Knowledge:WikiProject Palaeontology/Paleoart review/Archive 19

6422: 6363:), but like Hemiauchenia said, it removes a bit of its first-glance educational quality. A description-based legend looks fine when you're on the file page, but few people go that far when looking for an image, especially if it's republished on a Knowledge clone or Google images. That's also why I've added taxon names, specimen designations (for diagrams based on single specimens), and scale bars in more recent diagrams. It maintains context which would certainly be lost if someone doesn't bother to track down the file description. The biggest factor in my earlier decision to move the legend into the image is that the description "preview" you get when clicking on an image messes with the formatting, since bullet points don't work in the preview. Languages are a fair point, but I've seen some of these files translated or re-used without translation on other wikis, and most of the bones have Latin roots and fairly consistent names in other languages. 1248:

related to the onychophorans, it may be wise to give it paired claws and a head more similar to Hallucigenia. For Cordaticaris, I would shrink and shorten the body somewhat, yes. As for Caryosyntrips, I'm afraid it is likely not a radiodont at all. Of course we do not yet have any reasonably complete body fossils, but phylogenetic analysis typically brackets Caryonstrips as basal to the euarthropod/radiodont split, placing it closer to the gilled lobopodians like Opabinia than to Anomalocaris - it is only recovered as a radiodont when euarthropods are excluded. The limbs on Primicaris do not so closely appear to follow published material, the inner branch should be more slender, elongate, and end in a sort of "clawed" foot. I recommend seeing this paper

7531:

signature, it seems the image was taken from the website Ornitofrenia by Polish artist Piotr Gryz. According to the website all rights are reserved and with the incredibly vague copyright info on the upload I am surprised this wasn't caught earlier (unless of course i'm missing something here). This is ESPECIALLY concerning given the fact that the image is used across multiple pages not just on English Knowledge but also on Wikidata and foreign language wikipedia pages. Still, as I am not exactly experienced with the matter and execution (nor do I want to rush too quickly to deletion in case I am missing something someone else might now) I thought I should first bring it up here and leave deletion notices to someone else.

6134: 5988:). It's not necessarily wrong, but microsaurs have flip-flopped between amniotes and amphibians for more than a century and this is far from the final say on the matter. Marjanovic & Laurin 2019 is another well-cited paper with a big phylogenetic analysis and completely opposite position as stem-lissamphibians. In my opinion the best option would be to retain the illustration with a caption along the lines of "(interpreted as an amphibian)". The behavior is moderately speculative, as the description states it's inspired by amphiumas. Still, egg-guarding is widespread among vertebrates of all walks of life, especially amphibians, so I think it's fine. 4891: 4813: 961: 6480: 3669:, which looks like what FunkMonk described (the paper's CC BY 4.0, I might have to upload some of those figures sometime...). As for the forelimb the published diagram (Fig. 4 in description paper) shows many elements as more anteroposteriorly elongate than they look in the photo, there is not overlap between elements as present in some places in the photo, the elements are less tightly packed, and some of the phalanges seem to be smaller. I've gone ahead and added my diagram to the article as it became devoid of images of the genus save for the photo of the interclavicle, which somehow didn't seem adequate for the taxobox. -- 372: 6468: 6514: 6456: 3986: 4792: 416: 4571: 402: 6440: 1565: 4756: 4959: 2539: 5590: 6117: 3874: 6550: 1451: 386: 119: 3068: 3101: 4876: 5945:

lissamphibians, since that is also a non-consensus hypothesis which is still present in many published papers. The best option would be to discuss all of these hypotheses on the page itself. I agree that there's good evidence for most recumbirostrans having adaptations for subterranean life. That said, there is probably a lot of variation and plenty of taxa capable of both forms of foraging, like with moles, platypus, some caecilians, snakes, etc. From personal experience I know that lysorophian aestivation burrows akin to those of

6502: 6760: 3085: 1812: 622: 4724: 4943: 2444: 5706: 7229: 5740: 6101: 256: 1634: 3052: 1836: 5672: 1824: 6526: 4844: 35: 4038: 976: 1776: 3571: 4740: 4672: 6237: 6025: 4976: 3036: 6538: 240: 4022: 3890: 631: 4860: 6706: 3970: 897: 5004: 3792: 3488: 1800: 929: 2295: 2229: 7068: 6674: 945: 3583: 1788: 7084: 4692: 4656: 6658: 6626: 4927: 224: 5689: 3954: 913: 7482: 5655: 4776: 4388: 6722: 2373: 2436: 881: 5723: 5638: 1083: 6690: 2357: 2341: 3938: 3922: 3906: 1764: 1923: 1062: 4006: 2211: 992: 2325: 2113: 865: 4708: 4329: 2806: 6874: 6642: 1028: 1045: 1008: 2696: 4233: 4054: 3599:, based mainly on the photograph in Fernández (1994) (which is admittedly not the greatest photo quality). The anatomy of the limb seems to differ notably from Fernández's own diagram of it, which is definitely interesting. How does this diagram look? I may also attempt to make a life restoration for this guy, I'm not sure if the one we currently have is all that accurate. -- 1249: 4069:

figures are not based on actual skeletal elements, they just fit Nobu Tamura's illustrations to the scales described in the page. Now I don't even know if those sizes are actually correct. Some of Nobu Tamura's work may have problems with proportions, which is not as good as a diagram based on skeletal elements.

2781:

fragments of rock preserving natural molds and shards of bone), and the likelihood based on preserved dental characters (no complete teeth, but rather most teeth are internal casts of the pulp cavity) that it is not a tylosaurine mosasaur (PJ-H and MC pers. observ.), it will not be included in this analysis."

6318:

One thing I just thought of, which may be retroactively applicable to other images, is to remove the bone labels from the file itself, and present them in the caption (as is done for the mosasaurs below). This makes the original image less likely to be copied into other files of other languages where

7530:

While checking some stuff in preparation for a larger edit to the Dow's Puffin page, I noticed that the copyright information on this piece is less than reassuring. The artist is only credited as "unknown" while giving the vague "internet" as the sole source. After a little digging and matching the

5517:

Given that the supposed coracoid turned out to be the radius; probably not! The little flippers definitely don't mesh well with our understanding of merriamosaur anatomy. Given the quality of the skull (see fig 4c in Motani's revision) I'm not sure how much we really can say about the length of its

3650:

Yeah, I would expect the transition from the two lobes of the tail to be smoother, now it looks like the middle part is very distinct, like it is much broader there? I even think the shading should maybe just continue along the lower margin of the lower lobe, not continue across the middle. Like it

2703:

I've done this life restoration of the tylosaur Kaikaifilu hervei to replace the one currently used on the page, which seems to have a number of anatomical problems. While this is a highly fragmentary taxon, I've tried to keep it in line with generalized tylosaurine proportions, and have given it a

1745:

afterwards, but the images could need a look through here first. I've modified my old restoration and one that showed up on Commons recently to match more closely how the skull would have looked in an uncrushed state. The other images are heret for good measure, and while one editor has stated they

4068:

Why these charts haven't reviewed yet? These are Abyssal's charts that is still in use for articles, excluding ones that are already replaced. These charts would have been quite helpful in the early days, and even now they are easy to understand at first glance. The problem, however, is that these

3833:

As noted in the description, the tear-drop shaped structures are ventral eyes, with the only indication dorsally being a slight, smooth bump. Thinking it would be better to remove them from the drawing, or to only draw a slight curved edge to indicate the bumps. It also seems you've drawn the tail

2960:

Especially for an ecological reconstruction, it would be best to accurately depict the anatomy - as is, in the drawing, the segmental boundaries reach all the way to the flaps, diving the body entirely; very arthropod-like. This isn't what we see in the fossils. The visible segmental boundary only

1299:

to be outside the radiodont-euarthropod split? As far as I am aware, it is consistently recovered in a polytomy with Radiodonta and Deuteropoda, which means that its position as a basal radiodont is neither certain nor rejected (e.g. Vinther et al. 2014, Moysiuk & Caron 2021). Non-phylogenetic

142:

article, but was then removed due to issues regarding its acccuracy and quality. I was recommended to take it here for review if possible, and be clarified on what exact issues it has, to see if they can be changed. I based this reconstruction on pictures of the fossil itself, but given my lack of

4240:

This file looks like really inaccurate and confusing. Although it seems to be phylogenetically compatible to some extent, the selection of species is inconsistent, and there is no uniformity in the species used, such as current and fossil species, and it is simply confusing. This image is used in

1430:

Yes, the Facivermis could still use some work, the annulations would be similar to a modern velvet worm, also including small dermal papillae covering the body. My offer to provide a reconstruction stands. The Orstentubulus looks good, though I would remove that terminal butt and have it replaced

5759:

to now be early diverging sauropsid amniotes rather than reptiliomorphs, and to have had a burrowing (fossorial) lifestyle rather than being aquatic. That means that these images are now outdated. I think the skin covering is generally okay, as the visibility of scales is up to artistic license.

4615:

I think the drawing accurately represent both interpretations. It's up to you, but I think it still can be improve by showing the original photographs alongside the drawing as well, since B (Caron & Moysiuk 2021) was technically based on two pieces: part with most of the supposed endites and

1247:

I agree with Jun in their concern over the wide annulations of Facivermis. If we are in need of a life reconstruction, I would be willing to make and provide one. The Orsten animals all look great based on available published material, though considering Orstenotubulus is a hallucigeniid closely

2780:

I think Kaikaifilu should just be reconstructed as a generic mosasaurid until taxonomic revisions are made (though to be fair I think it still works with this). What Jiménez-Huidobro and Caldwell (2019) said was, "due to the extremely fragmentary nature of the material (most of the specimen is

2408:

The rhynchosaurs have cartoonishly large eyes and I'm not sure the premaxillae should be covered in keratin. But no major quibbles otherwise, I think? I should also add that these appear to be (at least only slightly modified versions of) press release images, so I wouldn't expect major flaws.

5944:

I only just noticed this conversation. Personally I would not say that "most modern studies" consider recumbirostrans to be amniotes. That hypothesis was mainly supported by one paper which emphasized braincase characteristics. We could just as easily say that microsaurs are ancestral to

1397:

Everything looks good to me! Excellent reconstructions, I particularly like the Facivermis reconstruction. The papillae on it look especially nice. And I see the updated Orstenotubulus, that looks ready to go to me, for whenever a page on the taxon is made. Thanks for your hard work.

6303:

Here's the diagram. I think the scaling is based on the juvenile holotype but none of the papers have provided a firm answer besides the scale bars provided in their skull diagrams. I'm not great at making my own scale bars off of photos, so I just used the pre-existing scales.

6946:

As far as I am aware, there are no life restorations of chondrosteids made by scientific publications, other than perhaps fishboy's one that you mention. A great shame that it got deleted, but given Yewtharaptor's penchant for copyright infringement, that was understandable.

6330:

Moving the labels to the file description would make the image less legible at a glance, which I consider more important. If other users want to make derivative images changing the labels, to their own language, that's fine, but we shouldn't be compromising image legibility.

6421: 7493:

Is it possible to create a size chart for the Jurassic nodosaurid Mymoorapelta? I'm trying to get its page updated and expanded, but it lacks a good size chart. Most of the material has not been fully described but there is a skeletal by Henry Sharpe that was posted on

6893:

I've seen, the appearance looks too sturgeon-like. In particular, the flank scutes seem to a unique feature to sturgeons and not shared with other Acipenseriformes, and their position on the body looks like they may have been a misinterpretation of the spinal column.

2922:

The external segmentation of the body should not go all the way to the fins - around halfway, it should slowly transition to a smooth, uninterrupted body like other radiodonts - making it clear that these are not true "arthropod" segments. Its a similar condition to

4253:

added this again. The caption does indicate that it is "obsolete," but no clear source is given that it was once shown that sponges evolved into sea anemones, and sea anemones evolved into Kinorhyncha. To be honest, I don't see any merit in keeping this image that

2236:

A quick skull reconstruction of Kinyang mabokoensi based on the type material and articulated. Also have a version with a soft tissue silhouette however not uploaded since I'm not sure if its going to be needed (especially given the poorly preserved lower jaw).

5174:

is said to lack a tail bend (I'm not sure whether this really is the case, given that it has the neural spine direction reversal, but it suggests that the bend would be pretty modest if it did exist, and therefore support a more modest fin). I'd personally use

5093:

Not arguing against lips as such, just saying that I don't think we can say the lack of lips is inaccurate either, and tag images as inaccurate based on that. But I'll see if I can fix some of these... Seems I'm the only one left modifying inaccurate images?

1863:

Had some discussion of this on the Discord server, and I expressed something similar, but the maker of the WIP size diagram said they were most likely altricial, though I don't know what that's based on. I guess based on modern seriemas and birds of prey.

4812: 1484:

This one needs to be redrawn and the sources for all of them should be credited. Additionally, this file needs to be renamed. 4 of the 5 species depicted are not sawfishes and none of them are represented by oral teeth, but instead rostral denticles.

3250:

Nice initiative, and good to know it is "official". I think it would be good to clarify in the image source descriptions that Roman has consented to these being uploaded, because now they are credited to you (Alex), which has caused some confusion.

4890: 191:

Ah, right, thanks for the replies. Yes I should probably use other more complete eurypterids as a reference, the incompleteness of the fossil was probably an issue in interpreting the animal. Don't know how I added an extra tergite in there,

5264:

Yeah, it looks like that may be the case, though judging by the holotype, the entire head seems a little too big, and the jaws too deep. Comparison with the holotype skeleton also seems to favor slight elongation of limbs and tail (per the

1847:

Is it just me, or does the group scene seem to depict an altricial juvenile? I don't know much about terror birds but that doesn't seem very probable for a flightless cursorial species, especially given how large the depicted juvenile is.

4991:

It seems that huge swathes of our ichthyopterygian restorations haven't been reviewed, so I'm posting all of our in-use Triassic ones here yet to receive a review. I've already noted some issues in their captions; how do the others look?

2765:

What traits would imply that the animal is not a tylosaurine? I know this taxon is extremely fragmentary, so could this reconstruction still work even if the animal wasn't definitively a tylosaurine, and if not what would need changing?

4432:), and the croc-like hind feet. Other proterochampsians tend to have fairly long feet with a very thick second toe, a long third toe, and a very thin fourth toe which is nearly as long as the third. Based on its preserved metatarsals, 6961:

There is a life restoration of a chondrosteid in a scientific publication. It’s even Gyrosteus specifically. It’s in “Gyrosteus mirabilis - ein großer Störverwandter aus einem Ahrensburger Lias-Geschiebe” (Hornung & Sachs, 2022).

4540:

The foreflippers could be a bit broader and taper less quickly, they seem to only barely be wide enough to contain all the preserved phalanges, and those digits are incomplete and there would have been a trailing edge on the flipper.

738:

This artwork has its fair share of problems, like the caudal fin being way too large and the head being all kinds of wrong. The reconstruction in Hamm's work is frankly terrible, it's just a bad tracing of Shimada's reconstruction of

4791: 7213: 2869:

Beside the number of flap-bearing body segments (17 instead of 18 in the recent description), I think it is accurate in both morphology and ecology. It might takes some time, but recently I've planned to make a reconstruction of

3279:

If you look at the author field of one of the images, you can see it currently says "Author Alex Uchytel". It could perhaps be changed to Roman instead (or to Roman and you), and perhaps it could state on your Commons userpage

2945:

Agreed about non-clear segmentation for life reconstruction, though clear segmentation is good for reconstruction that shows anatomy? I really don't know which is better for this art. Anyway number of segment looks like fixed.

6439: 6984:

that it's for that publication. Also, given the mouth posture in your restoration, are chondrosteids thought to have been suspension feeders or macropredators? I can't find any comments on their ecology in the literature.

6479: 1937: 1280:

and onychophoran, with addition of specialized neck lobopods and reduced tail (it's also worth to note that such long tail is an uncommon trait amongst lobopodians, and only unambiguously evident in some distantly-related

5052:

actually have lips). I never really though about the Ganges River dolphin before (many beaked whales also have exposed teeth too, but those seem to be specialized tusks); however, recent published reconstructions (i.e.

4122:

I don't see Nobu Tamura credited in any of these charts, despite all of the silhouettes being direct traces over his illustrations. This is especially egregious given that Steveoc is credited for the grid, key, and PD

1579:) and the body silhouette is based on that of an Okapi. I included the keratinous dome on the top of the head in the silhouette. Feedback is appreciated, thanks. If it looks usable for the article, let me know please. 6931:

As a matter of fact, once this image was replaced with a better reconstruction. Despite having permission to post the image, it was removed and then NT's one was re-added by a user unaware of the inaccuracy of that.

7259: 3235:

We just started looking into how to upload images and information on Knowledge, so we might be wrong about some of the technical details. We would be very grateful if you could help us with this. Thanks in advance

4427:

The snout shape doesn't look too off to me. Bigger issues I see include the multiple rows of osteoderms (when they appear to be absent in this species), the slightly too long temporal region (probably based on

4156: 1431:

with just the legs - there should be nothing past the terminal leg pair, with the anus between them. If possible, you may consider placing only a single anchoring claw on the last one or two leg pairs as well.

4755: 6578:

I must say that I'm not a huge fan of Headden's bipedally running pterosaurs; this is not a very lifelike posture. Perhaps the lifted leg could be removed, making it look more like it just touched down?

