User talk:Nick-D - Knowledge

6326:, introduced (in 2018): "This article covers a little-remembered, but significant, incident during World War II. In March 1944 the Australian and US military leadership in the South West Pacific became concerned that a powerful Japanese naval force was headed for the important Western Australian port of Fremantle. In response, reinforcements were rushed to the area, several American and Dutch submarines put to sea and the city's air and coastal defences were placed on alert. The tension increased over several days, and on 10 March air raid sirens were sounded when what appeared to be an enemy aircraft was detected. However, it all soon proved to a false alarm. The only Japanese force at sea was a small group of warships which conducted an unsuccessful raid against Allied shipping in the Indian Ocean. Overall, the article provides an interesting insight into the strategic situation in early 1944, an example of the limitations of intelligence information, and a reminder that the war was not yet won." -- 6340:... and today forthe other, Operation Title, "a valiant but failed Allied attack on the German battleship Tirpitz during October 1942. The attack plan was like something out of a thriller, and partially formed the basis of a postwar movie. It involved a small Norwegian ship smuggling two British manned torpedoes through heavily defended waters. While the manned torpedo crews were superbly trained and likely to have crippled Tirpitz, the operation failed at the last moment when shoddy workmanship caused both of the craft to be lost when they separated from the bottom of the trawler during a storm. The Allied personnel attempted to escape overland to Sweden, with one of the British seamen being captured and murdered by the Germans and the others making it across the border."! -- 296:, inrtroduced: "Project Waler was a failed attempt by the Australian Army to replace its ageing M113 armoured personnel carriers with more capable types. The project began in 1980 and never had clear goals. The Army favoured the largest and most expensive designs that were submitted as part of its focus on conventional warfare while the government preferred smaller and more mobile types suited to stopping raids on northern Australia. This led to cost blow outs and the cancellation of the project in 1985. The M113s were eventually upgraded instead, and continue to soldier on despite being obsolete. A new project to replace them is currently underway, but is also proving highly expensive and at risk of cancellation as a result."! -- 3278:

officials. Instead, it spread propaganda trying to win Australians over to the white minority regime in Rhodesia and helped businesses evade the trade sanctions against the country. The Rhodesian Information Centre survived multiple attempts by the Australian government to close it, including one which led to a High Court case in 1973 and another which caused a backbench revolt in 1977, and was finally shut down by the Zimbabwean government in 1980. As a result, while this is a slightly obscure topic, the article covers a lively period in Australian foreign relations and provides insights into Australian attitudes towards white minority rule in Africa during this period."! --

77: 6299: 40: 4134: 4080: 4144: 4101: 3970: 3949: 277: 4070: 3960: 7566: 1467: 5386: 7369: 7274:"Who can exercise the power ? 2.26As outlined above, the constitutional prerogative power to go to war is vested in the Governor-General by virtue of s 61. While the Governor-General has the formal power to make decisions regarding armed conflict and exercise control of the armed forces, by convention the Executive branch of government – that is, the Prime Minister and the Cabinet – will ultimately decide whether to go to war or conduct warlike operations." 8093: 4221: 1923: 4643: 4565: 193: 4525: 4608: 1755: 1543:, introduced (in 2018): "This article covers what must be one of the worst military blunders of World War II. In March 1944 around 15,000 Japanese troops attempted to attack fortified positions on the island of Bougainville which were held by 62,000 Americans who knew that they were coming. While the Japanese fought bravely, the offensive ended in total failure, with the veteran US Army units stopping the attack in a matter of days."! -- 23: 4198: 4247: 4469: 2121: 8505: 8156: 7863: 7629: 7120: 6820: 6528: 6059: 5901: 4928: 4668: 4367: 3314: 3011: 2536: 2341: 2224: 2013: 1816: 1300: 982: 343: 4123: 4059: 186: 7791: 6992: 5593: 3675: 3610: 3545: 1677: 4173: 1402: 8608: 6250: 3801: 1604: 3226:

and article lead to both state that the office began representing rhodesia in 1967 rather than 1966. (however, i admittedly cannot tell from the article whether the sydney office actually began operating earlier, or if it was actually originally the rhodesian information service's sydney branch, so it seems possible that the office in sydney actually did begin representing rhodesia in 1966.)

8431: 7963: 6457: 4812: 693: 4051: 4335:

over 200 support votes with no or essentially no critical comments. It would be good to turn the temperature down further though, including through a better process or at least a more mature discussion to reinstate the tools for former admins who lost them due to a misjudgement many years ago (in some cases ArbCom also misjudging things). Regards,

8110:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 3230:

Service" (as used in melbourne, with an 'n' in "Rhodesian") was different from "Rhodesia Information Service" (as used in the article lead, without an 'n' in "Rhodesia"), so i admittedly am uncertain about whether the article intended to consider the centre in melbourne part of the featured subject.

5234:

It's totally normal for editors to directly ask admins to directly look into the potential re-occurrence of sockmasters they have experience with, as assessments are often made on the basis of editing patterns. I'm one of a bunch of admins who have been involved with chasing HarveyCarter socks - they

1252:

World War II started on 1 September 1939." Only two sources are given for this and they are woefully inadequate. I have at least a dozen books on my shelf which date the outbreak to 3 September when France and the UK declared war on Germany. Without these declarations there would have been no general

893:

Hi there, thank you for helping this article not be deleted. I wrote the bulk of it myself and I included an argument for its existence on the talk page. Her resignation was an important event that was deserving of a concise article, consistent with those for the ending of other premierships recently

5674:

Hi, do you have sources for this? Not much has been published on the F-FDTL in recent years, so it's hard to track what's going on with the force. The very modest and sensible-looking new Air Component is a sign that the government is setting realistic goals for the force's structure rather than the

5290:

I don't see what repeatedly making these kinds of attacks is achieving, especially on my talk page - you are claiming that WCM was uncivil to you, yet this behaviour of yours is clearly unhelpful and - to be blunt - aggressive and rude. If you really think that this is a serious user conduct problem

