744:
305:
373:
768:, even American works. Granted, most of the people reading this will be dead in 2072, but that doesn't make it any better. Consider an unknown photograph obviously made in 1980 with a listed creator (so not anonymous), but the name is extremely generic and no information can be found on them. When will this photograph be safe-ish to use, assuming no further changes to copyright terms? Well, maybe a precocious 10-year old took the picture, and maybe they lived a long and full life to age 105, and maybe someone with a claim to their estate is extremely litigious. Math time:
130:
150:
870:
110:
209:
140:
36:
160:
123:
120:
192:
170:
200:
598:
213:
1305:. Given that the odds of someone abusing the license to create a line of knock-off statues is... remote... it should be safe-ish for the sculptor. (Technically it gives up the legal right to mess with, like, a band of Illinois Nazis using the image too, except that with Google Image search, that's nearly impossible to stop anyway.)
216:
215:
212:
210:
217:
487:, which has some nice effects, such as no longer needing to comply with our non-free content policies such as downscaling resolution. In the source editor, it'll look something like {{PD-US-expired-abroad|out_of_copyright_in=20XX}}; replace the year with when it enters the public domain in its source country.
520:, and the source country uses author's life + X years rules, then... maybe! Was it first published in the US, or published simultaneously around the world including the US? Was it published with a copyright notice in compliance with formalities? If it was, was the copyright renewed in the United States?
214:
1157:
About 10 years ago, I took a photograph of a statue in a public park. The statue had recently been commissioned and the artist paid for it by the city government. Thus, I contributed a few pennies from my taxes for the creation of that statue in that public park that anyone could see and photograph.
784:
Y years since publication, whichever is shorter. Copyright terms already extend far, far after everyone involved was dead. To avoid hypothetical 10-year old photographers & artists locking up orphan works forever, even a weak rule that said "copyright term is either author's life + 70 years, or
759:
You might think based on the above that, even if 95 years is too long, at least we'll see a steady march into the public domain year-by-year. That's a nice thought — and it will be true for a while — but in reality things are much worse. As overly long as the US's copyright term for 1929-1977 works
256:
in the United States (many lesser works were probably already public domain due to not being renewed, but now there's no need to verify the lack of renewal). In countries that use author's life plus some number of years, that means a few things: in "life + 70" countries, authors who died in 1953 had
1282:
That answers my question. I likely violated copyright law by publishing a photo of the statue on
Knowledge. But...I think the copyright law is ridiculous -- offering far too much protection to authors, sculptors, etc. Moreover, if I were the artist who created the statue I mentioned above, I would
836:
will still expire 95 years after publication for post-1978 works. But, to my limited knowledge, there are borderline cases where it might not be clear if something really qualifies for that, and the only way to decide the issue would be to expensively go to court. Under the older rules, there's no
686:
a later printing or edition.) Then follow the
Wikisource instructions; you can create a page-by-page transcription as well as combined full-chapter webpages that span across multiple scanned pages. This will be much faster and easier if the PDF already has the text natively, of course, rather than
818:
Easiest example: the irrational extension of old copyrights, rather than merely extending new ones. People doing creative work in the 1930s, 40s, 50s, and 60s thought that the reward from a mere 56 years of copyright was sufficient to produce their art; unless they were psychic or possessed a time
712:
This is the section where we give the usual free content enthusiast whining about copyright law, and how maybe you can do your part by informing your local representative / duke / overlord of the merits of an active public domain. That it would be better if copyright terms were much, much shorter,
1210:
government employee made it as part of performance of their duties, it might be public domain (uncharted territory here - does this even ever happen? Sounds like it was the municipal government anyway.) If the artist built a sculpture then sold it, even if it was directed by the government, then
1027:
The editorial I believe is correct when it says to avoid involving politicians But I believe that courts have taken a broader view of fair use because of the 1998 extension. Many academics and libraries have formulated guidelines for fair use and encourage people to use it. Even the fact that
682:. Hopefully a PDF of the scanned book already exists at the Internet Archive (for major works, it probably does); you'll upload that PDF to Commons after making triple-sure that it really is free content in both the US and its source country. (And make sure you upload the 1928-or-earlier scan,
567:. Many of them will say that copyright is kept for the same length of time as X, as if the author died the same year as publication; meaning many anonymously published works such as random photographs are public domain if they are from 1953. Just make sure to include in the image description
234:
January 1, 1928. A day that will live in... famy? After fears that the public domain (PD) would remain frozen forever, it started... very slowly... moving forward again in 2019 in the United States. This year's Public Domain Day is unusually momentous, as a certain rodent you may know has
785:
120 years after publication," would be a step forward. Ideally, something stronger would be nice (say, a global 95 years after publication limit? Or even 75 years after publication?), but we'll take what we can get at this point. Does anyone know any world leaders and can get this through?
