1458:
architectural style, architect and/or builder), so many editors begin and end their articles at that point. In Iowa, for example, these articles can tell the larger story about Euro-American immigration into the
Midwest. Congregational churches tell the story, for the most part, about New Englanders just as the Catholic churches tell the stories of the Irish and Germans, the Lutherans about Germans and Scandinavians, Episcopalians and Methodist about people from the eastern and southern US. These are generalizations and I'm not limiting these immigrant groups to these denominations. Davenport, Iowa had a German Congregational church and a German Methodist church, so the congregation tells the story about the building. Also, because the Congregational Church is still in existence it is a living reality and not an historical curiosity. The choice of architectural style for the building also says something about the congregation and the era that it was built. There are, of course, church buildings where the denomination that built the building no longer occupies it. This may be a bigger problem for naming the article rather than how to categorize it. The Sioux City, Iowa church building is no longer a Congregational church and should not be in the category. The Burlington and Nashua church buildings are still Congregational churches and they belong in the category as it currently exists. Other Congregational church buildings in Iowa, such as First Congregational in Iowa City, are now UCC congregations and they are listed in that category for Iowa. The ancient Christian Church referred to its buildings, which we call churches, as the
1163:. It is true that most churches on WP are only notable for inclusion in the NHRP, but that does not change the fact that an article on X church is about the church as organization as well as its building. Vegas's proposal to split building and church congregation articles is unworkable because there is no reason to have separate articles for churches as organizations from churches as buildings. The articles which are allegedly only about church buildings include in their scope the congregation which built and worship(ed) there, and at some point information about the church as organization may be added there. --
1783:, the category did not contain ANY United Church of Christ (UCC) churches. It contained three churches; two are affiliated with the National Association of Congregational Christian Churches, and the third is a church building that is now used by a Pentecostal congregation. There was, appropriately, a distinct and separate category for UCC churches in Iowa. Now Doncram has inserted all of the UCC churches into the Congregational churches category (in addition to the UCC category). Notwithstanding the fact that he has not put
396:-- To me "White Russians" refers primarily to Russians who went into exile (or stayed abroad) after the 1917 revolution, becasue they were opposed to the Reds of USSR. ONe of the tragedies of 20th cnetury is that many of these (effectively stateless) people were returned to USSR at end of WWII and were sent straight to the gulags. Not all of these people were members of a political movement, merely exiled for political reasons.
1064:
notable in
Knowledge are NRHP-listed. The NRHP-listed ones are just some that are easily documented as notable so they are more fully represented (are relatively over-represented) in Knowledge. Renaming to narrow the categories is hurtful. Let the Knowledge grow to include other non-NRHP-listed ones; be patient, let the categories grow. No benefit to rename or to split. Why pick on Congregational religion, by the way? --
1851:
categories are not robust to the addition of new articles (or the finding of already-existing
Knowledge articles) that fit the broader category but not the too-narrow one. And, I further think there's no need to split a pretty small category such as Iowa congregational churches into smaller categories of NRHP ones vs. non-NRHP ones, and UCC vs. non-UCC ones, when there are only 8 churches in the Iowa category. --
1109:
am sure, and in other states, where there is no surviving building (and perhaps no surviving church), for which articles will eventually be created. The NRHP articles are simply among the easiest articles to start; there will be others. So what if the current population of the
Vermont articles are all NRHP-listed churches; that doesn't indicate that the category should be deleted or that it should be split. --
1538:. An article about a church building that doesn't discuss the congregation is woefully short of useful information; we should expect articles to cover both and thus put these articles into categories that are menat for both. This problem should be blamed on those who create useless substubs, not on the current collection of categories. The nominator's first sentence is a good reason
1245:
is non denomination and used by multiple religions. Personally on building articles, it is reasonable to list the denomination that built the structure. It is also reasonable to list later denominations that have used the building. This would be the same as listing a second use for a religious building when it is converted to another use.
1462:, the house of the church. The church is the people, the building houses the church. Without the church, the people, the building is just a building (architecturally significant as it may be). It is the people that give the buildings their reason for existing, and they should not be divorced from that reality.
1698:
854:
842:
1457:
Church articles are invariably about the congregations that are housed, or were housed, in the building. Some of the articles are stubs waiting for their fuller stories to be told. It is rather easy to get the basic information about a church building listed on the NRHP in the US (name, date built,
1431:
As it happens, almost all of the articles in these categories are exclusively about the buildings. Most of them are stubs that indicate little more than the fact that the named church is listed on the
National Register. The three-article Iowa category is an exception to that generalization. Those two
1244:
There are a number of buildings with multiple uses. As such, they can be in multiple categories. I found in going through thousands of these articles that it is not uncommon for religious building articles to not specify the denomination that worships there. Likewise for others it is clear that it
1229:
if a building is no longer used as a congregational church, but is now say a United Reform Church, should the article even be in this category? Another article I found was on a non-denominational cemetary chapel. Not all chapels have a functional and denominated religious organization behind them.
1727:
For the record, there were already a couple of other churches in these categories that aren't listed on the
National Register. Additionally, there are several existing articles about current or former Congregational churches that aren't on the National Register and aren't on Doncram's list or in his
1191:
By separate articles I meant that having building and congregation categories would mean we'd have to decide whether an article is about a building or a congregation, so separate types of articles. I'm saying that's not necessary because the articles are almost always going to include both things in
1089:
I picked the
Congregationalists simply because they were the first case I looked at. And while there is some theoretical possibility of notable congregations in unimportant buildings, I note that every Vermont article is about an NRHP listing, and it's a very safe bet that every other article in the
1063:
for explanation how lists, categories, and navigation templates are complementary. Articles about churches are typically about either or both the church as a congregation and history that pre-dates and spans use of individual buildoings, and the church as a building. Not all U.S. churches that are
888:
These are mostly categories of NHRP (US) or Listed (UK) buildings, not congregations. As a rule, churches are not otherwise found worthy of articles. There is no system within these two projects for categorizing church buildings by denomination, but it would be obviously useful to do so. Therefore I
319:
to some extent. Personally I'd clamp down on a lot of the emigrants from historical entities, it just gets messy and a bit OC-ish trying to keep up with the history of the
Balkans, Italy, Germany or the African colonies. Stick with the modern names of the country, then add separate categories for eg
2251:
per nom. However, I am dubious about having a category for "stage actors" at all, because it is the nature of this overcroweded profession that many actors will take any work offered, so that they may do a run as a stage actor, then do a film and then appear in a TV drama. Another difficulty with
1137:
such a categorization could be justified. Until those articles exist, the possibility remains only a possibility. My experience with various discussions here is that parish articles do not generally survive deletion discussions; only building articles do, because architectural notability has clear,
1108:
It's not theoretical, there are notable churches of every denomination that have modern buildings, notable for their activity/size/congregations or notable for the modern (non-NRHP-eligible) architecture of their buildings. Also there were historically notable
Congregational churches in Vermont, I
1014:
Although churches are notable if they are listed, they are not automatically regarded as non-notable if they are not listed. I'm worried that the proposer does not understand the difference between a church congregation and
Congregational Churches, which applies to the congregations. It may be an
