: 174: 173: 118:and see lists of 3666: 3568:this Google form 3497: 3475: 3467: 3466: 3273: 3174:Message sent by 3173: 3161: 3005: 2999: 2961: 2960: 2549:have lately been 2530:Current proposal 2492: 2490: 2430: 2428: 2249: 2247: 2096: 2095: 1791:Cinema of Russia 1375: 1347:Uruguayan cinema 1287:Pakistani cinema 1107:Argentine cinema 1016:Comic book films 907: 766: 750:Project category 703: 521:Style guidelines 485: 478: 471: 461: 449:WikiProject Film 444: 437: 433: 397: 396: 393: 390: 387: 353: 348: 347: 346: 337: 330: 329: 324: 313: 306: 305: 287: 282: 281: 280: 258: 257: 254: 251: 248: 227: 222: 221: 220: 211: 204: 203: 198: 187: 180: 179: 148: 147: 144: 141: 138: 111:WikiProject Film 105: 100: 99: 98: 89: 82: 81: 76: 65: 58: 57: 35: 34: 33: 26: 3674: 3673: 3669: 3668: 3667: 3665: 3664: 3663: 3584: 3583: 3552: 3532: 3506: 3483: 3476: 3473: 3471: 3464: 3460: 3375: 3349: 3321: 3292: 3250: 3233:for details. -- 3211: 3195: 3159: 3117:fully-automated 3105: 3041: 3014: 2994: 2987: 2954: 2953: 2582: 2532: 2484: 2422: 2372:History of film 2241: 2089: 2088: 1813:Suggestions by 1449: 1227:Japanese cinema 1155:Canadian cinema 1095:American cinema 1004:Christian films 607:Cleanup listing 489: 451: 395:Russia articles 394: 391: 388: 385: 384: 373:To participate: 349: 344: 342: 322:Performing arts 319: 283: 278: 276: 255: 252: 249: 246: 245: 223: 218: 216: 193: 145: 142: 139: 136: 135: 101: 96: 94: 71: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3672: 3662: 3661: 3656: 3651: 3646: 3641: 3636: 3631: 3626: 3621: 3616: 3611: 3606: 3601: 3596: 3551: 3548: 3531: 3526: 3505: 3502: 3482: 3462: 3459: 3456: 3455: 3454: 3374: 3368: 3348: 3343: 3313: 3291: 3288: 3249: 3246: 3227:Alla Pugacheva 3210: 3202: 3191: 3144:Article Alerts 3111:Article alerts 3104: 3102:Article alerts 3099: 3040: 3037: 3013: 3010: 2997:Ed Fitzgerald 2986: 2983: 2982: 2981: 2943: 2942: 2941: 2940: 2939: 2938: 2937: 2936: 2935: 2934: 2933: 2932: 2931: 2930: 2929: 2928: 2927: 2926: 2925: 2924: 2923: 2922: 2714: 2713: 2712: 2711: 2710: 2709: 2650: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2626: 2625: 2613:as it stands. 2581: 2578: 2577: 2576: 2553: 2542: 2531: 2528: 2505: 2504: 2503: 2502: 2458: 2457: 2456: 2450: 2418: 2417: 2401: 2379:Special effect 2369: 2343: 2342: 2300: 2299: 2284: 2264: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2232: 2231: 2230: 2211: 2155: 2154: 2151: 2142: 2141: 2140: 2139: 2138: 2137: 2119: 2118: 2117: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2072: 2071: 2070: 2069: 2068: 2067: 2066: 2065: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1945: 1944: 1943: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1921: 1920: 1891: 1890: 1887: 1884: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1870: 1842:Lars von Trier 1838:Ingmar Bergman 1805: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1768: 1742: 1741: 1710: 1709: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1630: 1629: 1615: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1560: 1559: 1550: 1549: 1539: 1527: 1523: 1522: 1521: 