1300:
If you really want to go down the rabbit hole: you can try and look up who the sculptor was, and then ask them for permission - either via the sculptor posting on their website that they've licensed works X, Y, and Z under cc-by-sa, or via convincing the sculptor to follow the process at
619:
586:: but luckily, this doesn't matter often on Knowledge. The short version is that sheet music and lyrics from 1928 and before are public domain,as are new recordings of said music that explicitly release the rights; also, specific recordings from 1923 and earlier are now public domain.
955:
615:
1206:. My understanding is that if the sculpture was truly generic where the "sculptor" was just a employee hammering out a paint-by-numbers generic thingy that's a glorified lamppost, then there might be no right to it (as there's either no creative element). Alternatively, if a
553:
work published between 1929–1963 (e.g. first published in the US), you can throw the above author's life calculations in the trash, and skip straight to checking if the copyright was renewed. But that was already true and nothing really changed with this Public Domain
691:
and manually fixing its many errors. Making a
Wikisource edition might make sense for the most popular or important texts. After this is all done, go to the External links section of the Knowledge article on the scanned work, and proudly link your contribution with
541:
published in the United States and the source country. The other possibility (but a rare one) is if the work was already public domain in the source country in 1994 (unlikely; for many countries, this means the author needs to have died in 1924 or earlier). See
634:
For largely textual works, this means that long quotes are now permissible to use on
Knowledge, as long as you attribute it. I don't think this will come up very often unless someone finds and uploads a major 1928 reference work –
325:
Works are now free to use! Well. With caution. In general, copyright issues are something that it's best not to start uploading too aggressively on if you aren't sure. Copyright status will affect whether you ought to upload to
163:
1032:
shows a willingness to take the public domain more seriously. Indeed, WP editors should do all they can to exercise their right to the material that just entered the public domain. As the aphorism goes, "Use it, or lose it."-
1133:
What I miss in the article is the celebration of Public Domain Day 2024 on
Commons. All files that have been restored 1 - 10 January because of Public Domain Day + newly uploaded files, are now available at the project page
133:
257:
their works hit the public domain; and in "life + 50" countries, authors who died in 1973 have their works in the public domain. There are some complications here for
Knowledge though, which we will get into shortly.
211:
235:
finally been set loose. One of the driving forces behind multiple rounds of copyright extension in the United States over the last century was lobbying from the Disney corporation. The most recent of them, the 1998
1211:
the artist probably does have some rights, and then there's all the usual questions about if the artist has freely licensed the work. However, per the
Commons link above, if the statue is from before 1989, it's
717:
could be freed for general use. Unfortunately, there is a problem here. The
Hippocratic Oath says "First, do no harm," but every time politicians have looked at copyrights, it has almost always been to greatly
571:
you believe that the work truly is anonymous and some due diligence to show this; "I found it on the
Internet and I'm not sure from where" doesn't make it an anonymous work. The work also will need to be in the
779:
So, here is a modest proposal, which "merely" requires modifying international treaties a little. There should be a fallback instituted that says that the copyright term is either author's life + X years
173:
153:
776:
that this picture from 1980 is safely public domain. At least under the classic US system of mostly caring about publication date, at some point tracking down vague authors becomes irrelevant.