1669:

I can definitely do this, especially since the redescription and preservation are quite nice. Though there is technically a free copy of the skull diagram already available at figure 17A in Ezcurra 2016

6455: 444:

is from childish book (Gaines, Richard M. (2001). Coelophysis. ABDO Publishing Company. p. 16. ISBN 978-1-57765-488-9.), which is used as reference for several articles, like I already deleted but in

7351:

is said to have dimorphism I thought it appropriate to use human dimorphism (which is admittedly less prominent) in the comparison. I didn't see an estimate for the female shoulder height for either

3159: 2311: 6594:

Couldn't it look like a landing even if both legs were retained? In any case, we also have Witton's older skeletal (added above), which despite of course having some issues now, shows a quad launch

5063:) are shown with lips. Although lips apparently can be lost with relative ease, I'm not sure if that means not giving ichthyosaurs lips is a good idea; cetaceans have also lost their dorsal fins at 1651: 5775:

Since these just show one hypothesis, I don't think modified versions should be uploaded over them, but as separate files. I think most of these could be saved by removing backgrounds and such.

4159:

for many examples). I haven't done a detailed check of proportions, but the rear margin of the caudal fin should probably be more smoothly rounded. There is a high-quality CC BY 4.0 restoration

2570: 756:

However, its cranium is poorly-preserved and it comes from a smaller species, so its bauplan shouldn't necessarily be applied to larger species. I think it's best to hold off on reconstructing

548: 164:

The body segments are too irregular, and most importantly, the lacking of large scales across the posterior region of tergites, which is a defining characters of this genus (seperated it from

143:

practice in reconstructing eurypterids it is feasible that I missed something important, so I would be glad if I could potentially accomodate any inputs to guarantee a more accurate approach.

5963:

Also, even if we assume they were mainly fossorial, that hardly means they were unable to swim? So it would be mainly the one with the amphibian-like eggs that would be downright inaccurate?

562: 520: 486: 4398:(be careful, that figure looks like mistook scale bar, actually likely to be 5 cm), limbs are too short and too crocodile-like, also possibly tail is too long although not all is preserved. 3358: 3179: 1182: 348: 214: 2751:

Actually there is, since some researchers argued that this species is not really a tylosaurine due to its fragmentary nature with no exclusive tylosaurine traits (some even contradictory).

5981:

inaccurate. As I said, recumbirostrans as amniotes is not a universal consensus position, and is mainly supported by iterations of a recent phylogenetic analysis (from Pardo et al. 2017's

2533: 6467: 3725:

Thanks! I'm particularly happy with how this one turned out. Unless anyone else objects, I'll probably add the restoration to the article soon (which should be about ready for GAN...). --

3441:

One on "Summary" of commons file page. Basically, I don't think it's that good to have a link to an external website in the middle of the page, so it is better to be in file description.

2424: 2281: 2267: 2037:

Yeah, it looks good! The only remaining point I have is that based on closer comparison with the skeletal, the forelimbs may be a little too long (although I don't think the forelimbs of

1681: 3464: 3450: 3436: 3414: 3400: 3386: 3372: 3344: 3245: 2643: 2629: 1755: 330: 5012:

About the lack of lips, I don't think any of the other ones are restored with lips here either? Also, we don't know if it's even inaccurate. Also, look at those exposed chompers of the

2583:

what individuals do you want in the chart? Adult male, adult female, and calf? I don't know much about elephant anatomy, but I think I could probably figure it out with the skeletals. -

1703:

Here's my take. Like the original diagram, it's mostly based on NMK S 180, though the scaling appears to be a bit different so I didn't specify that it was that specimen in particular.

811: 769: 581: 2931:

reconstruction and diagram to see what I mean). No comment on the position of the setal blades, I'm undecided about them. Best to follow the description for now. Good work as always.

2746: 2206: 2192: 2178: 1712: 1698: 1378: 1360: 6133: 3335:

Thank you for the commentary. If anything, I think the website link should be in the Commons description instead of article itself. (Probably one in "external link" may good though)

3218: 3193: 733: 705: 691: 677: 284: 5608: 1663: 1622: 1588: 1242: 186: 4178:

has too thin a neck, the foreflippers don't really have much in the way of trailing edges here, that hindflipper kind of looks like it's on backwards, and it may need a caudal fin.

2289: 1334: 1309: 5103: 5086: 3306: 3292: 3274: 3260: 2523: 2509: 2491: 1887: 1873: 1854: 1548: 1526: 316: 4073:, for example, looks much taller than that really is, because the proportion of tail length is much shorter than it actually is. Also although not in use, but new size chart of 2608: 2592: 2496:

The first one is from 1916 and doesn't see that accurate , the second one doesn't really reflect the large splenius musculature that is inferred from the size of the crest, see

2402: 1421: 1407: 5190:, though no soft tissue is known for this taxon), although as mixosaurids have markedly different caudal anatomy from merriamosaurs, I'm not terribly concerned about the shape. 3198:

Anyway, it's a bit puzzling that this user just seems to be posting and promoting a link to Uchytel's website. I wonder if it's related to the anti-war activity on his website,

2082: 2071: 2047: 2032: 2011: 1996: 1971: 1607: 1598:

So this is a pretty blatant edit of the Dinosaur Planet Prenocephale, surely this is grounds for swift deletion on account of being most certainly violating copyright correct?

1392: 797: 783: 595: 7347:

Thanks, that does help. I decided it was time to overwrite, let me know what you think. I kept both human figures because there was horizontal room from the labels, and since

1290: 1260: 101: 93: 88: 76: 71: 63: 5039: 3630:

The restoration looks fine, but the shading on the caudal keel is a little weird. The forelimb looks good but I must admit I don't see how the photograph and diagram differ.

2556: 1907: 459: 4396: 2005:, which has a similarly short body and tail stock. It also would probably be good to mention what the proportions of the model are based on in the file description, too. -- 7033: 6775: 4998: 6830: 6209: 6190: 4609: 3144: 1494: 3651:

is now, it doesn't look like the lower lobe consists of the actual tail bones, as would be the case, it looks like that middle bulge is the tail bone, more like a fish.

2713: 2472: 7051: 6269: 3814:

from the Cambrian of China that I intend to create an article about. Drawn after the part type of the holotype and the diagram of such in the initial description paper

7201: 7181: 7162: 6372: 6313: 6298: 6284: 5958: 5769: 5025: 4521: 4091: 3762: 3751: 3706: 3695: 3645: 2760: 2659: 7422: 7391: 6956: 6941: 6749: 5939: 5925: 6994: 6971: 6063: 842: 7540: 6431: 5578: 5554: 5444: 5138: 2973: 2955: 2246: 645:

should be changed, because previous reconstruction looked like benthic, unlike estimated pelagic life. Then what added to the page without review is this. (made by

7519: 7468: 7292: 7276: 5997: 5972: 4452: 3815: 3660: 3460: 3432: 3396: 3368: 3302: 3270: 3241: 3005: 2864: 159: 7138: 7122: 6926: 6223: 6081: 5498: 4422: 4106: 3621: 2163: 6840: 6790: 6325: 5755:

Over the last decade, there has been a revolution in the systematics of "microsaurs", with most modern studies now considering microsaurs belonging to the clade

4639: 4625: 4503: 4336:

I'm still really not all that knowledgeable about mosasaurs, but hopefully this recon is fine to use in the article. Is there anything I should change about it?

2883: 7437: 6862: 5624: 5466:, so it might not be bad to modify its proportions to be more in line with this genus (i.e. longer snout, deeper chest, longer flippers, shorter tail stock). -- 5030:

The Besanosaurus could probably be easily fixed, but is it just me, or does it look like its rostrum is too short compared to the skull diagram in the article?

4367: 3857: 3843: 3548: 3534: 3519: 7304:

The whole image looks very cluttered and difficult to read, mostly due to how large all of the text is. You should make all of it much smaller, or, preferably,

6963: 6903: 5283:

I went ahead and shrank the head, made the jaws longer, and made the curve of the neck less extreme, to make it more in line with newer restorations like this.

4345: 3184:

If that is indeed him, it should somehow be clarified in the image descriptions, because some of them were nominated for deletion before due to the confusion.

2842: 2704:

layer of blubber based on the cold water temperatures of the Lopez de Bertodano Formation. Are there any issues with using this reconstruction in the article?

1102:... These are very nice and high quality images, and seem to be suitable for use on other languages of Knowledge as well. Though, the problems are as follows: 7555: 6603: 6585: 5903: 5875: 5848: 5820: 5798: 5784: 5524: 5512: 5472: 5414: 5359: 5345: 5330: 5316: 5305: 5294: 5278: 5267: 5245: 5231: 4547: 4535: 4117: 3731: 3720: 3675: 3131:. Still I am not sure that Alex Uchtel is really Roman himself, and this user looks like just working for posting Uchytel's works, saying like other person. ( 1672:. That said, it is covered with character state labels and I'm not sure if it's transformative enough to slip past copyright. It might still be worth a shot. 662: 6818: 6804: 3019: 2987: 2940: 2823: 2790: 2775: 2673: 2202: 2174: 1722: 1417: 1388: 1356: 7363: 7338: 6340: 2991: 567:

The head of that megalodon is pretty wonky and the proportions of the body and fins are a bit off. We already have Oliver Demuth's excellent reconstruction,

6572: 3349:

After problem is solved, I think we need an image showing the shape of the Elasmotherium horns in a new study for comparison. Is it possible to upload it?

1811: 850: 5259: 5220: 5204: 5162: 6712: 6413: 4407: 4314: 3456: 3428: 3392: 3364: 3298: 3266: 3237: 3120: 2911: 2897: 903: 21: 5310:

A bit late, but it seems worth noting that a dorsal fin would be implied via phylogenetic bracketing. Not sure why I didn't think to say this before. --

1951: 450:

it is used for reference of length with 3.5 m which is oversized considering skull length and proportion, I think that is another problem by the way...

6116: 935: 362: 6048: 5048:

does seem to have too short a snout. With regards to lips: yeah, a lot of them are missing lips, I just forgot to mention them (although quite a few

3605: 960: 856: 4290: 4210:

is too demarcated from the neck, the hindflippers are intensely lacking in flesh, and the tail needs a caudal fin. The hump back is also suspicious.

2927:, where the leathery cuticle becomes rigid and compact to form ridges along the back (dont know how well I phrased any of that, check the published 298:. The life restoration should probably resemble this better-preserved ichthyosaur more. A dorsal fin might also be nice, given that it falls in the 6664: 5803:

Well, if we imagine they were fossorial, they would work as underground digging poses too, no? And it only seems to be a real issue with the first

3827: 3985: 2827: 7252: 5458: 4097:

They could be replaced, yes, someone just needs to make replacements... For now, we can just tag and remove those that are clearly inaccurate.

1689:

I'm more worried about the implications of "(A) Modified from Gottmann-Quesada & Sander (2009)". If it's redrawn, it may not be a problem.

501: 5225:

Looks better! With the bend in the tail, I'd always assumed it was just perspective, as if it were coming out of a sharp turn or something. --

6781:

Not sure about the large spikes all over the body. Epijugal would be angled slightly more towards the frill, but otherwise looks good to me.

2855:? (I think it is fine to make your one for showing one specimen, and using this art for ecological life reconstruction will be really nice.) 428:

These images are not yet reviewed, but used in several pages in both English and other languages of Knowledge. Megalodon looks outdated, and

7255:

As this would be my first paleoart edit, I am eager to hear if I have stepped in any of the usual pitfalls or made other errors. Thank you.

5076:

in species with radically different anatomies, sizes, and ecologies, but I'm somewhat doubtful that it would be a good idea to depict, say,

4671: 4482: 1628: 586:

I think we have so many restorations of these taxa that we don't really need to save these if they're inaccurate, just give them the tags?

7301:

Yeah, the original is pretty bad (and slightly terrifying), even ignoring the bipedal stance. I have a couple comments about your update:

5839:

image was already uploaded, so I took the liberty and removed the single fish in it, added to gallery above, and will add to the article.

4281:

and are therefore protostomes. Thanks Obama. Update: I've gone ahead and removed the gif. It was irredeemably bad 2000's Knowledge trash.

3405:

Perhaps the best way is for you to upload the image first, post it on this page, check it, and then edit it or let someone else edit it.

3377:

I think it will be for comparison with the existing long-horned reconstruction, so probably that should be on around middle of the page.

4875: 1556: 6913:, while the presence of barbels is probable for all Acipenseriformes, living sturgeons only have four, while paddlefish have two, see 2620:

that failed review, so I am really not sure that image is accurate as well, even though that it was added in the page without review.

5894:

an other "microbrachomorphs" don't really fit into the modern framework of microsaur systematics and require further investigation.

2316: 1878:

No direct evidence has been found either way, but yes, phylogenetic bracketing would predict altricial juveniles in phorusrhacids.

1746:

will provide a better size diagram, this hasn't happened yet, so I might have to request another one here, if anyone's up for it.

7387: 7197: 7158: 6197: 5596:

Diagram of of bone movements between joints in mosasaur skulls, specifically showing the differences between a typical mosasaur (

4958: 4499: 4310: 3747: 3691: 3641: 2420: 2263: 1593: 544: 516: 7457:

s limbs were 20 to 25% longer than a gorilla's based on average gorilla body proportions between the molars and the long bones

4269: 2460:

Lacks the crest at the top of the skull that is seen in more accurate reconstructions, like the one in this 2020 press release

7286: 7285:

I didn't realise, I use a browser extension (Imagus) that loads it on hover. Here's a PNG preview, hopefully it fares better:

696:

Got something to base it on? Easiest would of course just to make a new version with the sharks isolated from the background.

7008: 6829:

It looks off balance, like it's about to tilt over (leg posture combined with body posture). And the eye looks twice too big.

469:

is definitely inaccurate in terms of its head height, and the short tail and big hoof-like claws are also suspect. That poor

7433:

If people here give me an updated height estimate I can scale it (or someone else can too, I don't own the file after all).

7104:

from the original version, and am planning on coloring it soon; additionally, I've finally finished and uploaded the WIP of

7042:, though I know it is rough so maybe I can recreate as diagram, though not sure. If others can do that I'll let them to do. 4512:

had a ton of them. 5-6 in the premaxilla and 34-35 more in each maxilla. Add to that 38 teeth in each part of the mandible.

3223:

Hi guys! My name is Alexandra (Alex) Uchytel. I am co-founder of Prehistoric Fauna project, and Roman Uchytel is my husband.

1775: 6754: 6611: 6254: 6231: 5885: 2902:

Opps, I'm sorry for my typo, I mean "18 instead of 17 in the recent description", the correct segment number should be 17.

5739: 4806:

was described as lacking a caudal bend, it still has the neural spine reversal, so probably could use more of a caudal fin

7546:

Considering the uploader's other images are screenshots of websites, the case seems pretty clear. It should all be DRed.

7476: 7221: 5629: 2687: 1445: 846: 51: 17: 7525: 6525: 4353:

Don't see any issues with this restoration, and I like how you represented the genus' long thin skull nicely. Good job!

6089: 4975: 4647: 4559: 4160: 3834:

bit as a single structure, while judging by the pleural spines it should be made of 3 small tergites and a tail spine.

3666: 3132: 2833:

I can't see anything that's really different from the press release reconstructions, so I say that it's probably good.

2725:

is really outdated? I don't know what that position in phylogeny is, but it is even not suitable if with proportion of

7442:

I assume you got the height estimate from the tallest gorilla on record. I haven't seen an actual height estimate for

7175:]). I'll look in to darkening it a bit more, I really need to turn my screen brightness further up when coloring... -- 3865: 6914: 6513: 5908:

Oh about microsaur, should we mention about possible Triassic record that is reported in the original description of

5518:

jaws, though it does look like the actual bony part would have been quite a good bit deeper than the crown height. --

1482: 1276:, but I agree with PaleoEquii that it most likely resemble a hallucigenid based on its phylogenetic position between 360: 6461:

Mainly there for cultural significance, so not important how accurate it is, though as a Witton work, it probably is

3123:

uploaded these reconstructions by Ukrainian paleoartist Roman Uchytel's works, who worked the study of the horn of

2430: 1984: 371: 7376:

I think it's better than the last version but the red horizontal lines feel a little distracting and unnecessary.

6917:

page 49, which are more likely to be the plesiomorphic number. There's definitely more than four barbels visible.

6404:

images have been reviewed, so in light of the redescription, here they are (excluding obviously inaccurate ones).

3027: 788:

As much as I don’t like the nurse shark-like aspects of the old one, it probably is the more accurate of the two.

6257: 5059: 3067: 6549: 5705: 1575:, and I would appreciate knowing if the proportions seem accurate. The skeletal material is based on the paper ( 415: 7057: 6032: 4320: 3281: 682:

No, more like, fin and body shapes. Still it is possible way to remove background and edit fin shapes, though.

401: 2888:

Sorry to contradict you, but there's actually 18 flap-bearing body segments in this picture on each specimen.

2127:

shows its soft tissue and different direction of "horns", although description of that paper is on article of

7383: 7193: 7154: 7040: 6214:

Also remember to add inaccurate tags (if you haven't already) so there is less chance they will be re-added.