1514: 1512: 1504: 1503: 1488: 1464: 1448: 1445: 1442: 1441: 1438: 1437: 1431: 1430: 1424: 1423: 1417: 1416: 1410: 1409: 1403: 1402: 1396: 1395: 1389: 1388: 1382: 1381: 1371: 1370: 1367: 1366: 1361: 1355: 1354: 1349: 1343: 1342: 1337: 1335:Spanish cinema 1331: 1330: 1325: 1319: 1318: 1313: 1307: 1306: 1301: 1299:Persian cinema 1295: 1294: 1289: 1283: 1282: 1277: 1271: 1270: 1265: 1259: 1258: 1253: 1251:Mexican cinema 1247: 1246: 1241: 1235: 1234: 1229: 1223: 1222: 1217: 1215:Italian cinema 1211: 1210: 1205: 1199: 1198: 1193: 1187: 1186: 1181: 1175: 1174: 1169: 1167:Chinese cinema 1163: 1162: 1157: 1151: 1150: 1145: 1143:British cinema 1139: 1138: 1133: 1127: 1126: 1121: 1115: 1114: 1109: 1103: 1102: 1097: 1091: 1090: 1084: 1083: 1078: 1072: 1071: 1066: 1060: 1059: 1054: 1052:Skydance Media 1048: 1047: 1042: 1036: 1035: 1030: 1024: 1023: 1018: 1012: 1011: 1006: 1000: 999: 994: 992:Animated films 988: 987: 981: 980: 975: 969: 968: 963: 957: 956: 951: 945: 944: 939: 937:Film festivals 933: 932: 927: 921: 920: 918:General topics 914: 913: 903: 902: 899: 898: 893: 891:Topic workshop 887: 886: 884: 877: 876: 871: 865: 864: 859: 853: 852: 847: 841: 840: 835: 829: 828: 823: 817: 816: 811: 809:Categorization 805: 804: 802: 795: 794: 792: 785: 784: 779: 773: 772: 762: 761: 758: 757: 752: 746: 745: 740: 738:Project banner 734: 733: 728: 722: 721: 716: 710: 709: 699: 698: 695: 694: 689: 683: 682: 677: 671: 670: 665: 659: 658: 653: 646: 645: 638: 637: 632: 625: 624: 619: 612: 611: 609: 602: 601: 599: 597:Article alerts 592: 591: 586: 580: 579: 574: 568: 567: 562: 555: 554: 549: 542: 541: 536: 529: 528: 523: 517: 516: 514: 507: 506: 498: 492: 491: 488: 487: 480: 473: 465: 457: 456: 453: 452: 447: 445: 429: 428: 425: 424: 421: 420: 411: 401: 400: 398: 371: 370:on Knowledge. 355: 354: 338: 326: 325: 314: 302: 301: 298: 297: 289: 288: 272: 262: 261: 259: 242:the discussion 229: 228: 212: 200: 199: 188: 176: 175: 172: 171: 162: 152: 151: 149: 107: 106: 90: 78: 77: 66: 54: 53: 47: 36: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3671: 3660: 3657: 3655: 3652: 3650: 3647: 3645: 3642: 3640: 3637: 3635: 3632: 3630: 3627: 3625: 3622: 3620: 3617: 3615: 3612: 3610: 3607: 3605: 3602: 3600: 3597: 3595: 3592: 3591: 3589: 3582: 3581: 3577: 3573: 3569: 3563: 3561: 3557: 3547: 3546: 3542: 3538: 3530: 3529:German Kultur 3525: 3524: 3520: 3516: 3511: 3501: 3500: 3495: 3492: 3489: 3488: 3481: 3470: 3453: 3449: 3445: 3441: 3437: 3436: 3435: 3434: 3430: 3426: 3421: 3419: 3414: 3410: 3406: 3405: 3400: 3399:Shakespeare's 3396: 3392: 3388: 3384: 3380: 3373: 3367: 3366: 3362: 3358: 3354: 3347: 3342: 3341: 3338: 3333: 3331: 3327: 3322: 3319: 3310: 3308: 3304: 3300: 3296: 3287: 3286: 3281: 3277: 3271: 3267: 3266:summary table 3263: 3259: 3255: 3245: 3244: 3240: 3236: 3232: 3228: 3224: 3220: 3216: 3209: 3208: 3201: 3199: 3194: 3189: 3184: 3181: 3177: 3171: 3169: 3165: 3157: 3156:"news system" 3153: 3149: 3145: 3140: 3138: 3134: 3130: 3126: 3122: 3118: 3114: 3113: 3112: 3103: 3098: 3097: 3094: 3090: 3086: 3081: 3079: 3075: 3070: 3068: 3064: 3060: 3055: 