4334:

Well prepared candidates seem to have a very easy parth to the admin tools these days, as the gang of editors who used to use RfA to bully other editors have gone away, in part because some of the ringleaders have been banned or had other types of sanctions applied. Lots of recent RfAs have received

3225:

diplomatic mission in australia? the article body seems to suggest that the rhodesian information centre in sydney replaced the rhodesian information service in melbourne in 1967, so if the article is specifically about the office in sydney, i am wondering if it would be more accurate for the blurb

2480:

hi, I apologize if you saw any harassment towards that editor. My intention was simply to leave my message in an ongoing discussion about my edits. The reasoning I was "reinstating these messages" is because they are removed with the excuse of me being a sockpuppet, which I'm not. By the way I won't

1097:

about the battalion who crossed the Rance River, the August 5th, 1944. You tell me that it was written that was the 329th Infantry Regiment as it's written in the US Army official history. Martin Blumenson did an error and you can see here in the 3rd Battalion, 330th Infantry Regiment history at the

4319:

A concerning thing here is that despite RFA being a dramatically more civil place than it was a few years ago, and most nominations very easily pass, a lot of editors are now unwilling to nominate to become an admin. It would be good to get back to something resembling the old mindset that being an

3758:

for the basic facts on the size, structure and composition of the army, as it's a well regarded source. My understanding is that the broader literature on the army is fairly large, and the article should cover its conscription policies (conscripts are required to serve for an indefinite period) and

3229:

considering the various names for the centre listed in the article lead, i had initially thought that maybe the name of the rhodesian information service in melbourne was simply considered an alternative name for the subject of the article. however, i eventually noticed that "Rhodesian Information

3155:, they seem at worst poorly sourced or jejune sometimes. For example, their two edits prior to that WWII one consisted of adding a name to a list, then realizing it was already on the list and removing it. I don't see any bad faith edits. Perhaps I am missing something? I didn't look very far back. 7296:

Yes, but that's quite different to what you added to the article. It is discussing who has authority to send Australia to war, not exercise control over the ADF and notes the role of Cabinet as well as the PM (the PM's authority derives in a lot of ways from their role as the chair of Cabinet). As

3277:

Thank you today for the article, introduced: "The Rhodesia Information Centre was the unofficial, and illegal, embassy the Rhodesian government maintained in Australia from 1966 to 1980. As the Australian government did not recognise Rhodesia's independence it had almost no contact with Australian

3245:

Hello, it was essentially the same thing, so 1966 is the best start date. As Jordan notes, the Rhodesian Information Service in Melbourne was replaced by the Rhodesia Information Centre; there does not appear to have been any break between the RIS closing and the RIC starting. The RIC has slightly

60:

template when you respond. If you send me an email, I'd appreciate it if you could also drop me a note here as they're sometimes automatically sent to my spam folder and I don't notice them. Please note that I may reply to emails on your talk page, though I'll do so in a way that does not disclose

8253:

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal

3902:

Thanks, Nick-D; yes, I noted those bits in your article and (think/hope) I employed same at the Gideon article. The two Americans were hired by Silvercorp (security firm), and sources do refer to them as mercenaries, but I removed mention as mercenaries of other exiled Venezuelan military who a)

7277:

Further, the GG (as CiC) acts on advice given by the Prime Minister, which in the case of the employment of the armed forces through the national security committee, which is also chaired by the Prime Minister. The NSC may skip the GG entirely and go straight to the CDF. "The process, of which I

3846:

Nick-D congratulations on this FA! I've been watching it with interest because of sticky terminology issues in an article I've been working on, trying to clean up, that has been subjected to years of disruptive editing and poor sourcing. At one point, it referred to all the exiled military and

5273:

Your previous incivility towards me, now inability to reflect on your actions, and continued lack of the impact this has on editors such as myself and the feeling of being targeted imo. I’ve noted on your previous contributions this is common place in your edits, and advise you to consider your

1244:

I admire your work on military and other articles and don't want to get off on the wrong foot with you. However, I think the word "led" is way out of place in the description of principal Allies in WWII. It imports a notion of leadership or precedence. Taking the war as a whole from Sep 1939 to

5656:

I've made some changes to the Falintil-FDTL organisation page. The short-lived force of the mid-1970s focused on company-level units; I have reason to believe that since 2006 the current force has trended back towards that direction. We can correspond, should you wish, regarding how frequently

4773:

You are right in saying most people die from disease. This is why I think we should make all death by disease categories that are not for a specific disease only container categories. I also really think we should just plain delete the cancer deaths tree. I do not think that is defining yo the

3887:

issues as many of the people who fought for Rhodesia, in potential violation of their home country's laws, will still be alive). The article notes how the term 'mercenary' has been used and goes into some detail on who the volunteers were and what motivated them, which might be helpful for the

4481:

By the authority vested in me by myself I present you with this award in recognition of one or more well argued opposes at FAC. I may or or may not agree with your reasoning and/or your oppose, but I take a Voltarian attitude towards your right to state it. Thank you, such stands help to make

8346:

Hi Adam, I'm not familiar with that aircraft type, but the photo looks good. As for the set of images, as they appear to lack captions (beyond being taken at Mascot Airport - this is now Kingsford Smith Airport, the main airport in Sydney) it might be difficult to use them for much. Regards,

3735:

I'm a newish editor and was wondering if you'd like to collab on a concentrated effort to work on/clean up the Eritrean Army page. I saw that you made some pretty constructive edits on it, in spite of some warring by a now blocked editor, so asking you for help seemed like a logical choice.

6771:

Hello, I am a new member of the Military history wikiproject, and I see you are a experienced editor. Although I appreciate that you will be busy, it would be kind of you to tell me how to request an article for re-assessment, as it currently does not make any sense to me! Thanks Sgtnugg

3419:

I have received a request for assistance regarding closer watching of some articles where POV editing may be an issue. Who are the Australian military editors in good standing right now who might be interested in adding a few more things to their watchlists, and getting involved?