990:
I support the renames for the reasons stated which I agree are valid for the vast majority of the affected articles. For the cases where you have a limited number of articles that should be in two trees then the articles can be in both. It appears that most of the oppose votes are of the mind set
1850:
I am sure several participants here are well-meaning in trying to make category names be descriptive. But the proposals to narrow categories so that their titles are more fully descriptive of the current contents of the category but allowing for no other types, seems to me not helpful. Too-narrow
1753:
and included in the category. I just added Iowa churches to the List and/or to the category so there are 8 now, rather than just 3 showing in the category before. And a subsequent specific proposal above to narrow the Iowa category also does not work, i think: i think the proposal was to revise
1514:
I'm not entirely certain of the protocol here, however, I'll write this here and whatever comes of it, so be it. I fully agree that the Iowa category should be changed to "Congregational Christian churches in Iowa." It is more accurate than the current title and therefore makes complete sense. I
1381:
has merit as a separate building-focused category. Most of the articles in this category are focused on the church buildings, so almost all could be slotted in that category (or subcats); many also could go into a churches-by-denomination category, if the actual denomination can be determined. For
1579:
Nyttend, the fact is that most of these articles don't talk much about the congregation because most of the information about these buildings comes from NHRP nominations, which tend to only care about what it took to get the building constructed. If one is lucky there may be some data on a parish
1665:
these categories, even though they address the same kinds of articles. These categories remain, for the most part, about buildings, and doncram, given that that the lists you assembled are focused on buildings (since they relate to NHRP listings) I could for the sake of wasting more time on it
1787:
into this category (presumably because the name of the church doesn't include the word "Congregational"), Doncram's categorization decision underlines my perception that the categories he has built -- and that are under discussion here -- are categories for church buildings that were built as
1491:
is an exception in that the articles are fairly substantial; almost all of the other articles in these categories are still minimal stubs that are solely about buildings. This is why I propose renaming the Iowa category as a category for Congregational Christian churches in Iowa. Many other
1368:), because of mergers and splits. Accordingly, churches in this category should be slotted in a denominational category that identifies a more specific denominational affiliation. The correct denominational categorization for many of the U.S. churches formerly considered Congregational is
1382:
the U.S. church buildings, I oppose the use of "National Register of Historic Places" in the category name, largely because I've worked on some articles for notable Congregational church buildings that aren't listed (or aren't individually listed) on the National Register (for example,
830:
779:
The question of whether we should have categories for "churches" or "church buildings" has been discussed at CFD many times over the last few years. The debates have usually been lengthy (and sometimes heated), and their outcomes have been inconsistent. Isn't it time for a
1701:
no longer works even temporarily. The same problem applies to the other suggested renames, they are not robust to the continued addition of new articles and to the development of existing articles to cover more about their congregations and non-building-related aspects.
2741:
311:. Some of them deserve the activist get-out, but I'm not sure that activism is relevant to emigration. I completely understand that if you are going to do an opinion-based emigration category then the White Russians would be at the front of the line for an exemption to
334:
Maybe; but it does have the benefit of allowing us to avoid direct categorization of many people as a "Soviet" emigrants, when those people are never described in reliable sources as "Soviet" anything and they certainly would not have self-identified as such.
2756:
2745:
818:
1802:
What nonsense. If you know about a church that should be in the Congregational churches in Iowa category, put it there. If you are intending to be funny or sarcastic or critical or whatever, I don't get it. Update: I just added, as you should have, the
1376:
for churches (such as two churches in Iowa) that belong to the National Association of Congregational Christian Churches. Additionally, though, because there are architectural similarities in many of the historic buildings identified as "Congregational",
1749:. The original specific proposal about renaming the Iowa Congregational churches in Iowa category also does not work, because there is at least one non-NRHP-listed one among the 8 notable Iowa Congregational churches now covered in the corresponding
1500:; my proposal would give similar treatment to Congregational Christian churches, while retaining a separate category for "Congregational" church buildings (including those of churches whose actual denominational affiliation is not yet determined). --
237:
1788:
Congregational churches. Accordingly, the best name for these categories is "Congregational church buildings". Once the categories are renamed, additional categorization may be needed to correctly classify the various churches by denomination. --
1348:
1391:
1341:
2971:, knowing of two museums of her in the city. Nobody noticed and helped, and just now i added a short info on the 2nd one. On a website dedicated to the poet there is a list of her museums and memorial places in Russia and Ukraine - see
1090:
US tree is of the same ilk. Besides, the utility of dividing the NRHP listings by denominational family (or religion) is obvious: the "religious function" categories are huge. If we did this as a split off instead of as a rename, most "
271:
But them we would disrupt the standard x emigrant to y form of the categories. I would rather lump them all under the Imperial Russian category and assume they have enough connection to Imperial Russia to count than use a non-standard
920:
since it may be the logical top level category in this area. If there is a better choice please clue us in. It is correct for an article to be in both a building and congregation category when both are well covered in the article.
241:
2385:
307:. I think the thing to remember is that "White Russian" isn't a nationality or an ethnicity in the same way as "the standard x emigrant to y form of the categories" - in fact White Russian categories come close to a breach of
3001:
1330:
2376:
1780:
1319:
2764:
2677:
1754:
the Iowa category to make it specifically about only UCC churches in Iowa, but there is a one that is specifically NOT a UCC church, that voted NOT to join the UCC, and which is NRHP-listed and wikipedia-notable. --
1614:
guideline supports having corresponding list-articles and categories. Since the list-article is kept, it makes sense to keep the corresponding category. I think this CFD is ready to be closed with KEEP decision.
1033:
I do understand the difference, and I would invite examination of the articles in verification of the fact that they are almost all (and in the case of the American categories, exclusively) about church buildings.
178:
The only issue with that name is that as far as I know, it's quite rare and unusual to describe these people in this way. It's much more common to call them White Russians (or White émigrés, if they left Russia.)
2816:
2795:
2728:
1267:
is clearly about the organization, it tells us when the organization was formed but not when the building was built. Building categories may be useful, but renaming the current ones to such would just create
1560:
Orlady asks me for clarification; sorry for being unclear. Basically, I'm saying "What we have right now is better than anything else that's been proposed, so let's leave everything where it is right now".
2776:
1807:
a.k.a. First Bible Missionary Church one, into the Iowa Congregational churches category. I don't enjoy any of this interaction, and wish that someone would close this whole proposal as obviously invalid.
1580:
website with a list of rectors/pastors or the like, but by and large there's precious little to work with. There's little notable in the history of most congregations; the exceptions tend to be places like
2618:
1928:
2147:
1373:
1352:
2095:
1206:
As long as both are discussed in the article, if can be categorized as both. If an article only includes one of these in its current state, then it should only be in one category and not both.
375:
304:
291:
156:
3022:, without prejudice to-creation if and when there are at least 6 articles to to place in the category. I doubt that there are likily to be enough such articles in the near future, so this fits
610:
2435:
2155:
2151:
2610:
2542:
393:
1992:
2367:
139:
has several meanings, one of which is people from Belarus. (That meaning was common in the days of the Russian Empire.) This category is for people who were supporters or members of the
674:
2011:
1936:
644:
601:
2449:
2993:
2898:
2252:
some of these is whether they refer to a person working in Northern Ireland or of that ethnic origin (but working elsewhere). Perhpas an "in" format would be better than "from".
298:
281:
266:
2291:
2243:
2175:
939:
Although I'd hope that any closing admin would read your comments to the end, there is a danger that you would be seen to be supportive of the deletion, which you're clearly not.