3053: 3049: 3045: 3044:Knowledge 0.7 3036: 3035: 3031: 3027: 3023: 3019: 3009: 3008: 3004: 3003: 3002: 2992: 2980: 2976: 2972: 2968: 2967: 2966: 2965: 2962: 2959: 2958: 2949: 2921: 2917: 2913: 2908: 2907: 2906: 2902: 2898: 2893: 2892: 2891: 2887: 2883: 2879: 2875: 2874: 2873: 2869: 2865: 2861: 2860: 2859: 2855: 2851: 2847: 2846: 2845: 2841: 2837: 2833: 2832: 2831: 2827: 2823: 2818: 2817: 2816: 2812: 2808: 2803: 2802: 2801: 2797: 2793: 2789: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2780: 2776: 2771: 2770: 2769: 2765: 2761: 2757: 2756: 2755: 2754: 2750: 2746: 2742: 2739: 2735: 2731: 2726: 2723: 2719: 2708: 2704: 2700: 2695: 2694: 2693: 2689: 2685: 2680: 2679: 2678: 2674: 2670: 2666: 2665: 2664: 2663: 2659: 2655: 2642: 2638: 2634: 2630: 2629: 2628: 2627: 2624: 2620: 2616: 2612: 2608: 2604: 2600: 2596: 2592: 2588: 2584: 2583: 2575: 2571: 2567: 2563: 2559: 2554: 2550: 2546: 2543: 2540: 2537: 2536: 2535: 2527: 2526: 2522: 2518: 2514: 2509: 2501: 2496: 2491: 2489: 2488: 2481: 2477: 2473: 2472: 2471: 2467: 2463: 2459: 2454: 2451: 2448: 2445: 2444: 2442: 2441: 2440: 2439: 2434: 2429: 2427: 2426: 2416: 2412: 2408: 2404: 2403: 2402: 2399: 2398: 2394: 2390: 2386: 2383: 2380: 2376: 2373: 2368: 2364: 2360: 2356: 2352: 2348: 2341: 2337: 2333: 2328: 2327: 2326: 2325: 2321: 2317: 2313: 2309: 2305: 2298: 2294: 2290: 2285: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2278: 2274: 2270: 2258: 2253: 2248: 2246: 2245: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2221: 2216: 2212: 2210: 2206: 2202: 2198: 2197: 2196: 2192: 2188: 2184: 2179: 2175: 2174: 2173: 2172: 2171: 2170: 2169: 2168: 2164: 2160: 2152: 2148: 2147: 2146: 2136: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2120: 2116: 2112: 2108: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2101: 2100: 2097: 2094: 2093: 2085: 2080: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2064: 2060: 2056: 2052: 2051:9781860641671 2049: 2045: 2040: 2039: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2025: 2021: 2020: 2019: 2015: 2011: 2006: 2005: 2004: 2000: 1996: 1992: 1988: 1984: 1980: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1970: 1966: 1962: 1957: 1953: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1919: 1915: 1911: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1888: 1885: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1869: 1865: 1861: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1851: 1847: 1843: 1839: 1834: 1830: 1826: 1822: 1820: 1816: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1808: 1807: 1806: 1804: 1800: 1796: 1792: 1788: 1786: 1785:Baltic states 1782: 1777: 1767: 1763: 1759: 1755: 1751: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1740: 1736: 1732: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1720: 1716: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1689: 1685: 1675: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1651: 1647: 1643: 1639: 1635: 1628: 1624: 1620: 1616: 1612: 1607: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1578: 1574: 1564: 1561: 1558: 1554: 