3847:

volunteers as mercenaries, which I think I've now corrected, but there are still terminology concerns. If you are now over the hump with your last FAC and have any free time, a set of experienced MilHist eyes from our now-expert on how to label these events and individuals at

1202:

I dumbly added this to the February edition after it was sent out! In my defence, I was still suffering from jet lag, fatigue and culture shock after a quick trip to India for work. I've removed it, and posted in in the March edition. Sorry for any and all confusion caused!

5040:

article is not up to FAC standards yet. I've made several attempts to polish the prose and ensure text-source integrity, but, unfortunately, the article is still pretty short as it is hard to find additional sources on the topic. What do you think about the article now?

5844:

As an aside, I think I've finished the featured content page, unless something passes A-class, FA, or FL in the next couple days (there's nothing MILHIST left in the FP queue that'll pass before 2 February, except the basically 100% guaranteed to pass Pedro II photo.)

6158:

Previous versions of this page had citations to a Globalsecurity.org page, which was an unambiguous copyright violation from the Kenya Yearbook 2010, whose details I have just inserted. Are you in a position to revdel everything except the last version? Kind regards,

7297:

the scandal relating to Scott Morrison's multiple ministries illustrated, the prime minister's authority is a long way from being absolute in the Australian system of government, as ministers are generally designated the ultimate decision makers under legislation.

5334: 3882:

Thanks Sandy. I'm travelling for the next month, so I don't think that I'll be able to help with that article. I used the term 'volunteers' in the article on Rhodesia as it's what many of the sources used, and was more neutral than 'mercenaries' (especially given

1947:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

852:

apologies for my slow reply here. Due to other commitments, I don't think that I'll have time to review this article. I was hoping to do so this weekend, but it didn't happen and I don't think that I can propose to be able to do so in the future. Regards,

482:

I couldn't find any information about revamps between 2013 and now, but last year 5.5 million euros were allocated for a renovation which will include a partial digitization of the collection. Unfortunately Greek military museums are not up to par with

2649:

Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Knowledge with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Knowledge's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your

1245:

August 1945 I would argue that the principal allies were UK, France, US, Soviets, China. You can order them alphabetically or in the order in which they took up arms against the Axis powers. What is the basis for the wording which currently exists?

3814: 1951:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

1123:

Hoping it give you a new point of view. I saw often the error in several books because they were based on the Martin Blumenson book but the original sources from the 83rd Infantry Division records are very sure about this small event of the war.

4264: 2861:(currently GA) to FA status. Luo is the first Chinese Catholic bishop. As this would be my very first FAC, I am looking for an FAC mentor, especially someone who I have never interacted with on Knowledge. Would you like to be my FAC mentor? 3188:

Attempt to start a nonsense article, then warnings for nonconstructive editing, then various edits reverted and then vandalising a high profile article. A 31 hour block seemed appropriate for this pattern of unhelpful behaviour. Regards,

8621: 7322: 7739: 6376:

Am I correct in thinking their weren't any, or is the bot acting up? If there weren't any, I just need to summarise three FAs and we're ready to go. Kind of pleased to see I'm not over-dominating fetured pictures this month.

2774:

Okay. I've roughed in all the articles that need covered in the featured content section, I don't think I'm up to writing summaries, though, not with all the things I'm going to need to do regarding my dad's death this week.

7227:

I am here based on your interest in history to ask (beg?) for you to do a look over of the High and Late Middle Ages sections of this page with an eye toward FA. If you can't, no hard feelings. But please help if you can!

2879:

Hi, I'd be very happy to look over this article over the coming weekend, though with the proviso that it's a topic I know nothing about! It looks interesting and already developed to a high standard though. Regards,

6780:. Please note that you can do the assessment yourself, though it's encouraged to seek a second opinion if you've contributed significantly to the article. If you're seeking an A-class review, they're handled via 49:

Welcome to my talk page. Please leave new messages at the bottom of this page. I generally watchlist other editors' talk pages I comment on during discussions, but please also feel free to ping me or leave me a

5341: 1159:

Just wanted to let you know I've tweaked some things, after having a short emailed correspondence with the author, who passed the factual items on to his editor to hopefully get fixed in the paperback edition.

3464:

Hey, I made an edit on the emu war wikipedia page and you reverted it and left a comment on my talk saying its vandalism, can you please explain how it was vandalism? I believe it was perfectly constructive.

3246:

different names in different sources, which causes further confusion! I've tweaked the lead of the article to help clarify this for readers, but I'd suggest that it's not needed for the TFA blurb. Regards,

5339:

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes

467:

Thank you! That looks great. Do you know if they've revamped the Athens War Museum? When I visited in 2013 it was looking pretty tired and run down, which was a shame as it had a great collection. Regards,

6931:

page? It seems a very stubborn unregistered user with a short history of edit-warring keeps messing up very well-written syntax, which is forcing me to manually clean up behind them. Danke and mach's gut.

6413:

Hi Adam, I don't think that Curtis or McGuires are in scope as there isn't a strong military-related aspect to their lives. Yes, unfortunately no new A-class articles were promoted in February. Regards,

5345: 4268: 4230: 784:. It's been stable for the few months since the last review so I'm wondering about submitting it for FAC. As it's my first time, I wanted to check in with you to see if you could give it a look over. -- 7505:

Since no more than one source is needed, in my opinion it is better to leave my source since it is easier to verify due to my book being in open access with a link directly heading to the needed page.

3907:. Your Rhodesian article was most interesting and helpful; I hope you have safe and enjoyable travels, and if you have time to glance at the article when you're back, it could use MilHist eyes. Bst, 772:

Hey Nick-D, I noticed you're listed as a mentor for featured article candidates and displayed a specific interest in military history. Last year I spent a good deal of time improving the article about

3123: 5450:

also assumed ownership of the article just by brushing off my edit as "not an improvement". Are you also implying that an user simply not being pleased by an edit is a reason for undoing said edit?