2322:
2261:
1607:
1361:
1291:
1254:
1056:
419:
2529:
2586:
1277:
1239:
801:
2602:
2085:
339:
329:
218:
209:
3127:
1390:). I haven't looked carefully enough at the UK category to form a strong opinion, but for consistency with the U.S. category structure I favor, I'd recommend renaming it to
693:
587:
183:
3106:. This is not a proposal to delete/rename/split/merge the category, so it doesn't belong at CFD. The nominator may want to take up the suggestion of asking the question at
3043:
2959:
3160:
2890:
2274:
and is subcats, I share those concerns about the merits of categorising actors by medium. But if that concern is to be pursued, it requires a separate group nomination. --
2224:
1471:
1419:
948:
930:
889:
am proposing to repurpose these categories to such a scheme, deleting the extraneous categories in the process. This is a trial run for doing this to other denominations.
1215:
1201:
1186:
2202:
1867:
1024:
1000:
985:
1524:
1509:
1445:
1413:
for articles about the churches as churches. The creation of a parallel category for those few articles that are solely about the buildings does not require a CfD. –
1172:
2938:
1770:
1718:
1631:
1551:
1542:
to get rid of current categories — because "These are mostly categories of NHRP (US) or Listed (UK) buildings, not congregations", where will you put the exceptions?
1432:
Connecticut church articles (i.e., Litchfield and Old Lyme) that I linked in my comment haven't ever been included in this category, but they are properly included in
1080:
3008:
1483:- Ideally, what you say would be true. However, the reality is that most of the articles in the U.S. categories discussed here are short stubs about buildings (e.g.,
1403:
1043:
962:
898:
710:
2919:
2648:
2575:
1570:
908:. I have argued in the past that the vast majority of articles in these trees are about the buildings and not the congregations. I would rather think of this as a
118:
110:
3148:
2984:
1895:
1824:
1797:
1737:
1652:
1593:
1147:
1125:
1103:
480:
442:
253:
2445:
as an uncontroversial cleanup. The right parenthesis appears to be a typo, and since there are no articles in the category, there's really no need for debate. --
1675:
1493:
1433:
969:
Vegaswikian, your statement supportive of splitting seems to indicate that your !vote is Oppose the deletion of the categories, not to Support deletion of them. --
507:
147:
405:
366:
433:
who clearly worked within the White Movement, but she died in 1920 in Russia. Thus we cannot rename it to emigres without removing articles that clearly belong.
42:
37:
459:
912:
since the proposal is simply using the bot to do the bulk move and then following up with a manual population/creation of a congregation tree as needed. I do
814:
286:
As I said, it's probably something we want to tackle after a name is settled here. What we choose might well vary considerably depending on whether we select
1337:
826:
233:
173:
258:
It would be best to tackle that issue once this discussion is resolved. "White émigrés to FOO" might also work, given the article about those people is at
2040:
294:. Personally, I think White Russian émigrés are sufficiently different than ordinary emigrants from the Russian Empire to warrant separate subcategories.
2271:
2186:
2139:
1515:
also thinks this makes sense for any other states as well. Those articles can be developed to add the additional information about the congregations.
244:, or figure out some other name from those who emigrated between the fall of the Czar in early 1917 and the establishments of the Soviet Union in 1922.
2803:, the county limits of San Francisco, and the City limits of San Francisco are the same, so there really is no difference that I am aware of (see the
1690:
1497:
2478:
1954:
2786:
SF County should very rarely be used. excellent accident. if merged, make sure all the supporting comments found at the county cat are moved over.
739:
1264:
3072:
536:
1804:
2845:
3019:
2902:
1484:
784:
to seek wider input on this question, and try to build a stable consensus rather than re-hashing the same debate again and again at CFD? --
1666:
renominate the lists for renaming to lists of buildings, to which all the same complaints I made the first time around would still apply.
647:
of the winners in the individual award categories a month ago. The award itself has notibility issues (at least based on the issue tag on
2099:
1945:
1694:
1326:
850:
2967:. I created the category intending it to be filled with material on other museums by other knowledgeable editors, while I worked on the
2763:
most people call it "San Francisco" anyway and the new cat name can be used to categorize all Bay Area request photos - Also it matches
2401:
2120:
378:
seems to be a good variant. Other categories containing "White Russians" in their titles should probably go through CfD individually.—
1383:
1369:
2614:
1779:
There may be some confusion here. At the time that this discussion started and also when I suggested renaming the Iowa category to
1488:
1378:
1315:
1301:
917:
866:
838:
2629:
per the above - I'll create the new required category, and remove the existing one from its wrong place in the hierarchy. Thanks.
1355:
as containers for that Iowa category and any other Congregational Christian churches that are lurking in the corners of Knowledge.
21:
2389:
1970:
101:
3122:
3038:
2996:, as this isn't not a proper name and could cause confusion, as indicated by the fact, that a user nominated the category at
2723:
2524:
2430:
2397:
2286:
2219:
2170:
2108:
796:
582:
2381:
59:
2915:, only one page in the category. Doesn't need to be merged to the other parent categories, as article is already in them.
2968:
2594:
2116:
1693:, which seems clearly Knowledge-notable, and is a Vermont church that is not NRHP-listed. So the sub-proposal to rename
1689:
I do think this has been discussed enough for the outcome to be clear. But, for what it is worth, i created new article
411:
358:
17:
1958:
2947:
1230:
Also, some articles are entirely about the buildings and tell us nothing of any organization that may use the building.
489:
468:
287:
122:
92:
1966:
1950:
1610:
has been closed with "No consensus" decision that keeps the list-article. As several persons have pointed out, the
1492:"Congregational" churches that are now affiliated with the United Church of Christ are now found in categories like
626:
3136:
2546:
2393:
1308:
875:
1015:
idea to create listed building categories - but this is probably best done manually and on a case by case basis.
1750:
1365:
1360:
My rationale: The denominational term "Congregational" lacks clear meaning (as I indicated in my comments at the
188:
That happens quite a bit though on Knowledge, with the rare version being used for Wiki-related reasons such as
2190:
2104:
1387:
450:
Rename to White movement. It might not be standard, but it accurately describes the contents of this category.
1988:
1862:
1819:
1784:
1765:
1713:
1626:
1581:
1120:
1075:
980:
614:
2002:
This category already had another nomination for upmerging. It seems irregular to open a second nomination.
1962:
622:
410:
This is a category, not an article, the resultant category would still be confusable with Belorussians. --
606:
143:. They are most commonly referred to as "White Russians", but I think we need some sort of disambiguator.
3139:? The category isn't applied consistently and there are beginning and ending categories for each year.
2812:
107:
1584:
whose NHRP listing is incidental to the history of the place; but these are very few and far between.
3182:
3153:
3118:
3107:
3091:
3063:
3034:
2955:
2864:
2836:
2791:
2719:
2696:
2668:
2590:
2520:
2497:
2469:
2426:
2341:
2313:
2282:
2239:
2215:
2166:
2059:
2031:
2007:
1914:
1886:
1273:
1235:
792:
758:
730:
689:
578:
555:
527:
476:
438:
277:
249:
78:
701:
as a rather minor award that is not a defining characteristic of those who have received the award.
2884:
1984:
1838:
To be clear, not all the United Kingdom congregational churches are Listed buildings (e.g. not the
774:
501:
2556:
To match the rest of the hierarchy. Category only has two members (one of which I've just added).