4495: 4306: 3743: 3687: 3637: 2962: 2416: 2259: 540: 512: 7253:

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/222346047547113474/1010283591521022012/Gigantopithecus_v_human_v1.svg

6537: 5671: 5605: 3873: 2634:

Its not exactly clear what the scale is supposed to be. The comparison is also in a nonstandard front view.

743: 7172: 4265: 385: 7021:. Photographs as well as illustrations of the holotype specimen can be found in this paper for reference. 6319:

the bone labels are the only difference, so that only one version needs to be maintained. Just a thought.

3100: 2719:

It looks good to me. By the way that is not directly related to that, but I think 12 m-long estimation of

2461: 2302:

Reconstruction of some of the Fauna of the Riachuelo formation i did for the wiki article, any critiques?

7108:

I'd been alluding to on the Discord server. Thoughts on these two? I may also try to fix the teeth on my

6868: 6368: 6309: 6280: 5993: 5954: 5584: 5486: 5284: 4448: 3615:

for the missing areas. This is my first time drawing a non-profile view for a while, how does it look? --

2497: 2223: 1708: 1677: 482: 7498:. The anatomy of the animal is very similar to that of Gargoyleosaurus, which already has a size chart. 1965:

in particular)? The general anatomy looks pretty good, although it seems to be missing a caudal keel. --

7495: 7047: 6937: 6887: 6205: 6186: 6100: 6059: 6054:

Oh I didn't notice that... Yeah Yellowpanda uploaded some works without review, as I mentioned before.

5921: 4635: 4605: 4403: 4087: 3544: 3515: 3446: 3410: 3382: 3354: 3340: 3214: 3175: 3140: 3001: 2951: 2860: 2742: 2625: 2188: 2159: 1374: 1178: 807: 729: 687: 658: 558: 455: 344: 326: 210: 155: 42: 7100:

In the theme of our Early Jurassic edit-a-thon, here are a couple more ichthyosaurs. I've updated the

6501: 3084: 1823: 1515: 7503: 6967: 6771: 6561: 6388: 1325:

If you won't provide a source for your claim, I'm not sure why you brought it up in the first place.

4942: 4918: 4837:

have been that bendable? There phylogenetic placement would also suggest that dorsal fins are needed

4723: 4683: 2559: 2479: 630: 7463: 7271: 7248: 7029: 6736:

Hello. Here are some reconstructions of almost all known priapulids from the Chengjiang, excluding

5398: 4739: 4170: 3848:

I've made the recommended changes, at least as far as the original diagram in the 2005 paper goes.

2874:

as you noted, as well as neuroanatomical diagrams each based on the earlier and recent discovery.--

2650:

Here's the size comparison (sorry about the wait). Hopefully I haven't made any egregious errors. -

1799: 1584: 754: 255: 6766:

Hello, I've illustrated a life reconstruction of Bisticeratops, is this suitable for the article?

5250:

Oh, and are its jaws too short, by the way? Look much longer in the skull diagram in the article.

4155:

has fore- and hindlimbs of subequal lengths (whereas the hindlimb should be markedly smaller, see

4037: 3506:

was deleted, I think you need to change credit of this image? (This image is added on the page of

2731:, 78 cm skull with total length 12 m is like head:total length ratio around 1:15, almost twice of 6981: 5688: 5654: 5619: 4982: 4362: 3051: 2551: 7314:" obscures the top of the male figure), and the subjects shouldn't overlap each other (like how 6473:

Probably has issues in light of the redescription, at least with some of the posterior cervicals

7536: 7378: 7188: 7149: 6990: 6952: 6922: 6899: 6364: 6336: 6305: 6294: 6276: 6265: 6091: 5989: 5950: 5935: 5899: 5794: 5765: 4517: 4490: 4444: 4301: 4286: 4172:), its hindfins are too short, the limbs seem to narrow, and it seems to have a bit of a "neck" 3853: 3823: 3738: 3682: 3632: 2838: 2669: 2639: 2604: 2566: 2505: 2468: 2411: 2398: 2307: 2277: 2254: 2242: 1883: 1835: 1704: 1673: 1659: 1603: 975: 535: 507: 478: 109: 7307:

Make a legend for all of the names/labels at one side, as is traditional for Wiki size charts.

6705: 4843: 4767: 4616:

gills (fig. 6a) and counterpart with most of the supposed podomeres (upper inset of fig. 6b).

4021: 3201:

then we might be convinced. But still why did they add images of lesser-known animals (except

2964:. Additionally, to this point, the body should probably be made slightly wider in the middle. 1763: 896: 7043: 6933: 6800: 6201: 6182: 6055: 6044: 5917: 5789:

Removing the backgrounds would still leave most of them in an awkward floating aquatic pose.

5722: 5637: 5432: 4859: 4631: 4601: 4570: 4399: 4261: 4083: 3889: 3540: 3511: 3442: 3406: 3378: 3350: 3336: 3210: 3171: 3136: 2997: 2947: 2856: 2738: 2621: 2184: 2155: 2100: 2001:

Yeah, it probably would make sense for it to be more pronounced, it's pretty distinct in the

1913: 1618: 1534: 1370: 1330: 1305: 1174: 803: 725: 683: 654: 554: 451: 340: 322: 239: 206: 151: 5186: 1987:. In fact, there is a tail keel here, but perhaps it make sense to make it more pronounced? 1274: 928: 7499: 7287:

https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/222346047547113474/1010279287133311016/unknown.png

6767: 6745: 5013: 4257: 3969: 3839: 3035: 3015: 2969: 2936: 2786: 2756: 1936:(The model was created as part of a joint project Prehistoric Production. Direct author is 1544: 1522: 1490: 1436: 1403: 1319: 1256: 834: 793: 765: 577: 292:

is incredibly poorly known, but everything that we have suggests an animal very similar to

200: 7247:

pointed out that sources indicate that the bipedal posture is unrepresentative, so I used

6673: 5930:

The microsaur page is currently a very, very bare stub. It needs way more work than that.

3226:

We decided to put our reconstructions of extinct animals on Knowledge for several reasons:

2538: 1787: 1564: 944: 711: 8: 7458: 7266: 7025: 6107: 5589: 5272:

Looking again, the issues with postcranial proportions may just be due to perspective. --

4341: 3953: 3283:

that it is an account shared between you and Roman, and perhaps state what your goal is?

2771: 2709: 1580: 668:

Are you talking about the background? We could just remove the seafloor from that image.

6657: 6625: 5182: 4926: 4508:

I agree with the text. On first glance it looks like it also may not have enough teeth.

4395:

This reconstruction looks like really outdated. Compared to this skeletal reconstruction

3129: 1898:

I did a new size diagram (added above), based on one of the inaccurate ones on Commons.

1450: 912: 223: 118: 7551: 7515: 7240: 6850: 6846: 6836: 6814: 6786: 6616: 6599: 6568: 6409: 6219: 6077: 6015: 5968: 5884:

Microsaurs are almost certainly a polyphyletic group, so this isn't suprising if true.

5871: 5844: 5816: 5780: 5611: 5574: 5550: 5508: 5492:

drawing of the known material). If anything, the jaws might not be deep enough here. --

5440: 5355: 5326: 5290: 5255: 5241: 5216: 5200: 5158: 5134: 5099: 5035: 5021: 4746: 4691: 4655: 4531: 4418: 4354: 4102: 3716: 3656: 3288: 3256: 3189: 2893: 2519: 2487: 2132: 1903: 1869: 1751: 1694: 1467:. I don't know what image the artist used, but it's definitely a rostral denticle from 1218: 838: 779: 701: 673: 648: 591: 280: 7022: 6721: 6359: 6353: 3905: 2372: 1576: 1457:

An important detail was missed in the original review: the rostral denticle labelled "

7532: 7334: 7236: 7176: 7133: 7117: 6986: 6948: 6918: 6895: 6858: 6580: 6332: 6290: 6261: 5931: 5895: 5790: 5761: 5519: 5493: 5481:

and reviewing the literature, it seems like this genus did have a shorter snout than

5467: 5409: 5340: 5311: 5300: 5273: 5226: 5126: 5081: 4993: 4621: 4542: 4513: 4441: 4439: 4437: 4375: 4282: 4242: 4191: 4112: 3849: 3819: 3757: 3726: 3701: 3670: 3616: 3600: 3556: 2961:

extends about halfway down the body, smoothing out before getting close to the flaps

2907: 2879: 2834: 2665: 2655: 2635: 2600: 2588: 2578: 2562: 2501: 2464: 2394: 2303: 2273: 2238: 2077: 2054: 2042: 2018: 2006: 1978: 1966: 1879: 1849: 1655: 1599: 1286: 1238: 713:

have really rough but probably useable body shape reconstruction. Also this monograph

609: 530: 311: 182: 175: 6759: 4775: 880: 205:

as well. I like works by that user, but some of them may contain anatomycal issues?

7510:

For the record, it has been made, added it above for review (remember to do this).

7434: 7419: 7360: 7289: 7256: 7018: 7010: 6910: 6796: 6040: 5070: 4478: 4224: 4044: 4005: 3937: 3921: 3912: 3530: 2453: 2067: 2028: 1992: 1947: 1614: 1326: 1301: 1134:

in particular is basal radiodont, so their body shapes can be quite different from

714: 6689: 2618: 2356: 2340: 7216: 6741: 6680: 6017: 5149: 4866: 4762: 4595: 4248: 3992: 3960: 3835: 3786: 3011: 2965: 2932: 2800: 2782: 2752: 2149: 1540: 1518: 1510: 1486: 1432: 1399: 1315: 1252: 1168: 1143: 951: 789: 761: 719: 621: 573: 474: 262: 5916:? Though it looks like not described yet, and as I see what only found is this. 5545:

from the compilation image and did some tweaks suggested on the Discord server.

3997: 2481: 2443: 2324: 1654:(p. 140). It'd be nice to see it adapted and color coded to put in the article. 991: 864: 568: 495:

is a work by Peter Minister for one of the newer DK dinosaur books, as with the

50:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

7447: 7090: 6890: 6632: 6400: 6390: 6347: 6174: 6161:, but after that they continue to add reconstruction without review. I deleted 5712: 5541: 5427: 4949: 4933: 4825: 4730: 4460: 4377: 4337: 4141:

are all shown in perspective, which is very problematic for diagrams like these

4075: 4028: 3896: 3880: 3558: 3265:

Thanks. Could you please give me a link to how this is done? Thanks in advance

3229:

1) educational reason, because we are addressed by many teachers and professors

2983: 2819: 2767: 2705: 2198: 2170: 2141: 1413: 1384: 1352: 919: 570: 306: 230: 138: 111: 6641: 5986: 5604:. Looking to see if cranial movements are accurate. Sources are Russell (1967) 2125: 1817:

Reconstructed skeleton in Japan I can't find trace of anywhere else on the web

1633: 170:). In my opinion, this genus is too incomplete to be reconstructed, but still 7547: 7511: 7244: 7228: 7116:... or just totally fail to do either in my currently limited time frame.) -- 7074: 6832: 6810: 6782: 6740:. I made them quickly so if there are any errors, feel free to discard them. 6728: 6595: 6564: 6487: 6405: 6215: 6073: 5964: 5867: 5840: 5812: 5776: 5756: 5570: 5546: 5504: 5436: 5351: 5322: 5286: 5251: 5237: 5212: 5196: 5154: 5130: 5095: 5031: 5017: 4707: 4527: 4414: 4098: 4012: 3976: 3712: 3652: 3284: 3252: 3199: 3185: 3125: 3107: 3091: 3074: 3058: 2889: 2515: 2483: 2389: 2379: 2102: 1915: 1899: 1865: 1747: 1742: 1738: 1690: 1646: 1459: 1108: 982: 775: 697: 669: 587: 553:

Looks like so, and for dinosaur ones I posted ones in Dinosaur image review.

276: 246: 128: 4053: 3510:

by Fossilader, because previous image with human example is controversial.)

1347:

Thank you all for reviewing my reconstructions, I tried to fix them. Except

1007: 7414: 7330: 7324:

Having both female and male figures is unnecessary, but not a huge problem.

6854: 6236: 6140: 6024: 5890: 5746: 5695: 5678: 5661: 5561: 5067: 5064: 4965: 4901: 4819: 4798: 4766:- Lacks lips, the narrow paddles here don't match the known limb elements ( 4698: 4678: 4662: 4617: 4587: 4321: 3944: 3928: 3810: 3797: 3711:

Very nice! Makes it really clear that the lower lobe is actually the tail.

2903: 2875: 2850: 2814: 2651: 2584: 2131:

but reconstruction is not updated. Also we should consider about this study

1469: 1282: 1234: 1194: 1160: 1120: 1114: 887: 529:

is published by Dotname Studios, making this user a potential violation of

392: 178: 6345:

I put the labels in the file description on some of my earliest diagrams (

6177:, as these look clearly inaccurate. Now this user added reconstruction of 2514:

Interestingly, the old one seems to show the neck more accurately then...

1687: 6696: 6427: 6321: 6163: 6157: 6123: 5910: 5860: 5462: 5073: 4850: 4474: 4462: 4278: 3570: 3526: 3497: 3153: 2727: 2721: 2363: 2347: 2063: 2024: 1988: 1943: 1300:

studies typically assign it to Radiodonta (e.g. Pates & Daley 2017).

1200: 1147:

look different from the front side. I think it's probably an angle issue.

294: 7173:

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Dirley-Cortes/publication/342461664

5460:) suggests an animal extremely similar to (or potentially identical) to 3170:

on its category... (Anyway categories of these files looks a bit messy)

1369:

should be narrower? Other than that, your fixed works looks fine to me.

1207: 1205: 7251:

to swap in a quadrupedal stance instead. The results can be seen here:

6612: 6249: 6200:, this user looks like sometimes adding information without reference. 6178: 6151: 5729: 5644: 5565:

and added above. Also added a restoration of a never reviewed supposed

5177: 5003: 4782: 4245:

which page itself needs huge update, and I deleted that image, however

3487: 3042: 2818:, taking into account that the body was found recently. Is it correct? 2733: 2688: 2549:

Would it be possible to make a size comparison compared to a human for

2331: 998: 871: 572:

so this one can be safely removed from any pages it's on and replaced.

300: 166: 4413:

Should be possible to fix. How do we feel about its downturned snout?

2294: 2228: 2076:

Ah, it looks like the perspective confused me. It looks good to me. --

1500:

After my initial post, I realized that the rostral denticle labelled "

7067: 6886:, as I can't find an open access copy of Woodward's 1889 description 6882: 6737: 6648: 6449:, and it's obviously based on it, perhaps worth labelling it as such? 5195:

Alright, do you think the current bend in the tail is too much also?

4580: 4295:

This is a poor-quality and entirely unnecessary image. We don't need

4080: 3791: 3507: 2002: 1251:

for reference. Lastly, I'm afraid the Opabinia is wholly unsuitable.

611: 446: 377: 197:

I think we should see other unreviewed (and added in pages) works by

7481: 7167:

It seems to be uncertain, though it may have been fairly similar to

7083: 6845:

Very minor nitpick: in the image description, you say it's from the

6445:

The species is unidentified, but since we don't have good images of

6144:(which article done by this user as well, article with one sentence) 5914: 4387: 3582: 1173:, other than that, are there any problems on these reconstructions? 6169: 5080:

without a dorsal fin; it gives a somewhat misleading impression. --

5016:, doesn't seem to be taken much into account in the "lips debate". 3806: 2435: 2387:

Came across this while looking for cynodont restorations. Only the

1733: 1724: 1670: 1014: 7239:

Wikimedia Commons channel and it was recommended to move it here.

5866:

one gilled genus? Needs to be seriously updated if this is wrong?

5864: 3427:

Thanks. How can I find the Commons description? Thanks in advance

1686:

Should be easy enough to remove those characters from the diagram?

1225:-based reconstruction. I'm more concern on the wide annulation of 7408:

Okay, I can remove those. Magnatyrannus further pointed out that

6433:

issues with this work, but are they enough to deem it inaccurate?

4714: 2135: 1082: 5335:

Well, we can't really say; but I think the one you added to the

4469:

Here is a life restoration of the recently described pliosaurid

2210: 2154:, I wonder if you can help about reconstruction of this animal? 2112: 1922: 1314:

I'm not going to argue this point on wikipedia paleoart review.

174:

could be use as reference since they're considered very similar

7359:, but if/when one is sourced other silhouettes could be added. 6873: 5397:: This paper has some good photos and diagrams of the forefin ( 4436:

seems to be the same. Here are some good papers on the species:

4328: 2805: 1126: 1061: 6982:

https://twitter.com/fishboy86164577/status/1550786664280125440

3119:

size chart that reviewed before (and looks like removed now),

2847:

As I see it looks nice and accurate enough, what do you think

436:

have flatter body and head? And I am not sure about length of

4917:

seems to have a very small skull; its neck is also too long (

4526:

Yeah, text should be left for the captions and descriptions.

4299:-style animations that depict evolution as a linear process. 4060: 2695: 1478: 1044: 1027: 7418:

and so should probably also be removed from the comparison.

5210: 5119: 4232: 321:

I moved dinosaur images for review of dinos.aur images now.