4536: 5309:

You miss this because of your bias. Bias is something which an admin should not have. Your behaviour should be exemplary. Your understanding and mediation should be sound. Please take a step back.

8536: 8520: 5218:

pages that insist I ‘sneak’ and made a ‘misleading edit’. By striking it through or by just apologising. Please let’s not be like this to editors who have never even had an interaction before.

3345: 3329: 8388:

13-14. Office of the Australian Aero Club (New South Wales Section) with Moths 'Geoffrey Hughes' G-AUAJ, 'Oswald Watt' G-AUFV (also G-AUAK, G-AUGK, G-AUAH, G-AUFV), Mascot, approximately 1928

6090: 6074: 4959: 4943: 4699: 4683: 1512: 1021: 1013: 997: 565: 8255: 5932: 5916: 4398: 4382: 3111: 382: 374: 358: 8254:

structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available

5156:

Hi, The general editing pattern looks different. You might want to start a sockpuppet report to ask that a checkuser look into this if there's a pattern of specific edits though. Regards,

8382:

8-10. 'Miss Australia' VH-UJK DH 60 of R. A. Annabel (with 'Miss Cronulla' VH-UIF of F. K. Bardesley and 'Gay Caballero' VH-UMZ of K. Wedgwood) for round Australia flight, 3-27 April 1930

8187: 8171: 8102: 4515: 3042: 3026: 529:

My schedule is pretty tight this month and you need to book an appointment to visit Zervas' house, so I wrote up a description from info I found online. So the review essay is finished.--

1979: 68:

to develop articles as I don't want to do their jobs for them or encourage this form of editing in any way. I also will generally avoid drawn-out discussions with such editors, as while

8528: 6851: 6835: 6559: 6543: 4324:

however looking at some of the combatative and adverserial queues of questions over time, I cannot imagine anyone wanting to live through the onslaught, whether they be tough or not...

4191:

Any administrator soliciting clients for paid Knowledge-related consulting or advising services not covered by other paid-contribution rules must disclose all clients on their userpage.

3790: 3337: 1847: 1831: 1331: 1315: 1116:

If you read the records of the 329th Infantry Regiment you will never see any mention of this event because they were involved in the fight at Chateauneuf d'Ille-et-Vilaine that day (

8260: 7894: 7878: 7660: 7644: 6732: 6082: 5371: 4951: 4691: 2567: 2551: 2372: 2356: 1005: 7747:. It seems imprudent for someone involved in politics with a history of questionable accounts to return without being formally unblocked, but I do not claim to know the full story. 7151: 7135: 6662:

Thank you today for the article, introduced: "This article covers a Japanese convoy operation of World War II whose failure had significant results for the New Guinea campaign."! --

5924: 4390: 4234: 2255: 2239: 2044: 2028: 1110:

Here the mention of the crossing of Rance River by members of the 3rd Battalion, 330th Infantry Regiment in the record of the 83rd Reconnaissance Troop (page 1 at the paragraph 10)

366: 7278:

appreciate many committee members are aware—decisions on the employment (sic) of the ADF, in my experience, have all been taken through the National Security Committee of cabinet"

8179: 6781: 3353: 3034: 2712: 4073: 6843: 6551: 4967: 4707: 1839: 1323: 7886: 7652: 6263: 5940: 5611:

On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for participating in 4 reviews between October and December 2023.

2559: 2438:

Hi Nick, did you want to check my last replies at the PR? Happy to look at tweaking text further but just let me know your thoughts on the latest if you have time... Cheers,

2364: 2183: 4238: 1420:

On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for participating in 2 reviews between October and December 2022.

8597: 8087: 7143: 3860: 3693:

On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for participating in 7 reviews between July and September 2023.

3414: 3050: 2713: 2247: 2036: 7010:

On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for participating in 4 reviews between January and March 2024.

3563:

On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for participating in 5 reviews between January and March 2022.

2186:

after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

1695:

On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for participating in 4 reviews between January and March 2023.

7068:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Knowledge by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

6859: 5827: 7809:

On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for participating in 7 reviews between April and June 2024.

5179:

My understanding of WP policy thus far is that these type of accusations are usually made via official channels and not on a specific administrator’s talk page. Like on

5033: 3991: 3986: 3976: 3628:

On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the The Milhist reviewing award (2 stripes) for participating in 5 reviews between April and June 2023.

8028:

Looking likely this'll pass. D'ye think the 120th anniversary of its commissioning would be best, or should we go for when it was laid down (which would put it sooner)

4845: 746: 7159: 6777: 2263: 2052: 6490: 637:

Both users the same content, the same objections on that page, so I suspect that is the same person with a sock account. Also, the same message as this I sent to the

5826:

and I always really welcome contributions. For book reviews you can either draft them in your user space, or post them directly in the next edition of the Bugle via

4182: 8070: 5557: 5543: 5507: 5480: 5451: 3260:

yeah, i tried following the sources to attempt to make sense out of it, and only ended up being more confused! anyway, your edits looks good. thanks, Nick-D.

2973: 1928: 1913: 7781: 6982: 5583: 5376: 3665: 3600: 3535: 1667: 5348:

respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year.

3903:

were not foreign, b) were not paid, c) and were not generally described by sources as mercenaries either. And on the BLP issues relative to US laws, I found

7752: 5718: 4550: 3218: 2822: 1943: 1125: 8467: 7800: 7001: 5602: 5396: 3684: 3619: 3554: 1686: 1411: 7047: 3754:

Hello, I'm afraid that as I'm going to be travelling for the next month I won't be able to help here. I'd suggest using the Institute of Strategic Studies

1529: 1392: 8265: 6017: 5410: 4001: 3808: 3792: 1911: 944: 4875:

I found all the FAs for this month's Bugle. And the FPs, which grow increasingly less connected to MILHIST left to right (but I think all still count).

