Knowledge

:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/British nuclear weapons and the Falklands War - Knowledge

Source 📝

136:, there's an interesting nuclear aspect to the conflict. The Royal Navy warships that were sent to the South Atlantic carried most of the British stockpile of nuclear depth bombs, mainly as it would have taken too long to have offloaded them. The British government and military did not seriously consider using nuclear weapons and the War Cabinet never wanted the depth bombs sent south. It was reported during and after the war that a British ballistic missile submarine had been sent to menace Argentina but historians have found no evidence that such a deployment took place. Interestingly, it emerged in recent years that British Prime Minister Thatcher might have been willing to use nuclear weapons if the war had gone disastrously for her. 844:
I reviewed this article for GA, and thought it was suitable for A-Class then. However, I see that have been some substantive additions since my GA review, mainly in the form of the new 'Commentary on nuclear deterrence' section and notes B and C. Reviewing these, the only issue I see is an odd
143:. It's turned out to be a much more complex and interesting topic than I expected. The article was assessed as a GA in mid-June and has since been considerably expanded and improved so I'm hopeful that the A-class criteria are met. Thank you in advance for your comments. 845:
phrasing in the new section. Towards the end of the second paragraph: "authored an article in 2012 critiquing that by Wilson." I think there may be a missing word after "that"? Otherwise, I am happy to support.
152: 75: 140: 831: 813: 781: 758: 739: 582: 565: 544: 525: 506: 479: 359: 342: 319: 290: 265: 244: 220: 116: 603: 439: 411: 720: 671: 460: 199: 178: 887: 869: 390: 112: 854: 798: 104: 639: 701: 62: 708:
Shouldn't we mention in the lead that the weapons could have been put onboard ships and aircraft in order to counter potential Soviet involvement in the conflict?
629: 617: 647: 653: 689:
Consider breaking up the 2nd paragraph to expand the length to the 4 paragraphs part of FAC criteria? I reckon you would want to take this article to FAC.
108: 21: 67: 643: 157: 367: 611: 99: 68: 532:
39e is about the risk of nuclear depth bombs exploding, which is on pp. 60-61, the paragraph starting with "While they were still at sea"
467:
39b describes the Cabinet meeting on 11 April, which is on p. 60, the sentence staring with "in the event and with enormous reluctance"
839: 623: 17: 124: 513:
39d is about the 28 May decision, which is on p. 60, the paragraph starting with "in the event and with enormous reluctance"
676: 36:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
899:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
120: 448:
In my 2005 hardback edition of Freedman, 39a refers to pp. 59-60, the paragraph starting "It might have been possible"
328:"The containers holding several active and inert nuclear weapons were damaged during transfers" The source says seven. 402:
It would seem so - the material on nuclear weapons starts on page 59 in my version, which is the paperback edition.
139:
I developed this article to set the record straight after a really bad article on this topic was developed
274:"a 300-yard (270 m) radius" The metric should be used first, with the imperial source in parentheses. ( 765:
In Polmar 2007, add the full name for the journal, namely the Proceedings of the US Naval Institute?
746:
Provide a link or identifier for Mueller 1988? Iirc all issues of Int Sec are available on JSTOR.
827: 794: 58: 8: 633: 666: 577: 337: 50: 822:
for promotion to A class. You just need one more support now and can then go for FAC.
229:"the British government issued a 'Negative Security Assurance'" Use double quotes per 727:
Link to International Institute for Strategic Studies as done for all other authors?
187:"Prior to the war Britain had ratified the Treaty of Tlatelolco" Say when this was? 865: 809: 777: 754: 735: 716: 697: 599: 561: 540: 521: 502: 486:
39c refers to training rounds, which are on pp. 57-58, the sentence starting with "