5170:: I'd say definitely too much; in the original description 2041:

are complete, so that should allow for a little leeway). --

6253:? There's a good reconstruction in Ford and Benson (2019) 3665:

I toned down the caudal keel and made it resemble that of

802:

I see. Currently, I changed main image to fossil drawing.

6795:

I think you should crop out the blank space on the left.

2060: 1130:, so possibly confuses if actual body fossils are found. 5503:

I wonder if a skeletal from 1972 can really be trusted?

4578:

I made this image shows two different interpretation of

4163:, so we could replace NT's with this one in the article. 5408:; mixosaurid nomenclature is still a bit of a mess). -- 3700:

I've colored the life restoration; how does it look? --

2555:? There's some good size references with scale bars in 1957:

Those foreflippers are very huge, was that the case in

1213:, since a body length estimation based on the ratio of 760:

for now given the lack of suitable reference material.

753:

is an undescribed one at the Texas Through Time museum.

4682:- Dentition doesn't match what's known for the genus ( 3611:

And here's the life restoration WIP, based largely on

3135:) As I see these edits I wonder if these are copyvio. 2290:

Reconstruction for some of Riachuelo Formation's fauna

5863:

article states some of them had gills, and even shows

5339:

looks nice, may as well do something similar here. --

5209:

Made the upper lobe a good deal smaller, how is this?

3391:

ok thanks, we’ll think of the best way to realise it

3205:) than the more well-known animals like mammoths and 1571:

I made this skeletal diagram of the newly discovered

1269:

was quite out of proportion... The reconstruction of

150:

Actually there are 13 tergites, that should be 12...

7446:. The most recent attempt I guess that I've seen is 6127:, which soft tissue looks not suitable for galeaspid 6039:. The skull is also too short for a scaphognathine. 3363:

You want this to be on the Elasmotherium main page?

2252:

Is a version possible with just the known material?

7310:

The text shouldn't overlap the subjects (like how "

7023:

https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologypapers/46/

4148:

should not have a markedly heterocercal caudal fin.

1929:Life restoration of an ophthalmosaurid ichthyosaur 1577:

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abl8316

122:A life reconstruction of the Ordovician eurypterid 6809:not really blank space though, there's the shadow 5425:I added a dorsal fin and smoothed out contours of 5129:, too much? Only blocked the shape in, no colour. 2393:one is currently in use on the English Knowledge. 6978:other than perhaps fishboy's one that you mention 2617:? Author of this image is same as this Thylacoleo 6563:by NT which hasn't been uploaded yet, worth it? 6485:Beak too blunt, almost looks like it's based on 5949:and lungfish are common in floodplain deposits. 2534:Request: Palaeoloxodon falconeri size comparison 2059:Skeletal and model match when superimposed (see 1781:Restoration of a group I modified from the right 4584:from images in Commons, is that look accurate, 2982:Thank you all for your reviews, how is it now? 2613:What about this image, though it is mainly for 1091:: Legs with claws and specialized neck lobopods 716:have too. Maybe you can help about this shark, 641:Well, I thought that one day reconstruction of 5477:Actually, after reading Fishboy's comments on 4079:may useful, as some non-English Wiki uses this 1141:The biramous appendages 2 on the back side of 749:. The only specimen showing the whole body of 7112:and upload that (or maybe (finally) color my 6889:, but based on skeletons of other members of 3158:contacted Roman and considered he is Alex at 339:. I think this pterosaur is partially known? 136:I have recently uploaded this image into the 7448:https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2484(79)90111-8 6247:Is it possible to create a skull diagram of 3667:Esben Horn's model in Eriksson et al. (2022) 3232:2) anti-war campaign, as you mentioned above 1933:giving birth. Is this good for the article? 3595:Here's a drawing of the partial forefin of 745:and it doesn't reflect the true anatomy of 7017:I'm requesting an image to go on the page 6531:Limb posture is odd, but is it inaccurate? 6149:This user once reviewed reconstruction of 5600:as random example) and the really evolved 5184:) (or perhaps Scott Hartman's skeletal of 4151:Somehow I only just noticed this but NT's 4127:man, none of which are even copyrightable! 2124:in commons looks like outdated. This study 5431:(added to the gallery) on the request of 5181:for approximating the upper lobe's size ( 857:Panarthropod reconstructions by Qohelet12 7480: 7227: 7147:What was its ecology? Feels a bit pale. 7039:I previously worked on illustration once 6872: 6758: 6398:It just occurred to me that none of our 6235: 6031:This restoration is clearly traced from 6023: 5977:Even the one with amphibian eggs is not 5588: 5002: 4327: 3790: 2804: 2694: 2537: 2442: 2434: 2293: 2227: 2209: 1921: 1632: 1563: 1514:(Fig. 7D of Martill & Ibrahim, 2012) 1449: 1074:, although perhaps it should be shorter. 477:will definitely have more to say on it. 117: 6980:because you mentioned it in your tweet 4769:) or what's known for other mixosaurids 2558:(open access, but not under CC-BY) and 1295:Could you point to a source that finds 14: 5569:for review here, is it beyond saving? 5400:, Fig. 8; note that this paper treats 3010:Excellent. Appreciate your hard work. 1351:, which I will draw again completely. 48:Do not edit the contents of this page. 7321:"Meters" could be abbreviated as "m". 5457:(which admittedly isn't that much... 6491:? The type specimen was labelled as 5236:Could be, I'll update it now, then. 4181:I dislike the gill-like line on the 3736:Very nice indeed. I would go ahead. 1728:imagery and request for size diagram 1629:Request: Protorosaurus skull diagram 432:looks inaccurate as well. Shouldn't 29: 7265:the link seems to be download only 7222:file:Gigantopithecus v human v1.svg 6976:Yeah. I already mentioned it above 6495:sp. by Wellnhofer in 1991 after all 5835:I noticed a cropped version of the 4884:- Seems a bit laterally compressed? 4111:I've listed some comments below. -- 3996:(which Slate Weasel made better one 1265:Now I'm just realized the trunk of 27: 18:Knowledge:WikiProject Palaeontology 7485:Diagram illustrating the size of 6909:Also, there are probably too many 6880:I'm not sure how much is known of 5607:pg 60-65 and LeBlanc et al. (2013) 5147:An any restoration I can base the 28: 7567: 6755:Bisticeratops Life Reconstruction 6275:I would be happy to handle this. 6232:Request: Orovenator skull diagram 3805:Somewhat crude drawing of of the 3795:Crude drawing of the carapace of 1644:There is a nice skull diagram of 440:, as reference used for 3 m-long 7477:Request: Mymoorapelta size chart 7235:Hi! A discussion started on the 7082: 7066: 6720: 6704: 6688: 6672: 6656: 6640: 6624: 6548: 6536: 6524: 6512: 6500: 6478: 6466: 6454: 6438: 6420: 6132: 6115: 6099: 5738: 5721: 5704: 5687: 5670: 5653: 5636: 5630:Recumbirostran life restorations 4974: 4957: 4941: 4925: 4889: 4874: 4858: 4842: 4811: 4790: 4774: 4754: 4738: 4722: 4706: 4690: 4670: 4654: 4630:Oh I see, thank you for advice! 4569: 4386: 4231: 4052: 4036: 4020: 4004: 3984: 3968: 3952: 3936: 3920: 3904: 3888: 3872: 3801:, after the part of the holotype 3581: 3569: 3486: 3099: 3083: 3066: 3050: 3034: 2371: 2355: 2339: 2323: 2317:Restorations by Marcio L. Castro 2272:this is just the known material 2111: 1834: 1822: 1810: 1798: 1786: 1774: 1762: 1081: 1060: 1043: 1026: 1006: 990: 974: 959: 943: 927: 911: 895: 879: 863: 774:Which one of the two is better? 653:) I think head looks a bit off? 629: 620: 491:I'm reasonably certain that the 414: 400: 384: 370: 275:seems to have too skinny limbs? 254: 238: 222: 33: 7220:scale image stance correction ( 6543:Angle maybe hides inaccuracies? 6256:(freely accessible through the 5007:Phylogenetic bracketing go home 2478:How are the other ones we have? 1983:Model proportions are based on 1594:Texacephale copyright violation 1477:are unbarbed and shaped like a 1221:, I wouldn't argue against the 1219:Lerosey-Aubril & Pates 2018 966:Diagrammatic reconstruction of 473:looks to be in great pain, and 6915:An overview of Acipenseriforms 4277:Til humans are descended from 1961:(I don't know very much about 1154:looks fewer than actually has. 13: 1: 7526:Dow's Puffin Copyright issue? 7506:) 23:05, 9 August 2022 (EDT) 6289:That would be great. Thanks. 6181:, what do you think of that? 5750:cropped and with fish removed 4169:looks too thin-snouted (i.e. 1229:and non-overlapping flaps of 187:12:31, 21 December 2021 (UTC) 160:11:58, 21 December 2021 (UTC) 7318:overlaps the female figure). 3866:Abyssal's size charts in use 3133:Here is contribution by them 2498:this figure for illustration 1517:and needs to be relabelled. 1188:Its also worth to note that 285:11:09, 7 February 2022 (UTC) 215:02:38, 7 February 2022 (UTC) 7: 7556:14:59, 22 August 2022 (UTC) 7541:14:50, 22 August 2022 (UTC) 7520:23:45, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 7469:18:27, 21 August 2022 (UTC) 7438:20:55, 20 August 2022 (UTC) 7423:20:55, 20 August 2022 (UTC) 7392:05:33, 20 August 2022 (UTC) 7364:04:50, 20 August 2022 (UTC) 7339:22:25, 19 August 2022 (UTC) 7293:21:03, 19 August 2022 (UTC) 7277:20:54, 19 August 2022 (UTC) 7260:20:42, 19 August 2022 (UTC) 7202:15:51, 19 August 2022 (UTC) 7182:13:22, 15 August 2022 (UTC) 7163:02:34, 15 August 2022 (UTC) 7139:21:56, 14 August 2022 (UTC) 7123:14:21, 13 August 2022 (UTC) 7058:Early Jurassic Ichthyosaurs 7052:04:48, 19 August 2022 (UTC) 7034:02:55, 19 August 2022 (UTC) 6995:10:41, 17 August 2022 (UTC) 6972:14:53, 16 August 2022 (UTC) 6957:05:07, 14 August 2022 (UTC) 6942:03:18, 14 August 2022 (UTC) 6927:18:51, 13 August 2022 (UTC) 6904:18:39, 13 August 2022 (UTC) 6863:23:31, 16 August 2022 (UTC) 6841:22:59, 16 August 2022 (UTC) 6819:22:56, 16 August 2022 (UTC) 6805:15:28, 16 August 2022 (UTC) 6791:14:56, 16 August 2022 (UTC) 6776:14:45, 16 August 2022 (UTC) 6750:22:15, 15 August 2022 (UTC) 6604:00:24, 15 August 2022 (UTC) 6586:15:10, 14 August 2022 (UTC) 6573:01:37, 10 August 2022 (UTC) 6414:01:37, 10 August 2022 (UTC) 6373:14:10, 10 August 2022 (UTC) 6341:02:39, 10 August 2022 (UTC) 6326:02:11, 10 August 2022 (UTC) 6224:01:19, 10 August 2022 (UTC) 6082:01:19, 10 August 2022 (UTC) 4199:is just another species of 3162:. Still I am not sure that 2232:Skull of Kinyang mabokoensi 2023:It's better now, isn't it? 1446:Rostral denticle comparison 1365:As Jun said, annulation of 124:Paraeurypterus anatoliensis 10: 7572: 6314:21:46, 8 August 2022 (UTC) 6299:00:40, 8 August 2022 (UTC) 6285:00:35, 8 August 2022 (UTC) 6270:21:49, 6 August 2022 (UTC) 6210:04:19, 8 August 2022 (UTC) 6191:03:33, 8 August 2022 (UTC) 6035:Jurassic World Dimorphodon 5998:00:50, 8 August 2022 (UTC) 5973:15:45, 6 August 2022 (UTC) 5959:13:13, 1 August 2022 (UTC) 5625:06:58, 7 August 2022 (UTC) 5579:16:19, 6 August 2022 (UTC) 4648:Triassic Ichthyopterygians 4640:09:08, 6 August 2022 (UTC) 4626:09:04, 6 August 2022 (UTC) 4610:05:46, 6 August 2022 (UTC) 4548:20:57, 5 August 2022 (UTC) 4536:17:33, 5 August 2022 (UTC) 4522:14:55, 5 August 2022 (UTC) 4504:14:19, 5 August 2022 (UTC) 4483:05:33, 5 August 2022 (UTC) 4473:. Are there any problems? 4453:13:29, 1 August 2022 (UTC) 4368:03:29, 1 August 2022 (UTC) 4272:) 2:34, 31 July 2022 (UTC) 4189:is actually a jr. syn. of 1769:My old restoration revised 1322:) 1:46, 25 May 2022 (UTC) 317:14:52, 14 March 2022 (UTC) 7312:Gigantopithecus giganteus 6064:16:51, 30 July 2022 (UTC) 6049:16:00, 30 July 2022 (UTC) 5940:17:57, 29 July 2022 (UTC) 5926:23:37, 28 July 2022 (UTC) 5904:21:53, 28 July 2022 (UTC) 5876:21:41, 28 July 2022 (UTC) 5849:21:09, 28 July 2022 (UTC) 5821:21:16, 28 July 2022 (UTC) 5799:21:07, 28 July 2022 (UTC) 5785:20:54, 28 July 2022 (UTC) 5770:19:35, 28 July 2022 (UTC) 5555:23:25, 22 July 2022 (UTC) 5525:23:43, 28 July 2022 (UTC) 5513:21:22, 28 July 2022 (UTC) 5499:18:47, 26 July 2022 (UTC) 5473:14:59, 24 July 2022 (UTC) 5453:Everything we know about 5445:15:50, 22 July 2022 (UTC) 5415:17:52, 19 July 2022 (UTC) 5360:00:02, 30 July 2022 (UTC) 5346:00:11, 29 July 2022 (UTC) 5331:00:08, 29 July 2022 (UTC) 5317:23:45, 28 July 2022 (UTC) 5306:14:59, 24 July 2022 (UTC) 5295:17:20, 22 July 2022 (UTC) 5279:22:33, 19 July 2022 (UTC) 5268:21:04, 19 July 2022 (UTC) 5260:19:16, 19 July 2022 (UTC) 5246:19:12, 19 July 2022 (UTC) 5232:19:06, 19 July 2022 (UTC) 5221:18:52, 19 July 2022 (UTC) 5205:18:06, 19 July 2022 (UTC) 5163:17:41, 19 July 2022 (UTC) 5139:17:34, 19 July 2022 (UTC) 4423:16:02, 28 July 2022 (UTC) 4408:15:52, 28 July 2022 (UTC) 4346:20:12, 31 July 2022 (UTC) 4315:03:38, 31 July 2022 (UTC) 4291:02:39, 31 July 2022 (UTC) 4118:16:31, 26 July 2022 (UTC) 4107:17:41, 25 July 2022 (UTC) 4092:15:35, 24 July 2022 (UTC) 3858:14:14, 22 July 2022 (UTC) 3844:21:11, 20 July 2022 (UTC) 3828:15:15, 20 July 2022 (UTC) 3816:available on researchgate 3763:13:39, 20 July 2022 (UTC) 3752:09:47, 20 July 2022 (UTC) 3732:15:48, 19 July 2022 (UTC) 3721:14:28, 19 July 2022 (UTC) 3707:14:22, 19 July 2022 (UTC) 3696:07:20, 19 July 2022 (UTC) 3676:23:52, 18 July 2022 (UTC) 3661:17:43, 18 July 2022 (UTC) 3646:15:35, 18 July 2022 (UTC) 3622:15:24, 17 July 2022 (UTC) 3606:15:08, 14 July 2022 (UTC) 3549:12:50, 20 July 2022 (UTC) 3535:05:06, 20 July 2022 (UTC) 3520:04:58, 20 July 2022 (UTC) 3437:13:26, 30 June 2022 (UTC) 3415:02:47, 10 July 2022 (UTC) 3373:13:36, 30 June 2022 (UTC) 3359:00:15, 29 June 2022 (UTC) 3345:23:52, 28 June 2022 (UTC) 3307:13:38, 30 June 2022 (UTC) 3293:13:30, 30 June 2022 (UTC) 3275:13:25, 30 June 2022 (UTC) 3261:16:50, 28 June 2022 (UTC) 3246:15:46, 28 June 2022 (UTC) 3219:03:42, 28 June 2022 (UTC) 3194:07:08, 24 June 2022 (UTC) 3180:02:49, 24 June 2022 (UTC) 3145:02:43, 24 June 2022 (UTC) 3020:05:14, 19 July 2022 (UTC) 3006:13:16, 18 July 2022 (UTC) 2992:13:11, 18 July 2022 (UTC) 2974:02:02, 15 July 2022 (UTC) 2956:01:26, 15 July 2022 (UTC) 2941:05:51, 14 July 2022 (UTC) 2912:06:02, 14 July 2022 (UTC) 2898:04:05, 14 July 2022 (UTC) 2884:02:48, 14 July 2022 (UTC) 2865:23:30, 13 July 2022 (UTC) 2843:21:18, 13 July 2022 (UTC) 2828:21:08, 13 July 2022 (UTC) 2812:Hello, I drew a group of 2791:22:09, 18 July 2022 (UTC) 2776:21:23, 18 July 2022 (UTC) 2761:20:02, 18 July 2022 (UTC) 2747:01:30, 10 June 2022 (UTC) 2674:00:32, 14 July 2022 (UTC) 2660:23:05, 12 July 2022 (UTC) 2644:09:25, 11 July 2022 (UTC) 2630:06:17, 11 July 2022 (UTC) 2571:03:46, 29 June 2022 (UTC) 2524:13:33, 28 June 2022 (UTC) 2510:13:21, 28 June 2022 (UTC) 2492:12:59, 28 June 2022 (UTC) 2473:10:57, 28 June 2022 (UTC) 2425:00:07, 20 June 2022 (UTC) 2403:22:41, 19 June 2022 (UTC) 2312:01:30, 18 June 2022 (UTC) 2282:22:02, 17 June 2022 (UTC) 2268:20:39, 17 June 2022 (UTC) 2247:19:39, 17 June 2022 (UTC) 2207:18:53, 13 June 2022 (UTC) 2193:02:14, 13 June 2022 (UTC) 2179:00:22, 13 June 2022 (UTC) 2164:13:25, 11 June 2022 (UTC) 2083:14:38, 12 June 2022 (UTC) 2072:14:16, 12 June 2022 (UTC) 1908:01:59, 12 June 2022 (UTC) 1439:) 1:46, 25 May 2022 (UTC) 851:03:16, 28 May 2022‎ (UTC) 7249:file:Gigantopithecus.png 6869:Gyrosteus by Nobu Tamura 5585:Mosasaur cranial kinesis 5104:18:52, 29 May 2022 (UTC) 5087:13:44, 29 May 2022 (UTC) 5040:21:37, 28 May 2022 (UTC) 5026:20:47, 28 May 2022 (UTC) 4999:18:50, 28 May 2022 (UTC) 3465:15:17, 7 July 2022 (UTC) 3451:08:47, 1 July 2022 (UTC) 3401:15:17, 7 July 2022 (UTC) 3387:08:45, 1 July 2022 (UTC) 2714:23:09, 9 June 2022 (UTC) 2664:Really good, thank you. 2609:20:59, 1 July 2022 (UTC) 2593:19:51, 1 July 2022 (UTC) 2431:Straight tusked elephant 2183:It looks so nice to me! 2134:about reconstruction of 2048:12:15, 18 May 2022 (UTC) 2033:10:27, 18 May 2022 (UTC) 2012:17:43, 14 May 2022 (UTC) 1997:16:00, 14 May 2022 (UTC) 1985:N. G. Zverkov's skeletal 1972:23:22, 11 May 2022 (UTC) 1888:22:40, 8 June 2022 (UTC) 1874:20:20, 4 June 2022 (UTC) 1855:19:59, 4 June 2022 (UTC) 1805:Rough drawing of occiput 1756:16:49, 4 June 2022 (UTC) 1741:, and I will send it to 1713:21:32, 5 June 2022 (UTC) 1699:23:28, 2 June 2022 (UTC) 1682:22:44, 2 June 2022 (UTC) 1664:07:21, 2 June 2022 (UTC) 1623:23:41, 3 June 2022 (UTC) 1608:23:12, 3 June 2022 (UTC) 1589:12:05, 3 June 2022 (UTC) 1549:21:33, 31 May 2022 (UTC) 1527:06:38, 30 May 2022 (UTC) 1495:06:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC) 1422:14:38, 30 May 2022 (UTC) 1408:06:42, 30 May 2022 (UTC) 1393:17:56, 27 May 2022 (UTC) 1379:02:31, 23 May 2022 (UTC) 1361:15:55, 19 May 2022 (UTC) 1335:20:01, 30 May 2022 (UTC) 1310:15:54, 18 May 2022 (UTC) 812:23:38, 26 May 2022 (UTC) 798:19:27, 26 May 2022 (UTC) 784:19:08, 26 May 2022 (UTC) 770:18:59, 26 May 2022 (UTC) 734:09:36, 26 May 2022 (UTC) 706:03:06, 26 May 2022 (UTC) 692:02:42, 26 May 2022 (UTC) 678:02:10, 26 May 2022 (UTC) 663:01:44, 26 May 2022 (UTC) 596:18:46, 26 May 2022 (UTC) 582:18:41, 26 May 2022 (UTC) 563:03:41, 23 May 2022 (UTC) 549:02:47, 23 May 2022 (UTC) 521:02:45, 23 May 2022 (UTC) 487:02:33, 23 May 2022 (UTC) 460:02:16, 23 May 2022 (UTC) 349:04:06, 25 May 2022 (UTC) 7186:That does look better. 