6947:

Hi, as there have been no edits in the last 48 hours or so, there aren't any grounds at present to protect the article. I'd suggest requesting this at

5506:

The information provided in the edit is virtually the same, albeit reworded and restyled. Also, sources and references were not included in the edits.

2969: 2823: 2628: 7999: 4031: 3135: 2734: 1774:

within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.

7741: 6693: 6637: 2167: 1217:

Heh, I did notice that but I thought there was method in the madness (like maybe HF wanted to see it published ASAP) so I'm now wiser... ;-) Cheers,

4137: 4091: 3931: 1104:

You can read there the Afer Action Report of the 330th Infantry Regiment for August 1944 with the describing of the events of the August 5th, 1944.

7748: 7312: 4150: 4107: 3963: 3839: 1520:

I linked to it here so that you can easily find it and state your opinion. I will link to our discussion we had about three months ago. Thank you.

4307: 4155: 4112: 4036: 913:

No worries. If it's renominated for deletion after being de-linked from the main page, please ping me. It's definitely a viable article. Regards,

831:: Hey, I noticed you're back and was wondering if you could take a look? No worries if not, I can go to a different person on the mentor list. -- 4284: 4011: 3427: 899: 4086: 799:

Hi, I'll try to look over it this weekend, but I'm preparing for an overseas trip so I might not get up to it for a couple of weeks I'm afraid.

8561: 8212: 7919: 7685: 7184: 6884: 6584: 6115: 6013: 5965: 4992: 4732: 4423: 3378: 3122:

has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the

3075: 2592: 2397: 2288: 2077: 1872: 1356: 1046: 940: 407: 3904: 2922:

Sorry, but I've been busy (and exhausted) from my work and some travel. I'd suggest looking for a mentor with better knowledge of this topic.

8646: 8615: 8599: 7579: 7452:

Hello, This isn't a topic I know anything about to be honest, but I'll try to leave some comments in the PR over the next few days. Regards,

7326: 6220:

has the same issues, but I will think a bit further on it, potentially making further edits, before I work out exactly what I ask you to do.

6001: 4289: 2177: 8134: 7737: 7281:

As head of the executive the branch of government, he and the cabinet have the power to exercise control of the armed forces. --regards,

4026: 8626: 8277: 7258: 6689: 6633: 6268: 3981: 3819: 2844: 777: 7826: 7027: 5628: 5434: 4207:

Administrators can now choose to add the user's user page to their watchlist when changing the usergroups for a user. This works both via

3710: 3645: 3580: 3165:

Yes I am. They are stating on their talk page now that their account may have been compromised, so I'm extending the block to indefinite.

1712: 8504: 8155: 7862: 7628: 7119: 6819: 6527: 6058: 5900: 4927: 4667: 4366: 4016: 3313: 3010: 2535: 2340: 2223: 2012: 1815: 1299: 981: 492: 342: 6314: 1437: 6323: 6002: 4279: 3730: 1732: 895: 268: 7098: 5059: 4020: 1932: 513:

Great, thank you. It's fair to say that the poor Greeks had higher priorities for limited government funds in 2013 than war museums.

5150: 2128: 1964: 8482: 8014: 7290: 6505: 4860: 2968:

for 4 September 2023. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at

2684: 1573: 761: 8122: 3748: 8488: 8264:

by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the

8248: 5138: 3297: 448:

Hi. I decided to write up a review essay for The Bulge along the lines of the one you made for the last issue. You can find mine

7338: 5542:

I did read them. I'm just saying the question did not involve sources, but rather a section being simply reworded and restyled.

5335:

Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!

5054: 1607:

This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

939:

for 16 March 2023. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at

8557: 8208: 7915: 7681: 7426: 7180: 6880: 6580: 6111: 6042: 6012:

for 6 March 2024. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at

5961: 4988: 4911: 4728: 4651: 4528: 4517: 4419: 4186: 3374: 3071: 2873: 2849: 2588: 2568:

Nick-D on alleged Australian war crimes and Hawkeye7 on the 1944–45 Philippines campaign and the Australian Signals Directorate

2393: 2284: 2073: 1868: 1637:

Hello, just wanted to let you know that I have re-uploaded the files as non-free files to Knowledge with a smaller resolution.

1352: 1042: 965: 648: 403: 6776:

Hi, and welcome to the project! If you'd like the article to be assessed against the B-class criteria you can request this at

6688:

for 15 May 2024. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at

6037: 4006: 1771: 8565: 8373:

3. Anderson and Hitchcock's Bristol Tourer G-AUDJ 'The Old Pioneer' which they flew from England to Australia, September 1928

8216: 7923: 7689: 7527:. It would be good to replace Shirer with something more recent and scholarly (his book is pretty outdated) though. Regards, 7188: 6888: 6632:

for 6 May 2024. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at

6620: 6588: 6119: 5969: 5884: 5095: 4996: 4736: 4427: 4350: 3936: 3382: 3079: 2596: 2401: 2292: 2081: 1876: 1360: 1050: 411: 326: 5565: 3996: 8273: 8139: 6676: 6671: 6657: 5367: 5028: 4303: 3119: 3113: 2994: 2513: 6713: 5711:

Could you possibly lend a hand with getting this article to DYK? I'm thinking a hook along the lines of "...that the ship

4783: 1766:

for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a

7508:

Also, I don't think it is less reliable than Shirer's book, since my source is just a translation of the primary source.

6920: 6803: 6511: 5180: 5146: 2494: 2486: 2207: 1799: 1794: 1283: 1099: 813:

No bother! Feel free to take as much time as you need, the article isn't going anywhere. I hope you have a good trip! --

8478: 8069:

Hi Nick-D, sorry to trouble you, I am involved in a content disagreement and was hoping you might be able to comment on

8010: 6501: 4856: 2829:

Hey, just noting a little clarification as to which version(s) you support is needed here. Sorry, it's mostly my fault.