245:. It locked up tons of other harmless photographs and books in limbo as well, which was just too bad as far as Disney was concerned. However, we did not see another extension, and now
483:, where it is indicated that works in the public domain in the US are accepted regardless of the copyright status in the home country. Mark such files here on English Knowledge with
386:
239:, was called that for a reason: repeated copyright extensions allowed Disney to keep their grasp on the oldest iterations of Mickey, whose first appearance was in the 1928 cartoon
734:(i.e. it wasn't controversial enough for a recorded vote). Calling up your local politician and encouraging them to start a new copyright-related bill may well make the problem
96:
670:
For the most deluxe treatment, if you think that there's sufficient interest in a work that digitizing the text is valuable rather than flipping through images, there is
970:
361:
924:
90:
823:
the art was made wasn't going to encourage them to retroactively produce more of it. But it certainly would make the companies that held the rights money longer, so.
904:
1302:
143:
320:
died in 1968, and France uses life of the author + 70 years. And it's possible that other sufficiently major contributors to the film also died in 1953 or later.
894:
806:
1063:
934:
909:
857:
848:
504:
537:"restored" various copyrights (sometimes to non-existent or unknowing "holders" of these copyrights) in 1994. The easiest way around this is if the work was
1158:
I posted my photograph of the statue on a
Knowledge page -- and it was removed by someone who said I was violating the copyright of the artist. Was I? Why?
919:
1100:
887:
1338:
1193:
1120:
1042:
939:
1314:
1240:
1000:
1292:
1224:
1203:
929:
914:
881:
55:
44:
1075:
1260:
1021:
1277:
1147:
346:
The above links already include the major works entering the public domain. However, you can go hunting for more obscure works, if you like.
1167:
1089:
Also, copyright laws did not consider for the fact that in their future, anybody could share and remix almost anything and everything easily.
944:
627:
The easiest thing to do is go upload some images! You can flip through those newly public domain books or pause old 1928 silent films, then
297:
652:
1389:
1109:, not publication. Determining when something was first published is difficult, and many photographs and manuscripts were never published.
701:
564:
436:
401:
1248:
975:
982:
743:
21:
1199:
1365:
113:
1360:
1355:
1135:
1029:
707:
543:
1350:
657:
959:
341:
1283:
be delighted to have it displayed on Knowledge: free publicity and recognition rather than wallowing in obscurity.
697:
713:
or if, at the very least, that we went back to a system of having to renew copyright registrations, meaning that
636:
590:
268:
688:
484:
1215:
public domain due to the annoyance of registering a copyright on a sculpture. (This is not legal advice.)
439:
to look up the relevant country if you aren't sure whether to use 50 or 70 years), then it's public domain.
1345:
991:
I intend to subsist solely on kale and quinoa so I can categorize Picasso on commons on my 198th birthday.
869:
751:
727:
628:
573:
397:
49:
35:
17:
1058:
As a foreign, I can't speak for the US, but another good example comes from the recent statements of the
480:
285:
January 1, 2024 is Public Domain Day: Works from 1928 are open to all, as are sound recordings from 1923!
236:
693:
312:
290:
1128:
996:
809:. Which will be a service toward the public commons, so go to it, but... a lot more work, for sure.
640:
278:
651:), and sometimes it's better to have nothing at all than to have something a century out of date.
499:
454:
304:
643:? Be careful here, though; back in the day, some Knowledge articles were preloaded with the 1911
663:
583:
563:
that use a copyright term of author's life + X, you should check the relevant country's rules at
1152:
1059:
1015:
606:
491:
444:
381:
1082:
Agreed. In my opinion, works should be released into the public domain at most 50 years after
750:
Copyright length in the United States, which was substantially extended in 1976 and 1998. The
372:
837:
fear of a litigious estate suing and claiming that they had a lingering authorship copyright.