1551: 1547: 1543: 1540: 1537: 1533: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1520: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1509: 1502: 1498: 1494: 1489: 1485: 1480: 1479: 1478: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1463: 1459: 1455: 1436: 1433: 1432: 1429: 1426: 1425: 1422: 1419: 1418: 1415: 1412: 1411: 1408: 1405: 1404: 1401: 1398: 1397: 1394: 1391: 1390: 1387: 1384: 1383: 1380: 1376: 1373: 1372: 1365: 1362: 1360: 1357: 1356: 1353: 1350: 1348: 1345: 1344: 1341: 1338: 1336: 1333: 1332: 1329: 1326: 1324: 1321: 1320: 1317: 1314: 1312: 1309: 1308: 1305: 1302: 1300: 1297: 1296: 1293: 1290: 1288: 1285: 1284: 1281: 1278: 1276: 1275:Nordic cinema 1273: 1272: 1269: 1266: 1264: 1261: 1260: 1257: 1254: 1252: 1249: 1248: 1245: 1242: 1240: 1239:Korean cinema 1237: 1236: 1233: 1230: 1228: 1225: 1224: 1221: 1218: 1216: 1213: 1212: 1209: 1206: 1204: 1203:Indian cinema 1201: 1200: 1197: 1194: 1192: 1191:German cinema 1189: 1188: 1185: 1182: 1180: 1179:French cinema 1177: 1176: 1173: 1170: 1168: 1165: 1164: 1161: 1158: 1156: 1153: 1152: 1149: 1146: 1144: 1141: 1140: 1137: 1134: 1132: 1131:Baltic cinema 1129: 1128: 1125: 1122: 1120: 1117: 1116: 1113: 1110: 1108: 1105: 1104: 1101: 1098: 1096: 1093: 1092: 1089: 1085: 1082: 1079: 1077: 1074: 1073: 1070: 1067: 1065: 1062: 1061: 1058: 1055: 1053: 1050: 1049: 1046: 1043: 1041: 1038: 1037: 1034: 1031: 1029: 1026: 1025: 1022: 1019: 1017: 1014: 1013: 1010: 1007: 1005: 1002: 1001: 998: 995: 993: 990: 989: 986: 982: 979: 976: 974: 971: 970: 967: 964: 962: 959: 958: 955: 952: 950: 947: 946: 943: 940: 938: 935: 934: 931: 928: 926: 923: 922: 919: 915: 912: 908: 905: 904: 897: 894: 892: 889: 888: 885: 883: 879: 878: 875: 872: 870: 867: 866: 863: 860: 858: 855: 854: 851: 848: 846: 843: 842: 839: 836: 834: 831: 830: 827: 824: 822: 819: 818: 815: 812: 810: 807: 806: 803: 801: 797: 796: 793: 791: 787: 786: 783: 780: 778: 775: 774: 771: 767: 764: 763: 756: 753: 751: 748: 747: 744: 741: 739: 736: 735: 732: 729: 727: 724: 723: 720: 717: 715: 712: 711: 708: 704: 701: 700: 693: 690: 688: 685: 684: 681: 678: 676: 673: 672: 669: 666: 664: 661: 660: 657: 654: 652: 648: 647: 644: 643:Popular pages 640: 639: 636: 633: 631: 627: 626: 623: 620: 618: 614: 613: 610: 608: 604: 603: 600: 598: 594: 593: 590: 587: 585: 582: 581: 578: 575: 573: 570: 569: 566: 563: 561: 557: 556: 553: 550: 548: 544: 543: 540: 537: 535: 531: 530: 527: 524: 522: 519: 518: 515: 513: 509: 508: 505: 502: 499: 497: 494: 493: 486: 481: 479: 474: 472: 467: 466: 462: 459: 458: 450: 446: 443: 439: 438: 435: 434: 418: 417: 407: 403: 402: 399: 382: 378: 374: 369: 365: 361: 360: 352: 351:Russia portal 341: 339: 336: 332: 331: 327: 323: 318: 315: 312: 308: 307: 295: 294: 286: 285:Russia portal 275: 268: 264: 263: 260: 243: 239: 235: 234: 226: 215: 213: 210: 206: 205: 201: 197: 192: 189: 186: 182: 181: 169: 168: 158: 154: 153: 150: 146:film articles 133: 129: 128:documentation 125: 121: 117: 113: 112: 104: 93: 91: 88: 84: 83: 79: 75: 70: 67: 64: 60: 59: 55: 51: 45: 41: 37: 28: 27: 19: 3564: 3553: 3533: 3528: 3507: 