2598:
2257:
1843:
618:
415:
401:
362:
2808:
1699:
Category:Congregational church buildings in Vermont on the National Register of Historic Places
855:
Category:Congregational church buildings in Vermont on the National Register of Historic Places
3177:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
3058:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
2831:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
2663:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
2464:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
2308:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
2026:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1881:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
725:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
522:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
357:
it can't stay where it is, since it isn't about Belorussians, or variants on the cocktail. --
3178:
3087:
3086:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
3059:
2860:
2859:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
2832:
2772:
2692:
2691:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
2664:
2493:
2492:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
2465:
2337:
2336:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
2309:
2075:
2055:
2054:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
2027:
1910:
1909:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1882:
1520:
1467:
1322:(which should include the churches in Burlington and Nashua, but not the one in Sioux City);
1287:
1250:
1211:
1182:
996:
926:
754:
753:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
726:
551:
550:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
523:
455:
97:
74:
73:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
843:
Category:Congregational church buildings in Iowa on the National Register of Historic Places
3111:
3027:
2951:
2934:
2787:
2712:
2513:
2419:
2364:
2275:
2235:
2208:
2159:
2082:
2003:
1269:
1231:
785:
685:
571:
472:
434:
273:
245:
240:, but the second option would be really awkward. Another possiblitity is to merge them to
8:
3157:
2880:
2074:. The question of the stage actor categories needs to be discussed in a discussion about
1933:
1020:
944:
497:
336:
325:
295:
263:
215:
205:
180:
144:
3023:
2253:
1197:
1168:
706:
397:
169:
54:
1643:. That "no consensus" closure was not exactly a ringing endorsement of the article. --
214:
True, but I see no reason to do that here, when the common name is perfectly do-able.
2980:
1857:
1814:
1760:
1708:
1621:
1566:
1547:
1115:
1070:
975:
259:
2912:
831:
Category:Congregational church buildings on the National Register of Historic Places
3144:
2768:
1793:
1733:
1671:
1648:
1589:
1516:
1505:
1463:
1441:
1415:
1399:
1283:
1246:
1207:
1178:
1143:
1099:
1039:
992:
958:
922:
894:
451:
430:
383:
312:
308:
189:
2930:
2361:
2198:
2079:
1839:
652:
648:
2617:
I had not realised there was this distinction. I now see it is also a subcat of
2357:
1282:
So you would not have an objection to using a building category as appropriate?
1192:
their scope, even if they currently only include information about one thing. --
2997:
2972:
2639:
2566:
1016:
940:
321:
315:, I'm just not sure that it's worth opening that can of worms even if they are
201:
161:
140:
3005:
2916:
2143:
1611:
1193:
1164:
1060:
781:
702:
496:
of them have reasons to object, but this seems the least-bad of the bunch. -
165:
136:
2742:
Category:Knowledge requested photographs in San Francisco County, California
2270:
Having been busying myself with recategorising a few thousand articles into
3080:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
2976:
2853:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
2685:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
2486:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
2330:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
2048:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1903:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1852:
1809:
1755:
1703:
1616:
1562:
1543:
1110:
1065:
970:
747:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
544:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
67:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
3140:
2446:
1789:
1729:
1667:
1644:
1585:
1501:
1487:), with no information about the churches that occupied those buildings.
1437:
1395:
1139:
1095:
1035:
954:
890:
379:
2194:
492:
as the best option of a set of unfortunatly and honestly bad choices -
991:
that the buildings are not notable enough to be categorized as such.
2757:
Category:Knowledge requested photographs in San Francisco, California
2746:
Category:Knowledge requested photographs in San Francisco, California
2678:
Category:Knowledge requested photographs in San Francisco, California
2630:
2557:
819:
Category:Listed Congregational church buildings in the United Kingdom
197:
2946:
for now. I do wonder though if we should not upmerge the target to
192:- a recent example that's cropped up in CfD lately is an article at
471:. WE could them add the parenthetical movement to subcats as well.
2804:
2207:
Well spotted. I have just added the nurses to this nomination. --
1842:), and not all the United States ones are NRHP-listed (e.g., not
2759:
without realizing the category was at the "county" designation,
1055:. Nominator has also nominated List of Congregational churches
238:
Category:White Russian (movement) emigrants to the United States
164:
and to more accurately reflect the description of the category.
1608:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/List of Congregational churches
1349:
Category:Congregational Christian churches in the United States
1392:
Category:Congregational church buildings in the United Kingdom
303:
I'd not seen this discussion when I brought up the subject of
1342:
Category:Congregational church buildings in the United States
193:
651:) and winning it is not a defining aspect of one's career.
2078:, not about the category here in the original nomination.
953:
I've modified proposal for retention of topmost category.
3171:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
3052:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
2825:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
2657:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
2458:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
2302:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
2020:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1875:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
719:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
516:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
3156:
might be a better forum for questions about categories.
2992:
In that case the category should at least be renamed to
1494:
Category:United Church of Christ churches in Connecticut
1434:
Category:United Church of Christ churches in Connecticut
1094:
church" categories would disappear for lack of members.
242:
Category:Imperial Russian emigrants to the United States
2975:(in Russian). Anyone is welcome to work on the topic.
2950:, the target does not really seem all that big either.
1661:
the lists are not strongly related to the reasons for
815:
Category:Congregational churches in the United Kingdom
1338:
Category:Congregational churches in the United States
827:
Category:Congregational churches in the United States
643:. I should have included this parent category in the
234:
Category:White Russian emigrants to the United States
3002:
Category:Anna Akhmatova Literary and Memorial Museum
160:
to better match the title of the parent article for
3185:). No further edits should be made to this section.
3094:). No further edits should be made to this section.
3066:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2867:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2839:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2699:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2671:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2500:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2472:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2344:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2316:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2187:
Category:People from Northern Ireland by occupation
2140:
Category:People from Northern Ireland by occupation
2062:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2034:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1917:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1889:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1331:
Category:Congregational church buildings in Vermont
761:). No further edits should be made to this section.
733:). No further edits should be made to this section.
558:). No further edits should be made to this section.
530:). No further edits should be made to this section.
96:, without creating a precedent for the sub-cats. –
81:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2377:Category:American female pornographic film actors)
2323:Category:American female pornographic film actors)
2124:(added later by BHG 19:28, 5 February 2013 (UTC))
1781:Category:Congregational Christian churches in Iowa
1320:Category:Congregational Christian churches in Iowa
1177:Where did I say that we should have two articles?
2765:Category:Wikipedians in San Francisco, California
2112:(added later by BHG 19:16, 5 February 2013 (UTC))
1691:First Congregational Church of Woodstock, Vermont
1498:Category:United Church of Christ churches in Iowa
1927:administrative close. The ongoing discussion is
777:here not to rename these categories as proposed.
320:membership of the White Movement if appropriate.
1265:First Congregational Church (Burlington, Iowa)
3135:What is the rationale behind categories like
1805:First Congregational Church (Davenport, Iowa)
869:as container for national "listed" categories
380:Ă‹zhiki (Igels HĂ©rissonovich ĂŹzhakoff-Amursky)
3020:Category:History museums in Saint Petersburg
2973:http://www.akhmatova.org/museums/museums.htm
2903:Category:History museums in Saint Petersburg
1485:First Congregational Church and Meetinghouse
2619:Category:Christian ministers by nationality
2100:Category:Stage actors from Northern Ireland
1946:Category:American actors of Chinese descent
1896:Category:American actors of Chinese descent
1785:another Iowa Congregational church building
1695:Category:Congregational churches in Vermont
1327:Category:Congregational churches in Vermont
851:Category:Congregational churches in Vermont
2609:Ah, Thanks for pointing this out. Because
2356:, could have probably been a speedy under
2121:Category:Women poets from Northern Ireland
1374:Category:Congregational Christian churches
1353:Category:Congregational Christian churches
1384:First Congregational Church of Litchfield
1370:Category:United Church of Christ churches
684:in general we discorage award categories.