723:
264:
1371:
1288:
1236:
1163:
992:
679:
503:, which is now public domain in the US, but is still under copyright in the UK, hence why
8:
1189:
1071:
347:
317:
316:
is now public domain in the United States... but probably not in France, since director
546:. Simultaneous US publication is usually the criterion most commonly met for this case.
1310:
1220:
1115:
611:
284:
1273:
1256:
1143:
1038:
1007:
966:
675:
331:
327:
272:
597:
1091:
418:
351:
287:, an article from the Center for the Study of the Public Domain at Duke University.
241:
225:
523:
260:
This topic has been covered in a number of places, so here are some useful links:
1284:
1266:
1232:
1175:
1159:
648:
1185:
1067:
479:, such works can be used locally on English Knowledge. The relevant policy is
459:
449:
1383:
1306:
1216:
1181:
1110:
833:
355:
253:
191:
183:
805:
exist, you may be stuck on the rockier road of obtaining a 1928 edition and
1269:
1252:
1139:
1053:
1034:
1303:
c:Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team#Declaration_of_consent_for_all_enquiries
252:
More specifically: works published in 1928 are now unconditionally in the
714:
618:, and a transcription project at Wikisource is underway, but incomplete:
249:
has entered the public domain, along with a massive pile of other works.
350:
and its subcategories are a good start. You can also browse around the
1066:. Yes, it's kind of a shameless plug, but I hope it's justified... : D
731:
671:
385:. Pause the movie wherever you like and extract images like this (see
335:
582:
has its own bespoke rules, thanks to the mostly public-domain-hostile
358:
that you can adjust to taste with other keywords, authors, or titles.
497:, which is public domain in the US but under copyright in Germany.
1198:
I am not an expert here on sculptures; I'd mostly be quoting from
387:
File:The Circus (1928) by Charlie Chaplin (restored version).webm
667:, which are maybe mildly more up-to-date than earlier editions.
229:, starring one Mickey Mouse, public domain as of January 1, 2024
766:
that's the system we'll be in for works published after 1978
526:– You can perform a search here. Quite a lot of works were
534:
1200:
Freedom_of_panorama#Notable_lawsuits_concerning_sculptures
655:
at the Internet Archive; mostly some 1928 publications of
507:
is a local-to-English-Knowledge upload and not at Commons.
199:
30:
Public Domain Day 2024: Mickey & You: What can you do?
475:, then uploading to Commons is against policy there.
722:
them, even when it made negative sense to do so. The
505:
File:Pooh meets Tigger, illustration by EH Shepard.gif
678:). Basically, you'll want to follow the procedure at
980:If your comment has not appeared here, you can try
281:, a post on the official Wikimedia Foundation blog.
738:, not better, judging by the track record so far.
411:solely American and published in 1928 (or before)
1381:
653:Here's a preloaded search of 1928 encyclopedias
561:published anonymously in non-American countries
1005:The copyright terms are ridiculously too long.
429:published in 1928 but not in the United States
1204:c:Commons:Public art and copyrights in the US
760:is, life-of-the-author + 70 years is usually
356:this is a preloaded query for works from 1928
181:
754:has more details on what to do in each case.
1249:Commons:Public_art_and_copyrights_in_the_US
544:Knowledge:Non-US_copyrights#Five-point_test
293:, an article from the Public Domain Review.
279:Welcome to the Public Domain, Mickey Mouse!
1180:Well... I've genuinely no idea, but maybe
1028:SCOTUS declined to rule again Google's in
614:was already on archive.org , so an editor
1086:in my opinion, and even that's too long.
819:travel machine, extending the copyright
983:
14:
1382:
674:, our local transcription site (think
416:Example: The 1928 animated short film
298:What can I do (on Wikimedia projects)?