475: 456: 435: 407: 386: 355: 315: 286: 261: 240: 216: 195: 174: 148: 89: 451:
Tweaked to pp. 61-62 (the material starts in the last couple of lines on page 61)
883: 850: 823: 790: 378:
fn 2 and 4: Imperial War Museums is italicised in the former, but not the latter
304: 54: 661: 572: 425: 332: 133: 46: 861: 805: 773: 750: 731: 712: 693: 682: 595: 557: 536: 517: 498: 471: 452: 431: 403: 382: 351: 311: 282: 257: 236: 212: 191: 170: 144: 85: 879: 846: 430:
Can I check which iteration of this footnote you're referring to here?
275: 230: 253:
Link Ministry of Defence, Permanent secretary (UK), Foreign Secretary
399:
fn 34: This is on pp. 57-58 (My 2005 edition may be different?)
640:
File:HMS Hermes (R12) underway on 16 March 1982 (6350754).jpg
132:
While nuclear weapons were obviously not used in the 1982
162:
Great work on this article. A fine piece of scholarship.
630:
File:WE177 training nuclear bomb at Explosion Museum.jpg
618:
File:Falklands, Campaign, (Distances to bases) 1982.jpg
860:
Many thanks - I've adjusted the wording of this para.
648:
File:HMS Repulse (S23) in the Firth of Clyde c1979.jpg
654:
File:Avro 698 Vulcan B2, UK - Air Force AN1236893.jpg
166:Jumbled phrase: "for if the had war gone badly" 644:File:RFA Fort Austin (A386) underway c1982.JPEG 100:British nuclear weapons and the Falklands War 69:British nuclear weapons and the Falklands War 624:File:Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher.jpg 76:Instructions for nominators and reviewers 350:Clarified. Thanks a lot for this review 768:It seems to be universally called just 553:I note that fn 13 also refers to p. 60 303:RFA? And "wasn't" should be "was not" ( 14: 660:All images are appropriately licensed 18:Knowledge:WikiProject Military history 32:The following discussion is closed. 626:- White House photograph - PD- okay 420:fn 39: Should be pp. 60-62, not 62 27: 28: 909: 556:I'm not sure what you mean here? 895:The discussion above is closed. 373:All sources are of good quality. 804:Thanks a lot for this review! 591:Spot checks: fn 41, 49 - okay 13: 1: 789:A good read overall, cheers 208:Link kilos of TNT? Convert? 7: 632:- Knowledge image - UK had 620:- US Army image - PD - okay 10: 914: 888:08:02, 3 August 2024 (UTC) 870:06:50, 3 August 2024 (UTC) 855:10:04, 2 August 2024 (UTC) 650:- US Navy image - PD- okay 63:08:20, 3 August 2024 (UTC) 692:That's a good idea: done 672:19:15, 28 June 2024 (UTC) 604:10:19, 30 June 2024 (UTC) 583:20:14, 30 June 2024 (UTC) 440:10:19, 30 June 2024 (UTC) 412:10:19, 30 June 2024 (UTC) 391:10:19, 30 June 2024 (UTC) 360:10:12, 30 June 2024 (UTC) 343:21:38, 28 June 2024 (UTC) 320:10:12, 30 June 2024 (UTC) 291:10:12, 30 June 2024 (UTC) 266:10:12, 30 June 2024 (UTC) 245:10:12, 30 June 2024 (UTC) 221:10:12, 30 June 2024 (UTC) 200:10:12, 30 June 2024 (UTC) 179:10:12, 30 June 2024 (UTC) 153:09:57, 28 June 2024 (UTC) 897:Please do not modify it. 832:05:33, 7 July 2024 (UTC) 814:02:17, 6 July 2024 (UTC) 799:20:51, 5 July 2024 (UTC) 782:02:17, 6 July 2024 (UTC) 759:02:17, 6 July 2024 (UTC) 740:02:17, 6 July 2024 (UTC) 721:02:17, 6 July 2024 (UTC) 702:02:17, 6 July 2024 (UTC) 566:10:33, 1 July 2024 (UTC) 545:10:33, 1 July 2024 (UTC) 526:10:33, 1 July 2024 (UTC) 507:10:33, 1 July 2024 (UTC) 480:10:33, 1 July 2024 (UTC) 461:10:33, 1 July 2024 (UTC) 34:Please do not modify it. 535:Page 62 in my edition. 516:Page 62 in my edition. 497:Page 62 in my edition. 494:joined the Task Force" 470:Page 62 in my edition. 299:" a RFA vessel wasn't" 878:Confirmed my support. 158:Support from Hawkeye7 368:Source review - pass 772:in the literature. 