2615:Category:Christian clergy by nationality
2158:upheld at every other CFD since then. --
1846:. So the original proposals don't work.
1489:Category:Congregational churches in Iowa
1379:Category:Congregational church buildings
1316:Category:Congregational churches in Iowa
1302:Category:Congregational church buildings
918:Category:Congregational church buildings
867:Category:Congregational church buildings
839:Category:Congregational churches in Iowa
1059:(which should obviously be Kept). See
771:keep all (i.e. do not rename or delete)
14:
2096:Category:Northern Ireland stage actors
2041:Category:Northern Ireland stage actors
1436:because they are UCC congregations. --
376:Category:Members of the White movement
292:Category:Members of the White movement
232:what should we do with categoies like
157:Category:Members of the White movement
2193:and a few 'in' rather than 'from').
2146:, except that a perverse decision at
2109:Category:Nurses from Northern Ireland
2969:List of museums in Saint Petersburg
2611:Category:Danish Christian ministers
2543:Category:Danish Christian ministers
2479:Category:Danish Christian ministers
2117:Category:Northern Irish women poets
429:This category includes people like
27:
18:Knowledge:Categories for discussion
2948:Category:History museums in Russia
740:Congregational churches categories
490:Category:White Russians (movement)
469:Category:White Russians (movement)
288:Category:White Russians (movement)
200:/-er is much the more common name.
123:Category:White Russians (movement)
93:Category:White Russians (movement)
28:
3197:
3101:The result of the discussion was:
2874:The result of the discussion was:
2706:The result of the discussion was:
2507:The result of the discussion was:
2351:The result of the discussion was:
2069:The result of the discussion was:
1924:The result of the discussion was:
768:The result of the discussion was:
565:The result of the discussion was:
88:The result of the discussion was:
3137:Category:1990s television series
3073:Category:1990s television series
2547:Category:Danish Christian clergy
1309:Category:Congregational churches
876:Category:Congregational churches
602:Category:Satellite Award winners
537:Category:Satellite Award winners
386:); February 5, 2013; 21:59 (UTC)
2994:Category:Anna Akhmatova museums
2899:Category:Anna Akhmatova Museums
2846:Category:Anna Akhmatova Museums
1836:note on UK and the general list
1751:List of Congregational churches
1366:List of Congregational churches
2805:city/county government website
2613:is currently a subcategory of
2191:Category:Northern Irish nurses
2150:ignored the convention set in
2105:Category:Northern Irish nurses
1388:Old Lyme Congregational Church
394:Category:White Russian émigrés
13:
1:
2817:18:37, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
2729:07:56, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
2530:22:49, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
2368:11:41, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
2292:01:42, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
2262:17:07, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
2086:11:48, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
1868:21:03, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
1825:02:47, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
1798:00:05, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
1771:21:03, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
1738:00:05, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
1719:20:36, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
1676:19:42, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
1653:19:27, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
1632:17:28, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
1594:19:42, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
1582:Washington National Cathedral
1571:04:15, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
1552:20:52, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
1525:21:39, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
802:07:54, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
588:22:46, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
481:20:07, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
460:14:24, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
443:20:05, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
420:02:04, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
406:17:01, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
30:
3161:03:35, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
3149:01:49, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
3128:00:41, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
3044:12:36, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
3009:15:52, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
2985:12:50, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
2960:02:15, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
2939:00:34, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
2920:05:17, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
2796:02:38, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
2777:07:02, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
2649:08:09, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
2603:05:57, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
2587:Category:Christian ministers
2576:09:21, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
2450:17:39, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
2436:13:33, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
2244:22:16, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
2225:19:16, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
2203:20:40, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
2176:17:19, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
2012:22:15, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
1993:17:35, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
1937:23:13, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
1510:01:41, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
1472:15:50, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
1446:14:25, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
1420:05:56, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
1404:04:36, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
1292:23:16, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
1278:17:54, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
1255:23:16, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
1240:17:51, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
1216:23:19, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
1202:22:00, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
1187:21:43, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
1173:16:39, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
1148:13:09, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
1126:11:55, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
1104:11:19, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
1081:09:14, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
1044:23:04, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
1025:22:34, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
1001:23:24, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
986:11:55, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
963:23:04, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
949:22:35, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
931:19:56, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
899:17:50, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
711:02:12, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
694:22:13, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
675:17:55, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
367:05:55, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
299:21:00, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
282:00:55, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
267:21:07, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
254:02:13, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
184:21:05, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
174:02:10, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
148:23:12, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
7:
2929:. Only 1 pg in category. --
10:
3202:
2891:03:57, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
508:03:55, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
340:21:35, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
330:14:23, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
305:the immigrants on 24 March
219:21:32, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
210:14:23, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
111:20:05, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
3154:Knowledge talk:Categories
3108:Knowledge talk:Categories
2591:Category:Christian clergy
3174:Please do not modify it.
3083:Please do not modify it.
3055:Please do not modify it.
2856:Please do not modify it.
2828:Please do not modify it.
2688:Please do not modify it.
2660:Please do not modify it.
2489:Please do not modify it.
2461:Please do not modify it.
2333:Please do not modify it.
2305:Please do not modify it.
2051:Please do not modify it.
2023:Please do not modify it.
1906:Please do not modify it.
1878:Please do not modify it.
750:Please do not modify it.
722:Please do not modify it.
547:Please do not modify it.
519:Please do not modify it.
70:Please do not modify it.
2185:per everything else in
1844:The Little Brown Church
119:Category:White Russians
60:Category:White Russians
2910:Nominator's rationale:
2753:Nominator's rationale:
2554:Nominator's rationale:
2418:. Pointless redirect.
2413:Nominator's rationale:
2133:Nominator's rationale:
1982:Nominator's rationale:
1657:The reasons given for
886:Nominator's rationale:
638:Nominator's rationale:
130:Nominator's rationale:
2076:Category:Stage actors
2144:speedy criterion C2C
1372:. I propose the new
2627:Withdraw nomination
1985:Harlem Baker Hughes
1687:update 2 on Vermont
773:. There is a clear
355:Rename to something
236:though. I can see
2148:CFD 2009 October 9
2138:per convention of
1133:they are created,
3126:
3042:
3018:per nominator to
3000:to be renamed to
2952:John Pack Lambert
2809:RightCowLeftCoast
2727:
2585:which hierarchy?