3486: 3477: 3422: 3408: 3402: 3376: 3350: 3334: 3325: 3323: 3320:<<< 3311: 3298: 3293: 3257: 3251: 3219:Sofia Rotaru 3212: 3205: 3185: 3172: 3163: 3160:display=none 3143: 3141: 3109: 3108: 3106: 3093:SelectionBot 3082: 3071: 3056: 3050:has made an 3042: 3022:sign up here 3017: 3015: 2998: 2996: 2988: 2957:The Bald One 2956: 2955: 2947: 2944: 2877: 2787: 2730:Theodor Luts 2718:Nordisk Film 2715: 2647: 2610: 2606: 2602: 2598: 2594: 2590: 2586: 2561: 2560:of its own, 2557: 2548: 2544: 2538: 2533: 2512: 2507: 2506: 2486: 2485: 2479: 2475: 2452: 2446: 2424: 2423: 2419: 2400: 2344: 2301: 2265: 2243: 2242: 2182: 2156: 2143: 2122: 2092:The Bald One 2091: 2090: 1986: 1982: 1892: 1878: 1829:Nordisk Film 1779: 1772: 1711: 1680: 1631: 1610: 1605: 1570: 1562: 1552: 1545: 1541: 1535: 1531: 1524: 1518: 1505: 1483: 1450: 1421:plot cleanup 1393:DVD citation 1327: 1087: 984: 973:Silent films 949:Film finance 917: 800:Instructions 726:Participants 714:Coordinators 617:New articles 414: 377:project page 372: 357: 291: 247:Soviet Union 231: 191:Soviet Union 165: 109: 50:WikiProjects 40:project page 39: 3487:SMcCandlish 3478:Please see 3335:Thank you. 3176:User:Addbot 3164:give a link 3148:report bugs 3129:Peer review 2609:members in 2283:conclusion. 2185:. Thanks!-- 925:Film awards 911:Task forces 770:Departments 675:Film portal 364:WikiProject 103:Film portal 3588:Categories 3556:WP 1.0 Bot 3262:WP 1.0 bot 3231:Talk:Dusha 3198:WP Physics 3186:Thanks. — 2722:Copenhagen 2267:on board. 1983:workgroups 1893:Thoughts? 1614:different? 961:Filmmaking 777:Assessment 534:Multimedia 132:guidelines 120:open tasks 3387:Oleg Dahl 3272:. — Carl 3235:Jaan Pärn 3133:full list 2734:languages 2355:consensus 2312:consensus 2024:precision 1831:owned by 1611:worse off 1379:Templates 1064:War films 869:Spotlight 845:Resources 663:Spotlight 3572:Walkerma 3560:web tool 3193:κοντριβς 3188:Headbomb 2971:Martintg 2895:force?-- 2864:Martintg 2615:Martintg 2580:Comments 2474:Why not 2462:Martintg 2407:Martintg 2269:Martintg 2215:Martintg 2159:Martintg 2107:Martintg 1910:Martintg 1815:Martintg 1758:Martintg 1715:Martintg 1566:already. 833:Outreach 651:Requests 3324:If you 2725:Denmark 2599:willing 2562:in time 2236:WP:BSNB 2218:good.-- 1466:1940.-- 1435:userbox 1407:infobox 790:B-Class 3537:Michig 3515:Michig 3413:verify 3404:Hamlet 3395:Yorick 3389:, and 3326:do not 3260:, the 2897:Termer 2850:Termer 2822:Termer 2792:Termer 2775:Termer 2745:Termer 2684:Termer 2654:Termer 2589:and a 2517:Termer 2389:Termer 2359:Termer 2316:Termer 2220:Termer 2201:Termer 2187:Termer 2127:Termer 2055:Termer 2010:Termer 1961:Termer 1846:Termer 1844:etc.-- 1833:Egmont 1795:Termer 1787:cinema 1684:Termer 1646:Termer 1590:LADave 1573:Termer 1468:Termer 1454:Termer 1447:Rename 1414:invite 1386:banner 857:Review 386:Russia 368:Russia 317:Russia 196:Russia 46:scale. 