757: 8591: 7846: 7612: 6941: 6407: 4532: 3408: 2519: 2324: 1749: 1627: 8106:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 6392:

is pretty much definitely passing, so I know we'll have at least one MILHIST FP, probably more, March is quite young.

6145: 5839: 5022: 4762: 1646: 1076: 7103: 6371: 6366: 6349: 6335: 5995: 5459: 5229: 5201: 5126:

This user tried to sneak the description "superpower" into the lede of British Empire with a misleading edit summary

4789:

I tend to agree. These categories only seem useful when the cause of death is a notable aspect of the person's life.

4768: 4453: 1996: 1632: 437: 241: 8242: 6700:, who assists the coordinators by making suggestions on the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist 6644:, who assists the coordinators by making suggestions on the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist 6443: 6024:, who assists the coordinators by making suggestions on the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist 5657:

updated the assessments of the IISS can be, and their choice of focus on particular world regions, but see here for

3856: 3105: 2810: 2790: 1506: 7834: 7035: 6928: 6921: 6914: 6614: 5636: 5165: 3718: 3653: 3588: 3208: 3126:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. 2318: 1902: 1720: 1445: 1386: 1277: 1111: 888: 7949: 7715: 7517: 7425:

Hi Nick-D, hope you're doing well. I would really appreciate a review of this article in preparation for FAC over

7344:

Hi, I'll look in on this nomination on the weekend with an eye to posting a full(er) review. Thanks for the note.

5551: 5537: 5515: 5501: 5483: 5474: 2622: 2427: 1488: 1262: 907: 8423: 8269: 7955: 7214: 6449: 6239: 5363: 5131: 5127: 4804: 4798: 4299: 3159: 3140: 2945: 2931: 2917: 2903: 2889: 2107: 1268:

Hello, Let's limit this conversation to the article's talk page to prevent fragmentation and confusion. Regards,

685: 3782: 3768: 3291: 2498: 1848:

Nick-D on the Australian War Memorial and the South China Sea raid, Hawkeye7 on the 1999 East Timor intervention

1148: 7548: 7536: 7306: 6288: 5812: 5422: 5359: 5089: 4624: 3239: 2989: 2957: 2490: 2482: 1133: 8415: 8356: 8111: 8058: 7756: 7483: 7461: 7237: 6423: 5874: 5860: 5790: 5770: 4905: 4509: 3921: 3897: 3877: 2769: 2749: 1567: 960: 320: 5133:. I asked them about it, their reply seems a bit off to me. I was wondering if this might be HarveyCarter? 4590: 1661: 928: 499:

in November 2022 so I will try to visit it by the end of the month and update the review essay accordingly.--

284: 7606: 7588: 7252: 6974: 6960: 6354: 6227: 6211: 6197: 6181: 5736: 5696: 5684: 5285: 5264: 4636: 4344: 3453: 2202: 2170:. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page 660: 538: 508: 7775: 7079: 5050: 4620: 4575: 3888:

Operation Gideon article. I agree that it's best to avoid simplistic labels for issues like this. Regards,

3141: 2665: 1484: 631: 461: 257: 7243:

Hello, I'm afraid that I don't know enough about this topic to be able to offer useful comments. Regards,

6760: 5320: 5304: 5244: 3525: 3507: 3489: 3198: 3183: 3174: 2469: 1226: 1186: 922: 876: 862: 840: 822: 808: 552: 522: 477: 76: 8082: 7721: 7491: 5442: 5406: 5141: 3214: 3152: 2958: 2706: 1258: 679: 611: 587: 230: 169: 165: 161: 157: 153: 149: 145: 141: 137: 133: 129: 125: 8043: 7353: 5816: 5119: 4491: 1212: 1090:

First, excuse me if my sentences are not well written, I hope you will excuse the fact that I'm french.

577: 8107: 7412: 7394: 7220: 7061: 6701: 6645: 6025: 5561: 5547: 5511: 5455: 3269: 3255: 2977: 2936:

Thanks for letting me know and no problem with that. Many thanks for your attention to this as well!!!

2187: 2173: 2113: 1991: 1540: 1517: 948: 929: 642: 179: 121: 117: 113: 109: 105: 101: 97: 93: 89: 6852:

Hawkeye7, Nick-D and Pickersgill-Cunliffe discuss six (count 'em, six!) works comprising eight volumes

5107: 2145:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 793: 8619:, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Knowledge. The 6927:

Hi Nick-D. Sir, would you be so kind (when and if you have time) to add a protection template to the

6745: 6310: 6261:, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Knowledge. The 6166: 5808: 5418: 5405:

On behalf of the Military History Project, I am proud to present the A-Class medal with Diamonds for

4779: 4546: 3812:, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Knowledge. The 2941: 2913: 2899: 2869: 2154: 1936: 1117: 1105: 443: 8625:

has been archived.This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may

6267:

has been archived.This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may

6028:

from two days before the article appears on the Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work!—

5668: 3818:

has been archived.This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may

2719:

Little thing I wrote up; hope you like it. Might throw it into the Signpost proper if they want it.

1139:

Hi, Knowledge operates off secondary not primary sources so I won't be making that change. Regards,

7556: 7359: 6797: 4598: 3778: 3744: 1763: 1586: 1129: 3480:

It was obvious vandalism, and you will be blocked if you repeat it. This obviously was not a war.

3474: 3221:. is this article specifically about the office in sydney, or more generally about the rhodesian 8324: 7286: 7221: 7053: 6428:

Aye, suppose the Coal Wars are more of a metaphor. Well, will sort things out for the three FAs.