2528:
2434:
2290:
2272:Category:Actesses
2236:John Pack Lambert
2223:
2174:
2142:. This would fit
2004:John Pack Lambert
1270:John Pack Lambert
1232:John Pack Lambert
800:
686:John Pack Lambert
645:bundle nomination
586:
473:John Pack Lambert
435:John Pack Lambert
274:John Pack Lambert
246:John Pack Lambert
51:
50:
3193:
3176:
3117:
3114:
3104:procedural close
3085:
3057:
3033:
3030:
2887:
2858:
2830:
2718:
2715:
2690:
2662:
2646:
2637:
2573:
2564:
2540:Propose renaming
2519:
2516:
2512:by nominator. --
2491:
2463:
2425:
2422:
2406:
2405:
2373:Propose deleting
2335:
2307:
2281:
2278:
2214:
2211:
2165:
2162:
2156:CfD 2009 July 13
2091:Propose renaming
2053:
2025:
2000:Procedural point
1975:
1974:
1942:Propose deleting
1908:
1880:
1865:
1860:
1855:
1822:
1817:
1812:
1768:
1763:
1758:
1747:update 3 on Iowa
1716:
1711:
1706:
1629:
1624:
1619:
1123:
1118:
1113:
1078:
1073:
1068:
983:
978:
973:
916:the deletion of
873:Propose deleting
848:Propose renaming
836:Propose renaming
824:Propose renaming
812:Propose renaming
791:
788:
752:
724:
673:
670:
667:
664:
661:
658:
631:
630:
598:Propose deleting
577:
574:
549:
521:
504:
431:Maria Bochkareva
116:Propose renaming
104:
72:
47:
36:
31:
3201:
3200:
3196:
3195:
3194:
3192:
3191:
3190:
3189:
3183:deletion review
3172:
3158:Good Ol’factory
3112:
3092:deletion review
3081:
3075:
3070:
3064:deletion review
3053:
3028:
2896:Propose merging
2889:
2885:
2865:deletion review
2854:
2848:
2843:
2837:deletion review
2826:
2788:Mercurywoodrose
2739:Propose merging
2713:
2697:deletion review
2686:
2680:
2675:
2669:deletion review
2658:
2640:
2631:
2567:
2558:
2514:
2498:deletion review
2487:
2481:
2476:
2470:deletion review
2459:
2420:
2379:
2375:
2342:deletion review
2331:
2325:
2320:
2314:deletion review
2303:
2276:
2209:
2160:
2060:deletion review
2049:
2043:
2038:
2032:deletion review
2021:
1948:
1944:
1934:Good Ol’factory
1915:deletion review
1904:
1898:
1893:
1887:deletion review
1876:
1863:
1858:
1853:
1840:Finsbury Chapel
1820:
1815:
1810:
1766:
1761:
1756:
1728:categories. --
1714:
1709:
1704:
1627:
1622:
1617:
1121:
1116:
1111:
1076:
1071:
1066:
981:
976:
971:
786:
775:local consensus
759:deletion review
748:
742:
737:
731:deletion review
720:
671:
668:
665:
662:
659:
656:
649:Satellite Award
604:
600:
572:
556:deletion review
545:
539:
534:
528:deletion review
517:
506:
502:
337:Good Ol’factory
296:Good Ol’factory
264:Good Ol’factory
216:Good Ol’factory
181:Good Ol’factory
145:Good Ol’factory
102:
79:deletion review
68:
62:
57:
52:
45:
34:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
3199:
3188:
3187:
3167:
3166:
3165:
3164:
3163:
3132:
3131:
3130:
3097:
3096:
3076:
3074:
3071:
3069:
3068:
3048:
3047:
3046:
3013:
3012:
3011:
2962:
2941:
2927:Support delete
2923:
2922:
2913:WP:OC#SMALLCAT
2907:
2906:
2905:
2883:
2881:The Bushranger
2870:
2869:
2849:
2847:
2844:
2842:
2841:
2821:
2820:
2819:
2798:
2780:
2779:
2750:
2749:
2748:
2733:
2732:
2731:
2702:
2701:
2681:
2679:
2676:
2674:
2673:
2653:
2652:
2651:
2623:
2622:
2606:
2605:
2579:
2578:
2551:
2550:
2549:
2534:
2533:
2532:
2503:
2502:
2482:
2480:
2477:
2475:
2474:
2454:
2453:
2452:
2439:
2438:
2410:
2409:
2408:
2407:
2347:
2346:
2326:
2324:
2321:
2319:
2318:
2298:
2297:
2296:
2295:
2294:
2265:
2264:
2246:
2229:
2228:
2227:
2179:
2178:
2152:2009 January 7
2130:
2129:
2128:
2127:
2126:
2114:
2088:
2065:
2064:
2044:
2042:
2039:
2037:
2036:
2016:
2015:
1996:
1995:
1979:
1978:
1977:
1976:
1920:
1919:
1899:
1897:
1894:
1892:
1891:
1871:
1848:
1847:
1832:
1831:
1830:
1829:
1828:
1827:
1774:
1773:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1740:
1722:
1721:
1683:
1682:
1681:
1680:
1679:
1678:
1635:
1634:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1598:
1597:
1596:
1574:
1573:
1555:
1554:
1532:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1475:
1474:
1460:domus ecclesia
1451:
1450:
1449:
1448:
1423:
1422:
1407:
1406:
1357:
1356:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1219:
1218:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1152:
1151:
1150:
1138:bright lines.
1084:
1083:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1028:
1027:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
967:
966:
965:
934:
933:
902:
901:
882:
881:
880:
879:
870:
857:
845:
833:
821:
806:
805:
804:
778:
764:
763:
743:
741:
738:
736:
735:
715:
714:
713:
696:
678:
677:
635:
634:
633:
632:
592:
591:
590:
561:
560:
540:
538:
535:
533:
532:
512:
511:
510:
500:
498:The Bushranger
483:
462:
445:
424:
423:
422:
387:
369:
352:
351:
350:
349:
348:
347:
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
227:
226:
225:
224:
223:
222:
221:
162:White movement
151:
150:
141:White movement
127:
126:
125:
84:
83:
63:
61:
58:
56:
53:
49:
48:
40:
29:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3198:
3186:
3184:
3180:
3175:
3169:
3168:
3162:
3159:
3155:
3152:
3151:
3150:
3146:
3142:
3138:
3134:
3133:
3129:
3124:
3120:
3116:
3109:
3105:
3102:
3099:
3098:
3095:
3093:
3089:
3084:
3078:
3077:
3067:
3065:
3061:
3056:
3050:
3049:
3045:
3040:
3036:
3032:
3025:
3021:
3017:
3014:
3010:
3007:
3003:
2999:
2995:
2991:
2988:
2987:
2986:
2982:
2978:
2974:
2970:
2966:
2963:
2961:
2957:
2953:
2949:
2945:
2942:
2940:
2936:
2932:
2928:
2925:
2924:
2921:
2918:
2914:
2911:
2908:
2904:
2900:
2897:
2894:
2893:
2892:
2888:
2886:One ping only
2882:
2878:
2875:
2872:
2871:
2868:
2866:
2862:
2857:
2851:
2850:
2840:
2838:
2834:
2829:
2823:
2822:
2818:
2814:
2810:
2806:
2802:
2799:
2797:
2793:
2789:
2785:
2782:
2781:
2778:
2774:
2770:
2766:
2762:
2758:
2754:
2751:
2747:
2743:
2740:
2737:
2736:
2735:
2734:
2730:
2725:
2721:
2717:
2710:
2707:
2704:
2703:
2700:
2698:
2694:
2689:
2683:
2682:
2672:
2670:
2666:
2661:
2655:
2654:
2650:
2647:
2645:
2644:
2638:
2636:
2635:
2628:
2625:
2624:
2620:
2616:
2612:
2608:
2607:
2604:
2600:
2596:
2595:65.92.180.137
2592:
2588:
2584:
2581:
2580:
2577:
2574:
2572:
2571:
2565:
2563:
2562:
2555:
2552:
2548:
2544:
2541:
2538:
2537:
2536:
2535:
2531:
2526:
2522:
2518:
2511:
2508:
2505:
2504:
2501:
2499:
2495:
2490:
2484:
2483:
2473:
2471:
2467:
2462:
2456:
2455:
2451:
2448:
2444:
2443:Speedy delete
2441:
2440:
2437:
2432:
2428:
2424:
2417:
2414:
2411:
2403:
2399:
2395:
2391:
2387:
2383:
2378:
2374:
2371:
2370:
2369:
2366:
2363:
2359:
2355:
2352:
2349:
2348:
2345:
2343:
2339:
2334:
2328:
2327:
2317:
2315:
2311:
2306:
2300:
2299:
2293:
2288:
2284:
2280:
2273:
2269:
2268:
2267:
2266:
2263:
2259:
2255:
2254:Peterkingiron
2250:
2247:
2245:
2241:
2237:
2233:
2230:
2226:
2221:
2217:
2213:
2206:
2205:
2204:
2200:
2196:
2192:
2188:
2184:
2181:
2180:
2177:
2172:
2168:
2164:
2157:
2153:
2149:
2145:
2141:
2137:
2134:
2131:
2125:
2122:
2118:
2115:
2113:
2110:
2106:
2103:
2102:
2101:
2097:
2094:
2093:
2092:
2089:
2087:
2084:
2081:
2077:
2073:
2070:
2067:
2066:
2063:
2061:
2057:
2052:
2046:
2045:
2035:
2033:
2029:
2024:
2018:
2017:
2013:
2009:
2005:
2001:
1998:
1997:
1994:
1990:
1986:
1983:
1980:
1972:
1968:
1964:
1960:
1956:
1952:
1947:
1943:
1940:
1939:
1938:
1935:
1931:
1930:
1925:
1922:
1921:
1918:
1916:
1912:
1907:
1901:
1900:
1890:
1888:
1884:
1879:
1873:
1872:
1870:
1869:
1866:
1861:
1856:
1845:
1841:
1837:
1834:
1833:
1826:
1823:
1818:
1813:
1806:
1801:
1800:
1799:
1795:
1791:
1786:
1782:
1778:
1777:
1776:
1775:
1772:
1769:
1764:
1759:
1752:
1748:
1745:
1744:
1739:
1735:
1731:
1726:
1725:
1724:
1723:
1720:
1717:
1712:
1707:
1700:
1696:
1692:
1688:
1685:
1684:
1677:
1673:
1669:
1664:
1660:
1656:
1655:
1654:
1650:
1646:
1642:
1639:
1638:
1637:
1636:
1633:
1630:
1625:
1620:
1613:
1609:
1606:
1603:
1602:
1595:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1578:
1577:
1576:
1575:
1572:
1568:
1564:
1559:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1553:
1549:
1545:
1541:
1537:
1534:
1533:
1526:
1522:
1518:
1513:
1512:
1511:
1507:
1503:
1499:
1495:
1490:
1486:
1482:
1479:
1478:
1477:
1476:
1473:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1456:
1453:
1452:
1447:
1443:
1439:
1435:
1430:
1427:
1426:
1425:
1424:
1421:
1418:
1417:
1412:
1409:
1408:
1405:
1401:
1397:
1393:
1389:
1385:
1380:
1375:
1371:
1367:
1363:
1359:
1358:
1354:
1350:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1325:
1321:
1317:
1314:
1310:
1307:
1303:
1300:
1297:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1275:
1271:
1266:
1263:
1260:
1256:
1252:
1248:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1228:
1225:
1217:
1213:
1209:
1205:
1204:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1159:
1158:
1149:
1145:
1141:
1136:
1132:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1124:
1119:
1114:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1101:
1097:
1093:
1088:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1082:
1079:
1074:
1069:
1062:
1058:
1054:
1051:
1050:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1013:
1010:
1009:
1002:
998:
994:
989:
988:
987:
984:
979:
974:
968:
964:
960:
956:
952:
951:
950:
946:
942:
938:
937:
936:
935:
932:
928:
924:
919:
915:
911:
907:
904:
903:
900:
896:
892:
887:
884:
883:
877:
874:
871:
868:
865:
863:
858:
856:
852:
849:
846:
844:
840:
837:
834:
832:
828:
825:
822:
820:
816:
813:
810:
809:
808:
807:
803:
798:
794:
790:
783:
776:
772:
769:
766:
765:
762:
760:
756:
751:
745:
744:
734:
732:
728:
723:
717:
716:
712:
708:
704:
700:
697:
695:
691:
687:
683:
680:
679:
676:
654:
650:
646:
642:
639:
636:
628:
624:
620:
616:
612:
608:
603:
599:
596:
595:
594:
593:
589:
584:
580:
576:
569:
566:
563:
562:
559:
557:
553:
548:
542:
541:
531:
529:
525:
520:
514:
513:
509:
505:
503:One ping only
499:
495:
491:
487:
484:
482:
478:
474:
470:
466:
463:
461:
457:
453:
449:
446:
444:
440:
436:
432:
428:
425:
421:
417:
413:
412:65.92.180.137
409:
408:
407:
403:
399:
398:Peterkingiron
395:
391:
388:
385:
381:
377:
373:
370:
368:
364:
360:
359:65.92.180.137
356:
353:
341:
338:
333:
332:
331:
327:
323:
318:
314:
313:WP:OC#OPINION
310:
309:WP:OC#OPINION
306:
302:
301:
300:
297:
293:
289:
285:
284:
283:
279:
275:
270:
269:
268:
265:
261:
257:
256:
255:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
231:
228:
220:
217:
213:
212:
211:
207:
203:
199:
195:
191:
187:
186:
185:
182:
177:
176:
175:
171:
167:
163:
159:
158:
153:
152:
149:
146:
142:
138:
137:White Russian
134:
131:
128:
124:
120:
117:
114:
113:
112:
109:
106:
105:
99:
95:
94:
89:
86:
85:
82:
80:
76:
71:
65:
64:
44:
41:
39:
33:
32:
23:
19:
3173:
3170:
3103:
3100:
3082:
3079:
3054:
3051:
3015:
2989:
2964:
2943:
2926:
2909:
2895:
2876:
2873:
2855:
2852:
2827:
2824:
2800:
2783:
2760:
2755:- I started
2752:
2738:
2708:
2705:
2687:
2684:
2659:
2656:
2642:
2641:
2633:
2632:
2626:
2582:
2569:
2568:
2560:
2559:
2553:
2539:
2509:
2506:
2488:
2485:
2460:
2457:
2442:
2415:
2412:
2372:
2353:
2350:
2332:
2329:
2304:
2301:
2248:
2231:
2182:
2135:
2132:
2123:
2111:
2090:
2071:
2068:
2050:
2047:
2022:
2019:
1999:
1981:
1941:
1926:
1923:
1905:
1902:
1877:
1874:
1849:
1835:
1746:
1686:
1662:
1658:
1640:
1604:
1539:
1535:
1480:
1459:
1454:
1428:
1414:
1410:
1345:
1334:
1323:
1312:
1305:
1298:
1261:
1226:
1160:
1134:
1130:
1092:denomination
1091:
1057:for deletion
1052:
1011:
913:
909:
905:
885:
872:
861:
859:
847:
835:
823:
811:
770:
767:
749:
746:
721:
718:
698:
681:
640:
637:
597:
567:
564:
546:
543:
518:
515:
493:
485:
464:
447:
426:
389:
371:
354:
316:
260:White émigré
229:
154:
132:
129:
115:
100:
90:
87:
69:
66:
3024:WP:SMALLCAT
2965:Leave as is
2769:WhisperToMe
1517:Farragutful
1464:Farragutful
1416:Philosopher
1284:Vegaswikian
1247:Vegaswikian
1208:Vegaswikian
1179:Vegaswikian
993:Vegaswikian
923:Vegaswikian
878:(now empty)
653:WP:OC#Award
452:Benkenobi18
317:sui generis
272:descriptor.