524:Stanford's Copyright Renewal Database
379:A still image from Charlie Chaplin's
54:
29:
565:Commons:Copyright rules by territory
518:author died in 1953 / 1973 or before
437:Commons:Copyright rules by territory
433:author died in or before 1953 / 1973
402:Commons:Copyright rules by territory
1390:Knowledge Signpost archives 2024-01
1265:Sorry - this is the correct link:
1030:Authors Guild, Inc. v. Google, Inc.
687:relying on the fallback Wikisource
473:under copyright in its home country
68:File:Steamboat wikipe (cropped).png
27:
868:
742:
704:for an example in-progress work.)
658:The New International Encyclopedia
639:is slim pickings, but perhaps the
629:upload extracted images to Commons
596:
371:
303:
207:
198:
71:Walt Disney, Kasuga, Paulatz, JPxG
56:
34:
28:
1401:
1337:is written by editors like you –
965:These comments are automatically
700:for an example finished work, or
1136:c:Commons:Public Domain Day/2024
726:passed 316–7 and 97–0; the 1998
190:
168:
158:
148:
138:
128:
118:
108:
1231:Thanks for the expert comment.
832:Although the good news is that
698:s:The Prose Edda (Brodeur 1916)
637:Category:1928 non-fiction books
631:. Then use them on Knowledge.
574:public domain by American rules
514:published between 1929 and 1963
976:add the page to your watchlist
826:
812:
795:
702:Index:The House at Pooh Corner
269:2024 in American public domain
13:
1:
485:Template:PD-US-expired-abroad
291:Happy Public Domain Day 2024!
1315:18:45, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
1293:13:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
1278:13:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
1261:00:59, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
1241:02:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
1225:23:12, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
1194:21:24, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
1168:11:59, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
1148:22:23, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
1121:23:44, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
1101:13:53, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
1076:21:02, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
1043:17:07, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
1022:14:40, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
1001:12:57, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
951:
708:What can I do (as a person)?
18:Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost
7:
530:renewed in their copyright.
481:Knowledge:Non-US copyrights
275:, for the on-wiki articles.
237:Mickey Mouse Protection Act
10:
1406:
694:Template:Wikisource-inline
612:scan with downloadable PDF
313:The Passion of Joan of Arc
641:Small Soviet Encyclopedia
500:The House at Pooh Corner
442:Example: The 1928 novel
807:scanning it in yourself
664:World Book Encyclopedia
645:Encyclopedia Britannica
584:Music Modernization Act
455:Lady Chatterley's Lover
1129:Missing in the article
1105:No, it should be from
1060:Italian Court of Audit
973:. To follow comments,
873:
770:1980 - 10 + 105 + 70 =
747:
616:uploaded it to Commons
607:Coming of Age in Samoa
601:
445:The Well of Loneliness
413:, it's public domain.
376:
308:
221:
203:
91:Public Domain Day 2024
39:
1062:, which I covered in
872:
772:the year of our Lord
746:
724:Copyright Act of 1976
600:
375:
366:in the public domain?