634:freedom of panorama 612:Image review - pass 141:and rightly deleted 35: 94: 78: 33: 905: 669: 664: 656:- GNU FDL - okay 594:Thanks for this 580: 575: 429: 340: 335: 129: 128: 82: 74: 913: 912: 908: 907: 906: 904: 903: 902: 901: 900: 842: 840:Zawed - support 685:, my comments: 679: 667: 662: 614: 578: 573: 423: 370: 338: 333: 305:MOS:CONTRACTION 160: 102: 98: 72: 38: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 911: 894: 893: 892: 891: 890: 873: 872: 841: 838: 837: 836: 835: 834: 787: 786: 785: 784: 763: 762: 761: 744: 743: 742: 725: 724: 723: 706: 705: 704: 678: 675: 658: 657: 651: 637: 627: 621: 613: 610: 609: 608: 607: 606: 588: 587: 586: 585: 570: 569: 568: 551: 550: 549: 548: 547: 530: 529: 528: 511: 510: 509: 484: 483: 482: 465: 464: 463: 443: 442: 417: 416: 415: 414: 396: 395: 394: 393: 375: 374: 369: 366: 365: 364: 363: 362: 330: 329: 325: 324: 323: 322: 296: 295: 294: 293: 271: 270: 269: 268: 250: 249: 248: 247: 226: 225: 224: 223: 205: 204: 203: 202: 184: 183: 182: 181: 159: 156: 96: 95: 84:Nominator(s): 71: 66: 39: 30: 29: 15: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 910: 898: 889: 885: 881: 877: 876: 875: 874: 871: 867: 863: 859: 858: 857: 856: 852: 848: 833: 829: 825: 821: 817: 816: 815: 811: 807: 803: 802: 801: 800: 796: 792: 783: 779: 775: 771: 767: 766: 764: 760: 756: 752: 748: 747: 745: 741: 737: 733: 729: 728: 726: 722: 718: 714: 710: 709: 707: 703: 699: 695: 691: 690: 688: 687: 686: 684: 674: 673: 670: 665: 655: 652: 649: 645: 641: 638: 635: 631: 628: 625: 622: 619: 616: 615: 605: 601: 597: 593: 592: 590: 589: 584: 581: 576: 571: 567: 563: 559: 555: 554: 552: 546: 542: 538: 534: 533: 531: 527: 523: 519: 515: 514: 512: 508: 504: 500: 496: 495: 493: 489: 485: 481: 477: 473: 469: 468: 466: 462: 458: 454: 450: 449: 447: 446: 445: 444: 441: 437: 433: 427: 422: 421: 419: 418: 413: 409: 405: 401: 400: 398: 397: 392: 388: 384: 380: 379: 377: 376: 372: 371: 361: 357: 353: 349: 348: 347: 346: 345: 344: 341: 336: 327: 326: 321: 317: 313: 309: 308: 306: 302: 298: 297: 292: 288: 284: 280: 279: 277: 273: 272: 267: 263: 259: 255: 254: 252: 251: 246: 242: 238: 234: 233: 232: 228: 227: 222: 218: 214: 210: 209: 207: 206: 201: 197: 193: 189: 188: 186: 185: 180: 176: 172: 168: 167: 165: 164: 163: 155: 154: 150: 146: 142: 137: 135: 134:Falklands War 130: 126: 122: 118: 114: 110: 106: 101: 93: 91: 87: 81: 80: 79: 77: 70: 65: 64: 60: 56: 52: 48: 44: 37: 23: 19: 896: 843: 819: 788: 769: 711:Yep, added. 680: 659: 491: 487: 331: 300: 161: 138: 131: 97: 83: 73: 42: 40: 31: 770:Proceedings 824:Matarisvan 791:Matarisvan 677:Matarisvan 492:Broadsword 276:MOS:METRIC 231:MOS:DOUBLE 55:MilHistBot 22:Assessment 818:Happy to 668:(discuss) 579:(discuss) 488:Brilliant 339:(discuss) 663:Hawkeye7 574:Hawkeye7 426:Hawkeye7 334:Hawkeye7 169:Tweaked 47:Donner60 43:promoted 41:Article 20:‎ | 820:support 113:history 862:Nick-D 806:Nick-D 774:Nick-D 751:Nick-D 732:Nick-D 713:Nick-D 694:Nick-D 683:Nick-D 636:- okay 596:Nick-D 558:Nick-D 537:Nick-D 518:Nick-D 499:Nick-D 472:Nick-D 453:Nick-D 432:Nick-D 404:Nick-D 383:Nick-D 381:Fixed 352:Nick-D 312:Nick-D 310:Fixed 283:Nick-D 258:Nick-D 237:Nick-D 213:Nick-D 192:Nick-D 171:Nick-D 145:Nick-D 86:Nick-D 53:) via 880:Zawed 847:Zawed 749:Done 730:Done 281:Done 256:Done 235:Done 211:Done 190:Done 121:watch 117:links 16:< 884:talk 866:talk 851:talk 828:talk 810:talk 795:talk 778:talk 755:talk 736:talk 717:talk 698:talk 600:talk 562:talk 541:talk 522:talk 503:talk 490:and 476:talk 457:talk 436:talk 408:talk 387:talk 356:talk 316:talk 287:talk 262:talk 241:talk 217:talk 196:talk 175:talk 149:talk 125:logs 109:talk 105:edit 90:talk 59:talk 51:talk 681:Hi 45:by 886:) 868:) 853:) 830:) 812:) 797:) 780:) 757:) 738:) 719:) 700:) 646:, 642:, 602:) 564:) 543:) 524:) 505:) 478:) 459:) 438:) 410:) 389:) 358:) 318:) 307:) 301:an 289:) 278:) 264:) 243:) 219:) 198:) 177:) 151:) 123:| 119:| 115:| 111:| 107:| 61:) 882:( 864:( 849:( 826:( 808:( 793:( 776:( 753:( 734:( 715:( 696:( 598:( 560:( 539:( 520:( 501:( 474:( 455:( 434:( 428:: 424:@ 406:( 385:( 354:( 314:( 285:( 260:( 239:( 215:( 194:( 173:( 147:( 127:) 103:( 92:) 88:( 57:( 49:(

Index

Knowledge:WikiProject Military history
Assessment
Donner60
talk
MilHistBot
talk
08:20, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
British nuclear weapons and the Falklands War
Instructions for nominators and reviewers
Nick-D
talk
British nuclear weapons and the Falklands War
edit
talk
history
links
watch
logs
Falklands War
and rightly deleted
Nick-D
talk
09:57, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Nick-D
talk
10:12, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Nick-D
talk
10:12, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Nick-D

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.