6430:has himself pointed out 5567:Shastasaurus altispinus 4983:Shastasaurus altispinus 4488:Maybe remove the text? 3502:, as original image of 2996:I think it looks fine. 2552:Palaeoloxodon falconeri 2120:Only reconstruction of 1952:16:52, 9 May 2022 (UTC) 1473:. Rostral denticles of 1291:17:03, 7 May 2022 (UTC) 1261:13:50, 7 May 2022 (UTC) 1243:07:09, 7 May 2022 (UTC) 1183:05:05, 7 May 2022 (UTC) 636:Previous reconstruction 331:11:02, 2 May 2022 (UTC) 146:Thank you, in advance. 7490: 7232: 6877: 6763: 6560:There is also this one 6244: 6092:User:BTMTheMarshmallow 6072:Should be DR'ed then. 6028: 5593: 5008: 4969:extracted and modified 4333: 3802: 3166:accurate? And it have 2809: 2700: 2599:All three preferably. 2546: 2457: 2440: 2299: 2233: 2214: 1926: 1641: 1568: 1508:either! It is instead 1454: 133: 7484: 7231: 6876: 6762: 6239: 6027: 5592: 5559:Did the same for the 5006: 4986:, how accurate is it? 4563:fossil interpretation 4331: 4297:Walking with Monsters 3794: 3028:Roman Uchytel's works 2808: 2698: 2541: 2446: 2439:Restoration by DFoidl 2438: 2297: 2231: 2213: 1931:Maiaspondylus lindoei 1925: 1636: 1567: 1453: 1053:: morphology and legs 121: 46:of past discussions. 6196:Also as I see their 5321:Ok, so a small one? 5014:Ganges river dolphin 4216:has too thin a neck. 3525:I did it right now. 1829:Oversized silhouette 1506:Onchopristis dunklei 1502:Onchopristis dunklei 1273:apparently based on 7450:where he concludes 6108:Clymenia (ammonite) 4909:- Even considering 4471:Eardasaurus powelli 4144:As a parvipelvian, 3680:Looks much better. 2447:Size estimation of 2298:Riachuelo_Formation 2224:Kinyang skull recon 2169:I tried, is it ok? 1383:Ok, how about now? 1204:in recent analysis 7491: 7412:has been moved to 7329:Hope this helps. - 7241:user:Magnatyrannus 7233: 6878: 6851:Kirtland Formation 6847:Kirkland Formation 6764: 6245: 6029: 5985:CT redescription ( 5594: 5350:Added dorsal fin. 5009: 4747:Barracudasauroides 4334: 4082:inaccurate chart. 3803: 3150:Ah I noticed that 2810: 2701: 2547: 2458: 2441: 2300: 2234: 2215: 2197:Then it's okay 👍 1927: 1652:2008 redescription 1642: 1569: 1504:" is not actually 1463:" is not actually 1455: 134: 7435:Arlo James Barnes 7420:Arlo James Barnes 7379:Lythronaxargestes 7361:Arlo James Barnes 7290:Arlo James Barnes 7257:Arlo James Barnes 7189:Lythronaxargestes 7180: 7150:Lythronaxargestes 7137: 7121: 6849:, instead of the 6713:Palaeopriapulites 6584: 6555:Witton's skeletal 6365:Fanboyphilosopher 6306:Fanboyphilosopher 6277:Fanboyphilosopher 6258:Knowledge Library 6037:promotional image 5990:Fanboyphilosopher 5951:Fanboyphilosopher 5523: 5497: 5491: 5471: 5435:, any thoughts?. 5413: 5344: 5315: 5304: 5277: 5266: 5230: 5085: 4997: 4546: 4491:Lythronaxargestes 4445:Fanboyphilosopher 4302:Lythronaxargestes 4273: 4260:comment added by 4243:Evolution of fish 4192:Baptanodon natans 4116: 3761: 3756:Thanks! Added. -- 3739:Lythronaxargestes 3730: 3705: 3683:Lythronaxargestes 3674: 3633:Lythronaxargestes 3620: 3604: 3121:User:Alex Uchytel 2412:Lythronaxargestes 2255:Lythronaxargestes 2081: 2046: 2010: 1970: 1942: 1853: 1705:Fanboyphilosopher 1674:Fanboyphilosopher 1558:Discokeryx xiezhi 1036:: more body hooks 904:Boeckelericambria 837:comment added by 536:Lythronaxargestes 508:Lythronaxargestes 479:Fanboyphilosopher 315: 107: 106: 58: 57: 52:current main page 7563: 7461: 7456: 7269: 7179: 7136: 7120: 7086: 7070: 7044:Ta-tea-two-te-to 7019:Tyrannasorus rex 7011:Tyrannasorus rex 6934:Ta-tea-two-te-to 6724: 6708: 6692: 6676: 6660: 6644: 6628: 6583: 6552: 6540: 6528: 6516: 6504: 6482: 6470: 6458: 6442: 6424: 6202:Ta-tea-two-te-to 6183:Ta-tea-two-te-to 6136: 6119: 6103: 6056:Ta-tea-two-te-to 5918:Ta-tea-two-te-to 5742: 5725: 5708: 5691: 5674: 5657: 5640: 5622: 5522: 5496: 5489: 5470: 5433:Ta-tea-two-te-to 5412: 5404:as a synonym of 5343: 5314: 5303: 5276: 5229: 5084: 4996: 4978: 4961: 4945: 4929: 4893: 4878: 4862: 4846: 4815: 4794: 4778: 4758: 4742: 4726: 4710: 4694: 4674: 4658: 4632:Ta-tea-two-te-to 4602:Ta-tea-two-te-to 4599: 4591: 4573: 4545: 4400:Ta-tea-two-te-to 4390: 4365: 4262:Ta-tea-two-te-to 4255: 4252: 4235: 4214:Dolichorhynchops 4185:. Additionally, 4167:Temnodontosaurus 4115: 4084:Ta-tea-two-te-to 4056: 4045:Dolichorhynchops 4040: 4024: 4008: 3988: 3972: 3956: 3940: 3924: 3913:Temnodontosaurus 3908: 3892: 3876: 3760: 3729: 3704: 3673: 3619: 3603: 3588:Life restoration 3585: 3573: 3541:Ta-tea-two-te-to 3512:Ta-tea-two-te-to 3501: 3490: 3443:Ta-tea-two-te-to 3407:Ta-tea-two-te-to 3379:Ta-tea-two-te-to 3351:Ta-tea-two-te-to 3337:Ta-tea-two-te-to 3211:Ta-tea-two-te-to 3172:Ta-tea-two-te-to 3157: 3137:Ta-tea-two-te-to 3103: 3087: 3070: 3054: 3038: 2998:Ta-tea-two-te-to 2948:Ta-tea-two-te-to 2857:Ta-tea-two-te-to 2854: 2739:Ta-tea-two-te-to 2691:life restoration 2622:Ta-tea-two-te-to 2582: 2454:Cygnus falconeri 2375: 2359: 2343: 2327: 2185:Ta-tea-two-te-to 2156:Ta-tea-two-te-to 2153: 2145: 2115: 2080: 2058: 2045: 2022: 2009: 1982: 1969: 1934: 1852: 1838: 1826: 1814: 1802: 1793:Original of left 1790: 1778: 1766: 1737:is currently at 1560:skeletal diagram 1538: 1535:PaleoGeekSquared 1371:Ta-tea-two-te-to 1175:Ta-tea-two-te-to 1172: 1164: 1085: 1064: 1047: 1030: 1010: 994: 978: 963: 947: 936:Aengapentastomum 931: 915: 899: 883: 867: 853: 804:Ta-tea-two-te-to 726:Ta-tea-two-te-to 723: 684:Ta-tea-two-te-to 655:Ta-tea-two-te-to 652: 633: 624: 555:Ta-tea-two-te-to 452:Ta-tea-two-te-to 418: 404: 388: 374: 363:User:Dotname2469 341:Ta-tea-two-te-to 323:Ta-tea-two-te-to 314: 273:Spinophorosaurus 258: 242: 226: 207:Ta-tea-two-te-to 204: 152:Ta-tea-two-te-to 85: 60: 59: 37: 36: 30: 7571: 7570: 7566: 7565: 7564: 7562: 7561: 7560: 7528: 7500:Augustios_Paleo 7479: 7459: 7454: 7452:Gigantopithecus 7444:Gigantopithecus 7349:Gigantopithecus 7267: 7226: 7217:Gigantopithecus 7098: 7097: 7096: 7095: 7094: 7087: 7079: 7078: 7071: 7060: 7015: 6964:Fishboy86164577 6871: 6768:Sauriazoicillus 6757: 6732: 6725: 6716: 6709: 6700: 6693: 6684: 6681:Xiaoheiqingella 6677: 6668: 6661: 6652: 6645: 6636: 6629: 6620: 6556: 6553: 6544: 6541: 6532: 6529: 6520: 6519:Too small head? 6517: 6508: 6505: 6496: 6483: 6474: 6471: 6462: 6459: 6450: 6443: 6434: 6425: 6396: 6234: 6145: 6137: 6128: 6120: 6111: 6104: 6095: 6022: 6018:Harpactognathus 5886:this 2020 paper 5751: 5743: 5734: 5726: 5717: 5709: 5700: 5692: 5683: 5675: 5666: 5658: 5649: 5641: 5632: 5620: 5587: 5402:Contectopalatus 5395:Contectopalatus 5150:Contectopalatus 4987: 4979: 4970: 4962: 4953: 4946: 4937: 4930: 4921: 4897:Californosaurus 4894: 4885: 4882:Californosaurus 4879: 4870: 4867:Californosaurus 4863: 4854: 4847: 4838: 4831:S. sikanniensis 4816: 4807: 4795: 4786: 4779: 4770: 4763:Contectopalatus 4759: 4750: 4743: 4734: 4727: 4718: 4711: 4702: 4695: 4686: 4675: 4666: 4659: 4650: 4593: 4585: 4574: 4565: 4467: 4391: 4382: 4363: 4326: 4246: 4236: 4227: 4201:Ophthalmosaurus 4195:(as to whether 4183:Ophthalmosaurus 4064: 4057: 4048: 4041: 4032: 4025: 4016: 4009: 4000: 3993:Ophthalmosaurus 3989: 3980: 3973: 3964: 3961:Californosaurus 3957: 3948: 3941: 3932: 3925: 3916: 3909: 3900: 3893: 3884: 3877: 3868: 3789: 3593: 3592: 3591: 3590: 3589: 3586: 3578: 3577: 3574: 3563: 3495: 3491: 3151: 3111: 3104: 3095: 3088: 3079: 3071: 3062: 3055: 3046: 3039: 3030: 2848: 2803: 2693: 2576: 2545:size comparison 2536: 2433: 2383: 2376: 2367: 2360: 2351: 2344: 2335: 2328: 2319: 2292: 2226: 2147: 2139: 2116: 2107: 2052: 2016: 1976: 1920: 1842: 1839: 1830: 1827: 1818: 1815: 1806: 1803: 1794: 1791: 1782: 1779: 1770: 1767: 1730: 1631: 1596: 1562: 1532: 1511:Australopristis 1448: 1166: 1158: 1144:Cambropachycope 1098:In addition to 1096: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1086: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1065: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1048: 1039: 1038: 1037: 1031: 1018: 1011: 1002: 995: 986: 979: 970: 968:Cambropachycope 964: 955: 952:Cambropachycope 948: 939: 932: 923: 916: 907: 900: 891: 884: 875: 868: 859: 832: 717: 646: 637: 634: 625: 616: 497:Monolophosaurus 424: 419: 410: 405: 396: 389: 380: 375: 366: 337:Harpactognathus 266: 263:Harpactognathus 259: 250: 243: 234: 227: 201:YellowPanda2001 198: 116: 81: 34: 26: 25: 24: 22:Paleoart review 12: 11: 5: 7569: 7559: 7558: 7527: 7524: 7523: 7522: 7478: 7475: 7474: 7473: 7472: 7471: 7460:Dunkleosteus77 7431: 7430: 7429: 7428: 7427: 7426: 7425: 7399: 7398: 7397: 7396: 7395: 7394: 7369: 7368: 7367: 7366: 7342: 7341: 7327: 7326: 7325: 7322: 7319: 7308: 7305: 7298: 7297: 7296: 7295: 7280: 7279: 7268:Dunkleosteus77 7225: 7212: 7211: 7210: 7209: 7208: 7207: 7206: 7205: 7204: 7169:Stenopterygius 7142: 7141: 7114:Cymbospondylus 7106:Excalibosaurus 7091:Excalibosaurus 7088: 7081: 7080: 7072: 7065: 7064: 7063: 7062: 7061: 7059: 7056: 7055: 7054: 7026:Di (they-them) 7014: 7007: 7006: 7005: 7004: 7003: 7002: 7001: 7000: 6999: 6998: 6997: 6891:Chondrosteidae 6870: 6867: 6866: 6865: 6843: 6826: 6825: 6824: 6823: 6822: 6821: 6756: 6753: 6734: 6733: 6726: 6719: 6717: 6710: 6703: 6701: 6694: 6687: 6685: 6678: 6671: 6669: 6665:Paratubiluchus 6662: 6655: 6653: 6646: 6639: 6637: 6633:Eximipriapulus 6630: 6623: 6619: 6610: 6609: 6608: 6607: 6606: 6589: 6588: 6558: 6557: 6554: 6547: 6545: 6542: 6535: 6533: 6530: 6523: 6521: 6518: 6511: 6509: 6506: 6499: 6497: 6484: 6477: 6475: 6472: 6465: 6463: 6460: 6453: 6451: 6444: 6437: 6435: 6426: 6419: 6401:Quetzalcoatlus 6395: 6391:Quetzalcoatlus 6387: 6386: 6385: 6384: 6383: 6382: 6381: 6380: 6379: 6378: 6377: 6376: 6375: 6233: 6230: 6229: 6228: 6227: 6226: 6175:anaspidomorphs 6147: 6146: 6138: 6131: 6129: 6121: 6114: 6112: 6105: 6098: 6094: 6088: 6087: 6086: 6085: 6084: 6067: 6066: 6021: 6014: 6013: 6012: 6011: 6010: 6009: 6008: 6007: 6006: 6005: 6004: 6003: 6002: 6001: 6000: 5888:suggests that 5879: 5878: 5856: 5855: 5854: 5853: 5852: 5851: 5828: 5827: 5826: 5825: 5824: 5823: 5753: 5752: 5744: 5737: 5735: 5727: 5720: 5718: 5716:by Nobu Tamura 5713:Cardiocephalus 5710: 5703: 5701: 5693: 5686: 5684: 5682:by Nobu Tamura 5676: 5669: 5667: 5659: 5652: 5650: 5642: 5635: 5631: 5628: 5586: 5583: 5582: 5581: 5557: 5542:Guanlingsaurus 5536: 5535: 5534: 5533: 5532: 5531: 5530: 5529: 5528: 5527: 5479:Himalayasaurus 5448: 5447: 5428:Himalayasaurus 5422: 5421: 5420: 5419: 5418: 5417: 5387: 5386: 5385: 5384: 5383: 5382: 5381: 5380: 5379: 5378: 5377: 5376: 5375: 5374: 5373: 5372: 5371: 5370: 5369: 5368: 5367: 5366: 5365: 5364: 5363: 5362: 5337:Guanlingsaurus 5308: 5299:Looks nice. -- 5270: 5192: 5191: 5142: 5141: 5115: 5114: 5113: 5112: 5111: 5110: 5109: 5108: 5107: 5106: 5060:Stenopterygius 4989: 4988: 4980: 4973: 4971: 4963: 4956: 4954: 4950:Guanlingsaurus 4947: 4940: 4938: 4934:Himalayasaurus 4931: 4924: 4922: 4911:Guanlingsaurus 4895: 4888: 4886: 4880: 4873: 4871: 4864: 4857: 4855: 4848: 4841: 4839: 4826:Guanlingsaurus 4817: 4810: 4808: 4796: 4789: 4787: 4780: 4773: 4771: 4760: 4753: 4751: 4744: 4737: 4735: 4731:Thalattoarchon 4728: 4721: 4719: 4712: 4705: 4703: 4696: 4689: 4687: 4676: 4669: 4667: 4660: 4653: 4649: 4646: 4645: 4644: 4643: 4642: 4576: 4575: 4568: 4564: 4558: 4557: 4556: 4555: 4554: 4553: 4552: 4551: 4550: 4466: 4459: 4458: 4457: 4456: 4455: 4434:Proterochampsa 4393: 4392: 4385: 4381: 4378:Proterochampsa 4374: 4373: 4372: 4371: 4370: 4325: 4324:reconstruction 4319: 4318: 4317: 4293: 4238: 4237: 4230: 4226: 4223: 4222: 4221: 4220: 4219: 4218: 4217: 4211: 4204: 4179: 4173: 4164: 4149: 4146:Excalibosaurus 4142: 4131:Excalibosaurus 4128: 4076:Cymbospondylus 4071:Cotylorhynchus 4066: 4065: 4058: 4051: 4049: 4042: 4035: 4033: 4029:Cotylorhynchus 4026: 4019: 4017: 4010: 4003: 4001: 3990: 3983: 3981: 3974: 3967: 3965: 3958: 3951: 3949: 3942: 3935: 3933: 3926: 3919: 3917: 3910: 3903: 3901: 3897:Stenopterygius 3894: 3887: 3885: 3881:Excalibosaurus 3878: 3871: 3867: 3864: 3863: 3862: 3861: 3860: 3788: 3785: 3784: 3783: 3782: 3781: 3780: 3779: 3778: 3777: 3776: 3775: 3774: 3773: 3772: 3771: 3770: 3769: 3768: 3767: 3766: 3765: 3625: 3624: 3613:Stenopterygius 3597:Chacaicosaurus 3587: 3580: 3579: 3575: 3568: 3567: 3566: 3565: 3564: 3562: 3559:Chacaicosaurus 3555: 3554: 3553: 3552: 3551: 3493: 3492: 3485: 3482: 3481: 3480: 3479: 3478: 3477: 3476: 3475: 3474: 3473: 3472: 3471: 3470: 3469: 3468: 3467: 3425: 3424: 3423: 3422: 3421: 3420: 3419: 3418: 3417: 3324: 3323: 3322: 3321: 3320: 3319: 3318: 3317: 3316: 3315: 3314: 3313: 3312: 3311: 3310: 3309: 3233: 3230: 3227: 3224: 3113: 3112: 3105: 3098: 3096: 3089: 3082: 3080: 3072: 3065: 3063: 3056: 3049: 3047: 3040: 3033: 3029: 3026: 3025: 3024: 3023: 3022: 3008: 2980: 2979: 2978: 2977: 2976: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2914: 2845: 2802: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2796: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2749: 2692: 2686: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2679: 2678: 2677: 2676: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2535: 2532: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2432: 2429: 2428: 2427: 2385: 2384: 2377: 2370: 2368: 2361: 2354: 2352: 2345: 2338: 2336: 2329: 2322: 2318: 2315: 2291: 2288: 2287: 2286: 2285: 2284: 2225: 2222: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2217: 2216: 2118: 2117: 2110: 2106: 2099: 2098: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2094: 2093: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2089: 2088: 2087: 2086: 2085: 1938:Petr Menshikov 1919: 1912: 1911: 1910: 1895: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1858: 1857: 1844: 1843: 1840: 1833: 1831: 1828: 1821: 1819: 1816: 1809: 1807: 1804: 1797: 1795: 1792: 1785: 1783: 1780: 1773: 1771: 1768: 1761: 1729: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1630: 1627: 1626: 1625: 1613:I removed it. 1595: 1592: 1581:Di (they-them) 1561: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1447: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1381: 1345: 1344: 1343: 1342: 1341: 1340: 1339: 1338: 1337: 1293: 1271:Orstenotubulus 1156: 1155: 1150:Body hooks of 1148: 1139: 1089:Orstenotubulus 1087: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1066: 1059: 1058: 1057: 1049: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1032: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1012: 1005: 1003: 996: 989: 987: 980: 973: 971: 965: 958: 956: 949: 942: 940: 933: 926: 924: 920:Orstenotubulus 