307:
265:2024 in public domain
220:
202:
38:
969:from this article's
398:Commons:Hirtle chart
348:Category:1928 works
318:Carl Theodor Dreyer
960:Discuss this story
925:WikiProject report
874:
861:"Special report" →
748:
602:
452:died in 1943. Or
377:
342:Step 1: Finding it
309:
222:
204:
45:← Back to Contents
40:
1153:Here's a question
984:purging the cache
905:Technology report
680:Help:Adding texts
676:Project Gutenberg
469:published in 1928
332:Wikimedia Commons
328:English Knowledge
273:Public Domain Day
218:
50:View Latest Issue
1397:
1374:
1179:
1118:
1113:
1099:
1097:
1094:
1064:a previous issue
1057:
1020:
1018:
1014:
1010:
987:
985:
979:
958:
892:
884:
877:
860:
853:"Special report"
852:
838:
830:
824:
816:
810:
799:
771:
620:Wikisource index
604:Margaret Mead's
591:Step 3: Using it
559:If the work was
512:If the work was
467:If the work was
427:If the work was
419:Steamboat Willie
409:If the work was
352:Internet Archive
247:Steamboat Willie
242:Steamboat Willie
226:Steamboat Willie
219:
194:
186:
172:
171:
162:
161:
152:
151:
142:
141:
132:
131:
122:
121:
112:
111:
62:
60:
58:
1405:
1404:
1400:
1399:
1398:
1396:
1395:
1394:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1370:
1368:
1363:
1358:
1353:
1348:
1341:
1331:
1330:
1173:
1155:
1131:
1116:
1111:
1095:
1092:
1090:
1051:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1006:
993:No Swan So Fine
989:
981:
974:
963:
962:
956:+ Add a comment
954:
950:
949:
948:
895:From the editor
885:
882:10 January 2024
880:
878:
875:
864:
863:
858:
855:
850:
844:
843:
842:
841:
831:
827:
817:
813:
800:
796:
769:
756:
755:
740:
710:
649:Template:EB1911
624:
623:
594:
593:
458:, whose author
391:
390:
369:
368:
344:
322:
321:
301:
300:
231:
230:
208:
205:
195:
188:
187:
180:
179:
178:
169:
159:
149:
139:
129:
119:
109:
103:
100:
89:
85:
84:
81:
78:
75:
72:
69:
65:
63:
57:10 January 2024
53:
52:
47:
41:
31:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1403:
1393:
1392:
1369:
1364:
1359:
1354:
1349:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1333:
1332:
1329:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1298:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1154:
1151:
1130:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1108:
1087:
1085:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1046:
1045:
964:
961:
953:
952:
947:
942:
937:
935:Traffic report
932:
927:
922:
917:
912:
910:News and notes
907:
902:
900:Special report
897:
891:
879:
867:
866:
865:
856:
847:
846:
845:
840:
839:
834:works-for-hire
825:
811:
793:
792:
791:
790:
757:
749:
741:
728:Sonny Bono Act
709:
706:
625:
603:
595:
592:
589:
588:
587:
577:
557:
556:
555:
547:
539:simultaneously
531:
510:
509:
508:
465:
464:
463:
460:D. H. Lawrence
450:Radclyffe Hall
425:
424:
423:
406:
405:
392:
378:
370:
367:
362:Step 2: Is it
360:
343:
340:
323:
310:
302:
299:
296:
295:
294:
288:
282:
276:
232:
223:
206:
197:
196:
189:
177:
176:
166:
156:
146:
136:
126:
116:
105:
104:
101:
95:
94:
93:
92:
88:Special report
87:
86:
82:
79:
76:
73:
70:
67:
66:
64:
61:
48:
43:
42:
33:
32:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1402:
1391:
1388:
1387:
1385:
1373:
1367:
1362:
1357:
1352:
1347:
1340:
1336:
1316:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1299:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1275:
1271:
1268:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1258:
1254:
1250:
1247:Please see:
1246:
1242:
1238:
1234:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1227:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1209:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1191:
1187:
1184:can help us!
1183:
1177:
1172:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1150:
1149:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1122:
1119:
1114:
1106:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1098:
1088:
1083:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1055:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1044:
1040:
1036:
1031:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1019:
1011:
1003:
1002:
998:
994:
986:
977:
972:
968:
957:
946:
943:
941:
938:
936:
933:
931:
928:
926:
923:
921:
918:
916:
913:
911:
908:
906:
903:
901:
898:
896:
893:
889:
883:
876:In this issue
871:
862:
854:
835:
829:
822:
815:
808:
804:
798:
794:
788:
787:
786:
783:
777:
775:
767:
763:
753:
745:
739:
737:
733:
729:
725:
721:
716:
705:
703:
699:
695:
690:
685:
681:
677:
673:
668:
666:
665:
660:
659:
654:
650:
646:
642:
638:
632:
630:
621:
617:
613:
609:
608:
599:
585:
581:
578:
575:
570:
566:
562:
558:
552:
548:
545:
540:
536:
532:
529:
525:
522:
521:
519:
515:
511:
506:
502:
501:
496:
494:
489:
488:
486:
482:
478:
474:
471:but is still
470:
466:
462:died in 1930.