3444:Xover 3425:Xover 3409:about 3401:play 3357:Xx236 3337:Okip 3316:: --> 3315:: --> 3314:: --> 3299:daily 3256:. On 3207:Dusha 985:Genre 38:This 16:< 3576:talk 3541:talk 3519:talk 3448:talk 3442:. -- 3429:talk 3361:talk 3303:BLPs 3280:talk 3239:talk 3180:here 3150:and 3137:here 3115:, a 3030:talk 3020:can 2975:talk 2916:talk 2901:talk 2886:talk 2878:When 2868:talk 2854:talk 2840:talk 2826:talk 2811:talk 2796:talk 2779:talk 2764:talk 2749:talk 2703:talk 2688:talk 2673:talk 2658:talk 2637:talk 2619:talk 2607:zero 2570:talk 2521:talk 2495:talk 2466:talk 2433:talk 2411:talk 2393:talk 2363:talk 2336:talk 2320:talk 2293:talk 2273:talk 2252:talk 2224:talk 2205:talk 2191:talk 2163:talk 2150:now. 2131:talk 2111:talk 2059:talk 2048:ISBN 2033:talk 2014:talk 1999:talk 1965:talk 1934:talk 1914:talk 1899:talk 1864:talk 1850:talk 1799:talk 1783:and 1762:talk 1735:talk 1719:talk 1703:talk 1688:talk 1670:talk 1650:talk 1623:talk 1606:were 1594:talk 1577:talk 1534:were 1497:talk 1484:were 1472:talk 1458:talk 1428:stub 1364:talk 1352:talk 1340:talk 1328:talk 1316:talk 1304:talk 1292:talk 1280:talk 1268:talk 1256:talk 1244:talk 1232:talk 1220:talk 1208:talk 1196:talk 1184:talk 1172:talk 1160:talk 1148:talk 1136:talk 1124:talk 1112:talk 1100:talk 1081:talk 1069:talk 1057:talk 1045:talk 1033:talk 1021:talk 1009:talk 997:talk 978:talk 966:talk 954:talk 942:talk 930:talk 896:talk 874:talk 862:talk 850:talk 838:talk 826:talk 821:Core 814:talk 782:talk 755:talk 743:talk 731:talk 719:talk 692:talk 680:talk 668:talk 656:talk 635:talk 622:talk 589:talk 577:talk 565:talk 552:talk 539:talk 526:talk 504:talk 362:, a 137:Film 122:and 69:Film 3504:BNA 3496:😼 3469:FYI 3418:AfD 3397:in 3276:CBM 3087:of 3069:. 2720:in 2487:Xil 2425:Xil 2357:.-- 2345:Hi 2314:.-- 2302:Hi 2244:Xil 1950:Hi 1506:Hi 3590:: 3578:) 3543:) 3521:) 3484:— 3472:– 3450:) 3431:) 3420:. 3385:, 3363:) 3332:. 3278:· 3241:) 3196:– 3170:. 3139:. 3127:, 3123:, 3072:A 3054:. 3032:) 2993:. 2977:) 2918:) 2903:) 2888:) 2870:) 2856:) 2842:) 2828:) 2813:) 2798:) 2781:) 2766:) 2751:) 2705:) 2690:) 2675:) 2660:) 2639:) 2621:) 2572:) 2523:) 2468:) 2460:-- 2413:) 2395:) 2387:-- 2377:; 2365:) 2338:) 2322:) 2295:) 2275:) 2226:) 2207:) 2193:) 2165:) 2157:-- 2133:) 2113:) 2061:) 2053:-- 2046:. 2035:) 2016:) 2001:) 1967:) 1936:) 1916:) 1901:) 1866:) 1852:) 1827:; 1801:) 1793:-- 1764:) 1737:) 1721:) 1705:) 1690:) 1672:) 1652:) 1640:, 1636:, 1625:) 1596:) 1579:) 1499:) 1474:) 1460:) 880:→ 798:→ 788:→ 649:→ 641:→ 628:→ 615:→ 605:→ 595:→ 558:→ 545:→ 532:→ 510:→ 490:) 320:: 194:: 72:: 3574:( 3539:( 3517:( 3494:¢ 3491:☏ 3446:( 3427:( 3359:( 3282:) 3274:( 3237:( 3190:{ 3182:. 3028:( 2973:( 2914:( 2899:( 2884:( 2866:( 2852:( 2838:( 2824:( 2809:( 2794:( 2777:( 2762:( 2747:( 2701:( 2686:( 2671:( 2656:( 2635:( 2617:( 2568:( 2519:( 2497:) 2493:( 2464:( 2435:) 2431:( 2409:( 2391:( 2361:( 2334:( 2318:( 2291:( 2271:( 2254:) 2250:( 2222:( 2203:( 2189:( 2161:( 2129:( 2109:( 2057:( 2031:( 2012:( 1997:( 1963:( 1932:( 1912:( 1897:( 1862:( 1848:( 1797:( 1760:( 1733:( 1717:( 1701:( 1686:( 1668:( 1648:( 1621:( 1592:( 1575:( 1495:( 1470:( 1456:( 501:+ 484:e 477:t 470:v 419:. 383:. 296:. 170:. 134:. 52::

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

talk:WikiProject Film/Soviet and post-Soviet cinema task force - Knowledge

Index