917: 910: 908: 901: 894: 892: 885: 878: 876: 869: 862: 858: 855: 829: 828: 827: 826: 825: 824: 823: 822: 821: 820: 819: 818: 817: 816: 815: 814: 639: 638: 635: 628: 626: 619: 615: 608: 607: 606: 605: 604: 603: 602: 601: 600: 599: 598: 525:And, in fact, 489: 426: 425: 420: 413: 411: 406: 399: 397: 390: 383: 381: 376: 369: 365: 359: 358: 357: 356: 355: 354: 353: 352: 351: 307:Stenopterygius 290:Himalayasaurus 268: 267: 260: 253: 251: 244: 237: 235: 231:Himalayasaurus 228: 221: 218: 217: 195: 194: 193: 162: 139:Paraeurypterus 126:, consuming a 115: 112:Paraeurypterus 108: 105: 104: 99: 96: 91: 86: 79: 74: 69: 66: 56: 55: 38: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 7568: 7557: 7553: 7549: 7545: 7544: 7543: 7542: 7538: 7534: 7521: 7517: 7513: 7509: 7508: 7507: 7505: 7501: 7497: 7488: 7483: 7470: 7467: 7466: 7462: 7453: 7449: 7445: 7441: 7440: 7439: 7436: 7432: 7424: 7421: 7417: 7416: 7411: 7407: 7406: 7405: 7404: 7403: 7402: 7401: 7400: 7393: 7389: 7385: 7381: 7380: 7375: 7374: 7373: 7372: 7371: 7370: 7365: 7362: 7358: 7357:G. giganticus 7354: 7350: 7346: 7345: 7344: 7343: 7340: 7336: 7332: 7328: 7323: 7320: 7317: 7313: 7309: 7306: 7303: 7302: 7300: 7299: 7294: 7291: 7288: 7284: 7283: 7282: 7281: 7278: 7275: 7274: 7270: 7264: 7263: 7262: 7261: 7258: 7254: 7250: 7246: 7245:user:Larrayal 7242: 7238: 7230: 7223: 7219: 7218: 7203: 7199: 7195: 7191: 7190: 7185: 7184: 7183: 7178: 7174: 7170: 7166: 7165: 7164: 7160: 7156: 7152: 7151: 7146: 7145: 7144: 7143: 7140: 7135: 7131: 7130:Hauffiopteryx 7127: 7126: 7125: 7124: 7119: 7115: 7111: 7110:Eurhinosaurus 7107: 7103: 7102:Hauffiopteryx 7093: 7092: 7085: 7077: 7076: 7075:Hauffiopteryx 7069: 7053: 7049: 7045: 7041: 7038: 7037: 7036: 7035: 7031: 7027: 7024: 7020: 7012: 6996: 6992: 6988: 6983: 6979: 6975: 6974: 6973: 6969: 6965: 6960: 6959: 6958: 6954: 6950: 6945: 6944: 6943: 6939: 6935: 6930: 6929: 6928: 6924: 6920: 6916: 6912: 6908: 6907: 6906: 6905: 6901: 6897: 6892: 6888: 6885: 6884: 6875: 6864: 6860: 6856: 6852: 6848: 6844: 6842: 6838: 6834: 6831: 6828: 6827: 6820: 6816: 6812: 6808: 6807: 6806: 6802: 6798: 6794: 6793: 6792: 6788: 6784: 6780: 6779: 6778: 6777: 6773: 6769: 6761: 6752: 6751: 6747: 6743: 6739: 6731: 6730: 6729:Paraselkirkia 6723: 6718: 6715: 6714: 6707: 6702: 6699: 6698: 6691: 6686: 6683: 6682: 6675: 6670: 6667: 6666: 6659: 6654: 6651: 6650: 6643: 6638: 6635: 6634: 6627: 6622: 6621: 6618: 6615:worms of the 6614: 6605: 6601: 6597: 6593: 6592: 6591: 6590: 6587: 6582: 6577: 6576: 6575: 6574: 6570: 6566: 6562: 6551: 6546: 6539: 6534: 6527: 6522: 6515: 6510: 6503: 6498: 6494: 6490: 6489: 6488:Wellnhopterus 6481: 6476: 6469: 6464: 6457: 6452: 6448: 6441: 6436: 6432: 6429: 6423: 6418: 6417: 6416: 6415: 6411: 6407: 6403: 6402: 6393: 6392: 6374: 6370: 6366: 6362: 6361: 6356: 6355: 6350: 6349: 6344: 6343: 6342: 6338: 6334: 6329: 6328: 6327: 6324: 6323: 6317: 6316: 6315: 6311: 6307: 6302: 6301: 6300: 6296: 6292: 6288: 6287: 6286: 6282: 6278: 6274: 6273: 6272: 6271: 6267: 6263: 6259: 6255: 6252: 6251: 6243:skull diagram 6242: 6238: 6225: 6221: 6217: 6213: 6212: 6211: 6207: 6203: 6199: 6198:contributions 6195: 6194: 6193: 6192: 6188: 6184: 6180: 6176: 6172: 6171: 6166: 6165: 6160: 6159: 6154: 6153: 6143: 6142: 6135: 6130: 6126: 6125: 6118: 6113: 6110: 6109: 6102: 6097: 6096: 6093: 6083: 6079: 6075: 6071: 6070: 6069: 6068: 6065: 6061: 6057: 6053: 6052: 6051: 6050: 6046: 6042: 6038: 6036: 6026: 6020: 6019: 5999: 5995: 5991: 5987: 5984: 5980: 5976: 5975: 5974: 5970: 5966: 5962: 5961: 5960: 5956: 5952: 5948: 5943: 5942: 5941: 5937: 5933: 5929: 5928: 5927: 5923: 5919: 5915: 5913: 5912: 5907: 5906: 5905: 5901: 5897: 5893: 5892: 5887: 5883: 5882: 5881: 5880: 5877: 5873: 5869: 5865: 5862: 5858: 5857: 5850: 5846: 5842: 5838: 5834: 5833: 5832: 5831: 5830: 5829: 5822: 5818: 5814: 5810: 5806: 5802: 5801: 5800: 5796: 5792: 5788: 5787: 5786: 5782: 5778: 5774: 5773: 5772: 5771: 5767: 5763: 5758: 5757:Recumbirostra 5749: 5748: 5741: 5736: 5732: 5731: 5724: 5719: 5715: 5714: 5707: 5702: 5698: 5697: 5690: 5685: 5681: 5680: 5673: 5668: 5664: 5663: 5656: 5651: 5647: 5646: 5639: 5634: 5633: 5627: 5626: 5623: 5617: 5616: 5615: 5614:Macrophyseter 5609: 5606: 5603: 5599: 5591: 5580: 5576: 5572: 5568: 5564: 5563: 5558: 5556: 5552: 5548: 5544: 5543: 5538: 5537: 5526: 5521: 5516: 5515: 5514: 5510: 5506: 5502: 5501: 5500: 5495: 5487: 5484: 5480: 5476: 5475: 5474: 5469: 5465: 5464: 5459: 5456: 5455:Himalaysaurus 5452: 5451: 5450: 5449: 5446: 5442: 5438: 5434: 5430: 5429: 5424: 5423: 5416: 5411: 5407: 5403: 5399: 5396: 5393: 5392: 5391: 5390: 5389: 5388: 5361: 5357: 5353: 5349: 5348: 5347: 5342: 5338: 5334: 5333: 5332: 5328: 5324: 5320: 5319: 5318: 5313: 5309: 5307: 5302: 5298: 5297: 5296: 5292: 5288: 5285: 5282: 5281: 5280: 5275: 5271: 5269: 5263: 5262: 5261: 5257: 5253: 5249: 5248: 5247: 5243: 5239: 5235: 5234: 5233: 5228: 5224: 5223: 5222: 5218: 5214: 5211: 5208: 5207: 5206: 5202: 5198: 5194: 5193: 5189: 5188: 5183: 5180: 5179: 5173: 5169: 5166: 5165: 5164: 5160: 5156: 5152: 5151: 5146: 5145: 5144: 5143: 5140: 5136: 5132: 5128: 5124: 5120: 5117: 5116: 5105: 5101: 5097: 5092: 5091: 5090: 5089: 5088: 5083: 5079: 5078:Ichthyosaurus 5075: 5072: 5069: 5066: 5062: 5061: 5056: 5051: 5047: 5043: 5042: 5041: 5037: 5033: 5029: 5028: 5027: 5023: 5019: 5015: 5011: 5010: 5005: 5001: 5000: 4995: 4985: 4984: 4977: 4972: 4968: 4967: 4960: 4955: 4952: 4951: 4944: 4939: 4936: 4935: 4928: 4923: 4919: 4916: 4912: 4908: 4904: 4903: 4898: 4892: 4887: 4883: 4877: 4872: 4869: 4868: 4861: 4856: 4853: 4852: 4845: 4840: 4836: 4832: 4828: 4827: 4822: 4821: 4814: 4809: 4805: 4801: 4800: 4793: 4788: 4785: 4784: 4777: 4772: 4768: 4765: 4764: 4757: 4752: 4749: 4748: 4741: 4736: 4733: 4732: 4725: 4720: 4717: 4716: 4709: 4704: 4701: 4700: 4693: 4688: 4684: 4681: 4680: 4673: 4668: 4665: 4664: 4657: 4652: 4651: 4641: 4637: 4633: 4629: 4628: 4627: 4623: 4619: 4614: 4613: 4612: 4611: 4607: 4603: 4597: 4589: 4583: 4582: 4572: 4567: 4566: 4562: 4549: 4544: 4539: 4538: 4537: 4533: 4529: 4525: 4524: 4523: 4519: 4515: 4511: 4507: 4506: 4505: 4501: 4497: 4493: 4492: 4487: 4486: 4485: 4484: 4480: 4476: 4472: 4465: 4464: 4454: 4450: 4446: 4442: 4440: 4438: 4435: 4431: 4426: 4425: 4424: 4420: 4416: 4412: 4411: 4410: 4409: 4405: 4401: 4397: 4389: 4384: 4383: 4380: 4379: 4369: 4366: 4360: 4359: 4358: 4357:Macrophyseter 4352: 4351: 4350: 4349: 4348: 4347: 4343: 4339: 4330: 4323: 4316: 4312: 4308: 4304: 4303: 4298: 4294: 4292: 4288: 4284: 4280: 4276: 4275: 4274: 4271: 4267: 4263: 4259: 4250: 4244: 4234: 4229: 4228: 4225:Ancestors.gif 4215: 4212: 4209: 4208:Muraenosaurus 4206:The skull of 4205: 4202: 4198: 4194: 4193: 4188: 4184: 4180: 4177: 4176:Trinacromerum 4174: 4171: 4168: 4165: 4162: 4158: 4157:Maisch (2008) 4154: 4150: 4147: 4143: 4140: 4136: 4135:Trinacromerum 4132: 4129: 4126: 4121: 4120: 4119: 4114: 4110: 4109: 4108: 4104: 4100: 4096: 4095: 4094: 4093: 4089: 4085: 4081: 4078: 4077: 4072: 4063: 4062: 4055: 4050: 4047: 4046: 4039: 4034: 4031: 4030: 4023: 4018: 4015: 4014: 4013:Muraenosaurus 4007: 4002: 3998: 3995: 3994: 3987: 3982: 3979: 3978: 3977:Trinacromerum 3971: 3966: 3963: 3962: 3955: 3950: 3947: 3946: 3939: 3934: 3931: 3930: 3923: 3918: 3915: 3914: 3907: 3902: 3899: 3898: 3891: 3886: 3883: 3882: 3875: 3870: 3869: 3859: 3855: 3851: 3847: 3846: 3845: 3841: 3837: 3832: 3831: 3830: 3829: 3825: 3821: 3817: 3813: 3812: 3808: 3800: 3799: 3793: 3764: 3759: 3755: 3754: 3753: 3749: 3745: 3741: 3740: 3735: 3734: 3733: 3728: 3724: 3723: 3722: 3718: 3714: 3710: 3709: 3708: 3703: 3699: 3698: 3697: 3693: 3689: 3685: 3684: 3679: 3678: 3677: 3672: 3668: 3664: 3663: 3662: 3658: 3654: 3649: 3648: 3647: 3643: 3639: 3635: 3634: 3629: 3628: 3627: 3626: 3623: 3618: 3614: 3610: 3609: 3608: 3607: 3602: 3598: 3584: 3572: 3561: 3560: 3550: 3546: 3542: 3538: 3537: 3536: 3532: 3528: 3524: 3523: 3522: 3521: 3517: 3513: 3509: 3505: 3504:Inostrancevia 3499: 3489: 3484: 3483: 3466: 3462: 3458: 3454: 3453: 3452: 3448: 3444: 3440: 3439: 3438: 3434: 3430: 3426: 3416: 3412: 3408: 3404: 3403: 3402: 3398: 3394: 3390: 3389: 3388: 3384: 3380: 3376: 3375: 3374: 3370: 3366: 3362: 3361: 3360: 3356: 3352: 3348: 3347: 3346: 3342: 3338: 3334: 3333: 3332: 3331: 3330: 3329: 3328: 3327: 3326: 3325: 3308: 3304: 3300: 3296: 3295: 3294: 3290: 3286: 3282: 3278: 3277: 3276: 3272: 3268: 3264: 3263: 3262: 3258: 3254: 3249: 3248: 3247: 3243: 3239: 3234: 3231: 3228: 3225: 3222: 3221: 3220: 3216: 3212: 3208: 3204: 3203:Inostrancevia 3200: 3197: 3196: 3195: 3191: 3187: 3183: 3182: 3181: 3177: 3173: 3169: 3165: 3164:Inostrancevia 3161: 3155: 3149: 3148: 3147: 3146: 3142: 3138: 3134: 3130: 3128: 3127: 3126:Elasmotherium 3122: 3118: 3117:Inostrancevia 3110: 3109: 3108:Kubanochoerus 3102: 3097: 3094: 3093: 3092:Murrayglossus 3086: 3081: 3078: 3076: 3075:Praemegaceros 3069: 3064: 3061: 3060: 3059:Inostrancevia 3053: 3048: 3045: 3044: 3037: 3032: 3031: 3021: 3017: 3013: 3009: 3007: 3003: 2999: 2995: 2994: 2993: 2989: 2985: 2981: 2975: 2971: 2967: 2963: 2959: 2958: 2957: 2953: 2949: 2944: 2943: 2942: 2938: 2934: 2930: 2929:Stanleycaris 2926: 2921: 2913: 2909: 2905: 2901: 2900: 2899: 2895: 2891: 2887: 2886: 2885: 2881: 2877: 2873: 2868: 2867: 2866: 2862: 2858: 2852: 2846: 2844: 2840: 2836: 2832: 2831: 2830: 2829: 2825: 2821: 2817: 2816: 2807: 2792: 2788: 2784: 2779: 2778: 2777: 2773: 2769: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2758: 2754: 2750: 2748: 2744: 2740: 2736: 2735: 2730: 2729: 2724: 2723: 2718: 2717: 2716: 2715: 2711: 2707: 2697: 2690: 2675: 2671: 2667: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2657: 2653: 2649: 2645: 2641: 2637: 2633: 2632: 2631: 2627: 2623: 2619: 2616: 2612: 2611: 2610: 2606: 2602: 2598: 2597: 2596: 2595: 2594: 2590: 2586: 2580: 2575: 2574: 2573: 2572: 2568: 2564: 2560: 2557: 2554: 2553: 2544: 2540: 2525: 2521: 2517: 2513: 2512: 2511: 2507: 2503: 2499: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2489: 2485: 2482: 2480: 2477: 2476: 2475: 2474: 2470: 2466: 2462: 2456: 2455: 2450: 2445: 2437: 2426: 2422: 2418: 2414: 2413: 2407: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2400: 2396: 2392: 2391: 2390:Siriusgnathus 2382: 2381: 2380:Siriusgnathus 2374: 2369: 2366: 2365: 2358: 2353: 2350: 2349: 2342: 2337: 2334: 2333: 2326: 2321: 2320: 2314: 2313: 2309: 2305: 2296: 2283: 2279: 2275: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2265: 2261: 2257: 2256: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2244: 2240: 2230: 2212: 2208: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2195: 2194: 2190: 2186: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2176: 2172: 2168: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2161: 2157: 2151: 2143: 2137: 2133: 2130: 2129:Haplophrentis 2126: 2123: 2122:Haplophrentis 2114: 2109: 2108: 2105: 2104: 2103:Haplophrentis 2084: 2079: 2075: 2074: 2073: 2069: 2065: 2061: 2056: 2051: 2050: 2049: 2044: 2040: 2039:Maiaspondylus 2036: 2035: 2034: 2030: 2026: 2020: 2015: 2014: 2013: 2008: 2004: 2000: 1999: 1998: 1994: 1990: 1986: 1980: 1975: 1974: 1973: 1968: 1964: 1960: 1959:Maiaspondylus 1956: 1955: 1954: 1953: 1949: 1945: 1941: 1939: 1932: 1924: 1918: 1917: 1916:Maiaspondylus 1909: 1905: 1901: 1897: 1896: 1889: 1885: 1881: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1871: 1867: 1862: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1856: 1851: 1846: 1845: 1837: 1832: 1825: 1820: 1813: 1808: 1801: 1796: 1789: 1784: 1777: 1772: 1765: 1760: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1753: 1749: 1744: 1740: 1736: 1735: 1727: 1726: 1714: 1710: 1706: 1702: 1701: 1700: 1696: 1692: 1688: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1671: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1661: 1657: 1653: 1649: 1648: 1647:Protorosaurus 1640:skull diagram 1639: 1638:Protorosaurus 1635: 1624: 1620: 1616: 1612: 1611: 1610: 1609: 1605: 1601: 1591: 1590: 1586: 1582: 1578: 1574: 1566: 1559: 1550: 1546: 1542: 1536: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1516: 1513: 1512: 1507: 1503: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1492: 1488: 1483: 1480: 1476: 1475:Libanopristis 1472: 1471: 1466: 1465:Libanopristis 1462: 1461: 1460:Libanopristis 1452: 1438: 1434: 1429: 1423: 1419: 1415: 1411: 1410: 1409: 1405: 1401: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1336: 1332: 1328: 1324: 1323: 1321: 1317: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1307: 1303: 1298: 1297:Caryosyntrips 1294: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1279: 1275: 1272: 1268: 1264: 1263: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1250: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1240: 1236: 1232: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1211:Caryosyntrips 1208: 1206: 1203: 1202: 1197: 1196: 1192:is closer to 1191: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1180: 1176: 1170: 1162: 1153: 1149: 1146: 1145: 1140: 1137: 1133: 1132:Caryosyntrips 1129: 1128: 1123: 1122: 1118:are based on 1117: 1116: 1111: 1110: 1109:Caryosyntrips 1105: 1104: 1103: 1101: 1100:Odontogriphus 1090: 1084: 1073: 1069: 1063: 1052: 1046: 1035: 1029: 1017: 1016: 1009: 1004: 1001: 1000: 993: 988: 985: 984: 983:Caryosyntrips 977: 972: 969: 962: 957: 954: 953: 946: 941: 938: 937: 930: 925: 922: 921: 914: 909: 906: 905: 898: 893: 890: 889: 882: 877: 874: 873: 866: 861: 860: 854: 852: 848: 844: 840: 839:Gojira Moment 836: 813: 809: 805: 801: 800: 799: 795: 791: 787: 786: 785: 781: 777: 773: 772: 771: 767: 763: 759: 755: 752: 748: 744: 742: 737: 736: 735: 731: 727: 721: 715: 712: 709: 708: 707: 703: 699: 695: 694: 693: 689: 685: 681: 680: 679: 675: 671: 667: 666: 665: 664: 660: 656: 650: 649:Gojira Moment 644: 632: 627: 623: 618: 617: 614: 613: 597: 593: 589: 585: 584: 583: 579: 575: 571: 569: 566: 565: 564: 560: 556: 552: 551: 550: 546: 542: 538: 537: 532: 528: 524: 523: 522: 518: 514: 510: 509: 504: 503: 498: 494: 490: 488: 484: 480: 476: 472: 468: 464: 463: 462: 461: 457: 453: 449: 448: 443: 439: 435: 431: 423: 417: 412: 409: 403: 398: 395: 394: 387: 382: 379: 373: 368: 367: 364: 350: 346: 342: 338: 334: 333: 332: 328: 324: 320: 319: 318: 313: 309: 308: 303: 302: 297: 296: 291: 288: 287: 286: 282: 278: 274: 270: 269: 265: 264: 257: 252: 249: 248: 247:Siksika ottae 241: 236: 233: 232: 225: 220: 219: 216: 212: 208: 202: 196: 190: 189: 188: 184: 180: 176: 173: 169: 168: 163: 161: 157: 153: 149: 148: 147: 144: 141: 140: 131: 130: 129:Didymograptus 125: 120: 114: 113: 103: 100: 97: 95: 92: 90: 87: 84: 80: 78: 75: 73: 70: 67: 65: 62: 61: 53: 49: 45: 44: 39: 32: 31: 23: 19: 7533:Armin Reindl 7529: 7492: 7487:Mymoorapelta 7486: 7464: 7451: 7443: 7415:Indopithecus 7413: 7410:G. giganteus 7409: 7377: 7356: 7352: 7348: 7315: 7311: 7272: 7234: 7215: 7187: 7177:Slate Weasel 7168: 7148: 7134:Slate Weasel 7129: 7118:Slate Weasel 7113: 7109: 7105: 7101: 7099: 7089: 7073: 7016: 6987:Hemiauchenia 6977: 6949:Hemiauchenia 6919:Hemiauchenia 6896:Hemiauchenia 6881: 6879: 6765: 6735: 6727: 6711: 6695: 6679: 6663: 6647: 6631: 6581:Slate Weasel 6559: 6507:Not too bad? 6492: 6486: 6446: 6399: 6397: 6389: 6358: 6352: 6346: 6333:Hemiauchenia 6320: 6291:Hemiauchenia 6262:Hemiauchenia 6248: 6246: 6240: 6168: 6162: 6156: 6150: 6148: 6141:Conoryctella 6139: 6122: 6106: 6034: 6030: 6016: 5982: 5978: 5946: 5932:Hemiauchenia 5909: 5896:Hemiauchenia 5891:Microbrachis 5889: 5837:Odonterpeton 5836: 5808: 5804: 5791:Hemiauchenia 5762:Hemiauchenia 5754: 5747:Odonterpeton 5745: 5733:by Smokeybjb 5728: 5711: 5699:by Smokeybjb 5696:Odonterpeton 5694: 5679:Brachydectes 5677: 5665:by Smokeybjb 5662:Brachydectes 5660: 5648:by SmokeyBjb 5643: 5613: 5612: 5610:pg 195-244. 