5046: 4555: 3848: 2447: 1734: 1575: 1480: 1236: 1082: 174: 7446: 4700:

Hawkeye7 looks at English Civil War logistics and Peacemaker67 at Austro-Hungarian torpedo boats

4328: 1171: 8571: 8222: 8064: 7929: 7695: 7194: 6894: 6709: 6667: 6653: 6594: 6362: 6345: 6331: 6276: 6125: 5975: 5704: 5270: 5250: 5207: 5135: 5113: 5002: 4742: 4586: 4487: 4433: 4399:

Hawkeye7 on an American general and the first female astronauts, Nick-D on Roman fortifications

3917: 3873: 3698: 3633: 3568: 3441: 3388: 3085: 2602: 2407: 2298: 2161: 2087: 1882: 1548: 1457: 1366: 1254: 1056: 781: 417: 301: 7523:

Hi, Knowledge has a strong preference for secondary sources over primary sources - please see

6696:. Please keep an eye on that page, as comments regarding the draft blurb may be left there by 6640:. Please keep an eye on that page, as comments regarding the draft blurb may be left there by 6357:

mentions a concert I loved to hear and a piece I loved to sing in choir, 150 years old OTD. --

6020:. Please keep an eye on that page, as comments regarding the draft blurb may be left there by 5479:

Errantios did not provide any references to support his reasons for undoing the edit, either.

5128:

https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=British_Empire&diff=1189352775&oldid=1189142714

4890: 3861:

Talk:Operation Gideon (2020)#Initial brainstorming to prep for writing Requested move proposal

1974:

G'day Nick-D, I would appreciate your comments in regards to verifiability in a discussion on

1552: 8634: 6306: 2133: 1642: 1525: 638: 4133: 4079: 3444:

and/or other relevant noticeboards to ask that other editors keep an eye on those articles.

305: 7822: 7585: 7233: 7023: 6970: 6937: 6704:

from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work!

6648:

from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work!

6224: 6194: 6163: 5807:? I might like to provide a book review occasionally, but don't want to step on your toes. 5693: 5665: 5624: 5430: 5101: 4775: 4632: 4542: 4143: 4100: 3969: 3706: 3641: 3576: 3513: 3424: 2980:

from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work!—

2937: 2909: 2895: 2865: 1969: 1759: 1708: 1433: 1094: 951:

from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work!—

767: 8: 8629:

to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers,

8340: 8318: 8078: 6766: 6718: 6271:

to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers,

6217: 5752: 5713: 5705: 5215: 5072: 4212: 3822:

to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers,

3774: 3740: 1987: 488: 8379:

7. Goya Henry and Arthur Lumb in their Junkers A.50 Junior 'Wendouree' VH-UNO, July 1930

8049:

I'd suggest the 120th anniversary of the commissioning, as this seems more significant.

8579: 8230: 8020: 7937: 7814: 7703: 7545: 7542: 7514: 7282: 7202: 7015: 6902: 6740: 6602: 6133: 5983: 5616: 5353: 5315: 5280: 5259: 5224: 5196: 5083: 5010: 4750: 4459: 4441: 4257: 4208: 3827: 3503: 3470: 3396: 3093: 2610: 2443: 2415: 2306: 2199: 2095: 1890: 1700: 1425: 1374: 1222: 1166: 1064: 903: 872: 836: 818: 789: 534: 504: 457: 425: 4069: 3959: 1100:

https://83rdinfdivdocs.org/documents/330th/various/330th_3rdBn_Our_part_in_the_war.pdf

8570:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

8403: 8328: 8306: 8221:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

8031: 7928:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

7694:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

7524: 7467: 7430: 7382: 7193:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

7091: 6893:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

6705: 6663: 6649: 6593:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

6431: 6395: 6358: 6341: 6327: 6272: 6151: 6124:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

6033: 5974:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

5848: 5778: 5744: 5724: 5001:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

4878: 4741:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

4582: 4483: 4432:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

3908: 3864: 3694: 3629: 3564: 3387:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

3131: 3084:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

2985: 2832: 2798: 2778: 2757: 2722: 2677: 2634: 2601:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

2406:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

2297:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

2086:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

1960: 1881:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

1544: 1365:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

1055:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

956: 656: 416:

If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from

297: 69: 54: 6692:, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at 6636:, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at 6016:, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at 5465:

You changed referenced material without providing a new reference that supports it.

2972:, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at 943:, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at 8642: 8630: 8283: 7334: 6728: 6724: 6621: 6381: 6284: 5648: 5176:: I’ve been editing on WP for a few years, and never been accused of sock puppetry. 3835: 3459: 1777: 1638: 1610: 1521: 1518:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/Commons:Deletion_requests/Rhodesia_vectors_after_1973

625: 3148: 8323:

Also, if it's not too big an ask, any of these images look good? It's a big set.

8130: 7818: 7582: 7390: 7229: 7019: 6966: 6933: 6677: 6257: 6241: 6221: 6191: 6160: 5690: 5662: 5620: 5426: 5414: 5211: 5184: 4628: 4325: 3702: 3637: 3572: 3435: 3421: 3265: 3235: 2433: 2149: 2140: 1790: 1745: 1738: 1704: 1623: 1598: 1590: 1579: 1429: 605: 496: 491:. While looking for information on the renovation I found that they opened a new 5749:

I tend to favour simple DYK hooks - how about something like: ... that the ship

5658: 1112:

https://83rdinfdivdocs.org/documents/83rdRCNTrp/AAR/AAR_83rd_Rcn_Trp_AUG1944.pdf

8300: 8074: 7745: 6948: 6385: 6298: 6187: 6152: 5447: 5068: 3739:

It just reads kind of wrong. I can't place my finger on it, but maybe you can.

1983: 1975: 1154: 5717:

sank before it even had a chance to finish its first voyage?" I've started it

375:

Hawkeye7 on the key contributions of two Australian scientists in World War II

39: 8575: 8226: 8071:

Talk:New South Wales Police Force#Rogerson and McNamara 2014 crimes relevance

7933: 7810: 7763: 7699: 7198: 7011: 6898: 6785: 6735: 6685: 6629: 6598: 6129: 6009: 5979: 5823: 5612: 5349: 5311: 5292: 5276: 5255: 5220: 5192: 5078: 5006: 4746: 4437: 3884: 3823: 3499: 3466: 3392: 3180: 3156: 3089: 2965: 2642: 2606: 2475: 2455: 2439: 2411: 2302: 2196: 2091: 1886: 1696: 1421: 1370: 1218: 1197: 1193: 1161: 1060: 936: 868: 847: 832: 814: 785: 773: 667: 559: 530: 500: 484: 453: 421: 293: 65: 8367:

1. Jessie Maude Miller (also known as 'Chubbie' Miller or Mrs Keith Miller?)

7511:

It is one of my first edits in an article, would love to get any feedback:)

5761:

and was wrecked at the end of its first voyage from Liverpool to Australia?