461:
457:
456:
451:
447:
446:
441:
440:
438:
434:
430:
426:
421:
420:
415:
414:
412:
408:
407:
404:
403:
399:
394:
393:
388:
384:
383:
374:
365:
359:
357:
353:
349:
339:
337:
333:
329:
319:
315:
314:
306:
292:
289:
286:
283:
280:
277:
274:
270:
266:
263:
262:
261:
258:
255:
254:public domain
250:
248:
244:
243:
238:
228:
227:
201:
193:
185:
175:
167:
165:
157:
155:
147:
145:
137:
135:
127:
125:
117:
115:
107:
106:
98:
59:
51:
46:
37:
23:
19:
1335:The Signpost
1334:
1267:c:COM:PACUSA
1212:
1207:
1156:
1132:
1004:
990:
920:In the media
899:
888:all comments
828:
820:
814:
802:
797:
781:
778:
773:
765:
761:
758:
752:Hirtle chart
735:
730:passed by a
719:
715:orphan works
711:
683:
669:
662:
656:
644:
633:
626:
605:
579:
576:, of course.
568:
560:
550:
538:
527:
517:
513:
498:
492:
476:
472:
468:
453:
443:
432:
428:
417:
410:
395:
380:
363:
345:
324:
311:
259:
251:
246:
240:
233:
224:
114:PDF download
74:CC 3.0 BY-SA
1372:Suggestions
1297:It is, yes.
1084:publication
967:transcluded
801:If the PDF
762:even longer
549:If it's an
495:(1927 film)
164:X (Twitter)
1285:Smallchief
1233:Smallchief
1176:Smallchief
1160:Smallchief
732:voice vote
672:Wikisource
493:Metropolis
490:Examples:
431:, but the
396:See also:
382:The Circus
336:Wikisource
102:Share this
97:Contribute
22:2024-01-10
1366:Subscribe
1186:Oltrepier
1117:(discuss)
1068:Oltrepier
971:talk page
940:Crossword
448:; author
334:, and/or
1384:Category
1361:Newsroom
1356:Archives
1339:join in!
1307:SnowFire
1217:SnowFire
1213:probably
1182:SnowFire
1112:Hawkeye7
1107:creation
930:Obituary
915:In focus
851:Previous
551:American
364:actually
184:SnowFire
154:Facebook
144:LinkedIn
134:Mastodon
20: |
1270:kosboot
1253:kosboot
1208:federal
1140:Romaine
1054:Kosboot
1035:kosboot
1017:Sphere!
803:doesn't
696:! (See
477:However
1096:Quokka
1009:Vulcan
764:, and
720:extend
516:, the
271:, and
174:Reddit
124:E-mail
1351:About
1093:Quick
945:Comix
821:after
789:Notes
736:worse
647:(see
610:. A
580:Music
435:(see
16:<
1346:Home
1311:talk
1289:talk
1274:talk
1257:talk
1237:talk
1221:talk
1202:and
1190:talk
1164:talk
1144:talk
1072:talk
1039:talk
997:talk
859:Next
774:2145
661:and
554:Day.
535:URAA
533:The
400:and
1013:❯❯❯
689:OCR
684:not
622:.).
569:why
528:not
182:By
99:—
83:300
1386::
1313:)
1291:)
1276:)
1259:)
1251:-
1239:)
1223:)
1192:)
1166:)
1146:)
1138:.
1074:)
1041:)
999:)
849:←
782:or
389:).
354:;
338:.
330:,
267:,
1309:(
1287:(
1272:(
1255:(
1235:(
1219:(
1188:(
1178::
1174:@
1162:(
1142:(
1070:(
1056::
1052:@
1037:(
995:(
988:.
978:.
890:)
886:(
422:!
80:0
77:0
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
.png){kind=small}
_English_Poster.png)