3115:HairedGirl
3031:HairedGirl
2931:Funandtrvl
2716:HairedGirl
2517:HairedGirl
2423:HairedGirl
2365:Od Mishehu
2279:HairedGirl
2212:HairedGirl
2163:HairedGirl
2083:Od Mishehu
2072:Rename all
789:HairedGirl
575:HairedGirl
155:Rename to
91:rename to
55:February 4
43:February 5
38:February 3
3179:talk page
3088:talk page
3060:talk page
2861:talk page
2833:talk page
2693:talk page
2665:talk page
2510:withdrawn
2494:talk page
2466:talk page
2362:עוד מישהו
2338:talk page
2310:talk page
2080:עוד מישהו
2056:talk page
2028:talk page
1911:talk page
1883:talk page
1268:problems.
1017:JASpencer
941:JASpencer
864:retaining
755:talk page
727:talk page
552:talk page
524:talk page
322:Le Deluge
202:Le Deluge
198:saltpetre
190:WP:ENGVAR
98:Fayenatic
75:talk page
3181:or in a
3123:contribs
3090:or in a
3062:or in a
3039:contribs
3006:Armbrust
2917:Armbrust
2863:or in a
2835:or in a
2724:contribs
2695:or in a
2667:or in a
2525:contribs
2496:or in a
2468:or in a
2431:contribs
2340:or in a
2312:or in a
2287:contribs
2234:per nom.
2220:contribs
2189:(except
2171:contribs
2058:or in a
2030:or in a
1913:or in a
1885:or in a
1663:renaming
1659:deleting
1429:Comment:
1227:Question
862:deleting
860:Propose
797:contribs
757:or in a
729:or in a
703:Alansohn
583:contribs
554:or in a
526:or in a
230:Question
166:Alansohn
77:or in a
20: |
2998:WP:CFDS
2990:Comment
2977:GregZak
2801:Support
2784:Support
2583:Comment
2390:history
1959:history
1641:Comment
1563:Nyttend
1544:Nyttend
1481:Comment
906:Support
615:history
448:Support
427:Comment
3141:Fuddle
3119:(talk)
3035:(talk)
2720:(talk)
2521:(talk)
2447:Elkman
2427:(talk)
2416:Delete
2358:CSD R3
2354:Delete
2283:(talk)
2249:REname
2232:Rename
2216:(talk)
2183:Rename
2167:(talk)
2136:Rename
1790:Orlady
1730:Orlady
1668:Mangoe
1645:Orlady
1612:wp:CLT
1605:Update
1586:Mangoe
1536:Oppose
1502:Orlady
1455:Oppose
1438:Orlady
1411:Oppose
1396:Orlady
1346:Create
1335:Rename
1324:Rename
1313:Rename
1306:Delete
1262:Oppose
1161:Oppose
1140:Mangoe
1096:Mangoe
1061:wp:CLT
1053:Oppose
1036:Mangoe
1012:Oppose
955:Mangoe
914:oppose
891:Mangoe
793:(talk)
782:WP:RFC
699:Delete
682:Delete
660:cheers
641:Delete
579:(talk)
568:delete
486:Rename
465:Rename
390:Rename
372:Rename
133:Rename
3113:Brown
3029:Brown
3016:Merge
2944:Merge
2877:merge
2714:Brown
2709:merge
2593:? --
2515:Brown
2421:Brown
2398:watch
2394:links
2277:Brown
2210:Brown
2195:Oculi
2161:Brown
1967:watch
1963:links
1394:. --
910:split
787:Brown
663:peaks
623:watch
619:links
573:Brown
196:when
194:Nitre
108:ondon
46:: -->
16:<
3145:talk
3110:. --
3026:. --
2981:talk
2956:talk
2935:talk
2813:talk
2807:).--
2792:talk
2773:talk
2711:. --
2599:talk
2402:logs
2386:talk
2382:edit
2258:talk
2240:talk
2199:talk
2154:and
2014:----
2008:talk
1989:talk
1971:logs
1955:talk
1951:edit
1929:here
1794:talk
1734:talk
1672:talk
1649:talk
1590:talk
1567:talk
1548:talk
1521:talk
1506:talk
1496:and
1468:talk
1442:talk
1400:talk
1386:and
1364:for
1351:and
1299:Keep
1288:talk
1274:talk
1251:talk
1236:talk
1212:talk
1198:talk
1183:talk
1169:talk
1144:talk
1135:then
1100:talk
1040:talk
1021:talk
997:talk
959:talk
945:talk
927:talk
895:talk
707:talk
690:talk
672:wars
669:lost
666:news
657:Star
627:logs
611:talk
607:edit
570:. --
477:talk
456:talk
439:talk
416:talk
402:talk
363:talk
326:talk
278:talk
250:talk
206:talk
170:talk
35:<
3121:• (
3037:• (
2901:to
2761:but
2744:to
2722:• (
2634:Pam
2589:or
2561:Pam
2545:to
2523:• (
2429:• (
2285:• (
2218:• (
2169:• (
2119:to
2107:to
2098:to
1859:ncr
1816:ncr
1762:ncr
1710:ncr
1697:to
1623:ncr
1540:not
1362:AFD
1340:to
1329:to
1318:to
1194:JFH
1165:JFH
1117:ncr
1072:ncr
977:ncr
853:to
841:to
829:to
817:to
795:• (
581:• (
494:all
488:to
467:to
392:to
384:yo?
382:• (
290:or
121:to
22:Log
3147:)
3004:.
2983:)
2958:)
2937:)
2879:.
2815:)
2794:)
2775:)
2767:-
2601:)
2400:|
2396:|
2392:|
2388:|
2384:|
2360:.
2260:)
2242:)
2201:)
2010:)
1991:)
1969:|
1965:|
1961:|
1957:|
1953:|
1932:.
1864:am
1854:do
1821:am
1811:do
1808:--
1796:)
1767:am
1757:do
1736:)
1715:am
1705:do
1702:--
1674:)
1651:)
1628:am
1618:do
1615:--
1592:)
1569:)
1550:)
1523:)
1508:)
1470:)
1444:)
1402:)
1344:;
1333:;
1311:;
1304:;
1290:)
1276:)
1253:)
1238:)
1214:)
1200:)
1185:)
1171:)
1146:)
1131:IF
1122:am
1112:do
1102:)
1077:am
1067:do
1042:)
1023:)
999:)
982:am
972:do
961:)
947:)
929:)
897:)
709:)
692:)
655:.
625:|
621:|
617:|
613:|
609:|
479:)
458:)
441:)
418:)
404:)
374:;
365:)
328:)
280:)
262:.
252:)
208:)
172:)
135:.
3143:(
3125:)
3041:)
2979:(
2954:(
2933:(
2811:(
2790:(
2771:(
2726:)
2643:D
2621:.
2597:(
2570:D
2527:)
2433:)
2404:)
2380:(
2289:)
2256:(
2238:(
2222:)
2197:(
2173:)
2006:(
1987:(
1973:)
1949:(
1792:(
1732:(
1670:(
1647:(
1588:(
1565:(
1546:(
1519:(
1504:(
1466:(
1440:(
1398:(
1286:(
1272:(
1249:(
1234:(
1210:(
1196:(
1181:(
1167:(
1142:(
1098:(
1038:(
1019:(
995:(
957:(
943:(
925:(
893:(
799:)
705:(
688:(
629:)
605:(
585:)
475:(
454:(
437:(
414:(
400:(
361:(
324:(
276:(
248:(
204:(
168:(
103:L
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.