3179:

OK, but I'd still like to know where the vandalism and bad faith edits are.

8409: 8334: 8312: 8037: 7329:. I was wondering if you would be interested in supporting the nomination? 7086: 7057: 6437: 6401: 6389: 6029: 5854: 5784: 5730: 5525: 5235:

are one of the most prolific sockmasters in subject areas I edit. Regards,

5042: 5037: 4884: 4313: 3852: 3127: 2981: 2838: 2804: 2784: 2763: 2728: 2692: 2672: 2638: 1956: 1594: 952: 652: 81: 7565: 3948: 1466: 8638: 8583: 8348: 8234: 8050: 7941: 7767: 7707: 7598: 7528: 7499: 7453: 7404: 7368: 7345: 7330: 7318: 7298: 7266: 7244: 7206: 6952: 6906: 6789: 6752: 6606: 6415: 6280: 6203: 6173: 6137: 5987: 5866: 5831: 5762: 5676: 5529: 5521: 5493: 5489: 5466: 5296: 5236: 5173: 5157: 5014: 4897: 4790: 4754: 4501: 4468: 4445: 4336: 3889: 3831: 3760: 3517: 3481: 3445: 3400: 3283: 3247: 3190: 3166: 3097: 2923: 2881: 2741: 2698: 2614: 2505: 2461: 2419: 2310: 2099: 1894: 1653: 1559: 1498: 1378: 1269: 1204: 1178: 1140: 1068: 914: 854: 828: 800: 671: 621: 569: 544: 514: 469: 429: 312: 276: 8188:

Hawkeye7 looks at two works on logistics and one on the Battle of Arnhem

8376:

4-6. Wackett Warrigal II with collapsed undercarriage, July-August 1930

8126: 7418: 7386: 6697: 6641: 6021: 5798: 3261: 3231: 2858: 2795:

How did the Op-ed just gain three additional sections? I need to stop.

2460:

Sorry for the slow reply here. Those changes look good to me. Regards,

1786: 1781: 1619: 1614: 601: 252: 225: 185: 5385: 566:

Knowledge:WikiProject Military history/News/February 2023/Review essay

543:

No worries - I'll post it over the weekend. Thank you again for this.

8385:

11-12. Air Force Vickers-Supermarine Seagull seaplane at Rose Bay (?)

6684:

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as

6628:

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as

6008:

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as

5214:. And I kindly request yoi retract your statements both here and the 4623:, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made 4564: 4220: 2964:

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as

935:

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as

2120: 192: 5253:

I kindly ask you to apologise, or retract your uncivil statements.

4866: 4836:

Spotlight: Introducing a repository of anti-disinformation projects

1770:

under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can

1534: 1513:

Let your opinion be stated on the Rhodesia vectors deletion request

1332:

Hog Farm on the Trans-Mississippi Theater of the American Civil War

593: 217: 202: 22: 8073:. There have been some discussions in the edit summaries. Regards 7743: 6733:

Knowledge:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Battle of Tinian

6481:

Bristol University Press and British Online Archives now available

6172:

Hi, I've just done that. Thanks for fixing this article! Regards,

1118:

https://83rdinfdivdocs.org/documents/329th/AAR/AAR_329_AUG1944.pdf

1106:

https://83rdinfdivdocs.org/documents/330th/AAR/AAR_330_AUG1944.pdf

7733: 7419: 5675:

more ambitious/grandiose previous structures and plans. Regards,

4642: 4607: 4246: 4197: 4122: 4058: 8607: 8391:

15-16. Sydney central business district and harbour from the air

6782:

Knowledge:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/A-Class review

6249: 3800: 7790: 7727: 6991: 5592: 3674: 3609: 3544: 1676: 1401: 1249: 449: 262: 32: 8400:

18-19. Aviators Phyllis Arnott, Freda Deaton and Bobbie Terry

4172: 3440:

apologies, I seem to have missed this. I'd suggest posting at

1248:

Also, the article states, "It is generally considered that in

7730: 5067:

Could I beg 5 minutes of your time, could you have a look at

2714:

Knowledge:WikiProject Military history/News/August 2023/Op-ed

383:

Nick-D reports on his recent visits to British military sites

8430: 7962: 6456: 5556:

Also, just to let you know, both edits had the same source.

4811: 4050: 692: 8461:

New user script for easily searching The Knowledge Library

8088:

Orphaned non-free image File:HMAS Tarakan (AWM 301490).jpg

6860:

Hawkeye7 on a lecture by the Australian official historian

6778:

Knowledge:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Requests

3415:

POV/disinformation on Russian invasion of Ukraine articles

2264:

Hawkeye7's tips for writing articles on military logistics

2053:

Hawkeye7's tips for writing articles on military logistics

61:

the exact content of the email if the matter is sensitive.

8282: 6727:

at A-class, I was wondering if you could do the same for

5520:

Please do read up on how referencing in Knowledge works.

3863:. Thanks for any help you can give should you have time! 5775:

Not bad. I thought it was getting a little too detailed

4260:

has concluded with the appointment of one new CheckUser.

7735: 3759:

the consequences this has had on the country. Regards,

3512:

Because it's the common name of the event - please see

1927:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

1093:

I saw that you reverted my modification in the article

6788:

rather than through individual wikiprojects. Regards,

2974:

Knowledge talk:Today's featured article/September 2023

1479:

Operation Title is an outstanding article. Great job!

8521: