5250:(involved as I supported Merge at the AfD). By the numbers this is "No Consensus". I count 4 Delete, 2 Merge, and 5 Keeps. However, two of the Keeps do not cite sources and just gush about how great and notable their mods are. These comments should be given less weight because nobility is not inherited; makers of notable things are not automatically notable. Two of the Keeps list sources but don't explain why they meet WP:NCORP; they are good comments but not great. All four Delete comments contain at least some source analysis explaining that most of the sources in the article or linked in the AfD as really about Enderal (or occasionally another mod) and provide only passing coverage of the studio. Thus strength of argument seemingly favors Delete. But given that two comments argued for a Merge and that Delete is not a slam dunk (there are easily enough sources to meet WP:V and enough to meet WP:NCORP can be subjective) a merge is an excellent option as an ATD. It isn't an obvious consensus since it was only a minority "vote", but it is a compromise that addresses both sides primary concerns. I.e. The sources are not really sufficient for the current reading of NCORP, but this is an important in it's niche company that shouldn't be a red-link. In particular I believe that AfD's with this configuration of arguments (i.e. Delete stronger than Keep but not a clear consensus with a clear suggestion of a Merge target with no articulated objection) should be closed as Merge even if I myself happened to favor keeping or deleting the article for whatever reason.
3475:, it is totally irrelevant whether the sources pointed out by Fram, some of which happen to be offline, were added to the article or not. We have no deadline on Knowledge. b) Personal life vs. creative life distinction is irrelevant in terms of the guidelines, as long as we have a significant coverage. It is a common fallacy to consider a piece covering their personal life in detail to be non-significant, because these are considered "trivial" matters. Someone can be notable just because their personal life is of broader public interest. c) Regarding the change of vote above: what happens to the draft after it is restored is also irrelevant for the purposes of deletion review. If it is prematurely moved to the main space, another AfD can be started. If the draft is left idle, it will be deleted in 6 months. But those are out of scope.
4108::Regardless of the process taken, the notability of this association is its uniqueness as a data source for academics and government researchers. The association allows access to its data by univerisity accredited economics and finance researchers seeking to understand how banks can stop making bad decsions. Banking regulators like the European Central Bank, the Bank of England and the US Fed use the data and analytics to set regulatory levels, so the better know the data source is the more widely it will be used as a "truth based" decision source. A wikipedia listing gives a quick reference to potential users and a factual record of how and why the data has been collected. The alternative is to just leave it to Google Scholar and google search, which would be second best
2286:(do nothing else; don't touch the AfD, which is not even contested). Not sufficiently identical (text significantly different and article less refbombed) and too heavily contested for a speedy deletion. AfD said the content was promotional but notability worth exploring, and then an AfC reviewer accepted the submission apparently accepting the new text as not promotional and a new page patroller marked the article as reviewed. So the last incarnation was a non-negligible attempt to fix the promo side at least, while notability is neither here nor there in terms of settledness because not even the AfD was closed as "delete" purely on the grounds of lack of notability, and in this DRV notability is being revisited kind of de novo. G4 isn't the correct tool to address this.â
4145:
research by top universities. GCD has a clear impact on the financial sector, and its work is widely cited in both professional and educational settings. There are numerous reliable, independent sources documenting GCDâs contributions, establishing its notability under
Knowledge's guidelines. Furthermore, as a non-profit working for the benefit of the industry, not allowing this page would unfairly limit the availability of important information in this space. The article is being actively improved to meet Knowledge's content standards. Deletion would remove valuable content relevant to professionals, researchers, and institutions and those who rely on Knowledge for such information. 13:04, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
1815:
article should be deleted. They then excused this by saying that in her time the subject wasn't covered much because of systemic bias, but this does not matter as
Knowledge can't fix historic injustices. They did not argue that the article is a suitable encyclopedic entry in spite of a lack of notability, by explaining what its encyclopedic value is. Its encyclopedic value can't be that we're covering non-notable women from 250 years ago to make a point about systemic bias. The only reasonable close would have been to weigh such arguments less favorably than the clear policy-based arguments and to find that there is a rough consensus coming from the policy-based delete advocacy. â
6233:
to do something, and relisting isn't for that. A new AfD is possible if there is an article and someone nominates it for deletion. So 1/2/3 years in the future (or sooner) someone could create an article about this topic again and it could be nominated for deletion. That's something that can simply happen all on its own, and
Deletion review doesn't have a say in it. Recreation is possible, as nothing prevents it. When you think that it's a good time to write about this because there are sufficient sources for an encyclopedia article, you can just write the article, and maybe no one will even nominate it for deletion. â
46:
3495:
sources brought up by Fram (maybe not) but it isn't reasonable to assume that their decision would have been different, as notability can't be determined from said sources. The suggestion to add the (yet-unidentified) sources to a hypothetical draft before mainspacing is aligned with the purpose of undeletion to draft: make the content speak for itself so that volunteer time does not need to be spent on an unnecessary and possibly confused discussion. I believed that it could be okay in this case to undelete to draft
4054:. The arguments to delete were just better. The deletion was strongly trending delete before the second and third relist, and after the third relist an overview of the sources was given, asserting that they are not of sufficient quality to support an article about an organization. Instead of meaningfully countering that, it was then claimed that the subject is not a company but an organization and that it has dealings with the worlds biggest banks etc., all of which is discountable argumentation.â
6154:(keep deleted). There is a noticeable absence of evidence that there is something to write about. I don't think that the page should be undeleted. The content was stated to be non-compliant with policy. When there is something to write about as may be evidenced in the sources, please write something that is policy compliant (which will have became doable by then). The close of the AfD has not been challenged and it speaks for itself so it doesn't seem like endorsing it has real meaning.â
6397:#3. This was deleted for failing two guidelines, one that doesn't exist anymore as well as GNG. I have now done an initial search to located 21 press articles that contribute towards GNG. These are now saved to my hard drive, in anticipation of this page being restored to draft space or user space, so I'm able to build a real encyclopedic article from those (and more that are coming later) sources. I have tried contacting the closer, who seems to be absent since July, so here we are.
3399:. The listed additional sources aren't super helpful in writing an encyclopedia article, but the existence of the mentioned sources points to even more sources existing, which seems worth investigating, and a draft existing during that time doesn't hurt. Edit: My original comment presumed that there is someone who would work on the draft and find and add new, yet-unmentioned (but somewhat likely to exist) sources. But those expectations weren't realistic. â
3789:
4005:(uninvolved): I could see discounting four or five of the seven "keep" !votes, but two (Eastmain's and Malinaccier's) were based either on sources they added to the article (I can't see what Eastmain added) or on an assessment, however brief, of relevant sources, not on mere assertions. That said, there were four stronger "deletes" (plus a weak nomination statement) against two reasonably strong "keeps," and that's a rough consensus.
840:
1731:!votes argue that "she would almost certainly have more sources if historical sources wrote more about women". Somehow this speculative argument has been found to outweigh the fact that there is, in fact, no significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources. Is it now enough to assert that sources would have existed if the world were a different place? Is this going to apply to content disputes as well?
1753:, and that the argument that her position was notable was made in support of the Keep statements. It is somewhat unusual for a closer to make a closing statement in support of No Consensus, and the closer should be thanked. The appellant appears to be saying that the closer should have discounted the Keep statements. The Keep position was soundly argued based on notability of the position of
5882:), but the author appears to be a subject-matter expert and is discussing a topic within his expertise. Still, there is no editorial oversight. This is at the very bottom of what we could treat as a reliable secondary source. Multiple reliable sources would be needed, and maybe in a group of such sources could this Medium post contribute to a determination that the list topic is notable. â
2345:- I haven't seen either the 1 September 2022 version deleted by Star Mississippi after the second AFD, or the 19 September 2024 version deleted by Sandstein as G4, and we don't have a statement by Sandstein that the 2024 version was substantially the same as the 2022 version, so I will trust that Sandstein concluded that the 2024 version was substantially the same as the 2022 version.
1956:, namely "politicians and judges" and "major local political figures who have received significant press coverage", does a lady-in-waiting with no significant coverage meet? Also, and this is entirely on me for not noticing earlier, not even our source for her lady of the bedchamber role can be called reliable source coverage â it is a self-published genealogy website.
1847:
discountable). They said that it should be kept because of the 18th and 19th century systemic bias, because the subject had a certain position, and because she appeared in a certain painting. So this isn't a disagreement about a policy. It isn't policy-based arguments vs. relevant policy-questioning arguments. It's policy-based arguments vs. red herrings. â
1605:. The ArbCom case also resulted in an RFC on portal guidelines which fizzled out. We have no portal guidelines because it was discovered that the long-existing guidelines had never been properly ratified. An RFC to ratify the long-existing guidelines failed, probably because there was and is division and polarization in the community over portals.
1548:. Florence was a country and a capital of a significant modern era power, and it's just a big topic with a bunch of stuff going on. That should increase the suitability of this outline topic and not lead to a conclusion that an outline with a lot of information is duplicative to the article. I protest this invalid rationale. Ultimately,
2732:, no one was arguing in support of retention, and the redirect is a valid ATD as IBT is what Uzac is notable for. He can easily be covered therein, and the history is retained. Thanks, Scope, for helping this editor stop edit warring. Support a p-block from both subjects since Shubhamgawali1 is unable to edit neutrally here.
5441:
any demonstrated notability. It was also said to be original research. While various references were provided and those facts are present in other
Knowledge articles too. It was said that lower communities is ambiguous but It includes last two (Vaishyas and shudras.) It seems to be deleted without any substantial reason.
5851:. The strong reason to delete was editors agreeing that the page did not meet stand-alone list eligibility criteria, including the concern that the list was assembled through the forbidden combining of material from multiple sources to state or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources.â
5440:
This article was deleted without any strong reason. The article was well written and well sourced with no inaccuracies reported yet. The reason was said to be unnotability but it's clear that Lists that fulfill recognized informational, navigation, or development purposes often are kept regardless of
5172:
To be clear, "no consensus" was my second (and only other) choice. However, I felt the "merge" comments, particularly the closing one from HighKing, were strong and persuasive. The nominator, IgelRM, also suggested a merge. I'd also add that a NC close implies no prejudice against renomination (which
2909:
I created this article many years ago about a piece of specialist software I was using at the time, which was prominent within the industry but not documented on WP. It was deleted at an AfD in 2009 while I was on
Wikibreak. The software continues to be considered an industry standard solution within
2232:, who published the article at AfC, which is precisely where a COI editor should be expected to submit content.) This could be is a DRV#3 case, where there's new coverage and new information (principally Lomtadze's acquisition of a football club, which resulted in new SIGCOV meeting the standard (see
2157:
You can cut out even more of the text and make a stub. The person is significant according to
Knowledge criteria. And as the owner of a football club, and as the owner of the largest bank in Kazakhstan. I did not intend to make an advertisement out of this article. I was editing a draft that someone
1814:
grounds and the argument that the courtly function is a notable topic is a red herring and is a question relevant to the article about that court title, not this biography. Some keeps admitted that the sourcing is not there, which means they made an observation consistent with the conclusion that the
818:
Consider attempting to discuss the matter with the closer as this could resolve the matter more quickly. There could have been a mistake, miscommunication, or misunderstanding, and a full review may not be needed. Such discussion also gives the closer the opportunity to clarify the reasoning behind a
6059:
The AfD was closed as "delete" because the article read like a dictionary entry. Musk becoming a trillionaire would not change that. But all are free to recreate the article once the concept of "trillionaire" is covered by reliable sources in sufficient depth for us to write an article about it that
5149:
Yes, it was indeed chosen as a middle-ground. But it was specifically chosen as a favoured idea to satisfy the most participants, which is not what the WP:SPV essay is talking about. If AfD used some kind of runoff voting system, Merge would be the outcome here, supported by more participants than a
4989:
In a close that I cannot fathom, Ritchie333 closed this as "merge". Half (6) argued for a keep, 2 argued for a merge, a minority (4) argued for deletion. Ritchie says that the deletion refuted the keeps, therefore merge has consensus, but I fail to see refutations. People disagreed, some considering
4819:
From what I see, the closer chose to delete Koi Mil Gaya 3, but relisted Koi Mil Gaya 2, even though both had zero participation, because of page histories of other (Krrish) entries of the bulk nomination. All entries of that bulk nomination ended as kept based on strength of the Krrish entries. For
3238:
is just about this AFD closure, not the first AFD closure, and nobody in this discussion was arguing for this article to be Kept. I'm sure there were opinions about this article that might not have been expressed during the AFD period. But the closer's obligation is to determine the consensus of the
2759:
at the AFD. A new re-write would be subject to another AFD of course. My recommendation is that
Shubhamgawali1 not do this due to recent edit warring (I would support a p-block of finite duration against this user as well, but DRV is not the venue for that discussion). With only two participants,
2605:
who worked to expand the article as they are a bit unsure about DRV. He believes the Afd result shouldn't have been redirected as there was insufficient people taking part in the Afd. Shubhamgawali1 suspects the result was wrong and a bit unfair. I was the one who sent the article to the Afd queue.
2244:
search, and neither the (very poorly argued) "keep" !votes nor the (good faith) "delete" !votes did any detailed source evaluation. Instead, the discussion focused more on
Lomtadze being most greatest businessman in most glorious nation of Kazakhstan! (the keeps) while the deletes focused on the UPE
1543:
applies to outlines. The section I'm linking to fails to mention outlines by name, but the start of the guideline does. Glossaries, indexes and timelines are also not duplicative to whatever, i.e. not redundant. Outlines can be good or bad. Good outlines can become featured outlines and these exist,
1352:
good faith. Waggers sums it up best in the deletion discussion. The perpetrators of that war eventually turned on each other, and the nominator of the deletion was indefinitely blocked for bad behavior. Another outline that was similarly trolled around that time had its deletion overturned at DRV in
6652:
As OwenX alludes to, you can just recreate an article when you can address all its reasons for deletion, and by the sound of it you can here - you don't need DRV's permission unless it's salted or someone G4s it. We can give you the deleted version, but if you expect it to help, you're going to be
6232:
By waiting a year or two (or three) on the relist, do you mean having a new
Articles for Deletion discussion in 1/2/3 years? If you would like more discussing to happen in AfD, that can't happen in the discussion that this deletion review links to, because that discussion concluded with a consensus
4328:
Overturn. Globalcreditdata ( GCD ) is an organization that provides help to its members in the credit risk department. The work they do and the quality is high. They also provide data to many academics to help them in their researches. I've been working with them for a little bit less than 10 years
3489:
But I was mainly commenting from the NEXIST perspective. I was not primarily stating that the sources from which notability can be determined need to edited in but that they need to be identified. The sources that have been identified up to this point are only circumstantial evidence of notability,
3457:
life, not personal life? Such weak sources only point to a potential for real evidence of notability to exist, but they don't prove notability in themselves. After Fram's comment, such better sources could have found and added to the article, or mentioned in the second AfD. They weren't, and that's
3433:
WP:THREE is an essay, not a guideline. WP:CREATIVE is a guideline, at least sufficient for invoking DRVPURPOSE#3, with these sources, I believe. Also, if someone is a media personality, information about their personal life may become relevant for the encyclopedia. We can't just dismiss those since
1364:
is a classification that includes acceptable and unacceptable forms, but the term wasn't used that way. Unfortunately, at the time, some well established page types were missing from that guideline, and the guideline itself was very poorly written and structured. Disclaimer: I updated the guideline
1010:
Any editor may express their opinion about an article or file being considered for deletion review. In the deletion review discussion, please type one of the following opinions preceded by an asterisk (*) and surrounded by three apostrophes (''') on either side. If you have additional thoughts to
5627:
Yes, thank you, I do understand the distinction between a person's class and their worth. Here in
Britain, some hereditary aristocrats are ghastly human beings and some third-generation council house tenants are lovely; and I'm sure that's the same everywhere else in the world too. I don't think
4859:
It is fair to assume that when Explicit deleted the third and relisted the second, he may not even have been aware of the first set of entries, or the collated discussion, as it was already relisted 3 hours prior by another relister CycloneYoris. Nor did the nomination statements of 2 and 3 have a
4815:
Why do you say that the nominations were incorrectly split? It is up to the nom to split the entries as per his rationale. Sometimes others do bundle them if they observe duplication, and see benefit in a bundled nomination. No one did so in this case, as I would believe the nominations were split
3259:
Thank you for responding. I have missed this discussion, I would have participated had I seen it when it was open. I was wondering if it would be possible restore the article, or to re-list the nomination? I believe the second deletion nomination statement was not done properly, since it addressed
2985:
If you're fine with rewriting it, you can now withdraw this DRV nomination, triggering an early close, after which you can create the new article. Be sure to link to this discussion when you create the new page, which should prevent it from being speedy deleted under G4. It might still end up in a
2642:
AFD was created about 16 days back, one user participated only, and result was redirected, while it was reverted by me as the article had enough significant coverage, and Etienne is founder of IBT media and also co owned another American news publication, please take look at article it was neutral
1597:
To refresh anyone's memory, the appellant started the portal wars by creating thousands of low-quality portals by an automated technique. This prompted a review of both recently created (2018 and 2019) portals and existing portals. Certain types of portals, including those created by automation,
5216:
The keeps specifically addressed NCORP. So did the deletes. None came to agreement with regards to whether or not sourcing met NCORP, with many feeling it did not apply because the point of NCORP was to prevent spammy ad-like creations, which this specifically was not. There is no consensus for a
4301:
I am an experienced professional in quantitative credit risk, with a long-standing career in the banking sector. Nearly six years ago, I became acquainted with the Global Credit Data (GCD), and since then, I have actively utilized it in my work. GCD offers a unique and comprehensive collection of
2119:
You are very categorical. The person is significant. The last edition of the article was not written in an advertising tone. I submitted a request here to discuss restoring the article. The deleted article was not created bypassing recovery. It was in draft for a long time and then was moved. All
2044:
Hello. Please consider restoring the article. It was deleted twice before. The last time on September 19, the article was removed by quick deletion. It was in draft for a long time and then moved to the main space. The article is written in a neutral tone with authoritative sources. There were no
1593:
This is an unserious appeal that consists of too many insults. The appellant says that they were personally attacked or trolled by this nomination, and claims that the nomination was part of the "portal wars" of 2019. The appellant did not raise any issue about a personal attack within the past
1351:
Outlines are an acceptable page type, along with navigation templates, indexes, glossaries, lists, portals, and timelines. That includes the Outline of Florence. Its deletion was essentially a personal attack on me, as an extension of the portal deletion war of 2019, and the nomination was not in
4844:
for all of those discussions. You are right I was notified of one of the listings (Koi Mil Gaya 3). By being unaware I meant that I did not know it was being treated separately and would not be relisted (similar to the 2nd and 1st films) despite my comment at the Krish 1 entry, saying that I am
4376:
DRV is not round 2 of AFD. It is an opportunity to determine whether the closer interpreted consensus correctly. I think the closer did a good job explaining why the keep comments were largely not based on policy. No one really addressed the comments by HighKing and Oaktree about the quality and
3274:
Unless an article is just blatant advertising, I never have an issue with an editor writing a draft of an article deleted in an AFD, whether this article is restored to Draft space or you take a fresh start (sometimes that is preferable). What we want on Knowledge are well-referenced articles on
4493:
It hasn't been recreated even once yet. If they're going to recreate, and this title is protected, they'll game the name and we probably won't find it. If it's not, they'll do it here, we'll yawn and G4 it, and they might get discouraged by the wasted effort. I don't agree with everything in
3494:
undeletion, DRV sould be able to say that "editors formed a consensus to delete, but they lacked knowledge of these important facts, and it's reasonable to asume that their decision, as reasonable AfD participants, would have been different if they hadn't". Editors maybe lacked knowledge of the
2193:
a new article. The problem is that, whether long (the 2024 and September 2022 deletions) or short (the March 2022 deletion and proposed new stub), there doesn't seem to be anything to say about this person other than that he has a whole lot of money; that he's spent some of it; that he's run a
1846:
in the AfD. The deletes did not base their case on an essay. The keeps did not argue that the page makes for an article that is suitable for retention in spite of policy (1. this is a possibility, as the policies aren't perfect; 2. they could have done it and those arguments would not have been
1206:
Ideally all closes should be made by an administrator to ensure that what is effectively the final appeal is applied consistently and fairly but in cases where the outcome is patently obvious or where a discussion has not been closed in good time it is permissible for a non-admin (ideally a DRV
2672:
participants in the AfD, not one, and the redirect outcome was correct. Shubhamgawali1 has not presented any new information that would justify a relisting. The only sourcing there is about the fraud conviction, which is already covered in the target of the redirect. In fact, the only thing in
4193:
As a Risk Trade Expert with extensive experience across various banks, I have been closely following the ICC Trade Register, published annually by the International Chamber of Commerce, for many years. The insights derived from the Global Credit Database on Loss Given Default (LGD) and Credit
4144:
Global Credit Data (GCD) is a notable association that collaborates with some of the largest banks globally, as well as regulators, financial consultants, and key players in the financial industry. It is a respected source of credit risk data, with its publications frequently used in academic
5493:
The sources cited are reliable. They contain easily accessable links to printed books by reputed authors and publishers. If any particular entry is disputed It can be challenged in talk page by citing other sources but deleting a list which have reliable citations shouldn't be the way to go.
3503:
sources can be found. And only when they are found to mainspace; adding them to the page was peripheral concern. But that is prone to being subverted by moving to mainspace without identifying the sources needed for notability, so I changed my mind. I am not opposed to undeleting straight to
5534:
The proposed list of Sanskrit authors from lower communities is significant as it challenges the notion that only high-caste individuals contributed to Sanskrit literature. By highlighting these authors, the list reveals the rich diversity within the tradition and underscores the meaningful
5101:
I can see your point about a forced compromise, but see no evidence of a supervote. Everything suggests that Ritchie was genuinely trying to find a way to close the AfD in the least contentious manner, without injecting his own views on the article or its sourcing. A forced compromise isn't
2269:. I think it's time to revisit these previous discussions and overturn to "keep," while protecting the page to mitigate COI editing. Alternatively, we could bring this to a new AfD where the sources can be re-evaluated, particularly those that have been published since the last AfD in 2022.
1365:
about a year ago to reflect the status quo, and recorded the missing de facto standard page types, without opposition by the guideline's watchers (the page is closely monitored). It has had plenty of time to season, and has been tested via application in multiple deletion discussions since.
5305:
I have again fixed your formatting to comply with DRV conventions. Secondly, can you please elaborate on this â which part of "per above" are you endorsing based on? DRV, more than anywhere else, needs nuanced commentary rather than "per X" voting, which adds very little to the discussion.
2960:
Write a new article. We're not going to overturn a unanimous AFD from 2009, and what was there - a three-sentence, unreferenced, fairly promotionally-written stub - wouldn't survive for an hour in mainspace, and looking at it would make the creation of a viable version harder, not easier.
2262:
4302:
defaulted credit data for non-retail sectors, which is invaluable for the benchmarking, as well as conducting both quantitative and qualitative analyses. Furthermore, the community that GCD brings together fosters networking and collaboration among professionals in the credit risk field.
4194:
Conversion Factors (CCF) in trade instruments shown in the report have significantly impacted the industry practices thanks to the data collected and the work done by this unique member driven organization. For further reference, please see the recent publication by the Bank of England:
1749:- The closure of No Consensus was a valid closure, and the closer provided an adequate closing statement that addresses the appellant's concern. The appellant says that there is insufficient coverage of the subject. The closer acknowledges this argument, and says that her position was
4674:
and linked to the latter discussions but was unaware of the separate listing for the third film in the series. To only delete redirects for this film from the series would appear unfair in light of these discussions. Please read the discussions and see if these rds should be restored.
6217:
Maybe wait a year or two on the relist; but my rationale is the fact that sources are apparently saying that Elon Musk could become a trillionaire by 2027; which my my calculations is only about three years from now. As for the indent, it was just a mistake and it has been fixed now.
2176:
best references so that the draft speaks for itself as evidence that a suitable encyclopedia entry is possible. Lack of certainty among editors that it is possible is literally the thing that causes the article to be repeatedly deleted. Do you want to do that? Please remember, three.
2228:. I came across the most recent incarnation of this page during New Page Review and was prepared to G4 it, but as I checked the sources, they did include SIGCOV in independent reliable sources. As a result, I decided to mark it as reviewed. (I also wanted to defer to the judgment of
1100:
Remember that deletion review is not an opportunity to (re-)express your opinion on the content in question. It is an opportunity to correct errors in process (in the absence of significant new information), and thus the action specified should be the editor's feeling of the correct
3648:. TheJoyfulTentmaker appears interested in improving the deleted version and there may or may not be additional SIGCOV. AFC (not DRV) is the place to evaluate these sources. Worst case, the draft never goes anywhere and is abandoned and G13ed, which is not a big deal at all.
2914:. I would like the page to be restored so that I can bring it up to date with appropriate citations. I was advised at WP:UNDELETE to contact the administrator who closed the AfD, however this was 15 years ago and sadly it appears from their talk page that they are deceased.
2321:
based on the new version that was just G4ed. Semi Involved as closer of 2022 AfD. While I don't know whether factors have sufficiently changed that Lomtadze is notable and don't have time or interest to dig into the sources, it's worth community discussion and not a speedy.
2712:
by an experienced user. Since he already passes guidelines for notability. About the point only sourcing about fraud because thats what got him more popular in the media so details more about that makes the readers have neutral and biographical article reading experience.
1207:
regular) to close discussions. Non-consensus closes should be avoided by non-admins unless they are absolutely unavoidable and the closer is sufficiently experienced at DRV to make that call. (Hint: if you are not sure that you have enough DRV experience then you don't.)
5557:, I respect your attempt to dispel the misconception about the paucity of lower caste Sanskrit authors, but Knowledge isn't the place to do this. For a list to meet our inclusion standards, it's not enough that individual items in it are covered by reliable sources. The
5600:
Please don't confuse lower social hierarchy with individual inferiority. It's like hierarchy in a company where a CEO could be a horrible person even when high in hierarchy and a sweeper could be a brilliant person even when lower in hierarchy. It's clearly listed in
4845:
making a reply for all of these listings. I now realize that it is up to the closer to decide to relist and separate listings are treated separately and it was my mistake in not making a comment at the other two entries linking my comment and rationale from Krish 1.
4704:
at this time, pending a clearer explanation from the appellant as to what they are asking. These two appeals were confusing before an admin consolidated them, but are still confusing, and I am not sure whether the appellant is even saying that there was an error.
4654:, the result was mostly due to non-participation by anyone else beyond the nominator and the non-partipicipation also resulted due to the fact that three very similar rds were incorrectly split into separate noms. The actual discussions took place at the other two:
2970:
I can't remember what the original said, which is why I asked for the restore. I wrote it nearly two decades ago. If it's only a few sentences I'll just write from scratch as you suggest. Do I just recreate the article or will that invite re-deletion by patrollers?
5077:. I see an even split between keep and delete/ATD votes, both in number and strength. The keep side provided several sources of content which I do not believe were fully disputed by the delete/ATD side. The closing statement reads to me as a forced-compromise
3539:
source that is not stuff like "he said this and another guy made these ten tweets", "he shared these photos on instragram", "genious advertiser and his ingenious divorce", and "he invented something but we don't know what; let's hope it's something useful".
2699:
I stopped editing after the warning. And I did not write the article after reading about him on Knowledge I found it useful thats why I reverted it. NO UPE or COI. I am also okay with an experienced editor writes the article. Sources are proper according to
1468:- 36. Hardly the useful navigational tool it was purported to be. Of course, the appellant doesn't need our permission to submit a fresh draft to AfC, and I have no objection to REFUNDing to draft or to a new AfD, hopefully without the interpersonal drama.
2240:). It's also a case of DRV#5, in which the two deletion nominations did not rely on a detailed source analysis. I believe the nominations were made in good faith (there is clearly COI/UPE going on) but the nomination statements did not show evidence of a
3190:: adding more sources to demonstrate that we have a very clear DRV#3 case here. None of the sources that follow has been considered in the deletion discussion, and all of them are contributing to notability either via the GNG or one of the SNGs such as
3298:
unanimous result. The additional Youtube source presented here by the appellant is just a five minute interview with the subject, and provides nothing in terms of notability. The AfD would have closed the same way had the appellant participated in it.
724:
required to consult the closer of a deletion discussion (or the deleting admin for a speedy deletion) before starting a deletion review. However doing so is good practice, and can often save time and effort for all concerned. Notifying the closer is
5535:
contributions of marginalized voices. Their works reflect unique perspectives on social justice and identity, enriching our understanding of Sanskrit heritage and promoting a more equitable narrative that honors the contributions of all communities.
3448:
We can dismiss many sources which are otherwise reliable and useful when determining notability. They aren't being dismissed as sources (we can use them in the article to support certain claims, such as about personal life). They are dismissed as
5191:
Merge was not only an acceptable option, it was specifically discussed as being okay in the discussion itself. No consensus is not a catch all for when there are issues with sourcing that haven't been rebutted, especially when NCORP is involved.
3612:
No. If you respect the AfD, then it is quite ok to have it undeleted to draftspace. Do not move it back to mainspace yourself for at least, no matter how fixed you think it is, but instead submit it through AfC. Read and follow the advice at
5808:
This is more of a western perspective on the phenomenon . In our words, propoganda. The tribal and regional cultures have all sprouted from the same hinduism. Distorting, reaffirming shastric traditions or discarding it are all possibilities.
5579:
I think the basic problem is "lower communities" in the title. What we actually need is to review any scholarly papers about this topic and see what the academics say about the relationship between written Sanskrit, caste, and socioeconomic
2100:, and the subsequent G4 were all correct. Someone seems to be paying good money to revive this self-aggrandizing curriculum vitae, and our goal should be to minimize the time wasted by other editors re-reviewing this. Consider adding to
4066:- The question is not whether each of the reviewers at DRV agrees with the weighting by the closer, but whether the weighting by the closer, and discounting of Keep !votes, was a valid judgment by the closer. It was, but just barely.
826:. Repeated requests every time some new, tiny snippet appears on the web have a tendency to be counter-productive. It is almost always best to play the waiting game unless you can decisively overcome the issues identified at deletion.
4474:
he and others were canvassed here off-wiki by the appellant. Another voter was confirmed to be a sockpuppet. Not that whoever ends up closing this needed this proof to discard those votes, but all this is to say that I support
1827:
NOTINHERITED is the wrong argument against the Keeps; NC is a perfectly valid reading of the lack of consensus. NC is valid when the participants degree about policy, just like it is when they disagree about facts or sources.
6114:. If Mr. Musk (or another person) eventually becomes widely known as becoming the first trillionaire, then we can have a discussion to add a link to his page into the DAB at that time. There is certainly nothing to do now.
1861:
This seems like the SNG vs GNG thing all over again. It's clear from the discussion that GNG isn't met, though, especially considering it was well argued by delete !voters and even keep !voters mentioned this, meaning there
5381:
4823:
The deletion was fine as a standard no-opposition close. The closer Explicit used to treat such closes as soft deletes that are open to reversal, so it should be straightforward to undelete and relist if that is the
1520:, a five year old AfD isn't going to be overturned. If you want the text to work on a new version, just ask an admin. If someone feels it needs a new AfD once in mainspace (or Venice needs deleted), it can be filed.
2258:
6096:
The appellant doesn't need our permission to submit a new draft to AfC, but someone possibly becoming a trillionaire in three years is hardly a reason to create an encyclopedic entry. The original close was fine.
5377:
5337:
5324:
3025:
Thanks Owen. It has been the direct subject of more than one paper (assessing its performance in different scenarios and in comparison to other similar tools) rather than just mentioned, so I think it should pass
5126:
A discussion has drawn to a close, with or without a clear outcome. It is supervoting to close in favor of an undiscussed or unfavored compromise idea, which may satisfy no one. If a discussion did not come to a
2681:
is that Uzac was born in France moved to the US; that's it. If an experienced, non-COI editor offered to expand this, with proper sourcing, I'd be the first to cheer them on. Shubhamgawali1 is not that person.
1244:
Certain discussions may be closed without result if there is no prospect of success (e.g. disruptive or sockpuppet nominations, if the nominator is repeatedly nominating the same page, or the page is listed at
5423:
165:
6201:, do you think there was much doubt in the participants' arguments that would warrant a relist years later? The outcome looks pretty clear to me. Plus, why are you adding additional indents to your comment?
2303:. I still see no fault in the AfDs or the previous DRV, but there's no need to deprive ourselves of a potentially notable topic just to punish COI editors. A semi-protect for the article would be advisable.
6876:
6871:
2481:. G4 is not because the same deletion rationale still applies--even if it does unquestionably. G4 is not for repeated UPE recreations, unless they would be G4 eligible even absent the UPE. New AfD? Sure.
6866:
3168:. The article is about a TV/magazine personality, and so many sources are naturally of that nature. But that does not change the fact that those are reliable, secondary and independent. Just to add one,
6653:
disappointed: besides now being three and a half years out of date, it was an infobox and four sentences of prose that could've been written entirely from looking at the infobox. I've pasted it here. â
4763:. All of these were nominated for deletion with the incorrect statement that these aren't used elsewhere or would not be expected by readers both of which were proven to be untrue in the discussions at
6669:
3 should come to DRV except in contentious cases, and this is not a contentious case. Recreators may normally either submit a draft for review or move the draft to mainspace subject to AFD. But if
5033:. Sometimes it's better to pick the outcome that the fewest would find objectionable than to just throw your hands in the air and do nothing with a "No consensus" close. I'm glad we have admins like
2668:
to revert the outcome of the AfD, twice on 15 September alone. And while they repeatedly deny it, their contribution history strongly suggests UPE/COI. Contrary to their statement above, there were
3930:
1706:
1588:- It is not entirely clear whether the appellant is asking to overturn the AFD to No Consensus or Keep, or whether the appellant is asking to recreate an outline in draft form subject to review.
4195:
3143:
5029:. The Delete and the Merge !votes there carry far more P&G weight than the various flavours of Keep. There was no specific consensus to Merge, but I agree with how the closer phrased it:
2254:
2045:
claims to significance in the draft. There were questions regarding the style of presentation. The draft has been corrected. However, after moving to the main space, the article was deleted.
1601:
The ArbCom case was inconclusive about portals because, as an ArbCom case, it focused on conduct. The ArbCom case resulted in one administrator desysopped for personal attacks, which was a
6037:
could become the first trillionaire by 2027, I think that we should allow for the "Trillionaire" article (the deleted one, not the current disambiguation page) to be restored as a draft at
5411:
1561:
I participated in that AfD, but that was an AfD where the I don't like it's trumped the I like it's. There's no reason to keep it deleted if we have other outlines of other similar pages.
5323:
3434:
we don't find them meaningful. Same as we can't dismiss the news that are basically about the movements of a soccer ball, even if some people may think those are not worthy of our time.
717:
5173:
may end up as "delete" - at least one editor observed the criteria for WP:CORP had been tightened up), whereas a merge can be expanded out at a later date if more sources are written.
3517:
Point well taken. But if you don't have a strong objection to undeletion to draft, as you first proposed, I kindly ask an admin to close this early so I can start improving the draft.
2423:
Having not seen the previously deleted versions, these are definitely sufficiently different that the 2024 version should not have been G4'd. Especially since it had gone through AfC.
3260:
just a small subset of the sources brought up in the prior discussion, and the two delete votes did not elaborate on any of the sources that were brought up there. Thanks in advance.
1152:
A nominated page should remain on deletion review for at least seven days, unless the nomination was a proposed deletion. After seven days, an administrator will determine whether a
9098:
6695:
2027:
875:
2172:
The way you have constructed your DRV nomination makes it impractical to process. You should have made a new draft precisely along the lines of "make a stub" based entirely on the
5432:
5834:
No, the consensus of the AFD was the reason. The appellant is disagreeing with the reasoning of the the AFD nominator and the AFD participants, but that is not what DRV is for.
4424:
P.S. The DRV request is flimsy at best. Those requesting review need to make their cases in order to keep from wasting so many people's time and effort, starting with their own.
2250:
3560:. WP:THREE is an essay yes. This is not about wikilawyering, but fairly simple advice. Read the essay. Ask me on my talk page if thereâs something in it you donât understand.
1487:(I voted in the AfD and gave actual reasons why this timeline was bad). The other stuff reason given here is interesting: based on that perfectly valid AfD and looking at e.g.
2410:. The sources in the last that weren't in either if the first two are #1, #3, #7, #8, #16, #17, #18, #20, #21, #22, and #23. Also, sort of, #14, which has text identical to
1694:
3453:
of notability. Say... personal life. Divorce news. How does that help determine that the individual is a notable creative professional? Would we not want sources about their
3029:
I should state for the record that I have no connection to the software whatsoever except that I used it a fair bit during my degree and early career - so no COI to declare.
8029:
6016:
4890:
4886:
4780:
4768:
4671:
4659:
4651:
4633:
4571:
3101:
1195:, the page(s) in question should be restored, as it indicates the deletion was not uncontroversial. The closer, or any editor, may then proceed to nominate the page at the
8039:
7994:
5037:
who have the resourcefulness and BOLDness to put aside the nose-counting, and find a solution that best reflects the preferences of participants, as supported by P&G.
6638:
is certainly experienced enough to skip AfC and decide when to move the article back to mainspace. Let's not stand in their way just because of that poorly-attended AfD.
3317:
segment is more than just an interview, but regardless, my main point was that Fram's excellent outline in the previous discussion, which includes 3 separate issues from
9022:
8634:
8392:
8034:
6376:
1552:. So if there is a perception that it is duplicative, try doing something about it editorially, and see if there's consensus for making the outline more abstracted etc.â
421:
3462:
pieces of real and final evidence of eligibility for inclusion ("notability" ... unfortunate term; I mean obviously the subject is somewhat famous but that isn't it). â
2783:
as a valid close. Another Relist would have been valid but was not required. DRV is not AFD Round 2, but I concur with deletion or redirection and not with keeping.
8024:
1292:
8004:
7999:
4841:
4764:
4655:
4216:
4203:
4126:
4113:
3925:
suggested that there was a "rough P&G consensus to delete". The discussion reflects rather a lack of consensus, the result of which should have been to keep per
3725:
2163:
2125:
2081:
2050:
1715:
1448:
The appellant is arguing on policy basis, so this appeal doesn't qualify under DRVPURPOSE#3. We are presented with a long list of OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, but unlike, say,
297:
287:
8879:
8019:
8014:
4591:
4175:
4156:
1084:*'''Allow recreation''' The new information provided looks like it justifies recreation of the article from scratch if there is anyone willing to do the work. ~~~~
340:
330:
236:
226:
4783:) which wasn't relisted and did not involve any participation. I am asking for these two to be restored in light of the fuller discussions that took place later.
3097:
3090:
1011:
share, you may type this after the opinion. Place four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your entry, which should be placed below the entries of any previous editors:
8009:
4820:
Koi Mil Gaya 2, there was one vote in favour and one against (by the nom), but I would believe the closer went with keep as an ATD because of less participation.
4313:
2704:, also article included early career, newsweek, controversy, and thats what has been in the references as I can see in the reverted edit history. I am okay with
5267:. I agree with the reading of the discussion as âmergeâ. If the merge doesnât happen, it falls back to âno consensusâ leaning âredirectâ, not leaning âkeepâ. â
8617:
3165:
8286:
4807:
4529:
4351:
4334:
4196:
https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/prudential-regulation/publication/2024/september/implementation-of-the-basel-3-1-standards-near-final-policy-statement-part-2
2076:
I cleaned the article of advertising phrases and unnecessary sources. Please look at the latest deleted version of the article. It was moved from the draft.
1374:
1288:
1281:
203:
186:
3325:, and non-interview articles by 2 separate Turkish columnists was not considered. The nominator only addressed the weaker ones among the sources presented.
9041:
8387:
6038:
5861:
5810:
5744:
5699:
5661:
5614:
5554:
5536:
5495:
5450:
5442:
4212:
4199:
4122:
4109:
3796:
3721:
3714:
1652:
1161:
1109:; long or repeated arguments are not generally helpful. Rather, editors should set out the key policies and guidelines supporting their preferred outcome.
5660:
That's modern artificial categorisation for vote bank politics. I am talking about traditional classification of jÄti and it's not exactly same as caste.
777:. In general you don't need anyone's permission to recreate a deleted page, if your new version does not qualify for deletion then it will not be deleted.
9046:
8763:
8612:
4772:
4744:
4663:
4587:
4171:
4152:
3344:
to add the new sources. The close was fine given the information considered, but now there's a reason to change direction and not spend seven days here.
1334:
8738:
3598:
To get back to the actual discussion here: do you have any objection to having this article restored to draft? If not, could an admin close this early?
2064:
4309:
3767:
670:
312:
3563:
Itâs fairly obvious to the rest of us that you adhere to some false beliefs. If youâre not interested in advice, then maybe Knowledge is not for you.
2446:. Above source analysis shows the version deleted in the AFD and the G4ed version are not sufficiently similar. This can be sent to AFD if desired.
8402:
6364:
5350:
8970:
8607:
8340:
4990:
the existing sources sufficient, others not. Even if you don't 'count' votes, I can't see how this is anything but a standard no consensus close.
4776:
4748:
4667:
4525:
4518:
4347:
4330:
3206:
458:
269:
259:
6577:: since we don't have access to your hard drive, can you please cite three of those 21 sources that you believe prove notability per GNG? Thanks!
8678:
8397:
8382:
4912:
4511:
3978:
from its members and the fact that prominent organizations use their research. Several keep !votes were bare "meets GNG" and did not engage with
3707:
3083:
2799:
2524:
1646:
1274:
1267:
241:
1093:*'''Overturn and userfy''' Needs more development in userspace before being published again, but the subject meets our notability criteria. ~~~~
8862:
8629:
6276:
2850:
1723:
I am requesting a review because I am dumbfounded by the interpretation of consensus. The article was nominated for deletion because it fails
1090:*'''Overturn and merge''' The article is a content fork, should have been merged into existing article on this topic rather than deleted. ~~~~
8557:
8073:
2237:
1783:, which notability guideline says that holders of notable offices are themselves inherently notable? Such a position is entirely contrary to
1664:
1177:
2148:, and at least one has the same text as one of the refs in the previous versions (there were 75 of those; I'm not about to read them all). â
1087:*'''List''' Article was speedied without discussion, criteria given did not match the problem, full discussion at AfD looks warranted. ~~~~
8328:
7966:
7901:
7836:
7771:
7706:
7641:
7576:
7511:
7446:
7381:
7316:
7251:
7186:
7121:
7056:
6991:
6926:
6861:
6385:
2584:
823:
3239:
editors who chose to participate in the discussion and given the comments, I don't see how you can argue for a different closure outcome.
3131:
3011:
by academic papers as the tool used in a research will help establish notability per NSOFTWARE, but that's outside the scope of this DRV.
1456:, the deleted article contained a grand total of 64 words of prose before the long list of wikilinks, much of which is already covered in
8823:
8783:
8716:
8044:
7981:
7976:
7931:
7916:
7911:
7866:
7851:
7846:
7801:
7786:
7781:
7736:
7721:
7716:
7671:
7656:
7651:
7606:
7591:
7586:
7541:
7526:
7521:
7476:
7461:
7456:
7411:
7396:
7391:
7346:
7331:
7326:
7281:
7266:
7261:
7216:
7201:
7196:
7151:
7136:
7131:
7086:
7071:
7066:
7021:
7006:
7001:
6956:
6941:
6936:
6891:
6826:
3228:
1893:. The Keeps are weak as a group, but the argument that we should have articles on all holders of a highly notable office is basically a
1491:, I see more reasons to delete that outline based on the AfD, than to restore the Florence one based on the existence of the Venice one.
409:
307:
3388:
1431:, seeing as this drama took place five years ago. The subsequent banning of the AfD nominator does not invalidate the result of the AfD
1132:
Admins participating in deletion reviews are routinely requested to restore deleted pages under review and replace the content with the
685:
363:
8788:
8768:
8726:
8461:
7971:
7926:
7906:
7861:
7841:
7796:
7776:
7731:
7711:
7666:
7646:
7601:
7581:
7536:
7516:
7471:
7451:
7406:
7386:
7341:
7321:
7276:
7256:
7211:
7191:
7146:
7126:
7081:
7061:
7016:
6996:
6951:
6931:
6886:
6821:
5129:. Obviously merge was not "undiscussed," but in my opinion there was no consensus and a merge close was chosen as the âmiddle-groundâ
3929:. More recently, the organisation has received further coverage in government sources, being discussed as an authoritative source in a
3355:
2097:
1740:
484:
302:
3372:
3275:
notable subjects and if a better version of this article, with better reliable sources, can be produced, then that should be allowed.
1531:
7961:
7896:
7831:
7766:
7701:
7636:
7571:
7506:
7441:
7376:
7311:
7246:
7181:
7116:
7051:
6986:
6921:
6856:
6292:â Restored to draft per request of an established editor and no action needed at DRV as factors have changed that moot the prior AfD
6060:
goes beyond a dictionary definition. It is not apparent from this review request, which cites no sources, that this is now the case.
4662:
both of which consider the same film series and both of which passed (these discussions also revolved around around our current DRVs
3007:. As Cryptic suggests, the 71-word blurb won't help anyone rewrite an actual article about the product. I'm not convinced that being
2846:
2811:
2067:. I'm leaning toward simply assuming that the content was sufficiently identical in spite of the stated corrections regarding style.â
1322:
849:, restoring an image deleted for lack of adequate licensing information, asking that the history be emailed to you, etc), please use
368:
4810:
RfD page for the Krrish entries until two days after the Koi Mil Gaya 3 nomination. Why do you say you were unaware of the listings?
3690:
1353:
1226:
Where the closer of a deletion discussion realizes their close was wrong, and nobody has endorsed, the closer may speedily close as
8758:
7941:
7936:
7876:
7871:
7811:
7806:
7746:
7741:
7681:
7676:
7616:
7611:
7551:
7546:
7486:
7481:
7421:
7416:
7356:
7351:
7291:
7286:
7226:
7221:
7161:
7156:
7096:
7091:
7031:
7026:
6966:
6961:
6901:
6896:
6836:
6831:
5698:
not very well written but good for basic idea. It should have more mentions from first hand Sanskrit sources, that is our shastras
3755:
3663:
2371:
1660:
1653:
1608:
The original nominator of the AFD was indefinitely blocked for personal attacks (on a now-banned user), not for flawed nominations.
1580:
766:
for uncontroversial undeletions, such as undeleting a very old article where substantial new sources have subsequently arisen. Use
2333:
373:
123:
8901:
8377:
7956:
7951:
7891:
7886:
7826:
7821:
7761:
7756:
7696:
7691:
7631:
7626:
7566:
7561:
7501:
7496:
7436:
7431:
7371:
7366:
7306:
7301:
7241:
7236:
7176:
7171:
7111:
7106:
7046:
7041:
6981:
6976:
6916:
6911:
6851:
6846:
5843:
4621:
4495:
2892:
2652:
2354:
2266:
2136:
I'll endorse this too. The text is different, but there are no new relevant, substantive factual changes except his purchase of
391:
264:
3626:
3607:
3575:
3544:
3526:
3508:
3484:
3466:
3443:
3428:
3403:
3212:
3200:
3152:
2743:
1965:
1940:
9130:
9012:
8793:
8639:
8602:
8579:
8207:
7946:
7881:
7816:
7751:
7686:
7621:
7556:
7491:
7426:
7361:
7296:
7231:
7166:
7101:
7036:
6971:
6906:
6841:
4972:
2792:
2517:
2362:, subject to review either by administrator, or by reviewer who is given copy of 2022 article, but not recreation of article.
2015:
1556:
1035:
681:
620:
599:
538:
519:
382:
345:
5404:
2634:
2461:
2278:
1512:
904:{{subst:drv2 |page=File:Foo.png |xfd_page=Knowledge:Files for deletion/2009 February 19#Foo.png |article=Foo |reason= }} ~~~~
8778:
8709:
8654:
8511:
8476:
8323:
8313:
6237:
5637:
4075:
2394:
1800:
1775:
1766:
830:
8955:
5772:
5752:
5735:
5707:
5693:
5669:
5655:
5622:
5595:
5544:
5526:
5396:
5293:
4792:
4714:
3334:
3308:
2775:
1370:
709:
because of a disagreement with the deletion discussion's outcome that does not involve the closer's judgment (a page may be
624:
9167:
8889:
8773:
6707:
5886:
5869:
5855:
5818:
4559:
4252:
3181:
2418:
2380:
2290:
2181:
2085:
2071:
1885:
1477:
1343:
1202:
If the decision under appeal was an XfD close, the closer may, at their discretion, relist the page(s) at the relevant XfD.
573:
6193:
6177:
6146:
5418:
5315:
5240:
5211:
4460:
4266:
4014:
3286:
3269:
3250:
3218:
2490:
1500:
1418:
8997:
8872:
8700:
8649:
8424:
8256:
6682:
5388:
5206:
5096:
5031:
the "merge" option suggested by some seemed to be the option that I felt most people who expressed a view could live with
4220:
4130:
3776:
3685:
2980:
2965:
2949:
2512:
2217:
2167:
2159:
2152:
2121:
2077:
2046:
1880:
1687:
1575:
1545:
1081:*'''Relist''' A new discussion at AfD should bring a more thorough discussion, given the new information shown here. ~~~~
710:
278:
208:
5803:
5740:
JÄti is a subcategory of Varna resulting from cross-breeding between varnas. Occupation is designated according to JÄti.
5636:, with 39 subcategories. Please could you say which of these you meant by "lower communities"? You don't seem to mean
4207:
4117:
4044:
2722:
2432:
1906:
1640:
1377:
was created to be part of a set and compares favorably with the outlines of other cities in and around Italy, including
9162:
9002:
8987:
8748:
8644:
8318:
8308:
8298:
8202:
8197:
6227:
6129:
6004:
5570:
5503:
5488:
5259:
5183:
5069:
4642:
4179:
4160:
4058:
3942:
3589:
3052:
3038:
3020:
2995:
2572:
2312:
2129:
2113:
1819:
321:
292:
217:
9083:
6303:
5276:
5159:
5144:
5111:
4905:
3215:
1851:
1837:
9150:
9110:
9051:
9034:
9007:
8429:
8369:
8187:
8066:
6743:
5916:
5473:
Avoid original or arbitrary criteria that would synthesize a list that is not plainly verifiable in reliable sources.
4806:
You were notified on your talk page about the Koi Mil Gaya 3 nomination. You were also actively participating in the
4377:
independence of the existing sources, or that coverage about a product does not equate to coverage of the company. --
4317:
3805:
2691:
2625:
Hi yes thanks for posting it for me, but I have not created the article. It was created in 2012 by some other user.
2198:
2036:
1679:
1221:
1106:
1005:
850:
767:
757:
744:
449:
354:
335:
231:
140:
29:
6158:
6072:
4411:
4338:
3997:
3956:
2953:
2923:
8813:
8705:
8671:
8540:
8419:
8177:
8145:
6716:
6334:
5768:
5731:
5689:
5651:
5610:
5606:
5591:
5181:
5065:
4439:
4419:
Closer interpreted consensus clearly and correctly. Delete !votes cited policy more effectively than did the keeps.
4224:
4134:
4026:
3835:
3700:
3197:
2674:
2054:
1701:
1354:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2019_June_6#c-Sandstein-2019-06-14T16:55:00.000Z-6_June_2019
1260:
770:
instead. (If any editor objects to the undeletion, then it is considered controversial and this forum may be used.)
5046:
4386:
4033:
3794:
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
1671:
9088:
8982:
8930:
8908:
8528:
8412:
8266:
8192:
8172:
6657:
6091:
6050:
5943:
4580:
4502:
4355:
3910:
3089:
2910:
the aerospace sector and is the subject of, or significantly referenced by, several academic articles - see e.g.
2498:
I'm not sure I'd keep this at AfD, but I don't think this qualifies for G4 as it's not close to being identical.
1280:
1025:
691:
if significant new information has come to light since a deletion that would justify recreating the deleted page;
177:
6634:. While I see no fault in how the AfD was closed 3.5 years ago, I trust the appellant's good judgement on this.
6406:
6106:
5081:. A second relist would be an okay option as well, but I do not see consensus forming with further discussion.
4871:
4854:
4835:
4488:
4288:
2760:
a second relist was possible but not required. I would consider this the redirect equivalent of a soft delete.
739:
process, or to have the history of a deleted page restored behind a new, improved version of the page, called a
9279:
9120:
9073:
8992:
8940:
8857:
8721:
8251:
6647:
5227:
5000:
4690:
4257:
We're probably dealing with a UPE and a couple of socks; check the contribution history. I just opened an SPI.
3713:
2701:
1078:*'''Endorse''' The original closing decision looks like it was sound, no reason shown here to overturn it. ~~~~
477:
250:
17:
6357:
6212:
6082:. There is nothing to suggest that there is anything to write at this title which will be more than a dicdef.
4911:
4510:
4095:
3706:
3082:
2819:
2798:
2523:
1645:
1273:
901:
is the name of the article where the file was used, and it shouldn't be used for any other page. For example:
9125:
8918:
8913:
8688:
6025:
4032:
all to the first sentence (same numbering as in Oaktree b's comment at afd, and they also mentioned #2); and
3160:
The only non-vote opinion comes from the nominator, and that does not address all the sources brought up by @
2880:
2616:
2593:
783:
763:
to attack other editors, cast aspersions, or make accusations of bias (such requests may be speedily closed);
6275:
4694:
2194:
couple redlinked companies; and that there's a bunch of very shallow and similar articles saying all that. â
9284:
9253:
9243:
9206:
9189:
9174:
9093:
8867:
8261:
8246:
8238:
8219:
8212:
8134:
8059:
6586:
5875:
5467:
at the AfD. The appellant has not demonstrated why this seemingly arbitrary list selection criterion meets
4960:
3993:
3603:
3522:
3480:
3439:
3330:
3265:
3224:
3177:
1973:
1936:
1810:. The delete side has successfully argued that the article is not suitable for retention on notability and
729:
3209:
3043:
Sounds good. I'd love to see a properly written and sourced article about this leading simulation engine.
2664:
and partial-block Shubhamgawali1 from that page for persistent edit-warring. Shubhamgawali1 has attempted
1140:
template, leaving the history for review by everyone. However, copyright violations and violations of the
9274:
9017:
8965:
8935:
8818:
8683:
8661:
8481:
8443:
6330:
6288:
4779:) were unfortunately deleted before the discussion for the rest concluded, as it was a separate listing (
3821:
1457:
1413:
1057:
736:
445:
414:
400:
6349:
9184:
8925:
8884:
8695:
8547:
8523:
8352:
8281:
8094:
6298:
5550:
4517:
4247:
3350:
3124:
2738:
2328:
2144:). 20 of 32 refs were present in at least one of the versions deleted at afd, most of the rest aren't
1526:
1356:
The main premise of deleting the Outline of Florence was that it was a content fork. However, the term
1169:
1039:
592:
554:
500:
440:
196:
6371:
991:{{Delrevxfd|date=2024 September 21|page=SECTION HEADER AT THE DELETION REVIEW LOG}}</noinclude: -->
918:
Inform the editor who closed the deletion discussion by adding the following on their user talk page:
9135:
8945:
8896:
8552:
8488:
6703:
6678:
6341:
6142:
5839:
4710:
4456:
4071:
3966:(involved): The keep !votes were not based on policies or guidelines. There was no identification of
3384:
3368:
3116:
2945:
2788:
2411:
2390:
2367:
2350:
1762:
1636:
1549:
1196:
1192:
732:
that have or have not been deleted (as each page is different and stands or falls on its own merits);
674:
470:
435:
5019:
1926:
74:
9218:
9201:
9196:
8845:
8624:
8589:
8466:
8293:
8123:
3203:
3138:
2901:
2718:
2648:
2630:
2530:
9077:
6595:
database, where you get 85,000 hits for his name, and have to sift out everything relating to the
3108:
1315:
8753:
8535:
8157:
5865:
5860:
Individual items needn't be found together in a single source. However, It's discussed together
5814:
5748:
5703:
5665:
5618:
5540:
5499:
5446:
5198:
4981:
4451:
after closure of DRV. It is likely that the article will otherwise be recreated by these SPAs.
3947:
Struck duplicate 'overturn' - by convention, the applicant does not get a bolded (second) !vote.
3748:
3677:
3599:
3557:
3518:
3476:
3435:
3412:
3326:
3261:
3220:
3173:
3033:
2975:
2918:
2504:
1945:
1932:
1929:
1923:
1872:
1567:
1382:
4614:
2120:
comments have been eliminated. Nobody pays any money! There is no monetary interest on my part!
1307:
9179:
8850:
8594:
8451:
8182:
6122:
5633:
5137:
5089:
4010:
3867:
3740:
3656:
2768:
2454:
2428:
2407:
2403:
2399:
2274:
2210:
2137:
2008:
1843:
1811:
1754:
1266:
1241:, the nominator may speedily close as "endorse" (or ask someone else to do so on their behalf).
1127:
4606:
4029:
4020:
1329:
656:
8572:
8506:
8498:
8364:
8335:
8303:
8162:
6591:
Here are some, though it might leave editors none the wiser. The search was conducted in the
6293:
5712:
So this list was taking the Shudras as a jÄti rather than as a varna. You meant people like
4552:
4470:
4242:
4023:
3762:
3699:
3491:
3471:
I respect this perspective, however I have to say it is not P&G compliant. a) Because of
3458:
why the article was deleted. And it should stay deleted until someone finally digs up two-to-
3419:. Go to draftspace if you find two or three sources that demonstrate Knowledge-notability. â-
3345:
2733:
2323:
2141:
2000:
1985:
1521:
1406:
1299:
1259:
1135:
1120:. This information can then be more fully evaluated in its proper deletion discussion forum.
773:
to ask for permission to write a new version of a page which was deleted, unless it has been
585:
514:
4628:
3732:
9248:
8567:
8562:
8167:
6699:
6674:
6666:
6402:
6394:
6219:
6198:
6169:
6138:
5997:
5835:
5764:
5727:
5685:
5647:
5587:
5522:
5300:
5285:
5255:
5179:
5061:
5015:
4720:
4706:
4686:
4678:
4598:
4544:
4476:
4452:
4359:
4321:
4183:
4148:
4067:
3851:
3825:
3380:
3364:
2937:
2784:
2565:
2386:
2363:
2346:
2233:
2022:
1902:
1788:
1780:
1758:
1632:
1602:
966:
Leave notice of the deletion review outside of and above the original deletion discussion:
845:
If your request is completely non-controversial (e.g., restoring an article deleted with a
800:
191:
2643:
and already passes general notability and has reliable sources that discusses the Title.
1992:
1064:. If an editor desires some action other than the default, they should make this clear; or
697:
if there were substantial procedural errors in the deletion discussion or speedy deletion.
8:
9140:
9061:
8977:
8840:
8830:
8666:
8140:
8102:
8082:
6713:
6234:
6155:
5989:
5883:
5852:
5800:
5476:
5272:
5078:
4902:
4566:
4407:
4055:
3975:
3938:
3906:
3810:
3622:
3585:
3571:
3541:
3505:
3463:
3424:
3400:
2714:
2644:
2626:
2602:
2557:
2377:
2287:
2178:
2068:
1961:
1848:
1816:
1796:
1772:
1736:
1553:
1153:
1096:*'''Overturn''' Original deletion decision was not consistent with current policies. ~~~~
925:
135:
4536:
9145:
8835:
8471:
8456:
8234:
6011:
5468:
5223:
5193:
4996:
4918:
4850:
4788:
4431:
3857:
3672:
3192:
3030:
2972:
2941:
2915:
2579:
2499:
2486:
1867:
1833:
1562:
1436:
1394:
1070:
of the page if new information is presented and deemed sufficient to permit recreation.
792:
753:
to argue technicalities (such as a deletion discussion being closed ten minutes early);
648:
156:
107:
99:
5981:
4479:'s call to SALT this page, as we're dealing with a very determined group of COI/SPAs.
2873:
2549:
893:
with the name of the deletion discussion page (leave blank for speedy deletions), and
716:(This point formerly required first consulting the deleting admin if possible. As per
8518:
8407:
6516:
6117:
5974:
5132:
5084:
4953:
4740:
4736:
4382:
4006:
3971:
3788:
3651:
2763:
2542:
2449:
2424:
2300:
2270:
1488:
1465:
1427:. If the deletion was a "personal attack", this belongs in AN/I, not DRV. Or rather,
1402:
1390:
1230:. They should fully reverse their close, restoring any deleted pages if appropriate.
1187:, the outcome should generally be the same as if the decision was endorsed. However:
1147:
6712:
No action is needed considering what Cryptic wrote. Good luck with the new article.â
2865:
1210:
1060:. For a keep decision, the default action associated with overturning is delete and
952:
to the top of the page under review to inform current editors about the discussion.
9065:
8439:
8152:
6670:
6189:
6087:
6046:
5939:
5879:
5602:
5513:: the original closing decision. The list of authors are not discussed together in
5346:
5311:
5235:
5008:
4945:
4284:
4091:
3989:
3952:
3536:
3472:
2756:
2609:
2246:
2241:
2145:
2101:
1981:
1974:
1540:
1461:
1453:
1398:
1386:
1246:
694:
if a page has been wrongly deleted with no way to tell what exactly was deleted; or
35:
2887:
9230:
9225:
8276:
8271:
8113:
6642:
6635:
6581:
6529:
6398:
6101:
5796:
5758:
5721:
5713:
5679:
5641:
5581:
5565:
5518:
5483:
5464:
5251:
5174:
5154:
5106:
5055:
5041:
5034:
4967:
4724:
4483:
4261:
3926:
3820:
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
3614:
3459:
3416:
3303:
3047:
3015:
2990:
2857:
2686:
2307:
2186:
2173:
2108:
1949:
1898:
1472:
1449:
1378:
1366:
1359:
4937:
4897:, the third film in a series of three installments, the first of which is named
2385:
I think that will have to be a double tempundel of the 2022 and 2024 versions.
756:
to request that previously deleted content be used on other pages (please go to
9213:
9157:
8347:
8224:
8128:
6691:
6596:
6063:
5268:
5231:
5102:
necessarily a bad thing; we often use those when resolving editorial disputes.
5004:
4447:
4403:
4399:
4395:
3967:
3934:
3902:
3618:
3595:
3581:
3567:
3514:
3420:
2911:
2245:
and COI issues plus the low-quality sources present in the article. However, a
2229:
1957:
1953:
1915:
1894:
1792:
1732:
1496:
1217:
846:
774:
89:
25:
5757:
Okay... in that case I can't see what's wrong with the close we're reviewing.â
3169:
1922:
policy-based. See, for instance, these other AfDs, for comparable arguments:
897:
with the reason why the discussion result should be changed. For media files,
85:
9268:
5717:
5219:
4992:
4867:
4846:
4831:
4801:
4784:
4719:
I have tried to clarify the nomination. Let me further elaborate, there is a
4682:
4425:
3235:
2482:
1829:
1784:
1724:
1509:
1141:
21:
1112:
The presentation of new information about the content should be prefaced by
6654:
6621:
Yttri, Tor (29 September 1998). "Sa ja til Sogndal â og ja til Haugesund".
6560:
6542:
6503:
5970:
5930:
5917:
5514:
4898:
4499:
4378:
4041:
3885:
3873:
3841:
3172:
is another media coverage about him, clearly demonstrating the notability.
2962:
2816:
2538:
2531:
2415:
2342:
2214:
2195:
2149:
634:" section below to make sure that is what you wish to do. Then, follow the
45:
6612:
Svenningsen, Kenneth (11 March 1997). "Har lagt Sogndal for sine føtter".
4893:. Such a movie does exist. Koi Mil Gaya 3 is a colloquial way to refer to
4468:: Philthebanker, one of the participants in the collapsed part 1 section,
3671:
the AfD but restore to draft - I agree completely with Frank Anchor here.
2414:, which gives me no confidence in any of the other "new" forbes.kz refs. â
1620:. The closer was correct and the appellant has not established any error.
28:" ("PROD") process, or simple image undeletions, please post a request at
6185:
6083:
6042:
5935:
5342:
5307:
4930:
4280:
4087:
3985:
3948:
1750:
1237:
their nomination, and nobody else has recommended any outcome other than
630:
If you are considering a request for a deletion review, please read the "
627:. This includes appeals to delete pages kept after a prior discussion.
6639:
6578:
6098:
5562:
5480:
5151:
5103:
5038:
4889:
demonstrates that the community disagrees with the delete rationale in
4480:
4258:
3922:
3300:
3044:
3012:
2987:
2932:
2683:
2304:
2105:
1469:
8051:
6690:- If this is restored, either an additional hatnote will be needed on
6603:
Sternhoff, Eva M. (27 October 2001). "Fra spetakkel til spektakulĂŚr".
5561:
of those items into a distinct list must be supported by the sources.
3970:, which is required by NCORP, and many of the keep !votes amounted to
3323:(which they selected among 179 search hits in the newspaper's archive)
2189:
is as usual good advice, but "make a stub" in this case isn't - there
945:
For nominations to overturn and delete a page previously kept, attach
6034:
5793:
relationship between written Sanskrit, caste, and socioeconomic class
5460:
3161:
2678:
2158:
had created over a year ago that had been moved into the main space.
1492:
1443:
a rough consensus to delete, even if we ignore the nomination itself.
4891:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 24#Koi Mil Gaya 3
4887:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 31#Koi Mil Gaya 2
4781:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 24#Koi Mil Gaya 3
4769:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 31#Koi Mil Gaya 2
4672:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 24#Koi Mil Gaya 3
4660:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 31#Koi Mil Gaya 2
4652:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 24#Koi Mil Gaya 3
1727:: it has not received significant coverage in reliable sources. The
90:
8100:
For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the
6203:
6166:â I think maybe on this one we should go back through AfD on this.
4894:
4862:
4826:
4760:
4756:
4752:
4732:
3318:
3277:
3256:
3241:
2253:(by Forbes staff and thus a reliable source), in Bloomberg News in
87:
8092:
For a listing of current collaborations, tasks, and news, see the
4279:
Canvassed non-confirmed editors prior to semi-protection, part 2.
4086:
Canvassed non-confirmed editors prior to semi-protection, part 1.
3490:
pointers to notability, but are not evidence of notability. For a
885:
of the discussions (but not at the top of the page). Then fill in
809:
5459:. The list was deleted for very valid reasons, well expressed by
5675:
6447:
6443:
4926:
4919:
4728:
4037:
1897:
argument and not so unreasonable as to be summarily ignored.
1220:
can be processed immediately as though they were a request at
91:
4842:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 31#Krish 1
4765:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 31#Krish 1
4656:
Knowledge:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 31#Krish 1
3814:(agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments,
1952:, could you please explain to me which of the two points of
1105:. Deletion review is facilitated by succinct discussions of
750:
to repeat arguments already made in the deletion discussion;
3580:
I looked at Framâs first three sources and am unimpressed.
2376:
Requesting tempundel to review the G4 with more certainty.â
2065:
Knowledge:Deletion review/Log/2022 April 7#Mikheil Lomtadze
1249:). These will usually be marked as "administrative close".
1074:
Examples of opinions for an article that had been deleted:
4735:. I had created redirects for alternative names of these:
5674:
Aha! Thanks, that's helpful. Is our Knowledge article on
3363:
if this is an appeal of the closure, which was correct.
3314:
6742:
3980:
641:
5124:
Forced compromise is listed as a a type of supervote.
1914:: The keeps are aligned with the first bullet point in
978:{{Delrevxfd|date=2024 September 21}}</noinclude: -->
5799:(but it isn't about the creation of new literature). â
1409:. Please overturn its deletion. Thank you. Sincerely,
5475:. I would have been just as happy with a Redirect to
1464:
has received 80 pageviews over the past 30 days, and
34:"WP:DELREV" redirects here. For Revision Delete, see
6611:
6592:
2469:
and send the offending admin back to CSD G4 school.
1539:
if it is believed that something is needed fom DRV.
1162:
Knowledge:Deletion review/Administrator instructions
949:{{Delrev|date=2024 September 21}}</noinclude: -->
5832:
This article was deleted without any strong reason.
2261:. In Georgian, we have a major in-depth profile on
1183:If the administrator closes the deletion review as
1038:and you believe it needs a full discussion at the
6602:
4241:anyone know where this discussion was canvassed?
9266:
5830:- DRV is not AFD round 2. The appellant says:
1034:, if the page was speedy deleted outside of the
5378:List of Sanskrit authors from lower communities
5338:List of Sanskrit authors from lower communities
5325:List of Sanskrit authors from lower communities
3196:(some sources may be critical of the subject):
2211:logs at alternate romanization Mikhail Lomtadze
987:the deletion review's section header, then use
5632:confusing is that Knowledge's category system
4036:and a second (third, if you count #5) copy of
1160:, the admin should follow the instructions at
8067:
3834:Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected
3804:among Knowledge contributors. Knowledge has
1172:. If the consensus was that the deletion was
983:If the deletion discussion's subpage name is
970:If the deletion discussion's subpage name is
593:
478:
6673:said come to DRV, then DRV can say Refund.
5874:Medium is near-forbidden on Knowledge, as a
2912:https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Gasturb
1842:No one used the word "inherit" or linked to
782:Copyright violating, libelous, or otherwise
6567:*Club domestic league appearances and goals
6313:The following is an archived debate of the
5953:The following is an archived debate of the
5360:The following is an archived debate of the
2829:The following is an archived debate of the
1757:, and the closer relied on this argument.
735:to challenge an article's deletion via the
8074:
8060:
6620:
6484:
4398:upfront may have helped dissuade the weak
4394:. Properly deleted, although pointing to
3808:regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
3504:mainspace given a credible NEXIST claim. â
974:the deletion review's section header, use
600:
586:
485:
471:
5743:Shudra is a varna with many JÄtis in it.
5605:hierarchy. It's discussed at many places
5479:, but the consensus to delete was clear.
4346:: An editor has expressed a concern that
4308:: An editor has expressed a concern that
4170:: An editor has expressed a concern that
814:Before listing a review request, please:
565:Discussion about closes prior to closing:
24:processes. For articles deleted via the "
3828:on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.
3415:is throwing unimpressive sources. Read
2986:fresh AfD; we can't help you with that.
2601:I'm filing this on behalf of the editor
2475:copies, It excludes pages that are not
1661:Penelope Brudenell, Countess of Cardigan
1654:Penelope Brudenell, Countess of Cardigan
1024:on the relevant deletion forum (usually
711:renominated after a reasonable timeframe
8081:
6137:or do nothing, as per above comments.
1787:. It is, in fact, a classic example of
1233:Where the nominator of a DRV wishes to
1142:policy on biographies of living persons
75:
63:
58:
9267:
4498:, but it's worth a read (or reread). â
3901:Incorrect interpretation of consensus
532:and to review closes of other reviews:
8055:
5638:Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
1197:appropriate deletion discussion forum
1168:, the page should be relisted at the
1042:to decide if it should be deleted; or
6492:
5517:and DRV is not an extension of AfD.
3783:
834:
822:Check that it is not on the list of
669:if someone believes the closer of a
40:
8398:Science, technology and engineering
6730:of the page listed in the heading.
6263:of the page listed in the heading.
5904:of the page listed in the heading.
5628:there's any confusion there. What
4816:evenly as 1, 2 and 3 ending titles.
3921:In the closing decision, the admin
3070:of the page listed in the heading.
1546:Category:FL-Class Outlines articles
1191:If the decision under appeal was a
831:Steps to list a new deletion review
13:
3974:and that its notability should be
14:
9296:
6796:
4840:I had made a collated comment at
4448:Apply Halite and related minerals
1222:Knowledge:Requests for undeletion
1124:is an alternative in such cases.
1018:the original closing decision; or
851:Knowledge:Requests for undeletion
768:Knowledge:Requests for undeletion
758:Knowledge:Requests for undeletion
745:Knowledge:Requests for undeletion
635:
530:For RfCs, community discussions,
30:Knowledge:Requests for undeletion
8462:A nice cup of tea and a sit down
6811:
6806:
6763:
6041:as it would now look promising.
4496:WP:Salting is usually a bad idea
3787:
2299:per the source analysis done by
1785:Knowledge's notability guideline
1435:. I see nothing improper in how
1180:with the consensus documented.
1156:exists. If that consensus is to
881:and paste the template skeleton
858:
838:
44:
6801:
6758:
6726:The above is an archive of the
6696:Arild Andersen (disambiguation)
6259:The above is an archive of the
5900:The above is an archive of the
4751:and the like for punctuation);
3499:NEXIST as it seems likely that
3066:The above is an archive of the
2104:if this comes back here again.
1508:Agree with Fram on all counts.
1006:Commenting in a deletion review
9084:Wikimedia Foundation elections
8759:Dispute resolution noticeboard
8403:Knowledge assistance and tasks
6791:
6304:01:56, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
6238:17:53, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
6228:16:04, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
6213:05:55, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
6194:08:53, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
6178:03:29, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
6159:20:30, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
6147:16:02, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
6130:14:19, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
6107:13:16, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
6092:08:17, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
6073:06:47, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
6051:02:42, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
5944:23:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
5887:11:25, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
5870:09:14, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
5856:20:44, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
5844:16:25, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
5819:12:59, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
5804:11:57, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
5773:11:14, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
5753:09:31, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
5736:18:56, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
5708:12:53, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
5694:11:48, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
5670:09:10, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
5656:13:58, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
5623:12:13, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
5596:11:24, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
5571:09:52, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
5545:08:26, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
5527:06:55, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
5504:08:18, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
5489:13:30, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
5451:11:13, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
5351:23:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
5316:21:46, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
5294:03:27, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
5277:22:56, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
5260:21:19, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
5241:22:20, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
5212:20:02, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
5184:16:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
5160:22:31, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
5145:21:54, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
5112:17:37, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
5097:14:17, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
5070:11:18, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
5047:23:11, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
5020:22:32, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
4906:20:18, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
4872:16:35, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
4855:15:22, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
4836:08:30, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
4793:03:28, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
4715:20:27, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
4695:15:40, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
4503:13:47, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
4489:12:41, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
4461:08:02, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
4440:23:09, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
4412:22:46, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
4387:15:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
4339:14:48, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
4289:17:53, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
4267:12:48, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
4253:12:42, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
4208:08:19, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
4118:06:50, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
4096:17:53, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
4076:03:51, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
4059:00:01, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
4045:18:25, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
4015:02:16, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
3998:19:59, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
3957:21:44, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
3943:20:22, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
3911:20:09, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
3691:22:13, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
3664:02:31, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
3627:10:26, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
3608:00:32, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
3590:21:08, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
3576:21:01, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
3545:01:20, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
3527:00:58, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
3509:19:07, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
3485:15:04, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
3467:08:54, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
3444:22:58, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
3429:22:28, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
3404:11:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
3389:03:44, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
3373:03:44, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
3356:12:57, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
3335:15:27, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
3309:09:09, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
3287:23:51, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
3270:06:14, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
3251:05:40, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
3229:03:58, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
3182:04:52, 14 September 2024 (UTC)
3053:19:54, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
3039:19:51, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
3021:19:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
2996:19:51, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
2981:19:44, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
2966:19:19, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
2954:20:03, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
2924:19:00, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
2820:20:09, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
2793:08:20, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
2776:02:25, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
2753:allow re-write of full article
2744:12:25, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
2723:11:56, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
2692:11:41, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
2653:10:37, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
2635:10:27, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
2617:10:10, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
2518:22:06, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
2491:05:11, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
2462:02:03, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
2433:00:56, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
2419:00:38, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
2395:21:23, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
2381:21:17, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
2372:19:59, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
2355:19:59, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
2334:17:54, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
2313:17:37, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
2291:17:16, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
2279:13:56, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
2218:13:38, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
2199:13:38, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
2182:12:54, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
2168:11:27, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
2153:11:20, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
2130:11:00, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
2114:10:56, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
2086:10:52, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
2072:10:50, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
2055:09:43, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
1966:05:55, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
1941:02:23, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
1907:23:04, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
1886:22:10, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
1852:08:46, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
1838:05:04, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
1820:21:14, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
1801:22:00, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
1776:21:20, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
1767:19:44, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
1741:18:35, 19 September 2024 (UTC)
1641:05:11, 21 September 2024 (UTC)
1581:22:01, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
1557:15:46, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
1532:14:20, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
1513:13:40, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
1501:13:09, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
1478:12:50, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
1419:11:18, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
1:
8764:Biographies of living persons
6773:
6768:
6717:19:31, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
6708:15:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
6683:15:59, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
6658:15:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
6648:15:21, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
6587:10:44, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
6407:10:27, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
4670:), I would have commented at
3824:on the part of others and to
2096:and speedy close. Both AfDs,
665:Deletion review may be used:
6786:
6781:
6750:Archives, by year and month
2063:. Previous deletion review:
1789:inherited notability fallacy
1103:interpretation of the debate
631:
520:Administrative action review
68:
7:
8603:Administrators' noticeboard
8477:Compliment before criticism
8314:Featured article candidates
6331:Arild Andersen (footballer)
6289:Arild Andersen (footballer)
6033:Given the recent news that
5634:thinks there are 411 castes
5549:This sounds like a case of
4723:which includes three films
4650:These rds were deleted per
1458:Template:Florence landmarks
1176:, the discussion should be
889:with the name of the page,
539:Administrators' noticeboard
10:
9301:
5054:, since there wasn't one.â
1866:consensus GNG wasn't met.
1371:Here's a before/after diff
1164:. If the consensus was to
790:
775:protected against creation
646:
574:Discussions for discussion
97:
33:
15:
9239:
9109:
9060:
8954:
8804:
8737:
8588:
8497:
8438:
8363:
8233:
8112:
8089:
7987:
7922:
7857:
7792:
7727:
7662:
7597:
7532:
7467:
7402:
7337:
7272:
7207:
7142:
7077:
7012:
6947:
6882:
6817:
6810:
6805:
6800:
6795:
6790:
6785:
6780:
6777:
6772:
6767:
6762:
6757:
6754:
6566:
6559:
6557:
6552:
6539:
6526:
6513:
6500:
6474:
6469:
6464:
6461:
6456:
6453:
6442:
6439:
6424:
6421:
6416:
3378:Allow Recreation of Draft
3166:prior deletion discussion
2360:Allow Submission of Draft
1624:Allow Recreation of Draft
999:
861:
688:or is otherwise disputed;
16:This page deals with the
8863:Copyright investigations
8309:Good article nominations
8299:Articles for improvement
6733:Please do not modify it.
6320:Please do not modify it.
6266:Please do not modify it.
5960:Please do not modify it.
5907:Please do not modify it.
5367:Please do not modify it.
5075:Overturn to no consensus
5052:Overturn to no consensus
3313:I believe that 5 minute
3073:Please do not modify it.
2836:Please do not modify it.
2675:the Etienne Uzac article
1144:should not be restored.
684:was done outside of the
459:Administrator guidelines
8262:Articles needing images
8257:Images needing articles
5613:paper and many others.
5609:It's discussed in this
3866:; accounts blocked for
3836:single-purpose accounts
3806:policies and guidelines
3558:User:TheJoyfulTentmaker
3413:User:TheJoyfulTentmaker
2755:, citing the lack of a
2477:substantially identical
2412:this ref from version 2
2400:The first afd'd version
2249:search finds SIGCOV in
1946:User:TheJoyfulTentmaker
1383:Outline of Vatican City
1107:policies and guidelines
741:history-only undeletion
701:Deletion review should
546:In bot-related matters:
501:Formal review processes
8814:Regional notice boards
8706:Requests for adminship
8430:Organizations category
8420:Counter-Vandalism Unit
8178:Centralized discussion
5530:(Involved in the AfD)
2929:Withdrawn by nominator
2749:Endorse redirect close
2479:to the deleted version
2473:sufficiently identical
2138:Wycombe Wanderers F.C.
1755:Lady of the Bedchamber
1616:the original close as
1048:the original decision
9280:Knowledge maintenance
9111:Directories, indexes,
8784:Neutral point of view
8717:Arbitration Committee
8267:Articles for creation
8173:The Knowledge Library
5934:â Deletion endorsed.
5341:â Deletion endorsed.
4225:few or no other edits
4135:few or no other edits
1771:How's that soundly? â
1598:have been deprecated.
1407:Outline of San Marino
1118:Overturn and (action)
1026:Articles for deletion
786:will not be restored.
218:Templates and modules
9074:Requests for comment
8858:Copyright assistance
8789:No original research
8769:Conflict of interest
8749:Requests for comment
8580:Controversial issues
8383:Culture and the arts
8252:Most-wanted articles
6663:Refund to Draftspace
6632:Refund to draftspace
6417:Personal information
4721:Krrish (film series)
4362:to this discussion.
4324:to this discussion.
4227:outside this topic.
4186:to this discussion.
4137:outside this topic.
4040:to External Links. â
3984:'s source analysis.
1199:, if they so choose.
1128:Temporary undeletion
1036:established criteria
760:for these requests);
625:deletion discussions
124:Deletion discussions
9285:Knowledge processes
9126:Edit summary legend
8393:History and society
8336:Article translation
8083:Knowledge community
6751:
6665:- I wonder whether
6457:1.79Â m (5Â ft 10Â in)
6413:
6317:of the page above.
5957:of the page above.
5551:WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS
5477:Sanskrit literature
5364:of the page above.
3818:by counting votes.
3797:not a majority vote
3321:'s printed archive
3098:Alinur VelidedeoÄlu
3091:Alinur VelidedeoÄlu
2833:of the page above.
2603:User:Shubhamgawali1
1544:believe it or not:
1375:Outline of Florence
1289:Outline of Florence
1282:Outline of Florence
671:deletion discussion
619:) is for reviewing
166:Request a copy of a
18:deletion discussion
9275:Knowledge deletion
9207:Citation templates
9094:Voting is not evil
9042:Arguments to avoid
8805:Other noticeboards
8247:Requested articles
6749:
6694:(the musician) or
6411:
6057:Closer's comment:
6039:Draft:Trillionaire
3933:policy document.
3722:Global Credit Data
3715:Global Credit Data
3701:Recent discussions
3644:delete close and
3600:TheJoyfulTentmaker
3519:TheJoyfulTentmaker
3477:TheJoyfulTentmaker
3436:TheJoyfulTentmaker
3327:TheJoyfulTentmaker
3262:TheJoyfulTentmaker
3221:TheJoyfulTentmaker
3174:TheJoyfulTentmaker
1933:TheJoyfulTentmaker
1859:Overturn to delete
1808:Overturn to delete
1603:Super Maria effect
1550:WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP
1460:. And by the way,
1395:Outline of Palermo
1367:Please take a look
1261:Active discussions
990:<noinclude: -->
977:<noinclude: -->
948:<noinclude: -->
824:perennial requests
784:prohibited content
64:Recent discussions
59:Active discussions
9262:
9261:
9047:Arguments to make
8936:General sanctions
8880:Resource requests
8819:Requests for help
8662:Revision deletion
8499:Maintenance tasks
8482:Kindness Campaign
8114:General community
8050:
8049:
6740:
6739:
6698:will be needed.
6571:
6570:
6553:Managerial career
6273:
6272:
6071:
5914:
5913:
5876:deprecated source
5791:Technically, the
5771:
5734:
5692:
5654:
5594:
5068:
5022:
4913:10 September 2024
4773:Koi... Mil Gaya 3
4745:Koi... Mil Gaya 3
4741:Koi... Mil Gaya 2
4737:Koi... Mil Gaya 1
4697:
4681:comment added by
4664:Koi... Mil Gaya 3
4588:Koi... Mil Gaya 3
4512:11 September 2024
4436:
4369:
4368:
4363:
4325:
4234:
4233:
4228:
4187:
4164:
4151:comment added by
4138:
3899:
3898:
3895:
3822:assume good faith
3708:13 September 2024
3397:Undelete to draft
3084:14 September 2024
3080:
3079:
2956:
2940:comment added by
2800:16 September 2024
2730:Endorse as closer
2525:17 September 2024
2263:Radio Tavisupleba
1647:19 September 2024
1489:Outline of Venice
1466:Outline of Venice
1439:closed it. There
1414:The Transhumanist
1403:Outline of Venice
1391:Outline of Naples
1275:20 September 2024
1268:21 September 2024
1218:proposed deletion
1170:appropriate forum
1058:Guide to deletion
1040:appropriate forum
1003:
1002:
928:|PAGE_NAME}} ~~~~
857:
856:
737:proposed deletion
610:
609:
495:
494:
418:
401:Proposed deletion
200:
118:
117:
26:Proposed Deletion
9292:
8941:Editor sanctions
8902:Page importation
8831:Asking questions
8794:Reliable sources
8645:User permissions
8553:Category tracker
8548:Database reports
8095:Community portal
8076:
8069:
8062:
8053:
8052:
6813:
6808:
6803:
6798:
6793:
6788:
6783:
6775:
6770:
6765:
6760:
6752:
6748:
6735:
6626:
6617:
6608:
6494:
6486:
6435:
6431:
6429:
6414:
6410:
6388:
6383:
6374:
6360:
6352:
6344:
6322:
6301:
6296:
6282:
6281:
6277:9 September 2024
6268:
6225:
6211:
6175:
6128:
6125:
6120:
6070:
6068:
6061:
6028:
6023:
6014:
6000:
5992:
5984:
5962:
5924:
5923:
5909:
5795:is discussed in
5763:
5726:
5684:
5646:
5586:
5515:reliable sources
5471:, which states,
5435:
5430:
5421:
5407:
5399:
5391:
5369:
5331:
5330:
5304:
5291:
5239:
5209:
5201:
5143:
5140:
5135:
5095:
5092:
5087:
5060:
5013:
5012:
4984:
4979:
4970:
4956:
4948:
4940:
4883:Allow recreation
4870:
4865:
4834:
4829:
4805:
4676:
4645:
4640:
4631:
4617:
4609:
4601:
4583:
4578:
4569:
4555:
4547:
4539:
4473:
4432:
4428:
4341:
4303:
4275:
4274:
4250:
4245:
4210:
4165:
4146:
4120:
4082:
4081:
3983:
3893:
3881:
3865:
3849:
3830:
3800:, but instead a
3791:
3784:
3779:
3774:
3765:
3751:
3743:
3735:
3688:
3680:
3662:
3659:
3654:
3646:restore as draft
3353:
3348:
3342:Restore to draft
3285:
3249:
3155:
3150:
3141:
3127:
3119:
3111:
3075:
3036:
3005:Allow recreation
2978:
2935:
2931:as suggested by
2921:
2904:
2899:
2890:
2876:
2868:
2860:
2838:
2805:
2804:
2774:
2771:
2766:
2741:
2736:
2614:
2612:
2596:
2591:
2582:
2568:
2560:
2552:
2515:
2507:
2471:This applies to
2460:
2457:
2452:
2331:
2326:
2265:and coverage in
2098:the previous DRV
2039:
2034:
2025:
2011:
2003:
1995:
1982:Mikheil Lomtadze
1975:Mikheil Lomtadze
1883:
1875:
1718:
1713:
1704:
1690:
1682:
1674:
1578:
1570:
1537:Allow recreation
1529:
1524:
1462:Outline of Turin
1454:Outline of Turin
1417:
1399:Outline of Turin
1387:Outline of Milan
1346:
1341:
1332:
1318:
1310:
1302:
1216:Objections to a
1139:
1122:Allow recreation
1068:Allow recreation
992:
979:
950:
929:
900:
896:
892:
888:
880:
878:
859:
842:
841:
835:
803:
673:interpreted the
659:
623:and outcomes of
621:speedy deletions
602:
595:
588:
555:Bots noticeboard
497:
496:
487:
480:
473:
412:
194:
120:
119:
110:
92:
79:
77:
48:
41:
9300:
9299:
9295:
9294:
9293:
9291:
9290:
9289:
9265:
9264:
9263:
9258:
9235:
9163:Manual of Style
9105:
9056:
8950:
8946:Long-term abuse
8890:History mergers
8873:Media questions
8800:
8779:Fringe theories
8739:Content dispute
8733:
8689:Title blacklist
8640:Page protection
8625:Admin dashboard
8584:
8493:
8434:
8359:
8229:
8108:
8085:
8080:
6747:
6731:
6728:deletion review
6700:Robert McClenon
6675:Robert McClenon
6645:
6625:(in Norwegian).
6616:(in Norwegian).
6607:(in Norwegian).
6605:Haugesunds Avis
6584:
6433:
6427:
6425:
6384:
6382:
6379:
6370:
6369:
6363:
6356:
6355:
6348:
6347:
6340:
6339:
6318:
6315:deletion review
6299:
6294:
6280:
6264:
6261:deletion review
6222:Hurricane Clyde
6220:
6202:
6199:Hurricane Clyde
6172:Hurricane Clyde
6170:
6139:Robert McClenon
6123:
6118:
6115:
6104:
6064:
6062:
6024:
6022:
6019:
6010:
6009:
6003:
5996:
5995:
5988:
5987:
5980:
5979:
5958:
5955:deletion review
5922:
5905:
5902:deletion review
5836:Robert McClenon
5797:Sanskritisation
5714:Matsyendranatha
5568:
5531:
5486:
5431:
5429:
5426:
5417:
5416:
5410:
5403:
5402:
5395:
5394:
5387:
5386:
5365:
5362:deletion review
5329:
5301:Hurricane Clyde
5298:
5288:Hurricane Clyde
5286:
5218:
5205:
5197:
5157:
5138:
5133:
5130:
5109:
5090:
5085:
5082:
5044:
4991:
4980:
4978:
4975:
4966:
4965:
4959:
4952:
4951:
4944:
4943:
4936:
4935:
4923:
4916:
4866:
4861:
4860:backlink to 1.
4830:
4825:
4799:
4725:Koi... Mil Gaya
4707:Robert McClenon
4641:
4639:
4636:
4627:
4626:
4620:
4613:
4612:
4605:
4604:
4597:
4596:
4579:
4577:
4574:
4565:
4564:
4558:
4551:
4550:
4543:
4542:
4535:
4534:
4522:
4515:
4486:
4477:Robert McClenon
4469:
4453:Robert McClenon
4438:
4426:
4370:
4291:
4264:
4248:
4243:
4235:
4098:
4068:Robert McClenon
4019:Eastmain added
3979:
3931:Bank of England
3883:
3871:
3855:
3839:
3826:sign your posts
3775:
3773:
3770:
3761:
3760:
3754:
3747:
3746:
3739:
3738:
3731:
3730:
3718:
3711:
3704:
3684:
3676:
3657:
3652:
3649:
3501:more and better
3492:WP:DRVPURPOSE#3
3381:Robert McClenon
3365:Robert McClenon
3351:
3346:
3306:
3276:
3240:
3151:
3149:
3146:
3137:
3136:
3130:
3123:
3122:
3115:
3114:
3107:
3106:
3094:
3087:
3071:
3068:deletion review
3050:
3034:
3018:
2993:
2976:
2919:
2900:
2898:
2895:
2886:
2885:
2879:
2872:
2871:
2864:
2863:
2856:
2855:
2834:
2831:deletion review
2803:
2785:Robert McClenon
2769:
2764:
2761:
2751:and explicitly
2739:
2734:
2689:
2677:not covered in
2610:
2608:
2592:
2590:
2587:
2578:
2577:
2571:
2564:
2563:
2556:
2555:
2548:
2547:
2535:
2528:
2511:
2503:
2455:
2450:
2447:
2387:McClenon mobile
2364:Robert McClenon
2347:Robert McClenon
2329:
2324:
2310:
2297:Resubmit to AfD
2111:
2035:
2033:
2030:
2021:
2020:
2014:
2007:
2006:
1999:
1998:
1991:
1990:
1978:
1879:
1871:
1844:WP:NOTINHERITED
1812:WP:NOTGENEALOGY
1781:Robert McClenon
1759:Robert McClenon
1714:
1712:
1709:
1700:
1699:
1693:
1686:
1685:
1678:
1677:
1670:
1669:
1657:
1650:
1633:Robert McClenon
1574:
1566:
1527:
1522:
1475:
1450:Outline of Rome
1410:
1379:Outline of Rome
1342:
1340:
1337:
1328:
1327:
1321:
1314:
1313:
1306:
1305:
1298:
1297:
1285:
1278:
1271:
1264:
1213:
1193:speedy deletion
1150:
1148:Closing reviews
1133:
1130:
1008:
989:
976:
962:
947:
941:
923:
914:
905:
898:
894:
890:
886:
876:
874:
870:
839:
833:
812:
807:
806:
799:
795:
789:
718:this discussion
682:speedy deletion
663:
662:
655:
651:
644:
613:Deletion review
606:
510:Deletion review
491:
455:
383:Speedy deletion
170:
168:deleted article
161:
152:Deletion review
145:
114:
113:
106:
102:
94:
93:
88:
82:
73:
39:
32:
22:speedy deletion
12:
11:
5:
9298:
9288:
9287:
9282:
9277:
9260:
9259:
9257:
9256:
9251:
9246:
9240:
9237:
9236:
9234:
9233:
9228:
9223:
9222:
9221:
9211:
9210:
9209:
9199:
9194:
9193:
9192:
9187:
9182:
9172:
9171:
9170:
9160:
9155:
9154:
9153:
9143:
9138:
9133:
9131:Editor's index
9128:
9123:
9117:
9115:
9113:
9107:
9106:
9104:
9103:
9102:
9101:
9096:
9086:
9081:
9070:
9068:
9058:
9057:
9055:
9054:
9052:Article Rescue
9049:
9044:
9039:
9038:
9037:
9027:
9026:
9025:
9015:
9010:
9005:
9000:
8995:
8990:
8985:
8980:
8975:
8974:
8973:
8962:
8960:
8957:
8952:
8951:
8949:
8948:
8943:
8938:
8933:
8928:
8923:
8922:
8921:
8916:
8906:
8905:
8904:
8894:
8893:
8892:
8882:
8877:
8876:
8875:
8870:
8865:
8855:
8854:
8853:
8848:
8846:Reference desk
8843:
8838:
8828:
8827:
8826:
8816:
8810:
8808:
8807:and assistance
8806:
8802:
8801:
8799:
8798:
8797:
8796:
8791:
8786:
8781:
8776:
8774:External links
8771:
8766:
8756:
8751:
8745:
8743:
8740:
8735:
8734:
8732:
8731:
8730:
8729:
8724:
8714:
8713:
8712:
8710:bureaucratship
8698:
8693:
8692:
8691:
8686:
8676:
8675:
8674:
8664:
8659:
8658:
8657:
8652:
8647:
8642:
8637:
8630:Admin requests
8627:
8622:
8621:
8620:
8615:
8610:
8599:
8597:
8592:
8590:Administrators
8586:
8585:
8583:
8582:
8577:
8576:
8575:
8573:Recent changes
8570:
8560:
8558:Dusty articles
8555:
8550:
8545:
8544:
8543:
8533:
8532:
8531:
8529:Admin category
8526:
8516:
8515:
8514:
8503:
8501:
8495:
8494:
8492:
8491:
8486:
8485:
8484:
8479:
8469:
8467:Charitableness
8464:
8459:
8454:
8448:
8446:
8436:
8435:
8433:
8432:
8427:
8422:
8417:
8416:
8415:
8413:Recent changes
8405:
8400:
8395:
8390:
8385:
8380:
8374:
8372:
8370:collaborations
8367:
8361:
8360:
8358:
8357:
8356:
8355:
8345:
8344:
8343:
8333:
8332:
8331:
8326:
8321:
8311:
8306:
8301:
8296:
8294:Vital articles
8291:
8290:
8289:
8284:
8279:
8274:
8264:
8259:
8254:
8249:
8243:
8241:
8231:
8230:
8228:
8227:
8222:
8217:
8216:
8215:
8210:
8205:
8200:
8195:
8190:
8180:
8175:
8170:
8165:
8160:
8155:
8150:
8149:
8148:
8143:
8138:
8126:
8124:Administration
8120:
8118:
8115:
8110:
8109:
8099:
8090:
8087:
8086:
8079:
8078:
8071:
8064:
8056:
8048:
8047:
8042:
8037:
8032:
8027:
8022:
8017:
8012:
8007:
8002:
7997:
7992:
7989:
7985:
7984:
7979:
7974:
7969:
7964:
7959:
7954:
7949:
7944:
7939:
7934:
7929:
7924:
7920:
7919:
7914:
7909:
7904:
7899:
7894:
7889:
7884:
7879:
7874:
7869:
7864:
7859:
7855:
7854:
7849:
7844:
7839:
7834:
7829:
7824:
7819:
7814:
7809:
7804:
7799:
7794:
7790:
7789:
7784:
7779:
7774:
7769:
7764:
7759:
7754:
7749:
7744:
7739:
7734:
7729:
7725:
7724:
7719:
7714:
7709:
7704:
7699:
7694:
7689:
7684:
7679:
7674:
7669:
7664:
7660:
7659:
7654:
7649:
7644:
7639:
7634:
7629:
7624:
7619:
7614:
7609:
7604:
7599:
7595:
7594:
7589:
7584:
7579:
7574:
7569:
7564:
7559:
7554:
7549:
7544:
7539:
7534:
7530:
7529:
7524:
7519:
7514:
7509:
7504:
7499:
7494:
7489:
7484:
7479:
7474:
7469:
7465:
7464:
7459:
7454:
7449:
7444:
7439:
7434:
7429:
7424:
7419:
7414:
7409:
7404:
7400:
7399:
7394:
7389:
7384:
7379:
7374:
7369:
7364:
7359:
7354:
7349:
7344:
7339:
7335:
7334:
7329:
7324:
7319:
7314:
7309:
7304:
7299:
7294:
7289:
7284:
7279:
7274:
7270:
7269:
7264:
7259:
7254:
7249:
7244:
7239:
7234:
7229:
7224:
7219:
7214:
7209:
7205:
7204:
7199:
7194:
7189:
7184:
7179:
7174:
7169:
7164:
7159:
7154:
7149:
7144:
7140:
7139:
7134:
7129:
7124:
7119:
7114:
7109:
7104:
7099:
7094:
7089:
7084:
7079:
7075:
7074:
7069:
7064:
7059:
7054:
7049:
7044:
7039:
7034:
7029:
7024:
7019:
7014:
7010:
7009:
7004:
6999:
6994:
6989:
6984:
6979:
6974:
6969:
6964:
6959:
6954:
6949:
6945:
6944:
6939:
6934:
6929:
6924:
6919:
6914:
6909:
6904:
6899:
6894:
6889:
6884:
6880:
6879:
6874:
6869:
6864:
6859:
6854:
6849:
6844:
6839:
6834:
6829:
6824:
6819:
6815:
6814:
6809:
6804:
6799:
6794:
6789:
6784:
6779:
6776:
6771:
6766:
6761:
6756:
6746:
6741:
6738:
6737:
6722:
6721:
6720:
6719:
6710:
6692:Arild Andersen
6685:
6660:
6650:
6643:
6629:
6628:
6627:
6618:
6609:
6589:
6582:
6569:
6568:
6564:
6563:
6558:
6555:
6554:
6550:
6549:
6547:
6545:
6540:
6537:
6536:
6534:
6532:
6527:
6524:
6523:
6521:
6519:
6514:
6511:
6510:
6508:
6506:
6501:
6498:
6497:
6488:
6481:
6476:
6472:
6471:
6470:Senior career*
6467:
6466:
6463:
6459:
6458:
6455:
6451:
6450:
6441:
6440:Place of birth
6437:
6436:
6432:9 January 1972
6423:
6419:
6418:
6412:Arild Andersen
6393:I am invoking
6391:
6390:
6380:
6367:
6361:
6353:
6345:
6337:
6325:
6324:
6309:
6308:
6307:
6306:
6279:
6274:
6271:
6270:
6255:
6254:
6253:
6252:
6251:
6250:
6249:
6248:
6247:
6246:
6245:
6244:
6243:
6242:
6241:
6240:
6161:
6149:
6132:
6109:
6102:
6094:
6076:
6075:
6031:
6030:
6020:
6007:
6001:
5993:
5985:
5977:
5965:
5964:
5949:
5948:
5947:
5946:
5921:
5915:
5912:
5911:
5896:
5895:
5894:
5893:
5892:
5891:
5890:
5889:
5846:
5825:
5824:
5823:
5822:
5821:
5789:
5788:
5787:
5786:
5785:
5784:
5783:
5782:
5781:
5780:
5779:
5778:
5777:
5776:
5775:
5741:
5577:
5576:
5575:
5574:
5573:
5566:
5529:
5508:
5507:
5506:
5484:
5438:
5437:
5427:
5414:
5408:
5400:
5392:
5384:
5372:
5371:
5356:
5355:
5354:
5353:
5328:
5322:
5321:
5320:
5319:
5318:
5279:
5262:
5245:
5244:
5243:
5186:
5169:
5168:
5167:
5166:
5165:
5164:
5163:
5162:
5155:
5150:No consensus.
5117:
5116:
5115:
5114:
5107:
5072:
5049:
5042:
5018:comment added
4987:
4986:
4976:
4963:
4957:
4949:
4941:
4933:
4922:
4917:
4915:
4910:
4909:
4908:
4879:
4878:
4877:
4876:
4875:
4874:
4821:
4817:
4812:
4811:
4797:
4796:
4795:
4777:Koi Mil Gaya 3
4749:Koi Mil Gaya 3
4668:Koi Mil Gaya 3
4648:
4647:
4637:
4624:
4618:
4610:
4602:
4594:
4585:
4575:
4562:
4556:
4548:
4540:
4532:
4526:Koi Mil Gaya 3
4521:
4519:Koi Mil Gaya 3
4516:
4514:
4509:
4508:
4507:
4506:
4505:
4484:
4463:
4443:
4442:
4430:
4421:
4420:
4414:
4389:
4367:
4366:
4365:
4364:
4326:
4293:
4292:
4278:
4273:
4272:
4271:
4270:
4269:
4262:
4232:
4231:
4230:
4229:
4188:
4139:
4100:
4099:
4085:
4080:
4079:
4078:
4061:
4049:
4048:
4047:
4000:
3961:
3960:
3959:
3897:
3896:
3792:
3782:
3781:
3771:
3758:
3752:
3744:
3736:
3728:
3717:
3712:
3710:
3705:
3703:
3698:
3696:
3694:
3693:
3666:
3639:
3638:
3637:
3636:
3635:
3634:
3633:
3632:
3631:
3630:
3629:
3564:
3561:
3555:
3554:
3553:
3552:
3551:
3550:
3549:
3548:
3547:
3406:
3391:
3375:
3358:
3339:
3338:
3337:
3304:
3293:
3292:
3291:
3290:
3289:
3232:
3231:
3158:
3157:
3147:
3134:
3128:
3120:
3112:
3104:
3093:
3088:
3086:
3081:
3078:
3077:
3062:
3061:
3060:
3059:
3058:
3057:
3056:
3055:
3048:
3027:
3016:
3002:
3001:
3000:
2999:
2998:
2991:
2907:
2906:
2896:
2883:
2877:
2869:
2861:
2853:
2841:
2840:
2825:
2824:
2823:
2822:
2815:â Withdrawn. â
2802:
2797:
2796:
2795:
2778:
2746:
2727:
2726:
2725:
2715:Shubhamgawali1
2687:
2658:
2657:
2656:
2655:
2645:Shubhamgawali1
2627:Shubhamgawali1
2599:
2598:
2588:
2575:
2569:
2561:
2553:
2545:
2534:
2529:
2527:
2522:
2521:
2520:
2493:
2464:
2441:
2440:
2439:
2438:
2437:
2436:
2435:
2408:yesterday's G4
2374:
2357:
2336:
2315:
2308:
2293:
2281:
2220:
2207:
2206:
2205:
2204:
2203:
2202:
2201:
2134:
2133:
2132:
2109:
2090:
2089:
2088:
2042:
2041:
2031:
2018:
2012:
2004:
1996:
1988:
1977:
1972:
1971:
1970:
1969:
1968:
1909:
1888:
1856:
1855:
1854:
1822:
1805:
1804:
1803:
1778:
1721:
1720:
1710:
1697:
1691:
1683:
1675:
1667:
1656:
1651:
1649:
1644:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1627:
1621:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1606:
1599:
1595:
1583:
1559:
1534:
1515:
1503:
1481:
1480:
1473:
1445:
1444:
1349:
1348:
1338:
1325:
1319:
1311:
1303:
1295:
1284:
1279:
1277:
1272:
1270:
1265:
1263:
1258:
1256:
1253:
1251:
1250:
1242:
1231:
1224:
1212:
1209:
1204:
1203:
1200:
1149:
1146:
1129:
1126:
1116:, rather than
1098:
1097:
1094:
1091:
1088:
1085:
1082:
1079:
1072:
1071:
1065:
1052:optionally an
1043:
1029:
1019:
1007:
1004:
1001:
1000:
997:
996:
995:
994:
985:different from
981:
963:
958:
955:
954:
942:
937:
934:
933:
932:
931:
915:
910:
907:
906:
903:
871:
866:
863:
862:
855:
854:
843:
832:
829:
828:
827:
820:
811:
808:
805:
804:
796:
791:
779:
778:
771:
764:
761:
754:
751:
748:
743:(please go to
733:
726:
714:
699:
698:
695:
692:
689:
678:
661:
660:
652:
647:
645:
643:
640:
608:
607:
605:
604:
597:
590:
582:
579:
578:
577:
576:
568:
567:
561:
560:
559:
558:
557:
549:
548:
542:
541:
535:
534:
531:
526:
525:
524:
523:
522:
517:
512:
504:
503:
493:
492:
490:
489:
482:
475:
467:
464:
463:
462:
461:
456:
454:
453:
443:
438:
432:
427:
426:
425:
424:
419:
404:
403:
397:
396:
395:
394:
386:
385:
379:
378:
377:
376:
371:
366:
358:
357:
351:
350:
349:
348:
343:
338:
333:
325:
324:
318:
317:
316:
315:
310:
305:
300:
295:
290:
282:
281:
275:
274:
273:
272:
267:
262:
254:
253:
247:
246:
245:
244:
239:
234:
229:
221:
220:
214:
213:
212:
211:
206:
201:
189:
181:
180:
174:
173:
172:
171:
167:
164:
162:
160:
159:
154:
148:
146:
144:
143:
138:
136:Deletion today
132:
127:
126:
116:
115:
112:
111:
103:
98:
95:
86:
84:
83:
81:
80:
71:
66:
61:
55:
51:
49:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
9297:
9286:
9283:
9281:
9278:
9276:
9273:
9272:
9270:
9255:
9252:
9250:
9247:
9245:
9242:
9241:
9238:
9232:
9229:
9227:
9224:
9220:
9217:
9216:
9215:
9212:
9208:
9205:
9204:
9203:
9200:
9198:
9195:
9191:
9188:
9186:
9183:
9181:
9178:
9177:
9176:
9173:
9169:
9166:
9165:
9164:
9161:
9159:
9156:
9152:
9151:Abbreviations
9149:
9148:
9147:
9144:
9142:
9139:
9137:
9134:
9132:
9129:
9127:
9124:
9122:
9119:
9118:
9116:
9114:and summaries
9112:
9108:
9100:
9097:
9095:
9092:
9091:
9090:
9087:
9085:
9082:
9079:
9075:
9072:
9071:
9069:
9067:
9063:
9059:
9053:
9050:
9048:
9045:
9043:
9040:
9036:
9033:
9032:
9031:
9028:
9024:
9021:
9020:
9019:
9016:
9014:
9011:
9009:
9006:
9004:
9001:
8999:
8996:
8994:
8991:
8989:
8986:
8984:
8981:
8979:
8976:
8972:
8969:
8968:
8967:
8964:
8963:
8961:
8959:
8953:
8947:
8944:
8942:
8939:
8937:
8934:
8932:
8929:
8927:
8924:
8920:
8917:
8915:
8912:
8911:
8910:
8907:
8903:
8900:
8899:
8898:
8895:
8891:
8888:
8887:
8886:
8883:
8881:
8878:
8874:
8871:
8869:
8868:Text problems
8866:
8864:
8861:
8860:
8859:
8856:
8852:
8849:
8847:
8844:
8842:
8839:
8837:
8834:
8833:
8832:
8829:
8825:
8822:
8821:
8820:
8817:
8815:
8812:
8811:
8809:
8803:
8795:
8792:
8790:
8787:
8785:
8782:
8780:
8777:
8775:
8772:
8770:
8767:
8765:
8762:
8761:
8760:
8757:
8755:
8754:Third opinion
8752:
8750:
8747:
8746:
8744:
8742:
8736:
8728:
8725:
8723:
8720:
8719:
8718:
8715:
8711:
8707:
8704:
8703:
8702:
8699:
8697:
8694:
8690:
8687:
8685:
8682:
8681:
8680:
8677:
8673:
8670:
8669:
8668:
8665:
8663:
8660:
8656:
8653:
8651:
8648:
8646:
8643:
8641:
8638:
8636:
8633:
8632:
8631:
8628:
8626:
8623:
8619:
8616:
8614:
8611:
8609:
8606:
8605:
8604:
8601:
8600:
8598:
8596:
8591:
8587:
8581:
8578:
8574:
8571:
8569:
8566:
8565:
8564:
8563:Special pages
8561:
8559:
8556:
8554:
8551:
8549:
8546:
8542:
8539:
8538:
8537:
8536:Edit requests
8534:
8530:
8527:
8525:
8522:
8521:
8520:
8517:
8513:
8510:
8509:
8508:
8505:
8504:
8502:
8500:
8496:
8490:
8487:
8483:
8480:
8478:
8475:
8474:
8473:
8470:
8468:
8465:
8463:
8460:
8458:
8455:
8453:
8450:
8449:
8447:
8445:
8441:
8437:
8431:
8428:
8426:
8425:Accessibility
8423:
8421:
8418:
8414:
8411:
8410:
8409:
8406:
8404:
8401:
8399:
8396:
8394:
8391:
8389:
8386:
8384:
8381:
8379:
8376:
8375:
8373:
8371:
8366:
8362:
8354:
8351:
8350:
8349:
8346:
8342:
8339:
8338:
8337:
8334:
8330:
8327:
8325:
8322:
8320:
8317:
8316:
8315:
8312:
8310:
8307:
8305:
8302:
8300:
8297:
8295:
8292:
8288:
8285:
8283:
8280:
8278:
8275:
8273:
8270:
8269:
8268:
8265:
8263:
8260:
8258:
8255:
8253:
8250:
8248:
8245:
8244:
8242:
8240:
8236:
8232:
8226:
8223:
8221:
8218:
8214:
8211:
8209:
8208:Miscellaneous
8206:
8204:
8201:
8199:
8196:
8194:
8191:
8189:
8186:
8185:
8184:
8181:
8179:
8176:
8174:
8171:
8169:
8166:
8164:
8161:
8159:
8158:Mailing lists
8156:
8154:
8151:
8147:
8144:
8142:
8139:
8137:
8136:
8132:
8131:
8130:
8127:
8125:
8122:
8121:
8119:
8117:
8111:
8107:
8105:
8104:
8097:
8096:
8088:
8084:
8077:
8072:
8070:
8065:
8063:
8058:
8057:
8054:
8046:
8043:
8041:
8038:
8036:
8033:
8031:
8028:
8026:
8023:
8021:
8018:
8016:
8013:
8011:
8008:
8006:
8003:
8001:
7998:
7996:
7993:
7990:
7986:
7983:
7980:
7978:
7975:
7973:
7970:
7968:
7965:
7963:
7960:
7958:
7955:
7953:
7950:
7948:
7945:
7943:
7940:
7938:
7935:
7933:
7930:
7928:
7925:
7921:
7918:
7915:
7913:
7910:
7908:
7905:
7903:
7900:
7898:
7895:
7893:
7890:
7888:
7885:
7883:
7880:
7878:
7875:
7873:
7870:
7868:
7865:
7863:
7860:
7856:
7853:
7850:
7848:
7845:
7843:
7840:
7838:
7835:
7833:
7830:
7828:
7825:
7823:
7820:
7818:
7815:
7813:
7810:
7808:
7805:
7803:
7800:
7798:
7795:
7791:
7788:
7785:
7783:
7780:
7778:
7775:
7773:
7770:
7768:
7765:
7763:
7760:
7758:
7755:
7753:
7750:
7748:
7745:
7743:
7740:
7738:
7735:
7733:
7730:
7726:
7723:
7720:
7718:
7715:
7713:
7710:
7708:
7705:
7703:
7700:
7698:
7695:
7693:
7690:
7688:
7685:
7683:
7680:
7678:
7675:
7673:
7670:
7668:
7665:
7661:
7658:
7655:
7653:
7650:
7648:
7645:
7643:
7640:
7638:
7635:
7633:
7630:
7628:
7625:
7623:
7620:
7618:
7615:
7613:
7610:
7608:
7605:
7603:
7600:
7596:
7593:
7590:
7588:
7585:
7583:
7580:
7578:
7575:
7573:
7570:
7568:
7565:
7563:
7560:
7558:
7555:
7553:
7550:
7548:
7545:
7543:
7540:
7538:
7535:
7531:
7528:
7525:
7523:
7520:
7518:
7515:
7513:
7510:
7508:
7505:
7503:
7500:
7498:
7495:
7493:
7490:
7488:
7485:
7483:
7480:
7478:
7475:
7473:
7470:
7466:
7463:
7460:
7458:
7455:
7453:
7450:
7448:
7445:
7443:
7440:
7438:
7435:
7433:
7430:
7428:
7425:
7423:
7420:
7418:
7415:
7413:
7410:
7408:
7405:
7401:
7398:
7395:
7393:
7390:
7388:
7385:
7383:
7380:
7378:
7375:
7373:
7370:
7368:
7365:
7363:
7360:
7358:
7355:
7353:
7350:
7348:
7345:
7343:
7340:
7336:
7333:
7330:
7328:
7325:
7323:
7320:
7318:
7315:
7313:
7310:
7308:
7305:
7303:
7300:
7298:
7295:
7293:
7290:
7288:
7285:
7283:
7280:
7278:
7275:
7271:
7268:
7265:
7263:
7260:
7258:
7255:
7253:
7250:
7248:
7245:
7243:
7240:
7238:
7235:
7233:
7230:
7228:
7225:
7223:
7220:
7218:
7215:
7213:
7210:
7206:
7203:
7200:
7198:
7195:
7193:
7190:
7188:
7185:
7183:
7180:
7178:
7175:
7173:
7170:
7168:
7165:
7163:
7160:
7158:
7155:
7153:
7150:
7148:
7145:
7141:
7138:
7135:
7133:
7130:
7128:
7125:
7123:
7120:
7118:
7115:
7113:
7110:
7108:
7105:
7103:
7100:
7098:
7095:
7093:
7090:
7088:
7085:
7083:
7080:
7076:
7073:
7070:
7068:
7065:
7063:
7060:
7058:
7055:
7053:
7050:
7048:
7045:
7043:
7040:
7038:
7035:
7033:
7030:
7028:
7025:
7023:
7020:
7018:
7015:
7011:
7008:
7005:
7003:
7000:
6998:
6995:
6993:
6990:
6988:
6985:
6983:
6980:
6978:
6975:
6973:
6970:
6968:
6965:
6963:
6960:
6958:
6955:
6953:
6950:
6946:
6943:
6940:
6938:
6935:
6933:
6930:
6928:
6925:
6923:
6920:
6918:
6915:
6913:
6910:
6908:
6905:
6903:
6900:
6898:
6895:
6893:
6890:
6888:
6885:
6881:
6878:
6875:
6873:
6870:
6868:
6865:
6863:
6860:
6858:
6855:
6853:
6850:
6848:
6845:
6843:
6840:
6838:
6835:
6833:
6830:
6828:
6825:
6823:
6820:
6816:
6753:
6745:
6736:
6734:
6729:
6724:
6723:
6718:
6715:
6711:
6709:
6705:
6701:
6697:
6693:
6689:
6686:
6684:
6680:
6676:
6672:
6668:
6664:
6661:
6659:
6656:
6651:
6649:
6646:
6641:
6637:
6633:
6630:
6624:
6619:
6615:
6610:
6606:
6601:
6600:
6598:
6594:
6590:
6588:
6585:
6580:
6576:
6573:
6572:
6565:
6562:
6556:
6551:
6548:
6546:
6544:
6541:
6538:
6535:
6533:
6531:
6528:
6525:
6522:
6520:
6518:
6515:
6512:
6509:
6507:
6505:
6502:
6499:
6496:
6489:
6487:
6482:
6480:
6477:
6473:
6468:
6460:
6452:
6449:
6445:
6438:
6422:Date of birth
6420:
6415:
6409:
6408:
6404:
6400:
6396:
6395:WP:DRVPURPOSE
6387:
6378:
6373:
6366:
6359:
6351:
6343:
6336:
6332:
6329:
6328:
6327:
6326:
6323:
6321:
6316:
6311:
6310:
6305:
6302:
6297:
6291:
6290:
6286:
6285:
6284:
6283:
6278:
6269:
6267:
6262:
6257:
6256:
6239:
6236:
6231:
6230:
6229:
6226:
6223:
6216:
6215:
6214:
6210:
6208:
6207:
6200:
6197:
6196:
6195:
6191:
6187:
6183:
6182:
6181:
6180:
6179:
6176:
6173:
6168:
6167:
6165:
6162:
6160:
6157:
6153:
6150:
6148:
6144:
6140:
6136:
6133:
6131:
6127:
6126:
6121:
6113:
6110:
6108:
6105:
6100:
6095:
6093:
6089:
6085:
6081:
6078:
6077:
6074:
6069:
6067:
6058:
6055:
6054:
6053:
6052:
6048:
6044:
6040:
6036:
6027:
6018:
6013:
6006:
5999:
5991:
5983:
5976:
5972:
5969:
5968:
5967:
5966:
5963:
5961:
5956:
5951:
5950:
5945:
5941:
5937:
5933:
5932:
5928:
5927:
5926:
5925:
5919:
5910:
5908:
5903:
5898:
5897:
5888:
5885:
5881:
5877:
5873:
5872:
5871:
5867:
5863:
5862:Mohit Dokania
5859:
5858:
5857:
5854:
5850:
5847:
5845:
5841:
5837:
5833:
5829:
5826:
5820:
5816:
5812:
5811:Mohit Dokania
5807:
5806:
5805:
5802:
5798:
5794:
5790:
5774:
5770:
5766:
5762:
5761:
5756:
5755:
5754:
5750:
5746:
5745:Mohit Dokania
5742:
5739:
5738:
5737:
5733:
5729:
5725:
5724:
5719:
5718:Narayana Guru
5715:
5711:
5710:
5709:
5705:
5701:
5700:Mohit Dokania
5697:
5696:
5695:
5691:
5687:
5683:
5682:
5677:
5673:
5672:
5671:
5667:
5663:
5662:Mohit Dokania
5659:
5658:
5657:
5653:
5649:
5645:
5644:
5639:
5635:
5631:
5626:
5625:
5624:
5620:
5616:
5615:Mohit Dokania
5612:
5608:
5604:
5599:
5598:
5597:
5593:
5589:
5585:
5584:
5578:
5572:
5569:
5564:
5560:
5556:
5555:Mohit Dokania
5552:
5548:
5547:
5546:
5542:
5538:
5537:Mohit Dokania
5533:
5532:
5528:
5524:
5520:
5516:
5512:
5509:
5505:
5501:
5497:
5496:Mohit Dokania
5492:
5491:
5490:
5487:
5482:
5478:
5474:
5470:
5466:
5462:
5458:
5455:
5454:
5453:
5452:
5448:
5444:
5443:Mohit Dokania
5434:
5425:
5420:
5413:
5406:
5398:
5390:
5383:
5379:
5376:
5375:
5374:
5373:
5370:
5368:
5363:
5358:
5357:
5352:
5348:
5344:
5340:
5339:
5335:
5334:
5333:
5332:
5326:
5317:
5313:
5309:
5302:
5297:
5296:
5295:
5292:
5289:
5283:
5280:
5278:
5274:
5270:
5266:
5263:
5261:
5257:
5253:
5249:
5246:
5242:
5237:
5233:
5229:
5225:
5221:
5215:
5214:
5213:
5210:
5208:
5202:
5200:
5195:
5194:SportingFlyer
5190:
5187:
5185:
5182:
5180:
5178:
5177:
5171:
5170:
5161:
5158:
5153:
5148:
5147:
5146:
5142:
5141:
5136:
5128:
5123:
5122:
5121:
5120:
5119:
5118:
5113:
5110:
5105:
5100:
5099:
5098:
5094:
5093:
5088:
5080:
5076:
5073:
5071:
5067:
5063:
5059:
5058:
5053:
5050:
5048:
5045:
5040:
5036:
5032:
5028:
5025:
5024:
5023:
5021:
5017:
5010:
5006:
5002:
4998:
4994:
4983:
4974:
4969:
4962:
4955:
4947:
4939:
4932:
4928:
4925:
4924:
4921:
4914:
4907:
4904:
4900:
4896:
4892:
4888:
4884:
4881:
4880:
4873:
4869:
4864:
4858:
4857:
4856:
4852:
4848:
4843:
4839:
4838:
4837:
4833:
4828:
4822:
4818:
4814:
4813:
4809:
4803:
4798:
4794:
4790:
4786:
4782:
4778:
4774:
4770:
4766:
4762:
4758:
4754:
4750:
4746:
4742:
4738:
4734:
4730:
4726:
4722:
4718:
4717:
4716:
4712:
4708:
4703:
4700:
4699:
4698:
4696:
4692:
4688:
4684:
4680:
4673:
4669:
4665:
4661:
4657:
4653:
4644:
4635:
4630:
4623:
4616:
4608:
4600:
4593:
4589:
4586:
4582:
4573:
4568:
4561:
4554:
4546:
4538:
4531:
4527:
4524:
4523:
4520:
4513:
4504:
4501:
4497:
4492:
4491:
4490:
4487:
4482:
4478:
4472:
4471:just admitted
4467:
4464:
4462:
4458:
4454:
4450:
4449:
4445:
4444:
4441:
4437:
4435:
4429:
4423:
4422:
4418:
4415:
4413:
4409:
4405:
4401:
4397:
4393:
4390:
4388:
4384:
4380:
4375:
4372:
4371:
4361:
4357:
4353:
4349:
4345:
4340:
4336:
4332:
4327:
4323:
4319:
4315:
4311:
4307:
4300:
4297:
4296:
4295:
4294:
4290:
4286:
4282:
4277:
4276:
4268:
4265:
4260:
4256:
4255:
4254:
4251:
4246:
4240:
4237:
4236:
4226:
4222:
4218:
4214:
4213:Risktrademike
4209:
4205:
4201:
4200:Risktrademike
4197:
4192:
4189:
4185:
4181:
4177:
4173:
4169:
4162:
4158:
4154:
4150:
4143:
4140:
4136:
4132:
4128:
4124:
4123:Philthebanker
4119:
4115:
4111:
4110:Philthebanker
4107:
4104:
4103:
4102:
4101:
4097:
4093:
4089:
4084:
4083:
4077:
4073:
4069:
4065:
4062:
4060:
4057:
4053:
4050:
4046:
4043:
4039:
4035:
4031:
4028:
4025:
4022:
4018:
4017:
4016:
4012:
4008:
4004:
4001:
3999:
3995:
3994:contributions
3991:
3987:
3982:
3977:
3973:
3969:
3965:
3962:
3958:
3954:
3950:
3946:
3945:
3944:
3940:
3936:
3932:
3928:
3924:
3920:
3919:
3915:
3914:
3913:
3912:
3908:
3904:
3891:
3887:
3879:
3875:
3869:
3863:
3859:
3853:
3847:
3843:
3837:
3833:
3829:
3827:
3823:
3817:
3813:
3812:
3807:
3803:
3799:
3798:
3793:
3790:
3786:
3785:
3778:
3769:
3764:
3757:
3750:
3742:
3734:
3727:
3723:
3720:
3719:
3716:
3709:
3702:
3697:
3692:
3689:
3687:
3681:
3679:
3674:
3673:SportingFlyer
3670:
3667:
3665:
3661:
3660:
3655:
3647:
3643:
3640:
3628:
3624:
3620:
3616:
3611:
3610:
3609:
3605:
3601:
3597:
3593:
3592:
3591:
3587:
3583:
3579:
3578:
3577:
3573:
3569:
3565:
3562:
3559:
3556:
3546:
3543:
3538:
3534:
3530:
3529:
3528:
3524:
3520:
3516:
3512:
3511:
3510:
3507:
3502:
3498:
3493:
3488:
3487:
3486:
3482:
3478:
3474:
3470:
3469:
3468:
3465:
3461:
3456:
3452:
3447:
3446:
3445:
3441:
3437:
3432:
3431:
3430:
3426:
3422:
3418:
3414:
3410:
3407:
3405:
3402:
3398:
3395:
3392:
3390:
3386:
3382:
3379:
3376:
3374:
3370:
3366:
3362:
3359:
3357:
3354:
3349:
3343:
3340:
3336:
3332:
3328:
3324:
3320:
3316:
3312:
3311:
3310:
3307:
3302:
3297:
3294:
3288:
3284:
3282:
3281:
3273:
3272:
3271:
3267:
3263:
3258:
3254:
3253:
3252:
3248:
3246:
3245:
3237:
3234:
3233:
3230:
3226:
3222:
3219:
3216:
3213:
3210:
3207:
3204:
3201:
3198:
3195:
3194:
3189:
3186:
3185:
3184:
3183:
3179:
3175:
3171:
3167:
3163:
3154:
3145:
3140:
3133:
3126:
3118:
3110:
3103:
3099:
3096:
3095:
3092:
3085:
3076:
3074:
3069:
3064:
3063:
3054:
3051:
3046:
3042:
3041:
3040:
3037:
3032:
3028:
3024:
3023:
3022:
3019:
3014:
3010:
3006:
3003:
2997:
2994:
2989:
2984:
2983:
2982:
2979:
2974:
2969:
2968:
2967:
2964:
2959:
2958:
2957:
2955:
2951:
2947:
2943:
2942:Yummifruitbat
2939:
2934:
2930:
2926:
2925:
2922:
2917:
2913:
2903:
2894:
2889:
2882:
2875:
2867:
2859:
2852:
2848:
2845:
2844:
2843:
2842:
2839:
2837:
2832:
2827:
2826:
2821:
2818:
2814:
2813:
2809:
2808:
2807:
2806:
2801:
2794:
2790:
2786:
2782:
2779:
2777:
2773:
2772:
2767:
2758:
2754:
2750:
2747:
2745:
2742:
2737:
2731:
2728:
2724:
2720:
2716:
2711:
2707:
2703:
2698:
2695:
2694:
2693:
2690:
2685:
2680:
2676:
2671:
2667:
2663:
2660:
2659:
2654:
2650:
2646:
2641:
2638:
2637:
2636:
2632:
2628:
2624:
2621:
2620:
2619:
2618:
2615:
2613:
2604:
2595:
2586:
2581:
2574:
2567:
2559:
2551:
2544:
2540:
2537:
2536:
2533:
2526:
2519:
2516:
2514:
2508:
2506:
2501:
2500:SportingFlyer
2497:
2494:
2492:
2488:
2484:
2480:
2478:
2474:
2468:
2465:
2463:
2459:
2458:
2453:
2445:
2442:
2434:
2430:
2426:
2422:
2421:
2420:
2417:
2413:
2409:
2405:
2401:
2398:
2397:
2396:
2392:
2388:
2384:
2383:
2382:
2379:
2375:
2373:
2369:
2365:
2361:
2358:
2356:
2352:
2348:
2344:
2340:
2337:
2335:
2332:
2327:
2320:
2316:
2314:
2311:
2306:
2302:
2298:
2294:
2292:
2289:
2285:
2282:
2280:
2276:
2272:
2268:
2264:
2260:
2259:November 2022
2257:and again in
2256:
2252:
2248:
2243:
2239:
2235:
2231:
2227:
2226:
2221:
2219:
2216:
2212:
2208:
2200:
2197:
2192:
2188:
2185:
2184:
2183:
2180:
2175:
2171:
2170:
2169:
2165:
2161:
2160:195.49.205.23
2156:
2155:
2154:
2151:
2147:
2143:
2139:
2135:
2131:
2127:
2123:
2122:195.49.205.23
2118:
2117:
2116:
2115:
2112:
2107:
2103:
2099:
2095:
2091:
2087:
2083:
2079:
2078:195.49.205.23
2075:
2074:
2073:
2070:
2066:
2062:
2059:
2058:
2057:
2056:
2052:
2048:
2047:195.49.205.23
2038:
2029:
2024:
2017:
2010:
2002:
1994:
1987:
1983:
1980:
1979:
1976:
1967:
1963:
1959:
1955:
1951:
1947:
1944:
1943:
1942:
1938:
1934:
1930:
1927:
1924:
1921:
1917:
1913:
1910:
1908:
1904:
1900:
1896:
1892:
1889:
1887:
1884:
1882:
1876:
1874:
1869:
1868:SportingFlyer
1865:
1860:
1857:
1853:
1850:
1845:
1841:
1840:
1839:
1835:
1831:
1826:
1823:
1821:
1818:
1813:
1809:
1806:
1802:
1798:
1794:
1790:
1786:
1782:
1779:
1777:
1774:
1770:
1769:
1768:
1764:
1760:
1756:
1752:
1748:
1745:
1744:
1743:
1742:
1738:
1734:
1730:
1726:
1717:
1708:
1703:
1696:
1689:
1681:
1673:
1666:
1662:
1659:
1658:
1655:
1648:
1643:
1642:
1638:
1634:
1625:
1622:
1619:
1615:
1612:
1607:
1604:
1600:
1596:
1592:
1591:
1590:
1589:
1587:
1584:
1582:
1579:
1577:
1571:
1569:
1564:
1563:SportingFlyer
1560:
1558:
1555:
1551:
1547:
1542:
1538:
1535:
1533:
1530:
1525:
1519:
1516:
1514:
1511:
1507:
1504:
1502:
1498:
1494:
1490:
1486:
1483:
1482:
1479:
1476:
1471:
1467:
1463:
1459:
1455:
1451:
1447:
1446:
1442:
1438:
1437:Jo-Jo Eumerus
1434:
1433:ex post facto
1430:
1426:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1420:
1416:
1415:
1408:
1404:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1384:
1380:
1376:
1372:
1368:
1363:
1361:
1355:
1345:
1336:
1331:
1324:
1317:
1309:
1301:
1294:
1290:
1287:
1286:
1283:
1276:
1269:
1262:
1257:
1254:
1248:
1243:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1229:
1225:
1223:
1219:
1215:
1214:
1211:Speedy closes
1208:
1201:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1186:
1181:
1179:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1159:
1155:
1145:
1143:
1137:
1125:
1123:
1119:
1115:
1110:
1108:
1104:
1095:
1092:
1089:
1086:
1083:
1080:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1069:
1066:
1063:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1044:
1041:
1037:
1033:
1030:
1027:
1023:
1020:
1017:
1014:
1013:
1012:
998:
993:
986:
982:
980:
973:
969:
968:
967:
964:
961:
957:
956:
953:
951:
943:
940:
936:
935:
930:
927:
921:
920:
919:
916:
913:
909:
908:
902:
884:
879:
872:
869:
865:
864:
860:
852:
848:
844:
837:
836:
825:
821:
817:
816:
815:
802:
798:
797:
794:
788:
787:
785:
776:
772:
769:
765:
762:
759:
755:
752:
749:
746:
742:
738:
734:
731:
728:to point out
727:
723:
720:an editor is
719:
715:
712:
708:
707:
706:
704:
696:
693:
690:
687:
683:
679:
676:
672:
668:
667:
666:
658:
657:WP:DRVPURPOSE
654:
653:
650:
639:
637:
633:
628:
626:
622:
618:
614:
603:
598:
596:
591:
589:
584:
583:
581:
580:
575:
572:
571:
570:
569:
566:
563:
562:
556:
553:
552:
551:
550:
547:
544:
543:
540:
537:
536:
533:
528:
527:
521:
518:
516:
513:
511:
508:
507:
506:
505:
502:
499:
498:
488:
483:
481:
476:
474:
469:
468:
466:
465:
460:
457:
451:
447:
444:
442:
439:
437:
434:
433:
431:
430:
429:
428:
423:
420:
416:
411:
408:
407:
406:
405:
402:
399:
398:
393:
390:
389:
388:
387:
384:
381:
380:
375:
372:
370:
367:
365:
362:
361:
360:
359:
356:
353:
352:
347:
344:
342:
339:
337:
334:
332:
329:
328:
327:
326:
323:
320:
319:
314:
311:
309:
306:
304:
301:
299:
296:
294:
291:
289:
286:
285:
284:
283:
280:
277:
276:
271:
268:
266:
263:
261:
258:
257:
256:
255:
252:
249:
248:
243:
240:
238:
235:
233:
230:
228:
225:
224:
223:
222:
219:
216:
215:
210:
207:
205:
202:
198:
193:
190:
188:
185:
184:
183:
182:
179:
176:
175:
169:
163:
158:
155:
153:
150:
149:
147:
142:
139:
137:
134:
133:
131:
130:
129:
128:
125:
122:
121:
109:
105:
104:
101:
96:
78:
76:(purge cache)
72:
70:
67:
65:
62:
60:
57:
56:
54:
50:
47:
43:
42:
37:
31:
27:
23:
19:
9180:Five pillars
9089:WP Democracy
9029:
8851:Adopt-a-user
8701:Bureaucrats'
8655:Open proxies
8613:Edit warring
8595:noticeboards
8452:Reward board
8388:Geographical
8365:WikiProjects
8183:Village pump
8146:In the media
8135:The Signpost
8133:
8101:
8093:
8091:
6732:
6727:
6725:
6687:
6662:
6631:
6622:
6613:
6604:
6597:the musician
6574:
6490:
6483:
6478:
6392:
6319:
6314:
6312:
6287:
6265:
6260:
6258:
6221:
6205:
6204:
6171:
6163:
6151:
6134:
6116:
6111:
6080:Keep deleted
6079:
6065:
6056:
6032:
5971:Trillionaire
5959:
5954:
5952:
5931:Trillionaire
5929:
5918:Trillionaire
5906:
5901:
5899:
5848:
5831:
5827:
5792:
5759:
5722:
5680:
5642:
5629:
5582:
5558:
5519:Jeraxmoirađ
5510:
5472:
5456:
5439:
5366:
5361:
5359:
5336:
5287:
5281:
5264:
5247:
5204:
5196:
5188:
5175:
5131:
5125:
5083:
5079:WP:SUPERVOTE
5074:
5056:
5051:
5030:
5026:
5014:â Preceding
4988:
4899:Koi Mil Gaya
4882:
4701:
4677:â Preceding
4649:
4465:
4446:
4434:Ohhhhhh, no!
4433:
4416:
4391:
4373:
4343:
4305:
4298:
4238:
4190:
4172:HalleyCA2015
4167:
4153:HalleyCA2015
4147:â Preceding
4141:
4105:
4064:Weak Endorse
4063:
4051:
4007:Dclemens1971
4003:Weak endorse
4002:
3963:
3917:
3916:
3900:
3889:
3877:
3868:sockpuppetry
3861:
3850:; suspected
3845:
3831:
3819:
3815:
3809:
3801:
3795:
3695:
3683:
3675:
3668:
3650:
3645:
3641:
3532:
3531:Please find
3500:
3496:
3454:
3450:
3408:
3396:
3393:
3377:
3360:
3341:
3322:
3295:
3279:
3278:
3243:
3242:
3191:
3187:
3159:
3072:
3067:
3065:
3008:
3004:
2936:â Preceding
2928:
2927:
2908:
2835:
2830:
2828:
2810:
2780:
2762:
2752:
2748:
2729:
2709:
2705:
2696:
2669:
2665:
2661:
2639:
2622:
2607:
2600:
2539:Etienne Uzac
2532:Etienne Uzac
2510:
2502:
2495:
2476:
2472:
2470:
2466:
2448:
2443:
2425:Dclemens1971
2359:
2339:Weak Endorse
2338:
2318:
2301:Dclemens1971
2296:
2283:
2271:Dclemens1971
2224:
2223:Overturn G4
2222:
2190:
2093:
2092:
2060:
2043:
1919:
1911:
1890:
1878:
1870:
1863:
1858:
1824:
1807:
1746:
1728:
1722:
1631:
1623:
1617:
1613:
1585:
1573:
1565:
1536:
1517:
1505:
1484:
1440:
1432:
1428:
1424:
1412:
1360:content fork
1357:
1350:
1255:
1252:
1238:
1234:
1227:
1205:
1185:no consensus
1184:
1182:
1173:
1165:
1157:
1151:
1136:TempUndelete
1131:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1111:
1102:
1099:
1073:
1067:
1061:
1053:
1049:
1045:
1031:
1021:
1015:
1009:
988:
984:
975:
971:
965:
959:
946:
944:
938:
922:
917:
911:
882:
873:
867:
813:
810:Instructions
781:
780:
740:
721:
702:
700:
677:incorrectly;
664:
636:instructions
629:
616:
612:
611:
564:
545:
529:
509:
157:Deletion log
151:
52:
9231:Wiki markup
9121:Departments
8958:discussions
8727:Enforcement
8650:Sockpuppets
8507:Task Center
8304:Peer review
8163:Wikipedians
6667:DRV Purpose
6462:Position(s)
6300:Mississippi
5469:WP:LISTCRIT
5284:per above.
4358:) has been
4320:) has been
4310:Deniss Alex
4249:Mississippi
4223:) has made
4182:) has been
4133:) has made
3352:Mississippi
3193:WP:CREATIVE
2740:Mississippi
2611:scope_creep
2496:Overturn G4
2467:Overturn G4
2444:Overturn G4
2330:Mississippi
2317:Time for a
2295:Changed to
2284:Overturn G4
1626:for review.
1594:five years.
1528:Mississippi
1518:Speedy moot
972:the same as
747:for these);
730:other pages
515:Move review
9269:Categories
9190:Guidelines
9168:Simplified
9099:Milestones
9035:Undeletion
9008:Miscellany
8998:Categories
8741:resolution
8512:Open tasks
8168:Statistics
6636:Geschichte
6428:1972-01-09
6399:Geschichte
6066:Sandstein
5760:SÂ Marshall
5723:SÂ Marshall
5681:SÂ Marshall
5678:accurate?â
5643:SÂ Marshall
5583:SÂ Marshall
5465:Jeraxmoira
5252:Eluchil404
5176:Ritchie333
5057:SÂ Marshall
5035:Ritchie333
4402:efforts. â
3972:WP:IKNOWIT
3802:discussion
3026:NSOFTWARE.
2666:four times
2404:the second
2267:Fortune.ge
1950:Eluchil404
1918:, so they
1899:Eluchil404
1062:vice versa
926:DRV notice
883:at the top
877:Click here
801:WP:DELREVD
725:required.)
392:candidates
355:Miscellany
279:Categories
141:Undeletion
9254:Templates
9202:Templates
9197:Shortcuts
9062:Elections
9003:Redirects
8988:Templates
8931:Education
8919:Whitelist
8914:Blacklist
8841:Help desk
8679:Usernames
8667:Oversight
8618:Vandalism
8608:Incidents
8568:New pages
8378:Directory
8348:Main Page
8203:Technical
8198:Proposals
8141:Goings-on
8103:Dashboard
6714:Alalch E.
6623:Sogn Avis
6614:Sydvesten
6561:Avaldsnes
6543:Haugesund
6517:Fyllingen
6504:Sandviken
6235:Alalch E.
6156:Alalch E.
6152:No action
6112:No action
6035:Elon Musk
5884:Alalch E.
5880:WP:MEDIUM
5853:Alalch E.
5801:Alalch E.
5269:SmokeyJoe
5127:consensus
4903:Alalch E.
4808:August 31
4404:SmokeyJoe
4360:canvassed
4348:Tophe1984
4331:Tophe1984
4322:canvassed
4184:canvassed
4056:Alalch E.
3981:Oaktree b
3976:inherited
3935:Hentheden
3903:Hentheden
3858:canvassed
3852:canvassed
3811:consensus
3619:SmokeyJoe
3596:SmokeyJoe
3582:SmokeyJoe
3568:SmokeyJoe
3542:Alalch E.
3537:WP:SIGCOV
3515:Alalch E.
3506:Alalch E.
3473:WP:NEXIST
3464:Alalch E.
3421:SmokeyJoe
3401:Alalch E.
3009:mentioned
2757:WP:QUORUM
2679:IBT Media
2378:Alalch E.
2288:Alalch E.
2247:WP:BEFORE
2242:WP:BEFORE
2238:Vedomosti
2230:Dr vulpes
2179:Alalch E.
2146:WP:SIGCOV
2102:WP:DEEPER
2069:Alalch E.
1958:Surtsicna
1849:Alalch E.
1817:Alalch E.
1793:Surtsicna
1773:Alalch E.
1733:Surtsicna
1554:Alalch E.
1541:WP:NOTDUP
1247:WP:DEEPER
1154:consensus
819:decision.
705:be used:
675:consensus
322:Redirects
36:WP:REVDEL
9249:Category
9185:Policies
9146:Glossary
9018:Proposed
8983:Articles
8956:Deletion
8836:Teahouse
8824:Category
8722:Requests
8684:Changing
8541:Category
8524:Category
8472:WikiLove
8457:Contests
8444:feedback
8324:Pictures
8282:Creation
8277:WP:AFC/C
8272:WP:AFC/R
8235:Contents
8220:Holidays
8188:Idea lab
6465:Defender
6434:(age 52)
5920:(closed)
5611:research
5559:grouping
5327:(closed)
5220:Headbomb
5217:merge.
4993:Headbomb
4895:Krrish 3
4847:Gotitbro
4824:opinion.
4802:Gotitbro
4785:Gotitbro
4761:Krrish 3
4757:Krrish 2
4753:Krrish 1
4733:Krrish 3
4691:contribs
4683:Gotitbro
4679:unsigned
4427:Doczilla
4417:Endorse.
4356:contribs
4318:contribs
4299:Overturn
4221:contribs
4191:Overturn
4180:contribs
4161:contribs
4149:unsigned
4142:Overturn
4131:contribs
4106:Overturn
3927:WP:NOCON
3918:Overturn
3890:username
3884:{{subst:
3878:username
3872:{{subst:
3862:username
3856:{{subst:
3846:username
3840:{{subst:
3615:WP:THREE
3497:prior to
3460:WP:THREE
3455:creative
3451:evidence
3417:WP:THREE
3319:Milliyet
2950:contribs
2938:unsigned
2710:re-write
2483:Jclemens
2187:WP:THREE
2174:WP:THREE
1830:Jclemens
1510:Reywas92
1429:belonged
1235:withdraw
1228:overturn
1174:endorsed
1158:undelete
1056:per the
1054:(action)
1046:Overturn
924:{{subst:
891:xfd_page
853:instead.
793:Shortcut
686:criteria
649:Shortcut
178:Articles
100:Shortcut
53:Skip to:
8885:Mergers
8672:Request
8635:Closure
8519:Backlog
8489:Thanks!
8408:Patrols
8239:grading
8153:Meetups
6744:Archive
6688:Comment
6655:Cryptic
6575:Comment
6530:Sogndal
6386:restore
6350:history
6135:Endorse
6026:restore
5990:history
5849:Endorse
5828:Endorse
5580:class.â
5511:Endorse
5457:Endorse
5433:restore
5397:history
5282:Endorse
5265:Endorse
5248:Endorse
5189:Endorse
5027:Endorse
5016:undated
4982:restore
4946:history
4702:Endorse
4643:restore
4607:history
4581:restore
4545:history
4500:Cryptic
4466:Comment
4400:WP:MEAT
4396:WP:CORP
4392:Endorse
4379:Enos733
4374:Endorse
4239:Comment
4052:Endorse
4042:Cryptic
3968:WP:SIRS
3964:Endorse
3854:users:
3777:restore
3741:history
3669:Endorse
3642:Endorse
3535:normal
3409:Endorse
3394:Endorse
3361:Endorse
3296:Endorse
3164:in the
3153:restore
3117:history
2963:Cryptic
2902:restore
2866:history
2847:Gasturb
2817:Cryptic
2812:Gasturb
2781:Endorse
2702:history
2697:Comment
2662:Endorse
2623:Comment
2594:restore
2558:history
2416:Cryptic
2319:new AfD
2225:to keep
2215:Cryptic
2196:Cryptic
2150:Cryptic
2142:BBC ref
2094:Endorse
2061:Comment
2037:restore
2001:history
1954:WP:NPOL
1916:WP:NPOL
1912:Endorse
1895:WP:NPOL
1891:Endorse
1825:Endorse
1751:notable
1747:Endorse
1716:restore
1680:history
1614:Endorse
1586:Comment
1506:Endorse
1485:Endorse
1425:Comment
1344:restore
1308:history
1239:endorse
1016:Endorse
899:article
642:Purpose
638:below.
632:Purpose
441:Process
374:closing
341:closing
308:working
298:closing
270:closing
242:holding
237:closing
204:closing
69:Archive
9136:Essays
9066:voting
9030:Review
9013:Speedy
8440:Awards
8353:Errors
8329:Topics
8193:Policy
8116:topics
6671:REFUND
6454:Height
6448:Norway
6444:Bergen
6186:Stifle
6164:Relist
6124:Anchor
6084:Stifle
6043:GTrang
5936:Daniel
5343:Daniel
5308:Daniel
5139:Anchor
5091:Anchor
4927:SureAI
4920:SureAI
4775:(also
4747:(also
4729:Krrish
4281:Daniel
4088:Daniel
3986:voorts
3949:Daniel
3658:Anchor
3236:WP:DRV
3188:Update
2770:Anchor
2706:relist
2640:Relist
2456:Anchor
2406:, and
2251:Forbes
1725:WP:GNG
1618:Delete
1405:, and
1178:closed
1166:relist
1114:Relist
1022:Relist
895:reason
450:Images
436:Policy
415:sorted
313:manual
303:speedy
197:sorted
108:WP:DRV
9244:Media
9226:Tools
9219:Today
9175:Rules
8993:Files
8978:Today
8971:Admin
8966:Guide
8897:Moves
8341:Pages
8319:Lists
7988:2006
7923:2007
7858:2008
7793:2009
7728:2010
7663:2011
7598:2012
7533:2013
7468:2014
7403:2015
7338:2016
7273:2017
7208:2018
7143:2019
7078:2020
7013:2021
6948:2022
6883:2023
6818:2024
6755:Year
6640:OwenĂ
6593:nb.no
6579:OwenĂ
6475:Years
6372:watch
6365:links
6184:Why?
6119:Frank
6099:OwenĂ
6012:watch
6005:links
5878:(see
5603:varna
5563:OwenĂ
5481:OwenĂ
5419:watch
5412:links
5152:OwenĂ
5134:Frank
5104:OwenĂ
5086:Frank
5039:OwenĂ
4968:watch
4961:links
4629:watch
4622:links
4567:watch
4560:links
4481:OwenĂ
4329:now.
4259:OwenĂ
3923:OwenX
3832:Note:
3763:watch
3756:links
3653:Frank
3301:OwenĂ
3139:watch
3132:links
3045:OwenĂ
3013:OwenĂ
2988:OwenĂ
2933:OwenĂ
2888:watch
2881:links
2765:Frank
2684:OwenĂ
2580:watch
2573:links
2451:Frank
2305:OwenĂ
2209:Note
2106:OwenĂ
2023:watch
2016:links
1702:watch
1695:links
1470:OwenĂ
1330:watch
1323:links
1028:); or
680:if a
446:Guide
364:today
331:today
288:today
260:today
251:Files
227:today
187:today
9214:Tips
9158:Help
9141:FAQs
9078:meta
9064:and
8926:Bots
8909:Spam
8708:and
8696:OTRS
8593:and
8442:and
8368:and
8287:Help
8237:and
8225:Bots
8129:News
7991:Jan
6778:May
6704:talk
6679:talk
6485:Apps
6479:Team
6403:talk
6358:logs
6342:edit
6335:talk
6295:Star
6190:talk
6143:talk
6088:talk
6047:talk
5998:logs
5982:edit
5975:talk
5940:talk
5866:talk
5840:talk
5815:talk
5749:talk
5716:and
5704:talk
5676:jÄti
5666:talk
5619:talk
5541:talk
5523:talk
5500:talk
5463:and
5461:Fram
5447:talk
5405:logs
5389:edit
5382:talk
5347:talk
5312:talk
5273:talk
5256:talk
4954:logs
4938:edit
4931:talk
4851:talk
4789:talk
4767:and
4759:and
4743:and
4731:and
4711:talk
4687:talk
4666:and
4658:and
4615:logs
4599:edit
4592:talk
4553:logs
4537:edit
4530:talk
4457:talk
4408:talk
4383:talk
4352:talk
4344:Note
4335:talk
4314:talk
4306:Note
4285:talk
4244:Star
4217:talk
4204:talk
4176:talk
4168:Note
4157:talk
4127:talk
4114:talk
4092:talk
4072:talk
4011:talk
3990:talk
3953:talk
3939:talk
3907:talk
3749:logs
3733:edit
3726:talk
3623:talk
3604:talk
3586:talk
3572:talk
3523:talk
3481:talk
3440:talk
3425:talk
3385:talk
3369:talk
3347:Star
3331:talk
3266:talk
3225:talk
3178:talk
3170:here
3162:Fram
3125:logs
3109:edit
3102:talk
2946:talk
2874:logs
2858:edit
2851:talk
2789:talk
2735:Star
2719:talk
2649:talk
2631:talk
2566:logs
2550:edit
2543:talk
2487:talk
2429:talk
2391:talk
2368:talk
2351:talk
2325:Star
2275:talk
2255:2020
2236:and
2164:talk
2126:talk
2082:talk
2051:talk
2009:logs
1993:edit
1986:talk
1962:talk
1937:talk
1903:talk
1834:talk
1797:talk
1763:talk
1737:talk
1729:Keep
1688:logs
1672:edit
1665:talk
1637:talk
1523:Star
1497:talk
1493:Fram
1316:logs
1300:edit
1293:talk
1032:List
887:page
847:PROD
422:BLPs
20:and
9023:BLP
8213:WMF
8045:Dec
8040:Nov
8035:Oct
8030:Sep
8025:Aug
8020:Jul
8015:Jun
8010:May
8005:Apr
8000:Mar
7995:Feb
7982:Dec
7977:Nov
7972:Oct
7967:Sep
7962:Aug
7957:Jul
7952:Jun
7947:May
7942:Apr
7937:Mar
7932:Feb
7927:Jan
7917:Dec
7912:Nov
7907:Oct
7902:Sep
7897:Aug
7892:Jul
7887:Jun
7882:May
7877:Apr
7872:Mar
7867:Feb
7862:Jan
7852:Dec
7847:Nov
7842:Oct
7837:Sep
7832:Aug
7827:Jul
7822:Jun
7817:May
7812:Apr
7807:Mar
7802:Feb
7797:Jan
7787:Dec
7782:Nov
7777:Oct
7772:Sep
7767:Aug
7762:Jul
7757:Jun
7752:May
7747:Apr
7742:Mar
7737:Feb
7732:Jan
7722:Dec
7717:Nov
7712:Oct
7707:Sep
7702:Aug
7697:Jul
7692:Jun
7687:May
7682:Apr
7677:Mar
7672:Feb
7667:Jan
7657:Dec
7652:Nov
7647:Oct
7642:Sep
7637:Aug
7632:Jul
7627:Jun
7622:May
7617:Apr
7612:Mar
7607:Feb
7602:Jan
7592:Dec
7587:Nov
7582:Oct
7577:Sep
7572:Aug
7567:Jul
7562:Jun
7557:May
7552:Apr
7547:Mar
7542:Feb
7537:Jan
7527:Dec
7522:Nov
7517:Oct
7512:Sep
7507:Aug
7502:Jul
7497:Jun
7492:May
7487:Apr
7482:Mar
7477:Feb
7472:Jan
7462:Dec
7457:Nov
7452:Oct
7447:Sep
7442:Aug
7437:Jul
7432:Jun
7427:May
7422:Apr
7417:Mar
7412:Feb
7407:Jan
7397:Dec
7392:Nov
7387:Oct
7382:Sep
7377:Aug
7372:Jul
7367:Jun
7362:May
7357:Apr
7352:Mar
7347:Feb
7342:Jan
7332:Dec
7327:Nov
7322:Oct
7317:Sep
7312:Aug
7307:Jul
7302:Jun
7297:May
7292:Apr
7287:Mar
7282:Feb
7277:Jan
7267:Dec
7262:Nov
7257:Oct
7252:Sep
7247:Aug
7242:Jul
7237:Jun
7232:May
7227:Apr
7222:Mar
7217:Feb
7212:Jan
7202:Dec
7197:Nov
7192:Oct
7187:Sep
7182:Aug
7177:Jul
7172:Jun
7167:May
7162:Apr
7157:Mar
7152:Feb
7147:Jan
7137:Dec
7132:Nov
7127:Oct
7122:Sep
7117:Aug
7112:Jul
7107:Jun
7102:May
7097:Apr
7092:Mar
7087:Feb
7082:Jan
7072:Dec
7067:Nov
7062:Oct
7057:Sep
7052:Aug
7047:Jul
7042:Jun
7037:May
7032:Apr
7027:Mar
7022:Feb
7017:Jan
7007:Dec
7002:Nov
6997:Oct
6992:Sep
6987:Aug
6982:Jul
6977:Jun
6972:May
6967:Apr
6962:Mar
6957:Feb
6952:Jan
6942:Dec
6937:Nov
6932:Oct
6927:Sep
6922:Aug
6917:Jul
6912:Jun
6907:May
6902:Apr
6897:Mar
6892:Feb
6887:Jan
6877:Dec
6872:Nov
6867:Oct
6862:Sep
6857:Aug
6852:Jul
6847:Jun
6842:May
6837:Apr
6832:Mar
6827:Feb
6822:Jan
6812:Dec
6807:Nov
6802:Oct
6797:Sep
6792:Aug
6787:Jul
6782:Jun
6774:Apr
6769:Mar
6764:Feb
6759:Jan
6493:Gls
6377:XfD
6375:) (
6017:XfD
6015:) (
5607:see
5424:XfD
5422:) (
4973:XfD
4971:) (
4863:Jay
4827:Jay
4634:XfD
4632:) (
4572:XfD
4570:) (
3886:csp
3882:or
3874:csm
3842:spa
3816:not
3768:XfD
3766:) (
3533:one
3411:.
3315:NBC
3257:Liz
3144:XfD
3142:) (
3031:YFB
2973:YFB
2916:YFB
2893:XfD
2891:) (
2708:or
2670:two
2585:XfD
2583:) (
2341:of
2234:BBC
2213:. â
2191:was
2028:XfD
2026:) (
1920:are
1864:was
1707:XfD
1705:) (
1452:or
1441:was
1373:).
1369:. (
1335:XfD
1333:) (
1050:and
722:not
703:not
617:DRV
410:all
369:all
346:log
336:all
293:all
265:all
232:all
209:log
192:all
9271::
6706:)
6681:)
6599:.
6446:,
6430:)
6405:)
6224:đ
6209:iz
6192:)
6174:đ
6145:)
6090:)
6049:)
5942:)
5868:)
5842:)
5817:)
5751:)
5720:?â
5706:)
5668:)
5640:.â
5630:is
5621:)
5553:.
5543:)
5525:)
5502:)
5449:)
5349:)
5314:)
5290:đ
5275:)
5258:)
5234:¡
5230:¡
5226:¡
5007:¡
5003:¡
4999:¡
4901:.â
4885:.
4868:đŹ
4853:)
4832:đŹ
4791:)
4771:.
4755:,
4739:,
4727:,
4713:)
4693:)
4689:â˘
4459:)
4410:)
4385:)
4354:â˘
4342:â
4337:)
4316:â˘
4304:â
4287:)
4219:â˘
4211:â
4206:)
4178:â˘
4166:â
4163:)
4159:â˘
4129:â˘
4121:â
4116:)
4094:)
4074:)
4013:)
3996:)
3955:)
3941:)
3909:)
3892:}}
3880:}}
3870::
3864:}}
3848:}}
3838::
3625:)
3617:.
3606:)
3588:)
3574:)
3566:-
3525:)
3483:)
3442:)
3427:)
3387:)
3371:)
3333:)
3283:iz
3268:)
3247:iz
3227:)
3217:,
3214:,
3211:,
3208:,
3205:,
3202:,
3199:,
3180:)
2952:)
2948:â˘
2791:)
2721:)
2651:)
2633:)
2489:)
2431:)
2402:,
2393:)
2370:)
2353:)
2343:G4
2277:)
2166:)
2128:)
2084:)
2053:)
1964:)
1948:,
1939:)
1928:,
1925:,
1905:)
1836:)
1799:)
1791:.
1765:)
1739:)
1639:)
1499:)
1411:â
1401:,
1397:,
1393:,
1389:,
1385:,
1381:,
1138:}}
1134:{{
960:4.
939:3.
912:2.
868:1.
713:);
9080:)
9076:(
8106:.
8098:.
8075:e
8068:t
8061:v
6702:(
6677:(
6644:â
6583:â
6495:)
6491:(
6426:(
6401:(
6389:)
6381:|
6368:|
6362:|
6354:|
6346:|
6338:|
6333:(
6206:L
6188:(
6141:(
6103:â
6086:(
6045:(
6029:)
6021:|
6008:|
6002:|
5994:|
5986:|
5978:|
5973:(
5938:(
5864:(
5838:(
5813:(
5769:C
5767:/
5765:T
5747:(
5732:C
5730:/
5728:T
5702:(
5690:C
5688:/
5686:T
5664:(
5652:C
5650:/
5648:T
5617:(
5592:C
5590:/
5588:T
5567:â
5539:(
5521:(
5498:(
5485:â
5445:(
5436:)
5428:|
5415:|
5409:|
5401:|
5393:|
5385:|
5380:(
5345:(
5310:(
5303::
5299:@
5271:(
5254:(
5238:}
5236:b
5232:p
5228:c
5224:t
5222:{
5207:C
5203:¡
5199:T
5156:â
5108:â
5066:C
5064:/
5062:T
5043:â
5011:}
5009:b
5005:p
5001:c
4997:t
4995:{
4985:)
4977:|
4964:|
4958:|
4950:|
4942:|
4934:|
4929:(
4849:(
4804::
4800:@
4787:(
4709:(
4685:(
4646:)
4638:|
4625:|
4619:|
4611:|
4603:|
4595:|
4590:(
4584:)
4576:|
4563:|
4557:|
4549:|
4541:|
4533:|
4528:(
4485:â
4455:(
4406:(
4381:(
4350:(
4333:(
4312:(
4283:(
4263:â
4215:(
4202:(
4198:.
4174:(
4155:(
4125:(
4112:(
4090:(
4070:(
4038:6
4034:5
4030:4
4027:3
4024:2
4021:1
4009:(
3992:/
3988:(
3951:(
3937:(
3905:(
3894:.
3888:|
3876:|
3860:|
3844:|
3780:)
3772:|
3759:|
3753:|
3745:|
3737:|
3729:|
3724:(
3686:C
3682:¡
3678:T
3621:(
3602:(
3594:@
3584:(
3570:(
3540:â
3521:(
3513:@
3479:(
3438:(
3423:(
3383:(
3367:(
3329:(
3305:â
3280:L
3264:(
3255:@
3244:L
3223:(
3176:(
3156:)
3148:|
3135:|
3129:|
3121:|
3113:|
3105:|
3100:(
3049:â
3035:Âż
3017:â
2992:â
2977:Âż
2961:â
2944:(
2920:Âż
2905:)
2897:|
2884:|
2878:|
2870:|
2862:|
2854:|
2849:(
2787:(
2717:(
2688:â
2647:(
2629:(
2597:)
2589:|
2576:|
2570:|
2562:|
2554:|
2546:|
2541:(
2513:C
2509:¡
2505:T
2485:(
2427:(
2389:(
2366:(
2349:(
2309:â
2273:(
2177:â
2162:(
2140:(
2124:(
2110:â
2080:(
2049:(
2040:)
2032:|
2019:|
2013:|
2005:|
1997:|
1989:|
1984:(
1960:(
1935:(
1931:.
1901:(
1881:C
1877:¡
1873:T
1832:(
1795:(
1761:(
1735:(
1719:)
1711:|
1698:|
1692:|
1684:|
1676:|
1668:|
1663:(
1635:(
1576:C
1572:¡
1568:T
1495:(
1474:â
1362:"
1358:"
1347:)
1339:|
1326:|
1320:|
1312:|
1304:|
1296:|
1291:(
615:(
601:e
594:t
587:v
486:e
479:t
472:v
452:)
448:(
417:)
413:(
199:)
195:(
38:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