5601: 5597: 5595: 5566: 5562:Shastasaurus 5560: 5540: 5539:I extracted 5520:Slate Weasel 5494:Slate Weasel 5485:(Fig. 15 of 5482: 5478: 5468:Slate Weasel 5461: 5454: 5426: 5410:Slate Weasel 5405: 5401: 5394: 5341:Slate Weasel 5336: 5312:Slate Weasel 5301:Slate Weasel 5274:Slate Weasel 5227:Slate Weasel 5185: 5176: 5172:Besanosaurus 5171: 5168:Besanosaurus 5167: 5153:paddles on? 5148: 5127:Slate Weasel 5123:Besanosaurus 5122: 5082:Slate Weasel 5077: 5058: 5054: 5049: 5046:Besanosaurus 5045: 4994:Slate Weasel 4990: 4981: 4966:Shastasaurus 4964: 4948: 4932: 4915:Shastasaurus 4914: 4910: 4907:Toretocnemus 4906: 4902:Shastasaurus 4900: 4896: 4881: 4865: 4849: 4835:Shastasaurus 4834: 4830: 4824: 4820:Shastasaurus 4818: 4804:Besanosaurus 4803: 4799:Besanosaurus 4797: 4781: 4761: 4745: 4729: 4713: 4699:Utatsusaurus 4697: 4679:Parvinatator 4677: 4663:Chaohusaurus 4661: 4579: 4577: 4560: 4543:Slate Weasel 4514:Armin Reindl 4509: 4489: 4470: 4468: 4461: 4433: 4429: 4394: 4376: 4356: 4355: 4335: 4332:Ectenosaurus 4322:Ectenosaurus 4300: 4296: 4283:Hemiauchenia 4256:— Preceding 4239: 4213: 4207: 4200: 4196: 4190: 4186: 4182: 4175: 4166: 4152: 4145: 4138: 4134: 4130: 4124: 4113:Slate Weasel 4074: 4070: 4067: 4059: 4043: 4027: 4011: 3991: 3975: 3959: 3945:Utatsusaurus 3943: 3929:Chaohusaurus 3927: 3911: 3895: 3879: 3850:Hemiauchenia 3820:Hemiauchenia 3811:Kwanyinaspis 3809: 3804: 3798:Kwanyinaspis 3796: 3787:Kwanyinaspis 3758:Slate Weasel 3737: 3727:Slate Weasel 3702:Slate Weasel 3681: 3671:Slate Weasel 3631: 3617:Slate Weasel 3612: 3601:Slate Weasel 3596: 3594: 3557: 3503: 3494: 3457:Alex Uchytel 3429:Alex Uchytel 3393:Alex Uchytel 3365:Alex Uchytel 3299:Alex Uchytel 3267:Alex Uchytel 3238:Alex Uchytel 3206: 3202: 3167: 3163: 3124: 3116: 3114: 3106: 3090: 3073: 3057: 3041: 2928: 2924: 2872:Stanleycaris 2871: 2835:Hemiauchenia 2815:Stanleycaris 2813: 2811: 2801:Stanleycaris 2732: 2726: 2720: 2702: 2666:Hemiauchenia 2636:Hemiauchenia 2615:C. falconeri 2614: 2601:Hemiauchenia 2579:Hemiauchenia 2563:Hemiauchenia 2550: 2548: 2543:P. falconeri 2542: 2502:Hemiauchenia 2465:Hemiauchenia 2459: 2452: 2449:P. falconeri 2448: 2410: 2395:Hemiauchenia 2388: 2386: 2378: 2362: 2346: 2330: 2304:Paleo Miguel 2301: 2274:Armin Reindl 2253: 2239:Armin Reindl 2235: 2128: 2121: 2119: 2101: 2078:Slate Weasel 2055:Slate Weasel 2043:Slate Weasel 2038: 2019:Slate Weasel 2007:Slate Weasel 1979:Slate Weasel 1967:Slate Weasel 1962: 1958: 1935: 1930: 1928: 1914: 1880:Albertonykus 1850:Slate Weasel 1732: 1731: 1723: 1656:Hemiauchenia 1645: 1643: 1637: 1600:Armin Reindl 1597: 1572: 1570: 1557: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1474: 1470:Onchopristis 1468: 1464: 1458: 1456: 1366: 1348: 1296: 1278:Hallucigenia 1277: 1270: 1266: 1230: 1226: 1223:Anomalocaris 1222: 1217:was made by 1215:Anomalocaris 1214: 1210: 1199: 1195:Cambroraster 1193: 1190:Cordaticaris 1189: 1157: 1151: 1142: 1136:Anomalocaris 1135: 1131: 1125: 1121:Anomalocaris 1119: 1115:Cordaticaris 1113: 1107: 1099: 1097: 1088: 1072:Cambroraster 1071: 1068:Cordaticaris 1067: 1050: 1033: 1013: 997: 981: 967: 950: 934: 918: 902: 888:Cordaticaris 886: 870: 833:— Preceding 830: 757: 750: 746: 741:Cretoxyrhina 740: 642: 640: 610: 534: 527:Dinosaur Zoo 526: 506: 502:Dinosaur Zoo 500: 496: 493:Metoposaurus 492: 470: 467:Metoposaurus 466: 445: 442:Metoposaurus 441: 438:Metoposaurus 437: 434:Metoposaurus 433: 430:Metoposaurus 429: 427: 422:Metoposaurus 421: 408:Metoposaurus 407: 393:Metoposaurus 391: 336: 312:Slate Weasel 305: 299: 293: 289: 272: 261: 245: 229: 171: 165: 145: 137: 135: 127: 123: 110: 82: 47: 41: 6797:Miracusaurs 6697:Sicyophorus 6428:Mark Witton 6360:Buriolestes 6354:Qianosuchus 6164:Nochelaspis 6158:Liaoconodon 6124:Nochelaspis 6041:Miracusaurs 5947:Diplocaulus 5911:Beishanodon 5861:Microsauria 5602:Plotosaurus 5488:contains a 5483:Shonisaurus 5463:Shonisaurus 5187:Shonisaurus 5118:How is this 4851:Shonisaurus 4510:Eardasaurus 4463:Eardasaurus 4279:Kinorhynchs 3455:ok, thanks 3297:Ok, thanks 2728:Plotosaurus 2722:Moanasaurus 2364:Macrocollum 2348:Gnathovorax 1841:New diagram 1615:Patachonica 1412:Thank you! 1327:Ornithopsis 1302:Ornithopsis 1281:species).-- 1201:Titanokorys 710:This thesis 310:bracket. -- 295:Shonisaurus 132:graptolite. 40:This is an 7237:WP:Discord 6742:PaleoEquii 6617:Chengjiang 6447:Q. lawsoni 6348:Vancleavea 6250:Orovenator 6241:Orovenator 6179:Galeaspida 6152:Gemuendina 5809:Lysorophus 5805:Micraroter 5730:Lysorophus 5645:Micraroter 5598:Tylosaurus 5490:very small 5406:Phalarodon 5178:Mixosaurus 5055:Kyhytysuka 5044:Yeah, the 4783:Phalarodon 4596:PaleoEquii 4249:Epipelagic 4197:Baptanodon 4139:Baptanodon 3836:PaleoEquii 3043:Amerhippus 3012:PaleoEquii 2966:PaleoEquii 2933:PaleoEquii 2783:Junsik1223 2753:Junsik1223 2734:Mosasaurus 2699:Kaikaifilu 2689:Kaikaifilu 2332:Sacisaurus 2150:PaleoEquii 1963:M. lindoei 1573:Discokeryx 1541:Carnoferox 1519:Carnoferox 1487:Carnoferox 1433:PaleoEquii 1400:PaleoEquii 1367:Facivermis 1316:PaleoEquii 1253:PaleoEquii 1227:Facivermis 1169:PaleoEquii 1152:Facivermis 1070:: body of 1051:Primicaris 1034:Facivermis 999:Facivermis 872:Primicaris 790:Carnoferox 762:Carnoferox 720:Carnoferox 574:Carnoferox 531:WP:ORGNAME 475:Carnoferox 301:Mixosaurus 172:Eurypterus 167:Eurypterus 102:Archive 25 94:Archive 21 89:Archive 20 83:Archive 19 77:Archive 18 72:Archive 17 64:Archive 15 7353:G. blacki 7316:G. blacki 7214:Proposed 7009:Request: 6883:Gyrosteus 6738:Selkirkia 6649:Corynetis 6613:Priapulid 6090:Works by 5983:Lethiscus 5979:downright 4581:Pahvantia 4561:Pahvantia 4430:P. nodosa 4338:Gasmasque 4187:O. discus 3508:Synapsida 3168:Carnivora 2984:Qohelet12 2820:Qohelet12 2768:Gasmasque 2706:Gasmasque 2199:Qohelet12 2171:Qohelet12 2142:Qohelet12 2138:as well. 2003:porbeagle 1414:Qohelet12 1385:Qohelet12 1353:Qohelet12 758:Ptychodus 751:Ptychodus 747:Ptychodus 643:Ptychodus 612:Ptychodus 471:Megalodon 447:Placerias 378:Megalodon 361:Works by 7548:FunkMonk 7512:FunkMonk 7388:contribs 7198:contribs 7159:contribs 7128:Colored 7013:(beetle) 6833:FunkMonk 6811:P2N2222A 6783:P2N2222A 6596:FunkMonk 6565:FunkMonk 6406:FunkMonk 6216:FunkMonk 6170:Clymenia 6074:FunkMonk 5965:FunkMonk 5868:FunkMonk 5841:FunkMonk 5813:FunkMonk 5807:and the 5777:FunkMonk 5571:FunkMonk 5547:FunkMonk 5505:FunkMonk 5437:FunkMonk 5352:FunkMonk 5323:FunkMonk 5287:FunkMonk 5252:FunkMonk 5238:FunkMonk 5213:FunkMonk 5197:FunkMonk 5155:FunkMonk 5131:FunkMonk 5121:for the 5096:FunkMonk 5071:separate 5032:FunkMonk 5018:FunkMonk 4833:- Would 4802:- While 4528:FunkMonk 4500:contribs 4415:FunkMonk 4311:contribs 4270:contribs 4258:unsigned 4099:FunkMonk 3807:artiopod 3748:contribs 3713:FunkMonk 3692:contribs 3653:FunkMonk 3642:contribs 3285:FunkMonk 3253:FunkMonk 3207:Smilodon 3186:FunkMonk 2925:Opabinia 2890:Larrayal 2516:FunkMonk 2484:FunkMonk 2421:contribs 2264:contribs 2136:hyoliths 1900:FunkMonk 1866:FunkMonk 1748:FunkMonk 1734:Kelenken 1725:Kelenken 1691:FunkMonk 1531:Tagging 1349:Opabinia 1267:Opabinia 1231:Opabinia 1106:Body of 1015:Opabinia 847:contribs 835:unsigned 831:oh wow- 776:FunkMonk 698:FunkMonk 670:FunkMonk 588:FunkMonk 545:contribs 517:contribs 277:FunkMonk 20:‎ | 7496:Twitter 7331:SlvrHwk 6911:barbels 6855:SlvrHwk 6394:imagery 4715:Grippia 4618:Junnn11 4588:Junnn11 4125:Pioneer 3576:Forefin 3077:cazioti 2904:Junnn11 2876:Junnn11 2851:Junnn11 2652:SlvrHwk 2585:SlvrHwk 1650:in the 1283:Junnn11 1235:Junnn11 1161:Junnn11 192:though. 179:Junnn11 43:archive 7465:(talk) 7273:(talk) 6357:, and 6322:IJReid 5125:tail, 4913:, the 4905:, and 4829:, and 4475:HFoxii 4137:, and 3539:Nice. 3527:HFoxii 3498:HFoxii 3154:HFoxii 2064:HFoxii 2025:HFoxii 1989:HFoxii 1944:HFoxii 1743:WP:FAC 1739:WP:GAN 1481:knife. 1209:. For 1127:Hurdia 335:Added 5074:times 5065:least 4241:page 4153:Steno 4061:Casea 1479:kukri 16:< 7552:talk 7537:talk 7516:talk 7504:talk 7384:talk 7335:talk 7243:and 7194:talk 7155:talk 7132:. -- 7048:talk 7030:talk 6991:talk 6968:talk 6953:talk 6938:talk 6923:talk 6900:talk 6859:talk 6837:talk 6815:talk 6801:talk 6787:talk 6772:talk 6746:talk 6600:talk 6569:talk 6410:talk 6369:talk 6337:talk 6310:talk 6295:talk 6281:talk 6266:talk 6220:talk 6206:talk 6187:talk 6155:and 6078:talk 6060:talk 6045:talk 5994:talk 5969:talk 5955:talk 5936:talk 5922:talk 5900:talk 5872:talk 5859:The 5845:talk 5817:talk 5795:talk 5781:talk 5766:talk 5621:talk 5575:talk 5551:talk 5509:talk 5441:talk 5356:talk 5327:talk 5291:talk 5256:talk 5242:talk 5217:talk 5201:talk 5159:talk 5135:talk 5100:talk 5068:four 5036:talk 5022:talk 4636:talk 4622:talk 4606:talk 4592:and 4532:talk 4518:talk 4496:talk 4479:talk 4449:talk 4419:talk 4404:talk 4364:talk 4342:talk 4307:talk 4287:talk 4266:talk 4254:way. 4203:...) 4161:here 4103:talk 4088:talk 3854:talk 3840:talk 3824:talk 3744:talk 3717:talk 3688:talk 3657:talk 3638:talk 3545:talk 3531:talk 3516:talk 3461:talk 3447:talk 3433:talk 3411:talk 3397:talk 3383:talk 3369:talk 3355:talk 3341:talk 3303:talk 3289:talk 3280:here 3271:talk 3257:talk 3242:talk 3215:talk 3190:talk 3176:talk 3160:here 3141:talk 3016:talk 3002:talk 2988:talk 2970:talk 2952:talk 2937:talk 2908:talk 2894:talk 2880:talk 2861:talk 2839:talk 2824:talk 2787:talk 2772:talk 2757:talk 2743:talk 2737:... 2710:talk 2670:talk 2656:talk 2640:talk 2626:talk 2605:talk 2589:talk 2567:talk 2520:talk 2506:talk 2488:talk 2469:talk 2451:and 2417:talk 2399:talk 2308:talk 2278:talk 2260:talk 2243:talk 2203:talk 2189:talk 2175:talk 2160:talk 2146:and 2068:talk 2029:talk 1993:talk 1948:talk 1904:talk 1884:talk 1870:talk 1752:talk 1709:talk 1695:talk 1678:talk 1660:talk 1619:talk 1604:talk 1585:talk 1545:talk 1523:talk 1491:talk 1437:talk 1418:talk 1404:talk 1389:talk 1375:talk 1357:talk 1331:talk 1320:talk 1306:talk 1287:talk 1257:talk 1239:talk 1198:and 1179:talk 1165:and 1124:and 1112:and 843:talk 808:talk 794:talk 780:talk 766:talk 730:talk 702:talk 688:talk 674:talk 659:talk 592:talk 578:talk 559:talk 541:talk 513:talk 483:talk 465:The 456:talk 345:talk 327:talk 281:talk 271:The 211:talk 183:talk 156:talk 7355:or 6853:. - 6260:). 3115:As 2062:). 1233:.-- 849:) 499:at 177:.-- 7554:) 7539:) 7518:) 7390:) 7386:| 7337:) 7200:) 7196:| 7161:) 7157:| 7050:) 7032:) 6993:) 6970:) 6955:) 6940:) 6925:) 6902:) 6861:) 6839:) 6817:) 6803:) 6789:) 6774:) 6748:) 6602:) 6579:-- 6571:) 6493:Q. 6412:) 6371:) 6351:, 6339:) 6312:) 6297:) 6283:) 6268:) 6222:) 6208:) 6189:) 6173:, 6167:, 6080:) 6062:) 6047:) 6033:a 5996:) 5971:) 5957:) 5938:) 5924:) 5902:) 5874:) 5847:) 5819:) 5811:. 5797:) 5783:) 5768:) 5618:| 5577:) 5553:) 5511:) 5443:) 5358:) 5329:) 5293:) 5258:) 5244:) 5219:) 5203:) 5161:) 5137:) 5102:) 5057:, 5050:do 5038:) 5024:) 4992:-- 4899:, 4823:, 4638:) 4624:) 4608:) 4600:? 4541:-- 4534:) 4520:) 4502:) 4498:| 4481:) 4451:) 4443:. 4421:) 4406:) 4361:| 4344:) 4313:) 4309:| 4289:) 4268:• 4133:, 4105:) 4090:) 3856:) 3842:) 3826:) 3818:. 3750:) 3746:| 3719:) 3694:) 3690:| 3659:) 3644:) 3640:| 3547:) 3533:) 3518:) 3463:) 3449:) 3435:) 3413:) 3399:) 3385:) 3371:) 3357:) 3343:) 3305:) 3291:) 3273:) 3259:) 3244:) 3217:) 3209:? 3192:) 3178:) 3143:) 3018:) 3004:) 2990:) 2972:) 2954:) 2939:) 2910:) 2896:) 2882:) 2863:) 2841:) 2826:) 2789:) 2774:) 2759:) 2745:) 2712:) 2672:) 2658:) 2642:) 2628:) 2607:) 2591:) 2569:) 2561:. 2522:) 2508:) 2500:. 2490:) 2471:) 2463:. 2423:) 2419:| 2401:) 2310:) 2280:) 2266:) 2262:| 2245:) 2205:) 2191:) 2177:) 2162:) 2070:) 2031:) 1995:) 1950:) 1940:). 1906:) 1886:) 1872:) 1848:-- 1754:) 1711:) 1697:) 1680:) 1662:) 1621:) 1606:) 1587:) 1547:) 1539:. 1525:) 1493:) 1420:) 1406:) 1391:) 1377:) 1359:) 1333:) 1308:) 1289:) 1259:) 1241:) 1181:) 845:• 810:) 796:) 782:) 768:) 732:) 724:? 704:) 690:) 676:) 661:) 594:) 580:) 561:) 547:) 543:| 533:. 519:) 515:| 505:. 485:) 458:) 347:) 329:) 304:+ 283:) 213:) 185:) 158:) 98:→ 68:← 7550:( 7535:( 7514:( 7502:( 7489:. 7455:' 7382:( 7333:( 7224:) 7192:( 7171:( 7153:( 7046:( 7028:( 6989:( 6966:( 6951:( 6936:( 6921:( 6898:( 6857:( 6835:( 6813:( 6799:( 6785:( 6770:( 6744:( 6598:( 6567:( 6408:( 6367:( 6335:( 6308:( 6293:( 6279:( 6264:( 6218:( 6204:( 6185:( 6076:( 6058:( 6043:( 5992:( 5967:( 5953:( 5934:( 5920:( 5898:( 5870:( 5843:( 5815:( 5793:( 5779:( 5764:( 5573:( 5549:( 5507:( 5439:( 5354:( 5325:( 5289:( 5254:( 5240:( 5215:( 5199:( 5157:( 5133:( 5098:( 5034:( 5020:( 4920:) 4685:) 4634:( 4620:( 4604:( 4598:: 4594:@ 4590:: 4586:@ 4530:( 4516:( 4494:( 4477:( 4447:( 4417:( 4402:( 4340:( 4305:( 4285:( 4264:( 4251:: 4247:@ 4101:( 4086:( 3999:) 3852:( 3838:( 3822:( 3742:( 3715:( 3686:( 3655:( 3636:( 3543:( 3529:( 3514:( 3500:: 3496:@ 3459:( 3445:( 3431:( 3409:( 3395:( 3381:( 3367:( 3353:( 3339:( 3301:( 3287:( 3269:( 3255:( 3240:( 3213:( 3188:( 3174:( 3156:: 3152:@ 3139:( 3014:( 3000:( 2986:( 2968:( 2950:( 2935:( 2906:( 2892:( 2878:( 2859:( 2853:: 2849:@ 2837:( 2822:( 2785:( 2770:( 2755:( 2741:( 2708:( 2668:( 2654:( 2638:( 2624:( 2603:( 2587:( 2581:: 2577:@ 2565:( 2518:( 2504:( 2486:( 2467:( 2415:( 2397:( 2306:( 2276:( 2258:( 2241:( 2201:( 2187:( 2173:( 2158:( 2152:: 2148:@ 2144:: 2140:@ 2066:( 2057:: 2053:@ 2027:( 2021:: 2017:@ 1991:( 1981:: 1977:@ 1946:( 1902:( 1882:( 1868:( 1750:( 1707:( 1693:( 1676:( 1658:( 1617:( 1602:( 1583:( 1543:( 1537:: 1533:@ 1521:( 1489:( 1435:( 1416:( 1402:( 1387:( 1373:( 1355:( 1329:( 1318:( 1304:( 1285:( 1255:( 1237:( 1177:( 1171:: 1167:@ 1163:: 1159:@ 1138:. 841:( 806:( 792:( 778:( 764:( 728:( 722:: 718:@ 700:( 686:( 672:( 657:( 651:: 647:@ 590:( 576:( 557:( 539:( 511:( 481:( 454:( 343:( 325:( 279:( 209:( 203:: 199:@ 181:( 154:( 54:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

:WikiProject Palaeontology/Paleoart review/Archive 19 - Knowledge

Index